Publication of State Plan Pursuant to the Help America Vote Act, 54141-54154 [E8-21800]

Agencies

• Election Assistance Commission

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 182 (Thursday, September 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54141-54154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21800]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Publication of State Plan Pursuant to the Help America Vote Act

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to sections 254(a)(11)(A) and 255(b) of the Help 
America Vote Act (HAVA), Public Law 107-252, the U.S. Election 
Assistance Commission (EAC) hereby causes to be published in the 
Federal Register changes to the HAVA State plan previously submitted by 
Georgia.

DATES: This notice is effective upon publication in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Whitener, Telephone 202-566-3100 
or 1-866-747-1471 (toll-free).
    Submit Comments: Any comments regarding the plans published 
herewith should be made in writing to the chief election official of 
the individual State at the address listed below.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 24, 2004, the U.S. Election 
Assistance Commission published in the Federal Register the original 
HAVA State plans filed by the fifty States, the District of Columbia 
and the Territories of American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. 
Virgin Islands. 69 FR 14002. HAVA anticipated that States, Territories 
and the District of Columbia would change or update their plans from 
time to time pursuant to HAVA section 254(a)(11) through (13). HAVA 
sections 254(a)(11)(A) and 255 require EAC to publish such updates. 
This is Georgia's first revision to its State plan.
    The revised State plan from Georgia addresses changes in the budget 
of the previously submitted State plan and accounts for the use of 
Fiscal Year 2008 requirements payments. The State has changed the focus 
of its plan from the initial deployment of voting system components and 
the related education of the public and local election officials to the 
continued maintenance of Georgia's voting system and the replacement of 
the State's voter registration database. In accordance with HAVA 
section 254(a)(12), the State plan submitted for publication provides 
information on how the State succeeded in carrying out its previous 
State plan. The State confirms that these changes to its State plan 
were developed and

[[Page 54142]]

submitted for public comment in accordance with HAVA sections 
254(a)(11), 255, and 256.
    Upon the expiration of thirty days from September 18, 2008, the 
State is eligible to implement the changes addressed in the plan that 
is published herein, in accordance with HAVA section 254(a)(11)(C).
    EAC wishes to acknowledge the effort that went into revising this 
State plan and encourages further public comment, in writing, to the 
State election official listed below.

Chief State Election Official

    The Honorable Karen C. Handel, Secretary of State, 2 Martin Luther 
King Jr. Drive SE., Suite 1104 West Tower, Atlanta, Georgia 30334, 
Phone: (404) 657-5380, Fax: (404) 657-5371. Thank you for your interest 
in improving the voting process in America.

    Dated: September 12, 2008.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

2008 STATE PLAN, AMENDED

Help America Vote Act of 2002

State of Georgia
    Plan amended and submitted by Karen Handel, Secretary of State, 
August 6, 2008.
    As required by Public Law 107-252, Help America Vote Act 2002, 
Section 253(b).

Table of Contents

Preamble

PART ONE

Chapter 1--Historical Election Challenges
Chapter 2--Election Reform (2001 and 2002)
    2.1 Direction in Code and Rule
    2.2 The 21st Century Voting Commission
    2.3 Pilot Project
    2.4 System Selection
    2.5 System Deployment
Chapter 3--2003 HAVA Status and Steps for Completing Compliance
    3.1 2003 Compliance Status
    3.2 2003 Legislative Steps for Completing Compliance
    3.3 2003 Administrative Actions and Certifications

PART TWO

Chapter 4--Change and Implementation Summary
    4.1 Overview of Changes to the 2003 State Plan
    4.2 Successful Implementation of the 2003 State Plan
Chapter 5--2008 HAVA State Plan, Amended Implementation
    5.1 Use of Requirements Payments
    5.2 Distribution and Monitoring
    5.3 Voter Education and Training
    5.4 Voting System Standards
    5.5 Election Fund Established
    5.6 Proposed Budget
    5.7 Maintenance of Effort
    5.8 Performance Goals and Measures
    5.9 Administrative Complaint Procedures
    5.10 Effect of Title I Payments
    5.11 Management of the Plan
    5.12 Previous State Plan Implementation and Changes
    5.13 State Plan Committee
Appendix 1--2003 Status & Implementation

Preamble

    This document is Georgia's current plan for continuing 
implementation of the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). The 2008 HAVA State 
Plan, Amended presents Georgia's historic election reform process that 
supported the creation of the 2003 HAVA State Plan, a summary of how 
the 2003 plan was implemented, and plans for upcoming years.
    Part One of this plan memorializes important historical context 
preceding the 2003 Georgia State Plan. Georgia is justifiably proud of 
having initiated important election reforms in anticipation of HAVA. 
Many of HAVA's requirements had already been implemented in Georgia by 
the November 2002 general election. Hence, Georgia's 2003 HAVA State 
Plan reflected a starting place that was significantly further ahead of 
most other states at that time.
    Part Two of the 2008 HAVA State Plan, Amended describes how Georgia 
has implemented its previous state plan (Chapter 4) and presents its 
plans for upcoming years (Chapter 5). While fully compliant with HAVA, 
Georgia is committed to on-going improvements. In that spirit, the 2008 
HAVA State Plan, Amended focuses on: (1) Replacing Georgia's 1993 
computer system supporting voter registration and elections management; 
(2) replacing components to preserve the reliable, accurate performance 
of Georgia's statewide uniform electronic voting system; and (3) 
continuing other successful initiatives that have proven valuable 
during the past 7 years.
    Activity under the 2003 State Plan had $77,304,946 in Federal funds 
available, plus State funds in excess of the required 5 percent match. 
Funds available for activity in the 2008 State Plan, Amended total 
$4,971,521 as shown in Table 1.

