Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request, 55589-55591 [E8-22563]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 187 / Thursday, September 25, 2008 / Notices
Approval does not constitute a
commitment by the FAA to financially
assist in the implementation of the
program nor a determination that all
measures covered by the program are
eligible for grant-in-aid funding from the
FAA under the Airport and Airway
Improvement Act of 1982. Where
Federal funding is sought, the airport
sponsor must submit requests for project
grants to the FAA Denver Airports
District Office in Denver, Colorado.
The Centennial Airport study
contains a proposed noise compatibility
program comprised of actions designed
for implementation by airport
management and adjacent jurisdictions
from the date of study completion to
beyond the year 2012. The Arapahoe
County Public Airport Authority,
Englewood, CO, requested that the FAA
evaluate and approve this material as a
noise compatibility program for the
Centennial Airport, as described in
Section 104(b) of the Act. The FAA
began its review of the program on
February 22, 2008, and was required by
a provision of the Act to approve or
disapprove the program within 180 days
(other than the use of new flight
procedures for noise control). Failure to
approve or disapprove such a program
within the 180-day period shall be
deemed to be an approval of such a
program.
The submitted program contained 12
proposed actions to address noise on
and off the airport. The FAA completed
its review and determined that the
overall program complied with
procedural and substantive
requirements of the Act and Part 150.
The overall program, therefore, was
approved by FAA effective August 12,
2008.
FAA granted outright approval for
five of the specific program
recommendations. One of these
approved elements involves voluntary
measures that the airport sponsor can
encourage pilots to use to help
minimize aircraft noise. The other four
approved recommendations involve
program management and are intended
to assist in the development and
operations of a noise abatement office
and noise monitoring efforts. These
measures include the installation of a
permanent noise monitoring system to
monitor noise levels and compliance
with noise abatement measures and the
use of a public advisory committee to
monitor programs implemented as a
result on the adoption of the NCP,
including the Noise Monitoring
Program.
FAA approved in part the NCP
recommendation that addresses land
use planning. This recommendation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Sep 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
involves the airport authority working
with the local municipalities to amend
zoning requirements, comprehensive
plans and development regulations to
minimize new, noncompatible land uses
near the airport and to minimize the
impact on airspace surrounding the
airport, including 14 CFR Part 77
imaginary surfaces. FAA disapproved
for Part 150 purposes portions of this
recommendation related to airspace
issues regulated under Part 77.
In addition, the airport sponsor
proposes four changes to flight
procedures. One of these measures, a
change to nighttime flight procedures
for jets departing to the north, FAA
approved, subject to further
environmental review and air traffic
operational safety and efficiency. FAA
also approved, for Part 150 purposes,
the elimination of the preferential
runway procedure.
FAA disapproved the remaining two
program elements that involve proposed
changes to flight procedures. FAA Air
Traffic Control determined these
procedures would create numerous
adverse impacts to safety and efficiency
of air traffic control operations. These
procedures would have tested 24-hour
flight tracks between 350 and 010
degree headings and implemented a 170
degree departure heading to 4 DME or
8,000 MSL (± 20 degrees).
The airport sponsor also proposes
banning certain type of aircraft
operations. In particular, the airport
sponsor proposes the ban of Stage I
aircraft under 75,000 lbs. from operating
at Centennial Airport but did not
provide data supporting the noise
benefit of such a ban, per Part 150
requirements. For this reason, the FAA
disapproved this recommendation
pending further study. The Arapahoe
Public Airport Authority may submit
this additional information to FAA for
further evaluation.
FAA also disapproved the proposed
ban of Stage 2 aircraft between the hours
of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., pending
additional information needed from the
airport sponsor, as required under 14
CFR Part 161. The Arapahoe Public
Airport Authority studied the noise
benefit of such a ban and describes this
benefit in its NCP. While this meets the
requirements of Part 150, Part 161
requires additional FAA review and
approval to determine the impact of
such a ban on air commerce and the
national airspace system prior to
implementing the ban.
FAA’s determinations are set forth in
detail in a Record of Approval endorsed
by the FAA Airports Division Manager
on August 12, 2008. The Record of
Approval, as well as other evaluation
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55589
materials and the documents
comprising the submittal, are available
for review at the FAA office and Internet
site listed above and at the
administrative offices of the Arapahoe
County Public Airport Authority,
Englewood, CO.
