Environmental Impact Statement: Kern County, CA, 54450-54451 [E8-21933]

Download as PDF 54450 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Notices as recorded in Official Record Volume 517, Page 79 of the Richland County Deed Records; Thence North 01°28′00″ West, along the East Line of the Northwest Quarter of Section No. 3 and passing thru an iron pin found at 323.58 feet, a total distance of 423.58 feet to an iron pin found at the Northeast corner of the right-of-way for Rupp Avenue, said iron pin also being the true place of beginning of the parcel herein described; Thence South 88°29′32″ West, along the North right-of-way line of Rupp Avenue, a distance of 100.00 feet to an iron pin found; Thence South 01°28′00″ East, along the right-of-way line of Rupp Avenue, a distance of 20.00 feet to an iron pin found; Thence South 88°29′32″ West, along the North right-of-way line of Rupp Avenue, a distance of 848.64 feet to an iron pin set, said iron pin also being at the Southwest corner of a parcel of land now owned by Milark Industries, Inc., as recorded in Official Record Volume 306, Page 179 of the Richard County Deed Records; Thence North 01°28′00″ West, along the East line of said Milark Industries, Inc., lands a distance of 418.98 feet to an iron pin set; Thence North 88°29′32″ East, a distance of 938.94 feet to an iron pin set, said iron pin also being on the East line of the Northwest Quarter of Section No. 3; Thence South 01°28′00″ East, along the East line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance of 399.10 feet to the true place of beginning, containing 9.029 acres, but subject to all legal highways and easements of record. Issued in Romulus, Michigan, on August 13, 2008. Matthew J. Thys, Manager, Detroit Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region. [FR Doc. E8–21806 Filed 9–18–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–M DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Environmental Impact Statement: Kern County, CA Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of Intent. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), is issuing this notice to advise the public that an Environmental VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:25 Sep 18, 2008 Jkt 214001 Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared for the proposed Centennial Corridor highway project in Kern County, California. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Gassner, Senior Environmental Planner, Southern Sierra Environmental Analysis Branch, Caltrans, 2015 E. Shields Avenue, Suite 100, Fresno, California 93726 or call (559) 243–8243. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 1, 2007, the FHWA assigned, and Caltrans assumed, environmental responsibilities for this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Caltrans as the delegated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) agency will prepare an EIS on a route adoption study to extend State Route 58 westerly to connect to Interstate 5, in Kern County, California. In addition, this EIS would provide environmental compliance documentation for construction of the project from State Route 58 to Heath Road. For purposes of the EIS, the project, known as the Centennial Corridor, is being evaluated in three segments. Two of the segments, from Interstate 5 to Heath Road and from Heath Road to Mohawk Street (Westside Parkway), have been the subject of previous NEPA documents. This EIS will incorporate by reference the previous documents: Final Route 58 Route Adoption Project, A Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report (Tier 1 EIS/EIR) (2002) and the Westside Parkway Environmental Assessment/ Final Environmental Impact Report (EA/ FEIR) (2006). This EIS will serve as a revalidation of the previous analysis. The final segment of the Centennial Corridor, from Mohawk Street to State Route 58, will be evaluated at a construction level of analysis and will address multiple alternatives. Alternative alignments currently being evaluated include options west of State Route 99, east of State Route 99, and parallel to State Route 99, as well as a ‘‘No Build’’ alternative, a transit alternative, and a transportation systems management alternative. All of the build alternative alignments would connect State Route 58 to the east end of the Westside Parkway project. Caltrans will continue to screen the alternatives identified through the scoping process and only carry forward those alternatives that are considered viable for evaluation in the EIS. The following alternatives are currently under consideration: Alternative A proposes to construct a new freeway west of the State Route 58/99 interchange. The alignment would travel in a westerly direction for approximately one mile on PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the south side of Stockdale Highway, at which point it would turn in a northwesterly direction and span the Carrier Canal, Truxtun Avenue, and the Kern River. The proposed route would then connect to the Westside Parkway alignment between Mohawk Street and Coffee Road. The total length of the project from the existing State Route 99/ State Route 58 interchange to Interstate 5 utilizing Alternative A would be approximately 16.31 miles. Alternative B proposes to construct a new freeway west of the State Route 58/ 99 interchange. The alignment would travel in a westerly direction for approximately one-half mile on the south side of Stockdale Highway, at which point it would turn to the northwest, span the Carrier Canal, Truxtun Avenue, and the Kern River. Alternative B would connect to the Westside Parkway alignment at the Mohawk Street interchange. The total length of the project from the existing State Route 99/State Route 58 interchange to Interstate 5 utilizing Alternative B is approximately 16.61 miles. Alternative C proposes to connect existing State Route 58 to the Westside Parkway by means of routing new lanes adjacent and parallel to existing State Route 99. These additional lanes would run