Applications for Food and Drug Administration Approval to Market a New Drug; Postmarketing Reports; Reporting Information About Authorized Generic Drugs; Companion Document to Direct Final Rule, 56529-56533 [E8-22829]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2008–0757/Airspace
Docket No. 08–ASW–13.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
Availability of NPRM’s
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s Web page at https://
www.faa.gov or the Superintendent of
Document’s Web page at https://
www.access.gpo.gov/nara.
Additionally, any person may obtain
a copy of this notice by submitting a
request to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Office of Air
Traffic Airspace Management, ATA–
400, 800 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591, or by calling
(202) 267–8783. Communications must
identify both docket numbers for this
notice. Persons interested in being
placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM’s should contact the FAA’s
Office of Rulemaking (202) 267–9677, to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No.
11–2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Distribution System, which describes
the application procedure.
The Proposal
This action proposes to amend Title
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR), Part 71 by amending the Class E
airspace area for IFR operations at Big
Spring McMahon-Wrinkle Airport, Big
Spring, TX. Changes to the VOR/DME
RWY 17 SIAP have made this action
necessary. The area would be depicted
on appropriate aeronautical charts.
Class E airspace areas are published
in Paragraph 6000 of FAA Order
7400.9R, dated August 15, 2007, and
effective September 15, 2007, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document would be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) Is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The FAA’s authority to
issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
amend controlled airspace at Big Spring
McMahon-Wrinkle Airport, Big Spring,
TX.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS;
AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING
POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9R, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated August 15, 2007, and effective
September 15, 2007, is amended as
follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas
extending upward from 700′ or more above
the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ASW TX E5 Big Spring, TX [Amended]
Big Spring McMahon-Wrinkle Airport, TX
(Lat. 32°12′45″ N., long. 101°31′18″ W.)
Big Spring VORTAC
(Lat. 32°23′08″ N., long. 101°29′01″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.9-mile
radius of Big Spring McMahon-Wrinkle
Airport and within 8 miles east and 4 miles
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56529
west of the 190° radial of the Big Spring
VORTAC extending from the 6.9-mile radius
to 21.9 miles south of the airport and within
3.9 miles each side of the 191° radial of the
Big Spring VORTAC extending from the 6.9mile radius to 10.3 miles north of the airport.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on August 28,
2008.
Roger M. Trevino,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E8–22448 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 314
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0341]
Applications for Food and Drug
Administration Approval to Market a
New Drug; Postmarketing Reports;
Reporting Information About
Authorized Generic Drugs; Companion
Document to Direct Final Rule
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is publishing this
companion proposed rule to the direct
final rule, published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register, which is
intended to amend our regulations to
require that the holder of a new drug
application (NDA) submit certain
information in an annual report
regarding authorized generic drugs. We
are taking this action as part of our
implementation of the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (FDAAA). FDAAA requires that
FDA publish a list of all authorized
generic drugs included in an annual
report since 1999, and that the agency
update the list quarterly.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the proposed rule by
December 15, 2008. If FDA receives any
significant adverse comments, the
agency will publish a document
withdrawing the direct final rule within
30 days after the comment period ends.
FDA will then proceed to respond to
comments under this proposed rule
using the usual notice and comment
procedures. Submit comments on
information collection issues under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 by
October 29, 2008 (see the ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995’’ section of this
document).
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
56530
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2008–N–
0341, by any of the following methods,
except that comments on information
collection issues under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 must be
submitted to the Office of Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) (see the ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995’’ section of this
document).