Re-issued in Renton, Washington, on
August 25, 2008.
Donna P. Taylor,
Manager, Airports Division, FAA Northwest
Mountain Region.
[FR Doc. E8–22460 Filed 9–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Proposed Agency Information
Collection Activities; Comment
Request
Federal Railroad
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
its implementing regulations, the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
hereby announces that it is seeking
renewal of the following currently
approved information collection
activities. Before submitting these
information collection requirements for
clearance by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), FRA is soliciting
public comment on specific aspects of
the activities identified below.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than November 24, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on any or all of the following proposed
activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert
Brogan, Office of Safety, Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop–25,
Washington, DC 20590, or Ms. Nakia
Jackson, Office of Information
Technology, RAD–20, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
SE., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC
20590. Commenters requesting FRA to
acknowledge receipt of their respective
comments must include a self-addressed
stamped postcard stating, ‘‘Comments
on OMB control number 2130–0571.’’
Alternatively, comments may be
transmitted via facsimile to (202) 493–
6216 or (202) 493–6497, or via e-mail to
Mr. Brogan at robert.brogan@dot.gov, or
to Ms. Jackson at
nakia.jackson@dot.gov. Please refer to
the assigned OMB control number in
any correspondence submitted. FRA
will summarize comments received in
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
55590
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 187 / Thursday, September 25, 2008 / Notices
response to this notice in a subsequent
notice and include them in its
information collection submission to
OMB for approval.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 25,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202)
493–6292) or Ms. Nakia Jackson, Office
of Information Technology, RAD–20,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1200
New Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 35,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202)
493–6073). (These telephone numbers
are not toll-free.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Pub. L. No. 104–13, § 2, 109 Stat.
163 (1995) (codified as revised at 44
U.S.C. 3501–3520), and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR Part
1320, require Federal agencies to
provide 60 days notice to the public for
comment on information collection
activities before seeking approval for
reinstatement or renewal by OMB. 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1),
1320.10(e)(1), 1320.12(a). Specifically,
FRA invites interested respondents to
comment on the following summary of
proposed information collection
activities regarding (i) Whether the
information collection activities are
necessary for FRA to properly execute
its functions, including whether the
activities will have practical utility; (ii)
the accuracy of FRA’s estimates of the
burden of the information collection
activities, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used to
determine the estimates; (iii) ways for
FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information being
collected; and (iv) ways for FRA to
minimize the burden of information
collection activities on the public by
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology (e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses). See 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)(i)–(iv); 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1)(i)–(iv). FRA believes that
soliciting public comment will promote
its efforts to reduce the administrative
and paperwork burdens associated with
the collection of information mandated
by Federal regulations. In summary,
FRA reasons that comments received
will advance three objectives: (i) Reduce
reporting burdens; (ii) ensure that it
organizes information collection
requirements in a ‘‘user friendly’’ format
to improve the use of such information;
and (iii) accurately assess the resources
expended to retrieve and produce
information requested. See 44 U.S.C.
3501.
Below is a brief summary of currently
approved information collection
activities that FRA will submit for
clearance by OMB as required under the
PRA:
Title: Occupational Noise Exposure
for Railroad Operating Employees.
OMB Control Number: 2130–0571.
Abstract: The collection of
information is used by FRA to ensure
that railroads covered by this rule
establish and implement—by specified
dates—noise monitoring, hearing
conservation, and audiometric testing
programs, as well as hearing
conservation training programs, to
protect their employees against the
damaging and potentially dangerous
effects of excessive noise in the
everyday rail environment.
Affected Public: Businesses.
Respondent Universe: 460 railroads.
Frequency of Submission: On
occasion.
Reporting Burden:
Respondent
universe
Total annual
responses
Average time
per response
227.9—Waivers ...................................................
227.103—Noise Monitoring Program ..................
460 Railroads ...............
460 Railroads ...............
5 petitions .....................
460 programs ...............
460 Railroads ...............
460 Railroads ...............
905 lists ........................
461 HCPs .....................
—Revised Hearing Conservation Programs
(HCPs).
227.109—Audiometric Testing Program—Existing Employees—Baseline Audiograms.
—Periodic Audiograms .................................
—Evaluation of Audiograms .........................
460 Railroads ...............
92 HCPs .......................
60 minutes ...................
2 hours/8 hours/600
hours.
30 minutes ...................
