Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Proposed Rulemaking To Designate Critical Habitat for the Threatened Southern Distinct Population Segment of North American Green Sturgeon, 52084-52110 [E8-20632]
Download as PDF
52084
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 226
[Docket No. 080730953–81003–01]
RIN 0648–AX04
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants: Proposed Rulemaking To
Designate Critical Habitat for the
Threatened Southern Distinct
Population Segment of North American
Green Sturgeon
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS), propose to
designate critical habitat for the
threatened Southern distinct population
segment of North American green
sturgeon (Southern DPS of green
sturgeon) pursuant to section 4 of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Specific
areas proposed for designation include:
coastal U.S. marine waters within 110
meters (m) depth from Monterey Bay,
California (including Monterey Bay),
north to Cape Flattery, Washington,
including the Strait of Juan de Fuca,
Washington, to its United States
boundary; the Sacramento River, lower
Feather River, and lower Yuba River in
California; the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta and Suisun, San Pablo, and San
Francisco bays in California; the lower
Columbia River estuary; and certain
coastal bays and estuaries in California
(Humboldt Bay), Oregon (Coos Bay,
Winchester Bay, and Yaquina Bay), and
Washington (Willapa Bay and Grays
Harbor). The areas proposed for
designation comprise approximately
325 miles (524 km) of freshwater river
habitat, 1,058 square miles (2,739 sq
km) of estuarine habitat, 11,927 square
miles (30,890 sq km) of marine habitat,
and 136 square miles (352 sq km) of
habitat within the Yolo and Sutter
bypasses (Sacramento River, CA).
We propose to exclude the following
areas from designation because the
benefits of exclusion outweigh the
benefits of inclusion and exclusion will
not result in the extinction of the
species: coastal U.S. marine waters
within 110 m depth from the California/
Mexico border north to Monterey Bay,
CA, and from the Alaska/Canada border
northwest to the Bering Strait; and
certain coastal bays and estuaries in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
California (Tomales Bay, Elkhorn
Slough, Noyo Harbor, and the estuaries
to the head of the tide in the Eel and
Klamath/Trinity rivers), Oregon
(Tillamook Bay and the estuaries to the
head of the tide in the Rogue, Siuslaw,
and Alsea rivers), and Washington
(Puget Sound). The areas excluded from
the proposed designation comprise
approximately 1,057 square miles (2,738
sq km) of estuarine habitat and 396,917
square miles (1,028,015 sq km) of
marine habitat.
We acknowledge that there may be
costs incurred by those planning to
undertake activities in certain areas, in
particular Coo Bay, OR, or other areas
along the lower Columbia River estuary,
as a result of this proposed critical
habitat designation for the Southern
DPS of green sturgeon that were not
captured in our draft economic report.
These activities include, but are not
limited to, liquefied natural gas (LNG)
projects, hydropower activities, and
alternative energy projects. We solicit
comment on what these additional costs
might be and will consider any
additional information received in
developing our final determination to
designate or exclude areas from critical
habitat for the Southern DPS of green
sturgeon.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
to designate critical habitat must be
received by no later than 5 p.m. Pacific
Standard Time on November 7, 2008. A
public hearing will be held promptly if
any person so requests by October 23,
2008. Notice of the date, location, and
time of any such hearing will be
published in the Federal Register not
less than 15 days before the hearing is
held.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule, identified by RIN
0648–AX04, by any one of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 1–562–980–4027, Attention:
Melissa Neuman.
• Mail: Submit written information to
Chief, Protected Resources Division,
Southwest Region, National Marine
Fisheries Service, 650 Capitol Mall,
Sacramento, CA 95814–4706.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (please
enter N/A in the required fields if you
wish to remain anonymous).
Attachments to electronic comments
will be accepted in Microsoft Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
Reference materials regarding this
determination can be obtained via the
Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov or
by submitting a request to the Assistant
Regional Administrator, Protected
Resources Division, Southwest Region,
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802–4213.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Neuman, NMFS, Southwest
Region (562) 980–4115 or Lisa Manning,
NMFS, Office of Protected Resources
(301) 713–1401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We determined that the Southern DPS
of green sturgeon is likely to become
endangered in the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range and listed the species as
threatened under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) on April 7, 2006 (71
FR 17757).
Section 4(b)(2) of the ESA requires us
to designate critical habitat for
threatened and endangered species ‘‘on
the basis of the best scientific data
available and after taking into
consideration the economic impact,
impact on national security, and any
other relevant impact, of specifying any
particular area as critical habitat.’’ This
section grants the Secretary [of
Commerce] discretion to exclude any
area from critical habitat if he
determines ‘‘the benefits of such
exclusion outweigh the benefits of
specifying such area as part of the
critical habitat.’’ The Secretary may not
exclude an area if it ‘‘will result in the
extinction of the species.’’
The ESA defines critical habitat under
Section 3(5)(A) as:
‘‘(i) the specific areas within the
geographical area occupied by the species, at
the time it is listed * * *, on which are
found those physical or biological features (I)
essential to the conservation of the species
and (II) which may require special
management considerations or protection;
and
(ii) specific areas outside the geographical
area occupied by the species at the time it is
listed * * * upon a determination by the
Secretary that such areas are essential for the
conservation of the species.’’
Once critical habitat is designated,
section 7 of the ESA requires Federal
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
agencies to ensure they do not fund,
authorize, or carry out any actions that
will destroy or adversely modify that
habitat. This requirement is in addition
to the ESA section 7 requirement that
Federal agencies ensure their actions do
not jeopardize the continued existence
of listed species.
When the final rule to list the
Southern DPS of green sturgeon was
published on April 7, 2006, we solicited
from the public information that would
inform the decision-making process for
designating critical habitat for the
species. Specifically, we requested
information regarding: (1) Green
sturgeon spawning habitat within the
range of the Southern DPS that was
present in the past, but may have been
lost over time; (2) biological or other
relevant data concerning any threats to
the Southern DPS of green sturgeon; (3)
quantitative evaluations describing the
quality and extent of freshwater and
marine habitats (occupied currently or
occupied in the past, but no longer
occupied) for juvenile and adult green
sturgeon as well as information on areas
that may qualify as critical habitat in
California for the Southern DPS; (4)
activities that could be affected by an
ESA critical habitat designation; and (5)
the economic costs and benefits of
additional requirements of management
measures likely to result from the
designation. No substantive additional
comments, beyond those that had been
received during prior solicitations for
information, were received.
The timeline for completing the
proposed critical habitat designation
described in this Federal Register
document was established pursuant to a
settlement agreement. On April 17,
2007, the Center for Biological Diversity
(CBD) filed a 60-day notice of intent to
sue the Secretary of Commerce and
NMFS for failing to designate critical
habitat and establish protective
regulations for the Southern DPS of
green sturgeon, as required by the ESA.
Pursuant to the settlement agreement
reached between the parties, we agreed
to make a determination on a proposed
critical habitat designation for the
Southern DPS of green sturgeon by
April 30, 2008, and a final designation
by April 30, 2009, which were later
extended to September 2, 2008 and June
30, 2009, respectively.
In developing this proposed rule, we
evaluated the best available information
regarding green sturgeon distribution
and habitat requirements, as well as
threats to the species. In the Final Rule
to list the Southern DPS as threatened
under the ESA (71 FR 17757; April 7,
2006), we identified seven extinction
risk factors, including: (1) Concentration
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
of spawning into one spawning river,
increasing the risk of catastrophic
extinction; (2) loss of spawning habitat
in the upper Sacramento and Feather
rivers due to migration barriers; (3) a
general lack of population data, but
suspected small population size; (4)
entrainment by water project operations;
(5) potentially limiting or lethal water
temperatures; (6) commercial and
recreational fisheries harvest; and (7)
toxins and exotic species. This
document describes the proposed
critical habitat designation, including
supporting information on green
sturgeon biology, distribution, and
habitat use, and the methods used to
develop the proposed designation.
Green Sturgeon Natural History
In the following sections, we describe
the natural history of green sturgeon as
it relates to the habitat needs of this
species. The green sturgeon is an
anadromous fish species that is longlived and the most marine oriented
sturgeon species in the family
Acipenseridae. The North American
form of green sturgeon (Acipenser
medirostris; hereafter, ‘‘green sturgeon’’)
is related to the Asian form (A. mikadoi,
also called Sakhalin sturgeon), but is
most likely a different species
(Artyukhin et al., 2007). Green sturgeon
is one of two sturgeon species occurring
on the U.S. west coast, the other being
white sturgeon (Acipenser
transmontanus). Adults can reach up to
270 cm in total length (TL) and 175 kg
in weight (Moyle, 2002); however,
adults greater than 2 m TL and 90 kg in
weight are not common (Skinner, 1972).
Females are larger and older
(approximately 162 cm TL and 16–20
years of age) than males (approximately
152 cm TL and 14–16 years of age) upon
reaching reproductive maturity (Van
Eenennaam et al., 2006). Maximum ages
most likely range from 60 to 70 years or
older (Emmett et al., 1991). Until
recently, few studies have focused on
green sturgeon due to its low abundance
and low commercial value compared to
white sturgeon.
Green sturgeon range from the Bering
˜
Sea, Alaska, to Ensenada, Mexico. A few
green sturgeon have been observed off
the southern California coast, including
fish less than 100 cm TL (Fitch and
Lavenberg, 1971, cited in Moyle et al.,
1995; Fitch and Schultz, 1978, cited in
Moyle et al., 1995). Green sturgeon
abundance increases north of Point
Conception, CA (Moyle et al., 1995).
Green sturgeon occupy freshwater rivers
from the Sacramento River up through
British Columbia (Moyle, 2002), but
spawning has been confirmed in only
three rivers, the Rogue River in Oregon
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
52085
and the Klamath and Sacramento rivers
in California. Based on genetic analyses
and spawning site fidelity (Adams et al.,
2002; Israel et al., 2004), NMFS has
determined green sturgeon are
comprised of at least two distinct
population segments (DPSs): (1) A
Northern DPS consisting of populations
originating from coastal watersheds
northward of and including the Eel
River (i.e., the Klamath and Rogue
rivers) (‘‘Northern DPS’’); and (2) a
southern DPS consisting of populations
originating from coastal watersheds
south of the Eel River, with the only
known spawning population in the
Sacramento River (‘‘Southern DPS’’).
The Northern DPS and Southern DPS
are distinguished based on genetic data
and spawning locations, but their
distributions outside of natal waters
generally overlap with one another
(Chadwick, 1959; Miller, 1972; CDFG,
2002; Israel et al., 2004; Moser and
Lindley, 2007; Erickson and Hightower,
2007; Lindley et al., 2008.). Both
Northern DPS and Southern DPS green
sturgeon occupy coastal estuaries and
coastal marine waters from southern
California to Alaska, including
Humboldt Bay, the lower Columbia
river estuary, Willapa Bay, Grays
Harbor, and coastal waters between
Vancouver Island, BC, and southeast
Alaska (Israel et al., 2004; Moser and
Lindley, 2007; Lindley et al., 2008).
Thus, green sturgeon observed in coastal
bays, estuaries, and coastal marine
waters outside of natal rivers may
belong to either DPS. However, the
Northern DPS of green sturgeon is not
classified as a listed species under the
ESA. Tagging or genetics data are
needed to determine to which DPS an
individual fish belongs. The distribution
of green sturgeon, and specifically of the
Southern DPS, is described in detail
under the section titled ‘‘Geographical
Areas Occupied by the Species and
Specific Areas within the Geographical
Areas Occupied.’’
Spawning
Spawning frequency is not well
known, but the best information
suggests adult green sturgeon spawn
every 2–4 years (Lindley and Moser,
NMFS, 2004, pers. comm., cited in 70
FR 17386, April 6, 2005; Erickson and
Webb, 2007). Beginning in late
February, adult green sturgeon migrate
from the ocean into fresh water to begin
their spawning migrations (Moyle et al.,
1995). Spawning occurs from March to
July, with peak activity from mid-April
to mid-June (Emmett et al., 1991).
Spawning populations in North
America have been confirmed in the
Rogue (Erickson et al., 2002; Farr and
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
52086
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Kern, 2005), Klamath, and Sacramento
Rivers (Moyle et al., 1992; CDFG, 2002).
Klamath and Rogue River populations
appear to spawn within 100 miles (161
km) of the ocean, whereas spawning on
the mainstem Sacramento River has
been documented over 240 miles (391
km) upstream, both downstream and
upstream of Red Bluff Diversion Dam
(RBDD) (Brown, 2007). Spawning most
likely occurs in fast, deep water (> 3 m
deep) over substrates ranging from clean
sand to bedrock, with preferences for
cobble substrates (Emmett et al., 1991;
Moyle et al., 1995). Green sturgeon
females produce 59,000 to 242,000 eggs,
with fecundity increasing with fish
length and age (Van Eenennaam et al.,
2006). Green sturgeon eggs are the
largest of any sturgeon species, ranging
from 4.04 to 4.66 mm in diameter, and
have a thin chorionic layer (Van
Eenennaam et al., 2001; Van Eenennaam
et al., 2006). Eggs are broadcast
spawned and likely adhere to substrates
or settle into crevices of river bedrock or
under gravel (Deng, 2000; Van
Eenennaam et al., 2001; Deng et al.,
2002). Van Eenennaam et al. (2001)
reported that green sturgeon eggs have
weak adhesiveness, but have since
retracted that statement, noting instead
that green sturgeon eggs are quite
adhesive within a few minutes after
release from the female (Van
Eenennaam, UC Davis, 2008, pers.
comm.). Optimum flow and temperature
requirements for spawning and
incubation are unclear, but spawning
success in most sturgeons is related to
these factors (Detlaff et al., 1993).
Average monthly water flow during the
spawning season (March–July) ranged
from 209–1,252 m3/s in the Sacramento
River over a 10-year period from 1996–
2006 (https://waterdata.usgs.gov) and
from 31–260 m3/s in the Rogue River
over a 4-year period from 2001–2004
(Erickson and Webb, 2007). Spawning
may be triggered by small increases in
water flow (Schaffter, 1997; Brown,
2007). Adult sturgeon occur in the
Sacramento River when temperatures
are between 8–14 °C (Moyle, 2002). In
laboratory studies, the optimal thermal
range for green sturgeon development
was from 11 to 17–18 °C, and
temperatures ≥ 23 °C were lethal to
embryos (Van Eenennaam et al., 2005).
Development of Early Life Stages
Green sturgeon embryos have poor
swimming ability and exhibit a strong
drive to remain in contact with
structure, preferring cover and dark
habitats to open bottom and illuminated
habitats in laboratory experiments
(Kynard et al., 2005). In these
experiments, early embryos made no
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
effort to swim, suggesting embryos
remain in spawning areas to develop
(Kynard et al., 2005). Newly emerged
green sturgeon larvae in the laboratory
hatched 144–216 hours, or 6–9 days,
after fertilization (incubation
temperatures ranged from 15–15.7 °C)
and ranged from 12.6–15 mm in length
(Van Eenennaam et al., 2001; Deng et
al., 2002). Unlike other acipenserids,
newly hatched larvae did not swim up
toward the water surface within the first
5 days post hatch (dph), but remained
in clumps near the bottom. By 5–6 dph,
larvae exhibited nocturnal behavior,
remaining clumped near the bottom
during the day and actively swimming
at night (Van Eenennaam et al., 2001;
Deng et al., 2002). Upon onset of feeding
at 10 dph (23.0–25.2 mm length) (Deng
et al., 2002), larvae are believed to
initiate downstream migration from
spawning areas, staying close to the
bottom and periodically interrupting
downstream movement with upstream
foraging bouts (Kynard et al., 2005).
Little is known about larval rearing
habitat and requirements. Temperatures
of 15 °C are believed to be optimal for
larval growth, whereas temperatures
below 11 °C or above 19 °C may be
detrimental for growth (Cech et al.,
2000, cited in COSEWIC, 2004).
Substrate may also affect growth and
foraging behavior. Larvae reared on flatsurfaced substrates (slate-rock and glass)
had higher specific growth rates than
larvae reared on cobble or sand, most
likely due to lower foraging
effectiveness and greater activity levels
in cobble and sand substrates (Nguyen
and Crocker, 2007). Larvae complete
metamorphosis to the juvenile stage at
45 dph, when fish range from 62.5 to
94.4 mm in length (Deng et al., 2002).
Juveniles continue to grow rapidly,
reaching 300 mm in length in one year
and over 600 mm within 2–3 years
(based on Klamath River fish; Nakamoto
et al., 1995). Laboratory experiments
indicate juveniles may occupy fresh to
brackish water at any age, but are able
to completely transition to salt water at
around 1.5 years in age (about 533 dph;
mean TL of 75.2 plus or minus 0.7 cm)
(Allen and Cech, 2007). Early juveniles
at 100 and 170 dph tolerated prolonged
exposure to saltwater, but experienced
decreased growth and activity levels
and, in some cases, mortality for
individuals at 100 dph (Allen and Cech,
2007). These results were consistent
with the Nakamoto et al. (1995) study
indicating that juveniles rear in fresh
and estuarine waters before dispersing
into salt water at about 1 to 4 years in
age (about 300 to 750 mm in length).
Early juveniles also exhibit nocturnal
behavior in all activities and initiate
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
directed downstream movement in the
fall, most likely to migrate to wintering
habitats (Kynard et al., 2005). Juvenile
green sturgeon prefer temperatures of
15–16 °C with an upper limit of 19 °C,
beyond which swimming performance
may decrease and cellular stress may
occur (Mayfield and Cech, 2004; Allen
et al., 2006). Laboratory measurements
of oxygen consumption by juveniles
ranged from 61.78 plus or minus 4.65
mg O2 hr¥1 kg¥1 to 76.06 plus or minus
7.63 mg O2 hr¥1 kg¥1, with a trend of
increasing oxygen consumption with
increasing body mass (Allen and Cech,
2006). Studies on juvenile feeding in
San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta identified
prey items of shrimp (Neomysis
awatchensis, Crangon franciscorum),
amphipods (Corophium spp., Photis
californica), isopods (Synidotea
laticauda), clams (Macoma spp.),
annelid worms, and unidentified crabs
and fishes (Ganssle, 1966; Radtke,
1966).
Adults and Subadults
To distinguish among different life
stages, we used the following
definitions. Adults are sexually mature
fish, subadults are sexually immature
fish that have entered into coastal
marine waters (usually at 3 years of age),
and juveniles are fish that have not yet
made their first entry into marine
waters. Green sturgeon spend a large
portion of their lives in coastal marine
waters as subadults and adults between
spawning episodes. Subadult male and
female green sturgeon spend at least
approximately 6 and 10 years,
respectively, at sea before reaching
reproductive maturity and returning to
freshwater to spawn for the first time
(Nakamoto et al., 1995). Adult green
sturgeon spend as many as 2–4 years at
sea between spawning events (Lindley
and Moser, NMFS, pers. comm., cited in
70 FR 17386, April 6, 2005; Erickson
and Webb, 2007). The average length at
maturity for green sturgeon is estimated
to be 152 cm TL (14–16 years) for males
and 162 cm TL (16–20 years) for females
in the Klamath River (Van Eenennaam
et al., 2006), and 145 cm TL for males
and 166 cm TL for females in the Rogue
River (Erickson and Webb, 2007). The
maximum size of subadults is
approximately 167 cm TL (Erickson and
Webb, 2007).
Adults typically begin their upstream
spawning migration in the spring and
either migrate downstream after
spawning, or reside within the river
over the summer. In the Klamath River,
tagged adults exhibited four movement
patterns: (1) Upstream spawning
migration; (2) spring outmigration to the
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ocean; (3) summer holding (June to
November) in deep pools with eddy
currents (for those that do not exhibit
post-spawning spring outmigration);
and (4) outmigration after summer
holding (Benson et al., 2007). Use of
summer holding sites has also been
observed in the Rogue River (Erickson et
al., 2002) and in the Sacramento River
(R. Corwin, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
(USBR), 2008, pers. comm.). Deep
holding pools greater than 5 m in depth
are believed to be important for
spawning as well as for summer holding
(R. Corwin, USBR, and B. Poytress,
USFWS, 2008, pers. comm). Winter
outmigration from the Klamath and
Rogue rivers was initiated when
temperatures dropped to 10–12 °C or
below 10 °C, and when discharge
increased to greater than 100 m3/s
(Erickson et al., 2002; Benson et al.,
2007). In the Sacramento River, tagged
adult green sturgeon were present
through November and December,
before moving downstream with
increased winter flows (M. Thomas, UC
Davis, and R. Corwin, USBR, 2008, pers.
comm.). Subadults may also migrate
upstream into the natal rivers, but for
unknown purposes. Adults and
subadults also occupy the San
Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun bays
and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
adjacent to the Sacramento River in the
summer months (although some
individuals that remain in the river
until late fall/early winter migrate
through the bays and Delta during their
winter outmigration), during which time
they are likely feeding and optimizing
growth (Kelly et al., 2007; Moser and
Lindley, 2007).
Outside of their natal waters, adult
and subadult green sturgeon inhabit
coastal marine habitats from the Bering
Sea to southern California, primarily
occupying waters within 110 meters (m)
depth (Erickson and Hightower, 2007).
Tagged subadults and adults have been
documented to make sustained coastal
migrations of up to 100 km per day (S.
Lindley and M. Moser, NMFS, pers.
comm., cited in BRT, 2005), but may
also reside in aggregation/feeding areas
in coastal marine waters for several days
at a time (S. Lindley and M. Moser,
NMFS, 2008, pers. comm.). There is
evidence that green sturgeon inhabit
certain estuaries on the northern
California, Oregon, and Washington
coasts during the summer, and inhabit
coastal marine waters along the central
California coast and between Vancouver
Island, British Columbia, and southeast
Alaska over the winter (Lindley et al.,
2008). Green sturgeon likely inhabit
these estuarine and marine waters to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
feed and to optimize growth (Moser and
Lindley, 2007). Particularly large
aggregations of green sturgeon occur in
the Columbia River estuary and
Washington estuaries and include green
sturgeon from all known spawning
populations (Moser and Lindley, 2007).
Although adult and subadult green
sturgeon occur in coastal marine waters
as far north as the Bering Sea, green
sturgeon have not been observed in
freshwater rivers or coastal bays and
estuaries in Alaska.
Within bays and estuaries, adults and
subadults inhabit a wide range of
environmental conditions. Adults and
subadults in Willapa Bay and the San
Francisco Bay Estuary occurred over the
entire temperature and salinity range
(11.9–21.9 °C; 8.8–32.1 ppt),
experienced large fluctuations in
temperature and salinity (up to 2 °C h¥1
and 1 practical salinity unit (PSU) h¥1),
and occupied a wide range of dissolved
oxygen levels from 6.54 to 8.98 mg O2/
l (Kelly et al., 2007; Moser and Lindley,
2007). Tagged adults and subadults in
the San Francisco Bay Estuary occupied
shallow depths during directional
movements but stayed close to the
bottom during non-directional
movements, presumably because they
were foraging (Kelly et al., 2007).
Similar to freshwater rivers, winter
outmigration from Willapa Bay was
initiated when water temperatures
dropped below 10 °C (Moser and
Lindley, 2007).
Adult and subadult green sturgeon in
the Columbia River estuary, Willapa
Bay, and Grays Harbor feed on
crangonid shrimp, burrowing
thalassinidean shrimp (primarily the
burrowing ghost shrimp (Neotrypaea
californiensis), but possibly other
related species), amphipods, clams,
juvenile Dungeness crab (Cancer
magister), anchovies, sand lances
(Ammodytes hexapterus), lingcod
(Ophiodon elongatus), and other
unidentified fishes (P. Foley,
unpublished data cited in Moyle et al.,
1995; C. Tracy, minutes to USFWS
meeting, cited in Moyle et al., 1995; O.
Langness, WDFW, pers. comm., cited in
Moser and Lindley, 2007; Dumbauld et
al., 2008). Burrowing ghost shrimp
made up about 50 percent of the
stomach contents of green sturgeon
sampled in 2003 (Dumbauld et al.,
2008). Subadults and adults feeding in
bays and estuaries may be exposed to
contaminants that may affect their
growth and reproduction. Studies on
white sturgeon in estuaries indicate that
the bioaccumulation of pesticides and
other contaminants adversely affects
growth and reproductive development
and may result in decreased
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
52087
reproductive success (Fairey et al.,
1997; Foster et al., 2001a; Foster et al.,
2001b; Kruse and Scarnecchia, 2002;
Feist et al., 2005; Greenfield et al.,
2005). Green sturgeon are believed to
experience similar risks from
contaminants (70 FR 17386, April 6,
2005).
Methods and Criteria Used to Identify
Critical Habitat
In the following sections, we describe
the relevant definitions and
requirements in the ESA and our
implementing regulations and the key
methods and criteria used to prepare
this proposed critical habitat
designation. In accordance with section
4(b)(2) of the ESA and our
implementing regulations (50 CFR
424.12(a)), this proposed rule is based
on the best scientific information
available concerning the Southern DPS’s
present and historical range, habitat,
and biology, as well as threats to its
habitat. In preparing this rule, we
reviewed and summarized current
information on the green sturgeon,
including recent biological surveys and
reports, peer-reviewed literature, NMFS
status reviews for green sturgeon (Moyle
et al., 1992; Adams et al., 2002; BRT,
2005), and the proposed and final listing
rules for the green sturgeon (70 FR
17386, April 6, 2005; 71 FR 17757, April
7, 2006).
To assist with the evaluation of
critical habitat, we convened a critical
habitat review team (CHRT) of nine
Federal biologists from NMFS, the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and
the USBR with experience in green
sturgeon biology, consultations, and
management, or experience in the
critical habitat designation process. The
CHRT used the best available scientific
and commercial data and their best
professional judgment to: (1) Verify the
geographical area occupied by the
Southern DPS at the time of listing; (2)
identify the physical and biological
features essential to the conservation of
the species; (3) identify specific areas
within the occupied area containing
those essential physical and biological
features; (4) verify whether the essential
features within each specific area may
need special management
considerations or protection and
identify activities that may affect these
essential features; (5) evaluate the
conservation value of each specific area;
and (6) determine if any unoccupied
areas are essential to the conservation of
the Southern DPS. The CHRT’s
evaluation and conclusions are
described in detail in the following
sections.