                          Table 1--Available Funding for 2008 HAVA State Plan, Amended
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Federal funds               State match                  Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remaining Title I Funds.................         $1,137,260  (already spent).................         $1,137,260
Remaining Title II Funds................            497,587  (already spent).................            497,587
2008 Funds Title II.....................          3,169,840  $166,834........................          3,336,674
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Funds Available...................  .................  ................................          4,971,521
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Part One

Chapter 1--Historical Election Challenges

    America's elections were primarily conducted by county and 
municipal governments through the year 2000. In Georgia, each county 
was responsible for the selection and purchase of the county voting 
system. The local election superintendent was responsible for the 
maintenance and testing of the voting systems as well as for the layout 
and printing of election ballots pursuant to state law.
    In the November 2000 General Election, 93,991 ballots in the State 
of Georgia did not register a vote in the Presidential race, because: 
(1) The voter accidentally marked more than one vote for the office; 
(2) the voter attempted to make a choice, but did not mark the ballot 
correctly; (3) the voting device failed to count the vote cast; or (4) 
the voter chose not to vote for the President.
    To evaluate the conduct of elections in Georgia during the weeks 
following the November 2000 General Election, the Secretary of State 
compiled and analyzed information from citizen complaints, minutes of 
public hearings conducted by the NAACP, concerns submitted by the 
League of Women Voters, and dozens of interviews of local election 
superintendents, voter registrars, and political party leaders. As a 
result of this analysis, the following issues were identified as 
affecting Georgia's elections:
    1. Outdated voting equipment;
    2. Ballot problems;
    3. Lines too long & other polling place deficiencies;
    4. Shortage of trained poll workers;

[[Page 54143]]

    5. Election law violations;
    6. Slow processing of Absentee Ballots;
    7. Growth of ``language minorities'';
    8. State mainframe computer system unreliable;
    9. Counties slow to report election results; and
    10. Voter registration process costly and slow.
    The Secretary of State also noted that the state was using four 
different types of voting systems, that no uniformity existed among the 
counties for counting votes, and that each system experienced a 
significant amount of under-votes. An analysis was then conducted of 
the under-votes that occurred on each type of voting system on a 
county-by county basis. In the 2000 General Election, the average 
percentage of under-votes for each system used in the State for all 
counties was 3.6%.
    A summary of results is shown in Table 2 below.

                                      Table 2--Voting Equipment Performance
                                             [2000 general election]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Introduced  in     Counties       Under vote       Votes not
          Voting system           Year  invented      Georgia      using system     percentage        counted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paper ballot....................            1889            1900               2             3.3             113
Punch card......................            1890            1964              17             4.6          38,065
Lever machine...................            1892            1950              73             4.2          16,926
Optical-scan....................            1980            1986              67  ..............  ..............
    --Central count.............  ..............  ..............  ..............             4.2          21,999
    --Precinct count............  ..............  ..............  ..............             4.7          16,196
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A report compiling the results of the study was prepared and 
presented to the Governor and the Members of the General Assembly with 
the following recommendations:
    1. Adopt a Statewide Uniform Electronic Voting Initiative--
Authorize, fund, and deploy a Statewide Uniform Electronic Voting 
Initiative (SUEVI) to create a single uniform method of voting 
consistent in every county in the state;
    2. Implement Early Voting--Enhance polling place convenience and 
reduce Election Day waiting;
    3. Overhaul the Voter Registration System--Upgrade the state's 
voter registration database from the slow, unreliable, inflexible, and 
expensive mainframe system to a flexible state-of-the-art server-based 
system;
    4. Pursue Poll Worker & Poll Location Alternatives--Seek new 
alternatives to assist counties in securing new poll locations and 
recruiting and training poll workers, both of which are in short 
supply;
    5. Streamline Polling Place Procedures--Reduce or eliminate 
burdensome paperwork and procedures at the polls and move voters more 
quickly through the voting process;
    6. Consolidate Authority to Remove Deceased Voters from Voter 
List--Authorize the Secretary of State to remove deceased voters from 
the voter rolls to assure a more accurate voter list, (responsibility 
that previously rested solely with the counties); and
    7. Modernize Voter Information Resources--Use new centralized 
technology solutions to offer citizens quicker, easier means to locate 
their precinct and verify their voter registration.
    The Secretary's report to the Governor and the Members of the 
General Assembly recommended that the State adopt a single uniform 
voting platform. Importantly, it also initiated a shift in policy--
transferring a portion of election responsibilities from the counties 
and election superintendents to the State for funding and deployment of 
a new statewide election system.

Chapter 2--Election Reform (2001-2002)

2.1 Direction in Code and Rule
    Recognizing the need to address concerns with the elections 
process, the General Assembly enacted bipartisan legislation, Senate 
Bill 213, (hereinafter ``SB 213'') which the Governor signed into law 
on April 18, 2001. Official Code of Georgia Code Annotated Sec.  21-2-
300 (hereinafter O.C.G.A. Sec.  21-2-300). This legislation established 
the policy and the statutory framework for Georgia to begin identifying 
and deploying essential changes to its election system.
    Chief among the changes to the election system was the policy 
directive that the Secretary of State would purchase and deploy a 
uniform voting system for casting and counting votes in all county, 
state and federal elections by the July 2004 General Primary. The 
Secretary of State was authorized to deploy to the counties a voting 
system that met requirements established by the Secretary of State. 
O.C.G.A. Sec.  21-2-300 (a). On August 30, 2002, the State Election 
Board advanced the implementation date to the November 2002 General 
Election with Rule 183-1-12-.01. With adoption of this directive, 
Georgia became the first state in the nation to set a deadline for the 
implementation of a modern uniform statewide voting system.
    O.C.G.A. Sec.  21-2-300 also authorized the Secretary of State to 
conduct a pilot project to test and evaluate the use of electronic 
voting systems during the 2001 municipal elections. It created the 21st 
Century Voting Commission (hereinafter ``Voting Commission'') to 
oversee the pilot project. The statute further authorized the Voting 
Commission to make recommendations to the General Assembly and the 
Secretary of State.
2.2 The 21st Century Voting Commission
    The purpose of the Voting Commission was to:
    1. Oversee the electronic voting pilot project,
    2. Test direct recording electronic (DRE) voting equipment,
    3. Advise the Secretary of State on the choice of voting equipment 
to be used statewide in all counties pursuant to O.C.G.A. Sec.  21-2-
300, and
    4. Report findings to the Governor and the General Assembly by 
December 31, 2001.
    The Voting Commission included four Democrats, four Republicans, 
eight Non-Partisan members, one Independent, and one member of the 
Libertarian Party of Georgia, six local county election officials, the 
Director of the State Elections Division, as well as five members of 
the Georgia General Assembly (three from the House and two from the 
Senate). The Voting Commission also accepted input from various public 
interest groups representing minorities, disabled voters and multi-
lingual groups.
    As its first priority, the Voting Commission investigated voting 
systems and established standards that a voting system would have to 
meet in order to

