Rules of Practice for Hearings, 58031-58032 [E8-23527]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(C) Nothing within this paragraph (f)
constitutes a waiver of inadmissibility
under section 209 of the Act or 8 CFR
part 209.
(3) Nonimmigrant visa. A
nonimmigrant visa issued to the
applicant for purposes of temporary
admission under section 212(d)(3)(A)(i)
of the Act and this paragraph (f) may not
be valid for more than 12 months or for
more than two applications for
admission during the 12-month period.
The authorized period of stay will be for
30 calendar days calculated from the
initial admission under this visa.
(4) Application at U.S. port. If
otherwise admissible, a holder of the
nonimmigrant visa issued under section
212(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Act and this
paragraph (f) is authorized to apply for
admission at a United States port of
entry at any time during the period of
validity of the visa in only the B–1
(business visitor) or B–2 (visitor for
pleasure) nonimmigrant categories.
(5) Admission limited; satisfactory
departure. Notwithstanding any other
provision of this chapter, no single
period of admission under section
212(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Act and this
paragraph (f) may be authorized for
more than 30 days; if an emergency
prevents a nonimmigrant alien admitted
under this paragraph (f) from departing
from the United States within his or her
period of authorized stay, the director
(or other appropriate official) having
jurisdiction over the place of the alien’s
temporary stay may, in his or her
discretion, grant an additional period
(or periods) of satisfactory departure,
each such period not to exceed 30 days.
If departure is accomplished during that
period, the alien is to be regarded as
having satisfactorily accomplished the
visit without overstaying the allotted
time.
(6) Failure to comply. No
authorization under section
212(d)(3)(A)(i) of the Act and this
paragraph (f) may be provided to any
alien who has previously failed to
comply with any condition of an
admission authorized under this
paragraph.
(7) Additional limitations. The
Secretary of Homeland Security or the
Secretary of State may require
additional evidence or impose
additional conditions on granting
authorization for temporary admissions
under this paragraph (f) as international
(or other relevant) conditions may
indicate.
(8) Option for case-by-case
determination. If the applicant does not
meet the criteria under this paragraph
(f), or does not wish to agree to the
conditions for the streamlined 30-day
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Oct 03, 2008
Jkt 217001
visa under this paragraph (f), the
applicant may elect to utilize the
process described in either paragraph (a)
or (b) of this section, as applicable.
Michael Chertoff,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–23287 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 263
[Docket No. R–1333]
Rules of Practice for Hearings
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (the Board) is
amending its rules of practice and
procedure to adjust the maximum
amount, as set by statute, of each civil
money penalty (CMP) within its
jurisdiction to account for inflation.
This action is required under the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by
the Debt Collection Improvement Act of
1996.
DATES: Effective Date: October 12, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine H. Wheatley, Associate
General Counsel (202/452–3779), or Jodi
C. Remer, Senior Counsel (202/452–
6403), Legal Division, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, 20th and C Streets, NW.,
Washington, DC 20551. For users of
Telecommunication Device for the Deaf
(TDD) only, contact 202/263–4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by
the Debt Collection Improvement Act of
1996, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note (FCPIA Act),
requires each Federal agency to adjust
each CMP within its jurisdiction by a
prescribed cost-of-living adjustment at
least once every four years. This cost-ofliving adjustment is based on the
formula described in section 5(b) of the
FCPIA Act. The Board made its last
adjustment in October 2004 (see 69 FR
56929).
The required cost-of-living adjustment
formula is based on the difference
between the Consumer Price Index (CPI)
for June of the year preceding the
adjustment (in this case, June 2007) and
the CPI for June of the year when the
CMP was last set or adjusted. To
calculate the adjustment, the Board used
the Department of Labor, Bureau of
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58031
Labor Statistics—All Urban Consumers
tables, in which the period 1982–84 was
equal to 100, to get the CPI values.