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions]:
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
To ensure more timely processing of
comments, FDA is no longer accepting
comments submitted to the agency by email. FDA encourages you to continue
to submit electronic comments by using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as
described previously, in the ADDRESSES
portion of this document under
Electronic Submissions.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received may be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Request for
Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number(s), found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
ADDRESSES:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle D.D. Bernstein, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave. Bldg. 51, rm. 6223,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–3601.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
I. Background
As described more fully in the direct
final rule, FDAAA requires that FDA
take the following actions: (1) Publish
on its Internet site a complete list of all
authorized generic drugs included in an
annual report submitted to the agency
after January 1, 1999; (2) update the list
quarterly; and (3) notify relevant Federal
agencies that the list has been published
and will be updated quarterly. For
purposes of publishing the list, section
505(t)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(t))
defines the term ‘‘authorized generic
drug’’ as a ‘‘listed drug (as that term is
used in [section 505(j) of the act]) that
has been approved [under section 505(c)
of the act] and is marketed, sold, or
distributed directly or indirectly to
retail class of trade under a different
labeling, packaging (other than
repackaging as the listed drug in blister
packs, unit doses, or similar packaging
for use in institutions), product code,
labeler code, trade name, or trade mark
than the listed drug.’’
We are proposing to amend § 314.3
(21 CFR 314.3) of our regulations by
adding a definition of ‘‘authorized
generic drug.’’ To allow FDA to
accurately report a complete list of all
authorized generic drugs included in
annual reports and to update the list in
a timely fashion, we are proposing to
amend § 314.81 (21 CFR 314.81) by
adding paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(b), which
would require that annual reports
specifically and clearly include the
information we are required to report. In
addition, we propose to require that the
NDA holder report the date the
authorized generic drug ceased being
distributed to ensure that the list is as
accurate and up-to-date as possible. The
first annual report submitted after
implementation of this regulation must
provide information regarding any
authorized generic drug that was
marketed during the time period
covered by an annual report submitted
after January 1, 1999. When information
is included in an annual report about an
authorized generic drug, we would
require that a copy of that portion of the
annual report be sent to a central office
in the agency that will compile the list
and update it quarterly. This proposed
rule assumes that the copy of the
relevant portion of the annual report
may currently be submitted in any
number of formats (e.g., a paper copy, a
PDF document on a computer disc).
Current capabilities do not permit direct
electronic submission through a Webbased system. However, FDA is
committed to adapting its business
practices to evolving technology,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
including using the significant
advancements in Web-based, electronic
systems. We anticipate that, in future
rulemakings, Web-based submission of
annual reports will eventually be
required. In anticipation of that future
change, this proposed rule provides that
once an electronic submission format is
adopted for annual reports, the
submission to the agency of the
information required under this
regulation will also be required in that
electronic format. We anticipate that
when such a change is implemented,
future guidance will address any
technical questions related to such
submissions.
II. Additional Information
This proposed rule is a companion to
the direct final rule published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register.
This companion proposed rule and the
direct final rule are identical in
substance. This companion proposed
rule will provide the procedural
framework to proceed with standard
notice-and-comment rulemaking in the
event the direct final rule receives
significant adverse comment and is
withdrawn. The comment period for the
companion proposed rule runs
concurrently with the comment period
of the direct final rule. Any comments
received under the companion proposed
rule will be treated as comments
regarding the direct final rule and vice
versa.
A significant adverse comment is one
that explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without change. A
comment recommending a rule change
in addition to this rule will not be
considered a significant adverse
comment unless the comment states
why this rule would be ineffective
without the additional change.
If no significant adverse comment is
received in response to the direct final
rule, no further action will be taken
related to the companion proposed rule.
Instead, we will publish a confirmation
notice within 30 days after the comment
period ends. We intend the direct final
rule to become effective 30 days after
publication of the confirmation notice.
If we receive significant adverse
comments, we will withdraw the direct
final rule. We will proceed to respond
to all the comments received regarding
the direct final rule, treating those
comments as comments to this proposed
rule. The agency will address the
comments in the subsequent final rule.
We will not provide additional
opportunity for comment. If we receive
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
a significant adverse comment which
applies to part of the rule and that part
may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, we may adopt as final those
parts of the rule that are not the subject
of significant adverse comment.
For additional background
information, see the corresponding
direct final rule published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register. All
persons who may wish to comment
should review the complete rationale for
this amendment set out in the preamble
of the direct final rule.
III. Environmental Impact
We have carefully considered, under
21 CFR part 25, the potential
environmental effects of this action. We
have concluded that this action will not
have a significant impact on the human
environment and that an environmental
impact statement is not required.
