Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Requirements on Content and Format of Labeling for Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products, 56592-56595 [E8-22731]
Download as PDF
56592
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Dated: September 24, 2008.
Janean Chambers,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–22752 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request
Proposed Projects
Title: Protection and Advacacy (P&A)
Voting Access Application and Annual
Report.
OMB No.: 0970–0326.
Description: This is a revision to
include the application for the
previously cleared Help America Vote
Act (HAVA) Annual report.
An application is required by Federal
statute (the Help America Vote Act
(HAVA) of 2002, Pub. L. 107–252,
Section 291, Payments for Protection
and Advocacy Systems, 42 U.S.C.
15461). Each State Protection &
Advocacy (P&A) System must prepare
an application in accordance with the
program announcement.
There is no application kit; the P&As
application may be in the format of its
choice. It must, however, be signed by
the P&As Executive Director or the
designated representative, and contain
the assurances as outlined under
Part I.C. Use of Funds. The P&As
designated representatives may signify
their agreement with the conditions/
assurances by signing and returning the
assurance document Attachment B,
found in Part IV of this Instruction. The
assurance document signed by the
Executive Director of the P&A, or other
designated person, should be submitted
with the application to the
Administration on Developmental
Disabilities.
An annual report is required by
Federal statute (the Help America Vote
Act (HAVA) of 2002, Pub. L. 107–252,
Section 291, Payments for Protection
and Advocacy Systems, 42 U.S.C.
15461). Each State Protection &
Advocacy (P&A) System must prepare
and submit an annual report at the end
of every fiscal year. The report
addresses the activities conducted with
the funds provided during the year. The
information from the annual report will
be aggregated into an annual profile of
how HAVA funds have been spent. The
report will also provide an overview of
the P&A goals and accomplishments
and permit the Administration on
Developmental Disabilities to track
progress to monitor grant activities.
Respondents: Protection & Advocacy
Systems—All States, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin
Islands, American Samoa, and Guam.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Number of
respondents
Instrument
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Protection and Advocacy (P&A) Voting Access Annual Report ......................
Protection and Advocacy (P&A) Voting Access Application ...........................
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,980.
In compliance with the requirements
of Section 506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the
Administration for Children and
Families is soliciting public comment
on the specific aspects of the
information collection described above.
Copies of the proposed collection of
information can be obtained and
comments may be forwarded by writing
to the Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Administration,
Office of Information Services, 370
L’Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington,
DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance
Officer. E-mail address:
infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All requests
should be identified by the title of the
information collection.
The Department specifically requests
comments on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
55
55
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Dated: September 24, 2008.
Janean Chambers,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–22754 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
Average
burden
hours per
response
1
1
Total
burden
hours
16
20
880
1,100
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0500]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Requirements on
Content and Format of Labeling for
Human Prescription Drug and
Biological Products
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
PO 00000
Number of
responses per
respondent
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the information collection provisions of
FDA’s requirements on content and
format of labeling for human
prescription drug and biological
products.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by November 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management (HFA–710),
Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,
301–796–3792.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Requirements on Content and Format of
Labeling for Human Prescription Drug
and Biological Products (OMB Control
Number 0910–0572)—Extension
FDA’s final rule entitled
‘‘Requirements on Content and Format
of Labeling for Human Prescription
Drug and Biological Products’’ (the final
rule), which published on January 24,
2006 (71 FR 3922), and was effective on
June 30, 2006, amended FDA’s
regulations governing the format and
content of labeling for human
prescription drug and biological
products to require that the labeling of
new and recently approved products
contain highlights of prescribing
information, a table of contents for
prescribing information, reordering of
certain sections, minor content changes,
and minimum graphical requirements.
These revisions were intended to make
it easier for health care practitioners to
access, read, and use information in
prescription drug labeling; to enhance
the safe and effective use of prescription
drug products; and to reduce the
number of adverse reactions resulting
from medication errors due to
misunderstood or incorrectly applied
drug information.
