Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC, Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3); Receipt of Request for Action Under 10 CFR 2.206, 55168-55169 [E8-22356]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
55168
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 24, 2008 / Notices
participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign
documents and access the E-Submittal
server for any proceeding in which it is
participating; and/or (2) creation of an
electronic docket for the proceeding
(even in instances in which the
petitioner/requestor (or its counsel or
representative) already holds an NRCissued digital ID certificate). Each
petitioner/ requestor will need to
download the Workplace Forms
ViewerTM to access the Electronic
Information Exchange (EIE), a
component of the E-Filing system. The
Workplace Forms ViewerTM is free and
is available at https://www.nrc.gov/sitehelp/e-submittals/install-viewer.html.
Information about applying for a digital
ID certificate is available on NRC’s
public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/e-submittals/applycertificates.html.
Once a petitioner/requestor has
obtained a digital ID certificate, had a
docket created, and downloaded the EIE
viewer, it can then submit a request for
hearing or petition for leave to
intervene. Submissions should be in
Portable Document Format (PDF) in
accordance with NRC guidance
available on the NRC public Web site at
https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html. A filing is considered
complete at the time the filer submits its
documents through EIE. To be timely,
an electronic filing must be submitted to
the EIE system no later than 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on the due date. Upon
receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing
system time-stamps the document and
sends the submitter an e-mail notice
confirming receipt of the document. The
EIE system also distributes an e-mail
notice that provides access to the
document to the NRC Office of the
General Counsel and any others who
have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the
proceeding, so that the filer need not
serve the documents on those
participants separately. Therefore,
applicants and other participants (or
their counsel or representative) must
apply for and receive a digital ID
certificate before a hearing request/
petition to intervene is filed so that they
can obtain access to the document via
the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically may
seek assistance through the ‘‘Contact
Us’’ link located on the NRC Web site
at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html or by calling the NRC
technical help line, which is available
between 8:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.,
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
The help line number is (800) 397–4209
or locally, (301) 415–4737.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:26 Sep 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
Participants who believe that they
have a good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file a
motion, in accordance with 10 CFR
2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
requesting authorization to continue to
submit documents in paper format.
Such filings must be submitted by: (1)
First-class mail addressed to the Office
of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or
(2) courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service to the Office of the
Secretary, Sixteenth Floor, One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this
manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants.
Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in
the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service upon
depositing the document with the
provider of the service.
Non-timely requests and/or petitions
and contentions will not be entertained
absent a determination by the
Commission, the presiding officer, or
the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
that the petition and/or request should
be granted and/or the contentions
should be admitted, based on a
balancing of the factors specified in 10
CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i)–(viii). To be timely,
filings must be submitted no later than
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due
date.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://
ehd.nrc.gov/ehd_proceeding/home.asp,
unless excluded pursuant to an order of
the Commission, an Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board, or a Presiding Officer.
Participants are requested not to include
personal privacy information, such as
social security numbers, home
addresses, or home phone numbers in
their filings. With respect to copyrighted
works, except for limited excerpts that
serve the purpose of the adjudicatory
filings and would constitute a Fair Use
application, Participants are requested
not to include copyrighted materials in
their submissions.
For further details with respect to this
license amendment application, see the
application for amendment dated July
30, 2007, as supplemented by letters
dated April 7 and September 8, 2008,
which are available for public
inspection at the Commission’s PDR,
located at One White Flint North, File
Public Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Publicly available records will be
accessible electronically from the
Agencywide Documents Access and
Management System’s (ADAMS) Public
Electronic Reading Room on the Internet
at the NRC Web site, https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by e-mail
to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 17th day
of September 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Richard V. Guzman,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch I–1, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E8–22360 Filed 9–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–247 and 50–286, License
Nos. DPR–26 and DPR–64]
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,
Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC,
Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC,
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit
Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3); Receipt of
Request for Action Under 10 CFR 2.206
Notice is hereby given that by petition
dated March 30, 2008, Mr. Sherwood
Martinelli has requested that the NRC
(1) ‘‘* * * suspend the license for IP2
and IP3 reactors located in Buchanan,
NY owned by Entergy until they are
fully in compliance with all 10 CFR
Rules and Regulations, as well as other
local, state and federal laws and
regulations, and have eliminated the
environmental risks that have
contributed to, and/or caused my wife’s
breast cancer,’’ and (2) ‘‘* * * halt the
License Renewal Process.’’
