Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 914 F Series Reciprocating Engines, 52932-52934 [E8-21282]
Download as PDF
52932
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 178
Friday, September 12, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0842; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NE–24–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; BombardierRotax GmbH 914 F Series
Reciprocating Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
SUMMARY:
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
Occurrence of cracks in the exhaust
muffler in the area of the exhaust bottom and
exhaust flange were reported, which could
lead to toxic contamination inside the cabin.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
carbon monoxide contamination in the
cockpit, which can adversely affect the
pilot, and possibly result in loss of
control of the aircraft.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by October 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Sep 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Woldan, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park; Burlington, MA
01803; telephone (781) 238–7136; fax
(781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0842; Directorate Identifier
2008–NE–24–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of the Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including, if provided, the name of the
individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78).
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2006–0127,
dated May 18, 2006 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states:
Occurrence of cracks in the exhaust
muffler in the area of the exhaust bottom and
exhaust flange were reported, which could
lead to toxic contamination inside the cabin.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH has issued
Service Bulletin SB–914–028 R1, dated
November 8, 2004. The actions
described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of Austria, and is
approved for operation in the United
States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with Austria, they have
notified us of the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are
proposing this AD because we evaluated
all information provided by Austria and
determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 75 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts would cost about $1,674
per product. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $137,550. Our cost
estimate is exclusive of possible
warranty coverage.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
E:\FR\FM\12SEP1.SGM
12SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
52933
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH: (Formerly Rotax
GmbH): Docket No. FAA–2008–0842;
Directorate Identifier 2008–NE–24–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by October
14, 2008.
Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier-Rotax
GmbH 914 F series reciprocating engines
with engine exhaust muffler, part number
(P/N) 979402 or 979404, with serial numbers
(SNs) listed in Table 1 of this AD, installed.
These engines are installed on, but not
limited to, Aeromot-Industria Mecanico
Metalurgica, AMT–300 (Turbo Ximango
Shark), Diamond Aircraft Industries, HK 36
TTS, HK 36 TTC, HK 36 TTC–ECO, and
Stemme GmbH & Co. KG, S10–VT series
powered sailplanes.
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
TABLE 1—AFFECTED EXHAUST MUFFLERS BY GROUP, P/N, AND SN
Group
P/N
SN
(1) A ...........................
979402 ......................
(2) B ...........................
979402 ......................
02.0001 through 02.0322, 03.0002, 03.0005, 03.0011, 03.0015, 03.0017, 03.0028, 03.0029,
03.0037, 03.0038, 03.0040, 03.0050, 03.0069, 03.0072, 03.0073, 03.0078, 03.0080 through
03.0086, 03.0088 through 03.0090, 03.0092 through 03.0101, 03.0103, and 03.0108.
03.0001, 03.0003, 03.0004, 03.0006, 03.0007 through 03.0010, 03.0012 through 03.0014,
03.0016, 03.0018 through 03.0027, 03.0030 through 03.0036, 03.0039, 03.0041 through
03.0049, 03.0051 through 03.0068, 03.0070, 03.0071, 03.0074 through 03.0077, 03.0079,
03.0087, 03.0091, 03.0102, and 03.0104 through 03.0107.
03.0200 through 04.0799.
979404 ......................
Reason
(d) Occurrence of cracks in the exhaust
muffler in the area of the exhaust bottom and
exhaust flange were reported, which could
lead to toxic contamination inside the cabin.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
carbon monoxide contamination in the
cockpit, which can adversely affect the pilot,
and possibly result in loss of control of the
aircraft.
Actions and Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
Initial Visual Inspection
Group A Exhaust Mufflers
(f) For exhaust mufflers specified in Group
A of Table 1 of this AD, within 50 hours of
operation after the effective date of this AD,
do the following:
(1) Perform a visual inspection around the
fillet weld of the exhaust inlet flange and
around the weld of the exhaust outlet for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Sep 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
evidence of leakage or cracks. Information on
inspecting the exhaust muffler can be found
in Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 914 F Service
Bulletin SB–914–028 R1, dated November 8,
2004.
(2) If you see evidence of an exhaust leak
or cracks, replace the exhaust muffler.
Group B Exhaust Mufflers
(g) For exhaust mufflers specified in Group
B of Table 1 of this AD, within 50 hours of
operation after the effective date of this AD,
do the following:
(1) Perform a visual inspection around the
weld of the exhaust outlet for evidence of
leakage or cracks. Information on inspecting
the exhaust muffler can be found in
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 914 F Service
Bulletin SB–914–028 R1, dated November 8,
2004.
