Schedule for Rating Disabilities; Evaluation of Scars, 54708-54712 [E8-21980]
Download as PDF
54708
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
EVALUATION OF COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT AND OTHER RESIDUALS OF TBI NOT OTHERWISE CLASSIFIED—Continued
Facets of cognitive
impairment and other
residuals of TBI not
otherwise classified
Level of
impairment
Consciousness ...............
*
*
*
*
Criteria
Total
Persistently altered state of consciousness, such as vegetative state, minimally responsive state,
coma.
*
3. In Appendix A to Part 4, § 4.124a,
add diagnostic code 8045 in numerical
order to the table to read as follows:
■
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 4
NOVA’s Comment
RIN 2900–AM55
Appendix A to Part 4—Table of
Amendments and Effective Dates Since
1946
Schedule for Rating Disabilities;
Evaluation of Scars
*
AGENCY:
*
*
*
*
ACTION:
Diagnostic
code No.
Sec.
*
*
4.124a .....
*
*
*
8045
*
*
*
*
*
Criterion and
evaluation October 23, 2008.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In Appendix B to Part 4, diagnostic
code 8045 is revised to read as follows:
■
Appendix B to Part 4—Numerical Index
of Disabilities
*
*
*
*
*
Diagnostic code No.
*
*
*
8045 ..................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Residuals of
traumatic
brain injury
(TBI).
*
*
*
*
*
5. In Appendix C to Part 4 under the
heading for ‘‘Brain’’ remove ‘‘Disease
due to trauma’’ and its diagnostic code
‘‘8045’’; and add in alphabetical order a
new heading ‘‘Traumatic brain injury
residuals’’ and its diagnostic code
‘‘8045’’.
■
[FR Doc. E8–22083 Filed 9–22–08; 8:45 am]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Sep 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
SUMMARY: This document amends the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Schedule for Rating Disabilities by
revising that portion of the Schedule
that addresses the Skin, so that it more
clearly reflects our policies concerning
the evaluation of scars.
DATES: Effective Date: This amendment
is effective October 23, 2008.
Applicability Date: This amendment
shall apply to all applications for
benefits received by VA on or after
October 23, 2008. A veteran whom VA
rated before such date under diagnostic
codes 7800, 7801, 7802, 7803, 7804, or
7805 of 38 CFR 4.118 may request
review under these clarified criteria,
irrespective of whether his or her
disability has worsened since the last
review. The effective date of any award,
or any increase in disability
compensation, based on this
amendment will not be earlier than the
effective date of this rule, but will
otherwise be assigned under the current
regulations regarding effective dates, 38
CFR 3.400, etc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maya Ferrandino, Regulations Staff
(211D), Compensation and Pension
Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (727) 319–5847.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 3, 2008, VA published in the
Federal Register (73 FR 428) a proposal
to amend those portions of the Schedule
for Rating Disabilities that address the
Skin, 38 CFR 4.118, by revising the
guidelines for the evaluation of scars.
Interested persons were invited to
submit written comments on or before
February 4, 2008. We received
comments from the National
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Organization of Veterans’ Advocates,
Inc. (NOVA), and Disabled American
Veterans (DAV).
Sfmt 4700
NOVA addressed a proposed change
to a note in diagnostic code 7801 that
would consider the trunk as one area of
the body. Currently, the note in
diagnostic code 7801 directs that scars
on widely separated areas, as on two or
more extremities or on anterior and
posterior surfaces of extremities or
trunk, will be separately rated. We
proposed to revise this note to clarify
that if multiple scars are present, VA
will assign a separate evaluation for
each affected extremity based on the
total area of the qualifying scars on that
extremity, and assign a separate
evaluation for the trunk based on the
total area of the qualifying scars on the
trunk. Qualifying scars under diagnostic
code 7801 are deep scars that are not
located on the head, face, or neck.
NOVA is concerned that the proposed
change will not adequately compensate
veterans for scars of the trunk. NOVA
stated the rationale for the change of
ensuring that the area of all deep scars
of the trunk are taken into account was
inadequate considering that the anterior
and posterior surfaces of the trunk may
be the largest separate and distinct areas
of the body.
Second, NOVA stated that a scar can
cross over into more than one separate
area of the body. In the proposed rule,
we stated that such a scar would be
treated as two separate scars to ensure
that the ratings reflect the disability to
each distinct area of the body.
Third, NOVA stated the proposed
change would potentially result in a
lower evaluation for a veteran with one
scar that covers both the anterior and
posterior trunk. NOVA offers the
following example: A veteran has one
30 inch scar that wraps around his
anterior and posterior trunk, with 15
square inches on the anterior side and
15 square inches on his posterior side.
Under the current diagnostic code, this
scar would be rated separately at 20
percent and 20 percent, for a combined
evaluation of 40 percent. Under the
proposed change, the veteran would be
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
entitled to one evaluation for a 30 inch
scar of 20 percent.
