Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls, 52006-52007 [E8-20672]
Download as PDF
52006
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Notices
Hearing-impaired persons who will
attend the meetings and require the
services of a sign language interpreter
should contact the Regional Office at
least ten (10) working days before the
scheduled date of the meetings.
Records generated from these
meetings may be inspected and
reproduced at the Eastern Regional
Office, as they become available, both
before and after the meetings. Persons
interested in the work of this advisory
committee are advised to go to the
Commission’s Web site, https://
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern
Regional Office at the above e-mail or
street address.
The meetings will be conducted
pursuant to the provisions of the rules
and regulations of the Commission and
FACA.
Dated in Washington, DC, September 3,
2008.
Christopher Byrnes,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. E8–20742 Filed 9–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 0808181107–81109–01]
Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export
Controls
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments on
foreign policy-based export controls.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) is reviewing the foreign
policy-based export controls in the
Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) to determine whether they should
be modified, rescinded or extended. To
help make these determinations, BIS is
seeking comments on how existing
foreign policy-based export controls
have affected exporters and the general
public. Additionally, BIS is particularly
interested in comments regarding the
Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to part
744 of the EAR), including on its
usefulness and format, as well as on the
specific entities listed and the licensing
policies and requirements assigned to
each.
DATES: Comments must be received by
October 8, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
sent by e-mail to
publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include
‘‘FPBEC’’ in the subject line of the
message. Written comments (three
copies) may be submitted by mail or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:59 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
hand delivery to Jeffery Lynch,
Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of
Industry and Security, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Room 2705, Washington,
DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general questions regarding foreign
policy-based export controls, Joan
Roberts, Foreign Policy Division, Office
of Nonproliferation and Treaty
Compliance, Bureau of Industry and
Security, telephone: (202) 482–4252,
and for questions specific to the Entity
List, Karen Nies-Vogel, Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration, Bureau of Industry and
Security, telephone: (202) 482–3811.
Copies of the current Annual Foreign
Policy Report to the Congress are
available at https://www.bis.doc.gov/
PoliciesAndRegulations/
08ForPolControls/index.htm and copies
may also be requested by calling the
Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty
Compliance at the number listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign
policy-based controls in the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) are
implemented pursuant to section 6 of
the Export Administration Act of 1979,
as amended. The current foreign policybased export controls maintained by the
Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
are set forth in the EAR, including in
parts 742 (CCL Based Controls), 744
(End-User and End-Use Based Controls)
and 746 (Embargoes and Special
Country Controls). These controls apply
to a range of countries, items, activities
and persons, including: Certain general
purpose microprocessors for ‘‘military
end-uses’’ and ‘‘military end-users’’
(§ 744.17); significant items (SI): Hot
section technology for the development,
production, or overhaul of commercial
aircraft engines, components, and
systems (§ 742.14); encryption items
(§§ 742.15 and 744.9); crime control and
detection commodities (§ 742.7);
specially designed implements of
torture (§ 742.11); certain firearms
included within the Inter-American
Convention Against the Illicit
Manufacturing of and Trafficking in
Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and
Other Related Materials (§ 742.17);
regional stability items (§ 742.6);
equipment and related technical data
used in the design, development,
production, or use of certain rocket
systems and unmanned air vehicles
(§§ 742.5 and 744.3); chemical
precursors and biological agents,
associated equipment, technical data,
and software related to the production
of chemical and biological agents
(§§ 742.2 and 744.4) and various
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
chemicals included in those controlled
pursuant to the Chemical Weapons
Convention (§ 742.18); nuclear
propulsion (§ 744.5); aircraft and vessels
(§ 744.7); communication intercepting
devices (software and technology)
(§ 742.13); embargoed countries (part
746); countries designated as supporters
of acts of international terrorism
(§§ 742.8, 742.9, 742.10, 742.19, 746.2,
746.4, 746.7, and 746.9); certain entities
in Russia (§ 744.10); individual
terrorists and terrorist organizations
(§§ 744.12, 744.13 and 744.14); certain
persons designated by Executive Order
13315 (‘‘Blocking Property of the
Former Iraqi Regime, Its Senior Officials
and Their Family Members’’) (§ 744.18);
and certain sanctioned entities
(§ 744.20). Attention is also given in this
context to the controls on nuclearrelated commodities and technology
(§§ 742.3 and 744.2), which are, in part,
implemented under section 309(c) of the
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act.
