Intermediary Relending Program, 54305-54307 [E8-22003]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(a) The right of the REE Agency to
disallow costs and recover funds on the
basis of a later audit or other review.
(b) The obligation of the Cooperator to
return any funds due as a result of later
refunds, corrections, or other
transactions.
(c) Audit requirements in § 550.24.
(d) Property management
requirements in §§ 550.36 through
550.42.
(e) Records retention as required in
§ 550.56.
§ 550.62
Collection of amounts due.
(a) Any funds paid to a Cooperator in
excess of the amount to which the
Cooperator is finally determined to be
entitled under the terms and conditions
of the award constitute a debt to the
Federal Government. If not paid within
a reasonable period after the demand for
payment, the REE Agency may in
accordance with 7 CFR part 3, reduce
the debt by—
(1) Making an administrative offset
against other requests for
reimbursements, or
(2) Withholding advance payments
otherwise due to the Cooperator, or
(3) Taking other action permitted by
statute.
(b) Except as otherwise provided by
law, the REE Agency shall charge
interest on an overdue debt in
accordance with 31 CFR part 900,
‘‘Federal Claims Collection Standards.’’
Gale A. Buchanan,
Chief Scientist, USDA, Under Secretary,
Research, Education, and Economics.
[FR Doc. E8–21941 Filed 9–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
7 CFR Parts 1951 and 4274
RIN: 0570–AA70
Intermediary Relending Program
Rural Business-Cooperative
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY: The Rural BusinessCooperative Service (RBS) amends its
regulations for the Intermediary
Relending Program (IRP). This action is
needed to address several contradictions
between the servicing and processing
regulations. The intended effect of this
action is to incorporate consistent
language in both regulations as it relates
to loan limits for ultimate recipients,
eligible vs. ineligible uses of funds, and
include a requirement on the extent to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Sep 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
which ultimate recipients are assisted
by the loans made. The changes will
result in eliminating inconsistencies
within the regulations and provide
clarity and guidance that will allow the
program to operate more efficiently and
effectively.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
November 3, 2008, unless USDA Rural
Development receives written adverse
comments or written notice of intent to
submit adverse comments on or before
October 20, 2008. If USDA Rural
Development receives such comments
or notice, USDA Rural Development
will publish a timely document in the
Federal Register withdrawing the direct
final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit adverse
comments or notice of intent to submit
adverse comments to this rule by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments via
the U.S. Postal Service to the Branch
Chief, Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, STOP 0742, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0742.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit
written comments via Federal Express
Mail or other courier service requiring a
street address to the Branch Chief,
Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, 300 7th Street, SW., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20024.
All written comments will be
available for public inspection during
regular work hours at 300 7th Street,
SW., 7th Floor address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori
A. Washington, Loan Specialist,
Specialty Lenders Division, Rural
Business-Cooperative Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, STOP 3225,
1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3225,
Telephone (202) 720–9815, E-mail
lori.washington@wdc.usda.gov.
Classification
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866 and has been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Programs Affected
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance number for the program
impacted by this action is 10.767,
Intermediary Relending Program.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54305
Intergovernmental Review
The IRP is subject to the provisions of
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. USDA Rural
Development has conducted
intergovernmental consultation in the
manner delineated in RD Instruction
1940–J, ‘‘Intergovernmental Review of
Rural Development Programs and
Activities,’’ and in 7 CFR part 3015,
subpart V.
Civil Justice Reform
This direct final rule has been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. In accordance with
this rule: (1) All State and local laws
and regulations that are in conflict with
this rule will be preempted, (2) no
retroactive effect will be given this rule,
and (3) administrative proceedings in
accordance with the regulations of the
Agency at 7 CFR part 11 must be
exhausted before bringing suit in court
challenging action taken under this rule
unless those regulations specifically
allow bringing suit at an earlier time.
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in
accordance with 7 CFR Part 1940,
Subpart G, ‘‘Environmental Program.’’
