Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for Massachusetts, 53718-53721 [E8-21486]
Download as PDF
53718
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP
State citation
*
State approval/submittal date
Title/subject
*
*
EPA approval date
*
*
*
Explanation
*
Chapter 116 (Reg 6)—Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Subchapter F—Standard Permits
*
*
Section 116.603 .......
*
*
*
Public Participation in Issuance of Standard Permits.
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–21490 Filed 9–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
09/20/06
9/17/08 [Insert FR page number where
document begins].
*
*
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of October 17, 2008.
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R01–OAR–
2008–0112. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, One
Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston,
MA. EPA requests that if at all possible,
you contact the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding legal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 55
[EPA–R01–OAR–2008–0112; A–1–FRL–
8709–4]
Outer Continental Shelf Air
Regulations Consistency Update for
Massachusetts
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing the updates
of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Air
Regulations proposed in the Federal
Register on February 27, 2008.
Requirements applying to OCS sources
located within 25 miles of states’
seaward boundaries must be updated
periodically to remain consistent with
the requirements of the corresponding
onshore area (COA), as mandated by
section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act
Amendments of 1990 (the Act). The
portion of the OCS air regulations that
is being updated pertains to the
requirements for OCS sources in the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The
intended effect of approving the OCS
requirements for the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts is to regulate emissions
from OCS sources in accordance with
the requirements onshore.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on October 17, 2008. The
incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this rule is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Sep 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
Ida
E. McDonnell, Air Permits, Toxics and
Indoor Air Unit, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street,
Suite 1100 (CAP), Boston, MA 02114–
2023, telephone number (617) 918–
1653, fax number (617) 918–0653, email mcdonnell.ida@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Organization of this document: The
following outline is provided to aid in
locating information in this preamble.
I. Background
II. Public Comment
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Section 328(a) of the Clean Air Act
(the Act) requires that EPA establish
requirements to control air pollution
from OCS sources located within 25
miles of states’ seaward boundaries that
are the same as onshore requirements.
To comply with this statutory mandate,
EPA must incorporate applicable rules
of the corresponding onshore area
(COA) into 40 CFR part 55.
On February 27, 2008 (73 FR 10406),
EPA proposed to incorporate various
Massachusetts air pollution control
requirements into 40 CFR part 55. These
requirements are being promulgated in
response to the submittal of a Notice of
Intent (NOI) on December 7, 2007 by
Cape Wind Associates, LLC of Boston,
Massachusetts. EPA has evaluated the
proposed requirements to ensure that
they are rationally related to the
attainment or maintenance of federal or
state ambient air quality standards or
Part C of title I of the Act, that they are
not designed expressly to prevent
exploration and development of the
OCS and that they are applicable to OCS
sources. 40 CFR 55.1. EPA has also
evaluated the rules to ensure that they
are not arbitrary or capricious. 40 CFR
55.12(e). In addition, EPA has excluded
administrative or procedural rules.
Section 328(a) of the Act and 40 CFR
part 55 limit EPA’s flexibility in
deciding which requirements will be
incorporated into part 55 and prevent
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
EPA from making substantive changes
to the requirements it incorporates. As
a result, EPA may be incorporating rules
into part 55 that do not conform to all
of EPA’s state implementation plan
(SIP) guidance or certain requirements
of the Act. Consistency updates may
result in the inclusion of state or local
rules or regulations into part 55, even
though the same rules may ultimately be
disapproved for inclusion as part of the
SIP. Inclusion in the OCS rule does not
imply that a rule meets the requirements
of the Act for SIP approval, nor does it
imply that the rule will be approved by
EPA for inclusion in the SIP.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
II. Public Comment
EPA received comments on the
proposed consistency update from Cape
Wind Associates. Summaries of those
comments and EPA’s responses are as
follows.
