Notice of Public Hearings for the Naval Sea Systems Command Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Keyport Range Complex Extension Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement, 52967-52969 [E8-21343]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Notices
City is the local agency responsible for
preparing an Environmental Impact
Report in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA).
The Corps and the City of
Folsom will jointly conduct a public
scoping meeting that will be held on
Thursday, September 25, 2008 from 5
p.m. to 7 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The scoping meeting will be
held at the Folsom Public Library
located at 411 Stafford Street, Folsom,
CA.
DATES:
Ms.
Lisa Gibson, (916) 557–5288, e-mail:
lisa.m.gibson2@usace.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Interested
parties are invited to submit written
comments on the permit application on
or before October 1, 2008. Scoping
comments should be submitted within
the next 60 days, but may be submitted
at any time prior to publication of the
Draft EIS. To submit comments on this
notice or for questions about the
proposed action and the Draft EIS,
please contact Lisa Gibson, 1325 J Street
(Room 1480), Sacramento, CA 95814–
2922. Parties interested in being added
to the Corps’ electronic mail notification
list for the proposed project can register
at: https://www.spl.usace.army.mil/
regulatory/register.html. Please refer to
Identification Number SPK–2007–02159
in any correspondence.
The South Folsom Property Owners
Group consists of seven property
owners. Each property owner would file
an application for Department of the
Army authorization under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act. The City of
Folsom has filed a permit application
for the proposed project. Because these
applications are interrelated, USACE is
considering them in a comprehensive
and combined manner. The joint
purpose of these applications is to
construct a large-scale, mixed-use,
mixed-density master planned
community and associated supporting
infrastructure. To comply with the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), USACE has decided to prepare
an EIS to assess the potential impacts to
waters of the United States from these
combined applications.
The proposed Folsom South of 50
Specific Plan project site lies within
unincorporated Sacramento County, CA,
immediately south of the City of
Folsom’s existing city limits. The site is
within the City of Folsom’s Sphere of
Influence (SOI). It is located south of
U.S. Highway 50, north of White Rock
Road, east of Prairie City Road, and west
of the El Dorado County line.
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Sep 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
Preliminary wetland delineations of
the project site show that a total of 82.89
acres of waters of the United States are
present within the proposed project
area, including 4.11 acres of vernal
pools, 24.43 acres of seasonal wetland
swales, 4.75 acres of seasonal wetlands,
1.25 acre of freshwater marsh, 10.46
acres of freshwater seeps, 7.72 acres of
ponds, 17.80 acres of stream channels
(relatively permanent waters), 10.43
acres of ephemeral drainage channels
(non relatively permanent waters), and
1.93 acres of ditches. The City of Folsom
has applied to fill approximately 21.28
acres of these waters to construct the
proposed project. These acreages do not
include indirect impacts from the
proposed action or impacts anticipated
to result from off-site infrastructure that
may be determined to be required to
support the proposed project as part of
the EIS process.
The EIS/EIR will include alternatives
to the Proposed Action that will meet
both NEPA and CEQA requirements.
The alternatives will also meet the
requirements of CWA Section 404(b)(1)
Guidelines. At this time it is expected
that the joint EIS/EIR will evaluate the
following on-site alternatives: (1) No
Action Alternative; (2) Proposed Action;
(3) Resource Impact Minimization
Alternative; (4) Centralized
Development Alternative; (5) Reduced
Hillside Development Alternative; (6)
No Build Alternative; and at least one
off-site alternative.
The Corps’ public involvement
program includes several opportunities
to provide verbal and written comments
on the proposed Folsom South of 50
Specific Plan project through the EIS
process. Affected federal, state, and
local agencies, Native American tribes,
and other interested private
organizations and parties are invited to
participate. Potentially significant issues
to be analyzed in depth in the EIS
include loss of waters of the United
States (including wetlands), and
impacts related to cultural resources,
biological resources, air quality,
hydrology and water quality, noise,
traffic, aesthetics, utilities and service
systems, and socioeconomic effects.
