Draft NPDES General Permit for Offshore Seafood Processors in Alaska (Permit Number AKG524000), 55840-55842 [E8-22553]
Download as PDF
55840
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 188 / Friday, September 26, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
chemical waste are scheduled for
closure and remediation under the
Consent Order.
6. Repair and replacement of mission
critical cooling system components for
buildings in TA–55—This decision will
allow these facilities to continue to
operate and for NNSA to install a new
cooling system that meets current
standards regarding the phase-out of
Class 1 ozone-depleting substances.
7. Final design of a new Radioactive
Liquid Waste Treatment Facility, and
design and construction of the Zero
Liquid Discharge Facility component of
this new treatment facility—This
decision will allow LANL to continue to
treat radioactive liquid wastes by
replacing a facility that does not meet
current standards and that cannot be
acceptably renovated. Regardless of any
decisions NNSA may make about
complex transformation and LANL’s
role in it, the laboratory will need to
treat liquid radioactive wastes for the
foreseeable future.
Mitigation Measures
As described in the SWEIS, LANL
operates under environmental laws,
regulations, and policies within a
framework of contractual requirements;
many of these requirements mandate
actions intended to control and mitigate
potential adverse environmental effects.
Examples include the Environment,
Safety, and Health Manual, emergency
plans, Integrated Safety Management
System, pollution prevention and waste
minimization programs, protected
species programs, and energy and
conservation programs. A Mitigation
Action Plan for this ROD will be issued
that includes: Specific habitat
conservation measures recommended by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
mitigating effects to potential habitat
areas; site- and action-specific
commitments related to the Consent
Order once the State of New Mexico
decides on specific environmental
remediation for LANL MDAs; and traffic
flow improvements that could involve
such measures as installing turn lanes,
installing and coordinating traffic lights,
and installing new signage. A summary
of all prior mitigation commitments for
LANL that are either underway or that
have yet to be initiated will be included
in the MAP. These prior commitments
include such actions as continued forest
management efforts, continued trail
management measures, and
implementation of a variety of sampling
and monitoring measures, as well as
additional measures to reduce potable
water use and conserve resources.
In addition, with respect to the
concerns raised by the Santa Clara
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:07 Sep 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
Pueblo, NNSA will continue its efforts
to support the Pueblo and other tribal
entities in matters of human health, and
will participate in various
intergovernmental cooperative efforts to
protect indigenous practices and
locations of concern. NNSA will
conduct government-to-government
consultation with the Pueblo and other
tribal entities to incorporate these
matters into the MAP.
Issued at Washington, DC, this 19th day of
September 2008.
Thomas P. D’Agostino,
Administrator, National Nuclear Security
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–22678 Filed 9–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8720–2]
Draft NPDES General Permit for
Offshore Seafood Processors in
Alaska (Permit Number AKG524000)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft
NPDES general permit and request for
public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Director, Office of Water
and Watersheds, EPA Region 10, is
proposing to issue a general National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit for Offshore Seafood
Processors in Alaska, pursuant to the
provisions of the Clean Water Act, 33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq. The draft general
permit authorizes the discharge of
treated seafood processing wastes from
new and existing facilities to State and
Federal Waters, at least 0.5 nautical
miles from shore as delineated by mean
lower low water. Interested persons may
submit comments on the proposed
general permit to EPA Region 10 at the
address below. Comments must be
received or postmarked by November
10, 2008. A fact sheet has been prepared
which sets forth the principle factual,
legal, policy, and scientific information
considered in the development of the
draft general permit.
The draft general permit contains a
variety of technology-based and water
quality-based effluent limitations, along
with administrative and monitoring
requirements, as well as other standard
conditions, prohibitions, and
management practices. Within state
waters a 100 foot mixing zone is
proposed for residues, dissolved gas,
non-hydrocarbon oil and grease, fecal
coliform, pH, temperature, color,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
turbidity, and total residual chlorine. In
addition, the permit allows for the
issuance of site specific zones of deposit
(ZODs) by the Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation (ADEC).
The site specific ZODs would only be
authorized for facilities discharging
between 0.5–1 nautical mile from shore
upon application by the discharger. If a
discharger requests a ZOD, ADEC would
public notice the proposed ZOD
authorization before the ZOD is
authorized for the discharger. ZODs will
be granted through an individual State
certification that will be attached to
EPA’s authorization to discharge letter.