Under the provisions of section 6 of
the Export Administration Act of 1979,
as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401–2420
(2000)) (EAA), export controls
maintained for foreign policy purposes
require annual extension. Section 6 of
the EAA requires a report to Congress
when foreign policy-based export
controls are extended. The EAA expired
on August 20, 2001. Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002)), which has been
extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the most recent being that of
July 23, 2008, 73 FR 43603 (July 25,
2008), continues the EAR and, to the
extent permitted by law, the provisions
of the EAA, in effect under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706
(2000)). The Department of Commerce,
insofar as appropriate, is following the
provisions of section 6 by reviewing its
foreign policy-based export controls,
requesting public comments on such
controls, and preparing a report to be
submitted to Congress.
In January 2008, the Secretary of
Commerce, on the recommendation of
the Secretary of State, extended for one
year all foreign policy-based export
controls then in effect.
To assure maximum public
participation in the review process,
comments are solicited on the extension
or revision of the existing foreign
policy-based export controls for another
year. Among the criteria considered in
determining whether to continue or
revise U.S. foreign policy-based export
controls are the following:
1. The likelihood that such controls
will achieve the intended foreign policy
purpose, in light of other factors,
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Notices
including the availability from other
countries of the goods, software or
technology proposed for such controls;
2. Whether the foreign policy
objective of such controls can be
achieved through negotiations or other
alternative means;
3. The compatibility of the controls
with the foreign policy objectives of the
United States and with overall United
States policy toward the country subject
to the controls;
4. Whether the reaction of other
countries to the extension of such
controls is not likely to render the
controls ineffective in achieving the
intended foreign policy objective or be
counterproductive to United States
foreign policy interests;
5. The comparative benefits to U.S.
foreign policy objectives versus the
effect of the controls on the export
performance of the United States, the
competitive position of the United
States in the international economy, the
international reputation of the United
States as a supplier of goods and
technology; and
6. The ability of the United States to
enforce the controls effectively.
BIS is particularly interested in
receiving comments on the economic
impact of proliferation controls. BIS is
also interested in industry information
relating to the following:
1. Information on the effect of foreign
policy-based export controls on sales of
U.S. products to third countries (i.e.,
those countries not targeted by
sanctions), including the views of
foreign purchasers or prospective
customers regarding U.S. foreign policybased export controls.
2. Information on controls maintained
by U.S. trade partners. For example, to
what extent do they have similar
controls on goods and technology on a
worldwide basis or to specific
destinations?
3. Information on licensing policies or
practices by our foreign trade partners
that are similar to U.S. foreign policybased export controls, including license
review criteria, use of conditions,
requirements for pre- and post-shipment
verifications (preferably supported by
examples of approvals, denials and
foreign regulations).
4. Suggestions for revisions to foreign
policy-based export controls that would
bring them more into line with
multilateral practice.
5. Comments or suggestions as to
actions that would make multilateral
controls more effective.
6. Information that illustrates the
effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on trade or acquisitions by
intended targets of the controls.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:59 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
7. Data or other information on the
effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on overall trade at the level of
individual industrial sectors.
8. Suggestions as to how to measure
the effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on trade.
9. Information on the use of foreign
policy-based export controls on targeted
countries, entities, or individuals.
BIS is also interested in comments
relating generally to the extension or
revision of existing foreign policy-based
export controls.
Entity List
The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to
Part 744 of the EAR) provides notice to
the public that certain exports and
reexports to parties identified on the
Entity List require a license from BIS
and that availability of License
Exceptions in such transactions is
limited. In connection with the annual
review of all foreign policy-based export
controls, BIS is particularly interested in
public comments regarding the Entity
List, including but not limited to those
specific to the entities on the List and
the licensing policies and requirements
assigned to each of them, and on the
Entity List’s utility and suggestions for
ways it might be improved through
changes in format, organization or
otherwise.
Parties submitting comments are
asked to be as specific as possible. All
comments received before the close of
the comment period will be considered
by BIS in reviewing the controls and
developing the report to Congress and/
or in implementing changes to the
Entity List.
BIS will not accept public comments
accompanied by a request that a part or
all of the material be treated
confidentially because of its business
proprietary nature or for any other
reason. BIS will return such comments
and materials to the persons submitting
the comments and will not consider
them in the development of a response.
All information relating to the notice
will be a matter of public record and
will be available for public inspection
and copying. In the interest of accuracy
and completeness, BIS requires written
comments. Oral comments must be
followed by written memoranda, which
will also be a matter of public record
and will be available for public review
and copying.
The Office of Administration, Bureau
of Industry and Security, U.S.
