Training; Supervisory, Management, and Executive Development, 51248-51252 [E8-20273]
Download as PDF
51248
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Parts 410 and 412
RIN 3206–AK75
Training; Supervisory, Management,
and Executive Development
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel
Management proposes to amend its
regulations to implement certain
training and development requirements
contained in the Federal Workforce
Flexibility Act of 2004.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘RIN 3206–AK75,’’ by any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web Site: https://
www.opm.gov. Click on the
‘‘Regulations’’ icon at the bottom right
of the Web page. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• E-mail: employ@opm.gov. Include
‘‘RIN 3206-AK75’’ in the subject line of
the message.
• Fax: (202) 606–2329.
• Mail, Hand Deliver/Courier
comments: Ms. Nancy Randa, Deputy
Associate Director for the Center for
Leadership, Executive Resources, and
Policy Analysis, Room 6357, 1900 E
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415–
9700.
erowe on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheryl Dube by telephone at (202) 606–
4063, by FAX at (202) 606–1637, or by
e-mail at cheryl.dube@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 30, 2004, the President signed
the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of
2004 (Act), Public Law 108–411, into
law. The Act makes several significant
changes in the law governing the
training and development of Federal
employees, supervisors, managers, and
executives. The first change requires
each agency to evaluate, on a regular
basis, its training programs and plans
with respect to the accomplishment of
its specific performance plans and
strategic goals, and to modify its
training plans and programs as needed
to accomplish the agency’s performance
plans and strategic goals. Other changes
to the regulation, not related to the Act,
are made to better align with law the
requirement for continued service
agreements and the submission of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:31 Aug 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
training data. The second major change
requires agencies to consult with the
Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
to establish comprehensive management
succession programs designed to
provide training to employees to
develop managers for the agency. It also
requires agencies, in consultation with
OPM, to establish programs to provide
training to managers regarding actions,
options, and strategies a manager may
use in relating to employees with
unacceptable performance, mentoring
employees, improving employee
performance and productivity, and
conducting employee performance
appraisals. The Homeland Security Act
of 2002, as codified at 5 U.S.C. 1103(c),
established the Human Capital
Assessment and Accountability
Framework (HCAAF) and mandated
OPM to design systems and set
standards, including appropriate
metrics, for assessing the management
of human capital by Federal agencies. 5
U.S.C. 1103(c) also specifies OPM will
develop standards for: (1) Aligning
human capital strategies of agencies
with the organization’s missions, goals
and objectives, (2) ensuring continuity
of leadership through succession plans,
and (3) holding managers and human
resources officers accountable for
efficient and effective human resources
management. The following are the
principal results sought by the proposed
changes in regulations:
Æ Agencies will have effective and
cost-efficient training programs linked
to agency strategic plans;
Æ Managers will develop strategies to
mentor others and to improve employee
performance and productivity.
To provide guidance to agencies in
accomplishing these results, we are
proposing changes in the following
parts of title 5 of the Code of Federal
Regulations: Part 410 on ‘‘Training’’ and
part 412 on ‘‘Executive, Management,
and Supervisory Development.’’
OPM is amending 5 CFR part 410,
subpart B, to reflect new agency
responsibilities for planning training so
employee training and development
will align with agency strategic plans.
The revised subpart B also would cover
agency responsibility for the evaluation
of training, currently included under
subpart F. The revised subpart C would
better align language on continued
service agreements with law. The
revised subpart C would also remove
the option to extend the date for
agencies to report training data to OPM.
The following are the major proposed
changes:
Æ Revised § 410.201(b) would make
agency training program requirements
more visible by listing those
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requirements and emphasizing the
alignment of employee training and
development with agency strategic
plans;
Æ Revised § 410.201(d) would include
language more consistent with the
Human Capital Assessment and
Accountability Framework and
consolidate references to Executive
Order 11348, which provides for the
further training of Government
employees and requires agencies to
review training programs no less often
than annually;
Æ Delete current § 410.203 and
incorporate the information in that
section into § 410.201. § 410.204 would
be renumbered as § 410.203.
Æ Delete current § 410.701 (c) as
extensions to report training data to
OPM are no longer accepted. § 410.701
(d) would be redesignated as § 410.701
(c).
Æ Delete current subpart F and
redesignate subpart G as subpart F, and
renumber § 410.701 as § 410.601.
Part 412, ‘‘Executive, Management,
and Supervisory Development,’’
requires some modification of its
structure to incorporate the changes in
law. Therefore, the current structure of
two subparts (Subpart A—General
Provisions, and Subpart B—Senior
Executive Service Status and Nonstatus
Candidate Development Programs)
would be modified to three subparts
(Subpart A— General Provisions,
Subpart B— Succession Planning, and
Subpart C— Executive Development).
Specifically, current § 412.103 would be
revised and placed within the new
subpart B as § 412.201, current
§ 412.104 would be revised and would
be placed within the new subpart C as
§ 412.301, and current subpart B would
be revised and placed within the new
subpart C. The following are the
additional major proposed changes in
part 412:
Subpart A—General Provisions
Æ Revised § 412.102(a), (b) and (b)(1)
would make more succinct the
references to the United States Code for
easier reading, explain the leadership
development continuum, and delete the
reference to ‘‘mastery level’’ because the
term implies development stops when
in fact development should be ongoing;
Æ Revised § 412.102(b)(3) would
replace ‘‘corporate perspective’’ with
‘‘broad agency and Governmentwide
perspective,’’ to more accurately reflect
the intended goal.
Æ Current § 412.103(c)(2) and (c)(3)
would be addressed in the new subpart
on Succession Planning, consistent with
the Act’s requirement that succession
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules
programs provide development for
future managers;
Æ Current § 412.104(a)(2) would be
deleted. The change would eliminate
the exemption from Governmentwide
recruitment for candidate development
programs.
erowe on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Subpart B—Succession Planning
Æ New § 412.201 would specify
requirements for agency management
succession programs;
Æ Revised § 412.202 would clarify
that agency leadership development
programs are part of the general
workforce development strategy;
Subpart C—Senior Executive Service
Candidate Development Programs
Æ New § 412.301(a) would provide for
an OPM-certified agency Senior
Executive Service Candidate
Development Program (SESCDP),
certification of the Executive Core
Qualifications (ECQs) of candidates by a
Qualifications Review Board, and
selection for the SES, without further
competition;
Æ New § 412.301(b) would require
agencies to submit a policy describing
their SESCDP program methodologies. It
also would require them to obtain OPM
approval for candidate development
programs once every 5 years to ensure
their alignment and strategic linkage
with agency succession plans and
would add a reference to multi-agency
programs to address collaborative,
Governmentwide executive
development;
Æ New § 412.301(c) would require
agencies with CDPs approved under
previous regulations to apply to OPM
for re-approval under the new
regulations in accordance with new
§ 412.301 (b). It also indicates all
existing approvals expire within 2 years
after publication of this regulation.