USDA Rural Development has
determined that this action does not
constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment, and, in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, Public Law 91–190, an
Environmental Impact Statement is not
required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
USDA Rural Development must prepare
a written statement, including a costbenefit analysis, for proposed and final
rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures to State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
to the private sector of $100 million or
more in any 1 year. When such a
statement is needed for a rule, section
205 of UMRA generally requires USDA
Rural Development to identify and
consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives and adopt the
least costly, more cost effective, or least
burdensome alternative that achieves
the objectives of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal
mandates (under the regulatory
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
54306
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for
State, local, and tribal governments or
the private sector. Thus, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections
202 and 205 of UMRA.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, USDA Rural
Development has determined that this
action would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the
action will not affect a significant
number of small entities as defined by
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601). USDA Rural Development made
this determination based on the fact that
this regulation only impacts those who
choose to participate in the program.
Small entity applicants will not be
impacted to a greater extent than large
entity applicants. Therefore, a
regulatory impact analysis was not
performed.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
It has been determined under
Executive Order 13132, Federalism, that
this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
The provisions contained in this rule
will not have a substantial direct effect
on States or their political subdivisions
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of Government.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not revise or impose
any new information collection or
recordkeeping requirements.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Background
A recent Management Control Review
of the program identified contradictions
between the processing (7 CFR part
4274, subpart D) and servicing (7 CFR
part 1951, subpart R) regulations. USDA
Rural Development is correcting
inconsistencies in the following areas:
(1) Eligible and ineligible loan purposes;
(2) ineligible borrowers; and (3) the
definition of ‘‘rural area.’’ The following
clarifications are being made (1) setting
the level of ultimate recipient loan
assistance; and (2) establishing when
debt refinancing should be considered.
15:21 Sep 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
obtain the previously held collateral as
security and must not pay off a creditor
in excess of the value of the collateral.
Additional collateral will be required
when the refinancing of an unsecured
loan is unavoidable to accomplish the
necessary strengthening of the ultimate
recipient’s position.
■ 3. Section 1951.854 is amended by
removing paragraphs (b)(7) and (b)(8)
and revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
List of Subjects
§ 1951.854
7 CFR Part 1951
Loan programs—Agriculture, rural
areas.
(a) Intermediaries. Intermediary loans
may not be used by the intermediary for
any of the following purposes:
(1) For payment of the intermediary’s
own administrative costs or expenses.
(2) For assistance in excess of what is
needed to accomplish the purpose of the
ultimate recipient project.
(3) For distribution or payment to the
owner, partners, shareholders, or
beneficiaries of the ultimate recipient or
members of their families when such
persons will retain any portion of their
equity in the ultimate recipient.
(4) For charitable institutions, that
would not have revenue from sales, fees,
or stable revenue to support the
operation and repay the loan, and
fraternal organizations.
(5) For assistance to Federal
government employees, active duty
military personnel, employees of the
intermediary, or any organization for
which such persons are directors or
officers or have 20 percent or more
ownership.
(6) For relending in a non-rural area.
(7) For a loan to an ultimate recipient
which has an application pending with,
or a loan outstanding from, another
intermediary involving an IRP revolving
fund if the total IRP loans would exceed
the limits established in § 4274.331(b).
(8) For any line of credit.
(9) For lending and investment
institutions and insurance companies.
(10) For golf courses, race tracks, or
gambling facilities.
(11) To finance more than 75 percent
or more than $250,000 of an ultimate
recipient’s total project cost, as
described in § 4274.331(b). The total
amount of RDLF funds requested by the
ultimate recipient plus the outstanding
balance of any existing RDLF loan(s)
will not exceed $150,000. This limit
does not apply to revolved funds. Other
loans, grants, or intermediary or
ultimate recipient contributions or
funds from other sources must be used
to make up the difference between the
total cost and the assistance provided
with RDLF funds.
(12) For any investments in securities
or certificates of deposit of over 30-day
7 CFR Part 4274
Community development, Economic
development, Loan programs—
Business, Rural areas.