Fourth, NOVA comments that under
the proposed change a veteran who has
two scars, one on his posterior trunk
and one on his anterior trunk, would
only receive one rating for that area; we
would not rate each scar separately, and
then provide a combined rating. The
effect could potentially be a lower rating
under the revised rule than the veteran
would receive under the current rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Response
We did not intend in the proposed
regulation to produce a lower evaluation
for scars of the trunk, and we agree that
this could happen under the criteria we
proposed. While in the proposed
regulation we considered the trunk to be
a single location for purposes of
evaluating multiple scars, after further
consideration, we have made changes in
the final rule indicating that the anterior
and posterior portions of the trunk
represent separate locations for
purposes of evaluation. With that
change, separate evaluations can be
assigned for the total area of qualifying
scars of each extremity, for the total area
of qualifying scars of the anterior
portion of the trunk, and for the total
area of qualifying scars of the posterior
portion of the trunk. Accordingly, we
have changed the first sentence of
proposed note 2 under diagnostic codes
7801 and 7802 to direct raters, if
multiple scars are present, or if a single
scar affects more than one extremity, or
a single scar affects one or more
extremities and either the anterior
portion or posterior portion of the trunk,
or both, or a single scar affects both the
anterior portion and the posterior
portion of the trunk, to assign a separate
evaluation based on the total area of
qualifying scars of each affected
extremity, the total area of qualifying
scars of the anterior portion of the trunk,
if affected, and the total area of the
qualifying scars of the posterior portion
of the trunk, if affected.
We have also added a statement in
note 2 of diagnostic codes 7801 and
7802 clarifying the borders of the
anterior (ventral) and posterior (dorsal)
portions of the trunk, in order to avoid
confusion about scars that may be
reported as being on the lateral aspects
of the trunk. It states that the
midaxillary line on each side separates
the anterior and posterior portions of
the trunk. Therefore, all portions of the
trunk are designated as either ‘‘anterior’’
or ‘‘posterior,’’ based on their
relationship to the midaxillary line, and
there is no portion that is designated
‘‘lateral.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Sep 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
We revised note 2 of diagnostic code
7802 to be identical to note 2 of
diagnostic code 7801. These notes
address the same concept and the
identical language will make the notes
easier to use. We are also making minor
technical changes to improve the clarity
of both notes.
DAV’s Comments
Method of Measurement
DAV commented that while they
agreed with the amendment to the areas
of scars, they were concerned that the
method of measurement was not
specifically stated in the regulation.
DAV stated that the diagnostic code
provides evaluations for square inches.
However, scars are often oddly shaped.
DAV proposed that the area of a scar be
measured based on the shape of a
rectangle from the top of the scar to the
bottom of the scar for the height
measurement, and from the farthest side
points of the scar for the width.
According to DAV, this method of
measurement would result in more
accurate measurements and more
consistent disability ratings. DAV
believes it is difficult for examiners and
adjudicators to determine the surface
area in square inches for oddly shaped
scars.
Response
We make no change based on this
comment. We note that the current
regulation does not specify a method of
measurement, and this has not created
difficulty for medical professionals who
are responsible for measuring scars.
Using the ‘‘rectangular area’’ method
described by DAV would
inappropriately overestimate the area of
scars that are hourglass-shaped, with the
narrow area being very long and thin,
and other scars where one portion is
much thinner than another. Measuring
as a rectangle in such cases could lead
to possible inaccuracies in evaluation.
Measuring the actual surface area, as
required by the rule, will not lead to
such inaccuracies; additionally, it is
impractical to set forth all of the
methods that can be used to measure
scars of various shapes and sizes. No
two scars are identical, and different
measuring techniques must be
employed based on the size, shape, and
location of a particular scar. Relying on
medical professionals who measure and
describe scars in VA medical
examinations and on evidence
contained in medical records is more
likely to produce accurate
measurements than a general rule such
as the one proposed by DAV. As such,
it would not be helpful to revise the
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54709
regulation to specify a method of
measuring scars.
Diagnostic Code 7801 Note 2 Preamble
DAV stated that the discussion of
proposed diagnostic code 7801 note 2 in
the preamble of our notice of proposed
rulemaking states that scars may run
into two separate areas and each area
should be separately evaluated.
However, DAV stated that the note itself
does not state this. DAV believes that
VA should ensure that this concept is
included in the note to ensure scars are
properly evaluated.
Response
We agree that note 2 can be clearer on
this point. Our revision to note 2
discussed above will include a revision
based on this comment. Additionally,
for clarity and as part of the revision
based on the separate comment, we will
make the same revision to note 2 of
diagnostic code 7802.
Diagnostic Code 7801 Note 2 Separate
Ratings
DAV additionally stated that the
proposed criterion that requires
adjudicators to award separate ratings
for a scar that runs into two separate
areas, for example the trunk and left
arm, may be less beneficial to veterans
in some cases. DAV stated that a veteran
with a scar of 12 square inches: 11
square inches on the trunk and 1 square
inch on the left arm, would receive a 10
percent evaluation for the trunk and 0
percent evaluation for the left arm,
which combine to 10 percent. If the 12
square inch scar was solely on the
trunk, the veteran receives a 20 percent
evaluation. DAV believes that
adjudicators should be able to award
either a single rating for the combined
surface area of a scar that runs into two
separate areas, or separate ratings,
whichever results in the higher rating.