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
52088
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Physical or Biological Features
Essential for Conservation
Joint NMFS–USFWS regulations, at
50 CFR 424.12(b), state that in
determining what areas are critical
habitat, the agencies ‘‘shall consider
those physical and biological features
that are essential to the conservation of
a given species and that may require
special management considerations or
protection.’’ Features to consider may
include, but are not limited to: ‘‘(1)
Space for individual and population
growth, and for normal behavior; (2)
Food, water, air, light, minerals, or other
nutritional or physiological
requirements; (3) Cover or shelter; (4)
Sites for breeding, reproduction, rearing
of offspring, germination, or seed
dispersal; and generally; (5) Habitats
that are protected from disturbance or
are representative of the historic
geographical and ecological
distributions of a species.’’ The
regulations also require the agencies to
‘‘focus on the principal biological or
physical constituent elements’’
(hereafter referred to as ‘‘Primary
Constituent Elements’’ or PCEs) within
the specific areas considered for
designation that are essential to
conservation of the species, which ‘‘may
include, but are not limited to, the
following: * * * spawning sites,
feeding sites, seasonal wetland or
dryland, water quality or quantity,
* * * geological formation, vegetation
type, tide, and specific soil types.’’
The CHRT recognized that the
different systems occupied by green
sturgeon at specific stages of their life
cycle serve distinct purposes and thus
may contain different PCEs. Based on
the best available scientific information,
the CHRT identified PCEs for freshwater
riverine systems, estuarine areas, and
nearshore marine waters.
The specific PCEs essential for the
conservation of the Southern DPS in
freshwater riverine systems include:
(1) Food resources. Abundant prey
items for larval, juvenile, subadult, and
adult life stages. Although the CHRT
lacked specific data on food resources
for green sturgeon within freshwater
riverine systems, juvenile green
sturgeon most likely feed on fly larvae
(based on nutritional studies on the
closely-related white sturgeon) (J.
Stuart, NMFS, 2008, pers. comm.). Food
resources are important for juvenile
foraging, growth, and development
during their downstream migration to
the Delta and bays. In addition, subadult
and adult green sturgeon may forage
during their downstream post-spawning
migration, while holding within deep
pools (Erickson et al., 2002), or on non-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
spawning migrations within freshwater
rivers. Subadult and adult green
sturgeon in freshwater rivers most likely
feed on benthic prey species similar to
those fed on in bays and estuaries,
including shrimp, clams, and benthic
fishes (Moyle et al., 1995; Erickson et
al., 2002; Moser and Lindley, 2007;
Dumbauld et al., 2008).
(2) Substrate type or size (i.e.,
structural features of substrates).
Substrates suitable for egg deposition
and development (e.g., bedrock sills and
shelves, cobble and gravel, or hard clean
sand, with interstices or irregular
surfaces to ‘‘collect’’ eggs and provide
protection from predators, and free of
excessive silt and debris that could
smother eggs during incubation), larval
development (e.g., substrates with
interstices or voids providing refuge
from predators and from high flow
conditions), and subadults and adults
(e.g., substrates for holding and
spawning). For example, spawning is
believed to occur over substrates
ranging from clean sand to bedrock,
with preferences for cobble (Emmett et
al., 1991; Moyle et al., 1995). Eggs likely
adhere to substrates, or settle into
crevices between substrates (Deng, 2000;
Van Eenennaam et al., 2001; Deng et al.,
2002). Both embryos and larvae
exhibited a strong affinity for benthic
structure during laboratory studies (Van
Eenennaam et al., 2001; Deng et al.,
2002; Kynard et al., 2005), and may seek
refuge within crevices, but use flatsurfaced substrates for foraging (Nguyen
and Crocker, 2007). For more details,
see the sections on ‘‘Spawning’’ and
‘‘Development of early life stages’’.
(3) Water flow. A flow regime (i.e., the
magnitude, frequency, duration,
seasonality, and rate-of-change of fresh
water discharge over time) necessary for
normal behavior, growth, and survival
of all life stages. Such a flow regime
should include stable and sufficient
water flow rates in spawning and
rearing reaches to maintain water
temperatures within the optimal range
for egg, larval, and juvenile survival and
development (11–19 °C) (Cech et al.,
2000, cited in COSEWIC, 2004; Mayfield
and Cech, 2004; Van Eenennaam et al.,
2005; Allen et al., 2006). Sufficient flow
is needed to reduce the incidence of
fungal infestations of the eggs (Deng et
al., 2002; Parsley et al., 2002). In
addition, sufficient flow is needed to
flush silt and debris from cobble, gravel,
and other substrate surfaces to prevent
crevices from being filled in (and
potentially suffocating the eggs; Deng et
al., 2002) and to maintain surfaces for
feeding (Nguyen and Crocker, 2007).
Successful migration of adult green
sturgeon to and from spawning grounds
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
is also dependent on sufficient water
flow. As stated in the subsection titled
‘‘Spawning’’, spawning success is most
certainly associated with water flow and
water temperature. Spawning in the
Sacramento River is believed to be
triggered by increases in water flow to
about 400 m3/s (average daily water
flow during spawning months: 198–306
m3/s) (Brown, 2007). Post-spawning
downstream migrations are triggered by
increased flows, ranging from 174–417
m3/s in the late summer (Vogel, 2005)
and greater than 100 m3/s in the winter
(Erickson et al., 2002; Benson et al.,
2007; M. Thomas and R. Corwin, USBR,
2008, pers. comm.).
(4) Water quality. Water quality,
including temperature, salinity, oxygen
content, and other chemical
characteristics, necessary for normal
behavior, growth, and viability of all life
stages (see sections on ‘‘Development of
early life stages’’ and ‘‘Adults and
subadults’’). Suitable water
temperatures would include: Stable
water temperatures within spawning
reaches (wide fluctuations could
increase egg mortality or deformities in
developing embryos); temperatures
within 11–17 °C (optimal range = 14–16
°C) in spawning reaches for egg
incubation (March–August) (Van
Eenennaam et al., 2005); temperatures
below 20 °C for larval development
(Werner et al., 2007); and temperatures
below 24 °C for juveniles (Mayfield and
Cech, 2004; Allen et al., 2006a). Suitable
salinity levels range from fresh water
(< 3 parts per thousand (ppt)) for larvae
and early juveniles (about 100 dph) to
brackish water (10 ppt) for juveniles
prior to their transition to salt water.
Prolonged exposure to higher salinities
may result in decreased growth and
activity levels and even mortality (Allen
and Cech, 2007). Adequate levels of
dissolved oxygen are needed to support
oxygen consumption by fish in their
early life stages (ranging from 61.78 to
76.06 mg O2 hr¥1 kg¥1 for juveniles)
(Allen and Cech, 2007). Suitable water
quality would also include water
containing acceptably low levels of
contaminants (i.e., pesticides,
organochlorines, elevated levels of
heavy metals, etc.; acceptably low levels
would be determined by NMFS on a
case-by-case basis) that may disrupt
normal development of embryonic,
larval, and juvenile stages of green
sturgeon. Water with acceptably low
levels of such contaminants would
protect green sturgeon from adverse
impacts on growth, reproductive
development, and reproductive success
(e.g., reduced egg size and abnormal
gonadal development) likely to result
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
from exposure to contaminants (Fairey
et al., 1997; Foster et al., 2001a; Foster
et al., 2001b; Kruse and Scarnecchia,
2002; Feist et al., 2005; Greenfield et al.,
2005).
(5) Migratory corridor. A migratory
pathway necessary for the safe and
timely passage of Southern DPS fish
within riverine habitats and between
riverine and estuarine habitats (e.g., an
unobstructed river or dammed river that
still allows for safe and timely passage).
We define safe and timely passage to
mean that human-induced
impediments, either physical, chemical
or biological, do not alter the migratory
behavior of the fish such that its
survival or the overall viability of the
species is compromised (e.g., an
impediment that compromises the
ability of fish to reach their spawning
habitat in time to encounter conspecifics and reproduce). Unimpeded
migratory corridors are necessary for
adult green sturgeon to migrate to and
from spawning habitats, and for larval
and juvenile green sturgeon to migrate
downstream from spawning/rearing
habitats within freshwater rivers to
rearing habitats within the estuaries.
(6) Water depth. Deep (≥ 5 m) holding
pools for both upstream and
downstream holding of adult or
subadult fish, with adequate water
quality and flow to maintain the
physiological needs of the holding adult
or subadult fish (see section titled
Adults and Subadults). Deep pools of
≥ 5 m depth with high associated
turbulence and upwelling are critical for
adult green sturgeon spawning and for
summer holding within the Sacramento
River (R. Corwin, USBR, and B.
Poytress, USFWS, 2008, pers. comm.).
Adult green sturgeon in the Klamath
and Rogue rivers also occupy deep
holding pools for extended periods of
time, presumably for feeding, energy
conservation, and/or refuge from high
water temperatures (Erickson et al.,
2002; Benson et al., 2007).
(7) Sediment quality. Sediment
quality (i.e., chemical characteristics)
necessary for normal behavior, growth,
and viability of all life stages. This
includes sediments free of elevated
levels of contaminants (e.g., selenium,
polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and
organochlorine pesticides) that may
adversely affect green sturgeon. Based
on studies of white sturgeon,
bioaccumulation of contaminants from
feeding on benthic species may
adversely affect the growth,
reproductive development, and
reproductive success of green sturgeon
(see section titled Adult and Subadults).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
The specific PCEs essential for the
conservation of the Southern DPS in
estuarine areas include:
(1) Food resources. Abundant prey
items within estuarine habitats and
substrates for juvenile, subadult, and
adult life stages. As described
previously (see Green Sturgeon Natural
History), prey species for juvenile,
subadult, and adult green sturgeon
within bays and estuaries primarily
consist of benthic invertebrates and
fishes, including crangonid shrimp,
burrowing thalassinidean shrimp
(particularly the burrowing ghost
shrimp), amphipods, isopods, clams,
annelid worms, crabs, sand lances, and
anchovies. These prey species are
critical for the rearing, foraging, growth,
and development of juvenile, subadult,
and adult green sturgeon within the
bays and estuaries.
(2) Water flow. Within bays and
estuaries adjacent to the Sacramento
River (i.e., the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta and the Suisun, San Pablo, and
San Francisco bays), sufficient flow into
the bay and estuary to allow adults to
successfully orient to the incoming flow
and migrate upstream to spawning
grounds. Sufficient flows are needed to
attract adult green sturgeon to the
Sacramento River to initiate the
upstream spawning migration
(Kohlhorst et al., 1991, cited in CDFG,
2002; J. Stuart, NMFS, 2008, pers.
comm.).
(3) Water quality. Water quality,
including temperature, salinity, oxygen
content, and other chemical
characteristics, necessary for normal
behavior, growth, and viability of all life
stages. Suitable water temperatures for
juvenile green sturgeon should be below
24 °C. At temperatures above 24 °C,
juvenile green sturgeon exhibit
decreased swimming performance
(Mayfield and Cech, 2004) and
increased cellular stress (Allen et al.,
2006). Suitable salinities range from
brackish water (10 ppt) to salt water (33
ppt). Juveniles transitioning from
brackish to salt water can tolerate
prolonged exposure to salt water
salinities, but may exhibit decreased
growth and activity levels (Allen and
Cech, 2007), whereas subadults and
adults tolerate a wide range of salinities
(Kelly et al., 2007). Subadult and adult
green sturgeon occupy a wide range of
dissolved oxygen levels, but may need
a minimum dissolved oxygen level of at
least 6.54 mg O2/l (Kelly et al., 2007;
Moser and Lindley, 2007). As described
above, adequate levels of dissolved
oxygen are also required to support
oxygen consumption by juveniles
(ranging from 61.78 to 76.06 mg O2 hr¥1
kg¥1) (Allen and Cech, 2007). Suitable
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
52089
water quality also includes water with
acceptably low levels of contaminants
(e.g., pesticides, organochlorines,
elevated levels of heavy metals;
acceptable low levels as determined by
NMFS on a case-by-case basis) that may
disrupt the normal development of
juvenile life stages, or the growth,
survival, or reproduction of subadult or
adult stages.
(4) Migratory corridor. A migratory
pathway necessary for the safe and
timely passage of Southern DPS fish
within estuarine habitats and between
estuarine and riverine or marine
habitats. We define safe and timely
passage to mean that human-induced
impediments, either physical, chemical
or biological, do not alter the migratory
behavior of the fish such that its
survival or the overall viability of the
species is compromised (e.g., an
impediment that compromises the
ability of fish to reach thermal refugia
by the time they enter a particular life
stage). Within the bays and estuaries
adjacent to the Sacramento River,
unimpeded passage is needed for
juvenile green sturgeon to migrate from
the river to the bays and estuaries and
eventually out into the ocean. Passage
within the bays and the Delta is also
critical for adults and subadults for
feeding and summer holding, as well as
to access the Sacramento River for their
upstream spawning migrations and to
make their outmigration back into the
ocean. Within bays and estuaries
outside of the Delta and the Suisun, San
Pablo, and San Francisco bays,
unimpeded passage is necessary for
adult and subadult green sturgeon to
access feeding areas, holding areas, and
thermal refugia, and to ensure passage
back out into the ocean.
(5) Water depth. A diversity of depths
necessary for shelter, foraging, and
migration of juvenile, subadult, and
adult life stages. Subadult and adult
green sturgeon occupy a diversity of
depths within bays and estuaries for
feeding and migration. Tagged adults
and subadults within the San Francisco
Bay estuary primarily occupied waters
over shallow depths of less than 10 m,
either swimming near the surface or
foraging along the bottom (Kelly et al.,
2007). In a study of juvenile green
sturgeon in the Delta, relatively large
numbers of juveniles were captured
primarily in shallow waters from 1–3
meters deep, indicating juveniles may
require even shallower depths for
rearing and foraging (Radtke, 1966).
Thus, a diversity of depths is important
to support different life stages and
habitat uses for green sturgeon within
estuarine areas.
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
52090
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(6) Sediment quality. Sediment
quality (i.e., chemical characteristics)
necessary for normal behavior, growth,
and viability of all life stages. This
includes sediments free of elevated
levels of contaminants (e.g., selenium,
PAHs, and organochlorine pesticides)
that can cause adverse effects on all life
stages of green sturgeon (see description
of ‘‘Sediment quality’’ for riverine
habitats above).
The specific PCEs essential for the
conservation of the Southern DPS in
coastal marine areas include:
(1) Migratory corridor. A migratory
pathway necessary for the safe and
timely passage of Southern DPS fish
within marine and between estuarine
and marine habitats. We define safe and
timely passage to mean that humaninduced impediments, either physical,
chemical or biological, do not alter the
migratory behavior of the fish such that
its survival or the overall viability of the
species is compromised (e.g., an
impediment that compromises the
ability of fish to reach abundant prey
resources during the summer months in
Northwest Pacific estuaries). Subadult
and adult green sturgeon spend the
majority of their time in marine and
estuarine waters outside of their natal
rivers. Unimpeded passage within
coastal marine waters is critical for
subadult and adult green sturgeon to
access oversummering habitats within
coastal bays and estuaries and
overwintering habitat within coastal
waters between Vancouver Island, BC,
and southeast Alaska. Access to and
unimpeded movement within these
areas is also necessary for green
sturgeon to forage for prey and make
lengthy migrations necessary to reach
other foraging areas (Lindley et al.,
2008). Passage is also necessary for
subadults and adults to migrate back to
San Francisco Bay and to the
Sacramento River for spawning.
(2) Water quality. Coastal marine
waters with adequate dissolved oxygen
levels and acceptably low levels of
contaminants (e.g., pesticides,
organochlorines, heavy metals that may
disrupt the normal behavior, growth,
and viability of subadult and adult
green sturgeon). Based on studies of
tagged subadult and adult green
sturgeon in the San Francisco Bay
estuary, CA, and Willapa Bay, WA,
subadults and adults may need a
minimum dissolved oxygen level of at
least 6.54 mg O2/l (Kelly et al., 2007;
Moser and Lindley, 2007). As described
above, exposure to and bioaccumulation
of contaminants may adversely affect
the growth, reproductive development,
and reproductive success of subadult
and adult green sturgeon. Thus, waters
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
with acceptably low levels of such
contaminants (as determined by NMFS
on a case-by-case basis) are required for
the normal development of green
sturgeon for optimal survival and
spawning success.
(3) Food resources. Abundant prey
items for subadults and adults, which
may include benthic invertebrates and
fishes. Green sturgeon spend more than
half their lives in coastal marine and
estuarine waters, spending from 3–20
years at a time out at sea. Abundant
food resources are important to support
subadults and adults over long-distance
migrations, and may be one of the
factors attracting green sturgeon to
habitats far to the north (off the coast of
Vancouver Island and Alaska) and to the
south (Monterey Bay, CA, and off the
coast of southern California) of their
natal habitat. Although the CHRT lacked
direct evidence, prey species likely
include benthic invertebrates and fishes
similar to those fed upon by green
sturgeon in bays and estuaries (e.g.,
shrimp, clams, crabs, anchovies, sand
lances) (see section on ‘‘Adults and
subadults’’).
Geographical Area Occupied by the
Species and Specific Areas Within the
Geographical Area Occupied
One of the first steps in the critical
habitat designation process is to define
the geographical area occupied by the
species at the time of listing. The CHRT
relied on data from tagging and tracking
studies, genetic analyses, field
observations, records of fisheries take
and incidental take (e.g., in water
diversion activities), and opportunistic
sightings to provide information on the
current range and distribution of green
sturgeon and of the Southern DPS. The
range of green sturgeon extends from the
˜
Bering Sea, Alaska, to Ensenada,
Mexico. Within this range, Southern
DPS fish are confirmed to occur from
Graves Harbor, Alaska, to Monterey Bay,
California (Lindley et al., 2008; S.
Lindley and M. Moser, NMFS, 2008,
unpublished data), based on telemetry
data and genetic analyses. Green
sturgeon have been observed northwest
of Graves Harbor, AK, and south of
Monterey Bay, CA, but have not been
identified as belonging to either the
Northern or Southern DPS. The CHRT
concluded that there are no barriers or
habitat conditions preventing Southern
DPS fish detected in Monterey Bay, CA,
or off Graves Harbor, AK, from moving
further south or further north, and that
the green sturgeon observed in these
areas could belong to either the
Northern DPS or the Southern DPS.
Based on this reasoning, the
geographical area occupied by the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Southern DPS was defined as the entire
range occupied by green sturgeon (i.e.,
˜
from the Bering Sea, AK, to Ensenada,
Mexico), encompassing all areas where
the presence of Southern DPS fish has
been confirmed, as well as areas where
the presence of Southern DPS fish is
likely (based on the presence of
confirmed Northern DPS fish or green
sturgeon of unknown DPS).
Areas outside of the United States
cannot be designated as critical habitat
(50 CFR 424.12(h)). Thus, the occupied
geographical area under consideration
for this designation is limited to areas
from the Bering Sea, AK, to the
California/Mexico border, excluding
Canadian waters. For freshwater rivers,
the CHRT concluded that green sturgeon
of each DPS are likely to occur
throughout their natal river systems,
but, within non-natal river systems, are
likely to be limited to the estuaries and
would not occur upstream of the head
of the tide. For the purposes of our
evaluation of critical habitat, we defined
all green sturgeon observed upstream of
the head of the tide in freshwater rivers
south of the Eel River (i.e., the
Sacramento River and its tributaries) as
belonging to the Southern DPS, and all
green sturgeon observed upstream of the
head of the tide in freshwater rivers
north of and including the Eel River as
belonging to the Northern DPS. Thus,
for freshwater rivers north of and
including the Eel River, the areas
upstream of the head of the tide were
not considered part of the geographical
area occupied by the Southern DPS.
The CHRT then identified ‘‘specific
areas’’ within the geographical area
occupied. To be eligible for designation
as critical habitat under the ESA, each
specific area must contain at least one
PCE that may require special
management considerations or
protection. For each specific occupied
area, the CHRT noted whether the
presence of Southern DPS green
sturgeon is confirmed or likely (based
on the presence of Northern DPS fish or
green sturgeon of unknown DPS) and
verified that each area contained one or
more PCE(s) that may require special
management considerations or
protection. The following paragraphs
provide a brief description of the
presence and distribution of Southern
DPS green sturgeon within each area
and summarize the CHRT’s methods for
delineating the specific areas.
Freshwater Rivers, Bypasses, and the
Delta
Green sturgeon occupy several
freshwater river systems from the
Sacramento River, CA, north to British
Columbia, Canada (Moyle, 2002). As
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
described in the previous section,
Southern DPS green sturgeon occur
throughout their natal river systems
(i.e., the Sacramento River, lower
Feather River, and lower Yuba River),
but are believed to be restricted to the
estuaries in non-natal river systems (i.e.,
north of and including the Eel River).
The CHRT defined the specific areas in
the Sacramento, Feather, and Yuba
rivers in California to include riverine
habitat from the river mouth upstream
to and including the furthest known site
of historic and/or current sighting or
capture of green sturgeon, as long as the
site is still accessible. The specific areas
were extended upstream to a
geographically identifiable point. The
riverine specific areas include areas that
offer at least periodic passage of
Southern DPS fish to upstream sites and
include sufficient habitat necessary for
each riverine life stage (e.g., spawning,
egg incubation, larval rearing, juvenile
feeding, passage throughout the river,
and/or passage into and out of estuarine
or marine habitat).
The CHRT delineated specific areas
where Southern DPS green sturgeon
occur, including: the Sacramento River,
the Yolo and Sutter bypasses, the lower
Feather River, and the lower Yuba
River. The CHRT also delineated a
specific area in the Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta. The mainstem
Sacramento River is the only area where
spawning by Southern DPS green
sturgeon has been confirmed and where
all life stages of the Southern DPS are
supported. Beginning in March and
through early summer, adult green
sturgeon migrate as far upstream as the
Keswick Dam (rkm 486) to spawn
(Brown, 2007). Spawning has been
confirmed by the collection of larvae
and juveniles at the RBDD and the
Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (GCID)
(CDFG, 2002; Brown, 2007) and by the
collection of green sturgeon eggs
downstream of the RBDD (Brown, 2007;
B. Poytress, USFWS, 2008, pers.
comm.). The Sacramento River provides
important spawning, holding, and
migratory habitat for adults and
important rearing, feeding, and
migratory habitat for larvae and
juveniles. The Yolo and Sutter bypasses
adjacent to the lower Sacramento River
also serve as important migratory
corridors for Southern DPS adults,
subadults, and juveniles on their
upstream or downstream migration and
provide a high macroinvertebrate forage
base that may support green sturgeon
feeding. Southern DPS adults occupy
the lower Feather River up to Oroville
Dam (rkm 116) and the lower Yuba
River up to Daguerre Dam (rkm 19).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
Based on observations of Southern DPS
adults occurring right up to the dams
and of spawning behavior by adults on
the Feather River, spawning may have
occurred historically in the lower
Feather River and, to a lesser extent, in
the lower Yuba River. However, no
green sturgeon eggs, larvae, or juveniles
have ever been collected within these
rivers. Further downstream, the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta provides
important rearing, feeding, and
migratory habitat for juveniles, which
occur throughout the Delta in all
months of the year. Subadults and
adults also occur throughout the Delta
to feed, grow, and prepare for their
outmigration to the ocean. The draft
biological report provides more detailed
information on each specific area,
including a description of the PCEs
present, special management
considerations or protection that may be
needed, and the presence and
distribution of Southern DPS green
sturgeon. The draft biological report is
available upon request (see ADDRESSES),
via our Web site at https://
swr.nmfs.noaa.gov, or via the Federal
eRulemaking Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov. For additional
discussion of the special management
considerations or protection that may be
needed for the PCEs, please see also the
description of ‘‘Special management
considerations or protection’’ below.
Bays and Estuaries
Southern DPS green sturgeon occupy
coastal bays and estuaries from
Monterey Bay, CA, to Puget Sound, WA.
In the Central Valley, CA, juvenile,
subadult, and adult life stages occur
throughout the Suisun, San Pablo, and
San Francisco bays. These bays support
the rearing, feeding, and growth of
juveniles prior to their first entry into
marine waters. The bays also serve as
important feeding, rearing, and
migratory habitat for subadult and adult
Southern DPS green sturgeon.
Outside of their natal system,
subadult and adult Southern DPS fish
occupy coastal bays and estuaries in
California, Oregon, and Washington,
including estuarine waters at the
mouths of non- natal rivers. Subadult
and adult Southern DPS green sturgeon
have been confirmed to occupy the
following coastal bays and estuaries:
Monterey Bay, CA; Humboldt Bay, CA;
Coos Bay, OR; Winchester Bay, OR; the
lower Columbia River estuary; Willapa
Bay, WA; Grays Harbor, WA; and Puget
Sound, WA (Chadwick, 1959; Miller,
1972; Lindley et al., 2008; Pinnix, 2008;
S. Lindley and M. Moser, NMFS, 2008,
unpublished data). The presence of
Southern DPS green sturgeon is likely
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
52091
(based on limited records of confirmed
Northern DPS fish or green sturgeon of
unknown DPS), but not confirmed
within the following coastal bays and
estuaries: Elkhorn Slough, CA; Tomales
Bay, CA; Noyo Harbor, CA; Eel River
estuary, CA; Klamath/Trinity River
estuary, CA; Rogue River estuary, OR;
Siuslaw River estuary, OR; Alsea River
estuary, OR; Yaquina Bay, OR; and
Tillamook Bay, OR (Emmett et al., 1991;
Moyle et al., 1992; Adams et al., 2002;
Erickson et al., 2002; Yoklavich et al.,
2002; Farr and Kern, 2005).
