Environmental Impact Statement: Kern County, CA, 54450-54451 [E8-21933]
Download as PDF
54450
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Notices
as recorded in Official Record Volume
517, Page 79 of the Richland County
Deed Records;
Thence North 01°28′00″ West, along
the East Line of the Northwest Quarter
of Section No. 3 and passing thru an
iron pin found at 323.58 feet, a total
distance of 423.58 feet to an iron pin
found at the Northeast corner of the
right-of-way for Rupp Avenue, said iron
pin also being the true place of
beginning of the parcel herein
described;
Thence South 88°29′32″ West, along
the North right-of-way line of Rupp
Avenue, a distance of 100.00 feet to an
iron pin found;
Thence South 01°28′00″ East, along
the right-of-way line of Rupp Avenue, a
distance of 20.00 feet to an iron pin
found;
Thence South 88°29′32″ West, along
the North right-of-way line of Rupp
Avenue, a distance of 848.64 feet to an
iron pin set, said iron pin also being at
the Southwest corner of a parcel of land
now owned by Milark Industries, Inc.,
as recorded in Official Record Volume
306, Page 179 of the Richard County
Deed Records;
Thence North 01°28′00″ West, along
the East line of said Milark Industries,
Inc., lands a distance of 418.98 feet to
an iron pin set;
Thence North 88°29′32″ East, a
distance of 938.94 feet to an iron pin set,
said iron pin also being on the East line
of the Northwest Quarter of Section No.
3;
Thence South 01°28′00″ East, along
the East line of said Northwest Quarter,
a distance of 399.10 feet to the true
place of beginning, containing 9.029
acres, but subject to all legal highways
and easements of record.
Issued in Romulus, Michigan, on August
13, 2008.
Matthew J. Thys,
Manager, Detroit Airports District Office,
FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. E8–21806 Filed 9–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement: Kern
County, CA
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the
California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans), is issuing this notice to
advise the public that an Environmental
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:25 Sep 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared
for the proposed Centennial Corridor
highway project in Kern County,
California.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Gassner, Senior Environmental
Planner, Southern Sierra Environmental
Analysis Branch, Caltrans, 2015 E.
Shields Avenue, Suite 100, Fresno,
California 93726 or call (559) 243–8243.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Effective July 1, 2007, the FHWA
assigned, and Caltrans assumed,
environmental responsibilities for this
project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.
Caltrans as the delegated National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
agency will prepare an EIS on a route
adoption study to extend State Route 58
westerly to connect to Interstate 5, in
Kern County, California. In addition,
this EIS would provide environmental
compliance documentation for
construction of the project from State
Route 58 to Heath Road. For purposes
of the EIS, the project, known as the
Centennial Corridor, is being evaluated
in three segments. Two of the segments,
from Interstate 5 to Heath Road and
from Heath Road to Mohawk Street
(Westside Parkway), have been the
subject of previous NEPA documents.
This EIS will incorporate by reference
the previous documents: Final Route 58
Route Adoption Project, A Tier 1
Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report (Tier 1
EIS/EIR) (2002) and the Westside
Parkway Environmental Assessment/
Final Environmental Impact Report (EA/
FEIR) (2006). This EIS will serve as a
revalidation of the previous analysis.
The final segment of the Centennial
Corridor, from Mohawk Street to State
Route 58, will be evaluated at a
construction level of analysis and will
address multiple alternatives.
Alternative alignments currently being
evaluated include options west of State
Route 99, east of State Route 99, and
parallel to State Route 99, as well as a
‘‘No Build’’ alternative, a transit
alternative, and a transportation systems
management alternative. All of the build
alternative alignments would connect
State Route 58 to the east end of the
Westside Parkway project. Caltrans will
continue to screen the alternatives
identified through the scoping process
and only carry forward those
alternatives that are considered viable
for evaluation in the EIS. The following
alternatives are currently under
consideration: Alternative A proposes to
construct a new freeway west of the
State Route 58/99 interchange. The
alignment would travel in a westerly
direction for approximately one mile on
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the south side of Stockdale Highway, at
which point it would turn in a
northwesterly direction and span the
Carrier Canal, Truxtun Avenue, and the
Kern River. The proposed route would
then connect to the Westside Parkway
alignment between Mohawk Street and
Coffee Road. The total length of the
project from the existing State Route 99/
State Route 58 interchange to Interstate
5 utilizing Alternative A would be
approximately 16.31 miles.
Alternative B proposes to construct a
new freeway west of the State Route 58/
99 interchange. The alignment would
travel in a westerly direction for
approximately one-half mile on the
south side of Stockdale Highway, at
which point it would turn to the
northwest, span the Carrier Canal,
Truxtun Avenue, and the Kern River.