Response
We make no change based on this
comment. We note that the requirement
to separately evaluate scars on separate
areas of the body is not a new
requirement; our proposed language
merely clarifies already existing
evaluation methods. Further, we
evaluate separate areas of the body to
compensate for functional loss of the
different areas of the body separately. In
the example mentioned by DAV, the
veteran has an 11 square inch scar of the
trunk versus a 12 square inch scar of the
trunk, which require different
evaluations because the 12 square inch
scar could lead to greater functional loss
of the trunk. VA’s ratings are based on
the average impairment to earning
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
54710
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This final rule
would not affect any small entities.
Only VA beneficiaries could be directly
affected. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b), this final rule is exempt from the
initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of sections 603
and 604.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
capacity caused by service-connected
disabilities. 38 U.S.C. 1155. Each area of
the body identified in the rule has a
separate and distinct function; therefore,
a scar that affects a single area of the
body is less likely to produce greater
overall disability than a similar scar that
affects more than one area of the body.
For this reason, we will rate the separate
areas of the body separately. Although
DAV suggests that assigning separate
ratings for each affected body part may
be less favorable to claimants in certain
circumstances than assigning only one
rating for each scar that affects more
than one body part, we believe that
assigning separate ratings for each
affected body part generally will be
beneficial to claimants and, moreover,
more closely comports with the purpose
of assigning ratings based on functional
loss.
We made an additional change to the
title of diagnostic code 7800 for the sake
of clarity. To avoid any possible
confusion about whether it refers to
burn scars, scars due to other causes, or
disfigurement only of the head, face, or
neck, or also to scars or disfigurement
in other areas, we clarified the title by
changing it to ‘‘Burn scar(s) of the head,
face, or neck; scar(s) of the head, face,
or neck due to other causes; or other
disfigurement of the head, face, or
neck’’. This eliminates any possible
confusion about the purpose of this
diagnostic code but does not represent
a substantive change from the proposed
regulation.
VA appreciates the comments
submitted in response to the proposed
rule. Based on the rationale stated in the
proposed rule and in this document, the
proposed rule is adopted as a final rule
with the changes noted.
We are additionally adding updates to
38 CFR part 4, Appendices A, B, and C,
to reflect changes to the diagnostic
criteria for scars made by this
rulemaking. The appendices are tools
for users of the Schedule for Rating
Disabilities and do not contain
substantive content regarding evaluation
of disabilities. As such, we believe it is
appropriate to include these updates in
this final rule.
Unfunded Mandates
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Sep 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Executive Order classifies a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), as any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities;
(2) create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been
examined and it has been determined to
be a significant regulatory action under
the Executive Order because it is likely
to result in a rule that may raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
year. This final rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers and Titles
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
for this final rule are 64.104, Pension for
Non-Service-Connected Disability for
Veterans, and 64.109, Veterans
Compensation for Service-Connected
Disability.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 4
Disability benefits, Pensions,
Veterans.
Approved: June 20, 2008.
Gordon H. Mansfield,
Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 38 CFR part 4, subpart B, is
amended as set forth below:
■
PART 4—SCHEDULE FOR RATING
DISABILITIES
Subpart B—Disability Ratings
1. The authority citation for part 4
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155, unless
otherwise noted.
2. Section 4.118 is amended by:
a. Adding an introductory paragraph.
b. Revising the heading to diagnostic
code 7800 and adding new notes (4) and
(5).
■ c. Revising diagnostic codes 7801,
7802, 7804, and 7805.
■ d. Removing diagnostic code 7803.
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 4.118
Schedule of ratings—skin.
A veteran who VA rated under
diagnostic codes 7800, 7801, 7802,
7803, 7804, or 7805 before October 23,
2008 can request review under
diagnostic codes 7800, 7801, 7802,
7804, and 7805, irrespective of whether
the veteran’s disability has increased
since the last review. VA will review
that veteran’s disability rating to
determine whether the veteran may be
entitled to a higher disability rating
under diagnostic codes 7800, 7801,
7802, 7804, and 7805. A request for
review pursuant to this rulemaking will
be treated as a claim for an increased
rating for purposes of determining the
effective date of an increased rating
awarded as a result of such review;
however, in no case will the award be
effective before October 23, 2008.
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
54711
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Rating
7800 Burn scar(s) of the head, face, or neck; scar(s) of the head, face, or neck due to other causes; or other disfigurement of
the head, face, or neck:
*
*
*
*
*
*
Note (4): Separately evaluate disabling effects other than disfigurement that are associated with individual scar(s) of the head,
face, or neck, such as pain, instability, and residuals of associated muscle or nerve injury, under the appropriate diagnostic
code(s) and apply § 4.25 to combine the evaluation(s) with the evaluation assigned under this diagnostic code.
Note (5): The characteristic(s) of disfigurement may be caused by one scar or by multiple scars; the characteristic(s) required to
assign a particular evaluation need not be caused by a single scar in order to assign that evaluation.
7801 Burn scar(s) or scar(s) due to other causes, not of the head, face, or neck, that are deep and nonlinear:
Area or areas of 144 square inches (929 sq. cm.) or greater .........................................................................................................
Area or areas of at least 72 square inches (465 sq. cm.) but less than 144 square inches (929 sq. cm.) ...................................
Area or areas of at least 12 square inches (77 sq. cm.) but less than 72 square inches (465 sq. cm.) .......................................
Area or areas of at least 6 square inches (39 sq. cm.) but less than 12 square inches (77 sq. cm.) ...........................................
