Listing Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Designating Critical Habitat; 90-day Finding for a Petition to Revise the Critical Habitat Designation for the Hawaiian Monk Seal, 57583-57585 [E8-23467]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 193 / Friday, October 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules
PART 552–SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
552.215–71
[Redesignated as 552.238–XX]
552.215–72
[Redesignated as 552.238–YY]
4. Sections 552.215–71 and 552.215–
72 are redesignated as 552.238–XX and
552.238–YY, respectively.
[FR Doc. E8–22745 Filed 10–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–61–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 226
[Docket No. 0809161218–81253–01]
RIN 0648–AX23
Listing Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife and Designating Critical
Habitat; 90–day Finding for a Petition
to Revise the Critical Habitat
Designation for the Hawaiian Monk
Seal
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), NationalOceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of petition finding;
request for information and comments.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS), announce a
90–day finding for a petition to revise
Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus
schauinslandi) critical habitat under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973,
as amended. The Hawaiian monk seal is
listed as endangered throughout its
range, and currently designated critical
habitat consists of all beach areas, sand
spits, and islets, including all beach
crest vegetation to its deepest extent
inland, lagoon waters, inner reef waters,
and ocean waters out to a depth of 20
fathoms (36.6m) around specific areas in
the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. The
petition seeks to include key beach
areas, sand spits, and islets, including
all beach crest vegetation to its deepest
extent inland, lagoon waters, inner reef
waters, and ocean waters out to a depth
of 200 meters around the main
Hawaiian Islands, and to extend critical
habitat designation in the Northwestern
Hawaiian Islands to Sand Island and
ocean waters out to a depth of 500
meters. We are initiating a review of
currently designated critical habitat of
the species to determine whether
revision is warranted. To ensure a
comprehensive review, we solicit
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:05 Oct 02, 2008
Jkt 217001
information and comments pertaining to
this species’ essential habitat needs
from any interested party.
DATES: Written comments and
information related to this petition
finding must be received [see
ADDRESSES] by December 2, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by [0648–AX23], by any one
of the following methods: (1) Electronic
Submissions: Submit all electronic
public comments via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov; (2) Fax: 808–973–
2941, attention: Krista Graham; or (3)
mail: addressed to Krista Graham,
National Marine Fisheries Service,
Pacific Islands Regional Office,
Protected Resources Division, 1601
Kapiolani Boulevard Suite 1110,
Honolulu, HI 96814.
All comments received are a part of
the public record and will generally be
posted to httphttps://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
Interested persons may obtain more
information about critical habitat
designated for the Hawaiian monk seal
online at the NMFS Pacific Islands
Regional Office website: https://
www.fpir.noaa.gov/PRD/
prdlcriticallhabitat.html
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Krista Graham by phone 808–944–2238,
fax 808–973–2941, or e-mail
krista.graham@noaa.gov; Lance Smith
by phone 808–944–2258, fax 808–973–
2941, or e-mail lance.smith@noaa.gov;
Lisa Van Atta by phone 808–944–2257,
fax 808–973–2941, or e-mail
alecia.vanatta@noaa.gov; or Marta
Nammack by phone 301–713–1401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Critical habitat is defined in the ESA
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) as:
‘‘(i) the specific areas within the
geographical area currently occupied by the
species, at the time it is listed... on which are
found those physical or biological features (I)
essential to the conservation of the species
and (II) which may require special
management considerations or protection;
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57583
and (ii) specific areas outside the
geographical area occupied by the species at
the time it is listed upon a determination by
the Secretary that such areas are essential for
the conservation of the species.’’
Our implementing regulations (50
CFR 424.12) describe those essential
physical and biological features to
include, but not limited to: (1) space for
individual and population growth, and
normal behavior; (2) food, water, air,
light, minerals, or other nutritional or
physiological requirements; (3) cover or
shelter; (4) sites for breeding,
reproduction, rearing of offspring; and
(5) habitats that are protected from
disturbance or are representative of the
historic geographical and ecological
distribution of a species. We are
required to focus on the primary
constituent elements (PCEs) which best
represent the principal biological or
physical features. PCEs may include,
but are not limited to: nesting grounds,
feeding sites, water quality, tide, and
geological formation. Our implementing
regulations (50 CFR 424.02) define
‘‘special management considerations or
protection’’ as any method or procedure
useful in protecting physical and
biological features of the environment
for the conservation of the species.
