Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Seabird and Pinniped Research Activities in Central California, 56556-56561 [E8-22819]
Download as PDF
56556
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
fishery develop beyond the scope of this
analysis. Alternative 1 would close the
current west-coast-based DSLL fishery
operating on the high seas, which
currently consists of one vessel. To
implement this alternative the HMS
FMP would need to be amended and the
implementing regulations published.
There could be some minor positive
impacts on protected species and fish
populations; however, many of these
species are highly migratory with a
Pacific-wide distribution. Thus, they
would not necessarily benefit from the
reduction of effort associated with
closing the west-coast-based DSLL
fishery because the effort may be shifted
to other fisheries to continue meeting
domestic demand for fish. Tuna
formerly caught in the west-coast-based
DSLL fishery are likely to be caught by
other nations and imported back into
the nation with the closed fishery. There
may also be some negative impacts on
the socio-economics of the participant,
fishing communities and the fishing
industry in general if this alternative
was implemented.
Alternative 2, the preferred
alternative, would allow the west-coastbased DSLL fishery to continue
operating on the high seas and expand
to a maximum of six vessels. At six
vessels, there could be some minor
negative impacts to protected resource
and finfish populations and some
positive socioeconomic impacts for the
participants and the fishing industry in
general if this alternative was
implemented. However, as discussed
previously, this may just result in a shift
in effort from one fishery to another, if
demand for tuna remains the same. All
U.S. longline vessels operating on the
high seas outside of the U.S. EEZ are
currently subject to the same controls
that applied to Hawaii-based longline
fishing vessels holding longline permits
in 2003. The limitations and
specifications for the fishing area, gear
configurations, sea turtle and seabird
mitigation measures, skipper
workshops, etc. are consistent with
current Federal regulations applicable to
longline vessels targeting tuna under the
Western Pacific Fishery Management
Council’s Pelagics FMP (implemented at
50 CFR part 665) and the Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s HMS FMP
(implemented at 50 CFR part 660).
Other Documents
As required in Section 7(a)(2) of the
Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.), NMFS is engaged in formal
consultations with NMFS’s Protected
Resource Division to determine if the
proposed action is likely to jeopardize
the continued existence and recovery of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
any endangered or threatened species or
result in the destruction or adverse
modification of critical habitat.
Request for Comments
NMFS requests public comment on
the draft environmental assessment of
the West Coast Deep-set Longline
Fishery Operating Outside of the U.S.
Exclusive Economic Zone.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: September 23, 2008.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–22818 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XK76
Pacific Fishery Management Council;
Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s (Council)
Salmon Technical Team (STT),
Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC) Salmon Subcommittee, and
Model Evaluation Workgroup (MEW)
will review proposed salmon
methodology changes in a joint work
session, which is open to the public.
DATES: The work session will be held
Wednesday, October 15, 2008, from 9
a.m. to 4 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The work session will be
held at the Marriott Courtyard Portland
Airport, Columbia Ballroom, 11550 NE
Airport Way, Portland, OR 97220;
telephone: (503) 252–3200.
Council address: Pacific Fishery
Management Council, 7700 NE
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland,
OR 97220–1384.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Chuck Tracy, Salmon Management Staff
Officer, Pacific Fishery Management
Council, (503) 820–2280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the work session is to brief
the STT and SSC Salmon Subcommittee
on proposed changes to methods and
standards used to manage ocean salmon
fisheries. The work session will include
review of proposed changes to the
Sacramento River fall Chinook
abundance forecast and harvest model,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and a preliminary sensitivity analysis of
the Chinook and Coho Fishery
Regulation Assessment Models (FRAM).
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in the meeting agenda may
come before the STT, SSC Salmon
Subcommittee, and MEW for
discussion, those issues may not be the
subject of formal action during this
meeting. Action will be restricted to
those issues specifically listed in this
notice and any issues arising after
publication of this notice that require
emergency action under Section 305(c)
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
provided the public has been notified of
the intent to take final action to address
the emergency.
Special Accommodations
This meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to Ms.
Carolyn Porter at (503) 820–2280 at least
5 days prior to the meeting date.
Dated: September 24, 2008.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–22751 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XK31
Small Takes of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Specified Activities;
Seabird and Pinniped Research
Activities in Central California
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental
harassment authorization; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request
from PRBO Conservation Science
(PRBO) for a one-year authorization to
take small numbers of marine mammals
by harassment incidental to conducting
seabird and pinniped research activities
˜
on Southeast Farallon Island, Ano
Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National
Seashore in central California. Pursuant
to the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS requests comments on
its proposal to authorize PRBO to take,
by Level B harassment, small numbers
of several species of pinnipeds at
˜
Southeast Farallon Island, Ano Nuevo
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Island, and Point Reyes National
Seashore beginning December 2008.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received no later than October 29,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
application should be addressed to P.
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225. The mailbox address for
providing e-mail comments is
PR1.0648–XK31@noaa.gov. Comments
sent via e-mail, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10–
megabyte file size.
A copy of the application and other
related documents may be obtained by
writing to the above address,
telephoning one of the contacts listed
here (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT), or visiting the internet at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular
business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeannine Cody or Jaclyn Daly, NMFS,
(301) 713–2289, or Monica DeAngelis,
NMFS Southwest Region, (562) 980–
3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by United States
citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing)
within a specified geographical region if
certain findings are made and either
regulations are issued or, if the taking is
limited to harassment, notice of a
proposed authorization is provided to
the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings
shall be granted if NMFS finds that the
taking will have a negligible impact on
the species or stock(s), and will not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for
certain subsistence uses, and if the
permissible methods of taking and
requirements pertaining to the
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting of
such taking are set forth.
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
..an impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably expected
to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
affect the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
for certain categories of activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[‘‘Level A harassment’’]; or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[‘‘Level B harassment’’].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS’ review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of small numbers
of marine mammals. Within 45 days of
the close of the comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny the
authorization.
Summary of Request
On July 28, 2008, NMFS received an
application from PRBO requesting an
authorization for the harassment of
small numbers of California sea lions
(Zalophus californianus), Pacific harbor
seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi),
northern elephant seals (Mirounga
angustirostris), and Steller sea lions
(Eumetopias jubatus) incidental to
conducting seabird and pinniped
research operations on Southeast
˜
Farallon Island, Ano Nuevo Island, and
Point Reyes National Seashore in central
California (CA). The proposed action
area consists of the following three
locations:
South Farallon Islands (SFI)
SFI consists of Southeast Farallon
Island (SEFI) and West End Island
(WEI). These two islands are directly
adjacent to each other and separated by
only a 30–foot (ft) (9.1 meters (m))
channel. The SFI have a land area of
approximately 120 acres (0.49 square
kilometers (km)) and are part of the
Farallon National Wildlife Refuge. The
islands are located near the edge of the
continental shelf 28 miles (45.1 km)
west of San Francisco, CA, and lie
within the waters of the Gulf of the
Farallones National Marine Sanctuary
(NMS).
˜
Ano Nuevo Island (ANI)
ANI is located one-quarter mile (402
˜
m) offshore of Ano Nuevo Point in San
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56557
Mateo County, CA). This small 25–acre
˜
(0.1 square km) island is part of the Ano
Nuevo State Reserve, all of which is
owned and operated by California State
Parks. ANI lies within the Monterey Bay
˜
NMS and the newly established Ano
Nuevo State Marine Conservation Area.
Point Reyes National Seashore (PRNS)
PRNS is located 40 miles (64.3 km)
north of San Francisco Bay and lies
within close proximity (6 miles, 9.6 km)
of the Cordell Bank NMS. The proposed
research areas are within the headland
coastal areas of this large National Park.