A. Summary of Prescription Drug
Labeling Content and Format
Requirements That Contain Collections
of Information
Section 201.56 (21 CFR 201.56)
requires that prescription drug labeling
contain certain information in the
format specified in either § 201.57 (21
CFR 201.57) or § 201.80 (21 CFR
201.80), depending on when the drug
was approved for marketing.
Section 201.56(a) sets forth general
labeling requirements applicable to all
prescription drugs. Section 201.56(b)
specifies the categories of new and more
recently approved prescription drugs
subject to the revised content and
format requirements in §§ 201.56(d) and
201.57. Section 201.56(c) sets forth the
schedule for implementing these revised
content and format requirements.
Section 201.56(e) specifies the sections
and subsections, required and optional,
for the labeling of older prescription
drugs not subject to the revised format
and content requirements.
Section 201.57(a) requires that
prescription drug labeling for new and
more recently approved prescription
drug products include ‘‘Highlights of
Prescribing Information.’’ Highlights
provides a concise extract of the most
important information required under
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
56593
§ 201.57(c) (the Full Prescribing
Information (FPI)), as well as certain
additional information important to
prescribers. Section 201.57(b) requires a
table of contents to prescribing
information, entitled ‘‘Full Prescribing
Information: Contents,’’ consisting of a
list of each heading and subheading
along with its identifying number to
facilitate health care practitioners’ use
of labeling information. Section
201.57(c) specifies the contents of the
FPI. Section 201.57(d) mandates the
minimum specifications for the format
of prescription drug labeling and
establishes minimum requirements for
key graphic elements such as bold type,
bullet points, type size, and spacing.
Older drugs not subject to the revised
labeling content and format
requirements in § 201.57 remain subject
to labeling requirements at § 201.80 (in
the final rule, former § 201.57 was
redesignated as § 201.80). Section
201.80(f)(2) requires that within 1 year,
any FDA-approved patient labeling be
referenced in the ‘‘Precautions’’ section
of the labeling of older products and
either accompany or be reprinted
immediately following the labeling.
B. Estimates of Reporting Burden
The PRA information collection
analysis in the final rule (71 FR 3964
through 3967) (currently approved
under OMB Control Number 0910–
0572) estimated the reporting burden for
a multi-year period. We are requesting
that OMB extend approval for the
information in this collection as
described below, which will continue to
be submitted to FDA during this multiyear period.
Annual Burden for Prescription Drug
Labeling Design, Testing, and
Submitting to FDA for New Drug
Applications (NDAs) and Biologics
License Applications (BLAs) (§§ 201.56
and 201.57) (Table 1)
New drug product applicants must:
(1) Design and create prescription drug
labeling containing Highlights,
Contents, and FPI, (2) test the designed
labeling (e.g., to ensure that the
designed labeling fits into cartonenclosed products), and (3) submit it to
FDA for approval. Based on the
projected data estimated in the final
rule, FDA estimates that it takes
applicants approximately 3,349 hours to
design, test, and submit prescription
drug labeling to FDA as part of an NDA
or BLA under the revised regulations.
Approximately 85 applicants submit
approximately 107 new applications
(NDAs and BLAs) to FDA per year,
totaling 358,343 hours.
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
56594
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
Burden Associated with Labeling
Supplements for Applications
Approved Within 5 Years Prior to the
Effective Date of the Rule (§ 201.57)
(Table 2)
The final rule required that
prescription drug applications approved
during the 5 years before, or pending on,
the effective date conform to format and
content requirements at § 201.57. For
these products, applicants must
redesign and negotiate the labeling,
including Highlights and Contents, test
the redesigned labeling, and prepare
and submit that labeling to FDA for
approval. Based on the projected data
estimated in the final rule, labeling
supplements for a total of approximately
344 innovator products are expected to
be submitted to FDA over a 5-year
period (beginning in year 3 and ending
in year 7 after the effective date of the
final rule). Approximately 172
applicants submit these labeling
supplements, and the time required for
redesigning, testing, and submitting the
labeling to FDA is approximately 196
hours per application, totaling 67,424
hours.