IV. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public
Law 104–4). Executive Order 12866
directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). The agency
believes that this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
by the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because this proposed rule
imposes only minimal regulatory
obligations, the agency certifies that the
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $130
million, using the most current (2007)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this proposed rule to result in any 1year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
The only costs of this proposed rule
are associated with the Paperwork
Reduction Act burden, described in
section V of this document. If we
assume an average hourly wage plus
benefits of $56 for the reporting
personnel, the annual cost is about
$29,000 ($56 per hour x 520 hours).
V. The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995
This proposed rule contains
information collection provisions that
are subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). A description of
these provisions is given with an
estimate of the annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden in Table 1 of this
document. Included in the estimate is
the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
56531
needed, and completing and reviewing
each collection of information.
FDA invites comments on the
following: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of FDA’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Title: Applications for FDA Approval
to Market a New Drug; Postmarketing
Reports; Reporting Information About
Authorized Generic Drugs.
Description: This rulemaking requires
the holder of an NDA to notify the
agency if an authorized generic drug is
marketed by clearly including this
information in annual reports in an
easily accessible place and by sending a
copy of the relevant portion of the
annual reports to a central office. We are
taking this action as part of our
implementation of FDAAA, which
requires that FDA publish a list of all
authorized generic drugs included in an
annual report after January 1, 1999, and
that the agency update the list quarterly.
We plan to publish this list on the
Internet and to notify relevant Federal
agencies that the list has been published
and will be updated.
Description of Respondents: Current
holders of an NDA under which an
authorized generic drug was marketed
during the time period covered by an
annual report submitted after January 1,
1999.
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
Number of
Respondents
21 CFR 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b)
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours Per
Response
Total Hours
60
6.7
400
1 hour
400
Authorized generic drug information submitted in each subsequent annual report
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
Authorized generic drug information in the first annual report
submitted after the implementation of § 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b)
60
6.7
400
15 minutes
100
The submission of a copy of that
portion of each annual report
containing authorized generic
drug information
60
6.7
400
3 minutes
20
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
56532
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
During the past several years, FDA
has reviewed a small sample of annual
reports it has received under
§ 314.81(b)(2) to discern whether an
authorized generic drug is being
marketed by the NDA holder. Based on
information learned from this review
and based on the number of annual
reports the agency currently receives
under § 314.81(b)(2),1 we estimate that,
after the implementation of
§ 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b), we will receive
approximately 400 annual reports
containing the information required
under § 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for authorized
generic drugs that were marketed during
the time period covered by an annual
report submitted after January 1, 1999.
Based on the number of sponsors that
currently submit all annual reports, we
estimate that approximately 60 sponsors
will submit these 400 annual reports
with authorized generics. As indicated
in Table 1 of this document, we are
estimating that the same number of
annual reports will be submitted each
subsequent year from the same number
of sponsors containing the information
required under § 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b), and
that the same number of copies of that
portion of each annual report containing
the authorized generic drug information
will be submitted from the same number
of sponsors. Concerning the hours per
response, based on our estimate of 40
hours to prepare each annual report
currently submitted under
§ 314.81(b)(2),2 we estimate that
sponsors will need approximately 1
hour to prepare the information
required under § 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for
each authorized generic drug that was
marketed during the time period
covered by an annual report submitted
after January 1, 1999, approximately 15
minutes to prepare the information
required under § 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for
each subsequent annual report, and
approximately 3 minutes to submit to
FDA a copy of that portion of each
annual report containing the authorized
generic drug information.
The information collection provisions
of this proposed rule have been
submitted to OMB for review. Interested
persons are requested to fax comments
regarding information collection by
October 29, 2008, to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB. To ensure that comments on
information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
1 During fiscal year 2006, the Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research received 2,569 annual
reports under § 314.81(b)(2) from 374 sponsors.)
2 See the Federal Register of January 4, 2008 (73
FR 865).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–6974.