Section 4(b)(2) of the ESA requires us
to designate and make revisions to
critical habitat for listed species based
on the best scientific data available and
after taking into consideration the
economic impact, the impact on
national security, and any other relevant
impact, of specifying any particular area
as critical habitat. The Secretary may
exclude any particular area from critical
habitat if he determines that the benefits
of such exclusion outweigh the benefits
of specifying such area as part of the
critical habitat, unless he determines
that the failure to designate such area as
critical habitat will result in the
extinction of the species concerned. We
are required to consider whether the
petition contains information indicating
that areas petitioned contain physical
and biological features essential to, and
that may require special management to
provide for, the conservation of the
species. Section 4(b)(3)(D)(i) of the ESA
requires us to make a finding as to
whether a petition to revise critical
habitat presents substantial scientific
information indicating that the revision
may be warranted. Our implementing
regulations (50 CFR 424.14) define
‘‘substantial information’’ as the amount
of information that would lead a
reasonable person to believe that the
measure proposed in the petition may
be warranted. In determining whether
substantial information exists, we take
into account several factors, including
E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM
03OCP1
57584
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 193 / Friday, October 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
information submitted with, and
referenced in, the petition and all other
information readily available in our
files. To the maximum extent
practicable, this finding is to be made
within 90 days of the receipt of the
petition, and the finding is to be
published promptly in the Federal
Register. If we find that a petition
presents substantial information
indicating that the revision may be
warranted, within 12 months after
receiving the petition, we are required
to determine how we intend to proceed
with the requested revision and
promptly publish notice of such
intention in the Federal Register. See
ESA Section 4(b)(3)(D)(ii).
Analysis of Petition
On July 9, 2008, we received a
petition from the Center for Biological
Diversity, Kahea, and the Ocean
Conservancy (Petitioners) to revise the
Hawaiian monk seal critical habitat
designation (Center for Biological
Diversity et al., 2008). Currently
designated critical habitat consists of all
beach areas, sand spits, and islets,
including all beach crest vegetation to
its deepest extent inland, lagoon waters,
inner reef waters, and ocean waters out
to a depth of 20 fathoms (36.6m) around
the following areas in the Northwestern
Hawaiian Islands: Kure Atoll; Midway
Islands, except Sand Island and its
harbor; Pearl and Hermes Reef; Lisianski
Island; Laysan Island; Maro Reef;
Gardner Pinnacles; French Frigate
Shoals; Necker Island; and Nihoa Island
(53 FR 18988; May 26, 1988). The
Petitioners seek to revise the critical
habitat designation to include key beach
areas, sand spits, and islets, including
all beach crest vegetation to its deepest
extent inland, lagoon waters, inner reef
waters, and ocean waters out to a depth
of 200 meters around the main
Hawaiian Islands, and to extend critical
habitat designation in the Northwestern
Hawaiian Islands to Sand Island and
ocean waters out to a depth of 500
meters.
The petition contains a detailed
description of the species’ natural
history and status, including
information on distribution and
movements, feeding and prey selection,
reproduction, population status and
trends, and factors contributing to the
current status of the species in the
Pacific Ocean. The petition describes
the importance of the terrestrial and
marine habitat for monk seals around
the entire Hawaiian Archipelago. The
Petitioners cite studies indicating that,
while a significant portion of the
species’ population is found throughout
the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:05 Oct 02, 2008
Jkt 217001
(NMFS, 2007), it is likely that monk
seals are recolonizing the main
Hawaiian Islands (Baker, 2006) since
Hawaiian monk seals have been sighted
on each of the eight main Hawaiian
Islands and their presence is increasing
(NMFS, 2007). The petition cites studies
demonstrating that births have
increased on the main Hawaiian Islands
since the mid–1990s (NMFS, 2007), and
that pups born on the main Hawaiian
Islands have been healthier and more
likely to survive to adulthood than those
born on the Northwestern Hawaiian
Islands (Baker et al., 2006). The
Petitioners further cite studies that
assert that these larger sizes and
healthier physical condition reflects
greater prey availability and, thus, better
foraging conditions in the main
Hawaiian Islands (Baker et al., 2006;
Baker, 2006; Baker and Johanos, 2004).