The calculations performed for the
2008 adjustment consisted of four
categories, depending on the year in
which the penalty was last set or
adjusted. For penalties that changed in
2004, the relevant CPIs were June 2007
(208.352) and June 2004 (189.7),
resulting in a CPI increase of 9.8
percent. For penalties that were last
changed in 2000, the relevant CPIs were
June 2007 (208.352) and June 2000
(172.4), resulting in a CPI increase of
20.9 percent. For penalties that were last
changed in 1996, the relevant CPIs were
June 2007 (208.352) and June 1996
(156.7), resulting in a CPI increase of
33.0 percent. One penalty did not exist
at the time of the last adjustment and
became effective in December 2005. For
that penalty, the relevant CPIs were June
2007 (208.352) and June 2005 (194.5),
resulting in a CPI increase of 7.1
percent.
Section 5 of the FCPIA Act provides
that the adjustment amount must be
rounded before adding it to the existing
penalty amount. The rounding
provision depends on the size of the
penalty being adjusted. For example, if
the penalty is greater than $100 but less
than or equal to $1,000, the increase is
rounded to the nearest $100; if it is
greater than $1,000 but less than or
equal to $10,000, the increase is
rounded to the nearest $1,000. Because
of this rounding rule, six penalty
amounts are not changing at this time.
For example, the penalty under 12
U.S.C. 3909(d) prior to the 2008
adjustment was $1,100. As this penalty
was last changed in 1996, the 33 percent
adjustment would be $363. Rounding
that increase to the nearest $1,000
results in an increase of $0. The
penalties that are not adjusted at this
time because of this rounding formula
will be subject to adjustment at the next
adjustment cycle to take account of the
entire period between the time of their
last adjustment (1996, 2000, or 2004)
and the next adjustment date. These
unadjusted penalties include the
inadvertently late or misleading reports
under 12 U.S.C. 324; 12 U.S.C. 1832(c);
Tier I penalty of 12 U.S.C. 1847(d),
3110(c); 12 U.S.C. 334, 374a, 1884; 12
U.S.C. 3909(d); and 42 U.S.C.
4012(a)(f)(5).
In accordance with section 6 of the
FCPIA Act, the increased penalties set
forth in this amendment apply only to
violations that occur after the date the
increase takes effect.
Public Law 104–134, title III,
§ 31001(s)(2), April 21, 1996, 110 Stat.
1321–272 amended the FCPIA Act and
E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM
06OCR1
58032
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
provided that ‘‘[t]he first adjustment of
a civil monetary penalty * * * may not
exceed 10 percent of such penalty.’’
Although there is one penalty for which
an initial adjustment is being made, 12
U.S.C. 1820(k)(6)(A)(ii), due to the effect
of the rounding rules, the calculated
dollar amount increase in the penalty is
the same as a 10 percent increase in this
case.
Public Comment Not Required
This rule is not subject to the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553 requiring
notice, public participation, and
deferred effective date. The FCPIA Act
provides Federal agencies with no
discretion in the adjustment of CMPs to
the rate of inflation, and it also requires
that adjustments be made at least every
four years. Moreover, this regulation is
ministerial and technical. For these
reasons, the Board finds good cause to
determine that public notice and
comment for this new regulation is
unnecessary, impractical, and contrary
to the public interest, pursuant to the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). These same reasons
also provide the Board with good cause
to adopt an effective date for this
regulation that is less than 30 days after
the date of publication in the Federal
Register, pursuant to the APA, 5 U.S.C.
553(d).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act applies
only to rules for which an agency
publishes a general notice of proposed
rulemaking pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
See 5 U.S.C. 601(2). Because the Board
has determined for good cause that the
APA does not require public notice and
comment on this final rule, we are not
publishing a general notice of proposed
rulemaking. Thus, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not apply to this
final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35;
5 CFR Part 1320 Appendix A.1), the
Board reviewed the final rule under the
authority delegated to the Board by the
Office of Management and Budget. No
collections of information pursuant to
the Paperwork Reduction Act are
contained in the final rule.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 263
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Crime, Equal Access
to Justice, Lawyers, Penalties.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Board of Governors
■
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:30 Oct 03, 2008
Jkt 217001
amends 12 CFR part 263 to read as
follows:
PART 263—RULES OF PRACTICE FOR
HEARINGS
1. The authority citation for part 263
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 12 U.S.C. 248,
324, 504, 505, 1817(j), 1818, 1820(k), 1828(c),
1831o, 1831p–1, 1847(b), 1847(d), 1884(b),
1972(2)(F), 3105, 3107, 3108, 3907, 3909; 15
U.S.C. 21, 78o–4, 78o–5, 78u–2; and 28
U.S.C. 2461 note.