150 hrs/2 hrs/31 hrs/7.5
hours.
1.74 hours ....................
5
5,165
—Notification of Employee of Monitoring .....
227.107—Hearing Conservation Program (HCP)
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
CFR section
78,000 Employees .......
7 min./25 minutes ........
7,000 + 2,500
25 minutes ...................
6 min./2.5 hours ...........
3,333
466
—Problem Audiograms ................................
—Follow-up Procedures—Notifications ........
—Fitting/Training of Employees: Hearing
Protectors.
—Referrals for Clinical/Otological Examinations.
—Notification to Employee of Need:
Otological Examination.
—New Audiometric Interpretation ................
227.111—Audiometric Test Requirements ..........
227.117—Hearing Protection Attenuation—Evaluation.
—Re-Evaluations ..........................................
227.119—Hearing Conservation Training Program—Development.
—Employee Training ....................................
—Periodic Training .......................................
227.121—Recordkeeping—Authorization:
Records.
—Request for Copies of Reports .................
8,000 Employees .........
8,000 Employees .........
240 Employees ............
60,000 audiograms +
6,000 audiograms.
8,000 audiograms ........
2,330 evaluations + 93
retests.
45 documents ..............
93 notifications .............
240 tr. sessions ............
10 minutes ...................
15 minutes ...................
2 minutes .....................
8
24
8
240 Employees ............
20 referrals/results .......
2 hours .........................
40
240 Employees ............
20 notifications .............
5 minutes .....................
2
240 Employees ............
1,000 Mobile Vans .......
460 Railroads ...............
20 notifications .............
1,000 tests ...................
50 evaluations ..............
5 minutes .....................
45 minutes ...................
30 minutes ...................
2
750
25
460 Railroads ...............
460 Railroads/AAR ......
10 re-evaluations .........
461 programs ...............
5
956
460 Railroads ...............
460 Railroads ...............
460 Railroads ...............
13,000
3,500
5
21 min. + 45 min ..........
166
—Records Transfer When Carrier Becomes
Defunct.
460 Railroads ...............
26,000 tr. Empl ............
7,000 tr. Empl ..............
10 requests + 10 responses.
150 requests + 150 responses.
10 records ....................
30 minutes ...................
8 hours/2 hours/116
hours/1 hour.
30 minutes ...................
30 minutes ...................
10 min. + 15 min ..........
24 minutes ...................
4
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Sep 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
78,000 Employees .......
78,000 Employees .......
460 Railroads ...............
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Total annual
burden hours
453
2,875
160
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 187 / Thursday, September 25, 2008 / Notices
55591
CFR section
Respondent
universe
Total annual
responses
Average time
per response
—Railroad Audiometric Test Records ..........
—Hearing Conservation Program (HCP)
Records.
—HCP Training Records of Employees .......
—Records: Standard Threshold Shifts of
Employees.
229.121—Locomotive Cab Noise—Tests/Certifications.
—Equipment Maintenance: Excessive Noise
Reports.
—Maintenance Records ...............................
—Internal Auditable Monitoring Systems .....
Appendix H—Static Test Protocols/Records .......
460 Railroads ...............
460 Railroads ...............
26,000 records .............
54,000 records .............
2 minutes .....................
45 seconds ...................
867
675
460 Railroads ...............
460 Railroads ...............
26,000 records .............
280 records ..................
30 seconds ...................
7 minutes .....................
217
33
3 Equipment Manufacturers.
460 Railroads ...............
700 tests/certific ...........
40 min. + 5 min ............
111
3,000 reports + 3,000
records.
3,750 records ...............
570 systems .................
2 retests + 2 records ....
10 min. + 5 min ............
750
8 minutes .....................
36 min. + 8.25 hour .....
35 min. + 5 min ............
500
572
1
Total Responses: 230,939.
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
44,178 hours.
Status: Regular Review.
Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5
CFR 1320.5(b), 1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA
informs all interested parties that it may
not conduct or sponsor, and a
respondent is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Issued in Washington, DC on September
19, 2008.