Specified Activities
Seabird Research on SEFI
Seabird research activities involve
observational and marking (i.e. netting
and banding for capture-mark-recapture)
studies of breeding seabirds and
viewing breeding seabirds from an
observation blind or censusing
shorebirds. This activity usually
involves one or two observers who
access the island’s two landings, the
North Landing and the East Landing, by
14 to 18 ft (4.3 to 5.5 m) open
motorboats which are hoisted onto the
island using a derrick system.
Researchers visit the sites
approximately one to three times per
day for a maximum of 1080 visits per
year. Most visits to these areas are brief
(approximately 15 minutes). From early
April through early August, seabird
observers are present from two to five
hours daily at North Landing to conduct
observational studies on breeding
Common Murres (Uria aalge).
Most intertidal areas of the island,
where marine mammals are present, are
rarely visited in seabird research. In
both locations (North Landing and East
Landing) the observers are located
greater than 50 feet (15.2 m) above any
pinnipeds primarily California sea lions
or northern elephant seals and to a
lesser extent harbor seals which may be
hauled out. Most potential for incidental
take will occur at the island’s two
landings. However, the likelihood of
encountering the eastern stock of Steller
sea lions at both sites is rare.
Field Station Resupply on SEFI
PRBO will resupply the field station
once every two weeks for a maximum of
26 visits per year. These visits to either
the North Landing or East Landing will
last one to three hours and involve
launching of the boat with one operator
along with two to four researchers
assisting with the operations from land.
At East Landing the primary landing site
all personnel assisting with the landing
will stay on the loading platform 30 ft
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
56558
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
(9.1 m) above the water. At North
Landing, loading operations occur at the
water level in the intertidal. Again, the
likelihood of encountering eastern
Steller sea lions at this location is rare.
Pinniped Research on West End Island
(WEI)
Pinniped research activities involve
surveying breeding elephant seals on
WEI between early December and late
February. There are approximately five
surveys per year, each lasting
approximately two hours. These surveys
involve three observers moving
approximately 1500 ft (457.2 m) above
pinniped colonies to census northern
elephant seal areas. Any transit above
eastern Steller sea lion haulout areas
will last approximately 30 minutes in
duration.
˜
Seabird Research on Ano Nuevo Island
(ANI)
Seabird research activities involve
monitoring seabird burrow nesting
habitat quality and habitat restoration
between the seabird breeding season
and the elephant seal pupping season.
All work is conducted by PRBO in
collaboration with Oikonos - Ecosystem
Knowledge through a collaborative
agreement with California State Parks.
This activity involves two to three
researchers who may access the island
by a 12 ft (3.7 m) Zodiac boat to conduct
research once a week April through
August; restoration and monitoring from
September-November; and intermittent
visits during the rest of the year.
Landings and visits to the nest boxes are
brief in duration (approximately 15
minutes) and the maximum number of
visits to the island would be 30 per year.
Most potential for incidental take
would occur at the landing beach on the
north side of the island when the
researchers arrive and depart to check
the boxes. Non-breeding pinnipeds may
occasionally be present, including
California sea lions that may be hauled
out near a small group of subterranean
seabird nest boxes on the island terrace.
In both locations researchers are located
more than 50 ft (15.2 m) away from any
pinnipeds which may be hauled out.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Seabird Research on Point Reyes
National Seashore (PRNS)
The National Park Service in
collaboration with PRBO conducts:
marine mammal research (see NMFS
Scientific Permit 373–1868); seabird
breeding and roosting colonies
monitoring; habitat restoration; removal
of non-native plants, intertidal
monitoring, and maintenance of coastal
dune habitat.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
Seabird monitoring usually involves
one or two observers conducting the
survey by small boats (12 to 22 ft) along
the PRNS shoreline. Observers will visit
the site year round, with an emphasis
during the seabird nesting season with
occasional, intermittent visits the rest of
the year. The maximum number of visits
per year to the PRNS is 18.
A majority of the research occurs in
areas where marine mammals are not
present. However, the potential for
incidental harassment will occur at the
landing beaches along Point Reyes
Headland, boat ramps, or parking lots
where northern elephant seals, harbor
seals, or California sea lions may be
hauled out.
Description of the Marine Mammals
Potentially Affected by the Activity
The marine mammals most likely to
be harassed incidental to conducting
seabird research at the proposed
research areas on SEFI, ANI, and PRNS
are primarily California sea lions,
northern elephant seals, Pacific harbor
seals, and to a lesser extent Steller sea
lions.
The marine mammals most likely to
be harassed incidental to conducting
research on harbor seals and northern
elephant seals (NMFS Scientific
Research Permit (SRP) 373–1868–00) are
primarily Steller sea lions. Incidental
harassment of elephant seals, harbor
seals, California sea lions, and northern
fur seals is authorized by SRP 373–
1868–00.
General information of these species
can be found in Caretta et al. (2008) and
is available at the following URL: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/
po2007.pdf. Refer to that document for
information on these species.
Additional information on these species
is presented below.
Northern Elephant Seal
The northern elephant breeding
population is distributed from central
Baja California, Mexico, to the Point
Reyes Peninsula in northern California.
Along this coastline there are 13 major
breeding colonies. The northern
elephant seal was exploited for its oil
during the 18th and 19th centuries and
by 1900 the population was reduced to
20 to 30 individuals on Guadalupe
Island (Hoelzel et al., 1993; Hoelzel,
1999). As a result of this bottleneck, the
genetic diversity found in this species is
extremely low (Hoelzel, 1999). The
recent formation of most rookeries
indicates that there is no genetic
differentiation among populations.
Although movement and genetic
exchange occurs among colonies, most
seals return to their natal site to breed
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(Huber et al., 1991). Recolonization of
their former breeding range progressed
north from the San Benito and
Guadalupe Islands off Baja California to
the most recent northernmost breeding
site at Point Reyes Headlands. In the last
three decades, annual pup production
has increased at the rate of 9.43 plus or
minus 0.51 percent per year in
California and 5.19 plus or minus 0.33
percent per year over the entire range
(Barlow et al., 1993).
A complete population count of
elephant seals is not possible because
all age classes are not ashore at the same
time. Elephant seal population size is
typically estimated by counting the
number of pups produced and
multiplying by the inverse of the
expected ratio of pups to total animals
(McCann 1985). Stewart et al., (1994)
used McCann’s multiplier of 4.5 to
extrapolate from 28,164 pups to a
population estimate of 127,000 elephant
seals in the U.S. and Mexico in 1991.
The multiplier of 4.5 was based on a
non-growing population. Boveng (1988)
and Barlow et al. (1993) suggest that a
multiplier of 3.5 is more appropriate for
a rapidly growing population such as
the California stock of elephant seals.
Based on the estimated 35,549 pups
born in California in 2005 and this 3.5
multiplier, the California stock was
approximately 124,000 in 2005.
At Point Reyes, the population grew
at 32.8 percent per year between 1988
and 1997 (Sydeman and Allen, 1999)
and around 10 percent per year since
2000 (S. Allen, unpubl. data), and in
2006 around 700 pups were born at
three primary breeding areas. The
population on the Farallon Islands has
declined by 3.4 percent per year since
1983, and in recent years numbers have
fluctuated between 100 and 200 pups
(W. Sydeman, D. Lee, unpubl. data).
Elephant seals congregate in central
California to breed from late November
to March. Females typically give birth to
a single pup and attend the pup for up
to six weeks. Breeding occurs after the
pup is weaned by attending males. After
breeding, seals migrate to the Gulf of
Alaska or deeper waters in the eastern
Pacific. Adult females and juveniles
return to terrestrial colonies to molt in
April and May, and males return in June
and July to molt, remaining onshore for
around three weeks.