after the effective date of the final rule
are subject to the content and format
requirements of §§ 201.56(d) and
201.57. To meet these requirements,
applicants must revise the existing
labeling for these products. Each year an
increasing number of innovator drug
labeling will have been revised, and
over time, very few efficacy
supplements independently will
generate labeling revisions. Based on the
projected data estimated in the final
rule, the number of affected efficacy
supplements over 10 years, beginning
with year 3, is 186, with a decreasing
number each year over the period.
Approximately 172 applicants will
trigger approximately 186 efficacy
supplements, each one requiring
approximately 196 hours to revise the
labeling in the application, totaling
36,456 hours. (As stated in the final
rule, in addition to this burden, a
minimal annual reporting burden (fewer
than 7) will continue indefinitely).
Burden Associated with Revised
Labeling Efficacy Supplements
Submitted on or After the Effective Date
of the Rule (§§ 201.56(d) and 201.57)
(Table 2)
Efficacy supplemental applications
for older drugs submitted to FDA on or
applications must submit labeling
supplements over the 10-year period
after the effective date of the rule. The
time required to revise and submit this
labeling to FDA is approximately 27
hours per application, totaling 9,072
hours. (As stated in the final rule, in
addition to this burden, a minimal
annual reporting burden associated with
a very small number of generic
applications referencing older drugs
may continue indefinitely).
Based on the projected data estimated
in the final rule, beginning in year 3 and
continuing throughout the 10-year
period analyzed, approximately 42
generic applicants per year must submit
labeling supplements. Approximately
336 already approved generic drug
Burden Associated with Revised
Labeling for Efficacy Supplements for
Generic Drug Products (§ 201.57) (Table
2)
C. Capital Costs
As discussed in the final rule, a small
number of carton-enclosed products
may require new packaging to
accommodate longer inserts. As many as
5 percent of the existing products
affected by the final rule (i.e., products
with new efficacy supplements,
products approved in the 5 years prior
to the effective date of the rule, and
affected abbreviated new drug
applications) may require equipment
changes at an estimated cost of $200,000
each product.
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED REPORTING BURDEN FOR NEW DRUG APPLICATIONS1
Category (21 CFR Section)
No. of Respondents
Annual Burden for Labeling Requirements in §§ 201.56 and
201.57
No. of Responses per
Respondent
85
Total Responses
1.26
Hours per Response
107
Total Hours
3,349
Total
1 There
358,343
358,343
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 2.—ESTIMATED REPORTING BURDENS FOR LABELING REVISIONS TO ALREADY-APPROVED DRUG PRODUCTS1
Category (21 CFR Section)
Year(s) In Which Burdens Occur After
June 30, 2006
No. of Respondents
No. of Responses per
Respondent
Total Responses
Hours per
Response
Total Hours
Total Capital Costs
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Burden associated with revised labeling for applications approved within 5
years prior to June 30,
2006 (§ 201.57)
Beginning year 3,
ending year 7
172
2
344
196
67,424
$3.3 million
Burden associated with revised labeling for efficacy
supplements submitted on
or after June 30, 2006
(§§ 201.56(d) and 201.57)
Beginning year 3, diminishing over time
172
1.08
186
196
36,456
$2.5 million
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
56595
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 189 / Monday, September 29, 2008 / Notices
TABLE 2.—ESTIMATED REPORTING BURDENS FOR LABELING REVISIONS TO ALREADY-APPROVED DRUG PRODUCTS1—
Continued
Category (21 CFR Section)
Year(s) In Which Burdens Occur After
June 30, 2006
Burden associated with revised labeling for efficacy
supplements for generic
drug products (§ 201.57)
Beginning year 3,
continuing annually
thereafter
No. of Respondents
No. of Responses per
Respondent
42
Total Responses
8
Hours per
Response
336 (for
years 1–10)
Total Hours
27
$2.5 million
Up to $8.3
million
are no operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA only through FDMS at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: September 17, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–22731 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Health Resources
and Services Administration (HRSA)
publishes abstracts of information
collection requests under review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). To request a copy
of the clearance requests submitted to
OMB for review, e-mail
paperwork@hrsa.gov or call the HRSA
Reports Clearance Office at (301) 443–
1129.