Comment: Cape Wind Associates
(CWA) recognizes EPA’s approach to the
consistency review is to include all state
requirements that could potentially
apply to any OCS source. CWA wants
EPA to confirm that the ultimate
applicability of any specific rule to Cape
Wind is to be determined on a case-bycase basis, consistent with the unique
attributes of each OCS source, COA and
the mandate to attain and maintain
ambient air quality.
Response: Section 328 of the Act
requires that for sources located within
25 miles of a state’s seaward boundary,
the requirements shall be the same as
would be applicable if the sources were
located in the corresponding onshore
area. EPA’s action specifies the OCS
requirements that will apply to any OCS
source for which Massachusetts is the
COA. The intended effect of approving
the OCS requirements is to regulate
emissions from OCS sources in
accordance with the requirements
onshore, to the extent those
requirements are applicable to OCS
sources and as modified by the
requirements of section 328 and 40 CFR
part 55. In updating 40 CFR part 55,
EPA reviewed the Commonwealth’s
rules to ensure that they are rationally
related to the attainment or maintenance
of federal or state ambient air quality
standards or part C of title I of the Act,
that they are not designed expressly to
prevent exploration and development of
the OCS and that they are applicable to
OCS sources. By contrast, when
permitting a source, EPA determines
which requirements apply to that
source. Therefore, upon receipt of a
permit application for any proposed
OCS source (including Cape Wind), EPA
will determine which of the regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Sep 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
included in part 55 apply to that OCS
source.
Comment: CWA would like EPA in
the consistency update to devote
substantial attention to the nature and
environmental policy implications of
the type of construction-stage sources
presented in the NOI, and the
subsequent and resulting benefits of an
operating renewable energy project to
air quality attainment and maintenance.
Response: As stated above, the
purpose of the consistency update is to
establish OCS requirements that
regulate emissions from OCS sources in
accordance with the requirements
onshore. Although the proposed
consistency update was triggered by
Cape Wind’s Notice of Intent, a part 55
consistency update applies not just to
the OCS source identified in the Notice
of Intent, but rather any source located
in the OCS for which the identified
onshore area (in this case,
Massachusetts) is the COA.
Consequently, EPA does not consider
the characteristics of particular
proposed OCS sources in determining
which state requirements are applicable
on the OCS.
Comment: CWA suggests in its
comments that the consistency update
may conflict with regulations currently
being developed by the Minerals
Management Service (‘‘MMS’’) pursuant
to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Pub.
L. 109–58, codified in relevant part at 43
U.S.C. 1337(p)). CWA expresses general
concern with the prospect of
inconsistent regulatory actions and
comments that the consistency update
should be treated as a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866 (58 FR 51735) and a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355).
Response: EPA has considered the
potential for the consistency update to
conflict with the actions of MMS and
determined that the consistency update
does not meet the definition of
significant regulatory action under
section 3 of Executive Order 12866
because it is not likely to ‘‘[c]reate a
serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency.’’
The consistency update simply
updates the existing requirements for
controlling air pollution from OCS
sources to make them consistent with
rules in the corresponding onshore areas
as specifically required by section 328
of the Act. This action is not
discretionary on the part of EPA. The
authority of MMS to regulate leases,
easements, or rights-of-way on the outer
continental shelf that ‘‘produce or
support [the] production, transportation,
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53719
or transmission of energy from sources
other than oil or natural gas’’ under the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 does not
present a conflict. See 43 U.S.C.
1337(p)(1)(C). The Energy Policy Act
explicitly states that ‘‘[n]othing in this
subsection displaces, supersedes, limits,
or modifies the jurisdiction,
responsibility, or authority of any
Federal or State agency under any other
Federal law.’’ 43 U.S.C. 1337(p)(9). As
EPA is required by the Clean Air Act to
issue the consistency update, the
consistency update is enacted under an
authority not displaced by the authority
granted to the MMS and no actual
conflict will occur.
