Scientific Data Stewardship Project Office for 2009, 58129-58131 [E8-23516]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices
Mr.
Jim Seger, telephone: (503) 820–2280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These
public hearings are being held in
preparation for a Council final decision
on trawl rationalization scheduled for
its November 2008 meeting. The agenda
for the November 2008 Council meeting
will be published in a subsequent
Federal Register, prior to the actual
meeting. The analytical package
supporting the Council deliberations
(including a preliminary draft
environmental impact statement) is
available from the Council web site
(www.pcouncil.org) and on request from
the Council office.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Schedule for Public Hearings
Public hearings will be held to receive
comments on the draft Amendment 20
at the following dates, times and
locations:
SUMMARY: The Scientific Data
Stewardship (SDS) Project seeks to
support the development and
stewardship of Climate Data Records
(CDRs) for the atmosphere, cryosphere,
oceans, and land surface. The Project
follows the National Research Council’s
2004 distinction between Fundamental
and Thematic Climate Data Records,
and is initially focused on Fundamental
CDRs and lower complexity Thematic
CDRs. The SDS Project is managed by
NOAA, but is informed by other
government agencies such that its
results represent a government-wide
contribution to climate change
detection, assessment, understanding,
adaptation and/or mitigation.
DATES: Letters of Intent should be
received no later than 5 p.m. Eastern
Time, October 31, 2008. Full proposals
must be received no later than 5 p.m.
Eastern Time, December 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Applications are available
at https://www.grants.gov. If the
applicant does Internet it take several
weeks, involving multiple steps. In
order to allow sufficient time for this
process, applicants should register as
soon as possible, even if they are not yet
ready to submit their proposal. If an
applicant has problems downloading
the application package from
Grants.gov, contact Grants.gov Customer
Support at (800) 518–4726 or
support@grants.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SDSPO Grants Manager: Linda S.
Statler, NOAA Scientific Data
Stewardship Project Office, 151 Patton
Ave., Asheville, NC 28801; Phone: 828–
271–4657; E-mail: Linda.S.Statler-atnoaa.gov. SDSPO Project Manager: Jeff
Privette, NOAA Scientific Data
Stewardship Project Office, 151 Patton
Ave., Asheville, NC28801; Phone: 828–
271–4331; E-mail: Jeff.Privette-atnoaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of
its climate mandate, the National
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
October 27, 2008 (2 P.M):
•Best Western Agate Beach Inn, (2
sections of Ballroom TBD), 3019 N.
Coast Highway, Newport, OR,
telephone: (541) 265–9411.
October 28, 2008 (Olympia, 3 P.M.,
Eureka, 2 P.M.):
•Washington Dept. of Fish Wild,
Natural Resources Building, 1st Floor,
Room 172, 1111 Washington Street NE,
Olympia, WA 98504.
•Red Lion, Evergreen Ballroom, 1929
Fourth Street, Eureka, CA.
October 29, 2008 (3 P.M.):
•Holiday Inn Express, Riverview 1
and 2, 205 West Marine Drive, Astoria,
OR.
•University Inn and Conf Center,
Sierra Room, 611 Ocean Street, Santa
Cruz, CA.
These hearings are exclusively for the
purpose of receiving public comment on
draft Amendment 20 to the groundfish
FMP and the accompanying analytical
package. No formal actions will be taken
at the hearings.
Special Accommodations
The hearings are physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to Ms.
