Rules of Practice for Hearings, 58031-58032 [E8-23527]

Download as PDF mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations (C) Nothing within this paragraph (f) constitutes a waiver of inadmissibility under section 209 of the Act or 8 CFR part 209. (3) Nonimmigrant visa. A nonimmigrant visa issued to the applicant for purposes of temporary admission under section 212(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Act and this paragraph (f) may not be valid for more than 12 months or for more than two applications for admission during the 12-month period. The authorized period of stay will be for 30 calendar days calculated from the initial admission under this visa. (4) Application at U.S. port. If otherwise admissible, a holder of the nonimmigrant visa issued under section 212(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Act and this paragraph (f) is authorized to apply for admission at a United States port of entry at any time during the period of validity of the visa in only the B–1 (business visitor) or B–2 (visitor for pleasure) nonimmigrant categories. (5) Admission limited; satisfactory departure. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, no single period of admission under section 212(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Act and this paragraph (f) may be authorized for more than 30 days; if an emergency prevents a nonimmigrant alien admitted under this paragraph (f) from departing from the United States within his or her period of authorized stay, the director (or other appropriate official) having jurisdiction over the place of the alien’s temporary stay may, in his or her discretion, grant an additional period (or periods) of satisfactory departure, each such period not to exceed 30 days. If departure is accomplished during that period, the alien is to be regarded as having satisfactorily accomplished the visit without overstaying the allotted time. (6) Failure to comply. No authorization under section 212(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Act and this paragraph (f) may be provided to any alien who has previously failed to comply with any condition of an admission authorized under this paragraph. (7) Additional limitations. The Secretary of Homeland Security or the Secretary of State may require additional evidence or impose additional conditions on granting authorization for temporary admissions under this paragraph (f) as international (or other relevant) conditions may indicate. (8) Option for case-by-case determination. If the applicant does not meet the criteria under this paragraph (f), or does not wish to agree to the conditions for the streamlined 30-day VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:30 Oct 03, 2008 Jkt 217001 visa under this paragraph (f), the applicant may elect to utilize the process described in either paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, as applicable. Michael Chertoff, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–23287 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–14–P FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 12 CFR Part 263 [Docket No. R–1333] Rules of Practice for Hearings Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Board) is amending its rules of practice and procedure to adjust the maximum amount, as set by statute, of each civil money penalty (CMP) within its jurisdiction to account for inflation. This action is required under the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996. DATES: Effective Date: October 12, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine H. Wheatley, Associate General Counsel (202/452–3779), or Jodi C. Remer, Senior Counsel (202/452– 6403), Legal Division, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551. For users of Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact 202/263–4869. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note (FCPIA Act), requires each Federal agency to adjust each CMP within its jurisdiction by a prescribed cost-of-living adjustment at least once every four years. This cost-ofliving adjustment is based on the formula described in section 5(b) of the FCPIA Act. The Board made its last adjustment in October 2004 (see 69 FR 56929). The required cost-of-living adjustment formula is based on the difference between the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for June of the year preceding the adjustment (in this case, June 2007) and the CPI for June of the year when the CMP was last set or adjusted. To calculate the adjustment, the Board used the Department of Labor, Bureau of PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 58031 Labor Statistics—All