USACE would initiate formal
consultation with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) under
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
for the proposed impacts to listed
species. USACE would also consult
with the State Historic Preservation
Office under Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act for properties
listed or potentially eligible for listing
on the National Register of Historic
Places, as appropriate.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52967
The joint lead agencies expect the
Draft EIS/EIR to be made available to the
public in the summer 2009.
Dated: August 22, 2008.
Thomas C. Chapman,
Colonel, U.S. Army, District Engineer.
[FR Doc. E8–21289 Filed 9–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–EH–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Public Hearings for the Naval
Sea Systems Command Naval
Undersea Warfare Center, Keyport
Range Complex Extension Draft
Environmental Impact Statement/
Overseas Environmental Impact
Statement
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 United States
Code [U.S.C.] 4321); the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
Regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of NEPA (Title 40
Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Parts
1500–1508); Department of the Navy
Procedures for Implementing NEPA (32
CFR 775); Executive Order (EO)12114,
Environmental Effects Abroad of Major
Federal Actions; and Department of
Defense (DoD) regulations implementing
EO 12114 (32 CFR Part 187), the
Department of the Navy (Navy) has
prepared and filed with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency a
Draft Environmental Impact Statement/
Overseas Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS/OEIS) on September 3,
2008. The National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) is a Cooperating Agency
for the EIS/OEIS.
The EIS/OEIS evaluates the potential
environmental impacts associated with
current and proposed research,
development, testing, and evaluation
(RDT&E) and related activities
scheduled and coordinated by Naval
Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC)
Keyport at the Naval Sea Systems
Command (NAVSEA) NUWC Keyport
Range Complex in Washington State.
The proposed action includes an
extension of the operational areas of the
NAVSEA NUWC Keyport Range
Complex and small increases in the
average annual number of tests and days
of testing at two of the three range sites
that comprise the Range Complex. A
Notice of Intent for this Draft EIS/OEIS
was published in the Federal Register
on September 11, 2003 (68 FR 176).
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
52968
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Notices
The Navy will conduct four public
hearings to receive oral and written
comments on the Draft EIS/OEIS.
Federal agencies, state agencies, and
local agencies and interested
individuals are invited to be present or
represented at the public hearings. This
notice announces the dates and
locations of the public hearings for this
Draft EIS/OEIS.
An open house session will precede
the scheduled public hearing at each of
the locations listed below and will
allow individuals to review the
information presented in the Draft EIS/
OEIS. Navy representatives will be
available during the open house
sessions to clarify information related to
the Draft EIS/OEIS.
DATES AND ADDRESSES: All meetings
will start with an open house session
from 5 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. A presentation
and formal public comment period will
be held from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. Public
hearings will be held on the following
dates and at the following locations:
Wednesday, October 1, 2008, at the
Naval Undersea Museum, 610 Dowell
Street, Keyport; Thursday, October 2,
2008, at North Mason Senior High
School, 200 E. Campus Drive, Belfair;
Monday, October 6, 2008, at Gray’s
Harbor Fire District #8, 4 First Street N.,
Pacific Beach; and Tuesday, October 7,
Quilcene Public Schools, Multi-Purpose
Room, 294715 Hwy 101, Quilcene.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Naval Facilities Engineering Command,
Northwest, Attention: Ms. Kimberly Kler
(EIS/OEIS PM), 1101 Tautog Circle,
Suite 203, Silverdale, WA 98315–1101;
facsimile: 360–396–0857; or https://
www-keyport.kpt.nuwc.navy.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of the Navy (Navy) proposes
to extend the operational areas
associated with the NAVSEA NUWC
Keyport Range Complex in Washington
State. The Keyport Range Complex is
composed of three geographically
distinct range sites: The Keyport Range
Site, Dabob Bay Range Complex (DBRC)
Site, and the Quinault Underwater
Tracking Range (QUTR) Site. The
proposed action would provide
additional operating space at each of the
three range sites and would also include
small increases in the average annual
number of tests and days of testing at
the Keyport Range Site and the QUTR
Site. Portions of the proposed extension
associated with the QUTR Site fall
outside the 12-nautical mile (nm) (22kilometer [km]) Territorial Waters
established by Presidential
Proclamation 5928. Therefore, this Draft
EIS/OEIS has also been prepared in
accordance with Navy procedures
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Sep 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
implementing Executive Order 12114
addressing components of the proposed
action beyond U.S. Territorial Waters.
