Koyukuk/Nowitna National Wildlife Refuges, Galena, AK, 58259-58261 [E8-23526]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices
5. PHA scoring data produced by
Integrated Asset Subsystem (NASS)
provides the data to PIH–IMS.
6. HUD Central Accounting and
(HUDCAPS) data mart provides
financial management info to PIH,
Housing Inventory, Management
reports, and Module 50058.
7. Voucher management System
serves as the source of leased units for
voucher funded assistance to PIH–IMS.
8. PIH–IMS provides Form 50058 data
on a monthly basis for the Enterprise
Income Verification system (EIV) for the
purpose of computer matching.
9. PIH–IMS also shares census tract
data with the Geo coding Service Center
system.
10. PIH–IMS provides information for
performance reporting and data that
assists in the budget formulation for the
Capital Fund.
3. The IMS System maintains record
of each user’s logons, logoffs, and logoff
exceptions if any.
4. For each user, IMS system logs the
number requests for web pages
containing privacy data. The number of
page view requests are tracked per page
per session. The first and last timestamp
of access for every privacy page is also
recorded per session.
5. IMS system archives the user
privileges data when a user is removed
from the system or when the unmasked
privacy data viewing privileges are
modified.
6. Hard copy records are stored in
lock file cabinets in rooms to which
access is limited to those personnel who
service the records.
7. Background screening, limited
authorization and access with access
limited to authorize personnel.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
STORAGE:
Records are stored manually in family
case files in the PHAs and electronically
in office automation equipment.
Records are stored on HUD computer
servers for field office and public
housing agencies’ access via the Internet
to: (1) Obtain social security and
supplemental security income data that
are not subject to provisions of 26 U.S.C.
6103; and (2) update actions taken in
resolving income discrepancies.
Software in IMS precludes the transfer
of any data subject to 26 U.S.C. 6103 to
unencrypted media. All of the IMS data
is store on HUD’s Servers. The disk and
backup files are maintained by HUD’s
information technology partners—
Electronic Data Services (EDS) and
Lockheed Martin. The original (hard
copy) files are stored in the originating
PHA.
IRRETRIEVABILITY:
Records are retrieved by an
individual’s SSN.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
SAFEGUARDS:
These are the measures used to
protect the records from unauthorized
access or disclosure:
1. The REAC–IT Web Access Secure
SubSystem (WASS) provides audit
logging for all system access via WASS’s
authentication of all users. Audit
logging in WASS includes a keystroke
logger which covers every keystroke of
any user with in WASS.
2. WASS provides authentication
methods that meet NIST requirements.
Every user has a WASS ID and is
authenticated via WASS.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Oct 03, 2008
Jkt 217001
SYSTEM MANAGERS(S) AND ADDRESSES:
Gary Faeth, Acting IT Division
Director for Public and Indian Housing
Information Management, Potomac
Center, 550 Twelfth Street, SW., First
Floor, Washington, DC 20410,
Telephone Number, (202) 475–8730 or
Hitesh Doshi, IMS Information
Technology Manager, Potomac Center,
550 Twelfth Street, First Floor, SW.,
Washington, DC 20410, Telephone
Number, (202) 475–8940.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:
For information, assistance, or inquiry
about the existence of records, contact
the Privacy Act Officer at the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC. Written requests must
include the full name, Social Security
Number, date of birth, current address,
and telephone number of the individual
making the request.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
Procedures for the amendment or
correction of records and for applicants
wanting to appeal initial agency
determination appear in 24 CFR part 16.
If additional information is needed,
contact:
(i) In relation to contesting contents of
records, the Departmental Privacy Act
Officer at HUD, 451 Seventh Street,
SW., Room 2256, Washington, DC
20410; and
(ii) In relation to appeals of initial
denials, HUD, Departmental Privacy
Frm 00150
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Appeals Officer, Office of General
Counsel, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20410.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
IMS receives data from field office
staff, federal government agencies, state
and local agencies, private data sources,
owners and management agencies.