Note (1): A deep scar is one associated with underlying soft tissue damage..
Note (2): If multiple qualifying scars are present, or if a single qualifying scar affects more than one extremity, or a single qualifying scar affects one or more extremities and either the anterior portion or posterior portion of the trunk, or both, or a single
qualifying scar affects both the anterior portion and the posterior portion of the trunk, assign a separate evaluation for each affected extremity based on the total area of the qualifying scars that affect that extremity, assign a separate evaluation based on
the total area of the qualifying scars that affect the anterior portion of the trunk, and assign a separate evaluation based on the
total area of the qualifying scars that affect the posterior portion of the trunk. The midaxillary line on each side separates the anterior and posterior portions of the trunk. Combine the separate evaluations under § 4.25. Qualifying scars are scars that are
nonlinear, deep, and are not located on the head, face, or neck.
7802
Burn scar(s) or scar(s) due to other causes, not of the head, face, or neck, that are superficial and nonlinear:
Area or areas of 144 square inches (929 sq. cm.) or greater .........................................................................................................
Note (1): A superficial scar is one not associated with underlying soft tissue damage.
Note (2): If multiple qualifying scars are present, or if a single qualifying scar affects more than one extremity, or a single qualifying scar affects one or more extremities and either the anterior portion or posterior portion of the trunk, or both, or a single
qualifying scar affects both the anterior portion and the posterior portion of the trunk, assign a separate evaluation for each affected extremity based on the total area of the qualifying scars that affect that extremity, assign a separate evaluation based on
the total area of the qualifying scars that affect the anterior portion of the trunk, and assign a separate evaluation based on the
total area of the qualifying scars that affect the posterior portion of the trunk. The midaxillary line on each side separates the anterior and posterior portions of the trunk. Combine the separate evaluations under § 4.25. Qualifying scars are scars that are
nonlinear, superficial, and are not located on the head, face, or neck.
7804 Scar(s), unstable or painful:
Five or more scars that are unstable or painful ...............................................................................................................................
Three or four scars that are unstable or painful ..............................................................................................................................
One or two scars that are unstable or painful .................................................................................................................................
Note (1): An unstable scar is one where, for any reason, there is frequent loss of covering of skin over the scar..
Note (2): If one or more scars are both unstable and painful, add 10 percent to the evaluation that is based on the total number of
unstable or painful scars.
Note (3): Scars evaluated under diagnostic codes 7800, 7801, 7802, or 7805 may also receive an evaluation under this diagnostic
code, when applicable.
7805 Scars, other (including linear scars) and other effects of scars evaluated under diagnostic codes 7800, 7801, 7802, and
7804:
Evaluate any disabling effect(s) not considered in a rating provided under diagnostic codes 7800–04 under an appropriate diagnostic code.
7804 and add diagnostic code 7805 to
read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
3. In Appendix A to Part 4, § 4.118
revise diagnostic codes 7800, through
■
*
4.118 ......................
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
*
7800
7801
7802
7803
7804
7805
10
30
20
10
Appendix A to Part 4—Table of
Amendments and Effective Dates Since
1946
*
*
*
*
Evaluation August 30, 2002; criterion October 23, 2008.
Criterion July 6, 1950; criterion August 30, 2002; criterion October 23, 2008.
Criterion September 22, 1978; criterion August 30, 2002; criterion October 23, 2008.
Criterion August 30, 2002; removed October 23, 2008.
Criterion July 6, 1950; criterion September 22, 1978; criterion and evaluation October 23, 2008.
Criterion October 23, 2008.
*
*
4. In Appendix B to Part 4 remove
diagnostic code 7803 and its disability
entry and revise the disability entries for
■
VerDate Aug<31>2005
40
30
20
10
Diagnostic
code No.
Sec.
*
*
16:35 Sep 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
*
*
diagnostic codes 7800, 7801, 7802,
7804, and 7805 to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
Appendix B to Part 4—Numerical Index
of Disabilities
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
54712
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Diagnostic
code No.
THE SKIN
*
7800 .......................
7801
7802
7804
7805
.......................
.......................
.......................
.......................
*
*
*
*
*
*
Burn scar(s) of the head, face, or neck; scar(s) of the head, face, or neck due to other causes; or other disfigurement of
the head, face, or neck.
Burn scar(s) or scar(s) due to other causes, not of the head, face, or neck, that are deep and nonlinear.
Burn scar(s) or scar(s) due to other causes, not of the head, face, or neck, that are superficial and nonlinear.
Scar(s), unstable or painful.
Scars, other.
*
*
*
5. In Appendix C to Part 4, revise the
disability entries immediately following
the heading ‘‘Scars:’’ to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
Appendix C to Part 4—Alphabetical
Index of Disabilities
Diagnostic
code No.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Scars:
Burn scar(s) of the head, face, or neck; scar(s) of the head, face, or neck due to other causes; or other disfigurement of the
head, face, or neck ...........................................................................................................................................................................
Burn scar(s) or scars(s) due to other causes, not of the head, face, or neck, that are deep and nonlinear .....................................
Burn scar(s) or scars(s) due to other causes, not of the head, face, or neck, that are superficial and nonlinear .............................