Pacific Harbor Seal
Harbor seals are one of the most
widely distributed pinnipeds in the
northern hemisphere and are found in
coastal, estuarine and some times fresh
water of both the Atlantic and Pacific
Oceans. There is considerable regional
genetic differentiation between harbor
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
seal populations as they are generally
limited in migratory movements. Under
the MMPA, six stocks of Pacific harbor
seals are identified within the U.S.
waters (Angliss and Lodge, 2004;
Carretta et al., 2008). Only the California
stock of harbor seal is found in the
proposed project area, and its
abundance is estimated to be 34,233
(Carretta et al., 2008). There is some
question whether the San Francisco Bay
population may be a separate stock
based on genetic analyses (D. German,
Sonoma State University, pers. com.). At
Point Reyes, the harbor seal population
is estimated to be 7,524 for the molt
season based on a correction factor of
1.65 (Lowry et al., 2005; Manna et al.,
2006).
In central California, harbor seals
breed annually from March through
May and molt in June and July. Females
give birth to a single pup and attend the
pup for around 30 days, at which time
they wean pups. Mating occurs in the
water around the time of weaning.
Harbor seals are resident year round at
terrestrial colonies; however, juveniles
may disperse to other colonies ranging
up to 500 km (311 miles (mi)).
Individual adult seals may also migrate
widely from breeding colonies.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
California Sea Lion
California sea lions range from
southern Mexico up to British Columbia
and breed almost entirely on islands in
southern California, Western Baja
California and the Gulf of California. In
recent years, California sea lions have
begun to breed annually in small
numbers at ANI and SFI, CA. One
abandoned pup was found at PRNS at
Wildcat Beach in 2003. This species is
separated into three recognized stocks
based on three geographic regions (U.S.
stock, Western Baja stock, and the Gulf
of California stock; Lowry et al., 1992).
Some movement has been documented
between these geographic stocks, but
rookeries in the U.S. are widely
separated from major rookeries of
western Baja California, Mexico (Barlow
et al., 1995). The U.S. stock of California
sea lion is the only stock present in the
proposed research area. The California
sea lion has the largest population of
any sea lion species and is the only sea
lion whose population is showing a
healthy growth rate of 5 to 6.2 percent
per annum. Annual incidental takes in
fisheries is approximately 915
individuals; however, the population is
growing by 8.2 percent per year and
fishing mortality is declining (Barlow et
al., 1995). Current U.S. population
estimates range from 237,000 to 244,000
(Carretta et al., 2008).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
California sea lions give birth in May
through July and breeding occurs in July
and August. Females and pups are
resident at breeding colonies year round
and males migrate north to feeding areas
from central California to British
Columbia, Canada. During years of low
food availability (e.g., El Nino Southern
Oscillation, or ENSO), females and
juveniles may also migrate north in
search of prey; and in some particularly
poor years (1997 - 1998), there can be
mass mortality of pups at rookeries.
On the Farallon Islands, California sea
lions haul out in many intertidal areas
year round, fluctuating from several
hundred to several thousand animals.
Breeding animals are concentrated in
areas where researchers would not visit
(PRBO, unpublished data).
California sea lions at Point Reyes
haul out at only a couple locations, but
will occur on human structures such as
boat ramps. The annual population
averages around 300 to 500 during the
fall through spring months, although on
occasion, several thousand sea lions can
arrive depending upon local prey
resources (S. Allen, unpublished data).
Steller Sea Lion
Steller sea lions breed from the Kuril
Islands and Okhotsk Sea through the
Aleutian Islands and the Gulf of Alaska,
and south to central California (Merrick
et al., 1987). Two separate stocks are
recognized within U.S. waters: an
eastern U.S. stock that includes animals
east of Cape Suckling, Alaska (144o W),
and a western U.S. stock that includes
animals west of Cape Suckling.
The Steller sea lion was hunted
during the sealing era for fur, hides,
blubber, and other organs. More
recently, Steller sea lions were
harvested during a modern pup hunt
that lasted from 1959–1972 during
which approximately 45,000 pups were
taken (Pasquel and Adkison, 1994).
At the cessation of the modern
commercial hunting, the Steller sea lion
was found along the Pacific Rim from
California to Japan with approximately
70 percent of the population in Alaskan
waters.
Despite the cessation of the
commercial hunt, the Steller sea lion
population has experienced a rapid
decrease since the mid–1980s, with the
western population stock declining by
greater than 64 percent in the last 30
years (Loughlin et al., 1992). The
number in 1989 was estimated at 68,094
individuals. This total included 10,000
in Russia, 47,960 in Alaska, 6,109 in
British Columbia, 2,261 in Oregon, and
1,764 in California (Loughlin et al.,
1992). Numbers in Alaska have been
declining by 7.8 percent since 1994
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56559
(National Marine Mammal Laboratory,
1995) and have declined by three
percent in California (Le Boeuf et al.,
1991; Ono 1993).
In the 1960s and 70s the number of
sea lions caught in trawl nets peaked,
while present day numbers are low.
California fisheries target several of the
most important prey items for Steller
sea lions and millions of metric tons of
prey have been removed by fisheries in
recent decades. Incidental mortality of
Steller sea lions in fisheries was very
low between 1990 and 2001 in
California. Shooting of adults during
fisheries interactions in central
California have been documented by the
Marine Mammal Stranding Network and
one adult male was found shot at Point
Reyes, California in the 1990s.
In 1990, the Steller sea lion was listed
as a threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Due to
persistent decline of the western U.S.
stock, NMFS reclassified these Steller
sea lions as an endangered distinct
population segment (DPS) under the
ESA in 1997, while the eastern U.S.
stock remained classified as threatened.
Under the MMPA, all Steller sea lions
are classified as strategic stocks are
considered ‘‘depleted.’’
The eastern stock of Steller sea lions
breeds on rookeries located in southeast
Alaska, British Columbia, Oregon, and
California; there are no rookeries located
in Washington. Counts of pups on
rookeries conducted near the end of the
birthing season are nearly complete
counts of pup production. Calkins and
Pitcher (1982) concluded that the total
Steller sea lion population could be
estimated by multiplying the pup
counts by a factor of 4.5, which was
based on the birth rate, and the sex and
age structure of the western Steller sea
lion population in the central Gulf of
Alaska. Using the most recent 2002–
2005 pup counts available by region
from aerial surveys across the range of
the eastern stock, the total population of
the eastern stock of Steller sea lions is
estimated to be 48,519 or 54,989. These
are based on multiplying the total
number of pups counted in southeast
Alaska (5,510 in 2005; NMFS, 2006),
British Columbia (3,318 in 2002; Pitcher
et al., 2007), Oregon (1,136 in 2002;
Pitcher et al., 2007), and California 818
in 2004; NMFS, 2006) by either 4.5
(Calkins and Pitcher, 1982) or 5.1 (Trites
and Larkin, 1996). These are
notminimum population estimates,
since they are extrapolated from pup
counts from photographs taken in 2002
- 2005, and demographic parameters of
a stable, equilibrium non-pup
population that were estimated for the
western Steller sea lion in the mid–
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
56560
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
1970s (Calkins and Pitcher, 1982). Trites
and Larkin’s (1996) pup multiplier
accounts for pups that die and
disappear prior to, as well as pups born
after, the counts are conducted. A pup
multiplier is used for estimating the size
of the eastern stock of Steller sea lions,
but not the western stock. Since the
western stock has declined drastically,
the assumption of an equilibrium
population in the west is not valid.
Because the eastern stock is increasing
within most of its range, using a pup
multiplier is a reasonable approach to
estimating abundance from pup counts.