Subadult and adult green sturgeon are
believed to occupy coastal bays and
estuaries outside of their natal waters
for feeding, optimization of growth, and
thermal refugia (Moser and Lindley,
2007; Lindley et al., 2008). Occupied
coastal bays and estuaries north of San
Francisco Bay, CA, contain
oversummering habitats for subadults
and adults, whereas coastal bays and
estuaries south of San Francisco Bay,
CA, are believed to contain
overwintering habitats (Lindley et al.,
2008). The largest concentrations of
green sturgeon, including Southern DPS
fish, occur within the lower Columbia
River estuary, Willapa Bay, and Grays
Harbor (Emmett et al., 1991; Adams et
al., 2002; WDFW and ODFW, 2002;
Israel and May, 2006; Moser and
Lindley, 2007; Lindley et al., 2008).
Large numbers of green sturgeon also
occur within Winchester Bay, Coos Bay,
and Humboldt Bay (Moyle et al., 1992;
Rien et al., 2000; Farr et al., 2001;
Adams et al., 2002; Farr and Rien, 2002,
2003; Farr and Kern, 2004, 2005; Israel
and May, 2006; Lindley et al., 2008;
Pinnix, 2008). Smaller numbers of green
sturgeon occur in Tomales Bay, CA
(Moyle et al., 1992), Yaquina Bay
(Emmett et al., 1991; Rien et al., 2000;
Farr et al., 2001; Farr and Rien, 2002,
2003; Farr and Kern, 2004, 2005), and
Puget Sound, WA (S. Lindley and M.
Moser, NMFS, 2008, unpublished data).
Based on limited available data, green
sturgeon presence is believed to be rare
in the following bays and estuaries:
Elkhorn Slough, CA; Noyo Harbor, CA;
Siuslaw River estuary, OR; Alsea River
estuary, OR; and Tillamook Bay, OR
(Emmett et al., 1991; Moyle et al., 1992;
Rien et al., 2000; Farr et al., 2001; Farr
and Rien, 2002; Yoklavich et al., 2002;
Farr and Rien, 2003; Farr and Kern,
2004, 2005). Green sturgeon are present
in the estuaries of the Eel River,
Klamath/Trinity rivers, and Rogue
River, but are believed to most likely
belong to the Northern DPS. This is
based on the fact that the Eel, Klamath/
Trinity, and Rogue rivers are spawning
rivers for the Northern DPS and that, to
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
52092
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
date, no tagged Southern DPS subadults
or adults have been detected in the
estuaries of the three rivers, although
Southern DPS fish have been observed
in coastal marine waters just outside the
mouth of the Klamath River (S. Lindley,
NMFS, 2008, pers. comm.).
The CHRT included all coastal bays
and estuaries for which there was
evidence to confirm the presence of
green sturgeon, noting where there were
confirmed Southern DPS fish,
confirmed Northern DPS fish, or
confirmed green sturgeon of unknown
DPS. As stated in the previous section,
based on our definitions for the
Northern DPS and Southern DPS, any
green sturgeon observed upstream of the
head of the tide in freshwater rivers
north of and including the Eel River
were assigned to the Northern DPS.
Thus, areas upstream of the head of the
tide on these rivers were not included
as part of the occupied specific areas for
the Southern DPS. Each specific area
was defined to extend from the mouth
of the bay or estuary upstream to the
head of the tide. The boundary at the
mouth of each bay or estuary was
defined by the COLREGS demarcation
line. COLREGS demarcation lines
delineate ‘‘those waters upon which
mariners shall comply with the
International Regulations for Preventing
Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS)
and those waters upon which mariners
shall comply with the Inland Navigation
Rules’’ (33 CFR 80.01). Waters inside of
the 72 COLREGS lines are Inland Rules
waters and waters outside of the 72
COLREGS lines are COLREGS waters.
The draft biological report provides
additional information for each specific
area. For a copy of the report, see
ADDRESSES, our Web site at https://
swr.nmfs.noaa.gov, or the Federal
eRulemaking Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov. For additional
discussion of the special management
considerations or protection that may be
needed for the PCEs, please see also the
description of ‘‘Special management
considerations or protection’’ below.
Coastal Marine Waters
Subadult and adult green sturgeon
spend most of their time in coastal
marine and estuarine waters. The best
available data indicate coastal marine
waters are important for seasonal
migrations from southern California to
Alaska to reach distant foraging and
aggregation areas. Green sturgeon occur
primarily within the 110 m depth
bathymetry (Erickson and Hightower,
2007). Green sturgeon tagged in the
Rogue River and tracked in marine
waters typically occupied the water
column at 40–70 m depth, but made
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
rapid vertical ascents to or near the
surface, for reasons yet unknown
(Erickson and Hightower, 2007). Green
sturgeon use of waters < 110 m depth
was confirmed by coastal Oregon and
Washington bottom-trawl fisheries
records indicating that most reported
locations of green sturgeon occurred
inside of the 110-m depth contour from
1993–2000, despite the fact that most of
the fishing effort occurred in water
deeper than 110 m (Erickson and
Hightower, 2007).
Based on tagging studies of both
Southern and Northern DPS fish, green
sturgeon spend a large part of their time
in coastal marine waters migrating
between coastal bays and estuaries,
including sustained long-distance
migrations of up to 100 km per day (S.
Lindley and M. Moser, NMFS, pers.
comm. cited in BRT, 2005). These
seasonal long-distance migrations are
most likely driven by food resources.
Some tagged individuals were observed
swimming at slower speeds and
spending several days within certain
areas, suggesting that the individuals
were feeding (S. Lindley and M. Moser,
NMFS, 2008, pers. comm.).
Within the geographical area
occupied (from the California/Mexico
border to the Bering Sea, Alaska), the
CHRT divided the coastal marine waters
into 12 specific areas between estuaries
or bays confirmed to be occupied by the
Southern DPS. The presence of green
sturgeon and Southern DPS fish within
each area was based on data from
tagging and tracking studies, records of
fisheries captures, and NOAA Observer
Program records. Tagged Southern DPS
subadults and adults have been detected
in coastal marine waters from Monterey
Bay, CA, to Graves Harbor, AK,
including the Strait of Juan de Fuca
(Lindley et al., 2008). Green sturgeon
bycatch data from NOAA’s West Coast
Groundfish Observer Program (WCGOP)
support the telemetry results, showing
green sturgeon occur from Monterey
Bay, CA, to Cape Flattery, WA, with the
greatest catch per unit effort in coastal
waters from Monterey Bay to Humboldt
Bay, CA (WCGOP, 2008, unpublished
data). Because green sturgeon were only
observed in the bottom trawl fishery,
there was no data on green sturgeon
bycatch off southeast Alaska, where
bottom trawl fishing is prohibited.
Green sturgeon have, however, been
captured in bottom trawl fisheries along
the coast off British Columbia. Although
critical habitat cannot be designated
within Canadian waters, it is important
to note that several tagged Southern DPS
green sturgeon have been detected off
Brooks Peninsula on the northern tip of
Vancouver Island, BC (Lindley et al.,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
2008.). Patterns of telemetry data
suggest that Southern DPS fish use
oversummering grounds in coastal bays
and estuaries along northern California,
Oregon, and Washington and
overwintering grounds between
Vancouver Island, BC, and southeast
Alaska (Lindley et al., 2008).
Based on the tagging data and the
information described above regarding
green sturgeon use of coastal bays and
estuaries in California, Oregon, and
Washington, the CHRT identified the
coastal marine waters from Monterey
Bay, CA, to Vancouver Island, BC, as the
primary migratory/connectivity corridor
for subadult and adult Southern DPS
green sturgeon to migrate to and from
oversummering habitats and
overwintering habitats. Coastal marine
waters off southeast Alaska were not
considered part of the primary
migratory/connectivity corridor for
green sturgeon, but were recognized as
an important area at the northern extent
of the overwintering range, based on the
detection of two tagged Southern DPS
fish off Graves Harbor, AK, (S. Lindley,
NMFS, and J. Israel, UC Davis, 2007,
pers. comm.) and green sturgeon
bycatch data along the northern coast of
British Columbia (Lindley et al., 2008).
For areas northwest of southeast Alaska
and south of Monterey Bay, CA, data on
green sturgeon occurrence include the
2006 capture of two green sturgeon of
unknown DPS in bottom trawl
groundfish fisheries off Kodiak Island,
AK, and in the Bering Sea off Unimak
Island, AK (J. Ferdinand and D.
Stevenson, NMFS, 2006, pers. comm.).
In coastal marine waters south of
Monterey Bay, a few green sturgeon of
unknown DPS have been captured off
Huntington Beach and Newport (Roedel,
1941), Point Vicente (Norris, 1957),
Santa Barbara, and San Pedro (R.
Rasmussen, NMFS, 2006, pers. comm.).
More detailed information on the
specific areas within coastal marine
waters can be found in the draft
biological report, available at our Web
site at
https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov, at the Federal
eRulemaking Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov, or upon request
(see ADDRESSES). For additional
discussion of the special management
considerations or protection that may be
needed for the PCEs, please see also the
description of ‘‘Special management
considerations or protection’’ below.
Special Management Considerations or
Protection
Joint NMFS and USFWS regulations
at 50 CFR 424.02(j) define ‘‘special
management considerations or
protection’’ to mean ‘‘any methods or
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
procedures useful in protecting physical
and biological features of the
environment for the conservation of
listed species.’’ Based on discussions
with the CHRT and consideration of the
draft economic report, a number of
activities were identified that may
threaten the PCEs such that special
management considerations or
protection may be required. Major
categories of habitat-related activities
include: (1) Dams; (2) water diversions;
(3) dredging and disposal of dredged
material; (4) in-water construction or
alterations, including channel
modifications/diking, sand and gravel
mining, gravel augmentation, road
building and maintenance, forestry,
grazing, agriculture, urbanization, and
other activities; (5) National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit activities and activities
generating non-point source pollution;
(6) power plants; (7) commercial
shipping; (8) aquaculture; (9)
desalination plants; (10) proposed
alternative energy projects; (11)
liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects; (12)
bottom trawling; and (13) habitat
restoration. These activities may have
an effect on one or more PCE(s) via their
alteration of one or more of the
following: Stream hydrology, water
level and flow, water temperature,
dissolved oxygen, erosion and sediment
input/transport, physical habitat
structure, vegetation, soils, nutrients
and chemicals, fish passage, and stream/
estuarine/marine benthic biota and prey
resources. The CHRT identified the
activities occurring within each specific
area that may necessitate special
management considerations or
protection for the PCEs and these are
described briefly in the following
paragraphs. These activities are
documented more fully in the draft
biological report.
Table 1 lists the specific areas and the
river miles or area (square miles)
covered, the PCEs present, and the
activities that may affect the PCEs for
each specific area and necessitate the
need for special management
considerations or protection. Several
activities may affect the PCEs within the
freshwater rivers, bypasses, and the
Delta. Within the rivers, dams and
diversions pose threats to habitat
features essential for the Southern DPS
by obstructing migration, alterating
Specific area
water flows and temperature, and
modifying substrate composition within
the rivers. Pollution from agricultural
runoff and water returns, as well as from
other point and non-point sources,
adversely affects water quality within
the rivers, bypasses and the Delta. Water
management practices in the bypasses
may pose a threat to Southern DPS fish
residing within or migrating through the
bypasses. For example, low water levels
may obstruct passage through the
bypasses, resulting in stranded fish.
Within the Delta, activities such as
dredging, pile driving, water diversion,
and the discharge of pollutants from
point and non-point sources can
adversely affect water quality as well as
alter the composition and distribution of
bottom substrates within the Delta.
Activities were also identified that
may threaten the PCEs in coastal bays
and estuaries and may necessitate the
need for special management
considerations or protection (Table 1).
The application of pesticides may
adversely affect prey resources and
water quality within the bays and
estuaries. In Willapa Bay and Grays
Harbor, WA, the use of carbaryl in
association with aquaculture operations
reduces the abundance and availability
of burrowing ghost shrimp, an
important prey species for green
sturgeon (Moser and Lindley, 2007;
Dumbauld et al., 2008). In the San
Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun bays,
several pesticides have been detected at
levels exceeding national benchmarks
for the protection of aquatic life
(Domagalski et al., 2000). These
pesticides pose a water quality issue
and may affect the abundance and
health of prey items as well as the
growth and reproductive health of
Southern DPS green sturgeon through
bioaccumulation. Other activities of
concern include those that may disturb
bottom substrates, adversely affect prey
resources, or degrade water quality
through resuspension of contaminated
sediments (e.g., dredging operations, inwater construction).
In addition, several activities were
identified that may affect the PCEs
within coastal marine areas such that
the PCEs would require special
management consideration or protection
(Table 1). The fact that green sturgeon
were only captured in the bottom trawl
fishery (based on the WCGOP bycatch
River miles
52093
data) provides evidence that green
sturgeon are associated with the benthos
and thus exposed to activities that
disturb the bottom. Of particular
concern are activities that affect prey
resources. Prey resources likely include
species similar to those fed on by green
sturgeon in bays and estuaries (e.g.,
burrowing ghost shrimp, mud shrimp,
crangonid shrimp, amphipods, isopods,
Dungeness crab), and these prey
resources are known to occur within the
marine specific areas. Activities that can
affect these prey resources include:
Commercial shipping and activities
generating point source pollution
(subject to National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System requirements) and
non-point source pollution that can
discharge contaminants and result in
bioaccumulation of contaminants in
green sturgeon; disposal of dredged
materials that can bury prey resources;
and bottom trawl fisheries that can
disturb the bottom (but may result in
beneficial or adverse effects on prey
resources for green sturgeon). In
addition, petroleum spills from
commercial shipping activities and
proposed tidal and wave energy projects
may affect water quality or hinder the
migration of green sturgeon along the
coast and may necessitate special
management of the PCEs.
Table 1. Summary of occupied
specific areas within freshwater rivers,
the bypasses, the Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta, coastal bays and
estuaries, and coastal marine areas
(within 110 m depth). The river miles or
surface area covered, the PCEs present,
and activities that may affect the PCEs
and necessitate the need for special
management considerations or
protection within each area are listed.
PCEs: Wd = depth, Fd = food, Fl = water
flow, P = passage, S = substrates, Sq =
sediment quality, Wq = water quality.
Activities: AG = agriculture, AQ =
aquaculture, BOT = bottom trawl
fishing, CON = in-water construction or
alterations, DAM = dams, DESAL =
desalination plants, DIV = water
diversions, DR = dredging and
deposition of dredged material, EP =
tidal/wave energy projects, LNG = LNG
projects, POLL = point and non-point
source pollution, PP = power plants,
REST = restoration, SHIP = commercial
shipping.
PCEs present
Activities
Freshwater rivers
Upper Sacramento River, CA ..................
Lower Sacramento River, CA ..................
Lower Feather River, CA .........................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
58.9
182.4
72.7
PO 00000
Wd, Fd, Fl, P, S, Sq, Wq ........................
Wd, Fd, Fl, P, S, Sq, Wq ........................
Wd, Fl, P, Wq ..........................................
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
CON, DAM, DIV, POLL.
AG, CON, DAM, DIV, DR, POLL.
AG, CON, DAM, DIV, POLL.
08SEP2
52094
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Specific area
River miles
Lower Yuba River, CA .............................
PCEs present
11.5
Wd, Fl, P, Wq ..........................................
Area
(sq miles)
Specific area
Activities
AG, DAM, DIV, POLL.
PCEs present
Activities
Bypasses and the Delta
Yolo Bypass, CA .....................................
Sutter Bypass, CA ...................................
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, CA .......
112.3
23.5
438.9
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Wd, Fd, Fl, P, S, Sq, Wq ........................
AG.
AG.
CON, DIV, DR, POLL, PP, REST.
Coastal Bays and Estuaries
Elkhorn Slough, CA .................................
Suisun Bay, CA .......................................
San Pablo Bay, CA .................................
San Francisco Bay, CA ...........................
Tomales Bay, CA ....................................
Noyo Harbor, CA .....................................
Eel R. Estuary, CA ..................................
Humboldt Bay, CA ...................................
Klamath/Trinity R. Estuary, CA ...............
Rogue R. Estuary, OR ............................
Coos Bay, OR .........................................
Winchester Bay, OR ................................
Siuslaw R. Estuary, OR ...........................
Alsea R. Estuary, OR ..............................
Yaquina Bay, OR .....................................
Tillamook Bay, OR ..................................
Columbia R. Estuary, OR and WA ..........
Willapa Bay, WA ......................................
Grays Harbor, WA ...................................
Puget Sound, WA ....................................
1.0
50.8
127.7
269.9
11.5
<0.1
8.5
26.6
2.5
0.6
17.7
10.8
0.4
0.8
6.3
14.2
236.9
134.3
91.8
1,017.8
Fd, Sq, P, Wq ..........................................
Wd, Fd, Fl, P, Sq, Wq .............................
Wd, Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..................................
Wd, Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
Fd, P, Sq, Wq ..........................................
DR, PP.
CON, DR, REST.
CON, DR, POLL, PP, REST.
CON, DR, EP, POLL, PP, REST.
DIV, POLL, REST.
DR, POLL.
CON, POLL.
AQ, POLL.
CON.
CON, POLL.
CON, LNG, POLL.
CON, POLL.
CON, POLL.
CON, DIV, POLL.
POLL.
CON, POLL.
CON, DAM, DR, LNG, POLL.
AQ, CON, EP, POLL.
AQ, POLL, SHIP.
CON, DR, EP, POLL, SHIP.
Coastal Marine Waters within 110 meters depth
CA/Mexico Border to Monterey Bay, CA
2,522.8
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
Monterey Bay, CA, to San Francisco
Bay, CA.
San Francisco Bay, CA, to Humboldt
Bay, CA.
Humboldt Bay, CA, to Coos Bay, OR .....
Coos Bay, OR, to Winchester Bay, OR ..
Winchester Bay, OR, to Columbia R. Estuary.
Columbia R. Estuary to Willapa Bay, WA
Willapa Bay, WA, to Grays Harbor, WA
Grays Harbor, WA, to WA/Canada Border.
Strait of Juan De Fuca, WA ....................
Canada/AK Border to Yakutat Bay, AK ..
Coastal Alaskan Waters Northwest of
Yakutat Bay, AK, including the Bering
Sea to the Bering Strait.
1,495.9
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
BOT, CON, DESAL, DR, EP, LNG,
POLL, PP.
BOT, DESAL, POLL, PP.
2,066.7
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
BOT, EP, POLL.
1,911.6
186.5
2,686.3
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
BOT, DR, EP, POLL.
BOT, EP.
BOT, EP, POLL.
477.1
403.0
1,900.9
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
BOT.
BOT.
BOT, EP, POLL.
798.8
19,567.9
374,826.4
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
Fd, P, Wq ................................................
BOT, DR, POLL.
EP, POLL, SHIP.
BOT, EP, LNG, SHIP.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Unoccupied Areas
Section 3(5)(A)(ii) of the ESA
authorizes the designation of ‘‘specific
areas outside the geographical area
occupied at the time [the species] is
listed’’ if these areas are essential for the
conservation of the species. Regulations
at 50 CFR 424.12(e) emphasize that the
agency ‘‘shall designate as critical
habitat areas outside the geographical
area presently occupied by a species
only when a designation limited to its
present range would be inadequate to
ensure the conservation of the species.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
The CHRT considered that a critical
habitat designation limited to presently
occupied areas may not be sufficient for
conservation, because such a
designation would not address one of
the major threats to the population
identified by the Status Review Team—
the concentration of spawning into one
spawning river (i.e., the Sacramento
River), and, as a consequence, the risk
of extirpation due to a catastrophic
event.
The CHRT identified seven
unoccupied areas in the Central Valley,
California that may provide additional
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
spawning habitat for the Southern DPS
of green sturgeon and considered
whether these areas are essential for the
conservation of the Southern DPS.
These seven areas include areas behind
dams that are currently inaccessible to
green sturgeon and areas below dams
that are not currently occupied by green
sturgeon. The areas include: (1) Reaches
upstream of Oroville Dam on the
Feather River; (2) reaches upstream of
Daguerre Dam on the Yuba River; (3)
areas on the Pit River upstream of
Keswick and Shasta dams; (4) areas on
the McCloud River upstream of Keswick
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
and Shasta dams; (5) areas on the upper
Sacramento River upstream of Keswick
and Shasta dams; (6) reaches on the
American River; and (7) reaches on the
San Joaquin River. Of these seven areas,
the CHRT identified reaches upstream
of Daguerre Dam on the Yuba River as
the most important for conserving the
species because: (1) The current habitat
conditions are likely to support
spawning; (2) adult Southern DPS fish
currently occupy habitat just below the
Daguerre Dam; (3) although the Yuba
River is part of the Sacramento River
drainage basin, it is separated spatially
from the current, single spawning
population on the upper Sacramento
River such that if a catastrophic
mortality event were to occur in the
upper Sacramento River, a Yuba River
population could help safeguard the
species from a mortality event that
would likely have significant adverse
species-level effects; and (4) there is a
greater potential for removal of the
Daguerre Dam, or restoration of fish
passage at the dam, in the near future
than for any of the other dams located
within the unoccupied areas identified
by the CHRT. The CHRT also
considered reaches on the San Joaquin
River, from the South Delta to the
Goodwin Dam on the Stanislaus River,
as important for conserving the
Southern DPS for some of the same
reasons mentioned above, especially
because the San Joaquin and Stanislaus
rivers are part of an entirely different
drainage basin than the current single
spawning area in the upper Sacramento
River. However, the CHRT was less
certain regarding the prospects for
reestablishing a spawning population in
this area, because current conditions on
the mainstem San Joaquin River are
poor and it is uncertain whether
conditions favorable for green sturgeon
presence and spawning could be
restored in this area in the near future.
The CHRT was unable to determine
that these seven unoccupied areas
which may be essential, actually are
essential to the conservation of the
Southern DPS at this time. Thus, these
seven unoccupied areas are not
proposed for designation as critical
habitat. The CHRT believed it likely that
at least one additional spawning area is
needed to support the conservation of
the Southern DPS, but because of
insufficient information regarding: (1)
The historical use of the currently
unoccupied areas by green sturgeon;
and (2) the likelihood that the habitats
within these unoccupied areas will be
restored to conditions that would
support green sturgeon presence and
spawning (e.g., restoring fish passage
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
and sufficient water flows and water
temperatures) they were unable to
determine which of these unoccupied
areas would be essential for conserving
the species. The development of a
recovery plan could help address the
latter question by establishing recovery
actions (e.g., removal of barriers on the
Yuba River) and recovery criteria (e.g.,
establishing at least two additional
spawning populations for the Southern
DPS in rivers south of the Eel River) in
order to achieve downlisting and
eventual delisting of the Southern DPS.
NMFS encourages actions that would
protect, conserve, and/or enhance
habitat conditions for the Southern DPS
(e.g., habitat restoration, removal of
dams, and establishment of fish passage)
within these areas. We request
additional information from the public
regarding these presently unoccupied
areas and their historical, current, and
potential use by green sturgeon.
Additional information would inform
our consideration of these areas for the
final designation as well as future
recovery planning for the Southern DPS.
Military Lands
Under the Sikes Act of 1997 (Sikes
Act) (16 U.S.C. 670a), ‘‘each military
installation that includes land and water
suitable for the conservation and
management of natural resources’’ is
required to develop and implement an
integrated natural resources
management plan (INRMP). An INRMP
integrates implementation of the
military mission of the installation with
stewardship of the natural resources
found there. Each INRMP includes: an
assessment of the ecological needs on
the military installation, including the
need to provide for the conservation of
listed species; a statement of goals and
priorities; a detailed description of
management actions to be implemented
to provide for these ecological needs;
and a monitoring and adaptive
management plan. Each INRMP must, to
the extent appropriate and applicable,
provide for fish and wildlife
management, fish and wildlife habitat
enhancement or modification, wetland
protection, enhancement, and
restoration where necessary to support
fish and wildlife and enforcement of
applicable natural resource laws.
The ESA was amended by the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2004 (Pub. L.108–136) to
address the designation of military
lands as critical habitat. ESA section
4(a)(3)(B)(i) states: ‘‘The Secretary shall
not designate as critical habitat any
lands or other geographical areas owned
or controlled by the Department of
Defense, or designated for its use, that
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
52095
are subject to an integrated natural
resources management plan prepared
under section 101 of the Sikes Act (16
U.S.C. 670a), if the Secretary determines
in writing that such plan provides a
benefit to the species for which critical
habitat is proposed for designation.’’
We contacted the Department of
Defense (DOD) and requested
information on all INRMPs for DOD
facilities that overlap with the specific
areas considered for designation as
critical habitat and that might provide
benefits to green sturgeon. The INRMPs
for one facility in California (Camp San
Luis Obispo) and for nine facilities in
Puget Sound, WA, were provided to us.
Of these, the following six facilities with
INRMPs were determined to overlap
with the specific areas under
consideration for critical habitat
designation (all located in Puget Sound,
WA): (1) Bremerton Naval Hospital; (2)
Naval Air Station, Everett; (3) Naval
Magazine Indian Island; (4) Naval Fuel
Depot, Manchester; (5) Naval Undersea
Warfare Center, Keyport; and (6) Naval
Air Station, Whidbey Island. We
reviewed the INRMPs for measures that
would benefit green sturgeon. The
INRMPs for four of the facilities
(Bremerton Naval Hospital, NAS
Everett, Naval Fuel Depot (Manchester),
and Naval Magazine (Indian Island))
contain measures for listed salmon and
bull trout that provide benefits for green
sturgeon. The INRMPs for the two
remaining facilities (NAS Whidbey
Island and NUWC Keyport) do not
contain specific requirements for listed
salmon or bull trout, but also include
measures that benefit fish species,
including green sturgeon. Examples of
the types of benefits include measures
to control erosion, protect riparian
zones and wetlands, minimize
stormwater and construction impacts,
and reduce contaminants. Based on
these benefits provided for green
sturgeon under the INRMPs, we
determined that the areas within these
six DOD facilities in Puget Sound, WA,
were not eligible for designation as
critical habitat.