Department of Commerce, displays
these public comments on BIS’s
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Web
site at https://www.bis.doc.gov/foia. This
office does not maintain a separate
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52007
public inspection facility. If you have
technical difficulties accessing this Web
site, please call BIS’s Office of
Administration at (202) 482–0637 for
assistance.
Dated: August 29, 2008.
Christopher R. Wall,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–20672 Filed 9–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–892
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results and Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbazole
violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC). The
period of review (POR) is December 1,
2006, through November 30, 2007. We
preliminarily determine that 11
companies have failed to cooperate by
not acting to the best of their ability to
comply with our requests for
information and, as a result, should be
assigned a rate based on adverse facts
available (AFA). We are also rescinding
this administrative review with respect
to three companies. If these preliminary
results are adopted in our final results
of this review, we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise during the POR.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
We will issue the final results no later
than 120 days from the date of
publication of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 8, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Scott or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2657 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 174 (Monday, September 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52006-52007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20672]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 0808181107-81109-01]
Effects of Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments on foreign policy-based export controls.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is reviewing the
foreign policy-based export controls in the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) to determine whether they should be modified,
rescinded or extended. To help make these determinations, BIS is
seeking comments on how existing foreign policy-based export controls
have affected exporters and the general public. Additionally, BIS is
particularly interested in comments regarding the Entity List
(Supplement No. 4 to part 744 of the EAR), including on its usefulness
and format, as well as on the specific entities listed and the
licensing policies and requirements assigned to each.
DATES: Comments must be received by October 8, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be sent by e-mail to
publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include ``FPBEC'' in the subject line of
the message. Written comments (three copies) may be submitted by mail
or hand delivery to Jeffery Lynch, Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau
of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, 14th Street &
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions regarding
foreign policy-based export controls, Joan Roberts, Foreign Policy
Division, Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty Compliance, Bureau of
Industry and Security, telephone: (202) 482-4252, and for questions
specific to the Entity List, Karen Nies-Vogel, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security,
telephone: (202) 482-3811. Copies of the current Annual Foreign Policy
Report to the Congress are available at https://www.bis.doc.gov/
PoliciesAndRegulations/08ForPolControls/index.htm and copies may also
be requested by calling the Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty
Compliance at the number listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign policy-based controls in the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) are implemented pursuant to section 6
of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended. The current
foreign policy-based export controls maintained by the Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS) are set forth in the EAR, including in
parts 742 (CCL Based Controls), 744 (End-User and End-Use Based
Controls) and 746 (Embargoes and Special Country Controls). These
controls apply to a range of countries, items, activities and persons,
including: Certain general purpose microprocessors for ``military end-
uses'' and ``military end-users'' (Sec. 744.17); significant items
(SI): Hot section technology for the development, production, or
overhaul of commercial aircraft engines, components, and systems (Sec.
742.14); encryption items (Sec. Sec. 742.15 and 744.9); crime control
and detection commodities (Sec. 742.7); specially designed implements
of torture (Sec. 742.11); certain firearms included within the Inter-
American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and
Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related
Materials (Sec. 742.17); regional stability items (Sec. 742.6);
equipment and related technical data used in the design, development,
production, or use of certain rocket systems and unmanned air vehicles
(Sec. Sec. 742.5 and 744.3); chemical precursors and biological
agents, associated equipment, technical data, and software related to
the production of chemical and biological agents (Sec. Sec. 742.2 and
744.4) and various chemicals included in those controlled pursuant to
the Chemical Weapons Convention (Sec. 742.18); nuclear propulsion
(Sec. 744.5); aircraft and vessels (Sec. 744.7); communication
intercepting devices (software and technology) (Sec. 742.13);
embargoed countries (part 746); countries designated as supporters of
acts of international terrorism (Sec. Sec. 742.8, 742.9, 742.10,
742.19, 746.2, 746.4, 746.7, and 746.9); certain entities in Russia
(Sec. 744.10); individual terrorists and terrorist organizations
(Sec. Sec. 744.12, 744.13 and 744.14); certain persons designated by
Executive Order 13315 (``Blocking Property of the Former Iraqi Regime,
Its Senior Officials and Their Family Members'') (Sec. 744.18); and
certain sanctioned entities (Sec. 744.20). Attention is also given in
this context to the controls on nuclear-related commodities and
technology (Sec. Sec. 742.3 and 744.2), which are, in part,
implemented under section 309(c) of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act.