Alternative B would connect to the
Westside Parkway alignment at the
Mohawk Street interchange. The total
length of the project from the existing
State Route 99/State Route 58
interchange to Interstate 5 utilizing
Alternative B is approximately 16.61
miles.
Alternative C proposes to connect
existing State Route 58 to the Westside
Parkway by means of routing new lanes
adjacent and parallel to existing State
Route 99. These additional lanes would
run parallel to and independent of State
Route 99. Movements between State
Route 58, State Route 99 and the
Westside Parkway would likely be
facilitated by braided ramps and
freeway-to-freeway connector ramps.
The total length of the project from State
Route 99 to Interstate 5 utilizing
Alternative C is approximately 18.51
miles.
Alternative D proposes to construct a
new freeway in the vicinity of Union
Avenue (State Route 204). The roadway
would extend north from State Route 58
for approximately one mile, where it
would turn to the west and run parallel
to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe
railroad tracks. Alternative D would
connect to the Westside Parkway
alignment at the new interchange at
Mohawk Street. The total length of the
project from State Route 58 at Union
Avenue to Interstate 5 is approximately
18.98 miles.
The ‘‘No Build’’ alternative, would
not construct any improvements. State
Route 58—East would continue to end
at State Route 99 where it would jog to
the north to tie into State Route 58—
West (Rosedale Highway). The Westside
Parkway would be constructed as a local
facility, but would not connect to State
Route 58, State Route 99, or Interstate 5.
Alternative M would evaluate Transit
and Transportation Systems
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Notices
Management (TSM) improvements.
TSM focuses on low capital,
environmentally-responsive
improvements that maximize efficiency
of existing facilities. An example of
TSM improvements would be providing
signal interconnects to facilitate the
flow of traffic or providing bus turn-out
bays to minimize the interruption of
buses along a specific route. Specific
transit and TSM measures have not been
developed at this point. Preliminary
traffic data is required to determine the
most effective transit and TSM
measures. Once the traffic data is
available it would be determined if
transit and TSM improvements would
be separate alternatives or if it is more
effective to evaluate a single alternative
that includes both transit and TSM
improvements.
It is anticipated that the proposed
project may require the following
federal permits and approvals: A
Biological Opinion from the United
States Fish & Wildlife Service, approval
of a PM10–PM2.5 Hot Spot Analysis by
the Inter-Agency Consultation
Committee, an Air Quality Conformity
determination from the Federal
Highway Administration, Section 401,
402 and 404 permits under the Clean
Water Act and a Farmland Conversion
Impact Rating for Corridor Type Projects
from the United States Soil
Conservation Service. Letters describing
the proposed action and soliciting
comments will be sent to appropriate
Federal, State, local and participating
agencies. In addition, the following
Native American groups have been
notified: The Chumash Council of
Bakersfield, Kawaiisu Tribe, Kawaiisu
Tribe of the Tejon Indian Reservation,
Kern Valley Indian Community, Kern
Valley Paiute Council, Kawaiisu Band of
Kern Valley Indians, Kudzubitcwanap
Palap Tribe, Native American Heritage
Council of Kern County, Santa Rosa
Rancheria—Tachi Yokuts Tribe,
Tubatalabals of Kern Valley, Tinoqui—
Chalola Council of Kitanemuk and
Yowlumne Tejon Indians, Tule River
Indian Reservation and the White
Blanket Paiute Rancheria. Private
organizations and citizens who have
previously expressed or are known to
have interest in this proposal have also
received notification on the project. The
environmental scoping process began in
March 2008. Public information
meetings were held on March 4, 2008,
May 22, 2008, July 21, 2008, and August
21, 2008, in Bakersfield, California.
Several community focus meetings have
been and are continuing to be held in
neighborhoods affected by the proposed
project alternatives.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:25 Sep 18, 2008
Jkt 214001
A scoping meeting will be held on
October 2, 2008. The meeting will be
held for agencies from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
at the Thomas Roads Improvement
Program Offices located at 900 Truxtun
Avenue, Suite 200, Bakersfield,
California. The meeting for the public
will be held from 4:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
at the Kern County Administrative
Offices, in the Building Rotunda located
at 1115 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield,
California to provide additional
opportunities for agency and public
input on the proposed project. Public
notice will be given of the time and
place of the meeting.
To ensure that the full range of issues
related to this proposed action are
addressed and all significant issues
identified, comments and suggestions
are invited from all interested parties.
Comments or questions concerning this
proposed action and the EIS should be
directed to Caltrans at the address
provided above.
54451
of final agency actions subject to 23
U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim seeking
judicial review of the Federal agency
actions on the highway project will be
barred unless the claim is filed on or
before March 18, 2009. If the Federal
law that authorizes judicial review of a
claim provides a time period of less
than 180 days for filing such claim, then
that shorter time period still applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melanie Brent, Caltrans District 4 Office
of Environmental Analysis, 111 Grand
Avenue, P. O. Box 23660, Oakland, CA
94623–0660, during normal business
hours from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Telephone
(510) 286–5621, e-mail Melanie Brent/
D04/Caltrans/CAGov.
