Safety Zone; IJSBA World Finals; Colorado River, Lake Havasu City, AZ, 54682-54684 [E8-22239]
Download as PDF
54682
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
§ 901.15 Approval of Alabama regulatory
program amendments.
chronological order by ‘‘Date of final
publication’’ to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
Original amendment
submission date
Date of final publication
*
July 18, 2008 .........
*
*
*
September 23, 2008 ...............................................................
Citation/description
*
*
ASMC 880–X–8B–.07 and 880–X–11D–.06.
*
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
rule, call Judy Leung-Yee, Project
Officer, First Coast Guard District, at
(212) 668–7165. If you have questions
on viewing the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
Coast Guard
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Loop
Parkway Bridge, across Long Creek at
mile 0.7, at Nassau County, New York,
has a vertical clearance in the closed
position of 21 feet at mean high water
and 25 feet at mean low water. The
existing drawbridge operation
regulations are listed at 33 CFR
117.799(f).
The waterway has seasonal
recreational vessels and fishing vessels
of various sizes. The facilities were
notified regarding this closure and no
objections were received.
The owner of the bridge, New York
State Department of Transportation,
requested a temporary deviation to
facilitate electrical maintenance at the
bridge.
Under this temporary deviation the
Loop Parkway Bridge at mile 0.7, across
Long Creek, may remain in the closed
position between 8:20 a.m. and 11:20
a.m. on September 22, 2008 and
September 23, 2008. In the event of
inclement weather the alternate rain
dates are September 29, 2008 and
September 30, 2008. Vessels that can
pass under the bridge without a bridge
opening may do so at all times.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the bridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0320]
[FR Doc. E8–22171 Filed 9–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG–2008–0896]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Long Island, New York Inland
Waterway From East Rockaway Inlet to
Shinnecock Canal, Nassau County, NY,
Maintenance
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast
Guard District, has issued a temporary
deviation from the regulations
governing the operation of the Loop
Parkway Bridge, mile 0.7, across Long
Creek, Nassau County, New York. Under
this temporary deviation the bridge may
remain in the closed position for three
hours on two days to facilitate bridge
maintenance.
This deviation is effective from
8:20 a.m. on September 22, 2008
through 11:20 a.m. on September 30,
2008.
DATES:
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2008–
0896 and are available online at
www.regulations.gov. They are also
available for inspection or copying at
two locations: The Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays,
and the First Coast Guard District,
Bridge Branch Office, 408 Atlantic
Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02110,
between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Sep 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Dated: September 11, 2008.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E8–22156 Filed 9–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; IJSBA World Finals;
Colorado River, Lake Havasu City, AZ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of Lake Havasu on the
lower Colorado River in support of the
IJSBA World Finals. This safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
on October 4, 2008, until 6 p.m. on
October 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2008–0320 and are
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov. This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at two locations: the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays and the U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, 2710 N.
Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92101
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call Petty Officer Kristen Beer,
USCG, Waterways Management, U.S.
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Small Entities
Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619)
278–7233. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On June 11, 2008, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zone; IJSBA World
Finals; Colorado River, Lake Havasu
City, Arizona in the Federal Register (73
FR 33030). We received no letters
commenting on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
Background and Purpose
The International Jet Sports Boating
Association is sponsoring the IJSBA
World Finals on Lake Havasu. The event
is a circle race consisting of 300–500
personal water craft up to 12 feet in
length. The sponsor will provide four to
five perimeter patrol and safety boats for
this event. This safety zone is necessary
to protect human safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, sponsor
vessels, and other users of the
waterway. This safety zone will protect
human safety by limiting public access
to the area.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
There are no changes from the
preceding NPRM since there were no
comments made during the allowed
period.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this temporary final rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory
Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the
size and location of the safety zone.
Specifically, the size and location of the
safety zone are limited and as such both
commercial and recreational will be
permitted to transit around the zone
during the enforcement periods.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Sep 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the region of Lake Havasu on the lower
Colorado River from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.
from October 4, 2008 through October
12, 2008.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: Vessel traffic may
pass safely around the safety zone.
Before the effective period, we will
publish a local notice to mariners (LNM)
and will issue a broadcast notice to
mariners (BNM) alerts via marine
channel 16 VFH before the safety zone
is enforced.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54683
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
54684
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded under the
Instruction that there are no factors in
this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. A final environmental
analysis checklist and a final categorical
exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Sep 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Dated: September 11, 2008.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E8–22239 Filed 9–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add a § 165.T11–035 to read as
follows:
■
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
§ 165.T11–035 Safety zone; IJSBA World
Finals; Colorado River, Lake Havasu City,
AZ.
