Training; Supervisory, Management, and Executive Development, 51248-51252 [E8-20273]

Download as PDF 51248 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 5 CFR Parts 410 and 412 RIN 3206–AK75 Training; Supervisory, Management, and Executive Development Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management proposes to amend its regulations to implement certain training and development requirements contained in the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004. DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 3, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ‘‘RIN 3206–AK75,’’ by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Agency Web Site: https:// www.opm.gov. Click on the ‘‘Regulations’’ icon at the bottom right of the Web page. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • E-mail: employ@opm.gov. Include ‘‘RIN 3206-AK75’’ in the subject line of the message. • Fax: (202) 606–2329. • Mail, Hand Deliver/Courier comments: Ms. Nancy Randa, Deputy Associate Director for the Center for Leadership, Executive Resources, and Policy Analysis, Room 6357, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415– 9700. erowe on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Dube by telephone at (202) 606– 4063, by FAX at (202) 606–1637, or by e-mail at cheryl.dube@opm.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 30, 2004, the President signed the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (Act), Public Law 108–411, into law. The Act makes several significant changes in the law governing the training and development of Federal employees, supervisors, managers, and executives. The first change requires each agency to evaluate, on a regular basis, its training programs and plans with respect to the accomplishment of its specific performance plans and strategic goals, and to modify its training plans and programs as needed to accomplish the agency’s performance plans and strategic goals. Other changes to the regulation, not related to the Act, are made to better align with law the requirement for continued service agreements and the submission of VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:31 Aug 29, 2008 Jkt 214001 training data. The second major change requires agencies to consult with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to establish comprehensive management succession programs designed to provide training to employees to develop managers for the agency. It also requires agencies, in consultation with OPM, to establish programs to provide training to managers regarding actions, options, and strategies a manager may use in relating to employees with unacceptable performance, mentoring employees, improving employee performance and productivity, and conducting employee performance appraisals. The Homeland Security Act of 2002, as codified at 5 U.S.C. 1103(c), established the Human Capital Assessment and Accountability Framework (HCAAF) and mandated OPM to design systems and set standards, including appropriate metrics, for assessing the management of human capital by Federal agencies. 5 U.S.C. 1103(c) also specifies OPM will develop standards for: (1) Aligning human capital strategies of agencies with the organization’s missions, goals and objectives, (2) ensuring continuity of leadership through succession plans, and (3) holding managers and human resources officers accountable for efficient and effective human resources management. The following are the principal results sought by the proposed changes in regulations: Æ Agencies will have effective and cost-efficient training programs linked to agency strategic plans; Æ Managers will develop strategies to mentor others and to improve employee performance and productivity. To provide guidance to agencies in accomplishing these results, we are proposing changes in the following parts of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations: Part 410 on ‘‘Training’’ and part 412 on ‘‘Executive, Management, and Supervisory Development.’’ OPM is amending 5 CFR part 410, subpart B, to reflect new agency responsibilities for planning training so employee training and development will align with agency strategic plans. The revised subpart B also would cover agency responsibility for the evaluation of training, currently included under subpart F. The revised subpart C would better align language on continued service agreements with law. The revised subpart C would also remove the option to extend the date for agencies to report training data to OPM. The following are the major proposed changes: Æ Revised § 410.201(b) would make agency training program requirements more visible by listing those PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 requirements and emphasizing the alignment of employee training and development with agency strategic plans; Æ Revised § 410.201(d) would include language more consistent with the Human Capital Assessment and Accountability Framework and consolidate references to Executive Order 11348, which provides for the further training of Government employees and requires agencies to review training programs no less often than annually; Æ Delete current § 410.203 and incorporate the information in that section into § 410.201. § 410.204 would be renumbered as § 410.203. Æ Delete current § 410.701 (c) as extensions to report training data to OPM are no longer accepted. § 410.701 (d) would be redesignated as § 410.701 (c). Æ Delete current subpart F and redesignate subpart G as subpart F, and renumber § 410.701 as § 410.601. Part 412, ‘‘Executive, Management, and Supervisory Development,’’ requires some modification of its structure to incorporate the changes in law. Therefore, the current structure of two subparts (Subpart A—General Provisions, and Subpart B—Senior Executive Service Status and Nonstatus Candidate Development Programs) would be modified to three subparts (Subpart A— General Provisions, Subpart B— Succession Planning, and Subpart C— Executive Development). Specifically, current § 412.103 would be revised and placed within the new subpart B as § 412.201, current § 412.104 would be revised and would be placed within the new subpart C as § 412.301, and current subpart B would be revised and placed within the new subpart C. The following are the additional major proposed changes in part 412: Subpart A—General Provisions Æ Revised § 412.102(a), (b) and (b)(1) would make more succinct the references to the United States Code for easier reading, explain the leadership development continuum, and delete the reference to ‘‘mastery level’’ because the term implies development stops when in fact development should be ongoing; Æ Revised § 412.102(b)(3) would replace ‘‘corporate perspective’’ with ‘‘broad agency and Governmentwide perspective,’’ to more accurately reflect the intended goal. Æ Current § 412.103(c)(2) and (c)(3) would be addressed in the new subpart on Succession Planning, consistent with the Act’s requirement that succession E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM 02SEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules programs provide development for future managers; Æ Current § 412.104(a)(2) would be deleted. The change would eliminate the exemption from Governmentwide recruitment for candidate development programs. erowe on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS Subpart B—Succession Planning Æ New § 412.201 would specify requirements for agency management succession programs; Æ Revised § 412.202 would clarify that agency leadership development programs are part of the general workforce development strategy; Subpart C—Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Programs Æ New § 412.301(a) would provide for an OPM-certified agency Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Program (SESCDP), certification of the Executive Core Qualifications (ECQs) of candidates by a Qualifications Review Board, and selection for the SES, without further competition; Æ New § 412.301(b) would require agencies to submit a policy describing their SESCDP program methodologies. It also would require them to obtain OPM approval for candidate development programs once every 5 years to ensure their alignment and strategic linkage with agency succession plans and would add a reference to multi-agency programs to address collaborative, Governmentwide executive development; Æ New § 412.301(c) would require agencies with CDPs approved under previous regulations to apply to OPM for