Steller sea lion numbers in California,
especially in southern and central
California, have declined from historic
numbers. Counts in California between
1927 and 1947 ranged between 5,000
and 7,000 non-pups with no apparent
trend, but have subsequently declined
by over 50 percent, remaining between
1,500 and 2,000 non-pups during 1980
- 2001. Limited information suggests
that counts in northern California
appear to be stable (NMFS, 1995).
The current population of eastern
Steller sea lions in the proposed
research area is estimated to number
between 50 and 750 animals. The PRBO
estimates that between 50 and 150
Steller sea lions live on the Farallon
Islands, and the NMFS Southwest
Fisheries Science Center (SWFSC)
estimates between 400 and 600 live on
ANI (PRBO unpublished data, 2008;
SWFSC unpublished data, 2008).
On SEFI, the abundance of females
declined an average of 3.6 percent per
year from 1974 to 1997 (Sydeman and
Allen 1999). Pup counts at ANI declined
5 percent annually through the 1990s
(NOAA Stock Assessment, 2003), and
have apparently stabilized between
2001 and 2005 (M. Lowry, SWFSC
unpublished data).
In 2000, the combined pup estimate
for both islands was 349. In 2005, the
pup estimate was 204 on ANI. Pup
counts on the Farallon Islands have
generally varied from five to 15
(Hastings and Sydeman, 2002; PRBO
unpublished data). Pups have not been
born at Point Reyes Headland since the
1970s and Steller sea lions are seen in
very low numbers there currently (S.
Allen, unpubl. data).
Steller sea lions give birth in May
through July and breeding commences a
couple of weeks after birth. Nonreproductive animals congregate at a
few haul out sites, including at ANI and
Point Reyes Headland. Pups are weaned
during the winter and spring of the
following year.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
The only anticipated impacts would
be temporary disturbances caused by
the appearance of researchers near the
pinnipeds. The potential disturbance
might alter pinniped behavior and cause
animals to flush from the area. Animals
may return to the same site once
researchers have left or go to an
alternate haul out site, which usually
occurs within 30 minutes (Allen et al.,
1985). Long term effects of this
disturbance are unlikely, as very few
breeding animals will be present in the
vicinity of the proposed seabird
research areas.
It is expected that any incidental
disturbance to pinnipeds from both
types of research would have minimal,
short-term effects and no long-term
effects on the individuals. Incidental
disturbance is believed to have minimal
impacts because pinnipeds usually
return to a site or a nearby site within
30 minutes upon conclusion of research
activities (Allen et al., 1985). Numerous
Incidental Harassment Authorizations
and Letters of Authorizations under the
MMPA, Incidental Take Permits under
Section 10(a)(1)(b) of the ESA, issued by
NMFS (e.g. 72 FR 124, January 3, 2007),
and reports on more localized areas
(e.g., Demarchi and Bentley, 2004) have
analyzed the potential effects of
incidental disturbance to pinnipeds
from various sources. Based on these
reports, the effects to pinnipeds appear,
at the most, to displace the animals
temporarily from their haul out sites.
Based on previous research reports from
PRBO, maximum disturbance to Steller
sea lions would result in the animals
flushing into the water in response to
presence of the researchers. It is not
expected that pinnipeds would
permanently abandon a haul-out site
during PRBO’s research, as precautions
would be taken to not disturb the same
haul-out site on frequent occasions.
No research would occur on pinniped
rookeries; therefore, mother and pup
separation or crushing of pups is not a
concern. Incidental harassment may
occur as researchers approach the haul
out sites with vessels and during
capture and sampling activities of
harbor seals and northern elephant
seals. In PRBO’s final report of activities
conducted from 2000–2005 under
Scientific Research Permit No. 373–
1575, they reported disturbing less than
16 Steller sea lions during all elephant
seal surveys on WEI.
Potential Impacts on Habitat
Neither the proposed seabird
research, nor the proposed pinniped
research would result in the physical
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
altering of marine mammal habitat.
Further, incidental marine mammal
takes will not result in the physical
altering of marine mammal habitat or
major breeding habitat. No survey or
sampling equipment will be left in
habitat areas; no toxic chemicals will be
present; and all state and federal marine
regulations, including those from
National Marine Sanctuaries, will be
followed in regards to boat emissions.
Potential Impacts to Subsistence
Harvest of Marine Mammals
There is no subsistence harvest of
marine mammals in the proposed
research area; therefore, there will be no
impact of the activity on the availability
of the species or stocks of marine
mammals for subsistence uses.
Number of Marine Mammals Expected
to Be Taken
It is expected that approximately
2,242 California sea lions, 418 harbor
seals, 253 northern elephant seals, and
31 Steller sea lions could be potentially
affected by Level B harassment. This
estimate is based on previous research
experiences, with the same activities
conducted in the proposed research
area, and on marine mammal research
activities in these areas. These
incidental harassment take numbers
represent approximately one percent of
the U.S. stock of California sea lion, 1.2
percent of the California stock of Pacific
harbor seal, less than one percent of the
California breeding stock of northern
elephant seal, and 0.02 percent of the
eastern U.S. stock of Steller sea lion. All
of the potential takes are expected to be
Level B behavioral harassment only. No
injury or mortality to pinnipeds is
expected or requested.
Proposed Monitoring and Mitigation
Measures
To reduce the potential for
disturbance from visual and acoustic
stimuli associated with these activities,
PRBO proposes to undertake the
following marine mammal mitigation
measures:
(1) Researchers would keep their
voices hushed and bodies low in the
visual presence of pinnipeds.
(2) Seabird observations at North
Landing on Southeast Farallon Island
would be conducted in an observation
blind where researchers are shielded
from the view of hauled out pinnipeds.
˜
(3) Beach landings on Ano Nuevo
Island would only occur after any
pinnipeds that might be present on the
landing beach have entered the water.
˜
(4) Ano Nuevo Island researchers
accessing seabird nest boxes would
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
crawl slowly if pinnipeds are within
view.
(5) Visits to intertidal areas of
Southeast Farallon Island during
research activities would be coordinated
to reduce potential take.
(6) All research goals on Ano Nuevo
Island would be coordinated to
minimize the necessary number of trips
to the island. Once on Ano Nuevo
Island, researchers would coordinate
monitoring schedules so that areas near
any pinnipeds would be accessed only
once per visit.
(7) The lead biologist would always
serve as an observer to evaluate
incidental take and halt any research
activities should the potential for
incidental take be too great.
Proposed Monitoring and Reporting
Researchers would take notes of sea
lions and seals observed within the
proposed research area during studies.
The notes would provide dates, time,
tidal height, species, numbers of sea
lions and seals present, and any
disturbances. PRBO would submit a
final report, including these notes, to
NMFS within 90 days after the
expiration of the Incidental Harassment
Authorization (IHA), if it is issued.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
In 2007, NMFS prepared a draft
Environmental Assessment (EA) on the
issuance of an IHA to PRBO to take
marine mammals by Level B harassment
incidental to conducting seabird
research in central California. The draft
EA was released for public review and
comment along with the application and
the proposed IHA (72 FR 41294, July 27,
2007). All comments were addressed in
full in the Federal Register Notice of
Issuance of an IHA for PRBO (72 FR
71121, December 14, 2007). At that
time, NMFS determined that conducting
the seabird research would not have a
significant impact on the quality of the
human environment and issued a
Finding of No Significant Impact.
For this proposed action, PRBO has
requested to incidentally harass 31
Steller sea lions, (i.e., 17 more than
what was requested in the 2007 IHA).