Notice is
hereby given that Caltrans, pursuant to
its assigned responsibilities under 23
U.S.C. 327, and certain Federal agencies
have taken final agency actions subject
to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by approving the
SR 84 Expressway Widening Project in
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
the State of California. When completed,
and Construction. The regulations
the project will widen SR 84 from two
implementing Executive Order 12372
to four lanes between Ruby Hill Drive
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
and Stanley Boulevard and two to six
Federal programs and activities apply to this
lanes between Stanley Boulevard and
program.)
Jack London Boulevard in the City of
Issued on: September 11, 2008.
Livermore, Alameda County, California.
Nancy Bobb,
The purpose of the project is to improve
Director, State Programs, Federal Highway
SR 84 as a regional route, improve
Administration, Sacramento, California.
traffic circulation, upgrade SR 84 to an
[FR Doc. E8–21933 Filed 9–18–08; 8:45 am]
expressway facility, and improve
bicycle and pedestrian access. The
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
project length is 4.8 miles. The actions
by the Federal agencies, and the laws
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION under which such actions were taken,
are described in the Initial Study with
Federal Highway Administration
Negative Declaration/Environmental
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions Assessment for the project, approved on
August 5, 2008 and in the Finding of No
on Proposed Highway in California
Significant Impact (FONSI) issued on
AGENCY: Federal Highway
August 5, 2008, and in other documents
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
in the project records. The Initial Study
with Negative Declaration/
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims
for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA Environmental Assessment, FONSI, and
other project records are available by
and Other Federal Agencies.
contacting Caltrans at the address
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions provided above. The FONSI can be
taken by the California Department of
viewed and downloaded from the
Transportation (Caltrans) pursuant to its project Web site at https://
assigned responsibilities under 23
www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/envdocs.htm.
U.S.C. 327 that are final within the
This notice applies to all Federal
meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). These
agency decisions as of the issuance date
actions relate to a proposed highway
of this notice and all laws under which
project, the State Route 84 (SR 84)
such actions were taken, including but
Expressway Widening Project between
not limited to:
approximately Jack London Boulevard
1. General: National Environmental
and Ruby Hill Drive (Post Miles 22.5 to
27.3) in the County of Alameda, State of Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
California. Those actions grant licenses, 4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23
U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128].
permits, and approvals for the project.
2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401–
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA, on
behalf of Caltrans, is advising the public 7671(q)].
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM
19SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54450-54451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21933]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement: Kern County, CA
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans), is issuing this notice to advise the public
that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared for the
proposed Centennial Corridor highway project in Kern County,
California.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Gassner, Senior Environmental
Planner, Southern Sierra Environmental Analysis Branch, Caltrans, 2015
E. Shields Avenue, Suite 100, Fresno, California 93726 or call (559)
243-8243.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Effective July 1, 2007, the FHWA assigned, and Caltrans assumed,
environmental responsibilities for this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C.
327. Caltrans as the delegated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
agency will prepare an EIS on a route adoption study to extend State
Route 58 westerly to connect to Interstate 5, in Kern County,
California. In addition, this EIS would provide environmental
compliance documentation for construction of the project from State
Route 58 to Heath Road. For purposes of the EIS, the project, known as
the Centennial Corridor, is being evaluated in three segments. Two of
the segments, from Interstate 5 to Heath Road and from Heath Road to
Mohawk Street (Westside Parkway), have been the subject of previous
NEPA documents. This EIS will incorporate by reference the previous
documents: Final Route 58 Route Adoption Project, A Tier 1
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (Tier 1 EIS/
EIR) (2002) and the Westside Parkway Environmental Assessment/Final
Environmental Impact Report (EA/FEIR) (2006). This EIS will serve as a
revalidation of the previous analysis.
The final segment of the Centennial Corridor, from Mohawk Street to
State Route 58, will be evaluated at a construction level of analysis
and will address multiple alternatives. Alternative alignments
currently being evaluated include options west of State Route 99, east
of State Route 99, and parallel to State Route 99, as well as a ``No
Build'' alternative, a transit alternative, and a transportation
systems management alternative. All of the build alternative alignments
would connect State Route 58 to the east end of the Westside Parkway
project. Caltrans will continue to screen the alternatives identified
through the scoping process and only carry forward those alternatives
that are considered viable for evaluation in the EIS. The following
alternatives are currently under consideration: Alternative A proposes
to construct a new freeway west of the State Route 58/99 interchange.