Public Housing Agencies (PHAs)
routinely collect personal and income
data from participants in and applicants
for HUD’s public and assisted housing
programs. The data collected by PHAs is
entered into IMS via the system itself by
VPN, via PHA-owned software, or via
HUD’s Family Reporting software (FRS)
EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE
ACT:
None.
[FR Doc. E8–23473 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
Electronic records are maintained and
destroyed according to the HUD Records
Disposition Schedule 2225.6. Records
are maintained for a period of three
years.
PO 00000
58259
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R7–2008–N0093]
Koyukuk/Nowitna National Wildlife
Refuges, Galena, AK
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the
Draft Revised Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Assessment for Koyukuk, Northern Unit
Innoko, and Nowitna National Wildlife
Refuges; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft revised
comprehensive conservation plan (Draft
CCP) and environmental assessment
(EA) for the Koyukuk, Northern Unit
Innoko, and Nowitna National Wildlife
Refuges (Refuge) is available for public
review and comment. In this Draft CCP
and EA we describe two alternatives,
including our preferred action, to
manage the Refuge for the next 15 years.
Also available for public review and
comment are draft compatibility
determinations.
Comments on the Draft CCP and
EA must be received on or before
December 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain
copies of the Draft CCP and EA by any
of the following methods. You may
request a paper copy, a summary, or a
CD–ROM containing both.
Agency Web Site: Download a copy of
the documents at https://alaska.fws.gov/
nwr/planning/plans.htm.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
58260
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices
E-mail: FW7_Koyukuk/
Nowitna_planning@fws.gov. Please
include ‘‘Revised CCP’’ in the subject
line of the message.
Mail: Robert Lambrecht, Planning
Team Leader, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, P.O. Box 287, Galena, Alaska
99741.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call
(907) 786–3357 to make an appointment
during regular business hours at the
USFWS Regional Office, 1011 E. Tudor
Road, Anchorage AK 99053 or call (907)
656–1231 to make an appointment
during business hours at the Koyukuk/
Nowitna Refuge in Galena, AK.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Robert Lambrecht at the address above
or (907) 656–1231; fax: (907) 656–1708;
or fw7_Koyukuk/
Nowitna_planning@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Koyukuk, Northern Unit
Innoko, and Nowitna National Wildlife
Refuges. We started this process through
a notice in the Federal Register (72 FR
57343; October 9, 2007).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Background
The ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 410hh et seq.,
43 U.S.C. 1602 et seq.) requires
development of a CCP for all national
wildlife refuges in Alaska. The Draft
CCP and EA for the Refuge was
developed consistent with Section
304(g) of ANILCA and the Refuge
Administration Act as amended by the
Refuge Improvement Act (16 U.S.C.
668dd et seq.). The purpose of
developing CCPs is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year management
strategy for achieving refuge purposes
and contributing to the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish,
wildlife, and habitat management and
conservation; legal mandates; and
Service policies. Plans define long-term
goals and objectives toward which
refuge management activities are
directed and identify which uses may be
compatible with the purposes of the
refuge. They identify wildlifedependent recreation opportunities
available to the public, including
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation
and photography, and environmental
education and interpretation.
Comprehensive conservation plans are
updated in accordance with planning
direction in Section 304(g) of ANILCA
and with NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Background: In 1980, ANILCA
designated the Koyukuk, Northern Unit
Innoko, and Nowitna National Wildlife
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Oct 03, 2008
Jkt 217001
Refuges. Refuge boundaries encompass
approximately 7.329 million acres of
which approximately 6.044 million
acres (82 percent) are under Service
jurisdiction. Section 302(3)(B) of
ANILCA states that the purposes for
which the Refuge was established
include: (i) To conserve fish and
wildlife populations and habitats in
their natural diversity; (ii) to fulfill
international treaty obligations of the
United States with respect to fish and
wildlife and their habitats; (iii) to
provide the opportunity for continued
subsistence use by local residents; and
(iv) to ensure water quality and
necessary water quantity within the
Refuge. CCPs and Environmental Impact
Statements were completed for the
Refuge in 1987 following direction in
Section 304(g) of ANILCA.