[[Page 54144]]

be considered for the pilot project and use in the State of Georgia. 
The standards included:
    1. A convenient and intuitive voter interface;
    2. Features that prohibit duplicate, or over-votes;
    3. Opportunity to correct under-vote or over-votes on ballot;
    4. Strong security components to assure that votes cannot be lost 
or cast without authorization;
    5. The capability to print, if required, a written record of each 
ballot cast;
    6. The flexibility to store and present thousands of different 
ballot variations or ``styles'';
    7. The capability to be fully accessible to blind voters and those 
with other disabilities and allow disabled voters to cast their ballot 
independently and without assistance;
    8. The ability to compute final results and generate a variety of 
election reports very quickly; and
    9. A turnkey system that would allow each county to conduct any 
election from start to finish without any assistance from the Vendor.
2.3 Pilot Project
    Upon establishing the system standards of the voting platform, the 
Voting Commission prepared for the November 2001 Pilot Project. In 
response to a request-for-proposals (RFP) commissioned by the Voting 
Commission, seven DRE system vendors petitioned to participate in the 
November 2001 Pilot Project. At a June meeting of the Voting Commission 
in Atlanta, all seven vendors demonstrated their systems and presented 
their experience and track record in the industry. The Voting 
Commission recommended that all seven vendors be allowed to participate 
in the project, provided that each vendor obtained the necessary 
national and state certifications in time to adequately prepare for the 
November 2001 Election.
    The Secretary of State entered into contracts with six certified 
vendors to conduct the Pilot Project. Using a lease agreement, the 
vendors agreed to provide voting systems for the Pilot Project at a 
special rate of $600 per voting unit. The contracts required that 
vendors transport the units to and from the cities, provide training 
for both election superintendents and poll workers, assist with voter 
education efforts via public demonstrations, and have staff present in 
precincts to provide Election Day support.
    The Voting Commission held five public hearings and additional sub-
committee work sessions across the State of Georgia. In these hearings, 
the Voting Commission reviewed data on voting error rates, heard 
presentations from manufacturers of electronic voting equipment and 
testimony from election officials from Georgia and other states, 
considered comments from interest groups, stakeholders, and the general 
public on voting issues, and reviewed the election results from the 
Pilot Project. Several Voting Commission delegations also traveled to 
other states to personally observe elections in which DRE voting 
equipment was used.
    Based on information obtained from the extensive analysis and 
review of data, public testimony, and observations obtained from the 
Pilot Project, the Voting Commission made the following system 
recommendations to the Governor and members of the General Assembly:
    1. Georgia's uniform election platform should be a DRE voting 
system used for Election Day in-precinct voting, for in-person absentee 
voting, and, if authorized by new legislation, for in-person 
``advance'' or ``early'' voting. The DRE system selected should have 
the capability to prevent duplicate, or over-votes, provide voters with 
a ``summary screen'' to warn voters of potential under-votes or 
selection errors, and include a process for voters to correct errors or 
omissions before a final vote is cast. The system should include on-
board battery back-up in case of power failure, have the capability to 
produce an independent and paper audit trail of every ballot cast and 
should permit a visually impaired voter, and others with disabilities, 
to cast a ballot independently and without assistance.
    2. For absentee voting by mail, the uniform system should include 
an optical scan component. The optical scan component should integrate 
seamlessly with the DRE components of the system for ballot preparation 
and tabulation.
    3. The uniform election system should be controlled by an Election 
Management System or software program that will allow election 
officials to easily design both DRE and optical scan ballot formats 
simultaneously, that will integrate all results into a single vote 
tallying report and that will easily interface with existing and future 
voter registration systems.
    4. The state should seek to maximize the benefits of statewide 
negotiating and purchasing capacity by securing a statewide software 
license, as well as favorable pricing for technical support, 
maintenance and additional or replacement equipment that is made 
available for the benefit of local governments.
    The Voting Commission unanimously adopted these recommendations and 
submitted them to the Governor and members of the General Assembly in 
December 2001.
2.4 System Selection
    Based upon the success of the Pilot Project and the recommendation 
from the Voting Commission, the Governor authorized and the General 
Assembly approved a Statewide Uniform Electronic Voting Initiative Fund 
(SUEVI) and authorized $54 million in bond funds for the purchase of a 
statewide uniform electronic voting system. An additional $3.8 million 
was authorized to establish the voter education fund and $500,000 for 
the creation of an Election Center for election official training and 
support at the Kennesaw State University Center for Election Systems 
(hereinafter ``KSU Center for Election Systems'').
    Upon establishment of the election fund, the Secretary of State and 
the Georgia Technology Authority (hereinafter ``GTA'') initiated an RFP 
process in January 2002 and began evaluating proposals from vendors 
capable of supplying a Direct Recording Electronic Voting System on a 
statewide basis for 2,926 precincts in 159 counties. The RFP required 
each vendor to submit a proposal that included: Voting system 
specifications, pricing plans, deployment plan and schedule, training 
plan and schedule for hardware and software training, short term and 
long term service plans, and a proposal for voter education efforts.
    In response to the RFP, nine vendors submitted bids for the 
deployment of a statewide voting system. An intensive proposal and 
demonstration process then began with the assistance of the Georgia 
Technology Authority. Through an extensive evaluation process conducted 
by GTA and the evaluation committee, Diebold Election Systems, Inc. 
(hereinafter ``Diebold'') was selected as the state's vendor for 
election equipment.
    The State of Georgia entered into a contract with Diebold on May 3, 
2002, wherein the State of Georgia and Diebold agreed to deploy a 
uniform voting system in every county within a 6-month implementation 
period (186 days prior to the November 5, 2002 election).
2.5 System Deployment
    The deployment plan Diebold provided in response to the State's RFP 
included the following phases: System testing, system development, 
system training and voter education.

[[Page 54145]]