VI. Legal Authority
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act), as amended by the Food
and Drug Administration Amendments
Act of 2007 (FDAAA), provides
authority for FDA to issue this proposed
rule. Section 505(t) of the act (21 U.S.C.
355(t); FDAAA section 920) requires
that FDA publish a complete list of all
authorized generic drugs included in an
annual report submitted to the agency
after January 1, 1999, and to update that
list quarterly. In addition, section 701(a)
of the act (21 U.S.C. 371(a)) provides
general authority for FDA to issue
regulations for the efficient enforcement
of the act. This proposed rule would
amend FDA’s existing regulations
regarding annual reports in order to
ensure that the information necessary
for the agency to fulfill its obligation
under section 505(t) is clearly reported.
VII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA
has determined that the rule does not
contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, the
agency has concluded that the rule does
not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
VIII. Request for Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
This comment period runs concurrently
with the comment period for the direct
final rule; any comments received will
be considered as comments regarding
the direct final rule. Submit a single
copy of electronic comments or two
paper copies of any mailed comments,
except that individuals may submit one
paper copy. Comments are to be
identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA only through FDMS at
https://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 314
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Drugs, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, it is proposed that
21 CFR part 314 be amended as follows:
PART 314—APPLICATIONS FOR FDA
APPROVAL TO MARKET A NEW DRUG
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 314 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352,
353, 355, 356, 356a, 356b, 356c, 371, 374,
379e.
2. Section 314.3 is amended in
paragraph (b) by adding the following
definition for authorized generic drug in
alphabetical order:
§ 314.3
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Authorized generic drug means a
listed drug, as defined in this section,
that has been approved under section
505(c) of the act and is marketed, sold,
or distributed directly or indirectly to
retail class of trade with labeling,
packaging (other than repackaging as the
listed drug in blister packs, unit doses,
or similar packaging for use in
institutions), product code, labeler code,
trade name, or trade mark that differs
from that of the listed drug.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 314.81 is amended by
redesignating paragraph (b)(2)(ii) as
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(a) and by adding
new paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(b) as follows:
§ 314.81
Other postmarketing reports.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(b) Authorized generic drugs. If
applicable, the date each authorized
generic drug (as defined in § 314.3)
entered the market, the date each
authorized generic drug ceased being
distributed, and the corresponding trade
or brand name. Each dosage form and/
or strength is a different authorized
generic drug and should be listed
separately. The first annual report
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
submitted on or after February 11, 2009,
must include the information listed in
this paragraph for any authorized
generic drug that was marketed during
the time period covered by an annual
report submitted after January 1, 1999.
If information is included in the annual
report with respect to any authorized
generic drug, a copy of that portion of
the annual report must be sent to the
Food and Drug Administration, Center
for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Office of Pharmaceutical Science, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm.
4183, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002
and marked ‘‘Authorized Generic
Submission’’ or, if FDA has required
that annual reports be submitted in an
electronic format, the information
required by this section must also be
submitted in the electronic format.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 16, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–22829 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–308W]
Technical Amendment to Listing in
Schedule III of Approved Drug
Products Containing
Tetrahydrocannabinols; Withdrawal of
Proposed Rule
Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), Department of
Justice
ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: DEA is withdrawing a
proposed rule that was published in the
Federal Register on September 24, 2007
(72 FR 54226) and is terminating the
rulemaking. The proposed rule would
have revised the DEA regulations with
respect to the listing in schedule III of
a synthetic isomer of
tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) contained
in a specific formulation of a drug
product approved by the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA).
Specifically, the proposed rule would
have revised the DEA regulation so that
it would also include generic drug
products approved by the FDA under
section 505(j) of the Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FDCA) (21 U.S.C. 355)
that cite the drug product currently
listed in schedule III as the reference
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
listed drug. In view of the comments
DEA received in response to the
proposed rule, DEA has decided—in
lieu of finalizing the proposed rule—to
proceed with the process set out in 21
U.S.C. 811 for transferring each such
generic drug individually to schedule
III.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine A. Sannerud, PhD., Chief,
Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section,
Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA
22152; Telephone: (202) 307–7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under the Controlled Substances Act
(CSA), the schedules of controlled
substances are published on an updated
basis in the DEA regulations. 21 U.S.C.