Public Comment: Copies of the draft
general permit, fact sheet, Biological
Evaluation, Essential Fish Habitat
Assessment, Environmental
Assessment, Preliminary Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI), and Ocean
Discharge Criteria Evaluation are
available upon request. Theses
documents may also be downloaded
from the Region 10 Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/r10earth/
waterpermits.htm (click on draft
permits, then Alaska). Interested
persons may submit written comments
to the attention of Lindsay Guzzo at the
address below. All comments must
include the name, address, and
telephone number of the commenter
and a concise statement of comment and
the relevant facts upon which it is
based. Comments of either support or
concern which are directed at specific,
cited permit requirements are
appreciated.
After the expiration date of the Public
Notice on November 10, 2008, the
Director, Office of Water and
Watersheds, EPA Region 10, will make
a final determination with respect to
issuance of the general permit. The
proposed requirements contained in the
draft general permit will become final
upon issuance if no significant
comments are received during the
public comment period.
DATES: Comments must be received or
postmarked by November 10, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed
general permit should be sent to
Lindsay Guzzo, Office of Water and
Watersheds; USEPA Region 10; 1200 6th
Ave, Suite 900, OWW–130; Seattle,
Washington 98101. Comments may also
be received via electronic mail at
guzzo.lindsay@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information can be obtained
by contacting Lindsay Guzzo at the
address above, or by visiting the Region
10 Web site at https://www.epa.gov/
r10earth/waterpermits.htm. Requests
may also be made to Audrey
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 188 / Friday, September 26, 2008 / Notices
Washington at (206) 553–0523, or
electronically mailed to:
washington.audrey@epa.gov. For further
information regarding the State’s
certification of the general permit,
contact Shawn Stokes at the address
below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Informational Meetings
Two public informational meetings
will be held to discuss the Proposed
Permit, clarify changes and to answer
general questions. Two meetings will be
held, one in Anchorage on October 15,
2008, in the Westmark Hotel Anchorage,
720 West 5th Avenue, Anchorage, AK
99501, at 5:30 p.m., the other in Seattle
on October 28, 2008 in the Red Lion
Hotel, 1415 5th Avenue, Seattle, WA
98101 at 5 p.m. These informational
meetings will not serve as a formal
public hearing on the permit.
Public Hearing
Persons wishing to request a public
hearing should submit their written
request by November 10, 2008 stating
the nature of the issues to be raised as
well as the requester’s name, address
and telephone number to Lindsay Guzzo
at the address above. If a public hearing
is scheduled, notice will be published
in the Federal Register. Notice will also
be posted on the Region 10 Web site,
and will be mailed to all interested
persons receiving letters of the
availability of the draft permit.
Administrative Record
The complete administrative record
for the draft permit is available for
public review at the EPA Region 10
headquarters at the address listed above.
Other Legal Requirements
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
State Water Quality Standards and
State Certification
EPA is also providing Public Notice of
ADEC’s intent to certify the general
permit pursuant to section 401 of the
Clean Water Act. ADEC has provided a
draft certification that the draft general
permit complies with State Water
Quality Standards (18 AAC 15),
including the State’s antidegradation
policy.
Persons wishing to comment on State
certification of the draft general NPDES
permit should send written comments
to Mr. Shawn Stokes in ADEC’s
Anchorage Office, 555 Cordova Street,
Anchorage, Alaska 99501, or via
electronic mail at
Shawn.Stokes@alaska.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:07 Sep 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
National Environmental Policy Act
Because the proposed permit will
cover new sources in Alaska, the permit
is subject to the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA). Based on the
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
consideration of the proposed NPDES
permit conditions, and in accordance
with the guidelines for determining the
significance of proposed federal actions
(40 CFR 1508.27) and EPA criteria for
initiating an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) (40 CFR 6.605), EPA has
concluded that the proposed NPDES
permit will not result in significant
effect on the human environment. The
proposed permit will not significantly
affect land use patterns or population,
wetlands or flood plains, threatened or
endangered species, farmlands,
ecologically critical areas, historic
resources, air quality, water quality,
noise levels, and fish and wildlife
resources. It will also not conflict with
approved local, regional, or state land
use plans or policies. The proposed
permit also conforms with all applicable
Federal statutes and executive orders.