The ANILCA requires us to designate
areas according to their respective
resources and values and to specify
programs and uses within the areas
designated. To meet this requirement,
the Alaska Region established
management categories (Minimal,
Moderate, Intensive, Wilderness, and
Wild River). Appropriate activities,
public uses, commercial uses, and
facilities are identified for each
management category. Three
management categories (Minimal,
Wilderness, and Wild River) apply to
the Refuge.
The 1997 Refuge Improvement Act
includes additional direction for
conservation planning throughout the
National Wildlife Refuge System. This
direction has been incorporated into
national planning policy for the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
including refuges in Alaska. This draft
revision of the Koyukuk, Northern Unit
Innoko, and Nowitna CCP/EA meets the
requirements of both ANILCA and the
Refuge Administration Act as amended
by the Refuge Improvement Act.
Issues raised during scoping and
addressed in the Draft CCP/EA are (1)
Management of wildlife populations,
especially moose; (2) future off-refuge
mining, oil, and gas developments; (3)
contaminants and their effects on wild
foods and water quality; (4) the effects
of climate change; (5) maintaining the
wild character of the Refuge and
wilderness quality; (6) future public use;
(7) how the fire management program
can help villages address their
hazardous fuel accumulations; and (8)
the need for more outreach and better
communication with the public.
The Draft CCP and EA describe and
evaluate two alternatives for managing
the Refuge for the next 15 years. These
alternatives follow much of the same
general management direction.
PO 00000
Frm 00151
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Alternative A (the No-Action
Alternative) is required under NEPA
and describes continuation of current
management activities. Alternative A
serves as a baseline against which to
compare the other alternative. Under
Alternative A, management of the
Refuge would continue to follow
direction described in the 1987 CCPs
and records of decision as modified by
subsequent program-specific plans (e.g.,
fisheries, cultural resources, and fire
management plans). Currently 91
percent of the Refuge is in Minimal
management, 7 percent is designated
Wilderness, and 2 percent is in Wild
River management. Alternative A would
continue to protect and maintain the
existing wildlife values, natural
diversity, and ecological integrity of the
Refuge. Human disturbances to fish and
wildlife habitats and populations would
be minimal. Private and commercial
uses of the Refuge would not change,
and public uses employing existing
access methods would continue to be
allowed. Opportunities to pursue
traditional subsistence activities, and
recreational hunting, fishing, and other
wildlife dependent activities, would be
maintained. Opportunities to pursue
research would be maintained.
Alternative B (the Proposed Action)
would generally continue to follow
management direction described in the
1987 CCPs and records of decision as
modified by subsequent programspecific plans, but some of that
management direction has been updated
by changes in policy since the 1987
Koyukuk and Northern Unit Innoko and
Nowitna Refuge CCPs were approved.
Alternative B identifies these specific
changes in management direction as
well as goals and objectives for Refuge
management.
Public Meetings
We will continue to involve the
public through open houses, meetings
and comments. We will mail notices of
availability to our Refuge mailing list.
Public meetings will be held in the
following Refuge area communities:
Galena, Hughes, Huslia, Kaltag,
Koyukuk, Nulato, Ruby, and Tanana.
Details will be announced locally in
advance of each meeting.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your name, address,
phone number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
58261
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. We will make all comments from
individual persons part of the official
public record. We will handle requests
for such comments in accordance with
the Freedom of Information Act, NEPA,
and Departmental policies and
procedures.
Dated: September 29, 2008.
