Characterization of the West Coast Deep-set Longline Fishery Operating Outside of the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone, 56555-56556 [E8-22818]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/). Copies of the
Fishery Management Plan for U.S. West
Coast Fisheries for Highly Migratory
Species and the accompanying
Environmental Impact Statement are
available on the Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s website
(www.pcouncil.org).
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XH30
Characterization of the West Coast
Deep-set Longline Fishery Operating
Outside of the U.S. Exclusive
Economic Zone
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Helvey, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Southwest Region, NMFS,
(562) 980–4040.
National Marine Fisheries
Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
Background
Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) announces its intent to issue an
environmental assessment (EA) which
analyzes the management options for
the west-coast-based deep-set longline
(DSLL) pelagic tuna fishery operating on
the high seas. The preferred alternative
is to allow for the continued operation
and possible minor expansion of the
west-coast-based DSLL pelagic tuna
fishery operating on the high seas.
Impacts to the human environment (e.g.,
effects of the proposed action on
protected species, finfish, seabirds, and
socioeconomics) were found to be
insignificant for both alternatives being
considered. In 2005 a single commercial
vessel began participating in the DSLL
fishery on the high seas; therefore, this
EA will provide the needed analysis to
manage the fishery based on the best
available science to ensure that the
fishery is consistent with all Federal
statutes and management objectives.
DATES: Written, faxed or emailed
comments must be received no later
than 5 p.m. pacific standard time on
October 29, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The public is encouraged to
submit comments on the draft
environmental assessment, identified by
RIN: 0648–XH30 by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: 0648–XH30.SWR@noaa.gov.
Include the RIN number in the subject
line of the message.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
National Marine Fisheries Service,
Sustainable Fisheries Division, 501 W.
Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,
CA 90802–4213.
• Fax: (562) 980–4047, Attention:
Mark Helvey.
The Draft Environmental Assessment
for the West Coast Deep-set Longline
Fishery Operating Outside of the U.S.
Exclusive Economic Zone is available
for review from the NMFS Southwest
Region website (https://
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
The HMS FMP prohibits all longline
fishing within the Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ) off Washington, Oregon, and
California. In addition, shallow-set
longline fishing for swordfish on the
high seas north of the equator is
prohibited except for vessels operating
under a Hawaii longline limited entry
permit. The HMS FMP and associated
environmental impact statement neither
prohibits nor explicitly analyzes DSLL
fishing on the high seas because at the
time the documents were developed by
the Pacific Fishery Management Council
and NMFS, shallow-set and DSLL
fishing were not considered separate
fisheries and the analysis in the HMS
FMP was primarily focused on shallowset longline fishing. At the time, most of
the west-coast-based pelagic longline
fishing on the high seas consisted of
shallow-set longline fishing for
swordfish. In addition, there was no
distinct DSLL fishery for tuna and it was
presumed that the DSLL fishery would
not develop primarily due to economic
and operational constraints. Thus only a
limited analysis of historic DSLL fishing
was provided in the HMS FMP and
accompanying environmental impact
statement.
However, in 2005 a single commercial
vessel began making deep-sets with
longline gear targeting tuna on an
exploratory basis and has continued
seasonally operating on the high seas.
The vessel has operated with close to
100 percent observer coverage, provided
by NMFS, adhering to fisheries
management regulations under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, 16
U.S.C. 1801 et seq., the HMS FMP, and
the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act,
16 U.S. C. chapter 75. NMFS
determined that the HMS FMP and
accompanying environmental impact
statement did not adequately address
DSLL fishing, or the potential impacts of
the High Seas Fishery Compliance Act
permits; therefore, NMFS is now doing
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56555
a more thorough analysis based on the
best available science.
Potential expansion of the fishery is
estimated to be minimal due to the high
operational costs (e.g., fuel and labor
costs) and vessel constraints associated
with fishing on the high seas. Fishing on
the high seas requires larger vessels than
those used for coastal or near-shore
fishing because the trips are longer,
require greater ice and fish hold
capacity, and the sea conditions can be
more challenging. Due to these logistical
challenges of fishing on the high seas
from west coast ports coupled with the
current experimental nature of the
fishery, NMFS does not anticipate that
additional vessels will participate in
this fishery; however, up to five
additional vessels could enter the
fishery as soon as the next three years
if regulations and/or poor catches in
other west-coast-based fisheries force
eligible vessels to seek alternate openaccess fishing options available to them.
This estimate originated from
discussions with the U.S. west coast
fishing industry and the Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s HMS Advisory
Subpanel to determine who had the
capacity and would be interested in
entering the fishery over the next three
years.