2.5.1 System Testing
    System testing involved 19,015 DRE voting stations, 400 absentee 
ballot systems and 161 voting system servers to be tested a minimum of 
4 times including at the:
    1. Manufacturer's warehouse;
    2. Central processing warehouse;
    3. County acceptance testing location by KSU; and
    4. Logic and Accuracy testing conducted by Diebold and County 
election staff days before the November election.
2.5.2 System Deployment
    Secretary of State created a formula based on one DRE unit per 200 
active registered voters in each county to determine the number of DRE 
units each county would receive. Before delivery, intergovernmental 
agreements were created between the State and each county which 
included terms for the storage, protection and use of the voting 
system. To facilitate deliveries and support, counties were grouped 
into 12 delivery regions. Dates were then established for delivery of 
components of the voting system to the Counties. Site surveys were 
conducted of polling places for assurances of adequate electrical 
supply, structural support of the building and security of the building 
for protection of the voting system.
2.5.3 System Training
    Extensive training and support of local election officials was an 
important factor in the successful initial deployment of equipment, as 
well as of its subsequent use. Election official training on the 
operation of the voting system officials was provided by Diebold. On-
site county training at the request of the county was provided on 
behalf of the Secretary of State's office by the KSU Center for 
Election Systems. Additional regional ``refresher'' sessions were 
conducted by the Secretary of State's State Elections Division. 
Preparations included poll worker training (at least 2 trained per 
precinct for all 2,926 precincts) provided at each county by Diebold. 
Further training was conducted by KSU Center for Election Systems and 
Diebold upon the request of individual county election officials.
2.5.4 Voter Education
    The Secretary of State's Office conducted direct voter education 
and supported outreach conducted by county election officials. A poll 
worker training video was created and used statewide to ensure uniform 
use of the equipment in polls on Election Day. A voter education video 
and a 30-second public service announcement entitled ``Touch the 
Future'' was developed and distributed for use statewide. State, 
regional and county level ``Voter Education Coordinators'' were 
deployed by the Secretary of State's Office to conduct hands-on DRE 
demonstrations in every county. Printed materials were distributed 
through U.S. mail and selected community groups. Comprehensive voter 
education Web site with interactive equipment demonstration was 
established and DRE unit demonstrations were conducted in a variety of 
settings including public meetings, school assemblies, and community 
festivals.
2.5.5 Deployment Outcome
    There were significant improvements in the conduct of the November 
2002 General Election in Georgia. The under-vote rate for the 2002 U.S. 
Senate Election was a historically low 0.86% (a dramatic reduction, 
compared to the 2000 Presidential Election under-vote rate of 3.5% and 
the 1998 U.S. Senate Election under-vote rate of 4.8%). Emphasis on 
election official training, voter education coordination at the 
regional and local level, and enthusiastic participation by state and 
county election officials, poll workers, and voters contributed to this 
success.

Chapter 3--2003 HAVA Status and Steps for Completing Compliance

3.1 2003 HAVA Status
    Georgia's successful use of its uniform statewide electronic voting 
system in the November 2002 General Election put it substantially in 
compliance with Help America Vote Act requirements. Steps already taken 
in anticipation of HAVA legislation are shown in Appendix 1--2003 
Compliance Status. Remaining steps which were still pending completion 
in December, 2003 are also identified in Appendix 1.
3.2 2003 Legislative Steps for Completing Compliance
    To complete compliance with HAVA requirements the Georgia General 
Assembly provided certain authorizations which could be included in the 
HAVA 2003 State Plan. This was accomplished with passage of Senate Bill 
258 (hereinafter ``SB 258''), which was signed by the Governor on June 
2, 2003. Upon approval of SB 258 by the United States Department of 
Justice, the State of Georgia had the statutory framework in place to 
implement all necessary procedures to bring Georgia into full 
compliance with the Help America Vote Act.
    SB 258 revised the following six areas of the Election Code:
    1. Definition of a vote--The Election Code previously provided the 
definition of a vote for each election system used in the State of 
Georgia for federal, state and local elections. SB 258 authorized the 
State Election Board (SEB) to promulgate rules (SEB Rule 183-1-15-.02) 
to consolidate and define a vote as required by HAVA and the 
establishment of a Vote Review Panel to review ballots rejected by 
optical scan tabulators (see O.C.G.A. Sec.  21-2-483(g)(2)(B)).
    2. Military and Overseas Ballots--SB 258 amended the Election Code 
to give responsibility for military and overseas civilian absentee 
voting procedures to the Secretary of State's Office. SB 258 also 
provided that applications for absentee ballots for military and 
overseas voters shall be valid for two election cycles as required for 
those voting under the Uniformed and Overseas Civilians Absentee Voting 
Act (UOCAVA). It also authorized the Secretary of State to adopt a new 
ballot oath created by the Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP).
    3. Registration of first-time voters by mail--SB 258 amended the 
Election Code to provide that citizens who register for the first time 
by U.S. Mail are required to include with that registration application 
one of the forms of identification specified in HAVA. Those who 
register by mail and do not include such documentation will be required 
to present identification at the polling place. Persons who are 
entitled to vote other than in person under federal law, including 
UOCAVA, are exempt from this provision. (HAVA Section 303(b)(3) and 
O.C.G.A. Sec.  21-2-220(c)(2)).
    4. Provisional Ballots--SB 258 amended the Election Code to provide 
that ballots cast during an election with federal candidates on the 
ballot at a polling place during court-ordered extended polling hours 
shall be treated as provisional ballots. It also required county 
election officials to provide notification to the voter regarding how 
to obtain information on whether the provisional ballot was counted and 
also requires county registrars to create a free access system that 
allows the voter to determine whether the provisional ballot was 
counted or not.
    5. ``Overvote'' Instructions--Georgia's DRE voting system precludes 
a voter from casting too many votes for an office (an ``overvote'') at 
the polling place. SB 258 amended the Election Code to provide that the 
absentee ballot instructions for optical scan mail in ballots include 
information about overvotes and explain how to avoid them. SB 258 also 
required that optical

[[Page 54146]]

