Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities; Correction, 56998-56999 [E8-23253]
Download as PDF
56998
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
and information, there is a reasonable
certainty that the use of Aspergillus
flavus NRRL 21882 on field, sweet and
pop corn will not cause harm to the U.S.
adult, children and infant populations
via dietary, aggregate and cumulative
exposure. Thus, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance on field,
sweet and pop corn is being granted.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
under section 408(d) of FFDCA in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this final rule
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:26 Sep 30, 2008
Jkt 217001
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Public Law 104–4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
X. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
aspirated grain fractions; corn, sweet,
kernel plus cob with husk removed;
corn, sweet, forage; corn, sweet, stover;
corn, pop, grain; and corn, pop, stover.
[FR Doc. E8–22957 Filed 9–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–1534–CN]
42 CFR Part 413
RIN 0938–AP11
Medicare Program; Prospective
Payment System and Consolidated
Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities;
Correction
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document corrects
technical errors that appeared in the
August 8, 2008 Federal Register
entitled, ‘‘Medicare Program;
Prospective Payment System and
Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing
Facilities for FY 2009.’’
DATES: Effective Date: This correction is
effective October 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill
Ullman, (410) 786–5667.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
In FR Doc. E8–17948 of August 8,
2008 (73 FR 46416), there were two
technical errors that this notice serves to
identify and correct. The corrections in
this correction notice are effective as if
they had been included in the document
published on August 8, 2008.
Accordingly, the corrections are
effective October 1, 2008.
PART 180—[AMENDED]
II. Summary of Errors
Dated: September 19, 2008.
Janet L. Andersen,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution
Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
■
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.1254 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 180.1254 Aspergillus flavus NRRL 21882;
exemption from requirement of a tolerance.
* * * * *
(b) An exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is established
for residues of Aspergillus flavus NRRL
21882 on corn, field, forage; corn, field,
grain; corn, field, stover; corn, field,
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
On page 46430 of the August 8, 2008
final rule, we are correcting the title of
Table 10. This table illustrates the
skilled nursing facility (SNF)
prospective payment system (PPS)
payment rate computations for a
hypothetical ‘‘XYZ’’ SNF located in
Cedar Rapids, IA. In the table’s title, the
wage index value for Cedar Rapids, IA
is incorrectly identified as 0.8924.
Accordingly, in section III of this
document (‘‘Correction of Errors’’), we
are correcting the wage index value in
the title of Table 10 to reflect the correct
wage index value of 0.8919. We note
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
that the entries for this value that appear
in the ‘‘wage index’’ column of the table
itself, as well as the corresponding entry
for CBSA 16300 in Table 8 (‘‘FY 2009
Wage Index for Urban Areas Based on
CBSA Labor Market Areas,’’ which
appeared as an addendum to the August
8, 2008 final rule), both correctly reflect
this value as 0.8919.
In addition, in the addendum to the
August 8, 2008 final rule, we are
revising an entry in Table 9 (‘‘FY 2009
Wage Index Based on CBSA Labor
Market Areas for Rural Areas’’) in order
to correct a technical error made to the
wage data for one inpatient hospital
provider in rural New Hampshire. We
are revising the wage index value
displayed in Table 9 for rural New
Hampshire from ‘‘1.0182’’ to the
corrected value of ‘‘1.0219’’. Since this
revision involves only a single entry in
Table 9, we are not republishing the
table in its entirety in this notice;
however, we note that the corrected
version of this table is available on the
SNF PPS Web site, which can be
accessed online at https://
www.cms.hhs.gov/SNFPPS/.
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
III. Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. E8–17948 (73 FR 46416),
make the following corrections:
1. On page 46430, in Table 10, the
wage index value ‘‘0.8924’’ displayed in
the title is revised to read ‘‘0.8919’’.
2. On page 46462, in Table 9, in the
wage index column for New Hampshire,
State code 30, the wage index value
‘‘1.0182’’ is revised to read ‘‘1.0219’’.