SESCDPs in progress on the date the
regulations become final may be
completed and graduates of those
programs may be submitted for QRB
certification regardless of this
expiration.
Æ New § 412.302(a) defines the
Executive Resources Board (ERB)
oversight responsibilities in the SESCDP
approval process;
Æ New § 412.302(a)(1) clarifies
competition must be under SES merit
staffing procedures;
Æ New § 412.302(b)(3) would modify
the four-month developmental
assignments to include at least one
assignment of 90 continuous days
outside the scope of the candidate’s
position of record and require the
assignments to include roles at the
executive level where the candidate is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:31 Aug 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
held responsible for achieving
organizational or agency results during
the developmental assignment. The
purpose of the new provision is to
enhance and broaden the candidate’s
experience, increase his or her
knowledge, and maximize his or her
understanding of the overall functioning
of the agency, so the candidate is
prepared for a range of agency positions
at the SES level.
Æ New § 412.302(d) would eliminate
the references to ‘‘status programs’’
(current § 412.202) and ‘‘non-status
programs’’ (current § 412.203). The new
provisions will refer to two categories of
‘‘candidates’’: 1) Individuals who hold a
career or career-type appointment
within the civil service; and 2)
individuals who do not hold such an
appointment, and will define conditions
under which individuals in either
category may participate in an SESCDP.
Subpart D—Executive Development
Æ New § 412.401 would add
continuing development of current SES
members as an ongoing requirement tied
to the performance process through an
Executive Development Plan (EDP).
This section also provides for the
developmental use of sabbaticals and
long-term assignments outside the
Federal sector, as provided by relevant
legal authorities.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Review
This rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify these regulations would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because they would apply only to
Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 410 and
412
Education, Government employees.
Office of Personnel Management.
Michael W. Hager,
Acting Director.
Accordingly, OPM is proposing to
amend 5 CFR parts 410 and 412 as
follows:
PART 410—TRAINING
1. The authority citation for part 410
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1103(c), 4101, et seq.;
E.O. 11348, 3 CFR, 1967 Comp., p. 275.
2. Revise the heading of subpart B to
read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51249
Subpart B—Planning and Evaluating
Training
3. Revise §§ 410.201 and 410.202 to
read as follows:
§ 410.201 Responsibilities of the head of
an agency.
Agency employee development plans
and programs should be designed to
build or support an agency workforce
capable of achieving agency mission
and performance goals and facilitating
continuous improvement of employee
and organizational performance. In
developing strategies to train
employees, heads of agencies or their
designee(s), under section 4103 of title
5, United States Code and in Executive
Order 11348, are required to:
(a) Establish, budget for, operate,
maintain, and evaluate plans and
programs for training agency employees
by, in, and through Government or nonGovernment facilities, as appropriate;
(b) Establish policies governing
employee training including a statement
of the alignment of employee training
and development with agency strategic
plans, the assignment of responsibility
to ensure the training goals are
achieved, and the delegation of training
approval authority to the lowest
appropriate level;
(c) Establish priorities for training
employees and allocate resources
according to those priorities; and
(d) Develop and maintain plans and
programs that:
(1) Identify mission-critical
occupations and competencies;
(2) Identify workforce competency
gaps;
(3) Include strategies for closing
competency gaps; and
(4) Assess periodically, but not less
often than annually, as required by
section 303 of Executive Order 11348.
§ 410.202
training.
Responsibilities for evaluating
Agencies must evaluate their training
programs annually to determine how
well such plans and programs
contribute to mission accomplishment
and meet organizational performance
goals.
4. Remove § 410.203 and redesignate
§ 410.204 as § 410.203.
5. Remove § 410.701(c) and
redesignate § 410.701(d) as § 410.701(c).
6. Remove subpart F and redesignate
subpart G as subpart F, including
redesignating § 410.701 as § 410.601.
7. Revise part 412 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
51250
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Subpart B—Succession Planning
PART 412—SUPERVISORY,
MANAGEMENT, AND EXECUTIVE
DEVELOPMENT
§ 412.201
Subpart A—General Provisions
Sec.
412.101
412.102
Coverage.
Purpose.
Subpart B—Succession Planning
412.201 Management succession.
412.202 Systematic training and
development of supervisors, managers,
and executives.
Subpart C—Senior Executive Service
Candidate Development Programs
412.301 Obtaining approval to conduct a
Senior Executive Service candidate
development program (SESCDP).
412.302 Criteria for a Senior Executive
Service candidate development program
(SESCDP).
Subpart D—Executive Development
412.401 Continuing executive development.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1103 (c)(2)(C), 3396,
3397, 4101, et seq.
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 412.101
Coverage.
This part applies to all incumbents of,
and candidates for, supervisory,
managerial, and executive positions in
the General Schedule, the Senior
Executive Service (SES), or equivalent
pay systems also covered by part 410 of
this chapter.
erowe on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
§ 412.102
Purpose.
(a) This part implements for
supervisors, managers, and executives
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapter 41,
related to training, and 5 U.S.C. 3396,
related to the criteria for programs of
systematic development of candidates
for the SES and the continuing
development of SES members.
(b) This part identifies a continuum of
leadership development, starting with
supervisory positions and proceeding
through management and executive
positions Governmentwide. For this
reason, this part provides requirements
by which agencies:
(1) Develop the competencies needed
by supervisors, managers, and
executives;
(2) Provide learning through
continuing development and training in
the context of succession planning; and
(3) Foster a broad agency and
Governmentwide perspective to prepare
individuals for advancement, thus
supplying the agency and the
Government with an adequate number
of well prepared and qualified
candidates to fill leadership positions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:31 Aug 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
Management succession.