Since EPA proposed its consistency
update, MMS has issued its proposed
regulations. See Alternative Energy and
Alternate Uses of Existing Facilities on
the Outer Continental Shelf, 73 FR
39376 (July 9, 2008). EPA has found no
possible conflict between this action
and MMS’s proposed regulations.
Indeed, MMS’s proposed rule
specifically states that proposed OCS
sources (other than those in the western
Gulf of Mexico, for which MMS itself
establishes the air pollution
requirements) must comply with the Act
and 40 CFR part 55. See 73 FR at 39384,
39429, 39431, 39498. Consequently,
there is no conflict. Because the
consistency update will not conflict
with actions taken by MMS pursuant to
the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the
consistency update is not an
‘‘inconsistent, incompatible, or
duplicative’’ regulation and is not
rendered a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13211 outlines
additional procedures to be followed
when a regulation is both a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 and is either ‘‘likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy,’’ or is
designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs. Since the consistency update is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, it is not a
significant energy action under
Executive Order 13211.
Finally, even if the consistency
update were a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866,
EPA has no reason to believe that
updating the existing requirements for
controlling air pollution from outer
continental shelf sources to make them
consistent with rules already applied to
sources in the corresponding onshore
areas would be ‘‘likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy’’ within
the meaning of section 4(b)(1)(ii) of
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
53720
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 13211. Therefore, even
if the consistency update were a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, it would not be
a significant energy action under
Executive Order 13211.
III. EPA Action
In this document, EPA takes final
action to incorporate the proposed
changes into 40 CFR part 55. No
changes were made to the proposed
action. EPA is approving the proposed
action under section 328(a)(1) of the
Act, 42 U.S.C. 7627. Section 328(a) of
the Act requires that EPA establish
requirements to control air pollution
from OCS sources located within 25
miles of states’ seaward boundaries that
are the same as onshore requirements.
To comply with this statutory mandate,
EPA must incorporate applicable
onshore rules into part 55 as they exist
onshore.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to establish
requirements to control air pollution
from OCS sources located within 25
miles of States’ seaward boundaries that
are the same as onshore air control
requirements. To comply with this
statutory mandate, EPA must
incorporate applicable onshore rules
into part 55 as they exist onshore. 42
U.S.C. 7627(a)(1); 40 CFR 55.12. Thus,
in promulgating OCS consistency
updates, EPA’s role is to maintain
consistency between OCS regulations
and the regulations of onshore areas,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
action simply updates the existing OCS
requirements to make them consistent
with requirements onshore, without the
exercise of any policy discretion by
EPA. For that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Sep 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because it does not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
nor does it impose substantial direct
compliance costs on tribal governments,
nor preempt tribal law.
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq., OMB has approved the
information collection requirements
contained in 40 CFR part 55 and, by
extension, this update to the rules, and
has assigned OMB control number
2060–0249. Notice of OMB’s approval of
EPA Information Collection Request
(‘‘ICR’’) No. 1601.06 was published in
the Federal Register on March 1, 2006
(71 FR 10499–10500). The approval
expires January 31, 2009. As EPA
previously indicated (70 FR 65897–
65898 (November 1, 2005)), the annual
public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for collection of information
under 40 CFR part 55 is estimated to
average 549 hours per response. Burden
means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal
agency. This includes the time needed
to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting,
validating, and verifying information,
processing and maintaining
information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able
to respond to a collection of
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and are
identified on the form and/or
instrument, if applicable. In addition,
the table in 40 CFR part 9 of currently
approved OMB control numbers for
various regulations lists the regulatory
citations for the information
requirements contained in 40 CFR part
55.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by November 17,
2008. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 55
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Continental Shelf,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 17, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Section 4.03: Annual Compliance Assurance
Fee (Effective 10/19/2007)
Dated: August 18, 2008.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
title 40, chapter I of the Code of Federal
Regulations, is amended as follows:
■
PART 55—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 55
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Section 328 of the Act (42
U.S.C. 7401, et seq.) as amended by Public
Law 101–549.