Because of this increase in the numbers
of marine mammals incidentally
harassed, NMFS has determined that it
will update the 2007 EA. NMFS is
currently preparing a Supplemental EA
which incorporates by reference the
2007 Final EA. Before making a
determination on the issuance of an
IHA, NMFS will ensure compliance
with NEPA and its implementing
regulations.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
Endangered Species Act
In a 2007 Biological Opinion issued
on July 27, 2007, NMFS concluded that
that the issuance of an IHA to PRBO for
seabird research was likely to affect, but
not likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of Steller sea lions. NMFS had
issued an incidental take statement
(ITS) for Steller sea lions pursuant to
section 7 of the ESA. The ITS contained
reasonable and prudent measures for
implementing terms and conditions to
minimize the effects of this take.
Since the proposed pinniped research
expands the scope of the previously
analyzed action, NMFS is conducting a
Section 7 consultation under the ESA to
make a determination whether the
proposed research project would be
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the eastern U.S. stock of
Steller sea lions.
Preliminary Determinations
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA to
PRBO to take small numbers of marine
mammals by harassment incidental to
conducting seabird and pinniped
research activities on Southeast Farallon
Island, Ano Nuevo Island, and Point
Reyes National Seashore in central CA.
The marine mammals most likely to be
harassed incidental to conducting
pinniped research (NMFS Scientific
Research Permit (SRP) 373–1868–00) are
primarily Steller sea lions. Issuance of
this IHA would be contingent upon
adherence to the proposed mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
described in this Federal Register
notice. For the reasons discussed in this
document and in the identified
supporting documents, NMFS has
preliminarily determined that the
impact of seabird research on SEFI, ANI,
and PRNS would result in Level B
harassment only of small numbers of
California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals,
northern elephant seals, and Steller sea
lions hauled out in the vicinity of the
proposed research area; and would have
a negligible impact on the affected
species. The provision requiring that the
activities not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of the
affected species or stock for subsistence
uses does not apply for this proposed
action.
No take by Level A harassment
(injury) or death is anticipated and
harassment takes should be at the
lowest level practicable due to
incorporation of the mitigation
measures proposed in this document.
Proposed Authorization
As a result of these preliminary
determinations, NMFS proposes to issue
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56561
an IHA to PRBO for the potential
harassment of small numbers of
California sea lions, harbor seals,
northern elephant seals, and Steller sea
lions incidental to conducting of seabird
research on Southeast Farallon Island,
˜
Ano Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes
National Seashore, provided the
previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements
are incorporated.
Dated: September 24, 2008.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–22819 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0139]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Information Collection; Federal
Acquisition and Community Right-ToKnow
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for an
extension to an existing OMB clearance
(9000–0139).
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Secretariat will be submitting to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
an extension of a currently approved
information collection requirement
concerning the reporting requirements
of the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986
(42 U.S.C. 11001–11050) and the
Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (42
U.S.C. 13101–13109). The clearance
currently expires onJanuary 31, 2009.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the FAR,
and whether it will have practical
utility; whether our estimate of the
public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on
valid assumptions and methodology;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 189 (Monday, September 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56556-56561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22819]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XK31
Small Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Seabird and Pinniped Research Activities in Central California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental harassment authorization; request
for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request from PRBO Conservation Science
(PRBO) for a one-year authorization to take small numbers of marine
mammals by harassment incidental to conducting seabird and pinniped
research activities on Southeast Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo
Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore in central California.
Pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), NMFS requests
comments on its proposal to authorize PRBO to take, by Level B
harassment, small numbers of several species of pinnipeds at Southeast
Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo
[[Page 56557]]
Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore beginning December 2008.
DATES: Comments and information must be received no later than October
29, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to P.
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225. The mailbox address
for providing e-mail comments is PR1.0648-XK31@noaa.gov. Comments sent
via e-mail, including all attachments, must not exceed a 10-megabyte
file size.
A copy of the application and other related documents may be
obtained by writing to the above address, telephoning one of the
contacts listed here (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT), or visiting
the internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be viewed, by appointment,
during regular business hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeannine Cody or Jaclyn Daly, NMFS,
(301) 713-2289, or Monica DeAngelis, NMFS Southwest Region, (562) 980-
3232.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by United States citizens who engage in a specified activity
(other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region
if certain findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if
the taking is limited to harassment, notice of a proposed authorization
is provided to the public for review.
Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for certain subsistence uses,
and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements pertaining to
the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting of such taking are set forth.
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as:
..an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the United States can apply for an authorization
to incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment.
Except for certain categories of activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [``Level A harassment'']; or (ii) has the potential to disturb
a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[``Level B harassment''].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS'
review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment
period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of
small numbers of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the
comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny the authorization.
Summary of Request
On July 28, 2008, NMFS received an application from PRBO requesting
an authorization for the harassment of small numbers of California sea
lions (Zalophus californianus), Pacific harbor seals (Phoca vitulina
richardsi), northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris), and
Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) incidental to conducting seabird
and pinniped research operations on Southeast Farallon Island,
A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore in central
California (CA). The proposed action area consists of the following
three locations:
South Farallon Islands (SFI)
SFI consists of Southeast Farallon Island (SEFI) and West End
Island (WEI). These two islands are directly adjacent to each other and
separated by only a 30-foot (ft) (9.1 meters (m)) channel. The SFI have
a land area of approximately 120 acres (0.49 square kilometers (km))
and are part of the Farallon National Wildlife Refuge. The islands are
located near the edge of the continental shelf 28 miles (45.1 km) west
of San Francisco, CA, and lie within the waters of the Gulf of the
Farallones National Marine Sanctuary (NMS).
A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island (ANI)
ANI is located one-quarter mile (402 m) offshore of A[ntilde]o
Nuevo Point in San Mateo County, CA). This small 25-acre (0.1 square
km) island is part of the A[ntilde]o Nuevo State Reserve, all of which
is owned and operated by California State Parks. ANI lies within the
Monterey Bay NMS and the newly established A[ntilde]o Nuevo State
Marine Conservation Area.
Point Reyes National Seashore (PRNS)
PRNS is located 40 miles (64.3 km) north of San Francisco Bay and
lies within close proximity (6 miles, 9.6 km) of the Cordell Bank NMS.
The proposed research areas are within the headland coastal areas of
this large National Park.
Specified Activities
Seabird Research on SEFI
Seabird research activities involve observational and marking (i.e.
netting and banding for capture-mark-recapture) studies of breeding
seabirds and viewing breeding seabirds from an observation blind or
censusing shorebirds. This activity usually involves one or two
observers who access the island's two landings, the North Landing and
the East Landing, by 14 to 18 ft (4.3 to 5.5 m) open motorboats which
are hoisted onto the island using a derrick system.
Researchers visit the sites approximately one to three times per
day for a maximum of 1080 visits per year. Most visits to these areas
are brief (approximately 15 minutes). From early April through early
August, seabird observers are present from two to five hours daily at
North Landing to conduct observational studies on breeding Common
Murres (Uria aalge).
Most intertidal areas of the island, where marine mammals are
present, are rarely visited in seabird research. In both locations
(North Landing and East Landing) the observers are located greater than
50 feet (15.2 m) above any pinnipeds primarily California sea lions or
northern elephant seals and to a lesser extent harbor seals which may
be hauled out. Most potential for incidental take will occur at the
island's two landings. However, the likelihood of encountering the
eastern stock of Steller sea lions at both sites is rare.
Field Station Resupply on SEFI
PRBO will resupply the field station once every two weeks for a
maximum of 26 visits per year. These visits to either the North Landing
or East Landing will last one to three hours and involve launching of
the boat with one operator along with two to four researchers assisting
with the operations from land. At East Landing the primary landing site
all personnel assisting with the landing will stay on the loading
platform 30 ft
[[Page 56558]]
(9.1 m) above the water. At North Landing, loading operations occur at
the water level in the intertidal. Again, the likelihood of
encountering eastern Steller sea lions at this location is rare.