The purpose of the proposed action is
to enable NUWC Keyport to continue
fulfilling its mission of providing test
and evaluation services and expertise to
support the Navy’s evolving manned
and unmanned undersea vehicle
program. NUWC Keyport has
historically provided facilities and
capabilities to support testing of
torpedoes, other unmanned vehicles,
submarine readiness, diver training, and
similar activities that are critical to the
success of undersea warfare.
Technological advancements in the
materials, instrumentation, guidance
systems, and tactical capabilities of
manned and unmanned vehicles
continue to evolve in parallel with
emerging national security priorities
and threat assessments. In response,
range capabilities and vehicle test
protocols must also evolve in order to
provide effective program support for
such advancements.
The proposed action to extend range
operational areas is needed because the
existing Range Complex is becoming
increasingly incapable of satisfying the
existing and evolving operational
capabilities and test requirements of
next-generation manned and unmanned
vehicles. The Navy requires a range
complex with assets that provide a
broader diversity of sea state conditions,
bottom type, deeper water, and
increased room to maneuver and
combine activities. Extending the Range
Complex operating areas as proposed
would enable the Navy to better support
current and future vehicle test
requirements in multiple marine
environments.
The proposed action would support
current and evolving test requirements
and range activities conducted at the
NAVSEA NUWC Keyport Range
Complex. The action also proposes
increases in the average annual number
of tests and days of testing at Keyport
Range and QUTR Sites. As the three
range sites within the NAVSEA NUWC
Keyport Range Complex are
geographically distinct, the set of
alternatives for one range site is
independent of the set of alternatives for
another range site. One or more action
alternatives have been identified for
each range site (in addition to the NoAction Alternative):
• Keyport Range Site: Keyport Range
Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative)—
extend range boundaries to the north,
east, and south, increasing the size of
the range from 1.5 square nautical miles
(nm2) to 3.2 nm2 (5.2 square kilometers
[km2] to 11.0 km2). The average annual
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
days of use would increase from 55 to
60 days.
• DBRC Site: DBRC Alternative 1—
extend the southern boundary of this
range approximately 10 nm (19 km).
DBRC Alternative 2 (Preferred
Alternative)—extend the southern
boundary approximately 10 nm (19 km),
and the northern boundary to 1 nm (2
km) south of the Hood Canal Bridge,
increasing the size of the range from
32.7 nm2 to 45.7 nm2 (112.1 km2 to
156.7 km2). There would be no increase
in average annual days of use under
either DBRC alternative.
• QUTR Site: QUTR Alternative 1—
extend the range boundaries to coincide
with the overlying special use airspace
of W–237A plus locate an 8.4 nm2 (28.8
km2) surf zone at Kalaloch. The total
range area under QUTR Alternative 1
would increase from approximately 48.3
nm2 (165.5 km2) to approximately
1,840.4 nm2 (6,312.4 km2). QUTR
Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative)—
extend the range boundaries the same as
Alternative 1 but locate a 7.8 nm2 (26.6
km2) surf zone at Pacific Beach instead
of at Kalaloch. The total range area
under QUTR Alternative 2 would be
1,839.8 nm2 (6,310.2 km2). QUTR
Alternative 3—extend the range
boundaries the same as Alternative 1
but locate a 22.6 nm2 (77.6 km2) surf
zone at Ocean City instead of at
Kalaloch. The total range area under
QUTR Alternative 3 would be 1,854.6
nm2 (6,361.2 km2). For all three QUTR
alternatives, the average annual use for
offshore activities would increase from
14 days to 16 days and activities in the
selected surf zone would occur an
average of 30 days per year.
The Navy considered a number of
other alternatives that were potentially
able to support the NUWC Keyport
mission. These testing alternatives were
initially screened and evaluated to
determine their ability to meet the
minimum operational selection criteria
but were eliminated from consideration
due to their inconsistency with the
mission and strategic vision for NUWC
Keyport and with the purpose and need
for the Proposed Action. Three
additional surf zone alternatives were
initially considered but eliminated from
consideration because they did not meet
the screening criteria for the Proposed
Action. Therefore, these alternatives
were not carried forward for analysis in
the EIS/OEIS.