re-approval under the new regulations in accordance with new § 412.301 (b). It also indicates all existing approvals expire within 2 years after publication of this regulation. SESCDPs in progress on the date the regulations become final may be completed and graduates of those programs may be submitted for QRB certification regardless of this expiration. Æ New § 412.302(a) defines the Executive Resources Board (ERB) oversight responsibilities in the SESCDP approval process; Æ New § 412.302(a)(1) clarifies competition must be under SES merit staffing procedures; Æ New § 412.302(b)(3) would modify the four-month developmental assignments to include at least one assignment of 90 continuous days outside the scope of the candidate’s position of record and require the assignments to include roles at the executive level where the candidate is VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:31 Aug 29, 2008 Jkt 214001 held responsible for achieving organizational or agency results during the developmental assignment. The purpose of the new provision is to enhance and broaden the candidate’s experience, increase his or her knowledge, and maximize his or her understanding of the overall functioning of the agency, so the candidate is prepared for a range of agency positions at the SES level. Æ New § 412.302(d) would eliminate the references to ‘‘status programs’’ (current § 412.202) and ‘‘non-status programs’’ (current § 412.203). The new provisions will refer to two categories of ‘‘candidates’’: 1) Individuals who hold a career or career-type appointment within the civil service; and 2) individuals who do not hold such an appointment, and will define conditions under which individuals in either category may participate in an SESCDP. Subpart D—Executive Development Æ New § 412.401 would add continuing development of current SES members as an ongoing requirement tied to the performance process through an Executive Development Plan (EDP). This section also provides for the developmental use of sabbaticals and long-term assignments outside the Federal sector, as provided by relevant legal authorities. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Review This rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with E.O. 12866. Regulatory Flexibility Act I certify these regulations would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they would apply only to Federal agencies and employees. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 410 and 412 Education, Government employees. Office of Personnel Management. Michael W. Hager, Acting Director. Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR parts 410 and 412 as follows: PART 410—TRAINING 1. The authority citation for part 410 is revised to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1103(c), 4101, et seq.; E.O. 11348, 3 CFR, 1967 Comp., p. 275. 2. Revise the heading of subpart B to read as follows: PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 51249 Subpart B—Planning and Evaluating Training 3. Revise §§ 410.201 and 410.202 to read as follows: § 410.201 Responsibilities of the head of an agency. Agency employee development plans and programs should be designed to build or support an agency workforce capable of achieving agency mission and performance goals and facilitating continuous improvement of employee and organizational performance. In developing strategies to train employees, heads of agencies or their designee(s), under section 4103 of title 5, United States Code and in Executive Order 11348, are required to: (a) Establish, budget for, operate, maintain, and evaluate plans and programs for training agency employees by, in, and through Government or nonGovernment facilities, as appropriate; (b) Establish policies governing employee training including a statement of the alignment of employee training and development with agency strategic plans, the assignment of responsibility to ensure the training goals are achieved, and the delegation of training approval authority to the lowest appropriate level; (c) Establish priorities for training employees and allocate resources according to those priorities; and (d) Develop and maintain plans and programs that: (1) Identify mission-critical occupations and competencies; (2) Identify workforce competency gaps; (3) Include strategies for closing competency gaps; and (4) Assess periodically, but not less often than annually, as required by section 303 of Executive Order 11348. § 410.202 training. Responsibilities for evaluating Agencies must evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals. 4. Remove § 410.203 and redesignate § 410.204 as § 410.203. 5. Remove § 410.701(c) and redesignate § 410.701(d) as § 410.701(c). 6. Remove subpart F and redesignate subpart G as subpart F, including redesignating § 410.701 as § 410.601. 7. Revise part 412 to read as follows: E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM 02SEP1 51250 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules Subpart B—Succession Planning PART 412—SUPERVISORY, MANAGEMENT, AND EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT § 412.201 Subpart A—General Provisions Sec. 412.101 412.102 Coverage. Purpose. Subpart B—Succession Planning 412.201 Management succession. 412.202 Systematic training and development of supervisors, managers, and executives. Subpart C—Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Programs 412.301 Obtaining approval to conduct a Senior Executive Service candidate development program (SESCDP). 412.302 Criteria for a Senior Executive Service candidate development program (SESCDP). Subpart D—Executive Development 412.401 Continuing executive development. Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1103 (c)(2)(C), 3396, 3397, 4101, et seq. Subpart A—General Provisions § 412.101 Coverage. This part applies to all incumbents of, and candidates for, supervisory, managerial, and executive positions in the General Schedule, the Senior Executive Service (SES), or equivalent pay systems also covered by part 410 of this chapter. erowe on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS § 412.102 Purpose. (a) This part implements for supervisors, managers, and executives the provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapter 41, related to training, and 5 U.S.C. 3396, related to the criteria for programs of systematic development of candidates for the SES and the continuing development of SES members. (b) This part identifies a continuum of leadership development, starting with supervisory positions and proceeding through management and executive positions Governmentwide. For this reason, this part provides requirements by which agencies: (1) Develop the competencies needed by supervisors, managers, and executives; (2) Provide learning through continuing development and training in the context of succession planning; and (3) Foster a broad agency and Governmentwide perspective to prepare individuals for advancement, thus supplying the agency and the Government with an adequate number of well prepared and qualified candidates to fill leadership positions. VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:31 Aug 29, 2008 Jkt 214001 Management succession. The head of each agency, in consultation with OPM, must develop a comprehensive management succession program, based on the agency’s workforce succession plans, to fill agency supervisory and managerial positions. These programs must be supported by employee training and development programs developed under 5 CFR 410.201 to prepare individuals for advancement, with a focus on both individual and agency performance and strengthening organizational capability, and to ensure an adequate number of well-prepared and qualified candidates for leadership positions. These programs must: (a) Implement developmental training consistent with agency succession management plans; (b) Provide continuing learning experiences throughout an individual’s career, such as details, mentoring, coaching, learning groups, and projects. These experiences should provide broad knowledge and practical experience linked to OPM’s Federal leadership competencies as well as agencyidentified, mission-related competencies, and should be consistent with the agency’s succession management plan; and (c) Include program evaluations pursuant to 5 CFR 410.202. § 412.202 Systematic training and development of supervisors, managers, and executives. All agencies must provide for the development of individuals in