Application of ESA Section 4(b)(2)
Section 4(b)(2) of the ESA requires the
Secretary to consider the economic,
national security, and any other relevant
impacts of designating any particular
area as critical habitat. Any particular
area may be excluded from critical
habitat if the Secretary determines that
the benefits of excluding the area
outweigh the benefits of designating the
area. The Secretary may not exclude a
particular area from designation if
exclusion will result in the extinction of
the species. Because the authority to
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
52096
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
exclude is discretionary, exclusion is
not required for any areas. In this
proposed designation, the Secretary has
applied his statutory discretion to
exclude 13 occupied areas from critical
habitat where the benefits of exclusion
outweigh the benefits of designation.
The first step in conducting the ESA
section 4(b)(2) analysis is to identify the
‘‘particular areas’’ to be analyzed. Where
we considered economic impacts and
weighed the economic benefits of
exclusion against the conservation
benefits of designation, we used the
same biologically-based ‘‘specific areas’’
we identified in the previous sections
pursuant to section 3(5)(A) of the ESA
(e.g., the upper Sacramento River, the
lower Sacramento River, the Delta, etc.).
Delineating the ‘‘particular areas’’ as the
same units as the ‘‘specific areas’’
allowed us to most effectively consider
the conservation value of the different
areas when balancing conservation
benefits of designation against economic
benefits of exclusion. At this time, we
have not identified any national security
or other relevant impacts of designation;
therefore, we did not delineate any
particular areas on the basis of these
impacts.
The next step in the ESA section
4(b)(2) analysis involves identification
of the impacts of designation: the
benefits of designation and the benefits
of exclusion, and then a more in-depth
discussion of each. We then weigh the
benefits of designation against the
benefits of exclusion, identify areas
eligible for exclusion where the benefits
of exclusion outweigh the benefits of
designation, and determine which areas
are appropriate to propose for exclusion.
These steps and the resulting list of
areas excluded from designation are
described in detail in the sections
below.
Impacts of Designation
The primary impact of a critical
habitat designation stems from the
requirement under section 7(a)(2) of the
ESA that Federal agencies insure their
actions are not likely to result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat. Determining this impact
is complicated by the fact that section
7(a)(2) contains the overlapping
requirement that Federal agencies must
also ensure their actions are not likely
to jeopardize the species’ continued
existence. One incremental impact of
designation is the extent to which
Federal agencies modify their actions to
insure their actions are not likely to
adversely modify the critical habitat of
the species, beyond any modifications
they would make because of the listing
and the jeopardy requirement. When a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
modification would be required due to
impacts to both the species and critical
habitat, the impact of the designation
may be co-extensive with the ESA
listing of the species. Additional
impacts of designation include state and
local protections that may be triggered
as a result of the designation and the
benefits from educating the public about
the importance of each area for species
conservation. The benefits of
designation were evaluated by
considering the conservation value of
each occupied specific area to the
Southern DPS. In the ‘‘Benefits of
Designation’’ section below, we discuss
how the conservation values of the
specific areas were assessed.
In determining the impacts of
designation, we predicted the
incremental change in Federal agency
actions as a result of the critical habitat
designation and the adverse
modification prohibition, beyond the
changes predicted to occur as a result of
listing and the jeopardy provision. In
recent critical habitat designations for
salmon and steelhead and for Southern
Resident killer whales, the ‘‘coextensive’’ impact of designation was
considered in accordance with a Tenth
Circuit Court decision (New Mexico
Cattle Growers Association v. U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 248 F.3d 1277
(10th Cir. 2001)) (NMCA). The ‘‘coextensive’’ impact of designation
considers the predicted change in the
Federal agency action resulting from the
critical habitat designation and the
adverse modification prohibition
(whereby the action’s effect on the PCEs
and the value of the habitat is analyzed),
even if the same change would result
from application of the listing and the
jeopardy provision (whereby the
action’s effect on the species itself and
individual members of the species is
analyzed). Shortly after the NMCA
decision, however, the Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit (Sierra Club v. U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 243 F.3d 434
(5th Cir. 2001) (Sierra Club)) and the
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
(Gifford Pinchot Task Force v. FWS, 378
F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2004)) (Gifford
Pinchot) invalidated our regulatory
definition of ‘‘adverse modification’’ of
critical habitat. Following that decision,
a District Court in Washington, D.C.
issued a decision involving the
USFWS’s critical habitat designation for
the piping plover (Cape Hatteras Access
Preservation Alliance v. Norton, 344 F.
Supp. 2d 1080 (D.D.C. 2004)) (Cape
Hatteras). In that decision, the Court
reasoned that the impact of a regulation
should be based on a comparison of the
world with and without the action, and
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
that the effects of listing and the
jeopardy provision should not be
considered as part of the impacts of a
designation in the ESA 4(b)(2) analysis
for a critical habitat designation.
Consistent with the Cape Hatteras
decision, we estimated and analyzed the
incremental impacts of designation,
beyond the impacts that would result
from the listing and jeopardy provision.
Our methods for estimating the impacts
of designation for economic impacts are
summarized in the section below titled
‘‘Determining the Benefits of Excluding
Particular Areas.’’ Because section
4(b)(2) requires a balancing of
competing considerations, we have
concluded that we must uniformly
consider impacts and benefits. Though
we do not propose exclusions based on
national security impacts or other
relevant impacts, we would also focus
on incremental impacts in such an
analysis. We recognize that excluding
an area from designation will not likely
avoid all of the impacts because the
jeopardy provision under section 7 still
applies. Similarly, much of the section
7 benefit would still apply because the
jeopardy provision still applies.
A draft economic report describes in
more detail the types of activities that
may be affected by the designation, the
potential range of changes we might
seek in those actions, and the estimated
economic impacts that might result from
such changes. A draft biological report
describes in detail the CHRT’s
evaluation of the conservation value of
each specific area and reports the final
conservation value ratings. The draft
ESA 4(b)(2) report describes the
weighing of the benefits of designation
against the benefits of exclusion for each
area. We solicit comments on all of
these reports, available on the NMFS
Southwest Region Web site at https://
swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/, on the Federal
E-Rulemaking Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov, or upon request
(see ADDRESSES).
Benefits of Designation
The primary benefit of designation is
the protection afforded under section 7
of the ESA, requiring all Federal
agencies to insure their actions are not
likely to destroy or adversely modify
designated critical habitat. This is in
addition to the requirement that all
Federal agencies ensure their actions are
not likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the species. In addition, the
designation may provide education and
outreach benefits by informing the
public about areas and features
important to species conservation. By
delineating areas of high conservation
value, the designation may help focus
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
and contribute to conservation efforts
for green sturgeon and their habitats.
These benefits are not directly
comparable to the costs of designation
for purposes of conducting the section
4(b)(2) analysis described below.
Ideally, the benefits should be
monetized. With sufficient information,
it may be possible to monetize the
benefits of a critical habitat designation
by first quantifying the benefits
expected from an ESA section 7
consultation and translating that into
dollars. We are not aware, however, of
any available data that would support
such an analysis for green sturgeon (e.g.,
estimates of the monetary value
associated with conserving the PCEs
within areas designated as critical
habitat, or with education and outreach
benefits). As an alternative approach,
we used the CHRT’s conservation value
ratings to represent the qualitative
conservation benefits of designation for
each of the particular areas identified as
critical habitat for the Southern DPS
(see the section titled Methods for
Assessment of Specific Areas). These
conservation value ratings represent the
estimated incremental benefit of
designating critical habitat for the
species. In evaluating the conservation
value of each specific area, the CHRT
focused on the habitat features present
in, habitat functions provided by each
area, and the importance of protecting
the habitat for the overall conservation
of the species. The draft biological
report sets forth detailed information on
the qualitative conservation benefits of
the specific areas proposed for
designation, which is summarized
briefly in the following paragraphs.
Methods for Assessment of Specific
Areas
After identifying the PCEs, the
geographical area occupied, and the
specific areas, the CHRT scored and
rated the relative conservation value of
each occupied specific area. The
conservation value ratings provided an
assessment of the relative importance of
each specific area to the conservation of
the Southern DPS. Areas rated as
‘‘High’’ were deemed to have a high
likelihood of promoting the
conservation of the Southern DPS. Areas
rated as ‘‘Medium’’ or ‘‘Low’’ were
deemed to have a moderate or low
likelihood of promoting the
conservation of the Southern DPS,
respectively. The CHRT considered
several factors in assigning the
conservation value ratings, including
the PCEs present, the condition of the
PCEs, the life stages and habitat
functions supported, and the historical,
present, and potential future use of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
area by green sturgeon. These factors
were scored by the CHRT and summed
to generate a total score for each specific
area, which was considered in the
CHRT’s evaluation and assignment of
the final conservation value ratings.
The CHRT also considered the
importance of connectivity among
habitats, recognizing that green sturgeon
must migrate along the coast to access
important oversummering and
overwintering habitats in coastal bays
and estuaries. Specific areas in coastal
marine waters may provide low to
medium value habitat for green sturgeon
based on the PCEs present. However,
such areas may contain high-value
connectivity corridors for green
sturgeon migrating out of the San
Francisco Bay system to bays and
estuaries in California, Oregon,
Washington, and Canada, without
which green sturgeon would not be able
to access high-value habitats. The CHRT
recognized that even within an area of
Low to Medium conservation value, the
presence of a migratory/connectivity
corridor that provides passage to high
value areas would warrant increasing
the overall conservation value of the
area to a High. To account for this, a
separate conservation value rating was
assigned to areas containing a
migratory/connectivity corridor, equal
to the rating of the highest-rated area for
which it served as a migratory/
connectivity corridor.
Members of the CHRT were then
asked to re-examine the conservation
value ratings for the specific areas
where the presence of Southern DPS
green sturgeon is likely (based on the
presence of Northern DPS fish or green
sturgeon of unknown origin), but not
confirmed. These areas include the
coastal marine waters within 110 m
depth from the California/Mexico
border to Monterey Bay, CA, and from
Yakutat Bay, AK, to the Bering Strait
(including the Bering Sea), as well as
the following coastal bays and estuaries:
Elkhorn Slough, CA; Tomales Bay, CA;
Noyo Harbor, CA; Eel River estuary, CA;
Klamath/Trinity River estuary, CA;
Rogue River estuary, OR; Siuslaw River
estuary, OR; Alsea River estuary, OR;
Yaquina Bay, OR; and Tillamook Bay,
OR. While these areas are considered
occupied for the reasons provided
above, the CHRT recognized that a lack
of documented evidence for Southern
DPS presence within these areas
(perhaps because of the lack of
monitoring or sampling effort within
these areas) is indicative of a high
degree of uncertainty as to the extent to
which Southern DPS fish use these
areas. The low occurrence of green
sturgeon within these areas is also
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
52097
indicated by few observations of the
species in these areas, both historically
and recently. The CHRT scored all of
these areas, except for Tomales Bay, CA,
much lower than other areas, reflecting
the CHRT’s assessment that these areas
contribute relatively little to the
conservation of the species. For the bays
and estuaries, this was based on the
limited area and depth to support green
sturgeon migration and feeding, as well
as the low use of these areas by green
sturgeon. Tomales Bay, CA, was given a
higher score and rated as ‘‘Medium,’’
because it is a large, deep embayment
providing good habitat for feeding by
green sturgeon and is likely the first
major bay to be encountered by
subadults making their first migration
into marine waters. As described above
(see ‘‘Bays and Estuaries’’), green
sturgeon are more commonly observed
in the Eel River estuary, Klamath/
Trinity River estuary, and Rogue River
estuary, but are believed to primarily
belong to the Northern DPS. Again,
there is great uncertainty as to the extent
of use of these estuaries by Southern
DPS fish. For the coastal marine waters,
the two areas are outside of the
migratory/connectivity corridor
identified by the CHRT and also lack
confirmed Southern DPS presence.
Although the CHRT did not include the
area in southeast Alaska up to Yakutat
Bay, AK, as part of the primary
migratory corridor, this area was rated
as ‘‘Medium’’ because it represents the
northern extent of the area containing
important overwintering grounds for
Southern DPS green sturgeon (Lindley
et al., 2008; S. Lindley and M. Moser,
NMFS, 2008, unpublished data). Based
on this information, the CHRT agreed
that the conservation value ratings
should be reduced by one rating for
these specific areas where the presence
of the Southern DPS is likely, but not
confirmed. This necessitated the
creation of a fourth conservation value
rating (‘‘Ultra-low’’). Those specific
areas that initially received a ‘‘Low’’
rating were assigned a final
conservation value rating of ‘‘Ultralow,’’ whereas those areas that initially
received a ‘‘Medium’’ rating were
assigned a final conservation value
rating of ‘‘Low.’’ None of the specific
areas where the presence of Southern
DPS fish was likely but not confirmed
had received a rating of ‘‘High.’’
The final conservation ratings and the
justifications for each specific area are
summarized in the draft biological
report (available via our Web site at
https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov, via the
Federal eRulemaking Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov, or upon
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
52098
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
request—see ADDRESSES). The CHRT
recognized that even within a rating
category, variation exists. For example,
freshwater riverine areas rated as
‘‘High’’ may be of greater conservation
value to the species than coastal marine
areas with the same rating. This
variation was captured in the comments
provided by the CHRT members for
each specific area. The draft biological
report describes in detail the evaluation
process used by the CHRT to assess the
specific areas, as well as the biological
information supporting the CHRT’s
assessment.
Determining the Benefits of Excluding
Particular Areas
To determine the benefits of
excluding particular areas from
designation, we considered the Federal
activities that may be subject to an ESA
section 7 consultation and the range of
potential changes that may be required
for each of these activities under the
adverse modification provision,
regardless of whether those changes
may also be required under the jeopardy
provision. These consultation and
project modification costs represent the
economic benefits of excluding each
particular area (that is, the economic
costs that would be avoided if an area
were excluded from the designation).
The CHRT identified and examined
the types of Federal activities that occur
within each of the specific areas and
that may affect Southern DPS green
sturgeon and the critical habitat (also
see the section on ‘‘Special Management
Considerations or Protection’’). Because
the Southern DPS was recently listed
under the ESA in 2006, we lack an
extensive consultation history. Thus,
the CHRT relied on NMFS’ experience
in conducting ESA section 7
consultations and their best professional
judgment to identify the types of
Federal activities that might trigger a
section 7 consultation. These include:
(1) The installation and operation of
dams; (2) the installation and operation
of water diversions; (3) in-water
construction or alterations; (4) dredging
operations and disposal of dredge
material; (5) NPDES permit activities
and activities generating non-point
source pollution, such as agricultural
runoff; (6) power plant operations; (7)
operations of liquefied natural gas
(LNG) projects; (8) discharges from
desalination plants; (9) commercial
shipping (e.g., discharges, oil spills);
(10) aquaculture; (11) tidal or wave
energy projects; (12) bottom trawl
fisheries; and (13) habitat restoration.
While we relied on the best, currently
available information to predict the
number of these types of activities
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
within the areas considered for
designation as critical habitat, we
recognize that some of these activities,
in particular tidal or wave energy
projects, are relatively new and
anticipated to increase in number in the
future. Relevant information received
during the comment period on the
number and nature of such projects
expected to occur within the proposed
critical habitat will inform any final
designation of critical habitat. In
addition, relevant information
concerning the potential impacts to
activities, particularly LNG and
hydropower activities, will also inform
any final designation, including our
determinations of whether to exclude
any particular area from the designation.
We then considered the range of
modifications we might seek in these
activities to avoid destroying or
adversely modifying critical habitat of
the Southern DPS. Because of the
limited consultation history, we relied
on information from consultations
conducted for salmon and steelhead,
comments received during green
sturgeon public scoping workshops
conducted for the development of
protective regulations, and information
from green sturgeon and section 7
biologists to determine the types of
activities and potential range of
changes. While we recognize that
differences between the biology of
Southern DPS green sturgeon and listed
salmonids exist, there is also overlap in
the types of habitat they use, their life
history strategies and their behavior.
Given the limited amount of direct
information regarding the types of
modifications we might seek to avoid
adverse modification of Southern DPS
critical habitat, we relied on the best
information available for analog species
(i.e., the listed salmonids) to guide our
decision making. Additional
information on differences in the habitat
needs, life history strategies, and
behavior of these species may allow us
to refine our analysis. For each potential
impact, we tried to provide information
on whether the impact is more closely
associated with adverse modification or
with jeopardy, to distinguish the
impacts of applying the jeopardy
provision versus the adverse
modification provision.
We were able to monetize estimates of
the economic impacts resulting from a
critical habitat designation; however,
because of the limited consultation
history for green sturgeon and
uncertainty about specific management
actions likely to be required under a
consultation, there was a great degree of
uncertainty in the cost estimates for
some specific areas. Several factors were
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
considered in developing the estimated
economic impacts, including the level
of economic activity within each area,
the level of baseline protection afforded
to green sturgeon by existing regulations
for each economic activity within each
area, and the estimated economic
impact (in dollars) associated with each
activity type. The baseline included the
protections afforded to green sturgeon
by the listing and jeopardy provision, as
well as protections provided for salmon
and steelhead and their critical habitat
including existing laws, regulations, and
initiatives. Estimates of the economic
costs were based on project
modifications that might be required
during consultation to avoid the
destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat (see draft Economic
Analysis Report for additional details).
Thus, the estimated economic impacts
represent the incremental impact of the
designation. The draft economic
analysis sets forth detailed information
on the economic impacts of designating
particular areas as critical habitat, as
well as consultation costs anticipated as
a result of this proposed designation.
Our determination of these
incremental economic impacts was
based on the best available information.
We solicit comment on the incremental
values assigned in the economic report
and will consider any relevant
information received, including relevant
differences in the biology of listed
salmonids and green sturgeon, in
developing the economic analysis
supporting any final designation.
Exclusions Based on Economic Impacts
A draft ESA 4(b)(2) report describes in
detail our approach to weighing the
benefit of designation against the
economic benefit of exclusion. The
results of our analysis contained in this
report are summarized below.
The benefits associated with species
conservation are not directly
comparable to the economic benefit,
benefit to national security, or other
relevant benefit that would result if an
area were excluded from designation.
We had sufficient information to
monetize the economic benefits of
excluding an area, but were not able to
monetize the conservation benefits of
designating an area. Thus, for each area
we compared the qualitative
conservation value against the monetary
economic impact estimate to determine
if the cost estimate exceeded a threshold
dollar amount. Areas where the
economic benefit of exclusion
outweighed the benefit of designation
were considered for exclusion from
designation as critical habitat.
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
We identified areas eligible for
exclusion based on four decision rules:
(1) All areas with a conservation value
rating of ‘‘High’’ were not eligible for
exclusion regardless of the level of
economic impact, because of the
threatened status of the Southern DPS of
green sturgeon; (2) areas with a
conservation value rating of ‘‘Medium’’
were eligible for exclusion if the
estimated economic impact exceeded
$100,000; (3) areas with a conservation
value rating of ‘‘Low’’ were eligible for
exclusion if the estimated economic
impact exceeded $10,000; and (4) areas
with a conservation value rating of
‘‘Ultra-low’’ were eligible for exclusion
if the estimated economic impact
exceeded $0 (see draft 4(b)(2) Report for
additional details). These dollar
thresholds do not represent an objective
judgment that Medium-value areas are
worth no more than $100,000, Lowvalue areas are worth no more than
$10,000, or Ultra-Low value areas are
worth $0. Under the ESA, we are to
weigh dissimilar impacts given limited
time and information. The statute
emphasizes that the decision to exclude
is discretionary. Thus, the economic
impact level at which the economic
benefits of exclusion outweigh the
conservation benefits of designation is a
matter of discretion and depends on the
policy context. For critical habitat, the
ESA directs us to consider exclusions to
avoid high economic impacts, but also
requires that the areas designated as
critical habitat are sufficient to support
the conservation of the species and to
avoid extinction. In this policy context,
we selected dollar thresholds
representing the levels at which the
economic impact associated with a
specific area would outweigh the
conservation benefits of designating that
area. These dollar thresholds and
decision rules provided a relatively
simple process to identify, in a limited
amount of time, specific areas
warranting consideration for exclusion.
Based on this analysis, we identified
15 occupied areas as eligible for
exclusion: (1) Elkhorn Slough, CA; (2)
the lower Feather River, CA; (3)
Tomales Bay, CA; (4) Noyo Harbor, CA;
(5) Eel River estuary, CA; (6) Klamath/
Trinity River estuary, CA; (7) Rogue
River estuary, OR; (8) Coos Bay, OR; (9)
Siuslaw River estuary, OR; (10) Alsea
River estuary, OR; (11) Tillamook Bay,
OR; (12) Puget Sound, WA; (13) coastal
marine waters within 110 m depth from
the CA-Mexico border to Monterey Bay,
CA; (14) coastal marine waters within
110 m depth from the Alaska/Canada
border to Yakutat Bay, AK; and (15)
coastal marine waters within 110 m
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
depth northwest of Yakutat Bay, AK, to
the Bering Strait (including the Bering
Sea).
We asked the CHRT whether
excluding any of the areas eligible for
exclusion would significantly impede
conservation of the Southern DPS or
result in extinction of the species. The
CHRT considered these questions in the
context of all of the areas eligible for
exclusion, as well as the information
they had developed in determining the
conservation value ratings.
The CHRT determined, and we
concur, that exclusion of the following
11 areas eligible for exclusion would not
significantly impede conservation or
result in extinction of the species: (1)
Elkhorn Slough, CA; (2) Tomales Bay,
CA; (3) Noyo Harbor, CA; (4) Eel River
estuary, CA; (5) Klamath/Trinity River
estuary, CA; (6) Rogue River estuary,
OR; (7) Siuslaw River estuary, OR; (8)
Alsea River estuary, OR; (9) Tillamook
Bay, OR; (10) coastal marine waters
within 110 m depth from the California/
Mexico border to Monterey Bay, CA;
and (11) coastal marine waters within
110 m depth northwest of Yakutat Bay,
AK, to the Bering Strait (including the
Bering Sea). The CHRT based their
determination on the fact that each of
these 11 areas was assigned a Low or
Ultra-low conservation value and
Southern DPS fish have not been
documented to use these areas
extensively. The CHRT discussed the
fact that the bays and estuaries eligible
for exclusion listed above may not be
used often by the Southern DPS
because: (1) They are relatively small
systems compared to other bays and
estuaries that are used extensively and
consequently received higher
conservation ratings; and (2) Southern
DPS fish do not appear to use Northern
DPS spawning systems extensively. The
CHRT discussed the fact that few green
sturgeon (of unknown DPS) have been
observed in coastal marine waters
within 110 m depth from the California/
Mexico border to Monterey Bay, CA;
and northwest of Yakutat Bay, AK, to
the Bering Strait (including the Bering
Sea). For these reasons, the CHRT
concluded that excluding the bays,
estuaries and coastal marine areas
mentioned above from the designation
would not significantly impede
conservation of the Southern DPS nor
result in extinction of the species. Thus,
we propose to exclude these 11 areas
from the critical habitat designation for
the Southern DPS. We recognize that the
lack of documented evidence for
Southern DPS presence in these areas
may be because these areas are not
adequately monitored for green
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
52099
sturgeon. We would encourage directed
surveys to be conducted in these areas.
The CHRT also reevaluated the four
areas of medium conservation value that
were eligible for exclusion (lower
Feather River, CA; Coos Bay, OR; Puget
Sound, WA; and coastal marine waters
within 110 m depth from the Alaska/
Canada border to Yakutat Bay, AK) to
determine whether excluding them
would significantly impede
conservation of the Southern DPS or
result in extinction of the species. The
CHRT determined that exclusion of
Puget Sound would not significantly
impede conservation of the Southern
DPS. Observations of green sturgeon in
Puget Sound are much less common
compared to the other estuaries in
Washington. Although two confirmed
Southern DPS fish were detected there
in 2006, the extent to which Southern
DPS green sturgeon use Puget Sound
remains uncertain. Despite the fact that
Puget Sound has a long history of
commercial and recreational fishing and
fishery-independent monitoring of other
species that use habitats similar to those
of green sturgeon, very few green
sturgeon have been observed there. In
addition, Puget Sound does not appear
to be part of the coastal migratory
corridor that Southern DPS fish use to
reach overwintering grounds north of
Vancouver Island (S. Lindley and M.
Moser, NMFS, 2008, pers. comm.), thus
corroborating the assertion that
Southern DPS do not use Puget Sound
extensively. The economic cost of
designating this area was well above the
$100 K threshold because of the large
number of activities affecting sediment
and water quality (i.e., dredging, inwater construction, and point and nonpoint sources of pollution) that might
require special management if critical
habitat were to be designated. Thus, we
propose to exclude Puget Sound as
critical habitat for the Southern DPS,
because the benefits of designation are
outweighed by the benefits of exclusion,
and because the exclusion of this area
will not result in the extinction of the
species.
The CHRT unanimously agreed that
exclusion of the lower Feather River
would significantly impede
conservation of the Southern DPS. The
CHRT identified the lower Feather River
as an important area for the
conservation of the Southern DPS,
because it has been consistently
occupied by the species and most likely
contains spawning habitat for the
Southern DPS, potentially providing a
spawning river for the Southern DPS in
addition to the Sacramento River. The
CHRT had assigned the lower Feather
River a Medium conservation value, but
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
52100
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
noted that future improvements to
habitat conditions (e.g., improved
passage, restoration of water flow) are
both logistically and financially feasible
and if they were carried out, would raise
the conservation value to a High. We
propose to designate the lower Feather
River as critical habitat for the Southern
DPS to protect the high conservation
potential of this area and reduce
extinction risk. We solicit additional
data and comments from the public
regarding designation of the Lower
Feather River, particularly information
regarding the economic costs associated
with activities that may be affected by
a critical habitat designation and on the
conservation benefits to green sturgeon
provided by this area.
