Regulations for Complying With the National Environmental Policy Act, 54667-54668 [E8-22090]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
§ 319.37–7
*
*
Matt
Harrington, National Environmental
Coordinator, Ecological Sciences
Division, NRCS, P.O. Box 2890, Room
6158–S, Washington, DC 20013;
telephone (202) 720–4925; submit email to: matt.harrington@wdc.usda.gov,
Attention: Compliance with NEPA
comments.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[Amended]
3. In § 319.37–7, paragraph (a)(3), the
table is amended by removing the entry
for ‘‘Fraxinus spp. (ash)’’.
■
Done in Washington, DC, this 17th day of
September 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–22194 Filed 9–22–08; 8:45 am]
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Availability of Rulemaking Documents
You can get an electronic copy of the
full Compliance with NEPA rule using
the Internet through the NRCS
homepage at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov
and by selecting ‘‘Programs,’’ then
‘‘National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) Documents.’’
7 CFR Part 650
Background
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
RIN 0578–AA41
[Docket No. NRCS–IFR–08001]
Regulations for Complying With the
National Environmental Policy Act
Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim final rule
as final rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS or Agency)
published an Interim Final Rule on June
25, 2008, amending its National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
compliance regulations by clarifying the
appropriate use of a program
environmental assessment (EA) and by
aligning its NEPA public involvement
process with that of the Council on
Environmental Quality’s (CEQ)
regulations that implement NEPA. Both
changes would better align the Agency
regulations with the CEQ NEPA
regulations and provide for the efficient
and timely environmental review of
NRCS actions, particularly those actions
where Congress has directed NRCS
action within short time periods of 60–
90 days. The Council on Environmental
Quality, in accordance with their
regulations, reviewed and approved the
proposed changes on June 11, 2008. The
comment period on the interim final
rule closed on July 25, 2008. No
comments were received on the interim
final rule. Accordingly, NRCS is issuing
this final rule to indicate that no
comments were received and to
announce that the interim rule is final
without change.
DATES: Effective September 23, 2008, the
interim final rule published on June 25,
2008 (73 FR 35883) is confirmed as
final.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Sep 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Synopsis of the Final Rule
The rule better aligns the NRCS’
NEPA regulations with that of the CEQ’s
regulations that implement NEPA. The
final rule amends 7 CFR 650.5(c) Figure
1 by inserting ‘‘Program EA’’ to the flow
chart on NRCS decisionmaking and the
rule adds a section to 7 CFR 650.8(a),
which discusses the criteria for
determining the need for a program EA.
The rule also makes changes to 7 CFR
650.12 so that 650.12 better conforms to
CEQ’s similar regulations.
First, the rule amends 7 CFR 650.5(c)
Figure 1 by inserting ‘‘Program EA’’ to
the flow chart on NRCS decisionmaking
and by adding a section to 7 CFR 650.8
discussing the criteria for determining
the need for a program EA. Previously,
Agency regulations did not address
NRCS’ ability to tier to Program EAs or
clarify when it is appropriate to use a
program environmental assessment. The
change to Figure 1 explicitly confirms
the State and field offices’ ability to tier
site-specific environmental reviews and
decisionmaking to either a Program EA
or Program EIS. The change to section
650.8 clearly states when it is
appropriate to use an environmental
assessment. This change aligns NRCS’
NEPA regulations with 40 CFR
1507.3(b)(2), which states that Agency
NEPA regulations should identify
specific criteria for those classes of
action which normally require an EA
and those that require an EIS. For
rulemaking actions under the Farm Bill,
the Agency has prepared program EAs
in the past because the limited
significance of the actions did not
warrant the preparation of an EIS.
Therefore, this rule change provides for
the efficient and timely environmental
review of NRCS actions.
Second, NRCS is changing the current
requirement of publication of the notice
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54667
of availability for every EA/FNSI in the
Federal Register. CEQ regulations
require public involvement in preparing
any EA/Finding of No Significant
Impact (FNSI) and require a 30-day
review period of the EA/FNSI only in
the following limited circumstances: (a)
The action is, or closely similar to, one
which normally requires the preparation
of an EIS, as defined by NRCS NEPA
implementing regulations at 7 CFR
650.7, or (b) the nature of the action is
one without precedent. The changes
made in the NRCS final rule at 7 CFR
650.12 mirror that of CEQ’s regulations.