The Petitioners claim that the
population of monk seals on the main
Hawaiian Islands is likely below the
carrying capacity of those islands. The
Petitioners believe that the petitioned
habitat area contains the PCEs or the
physical and biological features
essential to the conservation of
Hawaiian monk seals. The Petitioners
claim that the petitioned area provides
space for population growth and normal
behavior, and thus the main Hawaiian
Islands will provide important habitat
for recovery of the species. They offer
that the habitat components essential for
feeding, pupping, nursing, resting,
molting, and migrating include all
marine waters, along with associated
marine aquatic flora and fauna in the
water column, as well as the underlying
marine benthic community, all of which
occur in the main Hawaiian Islands. The
Petitioners assert that this is evidenced
by the increasing use of the area by
monk seals as well as their visibly
healthier body condition. As for
extending the area of designation in the
Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, the
Petitioners cite new studies that have
contradicted the previous belief that
monk seals foraged only on shallow reef
habitats (Parrish and Littnan, 2007). The
Petitioners cite from Baker et al. (2007)
that monk seals forage in a variety of
marine habitats within approximately
500 meters of the surface in the
Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Thus,
the Petitioners suggest that the
designation of critical habitat for the
Hawaiian monk seal in the main
Hawaiian Islands and the extension of
the designation in the Northwestern
Hawaiian Islands are consistent with the
recovery plan for the species.
Finally, the Petitioners request that, if
we determine some portion of the
petitioned area does not meet the
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
criteria for critical habitat, we analyze
whether some subset of this area should
be designated as critical habitat.
Petition Finding
Based on the above information and
information readily available in our
files, and pursuant to criteria specified
in 50 CFR 424.14(c), we find the
Petitioners present substantial scientific
information indicating that a revision to
the critical habitat designation for
Hawaiian monk seals may be warranted.
Our Pacific Islands Fisheries Science
Center has conducted research on
Hawaiian monk seals foraging, pupping,
nursing, resting, and migrating within
the petitioned area, in both the main
and Northwestern Hawaiian Islands,
and the area in general represents
principal habitat for Hawaiian monk
seals. The Petitioners have requested
broad areas to be considered as critical
habitat for this species. It is not clear
whether such a broad designation is
warranted at this time, but we will
review the best scientific information
available to determine whether these
petitioned areas or a subset of these
petitioned areas meet the definition of
critical habitat.
To ensure that the review of critical
habitat for Hawaiian monk seals is
complete and based on the best
available data, we solicit information
and comments on whether the
petitioned area, or some subset thereof,
qualifies as critical habitat. Areas that
include the physical and biological
features essential to the conservation of
the species and that may require special
management considerations or
protection should be identified. As
stated earlier, essential features include,
but are not limited to, space for
individual growth and for normal
behavior, food, water, air, light,
minerals, or other nutritional or
physiological requirements, cover or
shelter, sites for reproduction and
development of offspring, and habitats
that are protected from disturbance or
are representative of the historical,
geographical, and ecological
distributions of the species (50 CFR
424.12).
We request that all data, information,
and comments be accompanied by
supporting documentation such as
maps, bibliographic references, or
reprints of pertinent publications.
Comments and materials received will
be available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the above address (see
ADDRESSES).
E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM
03OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 193 / Friday, October 3, 2008 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Peer Review
The Office of Management and Budget
issued its Final Information Quality
Bulletin for Peer Review on December
16, 2004. The Bulletin went into effect
June 16, 2005, and generally requires
that all ‘‘influential scientific
information’’ and ‘‘highly influential
scientific information’’ disseminated on
or after that date be peer reviewed.
Because the information used to
evaluate this petition may be considered
‘‘influential scientific information,’’ we
solicit the names of recognized experts
in the field that could serve as peer
reviewers of such information we may
disseminate as we evaluate this petition.
Independent peer reviewers will be
selected from the academic and
scientific community, applicable tribal
and other Native American groups,
Federal and state agencies, the private
sector, and public interest groups.
References Cited
Baker, J.D. 2006. The Hawaiian Monk
Seal: Abundance Estimation, Patterns in
Survival, and Habitat Issues.
Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis. University
of Aberdeen, UK. 182 p.
