Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Recordkeeping and Reporting, 53390-53392 [E8-21597]
Download as PDF
53390
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 16, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
statement. The proposal would require
an amendment to FTA’s school bus
operations regulations, not its
interpretation of those regulations, and
FTA would have to adopt such a
scheme through a rulemaking.
With respect to the proposed
exemptions, FTA believes that, if
adopted, these proposals would
constitute substantive changes to the
text of FTA’s school bus operations
regulations. FTA already lists a series of
allowable exemptions at 49 CFR 605.11.
Thus, FTA believes that it cannot
appropriately consider these
exemptions within the rubric of this
final policy statement.
Finally, FTA believes that the
comments suggesting a negotiated
rulemaking fall outside the scope of this
policy statement. FTA will
appropriately address any comments
regarding a notice of proposed
rulemaking in that forum.
IV. Final FTA Policy
A. Purpose of Final FTA Policy
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
In the final policy set forth below,
FTA clarifies its guidance regarding
FTA’s interpretation of its school bus
operations regulations under 49 CFR
part 605 in light of the Court’s decision
in Rochester-Genesee Regional
Transportation Authority. FTA respects
the Court’s decision in the Western
District of New York. However, FTA
finds that the Court’s decision is
problematic because, if applied
elsewhere in the United States, it could
obstruct FTA’s ability to execute and
implement Congress’s school bus
prohibition and Congress’s express
intent regarding that prohibition.
Therefore, FTA issues this final policy
statement to clarify the status of FTA’s
guidance regarding its interpretation of
its school bus operations regulations
under 49 CFR part 605, and to resolve,
for jurisdictions outside of the Western
District of New York, conflicting issues
between FTA’s school bus operations
policy and the Court’s decision in
Rochester-Genesee Regional
Transportation Authority.
Additionally, FTA intends to issue
expeditiously a notice of proposed
rulemaking to provide clearer
definitions of ‘‘tripper service’’ and
‘‘school bus operations,’’ as well as
generally to update the existing school
bus regulation.
B. Tripper Service
With respect to a grantee’s regularly
scheduled public transportation service,
FTA shall interpret the definition of
‘‘tripper service’’ under 49 CFR 605.3(b),
as it historically has interpreted that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:22 Sep 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
definition, to allow a grantee to (1)
utilize ‘‘various fare collections or
subsidy systems,’’ (2) modify the
frequency of service, and (3) make de
minimis route alterations from route
paths in the immediate vicinity of
schools to stops located at or in close
proximity to the schools. For example,
a grantee may provide more frequent
service on an existing route to
accommodate increased student
ridership before and after school.
Furthermore, a grantee may alter route
paths to accommodate the needs of
school students by making de minimis
route alterations from route paths to
drop off and pick up students at stops
located on school grounds or in close
proximity to the schools.
FTA believes that this policy
regarding its interpretation of the
definition of ‘‘tripper service’’ is
consistent with both the statutory
language and the language of 49 CFR
605.3(b). This policy permits only the
type of design or modification
accommodations that FTA historically
has allowed and does not represent a
departure from FTA’s prior guidance on
this matter.
C. ‘‘Exclusive’’ School Bus Operations
To effectuate the intent of Congress
when it enacted its school bus
operations prohibition now codified at
49 U.S.C. 5323(f), FTA shall interpret
the term ‘‘exclusively’’ in the definition
of ‘‘school bus operations’’ under 49
CFR 605.3(b) to encompass any service
that a reasonable person would
conclude was primarily designed to
accommodate students and school
personnel, and only incidentally to
serve the nonstudent general public.
Additionally, grantees may create new
routes to serve school students and
personnel if a reasonable person would
conclude that the grantees designed the
routes to serve some segment of the
nonstudent general public.
FTA believes that maintaining this
interpretation of ‘‘exclusively’’ is
consistent with the legislative history on
the issue and would allow FTA
effectively to implement the express
intent of Congress, which is to prevent
unfair competition between Federally
funded grantees and private school bus
operators. This policy does not
represent a departure from FTA’s prior
guidance on this matter, and is merely
intended to provide FTA with
additional flexibility when interpreting
49 U.S.C. 5323(f) and 49 CFR 605.3(b)
and effectuating the intent of Congress.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Issued in Washington, DC on this 11th day
of September 2008.