The CHRT also determined that
exclusion of Coos Bay would
significantly impede the conservation of
the species. The CHRT identified Coos
Bay as an important area for the
Southern DPS because it is the largest
and deepest estuary along the Oregon
coast presently occupied by green
sturgeon, has a large mixing zone,
provides a protected area for green
sturgeon aggregation and feeding, and is
an important ‘‘stepping-stone’’ estuary
between San Francisco Bay and the
lower Columbia River estuary. There is
a great degree of uncertainty regarding
the economic costs associated with a
designation in this area. The estimated
costs ranged from $19,000 to $16
million, spanning the threshold value
over which an area was considered
eligible for exclusion ($100,000 for areas
with a Medium conservation value).
This uncertainty was driven largely by
the possible placement of one LNG
terminal inside the bay, a limited
understanding of how LNG projects
would affect the PCEs, and uncertainty
regarding how LNG activities might be
altered to avoid adverse modification of
green sturgeon critical habitat. Because
there is great uncertainty regarding the
LNG project at this time, we considered
the lower economic impact estimate
($19,000) in developing this proposed
rule. Based on this information, we
propose to designate Coos Bay as critical
habitat for the Southern DPS, because
the conservation value of the area
outweighs what we consider to be the
more realistic economic cost of
designation (i.e., approximately
$19,000). At this time, we propose that
designating critical habitat in Coos Bay
will provide conservation value to the
species and reduce extinction risk.
However, we acknowledge that $19,000
is likely a low estimate of the impact
likely to occur as a result of this
proposed critical habitat designation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
During the comment period we seek
from the public and will request from
relevant Federal agencies additional
data and information, in particular
information regarding additional costs
incurred by the LNG industry, to
develop a more accurate assessment of
the likely costs of this proposed
designation in Coos Bay and other areas
in the lower Columbia River estuary. We
will use such information in our
economic analysis and ESA 4(b)(2)
weighing process such that a
reconsideration of the proposed
designation of Coos Bay and other areas
along the lower Columbia River estuary
may be warranted. Therefore, we solicit
additional data and comments regarding
designation of Coos Bay and other areas
along the lower Columbia River estuary,
particularly information regarding the
economic costs associated with LNG
projects that may occur as a result of a
critical habitat designation.
The CHRT also looked closely at the
possible exclusion of the coastal marine
waters within 110 m depth from the
Alaska/Canada border to Yakutat Bay,
AK. Some CHRT members noted that
the exclusion of this area from the
designation might impede conservation
of the Southern DPS, because this area
may be an important component of the
overwintering range for the species.
Although only two tagged Southern DPS
green sturgeon have been detected in
this area, the fact that the detection
system in Graves Harbor, AK, is not
designed to detect green sturgeon and
that the data have only been collected
from 2005–2006 suggests that Southern
DPS use of the area may be greater than
indicated by the available data. Other
CHRT members stated that the relatively
low number of Southern DPS detections
in the area, in combination with the
uncertainty surrounding the activities
occurring in southeast Alaska, suggests
that excluding this area from the
designation would not significantly
impede conservation or result in the
extinction of the species. At this time,
we propose to exclude the coastal
marine waters within 110 m depth from
the Alaska/Canada border to Yakutat
Bay, AK, from the designation because
the economic impacts outweigh the
conservation benefit of designation in
this area. We solicit the public for more
information regarding: (1) The presence
of green sturgeon in coastal waters off
southeast Alaska; (2) the spatial
distribution of the PCEs in southeast
Alaska; (3) activities occurring in the
area that may affect the PCEs; (4) the
types of changes that might be proposed
for these activities to avoid impacts to
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the PCEs; and (5) estimated costs
associated with making these changes.
In summary, we propose to exclude
the following 13 specific areas from the
critical habitat designation: (1) Elkhorn
Slough, CA; (2) Tomales Bay, CA; (3)
Noyo Harbor, CA; (4) Eel River estuary,
CA; (5) Klamath/Trinity River estuary,
CA; (6) Rogue River estuary, OR; (7)
Siuslaw River estuary, OR; (8) Alsea
River estuary, OR; (9) Tillamook Bay,
OR; (10) Puget Sound, WA; (11) coastal
marine waters within 110 m depth from
the California/Mexico border to
Monterey Bay, CA; (12) coastal marine
waters within 110 m depth from the
Alaska/Canada border to Yakutat Bay,
AK; and (13) coastal marine waters
within 110 m depth northwest of
Yakutat Bay, AK, to the Bering Strait
(including the Bering Sea). Based on the
best scientific and commercial data
available, we have determined that the
exclusion of these 13 areas from the
designation would not result in the
extinction of the species.
Exclusions Based on Impacts on
National Security
We have contacted the DOD regarding
any DOD lands that may overlap with
areas proposed for designation as
critical habitat for the Southern DPS. At
this time, we have not received
information identifying impacts on
national security that may result from
the designation. However, we solicit
comments from the public and from the
DOD regarding any national security
concerns for the areas proposed for
designation. We are aware of DOD sites
in the Strait of Juan de Fuca that have
been excluded on the basis of national
security impacts for Southern Resident
killer whales and Puget Sound salmon,
as well as DOD sites off the coasts of
California and Washington that may be
affected by a critical habitat designation.
We request information specifically
pertaining to whether the designation
for such sites as critical habitat for the
Southern DPS would result in national
security impacts that would outweigh
the benefits of designation.
Other Relevant Impacts
We did not propose exclusions based
on other relevant impacts of
designation, particularly impacts on
Indian tribes.
For this proposed critical habitat
designation for Southern DPS green
sturgeon, we reviewed maps indicating
that very few if any areas under
consideration as critical habitat actually
overlap with Indian lands. Nearshore
coastal areas comprise the vast majority
of these possible overlap areas, but it is
unclear which if any Indian lands are
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
subject to consideration for possible
exclusion. In particular, we lack
information regarding where Indian
land boundaries lie in relation to
shoreline tidal boundaries used to
identify the lateral extent in this
proposed rule. Our preliminary
assessment indicates that the following
federally-recognized tribes (73 FR
18553, April 4, 2008) have lands that
may be in close proximity to areas
under consideration for designation as
critical habitat for Southern DPS green
sturgeon: the Hoh, Jamestown
S’Klallam, Lower Elwha, Makah,
Quileute, Quinault, and Shoalwater Bay
tribes in Washington; the Confederated
Tribes of Coos Lower Umpqua and
Siuslaw Indians and the Coquille Tribe
in Oregon; and the Cachil DeHe Band of
Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian
Community, Wiyot Tribe, and Yurok
Tribe in California.
We seek comments regarding these
areas and will continue to investigate
whether any Indian lands overlap, and
may warrant exclusion from, critical
habitat for Southern DPS green
sturgeon. Indian lands are those defined
in the Secretarial Order ‘‘American
Indian Tribal Rights, Federal-Tribal
Trust Responsibilities, and the
Endangered Species Act’’ (June 5, 1997),
including: (1) Lands held in trust by the
United States for the benefit of any
Indian tribe; (2) land held in trust by the
United States for any Indian Tribe or
individual subject to restrictions by the
United States against alienation; (3) fee
lands, either within or outside the
reservation boundaries, owned by the
tribal government; and (4) fee lands
within the reservation boundaries
owned by individual Indians.
If such areas are identified, the
benefits of exclusion could include
those we identified in recent critical
habitat designations for Pacific salmon
and steelhead (70 FR 52630; September
2, 2005), specifically: (1) The
furtherance of established national
policies, our Federal trust obligations
and our deference to the tribes in
management of natural resources on
their lands; (2) the maintenance of
effective long-term working
relationships to promote species
conservation on an ecosystem-wide
basis; (3) the allowance for continued
meaningful collaboration and
cooperation in scientific work to learn
more about the conservation needs of
the species on an ecosystem-wide basis;
and (4) continued respect for tribal
sovereignty over management of natural
resources on Indian lands through
established tribal natural resource
programs.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
We also seek information from
affected tribes concerning other tribal
activities that may be affected in areas
other than tribal lands (i.e., bottom
trawling and alternative energy projects
in marine areas).
Critical Habitat Designation
We propose to designate
approximately 325 miles (524 km) of
riverine habitat and 1,058 square miles
(2,739 sq km) of estuarine habitat in
California, Oregon, and Washington,
and 11,927 square miles (30,890 sq km)
of coastal marine habitat off California,
Oregon, and Washington within the
geographical area presently occupied by
the Southern DPS of green sturgeon. We
also propose to designate approximately
136 square miles (352 sq km) of habitat
within the Yolo and Sutter bypasses,
adjacent to the Sacramento River,
California. The proposed critical habitat
areas contain physical or biological
features essential to the conservation of
the species that may require special
management considerations or
protection. We propose to exclude 13
areas from designation for which the
benefit of exclusion outweighing the
benefit of inclusion. We conclude that
the exclusion of these areas will not
result in the extinction of the Southern
DPS. Although we have identified 7
presently unoccupied areas that may be
later determined to be essential to
conservation, we are not proposing any
unoccupied areas for designation as
critical habitat at this time, because we
do not have sufficient information to
determine that any of the unoccupied
areas are essential to the conservation of
the species.
Lateral Extent of Critical Habitat
For freshwater riverine habitats, we
described the lateral extent of critical
habitat units as the width of the stream
channel defined by the ordinary highwater line, as defined by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (COE) in 33 CFR
329.11. The ordinary high-water line on
non-tidal rivers is defined as ‘‘the line
on the shore established by the
fluctuations of water and indicated by
physical characteristics such as a clear,
natural line impressed on the bank;
shelving; changes in the character of
soil; destruction of terrestrial vegetation;
the presence of litter and debris, or
other appropriate means that consider
the characteristics of the surrounding
areas’’ (33 CFR 329.11(a)(1)). In areas for
which the ordinary high-water line has
not been defined pursuant to 33 CFR
329.11, we defined the width of the
stream channel by its bankfull elevation.
Bankfull elevation is the level at which
water begins to leave the channel and
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
52101
move into the floodplain (Rosgen, 1996)
and is reached at a discharge which
generally has a recurrence interval of 1
to 2 years on the annual flood series
(Leopold et al., 1992). For bays and
estuarine areas, we defined the lateral
extent by the mean higher high water
(MHHW) line. For coastal marine
habitats, the lateral extent to the west is
defined by the 110 m depth bathymetry
contour relative to the line of mean
lower low water (MLLW) and shoreward
to the area that is inundated by extreme
high tide, or to the COLREGS
demarcation lines delineating the
boundary between estuarine and marine
habitats. The textual descriptions of
critical habitat in the section titled
‘‘226.215 Critical habitat for the
Southern Distinct Population Segment
of North American Green Sturgeon
(Acipenser medirostris)’’ are the
definitive source for determining the
critical habitat boundaries. The
overview maps provided in section
‘‘226.215 Critical habitat for the
Southern Distinct Population Segment
of North American Green Sturgeon
(Acipenser medirostris)’’ are provided
for general guidance purposes only and
not as a definitive source for
determining critical habitat boundaries.
As discussed in previous critical
habitat designations, the quality of
aquatic and estuarine habitats within
stream channels and bays and estuaries
is intrinsically related to the adjacent
riparian zones and floodplain, to
surrounding wetlands and uplands, and
to non-fish-bearing streams above
occupied stream reaches. Human
activities that occur outside of
designated streams, bays, or estuaries
can destroy or adversely modify the
essential physical and biological
features within these areas. In addition,
human activities occurring within and
adjacent to reaches upstream or
downstream of designated stream
reaches or estuaries can also destroy or
adversely modify the essential physical
and biological features of these areas.
Similarly, human activities that occur
outside of designated coastal marine
areas inundated by extreme high tide
can destroy or adversely modify the
essential physical and biological
features of these areas. This designation
will help to ensure that Federal agencies
are aware of these important habitat
linkages.
Effects of Critical Habitat Designation
ESA Section 7 Consultation
Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA requires
Federal agencies, including NMFS, to
insure that any action authorized,
funded, or carried out by the agency
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
52102
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(agency action) does not jeopardize the
continued existence of any threatened
or endangered species or destroy or
adversely modify designated critical
habitat.
Federal agencies are also required to
confer with NMFS regarding any actions
likely to jeopardize a species proposed
for listing under the ESA, or likely to
destroy or adversely modify proposed
critical habitat, pursuant to section
7(a)(4). A conference involves informal
discussions in which NMFS may
recommend conservation measures to
minimize or avoid adverse effects. The
discussions and conservation
recommendations are to be documented
in a conference report provided to the
Federal agency. If requested by the
Federal agency, a formal conference
report may be issued, including a
biological opinion prepared according
to 50 CFR 402.14. A formal conference
report may be adopted as the biological
opinion when the species is listed or
critical habitat designated, if no
significant new information or changes
to the action alter the content of the
opinion.
When a species is listed or critical
habitat is designated, Federal agencies
must consult with NMFS on any agency
actions to be conducted in an area
where the species is present and that
may affect the species or its critical
habitat. During the consultation, NMFS
would evaluate the agency action to
determine whether the action may
adversely affect listed species or critical
habitat and issue its findings in a
biological opinion. If NMFS concludes
in the biological opinion that the agency
action would likely result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat, NMFS would also
recommend any reasonable and prudent
alternatives to the action. Reasonable
and prudent alternatives are defined in
50 CFR 402.02 as alternative actions
identified during formal consultation
that can be implemented in a manner
consistent with the intended purpose of
the action, that are consistent with the
scope of the Federal agency’s legal
authority and jurisdiction, that are
economically and technologically
feasible, and that would avoid the
destruction or adverse modification of
critical habitat.
Regulations at 50 CFR 402.16 require
Federal agencies that have retained
discretionary involvement or control
over an action, or where such
discretionary involvement or control is
authorized by law, to reinitiate
consultation on previously reviewed
actions in instances where: (1) Critical
habitat is subsequently designated; or
(2) new information or changes to the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
action may result in effects to critical
habitat not previously considered in the
biological opinion. Consequently, some
Federal agencies may request
reinitiation of consultation or
conference with NMFS on actions for
which formal consultation has been
completed, if those actions may affect
designated critical habitat or adversely
modify or destroy proposed critical
habitat.
Activities subject to the ESA section
7 consultation process include activities
on Federal lands and activities on
private or state lands requiring a permit
from a Federal agency (e.g., a section
10(a)(1)(B) permit from NMFS) or some
other Federal action, including funding
(e.g., Federal Highway Administration
(FHA) or Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) funding).
ESA section 7 consultation would not
be required for Federal actions that do
not affect listed species or critical
habitat and for actions on non-Federal
and private lands that are not Federally
funded, authorized, or carried out.
Activities Likely To Be Affected
ESA section 4(b)(8) requires in any
proposed or final regulation to designate
critical habitat an evaluation and brief
description of those activities (whether
public or private) that may adversely
modify such habitat or that may be
affected by such designation. A wide
variety of activities may affect the
proposed critical habitat and may be
subject to the ESA section 7
consultation process when carried out,
funded, or authorized by a Federal
agency. These include water and land
management actions of Federal agencies
(e.g., U.S. Forest Service (USFS), Bureau
of Land Management (BLM), Army
Corps of Engineers (COE), U.S. Bureau
of Reclamation (BOR), Natural Resource
Conservation Service (NRCS), National
Park Service (NPS), Bureau of Indian
Affairs (BIA), the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC), and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC))
and related or similar Federallyregulated projects and activities Federal
lands, including hydropower sites and
proposed tidal/wave energy projects
licensed by the FERC; nuclear power
sites licensed by the NRC; dams built or
operated by the COE or BOR; timber
sales and other vegetation management
activities conducted by the USFS, BLM
and BIA; irrigation diversions
authorized by the USFS and BLM; and
road building and maintenance
activities authorized by the USFS, BLM,
NPA, and BIA. Other actions of concern
include dredge and fill, mining, diking,
and bank stabilization activities
authorized or conducted by the COE,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
habitat modifications authorized by the
FEMA, and approval of water quality
standards and pesticide labeling and use
restrictions administered by the
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA).
Private entities may also be affected
by this proposed critical habitat
designation if a Federal permit is
required, Federal funding is received, or
the entity is involved in or receives
benefits from a Federal project. For
example, private entities may have
special use permits to convey water or
build access roads across Federal land;
they may require Federal permits to
construct irrigation withdrawal
facilities, or build or repair docks; they
may obtain water from Federally funded
and operated irrigation projects; or they
may apply pesticides that are only
available with Federal agency approval.
These activities will need to be
evaluated with respect to their potential
to destroy or adversely modify critical
habitat. Changes to the actions to
minimize or avoid destruction or
adverse modification of proposed
critical habitat may result in changes to
some activities, such as the operations
of dams and dredging activities.
Transportation and utilities sectors may
need to modify the placement of
culverts, bridges, and utility
conveyances (e.g., water, sewer, and
power lines) to avoid barriers to fish
migration. Developments (e.g., marinas,
residential, or industrial facilities)
occurring in or near streams, estuaries,
or marine waters designated as critical
habitat that require Federal
authorization or funding may need to be
altered or built in a manner to ensure
that critical habitat is not destroyed or
adversely modified as a result of the
construction or subsequent operation of
the facility.
Questions regarding whether specific
activities will constitute destruction or
adverse modification of critical habitat
should be directed to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Public Comments Solicited
To ensure the final action resulting
from this proposal will be as accurate
and as effective as possible, we solicit
comments and suggestions from the
public, other concerned governments
and agencies, the scientific community,
industry, or any other interested party
concerning this proposed rule.
Specifically, public comments are
sought concerning: (1) Information
describing the abundance, distribution,
and habitat use of Southern DPS green
sturgeon in freshwater rivers, bays,
estuaries, and coastal marine waters; (2)
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Information on the identification,
location, and quality of physical or
biological features which may be
essential to the conservation of the
Southern DPS; (3) Information regarding
potential impacts of designating any
particular area, including the types of
Federal activities that may trigger an
ESA section 7 consultation and the
possible modifications that may be
required of those activities as a result of
section 7 consultation; (4) Information
regarding the benefits of designating any
particular area of the proposed critical
habitat; (5) Information regarding the
benefits of excluding particular areas
from the critical habitat designation; (6)
Current or planned activities in the
areas proposed for designation and their
possible impacts on proposed critical
habitat; and (7) Any foreseeable
economic, national security, or other
relevant impacts resulting from the
proposed designations.
We encourage comments on this
proposal. You may submit your
comments and materials by any one of
several methods (see ADDRESSES). The
proposed rule, maps, references, and
other materials relating to this proposal
can be found on our Web site at
https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov. We will
consider all comments and information
received during the comment period for
this proposed rule in preparing the final
rule.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Public Hearings
Regulations at 50 CFR 424.16(c)(3)
require the Secretary to promptly hold
at least one public hearing if any person
requests one within 45 days of
publication of a proposed rule to
designate critical habitat. Requests for a
public hearing must be made in writing
(see ADDRESSES) by October 23, 2008. If
a public hearing is requested, a notice
detailing the specific hearing location
and time will be published in the
Federal Register at least 15 days before
the hearing is to be held. Information on
specific hearing locations and times will
also be posted on our Web site at
https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov. These
hearings provide the opportunity for
interested individuals and parties to
give comments, exchange information
and opinions, and engage in a
constructive dialogue concerning this
proposed rule. We encourage the
public’s involvement in such ESA
matters.
Peer Review
On July 1, 1994, a joint USFWS/
NMFS policy for peer review was issued
stating that the Services would solicit
independent peer review to ensure the
best biological and commercial data is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
used in the development of rulemaking
actions and draft recovery plans under
the ESA (59 FR 34270). On December
16, 2004, the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) issued its Final
Information Quality Bulletin for Peer
Review (Bulletin). The Bulletin was
published in the Federal Register on
January 14, 2005 (70 FR 2664), and went
into effect on June 16, 2005. The
primary purpose of the Bulletin is to
improve the quality and credibility of
scientific information disseminated by
the Federal government by requiring
peer review of ‘‘influential scientific
information’’ and highly influential
scientific information’’ prior to public
dissemination. Influential scientific
information is defined as ‘‘information
the agency reasonably can determine
will have or does have a clear and
substantial impact on important public
policies or private sector decisions.’’
The Bulletin provides agencies broad
discretion in determining the
appropriate process and level of peer
review. Stricter standards were
established for the peer review of
‘‘highly influential scientific
assessments,’’ defined as information
whose ‘‘dissemination could have a
potential impact of more than $500
million in any one year on either the
public or private sector or that the
dissemination is novel, controversial, or
precedent-setting, or has significant
interagency interest.’’ Two documents
supporting this proposal to designate
critical habitat for the Southern DPS of
green sturgeon are considered
influential scientific information and
subject to peer review. These documents
are the draft Biological Report and draft
Economic Analysis. We have distributed
the draft Biological Report and draft
Economic Analysis for independent
peer review and will address any
comments received in developing the
final drafts of the two reports. Both
documents are available on our Web site
at https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov, on the
Federal eRulemaking Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov, or upon
request (see ADDRESSES).
Required Determinations
Clarity of the Rule
Section I(12) of Executive Order (E.O.)
12866 requires each agency to write
regulations and notices that are easy to
understand. NMFS invites your
comments on how to make this
proposed rule easier to understand,
including answers to questions such as
the following: (1) Are the requirements
in the rule clearly stated? (2) Does the
rule contain technical language or
jargon that interferes with its clarity? (3)
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
52103
Does the format of the rule (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its
clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to
understand if it were divided into more
(but shorter) sections? (5) Is the
description of the rule in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
the preamble helpful in understanding
the rule? (6) What else could NMFS do
to make the rule easier to understand?
You may submit comments on how we
could make this proposed rule easier to
understand by any one of several
methods (see ADDRESSES).
Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O.
12866)
This proposed rule has been
determined to be significant for
purposes of E.O. 12866. A draft
economic report and ESA section 4(b)(2)
report have been prepared to support
the exclusion process under section
4(b)(2) of the ESA.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended
by the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
1996), whenever an agency publishes a
notice of rulemaking for any proposed
or final rule, it must prepare and make
available for public comment a
regulatory flexibility analysis describing
the effects of the rule on small entities
(i.e., small businesses, small
organizations, and small government
jurisdictions). We have prepared an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IRFA), which is part of the draft
Economic Analysis. This document is
available upon request (see ADDRESSES),
via our Web site at https://
swr.nmfs.noaa.gov, or via the Federal
eRulemaking Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov. The results of the
IRFA are summarized below.
At the present time, little information
exists regarding the cost structure and
operational procedures and strategies in
the sectors that may be directly affected
by the potential critical habitat
designation. In addition, given the short
consultation history for green sturgeon,
there is significant uncertainty regarding
the activities that may trigger an ESA
section 7 consultation or how those
activities may be modified as a result of
consultation. With these limitations in
mind, we considered which of the
potential economic impacts we
analyzed might affect small entities.
These estimates should not be
considered exact estimates of the
impacts of potential critical habitat to
individual businesses.
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
52104
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
The impacts to small businesses were
assessed for the following eight
activities: dredging, in-water
construction or alterations, NPDES
activities and other activities resulting
in non-point pollution, agriculture, dam
operations, water diversion operations,
bottom trawl fisheries, and power plant
operations. The impacts on small
entities were not assessed for LNG
projects, desalination plants, tidal and
wave energy projects, and restoration
projects because there is great
uncertainty regarding impacts to these
activities, the activities are unlikely to
be conducted by small entities, or the
impacts to small businesses are
expected to be minor.
Small entities were defined by the
Small Business Administration size
standards for each activity type. The
majority (> 80 percent) of entities
affected within each specific area would
be considered a small entity. A total of
11,002 small businesses involved in the
activities listed above would most likely
be affected by the proposed critical
habitat designation. The estimated
annualized costs associated with section
7 consultations incurred per small
entity range from $0 to $130,000, with
the largest annualized impacts
estimated for entities involved in
bottom trawl fisheries ($10 to $130,000)
and the operation of dams and water
diversions ($0 to $89,000). The total
estimated annualized costs of section 7
consultation incurred by small entities
is estimated to range from $467,600 to
$640,661 (the range is costs is due to
varying costs associated with bottom
trawl fisheries). The estimated economic
impacts on small entities vary
depending on the activity type and
location.
As required by the RFA (as amended
by the SBREFA), we considered various
alternatives to the proposed critical
habitat designation for the Southern
DPS. We considered and rejected the
alternative of not designating critical
habitat for the Southern DPS because
such an approach does not meet the
legal requirements of the ESA. We also
considered and rejected the alternative
of proposing the designation of all
potential critical habitat areas of the
Southern DPS (i.e., no areas are
excluded), because for several areas, the
economic benefits of exclusion
outweighed the benefits of inclusion
and we did not determine that exclusion
of these areas would significantly
impede conservation of the species or
result in extinction of the species. We
have considered and evaluated each of
these alternatives in the context of the
section 4(b)(2) process of weighing
benefits of exclusion against benefits of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
designation, and determined that the
current proposal provides an
appropriate balance between
conservation needs and the associated
economic and other relevant impacts. It
is estimated that small entities will save
from $165,842 to $268,882 in
compliance costs, due to the proposed
exclusions made in this designation.
E.O. 13211
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
an Executive Order on regulations that
significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, and use. E.O. 13211
requires agencies to prepare Statements
of Energy Effects when undertaking an
action expected to lead to the
promulgation of a final rule or
regulation that is a significant regulatory
action under E.O. 12866 and is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
We have considered the potential
impacts of this action on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy (see draft
economic analysis report). Activities
associated with the supply, distribution,
or use of energy that may be affected by
the critical habitat designation include
the operation of: (1) Dams and dam
facilities; (2) power plants; (3) proposed
alternative energy projects; and (4) LNG
projects.