The head of each agency, in
consultation with OPM, must develop a
comprehensive management succession
program, based on the agency’s
workforce succession plans, to fill
agency supervisory and managerial
positions. These programs must be
supported by employee training and
development programs developed under
5 CFR 410.201 to prepare individuals
for advancement, with a focus on both
individual and agency performance and
strengthening organizational capability,
and to ensure an adequate number of
well-prepared and qualified candidates
for leadership positions. These
programs must:
(a) Implement developmental training
consistent with agency succession
management plans;
(b) Provide continuing learning
experiences throughout an individual’s
career, such as details, mentoring,
coaching, learning groups, and projects.
These experiences should provide broad
knowledge and practical experience
linked to OPM’s Federal leadership
competencies as well as agencyidentified, mission-related
competencies, and should be consistent
with the agency’s succession
management plan; and
(c) Include program evaluations
pursuant to 5 CFR 410.202.
§ 412.202 Systematic training and
development of supervisors, managers, and
executives.
All agencies must provide for the
development of individuals in
supervisory, managerial and executive
positions, as well as individuals whom
the agency identifies as potential
candidates for those positions, based on
the agencies’ succession plans. Agencies
also must issue written policies to
ensure they:
(a) Design and implement leadership
development programs integrated with
the employee development plans,
programs, and strategies required by 5
CFR 410.201, and that foster a broad
agency and Governmentwide
perspective;
(b) Provide training within one year of
an employee’s initial appointment to a
supervisory position and follow up
periodically, but at least once every
three years, by providing each
supervisor and manager additional
training on the use of appropriate
actions, options, and strategies to:
(1) Mentor employees;
(2) Improve employee performance
and productivity;
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(3) Conduct employee performance
appraisals in accordance with agency
appraisal systems; and
(4) Identify and assist employees with
unacceptable performance.
(c) Provide training when individuals
make critical career transitions to
supervisor, manager, or executive
consistent with the results of
assessments of the agency’s needs and
the individual’s potential.
Subpart C—Senior Executive Service
Candidate Development Programs
§ 412.301 Obtaining approval to conduct a
Senior Executive Service candidate
development program (SESCDP).
(a) An SESCDP is an OPM-approved
training program designed to develop
the executive qualifications of
employees with strong executive
potential. Successful completion of the
program qualifies them for and
authorizes their initial career
appointment in the SES. An agency
conducting an SESCDP may submit
program graduates for Qualifications
Review Board (QRB) review of their
executive qualifications under 5 CFR
317.502. A program graduate certified
by a QRB may receive an initial career
appointment without further
competition to any SES position for
which he or she meets the professional
and technical qualifications
requirements.
(b) An agency covered by subchapter
II of chapter 31 of title 5, United States
Code, may apply to OPM to conduct an
SESCDP alone or on behalf of a group
of agencies. (In this subpart, the term
‘‘agency’’ refers to either a single agency
or a group of agencies acting in
partnership under this subpart.) Any
agency developing an SESCDP must
submit a policy document describing its
program methodologies to OPM for
formal approval before implementing
the SESCDP. An agency must seek OPM
approval every five years thereafter, and
must also consult OPM before
implementing a change substantially
altering how the SESCDP complies with
the requirements of this regulation. An
agency implementing an SESCDP
without first obtaining formal approval
may not submit graduates of the
program for QRB review.
(c) An agency that obtained OPM
approval under previous regulations
must apply for re-approval in
accordance with requirements in
paragraph (b) of this section and this
subpart before initiating a new SESCDP.
All existing approvals expire within 2
years after publication of this regulation.
(d) An agency covered by subchapter
II of chapter 31 of title 5, United States
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Code, may authorize a major agency
component employing senior executives
to apply directly to OPM for approval to
conduct an SESCDP. Such an
application from a component must be
accompanied by the agency’s written
endorsement. To obtain approval, the
component must meet the SESCDP
requirements of this subpart
independent of agency involvement.
(e) As always, agencies should be
mindful of merit principles in carrying
out their functions under this subpart.
erowe on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
§ 412.302 Criteria for a Senior Executive
Service candidate development program
(SESCDP).
(a) Executive Resources Board
requirements. An agency’s Executive
Resources Board (ERB) must oversee the
SESCDP. The ERB ensures the
development program lasts between 12
and 24 months and includes substantive
developmental experiences that should
equip a successful candidate to
accomplish Federal Government
missions as a senior executive. The
agency ERB must oversee and be
accountable for SESCDP recruitment,
merit staffing, and assessment. The
agency ERB must ensure the program
follows SES merit staffing provisions in
5 CFR 317.501, subject to the condition
explained in § 412.302(d)(1) of this part.
The ERB also must oversee
development, evaluation, progress in
the program, and graduation of
candidates, and for requesting
Qualifications Review Board (QRB)
certification of graduates where
appropriate. The ERB submits for QRB
review, within 90 days of graduation
from the program. The ERB also must
oversee the writing and implementation
of a removal policy for program
candidates who do not make adequate
progress.
(b) Recruitment. Recruitment for the
program is from all groups of qualified
individuals within the civil service, or
all groups of qualified individuals
whether or not within the civil service.
The number selected shall be consistent
with the number of expected vacancies.
(c) Senior Executive Service candidate
development program requirements. An
SESCDP lasts between 12 and 24
months. To graduate, a candidate must
accomplish the requirements between
the beginning and ending dates of the
program. Each individual participating
in an SESCDP must have:
(1) A documented Senior Executive
Service Development Plan (SESDP)
based upon a competency-based needs
determination and approved by the
agency ERB. The components of the
development plan must:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:31 Aug 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
(i) Address the executive core
qualifications (ECQs);
(ii) Address Federal Government
leadership challenges crucial to the
senior executive;
(iii) Provide increased knowledge and
understanding of the overall functioning
of the agency, so the participant is
prepared for a range of positions and
responsibilities;
(iv) Include interaction with a wide
mix of senior Federal employees outside
the candidate’s department or agency to
foster a Governmentwide perspective;
(v) Include interaction with senior
non-Federal employees to increase
experience of the broader context in
which executives operate; and
(vi) Have Governmentwide or multiagency applicability in the nature and
scope of the training;
(2) A formal training experience
lasting at least 80 hours that addresses
the ECQs and their application to SES
positions Governmentwide, explores
Federal leadership challenges crucial to
the senior executive, and has
Governmentwide or multi-agency
applicability;
(3) A developmental assignment of at
least 4 months of full-time service to
include at least one assignment of 90
continuous days in a position other
than, and substantially different from,
the candidate’s position of record. The
assignment must include executive level
responsibility and differ from the
candidate’s current and past
assignments in ways that broaden the
candidate’s experience, as well as
challenge the candidate with respect to
leadership competencies and the ECQs.
