Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 56587-56588 [E8-22811]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank
Holding Companies
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank
holding company. The factors that are
considered in acting on the notices are
set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the office of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than October
14, 2008.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King,
Community Affairs Officer) 90
Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55480–0291:
1. Randall E. Streifel, Powers Lake,
North Dakota, to acquire voting shares
of Liberty Bancorporation, Inc., and
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares
of Liberty State Bank, both of Powers
Lake, North Dakota.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, September 24, 2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8–22763 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, September 24, 2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8–22762 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications also will be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Additional information on all bank
holding companies may be obtained
from the National Information Center
website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than October 24,
2008.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King,
Community Affairs Officer) 90
Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55480–0291:
1. BHCB Holding Company, to
become a bank holding company by
acquiring 100 percent of the voting
shares of Black Hills Community Bank,
N.A., a de novo bank, both of Rapid
City, South Dakota.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E.
Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200
North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201–
2272:
1. First Artesia Bancshares, Inc.,
Artesia, New Mexico, to merge with
AmFin Holding Company, and thereby
indirectly acquire voting shares of
AmBank, both of Silver City, New
Mexico.
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Federal Trade Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The information collection
requirements described below will be
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for review, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act. The Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) is seeking
public comments on its proposal to
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56587
extend through October 31, 2011, the
current OMB clearance for the
information collection requirements
contained in its Amplifier Rule. That
clearance expires on October 31, 2008.
DATES: Comments must be filed by
October 29, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments.
Comments should refer to ‘‘Amplifier
Rule: FTC File No. P974222’’ to
facilitate the organization of comments.
A comment filed in paper form should
include this reference both in the text
and on the envelope and should be
mailed or delivered to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission/
Office of the Secretary, Room H-135,
Annex J, 600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW,
Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is
requesting that any comment filed in
paper form be sent by courier or
overnight service, if possible, because
U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
and at the Commission is subject to
delay due to heightened security
precautions. Moreover, because paper
mail in the Washington area and at the
Agency is subject to delay, please
consider submitting your comments in
electronic form, as prescribed below. If,
however, the comment contains any
material for which confidential
treatment is requested, it must be filed
in paper form, and the first page of the
document must be clearly labeled
‘‘Confidential.’’1
Comments filed in electronic form
should be submitted via the following
weblink: (https://
secure.commentworks.com/ftcAmplifierRule) (and following the
instructions on the web-based form). To
ensure that the Commission considers
an electronic comment, you must file it
on the web-based form at the weblink:
(https://secure.commentworks.com/ftcAmplifierRule). If this notice appears at
www.regulations.gov, you may also file
an electronic comment through that
website. The Commission will consider
all comments that regulations.gov
forwards to it.
Comments should also be submitted
to: Office of Management and Budget,
Attention: Desk Officer for the Federal
Trade Commission. Comments should
be submitted via facsimile to (202) 3956974 because U.S. Postal Mail is subject
1 FTC Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The comment
must be accompanied by an explicit request for
confidential treatment, including the factual and
legal basis for the request, and must identify the
specific portions of the comment to be withheld
from the public record. The request will be granted
or denied by the Commission’s General Counsel,
consistent with applicable law and the public
interest. See FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
56588
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
to lengthy delays due to heightened
security precautions.
The FTC Act and other laws the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives,
whether filed in paper or electronic
form. Comments received will be
available to the public on the FTC
website, to the extent practicable, at
www.ftc.gov. As a matter of discretion,
the FTC makes every effort to remove
home contact information for
individuals from the public comments it
receives before placing those comments
on the FTC website. More information,
including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC’s
privacy policy at (https://www.ftc.gov/
ftc/privacy.shtm).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be addressed to Jock K. Chung,
Attorney, Division of Enforcement,
Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal
Trade Commission, NJ-2122, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20580, (202) 3262984.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (‘‘PRA’’), 44
U.S.C. 3501-3520, federal agencies must
obtain approval from OMB for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. On June 18, 2008, the FTC
sought comment on the information
collection requirements pertaining to
the Commission’s Amplifier Rule (OMB
Control Number 3084-0105).2 No
comments were received. Pursuant to
the OMB regulations that implement the
PRA (5 CFR Part 1320), the FTC is
providing this second opportunity for
public comment while seeking OMB
approval to extend the existing
paperwork clearance for the
Commission’s Amplifier Rule. All
comments should be filed as prescribed
in the ADDRESSES section above, and
must be received on or before October
29, 2008.
The Amplifier Rule assists consumers
by standardizing the measurement and
disclosure of power output and other
performance characteristics of
amplifiers in stereos and other home
entertainment equipment. The Rule also
specifies the test conditions necessary to
make the disclosures that the Rule
requires.
Estimated annual hours burden: 450
hours (300 testing-related hours; 150
disclosure-related hours).