Carolyn Porter at (503) 820–2280
(voice), or (503) 820–2299 (fax) at least
5 days prior to the meeting date.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: October 1, 2008.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–23548 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Oct 03, 2008
Jkt 217001
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[Docket No. 0809181225–81227–01]
Scientific Data Stewardship Project
Office for 2009
National Environmental
Satellite Data and Information Service
Program Office (NESDISPO), National
Environmental Satellite Data and
Information Service (NESDIS), National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of funding availability.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58129
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) has a
responsibility to provide the Nation
with objective data and tools to help
characterize, understand, predict,
mitigate and coordinate its Climate Data
Record (CDR) activities with other
agencies through the U.S. adapt to
climate change and variability. To help
fulfill that responsibility, NOAA has
begun Climate Change Science Program
(CCSP). The National Research Council
defines a CDR as ‘‘a time series of
measurements of sufficient length,
consistency, and continuity to
determine climate variability and
change.’’ NOAA’s National Climatic
Data Center (NCDC) initiated the
Scientific Data Stewardship (SDS)
Project (hereafter referred to as the
Project) to lead the Agency’s CDR
activities and to coordinate with the
partner agencies. Given that early
algorithm development is supported
elsewhere, the Project is focused on the
generalization and application of mature
algorithms to multiple satellites and
sensors which together span climaterelevant time periods. It also supports
development of Climate Information
Records (CIRs), defined as time series
derived from CDRs and related longterm measurements that provide
specific information (e.g., drought area,
hurricane trends) about complex
environmental phenomena in a manner
useful to a variety of applications and
user communities. Together, the various
SDS products serve a wide range of
scientific, commercial, decision support
and policy-making needs. Various CDRs
have been developed in the past, most
notably through the NOAA–NASA
Pathfinder Program in the 1990s. NOAA
intends to leverage lessons from such
efforts into a more systematic,
comprehensive and sustained program.
To help achieve this, the Project plans
to execute its responsibilities in
partnership with the larger scientific
community through regular NOAA
Announcements of Opportunity as well
as through community reviews and
working groups. The Project represents
one of NOAA’s primary contributions to
the CCSP’s climate data goals.
Electronic Access: The full text of the
full funding opportunity announcement
for this program can be accessed via the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov. The announcement
will also be available by contacting the
program officials identified under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Applicants must comply with all
requirements contained in the full
funding opportunity announcement.
Statutory Authority: 49 U.S.C.
44720(b) and 33 U.S.C. 883d.
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
58130
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices
CFDA: 11.440, Environmental
Sciences, Applications, Data, and
Education.
Funding Availability: The total
anticipated federal funding in FY 2009
is $2.6M for new awards. The
anticipated number of new awards,
pending adequate proposals of merit, is
from 5 to 15. Please be advised that
actual funding levels will depend upon
the final FY 2009 budget appropriations.
Current plans assume that 100% of the
total resources provided through the
present FY 2009 SDS Announcement
will support extramural efforts that
include the broad academic, non-profit,
federal and commercial communities. In
FY 2007, the first year of SDS grants, the
Project made eight awards totaling
approximately $800K. In FY 2008, the
Project expanded total funding to nearly
$1,000K, which included funding for
three new starts. Past or current grantees
funded under this announcement are
eligible to apply for a new award, which
builds on previous activities or areas of
research not covered in the previous
award. Current grantees should not
request supplementary funding for
ongoing research through this
announcement. The exact amount of
funds that may be representatives.
Awards are to be up to three years in
length except where noted otherwise
awarded will be determined in preaward negotiations between the
applicant and NOAA by the Project.
Eligibility: Eligible applicants are
institutions of higher education; other
nonprofits; for profits; commercial
organizations; international
organizations; state, local and Indian
tribal governments; and Federal
agencies. Applications from non-Federal
and Federal applicants will be
competed against each other. Please
Note: Before non-NOAA Federal
applicants may be funded, they must
demonstrate that they have legal
authority to receive funds from another
Federal agency in excess of their
appropriation. The only exception to
this is governmental research facilities
for awards issued under the authority of
49 U.S.C. 44720(b). Because this
announcement is not proposing to
procure goods or services from
applicants, the Economy Act (31 U.S.C.
1535) is not an appropriate legal basis.
Cost Sharing Requirements: This
competition does not have Cost Sharing
requirements. However, applicants are
welcome to describe applicable costsharing when relevant.