Assignments need not be restricted to
the agency, the Executive Branch, or the
Federal Government, so long as they can
be accomplished in compliance with
applicable law and federal and agency
specific ethics regulations. The
candidate is held accountable for
organizational or agency results
achieved during the assignment. If the
assignment is in a non-Federal
organization, the ERB must provide for
adequate documentation of the
individual’s actions and
accomplishments and must determine
that the assignment will contribute to
development of the candidate’s
executive qualifications; and
(4) A mentor who is a member of the
SES or is otherwise determined by the
ERB to have the knowledge and capacity
to advise the candidate, consistent with
goals of the SESCDP. The mentor and
the candidate are jointly responsible for
a productive mentoring relationship;
however, the agency must establish
methods to assess these relationships
and, if necessary, facilitate them or
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
51251
make appropriate changes in the interest
of the candidate.
(d) An SESCDP is a training
opportunity that OPM has determined
to compete, with the condition noted in
§ 412.302(d)(1) of this part, under SES
merit staffing procedures. Because SES
merit staffing procedures require
recruitment from among either all
qualified persons or all qualified
persons within the civil service, an
agency must provide procedures under
which all persons within one of these
two possible areas of consideration may
compete for and, if selected, participate
in its SESCDP.
(1) An individual who does not
currently hold a career or career-type
civil service appointment may only
participate in an SESCDP by means of
a Schedule B appointment authorized
by 5 CFR 213.3202(j) to a full-time
position created for developmental
purposes connected with the SESCDP.
Exercising its authority under
§ 302.101(c)(6) of this chapter, OPM
hereby exempts these full-time positions
created for developmental purposes
connected with the SESCDP from the
appointment procedures of part 302 of
this chapter. Competition for these
appointments must be conducted
pursuant to SES merit staffing
procedures at § 317.501 of this chapter,
except that agencies must follow the
principle of veterans’ preference as far
as administratively feasible, in
accordance with § 302.101(c) of this
chapter. Candidates serving under this
Schedule B appointment may not be
used to fill an agency’s regular positions
on a continuing basis.
(2) An individual who currently holds
a career or career-type appointment in
the civil service must be selected
through SES merit staffing procedures at
§ 317.501 of this chapter. Such an
individual may be selected for and
participate in an SESCDP in any agency
while serving in his or her position of
record. The individual may continue to
participate in the SESCDP upon moving
to other civil service positions under
career or career-type appointment. An
SESCDP competition does not satisfy
the requirements of part 335 of this
chapter and therefore does not provide
an independent basis to appoint or
promote a career or career-type
appointee.
(3) A career or career-type appointee
may participate in an SESCDP
conducted by an agency other than his
or her employing agency under such
terms as are mutually agreeable and
outlined in a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) signed by both
agencies involved. Terms of the MOU
must be consistent with applicable
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
51252
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Proposed Rules
provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapter 41 and a
copy must be provided to OPM. Either
agency may decline or discontinue a
candidate’s participation if such terms
cannot be negotiated or are not fulfilled.
(4) Any candidate’s participation in
an SESCDP is at the discretion of the
employing agency and subject to
provisions established under 5 CFR
412.302(a) for removing a participant
who does not make adequate progress in
the program.
(5) For purposes of this paragraph, a
‘‘career-type’’ appointment means a
career or career-conditional
appointment or an appointment of
equivalent tenure. An appointment of
equivalent tenure is considered to be an
appointment in the excepted service
that is placed in Group I or Group II
under § 351.502(b) of this chapter.
Subpart D—Executive Development
erowe on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
§ 412.401 Continuing executive
development.
(a) Each agency must establish a
program or programs for the continuing
development of its senior executives in
accordance with 5 U.S.C 3396(a). Such
agency programs must include
preparation, implementation, and
regular updating of an Executive
Development Plan (EDP) for each senior
executive. The EDPs will:
(1) Function as a detailed guide of
developmental experiences to help SES
members, through participation in
short-term and longer term experiences,
meet organizational needs for
leadership, managerial improvement,
and organizational results;
(2) Address enhancement of existing
executive competencies and such other
competencies as will strengthen the
executive’s performance;
(3) Focus primarily on work-related
experiences;
(4) Outline developmental
opportunities and assignments to allow
the individual to develop a broader
perspective in the agency as well as
Governmentwide; and
(5) Be reviewed annually and revised
as appropriate by an ERB or similar
body designated by the agency to
oversee executive development, using
input from the performance evaluation
cycle.
(b) Consistent with 5 U.S.C. 3396(d)
and other applicable statutes, EDPs may
provide for executive sabbaticals and
other long-term assignments outside the
Federal sector.
[FR Doc. E8–20273 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:31 Aug 29, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
27628.’’ This document corrects the
docket number.
Need for the Correction
[Docket No. FAA–2007–27628; Directorate
Identifier 2007–CE–025–AD]
This correction is needed to assure
that all correspondence related to this
subject is posted in the correct docket.
RIN 2120–AA64
Correction of Publication
14 CFR Part 39
Airworthiness Directives; Cessna
Aircraft Company (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Columbia Aircraft
Manufacturing) Models LC40–550FG,
LC41–550FG, and LC42–550FG
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document makes a
correction to a proposed airworthiness
directive (AD), which was published in
the Federal Register on August 7, 2008
(73 FR 45902), and applies to certain
Cessna Aircraft Company (type
certificate previously held by Columbia
Aircraft Manufacturing) (Cessna)
Models LC40–550FG, LC41–550FG, and
LC42–550FG airplanes. This document
proposed to revise AD 2007–07–06 with
a new AD that would retain the actions
currently required in AD 2007–07–06;
allow installing access panels; and
change the serial number applicability.
The FAA incorrectly referenced the
docket number of this proposed AD as
‘‘FAA–2007–27268’’ instead of ‘‘FAA–
2007–27628.’’ This document corrects
the docket number.