scan tabulators be programmed to return (reject) ballots containing 
overvotes or improper marks.
    6. State Administrative Complaint Procedures--SB 258 amended the 
Election Code to authorize the Secretary of State (as the designated 
Chief Election Official) to establish and administer an administrative 
complaint procedure for processing complaints related to HAVA Title 
III. (see Secretary of State Rule 590-8-1-.01)
3.3 2003 Administrative Actions and Certifications
    Georgia's 2003 HAVA State Plan provided in Chapter IV reflects that 
Georgia had taken steps to meet and implement the following:
    1. Early Money Out Certification, HAVA Section 101(a): The 2003 
State Plan indicated that Georgia had certified and indicated 
participation for receipt of Title I payments through the GSA Web site. 
Funds were subsequently received.
    2. Accessibility of polling places for disabled voters, HAVA 
Section 101(b)(1)(G): The 2003 State Plan indicated Georgia's intent to 
survey and supervise the improvement of accessibility and quality of 
polling places providing physical access for individuals with 
disabilities. A statewide survey was subsequently made and used as the 
basis to implement a state-administered grant program for polling place 
accessibility improvements.
    3. Toll-free Access System, HAVA Section 101(b)(1)(H): The 2003 
State Plan indicated Georgia's intent to study and evaluate a toll-free 
hotline that voters may use to:
    a. Report possible voting fraud and voting rights violations,
    b. Obtain general election information, and
    c. Access detailed automated information on their voter 
registration status, specific polling place locations, and other 
relevant information.
    Georgia subsequently implemented a toll-free hot line.
    4. Certify Replacement of Punch Card or Lever Voting Machines, HAVA 
Section 102: The 2003 State Plan indicted that Georgia had certified 
that it had replaced punch card and lever voting systems and intended 
to use Section 102 funding to reimburse the State treasury as HAVA 
allowed. Reimbursements were subsequently made.
    5. Membership of Standards Board, HAVA Section 213: Two 
representatives to the Standard's Board were appointed as required. New 
appointments have been made as necessary.
    6. Certification of Use of Title II Requirements Payments, HAVA 
Section 253: The 2003 State Plan indicated Georgia's intent to certify 
that it would use Requirements payments in the manner required. 
Certification was provided and funds were subsequently received.
    7. Administrative Complaint Procedure, HAVA Section 402: The 2003 
State Plan indicated Georgia's intent to implement rules to administer 
the Administrative Complaint Procedure pursuant to authority granted in 
SB 258 to the Secretary of State. Rule 590-8-1-.1 ``Administrative 
Complaint Procedure for Violations of Title III of the Help America 
Vote Act of 2002'' was adopted on May 11, 2004 and published by the EAC 
in the Federal Register, Vol. 70, No.169, Thursday, September 1, 2005 
on page 52183.
    8. Military and Overseas Voting Information Office, HAVA Sections 
702 and 703: The Secretary of State pursuant to SB 258 became the 
Designated Military and Overseas Voting Information Office and assumed 
related responsibilities for reporting to the Election Assistance 
Commission.
    9. State Plan Submitted, HAVA Section 254: The 2003 State Plan 
indicated that it was meeting the requirements of HAVA Section 254. The 
2003 State Plan was submitted on December 10, 2003. It was published by 
the EAC in the Federal Register, Vol. 69, No. 57, Wednesday, March 24, 
2004 on pages 14247 to 14263.

Part Two

Chapter 4--Change and Implementation Summary

    This chapter describes how the 2008 amendments change Georgia's 
HAVA State Plan and report on how Georgia succeeded in carrying out the 
previous state plan (in fulfillment of the Help America vote Act of 
2002, Section 254(a)(12)). The 2008 amendments to the State Plan were 
developed in accordance with HAVA Section 255 and the requirements for 
public notice and comment prescribed in Section 256 of HAVA.
4.1 Overview of Changes to the 2003 State Plan
    Part One of Georgia's 2008 HAVA State Plan, Amended presents the 
historic election reform process that preceded and supported the 
creation of the 2003 HAVA State Plan. Part One is comprised of: Chapter 
1, Historical Election Challenges; Chapter 2, Election Reform (2001 and 
2002); and Chapter 3, 2003 HAVA Status and Steps for Completing 
Compliance. These three chapters contain the background information 
previously contained in Chapters I through IV of the 2003 HAVA State 
Plan.
    Part Two of Georgia's 2008 HAVA State Plan, Amended, is comprised 
of Chapters 4 and 5 which update the previous plan from 2003. Chapter 4 
presents the required summary of changes and reports on how the 2003 
plan was carried out. This chapter is completely new material because 
there have been no amendments to the Georgia HAVA State Plan prior to 
2008.
    Chapter 5, Implementation of the 2008 HAVA State Plan, Amended 
presents plans for future activity. It has 13 sections, one for each 
part of HAVA, Section 254(a) which specifies required parts of the HAVA 
State Plan. This chapter replaces the implementation Chapter V from 
2003 HAVA State Plan. While the 2003 plan focused heavily on the 
initial deployment of voting system components and the related 
education of the public and local election officials, emphasis in the 
2008 plan is on continuing the integrity Georgia's voting system 
(including component replacements) and on replacing the 1993 computer 
system supporting statewide voter registration and state elections 
administration.
4.2 Successful Implementation of the 2003 State Plan
    After enactment of Georgia's Senate Bill 258 on June of 2003, the 
Georgia HAVA State Plan was adopted on December 10, 2003 and published 
by the U.S. EAC in the Federal Register on March 24, 2004. 
Implementation followed immediately in 2004.
    Implementation of Georgia's 2003 HAVA State Plan has been a 
success. Financial reporting on annual expenditures, use of the State's 
five percent funding match, and of Georgia's on-going maintenance of 
effort at or above the State Fiscal Year 2000 amount have been reported 
separately in Georgia's annual Financial Status Report and accompanying 
narrative. Only the replacement of the computer system supporting 
statewide voter registration and election administration was deferred 
from the previous plan for action in the current plan. A summary of 
accomplishments and activity is presented in the following sections.
4.2.1 2004 Implementation of the 2003 State Plan
    1. In 2002 Georgia replaced all punch card and lever voting 
machines through State purchase and deployment of 19,015 DRE voting 
units (approximately one for every 200 active voters) to establish a 
statewide uniform, accessible

[[Page 54147]]