Baker, J.D., and T.C. Johanos. 2004.
Abundance of the Hawaiian Monk Seal
in the Main Hawaiian Islands.
Biological Conservation 116: 103–110.
Baker, J.D., C.L. Littnan, and D.W.
Johnston. 2006. Potential Effects of Sea
Level Rise on the Terrestrial Habitats of
Endangered and Endemic Megafauna in
the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands.
Endangered Species Research 2:21–30.
Baker, J.D., J.J. Polovina, and E.A.
Howell. 2007. Effect of Variable Oceanic
Productivity on the Survival of an
Upper Trophic Predator, the Hawaiian
Monk Seal Monachus schauinslandi.
Marine Ecology Progress Series 346:
277–283.
Center for Biological Diversity, Kahea,
and Ocean Conservancy. 2008. Petition
to Revise Critical Habitat for the
Hawaiian Monk Seal (Monachus
schauinslandi) Under the Endangered
Species Act. 41 pp. https://
www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/
mammals/Hawaiianlmonklseal/pdfs/
Petition-Monk-Seal-CH–07–02–08.pdf
National Marine Fisheries Service
(‘‘NMFS’’). 2007. Recovery Plan for the
Hawaiian Monk Seal (Monachus
schauinslandi). Second Revision.
National Marine Fisheries Service,
Silver Spring, MD. 165 pp.
Parrish, F.A. and C.L. Littnan. 2007.
Changing Perspectives in Hawaiian
Monk Seal Research Using AnimalBorne Imaging. Marine Technology
Society Journal 41:30–34.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:05 Oct 02, 2008
Jkt 217001
Dated: September 29, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–23467 Filed 10–2–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 080721859–81206–01]
RIN 0648–AX01
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska, Groundfish of the
Gulf of Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes a regulatory
amendment to exempt fishermen using
dinglebar fishing gear in federal waters
of the Gulf of Alaska from the
requirement to carry a vessel monitoring
system (VMS). This action is necessary
because the risk of damage posed to
protected corals in the Gulf of Alaska by
the dinglebar gear fishery is minor and
insufficient to justify the costs of VMS.
This action is intended to promote the
goals and objectives of the Magnuson–
Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Gulf of Alaska, and other applicable
law.
Comments must be received no
later than November 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue
Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit
comments, identified by RIN 0648–
AX01, by any one of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal website at
https://www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802.
• Fax: 907–586–7557.
• Hand delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of
the public record and will generally be
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57585
posted to https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
portable document file (pdf) formats
only.
Copies of the Environmental
Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review/
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(EA/RIR/IRFA) prepared for this action
may be obtained from the NMFS Alaska
Region at the address above or from the
Alaska Region website at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
Scheurer, 907–586–7356.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Groundfish fisheries in the Gulf of
Alaska (GOA) are managed under the
Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (FMP).
The North Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) prepared the FMP
under the authority of the Magnuson–
Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson–Stevens
Act). Regulations implementing the
FMP appear at 50 CFR part 679. General
regulations governing U.S. fisheries also
appear at 50 CFR part 600.
The FMP designates essential fish
habitat and habitat areas of particular
concern (HAPCs) in the Gulf of Alaska.
HAPCs are areas within essential fish
habitat that are of particular ecological
importance to the long–term
sustainability of managed species, are of
a rare type, or are especially susceptible
to degradation or development. The
Council may designate specific sites as
HAPCs and may develop management
measures to protect habitat features
within them. In order to protect HAPCs,
certain habitat protection areas and
habitat conservation zones have been
designated. A habitat protection area is
an area of special, rare habitat features
where fishing activities that may
adversely affect the habitat are
restricted.