2. Section 55.14 is amended as
follows:
■ a. By adding paragraph (d)(11).
■ b. In paragraph (e) introductory text
by adding a new address after the words
‘‘regional offices:’’.
■ c. By adding paragraph (e)(11).
■
§ 55.14 Requirements that apply to OCS
sources located within 25 miles of States’
seaward boundaries, by State.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(11) Massachusetts.
(i) 40 CFR part 52, subpart W.
(ii) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * * U.S.EPA, Region 1
(Massachusetts) One Congress Street,
Boston, MA 02114–2023 * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(11) Massachusetts.
(i) State requirements.
(A) Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Requirements Applicable to OCS
Sources, December 28, 2007.
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) Local requirements.
(A) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Appendix A to CFR part 55 is
amended by adding an entry for
Massachusetts in alphabetical order to
read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 55—Listing of State
and Local Requirements Incorporated
by Reference Into Part 55, by State
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Massachusetts
(a) State requirements.
(1) The following Commonwealth of
Massachusetts requirements are applicable to
OCS Sources, December 28, 2007,
Commonwealth of Massachusetts—
Department of Environmental Protection. The
following sections of 310 CMR 4.00, 310
CMR 6.00, 310 CMR 7.00 and 310 CMR 8.00:
310 CMR 4.00: Timely Action Schedule and
Fee Provisions
Section 4.01: Purpose, Authority and General
Provisions (Effective 10/19/2007)
Section 4.02: Definitions (Effective 10/19/
2007)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:59 Sep 16, 2008
Jkt 214001
53721
Section 7.00: Appendix C (Effective 12/28/
2007)
310 CMR 6.00: Ambient Air Quality
Standards for the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts
Section 6.01: Definitions (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 6.02: Scope (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 6.03: Reference Conditions (Effective
12/28/2007)
Section 6.04: Standards (Effective 12/28/
2007)
310 CMR 8.00: The Prevention and/or
Abatement of Air Pollution Episode and Air
Pollution Incident Emergencies
Section 8.01: Introduction (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 8.02: Definitions (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 8.03: Air Pollution Episode Criteria
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.04: Air Pollution Episode Potential
Advisories (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.05: Declaration of Air Pollution
Episodes and Incidents (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 8.06: Termination of Air Pollution
Episodes and Incident Emergencies
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.07: Emission Reductions Strategies
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.08: Emission Reduction Plans
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.15: Air Pollution Incident
Emergency (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.30: Severability (Effective 12/28/
2007)
(2) [Reserved]
310 CMR 7.00: Air Pollution Control
Section 7.00: Statutory Authority; Legend;
Preamble; Definitions (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 7.01: General Regulations to Prevent
Air Pollution (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.02: U Plan Approval and Emission
Limitations (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.03: U Plan Approval Exemptions:
Construction Requirements (Effective 12/
28/2007)
Section 7.04: U Fossil Fuel Utilization
Facilities (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.05: U Fuels All Districts (Effective
12/28/2007)
Section 7.06: U Visible Emissions (Effective
12/28/2007)
Section 7.07: U Open Burning (Effective 12/
28/2007)
Section 7.08: U Incinerators (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 7.09: U Dust, Odor, Construction and
Demolition (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.11: U Transportation Media
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.12: U Source Registration (Effective
12/28/2007)
Section 7.13: U Stack Testing (Effective 12/
28/2007)
Section 7.14: U Monitoring Devices and
Reports (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.15: U Asbestos (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 7.18: U Volatile and Halogenated
Organic Compounds (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.19: U Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for Sources of Oxides
of Nitrogen (NOX) (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.21: Sulfur Dioxide Emissions
Limitations (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.22: Sulfur Dioxide Emissions
Reductions for the Purpose of Reducing
Acid Rain (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.24: U Organic Material Storage and
Distribution (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.25: U Best Available Controls for
Consumer and Commercial Products
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.26: Industry Performance
Standards (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.27: NOX Allowance Program
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.28: NOX Allowance Trading
Program (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.29: Emissions Standards for Power
Plants (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.60: U Severability (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 7.00: Appendix A (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 7.00: Appendix B (Effective 12/28/
2007)
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–21486 Filed 9–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0791; FRL–8374–1]
Inert Ingredient: Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance for
amylopectin, acid-hydrolyzed,
1-octenylbutanedioate and for
amylopectin, hydrogen
1-octadecenylbutanedioate
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes
exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of amylopectin,
acid-hydrolyzed, 1-octenylbutanedioate
(CAS Reg. No. 113894–85–2) and for
amylopectin, hydrogen 1octadecenylbutanedioate (CAS Reg. No.