DATES: The comment period ending date
of October 6, 2008, remains the same.
The FAA will also address any
comments relating to this proposed AD
submitted to Docket No. FAA–2007–
27268.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Morfitt, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA
98057; telephone: (425) 917–6405; fax:
(425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
On August 1, 2008, the FAA issued a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to revise AD 2007–07–06 with a new AD
that would retain the actions currently
required in AD 2007–07–06; allow
installing access panels; and change the
serial number applicability. This NPRM
was published in the Federal Register
on August 7, 2008 (73 FR 45902). The
FAA incorrectly referenced the docket
number of this proposed AD as ‘‘FAA–
2007–27268’’ instead of ‘‘FAA–2007–
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Accordingly, the publication of
August 7, 2008 (73 FR 45902), which
was the subject of FR Doc. E8–18231, is
corrected as follows:
On page 45902, in the third column,
in the third line under the heading
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, replace
‘‘FAA–2007–27268’’ with ‘‘FAA–2007–
27628.’’
On page 45903, in the second column,
in the seventh line under the heading
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, replace
‘‘FAA–2007–27268’’ with ‘‘FAA–2007–
27628.’’
§ 39.13
[Corrected]
On page 45904, in the third column,
in the eighth and ninth lines under the
heading § 39.13 [Amended], replace
‘‘FAA–2007–27268’’ with ‘‘FAA–2007–
27628.’’
Action is taken herein to correct this
reference in the proposed AD.
The comment period ending date of
October 6, 2008, remains the same. The
FAA will also address any comments
relating to this proposed AD submitted
to Docket No. FAA–2007–27268.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August
25, 2008.
Brian A. Yanez,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–20200 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0453; Airspace
Docket No. 08–AAL–12]
Proposed Establishment of Class E
Airspace; Kwethluk, AK
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action proposes to
establish Class E airspace at Kwethluk,
AK. Two Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAPs) are being
developed for the Kwethluk Airport at
Kwethluk, AK. Adoption of this
proposal would result in creating Class
E airspace upward from 700 feet (ft.)
E:\FR\FM\02SEP1.SGM
02SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 2, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51248-51252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20273]
[[Page 51248]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Parts 410 and 412
RIN 3206-AK75
Training; Supervisory, Management, and Executive Development
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management proposes to amend its
regulations to implement certain training and development requirements
contained in the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``RIN 3206-AK75,'' by
any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web Site: https://www.opm.gov. Click on the
``Regulations'' icon at the bottom right of the Web page. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: employ@opm.gov. Include ``RIN 3206-AK75'' in the
subject line of the message.
Fax: (202) 606-2329.
Mail, Hand Deliver/Courier comments: Ms. Nancy Randa,
Deputy Associate Director for the Center for Leadership, Executive
Resources, and Policy Analysis, Room 6357, 1900 E Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20415-9700.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheryl Dube by telephone at (202) 606-
4063, by FAX at (202) 606-1637, or by e-mail at cheryl.dube@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 30, 2004, the President signed
the Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (Act), Public Law 108-
411, into law. The Act makes several significant changes in the law
governing the training and development of Federal employees,
supervisors, managers, and executives. The first change requires each
agency to evaluate, on a regular basis, its training programs and plans
with respect to the accomplishment of its specific performance plans
and strategic goals, and to modify its training plans and programs as
needed to accomplish the agency's performance plans and strategic
goals. Other changes to the regulation, not related to the Act, are
made to better align with law the requirement for continued service
agreements and the submission of training data. The second major change
requires agencies to consult with the Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) to establish comprehensive management succession programs
designed to provide training to employees to develop managers for the
agency. It also requires agencies, in consultation with OPM, to
establish programs to provide training to managers regarding actions,
options, and strategies a manager may use in relating to employees with
unacceptable performance, mentoring employees, improving employee
performance and productivity, and conducting employee performance
appraisals. The Homeland Security Act of 2002, as codified at 5 U.S.C.
1103(c), established the Human Capital Assessment and Accountability
Framework (HCAAF) and mandated OPM to design systems and set standards,
including appropriate metrics, for assessing the management of human
capital by Federal agencies. 5 U.S.C. 1103(c) also specifies OPM will
develop standards for: (1) Aligning human capital strategies of
agencies with the organization's missions, goals and objectives, (2)
ensuring continuity of leadership through succession plans, and (3)
holding managers and human resources officers accountable for efficient
and effective human resources management. The following are the
principal results sought by the proposed changes in regulations:
[cir] Agencies will have effective and cost-efficient training
programs linked to agency strategic plans;
[cir] Managers will develop strategies to mentor others and to
improve employee performance and productivity.
To provide guidance to agencies in accomplishing these results, we
are proposing changes in the following parts of title 5 of the Code of
Federal Regulations: Part 410 on ``Training'' and part 412 on
``Executive, Management, and Supervisory Development.''
OPM is amending 5 CFR part 410, subpart B, to reflect new agency
responsibilities for planning training so employee training and
development will align with agency strategic plans. The revised subpart
B also would cover agency responsibility for the evaluation of
training, currently included under subpart F. The revised subpart C
would better align language on continued service agreements with law.
The revised subpart C would also remove the option to extend the date
for agencies to report training data to OPM. The following are the
major proposed changes:
[cir] Revised Sec. 410.201(b) would make agency training program
requirements more visible by listing those requirements and emphasizing
the alignment of employee training and development with agency
strategic plans;
[cir] Revised Sec. 410.201(d) would include language more
consistent with the Human Capital Assessment and Accountability
Framework and consolidate references to Executive Order 11348, which
provides for the further training of Government employees and requires
agencies to review training programs no less often than annually;
[cir] Delete current Sec. 410.203 and incorporate the information
in that section into Sec. 410.201. Sec. 410.204 would be renumbered
as Sec. 410.203.
[cir] Delete current Sec. 410.701 (c) as extensions to report
training data to OPM are no longer accepted. Sec. 410.701 (d) would be
redesignated as Sec. 410.701 (c).
[cir] Delete current subpart F and redesignate subpart G as subpart
F, and renumber Sec. 410.701 as Sec. 410.601.