As a result of these findings, EPA has
determined that an EIS will not be
prepared and the public is invited to
comment on EPA’s Preliminary Finding
Of No Significant Impacts (FONSI).
Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act requires EPA to consult with the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
NOAA Fisheries regarding the potential
effects that an action may have on listed
endangered or threatened species or
their critical habitat. To address these
ESA requirements, and in support of
EPA’s informal consultation with the
Services, a Biological Evaluation (BE)
was prepared to analyze these potential
effects. During the development of the
draft general permit, information
provided by the Services was used to
identify species of interest for
consideration in the BE. The results of
the BE concluded that discharges from
Offshore Seafood Processing facilities
will either have no effect or are not
likely to adversely affect threatened or
endangered species in the vicinity of the
discharges. The fact sheet, the draft
permits and the BE are being reviewed
by the Services for consistency with
those programs established for the
conservation of endangered and
threatened species. Any additional
comments or conservation
recommendations received from the
Services regarding threatened or
endangered species will be considered
prior to issuance of the GPs.
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act
Section 305(b) of the MagnusonStevens Act (16 U.S.C. 1855(b)) requires
federal agencies to consult with NOAA
Fisheries when any activity proposed to
be permitted, funded, or undertaken by
a federal agency may have an adverse
effect on designated Essential Fish
Habitat (EFH) as defined by the Act. To
address the requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, EPA prepared
an EFH Assessment concluding that
offshore seafood processors operations
may adversely affect essential fish
habitat. However, EPA expects that
effects on essential fish habitat, while
possible, are likely to be limited in
extent for several reasons. For more
information please see the Biological
Evaluation/ EFH assessment. As with
ESA, any additional comments or
conservation recommendations received
from NOAA Fisheries regarding EFH
will be considered prior to issuance of
the GPs.
Executive Order 12866
EPA has determined that this general
permit is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under the terms of Executive
Order 12866 and is therefore not subject
to OMB review.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Endangered Species Act
PO 00000
55841
The information collection
requirements of this permit were
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.,
and assigned OMB control numbers
2040–0086 and 2040–0110.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires that EPA
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
for rules subject to the requirements of
5 U.S.C. 553(b) that have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. However, general NPDES
permits are not ‘‘rules’’ subject to the
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b), and is
therefore not subject to the RFA.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 201 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, generally requires Federal
agencies to assess the effects of their
‘‘regulatory actions’’ (defined to be the
same as ‘‘rules’’ subject to the RFA) on
tribal, State, and local governments and
the private sector. However, general
NPDES permits are not ‘‘rules’’ subject
to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b),
and is therefore not subject to the RFA.
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
55842
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 188 / Friday, September 26, 2008 / Notices
Dated: September 18, 2008.
Michael F. Gearheard,
Director, Office of Water and Watersheds,
Region 10.
[FR Doc. E8–22553 Filed 9–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–8586–1]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7146. An explanation of the
ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published
in FR dated April 6, 2008 (73 FR 19833).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20080240, ERP No. D–BLM–
A09825–00, PROGRAMMATIC—
Geothermal Leasing in the Western
United States.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about impacts
to air quality, groundwater and noise.
Rating EC2.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20080275, ERP No. F–NOA–
L39066–WA, ADOPTION—Fish
Passage and Aquatic Habitat
Restoration at Hemlock Dam,
Implementation, Gifford Pinchot
National Forest, Mount Adams
District, Skamania County, WA.
Summary: No comment letter sent to
the federal agency.
EIS No. 20080295, ERP No. F–FHW–
C40171–NY, NYS Route 17 at Exit 122
Interchange Project, To Improve the
Safety and Operation, Right-of-Way
Acquisition, Town of Wallkill, Orange
County, NY.
Summary: EPA continues to have
environmental concerns about wetland,
water quality, and air quality impacts.
EIS No. 20080300, ERP No. F–BLM–
K65296–AZ, Agua Fria National
Monument and BradshawHarquahala, Proposed Resource
Management Plan, Implementation,
Yavapai County, AZ.
Summary: EPA does not object to the
proposed project.