Urban Consumers tables, in which the period 1982–84 was equal to 100, to get the CPI values. The calculations performed for the 2008 adjustment consisted of four categories, depending on the year in which the penalty was last set or adjusted. For penalties that changed in 2004, the relevant CPIs were June 2007 (208.352) and June 2004 (189.7), resulting in a CPI increase of 9.8 percent. For penalties that were last changed in 2000, the relevant CPIs were June 2007 (208.352) and June 2000 (172.4), resulting in a CPI increase of 20.9 percent. For penalties that were last changed in 1996, the relevant CPIs were June 2007 (208.352) and June 1996 (156.7), resulting in a CPI increase of 33.0 percent. One penalty did not exist at the time of the last adjustment and became effective in December 2005. For that penalty, the relevant CPIs were June 2007 (208.352) and June 2005 (194.5), resulting in a CPI increase of 7.1 percent. Section 5 of the FCPIA Act provides that the adjustment amount must be rounded before adding it to the existing penalty amount. The rounding provision depends on the size of the penalty being adjusted. For example, if the penalty is greater than $100 but less than or equal to $1,000, the increase is rounded to the nearest $100; if it is greater than $1,000 but less than or equal to $10,000, the increase is rounded to the nearest $1,000. Because of this rounding rule, six penalty amounts are not changing at this time. For example, the penalty under 12 U.S.C. 3909(d) prior to the 2008 adjustment was $1,100. As this penalty was last changed in 1996, the 33 percent adjustment would be $363. Rounding that increase to the nearest $1,000 results in an increase of $0. The penalties that are not adjusted at this time because of this rounding formula will be subject to adjustment at the next adjustment cycle to take account of the entire period between the time of their last adjustment (1996, 2000, or 2004) and the next adjustment date. These unadjusted penalties include the inadvertently late or misleading reports under 12 U.S.C. 324; 12 U.S.C. 1832(c); Tier I penalty of 12 U.S.C. 1847(d), 3110(c); 12 U.S.C. 334, 374a, 1884; 12 U.S.C. 3909(d); and 42 U.S.C. 4012(a)(f)(5). In accordance with section 6 of the FCPIA Act, the increased penalties set forth in this amendment apply only to violations that occur after the date the increase takes effect. Public Law 104–134, title III, § 31001(s)(2), April 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–272 amended the FCPIA Act and E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM 06OCR1 58032 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations provided that ‘‘[t]he first adjustment of a civil monetary penalty * * * may not exceed 10 percent of such penalty.’’ Although there is one penalty for which an initial adjustment is being made, 12 U.S.C. 1820(k)(6)(A)(ii), due to the effect of the rounding rules, the calculated dollar amount increase in the penalty is the same as a 10 percent increase in this case. Public Comment Not Required This rule is not subject to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 requiring notice, public participation, and deferred effective date. The FCPIA Act provides Federal agencies with no discretion in the adjustment of CMPs to the rate of inflation, and it also requires that adjustments be made at least every four years. Moreover, this regulation is ministerial and technical. For these reasons, the Board finds good cause to determine that public notice and comment for this new regulation is unnecessary, impractical, and contrary to the public interest, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). These same reasons also provide the Board with good cause to adopt an effective date for this regulation that is less than 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register, pursuant to the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(d). Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act applies only to rules for which an agency publishes a general notice of proposed rulemaking pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b). See 5 U.S.C. 601(2). Because the Board has determined for good cause that the APA does not require public notice and comment on this final rule, we are not publishing a general notice of proposed rulemaking. Thus, the Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this final rule. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES Paperwork Reduction Act In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35; 5 CFR Part 1320 Appendix A.1), the Board reviewed the final rule under the authority delegated to the Board by the Office of Management and Budget. No collections of information pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act are contained in the final rule. List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 263 Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Crime, Equal Access to Justice, Lawyers, Penalties. Authority and Issuance For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board of Governors ■ VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:30 Oct 03, 2008 Jkt 217001 amends 12 CFR part 263 to read as follows: PART 263—RULES OF PRACTICE FOR HEARINGS 1. The authority citation for part 263 is revised to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 12 U.S.C. 248, 324, 504, 505, 1817(j), 1818, 1820(k), 1828(c), 1831o, 1831p–1, 1847(b), 1847(d), 1884(b), 1972(2)(F), 3105, 3107, 3108, 3907, 3909; 15 U.S.C. 21, 78o–4, 78o–5, 78u–2; and 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. 2. Section 263.65 is revised to read as follows: ■ § 263.65 Civil penalty inflation adjustments. (a) Inflation adjustments. In accordance with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note), the Board has set forth in paragraph (b) of this section adjusted maximum penalty amounts for each civil money penalty provided by law within its jurisdiction. The adjusted civil penalty amounts provided in paragraph (b) of this section replace only the amounts published in the statutes authorizing the assessment of penalties and the previously-adjusted amounts adopted as of October 12, 2004, October 12, 2000, and October 24, 1996. The authorizing statutes contain the complete provisions under which the Board may seek a civil money penalty. The increased penalty amounts apply only to violations occurring after the effective date of this rule. (b) Maximum civil money penalties. The maximum civil money penalties as set forth in the referenced statutory sections are as follows: (1) 12 U.S.C. 324: (i) Inadvertently late or misleading reports, inter alia—$2,200. (ii) Other late or misleading reports, inter alia—$32,000. (iii) Knowingly or recklessly false or misleading reports, inter alia— $1,375,000. (2) 12 U.S.C. 504, 505, 1817(j)(16), 1818(i)(2) and 1972(2)(F): (i) First tier—$7,500. (ii) Second tier—$37,500. (iii) Third tier—$1,375,000. (3) 12 U.S.C. 1820(k)(6)(A)(ii)— $275,000. (4) 12 U.S.C. 1832(c)—$1,100. (5) 12 U.S.C. 1847(b), 3110(a)— $37,500. (6) 12 U.S.C. 1847(d), 3110(c): (i) First tier—$2,200. (ii) Second tier—$32,000. (iii) Third tier—$1,375,000. (7) 12 U.S.C. 334, 374a, 1884—$110. (8) 12 U.S.C. 3909(d)—$1,100. (9) 15 U.S.C. 78u–2: PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 (i) 15 U.S.C. 78u–2(b)(1)—$7,500 for a natural person and $70,000 for any other person. (ii) 15 U.S.C. 78u–2(b)(2)—$70,000 for a natural person and $350,000 for any other person. (iii) 15 U.S.C. 78u–2(b)(3)—$140,000 for a natural person and $675,000 for any other person. (10) 42 U.S.C. 4012a(f)(5): (i) For each violation—$385. (ii) For the total amount of penalties assessed under 42 U.S.C 4012a(f)(5) against an institution or enterprise during any calendar year—$135,000. By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 1, 2008. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. E8–23527 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2006–24825; Directorate Identifier 2006–NE–17–AD; Amendment 39– 15623; AD 2008–16–05] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) Dart 528, 529, 532, 535, 542, and 552 Series Turboprop Engines; Correction Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule; correction. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting airworthiness directive (AD) 2008–16– 05. That AD applies to RRD Dart 528, 529, 532, 535, 542, and 552 Series turboprop engines. We published that AD in the Federal Register on July 31, 2008 (73 FR 44630). The superseded AD number in paragraph (b) in the regulatory section is incorrect. This document corrects that superseded AD number. In all other respects, the original document remains the same. DATES: Effective Date: Effective October 6, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Yang, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail: jason.yang@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238–7747; fax (781) 238–7199. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 31, 2008 (73 FR 44630), we published a final rule AD, FR Doc, E8–17423, in the Federal Register. That AD applies to E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM 06OCR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58031-58032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23527]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