■ For reasons set forth in this preamble,
chapters XVIII and XLII, title 7, Code of
Federal Regulations, are amended as
follows:
CHAPTER XVIII—RURAL HOUSING
SERVICE, RURAL BUSINESSCOOPERATIVE SERVICE, RURAL
UTILITIES SERVICE, AND FARM
SERVICE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
PART 1951—SERVICING AND
COLLECTIONS
1. The authority citation for part 1951
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1932
Note; 7 U.S.C. 1989; 301 U.S.C. 3716; 42
U.S.C. 1480.
E-Government Act Compliance
USDA Rural Development is
committed to complying with the EGovernment Act, to promote the use of
the Internet and other information
technologies to provide increased
opportunities for citizen access to
Government information and services,
and for other purposes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
We are also deleting references to
churches which precluded charitable
and faith-based institutions from
participating in the program in order to
align it with current Departmental
policies. We are also requiring an
annual report on the extent to which
increased employment, income and
ownership opportunities are provided to
low-income persons, farm families, and
displaced farm families for each loan
made by an intermediary.
Subpart R—Rural Development Loan
Servicing
2. Section 1951.853 is amended by
adding paragraph (b)(2)(xi) to read as
follows:
■
§ 1951.853 Loan purposes for undisbursed
RDLF loan funds from HHS.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(xi) Debt refinancing if the following
conditions are met.
(A) Intermediary is responsible for
determining whether debt restructuring
is in the best interest of the revolving
loan fund.
(B) Refinancing debts will be allowed
only when it is determined by the
intermediary that the project is viable
and refinancing is necessary to create
new or save existing jobs or create or
continue a needed service; and
(C) On any request for refinancing of
a secured loan, the intermediary must
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
Ineligible assistance purposes.
19SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
duration without the concurrence of
Rural Development. If the IRP funds
have been unused to make loans to
ultimate recipients for 6 months or
more, those funds will be returned to
Rural Development unless Rural
Development provides an exception to
the intermediary. Any exception would
be based on evidence satisfactory to
Rural Development that every effort is
being made by the intermediary to
utilize the IRP funding in conformance
with program objectives.
CHAPTER XLII—RURAL BUSINESSCOOPERATIVE SERVICE AND RURAL
UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE
PART 4274—DIRECT AND INSURED
LOANMAKING
4. The authority citation for part 4274
continues to read as follows:
■
the annual gross revenue is derived
from legalized gambling activity.
■ 7. Section 4274.338 is amended by
adding paragraph (b)(4)(ii)(D) to read as
follows:
§ 4274.338 Loan agreements between the
Agency and the intermediary.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) An annual report on the extent to
which increased employment, income
and ownership opportunities are
provided to low-income persons, farm
families, and displaced farm families for
each loan made by such intermediary.
Dated: September 12, 2008.
Ben Anderson,
Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative
Service.
[FR Doc. E8–22003 Filed 9–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1932
note; 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart D—Intermediary Relending
Program (IRP)
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
5. Section 4274.314 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(10)(i) and by
adding paragraph (b)(15) to read as
follows:
12 CFR Part 223
■
§ 4274.314
[Regulation W; Docket No. R–1330]
Loan purposes.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(10) * * *
(i) The intermediary is responsible for
making prudent lending decisions based
on sound underwriting principles when
considering the restructuring of an
ultimate recipient’s debt; and
*
*
*
*
*
(15) Aquaculture-based rural small
businesses.
■ 6. Section 4274.319 is amended by
revising paragraphs (c) and (d) and by
adding paragraphs (m) and (n) to read as
follows:
§ 4274.319
Ineligible loan purposes.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Charitable institutions, that would
not have revenue from sales, fees, or
stable revenue to support the operation
and repay the loan, and fraternal
organizations.
(d) Assistance to Federal government
employees, active duty military
personnel, employees of the
intermediary, or any organization for
which such persons are directors or
officers or have 20 percent or more
ownership.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) For any line of credit.
(n) For any legitimate business
activity when more than 10 percent of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Sep 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
Transactions Between Member Banks
and Their Affiliates: Exemption for
Certain Securities Financing
Transactions Between a Member Bank
and an Affiliate
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board).