The proposed action area analyzed in
this EA is the high seas off the West
Coast of the United States. The HMS
FMP defines the high seas as all waters
beyond the EEZ of the United States and
beyond any foreign nation’s EEZ, to the
extent that such EEZ is recognized by
the United States. The fishery is
expected to operate in a relatively small
subset of the eastern Pacific Ocean;
more specifically, in the area east of 140
W. longitude, north of the equator,
south of 35 N. latitude, and outside the
U.S. and Mexico EEZ’s (beyond 200
nautical miles offshore). Most, if not all,
future DSLL fishing is expected to occur
in this small subset of the eastern
Pacific Ocean; however, this analysis
defines the action area as the high seas
in order to be consistent with the
description of the DSLL fishery in the
HMS FMP, and to take into account the
possibility of fishing occurring in any
area on the high seas.
Alternatives
For this proposed action, there are
only two alternatives are being analyzed
due to the fact that NMFS has
determined that the regulations that are
currently in place are sufficient to meet
the need to regulate the current and any
reasonably foreseeable fishery.
However, NMFS may consider
additional regulations and do additional
NEPA analysis in the future should the
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
56556
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
fishery develop beyond the scope of this
analysis. Alternative 1 would close the
current west-coast-based DSLL fishery
operating on the high seas, which
currently consists of one vessel. To
implement this alternative the HMS
FMP would need to be amended and the
implementing regulations published.
There could be some minor positive
impacts on protected species and fish
populations; however, many of these
species are highly migratory with a
Pacific-wide distribution. Thus, they
would not necessarily benefit from the
reduction of effort associated with
closing the west-coast-based DSLL
fishery because the effort may be shifted
to other fisheries to continue meeting
domestic demand for fish. Tuna
formerly caught in the west-coast-based
DSLL fishery are likely to be caught by
other nations and imported back into
the nation with the closed fishery. There
may also be some negative impacts on
the socio-economics of the participant,
fishing communities and the fishing
industry in general if this alternative
was implemented.
Alternative 2, the preferred
alternative, would allow the west-coastbased DSLL fishery to continue
operating on the high seas and expand
to a maximum of six vessels. At six
vessels, there could be some minor
negative impacts to protected resource
and finfish populations and some
positive socioeconomic impacts for the
participants and the fishing industry in
general if this alternative was
implemented. However, as discussed
previously, this may just result in a shift
in effort from one fishery to another, if
demand for tuna remains the same. All
U.S. longline vessels operating on the
high seas outside of the U.S. EEZ are
currently subject to the same controls
that applied to Hawaii-based longline
fishing vessels holding longline permits
in 2003. The limitations and
specifications for the fishing area, gear
configurations, sea turtle and seabird
mitigation measures, skipper
workshops, etc. are consistent with
current Federal regulations applicable to
longline vessels targeting tuna under the
Western Pacific Fishery Management
Council’s Pelagics FMP (implemented at
50 CFR part 665) and the Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s HMS FMP
(implemented at 50 CFR part 660).
Other Documents
As required in Section 7(a)(2) of the
Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.), NMFS is engaged in formal
consultations with NMFS’s Protected
Resource Division to determine if the
proposed action is likely to jeopardize
the continued existence and recovery of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
any endangered or threatened species or
result in the destruction or adverse
modification of critical habitat.
Request for Comments
NMFS requests public comment on
the draft environmental assessment of
the West Coast Deep-set Longline
Fishery Operating Outside of the U.S.
Exclusive Economic Zone.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: September 23, 2008.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–22818 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XK76
Pacific Fishery Management Council;
Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s (Council)
Salmon Technical Team (STT),
Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC) Salmon Subcommittee, and
Model Evaluation Workgroup (MEW)
will review proposed salmon
methodology changes in a joint work
session, which is open to the public.
DATES: The work session will be held
Wednesday, October 15, 2008, from 9
a.m. to 4 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The work session will be
held at the Marriott Courtyard Portland
Airport, Columbia Ballroom, 11550 NE
Airport Way, Portland, OR 97220;
telephone: (503) 252–3200.
Council address: Pacific Fishery
Management Council, 7700 NE
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland,
OR 97220–1384.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Chuck Tracy, Salmon Management Staff
Officer, Pacific Fishery Management
Council, (503) 820–2280.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the work session is to brief
the STT and SSC Salmon Subcommittee
on proposed changes to methods and
standards used to manage ocean salmon
fisheries. The work session will include
review of proposed changes to the
Sacramento River fall Chinook
abundance forecast and harvest model,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and a preliminary sensitivity analysis of
the Chinook and Coho Fishery
Regulation Assessment Models (FRAM).