supervisory, managerial and executive positions, as well as individuals whom the agency identifies as potential candidates for those positions, based on the agencies’ succession plans. Agencies also must issue written policies to ensure they: (a) Design and implement leadership development programs integrated with the employee development plans, programs, and strategies required by 5 CFR 410.201, and that foster a broad agency and Governmentwide perspective; (b) Provide training within one year of an employee’s initial appointment to a supervisory position and follow up periodically, but at least once every three years, by providing each supervisor and manager additional training on the use of appropriate actions, options, and strategies to: (1) Mentor employees; (2) Improve employee performance and productivity; PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (3) Conduct employee performance appraisals in accordance with agency appraisal systems; and (4) Identify and assist employees with unacceptable performance. (c) Provide training when individuals make critical career transitions to supervisor, manager, or executive consistent with the results of assessments of the agency’s needs and the individual’s potential. Subpart C—Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Programs § 412.301 Obtaining approval to conduct a Senior Executive Service candidate development program (SESCDP). (a) An SESCDP is an OPM-approved training program designed to develop the executive qualifications of employees with strong executive potential. Successful completion of the program qualifies them for and authorizes their initial career appointment in the SES. An agency conducting an SESCDP may submit program graduates for Qualifications Review Board (QRB) review of their executive qualifications under 5 CFR 317.502. A program graduate certified by a QRB may receive an initial career appointment without further competition to any SES position for which he or she meets the professional and technical qualifications requirements. (b) An agency covered by subchapter II of chapter 31 of title 5, United States Code, may apply to OPM to conduct an SESCDP alone or on behalf of a group of agencies. (In this subpart, the term ‘‘agency’’ refers to either a single agency or a group of agencies acting in partnership under this subpart.) Any agency developing an SESCDP must submit a policy document describing its program methodologies to OPM for formal approval before implementing the SESCDP. An agency must seek OPM approval every five years thereafter, and must also consult OPM before implementing a change substantially altering how the SESCDP complies with the requirements of this regulation. An agency implementing an SESCDP without first obtaining formal approval may not submit graduates of the program for QRB review. (c) An agency that obtained OPM approval under previous regulations must apply for re-approval in accordance with requirements in paragraph (b) of this section and this subpart before initiating a new SESCDP. All existing approvals expire within 2 years after publication of this regulation. (d) An agency covered by subchapter II of chapter 31 of title 5, United States E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM 02SEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules Code, may authorize a major agency component employing senior executives to apply directly to OPM for approval to conduct an SESCDP. Such an application from a component must be accompanied by the agency’s written endorsement. To obtain approval, the component must meet the SESCDP requirements of this subpart independent of agency involvement. (e) As always, agencies should be mindful of merit principles in carrying out their functions under this subpart. erowe on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS § 412.302 Criteria for a Senior Executive Service candidate development program (SESCDP). (a) Executive Resources Board requirements. An agency’s Executive Resources Board (ERB) must oversee the SESCDP. The ERB ensures the development program lasts between 12 and 24 months and includes substantive developmental experiences that should equip a successful candidate to accomplish Federal Government missions as a senior executive. The agency ERB must oversee and be accountable for SESCDP recruitment, merit staffing, and assessment. The agency ERB must ensure the program follows SES merit staffing provisions in 5 CFR 317.501, subject to the condition explained in § 412.302(d)(1) of this part. The ERB also must oversee development, evaluation, progress in the program, and graduation of candidates, and for requesting Qualifications Review Board (QRB) certification of graduates where appropriate. The ERB submits for QRB review, within 90 days of graduation from the program. The ERB also must oversee the writing and implementation of a removal policy for program candidates who do not make adequate progress. (b) Recruitment. Recruitment for the program is from all groups of qualified individuals within the civil service, or all groups of qualified individuals whether or not within the civil service. The number selected shall be consistent with the number of expected vacancies. (c) Senior Executive Service candidate development program requirements. An SESCDP lasts between 12 and 24 months. To graduate, a candidate must accomplish the requirements between the beginning and ending dates of the program. Each individual participating in an SESCDP must have: (1) A documented Senior Executive Service Development Plan (SESDP) based upon a competency-based needs determination and approved by the agency ERB. The components of the development plan must: VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:31 Aug 29, 2008 Jkt 214001 (i) Address the executive core qualifications (ECQs); (ii) Address Federal Government leadership challenges crucial to the senior executive; (iii) Provide increased knowledge and understanding of the overall functioning of the agency, so the participant is prepared for a range of positions and responsibilities; (iv) Include interaction with a wide mix of senior Federal employees outside the candidate’s department or agency to foster a Governmentwide perspective; (v) Include interaction with senior non-Federal employees to increase experience of the broader context in which executives operate; and (vi) Have Governmentwide or multiagency applicability in the nature and scope of the training; (2) A formal training experience lasting at least 80 hours that addresses the ECQs and their application to SES positions Governmentwide, explores Federal leadership challenges crucial to the senior executive, and has Governmentwide or multi-agency applicability; (3) A developmental assignment of at least 4 months of full-time service to include at least one assignment of 90 continuous days in a position other than, and substantially different from, the candidate’s position of record. The assignment must include executive level responsibility and differ from the candidate’s current and past assignments in ways that broaden the candidate’s experience, as well as challenge the candidate with respect to leadership competencies and the ECQs. Assignments need not be restricted to the agency, the Executive Branch, or the Federal Government, so long as they can be accomplished in compliance with applicable law and federal and agency specific ethics regulations. The candidate is held accountable for organizational or agency results achieved during the assignment. If the assignment is in a non-Federal organization, the ERB must provide for adequate documentation of the individual’s actions and accomplishments and must determine that the assignment will contribute to development of the candidate’s executive qualifications; and (4) A mentor who is a member of the SES or is otherwise determined by the ERB to have the knowledge and capacity to advise the candidate, consistent with goals of the SESCDP. The mentor and the candidate are jointly responsible for a productive mentoring relationship; however, the agency must establish methods to assess these relationships and, if necessary, facilitate them or PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 51251 make appropriate changes in the interest of the candidate. (d) An SESCDP is a training opportunity that OPM has determined to compete, with the condition noted in § 412.302(d)(1) of this part, under SES merit staffing procedures. Because SES merit staffing procedures