D.J. Stadtler,
Director, Office of Financial Management,
Federal Railroad Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–22563 Filed 9–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA–2008–
0129]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
an extension of a currently approved
collection.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatement of previously approved
collections.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Sep 24, 2008
Jkt 214001
460 Railroads ...............
570 Railroads ...............
700 Locomotives ..........
This document describes one
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 24, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments must refer to the
docket notice numbers cited at the
beginning of this notice and be
submitted to Docket Management, Room
W12–140, ground level, 1200 New
Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590
by any of the following methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. Telephone: 1–
800–647–5527.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Participation heading of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
DocketInfo.dot.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Total annual
burden hours
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to the street
address listed above. The Internet access
to the docket will be at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Complete copies of each request for
collection of information may be
obtained at no charge from Carlita
Ballard, NHTSA, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
SE., Room W43–439, NVS–131,
Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard’s
telephone number is (202) 366–0846.
Please identify the relevant collection of
information by referring to its OMB
Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the
public and affected agencies concerning
each proposed collection of information.
The OMB has promulgated regulations
describing what must be included in
such a document. Under OMB’s
regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an
agency must ask for public comment on
the following:
(i.) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii.) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii.) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv.) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
E:\FR\FM\25SEN1.SGM
25SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 187 (Thursday, September 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55589-55591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22563]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment
Request
AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and its
implementing regulations, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
hereby announces that it is seeking renewal of the following currently
approved information collection activities. Before submitting these
information collection requirements for clearance by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), FRA is soliciting public comment on
specific aspects of the activities identified below.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than November 24, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on any or all of the following
proposed activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of
Safety, Planning and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop-25, Washington, DC
20590, or Ms. Nakia Jackson, Office of Information Technology, RAD-20,
Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop
35, Washington, DC 20590. Commenters requesting FRA to acknowledge
receipt of their respective comments must include a self-addressed
stamped postcard stating, ``Comments on OMB control number 2130-0571.''
Alternatively, comments may be transmitted via facsimile to (202) 493-
6216 or (202) 493-6497, or via e-mail to Mr. Brogan at
robert.brogan@dot.gov, or to Ms. Jackson at nakia.jackson@dot.gov.
Please refer to the assigned OMB control number in any correspondence
submitted. FRA will summarize comments received in
[[Page 55590]]
response to this notice in a subsequent notice and include them in its
information collection submission to OMB for approval.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of Planning
and Evaluation Division, RRS-21, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200
New Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone:
(202) 493-6292) or Ms. Nakia Jackson, Office of Information Technology,
RAD-20, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE.,
Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493-6073). (These
telephone numbers are not toll-free.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),
Pub. L. No. 104-13, Sec. 2, 109 Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised
at 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR Part
1320, require Federal agencies to provide 60 days notice to the public
for comment on information collection activities before seeking
approval for reinstatement or renewal by OMB. 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A);
5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), 1320.10(e)(1), 1320.12(a). Specifically, FRA
invites interested respondents to comment on the following summary of
proposed information collection activities regarding (i) Whether the
information collection activities are necessary for FRA to properly
execute its functions, including whether the activities will have
practical utility; (ii) the accuracy of FRA's estimates of the burden
of the information collection activities, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used to determine the estimates; (iii) ways
for FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
being collected; and (iv) ways for FRA to minimize the burden of
information collection activities on the public by automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology (e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses). See 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)(i)-(iv); 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1)(i)-(iv). FRA believes that soliciting public comment will
promote its efforts to reduce the administrative and paperwork burdens
associated with the collection of information mandated by Federal
regulations. In summary, FRA reasons that comments received will
advance three objectives: (i) Reduce reporting burdens; (ii) ensure
that it organizes information collection requirements in a ``user
friendly'' format to improve the use of such information; and (iii)
accurately assess the resources expended to retrieve and produce
information requested. See 44 U.S.C. 3501.
Below is a brief summary of currently approved information
collection activities that FRA will submit for clearance by OMB as
required under the PRA:
Title: Occupational Noise Exposure for Railroad Operating
Employees.
OMB Control Number: 2130-0571.
Abstract: The collection of information is used by FRA to ensure
that railroads covered by this rule establish and implement--by
specified dates--noise monitoring, hearing conservation, and
audiometric testing programs, as well as hearing conservation training
programs, to protect their employees against the damaging and
potentially dangerous effects of excessive noise in the everyday rail
environment.
Affected Public: Businesses.
Respondent Universe: 460 railroads.
Frequency of Submission: On occasion.
Reporting Burden:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total annual Average time per Total annual
CFR section Respondent universe responses response burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
227.9--Waivers................... 460 Railroads...... 5 petitions........ 60 minutes......... 5
227.103--Noise Monitoring Program 460 Railroads...... 460 programs....... 2 hours/8 hours/600 5,165
hours.