Evaluation and Selection Procedures:
The general evaluation criteria and
selection factors that apply to full
applications to this funding opportunity
are summarized below. The evaluation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Oct 03, 2008
Jkt 217001
criteria for full applications will have
different weights and details. Further
information about the evaluation criteria
and selection factors can be found in the
full funding opportunity announcement.
Evaluation Criteria for Projects: 1.
Importance and/or relevance and
applicability of proposed project to the
program goals (40%). This ascertains
whether there is intrinsic value in the
proposed work and/or relevance to
NOAA, Federal, regional, Project,
NOAA and CCSP CDR goals, and if the
work is applicable to the FY 2009
Priority State, or local activities. For the
SDS competition, this includes
relevance to the SDS CDRs or activities.
2. Technical/Scientific Merit (40%).
This assesses whether the approach is
technically sound and/or innovative, if
the methods are appropriate, and
whether there are clear project goals and
objectives. 3. Overall Qualifications of
Applicants (10%). This ascertains
whether the applicant possesses the
necessary education, experience,
training, facilities, and administrative
resources to accomplish the project. 4.
Project Costs (10%). The budget is
evaluated to determine if it is realistic
and commensurate with the project
needs and time-frame. 5. Outreach and
Education (0%). NOAA assesses
whether this project provides a focused
and effective education and outreach
strategy regarding NOAA’s mission to
protect the Nation’s natural resources.
For the SDS competition, this criterion
is not scored.
Review and Selection Process: Once a
full application has been received by
SDSPO, an initial administrative review
is conducted to determine compliance
with requirements and completeness of
the application. Independent peer mail
reviewers, and/or independent peer
panel reviewers consisting of Federal, or
a combination of both Federal and nonFederal experts, will evaluate full
proposals in accordance with the
evaluation criteria. If peer mail review
and peer panel review are both
conducted, the mail reviews will be
provided to the panel for use in its
deliberations prior to providing its
ratings. If only a peer mail review is
conducted, the Project Manager will use
the rank numerical order of the mail
reviews to determine funding
recommendations. If only a peer panel
review or both a peer panel review and
a peer mail review are conducted, the
Project Manager will use the numerical
rank order of the peer review panel to
determine funding recommendations.
Occasionally a reviewer may, due to
lack of familiarity in a particular area,
choose not to score a particular
proposal. The scores from remaining
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
peer panel reviewers for that proposal
will be averaged to produce a single
numerical score for the proposal. The
average score for each proposal will be
used to determine rank of proposals.
The Project Manager will recommend
proposals to the Selecting Official in
numerical rank order unless the
proposal is justified to be selected out
of rank order based upon additional
documented requirements of any
selection factor listed in section C.
below. The Project Manager will review
the amounts requested for each selected
proposal (including costs for computing
and networking services) and
recommend the total duration and the
amount of funding, which may be less
than the proposal and budget requested.
The Selecting Official will review the
recommendations.
Selection Factors for Projects: The
Selecting Official shall award in rank
order unless a proposal is justified to be
selected out of rank order based upon
any of the following factors: 1.
Availability of funding 2. Balance/
distribution of funds a. Geographically
b. By type of institutions c. By type of
partners d. By research area e. By
project types 3. Duplication of other
projects funded or considered for
funding by NOAA/federal agencies 4.
SDS Project priorities and policy factors
5. Applicant’s prior award performance
6. Partnerships with/participation of
targeted group 7. Adequacy of
information necessary for NOAA staff to
make a NEPA determination and draft
necessary documentation before
recommendations for funding are made
to the Grants Officer. The Selecting
Official makes final recommendations
for award to the Grants Officer who is
authorized to obligate the funds.
Intergovernmental Review:
Applications under the SDS Project are
not subject to Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
Limitation of Liability: In no event
will NOAA or the Department of
Commerce be responsible for proposal
preparation costs if these programs fail
to receive funding or are cancelled
because of other agency priorities.