require recruitment from among either all qualified persons or all qualified persons within the civil service, an agency must provide procedures under which all persons within one of these two possible areas of consideration may compete for and, if selected, participate in its SESCDP. (1) An individual who does not currently hold a career or career-type civil service appointment may only participate in an SESCDP by means of a Schedule B appointment authorized by 5 CFR 213.3202(j) to a full-time position created for developmental purposes connected with the SESCDP. Exercising its authority under § 302.101(c)(6) of this chapter, OPM hereby exempts these full-time positions created for developmental purposes connected with the SESCDP from the appointment procedures of part 302 of this chapter. Competition for these appointments must be conducted pursuant to SES merit staffing procedures at § 317.501 of this chapter, except that agencies must follow the principle of veterans’ preference as far as administratively feasible, in accordance with § 302.101(c) of this chapter. Candidates serving under this Schedule B appointment may not be used to fill an agency’s regular positions on a continuing basis. (2) An individual who currently holds a career or career-type appointment in the civil service must be selected through SES merit staffing procedures at § 317.501 of this chapter. Such an individual may be selected for and participate in an SESCDP in any agency while serving in his or her position of record. The individual may continue to participate in the SESCDP upon moving to other civil service positions under career or career-type appointment. An SESCDP competition does not satisfy the requirements of part 335 of this chapter and therefore does not provide an independent basis to appoint or promote a career or career-type appointee. (3) A career or career-type appointee may participate in an SESCDP conducted by an agency other than his or her employing agency under such terms as are mutually agreeable and outlined in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by both agencies involved. Terms of the MOU must be consistent with applicable E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM 02SEP1 51252 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapter 41 and a copy must be provided to OPM. Either agency may decline or discontinue a candidate’s participation if such terms cannot be negotiated or are not fulfilled. (4) Any candidate’s participation in an SESCDP is at the discretion of the employing agency and subject to provisions established under 5 CFR 412.302(a) for removing a participant who does not make adequate progress in the program. (5) For purposes of this paragraph, a ‘‘career-type’’ appointment means a career or career-conditional appointment or an appointment of equivalent tenure. An appointment of equivalent tenure is considered to be an appointment in the excepted service that is placed in Group I or Group II under § 351.502(b) of this chapter. Subpart D—Executive Development erowe on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS § 412.401 Continuing executive development. (a) Each agency must establish a program or programs for the continuing development of its senior executives in accordance with 5 U.S.C 3396(a). Such agency programs must include preparation, implementation, and regular updating of an Executive Development Plan (EDP) for each senior executive. The EDPs will: (1) Function as a detailed guide of developmental experiences to help SES members, through participation in short-term and longer term experiences, meet organizational needs for leadership, managerial improvement, and organizational results; (2) Address enhancement of existing executive competencies and such other competencies as will strengthen the executive’s performance; (3) Focus primarily on work-related experiences; (4) Outline developmental opportunities and assignments to allow the individual to develop a broader perspective in the agency as well as Governmentwide; and (5) Be reviewed annually and revised as appropriate by an ERB or similar body designated by the agency to oversee executive development, using input from the performance evaluation cycle. (b) Consistent with 5 U.S.C. 3396(d) and other applicable statutes, EDPs may provide for executive sabbaticals and other long-term assignments outside the Federal sector. [FR Doc. E8–20273 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6325–39–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:31 Aug 29, 2008 Jkt 214001 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 27628.’’ This document corrects the docket number. Need for the Correction [Docket No. FAA–2007–27628; Directorate Identifier 2007–CE–025–AD] This correction is needed to assure that all correspondence related to this subject is posted in the correct docket. RIN 2120–AA64 Correction of Publication 14 CFR Part 39 Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company (Type Certificate Previously Held by Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing) Models LC40–550FG, LC41–550FG, and LC42–550FG Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to a proposed airworthiness directive (AD), which was published in the Federal Register on August 7, 2008 (73 FR 45902), and applies to certain Cessna Aircraft Company (type certificate previously held by Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing) (Cessna) Models LC40–550FG, LC41–550FG, and LC42–550FG airplanes. This document proposed to revise AD 2007–07–06 with a new AD that would retain the actions currently required in AD 2007–07–06; allow installing access panels; and change the serial number applicability. The FAA incorrectly referenced the docket number of this proposed AD as ‘‘FAA–2007–27268’’ instead of ‘‘FAA– 2007–27628.’’ This document corrects the docket number. DATES: The comment period ending date of October 6, 2008, remains the same. The FAA will also address any comments relating to this proposed AD submitted to Docket No. FAA–2007– 27268. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Morfitt, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone: (425) 917–6405; fax: (425) 917–6590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion On August 1, 2008, the FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to revise AD 2007–07–06 with a new AD that would retain the actions currently required in AD 2007–07–06; allow installing access panels; and change the serial number applicability. This NPRM was published in the Federal Register on August 7, 2008 (73 FR 45902). The FAA incorrectly referenced the docket number of this proposed AD as ‘‘FAA– 2007–27268’’ instead of ‘‘FAA–2007– PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Accordingly, the publication of August 7, 2008 (73 FR 45902), which was the subject of FR Doc. E8–18231, is corrected as follows: On page 45902, in the third column, in the third line under the heading DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, replace ‘‘FAA–2007–27268’’ with ‘‘FAA–2007– 27628.’’ On page 45903, in the second column, in the seventh line under the heading SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, replace ‘‘FAA–2007–27268’’ with ‘‘FAA–2007– 27628.’’ § 39.13 [Corrected] On page 45904, in the third column, in the eighth and ninth lines under the heading § 39.13 [Amended], replace ‘‘FAA–2007–27268’’ with ‘‘FAA–2007– 27628.’’ Action is taken herein to correct this reference in the proposed AD. The comment period ending date of October 6, 2008, remains the same. The FAA will also address any comments relating to this proposed AD submitted to Docket No. FAA–2007–27268. Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 25, 2008. Brian A. Yanez, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E8–20200 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA–2008–0453; Airspace Docket No. 08–AAL–12] Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Kwethluk, AK Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace at Kwethluk, AK. Two Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) are being developed for the Kwethluk Airport at Kwethluk, AK. Adoption of this proposal would result in creating Class E airspace upward from 700 feet (ft.) E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM 02SEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 2, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51248-51252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20273]