812(a), (c) and n.1. Currently, one of the
substances listed in schedule III is the
following: ‘‘Dronabinol (synthetic) in
sesame oil and encapsulated in a soft
gelatin capsule in a U.S. Food and Drug
Administration [FDA] approved
product.’’ 21 CFR 1308.13(g)(1). This
describes the drug product marketed
under the brand name Marinol. As
explained in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) (72 FR 54226), it is
possible that generic versions of Marinol
could be approved by the FDA yet not
fit within the same schedule III listing
as Marinol. The proposed rule was
intended to correct this situation so that
certain generic versions of Marinol that
might be approved by the FDA in the
future would be in the same schedule as
Marinol.
During the comment period, DEA
received comments from nine entities
(firms, organizations, and one
individual). Six of the nine commenters
expressed support for the proposed
rule,1 two opposed it, and one stated
both that it was ‘‘a good idea’’ and ‘‘not
a good idea.’’ 2 One of the commenters
that opposed the rule asserted that the
rule was not in conformity with the
CSA. Specifically, this commenter
asserted that, to achieve the intended
result of the rule (transferring to
schedule III any future FDA-approved
generic versions of Marinol that do not
fit within the current wording of 21 CFR
1308.13(g)(1)), DEA must engage in
1 Three of the commenters that supported the rule
also said, in somewhat different ways, that the
proposed rule should go further—for example, by
also transferring marijuana and/or its derivatives
out of schedule I or by granting a pending
application by a person seeking to become
registered to manufacture marijuana.
2 This commenter suggested that all forms of THC
should either be in schedule I or schedule III, but
that FDA-approved formulations containing THC
should not be listed separately from illicit forms of
the drug.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56533
formal rescheduling action, following
the procedures set forth in 21 U.S.C.
811. Under these procedures, DEA
requests from the Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) a scientific
and medical evaluation and scheduling
recommendation, with DEA and HHS
being required to consider the eight
factors set forth in 21 U.S.C. 811(b).3 In
addition, both of the commenters that
objected to the proposed rule asserted
that the unique formulation of Marinol
(that which meets the current wording
of 21 CFR 1308.13(g)(1)) prevents the
drug from having the ‘‘high potential for
abuse’’ commensurate with controlled
substances in schedules I and II.
Further, these commenters asserted,
generic versions of Marinol that might
be approved by the FDA in the future
cannot be assumed to have the same
potential for abuse as Marinol if they
were to differ from Marinol in their
formulations or routes of
administration. Based on these
considerations, one of the objecting
commenters asked that DEA withdraw
the proposed rule or, in the alternative,
grant an administrative hearing to
address the issues raised in its
objections.
In the NPRM (in the preamble to the
proposed rule), DEA addressed the
foregoing legal and factual issues raised
by the objecting commenters. Having
considered the comments, DEA
continues to believe that the proposed
rule is legally permissible within the
structure of the CSA, for the reasons set
forth in the NPRM. In addition, having
obtained the input and concurrence of
the FDA during the development of the
proposed rule, DEA believes that the
proposed rule accurately reflects the
relevant legal considerations under the
FDCA and further that it is grounded in
sound scientific considerations. It
should also be noted that two of the
commenters that supported the rule
agreed with DEA regarding the core
legal and factual issues raised by those
commenters that objected to the rule.
Nonetheless, DEA must consider what
would likely be the practical realities of
going forward with the proposed rule at
this time.
First, if DEA were to grant the
objecting commenter’s request for a
hearing, the administrative proceedings
within the agency would likely take at
least two years to complete, taking into
account the time to conduct the hearing
presided over by an administrative law
judge (ALJ), the issuance by the ALJ of
a recommended decision, and the
3 For a discussion of the formal rescheduling
procedures under the CSA, see Gettman v. DEA,
290 F.3d at 430, 432 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
E:\FR\FM\29SEP1.SGM
29SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 189 (Monday, September 29, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56529-56533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22829]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 314
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0341]
Applications for Food and Drug Administration Approval to Market
a New Drug; Postmarketing Reports; Reporting Information About
Authorized Generic Drugs; Companion Document to Direct Final Rule
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing this
companion proposed rule to the direct final rule, published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register, which is intended to amend our
regulations to require that the holder of a new drug application (NDA)
submit certain information in an annual report regarding authorized
generic drugs. We are taking this action as part of our implementation
of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA).