EIS No. 20080308, ERP No. F–SFW–
L61233–WA, Hanford Reach National
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:07 Sep 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
Monument Comprehensive
Conservation Plan, Management of
Monument Resources, Programs and
Visitors for the Next 15 Years, Adams,
Benton, Franklin and Grant Counties,
WA.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
Dated: September 23, 2008.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E8–22681 Filed 9–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–8585–9]
Environmental Impacts Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–1399 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed 09/15/2008 Through 09/19/2008
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20080364, Draft Supplement,
NPS, GA, Chattahoochee River
National Recreation Area General
Management Plan, Updated
Information on Analyzing Six
Alternative Future Directions for the
Management and Use of
Chattachoochee River National
Recreation Area, Implementation,
Chattahoochee River, Atlanta, GA,
Comment Period Ends: 11/10/2008,
Contact: David Libman 404–562–3124
Ext. 685.
EIS No. 20080365, Draft EIS, NPS, NY,
Fort Stanwix National Monument
General Management Plan,
Implementation, Funding, City of
Rome, Oneida County, NY, Comment
Period Ends: 11/25/2008, Contact:
James O’Connell 617–223–5222.
EIS No. 20080366, Final EIS, AFS, MT,
Butte Resource Management Plan,
Implementation, Beaverhead,
Broadwater, Deerlodge, Gallatin,
Jefferson, Lewis and Clark, Silver Bow
and Park Counties, MT, Wait Period
Ends: 10/27/2008, Contact: Brenda
Williams 202–452–5112.
EIS No. 20080367, Final EIS, FHW, UT,
Mountain View Corridor (MVC)
Project, Proposed Transportation
Improvement 2030 Travel Demand in
Western Salt Lake County south of I–
80 and west of Bangerter Highway
and in northwestern Utah County of
I–15, south of the Salt Lake County
Line, and north of Utah Lake, Salt
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Lake and Utah County, UT, Wait
Period Ends: 10/27/2008, Contact:
Edward Woolford 801–963–0182.
EIS No. 20080368, Final EIS, AFS, MT,
Debaugan Fuels Reduction Project,
Proposed Fuels Reduction Activities,
Lolo National Forest, Superior Ranger
District, Mineral County, MT, Wait
Period Ends: 10/27/2008, Contact:
Sharon Sweeney 406–822–4233.
EIS No. 20080369, Draft EIS, FAA, FL,
Palm Beach International Airport
Project, Construction and Operation
of Proposed Airfield Improvements,
Funding, Palm Beach County, FL,
Comment Period Ends: 11/24/2008,
Contact: Lindy McDowell 407–812–
6331 Ext. 130.
EIS No. 20080370, Draft EIS, AFS, CA,
Gemmill Thin Project, Proposal to
Reduce the Intensity and Size of
Future Wildfires, and to Maintain/
Improve Ecosystem Function and
Wildlife Habitat, Chanchellula LateSuccessional Reserve, Shasta-Trinity
National Forest, Trinity County, CA,
Comment Period Ends: 11/10/2008,
Contact: Bobbie A. Dimonte 530–226–
2425.
EIS No. 20080371, Final EIS, FAA, TX,
ADOPTION—Northwest Corridor
Light Rail Transit Line (LRT) to
Irving/Dallas/Fort Worth International
Airport, Construction, Dallas County,
TX, Contact: Peggy Wade 817–222–
5697.
The U.S. Department of
Transportation’s Federal Aviation
Administration (DOT/FAA) has
ADOPTED the U.S. Department of
Transportation’s Federal Transit
Administration FEIS #2080289, filed on
07/24/2008. DOT/FAA was a
Cooperating Agency for the above
project. Recirculation of the FEIS is not
necessary under 40 CFR 1506.3(c).
EIS No. 20080372, Draft EIS, AFS, ID,
Salmon-Challis National Forest
(SCNF), Proposes Travel Planning and
OHV Route Designation, Lemhi,
Custer and Butte Counties, ID,
Comment Period Ends: 11/25/2008,
Contact: Karen Gallogly 208–756–
5103.
EIS No. 20080373, Final EIS, FHW, NC,
NC 12 Replacement of Herbert C.
Bonner Bridge (Bridge No. 11)
Revisions and Additions, over Oregon
Inlet Construction, Funding, U.S.