2
The Rule’s provisions require affected
entities to test the power output of
amplifiers in accordance with a
specified FTC protocol. The
Commission staff estimates that
approximately 300 new amplifiers and
receivers come on the market each year.
High fidelity manufacturers routinely
conduct performance tests on these new
products prior to sale. Because
manufacturers conduct such tests, the
Rule imposes no additional costs except
to the extent that the FTC protocol is
more time-consuming than alternative
testing procedures. In this regard, a
warm-up (‘‘precondition’’) period that
the Rule requires before measurements
are taken may add approximately one
hour to the time testing would
otherwise entail. Thus, staff estimates
that the Rule imposes approximately
300 hours (1 hour x 300 new products)
of added testing burden annually.
In addition, the Rule requires
disclosures if a manufacturer makes a
power output claim for a covered
product in an advertisement,
specification sheet, or product brochure.
This requirement does not impose any
additional costs on manufacturers
because, absent the Rule, media
advertisements, as well as manufacturer
specification sheets and product
brochures, would contain a power
specification obtained using an
alternative to the Rule-required testing
protocol. The Rule, however, also
requires disclosure of harmonic
distortion, power bandwidth, and
impedance ratings in manufacturer
specification sheets and product
brochures that might not otherwise be
included.
Staff assumes that manufacturers
produce one specification sheet and one
brochure each year for each new
amplifier and receiver. The burden of
disclosing the harmonic distortion,
bandwidth, and impedance information
on the specification sheets and
brochures is limited to the time needed
to draft and review the language
pertaining to the aforementioned
specifications. Staff estimates the time
involved for this task to be a maximum
of fifteen minutes for each new
specification sheet and brochure for a
total of 150 hours ([300 new products x
1 specification sheet) + (300 new
products x 1 brochure)] x 15 minutes).
The total annual burden imposed by
the Rule, therefore, is approximately
450 burden hours for testing and
disclosures.
73 FR 34750.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Estimated annual cost burden:
$19,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand.3
Generally, electronics engineers
perform the testing of amplifiers and
receivers. Staff estimates a labor cost of
$12,300 for such testing (300 hours for
testing x $41 per hour). Staff assumes
advertising or promotions managers
prepare the disclosures contained in
product brochures and manufacturer
specification sheet and estimates a labor
cost of $6,600 (150 hours for disclosures
x $44 per hour). Accordingly, staff
estimates the total labor costs associated
with the Rule to be approximately
$19,000 per year, rounded to the nearest
thousand ($12,300 for testing + $6,600
for disclosures).
The Rule imposes no capital or other
non-labor costs because its requirements
are incidental to testing and advertising
done in the ordinary course of business.
William Blumenthal,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E8–22811 Filed 9–26–08: 8:45 am]
[BILLING CODE 6750–01–S]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–2895–FN]
Medicare and Medicaid Programs;
Approval of Det Norske Veritas
Healthcare, Inc. for Deeming Authority
for Hospitals
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces our
decision to approve Det Norske Veritas
Healthcare, Inc. (DNVHC) for
recognition as a national accreditation
program for hospitals seeking to
participate in the Medicare or Medicaid
programs.
DATES: Effective Date: This final notice
is effective September 26, 2008 through
September 26, 2012.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Melanson, (410) 786–0310.
Patricia Chmielewski (410) 786–6899.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under the Medicare program, eligible
beneficiaries may receive covered
3 Staff’s labor cost estimates are based on recent
data from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics found
here: (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/
ocwage.pdf).
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 189 (Monday, September 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56587-56588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22811]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The information collection requirements described below will
be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for
review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. The Federal Trade
Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'') is seeking public comments on
its proposal to extend through October 31, 2011, the current OMB
clearance for the information collection requirements contained in its
Amplifier Rule. That clearance expires on October 31, 2008.
DATES: Comments must be filed by October 29, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments.
Comments should refer to ``Amplifier Rule: FTC File No. P974222'' to
facilitate the organization of comments. A comment filed in paper form
should include this reference both in the text and on the envelope and
should be mailed or delivered to the following address: Federal Trade
Commission/Office of the Secretary, Room H-135, Annex J, 600
Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20580. The FTC is requesting that
any comment filed in paper form be sent by courier or overnight
service, if possible, because U.S. postal mail in the Washington area
and at the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security
precautions. Moreover, because paper mail in the Washington area and at
the Agency is subject to delay, please consider submitting your
comments in electronic form, as prescribed below. If, however, the
comment contains any material for which confidential treatment is
requested, it must be filed in paper form, and the first page of the
document must be clearly labeled ``Confidential.''\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ FTC Rule 4.2(d), 16 CFR 4.2(d). The comment must be
accompanied by an explicit request for confidential treatment,
including the factual and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
the public record. The request will be granted or denied by the
Commission's General Counsel, consistent with applicable law and the
public interest. See FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments filed in electronic form should be submitted via the
following weblink: (https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-AmplifierRule)
(and following the instructions on the web-based form). To ensure that
the Commission considers an electronic comment, you must file it on the
web-based form at the weblink: (https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-
AmplifierRule). If this notice appears at www.regulations.gov, you may
also file an electronic comment through that website. The Commission
will consider all comments that regulations.gov forwards to it.