125109–81–1) when used in
antimicrobial formulations (food-contact
surface sanitizing solutions) under 40
CFR 180.940(a), and when used in
accordance with good agricultural or
manufacturing practice under 40 CFR
180.950. The petitioner, Lewis &
Harrison, LLC, on behalf of Alco
Chemical, submitted a petition to EPA
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by
the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
(FQPA), requesting an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance. This
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 17, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53718-53721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21486]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 55
[EPA-R01-OAR-2008-0112; A-1-FRL-8709-4]
Outer Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for
Massachusetts
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing the updates of the Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS) Air Regulations proposed in the Federal Register on February 27,
2008. Requirements applying to OCS sources located within 25 miles of
states' seaward boundaries must be updated periodically to remain
consistent with the requirements of the corresponding onshore area
(COA), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act Amendments
of 1990 (the Act). The portion of the OCS air regulations that is being
updated pertains to the requirements for OCS sources in the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The intended effect of approving the OCS
requirements for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is to regulate
emissions from OCS sources in accordance with the requirements onshore.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on October 17, 2008. The
incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this rule
is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of October 17,
2008.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R01-OAR-2008-0112. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida E. McDonnell, Air Permits, Toxics
and Indoor Air Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New
England Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CAP), Boston,
MA 02114-2023, telephone number (617) 918-1653, fax number (617) 918-
0653, e-mail mcdonnell.ida@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Organization of this document: The following outline is provided to
aid in locating information in this preamble.
I. Background
II. Public Comment
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Section 328(a) of the Clean Air Act (the Act) requires that EPA
establish requirements to control air pollution from OCS sources
located within 25 miles of states' seaward boundaries that are the same
as onshore requirements. To comply with this statutory mandate, EPA
must incorporate applicable rules of the corresponding onshore area
(COA) into 40 CFR part 55.
On February 27, 2008 (73 FR 10406), EPA proposed to incorporate
various Massachusetts air pollution control requirements into 40 CFR
part 55. These requirements are being promulgated in response to the
submittal of a Notice of Intent (NOI) on December 7, 2007 by Cape Wind
Associates, LLC of Boston, Massachusetts. EPA has evaluated the
proposed requirements to ensure that they are rationally related to the
attainment or maintenance of federal or state ambient air quality
standards or Part C of title I of the Act, that they are not designed
expressly to prevent exploration and development of the OCS and that
they are applicable to OCS sources. 40 CFR 55.1. EPA has also evaluated
the rules to ensure that they are not arbitrary or capricious. 40 CFR
55.12(e). In addition, EPA has excluded administrative or procedural
rules.
Section 328(a) of the Act and 40 CFR part 55 limit EPA's
flexibility in deciding which requirements will be incorporated into
part 55 and prevent
[[Page 53719]]
EPA from making substantive changes to the requirements it
incorporates. As a result, EPA may be incorporating rules into part 55
that do not conform to all of EPA's state implementation plan (SIP)
guidance or certain requirements of the Act. Consistency updates may
result in the inclusion of state or local rules or regulations into
part 55, even though the same rules may ultimately be disapproved for
inclusion as part of the SIP. Inclusion in the OCS rule does not imply
that a rule meets the requirements of the Act for SIP approval, nor
does it imply that the rule will be approved by EPA for inclusion in
the SIP.