The following request has been
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget for review under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995:
Proposed Project: Data Collection Tool
for State Offices of Rural Health Grant
Program: (New)
The mission of the Office of Rural
Health Policy (ORHP) is to sustain and
improve access to quality care services
for rural communities. In its authorizing
language (Sec. 711 of the Social Security
Act [42 U.S.C. 912]), Congress charged
ORHP with ‘‘administer[ing] grants,
cooperative agreements, and contracts to
provide technical assistance and other
activities as necessary to support
activities related to improving health
care in rural areas.’’
The State Offices of Rural Health
Grant Program (SORH) is authorized by
Section 338J of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254r). The
purpose of SORH is to assist States in
strengthening their rural health care
delivery systems by helping to support
a focal point for rural health within each
State. The program provides funding for
an institutional framework that links
rural hospitals, providers and
Number of
respondents
Form
Technical Assistance Report ...............................................
Total ..............................................................................
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
9,072
112,952
Total
1 There
Total Capital Costs
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent within 30 days of this notice to
the desk officer for HRSA, either by email to OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov
or by fax to 202–395–6974. Please direct
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Sep 26, 2008
Jkt 214001
50
50
Responses
per
respondent
Total
responses
Hours per
response
1
........................
50
........................
12.5
........................
all correspondence to the ‘‘attention of
the desk officer for HRSA.’’
PO 00000
communities with State and Federal
resources to help develop long term
solutions to rural health problems. The
average annual award for each State
based grantee is $150,000. The law
provides for a Federal-State partnership,
requiring a State funding match of $3 for
each $1 of Federal funding. Over the
past 16 years, this program has
leveraged in excess of $200 million in
State matching funds for rural health.
For SORH, program performance
measures were drafted to provide data
useful to the program and to enable
HRSA to provide aggregate program data
required by Congress under the
Government Performance and Results
Act (GPRA) of 1993. ORHP seeks to
collect information from grantees on
their efforts to provide technical
assistance to clients within their State.
SORH grantees would be required to
submit a Technical Assistance Report
that includes: 1) The total number of
technical assistance encounters
provided directly by the grantee; and, 2)
the total number of clients that received
direct technical assistance from the
grantee. Submission of the Technical
Assistance Report would be done via email to ORHP no later than 30 days after
the end of each twelve month budget
period.
The estimated average annual burden
is as follows:
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
625
625
Dated: September 22, 2008
Alexandra Huttinger,
Director, Division of Policy Review and
Coordination.
[FR Doc. E8–22728 Filed 9–26–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
Frm 00055
Total burden
hours
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 189 (Monday, September 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56592-56595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22731]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0500]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Requirements on Content and Format of Labeling for
Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
[[Page 56593]]
notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection
provisions of FDA's requirements on content and format of labeling for
human prescription drug and biological products.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the collection of
information by November 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3792.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Requirements on Content and Format of Labeling for Human Prescription
Drug and Biological Products (OMB Control Number 0910-0572)--Extension
FDA's final rule entitled ``Requirements on Content and Format of
Labeling for Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products'' (the
final rule), which published on January 24, 2006 (71 FR 3922), and was
effective on June 30, 2006, amended FDA's regulations governing the
format and content of labeling for human prescription drug and
biological products to require that the labeling of new and recently
approved products contain highlights of prescribing information, a
table of contents for prescribing information, reordering of certain
sections, minor content changes, and minimum graphical requirements.