parallel to and independent of State Route 99. Movements between State Route 58, State Route 99 and the Westside Parkway would likely be facilitated by braided ramps and freeway-to-freeway connector ramps. The total length of the project from State Route 99 to Interstate 5 utilizing Alternative C is approximately 18.51 miles. Alternative D proposes to construct a new freeway in the vicinity of Union Avenue (State Route 204). The roadway would extend north from State Route 58 for approximately one mile, where it would turn to the west and run parallel to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks. Alternative D would connect to the Westside Parkway alignment at the new interchange at Mohawk Street. The total length of the project from State Route 58 at Union Avenue to Interstate 5 is approximately 18.98 miles. The ‘‘No Build’’ alternative, would not construct any improvements. State Route 58—East would continue to end at State Route 99 where it would jog to the north to tie into State Route 58— West (Rosedale Highway). The Westside Parkway would be constructed as a local facility, but would not connect to State Route 58, State Route 99, or Interstate 5. Alternative M would evaluate Transit and Transportation Systems E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM 19SEN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 183 / Friday, September 19, 2008 / Notices Management (TSM) improvements. TSM focuses on low capital, environmentally-responsive improvements that maximize efficiency of existing facilities. An example of TSM improvements would be providing signal interconnects to facilitate the flow of traffic or providing bus turn-out bays to minimize the interruption of buses along a specific route. Specific transit and TSM measures have not been developed at this point. Preliminary traffic data is required to determine the most effective transit and TSM measures. Once the traffic data is available it would be determined if transit and TSM improvements would be separate alternatives or if it is more effective to evaluate a single alternative that includes both transit and TSM improvements. It is anticipated that the proposed project may require the following federal permits and approvals: A Biological Opinion from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service, approval of a PM10–PM2.5 Hot Spot Analysis by the Inter-Agency Consultation Committee, an Air Quality Conformity determination from the Federal Highway Administration, Section 401, 402 and 404 permits under the Clean Water Act and a Farmland Conversion Impact Rating for Corridor Type Projects from the United States Soil Conservation Service. Letters describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will be sent to appropriate Federal, State, local and participating agencies. In addition, the following Native American groups have been notified: The Chumash Council of Bakersfield, Kawaiisu Tribe, Kawaiisu Tribe of the Tejon Indian Reservation, Kern Valley Indian Community, Kern Valley Paiute Council, Kawaiisu Band of Kern Valley Indians, Kudzubitcwanap Palap Tribe, Native American Heritage Council of Kern County, Santa Rosa Rancheria—Tachi Yokuts Tribe, Tubatalabals of Kern Valley, Tinoqui— Chalola Council of Kitanemuk and Yowlumne Tejon Indians, Tule River Indian Reservation and the White Blanket Paiute Rancheria. Private organizations and citizens who have previously expressed or are known to have interest in this proposal have also received notification on the project. The environmental scoping process began in March 2008. Public information meetings were held on March 4, 2008, May 22, 2008, July 21, 2008, and August 21, 2008, in Bakersfield, California. Several community focus meetings have been and are continuing to be held in neighborhoods affected by the proposed project alternatives. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:25 Sep 18, 2008 Jkt 214001 A scoping meeting will be held on October 2, 2008. The meeting will be held for agencies from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. at the Thomas Roads Improvement Program Offices located at 900 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 200, Bakersfield, California. The meeting for the public will be held from 4:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at the Kern County Administrative Offices, in the Building Rotunda located at 1115 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, California to provide additional opportunities for agency and public input on the proposed project. Public notice will be given of the time and place of the meeting. To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be directed to Caltrans at the address provided above. 54451 of final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim seeking judicial review of the Federal agency actions on the highway project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before March 18, 2009. If the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of a claim provides a time period of less than 180 days for filing such claim, then that shorter time period still applies. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Brent, Caltrans District 4 Office of Environmental Analysis, 111 Grand Avenue, P. O. Box 23660, Oakland, CA 94623–0660, during normal business hours from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Telephone (510) 286–5621, e-mail Melanie Brent/ D04/Caltrans/CAGov. Notice is hereby given that Caltrans, pursuant to its assigned responsibilities under 23 U.S.C. 327, and certain Federal agencies have taken final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by approving the SR 84 Expressway Widening Project in (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning the State of California. When completed, and Construction. The regulations the project will widen SR 84 from two implementing Executive Order 12372 to four lanes between Ruby Hill Drive regarding intergovernmental consultation on and Stanley Boulevard and two to six Federal programs and