James S. Simpson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8–21601 Filed 9–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 080225265–81165–02]
RIN 0648–AW28
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Recordkeeping and
Reporting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS issues regulations to
exempt groundfish catcher/processors
and motherships equipped with an
operational vessel monitoring system
transmitter from check–in/check–out
requirements. This action reduces
paperwork requirements for certain
catcher/processors and motherships and
changes the definitions for ‘‘active’’
period for motherships and trawl,
longline, and pot gear catcher/
processors. This action reduces
administrative costs for both the fishing
industry and NMFS.
DATES: Effective October 16, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the burden-hour estimates or
other aspects of the collection–of–
information requirements contained in
this final rule may be submitted to
NMFS Alaska Region, P. O. Box 21668,
Juneau, AK 99802 or the Alaska Region
NMFS website at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov and by email to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patsy A. Bearden, 907–586–7008.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NMFS manages the U.S. groundfish
fisheries of the exclusive economic zone
(EEZ) off Alaska under the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area and the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Gulf of Alaska (FMPs). The North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 16, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
prepared the FMPs pursuant to the
Magnuson–Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, 16
U.S.C. 1801 et seq. (Magnuson–Stevens
Act). Regulations implementing the
FMPs appear at 50 CFR part 679.
General regulations that pertain to U.S.
fisheries appear at subpart H of 50 CFR
part 600.
Check–in/check–out Reports
A fish processor uses a check–in/
check–out report to notify NMFS that it
will participate or cease participation in
a groundfish fishery. The check–in/
check–out report also tells NMFS where
fishing will occur (if a catcher/
processor) or where groundfish will be
received (if a mothership). NMFS
inseason managers originally used the
check–in/check–out information to
monitor fishing capacity and effort. The
information also was used by the United
States Coast Guard to monitor catcher/
processor and mothership vessel
location.
According to regulations at § 679.5(h),
catcher/processor and mothership
operators, and shoreside processor and
stationary floating processor managers
must submit check–in/check–out
reports on behalf of the processor. This
action exempts operators of catcher/
processors and motherships equipped
with an operational vessel monitoring
system (VMS) transmitter from
submitting a check–in/check–out report
to NMFS. Specifically, this action
revises the text at § 679.5(h) to state that
a catcher/processor or mothership that
is not carrying onboard an operational
VMS transmitter that meets the
requirements of § 679.28(f) must submit
check–in/check–out reports.
This action does not change the
check–in/check–out report submission
requirement for shoreside processors
and stationary floating processors.
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Vessel Monitoring System (VMS)
Over the past ten years, NMFS has
added the requirement for VMS use in
many fishery management programs to
monitor vessel location. VMS
transmitters combine global positioning
systems and satellite communications to
automatically provide precise location
reports to NMFS several times each
hour. NMFS requires VMS
transmissions when a vessel is operating
in:
• Any reporting area off Alaska while
any fishery requiring VMS for which the
vessel has a species and gear
endorsement on its Federal Fisheries
Permit is open;
• The Aleutian Islands subarea;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:22 Sep 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
• The Gulf of Alaska (GOA) and
mobile bottom contact gear is onboard;
and
• The Central GOA Rockfish Pilot
Program.
Active and Inactive Status
NMFS’ current recordkeeping and
reporting regulations are based on the
active/inactive status of fishery
participants. Processors, including
motherships and trawl, longline, and
pot gear catcher/processors, must record
the occurrence of active and inactive
periods. If inactive, a processor is
required to do minimum recordkeeping
and is not required to submit a check–
in/check–out report. If active, a
processor must submit a check–in/
check–out report in addition to
recording and reporting detailed catch
information in logbooks and electronic
and non–electronic reports.