Gary Edwards,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
[FR Doc. E8–23526 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R6–ES–2008–N0187; 60120–1113–
0000; C4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 5-Year Reviews of Three
Wildlife Species and Eight Plant
Species in the Mountain-Prairie Region
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of review;
request for information on 11 species.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) initiate 5-year
reviews of three wildlife species and
eight plant species under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act) (see Table 1 under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ). We
request any new information on these
species that may have a bearing on their
classification as endangered or
threatened. Based on the results of these
5-year reviews, we will make
recommendations as to whether each of
these species is properly classified
under the Act.
DATES: To allow us adequate time to
conduct these reviews, we must receive
your information no later than
December 5, 2008. However, we will
continue to accept new information
about any listed species at any time.
ADDRESSES: For instructions on how to
submit information and review the
information that we receive on these
species, see ‘‘Public Solicitation of New
Information.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
species-specific information, contact the
appropriate person under ‘‘Public
Solicitation of New Information.’’
Individuals who are hearing impaired or
speech impaired may call the Federal
Relay Service at (800) 877–8337 for TTY
(telephone typewriter or teletypewriter)
assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Why Do We Conduct a 5-Year Review?
Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
we maintain the List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plant Species
(List) at 50 CFR 17.11 and 17.12. We
amend the List by publishing final rules
in the Federal Register. Section
4(c)(2)(A) of the Act requires that we
conduct a review of listed species at
least once every 5 years. Section
4(c)(2)(B) requires that we determine (1)
Whether a species no longer meets the
definition of threatened or endangered
and should be removed from the List
(delisted); (2) whether a species more
properly meets the definition of
threatened and should be reclassified
from endangered to threatened; or (3)
whether a species more properly meets
the definition of endangered and should
be reclassified from threatened to
endangered. Using the best scientific
and commercial data available, we
consider a species for delisting if the
data substantiate that the species is
neither endangered nor threatened for
one or more of the following reasons: (1)
The species is considered extinct; (2)
the species is considered to be
recovered; and/or (3) the original data
available when the species was listed, or
the interpretation of such data, were in
error (50 CFR 424.11(d)). Any change in
Federal classification requires a separate
rulemaking process. Therefore, we are
requesting submission of any new
information (best scientific and
commercial data) on these species that
is relevant to our review under section
4(c)(2)(A).
Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21
require that we publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing those
species currently under review. This
notice announces initiation of our active
review of the species in Table 1.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF LISTING INFORMATION
Scientific name
Status
Where listed
(current range)
Final listing rule
Chasmistes liorus ........................
Hesperia leonardus montana ......
Bufo hemiophrys baxteri .............
Endangered ...........
Threatened ............
Endangered ...........
Entire (UT) .............
Entire (CO) .............
Entire (WY) ............
51 FR 10851; 03/31/1986.
52 FR 36176; 09/25/1987.
49 FR 1992; 01/17/1984.
Schoenocrambe barnebyi ...........
Lepidium barnebyanum ...............
Penstemon haydenii ....................
Eriogonum pelinophilum ..............
Schoenocrambe argillacea ..........
Primula maguirei .........................
Phacelia formosula ......................
Schoenocrambe suffrutescens ....
Endangered ...........
Endangered ...........
Endangered ...........
Endangered ...........
Threatened ............
Threatened ............
Endangered ...........
Endangered ...........
Entire
Entire
Entire
Entire
Entire
Entire
Entire
Entire
57
55
52
49
57
50
47
52
Common name
ANIMALS
June sucker ............................
Pawnee montane skipper .......
Wyoming toad .........................
PLANTS
Barneby reed-mustard ............
Barneby ridge-cress ................
Blowout Penstemon ................
Clay-loving wild-buckwheat ....
Clay reed-mustard ..................
Maguire primrose ....................
North Park phacelia ................
Shrubby reed-mustard ............
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
What Information Do We Consider in
Our Review?