Two HAPCs are designated in the
Fairweather Grounds and one HAPC is
designated near Cape Ommaney in the
Gulf of Alaska. Within these HAPCs,
five Coral Habitat Protection Areas were
identified where high concentrations of
sensitive corals occur. Fishing is
restricted only in the Coral Habitat
E:\FR\FM\03OCP1.SGM
03OCP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 193 (Friday, October 3, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57583-57585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23467]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 226
[Docket No. 0809161218-81253-01]
RIN 0648-AX23
Listing Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Designating
Critical Habitat; 90-day Finding for a Petition to Revise the Critical
Habitat Designation for the Hawaiian Monk Seal
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), NationalOceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of petition finding; request for information and
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), announce a
90-day finding for a petition to revise Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus
schauinslandi) critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
of 1973, as amended. The Hawaiian monk seal is listed as endangered
throughout its range, and currently designated critical habitat
consists of all beach areas, sand spits, and islets, including all
beach crest vegetation to its deepest extent inland, lagoon waters,
inner reef waters, and ocean waters out to a depth of 20 fathoms
(36.6m) around specific areas in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. The
petition seeks to include key beach areas, sand spits, and islets,
including all beach crest vegetation to its deepest extent inland,
lagoon waters, inner reef waters, and ocean waters out to a depth of
200 meters around the main Hawaiian Islands, and to extend critical
habitat designation in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands to Sand Island
and ocean waters out to a depth of 500 meters. We are initiating a
review of currently designated critical habitat of the species to
determine whether revision is warranted. To ensure a comprehensive
review, we solicit information and comments pertaining to this species'
essential habitat needs from any interested party.
DATES: Written comments and information related to this petition
finding must be received [see ADDRESSES] by December 2, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by [0648-AX23], by any
one of the following methods: (1) Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http:/
/www.regulations.gov; (2) Fax: 808-973-2941, attention: Krista Graham;
or (3) mail: addressed to Krista Graham, National Marine Fisheries
Service, Pacific Islands Regional Office, Protected Resources Division,
1601 Kapiolani Boulevard Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814.
All comments received are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to httphttps://www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information (for example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do
not submit confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required
fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
Interested persons may obtain more information about critical
habitat designated for the Hawaiian monk seal online at the NMFS
Pacific Islands Regional Office website: https://www.fpir.noaa.gov/PRD/
prd_critical_habitat.html
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Krista Graham by phone 808-944-2238,
fax 808-973-2941, or e-mail krista.graham@noaa.gov; Lance Smith by
phone 808-944-2258, fax 808-973-2941, or e-mail lance.smith@noaa.gov;
Lisa Van Atta by phone 808-944-2257, fax 808-973-2941, or e-mail
alecia.vanatta@noaa.gov; or Marta Nammack by phone 301-713-1401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Critical habitat is defined in the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) as:
``(i) the specific areas within the geographical area currently
occupied by the species, at the time it is listed... on which are
found those physical or biological features (I) essential to the
conservation of the species and (II) which may require special
management considerations or protection; and (ii) specific areas
outside the geographical area occupied by the species at the time it
is listed upon a determination by the Secretary that such areas are
essential for the conservation of the species.''
Our implementing regulations (50 CFR 424.12) describe those
essential physical and biological features to include, but not limited
to: (1) space for individual and population growth, and normal
behavior; (2) food, water, air, light, minerals, or other nutritional
or physiological requirements; (3) cover or shelter; (4) sites for
breeding, reproduction, rearing of offspring; and (5) habitats that are
protected from disturbance or are representative of the historic
geographical and ecological distribution of a species. We are required
to focus on the primary constituent elements (PCEs) which best
represent the principal biological or physical features. PCEs may
include, but are not limited to: nesting grounds, feeding sites, water
quality, tide, and geological formation. Our implementing regulations
(50 CFR 424.02) define ``special management considerations or
protection'' as any method or procedure useful in protecting physical
and biological features of the environment for the conservation of the
species.
Section 4(b)(2) of the ESA requires us to designate and make
revisions to critical habitat for listed species based on the best
scientific data available and after taking into consideration the
economic impact, the impact on national security, and any other
relevant impact, of specifying any particular area as critical habitat.