2. Section 263.65 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 263.65 Civil penalty inflation
adjustments.
(a) Inflation adjustments. In
accordance with the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of
1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note), the Board
has set forth in paragraph (b) of this
section adjusted maximum penalty
amounts for each civil money penalty
provided by law within its jurisdiction.
The adjusted civil penalty amounts
provided in paragraph (b) of this section
replace only the amounts published in
the statutes authorizing the assessment
of penalties and the previously-adjusted
amounts adopted as of October 12, 2004,
October 12, 2000, and October 24, 1996.
The authorizing statutes contain the
complete provisions under which the
Board may seek a civil money penalty.
The increased penalty amounts apply
only to violations occurring after the
effective date of this rule.
(b) Maximum civil money penalties.
The maximum civil money penalties as
set forth in the referenced statutory
sections are as follows:
(1) 12 U.S.C. 324:
(i) Inadvertently late or misleading
reports, inter alia—$2,200.
(ii) Other late or misleading reports,
inter alia—$32,000.
(iii) Knowingly or recklessly false or
misleading reports, inter alia—
$1,375,000.
(2) 12 U.S.C. 504, 505, 1817(j)(16),
1818(i)(2) and 1972(2)(F):
(i) First tier—$7,500.
(ii) Second tier—$37,500.
(iii) Third tier—$1,375,000.
(3) 12 U.S.C. 1820(k)(6)(A)(ii)—
$275,000.
(4) 12 U.S.C. 1832(c)—$1,100.
(5) 12 U.S.C. 1847(b), 3110(a)—
$37,500.
(6) 12 U.S.C. 1847(d), 3110(c):
(i) First tier—$2,200.
(ii) Second tier—$32,000.
(iii) Third tier—$1,375,000.
(7) 12 U.S.C. 334, 374a, 1884—$110.
(8) 12 U.S.C. 3909(d)—$1,100.
(9) 15 U.S.C. 78u–2:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(i) 15 U.S.C. 78u–2(b)(1)—$7,500 for a
natural person and $70,000 for any
other person.
(ii) 15 U.S.C. 78u–2(b)(2)—$70,000 for
a natural person and $350,000 for any
other person.
(iii) 15 U.S.C. 78u–2(b)(3)—$140,000
for a natural person and $675,000 for
any other person.
(10) 42 U.S.C. 4012a(f)(5):
(i) For each violation—$385.
(ii) For the total amount of penalties
assessed under 42 U.S.C 4012a(f)(5)
against an institution or enterprise
during any calendar year—$135,000.
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, October 1, 2008.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8–23527 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–24825; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NE–17–AD; Amendment 39–
15623; AD 2008–16–05]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) Dart
528, 529, 532, 535, 542, and 552 Series
Turboprop Engines; Correction
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting
airworthiness directive (AD) 2008–16–
05. That AD applies to RRD Dart 528,
529, 532, 535, 542, and 552 Series
turboprop engines. We published that
AD in the Federal Register on July 31,
2008 (73 FR 44630). The superseded AD
number in paragraph (b) in the
regulatory section is incorrect. This
document corrects that superseded AD
number. In all other respects, the
original document remains the same.
DATES: Effective Date: Effective October
6, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Yang, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
e-mail: jason.yang@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7747; fax (781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July
31, 2008 (73 FR 44630), we published a
final rule AD, FR Doc, E8–17423, in the
Federal Register. That AD applies to
E:\FR\FM\06OCR1.SGM
06OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58031-58032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23527]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 263
[Docket No. R-1333]
Rules of Practice for Hearings
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
Board) is amending its rules of practice and procedure to adjust the
maximum amount, as set by statute, of each civil money penalty (CMP)
within its jurisdiction to account for inflation. This action is
required under the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of
1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996.