This change provides the Agency with
the flexibility for all program actions to
determine the most appropriate method
of public involvement in preparing the
EA/FNSI and the most appropriate
method for publication of the notice of
the availability of the EA/FNSI. As
noted by CEQ regulations implementing
NEPA (40 CFR 1506.6), actions
primarily of local concern may be
published in local newspapers and use
other means to reach the interested and
affected members of the public.
The final rule also allows the Agency
to implement an action upon issuing the
notice of availability of the EA/FNSI or
at a specified time period after issuance
of the notice based on the public
involvement provided. For Agency
actions with statutorily short
rulemaking timeframes or for emergency
actions, the ability to tailor public
involvement and review allows the
Agency to implement the action upon
issuance of the notice of availability or
a shorter timeframe thereafter, while
still meeting the requirements of NEPA
as well as its intent. This enables the
Agency to prepare adequate NEPA
analyses and to proceed with timely
implementation for these important
actions.
Regulatory Certifications
Executive Order 12866
The NRCS reviewed this final rule
under U.S. Department of Agriculture
(Department) procedures and Executive
Order 12866 issued September 30, 1993
(E.O. 12866), as amended by E.O. 13422
on Regulatory Planning and Review.
This final rule is issued in accordance
with the E.O. 12866. It has been
determined that this final rule is not
significant and, therefore, it has not
been reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
It has been determined that the
Regulatory Flexibility Act is not
applicable to this rule because NRCS is
not required by 5 U.S.C. 553, or any
other provision of law, to publish a
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
54668
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
notice of final rulemaking with respect
to the subject matter of this rule.
Environmental Analysis
The final rule amends the procedures
for implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) at 7
CFR Part 650 and would not directly
impact the environment. Agency NEPA
procedures are procedural guidance to
assist agencies in the fulfillment of
Agency responsibilities under NEPA,
but are not the Agency’s final
determination of what level of NEPA
analysis is required for a particular
action. The CEQ set forth the
requirements for establishing Agency
NEPA procedures in its regulations at 40
CFR 1505.1 and 1507.3. The CEQ
regulations do not require agencies to
conduct NEPA analyses or prepare
NEPA documentation when establishing
their NEPA procedures. The
determination that establishing Agency
NEPA procedures does not require
NEPA analysis and documentation has
been upheld in Heartwood, Inc. v. U.S.
Forest Service, 230 F.3d 947, 954–55
(7th Cir. 2000).
Paperwork Reduction Act
There are no requirements for
information collection associated with
this final rule that would require
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538), NRCS has assessed the effects of
this final rule on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This final rule does not compel the
expenditure of $100 million or more by
any State, local, or tribal governments or
anyone in the private sector. Therefore,
a statement under section 202 of the Act
is not required.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Civil Justice Reform
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. After adoption of this
final rule, (1) all State and local laws
and regulations that conflict with this
rule or that would impede full
implementation of this rule will be
preempted; (2) no retroactive effect
would be given to this final rule; and (3)
before an action may be brought in a
Federal court of competent jurisdiction,
the administrative appeal rights
afforded persons at 7 CFR Parts 614,
780, and 11 must be exhausted.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Sep 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Federalism
NRCS has considered this final rule
under the requirements of Executive
Order 13132 issued August 4, 1999 (E.O.
13132), ‘‘Federalism.’’ The Agency has
made an assessment that the final rule
conforms with the Federalism
principles set out in this Executive
Order; would not impose any
compliance costs on the States; and
would not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, nor on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore,
NRCS concludes that this final rule does
not have Federalism implications.
Energy Effects
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 13211 issued
May 18, 2001 (E.O. 13211), ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.’’ NRCS has
determined that this final rule does not
constitute a significant energy action as
defined in E.O. 13211.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, under the authority at 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; Executive Order
11514 (Rev.); 7 CFR 2.62, the Natural
Resources Conservation Service
confirms the interim rule amending 7
CFR part 650 which published at 73 FR
35883 on June 25, 2008, is adopted as
final without change.
Arlen L. Lancaster,
Chief, Natural Resources Conservation
Service.