Section 1502.14(d) of the CEQ
guidelines requires that the alternatives
analysis in the EIS ‘‘include the
alternative of no action.’’ In its NEPA’s
Forty Most Asked Questions, CEQ
identifies two distinct interpretations of
‘‘no action.’’ The interpretation selected
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Notices
by the action proponent depends on the
nature of the proposal being evaluated.
One interpretation of the No-Action
alternative is that the proposed activity
would not take place. This would mean
that Navy would not conduct test or
training activities in the Range
Complex. This interpretation does not
meet the purpose and need of the
proposed action and would neither be
reasonable nor practical. The other
interpretation of the No-Action
alternative is ‘‘no change from current
management direction or level of
management intensity.’’ This
interpretation would meet the purpose
and need of the proposed action and
would allow the Navy to compare the
potential impacts of the proposed action
to the impacts of maintaining the status
quo. With regard to this EIS/OEIS, the
No-Action Alternative represents the
regular and historic level of activity on
the Range Complex. Thus, the NoAction Alternative serves as a baseline
‘‘status quo’’ when studying levels of
range use and activity. In the Draft EIS/
OEIS, the potential impacts of the
current level of RDT&E and fleet activity
on the NAVSEA NUWC Keyport Range
Complex (defined by the No-Action
Alternative) are compared to the
potential impacts of activities proposed
under the action alternatives.
The Navy analyzed potential effects of
its current and proposed activities on
marine mammals, fish, sea turtles,
marine flora and invertebrates,
terrestrial wildlife, sediments and water
quality, cultural resources, recreation,
land and shoreline use, public health
and safety, socioeconomics and
environmental justice, and air quality.
No significant adverse impacts are
identified for any resource area in any
geographic location within the NAVSEA
NUWC Keyport Range Complex Study
Area that cannot be mitigated, with the
exception of exposure of marine
mammals to underwater sound. The
Navy has requested from NMFS a Letter
of Authorization (LOA) in accordance
with the Marine Mammal Protection Act
to authorize the incidental take of
marine mammals that may result from
the implementation of the activities
analyzed in the NAVSEA NUWC
Keyport Range Complex Extension Draft
EIS/OEIS. In compliance with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries
Conservation Management Act, the
Navy is in consultation with NMFS
regarding potential impacts to Essential
Fish Habitat. In accordance with section
7 of the Endangered Species Act, the
Navy is consulting with NMFS and U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
potential impacts to federally listed
species. The Navy is coordinating with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Sep 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
the Washington Department of Ecology
for a Coastal Consistency Determination
under the Coastal Zone Management
Act. Navy analysis has indicated that
under the Clean Air Act requirements,
no significant impacts would occur to
the regional air quality and under the
Clean Water Act there would be no
significant impacts to water quality.
National Historic Preservation Act
analysis indicated that no significant
impacts to cultural resources would
occur if the proposed action or
alternatives were implemented.
Implementation of the No Action
Alternative or any of the proposed
action alternatives would not disturb,
adversely affect, or result in any takes of
bald eagles. None of the alternatives
would result in a significant adverse
effect on the population of a migratory
bird species.
The decision to be made by the
Assistant Secretary of the Navy
(Installations & Environment) is to
determine which alternatives analyzed
in the EIS/OEIS best meet the needs of
the Navy given that all reasonably
foreseeable environmental impacts have
been considered.
The Draft EIS/OEIS was distributed to
Federal, State, and local agencies,
elected officials, and other interested
individuals and organizations on
September 12, 2008. The public
comment period will end on October 27,
2008. Copies of the Draft EIS/OEIS are
available for public review at the
following libraries:
• Aberdeen Timberland Library, 121 E.
Market St., Aberdeen, WA
• Hoodsport Timberland Library, N. 40
Schoolhouse Hill Road, Hoodsport,
WA
• Jefferson County Rural Library
District, 620 Cedar Avenue, Port
Hadlock, WA
• Kitsap Regional Library, 1301 Sylvan
Way, Bremerton, WA
• North Mason Timberland Library,
23801 NE State Rt. 3, Belfair, WA
• Ocean Shores Public Library, 573 Pt.