II. Public Comment
EPA received comments on the proposed consistency update from Cape
Wind Associates. Summaries of those comments and EPA's responses are as
follows.
Comment: Cape Wind Associates (CWA) recognizes EPA's approach to
the consistency review is to include all state requirements that could
potentially apply to any OCS source. CWA wants EPA to confirm that the
ultimate applicability of any specific rule to Cape Wind is to be
determined on a case-by-case basis, consistent with the unique
attributes of each OCS source, COA and the mandate to attain and
maintain ambient air quality.
Response: Section 328 of the Act requires that for sources located
within 25 miles of a state's seaward boundary, the requirements shall
be the same as would be applicable if the sources were located in the
corresponding onshore area. EPA's action specifies the OCS requirements
that will apply to any OCS source for which Massachusetts is the COA.
The intended effect of approving the OCS requirements is to regulate
emissions from OCS sources in accordance with the requirements onshore,
to the extent those requirements are applicable to OCS sources and as
modified by the requirements of section 328 and 40 CFR part 55. In
updating 40 CFR part 55, EPA reviewed the Commonwealth's rules to
ensure that they are rationally related to the attainment or
maintenance of federal or state ambient air quality standards or part C
of title I of the Act, that they are not designed expressly to prevent
exploration and development of the OCS and that they are applicable to
OCS sources. By contrast, when permitting a source, EPA determines
which requirements apply to that source. Therefore, upon receipt of a
permit application for any proposed OCS source (including Cape Wind),
EPA will determine which of the regulations included in part 55 apply
to that OCS source.
Comment: CWA would like EPA in the consistency update to devote
substantial attention to the nature and environmental policy
implications of the type of construction-stage sources presented in the
NOI, and the subsequent and resulting benefits of an operating
renewable energy project to air quality attainment and maintenance.
Response: As stated above, the purpose of the consistency update is
to establish OCS requirements that regulate emissions from OCS sources
in accordance with the requirements onshore. Although the proposed
consistency update was triggered by Cape Wind's Notice of Intent, a
part 55 consistency update applies not just to the OCS source
identified in the Notice of Intent, but rather any source located in
the OCS for which the identified onshore area (in this case,
Massachusetts) is the COA. Consequently, EPA does not consider the
characteristics of particular proposed OCS sources in determining which
state requirements are applicable on the OCS.
Comment: CWA suggests in its comments that the consistency update
may conflict with regulations currently being developed by the Minerals
Management Service (``MMS'') pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 2005
(Pub. L. 109-58, codified in relevant part at 43 U.S.C. 1337(p)). CWA
expresses general concern with the prospect of inconsistent regulatory
actions and comments that the consistency update should be treated as a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735) and a ``significant energy action'' under Executive Order 13211
(66 FR 28355).
Response: EPA has considered the potential for the consistency
update to conflict with the actions of MMS and determined that the
consistency update does not meet the definition of significant
regulatory action under section 3 of Executive Order 12866 because it
is not likely to ``[c]reate a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency.''
The consistency update simply updates the existing requirements for
controlling air pollution from OCS sources to make them consistent with
rules in the corresponding onshore areas as specifically required by
section 328 of the Act. This action is not discretionary on the part of
EPA. The authority of MMS to regulate leases, easements, or rights-of-
way on the outer continental shelf that ``produce or support [the]
production, transportation, or transmission of energy from sources
other than oil or natural gas'' under the Energy Policy Act of 2005
does not present a conflict. See 43 U.S.C. 1337(p)(1)(C). The Energy
Policy Act explicitly states that ``[n]othing in this subsection
displaces, supersedes, limits, or modifies the jurisdiction,
responsibility, or authority of any Federal or State agency under any
other Federal law.'' 43 U.S.C. 1337(p)(9). As EPA is required by the
Clean Air Act to issue the consistency update, the consistency update
is enacted under an authority not displaced by the authority granted to
the MMS and no actual conflict will occur.
