Safety Zone: Port of Ponce, Puerto Rico, 54950-54952 [E8-22410]
Download as PDF
54950
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) Proceed as directed by any Official
Patrol.
(iii) When authorized to transit the
regulated area, all vessels shall proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course that minimizes
wake near the event area.
(d) Effective period. This section will
be enforced from 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on
September 21, 2008.
Dated: September 15, 2008.
Fred M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E8–22429 Filed 9–23–08; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
Background and Purpose
[Docket No. USCG–2007–0075]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone: Port of Ponce, Puerto
Rico
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has
established both moving and fixed
safety zones around all vessels carrying
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) cargo in
the waters of the Caribbean Sea and
Bahia de Ponce, Puerto Rico. This rule
is necessary to protect the public by
minimizing the chance of collisions of
vessels carrying this inherently
dangerous and highly volatile material.
This rule requires vessel traffic to
maintain a safe distance from LNG
vessels operating near or moored in
Ponce, Puerto Rico.
DATES: This rule is effective October 24,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2007–0075 and are
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov. This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at two locations: the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays and the Sector
San Juan, Prevention Operations
Department, Waterways & Facilities
Division, 5 La Puntilla, San Juan, PR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Sep 23, 2008
Regulatory Information
On May 28, 2008, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zone; Port of Ponce,
Puerto Rico in the Federal Register (73
FR 30555). We received no letters
commenting on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ACTION:
00901 between 7:30 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Ensign Rachael Love of Sector
San Juan, Prevention Operations
Department at (787)–289–2071. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 214001
This rule is necessary to provide for
the safety of life at sea by excluding
vessel traffic from the waters
immediately adjacent to LNG carriers.
LNG in any quantity poses a risk of fire
or explosion due to its highly volatile
nature. LNG carried by tank ships in
bulk quantities can be hazardous to a
port if sufficient precaution is not taken
to reduce this risk. The proposed rule
would require vessel traffic to maintain
a 100-yard separation from LNG vessels
transiting the harbor and 150-foot
separation from LNG vessels moored
pierside. The purpose of this rule is to
minimize the risk of vessel collision or
allision with an LNG carrier, thereby
reducing the risk of fire or explosion.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments were received as a
result of publishing the NPRM; therefore
no changes have been made to the
regulatory text.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary due to the infrequent
arrival of LNG carriers and the small
amount of commercial vessel traffic in
Bahia de Ponce.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit a portion of
Bahia de Ponce when an LNG vessel is
transiting the harbor or moored at the
Puerto de Ponce waterfront facility. This
safety zone will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: The Port of Ponce
receives only a few commercial vessel
arrivals per week, and recreational
boating traffic can easily transit around
the regulated area.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
24SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Sep 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
54951
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Safety measures, and
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 165.771 to read as follows:
Technical Standards
§ 165.771 Safety Zone; Bahia de Ponce,
Puerto Rico
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
(a) Location. The following area is
established as a safety zone during the
specified conditions:
(1) A 100 yard radius around any
vessel carrying Liquefied Natural Gas
(LNG) cargo while transiting north of
Latitude 17°54′00″ N in the waters of the
Caribbean Sea and the Bahia de Ponce,
on approach to or departure from the
Puerto de Ponce waterfront facility in
Bahia de Ponce.
(2) The waters within 150 feet of any
vessel carrying LNG cargo while moored
at the Puerto de Ponce waterfront
facility in Bahia de Ponce, between
berths 4 and 7 at approximate position
17°58′12″N, 066°37′08″ W.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
Designated Representative means
Coast Guard Patrol Commander
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers and other officers operating
Coast Guard vessels and federal, state,
and local officers designated by or
assisting the COTP San Juan in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, anchoring, mooring or
transiting in these zones is prohibited
unless authorized by the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or a designated
representative. Persons and vessels
desiring to transit the Regulated Area
may contact the U.S. Coast Guard
Captain of the Port San Juan at
telephone number 787–289–2041 or on
VHF channel 16 (156.9 MHz).
(d) Enforcement periods. The Coast
Guard will notify the maritime
community of effective periods via a
broadcast notice to mariners on VHF
Marine Band Radio, Channel 22A (156.8
MHz).
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded under the Instruction
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is
categorically excluded, under figure
2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
24SER1
54952
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 29, 2008.
E. Pino,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Juan.
[FR Doc. E8–22410 Filed 9–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0844]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone: Robert Moses Causeway
Bridge State Boat Channel, Captree,
NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the State Boat
Channel surrounding the Robert Moses
Causeway located in Captree, New York.
This safety zone is necessary to protect
vessels transiting the area from hazards
imposed by construction barges and
equipment. Entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Long Island Sound,
New Haven, CT.
DATES: This rule will be effective from
12:01 a.m. on September 8, 2008 until
11:59 p.m on May 24, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2008–
0844 and are available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. They are
also available for inspection or copying
two locations: The Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays,
and at Coast Guard Sector Long Island
Sound, 120 Woodward Ave., New
Haven, CT 06512 between 9 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call LT Douglas Miller, Chief of
Waterways Management, Coast Guard
Sector Long Island Sound at 203–468–
4569. If you have questions on viewing
the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:28 Sep 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
immediate work is needed to ensure the
continued safe operation of the Robert
Moses Causeway Bridge which in turn
makes the publication of a notice of
proposed rulemaking and associated
comment period impractical as it would
delay the needed repair and
replacement work on the bridge.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. A delay or cancellation of this
ongoing construction project is not in
the public interest. In addition, this
safety zone is necessary to ensure the
safety of the maritime public and
construction workers through the
completion of this bridge construction
project.