Other ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
Retina ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Unstable or painful ...............................................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–21980 Filed 9–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
Marking Requirements for Parcel
Select
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Postal ServiceTM.
*
• For BMC presort entry packages,
use ‘‘Parcel Select BMC Presort’’ or
‘‘Parcel Select BMC PRSRT’’.
• For OBMC presort entry packages
(Inter-BMC) packages, use ‘‘Parcel Select
OBMC Presort’’ or ‘‘Parcel Select OBMC
PRSRT’’.
• For barcoded Intra-BMC and
barcoded Inter-BMC packages, use
‘‘Parcel Select Barcoded’’ or ‘‘Parcel
Select BC’’.
DATES:
Final rule.
*
Effective Date: October 9, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bert
*
The Postal Service is revising
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM) to reflect changes to the
marking requirements of our Shipping
Services product, Parcel Select. On
May 21, 2008, we published in the
Federal Register (Volume 73, Number
99) the proposed rule describing Parcel
Select marking changes. This final rule
revises the effective date to October 9,
2008 (proposed rule date was September
30, 2008) when Parcel Select shippers
must use one of the following markings,
as appropriate, on each Parcel Select
package:
• For all destination entry packages,
use ‘‘Parcel Select’’.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Sep 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
7800
7801
7802
7805
6011
7804
*
PART 111—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
part 111 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 414, 416, 3001–3011, 3201–
3219, 3403–3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632,
3633, and 5001.
2. Revise the following sections of
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM), as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
Olsen at 202–268–7276.
SUMMARY:
*
400
Commercial Mail Parcels
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
*
Comments
402 Elements on the Face of a
Mailpiece
There were no comments received on
the May 21, 2008 proposed rule.
The Postal Service adopts the
following changes to Mailing Standards
of the United States Postal Service,
Domestic Mail Manual (DMM),
incorporated by reference in the Code of
Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and
procedure, Postal Service.
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is
amended as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
2.0 Placement and Content of
Markings
*
*
*
*
*
2.2 Parcel Select, Bound Printed
Matter, Media Mail, and Library Mail
Markings
2.2.1
Basic Markings
[Revise the text of 2.2.1 as follows:]
The basic required marking (e.g.,
‘‘Parcel Select’’, ‘‘Bound Printed
Matter’’, ‘‘Media Mail’’, ‘‘Library Mail’’)
E:\FR\FM\23SER1.SGM
23SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 23, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54708-54712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21980]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 4
RIN 2900-AM55
Schedule for Rating Disabilities; Evaluation of Scars
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Schedule for Rating Disabilities by revising that portion of the
Schedule that addresses the Skin, so that it more clearly reflects our
policies concerning the evaluation of scars.
DATES: Effective Date: This amendment is effective October 23, 2008.
Applicability Date: This amendment shall apply to all applications
for benefits received by VA on or after October 23, 2008. A veteran
whom VA rated before such date under diagnostic codes 7800, 7801, 7802,
7803, 7804, or 7805 of 38 CFR 4.118 may request review under these
clarified criteria, irrespective of whether his or her disability has
worsened since the last review. The effective date of any award, or any
increase in disability compensation, based on this amendment will not
be earlier than the effective date of this rule, but will otherwise be
assigned under the current regulations regarding effective dates, 38
CFR 3.400, etc.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maya Ferrandino, Regulations Staff
(211D), Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (727) 319-5847. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 3, 2008, VA published in the
Federal Register (73 FR 428) a proposal to amend those portions of the
Schedule for Rating Disabilities that address the Skin, 38 CFR 4.118,
by revising the guidelines for the evaluation of scars. Interested
persons were invited to submit written comments on or before February
4, 2008. We received comments from the National Organization of
Veterans' Advocates, Inc. (NOVA), and Disabled American Veterans (DAV).
NOVA's Comment
NOVA addressed a proposed change to a note in diagnostic code 7801
that would consider the trunk as one area of the body. Currently, the
note in diagnostic code 7801 directs that scars on widely separated
areas, as on two or more extremities or on anterior and posterior
surfaces of extremities or trunk, will be separately rated. We proposed
to revise this note to clarify that if multiple scars are present, VA
will assign a separate evaluation for each affected extremity based on
the total area of the qualifying scars on that extremity, and assign a
separate evaluation for the trunk based on the total area of the
qualifying scars on the trunk. Qualifying scars under diagnostic code
7801 are deep scars that are not located on the head, face, or neck.
NOVA is concerned that the proposed change will not adequately
compensate veterans for scars of the trunk. NOVA stated the rationale
for the change of ensuring that the area of all deep scars of the trunk
are taken into account was inadequate considering that the anterior and
posterior surfaces of the trunk may be the largest separate and
distinct areas of the body.
Second, NOVA stated that a scar can cross over into more than one
separate area of the body. In the proposed rule, we stated that such a
scar would be treated as two separate scars to ensure that the ratings
reflect the disability to each distinct area of the body.
Third, NOVA stated the proposed change would potentially result in
a lower evaluation for a veteran with one scar that covers both the
anterior and posterior trunk. NOVA offers the following example: A
veteran has one 30 inch scar that wraps around his anterior and
posterior trunk, with 15 square inches on the anterior side and 15
square inches on his posterior side. Under the current diagnostic code,
this scar would be rated separately at 20 percent and 20 percent, for a
combined evaluation of 40 percent. Under the proposed change, the
veteran would be
[[Page 54709]]
entitled to one evaluation for a 30 inch scar of 20 percent.