These revisions were intended to make it easier for health care
practitioners to access, read, and use information in prescription drug
labeling; to enhance the safe and effective use of prescription drug
products; and to reduce the number of adverse reactions resulting from
medication errors due to misunderstood or incorrectly applied drug
information.
A. Summary of Prescription Drug Labeling Content and Format
Requirements That Contain Collections of Information
Section 201.56 (21 CFR 201.56) requires that prescription drug
labeling contain certain information in the format specified in either
Sec. 201.57 (21 CFR 201.57) or Sec. 201.80 (21 CFR 201.80), depending
on when the drug was approved for marketing.
Section 201.56(a) sets forth general labeling requirements
applicable to all prescription drugs. Section 201.56(b) specifies the
categories of new and more recently approved prescription drugs subject
to the revised content and format requirements in Sec. Sec. 201.56(d)
and 201.57. Section 201.56(c) sets forth the schedule for implementing
these revised content and format requirements. Section 201.56(e)
specifies the sections and subsections, required and optional, for the
labeling of older prescription drugs not subject to the revised format
and content requirements.
Section 201.57(a) requires that prescription drug labeling for new
and more recently approved prescription drug products include
``Highlights of Prescribing Information.'' Highlights provides a
concise extract of the most important information required under Sec.
201.57(c) (the Full Prescribing Information (FPI)), as well as certain
additional information important to prescribers. Section 201.57(b)
requires a table of contents to prescribing information, entitled
``Full Prescribing Information: Contents,'' consisting of a list of
each heading and subheading along with its identifying number to
facilitate health care practitioners' use of labeling information.
Section 201.57(c) specifies the contents of the FPI. Section 201.57(d)
mandates the minimum specifications for the format of prescription drug
labeling and establishes minimum requirements for key graphic elements
such as bold type, bullet points, type size, and spacing.
Older drugs not subject to the revised labeling content and format
requirements in Sec. 201.57 remain subject to labeling requirements at
Sec. 201.80 (in the final rule, former Sec. 201.57 was redesignated
as Sec. 201.80). Section 201.80(f)(2) requires that within 1 year, any
FDA-approved patient labeling be referenced in the ``Precautions''
section of the labeling of older products and either accompany or be
reprinted immediately following the labeling.
B. Estimates of Reporting Burden
The PRA information collection analysis in the final rule (71 FR
3964 through 3967) (currently approved under OMB Control Number 0910-
0572) estimated the reporting burden for a multi-year period. We are
requesting that OMB extend approval for the information in this
collection as described below, which will continue to be submitted to
FDA during this multi-year period.
Annual Burden for Prescription Drug Labeling Design, Testing, and
Submitting to FDA for New Drug Applications (NDAs) and Biologics
License Applications (BLAs) (Sec. Sec. 201.56 and 201.57) (Table 1)
New drug product applicants must: (1) Design and create
prescription drug labeling containing Highlights, Contents, and FPI,
(2) test the designed labeling (e.g., to ensure that the designed
labeling fits into carton-enclosed products), and (3) submit it to FDA
for approval. Based on the projected data estimated in the final rule,
FDA estimates that it takes applicants approximately 3,349 hours to
design, test, and submit prescription drug labeling to FDA as part of
an NDA or BLA under the revised regulations. Approximately 85
applicants submit approximately 107 new applications (NDAs and BLAs) to
FDA per year, totaling 358,343 hours.