Brown Ave., NW., Ocean Shores, WA
• Port Orchard Library, 87 Sidney St.,
Port Orchard, WA
• Port Townsend Public Library, 1220
Lawrence St., Port Townsend, WA
• Poulsbo Branch Library, 700 NE
Lincoln St., Poulsbo, WA
• Quinault Indian Nation Tribal
Library, P.O. Box 189, Taholah, WA
• Skokomish Tribal Center, N 80 Tribal
Center Road, Shelton, WA
The NAVSEA NUWC Keyport Range
Complex Extension Draft EIS/OEIS is
also available for electronic public
viewing at: https://wwwkeyport.kpt.nuwc.navy.mil. A paper
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52969
copy of the Executive Summary or a
single CD with the Draft EIS/OEIS will
be made available upon written request
by contacting Naval Facilities
Engineering Command, Northwest,
Attention: Mrs. Kimberly Kler (EIS/OEIS
PM), 1101 Tautog Circle, Suite 203,
Silverdale, WA 98315–1101; facsimile:
360–396–0857.
Federal, State, and local agencies and
interested parties are invited to be
present or represented at the public
hearing. Written comments can also be
submitted during the open house
sessions preceding the public hearings.
Oral statements will be heard and
transcribed by a stenographer; however,
to ensure the accuracy of the record, all
statements should be submitted in
writing. All statements, both oral and
written, will become part of the public
record on the Draft EIS/OEIS and will be
responded to in the Final EIS/OEIS.
Equal weight will be given to both oral
and written statements. In the interest of
available time, and to ensure all who
wish to give an oral statement have the
opportunity to do so, each speaker’s
comments will be limited to three (3)
minutes. If a long statement is to be
presented, it should be summarized at
the public hearing with the full text
submitted either in writing at the
hearing, or mailed or faxed to Naval
Facilities Engineering Command,
Northwest, Attention: Mrs. Kimberly
Kler (EIS/OEIS PM), 1101 Tautog Circle,
Suite 203, Silverdale, WA 98315–1101;
facsimile: 360–396–0857. In addition,
comments may be submitted on-line at
https://www-keyport.kpt.nuwc.navy.mil
during the comment period. All written
comments must be postmarked by
October 27, 2008 to ensure they become
part of the official record. All comments
will be addressed in the Final EIS/OEIS.
Dated: September 3, 2008.
T.M. Cruz,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–21343 Filed 9–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Public Hearings for the Navy
Cherry Point Range Complex Draft
Environmental Impact Statement/
Overseas Environmental Impact
Statement
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
12SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 178 (Friday, September 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52967-52969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21343]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Public Hearings for the Naval Sea Systems Command Naval
Undersea Warfare Center, Keyport Range Complex Extension Draft
Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 United States Code [U.S.C.] 4321); the
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of NEPA (Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations
[CFR] Parts 1500-1508); Department of the Navy Procedures for
Implementing NEPA (32 CFR 775); Executive Order (EO)12114,
Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions; and Department
of Defense (DoD) regulations implementing EO 12114 (32 CFR Part 187),
the Department of the Navy (Navy) has prepared and filed with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency a Draft Environmental Impact Statement/
Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (EIS/OEIS) on September 3,
2008. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is a Cooperating
Agency for the EIS/OEIS.
The EIS/OEIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts
associated with current and proposed research, development, testing,
and evaluation (RDT&E) and related activities scheduled and coordinated
by Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC) Keyport at the Naval Sea
Systems Command (NAVSEA) NUWC Keyport Range Complex in Washington
State. The proposed action includes an extension of the operational
areas of the NAVSEA NUWC Keyport Range Complex and small increases in
the average annual number of tests and days of testing at two of the
three range sites that comprise the Range Complex. A Notice of Intent
for this Draft EIS/OEIS was published in the Federal Register on
September 11, 2003 (68 FR 176).