Publication of this announcement does
not oblige NOAA to award any specific
project or to obligate any available
funds.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA): NOAA must analyze the
potential environmental impacts, as
required by the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), for applicant
projects or proposals which are seeking
NOAA federal funding opportunities.
Detailed information on NOAA
compliance with NEPA can be found at
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 194 / Monday, October 6, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
the following NOAA NEPA Web site:
https://www.nepa.noaa.gov/, including
our NOAA Administrative Order 216–6
for NEPA, https://www.nepa.noaa.gov/
NAO216_6_TOC.pdf, and the Council
on Environmental Quality
implementation regulations, https://
ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/
toc_ceq.htm.
Consequently, as part of an
applicant’s package, and under their
description of their program activities,
applicants are required to provide
detailed information on the activities to
be conducted, locations, sites, species
and habitat to be affected, possible
construction activities, and any
environmental concerns that may exist
(e.g., the use and disposal of hazardous
or toxic chemicals, introduction of nonindigenous species, impacts to
endangered and threatened species,
aquaculture projects, and impacts to
coral reef systems). In addition to
providing specific information that will
serve as the basis for any required
impact analyses, applicants may also be
requested to assist NOAA in drafting of
an environmental assessment, if NOAA
determines an assessment is required.
Applicants will also be required to
cooperate with NOAA in identifying
feasible measures to reduce or avoid any
identified adverse environmental
impacts of their proposal. The failure to
do so shall be grounds for not selecting
an application. In some cases if
additional information is required after
an application is selected, funds can be
withheld by the Grants Officer under a
special award condition requiring the
recipient to submit additional
environmental compliance information
sufficient to enable NOAA to make an
assessment on any impacts that a project
may have on the environment.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Oct 03, 2008
Jkt 217001
The Department of Commerce PreAward Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements:
The Department of Commerce PreAward Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements
contained in the Federal Register notice
of February 11, 2008 (73 FR 7696), are
applicable to this solicitation.
Paperwork Reduction Act: This
document contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
use of Standard Forms 424, 424A, 424B,
and SF–LLL and CD–346 has been
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the respective
control numbers 0348–0043, 0348–0044,
0348–0040, 0348–0046, and 0605–0001.
Notwithstanding any other provision of
law, no person is required to, nor shall
a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of
information subject to the requirements
of the PRA unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Executive Order 12866: This notice
has been determined to be not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism):
It has been determined that this notice
does not contain policies with
Federalism implications as that term is
defined in Executive Order 13132.
Administrative Procedure Act/
Regulatory Flexibility Act: Prior notice
and an opportunity for public comment
are not required by the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other law for rules
concerning public property, loans,
grants, benefits, and contracts (5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2)). Because notice and
opportunity for comment are not
required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 or any
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58131
other law, the analytical requirements
for the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are inapplicable.
Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis has not been prepared.
Mary E. Kicza,
Assistant Administrator for Satellite and
Information Services.
[FR Doc. E8–23516 Filed 10–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal Nos. 08–85]
36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification
Department of Defense, Defense
Security Cooperation Agency.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is
publishing the unclassified text of a
section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.
This is published to fulfill the
requirements of section 155 of Public
Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601–
3740.
The following is a copy of a letter to
the Speaker of the House of
Representatives, Transmittals 08–85
with attached transmittal, policy
justification, and Sensitivity of
Technology.
Dated: September 25, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–M
E:\FR\FM\06OCN1.SGM
06OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 194 (Monday, October 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58129-58131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23516]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[Docket No. 0809181225-81227-01]
Scientific Data Stewardship Project Office for 2009
AGENCY: National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service
Program Office (NESDISPO), National Environmental Satellite Data and
Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of funding availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Scientific Data Stewardship (SDS) Project seeks to support
the development and stewardship of Climate Data Records (CDRs) for the
atmosphere, cryosphere, oceans, and land surface. The Project follows
the National Research Council's 2004 distinction between Fundamental
and Thematic Climate Data Records, and is initially focused on
Fundamental CDRs and lower complexity Thematic CDRs. The SDS Project is
managed by NOAA, but is informed by other government agencies such that
its results represent a government-wide contribution to climate change
detection, assessment, understanding, adaptation and/or mitigation.