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In light of the continuing
unusual and exigent circumstances in
the financial markets, the Board has
adopted, on an interim final basis, a
regulatory exemption for member banks
from certain provisions of section 23A
of the Federal Reserve Act and the
Board’s Regulation W. The exemption
increases the capacity of member banks,
subject to certain conditions designed to
help ensure the safety and soundness of
the banks, to enter into securities
financing transactions with affiliates.
DATES: The interim final rule became
effective on September 14, 2008.
Comments must be received on or
before October 31, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. R–1330, by any
of the following methods:
Agency Web Site: https://
www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/
generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
54307
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail:
regs.comments@federalreserve.gov.
Include docket number in the subject
line of the message.
Fax: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–
3102.
Mail: Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary,
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20551.
All public comments are available
from the Board’s Web site at https://
www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/
foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as submitted,
unless modified for technical reasons.
Accordingly, your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or
contact information.
Public comments may also be viewed
electronically or in paper form in Room
MP–500 of the Board’s Martin Building
(20th and C Streets, NW.) between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark E. Van Der Weide, Assistant
General Counsel, (202) 452–2263, Legal
Division, or Norah M. Barger, Deputy
Director, (202) 452–2402, Division of
Banking Supervision and Regulation,
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20551. For the deaf, hard of hearing,
and speech impaired only,
teletypewriter (TTY), (202) 263–4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In light of
the ongoing dislocations in the financial
markets, and the potential impact of
such dislocations on the functioning of
the U.S. tri-party repurchase agreement
market, the Board has adopted on an
interim basis the following exemption
from section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act (12 U.S.C. 371c) and the Board’s
Regulation W (12 CFR part 223). The
exemption will facilitate the ability of
an affiliate of a member bank (such as
an SEC-registered broker-dealer) to
obtain financing, if needed, for
securities or other assets that the
affiliate ordinarily would have financed
through the U.S. tri-party repurchase
agreement market. The exemption is
subject to several conditions designed to
protect the safety and soundness of the
member bank.
First, the member bank may use the
exemption to finance only those asset
types that the affiliate currently finances
in the U.S. tri-party repurchase
agreement market.
Second, the transactions must be
marked to market daily and subject to
daily margin maintenance requirements,
E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM
19SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54305-54307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-22003]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
7 CFR Parts 1951 and 4274
RIN: 0570-AA70
Intermediary Relending Program
AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS) amends its
regulations for the Intermediary Relending Program (IRP). This action
is needed to address several contradictions between the servicing and
processing regulations. The intended effect of this action is to
incorporate consistent language in both regulations as it relates to
loan limits for ultimate recipients, eligible vs. ineligible uses of
funds, and include a requirement on the extent to which ultimate
recipients are assisted by the loans made. The changes will result in
eliminating inconsistencies within the regulations and provide clarity
and guidance that will allow the program to operate more efficiently
and effectively.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective November 3, 2008, unless
USDA Rural Development receives written adverse comments or written
notice of intent to submit adverse comments on or before October 20,
2008. If USDA Rural Development receives such comments or notice, USDA
Rural Development will publish a timely document in the Federal
Register withdrawing the direct final rule.
ADDRESSES: You may submit adverse comments or notice of intent to
submit adverse comments to this rule by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Submit written comments via the U.S. Postal Service
to the Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, STOP 0742, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-0742.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit written comments via Federal
Express Mail or other courier service requiring a street address to the
Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 300 7th Street, SW., 7th Floor, Washington,
DC 20024.
All written comments will be available for public inspection during
regular work hours at 300 7th Street, SW., 7th Floor address listed
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori A. Washington, Loan Specialist,
Specialty Lenders Division, Rural Business-Cooperative Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, STOP 3225, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-3225, Telephone (202) 720-9815, E-mail
lori.washington@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Classification
This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and has been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
Programs Affected
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number for the program
impacted by this action is 10.767, Intermediary Relending Program.