[[Page 52968]]
The Navy will conduct four public hearings to receive oral and
written comments on the Draft EIS/OEIS. Federal agencies, state
agencies, and local agencies and interested individuals are invited to
be present or represented at the public hearings. This notice announces
the dates and locations of the public hearings for this Draft EIS/OEIS.
An open house session will precede the scheduled public hearing at
each of the locations listed below and will allow individuals to review
the information presented in the Draft EIS/OEIS. Navy representatives
will be available during the open house sessions to clarify information
related to the Draft EIS/OEIS.
DATES AND ADDRESSES: All meetings will start with an open house
session from 5 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. A presentation and formal public
comment period will be held from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. Public hearings will
be held on the following dates and at the following locations:
Wednesday, October 1, 2008, at the Naval Undersea Museum, 610 Dowell
Street, Keyport; Thursday, October 2, 2008, at North Mason Senior High
School, 200 E. Campus Drive, Belfair; Monday, October 6, 2008, at
Gray's Harbor Fire District 8, 4 First Street N., Pacific
Beach; and Tuesday, October 7, Quilcene Public Schools, Multi-Purpose
Room, 294715 Hwy 101, Quilcene.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Naval Facilities Engineering Command,
Northwest, Attention: Ms. Kimberly Kler (EIS/OEIS PM), 1101 Tautog
Circle, Suite 203, Silverdale, WA 98315-1101; facsimile: 360-396-0857;
or https://www-keyport.kpt.nuwc.navy.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Navy (Navy) proposes
to extend the operational areas associated with the NAVSEA NUWC Keyport
Range Complex in Washington State. The Keyport Range Complex is
composed of three geographically distinct range sites: The Keyport
Range Site, Dabob Bay Range Complex (DBRC) Site, and the Quinault
Underwater Tracking Range (QUTR) Site. The proposed action would
provide additional operating space at each of the three range sites and
would also include small increases in the average annual number of
tests and days of testing at the Keyport Range Site and the QUTR Site.
Portions of the proposed extension associated with the QUTR Site fall
outside the 12-nautical mile (nm) (22-kilometer [km]) Territorial
Waters established by Presidential Proclamation 5928. Therefore, this
Draft EIS/OEIS has also been prepared in accordance with Navy
procedures implementing Executive Order 12114 addressing components of
the proposed action beyond U.S. Territorial Waters.
The purpose of the proposed action is to enable NUWC Keyport to
continue fulfilling its mission of providing test and evaluation
services and expertise to support the Navy's evolving manned and
unmanned undersea vehicle program. NUWC Keyport has historically
provided facilities and capabilities to support testing of torpedoes,
other unmanned vehicles, submarine readiness, diver training, and
similar activities that are critical to the success of undersea
warfare. Technological advancements in the materials, instrumentation,
guidance systems, and tactical capabilities of manned and unmanned
vehicles continue to evolve in parallel with emerging national security
priorities and threat assessments. In response, range capabilities and
vehicle test protocols must also evolve in order to provide effective
program support for such advancements.
The proposed action to extend range operational areas is needed
because the existing Range Complex is becoming increasingly incapable
of satisfying the existing and evolving operational capabilities and
test requirements of next-generation manned and unmanned vehicles. The
Navy requires a range complex with assets that provide a broader
diversity of sea state conditions, bottom type, deeper water, and
increased room to maneuver and combine activities. Extending the Range
Complex operating areas as proposed would enable the Navy to better
support current and future vehicle test requirements in multiple marine
environments.
The proposed action would support current and evolving test
requirements and range activities conducted at the NAVSEA NUWC Keyport
Range Complex. The action also proposes increases in the average annual
number of tests and days of testing at Keyport Range and QUTR Sites. As
the three range sites within the NAVSEA NUWC Keyport Range Complex are
geographically distinct, the set of alternatives for one range site is
independent of the set of alternatives for another range site. One or
more action alternatives have been identified for each range site (in
addition to the No-Action Alternative):
Keyport Range Site: Keyport Range Alternative 1 (Preferred
Alternative)--extend range boundaries to the north, east, and south,
increasing the size of the range from 1.5 square nautical miles
(nm2) to 3.2 nm2 (5.2 square kilometers
[km2] to 11.0 km2). The average annual days of
use would increase from 55 to 60 days.