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
and Delayed Effective Date
We ordinarily publish a proposed rule
in the Federal Register to provide a
period for public comment before the
provisions of a rule such as this take
effect in accordance with section 553(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). We also
ordinarily provide a 30-day delay in the
effective date of the provisions of a
notice in accordance with section 553(d)
of the APA (5 U.S.C. 553(d)). However,
we can waive both the notice and
comment procedure and the 30-day
delay in effective date if the Secretary
finds, for good cause, that a notice and
comment process is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, and incorporates a statement of
the finding and the reasons for it in the
notice.
We find for good cause that it is
unnecessary to undertake notice and
comment rulemaking because this
notice merely provides technical
corrections to the regulations. We are
not making substantive changes to our
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:26 Sep 30, 2008
Jkt 217001
payment methodologies or policies, but
rather, are simply implementing
correctly the payment methodologies
and policies that we previously
proposed, received comment on, and
subsequently finalized. The public has
already had the opportunity to comment
on these payment methodologies and
policies, and this correction notice is
intended solely to ensure that the FY
2009 SNF PPS final rule accurately
reflects them. Therefore, we believe that
undertaking further notice and comment
procedures to incorporate these
corrections into the final rule is
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest.
Further, we believe a delayed
effective date is unnecessary because
this correction notice merely corrects
inadvertent technical errors. The
changes noted above do not make any
substantive changes to the SNF PPS
payment methodologies or policies.
Moreover, we regard imposing a delay
in the effective date as being contrary to
the public interest. We believe that it is
in the public interest for providers to
receive appropriate SNF PPS payments
in as timely a manner as possible and
to ensure that the FY 2009 SNF PPS
final rule accurately reflects our
payment methodologies, payment rates,
and policies. Therefore, we find good
cause to waive notice and comment
procedures, as well as the 30-day delay
in effective date.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: September 29, 2008.
Ashley Files Flory,
Deputy Executive Secretary to the
Department.
[FR Doc. E8–23253 Filed 9–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 25
Satellite Communications
CFR Correction
In title 47 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, parts 20 to 39, revised as of
October 1, 2007, in § 25.208, on page
239, in Table 1G in paragraph (g) and,
on page 240, in Table 1H in paragraph
(h) make the following change:
For each entry in the tables, remove
the number ‘‘40’’ from the third column,
‘‘Percentage of time during which
EPFDdown level may not be exceeded’’
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
56999
and add it to the fourth column,
‘‘Reference bandwidth (kHz)’’.
[FR Doc. E8–23115 Filed 9–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[FCC 08–192]
Network Affiliated Stations Alliance
(NASA) Petition for Inquiry Into
Network Practices and Motion for
Declaratory Ruling
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of petition for inquiry.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NASA and the Networks
request that the Commission affirm a
number of basic principles relating to
the Commission rules governing
network/affiliate relationships to avoid
future disputes. Since that time, each of
the Networks engaged in constructive
discussions with its respective affiliates
and revised its current standard
affiliation agreement to address the
central issues raised by NASA.
Accordingly, NASA and the Networks
agree that a Commission ruling with
respect to those particular contract
provisions is no longer necessary.
Pursuant to the Commission’s rules, we
grant NASA’s request for declaratory
ruling in part and grant the Joint
Request in full.
DATES: October 1, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by FCC 08–192, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information on this
proceeding, please contact Holly Saurer,
Holly.Saurer@fcc.gov, of the Policy
Division, Media Bureau, (202) 418–
2120.
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 1, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56998-56999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23253]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-1534-CN]
42 CFR Part 413
RIN 0938-AP11
Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated
Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities; Correction
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects technical errors that appeared in the
August 8, 2008 Federal Register entitled, ``Medicare Program;
Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing
Facilities for FY 2009.''
DATES: Effective Date: This correction is effective October 1, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Ullman, (410) 786-5667.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In FR Doc. E8-17948 of August 8, 2008 (73 FR 46416), there were two
technical errors that this notice serves to identify and correct. The
corrections in this correction notice are effective as if they had been
included in the document published on August 8, 2008. Accordingly, the
corrections are effective October 1, 2008.