DATES: Effective Date: October 12, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine H. Wheatley, Associate
General Counsel (202/452-3779), or Jodi C. Remer, Senior Counsel (202/
452-6403), Legal Division, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, 20th and C Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551. For users of
Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD) only, contact 202/263-4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement
Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note (FCPIA Act), requires each Federal
agency to adjust each CMP within its jurisdiction by a prescribed cost-
of-living adjustment at least once every four years. This cost-of-
living adjustment is based on the formula described in section 5(b) of
the FCPIA Act. The Board made its last adjustment in October 2004 (see
69 FR 56929).
The required cost-of-living adjustment formula is based on the
difference between the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for June of the year
preceding the adjustment (in this case, June 2007) and the CPI for June
of the year when the CMP was last set or adjusted. To calculate the
adjustment, the Board used the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics--All Urban Consumers tables, in which the period 1982-84 was
equal to 100, to get the CPI values.
The calculations performed for the 2008 adjustment consisted of
four categories, depending on the year in which the penalty was last
set or adjusted. For penalties that changed in 2004, the relevant CPIs
were June 2007 (208.352) and June 2004 (189.7), resulting in a CPI
increase of 9.8 percent. For penalties that were last changed in 2000,
the relevant CPIs were June 2007 (208.352) and June 2000 (172.4),
resulting in a CPI increase of 20.9 percent. For penalties that were
last changed in 1996, the relevant CPIs were June 2007 (208.352) and
June 1996 (156.7), resulting in a CPI increase of 33.0 percent. One
penalty did not exist at the time of the last adjustment and became
effective in December 2005. For that penalty, the relevant CPIs were
June 2007 (208.352) and June 2005 (194.5), resulting in a CPI increase
of 7.1 percent.
Section 5 of the FCPIA Act provides that the adjustment amount must
be rounded before adding it to the existing penalty amount. The
rounding provision depends on the size of the penalty being adjusted.
For example, if the penalty is greater than $100 but less than or equal
to $1,000, the increase is rounded to the nearest $100; if it is
greater than $1,000 but less than or equal to $10,000, the increase is
rounded to the nearest $1,000. Because of this rounding rule, six
penalty amounts are not changing at this time. For example, the penalty
under 12 U.S.C. 3909(d) prior to the 2008 adjustment was $1,100. As
this penalty was last changed in 1996, the 33 percent adjustment would
be $363. Rounding that increase to the nearest $1,000 results in an
increase of $0. The penalties that are not adjusted at this time
because of this rounding formula will be subject to adjustment at the
next adjustment cycle to take account of the entire period between the
time of their last adjustment (1996, 2000, or 2004) and the next
adjustment date. These unadjusted penalties include the inadvertently
late or misleading reports under 12 U.S.C. 324; 12 U.S.C. 1832(c); Tier
I penalty of 12 U.S.C. 1847(d), 3110(c); 12 U.S.C. 334, 374a, 1884; 12
U.S.C. 3909(d); and 42 U.S.C. 4012(a)(f)(5).
In accordance with section 6 of the FCPIA Act, the increased
penalties set forth in this amendment apply only to violations that
occur after the date the increase takes effect.
Public Law 104-134, title III, Sec. 31001(s)(2), April 21, 1996,
110 Stat. 1321-272 amended the FCPIA Act and
[[Page 58032]]
provided that ``[t]he first adjustment of a civil monetary penalty * *
* may not exceed 10 percent of such penalty.'' Although there is one
penalty for which an initial adjustment is being made, 12 U.S.C.
1820(k)(6)(A)(ii), due to the effect of the rounding rules, the
calculated dollar amount increase in the penalty is the same as a 10
percent increase in this case.
Public Comment Not Required
This rule is not subject to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553
requiring notice, public participation, and deferred effective date.