(2) If you see evidence of an exhaust leak
or cracks, replace the exhaust muffler.
Repetitive Visual Inspections
(h) Within 50 hours of operation since the
last inspection, perform the actions specified
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(2) and (g)(1)
through (g)(2) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
(i) None.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(k) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2006–0127, dated May 18, 2006,
and Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 914 F Service
Bulletin SB–914–028 R1, dated November 8,
2004, for related information.
(l) Contact Richard Woldan, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803, telephone (781) 238–7136; fax (781)
238–7199, for more information about this
AD.
E:\FR\FM\12SEP1.SGM
12SEP1
52934
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
September 5, 2008.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–21282 Filed 9–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
Proposed Modification of the
Asheville, NC, Class C Airspace Area;
Public Meeting
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces a factfinding informal airspace meeting to
solicit information from airspace users
and others concerning a plan to modify
the Class C airspace area at Asheville,
NC. The modification would ensure that
arriving aircraft are contained within
Class C airspace while flying instrument
approaches to runways 16 and 34 at the
Asheville Regional Airport. The purpose
of the meeting is to provide interested
parties an opportunity to present views,
recommendations, and comments to be
considered by the FAA in developing a
proposal. All comments received during
the meeting will be considered prior to
issuance of a notice of proposed
rulemaking.
The informal airspace meeting
will be held on Tuesday, October 14,
2008, beginning at 6:30 p.m. Comments
must be received on or before November
14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the O.D. Lacey Griffin Building, 21
Aviation Way, Fletcher, NC 28732.
Comments: Send comments on the
proposal to Mark Ward, Manager,
Operations Support Group, Air Traffic
Organization Eastern Service Area,
Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grey
Pelkey, Manager, Asheville Airport
Traffic Control Tower, Asheville
Airport, 61 Terminal Drive Suite 2,
Fletcher, NC 28732; Telephone (828)
684–0421.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
DATES:
(b) The meeting will be informal in
nature and will be conducted by one or
more representatives of the FAA Eastern
Service Area. A representative from the
FAA will present an informal briefing
on the planned modification to the Class
C airspace at Asheville, NC. Each
participant will be given an opportunity
to deliver comments or make a
presentation, although a time limit may
be imposed. Only comments concerning
the plan to modify the Class C airspace
area at Asheville, NC, will be accepted.
(c) Each person wishing to make a
presentation to the FAA panel will be
asked to sign in and estimate the
amount of time needed for such
presentation. This will permit the panel
to allocate an appropriate amount of
time for each presenter. The meeting
will not be adjourned until everyone on
the list has had an opportunity to
address the panel.
(d) Position papers or other handout
material relating to the substance of
these meetings will be accepted.
Participants wishing to submit handout
material should present an original and
two copies (3 copies total) to the
presiding officer. There should be
additional copies of each handout
available for other attendees.
(e) The meeting will not be formally
recorded. However, a summary of
comments made at the meeting will be
filed in the docket.
Agenda for the Meeting
—Sign-in.
—Presentation of Meeting Procedures.
—FAA explanation of the proposed
Class C modifications.
—Public Presentations and Discussions.
—Closing Comments.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
Issued in Washington DC, on September 2,
2008.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. E8–21216 Filed 9–11–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Meeting Procedures
(a) The meeting will be open to all
persons on a space-available basis.
There will be no admission fee or other
charge to attend and participate.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:20 Sep 11, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0721]
RIN 1625 AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Willamette River, Portland, OR,
Schedule Change
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the drawbridge operation
regulation for the Broadway and
Burnside Bridges across the Willamette
River, mile 11.7, in Portland, Oregon so
that one-hour notice would be required
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through
Friday and two-hour notice at all other
times. The Broadway Bridge would be
deleted as a point of contact for
upstream vessels, leaving the
Hawthorne Bridge as the point of
contact for both upstream and
downstream travel directions.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
November 12, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by the Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2008–0721 to the Docket
Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Online: https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(3) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on
the Ground Floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
(4) Fax: 202–493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Austin Pratt, Chief, Bridge
Section, Waterways Management
Branch, 13th Coast Guard District,
telephone 206–220–7282. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\12SEP1.SGM
12SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 178 (Friday, September 12, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52932-52934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-21282]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 178 / Friday, September 12, 2008 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 52932]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0842; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-24-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 914 F Series
Reciprocating Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Occurrence of cracks in the exhaust muffler in the area of the
exhaust bottom and exhaust flange were reported, which could lead to
toxic contamination inside the cabin.