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in the meeting agenda may
come before the STT, SSC Salmon
Subcommittee, and MEW for
discussion, those issues may not be the
subject of formal action during this
meeting. Action will be restricted to
those issues specifically listed in this
notice and any issues arising after
publication of this notice that require
emergency action under Section 305(c)
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
provided the public has been notified of
the intent to take final action to address
the emergency.
Special Accommodations
This meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to Ms.
Carolyn Porter at (503) 820–2280 at least
5 days prior to the meeting date.
Dated: September 24, 2008.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8–22751 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XK31
Small Takes of Marine Mammals
Incidental to Specified Activities;
Seabird and Pinniped Research
Activities in Central California
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; proposed incidental
harassment authorization; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS has received a request
from PRBO Conservation Science
(PRBO) for a one-year authorization to
take small numbers of marine mammals
by harassment incidental to conducting
seabird and pinniped research activities
˜
on Southeast Farallon Island, Ano
Nuevo Island, and Point Reyes National
Seashore in central California. Pursuant
to the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), NMFS requests comments on
its proposal to authorize PRBO to take,
by Level B harassment, small numbers
of several species of pinnipeds at
˜
Southeast Farallon Island, Ano Nuevo
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 189 (Monday, September 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56555-56556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22818]
[[Page 56555]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XH30
Characterization of the West Coast Deep-set Longline Fishery
Operating Outside of the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announces its intent to issue
an environmental assessment (EA) which analyzes the management options
for the west-coast-based deep-set longline (DSLL) pelagic tuna fishery
operating on the high seas. The preferred alternative is to allow for
the continued operation and possible minor expansion of the west-coast-
based DSLL pelagic tuna fishery operating on the high seas. Impacts to
the human environment (e.g., effects of the proposed action on
protected species, finfish, seabirds, and socioeconomics) were found to
be insignificant for both alternatives being considered. In 2005 a
single commercial vessel began participating in the DSLL fishery on the
high seas; therefore, this EA will provide the needed analysis to
manage the fishery based on the best available science to ensure that
the fishery is consistent with all Federal statutes and management
objectives.
DATES: Written, faxed or emailed comments must be received no later
than 5 p.m. pacific standard time on October 29, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The public is encouraged to submit comments on the draft
environmental assessment, identified by RIN: 0648-XH30 by any of the
following methods:
E-mail: 0648-XH30.SWR@noaa.gov. Include the RIN number in
the subject line of the message.
Mail: Submit written comments to National Marine Fisheries
Service, Sustainable Fisheries Division, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802-4213.
Fax: (562) 980-4047, Attention: Mark Helvey.
The Draft Environmental Assessment for the West Coast Deep-set
Longline Fishery Operating Outside of the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone
is available for review from the NMFS Southwest Region website (https://
swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/). Copies of the Fishery Management Plan for U.S.
West Coast Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species and the accompanying
Environmental Impact Statement are available on the Pacific Fishery
Management Council's website (www.pcouncil.org).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Helvey, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Southwest Region, NMFS,
(562) 980-4040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The HMS FMP prohibits all longline fishing within the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) off Washington, Oregon, and California. In
addition, shallow-set longline fishing for swordfish on the high seas
north of the equator is prohibited except for vessels operating under a
Hawaii longline limited entry permit. The HMS FMP and associated
environmental impact statement neither prohibits nor explicitly
analyzes DSLL fishing on the high seas because at the time the
documents were developed by the Pacific Fishery Management Council and
NMFS, shallow-set and DSLL fishing were not considered separate
fisheries and the analysis in the HMS FMP was primarily focused on
shallow-set longline fishing. At the time, most of the west-coast-based
pelagic longline fishing on the high seas consisted of shallow-set
longline fishing for swordfish. In addition, there was no distinct DSLL
fishery for tuna and it was presumed that the DSLL fishery would not
develop primarily due to economic and operational constraints. Thus
only a limited analysis of historic DSLL fishing was provided in the
HMS FMP and accompanying environmental impact statement.
However, in 2005 a single commercial vessel began making deep-sets
with longline gear targeting tuna on an exploratory basis and has
continued seasonally operating on the high seas. The vessel has
operated with close to 100 percent observer coverage, provided by NMFS,
adhering to fisheries management regulations under the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., the
HMS FMP, and the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act, 16 U.S. C. chapter
75. NMFS determined that the HMS FMP and accompanying environmental
impact statement did not adequately address DSLL fishing, or the
potential impacts of the High Seas Fishery Compliance Act permits;
therefore, NMFS is now doing a more thorough analysis based on the best
available science.