activities apply to this lanes between Stanley Boulevard and program.) Jack London Boulevard in the City of Issued on: September 11, 2008. Livermore, Alameda County, California. Nancy Bobb, The purpose of the project is to improve Director, State Programs, Federal Highway SR 84 as a regional route, improve Administration, Sacramento, California. traffic circulation, upgrade SR 84 to an [FR Doc. E8–21933 Filed 9–18–08; 8:45 am] expressway facility, and improve bicycle and pedestrian access. The BILLING CODE 4910–22–P project length is 4.8 miles. The actions by the Federal agencies, and the laws DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION under which such actions were taken, are described in the Initial Study with Federal Highway Administration Negative Declaration/Environmental Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions Assessment for the project, approved on August 5, 2008 and in the Finding of No on Proposed Highway in California Significant Impact (FONSI) issued on AGENCY: Federal Highway August 5, 2008, and in other documents Administration (FHWA), DOT. in the project records. The Initial Study with Negative Declaration/ ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA Environmental Assessment, FONSI, and other project records are available by and Other Federal Agencies. contacting Caltrans at the address SUMMARY: This notice announces actions provided above. The FONSI can be taken by the California Department of viewed and downloaded from the Transportation (Caltrans) pursuant to its project Web site at https:// assigned responsibilities under 23 www.dot.ca.gov/dist4/envdocs.htm. U.S.C. 327 that are final within the This notice applies to all Federal meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). These agency decisions as of the issuance date actions relate to a proposed highway of this notice and all laws under which project, the State Route 84 (SR 84) such actions were taken, including but Expressway Widening Project between not limited to: approximately Jack London Boulevard 1. General: National Environmental and Ruby Hill Drive (Post Miles 22.5 to 27.3) in the County of Alameda, State of Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321– California. Those actions grant licenses, 4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128]. permits, and approvals for the project. 2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401– DATES: By this notice, the FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is advising the public 7671(q)]. PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM 19SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 183 (Friday, September 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54450-54451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21933]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: Kern County, CA

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the California Department of 
Transportation (Caltrans), is issuing this notice to advise the public 
that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared for the 
proposed Centennial Corridor highway project in Kern County, 
California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Gassner, Senior Environmental 
Planner, Southern Sierra Environmental Analysis Branch, Caltrans, 2015 
E. Shields Avenue, Suite 100, Fresno, California 93726 or call (559) 
243-8243.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Effective July 1, 2007, the FHWA assigned, and Caltrans assumed, 
environmental responsibilities for this project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 
327. Caltrans as the delegated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 
agency will prepare an EIS on a route adoption study to extend State 
Route 58 westerly to connect to Interstate 5, in Kern County, 
California. In addition, this EIS would provide environmental 
compliance documentation for construction of the project from State 
Route 58 to Heath Road. For purposes of the EIS, the project, known as 
the Centennial Corridor, is being evaluated in three segments. Two of 
the segments, from Interstate 5 to Heath Road and from Heath Road to 
Mohawk Street (Westside Parkway), have been the subject of previous 
NEPA documents. This EIS will incorporate by reference the previous 
documents: Final Route 58 Route Adoption Project, A Tier 1 
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (Tier 1 EIS/
EIR) (2002) and the Westside Parkway Environmental Assessment/Final 
Environmental Impact Report (EA/FEIR) (2006). This EIS will serve as a 
revalidation of the previous analysis.
    The final segment of the Centennial Corridor, from Mohawk Street to 
State Route 58, will be evaluated at a construction level of analysis 
and will address multiple alternatives. Alternative alignments 
currently being evaluated include options west of State Route 99, east 
of State Route 99, and parallel to State Route 99, as well as a ``No 
Build'' alternative, a transit alternative, and a transportation 
systems management alternative. All of the build alternative alignments 
would connect State Route 58 to the east end of the Westside Parkway 
project. Caltrans will continue to screen the alternatives identified 
through the scoping process and only carry forward those alternatives 
that are considered viable for evaluation in the EIS. The following 
alternatives are currently under consideration: Alternative A proposes 
to construct a new freeway west of the State Route 58/99 interchange. 
The alignment would travel in a westerly direction for approximately 
one mile on the south side of Stockdale Highway, at which point it 
would turn in a northwesterly direction and span the Carrier Canal, 
Truxtun Avenue, and the Kern River. The proposed route would then 
connect to the Westside Parkway alignment between Mohawk Street and 
Coffee Road. The total length of the project from the existing State 
Route 99/State Route 58 interchange to Interstate 5 utilizing 
Alternative A would be approximately 16.31 miles.