The definition for an active period for
a mothership and catcher/processor
currently means ‘‘when checked–in or
processing.’’ Because this action
eliminates the check–in/check–out
report submittal requirement for certain
of the motherships and catcher/
processors, these processors would not
qualify as being active and therefore
would not need to report catch
information. Therefore, the definition
for an active period must change by
removing ‘‘checked–in’’ as a reason for
being active.
For a catcher/processor using longline
or pot gear, the definition for ‘‘active’’
status is revised at § 679.5(a)(7)(i)(D)(1)
to describe that ‘‘active’’ status starts
when all or part of the longline or pot
gear is in the water. For a catcher/
processor using trawl gear, the
definition for ‘‘active’’ status is revised
at § 679.5(a)(7)(i)(D)(2) to describe that
‘‘active’’ status starts when all or part of
the trawl net is in the water. Further, for
a mothership, the definition for ‘‘active’’
status is revised at § 679.5(a)(7)(i)(C) to
describe that an ‘‘active’’ status is when
a mothership is receiving or processing
groundfish.
A proposed rule was published in the
Federal Register on May 29, 2008 (73
FR 30876), and the public review and
comment period closed on June 30,
2008. No comments were received, and
no changes have been made to the
proposed rule. Please refer to the
proposed rule for more detailed
background information.
Classification
The Administrator, Alaska Region,
NMFS, determined that this regulatory
amendment is necessary for the
conservation and management of the
groundfish fishery and that it is
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
53391
consistent with the Magnuson–Stevens
Act and other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Council for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration during
the proposed rule stage that this action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the
certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
No comments were received regarding
this certification, and no changes have
been made to the proposed rule. As a
result, a regulatory flexibility analysis
was not required and none was
prepared.
Collection–of–Information
This rule contains a collection–of–
information requirement subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
has been approved by OMB under
Control Number 0648–0213. Public
reporting burden for the check–in/
check–out report is estimated to average
seven minutes per response including
the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection–of–information. The
removal of the requirement for check–in
and check–out reports by catcher/
processors and motherships will result
in an estimated annual savings of 248
burden hours per year, $6,200 in
personnel costs, and $3,928 in
miscellaneous costs.
Send comments regarding this burden
estimate, or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and by e–mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
202–395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
53392
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 16, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: September 10, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 679
continues to read as follows:
■
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 679 is amended
as follows:
■
If participant
is. . .
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et
seq.; 3631 et seq.; and Pub. L. 108–447.
2. In § 679.5:
a. Paragraphs (h)(2) and (h)(3) are
redesignated as paragraphs (h)(3) and
(h)(4), respectively.
■ b. Paragraph (h)(2) heading and
paragraph (h)(2)(i) are added.
■
■
And fishing activity is. . .
c. Paragraph (h)(1)(iii) is redesignated
as paragraph (h)(2)(ii).
■ d. Paragraphs (a)(7)(i)(C), (a)(7)(i)(D),
and (h)(1) introductory text, and the
heading for newly redesignated
paragraph (h)(2)(ii) are revised.
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
§ 679.5
(R&R).
Recordkeeping and reporting
(a) * * *
(7) * * *
(i) * * *
An inactive period
is. . .
An active period is. . .
*******
(C) MS
Receipt, discard, or processing of groundfish
When receiving or processing groundfish.
When not active
(D) C/P
Harvest, discard, or processing groundfish
A longline or pot gear catcher/processor is active
when processing groundfish or when all or part of the
longline or pot gear is in the water.
When not active
A trawl gear catcher/processor is active when processing groundfish or when all or part of the trawl net is
in the water.
When not active
*******
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(1) Requirement. Except as noted in
paragraph (h)(2) of this section, the
operator of a catcher/processor or
mothership and the manager of a
shoreside processor or stationary
floating processor must submit to NMFS
a check–in report (BEGIN message) prior
to becoming active and a check–out
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:22 Sep 15, 2008
Jkt 214001
report (CEASE message) for every
check–in report submitted. The check–
in report and check–out report must be
submitted by fax to 907–586–7131, or by
e–mail to
erreports.alaskafisheries@noaa.gov.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Exceptions—(i) VMS onboard. The
operator of a catcher/processor or
mothership is not required to submit to
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NMFS a check–in report or check–out
report if the vessel is carrying onboard
a transmitting VMS that meets the
requirements of § 679.28(f).