The request is being treated pursuant
to 10 CFR 2.206 of the Commission’s
regulations. The request has been
referred to the Director of the Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR). The
Petitioner participated in a conference
call with the NRR Petition Review
Board (PRB) on August 14, 2008, to
discuss the petition. The additional
information provided by the Petitioner
was considered by the PRB before
making its final recommendation. By
letter dated September 15th, 2008, the
Director accepted for review, pursuant
to 10 CFR 2.206, the Petitioner’s
concerns regarding the licensee’s failure
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 24, 2008 / Notices
to implement the new emergency
notification siren system in a timely
manner. The Director also informed the
Petitioner that the siren issues in this
petition would be combined with the
Petitioner’s earlier petition on the new
siren system, dated September 28, 2007.
The earlier petition was noticed in the
Federal Register on February 25, 2008
(73 FR 10068). The Director informed
the Petitioner that his issues on
groundwater contamination were
considered by the NRC in response to an
earlier petition by the Petitioner. A
Final Director’s Decision was issued on
August 14, 2008, and noticed in the
Federal Register on August 21, 2008 (73
FR 49495). The NRC found that the
licensee was in compliance with the
pertinent NRC regulatory requirements
on the release of radioactive isotopes
and that public health and safety have
not been, nor are likely to be, adversely
affected.
As provided by Section 2.206,
appropriate action will be taken on this
petition within a reasonable time.
A copy of the petition and the
transcript of the conference call with the
PRB can be located at Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
Systems Accession Nos. ML080950265
and ML082330375, respectively, and are
available for inspection at the
Commission’s Public Document Room,
located at One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day
of September 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E8–22356 Filed 9–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
Draft 2008 Report to Congress on the
Benefits and Costs of Federal
Regulations
Office of Management and
Budget, Executive Office of the
President.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comments.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) requests comments
on its Draft 2008 Report to Congress on
the Benefits and Costs of Federal
Regulation. The full Draft Report is
available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/
omb/inforeg/regpolreports_congress.html, and is divided
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:26 Sep 23, 2008
Jkt 214001
into four chapters. Chapter I examines
the benefits and costs of major Federal
regulations issued in fiscal year 2007
and summarizes the benefits and costs
of major regulations issued between
September 1997 and 2007. It also
discusses regulatory impacts on State,
local, and tribal governments, small
business, wages, and economic growth.
Chapter II examines trends in regulation
since OMB began to compile benefit and
cost estimates records in 1981. Chapter
III provides an update on
implementation of the Information
Quality Act, and Chapter IV summarizes
agency compliance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act.
DATES: To ensure consideration of
comments as OMB prepares this Draft
Report for submission to Congress,
comments must be in writing and
received by 45 days after publication.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by one of
the following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Direct
comments to Docket ID OMB–2008–
0014
• E-mail:
OIRA_BC_RPT@omb.eop.gov
• Fax: (202) 395–7285
• Mail: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Attn: Darcel
D. Gayle, NEOB, Room 10202, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503. We
are still experiencing delays in the
regular mail, including first class and
express mail. To ensure that your
comments are received, we recommend
that comments on this draft report be
electronically submitted.
All comments submitted in response
to this notice will be made available to
the public, including by posting them
on OMB’s Web site. For this reason,
please do not include in your comments
information of a confidential nature,
such as sensitive personal information
or proprietary information. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means OMB will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to OMB, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Darcel D. Gayle, Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, NEOB, Room
10202, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503. Telephone:
(202) 395–3084.
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55169
Congress
directed the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to prepare an annual
Report to Congress on the Costs and
Benefits of Federal Regulations.