Pinniped Research on West End Island (WEI)
Pinniped research activities involve surveying breeding elephant
seals on WEI between early December and late February. There are
approximately five surveys per year, each lasting approximately two
hours. These surveys involve three observers moving approximately 1500
ft (457.2 m) above pinniped colonies to census northern elephant seal
areas. Any transit above eastern Steller sea lion haulout areas will
last approximately 30 minutes in duration.
Seabird Research on A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island (ANI)
Seabird research activities involve monitoring seabird burrow
nesting habitat quality and habitat restoration between the seabird
breeding season and the elephant seal pupping season. All work is
conducted by PRBO in collaboration with Oikonos - Ecosystem Knowledge
through a collaborative agreement with California State Parks.
This activity involves two to three researchers who may access the
island by a 12 ft (3.7 m) Zodiac boat to conduct research once a week
April through August; restoration and monitoring from September-
November; and intermittent visits during the rest of the year. Landings
and visits to the nest boxes are brief in duration (approximately 15
minutes) and the maximum number of visits to the island would be 30 per
year.
Most potential for incidental take would occur at the landing beach
on the north side of the island when the researchers arrive and depart
to check the boxes. Non-breeding pinnipeds may occasionally be present,
including California sea lions that may be hauled out near a small
group of subterranean seabird nest boxes on the island terrace. In both
locations researchers are located more than 50 ft (15.2 m) away from
any pinnipeds which may be hauled out.
Seabird Research on Point Reyes National Seashore (PRNS)
The National Park Service in collaboration with PRBO conducts:
marine mammal research (see NMFS Scientific Permit 373-1868); seabird
breeding and roosting colonies monitoring; habitat restoration; removal
of non-native plants, intertidal monitoring, and maintenance of coastal
dune habitat.
Seabird monitoring usually involves one or two observers conducting
the survey by small boats (12 to 22 ft) along the PRNS shoreline.
Observers will visit the site year round, with an emphasis during the
seabird nesting season with occasional, intermittent visits the rest of
the year. The maximum number of visits per year to the PRNS is 18.
A majority of the research occurs in areas where marine mammals are
not present. However, the potential for incidental harassment will
occur at the landing beaches along Point Reyes Headland, boat ramps, or
parking lots where northern elephant seals, harbor seals, or California
sea lions may be hauled out.
Description of the Marine Mammals Potentially Affected by the Activity
The marine mammals most likely to be harassed incidental to
conducting seabird research at the proposed research areas on SEFI,
ANI, and PRNS are primarily California sea lions, northern elephant
seals, Pacific harbor seals, and to a lesser extent Steller sea lions.
The marine mammals most likely to be harassed incidental to
conducting research on harbor seals and northern elephant seals (NMFS
Scientific Research Permit (SRP) 373-1868-00) are primarily Steller sea
lions. Incidental harassment of elephant seals, harbor seals,
California sea lions, and northern fur seals is authorized by SRP 373-
1868-00.
General information of these species can be found in Caretta et al.
(2008) and is available at the following URL: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/pdfs/sars/po2007.pdf. Refer to that document for information on
these species. Additional information on these species is presented
below.
Northern Elephant Seal
The northern elephant breeding population is distributed from
central Baja California, Mexico, to the Point Reyes Peninsula in
northern California. Along this coastline there are 13 major breeding
colonies. The northern elephant seal was exploited for its oil during
the 18\th\ and 19\th\ centuries and by 1900 the population was reduced
to 20 to 30 individuals on Guadalupe Island (Hoelzel et al., 1993;
Hoelzel, 1999). As a result of this bottleneck, the genetic diversity
found in this species is extremely low (Hoelzel, 1999). The recent
formation of most rookeries indicates that there is no genetic
differentiation among populations. Although movement and genetic
exchange occurs among colonies, most seals return to their natal site
to breed (Huber et al., 1991). Recolonization of their former breeding
range progressed north from the San Benito and Guadalupe Islands off
Baja California to the most recent northernmost breeding site at Point
Reyes Headlands. In the last three decades, annual pup production has
increased at the rate of 9.43 plus or minus 0.51 percent per year in
California and 5.19 plus or minus 0.33 percent per year over the entire
range (Barlow et al., 1993).
A complete population count of elephant seals is not possible
because all age classes are not ashore at the same time. Elephant seal
population size is typically estimated by counting the number of pups
produced and multiplying by the inverse of the expected ratio of pups
to total animals (McCann 1985). Stewart et al., (1994) used McCann's
multiplier of 4.5 to extrapolate from 28,164 pups to a population
estimate of 127,000 elephant seals in the U.S. and Mexico in 1991. The
multiplier of 4.5 was based on a non-growing population. Boveng (1988)
and Barlow et al. (1993) suggest that a multiplier of 3.5 is more
appropriate for a rapidly growing population such as the California
stock of elephant seals. Based on the estimated 35,549 pups born in
California in 2005 and this 3.5 multiplier, the California stock was
approximately 124,000 in 2005.
At Point Reyes, the population grew at 32.8 percent per year
between 1988 and 1997 (Sydeman and Allen, 1999) and around 10 percent
per year since 2000 (S. Allen, unpubl. data), and in 2006 around 700
pups were born at three primary breeding areas. The population on the
Farallon Islands has declined by 3.4 percent per year since 1983, and
in recent years numbers have fluctuated between 100 and 200 pups (W.
Sydeman, D. Lee, unpubl. data).
Elephant seals congregate in central California to breed from late
November to March. Females typically give birth to a single pup and
attend the pup for up to six weeks. Breeding occurs after the pup is
weaned by attending males. After breeding, seals migrate to the Gulf of
Alaska or deeper waters in the eastern Pacific. Adult females and
juveniles return to terrestrial colonies to molt in April and May, and
males return in June and July to molt, remaining onshore for around
three weeks.
Pacific Harbor Seal
Harbor seals are one of the most widely distributed pinnipeds in
the northern hemisphere and are found in coastal, estuarine and some
times fresh water of both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. There is
considerable regional genetic differentiation between harbor
[[Page 56559]]
seal populations as they are generally limited in migratory movements.
Under the MMPA, six stocks of Pacific harbor seals are identified
within the U.S. waters (Angliss and Lodge, 2004; Carretta et al.,
2008). Only the California stock of harbor seal is found in the
proposed project area, and its abundance is estimated to be 34,233
(Carretta et al., 2008). There is some question whether the San
Francisco Bay population may be a separate stock based on genetic
analyses (D. German, Sonoma State University, pers. com.). At Point
Reyes, the harbor seal population is estimated to be 7,524 for the molt
season based on a correction factor of 1.65 (Lowry et al., 2005; Manna
et al., 2006).
In central California, harbor seals breed annually from March
through May and molt in June and July. Females give birth to a single
pup and attend the pup for around 30 days, at which time they wean
pups. Mating occurs in the water around the time of weaning. Harbor
seals are resident year round at terrestrial colonies; however,
juveniles may disperse to other colonies ranging up to 500 km (311
miles (mi)). Individual adult seals may also migrate widely from
breeding colonies.