Fourth, NOVA comments that under the proposed change a veteran who
has two scars, one on his posterior trunk and one on his anterior
trunk, would only receive one rating for that area; we would not rate
each scar separately, and then provide a combined rating. The effect
could potentially be a lower rating under the revised rule than the
veteran would receive under the current rule.
Response
We did not intend in the proposed regulation to produce a lower
evaluation for scars of the trunk, and we agree that this could happen
under the criteria we proposed. While in the proposed regulation we
considered the trunk to be a single location for purposes of evaluating
multiple scars, after further consideration, we have made changes in
the final rule indicating that the anterior and posterior portions of
the trunk represent separate locations for purposes of evaluation. With
that change, separate evaluations can be assigned for the total area of
qualifying scars of each extremity, for the total area of qualifying
scars of the anterior portion of the trunk, and for the total area of
qualifying scars of the posterior portion of the trunk. Accordingly, we
have changed the first sentence of proposed note 2 under diagnostic
codes 7801 and 7802 to direct raters, if multiple scars are present, or
if a single scar affects more than one extremity, or a single scar
affects one or more extremities and either the anterior portion or
posterior portion of the trunk, or both, or a single scar affects both
the anterior portion and the posterior portion of the trunk, to assign
a separate evaluation based on the total area of qualifying scars of
each affected extremity, the total area of qualifying scars of the
anterior portion of the trunk, if affected, and the total area of the
qualifying scars of the posterior portion of the trunk, if affected.
We have also added a statement in note 2 of diagnostic codes 7801
and 7802 clarifying the borders of the anterior (ventral) and posterior
(dorsal) portions of the trunk, in order to avoid confusion about scars
that may be reported as being on the lateral aspects of the trunk. It
states that the midaxillary line on each side separates the anterior
and posterior portions of the trunk. Therefore, all portions of the
trunk are designated as either ``anterior'' or ``posterior,'' based on
their relationship to the midaxillary line, and there is no portion
that is designated ``lateral.''
We revised note 2 of diagnostic code 7802 to be identical to note 2
of diagnostic code 7801. These notes address the same concept and the
identical language will make the notes easier to use. We are also
making minor technical changes to improve the clarity of both notes.
DAV's Comments
Method of Measurement
DAV commented that while they agreed with the amendment to the
areas of scars, they were concerned that the method of measurement was
not specifically stated in the regulation. DAV stated that the
diagnostic code provides evaluations for square inches. However, scars
are often oddly shaped. DAV proposed that the area of a scar be
measured based on the shape of a rectangle from the top of the scar to
the bottom of the scar for the height measurement, and from the
farthest side points of the scar for the width. According to DAV, this
method of measurement would result in more accurate measurements and
more consistent disability ratings. DAV believes it is difficult for
examiners and adjudicators to determine the surface area in square
inches for oddly shaped scars.
Response
We make no change based on this comment. We note that the current
regulation does not specify a method of measurement, and this has not
created difficulty for medical professionals who are responsible for
measuring scars. Using the ``rectangular area'' method described by DAV
would inappropriately overestimate the area of scars that are
hourglass-shaped, with the narrow area being very long and thin, and
other scars where one portion is much thinner than another. Measuring
as a rectangle in such cases could lead to possible inaccuracies in
evaluation. Measuring the actual surface area, as required by the rule,
will not lead to such inaccuracies; additionally, it is impractical to
set forth all of the methods that can be used to measure scars of
various shapes and sizes. No two scars are identical, and different
measuring techniques must be employed based on the size, shape, and
location of a particular scar. Relying on medical professionals who
measure and describe scars in VA medical examinations and on evidence
contained in medical records is more likely to produce accurate
measurements than a general rule such as the one proposed by DAV. As
such, it would not be helpful to revise the regulation to specify a
method of measuring scars.
Diagnostic Code 7801 Note 2 Preamble
DAV stated that the discussion of proposed diagnostic code 7801
note 2 in the preamble of our notice of proposed rulemaking states that
scars may run into two separate areas and each area should be
separately evaluated. However, DAV stated that the note itself does not
state this. DAV believes that VA should ensure that this concept is
included in the note to ensure scars are properly evaluated.
Response
We agree that note 2 can be clearer on this point. Our revision to
note 2 discussed above will include a revision based on this comment.
Additionally, for clarity and as part of the revision based on the
separate comment, we will make the same revision to note 2 of
diagnostic code 7802.
Diagnostic Code 7801 Note 2 Separate Ratings
DAV additionally stated that the proposed criterion that requires
adjudicators to award separate ratings for a scar that runs into two
separate areas, for example the trunk and left arm, may be less
beneficial to veterans in some cases. DAV stated that a veteran with a
scar of 12 square inches: 11 square inches on the trunk and 1 square
inch on the left arm, would receive a 10 percent evaluation for the
trunk and 0 percent evaluation for the left arm, which combine to 10
percent. If the 12 square inch scar was solely on the trunk, the
veteran receives a 20 percent evaluation. DAV believes that
adjudicators should be able to award either a single rating for the
combined surface area of a scar that runs into two separate areas, or
separate ratings, whichever results in the higher rating.