The Secretary may exclude any particular area from critical habitat if
he determines that the benefits of such exclusion outweigh the benefits
of specifying such area as part of the critical habitat, unless he
determines that the failure to designate such area as critical habitat
will result in the extinction of the species concerned. We are required
to consider whether the petition contains information indicating that
areas petitioned contain physical and biological features essential to,
and that may require special management to provide for, the
conservation of the species. Section 4(b)(3)(D)(i) of the ESA requires
us to make a finding as to whether a petition to revise critical
habitat presents substantial scientific information indicating that the
revision may be warranted. Our implementing regulations (50 CFR 424.14)
define ``substantial information'' as the amount of information that
would lead a reasonable person to believe that the measure proposed in
the petition may be warranted. In determining whether substantial
information exists, we take into account several factors, including
[[Page 57584]]
information submitted with, and referenced in, the petition and all
other information readily available in our files. To the maximum extent
practicable, this finding is to be made within 90 days of the receipt
of the petition, and the finding is to be published promptly in the
Federal Register. If we find that a petition presents substantial
information indicating that the revision may be warranted, within 12
months after receiving the petition, we are required to determine how
we intend to proceed with the requested revision and promptly publish
notice of such intention in the Federal Register. See ESA Section
4(b)(3)(D)(ii).
Analysis of Petition
On July 9, 2008, we received a petition from the Center for
Biological Diversity, Kahea, and the Ocean Conservancy (Petitioners) to
revise the Hawaiian monk seal critical habitat designation (Center for
Biological Diversity et al., 2008). Currently designated critical
habitat consists of all beach areas, sand spits, and islets, including
all beach crest vegetation to its deepest extent inland, lagoon waters,
inner reef waters, and ocean waters out to a depth of 20 fathoms
(36.6m) around the following areas in the Northwestern Hawaiian
Islands: Kure Atoll; Midway Islands, except Sand Island and its harbor;
Pearl and Hermes Reef; Lisianski Island; Laysan Island; Maro Reef;
Gardner Pinnacles; French Frigate Shoals; Necker Island; and Nihoa
Island (53 FR 18988; May 26, 1988). The Petitioners seek to revise the
critical habitat designation to include key beach areas, sand spits,
and islets, including all beach crest vegetation to its deepest extent
inland, lagoon waters, inner reef waters, and ocean waters out to a
depth of 200 meters around the main Hawaiian Islands, and to extend
critical habitat designation in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands to
Sand Island and ocean waters out to a depth of 500 meters.
The petition contains a detailed description of the species'
natural history and status, including information on distribution and
movements, feeding and prey selection, reproduction, population status
and trends, and factors contributing to the current status of the
species in the Pacific Ocean. The petition describes the importance of
the terrestrial and marine habitat for monk seals around the entire
Hawaiian Archipelago. The Petitioners cite studies indicating that,
while a significant portion of the species' population is found
throughout the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NMFS, 2007), it is likely
that monk seals are recolonizing the main Hawaiian Islands (Baker,
2006) since Hawaiian monk seals have been sighted on each of the eight
main Hawaiian Islands and their presence is increasing (NMFS, 2007).
The petition cites studies demonstrating that births have increased on
the main Hawaiian Islands since the mid-1990s (NMFS, 2007), and that
pups born on the main Hawaiian Islands have been healthier and more
likely to survive to adulthood than those born on the Northwestern
Hawaiian Islands (Baker et al., 2006). The Petitioners further cite
studies that assert that these larger sizes and healthier physical
condition reflects greater prey availability and, thus, better foraging
conditions in the main Hawaiian Islands (Baker et al., 2006; Baker,
2006; Baker and Johanos, 2004).
The Petitioners claim that the population of monk seals on the main
Hawaiian Islands is likely below the carrying capacity of those
islands. The Petitioners believe that the petitioned habitat area
contains the PCEs or the physical and biological features essential to
the conservation of Hawaiian monk seals. The Petitioners claim that the
petitioned area provides space for population growth and normal
behavior, and thus the main Hawaiian Islands will provide important
habitat for recovery of the species. They offer that the habitat
components essential for feeding, pupping, nursing, resting, molting,
and migrating include all marine waters, along with associated marine
aquatic flora and fauna in the water column, as well as the underlying
marine benthic community, all of which occur in the main Hawaiian
Islands. The Petitioners assert that this is evidenced by the
increasing use of the area by monk seals as well as their visibly
healthier body condition. As for extending the area of designation in
the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, the Petitioners cite new studies
that have contradicted the previous belief that monk seals foraged only
on shallow reef habitats (Parrish and Littnan, 2007). The Petitioners
cite from Baker et al. (2007) that monk seals forage in a variety of
marine habitats within approximately 500 meters of the surface in the
Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Thus, the Petitioners suggest that the
designation of critical habitat for the Hawaiian monk seal in the main
Hawaiian Islands and the extension of the designation in the
Northwestern Hawaiian Islands are consistent with the recovery plan for
the species.