California Sea Lion
California sea lions range from southern Mexico up to British
Columbia and breed almost entirely on islands in southern California,
Western Baja California and the Gulf of California. In recent years,
California sea lions have begun to breed annually in small numbers at
ANI and SFI, CA. One abandoned pup was found at PRNS at Wildcat Beach
in 2003. This species is separated into three recognized stocks based
on three geographic regions (U.S. stock, Western Baja stock, and the
Gulf of California stock; Lowry et al., 1992). Some movement has been
documented between these geographic stocks, but rookeries in the U.S.
are widely separated from major rookeries of western Baja California,
Mexico (Barlow et al., 1995). The U.S. stock of California sea lion is
the only stock present in the proposed research area. The California
sea lion has the largest population of any sea lion species and is the
only sea lion whose population is showing a healthy growth rate of 5 to
6.2 percent per annum. Annual incidental takes in fisheries is
approximately 915 individuals; however, the population is growing by
8.2 percent per year and fishing mortality is declining (Barlow et al.,
1995). Current U.S. population estimates range from 237,000 to 244,000
(Carretta et al., 2008).
California sea lions give birth in May through July and breeding
occurs in July and August. Females and pups are resident at breeding
colonies year round and males migrate north to feeding areas from
central California to British Columbia, Canada. During years of low
food availability (e.g., El Nino Southern Oscillation, or ENSO),
females and juveniles may also migrate north in search of prey; and in
some particularly poor years (1997 - 1998), there can be mass mortality
of pups at rookeries.
On the Farallon Islands, California sea lions haul out in many
intertidal areas year round, fluctuating from several hundred to
several thousand animals. Breeding animals are concentrated in areas
where researchers would not visit (PRBO, unpublished data).
California sea lions at Point Reyes haul out at only a couple
locations, but will occur on human structures such as boat ramps. The
annual population averages around 300 to 500 during the fall through
spring months, although on occasion, several thousand sea lions can
arrive depending upon local prey resources (S. Allen, unpublished
data).
Steller Sea Lion
Steller sea lions breed from the Kuril Islands and Okhotsk Sea
through the Aleutian Islands and the Gulf of Alaska, and south to
central California (Merrick et al., 1987). Two separate stocks are
recognized within U.S. waters: an eastern U.S. stock that includes
animals east of Cape Suckling, Alaska (144o W), and a western U.S.
stock that includes animals west of Cape Suckling.
The Steller sea lion was hunted during the sealing era for fur,
hides, blubber, and other organs. More recently, Steller sea lions were
harvested during a modern pup hunt that lasted from 1959-1972 during
which approximately 45,000 pups were taken (Pasquel and Adkison, 1994).
At the cessation of the modern commercial hunting, the Steller sea
lion was found along the Pacific Rim from California to Japan with
approximately 70 percent of the population in Alaskan waters.
Despite the cessation of the commercial hunt, the Steller sea lion
population has experienced a rapid decrease since the mid-1980s, with
the western population stock declining by greater than 64 percent in
the last 30 years (Loughlin et al., 1992). The number in 1989 was
estimated at 68,094 individuals. This total included 10,000 in Russia,
47,960 in Alaska, 6,109 in British Columbia, 2,261 in Oregon, and 1,764
in California (Loughlin et al., 1992). Numbers in Alaska have been
declining by 7.8 percent since 1994 (National Marine Mammal Laboratory,
1995) and have declined by three percent in California (Le Boeuf et
al., 1991; Ono 1993).
In the 1960s and 70s the number of sea lions caught in trawl nets
peaked, while present day numbers are low. California fisheries target
several of the most important prey items for Steller sea lions and
millions of metric tons of prey have been removed by fisheries in
recent decades. Incidental mortality of Steller sea lions in fisheries
was very low between 1990 and 2001 in California. Shooting of adults
during fisheries interactions in central California have been
documented by the Marine Mammal Stranding Network and one adult male
was found shot at Point Reyes, California in the 1990s.
In 1990, the Steller sea lion was listed as a threatened species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Due to persistent decline of
the western U.S. stock, NMFS reclassified these Steller sea lions as an
endangered distinct population segment (DPS) under the ESA in 1997,
while the eastern U.S. stock remained classified as threatened. Under
the MMPA, all Steller sea lions are classified as strategic stocks are
considered ``depleted.''
The eastern stock of Steller sea lions breeds on rookeries located
in southeast Alaska, British Columbia, Oregon, and California; there
are no rookeries located in Washington. Counts of pups on rookeries
conducted near the end of the birthing season are nearly complete
counts of pup production. Calkins and Pitcher (1982) concluded that the
total Steller sea lion population could be estimated by multiplying the
pup counts by a factor of 4.5, which was based on the birth rate, and
the sex and age structure of the western Steller sea lion population in
the central Gulf of Alaska. Using the most recent 2002-2005 pup counts
available by region from aerial surveys across the range of the eastern
stock, the total population of the eastern stock of Steller sea lions
is estimated to be 48,519 or 54,989. These are based on multiplying the
total number of pups counted in southeast Alaska (5,510 in 2005; NMFS,
2006), British Columbia (3,318 in 2002; Pitcher et al., 2007), Oregon
(1,136 in 2002; Pitcher et al., 2007), and California 818 in 2004;
NMFS, 2006) by either 4.5 (Calkins and Pitcher, 1982) or 5.1 (Trites
and Larkin, 1996). These are notminimum population estimates, since
they are extrapolated from pup counts from photographs taken in 2002 -
2005, and demographic parameters of a stable, equilibrium non-pup
population that were estimated for the western Steller sea lion in the
mid-
[[Page 56560]]
1970s (Calkins and Pitcher, 1982). Trites and Larkin's (1996) pup
multiplier accounts for pups that die and disappear prior to, as well
as pups born after, the counts are conducted. A pup multiplier is used
for estimating the size of the eastern stock of Steller sea lions, but
not the western stock. Since the western stock has declined
drastically, the assumption of an equilibrium population in the west is
not valid. Because the eastern stock is increasing within most of its
range, using a pup multiplier is a reasonable approach to estimating
abundance from pup counts.
Steller sea lion numbers in California, especially in southern and
central California, have declined from historic numbers. Counts in
California between 1927 and 1947 ranged between 5,000 and 7,000 non-
pups with no apparent trend, but have subsequently declined by over 50
percent, remaining between 1,500 and 2,000 non-pups during 1980 - 2001.
Limited information suggests that counts in northern California appear
to be stable (NMFS, 1995).
The current population of eastern Steller sea lions in the proposed
research area is estimated to number between 50 and 750 animals. The
PRBO estimates that between 50 and 150 Steller sea lions live on the
Farallon Islands, and the NMFS Southwest Fisheries Science Center
(SWFSC) estimates between 400 and 600 live on ANI (PRBO unpublished
data, 2008; SWFSC unpublished data, 2008).
On SEFI, the abundance of females declined an average of 3.6
percent per year from 1974 to 1997 (Sydeman and Allen 1999). Pup counts
at ANI declined 5 percent annually through the 1990s (NOAA Stock
Assessment, 2003), and have apparently stabilized between 2001 and 2005
(M. Lowry, SWFSC unpublished data).
In 2000, the combined pup estimate for both islands was 349. In
2005, the pup estimate was 204 on ANI. Pup counts on the Farallon
Islands have generally varied from five to 15 (Hastings and Sydeman,
2002; PRBO unpublished data). Pups have not been born at Point Reyes
Headland since the 1970s and Steller sea lions are seen in very low
numbers there currently (S. Allen, unpubl. data).
Steller sea lions give birth in May through July and breeding
commences a couple of weeks after birth. Non-reproductive animals
congregate at a few haul out sites, including at ANI and Point Reyes
Headland. Pups are weaned during the winter and spring of the following
year.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammals
The only anticipated impacts would be temporary disturbances caused
by the appearance of researchers near the pinnipeds. The potential
disturbance might alter pinniped behavior and cause animals to flush
from the area. Animals may return to the same site once researchers
have left or go to an alternate haul out site, which usually occurs
within 30 minutes (Allen et al., 1985). Long term effects of this
disturbance are unlikely, as very few breeding animals will be present
in the vicinity of the proposed seabird research areas.