voting system. During 2004 the state was reimbursed under HAVA 
provisions for voting system replacement.
    2. To improve voting machine availability and to support in-person 
absentee voting, an additional 955 DRE voting units were purchased and 
distributed to counties prior to the November 2004 General Election.
    3. The State purchased 24,250 additional flash memory cards for the 
DRE voting units to provide greater efficiency in preparing for 
federal, state, and local runoffs resulting from elections held during 
the 2004 General Election Cycle.
    4. The State acquired state-specific voter access cards and 
supervisor cards for use with DRE voting units purchased in compliance 
with Title II and the voting system standards of Title III Section 201. 
These state-specific cards enabled the State of Georgia to provide 
increased security for the state's uniform voting system.
    5. The State provided election officials in all counties with three 
days of technical support for DRE voting units and GEMS servers 
technology for each of the following elections held in 2004: 
Presidential Preference Primary, Primary Election, Primary Runoff, 
General Election and General Election Runoff.
    6. The Department of State Audits completed an audit of the State 
HAVA Fund.
    7. Ballot building became a cooperative program between the 
Secretary of State's Office and the Kennesaw State University Center 
for Election Systems to support statewide ballot quality and 
timeliness. Related instructional materials were provided on voting 
system components and voting system supplies to all 159 counties for 
use during 2004 federal and state election cycle.
    8. Acceptance testing for all voting equipment and the 
responsibilities for related equipment evaluation, local election 
official training and support, and overall voting system security were 
added to duties that Kennesaw State University Center for Election 
Systems conducts for the Secretary of State.
    9. The State developed and distributed statewide HAVA compliant 
polling place posters, voter registration materials and other forms for 
elections administration.
    10. The State presented training to support implementation to local 
election officials through: The Georgia Election Official Certification 
program; conferences of statewide election official associations 
(Georgia Election Officials Association, Voter Registrars Association 
of Georgia, and Georgia Municipal Association); classes at Kennesaw 
State University Center for Elections; and through regional and county 
level sessions.
    11. The State provided voting system demonstrations and education 
to voters and assisted county officials in doing so as well.
    12. The statewide voter registration system was enhanced with 
system upgrades, and counties were supported with related instruction, 
helpdesk support and connectivity support.
    13. Compliant provisional voting procedures were implemented using 
newly created materials.
    14. Accessibility for voters with disabilities was assessed for 
each polling place by surveying each county. Results were used by the 
Secretary of State to help define training needs, create a training 
video and brochure, and to guide grant participation in the program 
administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for 
polling place accessibility improvements.
    15. The required administrative complaint process was put in place 
through rule-making and implementation by the Secretary of State. 
Information relating to the Administrative Complaint Process can also 
be found on the Secretary of State's Web site at https://
www.sos.state.ga.us.
4.2.2 2005 Implementation of the 2003 State Plan
    1. An optical scan ballot tabulator was purchased and deployed to 
every county to improve the processing of mailed absentee ballots.
    2. Electronic poll books (ExpressPolls) were purchased for each 
polling place to streamline the voting process and further enhance the 
voting system and the preparation of registered voter lists. 
ExpressPolls also replaced the encoder component necessary for 
accessing election ballots on the DRE voting units.
    3. The Secretary of State conducted regional training for the 159 
county election superintendents and their staff on the use of DRE 
voting systems, related HAVA requirements and additional federal laws 
for improved elections administration.
    4. Proper management of the State HAVA Fund was assured through an 
audit by the Department of State Audits.
    5. The State acquired three backup computer servers, memory card 
duplication equipment for ExpressPolls and extended warranty on the DRE 
voting units to ensure proper maintenance in preparation for the 2006 
General Election.
    6. The Secretary of State made initial assessments of the 
availability of vendors who might provide a new voter registration 
system and of the higher level requirements of such a system.
    7. The Secretary of State continued programs for voter education 
and outreach programs; local election official training, voting system 
procedures and security enhancements, ballot building, polling place 
accessibility, and for the voter registration system's security 
monitoring, maintenance, and system upgrades.
4.2.3 2006 Implementation of the 2003 State Plan
    1. Equipment to duplicate flash cards for use in ExpressPolls was 
purchased to improve processing for each election.
    2. The security of the statewide voter registration system was 
improved with the addition of a dynamic security password for database 
access.
    3. The Secretary of State provided local election officials in 
every county with three days of technical support for DRE voting units, 
GEMS servers technology, and electronic poll books (ExpressPolls) in 
each of the following elections: Primary Election, Primary Runoff, 
General Election and General Election Runoff.
    4. Programs continued for voter education and outreach programs; 
local election official training, voting system procedures and security 
enhancements, ballot building, polling place accessibility, and for the 
voter registration system's security monitoring, maintenance, and 
system upgrades.
4.2.4 2007 Implementation of the 2003 State Plan
    1. Electronic poll book (ExpressPolls) were upgraded to facilitate 
uploading to the statewide voter registration system the voters' record 
of having participated in the election and other enhancements 
recommended by local election officials.
    2. The Secretary of State contracted for regional quick response 
teams to be available for technical support to county election 
officials for electronic poll books, voting units and GEMS servers 
technology for the February 2008 Presidential Preference Primary.
    3. Prepared to contract a 2008 statewide program for maintenance 
and limited replacement of GEMS servers used in each county.
    4. Polling place accessibility was again surveyed, program 
materials updated, additional grant funds received, and reimbursements 
were made for approved remedial improvements completed by counties.

[[Page 54148]]

    5. Programs continued for voter education and outreach programs; 
local election official training, voting system procedures and security 
enhancements, ballot building, and for the voter registration system's 
security monitoring, maintenance, and system upgrades.
4.2.5 2008 Implementation of the 2003 State Plan
    1. The Secretary of State contracted for regional quick response 
teams to be available for technical support to county election 
officials for electronic poll books, voting units and GEMS servers 
technology for the following elections held in 2008: Presidential 
Preference Primary, Primary Election, Primary Runoff, General Election 
and General Election Runoff.
    2. A statewide program for maintenance and limited replacement of 
GEMS servers used in each county was carried out.
    3. Programs continued for voter education and outreach programs; 
local election official training, voting system procedures and security 
enhancements, polling place accessibility, ballot building, and for the 
voter registration system's security monitoring, maintenance, and 
system upgrades.