We are proposing this AD to prevent carbon monoxide contamination in
the cockpit, which can adversely affect the pilot, and possibly result
in loss of control of the aircraft.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 14,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Woldan, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park; Burlington, MA 01803; telephone (781) 238-
7136; fax (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0842;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-24-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2006-0127, dated May 18, 2006 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Occurrence of cracks in the exhaust muffler in the area of the
exhaust bottom and exhaust flange were reported, which could lead to
toxic contamination inside the cabin.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH has issued Service Bulletin SB-914-028 R1,
dated November 8, 2004. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of
Austria, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with Austria, they have notified us of the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by Austria and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 75 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 2 work-hours per product to comply with this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $1,674 per product. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $137,550.
Our cost estimate is exclusive of possible warranty coverage.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII:
[[Page 52933]]
Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Bombardier-Rotax GmbH: (Formerly Rotax GmbH): Docket No. FAA-2008-
0842; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-24-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by October 14, 2008.
Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 914 F series
reciprocating engines with engine exhaust muffler, part number (P/N)
979402 or 979404, with serial numbers (SNs) listed in Table 1 of
this AD, installed. These engines are installed on, but not limited
to, Aeromot-Industria Mecanico Metalurgica, AMT-300 (Turbo Ximango
Shark), Diamond Aircraft Industries, HK 36 TTS, HK 36 TTC, HK 36
TTC-ECO, and Stemme GmbH & Co. KG, S10-VT series powered sailplanes.
Table 1--Affected Exhaust Mufflers by Group, P/N, and SN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group P/N SN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) A................................. 979402................................ 02.0001 through 02.0322,
03.0002, 03.0005, 03.0011,
03.0015, 03.0017, 03.0028,
03.0029, 03.0037, 03.0038,
03.0040, 03.0050, 03.0069,
03.0072, 03.0073, 03.0078,
03.0080 through 03.0086,
03.0088 through 03.0090,
03.0092 through 03.0101,
03.0103, and 03.0108.
(2) B................................. 979402................................ 03.0001, 03.0003, 03.0004,
03.0006, 03.0007 through
03.0010, 03.0012 through
03.0014, 03.0016, 03.0018
through 03.0027, 03.0030
through 03.0036, 03.0039,
03.0041 through 03.0049,
03.0051 through 03.0068,
03.0070, 03.0071, 03.0074
through 03.0077, 03.0079,
03.0087, 03.0091, 03.0102, and
03.0104 through 03.0107.
979404................................ 03.0200 through 04.0799.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason
(d) Occurrence of cracks in the exhaust muffler in the area of
the exhaust bottom and exhaust flange were reported, which could
lead to toxic contamination inside the cabin.
We are proposing this AD to prevent carbon monoxide
contamination in the cockpit, which can adversely affect the pilot,
and possibly result in loss of control of the aircraft.
Actions and Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
Initial Visual Inspection
Group A Exhaust Mufflers
(f) For exhaust mufflers specified in Group A of Table 1 of this
AD, within 50 hours of operation after the effective date of this
AD, do the following:
(1) Perform a visual inspection around the fillet weld of the
exhaust inlet flange and around the weld of the exhaust outlet for
evidence of leakage or cracks. Information on inspecting the exhaust
muffler can be found in Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 914 F Service Bulletin
SB-914-028 R1, dated November 8, 2004.
(2) If you see evidence of an exhaust leak or cracks, replace
the exhaust muffler.
Group B Exhaust Mufflers
(g) For exhaust mufflers specified in Group B of Table 1 of this
AD, within 50 hours of operation after the effective date of this
AD, do the following:
(1) Perform a visual inspection around the weld of the exhaust
outlet for evidence of leakage or cracks. Information on inspecting
the exhaust muffler can be found in Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 914 F
Service Bulletin SB-914-028 R1, dated November 8, 2004.
(2) If you see evidence of an exhaust leak or cracks, replace
the exhaust muffler.
Repetitive Visual Inspections
(h) Within 50 hours of operation since the last inspection,
perform the actions specified in paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(2)
and (g)(1) through (g)(2) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
(i) None.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19.
Related Information
(k) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2006-0127, dated
May 18, 2006, and Bombardier-Rotax GmbH 914 F Service Bulletin SB-
914-028 R1, dated November 8, 2004, for related information.
(l) Contact Richard Woldan, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803, telephone (781) 238-
7136; fax (781) 238-7199, for more information about this AD.
[[Page 52934]]
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 5, 2008.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-21282 Filed 9-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P