[[Page 51248]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

5 CFR Parts 410 and 412

RIN 3206-AK75


Training; Supervisory, Management, and Executive Development

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management proposes to amend its 
regulations to implement certain training and development requirements 
contained in the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 3, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``RIN 3206-AK75,'' by 
any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Agency Web Site: https://www.opm.gov. Click on the 
``Regulations'' icon at the bottom right of the Web page. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail: employ@opm.gov. Include ``RIN 3206-AK75'' in the 
subject line of the message.
     Fax: (202) 606-2329.
     Mail, Hand Deliver/Courier comments: Ms. Nancy Randa, 
Deputy Associate Director for the Center for Leadership, Executive 
Resources, and Policy Analysis, Room 6357, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20415-9700.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Dube by telephone at (202) 606-
4063, by FAX at (202) 606-1637, or by e-mail at cheryl.dube@opm.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 30, 2004, the President signed 
the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (Act), Public Law 108-
411, into law. The Act makes several significant changes in the law 
governing the training and development of Federal employees, 
supervisors, managers, and executives. The first change requires each 
agency to evaluate, on a regular basis, its training programs and plans 
with respect to the accomplishment of its specific performance plans 
and strategic goals, and to modify its training plans and programs as 
needed to accomplish the agency's performance plans and strategic 
goals. Other changes to the regulation, not related to the Act, are 
made to better align with law the requirement for continued service 
agreements and the submission of training data. The second major change 
requires agencies to consult with the Office of Personnel Management 
(OPM) to establish comprehensive management succession programs 
designed to provide training to employees to develop managers for the 
agency. It also requires agencies, in consultation with OPM, to 
establish programs to provide training to managers regarding actions, 
options, and strategies a manager may use in relating to employees with 
unacceptable performance, mentoring employees, improving employee 
performance and productivity, and conducting employee performance 
appraisals. The Homeland Security Act of 2002, as codified at 5 U.S.C. 
1103(c), established the Human Capital Assessment and Accountability 
Framework (HCAAF) and mandated OPM to design systems and set standards, 
including appropriate metrics, for assessing the management of human 
capital by Federal agencies. 5 U.S.C. 1103(c) also specifies OPM will 
develop standards for: (1) Aligning human capital strategies of 
agencies with the organization's missions, goals and objectives, (2) 
ensuring continuity of leadership through succession plans, and (3) 
holding managers and human resources officers accountable for efficient 
and effective human resources management. The following are the 
principal results sought by the proposed changes in regulations:
    [cir] Agencies will have effective and cost-efficient training 
programs linked to agency strategic plans;
    [cir] Managers will develop strategies to mentor others and to 
improve employee performance and productivity.
    To provide guidance to agencies in accomplishing these results, we 
are proposing changes in the following parts of title 5 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations: Part 410 on ``Training'' and part 412 on 
``Executive, Management, and Supervisory Development.''
    OPM is amending 5 CFR part 410, subpart B, to reflect new agency 
responsibilities for planning training so employee training and 
development will align with agency strategic plans. The revised subpart 
B also would cover agency responsibility for the evaluation of 
training, currently included under subpart F. The revised subpart C 
would better align language on continued service agreements with law. 
The revised subpart C would also remove the option to extend the date 
for agencies to report training data to OPM. The following are the 
major proposed changes:
    [cir] Revised Sec.  410.201(b) would make agency training program 
requirements more visible by listing those requirements and emphasizing 
the alignment of employee training and development with agency 
strategic plans;
    [cir] Revised Sec.  410.201(d) would include language more 
consistent with the Human Capital Assessment and Accountability 
Framework and consolidate references to Executive Order 11348, which 
provides for the further training of Government employees and requires 
agencies to review training programs no less often than annually;
    [cir] Delete current Sec.  410.203 and incorporate the information 
in that section into Sec.  410.201. Sec.  410.204 would be renumbered 
as Sec.  410.203.
    [cir] Delete current Sec.  410.701 (c) as extensions to report 
training data to OPM are no longer accepted. Sec.  410.701 (d) would be 
redesignated as Sec.  410.701 (c).
    [cir] Delete current subpart F and redesignate subpart G as subpart 
F, and renumber Sec.  410.701 as Sec.  410.601.
    Part 412, ``Executive, Management, and Supervisory Development,'' 
requires some modification of its structure to incorporate the changes 
in law. Therefore, the current structure of two subparts (Subpart A--
General Provisions, and Subpart B--Senior Executive Service Status and 
Nonstatus Candidate Development Programs) would be modified to three 
subparts (Subpart A-- General Provisions, Subpart B-- Succession 
Planning, and Subpart C-- Executive Development). Specifically, current 
Sec.  412.103 would be revised and placed within the new subpart B as 
Sec.  412.201, current Sec.  412.104 would be revised and would be 
placed within the new subpart C as Sec.  412.301, and current subpart B 
would be revised and placed within the new subpart C. The following are 
the additional major proposed changes in part 412:

Subpart A--General Provisions

    [cir] Revised Sec.  412.102(a), (b) and (b)(1) would make more 
succinct the references to the United States Code for easier reading, 
explain the leadership development continuum, and delete the reference 
to ``mastery level'' because the term implies development stops when in 
fact development should be ongoing;
    [cir] Revised Sec.  412.102(b)(3) would replace ``corporate 
perspective'' with ``broad agency and Governmentwide perspective,'' to 
more accurately reflect the intended goal.
    [cir] Current Sec.  412.103(c)(2) and (c)(3) would be addressed in 
the new subpart on Succession Planning, consistent with the Act's 
requirement that succession

[[Page 51249]]

programs provide development for future managers;
    [cir] Current Sec.  412.104(a)(2) would be deleted. The change 
would eliminate the exemption from Governmentwide recruitment for 
candidate development programs.