(ii) Two adjacent reporting areas.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–21597 Filed 9–15–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 16, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53390-53392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21597]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 080225265-81165-02]
RIN 0648-AW28
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska;
Recordkeeping and Reporting
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues regulations to exempt groundfish catcher/
processors and motherships equipped with an operational vessel
monitoring system transmitter from check-in/check-out requirements.
This action reduces paperwork requirements for certain catcher/
processors and motherships and changes the definitions for ``active''
period for motherships and trawl, longline, and pot gear catcher/
processors. This action reduces administrative costs for both the
fishing industry and NMFS.
DATES: Effective October 16, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or
other aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained
in this final rule may be submitted to NMFS Alaska Region, P. O. Box
21668, Juneau, AK 99802 or the Alaska Region NMFS website at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov and by email to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or
fax to 202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patsy A. Bearden, 907-586-7008.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NMFS manages the U.S. groundfish fisheries of the exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) off Alaska under the Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area and
the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska
(FMPs). The North Pacific Fishery Management Council
[[Page 53391]]
prepared the FMPs pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. (Magnuson-Stevens Act).
Regulations implementing the FMPs appear at 50 CFR part 679. General
regulations that pertain to U.S. fisheries appear at subpart H of 50
CFR part 600.
Check-in/check-out Reports
A fish processor uses a check-in/check-out report to notify NMFS
that it will participate or cease participation in a groundfish
fishery. The check-in/check-out report also tells NMFS where fishing
will occur (if a catcher/processor) or where groundfish will be
received (if a mothership). NMFS inseason managers originally used the
check-in/check-out information to monitor fishing capacity and effort.
The information also was used by the United States Coast Guard to
monitor catcher/processor and mothership vessel location.
According to regulations at Sec. 679.5(h), catcher/processor and
mothership operators, and shoreside processor and stationary floating
processor managers must submit check-in/check-out reports on behalf of
the processor. This action exempts operators of catcher/processors and
motherships equipped with an operational vessel monitoring system (VMS)
transmitter from submitting a check-in/check-out report to NMFS.
Specifically, this action revises the text at Sec. 679.5(h) to state
that a catcher/processor or mothership that is not carrying onboard an
operational VMS transmitter that meets the requirements of Sec.
679.28(f) must submit check-in/check-out reports.
This action does not change the check-in/check-out report
submission requirement for shoreside processors and stationary floating
processors.
Vessel Monitoring System (VMS)
Over the past ten years, NMFS has added the requirement for VMS use
in many fishery management programs to monitor vessel location. VMS
transmitters combine global positioning systems and satellite
communications to automatically provide precise location reports to
NMFS several times each hour. NMFS requires VMS transmissions when a
vessel is operating in:
Any reporting area off Alaska while any fishery requiring
VMS for which the vessel has a species and gear endorsement on its
Federal Fisheries Permit is open;
The Aleutian Islands subarea;
The Gulf of Alaska (GOA) and mobile bottom contact gear is
onboard; and
The Central GOA Rockfish Pilot Program.
Active and Inactive Status
NMFS' current recordkeeping and reporting regulations are based on
the active/inactive status of fishery participants. Processors,
including motherships and trawl, longline, and pot gear catcher/
processors, must record the occurrence of active and inactive periods.
If inactive, a processor is required to do minimum recordkeeping and is
not required to submit a check-in/check-out report. If active, a
processor must submit a check-in/check-out report in addition to
recording and reporting detailed catch information in logbooks and
electronic and non-electronic reports.
The definition for an active period for a mothership and catcher/
processor currently means ``when checked-in or processing.'' Because
this action eliminates the check-in/check-out report submittal
requirement for certain of the motherships and catcher/processors,
these processors would not qualify as being active and therefore would
not need to report catch information. Therefore, the definition for an
active period must change by removing ``checked-in'' as a reason for
being active.