FDAAA requires that FDA publish a list of all authorized generic drugs
included in an annual report since 1999, and that the agency update the
list quarterly.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the proposed rule by
December 15, 2008. If FDA receives any significant adverse comments,
the agency will publish a document withdrawing the direct final rule
within 30 days after the comment period ends. FDA will then proceed to
respond to comments under this proposed rule using the usual notice and
comment procedures. Submit comments on information collection issues
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 by October 29, 2008 (see the
``Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995'' section of this document).
[[Page 56530]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2008-
N-0341, by any of the following methods, except that comments on
information collection issues under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
must be submitted to the Office of Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) (see the ``Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995'' section of this document).
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions]: Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
To ensure more timely processing of comments, FDA is no longer
accepting comments submitted to the agency by e-mail. FDA encourages
you to continue to submit electronic comments by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, as described previously, in the ADDRESSES portion
of this document under Electronic Submissions.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received may be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For additional information on submitting
comments, see the ``Request for Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number(s), found in brackets in the heading of this document,
into the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the
Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle D.D. Bernstein, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave. Bldg. 51, rm. 6223, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3601.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
As described more fully in the direct final rule, FDAAA requires
that FDA take the following actions: (1) Publish on its Internet site a
complete list of all authorized generic drugs included in an annual
report submitted to the agency after January 1, 1999; (2) update the
list quarterly; and (3) notify relevant Federal agencies that the list
has been published and will be updated quarterly. For purposes of
publishing the list, section 505(t)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(t)) defines the term ``authorized
generic drug'' as a ``listed drug (as that term is used in [section
505(j) of the act]) that has been approved [under section 505(c) of the
act] and is marketed, sold, or distributed directly or indirectly to
retail class of trade under a different labeling, packaging (other than
repackaging as the listed drug in blister packs, unit doses, or similar
packaging for use in institutions), product code, labeler code, trade
name, or trade mark than the listed drug.''
We are proposing to amend Sec. 314.3 (21 CFR 314.3) of our
regulations by adding a definition of ``authorized generic drug.'' To
allow FDA to accurately report a complete list of all authorized
generic drugs included in annual reports and to update the list in a
timely fashion, we are proposing to amend Sec. 314.81 (21 CFR 314.81)
by adding paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(b), which would require that annual
reports specifically and clearly include the information we are
required to report. In addition, we propose to require that the NDA
holder report the date the authorized generic drug ceased being
distributed to ensure that the list is as accurate and up-to-date as
possible. The first annual report submitted after implementation of
this regulation must provide information regarding any authorized
generic drug that was marketed during the time period covered by an
annual report submitted after January 1, 1999. When information is
included in an annual report about an authorized generic drug, we would
require that a copy of that portion of the annual report be sent to a
central office in the agency that will compile the list and update it
quarterly. This proposed rule assumes that the copy of the relevant
portion of the annual report may currently be submitted in any number
of formats (e.g., a paper copy, a PDF document on a computer disc).
Current capabilities do not permit direct electronic submission through
a Web-based system. However, FDA is committed to adapting its business
practices to evolving technology, including using the significant
advancements in Web-based, electronic systems. We anticipate that, in
future rulemakings, Web-based submission of annual reports will
eventually be required. In anticipation of that future change, this
proposed rule provides that once an electronic submission format is
adopted for annual reports, the submission to the agency of the
information required under this regulation will also be required in
that electronic format. We anticipate that when such a change is
implemented, future guidance will address any technical questions
related to such submissions.