Background and Purpose
Currently, the New York Department
of Transportation is repairing the
existing bascule and associated
machinery of the Robert Moses
Causeway Bridge located over the State
Boat Channel in Captree, NY; these
modifications are needed to ensure the
continued safe operation of the bridge.
To complete the modifications on the
bridge, barges will need to block the
waterway during the course of the
project. To ensure the continued safety
of the boating community, the Coast
Guard is establishing a safety zone in all
navigable waters of State Boat Channel
within 100-yards of the Robert Moses
Causeway Bridge. This safety zone is
necessary to protect the safety of the
boating community who wish to utilize
the State Boat channel. Vessels may
utilize the Great South Bay or Jones
Inlet as an alternative route to using the
State Boat Channel, adding minimal
additional transit time. Marine traffic
may also transit safely outside of the
safety zone during the effective dates
thus allowing navigation in all other
areas of the State Boat Channel, except
the portion delineated by this rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Discussion of Rule
This regulation establishes a
temporary safety zone on the State Boat
Channel within 100-yards to either side
of the Robert Moses Causeway Bridge.
This action is intended to prohibit
vessel traffic in a portion of the State
Boat Channel within 100 yards of the
Robert Moses Causeway Bridge in
Captree, NY and to provide for the
safety of the boating community due to
the hazards posed by construction
equipment located in the waterway
during the repair of the existing span.
The effective period of this safety
zone will be from 12:01 a.m. September
8, 2008 until 11:59 p.m. on May 24,
2009. Entry into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Long Island Sound.
Any violation of the safety zone
described herein is punishable by,
among other things, civil and criminal
penalties, in rem liability against the
offending vessel, and the initiation of
suspension or revocation proceedings
against Coast Guard-issued merchant
mariner credentials.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
This regulation may have some
impact on the public, but the potential
impact will be minimized for the
following reasons: Vessels may transit
in all areas of the State Boat Channel
other than the area of the safety zone,
and may utilize other routes with
minimal increased transit time.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
E:\FR\FM\24SER1.SGM
24SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54950-54952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22410]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2007-0075]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone: Port of Ponce, Puerto Rico
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has established both moving and fixed safety
zones around all vessels carrying Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) cargo in
the waters of the Caribbean Sea and Bahia de Ponce, Puerto Rico. This
rule is necessary to protect the public by minimizing the chance of
collisions of vessels carrying this inherently dangerous and highly
volatile material. This rule requires vessel traffic to maintain a safe
distance from LNG vessels operating near or moored in Ponce, Puerto
Rico.
DATES: This rule is effective October 24, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2007-0075 and are available online at https://
www.regulations.gov. This material is also available for inspection or
copying at two locations: the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays and the Sector San
Juan, Prevention Operations Department, Waterways & Facilities
Division, 5 La Puntilla, San Juan, PR 00901 between 7:30 a.m. and 3
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Ensign Rachael Love of Sector San Juan, Prevention
Operations Department at (787)-289-2071. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On May 28, 2008, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zone; Port of Ponce, Puerto Rico in the Federal
Register (73 FR 30555). We received no letters commenting on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
This rule is necessary to provide for the safety of life at sea by
excluding vessel traffic from the waters immediately adjacent to LNG
carriers. LNG in any quantity poses a risk of fire or explosion due to
its highly volatile nature. LNG carried by tank ships in bulk
quantities can be hazardous to a port if sufficient precaution is not
taken to reduce this risk. The proposed rule would require vessel
traffic to maintain a 100-yard separation from LNG vessels transiting
the harbor and 150-foot separation from LNG vessels moored pierside.
The purpose of this rule is to minimize the risk of vessel collision or
allision with an LNG carrier, thereby reducing the risk of fire or
explosion.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments were received as a result of publishing the NPRM;
therefore no changes have been made to the regulatory text.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary due to the
infrequent arrival of LNG carriers and the small amount of commercial
vessel traffic in Bahia de Ponce.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule may affect the following entities, some of which might be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
a portion of Bahia de Ponce when an LNG vessel is transiting the harbor
or moored at the Puerto de Ponce waterfront facility. This safety zone
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities for the following reasons: The Port of Ponce receives
only a few commercial vessel arrivals per week, and recreational
boating traffic can easily transit around the regulated area.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
[[Page 54951]]
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
under the Instruction that there are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety measures, and Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107-295,
116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.771 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.771 Safety Zone; Bahia de Ponce, Puerto Rico
(a) Location. The following area is established as a safety zone
during the specified conditions:
(1) A 100 yard radius around any vessel carrying Liquefied Natural
Gas (LNG) cargo while transiting north of Latitude 17[deg]54'00'' N in
the waters of the Caribbean Sea and the Bahia de Ponce, on approach to
or departure from the Puerto de Ponce waterfront facility in Bahia de
Ponce.
(2) The waters within 150 feet of any vessel carrying LNG cargo
while moored at the Puerto de Ponce waterfront facility in Bahia de
Ponce, between berths 4 and 7 at approximate position 17[deg]58'12''N,
066[deg]37'08'' W.
(b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
Designated Representative means Coast Guard Patrol Commander
including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers and other officers
operating Coast Guard vessels and federal, state, and local officers
designated by or assisting the COTP San Juan in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, anchoring, mooring or transiting in these
zones is prohibited unless authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the
Port or a designated representative. Persons and vessels desiring to
transit the Regulated Area may contact the U.S. Coast Guard Captain of
the Port San Juan at telephone number 787-289-2041 or on VHF channel 16
(156.9 MHz).
(d) Enforcement periods. The Coast Guard will notify the maritime
community of effective periods via a broadcast notice to mariners on
VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 22A (156.8 MHz).
[[Page 54952]]
Dated: August 29, 2008.
E. Pino,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Juan.
[FR Doc. E8-22410 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P