Response
We make no change based on this comment. We note that the
requirement to separately evaluate scars on separate areas of the body
is not a new requirement; our proposed language merely clarifies
already existing evaluation methods. Further, we evaluate separate
areas of the body to compensate for functional loss of the different
areas of the body separately. In the example mentioned by DAV, the
veteran has an 11 square inch scar of the trunk versus a 12 square inch
scar of the trunk, which require different evaluations because the 12
square inch scar could lead to greater functional loss of the trunk.
VA's ratings are based on the average impairment to earning
[[Page 54710]]
capacity caused by service-connected disabilities. 38 U.S.C. 1155. Each
area of the body identified in the rule has a separate and distinct
function; therefore, a scar that affects a single area of the body is
less likely to produce greater overall disability than a similar scar
that affects more than one area of the body. For this reason, we will
rate the separate areas of the body separately. Although DAV suggests
that assigning separate ratings for each affected body part may be less
favorable to claimants in certain circumstances than assigning only one
rating for each scar that affects more than one body part, we believe
that assigning separate ratings for each affected body part generally
will be beneficial to claimants and, moreover, more closely comports
with the purpose of assigning ratings based on functional loss.
We made an additional change to the title of diagnostic code 7800
for the sake of clarity. To avoid any possible confusion about whether
it refers to burn scars, scars due to other causes, or disfigurement
only of the head, face, or neck, or also to scars or disfigurement in
other areas, we clarified the title by changing it to ``Burn scar(s) of
the head, face, or neck; scar(s) of the head, face, or neck due to
other causes; or other disfigurement of the head, face, or neck''. This
eliminates any possible confusion about the purpose of this diagnostic
code but does not represent a substantive change from the proposed
regulation.
VA appreciates the comments submitted in response to the proposed
rule. Based on the rationale stated in the proposed rule and in this
document, the proposed rule is adopted as a final rule with the changes
noted.
We are additionally adding updates to 38 CFR part 4, Appendices A,
B, and C, to reflect changes to the diagnostic criteria for scars made
by this rulemaking. The appendices are tools for users of the Schedule
for Rating Disabilities and do not contain substantive content
regarding evaluation of disabilities. As such, we believe it is
appropriate to include these updates in this final rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. This final rule would not affect any small entities. Only VA
beneficiaries could be directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this final rule is exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive
Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect
on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive Order.
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been examined and it has been
determined to be a significant regulatory action under the Executive
Order because it is likely to result in a rule that may raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any year. This final rule would have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers and Titles
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and
titles for this final rule are 64.104, Pension for Non-Service-
Connected Disability for Veterans, and 64.109, Veterans Compensation
for Service-Connected Disability.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 4
Disability benefits, Pensions, Veterans.
Approved: June 20, 2008.
Gordon H. Mansfield,
Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 38 CFR part 4, subpart B, is
amended as set forth below:
PART 4--SCHEDULE FOR RATING DISABILITIES
Subpart B--Disability Ratings
0
1. The authority citation for part 4 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155, unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Section 4.118 is amended by:
0
a. Adding an introductory paragraph.
0
b. Revising the heading to diagnostic code 7800 and adding new notes
(4) and (5).
0
c. Revising diagnostic codes 7801, 7802, 7804, and 7805.
0
d. Removing diagnostic code 7803.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 4.118 Schedule of ratings--skin.
A veteran who VA rated under diagnostic codes 7800, 7801, 7802,
7803, 7804, or 7805 before October 23, 2008 can request review under
diagnostic codes 7800, 7801, 7802, 7804, and 7805, irrespective of
whether the veteran's disability has increased since the last review.
VA will review that veteran's disability rating to determine whether
the veteran may be entitled to a higher disability rating under
diagnostic codes 7800, 7801, 7802, 7804, and 7805. A request for review
pursuant to this rulemaking will be treated as a claim for an increased
rating for purposes of determining the effective date of an increased
rating awarded as a result of such review; however, in no case will the
award be effective before October 23, 2008.
[[Page 54711]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7800 Burn scar(s) of the head, face, or neck; scar(s) of
the head, face, or neck due to other causes; or other
disfigurement of the head, face, or neck:
* * * * * * *
Note (4): Separately evaluate disabling effects other than
disfigurement that are associated with individual scar(s)
of the head, face, or neck, such as pain, instability, and
residuals of associated muscle or nerve injury, under the
appropriate diagnostic code(s) and apply Sec. 4.25 to
combine the evaluation(s) with the evaluation assigned
under this diagnostic code................................
Note (5): The characteristic(s) of disfigurement may be
caused by one scar or by multiple scars; the
characteristic(s) required to assign a particular
evaluation need not be caused by a single scar in order to
assign that evaluation....................................
7801 Burn scar(s) or scar(s) due to other causes, not of
the head, face, or neck, that are deep and nonlinear:
Area or areas of 144 square inches (929 sq. cm.) or 40
greater...............................................
Area or areas of at least 72 square inches (465 sq. 30
cm.) but less than 144 square inches (929 sq. cm.)....
Area or areas of at least 12 square inches (77 sq. cm.) 20
but less than 72 square inches (465 sq. cm.)..........