--Notification of Employee of 460 Railroads...... 905 lists.......... 30 minutes......... 453
Monitoring.
227.107--Hearing Conservation 460 Railroads...... 461 HCPs........... 150 hrs/2 hrs/31 2,875
Program (HCP). hrs/7.5 hours.
--Revised Hearing 460 Railroads...... 92 HCPs............ 1.74 hours......... 160
Conservation Programs (HCPs).
227.109--Audiometric Testing 78,000 Employees... 60,000 audiograms + 7 min./25 minutes.. 7,000 + 2,500
Program--Existing Employees-- 6,000 audiograms.
Baseline Audiograms.
--Periodic Audiograms........ 78,000 Employees... 8,000 audiograms... 25 minutes......... 3,333
--Evaluation of Audiograms... 78,000 Employees... 2,330 evaluations + 6 min./2.5 hours... 466
93 retests.
--Problem Audiograms......... 8,000 Employees.... 45 documents....... 10 minutes......... 8
--Follow-up Procedures-- 8,000 Employees.... 93 notifications... 15 minutes......... 24
Notifications.
--Fitting/Training of 240 Employees...... 240 tr. sessions... 2 minutes.......... 8
Employees: Hearing
Protectors.
--Referrals for Clinical/ 240 Employees...... 20 referrals/ 2 hours............ 40
Otological Examinations. results.
--Notification to Employee of 240 Employees...... 20 notifications... 5 minutes.......... 2
Need: Otological Examination.
--New Audiometric 240 Employees...... 20 notifications... 5 minutes.......... 2
Interpretation.
227.111--Audiometric Test 1,000 Mobile Vans.. 1,000 tests........ 45 minutes......... 750
Requirements.
227.117--Hearing Protection 460 Railroads...... 50 evaluations..... 30 minutes......... 25
Attenuation--Evaluation.
--Re-Evaluations............. 460 Railroads...... 10 re-evaluations.. 30 minutes......... 5
227.119--Hearing Conservation 460 Railroads/AAR.. 461 programs....... 8 hours/2 hours/116 956
Training Program--Development. hours/1 hour.
--Employee Training.......... 460 Railroads...... 26,000 tr. Empl.... 30 minutes......... 13,000
--Periodic Training.......... 460 Railroads...... 7,000 tr. Empl..... 30 minutes......... 3,500
227.121--Recordkeeping--Authoriza 460 Railroads...... 10 requests + 10 10 min. + 15 min... 5
tion: Records. responses.
--Request for Copies of 460 Railroads...... 150 requests + 150 21 min. + 45 min... 166
Reports. responses.
--Records Transfer When 460 Railroads...... 10 records......... 24 minutes......... 4
Carrier Becomes Defunct.
[[Page 55591]]
--Railroad Audiometric Test 460 Railroads...... 26,000 records..... 2 minutes.......... 867
Records.
--Hearing Conservation 460 Railroads...... 54,000 records..... 45 seconds......... 675
Program (HCP) Records.
--HCP Training Records of 460 Railroads...... 26,000 records..... 30 seconds......... 217
Employees.
--Records: Standard Threshold 460 Railroads...... 280 records........ 7 minutes.......... 33
Shifts of Employees.
229.121--Locomotive Cab Noise-- 3 Equipment 700 tests/certific. 40 min. + 5 min.... 111
Tests/Certifications. Manufacturers.
--Equipment Maintenance: 460 Railroads...... 3,000 reports + 10 min. + 5 min.... 750
Excessive Noise Reports. 3,000 records.
--Maintenance Records........ 460 Railroads...... 3,750 records...... 8 minutes.......... 500
--Internal Auditable 570 Railroads...... 570 systems........ 36 min. + 8.25 hour 572
Monitoring Systems.
Appendix H--Static Test Protocols/ 700 Locomotives.... 2 retests + 2 35 min. + 5 min.... 1
Records. records.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Responses: 230,939.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 44,178 hours.
Status: Regular Review.
Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR 1320.5(b),
1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA informs all interested parties that it may not
conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
Issued in Washington, DC on September 19, 2008.
D.J. Stadtler,
Director, Office of Financial Management, Federal Railroad
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-22563 Filed 9-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P