Coast Guard Permit, Special-UsePermit, Right-of-Way Permit, U.S.
Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permit,
Dare County, NC, Wait Period Ends:
10/27/2008, Contact: John F. Sullivan
III P.E. 919–747–7000.
EIS No. 20080374, Draft EIS, FAA, PA,
Philadelphia International Airport
(PHL) Capacity Enhancement Program
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 188 (Friday, September 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55840-55842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22553]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8720-2]
Draft NPDES General Permit for Offshore Seafood Processors in
Alaska (Permit Number AKG524000)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft NPDES general permit and
request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, EPA Region 10,
is proposing to issue a general National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit for Offshore Seafood Processors in
Alaska, pursuant to the provisions of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.
1251 et seq. The draft general permit authorizes the discharge of
treated seafood processing wastes from new and existing facilities to
State and Federal Waters, at least 0.5 nautical miles from shore as
delineated by mean lower low water. Interested persons may submit
comments on the proposed general permit to EPA Region 10 at the address
below. Comments must be received or postmarked by November 10, 2008. A
fact sheet has been prepared which sets forth the principle factual,
legal, policy, and scientific information considered in the development
of the draft general permit.
The draft general permit contains a variety of technology-based and
water quality-based effluent limitations, along with administrative and
monitoring requirements, as well as other standard conditions,
prohibitions, and management practices. Within state waters a 100 foot
mixing zone is proposed for residues, dissolved gas, non-hydrocarbon
oil and grease, fecal coliform, pH, temperature, color, turbidity, and
total residual chlorine. In addition, the permit allows for the
issuance of site specific zones of deposit (ZODs) by the Alaska
Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). The site specific ZODs
would only be authorized for facilities discharging between 0.5-1
nautical mile from shore upon application by the discharger. If a
discharger requests a ZOD, ADEC would public notice the proposed ZOD
authorization before the ZOD is authorized for the discharger. ZODs
will be granted through an individual State certification that will be
attached to EPA's authorization to discharge letter.
Public Comment: Copies of the draft general permit, fact sheet,
Biological Evaluation, Essential Fish Habitat Assessment, Environmental
Assessment, Preliminary Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), and
Ocean Discharge Criteria Evaluation are available upon request. Theses
documents may also be downloaded from the Region 10 Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/r10earth/waterpermits.htm (click on draft permits, then
Alaska). Interested persons may submit written comments to the
attention of Lindsay Guzzo at the address below. All comments must
include the name, address, and telephone number of the commenter and a
concise statement of comment and the relevant facts upon which it is
based. Comments of either support or concern which are directed at
specific, cited permit requirements are appreciated.
After the expiration date of the Public Notice on November 10,
2008, the Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, EPA Region 10, will
make a final determination with respect to issuance of the general
permit. The proposed requirements contained in the draft general permit
will become final upon issuance if no significant comments are received
during the public comment period.
DATES: Comments must be received or postmarked by November 10, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed general permit should be sent to
Lindsay Guzzo, Office of Water and Watersheds; USEPA Region 10; 1200
6th Ave, Suite 900, OWW-130; Seattle, Washington 98101. Comments may
also be received via electronic mail at guzzo.lindsay@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information can be obtained
by contacting Lindsay Guzzo at the address above, or by visiting the
Region 10 Web site at https://www.epa.gov/r10earth/waterpermits.htm.
Requests may also be made to Audrey
[[Page 55841]]
Washington at (206) 553-0523, or electronically mailed to:
washington.audrey@epa.gov. For further information regarding the
State's certification of the general permit, contact Shawn Stokes at
the address below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Informational Meetings
Two public informational meetings will be held to discuss the
Proposed Permit, clarify changes and to answer general questions. Two
meetings will be held, one in Anchorage on October 15, 2008, in the
Westmark Hotel Anchorage, 720 West 5th Avenue, Anchorage, AK 99501, at
5:30 p.m., the other in Seattle on October 28, 2008 in the Red Lion
Hotel, 1415 5th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101 at 5 p.m. These informational
meetings will not serve as a formal public hearing on the permit.