Area or areas of at least 6 square inches (39 sq. cm.) 10
but less than 12 square inches (77 sq. cm.)...........
Note (1): A deep scar is one associated with underlying
soft tissue damage........................................
Note (2): If multiple qualifying scars are present, or if a
single qualifying scar affects more than one extremity, or
a single qualifying scar affects one or more extremities
and either the anterior portion or posterior portion of
the trunk, or both, or a single qualifying scar affects
both the anterior portion and the posterior portion of the
trunk, assign a separate evaluation for each affected
extremity based on the total area of the qualifying scars
that affect that extremity, assign a separate evaluation
based on the total area of the qualifying scars that
affect the anterior portion of the trunk, and assign a
separate evaluation based on the total area of the
qualifying scars that affect the posterior portion of the
trunk. The midaxillary line on each side separates the
anterior and posterior portions of the trunk. Combine the
separate evaluations under Sec. 4.25. Qualifying scars
are scars that are nonlinear, deep, and are not located on
the head, face, or neck...................................
7802 Burn scar(s) or scar(s) due to other causes, not of
the head, face, or neck, that are superficial and
nonlinear:
Area or areas of 144 square inches (929 sq. cm.) or 10
greater...............................................
Note (1): A superficial scar is one not associated with
underlying soft tissue damage.............................
Note (2): If multiple qualifying scars are present, or if a
single qualifying scar affects more than one extremity, or
a single qualifying scar affects one or more extremities
and either the anterior portion or posterior portion of
the trunk, or both, or a single qualifying scar affects
both the anterior portion and the posterior portion of the
trunk, assign a separate evaluation for each affected
extremity based on the total area of the qualifying scars
that affect that extremity, assign a separate evaluation
based on the total area of the qualifying scars that
affect the anterior portion of the trunk, and assign a
separate evaluation based on the total area of the
qualifying scars that affect the posterior portion of the
trunk. The midaxillary line on each side separates the
anterior and posterior portions of the trunk. Combine the
separate evaluations under Sec. 4.25. Qualifying scars
are scars that are nonlinear, superficial, and are not
located on the head, face, or neck........................
7804 Scar(s), unstable or painful:
Five or more scars that are unstable or painful........ 30
Three or four scars that are unstable or painful....... 20
One or two scars that are unstable or painful.......... 10
Note (1): An unstable scar is one where, for any reason,
there is frequent loss of covering of skin over the scar..
Note (2): If one or more scars are both unstable and
painful, add 10 percent to the evaluation that is based on
the total number of unstable or painful scars.............
Note (3): Scars evaluated under diagnostic codes 7800,
7801, 7802, or 7805 may also receive an evaluation under
this diagnostic code, when applicable.....................
7805 Scars, other (including linear scars) and other
effects of scars evaluated under diagnostic codes 7800,
7801, 7802, and 7804:
Evaluate any disabling effect(s) not considered in a
rating provided under diagnostic codes 7800-04 under
an appropriate diagnostic code........................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
3. In Appendix A to Part 4, Sec. 4.118 revise diagnostic codes 7800,
through 7804 and add diagnostic code 7805 to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 4--Table of Amendments and Effective Dates Since
1946
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic
Sec. code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
4.118.......................... 7800 Evaluation August 30,
2002; criterion October
23, 2008.
7801 Criterion July 6, 1950;
criterion August 30,
2002; criterion October
23, 2008.
7802 Criterion September 22,
1978; criterion August
30, 2002; criterion
October 23, 2008.
7803 Criterion August 30, 2002;
removed October 23, 2008.
7804 Criterion July 6, 1950;
criterion September 22,
1978; criterion and
evaluation October 23,
2008.
7805 Criterion October 23,
2008.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
4. In Appendix B to Part 4 remove diagnostic code 7803 and its
disability entry and revise the disability entries for diagnostic codes
7800, 7801, 7802, 7804, and 7805 to read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 4--Numerical Index of Disabilities
[[Page 54712]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE SKIN
* * * * * * *
7800................................. Burn scar(s) of the head, face,
or neck; scar(s) of the head,
face, or neck due to other
causes; or other disfigurement
of the head, face, or neck.
7801................................. Burn scar(s) or scar(s) due to
other causes, not of the head,
face, or neck, that are deep and
nonlinear.
7802................................. Burn scar(s) or scar(s) due to
other causes, not of the head,
face, or neck, that are
superficial and nonlinear.
7804................................. Scar(s), unstable or painful.
7805................................. Scars, other.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
5. In Appendix C to Part 4, revise the disability entries immediately
following the heading ``Scars:'' to read as follows:
Appendix C to Part 4--Alphabetical Index of Disabilities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic
code No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Scars:
Burn scar(s) of the head, face, or neck; scar(s) of the 7800
head, face, or neck due to other causes; or other
disfigurement of the head, face, or neck................
Burn scar(s) or scars(s) due to other causes, not of the 7801
head, face, or neck, that are deep and nonlinear........
Burn scar(s) or scars(s) due to other causes, not of the 7802
head, face, or neck, that are superficial and nonlinear.
Other.................................................... 7805
Retina................................................... 6011
Unstable or painful...................................... 7804
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E8-21980 Filed 9-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P