Finally, the Petitioners request that, if we determine some portion
of the petitioned area does not meet the criteria for critical habitat,
we analyze whether some subset of this area should be designated as
critical habitat.
Petition Finding
Based on the above information and information readily available in
our files, and pursuant to criteria specified in 50 CFR 424.14(c), we
find the Petitioners present substantial scientific information
indicating that a revision to the critical habitat designation for
Hawaiian monk seals may be warranted. Our Pacific Islands Fisheries
Science Center has conducted research on Hawaiian monk seals foraging,
pupping, nursing, resting, and migrating within the petitioned area, in
both the main and Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, and the area in
general represents principal habitat for Hawaiian monk seals. The
Petitioners have requested broad areas to be considered as critical
habitat for this species. It is not clear whether such a broad
designation is warranted at this time, but we will review the best
scientific information available to determine whether these petitioned
areas or a subset of these petitioned areas meet the definition of
critical habitat.
To ensure that the review of critical habitat for Hawaiian monk
seals is complete and based on the best available data, we solicit
information and comments on whether the petitioned area, or some subset
thereof, qualifies as critical habitat. Areas that include the physical
and biological features essential to the conservation of the species
and that may require special management considerations or protection
should be identified. As stated earlier, essential features include,
but are not limited to, space for individual growth and for normal
behavior, food, water, air, light, minerals, or other nutritional or
physiological requirements, cover or shelter, sites for reproduction
and development of offspring, and habitats that are protected from
disturbance or are representative of the historical, geographical, and
ecological distributions of the species (50 CFR 424.12).
We request that all data, information, and comments be accompanied
by supporting documentation such as maps, bibliographic references, or
reprints of pertinent publications. Comments and materials received
will be available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal
business hours at the above address (see ADDRESSES).
[[Page 57585]]
Peer Review
The Office of Management and Budget issued its Final Information
Quality Bulletin for Peer Review on December 16, 2004. The Bulletin
went into effect June 16, 2005, and generally requires that all
``influential scientific information'' and ``highly influential
scientific information'' disseminated on or after that date be peer
reviewed. Because the information used to evaluate this petition may be
considered ``influential scientific information,'' we solicit the names
of recognized experts in the field that could serve as peer reviewers
of such information we may disseminate as we evaluate this petition.
Independent peer reviewers will be selected from the academic and
scientific community, applicable tribal and other Native American
groups, Federal and state agencies, the private sector, and public
interest groups.
References Cited
Baker, J.D. 2006. The Hawaiian Monk Seal: Abundance Estimation,
Patterns in Survival, and Habitat Issues. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis.
University of Aberdeen, UK. 182 p.
Baker, J.D., and T.C. Johanos. 2004. Abundance of the Hawaiian Monk
Seal in the Main Hawaiian Islands. Biological Conservation 116: 103-
110.
Baker, J.D., C.L. Littnan, and D.W. Johnston. 2006. Potential
Effects of Sea Level Rise on the Terrestrial Habitats of Endangered and
Endemic Megafauna in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Endangered
Species Research 2:21-30.
Baker, J.D., J.J. Polovina, and E.A. Howell. 2007. Effect of
Variable Oceanic Productivity on the Survival of an Upper Trophic
Predator, the Hawaiian Monk Seal Monachus schauinslandi. Marine Ecology
Progress Series 346: 277-283.
Center for Biological Diversity, Kahea, and Ocean Conservancy.
2008. Petition to Revise Critical Habitat for the Hawaiian Monk Seal
(Monachus schauinslandi) Under the Endangered Species Act. 41 pp.
https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/mammals/Hawaiian_monk_
seal/pdfs/Petition-Monk-Seal-CH-07-02-08.pdf
National Marine Fisheries Service (``NMFS''). 2007. Recovery Plan
for the Hawaiian Monk Seal (Monachus schauinslandi). Second Revision.
National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, MD. 165 pp.
Parrish, F.A. and C.L. Littnan. 2007. Changing Perspectives in
Hawaiian Monk Seal Research Using Animal-Borne Imaging. Marine
Technology Society Journal 41:30-34.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: September 29, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8-23467 Filed 10-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