Subpart B--Succession Planning

    [cir] New Sec.  412.201 would specify requirements for agency 
management succession programs;
    [cir] Revised Sec.  412.202 would clarify that agency leadership 
development programs are part of the general workforce development 
strategy;

Subpart C--Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Programs

    [cir] New Sec.  412.301(a) would provide for an OPM-certified 
agency Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Program (SESCDP), 
certification of the Executive Core Qualifications (ECQs) of candidates 
by a Qualifications Review Board, and selection for the SES, without 
further competition;
    [cir] New Sec.  412.301(b) would require agencies to submit a 
policy describing their SESCDP program methodologies. It also would 
require them to obtain OPM approval for candidate development programs 
once every 5 years to ensure their alignment and strategic linkage with 
agency succession plans and would add a reference to multi-agency 
programs to address collaborative, Governmentwide executive 
development;
    [cir] New Sec.  412.301(c) would require agencies with CDPs 
approved under previous regulations to apply to OPM for re-approval 
under the new regulations in accordance with new Sec.  412.301 (b). It 
also indicates all existing approvals expire within 2 years after 
publication of this regulation. SESCDPs in progress on the date the 
regulations become final may be completed and graduates of those 
programs may be submitted for QRB certification regardless of this 
expiration.
    [cir] New Sec.  412.302(a) defines the Executive Resources Board 
(ERB) oversight responsibilities in the SESCDP approval process;
    [cir] New Sec.  412.302(a)(1) clarifies competition must be under 
SES merit staffing procedures;
    [cir] New Sec.  412.302(b)(3) would modify the four-month 
developmental assignments to include at least one assignment of 90 
continuous days outside the scope of the candidate's position of record 
and require the assignments to include roles at the executive level 
where the candidate is held responsible for achieving organizational or 
agency results during the developmental assignment. The purpose of the 
new provision is to enhance and broaden the candidate's experience, 
increase his or her knowledge, and maximize his or her understanding of 
the overall functioning of the agency, so the candidate is prepared for 
a range of agency positions at the SES level.
    [cir] New Sec.  412.302(d) would eliminate the references to 
``status programs'' (current Sec.  412.202) and ``non-status programs'' 
(current Sec.  412.203). The new provisions will refer to two 
categories of ``candidates'': 1) Individuals who hold a career or 
career-type appointment within the civil service; and 2) individuals 
who do not hold such an appointment, and will define conditions under 
which individuals in either category may participate in an SESCDP.

Subpart D--Executive Development

    [cir] New Sec.  412.401 would add continuing development of current 
SES members as an ongoing requirement tied to the performance process 
through an Executive Development Plan (EDP). This section also provides 
for the developmental use of sabbaticals and long-term assignments 
outside the Federal sector, as provided by relevant legal authorities.

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Review

    This rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget 
in accordance with E.O. 12866.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    I certify these regulations would not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities because they would 
apply only to Federal agencies and employees.

List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 410 and 412

    Education, Government employees.

Office of Personnel Management.
Michael W. Hager,
Acting Director.

    Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR parts 410 and 412 as 
follows:

PART 410--TRAINING

    1. The authority citation for part 410 is revised to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1103(c), 4101, et seq.; E.O. 11348, 3 CFR, 
1967 Comp., p. 275.

    2. Revise the heading of subpart B to read as follows:

Subpart B--Planning and Evaluating Training

    3. Revise Sec. Sec.  410.201 and 410.202 to read as follows:


Sec.  410.201  Responsibilities of the head of an agency.

    Agency employee development plans and programs should be designed 
to build or support an agency workforce capable of achieving agency 
mission and performance goals and facilitating continuous improvement 
of employee and organizational performance. In developing strategies to 
train employees, heads of agencies or their designee(s), under section 
4103 of title 5, United States Code and in Executive Order 11348, are 
required to:
    (a) Establish, budget for, operate, maintain, and evaluate plans 
and programs for training agency employees by, in, and through 
Government or non-Government facilities, as appropriate;
    (b) Establish policies governing employee training including a 
statement of the alignment of employee training and development with 
agency strategic plans, the assignment of responsibility to ensure the 
training goals are achieved, and the delegation of training approval 
authority to the lowest appropriate level;
    (c) Establish priorities for training employees and allocate 
resources according to those priorities; and
    (d) Develop and maintain plans and programs that:
    (1) Identify mission-critical occupations and competencies;
    (2) Identify workforce competency gaps;
    (3) Include strategies for closing competency gaps; and
    (4) Assess periodically, but not less often than annually, as 
required by section 303 of Executive Order 11348.


Sec.  410.202  Responsibilities for evaluating training.

    Agencies must evaluate their training programs annually to 
determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission 
accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals.
    4. Remove Sec.  410.203 and redesignate Sec.  410.204 as Sec.  
410.203.
    5. Remove Sec.  410.701(c) and redesignate Sec.  410.701(d) as 
Sec.  410.701(c).
    6. Remove subpart F and redesignate subpart G as subpart F, 
including redesignating Sec.  410.701 as Sec.  410.601.
    7. Revise part 412 to read as follows:

[[Page 51250]]

PART 412--SUPERVISORY, MANAGEMENT, AND EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT

Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec.
412.101 Coverage.
412.102 Purpose.
Subpart B--Succession Planning
412.201 Management succession.
412.202 Systematic training and development of supervisors, 
managers, and executives.
Subpart C--Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Programs
412.301 Obtaining approval to conduct a Senior Executive Service 
candidate development program (SESCDP).
412.302 Criteria for a Senior Executive Service candidate 
development program (SESCDP).
Subpart D--Executive Development
412.401 Continuing executive development.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1103 (c)(2)(C), 3396, 3397, 4101, et seq.

Subpart A--General Provisions


Sec.  412.101  Coverage.

    This part applies to all incumbents of, and candidates for, 
supervisory, managerial, and executive positions in the General 
Schedule, the Senior Executive Service (SES), or equivalent pay systems 
also covered by part 410 of this chapter.


Sec.  412.102  Purpose.