Since EPA proposed its consistency update, MMS has issued its
proposed regulations. See Alternative Energy and Alternate Uses of
Existing Facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf, 73 FR 39376 (July
9, 2008). EPA has found no possible conflict between this action and
MMS's proposed regulations. Indeed, MMS's proposed rule specifically
states that proposed OCS sources (other than those in the western Gulf
of Mexico, for which MMS itself establishes the air pollution
requirements) must comply with the Act and 40 CFR part 55. See 73 FR at
39384, 39429, 39431, 39498. Consequently, there is no conflict. Because
the consistency update will not conflict with actions taken by MMS
pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the consistency update is
not an ``inconsistent, incompatible, or duplicative'' regulation and is
not rendered a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Executive Order 13211 outlines additional procedures to be followed
when a regulation is both a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 and is either ``likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy,'' or is
designated by the Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs. Since the consistency update is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, it is not a significant
energy action under Executive Order 13211.
Finally, even if the consistency update were a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, EPA has no reason to
believe that updating the existing requirements for controlling air
pollution from outer continental shelf sources to make them consistent
with rules already applied to sources in the corresponding onshore
areas would be ``likely to have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy'' within the meaning of section
4(b)(1)(ii) of
[[Page 53720]]
Executive Order 13211. Therefore, even if the consistency update were a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, it would not
be a significant energy action under Executive Order 13211.
III. EPA Action
In this document, EPA takes final action to incorporate the
proposed changes into 40 CFR part 55. No changes were made to the
proposed action. EPA is approving the proposed action under section
328(a)(1) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7627. Section 328(a) of the Act
requires that EPA establish requirements to control air pollution from
OCS sources located within 25 miles of states' seaward boundaries that
are the same as onshore requirements. To comply with this statutory
mandate, EPA must incorporate applicable onshore rules into part 55 as
they exist onshore.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to establish
requirements to control air pollution from OCS sources located within
25 miles of States' seaward boundaries that are the same as onshore air
control requirements. To comply with this statutory mandate, EPA must
incorporate applicable onshore rules into part 55 as they exist
onshore. 42 U.S.C. 7627(a)(1); 40 CFR 55.12. Thus, in promulgating OCS
consistency updates, EPA's role is to maintain consistency between OCS
regulations and the regulations of onshore areas, provided that they
meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action simply
updates the existing OCS requirements to make them consistent with
requirements onshore, without the exercise of any policy discretion by
EPA. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, nor does it impose
substantial direct compliance costs on tribal governments, nor preempt
tribal law.
Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq., OMB has approved the information collection requirements
contained in 40 CFR part 55 and, by extension, this update to the
rules, and has assigned OMB control number 2060-0249. Notice of OMB's
approval of EPA Information Collection Request (``ICR'') No. 1601.06
was published in the Federal Register on March 1, 2006 (71 FR 10499-
10500). The approval expires January 31, 2009. As EPA previously
indicated (70 FR 65897-65898 (November 1, 2005)), the annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for collection of information under
40 CFR part 55 is estimated to average 549 hours per response. Burden
means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed
to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and are identified on
the form and/or instrument, if applicable. In addition, the table in 40
CFR part 9 of currently approved OMB control numbers for various
regulations lists the regulatory citations for the information
requirements contained in 40 CFR part 55.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 17, 2008. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 55
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Continental Shelf, Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.
[[Page 53721]]
Dated: August 18, 2008.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations, is amended as follows:
PART 55--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 55 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Section 328 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.) as
amended by Public Law 101-549.
0
2. Section 55.14 is amended as follows:
0
a. By adding paragraph (d)(11).