DATES: Letters of Intent should be received no later than 5 p.m.
Eastern Time, October 31, 2008. Full proposals must be received no
later than 5 p.m. Eastern Time, December 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Applications are available at https://www.grants.gov. If the
applicant does Internet it take several weeks, involving multiple
steps. In order to allow sufficient time for this process, applicants
should register as soon as possible, even if they are not yet ready to
submit their proposal. If an applicant has problems downloading the
application package from Grants.gov, contact Grants.gov Customer
Support at (800) 518-4726 or support@grants.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SDSPO Grants Manager: Linda S.
Statler, NOAA Scientific Data Stewardship Project Office, 151 Patton
Ave., Asheville, NC 28801; Phone: 828-271-4657; E-mail:
Linda.S.Statler-at-noaa.gov. SDSPO Project Manager: Jeff Privette, NOAA
Scientific Data Stewardship Project Office, 151 Patton Ave., Asheville,
NC28801; Phone: 828-271-4331; E-mail: Jeff.Privette-at-noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of its climate mandate, the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has a responsibility to
provide the Nation with objective data and tools to help characterize,
understand, predict, mitigate and coordinate its Climate Data Record
(CDR) activities with other agencies through the U.S. adapt to climate
change and variability. To help fulfill that responsibility, NOAA has
begun Climate Change Science Program (CCSP). The National Research
Council defines a CDR as ``a time series of measurements of sufficient
length, consistency, and continuity to determine climate variability
and change.'' NOAA's National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) initiated the
Scientific Data Stewardship (SDS) Project (hereafter referred to as the
Project) to lead the Agency's CDR activities and to coordinate with the
partner agencies. Given that early algorithm development is supported
elsewhere, the Project is focused on the generalization and application
of mature algorithms to multiple satellites and sensors which together
span climate-relevant time periods. It also supports development of
Climate Information Records (CIRs), defined as time series derived from
CDRs and related long-term measurements that provide specific
information (e.g., drought area, hurricane trends) about complex
environmental phenomena in a manner useful to a variety of applications
and user communities. Together, the various SDS products serve a wide
range of scientific, commercial, decision support and policy-making
needs. Various CDRs have been developed in the past, most notably
through the NOAA-NASA Pathfinder Program in the 1990s. NOAA intends to
leverage lessons from such efforts into a more systematic,
comprehensive and sustained program. To help achieve this, the Project
plans to execute its responsibilities in partnership with the larger
scientific community through regular NOAA Announcements of Opportunity
as well as through community reviews and working groups. The Project
represents one of NOAA's primary contributions to the CCSP's climate
data goals.
Electronic Access: The full text of the full funding opportunity
announcement for this program can be accessed via the Grants.gov Web
site at https://www.grants.gov. The announcement will also be available
by contacting the program officials identified under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. Applicants must comply with all requirements
contained in the full funding opportunity announcement.
Statutory Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44720(b) and 33 U.S.C. 883d.
[[Page 58130]]
CFDA: 11.440, Environmental Sciences, Applications, Data, and
Education.
Funding Availability: The total anticipated federal funding in FY
2009 is $2.6M for new awards. The anticipated number of new awards,
pending adequate proposals of merit, is from 5 to 15. Please be advised
that actual funding levels will depend upon the final FY 2009 budget
appropriations. Current plans assume that 100% of the total resources
provided through the present FY 2009 SDS Announcement will support
extramural efforts that include the broad academic, non-profit, federal
and commercial communities. In FY 2007, the first year of SDS grants,
the Project made eight awards totaling approximately $800K. In FY 2008,
the Project expanded total funding to nearly $1,000K, which included
funding for three new starts. Past or current grantees funded under
this announcement are eligible to apply for a new award, which builds
on previous activities or areas of research not covered in the previous
award. Current grantees should not request supplementary funding for
ongoing research through this announcement. The exact amount of funds
that may be representatives. Awards are to be up to three years in
length except where noted otherwise awarded will be determined in pre-
award negotiations between the applicant and NOAA by the Project.