Public Hearing
Persons wishing to request a public hearing should submit their
written request by November 10, 2008 stating the nature of the issues
to be raised as well as the requester's name, address and telephone
number to Lindsay Guzzo at the address above. If a public hearing is
scheduled, notice will be published in the Federal Register. Notice
will also be posted on the Region 10 Web site, and will be mailed to
all interested persons receiving letters of the availability of the
draft permit.
Administrative Record
The complete administrative record for the draft permit is
available for public review at the EPA Region 10 headquarters at the
address listed above.
Other Legal Requirements
State Water Quality Standards and State Certification
EPA is also providing Public Notice of ADEC's intent to certify the
general permit pursuant to section 401 of the Clean Water Act. ADEC has
provided a draft certification that the draft general permit complies
with State Water Quality Standards (18 AAC 15), including the State's
antidegradation policy.
Persons wishing to comment on State certification of the draft
general NPDES permit should send written comments to Mr. Shawn Stokes
in ADEC's Anchorage Office, 555 Cordova Street, Anchorage, Alaska
99501, or via electronic mail at Shawn.Stokes@alaska.gov.
National Environmental Policy Act
Because the proposed permit will cover new sources in Alaska, the
permit is subject to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Based on the Environmental Assessment (EA) and consideration of the
proposed NPDES permit conditions, and in accordance with the guidelines
for determining the significance of proposed federal actions (40 CFR
1508.27) and EPA criteria for initiating an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) (40 CFR 6.605), EPA has concluded that the proposed
NPDES permit will not result in significant effect on the human
environment. The proposed permit will not significantly affect land use
patterns or population, wetlands or flood plains, threatened or
endangered species, farmlands, ecologically critical areas, historic
resources, air quality, water quality, noise levels, and fish and
wildlife resources. It will also not conflict with approved local,
regional, or state land use plans or policies. The proposed permit also
conforms with all applicable Federal statutes and executive orders. As
a result of these findings, EPA has determined that an EIS will not be
prepared and the public is invited to comment on EPA's Preliminary
Finding Of No Significant Impacts (FONSI).
Endangered Species Act
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires EPA to consult
with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and NOAA Fisheries regarding
the potential effects that an action may have on listed endangered or
threatened species or their critical habitat. To address these ESA
requirements, and in support of EPA's informal consultation with the
Services, a Biological Evaluation (BE) was prepared to analyze these
potential effects. During the development of the draft general permit,
information provided by the Services was used to identify species of
interest for consideration in the BE. The results of the BE concluded
that discharges from Offshore Seafood Processing facilities will either
have no effect or are not likely to adversely affect threatened or
endangered species in the vicinity of the discharges. The fact sheet,
the draft permits and the BE are being reviewed by the Services for
consistency with those programs established for the conservation of
endangered and threatened species. Any additional comments or
conservation recommendations received from the Services regarding
threatened or endangered species will be considered prior to issuance
of the GPs.
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Section 305(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act (16 U.S.C. 1855(b))
requires federal agencies to consult with NOAA Fisheries when any
activity proposed to be permitted, funded, or undertaken by a federal
agency may have an adverse effect on designated Essential Fish Habitat
(EFH) as defined by the Act. To address the requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, EPA prepared an EFH Assessment concluding that
offshore seafood processors operations may adversely affect essential
fish habitat. However, EPA expects that effects on essential fish
habitat, while possible, are likely to be limited in extent for several
reasons. For more information please see the Biological Evaluation/ EFH
assessment. As with ESA, any additional comments or conservation
recommendations received from NOAA Fisheries regarding EFH will be
considered prior to issuance of the GPs.
Executive Order 12866
EPA has determined that this general permit is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is
therefore not subject to OMB review.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements of this permit were
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.,
and assigned OMB control numbers 2040-0086 and 2040-0110.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
requires that EPA prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis for rules
subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) that have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities. However, general
NPDES permits are not ``rules'' subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C.
553(b), and is therefore not subject to the RFA.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), Public Law
104-4, generally requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their ``regulatory actions'' (defined to be the same as ``rules''
subject to the RFA) on tribal, State, and local governments and the
private sector. However, general NPDES permits are not ``rules''
subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b), and is therefore not
subject to the RFA.
[[Page 55842]]
Dated: September 18, 2008.
Michael F. Gearheard,
Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, Region 10.
[FR Doc. E8-22553 Filed 9-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P