12 CFR Part 263

[Docket No. R-1333]


Rules of Practice for Hearings

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the 
Board) is amending its rules of practice and procedure to adjust the 
maximum amount, as set by statute, of each civil money penalty (CMP) 
within its jurisdiction to account for inflation. This action is 
required under the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 
1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996.

DATES: Effective Date: October 12, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine H. Wheatley, Associate 
General Counsel (202/452-3779), or Jodi C. Remer, Senior Counsel (202/
452-6403), Legal Division, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551. For users of 
Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact 202/263-4869.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation 
Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement 
Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note (FCPIA Act), requires each Federal 
agency to adjust each CMP within its jurisdiction by a prescribed cost-
of-living adjustment at least once every four years. This cost-of-
living adjustment is based on the formula described in section 5(b) of 
the FCPIA Act. The Board made its last adjustment in October 2004 (see 
69 FR 56929).
    The required cost-of-living adjustment formula is based on the 
difference between the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for June of the year 
preceding the adjustment (in this case, June 2007) and the CPI for June 
of the year when the CMP was last set or adjusted. To calculate the 
adjustment, the Board used the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor 
Statistics--All Urban Consumers tables, in which the period 1982-84 was 
equal to 100, to get the CPI values.
    The calculations performed for the 2008 adjustment consisted of 
four categories, depending on the year in which the penalty was last 
set or adjusted. For penalties that changed in 2004, the relevant CPIs 
were June 2007 (208.352) and June 2004 (189.7), resulting in a CPI 
increase of 9.8 percent. For penalties that were last changed in 2000, 
the relevant CPIs were June 2007 (208.352) and June 2000 (172.4), 
resulting in a CPI increase of 20.9 percent. For penalties that were 
last changed in 1996, the relevant CPIs were June 2007 (208.352) and 
June 1996 (156.7), resulting in a CPI increase of 33.0 percent. One 
penalty did not exist at the time of the last adjustment and became 
effective in December 2005. For that penalty, the relevant CPIs were 
June 2007 (208.352) and June 2005 (194.5), resulting in a CPI increase 
of 7.1 percent.
    Section 5 of the FCPIA Act provides that the adjustment amount must 
be rounded before adding it to the existing penalty amount. The 
rounding provision depends on the size of the penalty being adjusted. 
For example, if the penalty is greater than $100 but less than or equal 
to $1,000, the increase is rounded to the nearest $100; if it is 
greater than $1,000 but less than or equal to $10,000, the increase is 
rounded to the nearest $1,000. Because of this rounding rule, six 
penalty amounts are not changing at this time. For example, the penalty 
under 12 U.S.C. 3909(d) prior to the 2008 adjustment was $1,100. As 
this penalty was last changed in 1996, the 33 percent adjustment would 
be $363. Rounding that increase to the nearest $1,000 results in an 
increase of $0. The penalties that are not adjusted at this time 
because of this rounding formula will be subject to adjustment at the 
next adjustment cycle to take account of the entire period between the 
time of their last adjustment (1996, 2000, or 2004) and the next 
adjustment date. These unadjusted penalties include the inadvertently 
late or misleading reports under 12 U.S.C. 324; 12 U.S.C. 1832(c); Tier 
I penalty of 12 U.S.C. 1847(d), 3110(c); 12 U.S.C. 334, 374a, 1884; 12 
U.S.C. 3909(d); and 42 U.S.C. 4012(a)(f)(5).
    In accordance with section 6 of the FCPIA Act, the increased 
penalties set forth in this amendment apply only to violations that 
occur after the date the increase takes effect.
    Public Law 104-134, title III, Sec.  31001(s)(2), April 21, 1996, 
110 Stat. 1321-272 amended the FCPIA Act and

[[Page 58032]]

provided that ``[t]he first adjustment of a civil monetary penalty * * 
* may not exceed 10 percent of such penalty.'' Although there is one 
penalty for which an initial adjustment is being made, 12 U.S.C. 
1820(k)(6)(A)(ii), due to the effect of the rounding rules, the 
calculated dollar amount increase in the penalty is the same as a 10 
percent increase in this case.