All of the 189 dams analyzed in the
economic analysis exist within the areas
occupied by Southern DPS green
sturgeon and may be affected by the
potential critical habitat designation.
The dams are located within the Central
Valley, CA, and in the lower Columbia
River estuary. Owners or operators of
the dams may be required to undertake
specific modifications to avoid
destroying or adversely modifying the
proposed critical habitat for green
sturgeon. Given substantial variation in
the potential for effects on green
sturgeon and critical habitat, such
modifications would be determined on
a case-by-case basis, and costs would
vary widely. Because the areas overlap
with existing critical habitat
designations for salmon species, and
because the guidelines we have in place
for dam modifications focus on listed
salmonids, we will likely recommend
modifications to dams that are similar to
those we recommend for salmonids
until additional information on green
sturgeon indicates otherwise. Thus, the
additional effects of the critical habitat
designation for green sturgeon would
likely be minimal. In addition,
modifications required for the
protection of critical habitat would
likely be similar to those required under
the jeopardy standard.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Of the 58 power plants analyzed in
the economic analysis, approximately
56 power plants exist within the areas
occupied by Southern DPS green
sturgeon and may be affected by the
potential critical habitat designation.
The installation of new technology to
cool thermal effluents may be required
under an ESA section 7 consultation.
All of the power plants except for one
located on the California coast are
subject to existing protections for
salmon species. For similar reasons
given in the previous paragraph, we
would likely recommend modifications
to power plants that are similar to those
we recommend for protecting listed
salmonid critical habitat until
additional information indicates
otherwise. For the one coastal power
plant, modifications required for the
protection of critical habitat would
likely be similar to those required under
the jeopardy standard.
Of the 36 alternative energy projects
analyzed in the economic analysis,
approximately 18 alternative energy
projects have pending applications or
have received preliminary permits to
operate within bays, estuaries, and
coastal marine waters proposed for
designation as critical habitat for the
Southern DPS of green sturgeon. Given
the necessary timeframes for project
construction, it may be reasonable to
assume that this set of projects will
incur project modification costs related
to green sturgeon critical habitat within
the next 20 years. However, it should
also be noted that other new permit
applications are likely to be filed in the
future, and that rate of application may
be increasing. The Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) points
out that while it received only one
application between 2004 and 2005 for
hydrokinetic (tidal- and wave-energy)
projects, it received seven preliminary
permit applications in both 2006 and
2007 within the critical habitat study
area, excluding Alaska waters. We seek
comment on the likely number of
projects within the timeframe of this
analysis. Relevant information received
will inform our final analysis.
Because these projects are in their
preliminary stages, it is not clear what
effects the projects will have on habitats
and natural resources, nor what effects
a critical habitat designation would
have on these projects. Concerns over
the entrainment or impingement of
green sturgeon in structures associated
with alternative energy projects would
be addressed under the jeopardy
standard, whereas impacts on passage
and water quality would be addressed
under the adverse modification
provision. Such impacts are of concern
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
for other fish species as well as for green
sturgeon (McIsaac, 2008, Letter from the
Pacific Fishery Management Council to
Randall Luthi, Minerals Management
Service). It is likely that management
measures to minimize or avoid habitat
impacts for other species will be
required for alternative energy projects.
Based on the best available information,
the project modifications we would
require to protect green sturgeon critical
habitat would likely be similar to those
applied for the protection of other
marine species.
Of the 12 LNG projects analyzed in
the economic analysis, there are 4
proposed LNG projects within the areas
proposed for designation as critical
habitat, one within Coos Bay and three
within the lower Columbia River. Like
the alternative energy projects, there is
a high degree of uncertainty regarding
whether these proposed projects will be
implemented. As a result, it is unclear
at this time what effects a critical habitat
designation would have on these
proposed LNG projects. In cases where
listed salmon and steelhead species or
critical habitat designated for these
species occurs within the areas where
proposed LNG projects are located (e.g.,
in the Lower Columbia River), the best
available information indicates that
measures implemented for the
protection of these species would be
similar to those required to protect
critical habitat for green sturgeon. In
areas where listed salmon and steelhead
or critical habitat areas designated for
these species are not present (e.g., in
Coos Bay, where critical habitat has not
been designated for salmon and
steelhead), measures implemented to
avoid adverse modification of green
sturgeon habitat may result in energy
impacts.
Based on this preliminary analysis,
we have initially determined that the
designation of critical habitat for
Southern DPS green sturgeon would not
result in significant impacts on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.)
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, NMFS makes the
following findings:
(A) This proposed rule will not
produce a Federal mandate. In general,
a Federal mandate is a provision in
legislation, statute, or regulation that
would impose an enforceable duty upon
State, local, tribal governments, or the
private sector and includes both
‘‘Federal intergovernmental mandates’’
and ‘‘Federal private sector mandates.’’
These terms are defined in 2 U.S.C.
658(5)–(7). ‘‘Federal intergovernmental
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
mandate’’ includes a regulation that
‘‘would impose an enforceable duty
upon State, local, or tribal governments’’
with two exceptions. It excludes ‘‘a
condition of Federal assistance.’’ It also
excludes ‘‘a duty arising from
participation in a voluntary Federal
program,’’ unless the regulation ‘‘relates
to a then-existing Federal program
under which $500,000,000 or more is
provided annually to State, local, and
tribal governments under entitlement
authority,’’ if the provision would
‘‘increase the stringency of conditions of
assistance’’ or ‘‘place caps upon, or
otherwise decrease, the Federal
Government’s responsibility to provide
funding’’ and the State, local, or tribal
government’s ‘‘lack authority’’ to adjust
accordingly. (At the time of enactment,
these entitlement programs were:
Medicaid; Aid to Families with
Dependent Children work programs;
Child Nutrition; Food Stamps; Social
Services Block Grants; Vocational
Rehabilitation State Grants; Foster Care,
Adoption Assistance, and Independent
Living; Family Support Welfare
Services; and Child Support
Enforcement.) ‘‘Federal private sector
mandate’’ includes a regulation that
‘‘would impose an enforceable duty
upon the private sector, except (I) a
condition of Federal assistance; or (ii) a
duty arising from participation in a
voluntary Federal program.’’ The
designation of critical habitat does not
impose an enforceable duty on nonFederal government entities or private
parties. The only regulatory effect of a
critical habitat designation is that
Federal agencies must ensure that their
actions do not destroy or adversely
modify critical habitat under ESA
section 7. Non-Federal entities who
receive funding, assistance, or permits
from Federal agencies, or otherwise
require approval or authorization from a
Federal agency for an action may be
indirectly affected by the designation of
critical habitat. Furthermore, to the
extent that non-Federal entities are
indirectly impacted because they
receive Federal assistance or participate
in a voluntary Federal aid program, the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act would
not apply; nor would critical habitat
shift the costs of the large entitlement
programs listed above to state
governments.
(b) Due to the prohibition against take
of the Southern DPS both within and
outside of the designated areas, we do
not anticipate that this proposed rule
will significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. As such, a Small
Government Agency Plan is not
required.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
52105
Takings
Under E.O. 12630, Federal agencies
must consider the effects of their actions
on constitutionally protected private
property rights and avoid unnecessary
takings of property. A taking of property
includes actions that result in physical
invasion or occupancy of private
property, and regulations imposed on
private property that substantially affect
its value or use. In accordance with E.O.
12630, this proposed rule does not have
significant takings implications. A
takings implication assessment is not
required. The designation of critical
habitat affects only Federal agency
actions. This proposed rule would not
increase or decrease the current
restrictions on private property
concerning take of Southern DPS fish,
nor do we expect the proposed critical
habitat designation to impose additional
burdens on land use or affect property
values. Additionally, the proposed
critical habitat designation does not
preclude the development of Habitat
Conservation Plans and issuance of
incidental take permits for non-Federal
actions. Owners of areas included
within the proposed critical habitat
designation would continue to have the
opportunity to use their property in
ways consistent with the survival of
listed Southern DPS.
Federalism
In accordance with E.O. 13132, we
determined that this proposed rule does
not have significant Federalism effects
and that a Federalism assessment is not
required. In keeping with Department of
Commerce policies, we request
information from, and will coordinate
development of this proposed critical
habitat designation with, appropriate
state resource agencies in California,
Oregon, Washington, and Alaska. The
proposed designation may have some
benefit to state and local resource
agencies in that the areas essential to the
conservation of the species are more
clearly defined, and the PCEs of the
habitat necessary for the survival of the
Southern DPS of green sturgeon are
specifically identified. While this
designation does not alter where and
what Federally sponsored activities may
occur, it may assist local governments in
long-range planning (rather than waiting
for case-by-case ESA section 7
consultations to occur).
Civil Justice Reform
In accordance with E.O. 12988, we
have determined that this proposed rule
does not unduly burden the judicial
system and meets the requirements of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the E.O. We
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
52106
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
are proposing to designate critical
habitat in accordance with the
provisions of the ESA. This proposed
rule uses standard property descriptions
and identifies the PCEs within the
designated areas to assist the public in
understanding the habitat needs of the
Southern DPS of green sturgeon.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
This proposed rule does not contain
new or revised information collections
that require approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act. This
proposed rule will not impose
recordkeeping or reporting requirements
on State or local governments,
individuals, businesses, or
organizations. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA)
NMFS has determined that an
environmental analysis as provided for
under the NEPA of 1969 for critical
habitat designations made pursuant to
the ESA is not required. See Douglas
County v. Babbitt, 48 F.3d 1495 (9th Cir.
1995), cert. Denied, 116 S.Ct 698 (1996).
Government-to-Government
Relationship With Tribes
The longstanding and distinctive
relationship between the Federal and
tribal governments is defined by
treaties, statutes, executive orders,
judicial decisions, and agreements,
which differentiate tribal governments
from the other entities that deal with, or
are affected by, the Federal government.
This relationship has given rise to a
special Federal trust responsibility
involving the legal responsibilities and
obligations of the United States toward
Indian Tribes and the application of
fiduciary standards of due care with
respect to Indian lands, tribal trust
resources, and the exercise of tribal
rights. Pursuant to these authorities
lands have been retained by Indian
Tribes or have been set aside for tribal
use. These lands are managed by Indian
Tribes in accordance with tribal goals
and objectives within the framework of
applicable treaties and laws. E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, outlines the
responsibilities of the Federal
Government in matters affecting tribal
interests.
There is a broad array of activities on
Indian lands that may trigger ESA
section 7 consultations. In the case of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
Southern DPS green sturgeon, we
reviewed maps indicating that very few
if any areas under consideration as
critical habitat actually overlap with
Indian lands. Nearshore coastal areas
comprise the vast majority of these
possible overlap areas, but it is unclear
which if any Indian lands are subject to
consideration for possible exclusion. In
particular, we lack information
regarding where Indian land boundaries
lie in relation to shoreline tidal
boundaries used to identify the lateral
extent in this proposed rule. Our
preliminary assessment indicates that
the following federally recognized tribes
(73 FR 18553, April 4, 2008) have lands
that may be in close proximity to areas
under consideration for designation as
critical habitat for Southern DPS green
sturgeon: The Hoh, Jamestown
S’Klallam, Lower Elwha, Makah,
Quileute, Quinault, and Shoalwater Bay
tribes in Washington; the Confederated
Tribes of Coos Lower Umpqua and
Siuslaw Indians and the Coquille Tribe
in Oregon; and the Cachil DeHe Band of
Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian
Community, Wiyot Tribe, and Yurok
Tribe in California.
We seek comments regarding these
areas and will continue to investigate
whether any Indian lands overlap, and
may warrant exclusion from, critical
habitat for Southern DPS green
sturgeon. Indian lands are those defined
in the Secretarial Order ‘‘American
Indian Tribal Rights, Federal-Tribal
Trust Responsibilities, and the
Endangered Species Act’’ (June 5, 1997),
including: (1) Lands held in trust by the
United States for the benefit of any
Indian tribe; (2) land held in trust by the
United States for any Indian Tribe or
individual subject to restrictions by the
United States against alienation; (3) fee
lands, either within or outside the
reservation boundaries, owned by the
tribal government; and (4) fee lands
within the reservation boundaries
owned by individual Indians.
If such areas are identified, the
benefits of exclusion could include
those we identified in recent critical
habitat designations for Pacific salmon
and steelhead (70 FR 52630; September
2, 2005), specifically: (1) The
furtherance of established national
policies, our Federal trust obligations
and our deference to the tribes in
management of natural resources on
their lands; (2) the maintenance of
effective long-term working
relationships to promote species
conservation on an ecosystem-wide
basis; (3) the allowance for continued
meaningful collaboration and
cooperation in scientific work to learn
more about the conservation needs of
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the species on an ecosystem-wide basis;
and (4) continued respect for tribal
sovereignty over management of natural
resources on Indian lands through
established tribal natural resource
programs.
We also seek information from
affected tribes concerning other tribal
activities that may be affected in areas
other than tribal lands (i.e., bottom
trawling and alternative energy projects
in marine areas).
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited
herein is available upon request (see
ADDRESSES section) or via our Web site
at https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 226
Endangered and threatened species.
Dated: August 29, 2008.
John Oliver,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Operations, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we propose to amend part
226, title 50 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as set forth below:
PART 226—DESIGNATED CRITICAL
HABITAT
1. The authority citation of part 226
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1533.
2. Add § 226.216, to read as follows:
§ 226.216 Critical habitat for the Southern
Distinct Population Segment of North
American Green Sturgeon (Acipenser
medirostris).
Critical habitat is designated for the
Southern Distinct Population Segment
of North American green sturgeon
(Southern DPS) as described in this
section. The textual descriptions of
critical habitat in this section are the
definitive source for determining the
critical habitat boundaries. The
overview maps are provided for general
guidance purposes only and not as a
definitive source for determining critical
habitat boundaries.
(a) Critical habitat boundaries.
Critical habitat in freshwater riverine
areas includes the stream channels and
a lateral extent as defined by the
ordinary high-water line (33 CFR
329.11). In areas for which the ordinary
high-water line has not been defined
pursuant to 33 CFR 329.11, the lateral
extent will be defined by the bankfull
elevation. Bankfull elevation is the level
at which water begins to leave the
channel and move into the floodplain
and is reached at a discharge which
generally has a recurrence interval of 1
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
to 2 years on the annual flood series.
Critical habitat in bays and estuaries
includes tidally influenced areas as
defined by the elevation of mean higher
high water. The boundary between
nearshore coastal marine areas and bays
and estuaries are delineated by the
COLREGS lines (33 CFR part 80).
Critical habitat in coastal marine areas
is defined by the zone between the 110
m depth bathymetry line and the line on
shore reached by extreme high water, or
to the COLREGS lines.
(1) Coastal marine areas: All U.S.
coastal marine waters out to the 110 m
depth bathymetry line (relative to
MLLW) from Monterey Bay, California
(36°38′12″ N./ 121°56′13″ W.) north and
east to include waters in the Strait of
Juan de Fuca, Washington. The Strait of
Juan de Fuca includes all U.S. marine
waters: In Clallam County east of a line
connecting Cape Flattery (48°23′10″ N./
124°43′32″ W.), Tatoosh Island
(48°23′30″ N./ 124°44′12″ W.), and
Bonilla Point, British Columbia
(48°35′30″ N./ 124°43′00″ W.); in
Jefferson and Island counties north and
west of a line connecting Point Wilson
(48°08′38″ N./ 122°45′07″ W.) and
Admiralty Head (48°09′18″ N./
122°40′41″ W.); and in San Juan and
Skagit counties south of lines
connecting the U.S.-Canada border
(48°27′27″ N./ 123°09′46″ W.) and Pile
Point (48°28′56″ N./ 123°05′33″ W.),
Cattle Point (48°27′1″ N./ 122°57′39″ W.)
and Davis Point (48°27′21″ N./
122°56′03″ W.), and Fidalgo Head
(48°29′34″ N./ 122°42′07″ W.) and Lopez
Island (48°28′43″ N./ 122°49′08″ W.).
(2) Freshwater riverine habitats:
Critical habitat is designated to include
the following freshwater riverine areas
in California:
(i) Sacramento River, California. From
the Sacramento I-Street Bridge upstream
to Keswick Dam (40°36′39″ N./
122°26′41″ W.), including the waters
encompassed by the Yolo Bypass and
the Sutter Bypass areas.
(ii) Lower Feather River, California.
From the confluence with the mainstem
Sacramento River upstream to Oroville
Dam (39°32′35″ N./ 121°29′27″ W.).
(iii) Lower Yuba River, California.
From the confluence with the mainstem
Feather River upstream to Daguerre Dam
(39°12′35″ N./ 121°26′33″ W.).
(3) Coastal bays and estuaries: Critical
habitat is designated to include the
following coastal bays and estuaries in
California, Oregon, and Washington:
(i) Central Valley, California. All
tidally influenced areas of San
Francisco Bay, San Pablo Bay, Suisun
Bay, and the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta up to the elevation of mean higher
high water, including tributaries
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
upstream to the head of tide. Designated
areas in the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta include all waterways within the
area defined in California Water Code
Section 12220, except for the following
excluded slough areas: Fivemile Slough
(all reaches upstream from its
confluence with Fourteenmile Slough at
38°00′50″ N./ 121°22′09″ W.); Sevenmile
Slough (all reaches between Threemile
Slough at 38°06′55″ N./ 121°40′55″ W.
and Jackson Slough at 38°06′59″ N./
121°37′44″ W.); Snodgrass Slough (all
reaches upstream from Lambert Road at
38°19′14″ N./ 121°31′08″ W.); Tom
Paine Slough (all reaches upstream from
its confluence with Middle River at
37°47′25″ N./ 121°25′08″ W.); and
Trapper Slough (all reaches upstream
from 37°53′36″ N./ 121°29′15″ W.).
(ii) Humboldt Bay, California: All
tidally influenced areas of Humboldt
Bay up to the elevation of mean higher
high water, including tributaries
upstream to the head of tide.
(iii) Coos Bay, Oregon. All tidally
influenced areas of Coos Bay up to the
elevation of mean higher high water,
including tributaries upstream to the
head of tide.
(iv) Winchester Bay, Oregon. All
tidally influenced areas of Winchester
Bay up to the elevation of mean higher
high water, including tributaries
upstream to the head of tide.
(v) Yaquina Bay, Oregon. All tidally
influenced areas of Yaquina Bay up to
the elevation of mean higher high water,
including tributaries upstream to the
head of tide.
(vi) Lower Columbia River,
Washington and Oregon. All tidally
influenced areas of the Columbia and
Willamette Rivers downstream of
Bonneville Dam and Willamette Falls
and up to the elevation of mean higher
high water, including tributaries
upstream to the head of tide.
(vii) Willapa Bay, Washington. All
tidally influenced areas of Willapa Bay
up to the elevation of mean higher high
water, including tributaries upstream to
the head of tide.
(viii) Grays Harbor, Washington. All
tidally influenced areas of Grays Harbor
up to the elevation of mean higher high
water, including tributaries upstream to
the head of tide.
(b) Primary constituent elements. The
primary constituent elements essential
for the conservation of the Southern
DPS of green sturgeon are:
(1) For freshwater riverine systems:
(i) Food resources. Abundant prey
items for larval, juvenile, subadult, and
adult life stages.
(ii) Substrate type or size (i.e.,
structural features of substrates).
Substrates suitable for egg deposition
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
52107
and development (e.g., bedrock sills and
shelves, cobble and gravel, or hard clean
sand, with interstices or irregular
surfaces to ‘‘collect’’ eggs and provide
protection from predators, and free of
excessive silt and debris that could
smother eggs during incubation), larval
development (e.g., substrates with
interstices or voids providing refuge
from predators and from high flow
conditions), and subadults and adults
(e.g., substrates for holding and
spawning).
(iii) Water flow. A flow regime (i.e.,
the magnitude, frequency, duration,
seasonality, and rate-of-change of fresh
water discharge over time) necessary for
normal behavior, growth, and survival
of all life stages.
(iv) Water quality. Water quality,
including temperature, salinity, oxygen
content, and other chemical
characteristics, necessary for normal
behavior, growth, and viability of all life
stages.
(v) Migratory corridor. A migratory
pathway necessary for the safe and
timely passage of Southern DPS fish
within riverine habitats and between
riverine and estuarine habitats (e.g., an
unobstructed river or dammed river that
still allows for safe and timely passage).
(vi) Depth. Deep (≥5 m) holding pools
for both upstream and downstream
holding of adult or subadult fish, with
adequate water quality and flow to
maintain the physiological needs of the
holding adult or subadult fish.
(vii) Sediment quality. Sediment
quality (i.e., chemical characteristics)
necessary for normal behavior, growth,
and viability of all life stages.
(2) For estuarine habitats:
(i) Food resources. Abundant prey
items within estuarine habitats and
substrates for juvenile, subadult, and
adult life stages.
(ii) Water flow. Within bays and
estuaries adjacent to the Sacramento
River (i.e., the Sacramento-San Joaquin
Delta and the Suisun, San Pablo, and
San Francisco bays), sufficient flow into
the bay and estuary to allow adults to
successfully orient to the incoming flow
and migrate upstream to spawning
grounds.
(iii) Water quality. Water quality,
including temperature, salinity, oxygen
content, and other chemical
characteristics, necessary for normal
behavior, growth, and viability of all life
stages.
(iv) Migratory corridor. A migratory
pathway necessary for the safe and
timely passage of Southern DPS fish
within estuarine habitats and between
estuarine and riverine or marine
habitats.
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
52108
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
(v) Depth. A diversity of depths
necessary for shelter, foraging, and
migration of juvenile, subadult, and
adult life stages.
(vi) Sediment quality. Sediment
quality (i.e., chemical characteristics)
necessary for normal behavior, growth,
and viability of all life stages.
(3) For nearshore coastal marine
areas:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
(i) Migratory corridor. A migratory
pathway necessary for the safe and
timely passage of Southern DPS fish
within marine and between estuarine
and marine habitats.
(ii) Water quality. Nearshore marine
waters with adequate dissolved oxygen
levels and acceptably low levels of
contaminants (e.g., pesticides,
organochlorines, elevated levels of
heavy metals) that may disrupt the
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
normal behavior, growth, and viability
of subadult and adult green sturgeon.
(iii) Food resources. Abundant prey
items for subadults and adults, which
may include benthic invertebrates and
fishes.
(c) Maps of proposed critical habitat
for the Southern DPS of green sturgeon
follow:
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
52109
EP08SE08.000
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
52110
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 / Proposed Rules
[FR Doc. E8–20632 Filed 9–5–08; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:13 Sep 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\08SEP2.SGM
08SEP2
EP08SE08.001
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS2
BILLING CODE 3510–22–C
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 174 (Monday, September 8, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 52084-52110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20632]
[[Page 52083]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Commerce
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
50 CFR Part 226
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Proposed Rulemaking To
Designate Critical Habitat for the Threatened Southern Distinct
Population Segment of North American Green Sturgeon; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 174 / Monday, September 8, 2008 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 52084]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 226
[Docket No. 080730953-81003-01]
RIN 0648-AX04
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Proposed
Rulemaking To Designate Critical Habitat for the Threatened Southern
Distinct Population Segment of North American Green Sturgeon
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), propose to
designate critical habitat for the threatened Southern distinct
population segment of North American green sturgeon (Southern DPS of
green sturgeon) pursuant to section 4 of the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). Specific areas proposed for designation include: coastal U.S.
marine waters within 110 meters (m) depth from Monterey Bay, California
(including Monterey Bay), north to Cape Flattery, Washington, including
the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington, to its United States boundary;
the Sacramento River, lower Feather River, and lower Yuba River in
California; the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and Suisun, San Pablo, and
San Francisco bays in California; the lower Columbia River estuary; and
certain coastal bays and estuaries in California (Humboldt Bay), Oregon
(Coos Bay, Winchester Bay, and Yaquina Bay), and Washington (Willapa
Bay and Grays Harbor). The areas proposed for designation comprise
approximately 325 miles (524 km) of freshwater river habitat, 1,058
square miles (2,739 sq km) of estuarine habitat, 11,927 square miles
(30,890 sq km) of marine habitat, and 136 square miles (352 sq km) of
habitat within the Yolo and Sutter bypasses (Sacramento River, CA).
We propose to exclude the following areas from designation because
the benefits of exclusion outweigh the benefits of inclusion and
exclusion will not result in the extinction of the species: coastal
U.S. marine waters within 110 m depth from the California/Mexico border
north to Monterey Bay, CA, and from the Alaska/Canada border northwest
to the Bering Strait; and certain coastal bays and estuaries in
California (Tomales Bay, Elkhorn Slough, Noyo Harbor, and the estuaries
to the head of the tide in the Eel and Klamath/Trinity rivers), Oregon
(Tillamook Bay and the estuaries to the head of the tide in the Rogue,
Siuslaw, and Alsea rivers), and Washington (Puget Sound). The areas
excluded from the proposed designation comprise approximately 1,057
square miles (2,738 sq km) of estuarine habitat and 396,917 square
miles (1,028,015 sq km) of marine habitat.
We acknowledge that there may be costs incurred by those planning
to undertake activities in certain areas, in particular Coo Bay, OR, or
other areas along the lower Columbia River estuary, as a result of this
proposed critical habitat designation for the Southern DPS of green
sturgeon that were not captured in our draft economic report. These
activities include, but are not limited to, liquefied natural gas (LNG)
projects, hydropower activities, and alternative energy projects. We
solicit comment on what these additional costs might be and will
consider any additional information received in developing our final
determination to designate or exclude areas from critical habitat for
the Southern DPS of green sturgeon.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule to designate critical habitat
must be received by no later than 5 p.m. Pacific Standard Time on
November 7, 2008. A public hearing will be held promptly if any person
so requests by October 23, 2008. Notice of the date, location, and time
of any such hearing will be published in the Federal Register not less
than 15 days before the hearing is held.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed rule, identified by
RIN 0648-AX04, by any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 1-562-980-4027, Attention: Melissa Neuman.