    Alternative B proposes to construct a new freeway west of the State 
Route 58/99 interchange. The alignment would travel in a westerly 
direction for approximately one-half mile on the south side of 
Stockdale Highway, at which point it would turn to the northwest, span 
the Carrier Canal, Truxtun Avenue, and the Kern River. Alternative B 
would connect to the Westside Parkway alignment at the Mohawk Street 
interchange. The total length of the project from the existing State 
Route 99/State Route 58 interchange to Interstate 5 utilizing 
Alternative B is approximately 16.61 miles.
    Alternative C proposes to connect existing State Route 58 to the 
Westside Parkway by means of routing new lanes adjacent and parallel to 
existing State Route 99. These additional lanes would run parallel to 
and independent of State Route 99. Movements between State Route 58, 
State Route 99 and the Westside Parkway would likely be facilitated by 
braided ramps and freeway-to-freeway connector ramps. The total length 
of the project from State Route 99 to Interstate 5 utilizing 
Alternative C is approximately 18.51 miles.
    Alternative D proposes to construct a new freeway in the vicinity 
of Union Avenue (State Route 204). The roadway would extend north from 
State Route 58 for approximately one mile, where it would turn to the 
west and run parallel to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad 
tracks. Alternative D would connect to the Westside Parkway alignment 
at the new interchange at Mohawk Street. The total length of the 
project from State Route 58 at Union Avenue to Interstate 5 is 
approximately 18.98 miles.
    The ``No Build'' alternative, would not construct any improvements. 
State Route 58--East would continue to end at State Route 99 where it 
would jog to the north to tie into State Route 58--West (Rosedale 
Highway). The Westside Parkway would be constructed as a local 
facility, but would not connect to State Route 58, State Route 99, or 
Interstate 5.
    Alternative M would evaluate Transit and Transportation Systems

[[Page 54451]]

Management (TSM) improvements. TSM focuses on low capital, 
environmentally-responsive improvements that maximize efficiency of 
existing facilities. An example of TSM improvements would be providing 
signal interconnects to facilitate the flow of traffic or providing bus 
turn-out bays to minimize the interruption of buses along a specific 
route. Specific transit and TSM measures have not been developed at 
this point. Preliminary traffic data is required to determine the most 
effective transit and TSM measures. Once the traffic data is available 
it would be determined if transit and TSM improvements would be 
separate alternatives or if it is more effective to evaluate a single 
alternative that includes both transit and TSM improvements.
    It is anticipated that the proposed project may require the 
following federal permits and approvals: A Biological Opinion from the 
United States Fish & Wildlife Service, approval of a PM10-
PM2.5 Hot Spot Analysis by the Inter-Agency Consultation 
Committee, an Air Quality Conformity determination from the Federal 
Highway Administration, Section 401, 402 and 404 permits under the 
Clean Water Act and a Farmland Conversion Impact Rating for Corridor 
Type Projects from the United States Soil Conservation Service. Letters 
describing the proposed action and soliciting comments will be sent to 
appropriate Federal, State, local and participating agencies. In 
addition, the following Native American groups have been notified: The 
Chumash Council of Bakersfield, Kawaiisu Tribe, Kawaiisu Tribe of the 
Tejon Indian Reservation, Kern Valley Indian Community, Kern Valley 
Paiute Council, Kawaiisu Band of Kern Valley Indians, Kudzubitcwanap 
Palap Tribe, Native American Heritage Council of Kern County, Santa 
Rosa Rancheria--Tachi Yokuts Tribe, Tubatalabals of Kern Valley, 
Tinoqui--Chalola Council of Kitanemuk and Yowlumne Tejon Indians, Tule 
River Indian Reservation and the White Blanket Paiute Rancheria. 
Private organizations and citizens who have previously expressed or are 
known to have interest in this proposal have also received notification 
on the project. The environmental scoping process began in March 2008. 
Public information meetings were held on March 4, 2008, May 22, 2008, 
July 21, 2008, and August 21, 2008, in Bakersfield, California. Several 
community focus meetings have been and are continuing to be held in 
neighborhoods affected by the proposed project alternatives.
    A scoping meeting will be held on October 2, 2008. The meeting will 
be held for agencies from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. at the Thomas Roads 
Improvement Program Offices located at 900 Truxtun Avenue, Suite 200, 
Bakersfield, California. The meeting for the public will be held from 
4:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at the Kern County Administrative Offices, in 
the Building Rotunda located at 1115 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, 
California to provide additional opportunities for agency and public 
input on the proposed project. Public notice will be given of the time 
and place of the meeting.
    To ensure that the full range of issues related to this proposed 
action are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments 
and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments or 
questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be 
directed to Caltrans at the address provided above.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

    Issued on: September 11, 2008.
Nancy Bobb,
Director, State Programs, Federal Highway Administration, Sacramento, 
California.
[FR Doc. E8-21933 Filed 9-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.