[FR Doc. E8–22090 Filed 9–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. AMS–FV–08–0052; FV08–922–
1 FR]
Apricots Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule increases the
assessment rate established for the
Washington Apricot Marketing
Committee (Committee) for the 2008–09
and subsequent fiscal periods from
$1.50 to $2.00 per ton for Washington
apricots. The Committee is responsible
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for local administration of the marketing
order regulating the handling of apricots
grown in designated counties in
Washington. Assessments upon
handlers of apricots are used by the
Committee to fund reasonable and
necessary expenses of the program. The
fiscal period for the marketing order
begins April 1 and ends March 31. The
assessment rate remains in effect
indefinitely unless modified, suspended
or terminated.
DATES: Effective Date: September 24,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Curry or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
suite 385, Portland, OR 97204;
Telephone: (503) 326–2724; Fax: (503)
326–7440; or e-mail:
Robert.Curry@usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence, SW.,
STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250–
0237; Telephone: (202) 720–2491; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or e-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
922 (7 CFR 922), as amended, regulating
the handling of apricots grown in
designated counties in Washington,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order.’’
The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, apricot handlers in designated
counties in Washington are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable Washington
apricots beginning April 1, 2008, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated. This rule will not preempt
any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54667-54668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22090]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
7 CFR Part 650
RIN 0578-AA41
[Docket No. NRCS-IFR-08001]
Regulations for Complying With the National Environmental Policy
Act
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim final rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS or Agency)
published an Interim Final Rule on June 25, 2008, amending its National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance regulations by clarifying
the appropriate use of a program environmental assessment (EA) and by
aligning its NEPA public involvement process with that of the Council
on Environmental Quality's (CEQ) regulations that implement NEPA. Both
changes would better align the Agency regulations with the CEQ NEPA
regulations and provide for the efficient and timely environmental
review of NRCS actions, particularly those actions where Congress has
directed NRCS action within short time periods of 60-90 days. The
Council on Environmental Quality, in accordance with their regulations,
reviewed and approved the proposed changes on June 11, 2008. The
comment period on the interim final rule closed on July 25, 2008. No
comments were received on the interim final rule. Accordingly, NRCS is
issuing this final rule to indicate that no comments were received and
to announce that the interim rule is final without change.
DATES: Effective September 23, 2008, the interim final rule published
on June 25, 2008 (73 FR 35883) is confirmed as final.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Harrington, National
Environmental Coordinator, Ecological Sciences Division, NRCS, P.O. Box
2890, Room 6158-S, Washington, DC 20013; telephone (202) 720-4925;
submit e-mail to: matt.harrington@wdc.usda.gov, Attention: Compliance
with NEPA comments.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Rulemaking Documents
You can get an electronic copy of the full Compliance with NEPA
rule using the Internet through the NRCS homepage at https://
www.nrcs.usda.gov and by selecting ``Programs,'' then ``National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Documents.''
Background
Synopsis of the Final Rule
The rule better aligns the NRCS' NEPA regulations with that of the
CEQ's regulations that implement NEPA. The final rule amends 7 CFR
650.5(c) Figure 1 by inserting ``Program EA'' to the flow chart on NRCS
decisionmaking and the rule adds a section to 7 CFR 650.8(a), which
discusses the criteria for determining the need for a program EA. The
rule also makes changes to 7 CFR 650.12 so that 650.12 better conforms
to CEQ's similar regulations.
First, the rule amends 7 CFR 650.5(c) Figure 1 by inserting
``Program EA'' to the flow chart on NRCS decisionmaking and by adding a
section to 7 CFR 650.8 discussing the criteria for determining the need
for a program EA. Previously, Agency regulations did not address NRCS'
ability to tier to Program EAs or clarify when it is appropriate to use
a program environmental assessment. The change to Figure 1 explicitly
confirms the State and field offices' ability to tier site-specific
environmental reviews and decisionmaking to either a Program EA or
Program EIS. The change to section 650.8 clearly states when it is
appropriate to use an environmental assessment. This change aligns
NRCS' NEPA regulations with 40 CFR 1507.3(b)(2), which states that
Agency NEPA regulations should identify specific criteria for those
classes of action which normally require an EA and those that require
an EIS. For rulemaking actions under the Farm Bill, the Agency has
prepared program EAs in the past because the limited significance of
the actions did not warrant the preparation of an EIS. Therefore, this
rule change provides for the efficient and timely environmental review
of NRCS actions.
Second, NRCS is changing the current requirement of publication of
the notice of availability for every EA/FNSI in the Federal Register.