In our 5-year review, we consider all
new information available at the time of
the review. These reviews will generally
consider the best scientific and
commercial data that have become
available since the original listing
determination or most recent status
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Oct 03, 2008
Jkt 217001
review of each species, such as—(A)
Species biology, including but not
limited to population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics,
and genetics; (B) Habitat conditions,
including but not limited to amount,
distribution, and suitability; (C)
Conservation measures that have been
implemented to benefit the species; (D)
PO 00000
Frm 00152
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(UT) .............
(UT) .............
(NE, WY) .....
(CO) ............
(UT) .............
(UT) .............
(CO) ............
(UT) .............
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
1403; 01/14/1992.
39864; 09/28/1990.
32929; 09/01/1987.
28565; 07/13/1984.
1403; 01/14/1992.
33734; 08/21/1985.
38540; 09/01/1982.
37420; 10/06/1987.
Threat status and trends (see five factors
under heading ‘‘How do we determine
whether a species is endangered or
threatened?’’); and (E) Other new
information, data, or corrections,
including but not limited to taxonomic
or nomenclatural changes, identification
of erroneous information contained in
the List of Endangered and Threatened
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58259-58261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23526]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R7-2008-N0093]
Koyukuk/Nowitna National Wildlife Refuges, Galena, AK
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Draft Revised Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for Koyukuk, Northern
Unit Innoko, and Nowitna National Wildlife Refuges; request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft revised comprehensive conservation plan (Draft
CCP) and environmental assessment (EA) for the Koyukuk, Northern Unit
Innoko, and Nowitna National Wildlife Refuges (Refuge) is available for
public review and comment. In this Draft CCP and EA we describe two
alternatives, including our preferred action, to manage the Refuge for
the next 15 years. Also available for public review and comment are
draft compatibility determinations.
DATES: Comments on the Draft CCP and EA must be received on or before
December 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the Draft CCP and EA by any
of the following methods. You may request a paper copy, a summary, or a
CD-ROM containing both.
Agency Web Site: Download a copy of the documents at https://
alaska.fws.gov/nwr/planning/plans.htm.
[[Page 58260]]
E-mail: FW7--Koyukuk/Nowitna_planning@fws.gov. Please include
``Revised CCP'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Robert Lambrecht, Planning Team Leader, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 287, Galena, Alaska 99741.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call (907) 786-3357 to make an
appointment during regular business hours at the USFWS Regional Office,
1011 E. Tudor Road, Anchorage AK 99053 or call (907) 656-1231 to make
an appointment during business hours at the Koyukuk/Nowitna Refuge in
Galena, AK.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Robert Lambrecht at the address above
or (907) 656-1231; fax: (907) 656-1708; or fw7--Koyukuk/Nowitna_
planning@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Koyukuk, Northern
Unit Innoko, and Nowitna National Wildlife Refuges. We started this
process through a notice in the Federal Register (72 FR 57343; October
9, 2007).
Background
The ANILCA (16 U.S.C. 410hh et seq., 43 U.S.C. 1602 et seq.)
requires development of a CCP for all national wildlife refuges in
Alaska. The Draft CCP and EA for the Refuge was developed consistent
with Section 304(g) of ANILCA and the Refuge Administration Act as
amended by the Refuge Improvement Act (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.). The
purpose of developing CCPs is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year
management strategy for achieving refuge purposes and contributing to
the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with
sound principles of fish, wildlife, and habitat management and
conservation; legal mandates; and Service policies. Plans define long-
term goals and objectives toward which refuge management activities are
directed and identify which uses may be compatible with the purposes of
the refuge. They identify wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities
available to the public, including hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation and photography, and environmental education and
interpretation. Comprehensive conservation plans are updated in
accordance with planning direction in Section 304(g) of ANILCA and with
NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Background: In 1980, ANILCA designated the Koyukuk, Northern Unit
Innoko, and Nowitna National Wildlife Refuges. Refuge boundaries
encompass approximately 7.329 million acres of which approximately
6.044 million acres (82 percent) are under Service jurisdiction.