Part 412, ``Executive, Management, and Supervisory Development,''
requires some modification of its structure to incorporate the changes
in law. Therefore, the current structure of two subparts (Subpart A--
General Provisions, and Subpart B--Senior Executive Service Status and
Nonstatus Candidate Development Programs) would be modified to three
subparts (Subpart A-- General Provisions, Subpart B-- Succession
Planning, and Subpart C-- Executive Development). Specifically, current
Sec. 412.103 would be revised and placed within the new subpart B as
Sec. 412.201, current Sec. 412.104 would be revised and would be
placed within the new subpart C as Sec. 412.301, and current subpart B
would be revised and placed within the new subpart C. The following are
the additional major proposed changes in part 412:
Subpart A--General Provisions
[cir] Revised Sec. 412.102(a), (b) and (b)(1) would make more
succinct the references to the United States Code for easier reading,
explain the leadership development continuum, and delete the reference
to ``mastery level'' because the term implies development stops when in
fact development should be ongoing;
[cir] Revised Sec. 412.102(b)(3) would replace ``corporate
perspective'' with ``broad agency and Governmentwide perspective,'' to
more accurately reflect the intended goal.
[cir] Current Sec. 412.103(c)(2) and (c)(3) would be addressed in
the new subpart on Succession Planning, consistent with the Act's
requirement that succession
[[Page 51249]]
programs provide development for future managers;
[cir] Current Sec. 412.104(a)(2) would be deleted. The change
would eliminate the exemption from Governmentwide recruitment for
candidate development programs.
Subpart B--Succession Planning
[cir] New Sec. 412.201 would specify requirements for agency
management succession programs;
[cir] Revised Sec. 412.202 would clarify that agency leadership
development programs are part of the general workforce development
strategy;
Subpart C--Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Programs
[cir] New Sec. 412.301(a) would provide for an OPM-certified
agency Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Program (SESCDP),
certification of the Executive Core Qualifications (ECQs) of candidates
by a Qualifications Review Board, and selection for the SES, without
further competition;
[cir] New Sec. 412.301(b) would require agencies to submit a
policy describing their SESCDP program methodologies. It also would
require them to obtain OPM approval for candidate development programs
once every 5 years to ensure their alignment and strategic linkage with
agency succession plans and would add a reference to multi-agency
programs to address collaborative, Governmentwide executive
development;
[cir] New Sec. 412.301(c) would require agencies with CDPs
approved under previous regulations to apply to OPM for re-approval
under the new regulations in accordance with new Sec. 412.301 (b). It
also indicates all existing approvals expire within 2 years after
publication of this regulation. SESCDPs in progress on the date the
regulations become final may be completed and graduates of those
programs may be submitted for QRB certification regardless of this
expiration.
[cir] New Sec. 412.302(a) defines the Executive Resources Board
(ERB) oversight responsibilities in the SESCDP approval process;
[cir] New Sec. 412.302(a)(1) clarifies competition must be under
SES merit staffing procedures;
[cir] New Sec. 412.302(b)(3) would modify the four-month
developmental assignments to include at least one assignment of 90
continuous days outside the scope of the candidate's position of record
and require the assignments to include roles at the executive level
where the candidate is held responsible for achieving organizational or
agency results during the developmental assignment. The purpose of the
new provision is to enhance and broaden the candidate's experience,
increase his or her knowledge, and maximize his or her understanding of
the overall functioning of the agency, so the candidate is prepared for
a range of agency positions at the SES level.
[cir] New Sec. 412.302(d) would eliminate the references to
``status programs'' (current Sec. 412.202) and ``non-status programs''
(current Sec. 412.203). The new provisions will refer to two
categories of ``candidates'': 1) Individuals who hold a career or
career-type appointment within the civil service; and 2) individuals
who do not hold such an appointment, and will define conditions under
which individuals in either category may participate in an SESCDP.
Subpart D--Executive Development
[cir] New Sec. 412.401 would add continuing development of current
SES members as an ongoing requirement tied to the performance process
through an Executive Development Plan (EDP). This section also provides
for the developmental use of sabbaticals and long-term assignments
outside the Federal sector, as provided by relevant legal authorities.
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Review
This rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
in accordance with E.O. 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify these regulations would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities because they would
apply only to Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Parts 410 and 412
Education, Government employees.
Office of Personnel Management.
Michael W. Hager,
Acting Director.
Accordingly, OPM is proposing to amend 5 CFR parts 410 and 412 as
follows:
PART 410--TRAINING
1. The authority citation for part 410 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1103(c), 4101, et seq.; E.O. 11348, 3 CFR,
1967 Comp., p. 275.
2. Revise the heading of subpart B to read as follows:
Subpart B--Planning and Evaluating Training
3. Revise Sec. Sec. 410.201 and 410.202 to read as follows:
Sec. 410.201 Responsibilities of the head of an agency.
Agency employee development plans and programs should be designed
to build or support an agency workforce capable of achieving agency
mission and performance goals and facilitating continuous improvement
of employee and organizational performance. In developing strategies to
train employees, heads of agencies or their designee(s), under section
4103 of title 5, United States Code and in Executive Order 11348, are
required to:
(a) Establish, budget for, operate, maintain, and evaluate plans
and programs for training agency employees by, in, and through
Government or non-Government facilities, as appropriate;
(b) Establish policies governing employee training including a
statement of the alignment of employee training and development with
agency strategic plans, the assignment of responsibility to ensure the
training goals are achieved, and the delegation of training approval
authority to the lowest appropriate level;
(c) Establish priorities for training employees and allocate
resources according to those priorities; and
(d) Develop and maintain plans and programs that:
(1) Identify mission-critical occupations and competencies;
(2) Identify workforce competency gaps;
(3) Include strategies for closing competency gaps; and
(4) Assess periodically, but not less often than annually, as
required by section 303 of Executive Order 11348.
Sec. 410.202 Responsibilities for evaluating training.
Agencies must evaluate their training programs annually to
determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission
accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals.
4. Remove Sec. 410.203 and redesignate Sec. 410.204 as Sec.
410.203.
5. Remove Sec. 410.701(c) and redesignate Sec. 410.701(d) as
Sec. 410.701(c).
6. Remove subpart F and redesignate subpart G as subpart F,
including redesignating Sec. 410.701 as Sec. 410.601.
7. Revise part 412 to read as follows:
[[Page 51250]]
PART 412--SUPERVISORY, MANAGEMENT, AND EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec.