Eligibility: Eligible applicants are institutions of higher
education; other nonprofits; for profits; commercial organizations;
international organizations; state, local and Indian tribal
governments; and Federal agencies. Applications from non-Federal and
Federal applicants will be competed against each other. Please Note:
Before non-NOAA Federal applicants may be funded, they must demonstrate
that they have legal authority to receive funds from another Federal
agency in excess of their appropriation. The only exception to this is
governmental research facilities for awards issued under the authority
of 49 U.S.C. 44720(b). Because this announcement is not proposing to
procure goods or services from applicants, the Economy Act (31 U.S.C.
1535) is not an appropriate legal basis.
Cost Sharing Requirements: This competition does not have Cost
Sharing requirements. However, applicants are welcome to describe
applicable cost-sharing when relevant.
Evaluation and Selection Procedures: The general evaluation
criteria and selection factors that apply to full applications to this
funding opportunity are summarized below. The evaluation criteria for
full applications will have different weights and details. Further
information about the evaluation criteria and selection factors can be
found in the full funding opportunity announcement.
Evaluation Criteria for Projects: 1. Importance and/or relevance
and applicability of proposed project to the program goals (40%). This
ascertains whether there is intrinsic value in the proposed work and/or
relevance to NOAA, Federal, regional, Project, NOAA and CCSP CDR goals,
and if the work is applicable to the FY 2009 Priority State, or local
activities. For the SDS competition, this includes relevance to the SDS
CDRs or activities. 2. Technical/Scientific Merit (40%). This assesses
whether the approach is technically sound and/or innovative, if the
methods are appropriate, and whether there are clear project goals and
objectives. 3. Overall Qualifications of Applicants (10%). This
ascertains whether the applicant possesses the necessary education,
experience, training, facilities, and administrative resources to
accomplish the project. 4. Project Costs (10%). The budget is evaluated
to determine if it is realistic and commensurate with the project needs
and time-frame. 5. Outreach and Education (0%). NOAA assesses whether
this project provides a focused and effective education and outreach
strategy regarding NOAA's mission to protect the Nation's natural
resources. For the SDS competition, this criterion is not scored.
Review and Selection Process: Once a full application has been
received by SDSPO, an initial administrative review is conducted to
determine compliance with requirements and completeness of the
application. Independent peer mail reviewers, and/or independent peer
panel reviewers consisting of Federal, or a combination of both Federal
and non-Federal experts, will evaluate full proposals in accordance
with the evaluation criteria. If peer mail review and peer panel review
are both conducted, the mail reviews will be provided to the panel for
use in its deliberations prior to providing its ratings. If only a peer
mail review is conducted, the Project Manager will use the rank
numerical order of the mail reviews to determine funding
recommendations. If only a peer panel review or both a peer panel
review and a peer mail review are conducted, the Project Manager will
use the numerical rank order of the peer review panel to determine
funding recommendations. Occasionally a reviewer may, due to lack of
familiarity in a particular area, choose not to score a particular
proposal. The scores from remaining peer panel reviewers for that
proposal will be averaged to produce a single numerical score for the
proposal. The average score for each proposal will be used to determine
rank of proposals. The Project Manager will recommend proposals to the
Selecting Official in numerical rank order unless the proposal is
justified to be selected out of rank order based upon additional
documented requirements of any selection factor listed in section C.
below. The Project Manager will review the amounts requested for each
selected proposal (including costs for computing and networking
services) and recommend the total duration and the amount of funding,
which may be less than the proposal and budget requested. The Selecting
Official will review the recommendations.