Section 302(3)(B) of ANILCA states that the purposes for which the
Refuge was established include: (i) To conserve fish and wildlife
populations and habitats in their natural diversity; (ii) to fulfill
international treaty obligations of the United States with respect to
fish and wildlife and their habitats; (iii) to provide the opportunity
for continued subsistence use by local residents; and (iv) to ensure
water quality and necessary water quantity within the Refuge. CCPs and
Environmental Impact Statements were completed for the Refuge in 1987
following direction in Section 304(g) of ANILCA.
The ANILCA requires us to designate areas according to their
respective resources and values and to specify programs and uses within
the areas designated. To meet this requirement, the Alaska Region
established management categories (Minimal, Moderate, Intensive,
Wilderness, and Wild River). Appropriate activities, public uses,
commercial uses, and facilities are identified for each management
category. Three management categories (Minimal, Wilderness, and Wild
River) apply to the Refuge.
The 1997 Refuge Improvement Act includes additional direction for
conservation planning throughout the National Wildlife Refuge System.
This direction has been incorporated into national planning policy for
the National Wildlife Refuge System, including refuges in Alaska. This
draft revision of the Koyukuk, Northern Unit Innoko, and Nowitna CCP/EA
meets the requirements of both ANILCA and the Refuge Administration Act
as amended by the Refuge Improvement Act.
Issues raised during scoping and addressed in the Draft CCP/EA are
(1) Management of wildlife populations, especially moose; (2) future
off-refuge mining, oil, and gas developments; (3) contaminants and
their effects on wild foods and water quality; (4) the effects of
climate change; (5) maintaining the wild character of the Refuge and
wilderness quality; (6) future public use; (7) how the fire management
program can help villages address their hazardous fuel accumulations;
and (8) the need for more outreach and better communication with the
public.
The Draft CCP and EA describe and evaluate two alternatives for
managing the Refuge for the next 15 years. These alternatives follow
much of the same general management direction. Alternative A (the No-
Action Alternative) is required under NEPA and describes continuation
of current management activities. Alternative A serves as a baseline
against which to compare the other alternative. Under Alternative A,
management of the Refuge would continue to follow direction described
in the 1987 CCPs and records of decision as modified by subsequent
program-specific plans (e.g., fisheries, cultural resources, and fire
management plans). Currently 91 percent of the Refuge is in Minimal
management, 7 percent is designated Wilderness, and 2 percent is in
Wild River management. Alternative A would continue to protect and
maintain the existing wildlife values, natural diversity, and
ecological integrity of the Refuge. Human disturbances to fish and
wildlife habitats and populations would be minimal. Private and
commercial uses of the Refuge would not change, and public uses
employing existing access methods would continue to be allowed.
Opportunities to pursue traditional subsistence activities, and
recreational hunting, fishing, and other wildlife dependent activities,
would be maintained. Opportunities to pursue research would be
maintained. Alternative B (the Proposed Action) would generally
continue to follow management direction described in the 1987 CCPs and
records of decision as modified by subsequent program-specific plans,
but some of that management direction has been updated by changes in
policy since the 1987 Koyukuk and Northern Unit Innoko and Nowitna
Refuge CCPs were approved. Alternative B identifies these specific
changes in management direction as well as goals and objectives for
Refuge management.
Public Meetings
We will continue to involve the public through open houses,
meetings and comments. We will mail notices of availability to our
Refuge mailing list. Public meetings will be held in the following
Refuge area communities: Galena, Hughes, Huslia, Kaltag, Koyukuk,
Nulato, Ruby, and Tanana. Details will be announced locally in advance
of each meeting.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your name, address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should
be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
[[Page 58261]]
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so. We will make all comments from individual persons part
of the official public record. We will handle requests for such
comments in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, NEPA, and
Departmental policies and procedures.
Dated: September 29, 2008.
Gary Edwards,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage,
Alaska.
[FR Doc. E8-23526 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P