Potential expansion of the fishery is estimated to be minimal due
to the high operational costs (e.g., fuel and labor costs) and vessel
constraints associated with fishing on the high seas. Fishing on the
high seas requires larger vessels than those used for coastal or near-
shore fishing because the trips are longer, require greater ice and
fish hold capacity, and the sea conditions can be more challenging. Due
to these logistical challenges of fishing on the high seas from west
coast ports coupled with the current experimental nature of the
fishery, NMFS does not anticipate that additional vessels will
participate in this fishery; however, up to five additional vessels
could enter the fishery as soon as the next three years if regulations
and/or poor catches in other west-coast-based fisheries force eligible
vessels to seek alternate open-access fishing options available to
them. This estimate originated from discussions with the U.S. west
coast fishing industry and the Pacific Fishery Management Council's HMS
Advisory Subpanel to determine who had the capacity and would be
interested in entering the fishery over the next three years.
The proposed action area analyzed in this EA is the high seas off
the West Coast of the United States. The HMS FMP defines the high seas
as all waters beyond the EEZ of the United States and beyond any
foreign nation's EEZ, to the extent that such EEZ is recognized by the
United States. The fishery is expected to operate in a relatively small
subset of the eastern Pacific Ocean; more specifically, in the area
east of 140 W. longitude, north of the equator, south of 35 N.
latitude, and outside the U.S. and Mexico EEZ's (beyond 200 nautical
miles offshore). Most, if not all, future DSLL fishing is expected to
occur in this small subset of the eastern Pacific Ocean; however, this
analysis defines the action area as the high seas in order to be
consistent with the description of the DSLL fishery in the HMS FMP, and
to take into account the possibility of fishing occurring in any area
on the high seas.
Alternatives
For this proposed action, there are only two alternatives are being
analyzed due to the fact that NMFS has determined that the regulations
that are currently in place are sufficient to meet the need to regulate
the current and any reasonably foreseeable fishery. However, NMFS may
consider additional regulations and do additional NEPA analysis in the
future should the
[[Page 56556]]
fishery develop beyond the scope of this analysis. Alternative 1 would
close the current west-coast-based DSLL fishery operating on the high
seas, which currently consists of one vessel. To implement this
alternative the HMS FMP would need to be amended and the implementing
regulations published. There could be some minor positive impacts on
protected species and fish populations; however, many of these species
are highly migratory with a Pacific-wide distribution. Thus, they would
not necessarily benefit from the reduction of effort associated with
closing the west-coast-based DSLL fishery because the effort may be
shifted to other fisheries to continue meeting domestic demand for
fish. Tuna formerly caught in the west-coast-based DSLL fishery are
likely to be caught by other nations and imported back into the nation
with the closed fishery. There may also be some negative impacts on the
socio-economics of the participant, fishing communities and the fishing
industry in general if this alternative was implemented.
Alternative 2, the preferred alternative, would allow the west-
coast-based DSLL fishery to continue operating on the high seas and
expand to a maximum of six vessels. At six vessels, there could be some
minor negative impacts to protected resource and finfish populations
and some positive socioeconomic impacts for the participants and the
fishing industry in general if this alternative was implemented.
However, as discussed previously, this may just result in a shift in
effort from one fishery to another, if demand for tuna remains the
same. All U.S. longline vessels operating on the high seas outside of
the U.S. EEZ are currently subject to the same controls that applied to
Hawaii-based longline fishing vessels holding longline permits in 2003.
The limitations and specifications for the fishing area, gear
configurations, sea turtle and seabird mitigation measures, skipper
workshops, etc. are consistent with current Federal regulations
applicable to longline vessels targeting tuna under the Western Pacific
Fishery Management Council's Pelagics FMP (implemented at 50 CFR part
665) and the Pacific Fishery Management Council's HMS FMP (implemented
at 50 CFR part 660).
Other Documents
As required in Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), NMFS is engaged in formal consultations with
NMFS's Protected Resource Division to determine if the proposed action
is likely to jeopardize the continued existence and recovery of any
endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or
adverse modification of critical habitat.
Request for Comments
NMFS requests public comment on the draft environmental assessment
of the West Coast Deep-set Longline Fishery Operating Outside of the
U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: September 23, 2008.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8-22818 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S