Public Comment Not Required

    This rule is not subject to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 
requiring notice, public participation, and deferred effective date. 
The FCPIA Act provides Federal agencies with no discretion in the 
adjustment of CMPs to the rate of inflation, and it also requires that 
adjustments be made at least every four years. Moreover, this 
regulation is ministerial and technical. For these reasons, the Board 
finds good cause to determine that public notice and comment for this 
new regulation is unnecessary, impractical, and contrary to the public 
interest, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 
553(b)(3)(B). These same reasons also provide the Board with good cause 
to adopt an effective date for this regulation that is less than 30 
days after the date of publication in the Federal Register, pursuant to 
the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(d).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act applies only to rules for which an 
agency publishes a general notice of proposed rulemaking pursuant to 5 
U.S.C. 553(b). See 5 U.S.C. 601(2). Because the Board has determined 
for good cause that the APA does not require public notice and comment 
on this final rule, we are not publishing a general notice of proposed 
rulemaking. Thus, the Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this 
final rule.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
Ch. 35; 5 CFR Part 1320 Appendix A.1), the Board reviewed the final 
rule under the authority delegated to the Board by the Office of 
Management and Budget. No collections of information pursuant to the 
Paperwork Reduction Act are contained in the final rule.

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 263

    Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Crime, Equal Access 
to Justice, Lawyers, Penalties.

Authority and Issuance

0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board of Governors 
amends 12 CFR part 263 to read as follows:

PART 263--RULES OF PRACTICE FOR HEARINGS

0
1. The authority citation for part 263 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 12 U.S.C. 248, 324, 504, 505, 1817(j), 
1818, 1820(k), 1828(c), 1831o, 1831p-1, 1847(b), 1847(d), 1884(b), 
1972(2)(F), 3105, 3107, 3108, 3907, 3909; 15 U.S.C. 21, 78o-4, 78o-
5, 78u-2; and 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.

0
2. Section 263.65 is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  263.65  Civil penalty inflation adjustments.

    (a) Inflation adjustments. In accordance with the Federal Civil 
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note), the 
Board has set forth in paragraph (b) of this section adjusted maximum 
penalty amounts for each civil money penalty provided by law within its 
jurisdiction. The adjusted civil penalty amounts provided in paragraph 
(b) of this section replace only the amounts published in the statutes 
authorizing the assessment of penalties and the previously-adjusted 
amounts adopted as of October 12, 2004, October 12, 2000, and October 
24, 1996. The authorizing statutes contain the complete provisions 
under which the Board may seek a civil money penalty. The increased 
penalty amounts apply only to violations occurring after the effective 
date of this rule.
    (b) Maximum civil money penalties. The maximum civil money 
penalties as set forth in the referenced statutory sections are as 
follows:
    (1) 12 U.S.C. 324:
    (i) Inadvertently late or misleading reports, inter alia--$2,200.
    (ii) Other late or misleading reports, inter alia--$32,000.
    (iii) Knowingly or recklessly false or misleading reports, inter 
alia--$1,375,000.
    (2) 12 U.S.C. 504, 505, 1817(j)(16), 1818(i)(2) and 1972(2)(F):
    (i) First tier--$7,500.
    (ii) Second tier--$37,500.
    (iii) Third tier--$1,375,000.
    (3) 12 U.S.C. 1820(k)(6)(A)(ii)--$275,000.
    (4) 12 U.S.C. 1832(c)--$1,100.
    (5) 12 U.S.C. 1847(b), 3110(a)--$37,500.
    (6) 12 U.S.C. 1847(d), 3110(c):
    (i) First tier--$2,200.
    (ii) Second tier--$32,000.
    (iii) Third tier--$1,375,000.
    (7) 12 U.S.C. 334, 374a, 1884--$110.
    (8) 12 U.S.C. 3909(d)--$1,100.
    (9) 15 U.S.C. 78u-2:
    (i) 15 U.S.C. 78u-2(b)(1)--$7,500 for a natural person and $70,000 
for any other person.
    (ii) 15 U.S.C. 78u-2(b)(2)--$70,000 for a natural person and 
$350,000 for any other person.
    (iii) 15 U.S.C. 78u-2(b)(3)--$140,000 for a natural person and 
$675,000 for any other person.
    (10) 42 U.S.C. 4012a(f)(5):
    (i) For each violation--$385.
    (ii) For the total amount of penalties assessed under 42 U.S.C 
4012a(f)(5) against an institution or enterprise during any calendar 
year--$135,000.

    By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, October 1, 2008.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
 [FR Doc. E8-23527 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.