For a catcher/processor using longline or pot gear, the definition
for ``active'' status is revised at Sec. 679.5(a)(7)(i)(D)(1) to
describe that ``active'' status starts when all or part of the longline
or pot gear is in the water. For a catcher/processor using trawl gear,
the definition for ``active'' status is revised at Sec.
679.5(a)(7)(i)(D)(2) to describe that ``active'' status starts when all
or part of the trawl net is in the water. Further, for a mothership,
the definition for ``active'' status is revised at Sec.
679.5(a)(7)(i)(C) to describe that an ``active'' status is when a
mothership is receiving or processing groundfish.
A proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on May 29,
2008 (73 FR 30876), and the public review and comment period closed on
June 30, 2008. No comments were received, and no changes have been made
to the proposed rule. Please refer to the proposed rule for more
detailed background information.
Classification
The Administrator, Alaska Region, NMFS, determined that this
regulatory amendment is necessary for the conservation and management
of the groundfish fishery and that it is consistent with the Magnuson-
Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Council for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration during the proposed rule stage that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for the certification was published in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here. No comments were received
regarding this certification, and no changes have been made to the
proposed rule. As a result, a regulatory flexibility analysis was not
required and none was prepared.
Collection-of-Information
This rule contains a collection-of-information requirement subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that has been approved by OMB
under Control Number 0648-0213. Public reporting burden for the check-
in/check-out report is estimated to average seven minutes per response
including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection-of-information. The removal of the requirement
for check-in and check-out reports by catcher/processors and
motherships will result in an estimated annual savings of 248 burden
hours per year, $6,200 in personnel costs, and $3,928 in miscellaneous
costs.
Send comments regarding this burden estimate, or any other aspect
of this data collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden,
to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by e-mail to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or
fax to 202-395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 53392]]
Dated: September 10, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 679 is amended as
follows:
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.;
and Pub. L. 108-447.
0
2. In Sec. 679.5:
0
a. Paragraphs (h)(2) and (h)(3) are redesignated as paragraphs (h)(3)
and (h)(4), respectively.
0
b. Paragraph (h)(2) heading and paragraph (h)(2)(i) are added.
0
c. Paragraph (h)(1)(iii) is redesignated as paragraph (h)(2)(ii).
0
d. Paragraphs (a)(7)(i)(C), (a)(7)(i)(D), and (h)(1) introductory text,
and the heading for newly redesignated paragraph (h)(2)(ii) are
revised.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 679.5 Recordkeeping and reporting (R&R).
(a) * * *
(7) * * *
(i) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If
participant And fishing An active period is. An inactive
is. . . activity is. . . . . period is. . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * ................... .................... ...............
*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(C) MS Receipt, discard, When receiving or When not active
or processing of processing
groundfish groundfish.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(D) C/P Harvest, discard, A longline or pot When not active
or processing gear catcher/
groundfish processor is active
when processing
groundfish or when
all or part of the
longline or pot
gear is in the
water.
--------------------------------------
................... A trawl gear catcher/ When not active
processor is active
when processing
groundfish or when
all or part of the
trawl net is in the
water.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * ................... .................... ...............
*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(1) Requirement. Except as noted in paragraph (h)(2) of this
section, the operator of a catcher/processor or mothership and the
manager of a shoreside processor or stationary floating processor must
submit to NMFS a check-in report (BEGIN message) prior to becoming
active and a check-out report (CEASE message) for every check-in report
submitted. The check-in report and check-out report must be submitted
by fax to 907-586-7131, or by e-mail to
erreports.alaskafisheries@noaa.gov.
* * * * *
(2) Exceptions--(i) VMS onboard. The operator of a catcher/
processor or mothership is not required to submit to NMFS a check-in
report or check-out report if the vessel is carrying onboard a
transmitting VMS that meets the requirements of Sec. 679.28(f).
(ii) Two adjacent reporting areas. * * *
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-21597 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S