CEQ regulations require public involvement in preparing any EA/Finding
of No Significant Impact (FNSI) and require a 30-day review period of
the EA/FNSI only in the following limited circumstances: (a) The action
is, or closely similar to, one which normally requires the preparation
of an EIS, as defined by NRCS NEPA implementing regulations at 7 CFR
650.7, or (b) the nature of the action is one without precedent. The
changes made in the NRCS final rule at 7 CFR 650.12 mirror that of
CEQ's regulations. This change provides the Agency with the flexibility
for all program actions to determine the most appropriate method of
public involvement in preparing the EA/FNSI and the most appropriate
method for publication of the notice of the availability of the EA/
FNSI. As noted by CEQ regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR 1506.6),
actions primarily of local concern may be published in local newspapers
and use other means to reach the interested and affected members of the
public.
The final rule also allows the Agency to implement an action upon
issuing the notice of availability of the EA/FNSI or at a specified
time period after issuance of the notice based on the public
involvement provided. For Agency actions with statutorily short
rulemaking timeframes or for emergency actions, the ability to tailor
public involvement and review allows the Agency to implement the action
upon issuance of the notice of availability or a shorter timeframe
thereafter, while still meeting the requirements of NEPA as well as its
intent. This enables the Agency to prepare adequate NEPA analyses and
to proceed with timely implementation for these important actions.
Regulatory Certifications
Executive Order 12866
The NRCS reviewed this final rule under U.S. Department of
Agriculture (Department) procedures and Executive Order 12866 issued
September 30, 1993 (E.O. 12866), as amended by E.O. 13422 on Regulatory
Planning and Review. This final rule is issued in accordance with the
E.O. 12866. It has been determined that this final rule is not
significant and, therefore, it has not been reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
It has been determined that the Regulatory Flexibility Act is not
applicable to this rule because NRCS is not required by 5 U.S.C. 553,
or any other provision of law, to publish a
[[Page 54668]]
notice of final rulemaking with respect to the subject matter of this
rule.
Environmental Analysis
The final rule amends the procedures for implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) at 7 CFR Part 650 and would not
directly impact the environment. Agency NEPA procedures are procedural
guidance to assist agencies in the fulfillment of Agency
responsibilities under NEPA, but are not the Agency's final
determination of what level of NEPA analysis is required for a
particular action. The CEQ set forth the requirements for establishing
Agency NEPA procedures in its regulations at 40 CFR 1505.1 and 1507.3.
The CEQ regulations do not require agencies to conduct NEPA analyses or
prepare NEPA documentation when establishing their NEPA procedures. The
determination that establishing Agency NEPA procedures does not require
NEPA analysis and documentation has been upheld in Heartwood, Inc. v.
U.S. Forest Service, 230 F.3d 947, 954-55 (7th Cir. 2000).
Paperwork Reduction Act
There are no requirements for information collection associated
with this final rule that would require approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538), NRCS has assessed the effects of this final rule on State,
local, and tribal governments and the private sector. This final rule
does not compel the expenditure of $100 million or more by any State,
local, or tribal governments or anyone in the private sector.
Therefore, a statement under section 202 of the Act is not required.
Civil Justice Reform
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. After adoption of this final rule, (1) all State
and local laws and regulations that conflict with this rule or that
would impede full implementation of this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect would be given to this final rule; and (3) before an
action may be brought in a Federal court of competent jurisdiction, the
administrative appeal rights afforded persons at 7 CFR Parts 614, 780,
and 11 must be exhausted.
Federalism
NRCS has considered this final rule under the requirements of
Executive Order 13132 issued August 4, 1999 (E.O. 13132),
``Federalism.'' The Agency has made an assessment that the final rule
conforms with the Federalism principles set out in this Executive
Order; would not impose any compliance costs on the States; and would
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, nor on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Therefore, NRCS concludes that this final rule does not have Federalism
implications.
Energy Effects
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13211
issued May 18, 2001 (E.O. 13211), ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.'' NRCS has
determined that this final rule does not constitute a significant
energy action as defined in E.O. 13211.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, under the authority at 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; Executive Order 11514 (Rev.); 7 CFR 2.62, the
Natural Resources Conservation Service confirms the interim rule
amending 7 CFR part 650 which published at 73 FR 35883 on June 25,
2008, is adopted as final without change.
Arlen L. Lancaster,
Chief, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. E8-22090 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P