Intergovernmental Review
The IRP is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. USDA Rural Development has conducted intergovernmental
consultation in the manner delineated in RD Instruction 1940-J,
``Intergovernmental Review of Rural Development Programs and
Activities,'' and in 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.
Civil Justice Reform
This direct final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order
12988, Civil Justice Reform. In accordance with this rule: (1) All
State and local laws and regulations that are in conflict with this
rule will be preempted, (2) no retroactive effect will be given this
rule, and (3) administrative proceedings in accordance with the
regulations of the Agency at 7 CFR part 11 must be exhausted before
bringing suit in court challenging action taken under this rule unless
those regulations specifically allow bringing suit at an earlier time.
Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in accordance with 7 CFR Part 1940,
Subpart G, ``Environmental Program.'' USDA Rural Development has
determined that this action does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, and, in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public
Law 91-190, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, USDA
Rural Development must prepare a written statement, including a cost-
benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal
mandates'' that may result in expenditures to State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector of $100 million
or more in any 1 year. When such a statement is needed for a rule,
section 205 of UMRA generally requires USDA Rural Development to
identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives
and adopt the least costly, more cost effective, or least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory
[[Page 54306]]
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and tribal
governments or the private sector. Thus, this rule is not subject to
the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, USDA Rural
Development has determined that this action would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
because the action will not affect a significant number of small
entities as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601).
USDA Rural Development made this determination based on the fact that
this regulation only impacts those who choose to participate in the
program. Small entity applicants will not be impacted to a greater
extent than large entity applicants. Therefore, a regulatory impact
analysis was not performed.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
It has been determined under Executive Order 13132, Federalism,
that this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. The provisions
contained in this rule will not have a substantial direct effect on
States or their political subdivisions or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of Government.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not revise or impose any new information collection
or recordkeeping requirements.
E-Government Act Compliance
USDA Rural Development is committed to complying with the E-
Government Act, to promote the use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and services, and for other purposes.
Background
A recent Management Control Review of the program identified
contradictions between the processing (7 CFR part 4274, subpart D) and
servicing (7 CFR part 1951, subpart R) regulations. USDA Rural
Development is correcting inconsistencies in the following areas: (1)
Eligible and ineligible loan purposes; (2) ineligible borrowers; and
(3) the definition of ``rural area.'' The following clarifications are
being made (1) setting the level of ultimate recipient loan assistance;
and (2) establishing when debt refinancing should be considered. We are
also deleting references to churches which precluded charitable and
faith-based institutions from participating in the program in order to
align it with current Departmental policies. We are also requiring an
annual report on the extent to which increased employment, income and
ownership opportunities are provided to low-income persons, farm
families, and displaced farm families for each loan made by an
intermediary.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 1951
Loan programs--Agriculture, rural areas.
7 CFR Part 4274
Community development, Economic development, Loan programs--
Business, Rural areas.
0
For reasons set forth in this preamble, chapters XVIII and XLII, title
7, Code of Federal Regulations, are amended as follows:
CHAPTER XVIII--RURAL HOUSING SERVICE, RURAL BUSINESS-COOPERATIVE
SERVICE, RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE, AND FARM SERVICE AGENCY,
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PART 1951--SERVICING AND COLLECTIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1951 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1932 Note; 7 U.S.C. 1989; 301
U.S.C. 3716; 42 U.S.C. 1480.
Subpart R--Rural Development Loan Servicing
0
2. Section 1951.853 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(2)(xi) to read
as follows:
Sec. 1951.853 Loan purposes for undisbursed RDLF loan funds from HHS.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(xi) Debt refinancing if the following conditions are met.
(A) Intermediary is responsible for determining whether debt
restructuring is in the best interest of the revolving loan fund.
(B) Refinancing debts will be allowed only when it is determined by
the intermediary that the project is viable and refinancing is
necessary to create new or save existing jobs or create or continue a
needed service; and
(C) On any request for refinancing of a secured loan, the
intermediary must obtain the previously held collateral as security and
must not pay off a creditor in excess of the value of the collateral.
Additional collateral will be required when the refinancing of an
unsecured loan is unavoidable to accomplish the necessary strengthening
of the ultimate recipient's position.