The alignment would travel in a westerly direction for approximately
one mile on the south side of Stockdale Highway, at which point it
would turn in a northwesterly direction and span the Carrier Canal,
Truxtun Avenue, and the Kern River. The proposed route would then
connect to the Westside Parkway alignment between Mohawk Street and
Coffee Road. The total length of the project from the existing State
Route 99/State Route 58 interchange to Interstate 5 utilizing
Alternative A would be approximately 16.31 miles.
Alternative B proposes to construct a new freeway west of the State
Route 58/99 interchange. The alignment would travel in a westerly
direction for approximately one-half mile on the south side of
Stockdale Highway, at which point it would turn to the northwest, span
the Carrier Canal, Truxtun Avenue, and the Kern River. Alternative B
would connect to the Westside Parkway alignment at the Mohawk Street
interchange. The total length of the project from the existing State
Route 99/State Route 58 interchange to Interstate 5 utilizing
Alternative B is approximately 16.61 miles.
Alternative C proposes to connect existing State Route 58 to the
Westside Parkway by means of routing new lanes adjacent and parallel to
existing State Route 99. These additional lanes would run parallel to
and independent of State Route 99. Movements between State Route 58,
State Route 99 and the Westside Parkway would likely be facilitated by
braided ramps and freeway-to-freeway connector ramps. The total length
of the project from State Route 99 to Interstate 5 utilizing
Alternative C is approximately 18.51 miles.
Alternative D proposes to construct a new freeway in the vicinity
of Union Avenue (State Route 204). The roadway would extend north from
State Route 58 for approximately one mile, where it would turn to the
west and run parallel to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad
tracks. Alternative D would connect to the Westside Parkway alignment
at the new interchange at Mohawk Street. The total length of the
project from State Route 58 at Union Avenue to Interstate 5 is
approximately 18.98 miles.
The ``No Build'' alternative, would not construct any improvements.
State Route 58--East would continue to end at State Route 99 where it
would jog to the north to tie into State Route 58--West (Rosedale
Highway). The Westside Parkway would be constructed as a local
facility, but would not connect to State Route 58, State Route 99, or
Interstate 5.
Alternative M would evaluate Transit and Transportation Systems
[[Page 54451]]
Management (TSM) improvements. TSM focuses on low capital,
environmentally-responsive improvements that maximize efficiency of
existing facilities. An example of TSM improvements would be providing
signal interconnects to facilitate the flow of traffic or providing bus
turn-out bays to minimize the interruption of buses along a specific
route. Specific transit and TSM measures have not been developed at
this point. Preliminary traffic data is required to determine the most
effective transit and TSM measures. Once the traffic data is available
it would be determined if transit and TSM improvements would be
separate alternatives or if it is more effective to evaluate a single
alternative that includes both transit and TSM improvements.
It is anticipated that the proposed project may require the
following federal permits and approvals: A Biological Opinion from the
United States Fish & Wildlife Service, approval of a PM10-
PM2.5 Hot Spot Analysis by the Inter-Agency Consultation
Committee, an Air Quality Conformity determination from the Federal
Highway Administration, Section 401, 402 and 404 permits under the
Clean Water Act and a Farmland Conversion Impact Rating for Corridor
Type Projects from the United States Soil Conservation Service. Letters
describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will be sent to
appropriate Federal, State, local and participating agencies. In
addition, the following Native American groups have been notified: The
Chumash Council of Bakersfield, Kawaiisu Tribe, Kawaiisu Tribe of the
Tejon Indian Reservation, Kern Valley Indian Community, Kern Valley
Paiute Council, Kawaiisu Band of Kern Valley Indians, Kudzubitcwanap
Palap Tribe, Native American Heritage Council of Kern County, Santa
Rosa Rancheria--Tachi Yokuts Tribe, Tubatalabals of Kern Valley,
Tinoqui--Chalola Council of Kitanemuk and Yowlumne Tejon Indians, Tule
River Indian Reservation and the White Blanket Paiute Rancheria.
Private organizations and citizens who have previously expressed or are
known to have interest in this proposal have also received notification
on the project. The environmental scoping process began in March 2008.
Public information meetings were held on March 4, 2008, May 22, 2008,
July 21, 2008, and August 21, 2008, in Bakersfield, California. Several
community focus meetings have been and are continuing to be held in
neighborhoods affected by the proposed project alternatives.
A scoping meeting will be held on October 2, 2008. The meeting will
be held for agencies from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. at the Thomas Roads
Improvement Program Offices located at 900 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 200,
Bakersfield, California. The meeting for the public will be held from
4:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at the Kern County Administrative Offices, in
the Building Rotunda located at 1115 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield,
California to provide additional opportunities for agency and public
input on the proposed project. Public notice will be given of the time
and place of the meeting.
To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed
action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be
directed to Caltrans at the address provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Issued on: September 11, 2008.
Nancy Bobb,
Director, State Programs, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. E8-21933 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P