Mail: Submit written information to Chief, Protected
Resources Division, Southwest Region, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 650 Capitol Mall, Sacramento, CA 95814-4706.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (please enter N/A in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be
accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
Reference materials regarding this determination can be obtained
via the Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov or by submitting a
request to the Assistant Regional Administrator, Protected Resources
Division, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200,
Long Beach, CA 90802-4213.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Neuman, NMFS, Southwest Region
(562) 980-4115 or Lisa Manning, NMFS, Office of Protected Resources
(301) 713-1401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We determined that the Southern DPS of green sturgeon is likely to
become endangered in the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range and listed the species as threatened
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) on April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17757).
Section 4(b)(2) of the ESA requires us to designate critical
habitat for threatened and endangered species ``on the basis of the
best scientific data available and after taking into consideration the
economic impact, impact on national security, and any other relevant
impact, of specifying any particular area as critical habitat.'' This
section grants the Secretary [of Commerce] discretion to exclude any
area from critical habitat if he determines ``the benefits of such
exclusion outweigh the benefits of specifying such area as part of the
critical habitat.'' The Secretary may not exclude an area if it ``will
result in the extinction of the species.''
The ESA defines critical habitat under Section 3(5)(A) as:
``(i) the specific areas within the geographical area occupied
by the species, at the time it is listed * * *, on which are found
those physical or biological features (I) essential to the
conservation of the species and (II) which may require special
management considerations or protection; and
(ii) specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by
the species at the time it is listed * * * upon a determination by
the Secretary that such areas are essential for the conservation of
the species.''
Once critical habitat is designated, section 7 of the ESA requires
Federal
[[Page 52085]]
agencies to ensure they do not fund, authorize, or carry out any
actions that will destroy or adversely modify that habitat. This
requirement is in addition to the ESA section 7 requirement that
Federal agencies ensure their actions do not jeopardize the continued
existence of listed species.
When the final rule to list the Southern DPS of green sturgeon was
published on April 7, 2006, we solicited from the public information
that would inform the decision-making process for designating critical
habitat for the species. Specifically, we requested information
regarding: (1) Green sturgeon spawning habitat within the range of the
Southern DPS that was present in the past, but may have been lost over
time; (2) biological or other relevant data concerning any threats to
the Southern DPS of green sturgeon; (3) quantitative evaluations
describing the quality and extent of freshwater and marine habitats
(occupied currently or occupied in the past, but no longer occupied)
for juvenile and adult green sturgeon as well as information on areas
that may qualify as critical habitat in California for the Southern
DPS; (4) activities that could be affected by an ESA critical habitat
designation; and (5) the economic costs and benefits of additional
requirements of management measures likely to result from the
designation. No substantive additional comments, beyond those that had
been received during prior solicitations for information, were
received.
The timeline for completing the proposed critical habitat
designation described in this Federal Register document was established
pursuant to a settlement agreement. On April 17, 2007, the Center for
Biological Diversity (CBD) filed a 60-day notice of intent to sue the
Secretary of Commerce and NMFS for failing to designate critical
habitat and establish protective regulations for the Southern DPS of
green sturgeon, as required by the ESA. Pursuant to the settlement
agreement reached between the parties, we agreed to make a
determination on a proposed critical habitat designation for the
Southern DPS of green sturgeon by April 30, 2008, and a final
designation by April 30, 2009, which were later extended to September
2, 2008 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
In developing this proposed rule, we evaluated the best available
information regarding green sturgeon distribution and habitat
requirements, as well as threats to the species. In the Final Rule to
list the Southern DPS as threatened under the ESA (71 FR 17757; April
7, 2006), we identified seven extinction risk factors, including: (1)
Concentration of spawning into one spawning river, increasing the risk
of catastrophic extinction; (2) loss of spawning habitat in the upper
Sacramento and Feather rivers due to migration barriers; (3) a general
lack of population data, but suspected small population size; (4)
entrainment by water project operations; (5) potentially limiting or
lethal water temperatures; (6) commercial and recreational fisheries
harvest; and (7) toxins and exotic species. This document describes the
proposed critical habitat designation, including supporting information
on green sturgeon biology, distribution, and habitat use, and the
methods used to develop the proposed designation.
Green Sturgeon Natural History
In the following sections, we describe the natural history of green
sturgeon as it relates to the habitat needs of this species. The green
sturgeon is an anadromous fish species that is long-lived and the most
marine oriented sturgeon species in the family Acipenseridae. The North
American form of green sturgeon (Acipenser medirostris; hereafter,
``green sturgeon'') is related to the Asian form (A. mikadoi, also
called Sakhalin sturgeon), but is most likely a different species
(Artyukhin et al., 2007). Green sturgeon is one of two sturgeon species
occurring on the U.S. west coast, the other being white sturgeon
(Acipenser transmontanus). Adults can reach up to 270 cm in total
length (TL) and 175 kg in weight (Moyle, 2002); however, adults greater
than 2 m TL and 90 kg in weight are not common (Skinner, 1972). Females
are larger and older (approximately 162 cm TL and 16-20 years of age)
than males (approximately 152 cm TL and 14-16 years of age) upon
reaching reproductive maturity (Van Eenennaam et al., 2006). Maximum
ages most likely range from 60 to 70 years or older (Emmett et al.,
1991). Until recently, few studies have focused on green sturgeon due
to its low abundance and low commercial value compared to white
sturgeon.
Green sturgeon range from the Bering Sea, Alaska, to
Ense[ntilde]ada, Mexico. A few green sturgeon have been observed off
the southern California coast, including fish less than 100 cm TL
(Fitch and Lavenberg, 1971, cited in Moyle et al., 1995; Fitch and
Schultz, 1978, cited in Moyle et al., 1995). Green sturgeon abundance
increases north of Point Conception, CA (Moyle et al., 1995). Green
sturgeon occupy freshwater rivers from the Sacramento River up through
British Columbia (Moyle, 2002), but spawning has been confirmed in only
three rivers, the Rogue River in Oregon and the Klamath and Sacramento
rivers in California. Based on genetic analyses and spawning site
fidelity (Adams et al., 2002; Israel et al., 2004), NMFS has determined
green sturgeon are comprised of at least two distinct population
segments (DPSs): (1) A Northern DPS consisting of populations
originating from coastal watersheds northward of and including the Eel
River (i.e., the Klamath and Rogue rivers) (``Northern DPS''); and (2)
a southern DPS consisting of populations originating from coastal
watersheds south of the Eel River, with the only known spawning
population in the Sacramento River (``Southern DPS''). The Northern DPS
and Southern DPS are distinguished based on genetic data and spawning
locations, but their distributions outside of natal waters generally
overlap with one another (Chadwick, 1959; Miller, 1972; CDFG, 2002;
Israel et al., 2004; Moser and Lindley, 2007; Erickson and Hightower,
2007; Lindley et al., 2008.). Both Northern DPS and Southern DPS green
sturgeon occupy coastal estuaries and coastal marine waters from
southern California to Alaska, including Humboldt Bay, the lower
Columbia river estuary, Willapa Bay, Grays Harbor, and coastal waters
between Vancouver Island, BC, and southeast Alaska (Israel et al.,
2004; Moser and Lindley, 2007; Lindley et al., 2008). Thus, green
sturgeon observed in coastal bays, estuaries, and coastal marine waters
outside of natal rivers may belong to either DPS. However, the Northern
DPS of green sturgeon is not classified as a listed species under the
ESA. Tagging or genetics data are needed to determine to which DPS an
individual fish belongs. The distribution of green sturgeon, and
specifically of the Southern DPS, is described in detail under the
section titled ``Geographical Areas Occupied by the Species and
Specific Areas within the Geographical Areas Occupied.''
Spawning
Spawning frequency is not well known, but the best information
suggests adult green sturgeon spawn every 2-4 years (Lindley and Moser,
NMFS, 2004, pers. comm., cited in 70 FR 17386, April 6, 2005; Erickson
and Webb, 2007). Beginning in late February, adult green sturgeon
migrate from the ocean into fresh water to begin their spawning
migrations (Moyle et al., 1995). Spawning occurs from March to July,
with peak activity from mid-April to mid-June (Emmett et al., 1991).
Spawning populations in North America have been confirmed in the Rogue
(Erickson et al., 2002; Farr and
[[Page 52086]]
Kern, 2005), Klamath, and Sacramento Rivers (Moyle et al., 1992; CDFG,
2002). Klamath and Rogue River populations appear to spawn within 100
miles (161 km) of the ocean, whereas spawning on the mainstem
Sacramento River has been documented over 240 miles (391 km) upstream,
both downstream and upstream of Red Bluff Diversion Dam (RBDD) (Brown,
2007). Spawning most likely occurs in fast, deep water (> 3 m deep)
over substrates ranging from clean sand to bedrock, with preferences
for cobble substrates (Emmett et al., 1991; Moyle et al., 1995). Green
sturgeon females produce 59,000 to 242,000 eggs, with fecundity
increasing with fish length and age (Van Eenennaam et al., 2006). Green
sturgeon eggs are the largest of any sturgeon species, ranging from
4.04 to 4.66 mm in diameter, and have a thin chorionic layer (Van
Eenennaam et al., 2001; Van Eenennaam et al., 2006). Eggs are broadcast
spawned and likely adhere to substrates or settle into crevices of
river bedrock or under gravel (Deng, 2000; Van Eenennaam et al., 2001;
Deng et al., 2002). Van Eenennaam et al. (2001) reported that green
sturgeon eggs have weak adhesiveness, but have since retracted that
statement, noting instead that green sturgeon eggs are quite adhesive
within a few minutes after release from the female (Van Eenennaam, UC
Davis, 2008, pers. comm.). Optimum flow and temperature requirements
for spawning and incubation are unclear, but spawning success in most
sturgeons is related to these factors (Detlaff et al., 1993). Average
monthly water flow during the spawning season (March-July) ranged from
209-1,252 m\3\/s in the Sacramento River over a 10-year period from
1996-2006 (https://waterdata.usgs.gov) and from 31-260 m\3\/s in the
Rogue River over a 4-year period from 2001-2004 (Erickson and Webb,
2007). Spawning may be triggered by small increases in water flow
(Schaffter, 1997; Brown, 2007). Adult sturgeon occur in the Sacramento
River when temperatures are between 8-14 [deg]C (Moyle, 2002). In
laboratory studies, the optimal thermal range for green sturgeon
development was from 11 to 17-18 [deg]C, and temperatures >= 23 [deg]C
were lethal to embryos (Van Eenennaam et al., 2005).
Development of Early Life Stages
Green sturgeon embryos have poor swimming ability and exhibit a
strong drive to remain in contact with structure, preferring cover and
dark habitats to open bottom and illuminated habitats in laboratory
experiments (Kynard et al., 2005). In these experiments, early embryos
made no effort to swim, suggesting embryos remain in spawning areas to
develop (Kynard et al., 2005). Newly emerged green sturgeon larvae in
the laboratory hatched 144-216 hours, or 6-9 days, after fertilization
(incubation temperatures ranged from 15-15.7 [deg]C) and ranged from
12.6-15 mm in length (Van Eenennaam et al., 2001; Deng et al., 2002).
Unlike other acipenserids, newly hatched larvae did not swim up toward
the water surface within the first 5 days post hatch (dph), but
remained in clumps near the bottom. By 5-6 dph, larvae exhibited
nocturnal behavior, remaining clumped near the bottom during the day
and actively swimming at night (Van Eenennaam et al., 2001; Deng et
al., 2002). Upon onset of feeding at 10 dph (23.0-25.2 mm length) (Deng
et al., 2002), larvae are believed to initiate downstream migration
from spawning areas, staying close to the bottom and periodically
interrupting downstream movement with upstream foraging bouts (Kynard
et al., 2005).
Little is known about larval rearing habitat and requirements.
Temperatures of 15 [deg]C are believed to be optimal for larval growth,
whereas temperatures below 11 [deg]C or above 19 [deg]C may be
detrimental for growth (Cech et al., 2000, cited in COSEWIC, 2004).
Substrate may also affect growth and foraging behavior. Larvae reared
on flat-surfaced substrates (slate-rock and glass) had higher specific
growth rates than larvae reared on cobble or sand, most likely due to
lower foraging effectiveness and greater activity levels in cobble and
sand substrates (Nguyen and Crocker, 2007). Larvae complete
metamorphosis to the juvenile stage at 45 dph, when fish range from
62.5 to 94.4 mm in length (Deng et al., 2002).
Juveniles continue to grow rapidly, reaching 300 mm in length in
one year and over 600 mm within 2-3 years (based on Klamath River fish;
Nakamoto et al., 1995). Laboratory experiments indicate juveniles may
occupy fresh to brackish water at any age, but are able to completely
transition to salt water at around 1.5 years in age (about 533 dph;
mean TL of 75.2 plus or minus 0.7 cm) (Allen and Cech, 2007). Early
juveniles at 100 and 170 dph tolerated prolonged exposure to saltwater,
but experienced decreased growth and activity levels and, in some
cases, mortality for individuals at 100 dph (Allen and Cech, 2007).
These results were consistent with the Nakamoto et al. (1995) study
indicating that juveniles rear in fresh and estuarine waters before
dispersing into salt water at about 1 to 4 years in age (about 300 to
750 mm in length). Early juveniles also exhibit nocturnal behavior in
all activities and initiate directed downstream movement in the fall,
most likely to migrate to wintering habitats (Kynard et al., 2005).
Juvenile green sturgeon prefer temperatures of 15-16 [deg]C with an
upper limit of 19 [deg]C, beyond which swimming performance may
decrease and cellular stress may occur (Mayfield and Cech, 2004; Allen
et al., 2006). Laboratory measurements of oxygen consumption by
juveniles ranged from 61.78 plus or minus 4.65 mg O2
hr-1 kg-1 to 76.06 plus or minus 7.63 mg
O2 hr-1 kg-1, with a trend of
increasing oxygen consumption with increasing body mass (Allen and
Cech, 2006). Studies on juvenile feeding in San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay,
and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta identified prey items of shrimp
(Neomysis awatchensis, Crangon franciscorum), amphipods (Corophium
spp., Photis californica), isopods (Synidotea laticauda), clams (Macoma
spp.), annelid worms, and unidentified crabs and fishes (Ganssle, 1966;
Radtke, 1966).
Adults and Subadults
To distinguish among different life stages, we used the following
definitions. Adults are sexually mature fish, subadults are sexually
immature fish that have entered into coastal marine waters (usually at
3 years of age), and juveniles are fish that have not yet made their
first entry into marine waters. Green sturgeon spend a large portion of
their lives in coastal marine waters as subadults and adults between
spawning episodes. Subadult male and female green sturgeon spend at
least approximately 6 and 10 years, respectively, at sea before
reaching reproductive maturity and returning to freshwater to spawn for
the first time (Nakamoto et al., 1995). Adult green sturgeon spend as
many as 2-4 years at sea between spawning events (Lindley and Moser,
NMFS, pers. comm., cited in 70 FR 17386, April 6, 2005; Erickson and
Webb, 2007). The average length at maturity for green sturgeon is
estimated to be 152 cm TL (14-16 years) for males and 162 cm TL (16-20
years) for females in the Klamath River (Van Eenennaam et al., 2006),
and 145 cm TL for males and 166 cm TL for females in the Rogue River
(Erickson and Webb, 2007). The maximum size of subadults is
approximately 167 cm TL (Erickson and Webb, 2007).
Adults typically begin their upstream spawning migration in the
spring and either migrate downstream after spawning, or reside within
the river over the summer. In the Klamath River, tagged adults
exhibited four movement patterns: (1) Upstream spawning migration; (2)
spring outmigration to the
[[Page 52087]]
ocean; (3) summer holding (June to November) in deep pools with eddy
currents (for those that do not exhibit post-spawning spring
outmigration); and (4) outmigration after summer holding (Benson et
al., 2007). Use of summer holding sites has also been observed in the
Rogue River (Erickson et al., 2002) and in the Sacramento River (R.
Corwin, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), 2008, pers. comm.). Deep
holding pools greater than 5 m in depth are believed to be important
for spawning as well as for summer holding (R. Corwin, USBR, and B.
Poytress, USFWS, 2008, pers. comm). Winter outmigration from the
Klamath and Rogue rivers was initiated when temperatures dropped to 10-
12 [deg]C or below 10 [deg]C, and when discharge increased to greater
than 100 m\3\/s (Erickson et al., 2002; Benson et al., 2007). In the
Sacramento River, tagged adult green sturgeon were present through
November and December, before moving downstream with increased winter
flows (M. Thomas, UC Davis, and R. Corwin, USBR, 2008, pers. comm.).
Subadults may also migrate upstream into the natal rivers, but for
unknown purposes. Adults and subadults also occupy the San Francisco,
San Pablo, and Suisun bays and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
adjacent to the Sacramento River in the summer months (although some
individuals that remain in the river until late fall/early winter
migrate through the bays and Delta during their winter outmigration),
during which time they are likely feeding and optimizing growth (Kelly
et al., 2007; Moser and Lindley, 2007).
Outside of their natal waters, adult and subadult green sturgeon
inhabit coastal marine habitats from the Bering Sea to southern
California, primarily occupying waters within 110 meters (m) depth
(Erickson and Hightower, 2007). Tagged subadults and adults have been
documented to make sustained coastal migrations of up to 100 km per day
(S. Lindley and M. Moser, NMFS, pers. comm., cited in BRT, 2005), but
may also reside in aggregation/feeding areas in coastal marine waters
for several days at a time (S. Lindley and M. Moser, NMFS, 2008, pers.
comm.). There is evidence that green sturgeon inhabit certain estuaries
on the northern California, Oregon, and Washington coasts during the
summer, and inhabit coastal marine waters along the central California
coast and between Vancouver Island, British Columbia, and southeast
Alaska over the winter (Lindley et al., 2008). Green sturgeon likely
inhabit these estuarine and marine waters to feed and to optimize
growth (Moser and Lindley, 2007). Particularly large aggregations of
green sturgeon occur in the Columbia River estuary and Washington
estuaries and include green sturgeon from all known spawning
populations (Moser and Lindley, 2007). Although adult and subadult
green sturgeon occur in coastal marine waters as far north as the
Bering Sea, green sturgeon have not been observed in freshwater rivers
or coastal bays and estuaries in Alaska.
Within bays and estuaries, adults and subadults inhabit a wide
range of environmental conditions. Adults and subadults in Willapa Bay
and the San Francisco Bay Estuary occurred over the entire temperature
and salinity range (11.9-21.9 [deg]C; 8.8-32.1 ppt), experienced large
fluctuations in temperature and salinity (up to 2 [deg]C h-1
and 1 practical salinity unit (PSU) h-1), and occupied a
wide range of dissolved oxygen levels from 6.54 to 8.98 mg
O2/l (Kelly et al., 2007; Moser and Lindley, 2007). Tagged
adults and subadults in the San Francisco Bay Estuary occupied shallow
depths during directional movements but stayed close to the bottom
during non-directional movements, presumably because they were foraging
(Kelly et al., 2007). Similar to freshwater rivers, winter outmigration
from Willapa Bay was initiated when water temperatures dropped below 10
[deg]C (Moser and Lindley, 2007).
Adult and subadult green sturgeon in the Columbia River estuary,
Willapa Bay, and Grays Harbor feed on crangonid shrimp, burrowing
thalassinidean shrimp (primarily the burrowing ghost shrimp (Neotrypaea
californiensis), but possibly other related species), amphipods, clams,
juvenile Dungeness crab (Cancer magister), anchovies, sand lances
(Ammodytes hexapterus), lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus), and other
unidentified fishes (P. Foley, unpublished data cited in Moyle et al.,
1995; C. Tracy, minutes to USFWS meeting, cited in Moyle et al., 1995;
O. Langness, WDFW, pers. comm., cited in Moser and Lindley, 2007;
Dumbauld et al., 2008). Burrowing ghost shrimp made up about 50 percent
of the stomach contents of green sturgeon sampled in 2003 (Dumbauld et
al., 2008). Subadults and adults feeding in bays and estuaries may be
exposed to contaminants that may affect their growth and reproduction.
Studies on white sturgeon in estuaries indicate that the
bioaccumulation of pesticides and other contaminants adversely affects
growth and reproductive development and may result in decreased
reproductive success (Fairey et al., 1997; Foster et al., 2001a; Foster
et al., 2001b; Kruse and Scarnecchia, 2002; Feist et al., 2005;
Greenfield et al., 2005). Green sturgeon are believed to experience
similar risks from contaminants (70 FR 17386, April 6, 2005).
Methods and Criteria Used to Identify Critical Habitat
In the following sections, we describe the relevant definitions and
requirements in the ESA and our implementing regulations and the key
methods and criteria used to prepare this proposed critical habitat
designation. In accordance with section 4(b)(2) of the ESA and our
implementing regulations (50 CFR 424.12(a)), this proposed rule is
based on the best scientific information available concerning the
Southern DPS's present and historical range, habitat, and biology, as
well as threats to its habitat. In preparing this rule, we reviewed and
summarized current information on the green sturgeon, including recent
biological surveys and reports, peer-reviewed literature, NMFS status
reviews for green sturgeon (Moyle et al., 1992; Adams et al., 2002;
BRT, 2005), and the proposed and final listing rules for the green
sturgeon (70 FR 17386, April 6, 2005; 71 FR 17757, April 7, 2006).
To assist with the evaluation of critical habitat, we convened a
critical habitat review team (CHRT) of nine Federal biologists from
NMFS, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the USBR with
experience in green sturgeon biology, consultations, and management, or
experience in the critical habitat designation process. The CHRT used
the best available scientific and commercial data and their best
professional judgment to: (1) Verify the geographical area occupied by
the Southern DPS at the time of listing; (2) identify the physical and
biological features essential to the conservation of the species; (3)
identify specific areas within the occupied area containing those
essential physical and biological features; (4) verify whether the
essential features within each specific area may need special
management considerations or protection and identify activities that
may affect these essential features; (5) evaluate the conservation
value of each specific area; and (6) determine if any unoccupied areas
are essential to the conservation of the Southern DPS. The CHRT's
evaluation and conclusions are described in detail in the following
sections.
[[Page 52088]]
Physical or Biological Features Essential for Conservation
Joint NMFS-USFWS regulations, at 50 CFR 424.12(b), state that in
determining what areas are critical habitat, the agencies ``shall
consider those physical and biological features that are essential to
the conservation of a given species and that may require special
management considerations or protection.'' Features to consider may
include, but are not limited to: ``(1) Space for individual and
population growth, and for normal behavior; (2) Food, water, air,
light, minerals, or other nutritional or physiological requirements;
(3) Cover or shelter; (4) Sites for breeding, reproduction, rearing of
offspring, germination, or seed dispersal; and generally; (5) Habitats
that are protected from disturbance or are representative of the
historic geographical and ecological distributions of a species.'' The
regulations also require the agencies to ``focus on the principal
biological or physical constituent elements'' (hereafter referred to as
``Primary Constituent Elements'' or PCEs) within the specific areas
considered for designation that are essential to conservation of the
species, which ``may include, but are not limited to, the following: *
* * spawning sites, feeding sites, seasonal wetland or dryland, water
quality or quantity, * * * geological formation, vegetation type, tide,
and specific soil types.''
The CHRT recognized that the different systems occupied by green
sturgeon at specific stages of their life cycle serve distinct purposes
and thus may contain different PCEs. Based on the best available
scientific information, the CHRT identified PCEs for freshwater
riverine systems, estuarine areas, and nearshore marine waters.
The specific PCEs essential for the conservation of the Southern
DPS in freshwater riverine systems include:
(1) Food resources. Abundant prey items for larval, juvenile,
subadult, and adult life stages. Although the CHRT lacked specific data
on food resources for green sturgeon within freshwater riverine
systems, juvenile green sturgeon most likely feed on fly larvae (based
on nutritional studies on the closely-related white sturgeon) (J.
Stuart, NMFS, 2008, pers. comm.). Food resources are important for
juvenile foraging, growth, and development during their downstream
migration to the Delta and bays. In addition, subadult and adult green
sturgeon may forage during their downstream post-spawning migration,
while holding within deep pools (Erickson et al., 2002), or on non-
spawning migrations within freshwater rivers. Subadult and adult green
sturgeon in freshwater rivers most likely feed on benthic prey species
similar to those fed on in bays and estuaries, including shrimp, clams,
and benthic fishes (Moyle et al., 1995; Erickson et al., 2002; Moser
and Lindley, 2007; Dumbauld et al., 2008).
(2) Substrate type or size (i.e., structural features of
substrates). Substrates suitable for egg deposition and development
(e.g., bedrock sills and shelves, cobble and gravel, or hard clean
sand, with interstices or irregular surfaces to ``collect'' eggs and
provide protection from predators, and free of excessive silt and
debris that could smother eggs during incubation), larval development
(e.g., substrates with interstices or voids providing refuge from
predators and from high flow conditions), and subadults and adults
(e.g., substrates for holding and spawning). For example, spawning is
believed to occur over substrates ranging from clean sand to bedrock,
with preferences for cobble (Emmett et al., 1991; Moyle et al., 1995).
Eggs likely adhere to substrates, or settle into crevices between
substrates (Deng, 2000; Van Eenennaam et al., 2001; Deng et al., 2002).
Both embryos and larvae exhibited a strong affinity for benthic
structure during laboratory studies (Van Eenennaam et al., 2001; Deng
et al., 2002; Kynard et al., 2005), and may seek refuge within
crevices, but use flat-surfaced substrates for foraging (Nguyen and
Crocker, 2007). For more details, see the sections on ``Spawning'' and
``Development of early life stages''.