II. Additional Information
This proposed rule is a companion to the direct final rule
published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. This
companion proposed rule and the direct final rule are identical in
substance. This companion proposed rule will provide the procedural
framework to proceed with standard notice-and-comment rulemaking in the
event the direct final rule receives significant adverse comment and is
withdrawn. The comment period for the companion proposed rule runs
concurrently with the comment period of the direct final rule. Any
comments received under the companion proposed rule will be treated as
comments regarding the direct final rule and vice versa.
A significant adverse comment is one that explains why the rule
would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying
premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without
change. A comment recommending a rule change in addition to this rule
will not be considered a significant adverse comment unless the comment
states why this rule would be ineffective without the additional
change.
If no significant adverse comment is received in response to the
direct final rule, no further action will be taken related to the
companion proposed rule. Instead, we will publish a confirmation notice
within 30 days after the comment period ends. We intend the direct
final rule to become effective 30 days after publication of the
confirmation notice.
If we receive significant adverse comments, we will withdraw the
direct final rule. We will proceed to respond to all the comments
received regarding the direct final rule, treating those comments as
comments to this proposed rule. The agency will address the comments in
the subsequent final rule. We will not provide additional opportunity
for comment. If we receive
[[Page 56531]]
a significant adverse comment which applies to part of the rule and
that part may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt
as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of
significant adverse comment.
For additional background information, see the corresponding direct
final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
All persons who may wish to comment should review the complete
rationale for this amendment set out in the preamble of the direct
final rule.
III. Environmental Impact
We have carefully considered, under 21 CFR part 25, the potential
environmental effects of this action. We have concluded that this
action will not have a significant impact on the human environment and
that an environmental impact statement is not required.
IV. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive
Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). Executive
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that
this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by
the Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because this proposed rule imposes only minimal
regulatory obligations, the agency certifies that the proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $130 million, using the most current (2007) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
proposed rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
The only costs of this proposed rule are associated with the
Paperwork Reduction Act burden, described in section V of this
document. If we assume an average hourly wage plus benefits of $56 for
the reporting personnel, the annual cost is about $29,000 ($56 per hour
x 520 hours).
V. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule contains information collection provisions that
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). A
description of these provisions is given with an estimate of the annual
reporting and recordkeeping burden in Table 1 of this document.
Included in the estimate is the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing each collection of information.
FDA invites comments on the following: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
FDA's functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Title: Applications for FDA Approval to Market a New Drug;
Postmarketing Reports; Reporting Information About Authorized Generic
Drugs.
Description: This rulemaking requires the holder of an NDA to
notify the agency if an authorized generic drug is marketed by clearly
including this information in annual reports in an easily accessible
place and by sending a copy of the relevant portion of the annual
reports to a central office. We are taking this action as part of our
implementation of FDAAA, which requires that FDA publish a list of all
authorized generic drugs included in an annual report after January 1,
1999, and that the agency update the list quarterly. We plan to publish
this list on the Internet and to notify relevant Federal agencies that
the list has been published and will be updated.
Description of Respondents: Current holders of an NDA under which
an authorized generic drug was marketed during the time period covered
by an annual report submitted after January 1, 1999.
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours Per
21 CFR 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) Respondents per Response Responses Response Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authorized generic drug information in the first 60 6.7 400 1 hour 400
annual report submitted after the implementation of
Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authorized generic drug information submitted in each 60 6.7 400 15 minutes 100
subsequent annual report
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The submission of a copy of that portion of each 60 6.7 400 3 minutes 20
annual report containing authorized generic drug
information
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
[[Page 56532]]
During the past several years, FDA has reviewed a small sample of
annual reports it has received under Sec. 314.81(b)(2) to discern
whether an authorized generic drug is being marketed by the NDA holder.
Based on information learned from this review and based on the number
of annual reports the agency currently receives under Sec.
314.81(b)(2),\1\ we estimate that, after the implementation of Sec.