Chapter 5--Implementation of the 2008 HAVA State Plan, Amended

    Chapter 5 presents Georgia's plans for 2008 and following years. It 
consists of 13 parts, one for each section of HAVA 254(a), which sets 
forth the required content of the state plan. Parts 5.1 through 5.13 
each begin with the statutory requirement of that part of the plan and 
the following portion provides Georgia's fulfillment of that 
requirement.
5.1 Use of Requirements Payments
    Part 5.1 of Georgia's State Plan implementation describes ``how the 
State will use the requirements payments to meet the requirements of 
Title III, and if applicable under Section 251(a)(2), to carry out 
other activities to improve administration of elections'' as required 
by Public Law 107-252, Help America Vote Act of 2002, Section 
254(a)(1).
    To continue meeting the requirements of Title III in 2008 and 
following years, Georgia will expend funds for the following purposes:
    1. A portion of the Requirements Payments will be used to conduct 
maintenance on servers used as part of the statewide uniform electronic 
voting system, and to replace aging servers and other voting system 
components.
    2. A portion of the Requirements Payments will be used to replace 
the fifteen-year-old (1993) centralized voter registration system 
currently being used by the State. The new system will allow an easier 
interface and more efficient system functions (e.g., electronic sharing 
and comparison of data among units of government to confirm voter 
eligibility).
    3. Additional expenditures may be made in the following areas:
     Voter education activities;
     Election official training activities;
     Development of Statewide Uniform Poll Worker Training 
Curriculum and Handbook;
     Any other activities allowed under HAVA.
5.2 Distribution and Monitoring
    Part 5.2 of Georgia's State Plan implementation describes ``how the 
State will distribute and monitor the distribution of the requirements 
payment to units of local government or other entities in the State for 
carrying out the activities described in paragraph (1), including a 
description of--(A) the criteria to be used to determine the 
eligibility of such units or entities for receiving the payment; and 
(B) the methods to be used by the State to monitor the performance of 
the units or entities to whom the payment is distributed, consistent 
with the performance goals and measures adopted under paragraph 8'' as 
required by Public Law 107-252, Help America Vote Act of 2002, Section 
254(a)(2).
5.2.1 Distribution of Requirements Payments--Section 254(a)(2)(A)
    As the State's chief election official, the Secretary of State is 
authorized by O.C.G.A. Sec.  21-2-300 to implement and deploy a 
statewide uniform voting system for use by local election officials in 
county, state, and federal elections.
    The Secretary of State will centrally administer expenditures to 
maintain the reliability of the statewide uniform voting system so 
there will be no related fund distributions among counties. In 2008, 
emphasis will be on conducting server maintenance and assessing the 
need to replace individual servers. Servicing, replacement of 
components, and replacement of servers will be as deemed prudent by the 
Secretary of State. The HAVA State Plan, Amended anticipates replacing 
up to all 170 servers used to tabulate votes in each of Georgia's 159 
counties during 2008 and following years, including a small inventory 
for emergency replacement and dedicated training units.
    An individual county will be deemed eligible to receive a 
replacement server when, in the judgment of the Secretary of State, 
replacement of the existing unit is warranted based on considerations 
including, but not limited to, the age of the unit, the service history 
of the unit, the nature of pending repairs, and the continuing 
availability of parts.
    Intergovernmental Agreements for use of voting equipment remain in 
place as do past practices of maintaining inventory listings and access 
logs.
    The Secretary of State will centrally administer expenditures 
supporting the replacement of the 1993 statewide voter registration 
system with a modern system so there will be no related fund 
distributions among counties. Counties will all receive training and 
helpdesk support in the use of the new system.
5.2.2 Monitoring of Requirements Payments--Section 254(a)(2)(B)
    The Secretary of State is responsible for disbursing and tracking 
Title I and Title II funds for the projects to enhance election 
administration.
    If local units of government (or other entities) receive payments, 
the Secretary of State will monitor the performance of those parties 
consistent with performance goals and measures adopted under Section 8 
of this chapter. Allocation request forms and expense codes created to 
implement the 2003 HAVA State Plan would continue to be used, or 
modified, as appropriate to monitor and track HAVA spending. Agreements 
specifying the use of the funds would be entered into prior to 
disbursements being made. Recipients may be required to submit written 
reports to the Secretary of State indicating the status and level of 
success of any project or activity receiving funding through the 
Secretary of State.
    Audits conducted by the State of Georgia Department of Audits and 
Accounts will be used to monitor HAVA expenditures.
5.3 Voter Education and Training
    Part 5.3 of Georgia's State Plan implementation describes ``how the 
State will provide for programs for voter education, election official 
education and training, and poll worker training which will assist the 
State in meeting the requirements of Title III'' as required by Public 
Law 107-252, Help America Vote Act of 2002, Section 254(a)(3).
5.3.1 Voter Education
    Since the 2002 general election, introduction of Georgia's uniform 
statewide voting system, voters have become very familiar with their 
voting equipment through educational

[[Page 54149]]

programs and its use in 3 statewide election cycles.
    Continuing voter education focuses on reaching voters who are new 
to Georgia's voting process. This includes youth who are about to reach 
voting age, as well as newly registered adults. The Secretary of 
State's Web site posts information showing current voting equipment and 
how it is used, to which all voters may refer. In addition, county 
election officials publically display demonstration voting units before 
elections. The Secretary of State will continue to explore voter 
education outreach in cooperation with local election officials and 
non-governmental organizations.
5.3.2 Election Official Training
    The Secretary of State's Office continues to train local election 
officials on the use of Georgia's voting system to properly conduct 
elections. The Secretary of State's Office maintains an election lab 
for voting equipment training and offers local election officials 
regularly scheduled classes on the use of the statewide uniform voting 
system components for specific elections tasks.
    Georgia's election law requires local election officials to become 
certified by completing up to 64 hours of courses approved by the 
Secretary of State. O.C.G.A. 21-2-101. Georgia's certification program 
for local election officials continues to be updated based on lessons 
learned from previous elections. It is anticipated that this program 
will be further expanded and customized for county election 
superintendents and registrars, as well as for municipal election 
officials.
    Georgia election law also requires local election officials to 
obtain on-going training. O.C.G.A. 21-2-100(a). Annual training 
conferences have been, and continue to be, conducted in collaboration 
with statewide election official associations.
    Certification and on-going training programs include the electronic 
voting system; polling place procedures and poll worker training; 
local, state, and federal election laws governing administrative 
duties; disability access initiatives; voter registration and education 
initiatives; new legislation that affects local, state, and federal 
election laws; and any other topics that may enhance the administration 
of elections.
5.4 Voting System Standards
    Part 5.4 of Georgia's State Plan implementation describes ``how the 
State will adopt voting system guidelines and processes, which are 
consistent with the requirements of Section 301'' as required by Public 
Law 107-252, Help America Vote Act of 2002, Section 254(a)(4).
    Voting System Guidelines adopted by the 21st Century Voting 
Commission and used to select the statewide uniform electronic voting 
system used in the 2002 General Election were established in 2001 and 
passed into law by the Georgia General Assembly in 2001 through Senate 
Bill 213. O.C.G.A. 21-2-300.
5.5 Election Fund Established
    Part 5.5 of Georgia's State Plan implementation describes ``how the 
State will establish a Fund described in subsection (b) for purposes of 
administering the State's activities under this part, including 
information on fund management'' as required by Public Law 107-252, 
Help America Vote Act of 2002, Section 254(a)(5).
    With the approval from the State of Georgia Department of Audits, 
the Office of Secretary of State established a separate bank account 
for the Election Fund and has assigned an internal identification code 
for tracking the expenditures. The Election Fund has been designated as 
a federal election fund account that shall only be used for the 
enhancement and continuation of election administration. The Fund also 
contains individual expenditure codes for tracking Section 101, Section 
102, Title II, and matching fund expenditures.
5.6 Proposed Budget
    Part 5.6 of Georgia's State Plan implementation describes ``how the 
State's proposed budget for activities under this part, based on the 
State's best estimates of the costs of such activities and the amount 
of funds to be made available, including specific information on:
    (A) The costs of the activities required to be carried out to meet 
the requirements of Title III;
    (B) The portion of the requirements payment which will be used to 
carry out activities to meet such requirements; and
    (C) The portion of the requirements payment which will be used to 
carry out other activities'' as required by Public Law 107-252, Help 
America Vote Act of 2002, Section 254(a)(6).
5.6.1 Available Funds
    The U.S. Omnibus Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (Pub. L. 
110-161) includes $115 million in ``Requirements Payments'' to help 
states improve the administration of Federal elections under HAVA, 
Title II, Subtitle D, Part 1. Georgia is eligible for $3,169,840 of 
these funds. To receive its allocated portion, Georgia will certify its 
eligibility as prescribed in HAVA Section 253. As part of this 
certification, Georgia will affirm the state's appropriation of the 
required match of at least 5 percent ($166,834).
    As of July 2008 the State of Georgia had approximately $1,137,260 
remaining from earlier HAVA disbursements under Title I and $497,587 
remaining from disbursements under Title II.
    Activities are planned anticipating the full availability of new 
funds appropriated in 2008 and of funds retained from appropriations in 
earlier years.