Specifically, Section 624 of the FY 2001
Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, also known as the
‘‘Regulatory Right-to-Know Act’’ (the
Act), requires OMB to submit a report
on the costs and benefits of Federal
regulations together with
recommendation for reform. The Act
states that the report should contain
estimates of the costs and benefits of
regulations in the aggregate, by agency
and agency program, and by major rule,
as well as an analysis of impacts of
Federal regulation on State, local, and
tribal governments, small businesses,
wages, and economic growth. The Act
also states that the report should go
through notice and comment and peer
review.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Susan E. Dudley,
Administrator, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. E8–22324 Filed 9–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 58592 ]
Emergency Order Pursuant to Section
12(K)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 Taking Temporary Action To
Respond to Market Developments
September 18, 2008.
The Commission is aware of the
continued potential of sudden and
excessive fluctuations of securities
prices and disruption in the functioning
of the securities markets that could
threaten fair and orderly markets. In our
recent publication of an emergency
order under Section 12(k) of the
Exchange Act (the ‘‘Act’’),1 for example,
we were concerned about the possible
unnecessary or artificial price
movements based on unfounded rumors
regarding the stability of financial
institutions and other issuers
exacerbated by ‘‘naked’’ short selling.
Our concerns, however, are no longer
limited to just the financial institutions
that were the subject of the July
Emergency Order. Recent market
conditions have made us concerned that
short selling in the securities of a wider
range of financial institutions may be
1 See Exchange Act Release No. 58166 (July 15,
2008). See also Exchange Act Release No. 58190
(July 18, 2008) (‘‘Amended July Emergency Order’’).
See also Exchange Act Release No. 58572
(September 17, 2008).
E:\FR\FM\24SEN1.SGM
24SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55168-55169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22356]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286, License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64]
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2,
LLC, Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC, Indian Point Nuclear
Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3); Receipt of Request for
Action Under 10 CFR 2.206
Notice is hereby given that by petition dated March 30, 2008, Mr.
Sherwood Martinelli has requested that the NRC (1) ``* * * suspend the
license for IP2 and IP3 reactors located in Buchanan, NY owned by
Entergy until they are fully in compliance with all 10 CFR Rules and
Regulations, as well as other local, state and federal laws and
regulations, and have eliminated the environmental risks that have
contributed to, and/or caused my wife's breast cancer,'' and (2) ``* *
* halt the License Renewal Process.''
The request is being treated pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 of the
Commission's regulations. The request has been referred to the Director
of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR). The Petitioner
participated in a conference call with the NRR Petition Review Board
(PRB) on August 14, 2008, to discuss the petition. The additional
information provided by the Petitioner was considered by the PRB before
making its final recommendation. By letter dated September 15th, 2008,
the Director accepted for review, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206, the
Petitioner's concerns regarding the licensee's failure
[[Page 55169]]
to implement the new emergency notification siren system in a timely
manner. The Director also informed the Petitioner that the siren issues
in this petition would be combined with the Petitioner's earlier
petition on the new siren system, dated September 28, 2007. The earlier
petition was noticed in the Federal Register on February 25, 2008 (73
FR 10068). The Director informed the Petitioner that his issues on
groundwater contamination were considered by the NRC in response to an
earlier petition by the Petitioner. A Final Director's Decision was
issued on August 14, 2008, and noticed in the Federal Register on
August 21, 2008 (73 FR 49495). The NRC found that the licensee was in
compliance with the pertinent NRC regulatory requirements on the
release of radioactive isotopes and that public health and safety have
not been, nor are likely to be, adversely affected.
As provided by Section 2.206, appropriate action will be taken on
this petition within a reasonable time.
A copy of the petition and the transcript of the conference call
with the PRB can be located at Agencywide Documents Access and
Management Systems Accession Nos. ML080950265 and ML082330375,
respectively, and are available for inspection at the Commission's
Public Document Room, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of September 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. E8-22356 Filed 9-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P