0
3. Section 1951.854 is amended by removing paragraphs (b)(7) and (b)(8)
and revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 1951.854 Ineligible assistance purposes.
(a) Intermediaries. Intermediary loans may not be used by the
intermediary for any of the following purposes:
(1) For payment of the intermediary's own administrative costs or
expenses.
(2) For assistance in excess of what is needed to accomplish the
purpose of the ultimate recipient project.
(3) For distribution or payment to the owner, partners,
shareholders, or beneficiaries of the ultimate recipient or members of
their families when such persons will retain any portion of their
equity in the ultimate recipient.
(4) For charitable institutions, that would not have revenue from
sales, fees, or stable revenue to support the operation and repay the
loan, and fraternal organizations.
(5) For assistance to Federal government employees, active duty
military personnel, employees of the intermediary, or any organization
for which such persons are directors or officers or have 20 percent or
more ownership.
(6) For relending in a non-rural area.
(7) For a loan to an ultimate recipient which has an application
pending with, or a loan outstanding from, another intermediary
involving an IRP revolving fund if the total IRP loans would exceed the
limits established in Sec. 4274.331(b).
(8) For any line of credit.
(9) For lending and investment institutions and insurance
companies.
(10) For golf courses, race tracks, or gambling facilities.
(11) To finance more than 75 percent or more than $250,000 of an
ultimate recipient's total project cost, as described in Sec.
4274.331(b). The total amount of RDLF funds requested by the ultimate
recipient plus the outstanding balance of any existing RDLF loan(s)
will not exceed $150,000. This limit does not apply to revolved funds.
Other loans, grants, or intermediary or ultimate recipient
contributions or funds from other sources must be used to make up the
difference between the total cost and the assistance provided with RDLF
funds.
(12) For any investments in securities or certificates of deposit
of over 30-day
[[Page 54307]]
duration without the concurrence of Rural Development. If the IRP funds
have been unused to make loans to ultimate recipients for 6 months or
more, those funds will be returned to Rural Development unless Rural
Development provides an exception to the intermediary. Any exception
would be based on evidence satisfactory to Rural Development that every
effort is being made by the intermediary to utilize the IRP funding in
conformance with program objectives.
CHAPTER XLII--RURAL BUSINESS-COOPERATIVE SERVICE AND RURAL
UTILITIES SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PART 4274--DIRECT AND INSURED LOANMAKING
0
4. The authority citation for part 4274 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1932 note; 7 U.S.C. 1989.
Subpart D--Intermediary Relending Program (IRP)
0
5. Section 4274.314 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(10)(i) and by
adding paragraph (b)(15) to read as follows:
Sec. 4274.314 Loan purposes.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(10) * * *
(i) The intermediary is responsible for making prudent lending
decisions based on sound underwriting principles when considering the
restructuring of an ultimate recipient's debt; and
* * * * *
(15) Aquaculture-based rural small businesses.
0
6. Section 4274.319 is amended by revising paragraphs (c) and (d) and
by adding paragraphs (m) and (n) to read as follows:
Sec. 4274.319 Ineligible loan purposes.
* * * * *
(c) Charitable institutions, that would not have revenue from
sales, fees, or stable revenue to support the operation and repay the
loan, and fraternal organizations.
(d) Assistance to Federal government employees, active duty
military personnel, employees of the intermediary, or any organization
for which such persons are directors or officers or have 20 percent or
more ownership.
* * * * *
(m) For any line of credit.
(n) For any legitimate business activity when more than 10 percent
of the annual gross revenue is derived from legalized gambling
activity.
0
7. Section 4274.338 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(4)(ii)(D) to
read as follows:
Sec. 4274.338 Loan agreements between the Agency and the
intermediary.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) An annual report on the extent to which increased employment,
income and ownership opportunities are provided to low-income persons,
farm families, and displaced farm families for each loan made by such
intermediary.
Dated: September 12, 2008.
Ben Anderson,
Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative Service.
[FR Doc. E8-22003 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XY-P