[[Page 56594]]
Burden Associated with Labeling Supplements for Applications Approved
Within 5 Years Prior to the Effective Date of the Rule (Sec. 201.57)
(Table 2)
The final rule required that prescription drug applications
approved during the 5 years before, or pending on, the effective date
conform to format and content requirements at Sec. 201.57. For these
products, applicants must redesign and negotiate the labeling,
including Highlights and Contents, test the redesigned labeling, and
prepare and submit that labeling to FDA for approval. Based on the
projected data estimated in the final rule, labeling supplements for a
total of approximately 344 innovator products are expected to be
submitted to FDA over a 5-year period (beginning in year 3 and ending
in year 7 after the effective date of the final rule). Approximately
172 applicants submit these labeling supplements, and the time required
for redesigning, testing, and submitting the labeling to FDA is
approximately 196 hours per application, totaling 67,424 hours.
Burden Associated with Revised Labeling Efficacy Supplements Submitted
on or After the Effective Date of the Rule (Sec. Sec. 201.56(d) and
201.57) (Table 2)
Efficacy supplemental applications for older drugs submitted to FDA
on or after the effective date of the final rule are subject to the
content and format requirements of Sec. Sec. 201.56(d) and 201.57. To
meet these requirements, applicants must revise the existing labeling
for these products. Each year an increasing number of innovator drug
labeling will have been revised, and over time, very few efficacy
supplements independently will generate labeling revisions. Based on
the projected data estimated in the final rule, the number of affected
efficacy supplements over 10 years, beginning with year 3, is 186, with
a decreasing number each year over the period. Approximately 172
applicants will trigger approximately 186 efficacy supplements, each
one requiring approximately 196 hours to revise the labeling in the
application, totaling 36,456 hours. (As stated in the final rule, in
addition to this burden, a minimal annual reporting burden (fewer than
7) will continue indefinitely).
Burden Associated with Revised Labeling for Efficacy Supplements for
Generic Drug Products (Sec. 201.57) (Table 2)
Based on the projected data estimated in the final rule, beginning
in year 3 and continuing throughout the 10-year period analyzed,
approximately 42 generic applicants per year must submit labeling
supplements. Approximately 336 already approved generic drug
applications must submit labeling supplements over the 10-year period
after the effective date of the rule. The time required to revise and
submit this labeling to FDA is approximately 27 hours per application,
totaling 9,072 hours. (As stated in the final rule, in addition to this
burden, a minimal annual reporting burden associated with a very small
number of generic applications referencing older drugs may continue
indefinitely).
C. Capital Costs
As discussed in the final rule, a small number of carton-enclosed
products may require new packaging to accommodate longer inserts. As
many as 5 percent of the existing products affected by the final rule
(i.e., products with new efficacy supplements, products approved in the
5 years prior to the effective date of the rule, and affected
abbreviated new drug applications) may require equipment changes at an
estimated cost of $200,000 each product.
Table 1.--Estimated Reporting Burden For New Drug Applications\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of No. of Responses per Hours per
Category (21 CFR Section) Respondents Respondent Total Responses Response Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Burden for Labeling Requirements in Sec. Sec. 85 1.26 107 3,349 358,343
201.56 and 201.57
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 358,343
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Table 2.--Estimated Reporting Burdens For Labeling Revisions To Already-Approved Drug Products\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year(s) In
Category (21 CFR Which Burdens No. of No. of Total Hours per Total
Section) Occur After Respondents Responses per Responses Response Total Hours Capital
June 30, 2006 Respondent Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden Beginning 172 2 344 196 67,424 $3.3
associated with year 3, million
revised ending year
labeling for 7
applications
approved within
5 years prior
to June 30,
2006 (Sec.
201.57)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden Beginning 172 1.08 186 196 36,456 $2.5
associated with year 3, million
revised diminishing
labeling for over time
efficacy
supplements
submitted on or
after June 30,
2006 (Sec.
Sec.
201.56(d) and
201.57)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 56595]]
Burden Beginning 42 8 336 (for 27 9,072 $2.5
associated with year 3, years 1-10) million
revised continuing
labeling for annually
efficacy thereafter
supplements for
generic drug
products (Sec.
201.57)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 112,952 Up to $8.3
million
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only
through FDMS at https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: September 17, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-22731 Filed 9-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S