The FCPIA Act provides Federal agencies with no discretion in the
adjustment of CMPs to the rate of inflation, and it also requires that
adjustments be made at least every four years. Moreover, this
regulation is ministerial and technical. For these reasons, the Board
finds good cause to determine that public notice and comment for this
new regulation is unnecessary, impractical, and contrary to the public
interest, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B). These same reasons also provide the Board with good cause
to adopt an effective date for this regulation that is less than 30
days after the date of publication in the Federal Register, pursuant to
the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act applies only to rules for which an
agency publishes a general notice of proposed rulemaking pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b). See 5 U.S.C. 601(2). Because the Board has determined
for good cause that the APA does not require public notice and comment
on this final rule, we are not publishing a general notice of proposed
rulemaking. Thus, the Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this
final rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Ch. 35; 5 CFR Part 1320 Appendix A.1), the Board reviewed the final
rule under the authority delegated to the Board by the Office of
Management and Budget. No collections of information pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act are contained in the final rule.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 263
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Crime, Equal Access
to Justice, Lawyers, Penalties.
Authority and Issuance
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board of Governors
amends 12 CFR part 263 to read as follows:
PART 263--RULES OF PRACTICE FOR HEARINGS
0
1. The authority citation for part 263 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504; 12 U.S.C. 248, 324, 504, 505, 1817(j),
1818, 1820(k), 1828(c), 1831o, 1831p-1, 1847(b), 1847(d), 1884(b),
1972(2)(F), 3105, 3107, 3108, 3907, 3909; 15 U.S.C. 21, 78o-4, 78o-
5, 78u-2; and 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
0
2. Section 263.65 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 263.65 Civil penalty inflation adjustments.
(a) Inflation adjustments. In accordance with the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note), the
Board has set forth in paragraph (b) of this section adjusted maximum
penalty amounts for each civil money penalty provided by law within its
jurisdiction. The adjusted civil penalty amounts provided in paragraph
(b) of this section replace only the amounts published in the statutes
authorizing the assessment of penalties and the previously-adjusted
amounts adopted as of October 12, 2004, October 12, 2000, and October
24, 1996. The authorizing statutes contain the complete provisions
under which the Board may seek a civil money penalty. The increased
penalty amounts apply only to violations occurring after the effective
date of this rule.
(b) Maximum civil money penalties. The maximum civil money
penalties as set forth in the referenced statutory sections are as
follows:
(1) 12 U.S.C. 324:
(i) Inadvertently late or misleading reports, inter alia--$2,200.
(ii) Other late or misleading reports, inter alia--$32,000.
(iii) Knowingly or recklessly false or misleading reports, inter
alia--$1,375,000.
(2) 12 U.S.C. 504, 505, 1817(j)(16), 1818(i)(2) and 1972(2)(F):
(i) First tier--$7,500.
(ii) Second tier--$37,500.
(iii) Third tier--$1,375,000.
(3) 12 U.S.C. 1820(k)(6)(A)(ii)--$275,000.
(4) 12 U.S.C. 1832(c)--$1,100.
(5) 12 U.S.C. 1847(b), 3110(a)--$37,500.
(6) 12 U.S.C. 1847(d), 3110(c):
(i) First tier--$2,200.
(ii) Second tier--$32,000.
(iii) Third tier--$1,375,000.
(7) 12 U.S.C. 334, 374a, 1884--$110.
(8) 12 U.S.C. 3909(d)--$1,100.
(9) 15 U.S.C. 78u-2:
(i) 15 U.S.C. 78u-2(b)(1)--$7,500 for a natural person and $70,000
for any other person.
(ii) 15 U.S.C. 78u-2(b)(2)--$70,000 for a natural person and
$350,000 for any other person.
(iii) 15 U.S.C. 78u-2(b)(3)--$140,000 for a natural person and
$675,000 for any other person.
(10) 42 U.S.C. 4012a(f)(5):
(i) For each violation--$385.
(ii) For the total amount of penalties assessed under 42 U.S.C
4012a(f)(5) against an institution or enterprise during any calendar
year--$135,000.
By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, October 1, 2008.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-23527 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P