412.101 Coverage.
412.102 Purpose.
Subpart B--Succession Planning
412.201 Management succession.
412.202 Systematic training and development of supervisors,
managers, and executives.
Subpart C--Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Programs
412.301 Obtaining approval to conduct a Senior Executive Service
candidate development program (SESCDP).
412.302 Criteria for a Senior Executive Service candidate
development program (SESCDP).
Subpart D--Executive Development
412.401 Continuing executive development.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1103 (c)(2)(C), 3396, 3397, 4101, et seq.
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec. 412.101 Coverage.
This part applies to all incumbents of, and candidates for,
supervisory, managerial, and executive positions in the General
Schedule, the Senior Executive Service (SES), or equivalent pay systems
also covered by part 410 of this chapter.
Sec. 412.102 Purpose.
(a) This part implements for supervisors, managers, and executives
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapter 41, related to training, and 5
U.S.C. 3396, related to the criteria for programs of systematic
development of candidates for the SES and the continuing development of
SES members.
(b) This part identifies a continuum of leadership development,
starting with supervisory positions and proceeding through management
and executive positions Governmentwide. For this reason, this part
provides requirements by which agencies:
(1) Develop the competencies needed by supervisors, managers, and
executives;
(2) Provide learning through continuing development and training in
the context of succession planning; and
(3) Foster a broad agency and Governmentwide perspective to prepare
individuals for advancement, thus supplying the agency and the
Government with an adequate number of well prepared and qualified
candidates to fill leadership positions.
Subpart B--Succession Planning
Sec. 412.201 Management succession.
The head of each agency, in consultation with OPM, must develop a
comprehensive management succession program, based on the agency's
workforce succession plans, to fill agency supervisory and managerial
positions. These programs must be supported by employee training and
development programs developed under 5 CFR 410.201 to prepare
individuals for advancement, with a focus on both individual and agency
performance and strengthening organizational capability, and to ensure
an adequate number of well-prepared and qualified candidates for
leadership positions. These programs must:
(a) Implement developmental training consistent with agency
succession management plans;
(b) Provide continuing learning experiences throughout an
individual's career, such as details, mentoring, coaching, learning
groups, and projects. These experiences should provide broad knowledge
and practical experience linked to OPM's Federal leadership
competencies as well as agency-identified, mission-related
competencies, and should be consistent with the agency's succession
management plan; and
(c) Include program evaluations pursuant to 5 CFR 410.202.
Sec. 412.202 Systematic training and development of supervisors,
managers, and executives.
All agencies must provide for the development of individuals in
supervisory, managerial and executive positions, as well as individuals
whom the agency identifies as potential candidates for those positions,
based on the agencies' succession plans. Agencies also must issue
written policies to ensure they:
(a) Design and implement leadership development programs integrated
with the employee development plans, programs, and strategies required
by 5 CFR 410.201, and that foster a broad agency and Governmentwide
perspective;
(b) Provide training within one year of an employee's initial
appointment to a supervisory position and follow up periodically, but
at least once every three years, by providing each supervisor and
manager additional training on the use of appropriate actions, options,
and strategies to:
(1) Mentor employees;
(2) Improve employee performance and productivity;
(3) Conduct employee performance appraisals in accordance with
agency appraisal systems; and
(4) Identify and assist employees with unacceptable performance.
(c) Provide training when individuals make critical career
transitions to supervisor, manager, or executive consistent with the
results of assessments of the agency's needs and the individual's
potential.
Subpart C--Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Programs
Sec. 412.301 Obtaining approval to conduct a Senior Executive Service
candidate development program (SESCDP).
(a) An SESCDP is an OPM-approved training program designed to
develop the executive qualifications of employees with strong executive
potential. Successful completion of the program qualifies them for and
authorizes their initial career appointment in the SES. An agency
conducting an SESCDP may submit program graduates for Qualifications
Review Board (QRB) review of their executive qualifications under 5 CFR
317.502. A program graduate certified by a QRB may receive an initial
career appointment without further competition to any SES position for
which he or she meets the professional and technical qualifications
requirements.
(b) An agency covered by subchapter II of chapter 31 of title 5,
United States Code, may apply to OPM to conduct an SESCDP alone or on
behalf of a group of agencies. (In this subpart, the term ``agency''
refers to either a single agency or a group of agencies acting in
partnership under this subpart.) Any agency developing an SESCDP must
submit a policy document describing its program methodologies to OPM
for formal approval before implementing the SESCDP. An agency must seek
OPM approval every five years thereafter, and must also consult OPM
before implementing a change substantially altering how the SESCDP
complies with the requirements of this regulation. An agency
implementing an SESCDP without first obtaining formal approval may not
submit graduates of the program for QRB review.
(c) An agency that obtained OPM approval under previous regulations
must apply for re-approval in accordance with requirements in paragraph
(b) of this section and this subpart before initiating a new SESCDP.
All existing approvals expire within 2 years after publication of this
regulation.
(d) An agency covered by subchapter II of chapter 31 of title 5,
United States
[[Page 51251]]
Code, may authorize a major agency component employing senior
executives to apply directly to OPM for approval to conduct an SESCDP.
Such an application from a component must be accompanied by the
agency's written endorsement. To obtain approval, the component must
meet the SESCDP requirements of this subpart independent of agency
involvement.
(e) As always, agencies should be mindful of merit principles in
carrying out their functions under this subpart.
Sec. 412.302 Criteria for a Senior Executive Service candidate
development program (SESCDP).
(a) Executive Resources Board requirements. An agency's Executive
Resources Board (ERB) must oversee the SESCDP. The ERB ensures the
development program lasts between 12 and 24 months and includes
substantive developmental experiences that should equip a successful
candidate to accomplish Federal Government missions as a senior
executive. The agency ERB must oversee and be accountable for SESCDP
recruitment, merit staffing, and assessment. The agency ERB must ensure
the program follows SES merit staffing provisions in 5 CFR 317.501,
subject to the condition explained in Sec. 412.302(d)(1) of this part.
The ERB also must oversee development, evaluation, progress in the
program, and graduation of candidates, and for requesting
Qualifications Review Board (QRB) certification of graduates where
appropriate. The ERB submits for QRB review, within 90 days of
graduation from the program. The ERB also must oversee the writing and
implementation of a removal policy for program candidates who do not
make adequate progress.