(3) Water flow. A flow regime (i.e., the magnitude, frequency,
duration, seasonality, and rate-of-change of fresh water discharge over
time) necessary for normal behavior, growth, and survival of all life
stages. Such a flow regime should include stable and sufficient water
flow rates in spawning and rearing reaches to maintain water
temperatures within the optimal range for egg, larval, and juvenile
survival and development (11-19 [deg]C) (Cech et al., 2000, cited in
COSEWIC, 2004; Mayfield and Cech, 2004; Van Eenennaam et al., 2005;
Allen et al., 2006). Sufficient flow is needed to reduce the incidence
of fungal infestations of the eggs (Deng et al., 2002; Parsley et al.,
2002). In addition, sufficient flow is needed to flush silt and debris
from cobble, gravel, and other substrate surfaces to prevent crevices
from being filled in (and potentially suffocating the eggs; Deng et
al., 2002) and to maintain surfaces for feeding (Nguyen and Crocker,
2007). Successful migration of adult green sturgeon to and from
spawning grounds is also dependent on sufficient water flow. As stated
in the subsection titled ``Spawning'', spawning success is most
certainly associated with water flow and water temperature. Spawning in
the Sacramento River is believed to be triggered by increases in water
flow to about 400 m\3\/s (average daily water flow during spawning
months: 198-306 m\3\/s) (Brown, 2007). Post-spawning downstream
migrations are triggered by increased flows, ranging from 174-417 m\3\/
s in the late summer (Vogel, 2005) and greater than 100 m\3\/s in the
winter (Erickson et al., 2002; Benson et al., 2007; M. Thomas and R.
Corwin, USBR, 2008, pers. comm.).
(4) Water quality. Water quality, including temperature, salinity,
oxygen content, and other chemical characteristics, necessary for
normal behavior, growth, and viability of all life stages (see sections
on ``Development of early life stages'' and ``Adults and subadults'').
Suitable water temperatures would include: Stable water temperatures
within spawning reaches (wide fluctuations could increase egg mortality
or deformities in developing embryos); temperatures within 11-17 [deg]C
(optimal range = 14-16 [deg]C) in spawning reaches for egg incubation
(March-August) (Van Eenennaam et al., 2005); temperatures below 20
[deg]C for larval development (Werner et al., 2007); and temperatures
below 24 [deg]C for juveniles (Mayfield and Cech, 2004; Allen et al.,
2006a). Suitable salinity levels range from fresh water (< 3 parts per
thousand (ppt)) for larvae and early juveniles (about 100 dph) to
brackish water (10 ppt) for juveniles prior to their transition to salt
water. Prolonged exposure to higher salinities may result in decreased
growth and activity levels and even mortality (Allen and Cech, 2007).
Adequate levels of dissolved oxygen are needed to support oxygen
consumption by fish in their early life stages (ranging from 61.78 to
76.06 mg O2 hr-\1\ kg-\1\ for
juveniles) (Allen and Cech, 2007). Suitable water quality would also
include water containing acceptably low levels of contaminants (i.e.,
pesticides, organochlorines, elevated levels of heavy metals, etc.;
acceptably low levels would be determined by NMFS on a case-by-case
basis) that may disrupt normal development of embryonic, larval, and
juvenile stages of green sturgeon. Water with acceptably low levels of
such contaminants would protect green sturgeon from adverse impacts on
growth, reproductive development, and reproductive success (e.g.,
reduced egg size and abnormal gonadal development) likely to result
[[Page 52089]]
from exposure to contaminants (Fairey et al., 1997; Foster et al.,
2001a; Foster et al., 2001b; Kruse and Scarnecchia, 2002; Feist et al.,
2005; Greenfield et al., 2005).
(5) Migratory corridor. A migratory pathway necessary for the safe
and timely passage of Southern DPS fish within riverine habitats and
between riverine and estuarine habitats (e.g., an unobstructed river or
dammed river that still allows for safe and timely passage). We define
safe and timely passage to mean that human-induced impediments, either
physical, chemical or biological, do not alter the migratory behavior
of the fish such that its survival or the overall viability of the
species is compromised (e.g., an impediment that compromises the
ability of fish to reach their spawning habitat in time to encounter
con-specifics and reproduce). Unimpeded migratory corridors are
necessary for adult green sturgeon to migrate to and from spawning
habitats, and for larval and juvenile green sturgeon to migrate
downstream from spawning/rearing habitats within freshwater rivers to
rearing habitats within the estuaries.
(6) Water depth. Deep (>= 5 m) holding pools for both upstream and
downstream holding of adult or subadult fish, with adequate water
quality and flow to maintain the physiological needs of the holding
adult or subadult fish (see section titled Adults and Subadults). Deep
pools of >= 5 m depth with high associated turbulence and upwelling are
critical for adult green sturgeon spawning and for summer holding
within the Sacramento River (R. Corwin, USBR, and B. Poytress, USFWS,
2008, pers. comm.). Adult green sturgeon in the Klamath and Rogue
rivers also occupy deep holding pools for extended periods of time,
presumably for feeding, energy conservation, and/or refuge from high
water temperatures (Erickson et al., 2002; Benson et al., 2007).
(7) Sediment quality. Sediment quality (i.e., chemical
characteristics) necessary for normal behavior, growth, and viability
of all life stages. This includes sediments free of elevated levels of
contaminants (e.g., selenium, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and
organochlorine pesticides) that may adversely affect green sturgeon.
Based on studies of white sturgeon, bioaccumulation of contaminants
from feeding on benthic species may adversely affect the growth,
reproductive development, and reproductive success of green sturgeon
(see section titled Adult and Subadults).
The specific PCEs essential for the conservation of the Southern
DPS in estuarine areas include:
(1) Food resources. Abundant prey items within estuarine habitats
and substrates for juvenile, subadult, and adult life stages. As
described previously (see Green Sturgeon Natural History), prey species
for juvenile, subadult, and adult green sturgeon within bays and
estuaries primarily consist of benthic invertebrates and fishes,
including crangonid shrimp, burrowing thalassinidean shrimp
(particularly the burrowing ghost shrimp), amphipods, isopods, clams,
annelid worms, crabs, sand lances, and anchovies. These prey species
are critical for the rearing, foraging, growth, and development of
juvenile, subadult, and adult green sturgeon within the bays and
estuaries.
(2) Water flow. Within bays and estuaries adjacent to the
Sacramento River (i.e., the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and the
Suisun, San Pablo, and San Francisco bays), sufficient flow into the
bay and estuary to allow adults to successfully orient to the incoming
flow and migrate upstream to spawning grounds. Sufficient flows are
needed to attract adult green sturgeon to the Sacramento River to
initiate the upstream spawning migration (Kohlhorst et al., 1991, cited
in CDFG, 2002; J. Stuart, NMFS, 2008, pers. comm.).
(3) Water quality. Water quality, including temperature, salinity,
oxygen content, and other chemical characteristics, necessary for
normal behavior, growth, and viability of all life stages. Suitable
water temperatures for juvenile green sturgeon should be below 24
[deg]C. At temperatures above 24 [deg]C, juvenile green sturgeon
exhibit decreased swimming performance (Mayfield and Cech, 2004) and
increased cellular stress (Allen et al., 2006). Suitable salinities
range from brackish water (10 ppt) to salt water (33 ppt). Juveniles
transitioning from brackish to salt water can tolerate prolonged
exposure to salt water salinities, but may exhibit decreased growth and
activity levels (Allen and Cech, 2007), whereas subadults and adults
tolerate a wide range of salinities (Kelly et al., 2007). Subadult and
adult green sturgeon occupy a wide range of dissolved oxygen levels,
but may need a minimum dissolved oxygen level of at least 6.54 mg
O2/l (Kelly et al., 2007; Moser and Lindley, 2007). As
described above, adequate levels of dissolved oxygen are also required
to support oxygen consumption by juveniles (ranging from 61.78 to 76.06
mg O2 hr-\1\ kg-\1\) (Allen and Cech,
2007). Suitable water quality also includes water with acceptably low
levels of contaminants (e.g., pesticides, organochlorines, elevated
levels of heavy metals; acceptable low levels as determined by NMFS on
a case-by-case basis) that may disrupt the normal development of
juvenile life stages, or the growth, survival, or reproduction of
subadult or adult stages.
(4) Migratory corridor. A migratory pathway necessary for the safe
and timely passage of Southern DPS fish within estuarine habitats and
between estuarine and riverine or marine habitats. We define safe and
timely passage to mean that human-induced impediments, either physical,
chemical or biological, do not alter the migratory behavior of the fish
such that its survival or the overall viability of the species is
compromised (e.g., an impediment that compromises the ability of fish
to reach thermal refugia by the time they enter a particular life
stage). Within the bays and estuaries adjacent to the Sacramento River,
unimpeded passage is needed for juvenile green sturgeon to migrate from
the river to the bays and estuaries and eventually out into the ocean.
Passage within the bays and the Delta is also critical for adults and
subadults for feeding and summer holding, as well as to access the
Sacramento River for their upstream spawning migrations and to make
their outmigration back into the ocean. Within bays and estuaries
outside of the Delta and the Suisun, San Pablo, and San Francisco bays,
unimpeded passage is necessary for adult and subadult green sturgeon to
access feeding areas, holding areas, and thermal refugia, and to ensure
passage back out into the ocean.
(5) Water depth. A diversity of depths necessary for shelter,
foraging, and migration of juvenile, subadult, and adult life stages.
Subadult and adult green sturgeon occupy a diversity of depths within
bays and estuaries for feeding and migration. Tagged adults and
subadults within the San Francisco Bay estuary primarily occupied
waters over shallow depths of less than 10 m, either swimming near the
surface or foraging along the bottom (Kelly et al., 2007). In a study
of juvenile green sturgeon in the Delta, relatively large numbers of
juveniles were captured primarily in shallow waters from 1-3 meters
deep, indicating juveniles may require even shallower depths for
rearing and foraging (Radtke, 1966). Thus, a diversity of depths is
important to support different life stages and habitat uses for green
sturgeon within estuarine areas.
[[Page 52090]]
(6) Sediment quality. Sediment quality (i.e., chemical
characteristics) necessary for normal behavior, growth, and viability
of all life stages. This includes sediments free of elevated levels of
contaminants (e.g., selenium, PAHs, and organochlorine pesticides) that
can cause adverse effects on all life stages of green sturgeon (see
description of ``Sediment quality'' for riverine habitats above).
The specific PCEs essential for the conservation of the Southern
DPS in coastal marine areas include:
(1) Migratory corridor. A migratory pathway necessary for the safe
and timely passage of Southern DPS fish within marine and between
estuarine and marine habitats. We define safe and timely passage to
mean that human-induced impediments, either physical, chemical or
biological, do not alter the migratory behavior of the fish such that
its survival or the overall viability of the species is compromised
(e.g., an impediment that compromises the ability of fish to reach
abundant prey resources during the summer months in Northwest Pacific
estuaries). Subadult and adult green sturgeon spend the majority of
their time in marine and estuarine waters outside of their natal
rivers. Unimpeded passage within coastal marine waters is critical for
subadult and adult green sturgeon to access oversummering habitats
within coastal bays and estuaries and overwintering habitat within
coastal waters between Vancouver Island, BC, and southeast Alaska.
Access to and unimpeded movement within these areas is also necessary
for green sturgeon to forage for prey and make lengthy migrations
necessary to reach other foraging areas (Lindley et al., 2008). Passage
is also necessary for subadults and adults to migrate back to San
Francisco Bay and to the Sacramento River for spawning.
(2) Water quality. Coastal marine waters with adequate dissolved
oxygen levels and acceptably low levels of contaminants (e.g.,
pesticides, organochlorines, heavy metals that may disrupt the normal
behavior, growth, and viability of subadult and adult green sturgeon).
Based on studies of tagged subadult and adult green sturgeon in the San
Francisco Bay estuary, CA, and Willapa Bay, WA, subadults and adults
may need a minimum dissolved oxygen level of at least 6.54 mg
O2/l (Kelly et al., 2007; Moser and Lindley, 2007). As
described above, exposure to and bioaccumulation of contaminants may
adversely affect the growth, reproductive development, and reproductive
success of subadult and adult green sturgeon. Thus, waters with
acceptably low levels of such contaminants (as determined by NMFS on a
case-by-case basis) are required for the normal development of green
sturgeon for optimal survival and spawning success.
(3) Food resources. Abundant prey items for subadults and adults,
which may include benthic invertebrates and fishes. Green sturgeon
spend more than half their lives in coastal marine and estuarine
waters, spending from 3-20 years at a time out at sea. Abundant food
resources are important to support subadults and adults over long-
distance migrations, and may be one of the factors attracting green
sturgeon to habitats far to the north (off the coast of Vancouver
Island and Alaska) and to the south (Monterey Bay, CA, and off the
coast of southern California) of their natal habitat. Although the CHRT
lacked direct evidence, prey species likely include benthic
invertebrates and fishes similar to those fed upon by green sturgeon in
bays and estuaries (e.g., shrimp, clams, crabs, anchovies, sand lances)
(see section on ``Adults and subadults'').
Geographical Area Occupied by the Species and Specific Areas Within the
Geographical Area Occupied
One of the first steps in the critical habitat designation process
is to define the geographical area occupied by the species at the time
of listing. The CHRT relied on data from tagging and tracking studies,
genetic analyses, field observations, records of fisheries take and
incidental take (e.g., in water diversion activities), and
opportunistic sightings to provide information on the current range and
distribution of green sturgeon and of the Southern DPS. The range of
green sturgeon extends from the Bering Sea, Alaska, to Ense[ntilde]ada,
Mexico. Within this range, Southern DPS fish are confirmed to occur
from Graves Harbor, Alaska, to Monterey Bay, California (Lindley et
al., 2008; S. Lindley and M. Moser, NMFS, 2008, unpublished data),
based on telemetry data and genetic analyses. Green sturgeon have been
observed northwest of Graves Harbor, AK, and south of Monterey Bay, CA,
but have not been identified as belonging to either the Northern or
Southern DPS. The CHRT concluded that there are no barriers or habitat
conditions preventing Southern DPS fish detected in Monterey Bay, CA,
or off Graves Harbor, AK, from moving further south or further north,
and that the green sturgeon observed in these areas could belong to
either the Northern DPS or the Southern DPS. Based on this reasoning,
the geographical area occupied by the Southern DPS was defined as the
entire range occupied by green sturgeon (i.e., from the Bering Sea, AK,
to Ense[ntilde]ada, Mexico), encompassing all areas where the presence
of Southern DPS fish has been confirmed, as well as areas where the
presence of Southern DPS fish is likely (based on the presence of
confirmed Northern DPS fish or green sturgeon of unknown DPS).
Areas outside of the United States cannot be designated as critical
habitat (50 CFR 424.12(h)). Thus, the occupied geographical area under
consideration for this designation is limited to areas from the Bering
Sea, AK, to the California/Mexico border, excluding Canadian waters.
For freshwater rivers, the CHRT concluded that green sturgeon of each
DPS are likely to occur throughout their natal river systems, but,
within non-natal river systems, are likely to be limited to the
estuaries and would not occur upstream of the head of the tide. For the
purposes of our evaluation of critical habitat, we defined all green
sturgeon observed upstream of the head of the tide in freshwater rivers
south of the Eel River (i.e., the Sacramento River and its tributaries)
as belonging to the Southern DPS, and all green sturgeon observed
upstream of the head of the tide in freshwater rivers north of and
including the Eel River as belonging to the Northern DPS. Thus, for
freshwater rivers north of and including the Eel River, the areas
upstream of the head of the tide were not considered part of the
geographical area occupied by the Southern DPS.
The CHRT then identified ``specific areas'' within the geographical
area occupied. To be eligible for designation as critical habitat under
the ESA, each specific area must contain at least one PCE that may
require special management considerations or protection. For each
specific occupied area, the CHRT noted whether the presence of Southern
DPS green sturgeon is confirmed or likely (based on the presence of
Northern DPS fish or green sturgeon of unknown DPS) and verified that
each area contained one or more PCE(s) that may require special
management considerations or protection. The following paragraphs
provide a brief description of the presence and distribution of
Southern DPS green sturgeon within each area and summarize the CHRT's
methods for delineating the specific areas.
Freshwater Rivers, Bypasses, and the Delta
Green sturgeon occupy several freshwater river systems from the
Sacramento River, CA, north to British Columbia, Canada (Moyle, 2002).
As
[[Page 52091]]
described in the previous section, Southern DPS green sturgeon occur
throughout their natal river systems (i.e., the Sacramento River, lower
Feather River, and lower Yuba River), but are believed to be restricted
to the estuaries in non-natal river systems (i.e., north of and
including the Eel River). The CHRT defined the specific areas in the
Sacramento, Feather, and Yuba rivers in California to include riverine
habitat from the river mouth upstream to and including the furthest
known site of historic and/or current sighting or capture of green
sturgeon, as long as the site is still accessible. The specific areas
were extended upstream to a geographically identifiable point. The
riverine specific areas include areas that offer at least periodic
passage of Southern DPS fish to upstream sites and include sufficient
habitat necessary for each riverine life stage (e.g., spawning, egg
incubation, larval rearing, juvenile feeding, passage throughout the
river, and/or passage into and out of estuarine or marine habitat).
The CHRT delineated specific areas where Southern DPS green
sturgeon occur, including: the Sacramento River, the Yolo and Sutter
bypasses, the lower Feather River, and the lower Yuba River. The CHRT
also delineated a specific area in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
The mainstem Sacramento River is the only area where spawning by
Southern DPS green sturgeon has been confirmed and where all life
stages of the Southern DPS are supported. Beginning in March and
through early summer, adult green sturgeon migrate as far upstream as
the Keswick Dam (rkm 486) to spawn (Brown, 2007). Spawning has been
confirmed by the collection of larvae and juveniles at the RBDD and the
Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (GCID) (CDFG, 2002; Brown, 2007) and
by the collection of green sturgeon eggs downstream of the RBDD (Brown,
2007; B. Poytress, USFWS, 2008, pers. comm.). The Sacramento River
provides important spawning, holding, and migratory habitat for adults
and important rearing, feeding, and migratory habitat for larvae and
juveniles. The Yolo and Sutter bypasses adjacent to the lower
Sacramento River also serve as important migratory corridors for
Southern DPS adults, subadults, and juveniles on their upstream or
downstream migration and provide a high macroinvertebrate forage base
that may support green sturgeon feeding. Southern DPS adults occupy the
lower Feather River up to Oroville Dam (rkm 116) and the lower Yuba
River up to Daguerre Dam (rkm 19). Based on observations of Southern
DPS adults occurring right up to the dams and of spawning behavior by
adults on the Feather River, spawning may have occurred historically in
the lower Feather River and, to a lesser extent, in the lower Yuba
River. However, no green sturgeon eggs, larvae, or juveniles have ever
been collected within these rivers. Further downstream, the Sacramento-
San Joaquin Delta provides important rearing, feeding, and migratory
habitat for juveniles, which occur throughout the Delta in all months
of the year. Subadults and adults also occur throughout the Delta to
feed, grow, and prepare for their outmigration to the ocean. The draft
biological report provides more detailed information on each specific
area, including a description of the PCEs present, special management
considerations or protection that may be needed, and the presence and
distribution of Southern DPS green sturgeon. The draft biological
report is available upon request (see ADDRESSES), via our Web site at
https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov, or via the Federal eRulemaking Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov. For additional discussion of the special
management considerations or protection that may be needed for the
PCEs, please see also the description of ``Special management
considerations or protection'' below.
Bays and Estuaries
Southern DPS green sturgeon occupy coastal bays and estuaries from
Monterey Bay, CA, to Puget Sound, WA. In the Central Valley, CA,
juvenile, subadult, and adult life stages occur throughout the Suisun,
San Pablo, and San Francisco bays. These bays support the rearing,
feeding, and growth of juveniles prior to their first entry into marine
waters. The bays also serve as important feeding, rearing, and
migratory habitat for subadult and adult Southern DPS green sturgeon.
Outside of their natal system, subadult and adult Southern DPS fish
occupy coastal bays and estuaries in California, Oregon, and
Washington, including estuarine waters at the mouths of non- natal
rivers. Subadult and adult Southern DPS green sturgeon have been
confirmed to occupy the following coastal bays and estuaries: Monterey
Bay, CA; Humboldt Bay, CA; Coos Bay, OR; Winchester Bay, OR; the lower
Columbia River estuary; Willapa Bay, WA; Grays Harbor, WA; and Puget
Sound, WA (Chadwick, 1959; Miller, 1972; Lindley et al., 2008; Pinnix,
2008; S. Lindley and M. Moser, NMFS, 2008, unpublished data). The
presence of Southern DPS green sturgeon is likely (based on limited
records of confirmed Northern DPS fish or green sturgeon of unknown
DPS), but not confirmed within the following coastal bays and
estuaries: Elkhorn Slough, CA; Tomales Bay, CA; Noyo Harbor, CA; Eel
River estuary, CA; Klamath/Trinity River estuary, CA; Rogue River
estuary, OR; Siuslaw River estuary, OR; Alsea River estuary, OR;
Yaquina Bay, OR; and Tillamook Bay, OR (Emmett et al., 1991; Moyle et
al., 1992; Adams et al., 2002; Erickson et al., 2002; Yoklavich et al.,
2002; Farr and Kern, 2005).
Subadult and adult green sturgeon are believed to occupy coastal
bays and estuaries outside of their natal waters for feeding,
optimization of growth, and thermal refugia (Moser and Lindley, 2007;
Lindley et al., 2008). Occupied coastal bays and estuaries north of San
Francisco Bay, CA, contain oversummering habitats for subadults and
adults, whereas coastal bays and estuaries south of San Francisco Bay,
CA, are believed to contain overwintering habitats (Lindley et al.,
2008). The largest concentrations of green sturgeon, including Southern
DPS fish, occur within the lower Columbia River estuary, Willapa Bay,
and Grays Harbor (Emmett et al., 1991; Adams et al., 2002; WDFW and
ODFW, 2002; Israel and May, 2006; Moser and Lindley, 2007; Lindley et
al., 2008). Large numbers of green sturgeon also occur within
Winchester Bay, Coos Bay, and Humboldt Bay (Moyle et al., 1992; Rien et
al., 2000; Farr et al., 2001; Adams et al., 2002; Farr and Rien, 2002,
2003; Farr and Kern, 2004, 2005; Israel and May, 2006; Lindley et al.,
2008; Pinnix, 2008). Smaller numbers of green sturgeon occur in Tomales
Bay, CA (Moyle et al., 1992), Yaquina Bay (Emmett et al., 1991; Rien et
al., 2000; Farr et al., 2001; Farr and Rien, 2002, 2003; Farr and Kern,
2004, 2005), and Puget Sound, WA (S. Lindley and M. Moser, NMFS, 2008,
unpublished data). Based on limited available data, green sturgeon
presence is believed to be rare in the following bays and estuaries:
Elkhorn Slough, CA; Noyo Harbor, CA; Siuslaw River estuary, OR; Alsea
River estuary, OR; and Tillamook Bay, OR (Emmett et al., 1991; Moyle et
al., 1992; Rien et al., 2000; Farr et al., 2001; Farr and Rien, 2002;
Yoklavich et al., 2002; Farr and Rien, 2003; Farr and Kern, 2004,
2005). Green sturgeon are present in the estuaries of the Eel River,
Klamath/Trinity rivers, and Rogue River, but are believed to most
likely belong to the Northern DPS. This is based on the fact that the
Eel, Klamath/Trinity, and Rogue rivers are spawning rivers for the
Northern DPS and that, to
[[Page 52092]]
date, no tagged Southern DPS subadults or adults have been detected in
the estuaries of the three rivers, although Southern DPS fish have been
observed in coastal marine waters just outside the mouth of the Klamath
River (S. Lindley, NMFS, 2008, pers. comm.).
The CHRT included all coastal bays and estuaries for which there
was evidence to confirm the presence of green sturgeon, noting where
there were confirmed Southern DPS fish, confirmed Northern DPS fish, or
confirmed green sturgeon of unknown DPS. As stated in the previous
section, based on our definitions for the Northern DPS and Southern
DPS, any green sturgeon observed upstream of the head of the tide in
freshwater rivers north of and including the Eel River were assigned to
the Northern DPS. Thus, areas upstream of the head of the tide on these
rivers were not included as part of the occupied specific areas for the
Southern DPS. Each specific area was defined to extend from the mouth
of the bay or estuary upstream to the head of the tide. The boundary at
the mouth of each bay or estuary was defined by the COLREGS demarcation
line. COLREGS demarcation lines delineate ``those waters upon which
mariners shall comply with the International Regulations for Preventing
Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS) and those waters upon which
mariners shall comply with the Inland Navigation Rules'' (33 CFR
80.01). Waters inside of the 72 COLREGS lines are Inland Rules waters
and waters outside of the 72 COLREGS lines are COLREGS waters. The
draft biological report provides additional information for each
specific area. For a copy of the report, see ADDRESSES, our Web site at
https://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov, or the Federal eRulemaking Web site at http:/
/www.regulations.gov. For additional discussion of the special
management considerations or protection that may be needed for the
PCEs, please see also the description of ``Special management
considerations or protection'' below.
Coastal Marine Waters
Subadult and adult green sturgeon spend most of their time in
coastal marine and estuarine waters. The best available data indicate
coastal marine waters are important for seasonal migrations from
southern California to Alaska to reach distant foraging and aggregation
areas. Green sturgeon occur primarily within the 110 m depth bathymetry
(Erickson and Hightower, 2007). Green sturgeon tagged in the Rogue
River and tracked in marine waters typically occupied the water column
at 40-70 m depth, but made rapid vertical ascents to or near the
surface, for reasons yet unknown (Erickson and Hightower, 2007). Green
sturgeon use of waters < 110 m depth was confirmed by coastal Oregon
and Washington bottom-trawl fisheries records indicating that most
reported locations of green sturgeon occurred inside of the 110-m depth
contour from 1993-2000, despite the fact that most of the fishing
effort occurred in water deeper than 110 m (Erickson and Hightower,
2007).
Based on tagging studies of both Southern and Northern DPS fish,
green sturgeon spend a large part of their time in coastal marine
waters migrating between coastal bays and estuaries, including
sustained long-distance m