DBRC Site: DBRC Alternative 1--extend the southern
boundary of this range approximately 10 nm (19 km). DBRC Alternative 2
(Preferred Alternative)--extend the southern boundary approximately 10
nm (19 km), and the northern boundary to 1 nm (2 km) south of the Hood
Canal Bridge, increasing the size of the range from 32.7 nm2
to 45.7 nm2 (112.1 km2 to 156.7 km2).
There would be no increase in average annual days of use under either
DBRC alternative.
QUTR Site: QUTR Alternative 1--extend the range boundaries
to coincide with the overlying special use airspace of W-237A plus
locate an 8.4 nm2 (28.8 km2) surf zone at
Kalaloch. The total range area under QUTR Alternative 1 would increase
from approximately 48.3 nm2 (165.5 km2) to
approximately 1,840.4 nm2 (6,312.4 km2). QUTR
Alternative 2 (Preferred Alternative)--extend the range boundaries the
same as Alternative 1 but locate a 7.8 nm2 (26.6
km2) surf zone at Pacific Beach instead of at Kalaloch. The
total range area under QUTR Alternative 2 would be 1,839.8
nm2 (6,310.2 km2). QUTR Alternative 3--extend the
range boundaries the same as Alternative 1 but locate a 22.6
nm2 (77.6 km2) surf zone at Ocean City instead of
at Kalaloch. The total range area under QUTR Alternative 3 would be
1,854.6 nm2 (6,361.2 km2). For all three QUTR
alternatives, the average annual use for offshore activities would
increase from 14 days to 16 days and activities in the selected surf
zone would occur an average of 30 days per year.
The Navy considered a number of other alternatives that were
potentially able to support the NUWC Keyport mission. These testing
alternatives were initially screened and evaluated to determine their
ability to meet the minimum operational selection criteria but were
eliminated from consideration due to their inconsistency with the
mission and strategic vision for NUWC Keyport and with the purpose and
need for the Proposed Action. Three additional surf zone alternatives
were initially considered but eliminated from consideration because
they did not meet the screening criteria for the Proposed Action.
Therefore, these alternatives were not carried forward for analysis in
the EIS/OEIS.
Section 1502.14(d) of the CEQ guidelines requires that the
alternatives analysis in the EIS ``include the alternative of no
action.'' In its NEPA's Forty Most Asked Questions, CEQ identifies two
distinct interpretations of ``no action.'' The interpretation selected
[[Page 52969]]
by the action proponent depends on the nature of the proposal being
evaluated. One interpretation of the No-Action alternative is that the
proposed activity would not take place. This would mean that Navy would
not conduct test or training activities in the Range Complex. This
interpretation does not meet the purpose and need of the proposed
action and would neither be reasonable nor practical. The other
interpretation of the No-Action alternative is ``no change from current
management direction or level of management intensity.'' This
interpretation would meet the purpose and need of the proposed action
and would allow the Navy to compare the potential impacts of the
proposed action to the impacts of maintaining the status quo. With
regard to this EIS/OEIS, the No-Action Alternative represents the
regular and historic level of activity on the Range Complex. Thus, the
No-Action Alternative serves as a baseline ``status quo'' when studying
levels of range use and activity. In the Draft EIS/OEIS, the potential
impacts of the current level of RDT&E and fleet activity on the NAVSEA
NUWC Keyport Range Complex (defined by the No-Action Alternative) are
compared to the potential impacts of activities proposed under the
action alternatives.
The Navy analyzed potential effects of its current and proposed
activities on marine mammals, fish, sea turtles, marine flora and
invertebrates, terrestrial wildlife, sediments and water quality,
cultural resources, recreation, land and shoreline use, public health
and safety, socioeconomics and environmental justice, and air quality.