314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b), we will receive approximately 400 annual reports
containing the information required under Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for
authorized generic drugs that were marketed during the time period
covered by an annual report submitted after January 1, 1999. Based on
the number of sponsors that currently submit all annual reports, we
estimate that approximately 60 sponsors will submit these 400 annual
reports with authorized generics. As indicated in Table 1 of this
document, we are estimating that the same number of annual reports will
be submitted each subsequent year from the same number of sponsors
containing the information required under Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b),
and that the same number of copies of that portion of each annual
report containing the authorized generic drug information will be
submitted from the same number of sponsors. Concerning the hours per
response, based on our estimate of 40 hours to prepare each annual
report currently submitted under Sec. 314.81(b)(2),\2\ we estimate
that sponsors will need approximately 1 hour to prepare the information
required under Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for each authorized generic
drug that was marketed during the time period covered by an annual
report submitted after January 1, 1999, approximately 15 minutes to
prepare the information required under Sec. 314.81(b)(2)(ii)(b) for
each subsequent annual report, and approximately 3 minutes to submit to
FDA a copy of that portion of each annual report containing the
authorized generic drug information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ During fiscal year 2006, the Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research received 2,569 annual reports under Sec. 314.81(b)(2) from
374 sponsors.)
\2\ See the Federal Register of January 4, 2008 (73 FR 865).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information collection provisions of this proposed rule have
been submitted to OMB for review. Interested persons are requested to
fax comments regarding information collection by October 29, 2008, to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB. To ensure that
comments on information collection are received, OMB recommends that
written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: 202-395-6974.
VI. Legal Authority
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act), as amended by
the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA),
provides authority for FDA to issue this proposed rule. Section 505(t)
of the act (21 U.S.C. 355(t); FDAAA section 920) requires that FDA
publish a complete list of all authorized generic drugs included in an
annual report submitted to the agency after January 1, 1999, and to
update that list quarterly. In addition, section 701(a) of the act (21
U.S.C. 371(a)) provides general authority for FDA to issue regulations
for the efficient enforcement of the act. This proposed rule would
amend FDA's existing regulations regarding annual reports in order to
ensure that the information necessary for the agency to fulfill its
obligation under section 505(t) is clearly reported.
VII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that
the rule does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government. Accordingly, the agency has concluded
that the rule does not contain policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
VIII. Request for Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
This comment period runs concurrently with the comment period for the
direct final rule; any comments received will be considered as comments
regarding the direct final rule. Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only
through FDMS at https://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 314
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Drugs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, it is
proposed that 21 CFR part 314 be amended as follows:
PART 314--APPLICATIONS FOR FDA APPROVAL TO MARKET A NEW DRUG
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 314 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 355, 356, 356a,
356b, 356c, 371, 374, 379e.
2. Section 314.3 is amended in paragraph (b) by adding the
following definition for authorized generic drug in alphabetical order:
Sec. 314.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Authorized generic drug means a listed drug, as defined in this
section, that has been approved under section 505(c) of the act and is
marketed, sold, or distributed directly or indirectly to retail class
of trade with labeling, packaging (other than repackaging as the listed
drug in blister packs, unit doses, or similar packaging for use in
institutions), product code, labeler code, trade name, or trade mark
that differs from that of the listed drug.
* * * * *
3. Section 314.81 is amended by redesignating paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
as paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(a) and by adding new paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(b) as
follows:
Sec. 314.81 Other postmarketing reports.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * *
(b) Authorized generic drugs. If applicable, the date each
authorized generic drug (as defined in Sec. 314.3) entered the market,
the date each authorized generic drug ceased being distributed, and the
corresponding trade or brand name. Each dosage form and/or strength is
a different authorized generic drug and should be listed separately.
The first annual report
[[Page 56533]]
submitted on or after February 11, 2009, must include the information
listed in this paragraph for any authorized generic drug that was
marketed during the time period covered by an annual report submitted
after January 1, 1999. If information is included in the annual report
with respect to any authorized generic drug, a copy of that portion of
the annual report must be sent to the Food and Drug Administration,
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical
Science, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 4183, Silver Spring,
MD 20993-0002 and marked ``Authorized Generic Submission'' or, if FDA
has required that annual reports be submitted in an electronic format,
the information required by this section must also be submitted in the
electronic format.
* * * * *
Dated: September 16, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-22829 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S