0
b. In paragraph (e) introductory text by adding a new address after the
words ``regional offices:''.
0
c. By adding paragraph (e)(11).
Sec. 55.14 Requirements that apply to OCS sources located within 25
miles of States' seaward boundaries, by State.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(11) Massachusetts.
(i) 40 CFR part 52, subpart W.
(ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(e) * * * U.S.EPA, Region 1 (Massachusetts) One Congress Street,
Boston, MA 02114-2023 * * *
* * * * *
(11) Massachusetts.
(i) State requirements.
(A) Commonwealth of Massachusetts Requirements Applicable to OCS
Sources, December 28, 2007.
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) Local requirements.
(A) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
3. Appendix A to CFR part 55 is amended by adding an entry for
Massachusetts in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 55--Listing of State and Local Requirements
Incorporated by Reference Into Part 55, by State
* * * * *
Massachusetts
(a) State requirements.
(1) The following Commonwealth of Massachusetts requirements are
applicable to OCS Sources, December 28, 2007, Commonwealth of
Massachusetts--Department of Environmental Protection. The following
sections of 310 CMR 4.00, 310 CMR 6.00, 310 CMR 7.00 and 310 CMR
8.00:
310 CMR 4.00: Timely Action Schedule and Fee Provisions
Section 4.01: Purpose, Authority and General Provisions (Effective
10/19/2007)
Section 4.02: Definitions (Effective 10/19/2007)
Section 4.03: Annual Compliance Assurance Fee (Effective 10/19/2007)
310 CMR 6.00: Ambient Air Quality Standards for the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts
Section 6.01: Definitions (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 6.02: Scope (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 6.03: Reference Conditions (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 6.04: Standards (Effective 12/28/2007)
310 CMR 7.00: Air Pollution Control
Section 7.00: Statutory Authority; Legend; Preamble; Definitions
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.01: General Regulations to Prevent Air Pollution
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.02: U Plan Approval and Emission Limitations (Effective
12/28/2007)
Section 7.03: U Plan Approval Exemptions: Construction Requirements
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.04: U Fossil Fuel Utilization Facilities (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 7.05: U Fuels All Districts (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.06: U Visible Emissions (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.07: U Open Burning (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.08: U Incinerators (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.09: U Dust, Odor, Construction and Demolition (Effective
12/28/2007)
Section 7.11: U Transportation Media (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.12: U Source Registration (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.13: U Stack Testing (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.14: U Monitoring Devices and Reports (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 7.15: U Asbestos (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.18: U Volatile and Halogenated Organic Compounds
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.19: U Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for
Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 7.21: Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Limitations (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 7.22: Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Reductions for the Purpose of
Reducing Acid Rain (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.24: U Organic Material Storage and Distribution (Effective
12/28/2007)
Section 7.25: U Best Available Controls for Consumer and Commercial
Products (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.26: Industry Performance Standards (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.27: NOX Allowance Program (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 7.28: NOX Allowance Trading Program (Effective
12/28/2007)
Section 7.29: Emissions Standards for Power Plants (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 7.60: U Severability (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.00: Appendix A (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.00: Appendix B (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 7.00: Appendix C (Effective 12/28/2007)
310 CMR 8.00: The Prevention and/or Abatement of Air Pollution Episode
and Air Pollution Incident Emergencies
Section 8.01: Introduction (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.02: Definitions (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.03: Air Pollution Episode Criteria (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.04: Air Pollution Episode Potential Advisories (Effective
12/28/2007)
Section 8.05: Declaration of Air Pollution Episodes and Incidents
(Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.06: Termination of Air Pollution Episodes and Incident
Emergencies (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.07: Emission Reductions Strategies (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.08: Emission Reduction Plans (Effective 12/28/2007)
Section 8.15: Air Pollution Incident Emergency (Effective 12/28/
2007)
Section 8.30: Severability (Effective 12/28/2007)
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-21486 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P