No significant adverse impacts are identified for any resource area
in any geographic location within the NAVSEA NUWC Keyport Range Complex
Study Area that cannot be mitigated, with the exception of exposure of
marine mammals to underwater sound. The Navy has requested from NMFS a
Letter of Authorization (LOA) in accordance with the Marine Mammal
Protection Act to authorize the incidental take of marine mammals that
may result from the implementation of the activities analyzed in the
NAVSEA NUWC Keyport Range Complex Extension Draft EIS/OEIS. In
compliance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation Management
Act, the Navy is in consultation with NMFS regarding potential impacts
to Essential Fish Habitat. In accordance with section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act, the Navy is consulting with NMFS and U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for potential impacts to federally listed
species. The Navy is coordinating with the Washington Department of
Ecology for a Coastal Consistency Determination under the Coastal Zone
Management Act. Navy analysis has indicated that under the Clean Air
Act requirements, no significant impacts would occur to the regional
air quality and under the Clean Water Act there would be no significant
impacts to water quality. National Historic Preservation Act analysis
indicated that no significant impacts to cultural resources would occur
if the proposed action or alternatives were implemented. Implementation
of the No Action Alternative or any of the proposed action alternatives
would not disturb, adversely affect, or result in any takes of bald
eagles. None of the alternatives would result in a significant adverse
effect on the population of a migratory bird species.
The decision to be made by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy
(Installations & Environment) is to determine which alternatives
analyzed in the EIS/OEIS best meet the needs of the Navy given that all
reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts have been considered.
The Draft EIS/OEIS was distributed to Federal, State, and local
agencies, elected officials, and other interested individuals and
organizations on September 12, 2008. The public comment period will end
on October 27, 2008. Copies of the Draft EIS/OEIS are available for
public review at the following libraries:
Aberdeen Timberland Library, 121 E. Market St., Aberdeen, WA
Hoodsport Timberland Library, N. 40 Schoolhouse Hill Road,
Hoodsport, WA
Jefferson County Rural Library District, 620 Cedar Avenue,
Port Hadlock, WA
Kitsap Regional Library, 1301 Sylvan Way, Bremerton, WA
North Mason Timberland Library, 23801 NE State Rt. 3, Belfair,
WA
Ocean Shores Public Library, 573 Pt. Brown Ave., NW., Ocean
Shores, WA
Port Orchard Library, 87 Sidney St., Port Orchard, WA
Port Townsend Public Library, 1220 Lawrence St., Port
Townsend, WA
Poulsbo Branch Library, 700 NE Lincoln St., Poulsbo, WA
Quinault Indian Nation Tribal Library, P.O. Box 189, Taholah,
WA
Skokomish Tribal Center, N 80 Tribal Center Road, Shelton, WA
The NAVSEA NUWC Keyport Range Complex Extension Draft EIS/OEIS is
also available for electronic public viewing at: https://www-
keyport.kpt.nuwc.navy.mil. A paper copy of the Executive Summary or a
single CD with the Draft EIS/OEIS will be made available upon written
request by contacting Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Northwest,
Attention: Mrs. Kimberly Kler (EIS/OEIS PM), 1101 Tautog Circle, Suite
203, Silverdale, WA 98315-1101; facsimile: 360-396-0857.
Federal, State, and local agencies and interested parties are
invited to be present or represented at the public hearing. Written
comments can also be submitted during the open house sessions preceding
the public hearings.
Oral statements will be heard and transcribed by a stenographer;
however, to ensure the accuracy of the record, all statements should be
submitted in writing. All statements, both oral and written, will
become part of the public record on the Draft EIS/OEIS and will be
responded to in the Final EIS/OEIS. Equal weight will be given to both
oral and written statements. In the interest of available time, and to
ensure all who wish to give an oral statement have the opportunity to
do so, each speaker's comments will be limited to three (3) minutes. If
a long statement is to be presented, it should be summarized at the
public hearing with the full text submitted either in writing at the
hearing, or mailed or faxed to Naval Facilities Engineering Command,
Northwest, Attention: Mrs. Kimberly Kler (EIS/OEIS PM), 1101 Tautog
Circle, Suite 203, Silverdale, WA 98315-1101; facsimile: 360-396-0857.
In addition, comments may be submitted on-line at https://www-
keyport.kpt.nuwc.navy.mil during the comment period. All written
comments must be postmarked by October 27, 2008 to ensure they become
part of the official record. All comments will be addressed in the
Final EIS/OEIS.
Dated: September 3, 2008.
T.M. Cruz,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-21343 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P