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0914]
(a) Location. The limits of the
proposed safety zone are as follows: the
London Bridge channel at 34°28.49 N,
114°21.33 W, then northwest to
34°28.52 N, 114°21.46 W, then
southwest to 34°28.44 N, 114°21.73 W,
then south to 34°28.30 N, 114°21.69 W,
and finally following the shoreline east
and north to 34°28.49 N, 114°21.33 W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced daily from 6 a.m. to 6
p.m., October 4, 2008 through October
12, 2008. If the event concludes prior to
the scheduled termination time, the
Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
designated representative means any
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port San Diego or his
designated representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
designated representative at Patrol
Commander (PATCOM). The PATCOM
may be contacted on VHF–FM Channel
16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
Safety Zone; Milwaukee River
Challenge, Milwaukee River,
Milwaukee, WI
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 1625–AA00
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Milwaukee River, Milwaukee, WI.
This zone is intended to restrict vessels
from a portion of the Milwaukee River
during the Milwaukee River Challenge
on September 20, 2008. This temporary
safety zone will establish restrictions
upon, and control the movement of,
vessels in a specified area immediately
prior to, during, and immediately after
the regatta.
DATES: This regulation is effective from
9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on September 20, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2008–
0914 and are available online at
www.regulations.gov. They are also
available for inspection or copying at
two locations: The Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays,
and U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan, 2420 South Lincoln Memorial
Drive, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53207
between 9:30 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
MST2 Eric Vogel, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747–
7154. If you have questions on viewing
the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone (202) 366–9826.
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54682-54684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22239]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2008-0320]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; IJSBA World Finals; Colorado River, Lake Havasu
City, AZ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the navigable
waters of Lake Havasu on the lower Colorado River in support of the
IJSBA World Finals. This safety zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of the participants, crew, spectators, participating vessels,
and other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within
this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. on October 4, 2008, until 6
p.m. on October 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2008-0320 and are available online at https://
www.regulations.gov. This material is also available for inspection or
copying at two locations: the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays and the U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92101
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Petty Officer Kristen Beer, USCG, Waterways
Management, U.S.
[[Page 54683]]
Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619) 278-7233. If you have questions
on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On June 11, 2008, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zone; IJSBA World Finals; Colorado River, Lake
Havasu City, Arizona in the Federal Register (73 FR 33030). We received
no letters commenting on the proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The International Jet Sports Boating Association is sponsoring the
IJSBA World Finals on Lake Havasu. The event is a circle race
consisting of 300-500 personal water craft up to 12 feet in length. The
sponsor will provide four to five perimeter patrol and safety boats for
this event. This safety zone is necessary to protect human safety of
the participants, crew, spectators, sponsor vessels, and other users of
the waterway. This safety zone will protect human safety by limiting
public access to the area.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
There are no changes from the preceding NPRM since there were no
comments made during the allowed period.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this temporary final rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the size and location of the safety
zone. Specifically, the size and location of the safety zone are
limited and as such both commercial and recreational will be permitted
to transit around the zone during the enforcement periods.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the region of Lake Havasu on the lower Colorado River from
6 a.m. to 6 p.m. from October 4, 2008 through October 12, 2008.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: Vessel
traffic may pass safely around the safety zone. Before the effective
period, we will publish a local notice to mariners (LNM) and will issue
a broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) alerts via marine channel 16 VFH
before the safety zone is enforced.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
[[Page 54684]]
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
under the Instruction that there are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. A final environmental analysis checklist
and a final categorical exclusion determination are available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add a Sec. 165.T11-035 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-035 Safety zone; IJSBA World Finals; Colorado River,
Lake Havasu City, AZ.
(a) Location. The limits of the proposed safety zone are as
follows: the London Bridge channel at 34[deg]28.49 N, 114[deg]21.33 W,
then northwest to 34[deg]28.52 N, 114[deg]21.46 W, then southwest to
34[deg]28.44 N, 114[deg]21.73 W, then south to 34[deg]28.30 N,
114[deg]21.69 W, and finally following the shoreline east and north to
34[deg]28.49 N, 114[deg]21.33 W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced daily from 6
a.m. to 6 p.m., October 4, 2008 through October 12, 2008. If the event
concludes prior to the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the
Port will cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that
fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
designated representative means any commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, and local, state, and federal law enforcement vessels who
have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port San Diego or his designated representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety
zone may request authorization to do so from the designated
representative at Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The PATCOM may be
contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies.
Dated: September 11, 2008.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E8-22239 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P