II. Summary of Errors
On page 46430 of the August 8, 2008 final rule, we are correcting
the title of Table 10. This table illustrates the skilled nursing
facility (SNF) prospective payment system (PPS) payment rate
computations for a hypothetical ``XYZ'' SNF located in Cedar Rapids,
IA. In the table's title, the wage index value for Cedar Rapids, IA is
incorrectly identified as 0.8924. Accordingly, in section III of this
document (``Correction of Errors''), we are correcting the wage index
value in the title of Table 10 to reflect the correct wage index value
of 0.8919. We note
[[Page 56999]]
that the entries for this value that appear in the ``wage index''
column of the table itself, as well as the corresponding entry for CBSA
16300 in Table 8 (``FY 2009 Wage Index for Urban Areas Based on CBSA
Labor Market Areas,'' which appeared as an addendum to the August 8,
2008 final rule), both correctly reflect this value as 0.8919.
In addition, in the addendum to the August 8, 2008 final rule, we
are revising an entry in Table 9 (``FY 2009 Wage Index Based on CBSA
Labor Market Areas for Rural Areas'') in order to correct a technical
error made to the wage data for one inpatient hospital provider in
rural New Hampshire. We are revising the wage index value displayed in
Table 9 for rural New Hampshire from ``1.0182'' to the corrected value
of ``1.0219''. Since this revision involves only a single entry in
Table 9, we are not republishing the table in its entirety in this
notice; however, we note that the corrected version of this table is
available on the SNF PPS Web site, which can be accessed online at
https://www.cms.hhs.gov/SNFPPS/.
III. Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. E8-17948 (73 FR 46416), make the following corrections:
1. On page 46430, in Table 10, the wage index value ``0.8924''
displayed in the title is revised to read ``0.8919''.
2. On page 46462, in Table 9, in the wage index column for New
Hampshire, State code 30, the wage index value ``1.0182'' is revised to
read ``1.0219''.
IV. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Delayed Effective Date
We ordinarily publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register to
provide a period for public comment before the provisions of a rule
such as this take effect in accordance with section 553(b) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). We also
ordinarily provide a 30-day delay in the effective date of the
provisions of a notice in accordance with section 553(d) of the APA (5
U.S.C. 553(d)). However, we can waive both the notice and comment
procedure and the 30-day delay in effective date if the Secretary
finds, for good cause, that a notice and comment process is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and
incorporates a statement of the finding and the reasons for it in the
notice.
We find for good cause that it is unnecessary to undertake notice
and comment rulemaking because this notice merely provides technical
corrections to the regulations. We are not making substantive changes
to our payment methodologies or policies, but rather, are simply
implementing correctly the payment methodologies and policies that we
previously proposed, received comment on, and subsequently finalized.
The public has already had the opportunity to comment on these payment
methodologies and policies, and this correction notice is intended
solely to ensure that the FY 2009 SNF PPS final rule accurately
reflects them. Therefore, we believe that undertaking further notice
and comment procedures to incorporate these corrections into the final
rule is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest.
Further, we believe a delayed effective date is unnecessary because
this correction notice merely corrects inadvertent technical errors.
The changes noted above do not make any substantive changes to the SNF
PPS payment methodologies or policies. Moreover, we regard imposing a
delay in the effective date as being contrary to the public interest.
We believe that it is in the public interest for providers to receive
appropriate SNF PPS payments in as timely a manner as possible and to
ensure that the FY 2009 SNF PPS final rule accurately reflects our
payment methodologies, payment rates, and policies. Therefore, we find
good cause to waive notice and comment procedures, as well as the 30-
day delay in effective date.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773,
Medicare--Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare--
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
Dated: September 29, 2008.
Ashley Files Flory,
Deputy Executive Secretary to the Department.
[FR Doc. E8-23253 Filed 9-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P