Comments should also be submitted to: Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the Federal Trade Commission.
Comments should be submitted via facsimile to (202) 395-6974 because
U.S. Postal Mail is subject
[[Page 56588]]
to lengthy delays due to heightened security precautions.
The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives, whether filed in paper or electronic
form. Comments received will be available to the public on the FTC
website, to the extent practicable, at www.ftc.gov. As a matter of
discretion, the FTC makes every effort to remove home contact
information for individuals from the public comments it receives before
placing those comments on the FTC website. More information, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's
privacy policy at (https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.shtm).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be addressed to Jock K. Chung, Attorney, Division of
Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission,
NJ-2122, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580, (202)
326-2984.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (``PRA''),
44 U.S.C. 3501-3520, federal agencies must obtain approval from OMB for
each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. On June 18,
2008, the FTC sought comment on the information collection requirements
pertaining to the Commission's Amplifier Rule (OMB Control Number 3084-
0105).\2\ No comments were received. Pursuant to the OMB regulations
that implement the PRA (5 CFR Part 1320), the FTC is providing this
second opportunity for public comment while seeking OMB approval to
extend the existing paperwork clearance for the Commission's Amplifier
Rule. All comments should be filed as prescribed in the ADDRESSES
section above, and must be received on or before October 29, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 73 FR 34750.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Amplifier Rule assists consumers by standardizing the
measurement and disclosure of power output and other performance
characteristics of amplifiers in stereos and other home entertainment
equipment. The Rule also specifies the test conditions necessary to
make the disclosures that the Rule requires.
Estimated annual hours burden: 450 hours (300 testing-related
hours; 150 disclosure-related hours).
The Rule's provisions require affected entities to test the power
output of amplifiers in accordance with a specified FTC protocol. The
Commission staff estimates that approximately 300 new amplifiers and
receivers come on the market each year. High fidelity manufacturers
routinely conduct performance tests on these new products prior to
sale. Because manufacturers conduct such tests, the Rule imposes no
additional costs except to the extent that the FTC protocol is more
time-consuming than alternative testing procedures. In this regard, a
warm-up (``precondition'') period that the Rule requires before
measurements are taken may add approximately one hour to the time
testing would otherwise entail. Thus, staff estimates that the Rule
imposes approximately 300 hours (1 hour x 300 new products) of added
testing burden annually.
In addition, the Rule requires disclosures if a manufacturer makes
a power output claim for a covered product in an advertisement,
specification sheet, or product brochure. This requirement does not
impose any additional costs on manufacturers because, absent the Rule,
media advertisements, as well as manufacturer specification sheets and
product brochures, would contain a power specification obtained using
an alternative to the Rule-required testing protocol. The Rule,
however, also requires disclosure of harmonic distortion, power
bandwidth, and impedance ratings in manufacturer specification sheets
and product brochures that might not otherwise be included.
Staff assumes that manufacturers produce one specification sheet
and one brochure each year for each new amplifier and receiver. The
burden of disclosing the harmonic distortion, bandwidth, and impedance
information on the specification sheets and brochures is limited to the
time needed to draft and review the language pertaining to the
aforementioned specifications. Staff estimates the time involved for
this task to be a maximum of fifteen minutes for each new specification
sheet and brochure for a total of 150 hours ([300 new products x 1
specification sheet) + (300 new products x 1 brochure)] x 15 minutes).
The total annual burden imposed by the Rule, therefore, is
approximately 450 burden hours for testing and disclosures.
Estimated annual cost burden: $19,000, rounded to the nearest
thousand.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Staff's labor cost estimates are based on recent data from
the Bureau of Labor and Statistics found here: (https://www.bls.gov/
news.release/pdf/ocwage.pdf).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Generally, electronics engineers perform the testing of amplifiers
and receivers. Staff estimates a labor cost of $12,300 for such testing
(300 hours for testing x $41 per hour). Staff assumes advertising or
promotions managers prepare the disclosures contained in product
brochures and manufacturer specification sheet and estimates a labor
cost of $6,600 (150 hours for disclosures x $44 per hour). Accordingly,
staff estimates the total labor costs associated with the Rule to be
approximately $19,000 per year, rounded to the nearest thousand
($12,300 for testing + $6,600 for disclosures).
The Rule imposes no capital or other non-labor costs because its
requirements are incidental to testing and advertising done in the
ordinary course of business.
William Blumenthal,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E8-22811 Filed 9-26-08: 8:45 am]
[BILLING CODE 6750-01-S]