Under the provisions of section 6 of the Export Administration Act
of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420 (2000)) (EAA), export
controls maintained for foreign policy purposes require annual
extension. Section 6 of the EAA requires a report to Congress when
foreign policy-based export controls are extended. The EAA expired on
August 20, 2001. Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive
Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of July 23, 2008, 73
FR 43603 (July 25, 2008), continues the EAR and, to the extent
permitted by law, the provisions of the EAA, in effect under the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706
(2000)). The Department of Commerce, insofar as appropriate, is
following the provisions of section 6 by reviewing its foreign policy-
based export controls, requesting public comments on such controls, and
preparing a report to be submitted to Congress.
In January 2008, the Secretary of Commerce, on the recommendation
of the Secretary of State, extended for one year all foreign policy-
based export controls then in effect.
To assure maximum public participation in the review process,
comments are solicited on the extension or revision of the existing
foreign policy-based export controls for another year. Among the
criteria considered in determining whether to continue or revise U.S.
foreign policy-based export controls are the following:
1. The likelihood that such controls will achieve the intended
foreign policy purpose, in light of other factors,
[[Page 52007]]
including the availability from other countries of the goods, software
or technology proposed for such controls;
2. Whether the foreign policy objective of such controls can be
achieved through negotiations or other alternative means;
3. The compatibility of the controls with the foreign policy
objectives of the United States and with overall United States policy
toward the country subject to the controls;
4. Whether the reaction of other countries to the extension of such
controls is not likely to render the controls ineffective in achieving
the intended foreign policy objective or be counterproductive to United
States foreign policy interests;
5. The comparative benefits to U.S. foreign policy objectives
versus the effect of the controls on the export performance of the
United States, the competitive position of the United States in the
international economy, the international reputation of the United
States as a supplier of goods and technology; and
6. The ability of the United States to enforce the controls
effectively.
BIS is particularly interested in receiving comments on the
economic impact of proliferation controls. BIS is also interested in
industry information relating to the following:
1. Information on the effect of foreign policy-based export
controls on sales of U.S. products to third countries (i.e., those
countries not targeted by sanctions), including the views of foreign
purchasers or prospective customers regarding U.S. foreign policy-based
export controls.
2. Information on controls maintained by U.S. trade partners. For
example, to what extent do they have similar controls on goods and
technology on a worldwide basis or to specific destinations?
3. Information on licensing policies or practices by our foreign
trade partners that are similar to U.S. foreign policy-based export
controls, including license review criteria, use of conditions,
requirements for pre- and post-shipment verifications (preferably
supported by examples of approvals, denials and foreign regulations).
4. Suggestions for revisions to foreign policy-based export
controls that would bring them more into line with multilateral
practice.
5. Comments or suggestions as to actions that would make
multilateral controls more effective.
6. Information that illustrates the effect of foreign policy-based
export controls on trade or acquisitions by intended targets of the
controls.
7. Data or other information on the effect of foreign policy-based
export controls on overall trade at the level of individual industrial
sectors.
8. Suggestions as to how to measure the effect of foreign policy-
based export controls on trade.
9. Information on the use of foreign policy-based export controls
on targeted countries, entities, or individuals.
BIS is also interested in comments relating generally to the
extension or revision of existing foreign policy-based export controls.
Entity List
The Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 of the EAR) provides
notice to the public that certain exports and reexports to parties
identified on the Entity List require a license from BIS and that
availability of License Exceptions in such transactions is limited. In
connection with the annual review of all foreign policy-based export
controls, BIS is particularly interested in public comments regarding
the Entity List, including but not limited to those specific to the
entities on the List and the licensing policies and requirements
assigned to each of them, and on the Entity List's utility and
suggestions for ways it might be improved through changes in format,
organization or otherwise.
Parties submitting comments are asked to be as specific as
possible. All comments received before the close of the comment period
will be considered by BIS in reviewing the controls and developing the
report to Congress and/or in implementing changes to the Entity List.
BIS will not accept public comments accompanied by a request that a
part or all of the material be treated confidentially because of its
business proprietary nature or for any other reason. BIS will return
such comments and materials to the persons submitting the comments and
will not consider them in the development of a response. All
information relating to the notice will be a matter of public record
and will be available for public inspection and copying. In the
interest of accuracy and completeness, BIS requires written comments.
Oral comments must be followed by written memoranda, which will also be
a matter of public record and will be available for public review and
copying.
The Office of Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S.
Department of Commerce, displays these public comments on BIS's Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA) Web site at https://www.bis.doc.gov/foia. This
office does not maintain a separate public inspection facility. If you
have technical difficulties accessing this Web site, please call BIS's
Office of Administration at (202) 482-0637 for assistance.
Dated: August 29, 2008.
Christopher R. Wall,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-20672 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P