It is expected that any incidental disturbance to pinnipeds from
both types of research would have minimal, short-term effects and no
long-term effects on the individuals. Incidental disturbance is
believed to have minimal impacts because pinnipeds usually return to a
site or a nearby site within 30 minutes upon conclusion of research
activities (Allen et al., 1985). Numerous Incidental Harassment
Authorizations and Letters of Authorizations under the MMPA, Incidental
Take Permits under Section 10(a)(1)(b) of the ESA, issued by NMFS (e.g.
72 FR 124, January 3, 2007), and reports on more localized areas (e.g.,
Demarchi and Bentley, 2004) have analyzed the potential effects of
incidental disturbance to pinnipeds from various sources. Based on
these reports, the effects to pinnipeds appear, at the most, to
displace the animals temporarily from their haul out sites. Based on
previous research reports from PRBO, maximum disturbance to Steller sea
lions would result in the animals flushing into the water in response
to presence of the researchers. It is not expected that pinnipeds would
permanently abandon a haul-out site during PRBO's research, as
precautions would be taken to not disturb the same haul-out site on
frequent occasions.
No research would occur on pinniped rookeries; therefore, mother
and pup separation or crushing of pups is not a concern. Incidental
harassment may occur as researchers approach the haul out sites with
vessels and during capture and sampling activities of harbor seals and
northern elephant seals. In PRBO's final report of activities conducted
from 2000-2005 under Scientific Research Permit No. 373-1575, they
reported disturbing less than 16 Steller sea lions during all elephant
seal surveys on WEI.
Potential Impacts on Habitat
Neither the proposed seabird research, nor the proposed pinniped
research would result in the physical altering of marine mammal
habitat. Further, incidental marine mammal takes will not result in the
physical altering of marine mammal habitat or major breeding habitat.
No survey or sampling equipment will be left in habitat areas; no toxic
chemicals will be present; and all state and federal marine
regulations, including those from National Marine Sanctuaries, will be
followed in regards to boat emissions.
Potential Impacts to Subsistence Harvest of Marine Mammals
There is no subsistence harvest of marine mammals in the proposed
research area; therefore, there will be no impact of the activity on
the availability of the species or stocks of marine mammals for
subsistence uses.
Number of Marine Mammals Expected to Be Taken
It is expected that approximately 2,242 California sea lions, 418
harbor seals, 253 northern elephant seals, and 31 Steller sea lions
could be potentially affected by Level B harassment. This estimate is
based on previous research experiences, with the same activities
conducted in the proposed research area, and on marine mammal research
activities in these areas. These incidental harassment take numbers
represent approximately one percent of the U.S. stock of California sea
lion, 1.2 percent of the California stock of Pacific harbor seal, less
than one percent of the California breeding stock of northern elephant
seal, and 0.02 percent of the eastern U.S. stock of Steller sea lion.
All of the potential takes are expected to be Level B behavioral
harassment only. No injury or mortality to pinnipeds is expected or
requested.
Proposed Monitoring and Mitigation Measures
To reduce the potential for disturbance from visual and acoustic
stimuli associated with these activities, PRBO proposes to undertake
the following marine mammal mitigation measures:
(1) Researchers would keep their voices hushed and bodies low in
the visual presence of pinnipeds.
(2) Seabird observations at North Landing on Southeast Farallon
Island would be conducted in an observation blind where researchers are
shielded from the view of hauled out pinnipeds.
(3) Beach landings on A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island would only occur
after any pinnipeds that might be present on the landing beach have
entered the water.
(4) A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island researchers accessing seabird nest
boxes would
[[Page 56561]]
crawl slowly if pinnipeds are within view.
(5) Visits to intertidal areas of Southeast Farallon Island during
research activities would be coordinated to reduce potential take.
(6) All research goals on Ano Nuevo Island would be coordinated to
minimize the necessary number of trips to the island. Once on Ano Nuevo
Island, researchers would coordinate monitoring schedules so that areas
near any pinnipeds would be accessed only once per visit.
(7) The lead biologist would always serve as an observer to
evaluate incidental take and halt any research activities should the
potential for incidental take be too great.
Proposed Monitoring and Reporting
Researchers would take notes of sea lions and seals observed within
the proposed research area during studies. The notes would provide
dates, time, tidal height, species, numbers of sea lions and seals
present, and any disturbances. PRBO would submit a final report,
including these notes, to NMFS within 90 days after the expiration of
the Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA), if it is issued.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
In 2007, NMFS prepared a draft Environmental Assessment (EA) on the
issuance of an IHA to PRBO to take marine mammals by Level B harassment
incidental to conducting seabird research in central California. The
draft EA was released for public review and comment along with the
application and the proposed IHA (72 FR 41294, July 27, 2007). All
comments were addressed in full in the Federal Register Notice of
Issuance of an IHA for PRBO (72 FR 71121, December 14, 2007). At that
time, NMFS determined that conducting the seabird research would not
have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment and
issued a Finding of No Significant Impact.
For this proposed action, PRBO has requested to incidentally harass
31 Steller sea lions, (i.e., 17 more than what was requested in the
2007 IHA). Because of this increase in the numbers of marine mammals
incidentally harassed, NMFS has determined that it will update the 2007
EA. NMFS is currently preparing a Supplemental EA which incorporates by
reference the 2007 Final EA. Before making a determination on the
issuance of an IHA, NMFS will ensure compliance with NEPA and its
implementing regulations.
Endangered Species Act
In a 2007 Biological Opinion issued on July 27, 2007, NMFS
concluded that that the issuance of an IHA to PRBO for seabird research
was likely to affect, but not likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of Steller sea lions. NMFS had issued an incidental take
statement (ITS) for Steller sea lions pursuant to section 7 of the ESA.
The ITS contained reasonable and prudent measures for implementing
terms and conditions to minimize the effects of this take.
Since the proposed pinniped research expands the scope of the
previously analyzed action, NMFS is conducting a Section 7 consultation
under the ESA to make a determination whether the proposed research
project would be likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the
eastern U.S. stock of Steller sea lions.
Preliminary Determinations
NMFS proposes to issue an IHA to PRBO to take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment incidental to conducting seabird and
pinniped research activities on Southeast Farallon Island, Ano Nuevo
Island, and Point Reyes National Seashore in central CA. The marine
mammals most likely to be harassed incidental to conducting pinniped
research (NMFS Scientific Research Permit (SRP) 373-1868-00) are
primarily Steller sea lions. Issuance of this IHA would be contingent
upon adherence to the proposed mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements described in this Federal Register notice. For the reasons
discussed in this document and in the identified supporting documents,
NMFS has preliminarily determined that the impact of seabird research
on SEFI, ANI, and PRNS would result in Level B harassment only of small
numbers of California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals, northern
elephant seals, and Steller sea lions hauled out in the vicinity of the
proposed research area; and would have a negligible impact on the
affected species. The provision requiring that the activities not have
an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the affected
species or stock for subsistence uses does not apply for this proposed
action.
No take by Level A harassment (injury) or death is anticipated and
harassment takes should be at the lowest level practicable due to
incorporation of the mitigation measures proposed in this document.
Proposed Authorization
As a result of these preliminary determinations, NMFS proposes to
issue an IHA to PRBO for the potential harassment of small numbers of
California sea lions, harbor seals, northern elephant seals, and
Steller sea lions incidental to conducting of seabird research on
Southeast Farallon Island, A[ntilde]o Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes
National Seashore, provided the previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements are incorporated.
Dated: September 24, 2008.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-22819 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S