    (a) This part implements for supervisors, managers, and executives 
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapter 41, related to training, and 5 
U.S.C. 3396, related to the criteria for programs of systematic 
development of candidates for the SES and the continuing development of 
SES members.
    (b) This part identifies a continuum of leadership development, 
starting with supervisory positions and proceeding through management 
and executive positions Governmentwide. For this reason, this part 
provides requirements by which agencies:
    (1) Develop the competencies needed by supervisors, managers, and 
executives;
    (2) Provide learning through continuing development and training in 
the context of succession planning; and
    (3) Foster a broad agency and Governmentwide perspective to prepare 
individuals for advancement, thus supplying the agency and the 
Government with an adequate number of well prepared and qualified 
candidates to fill leadership positions.

Subpart B--Succession Planning


Sec.  412.201  Management succession.

    The head of each agency, in consultation with OPM, must develop a 
comprehensive management succession program, based on the agency's 
workforce succession plans, to fill agency supervisory and managerial 
positions. These programs must be supported by employee training and 
development programs developed under 5 CFR 410.201 to prepare 
individuals for advancement, with a focus on both individual and agency 
performance and strengthening organizational capability, and to ensure 
an adequate number of well-prepared and qualified candidates for 
leadership positions. These programs must:
    (a) Implement developmental training consistent with agency 
succession management plans;
    (b) Provide continuing learning experiences throughout an 
individual's career, such as details, mentoring, coaching, learning 
groups, and projects. These experiences should provide broad knowledge 
and practical experience linked to OPM's Federal leadership 
competencies as well as agency-identified, mission-related 
competencies, and should be consistent with the agency's succession 
management plan; and
    (c) Include program evaluations pursuant to 5 CFR 410.202.


Sec.  412.202  Systematic training and development of supervisors, 
managers, and executives.

    All agencies must provide for the development of individuals in 
supervisory, managerial and executive positions, as well as individuals 
whom the agency identifies as potential candidates for those positions, 
based on the agencies' succession plans. Agencies also must issue 
written policies to ensure they:
    (a) Design and implement leadership development programs integrated 
with the employee development plans, programs, and strategies required 
by 5 CFR 410.201, and that foster a broad agency and Governmentwide 
perspective;
    (b) Provide training within one year of an employee's initial 
appointment to a supervisory position and follow up periodically, but 
at least once every three years, by providing each supervisor and 
manager additional training on the use of appropriate actions, options, 
and strategies to:
    (1) Mentor employees;
    (2) Improve employee performance and productivity;
    (3) Conduct employee performance appraisals in accordance with 
agency appraisal systems; and
    (4) Identify and assist employees with unacceptable performance.
    (c) Provide training when individuals make critical career 
transitions to supervisor, manager, or executive consistent with the 
results of assessments of the agency's needs and the individual's 
potential.

Subpart C--Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Programs


Sec.  412.301  Obtaining approval to conduct a Senior Executive Service 
candidate development program (SESCDP).

    (a) An SESCDP is an OPM-approved training program designed to 
develop the executive qualifications of employees with strong executive 
potential. Successful completion of the program qualifies them for and 
authorizes their initial career appointment in the SES. An agency 
conducting an SESCDP may submit program graduates for Qualifications 
Review Board (QRB) review of their executive qualifications under 5 CFR 
317.502. A program graduate certified by a QRB may receive an initial 
career appointment without further competition to any SES position for 
which he or she meets the professional and technical qualifications 
requirements.
    (b) An agency covered by subchapter II of chapter 31 of title 5, 
United States Code, may apply to OPM to conduct an SESCDP alone or on 
behalf of a group of agencies. (In this subpart, the term ``agency'' 
refers to either a single agency or a group of agencies acting in 
partnership under this subpart.) Any agency developing an SESCDP must 
submit a policy document describing its program methodologies to OPM 
for formal approval before implementing the SESCDP. An agency must seek 
OPM approval every five years thereafter, and must also consult OPM 
before implementing a change substantially altering how the SESCDP 
complies with the requirements of this regulation. An agency 
implementing an SESCDP without first obtaining formal approval may not 
submit graduates of the program for QRB review.
    (c) An agency that obtained OPM approval under previous regulations 
must apply for re-approval in accordance with requirements in paragraph 
(b) of this section and this subpart before initiating a new SESCDP. 
All existing approvals expire within 2 years after publication of this 
regulation.
    (d) An agency covered by subchapter II of chapter 31 of title 5, 
United States

[[Page 51251]]

Code, may authorize a major agency component employing senior 
executives to apply directly to OPM for approval to conduct an SESCDP. 
Such an application from a component must be accompanied by the 
agency's written endorsement. To obtain approval, the component must 
meet the SESCDP requirements of this subpart independent of agency 
involvement.
    (e) As always, agencies should be mindful of merit principles in 
carrying out their functions under this subpart.


Sec.  412.302  Criteria for a Senior Executive Service candidate 
development program (SESCDP).