(b) Recruitment. Recruitment for the program is from all groups of
qualified individuals within the civil service, or all groups of
qualified individuals whether or not within the civil service. The
number selected shall be consistent with the number of expected
vacancies.
(c) Senior Executive Service candidate development program
requirements. An SESCDP lasts between 12 and 24 months. To graduate, a
candidate must accomplish the requirements between the beginning and
ending dates of the program. Each individual participating in an SESCDP
must have:
(1) A documented Senior Executive Service Development Plan (SESDP)
based upon a competency-based needs determination and approved by the
agency ERB. The components of the development plan must:
(i) Address the executive core qualifications (ECQs);
(ii) Address Federal Government leadership challenges crucial to
the senior executive;
(iii) Provide increased knowledge and understanding of the overall
functioning of the agency, so the participant is prepared for a range
of positions and responsibilities;
(iv) Include interaction with a wide mix of senior Federal
employees outside the candidate's department or agency to foster a
Governmentwide perspective;
(v) Include interaction with senior non-Federal employees to
increase experience of the broader context in which executives operate;
and
(vi) Have Governmentwide or multi-agency applicability in the
nature and scope of the training;
(2) A formal training experience lasting at least 80 hours that
addresses the ECQs and their application to SES positions
Governmentwide, explores Federal leadership challenges crucial to the
senior executive, and has Governmentwide or multi-agency applicability;
(3) A developmental assignment of at least 4 months of full-time
service to include at least one assignment of 90 continuous days in a
position other than, and substantially different from, the candidate's
position of record. The assignment must include executive level
responsibility and differ from the candidate's current and past
assignments in ways that broaden the candidate's experience, as well as
challenge the candidate with respect to leadership competencies and the
ECQs. Assignments need not be restricted to the agency, the Executive
Branch, or the Federal Government, so long as they can be accomplished
in compliance with applicable law and federal and agency specific
ethics regulations. The candidate is held accountable for
organizational or agency results achieved during the assignment. If the
assignment is in a non-Federal organization, the ERB must provide for
adequate documentation of the individual's actions and accomplishments
and must determine that the assignment will contribute to development
of the candidate's executive qualifications; and
(4) A mentor who is a member of the SES or is otherwise determined
by the ERB to have the knowledge and capacity to advise the candidate,
consistent with goals of the SESCDP. The mentor and the candidate are
jointly responsible for a productive mentoring relationship; however,
the agency must establish methods to assess these relationships and, if
necessary, facilitate them or make appropriate changes in the interest
of the candidate.
(d) An SESCDP is a training opportunity that OPM has determined to
compete, with the condition noted in Sec. 412.302(d)(1) of this part,
under SES merit staffing procedures. Because SES merit staffing
procedures require recruitment from among either all qualified persons
or all qualified persons within the civil service, an agency must
provide procedures under which all persons within one of these two
possible areas of consideration may compete for and, if selected,
participate in its SESCDP.
(1) An individual who does not currently hold a career or career-
type civil service appointment may only participate in an SESCDP by
means of a Schedule B appointment authorized by 5 CFR 213.3202(j) to a
full-time position created for developmental purposes connected with
the SESCDP. Exercising its authority under Sec. 302.101(c)(6) of this
chapter, OPM hereby exempts these full-time positions created for
developmental purposes connected with the SESCDP from the appointment
procedures of part 302 of this chapter. Competition for these
appointments must be conducted pursuant to SES merit staffing
procedures at Sec. 317.501 of this chapter, except that agencies must
follow the principle of veterans' preference as far as administratively
feasible, in accordance with Sec. 302.101(c) of this chapter.
Candidates serving under this Schedule B appointment may not be used to
fill an agency's regular positions on a continuing basis.
(2) An individual who currently holds a career or career-type
appointment in the civil service must be selected through SES merit
staffing procedures at Sec. 317.501 of this chapter. Such an
individual may be selected for and participate in an SESCDP in any
agency while serving in his or her position of record. The individual
may continue to participate in the SESCDP upon moving to other civil
service positions under career or career-type appointment. An SESCDP
competition does not satisfy the requirements of part 335 of this
chapter and therefore does not provide an independent basis to appoint
or promote a career or career-type appointee.
(3) A career or career-type appointee may participate in an SESCDP
conducted by an agency other than his or her employing agency under
such terms as are mutually agreeable and outlined in a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) signed by both agencies involved. Terms of the MOU
must be consistent with applicable
[[Page 51252]]
provisions of 5 U.S.C. chapter 41 and a copy must be provided to OPM.
Either agency may decline or discontinue a candidate's participation if
such terms cannot be negotiated or are not fulfilled.
(4) Any candidate's participation in an SESCDP is at the discretion
of the employing agency and subject to provisions established under 5
CFR 412.302(a) for removing a participant who does not make adequate
progress in the program.
(5) For purposes of this paragraph, a ``career-type'' appointment
means a career or career-conditional appointment or an appointment of
equivalent tenure. An appointment of equivalent tenure is considered to
be an appointment in the excepted service that is placed in Group I or
Group II under Sec. 351.502(b) of this chapter.
Subpart D--Executive Development
Sec. 412.401 Continuing executive development.
(a) Each agency must establish a program or programs for the
continuing development of its senior executives in accordance with 5
U.S.C 3396(a). Such agency programs must include preparation,
implementation, and regular updating of an Executive Development Plan
(EDP) for each senior executive. The EDPs will:
(1) Function as a detailed guide of developmental experiences to
help SES members, through participation in short-term and longer term
experiences, meet organizational needs for leadership, managerial
improvement, and organizational results;
(2) Address enhancement of existing executive competencies and such
other competencies as will strengthen the executive's performance;
(3) Focus primarily on work-related experiences;
(4) Outline developmental opportunities and assignments to allow
the individual to develop a broader perspective in the agency as well
as Governmentwide; and
(5) Be reviewed annually and revised as appropriate by an ERB or
similar body designated by the agency to oversee executive development,
using input from the performance evaluation cycle.
(b) Consistent with 5 U.S.C. 3396(d) and other applicable statutes,
EDPs may provide for executive sabbaticals and other long-term
assignments outside the Federal sector.
[FR Doc. E8-20273 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P