                                          Table 3--Available HAVA Funds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Federal funds              State match                  Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remaining Title I Funds.................         $1,137,260  (already spent).................         $1,137,260
Remaining Title II Funds................           $497,587  (already spent).................           $497,587
2008 Funds Title II.....................         $3,169,840  $166,834........................         $3,336,674
                                         -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total Funds Available...............  .................  ................................         $4,971,521
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5.6.2 Planned Activities
    To address requirements of Title III in 2008 and following years, 
Georgia will expend funds for the following purposes contingent upon 
priorities discussed below as well as the availability of funds:

[[Page 54150]]



                   Table 4--Planned Activity and Costs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Activity                          Estimated costs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Voting System Maintenance and  $100,000 to $450,000.
 Component Replacement.
2. Centralized Voter              $8 million to $15 million.
 Registration System.
3. Training, Outreach, and Other  $50,000 to $500,000.
 Activities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Voting System Maintenance and Component Replacement: A portion 
of the available funds will be used to conduct maintenance of voting 
systems and to repair or replace components as needed. Many components 
of Georgia's statewide electronic voting system were put in place in 
2002. To ensure the on-going integrity of Georgia's voting system, a 
preventive maintenance program will extend the operational life of 
servers, improve security, and identify any current or potential 
component replacement needs.
    The replacement of aging servers at each county will be a high 
priority. Actions necessary to support county voting system servers in 
an approaching election will have first priority. It is anticipated 
that 168 servers will be replaced during 2008 and the following years 
at a cost of approximately $400,000. This will accommodate one server 
per county, as well as a small State inventory for emergency 
replacement and dedicated training units.
    2. Centralized Voter Registration System: A portion of the 
available funds will be used to replace the fifteen-year old (1993) 
statewide voter registration database currently being used by the 
State. The 1993 system is antiquated and requires extensive 
maintenance. Very high operating costs (by the keystroke) and high 
maintenance costs of this system are an on-going burden. Replacing the 
system will: allow for more effective use of elections funds; help 
ensure the quality and reliability of voter registration data 
management; give every county a more reliable and efficient interface 
with the centralized voter registration system; and allow improved 
integration with related election administration and reporting 
functions.
    Under the 2003 HAVA State Plan, the Secretary of State conducted a 
preliminary assessment of available vendors that were capable of 
replacing the current system with a state-of-the-art system. The 
Secretary of State also compiled a high level requirements analysis for 
the successor system. The next steps of this process are to prepare 
detailed performance specifications, including a functional 
requirements analysis of the new system, and then to proceed with 
building, testing, and deployment.
    The estimated cost of the new system is $8 to $15 million. The use 
of HAVA funds from both Title I and Title II is anticipated.
    3. Training, Outreach, and Other Activities: As described in 
Section 5.3, the State of Georgia will continue to conduct outreach to 
voters who need to be introduced to the voting system used throughout 
the state. In addition, training will continue to be provided to local 
election officials on the use of Georgia's voting system and voter 
registration system to properly conduct elections. Enhancing voters' 
access to processes related to poll location, registration status 
confirmation, complaints, and status of absentee and provisional 
balloting may also be addressed. In the future, consideration may also 
be given to evaluating replacement of Georgia's present electronic 
voting equipment as it begins to age. Use of HAVA funds for these 
activities is contingent upon the availability of funds.
5.7 Maintenance of Effort
    Part 5.7 of Georgia's State Plan implementation describes ``how the 
State, in using the requirements payment, will maintain the 
expenditures of the State for activities funded by the payment at a 
level that is not less than the level of such expenditures maintained 
by the State for the fiscal year prior to November 2000'' as required 
by Public Law 107-252, Help America Vote Act of 2002, Section 
254(a)(7).
    The State of Georgia will continue to maintain or exceed that level 
of election administration expenditures incurred during the State 
Fiscal Year 2000 ($4,598,813) while conducting activities that fall 
under the Title III requirements of the Help America Vote Act.
5.8 Performance Goals and Measures
    Part 5.8 of Georgia's State Plan implementation describes ``how the 
State will adopt performance goals and measures that will be used by 
the State to determine its success and the success of units of local 
government in the State in carrying out the plan, including timetables 
for meeting each of the elements of the Plan, descriptions of the 
criteria the State will use to measure performance and the process used 
to develop such criteria, and a description of which official is to be 
held responsible for ensuring that each performance goal is met'' as 
required by Public Law 107-252, Help America Vote Act of 2002, Section 
254(a)(8).
    In collaboration with local election officials, the Secretary of 
State establishes goals and performance measures to ensure compliance 
with HAVA requirements. Regular reviews of Georgia's election laws, 
policies, and procedures help ensure that election administration and 
voter registration processes are impartial and efficient and subject to 
on-going improvements.
5.8.1 Performance Goals
    For the initial implementation and deployment of the statewide 
uniform electronic voting system Georgia developed milestones and goals 
through the 21st Century Voting Commission as described earlier in 
detail. Milestones remain for having system components in place and 
tested before each election, local election officials trained in a 
timely manner, and for Election Day performance reporting. Scheduling 
for individual milestones is periodically reviewed and subject to 
change by the Secretary of State in consultation with local election 
officials and other parties knowledgable in the matters under 
consideration.
    In 2008, and the years following, maintenance and replacement of 
GEMS servers in each county will be done in a manner to continue past 
performance of the statewide uniform electronic voting system. Any 
additional goals and measures will be addressed by the Secretary of 
St