Selection Factors for Projects: The Selecting Official shall award
in rank order unless a proposal is justified to be selected out of rank
order based upon any of the following factors: 1. Availability of
funding 2. Balance/distribution of funds a. Geographically b. By type
of institutions c. By type of partners d. By research area e. By
project types 3. Duplication of other projects funded or considered for
funding by NOAA/federal agencies 4. SDS Project priorities and policy
factors 5. Applicant's prior award performance 6. Partnerships with/
participation of targeted group 7. Adequacy of information necessary
for NOAA staff to make a NEPA determination and draft necessary
documentation before recommendations for funding are made to the Grants
Officer. The Selecting Official makes final recommendations for award
to the Grants Officer who is authorized to obligate the funds.
Intergovernmental Review: Applications under the SDS Project are
not subject to Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of
Federal Programs.''
Limitation of Liability: In no event will NOAA or the Department of
Commerce be responsible for proposal preparation costs if these
programs fail to receive funding or are cancelled because of other
agency priorities. Publication of this announcement does not oblige
NOAA to award any specific project or to obligate any available funds.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): NOAA must analyze the
potential environmental impacts, as required by the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), for applicant projects or proposals
which are seeking NOAA federal funding opportunities. Detailed
information on NOAA compliance with NEPA can be found at
[[Page 58131]]
the following NOAA NEPA Web site: https://www.nepa.noaa.gov/, including
our NOAA Administrative Order 216-6 for NEPA, https://www.nepa.noaa.gov/
NAO216_6_TOC.pdf, and the Council on Environmental Quality
implementation regulations, https://ceq.eh.doe.gov/nepa/regs/ceq/toc_
ceq.htm.
Consequently, as part of an applicant's package, and under their
description of their program activities, applicants are required to
provide detailed information on the activities to be conducted,
locations, sites, species and habitat to be affected, possible
construction activities, and any environmental concerns that may exist
(e.g., the use and disposal of hazardous or toxic chemicals,
introduction of non-indigenous species, impacts to endangered and
threatened species, aquaculture projects, and impacts to coral reef
systems). In addition to providing specific information that will serve
as the basis for any required impact analyses, applicants may also be
requested to assist NOAA in drafting of an environmental assessment, if
NOAA determines an assessment is required. Applicants will also be
required to cooperate with NOAA in identifying feasible measures to
reduce or avoid any identified adverse environmental impacts of their
proposal. The failure to do so shall be grounds for not selecting an
application. In some cases if additional information is required after
an application is selected, funds can be withheld by the Grants Officer
under a special award condition requiring the recipient to submit
additional environmental compliance information sufficient to enable
NOAA to make an assessment on any impacts that a project may have on
the environment.
The Department of Commerce Pre-Award Notification Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements: The Department of Commerce Pre-Award
Notification Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements
contained in the Federal Register notice of February 11, 2008 (73 FR
7696), are applicable to this solicitation.
Paperwork Reduction Act: This document contains collection-of-
information requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
The use of Standard Forms 424, 424A, 424B, and SF-LLL and CD-346 has
been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
respective control numbers 0348-0043, 0348-0044, 0348-0040, 0348-0046,
and 0605-0001. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of
the PRA unless that collection of information displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
Executive Order 12866: This notice has been determined to be not
significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism): It has been determined that
this notice does not contain policies with Federalism implications as
that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
Administrative Procedure Act/Regulatory Flexibility Act: Prior
notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required by the
Administrative Procedure Act or any other law for rules concerning
public property, loans, grants, benefits, and contracts (5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2)). Because notice and opportunity for comment are not required
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 or any other law, the analytical requirements
for the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are
inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis has not been
prepared.
Mary E. Kicza,
Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services.
[FR Doc. E8-23516 Filed 10-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P