    (a) Executive Resources Board requirements. An agency's Executive 
Resources Board (ERB) must oversee the SESCDP. The ERB ensures the 
development program lasts between 12 and 24 months and includes 
substantive developmental experiences that should equip a successful 
candidate to accomplish Federal Government missions as a senior 
executive. The agency ERB must oversee and be accountable for SESCDP 
recruitment, merit staffing, and assessment. The agency ERB must ensure 
the program follows SES merit staffing provisions in 5 CFR 317.501, 
subject to the condition explained in Sec.  412.302(d)(1) of this part. 
The ERB also must oversee development, evaluation, progress in the 
program, and graduation of candidates, and for requesting 
Qualifications Review Board (QRB) certification of graduates where 
appropriate. The ERB submits for QRB review, within 90 days of 
graduation from the program. The ERB also must oversee the writing and 
implementation of a removal policy for program candidates who do not 
make adequate progress.
    (b) Recruitment. Recruitment for the program is from all groups of 
qualified individuals within the civil service, or all groups of 
qualified individuals whether or not within the civil service. The 
number selected shall be consistent with the number of expected 
vacancies.
    (c) Senior Executive Service candidate development program 
requirements. An SESCDP lasts between 12 and 24 months. To graduate, a 
candidate must accomplish the requirements between the beginning and 
ending dates of the program. Each individual participating in an SESCDP 
must have:
    (1) A documented Senior Executive Service Development Plan (SESDP) 
based upon a competency-based needs determination and approved by the 
agency ERB. The components of the development plan must:
    (i) Address the executive core qualifications (ECQs);
    (ii) Address Federal Government leadership challenges crucial to 
the senior executive;
    (iii) Provide increased knowledge and understanding of the overall 
functioning of the agency, so the participant is prepared for a range 
of positions and responsibilities;
    (iv) Include interaction with a wide mix of senior Federal 
employees outside the candidate's department or agency to foster a 
Governmentwide perspective;
    (v) Include interaction with senior non-Federal employees to 
increase experience of the broader context in which executives operate; 
and
    (vi) Have Governmentwide or multi-agency applicability in the 
nature and scope of the training;
    (2) A formal training experience lasting at least 80 hours that 
addresses the ECQs and their application to SES positions 
Governmentwide, explores Federal leadership challenges crucial to the 
senior executive, and has Governmentwide or multi-agency applicability;
    (3) A developmental assignment of at least 4 months of full-time 
service to include at least one assignment of 90 continuous days in a 
position other than, and substantially different from, the candidate's 
position of record. The assignment must include executive level 
responsibility and differ from the candidate's current and past 
assignments in ways that broaden the candidate's experience, as well as 
challenge the candidate with respect to leadership competencies and the 
ECQs. Assignments need not be restricted to the agency, the Executive 
Branch, or the Federal Government, so long as they can be accomplished 
in compliance with applicable law and federal and agency specific 
ethics regulations. The candidate is held accountable for 
organizational or agency results achieved during the assignment. If the 
assignment is in a non-Federal organization, the ERB must provide for 
adequate documentation of the individual's actions and accomplishments 
and must determine that the assignment will contribute to development 
of the candidate's executive qualifications; and
    (4) A mentor who is a member of the SES or is otherwise determined 
by the ERB to have the knowledge and capacity to advise the candidate, 
consistent with goals of the SESCDP. The mentor and the candidate are 
jointly responsible for a productive mentoring relationship; however, 
the agency must establish methods to assess these relationships and, if 
necessary, facilitate them or make appropriate changes in the interest 
of the candidate.
    (d) An SESCDP is a training opportunity that OPM has determined to 
compete, with the condition noted in Sec.  412.302(d)(1) of this part, 
under SES merit staffing procedures. Because SES merit staffing 
procedures require recruitment from among either all qualified persons 
or all qualified persons within the civil service, an agency must 
provide procedures under which all persons within one of these two 
possible areas of consideration may compete for and, if selected, 
participate in its SESCDP.
    (1) An individual who does not currently hold a career or career-
type civil service appointment may only participate in an SESCDP by 
means of a Schedule B appointment authorized by 5 CFR 213.3202(j) to a 
full-time position created for developmental purposes connected with 
the SESCDP. Exercising its authority under Sec.  302.101(c)(6) of this 
chapter, OPM hereby exempts these full-time positions created for 
developmental purposes connected with the SESCDP from the appointment 
procedures of part 302 of this chapter. Competition for these 
appointments must be conducted pursuant to SES merit staffing 
procedures at Sec.  317.501 of this chapter, except that agencies must 
follow the principle of veterans' preference as far as administratively 
feasible, in accordance with Sec.  302.101(c) of this chapter. 
Candidates serving under this Schedule B appointment may not be used to 
fill an agency's regular positions on a continuing basis.
    (2) An individual who currently holds a career or career-type 
appointment in the civil service must be selected through SES merit 
staffing procedures at Sec.  317.501 of this chapter. Such an 
individual may be selected for and participate in an SESCDP in any 
agency while serving in his or her position of record. The individual 
may continue to participate in the SESCDP upon moving to other civil 
service positions under career or career-type appointment. An SESCDP 
competition does not satisfy the requirements of part 335 of this 
chapter and therefore does not provide an independent basis to appoint 
or promote a career or career-type appointee.
    (3) A career or career-type appointee may participate in an SESCDP 
conducted by an agency other than his or her employing agency under 
such terms as are mutually agreeable and outlined in a Memorandum of 
Understanding (MOU) signed by both agencies involved. Terms of the MOU 
must be consistent with applicable

[[Page 51252]]

provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapter 41 and a copy must be provided to OPM. 
Either agency may decline or discontinue a candidate's participation if 
such terms cannot be negotiated or are not fulfilled.
    (4) Any candidate's participation in an SESCDP is at the discretion 
of the employing agency and subject to provisions established under 5 
CFR 412.302(a) for removing a participant who does not make adequate 
progress in the program.
    (5) For purposes of this paragraph, a ``career-type'' appointment 
means a career or career-conditional appointment or an appointment of 
equivalent tenure. An appointment of equivalent tenure is considered to 
be an appointment in the excepted service that is placed in Group I or 
Group II under Sec.  351.502(b) of this chapter.

Subpart D--Executive Development


Sec.  412.401  Continuing executive development.

    (a) Each agency must establish a program or programs for the 
continuing development of its senior executives in accordance with 5 
U.S.C 3396(a). Such agency programs must include preparation, 
implementation, and regular updating of an Executive Development Plan 
(EDP) for each senior executive. The EDPs will:
    (1) Function as a detailed guide of developmental experiences to 
help SES members, through participation in short-term and longer term 
experiences, meet organizational needs for leadership, managerial 
improvement, and organizational results;
    (2) Address enhancement of existing executive competencies and such 
other competencies as will strengthen the executive's performance;
    (3) Focus primarily on work-related experiences;
    (4) Outline developmental opportunities and assignments to allow 
the individual to develop a broader perspective in the agency as well 
as Governmentwide; and
    (5) Be reviewed annually and revised as appropriate by an ERB or 
similar body designated by the agency to oversee executive development, 
using input from the performance evaluation cycle.
    (b) Consistent with 5 U.S.C. 3396(d) and other applicable statutes, 
EDPs may provide for executive sabbaticals and other long-term 
assignments outside the Federal sector.

[FR Doc. E8-20273 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.