Application by the Massachusetts Department of Highways for a Preemption Determination on the City of Boston's Hazardous Materials Routing Designation, 51335-51336 [E8-20222]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Notices Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to attend and persons desiring to present oral statement should notify the person listed above not later than October 24, 2008. The next quarterly meeting of the FAA ATPAC is planned to be held from January 13–14, 2009, in Miami, FL. Any member of the public may present a written statement to the Committee at any time at the address given above. Issued in Washington, DC, on August 26, 2008. Richard Jehlen, Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures, Advisory Committee. [FR Doc. E8–20310 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA–2008–0204] Application by the Massachusetts Department of Highways for a Preemption Determination on the City of Boston’s Hazardous Materials Routing Designation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), (DOT). ACTION: Notice of application for preemption determination, consolidation with the American Trucking Associations, Inc. (ATA) application for preemption determination, and extension of time to submit comments. erowe on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: FMCSA provides notice and invites interested parties to submit comments on an application by the Massachusetts Department of Highways (MassHighway) for an administrative determination on whether Federal law preempts highway routing designations issued by the City of Boston (Boston) regarding the transportation of hazardous materials. MassHighway seeks a preemption determination to resolve whether Boston’s regulatory scheme on hazardous materials transportation in Boston remains consistent with Federal law in light of the history of the Boston regulation, changes that have occurred since the regulation’s inception in 1980, and policy changes in issuing permits under the regulation. The MassHighway application, filed on July 25, 2008, encompasses the issues raised by ATA VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:40 Aug 29, 2008 Jkt 214001 in its application for preemption determination filed on May 30, 2008. Accordingly, the MassHighway application will be consolidated with the ATA application in Docket No. FMCSA–1008–0204 and the time period for submitting comments is extended by this notice. DATES: Comments received by October 17, 2008 and rebuttal comments received by December 1, 2008 will be considered before an administrative ruling is issued. Rebuttal comments may discuss only those issues raised by comments received during the initial comment period and may not discuss new issues. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket Management System Number FMCSA– 2008–0204 by any of the following methods: Web Site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the Federal electronic docket site. Fax: 1–202–493–2251. Mail to: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Courier or Hand Delivery: Ground Floor, Room W12–140, DOT Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and docket number. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information, see the Public Participation and Supplementary Information headings below. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https:// www.regulations.gov at any time or to the ground floor, Room W12–140, DOT Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 51335 19476) or you may visit https:// www.regulations.gov. Public participation: The https:// www.regulations.gov Web site is generally available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. You can get electronic submission and retrieval help and guidelines under the ‘‘help’’ section of the https://www.regulations.gov Web site and also at the DOT’s https:// docketsinfo.dot.gov Web site. If you want confirmation of receipt of your comments, please include a selfaddressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting comments online. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James O. Simmons, Chief, Hazardous Materials Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or at james.simmons@dot.gov (e-mail). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A copy of each comment must be sent to Monica E. Conyngham, Chief Counsel, MassHighway, 10 Park Plaza, Boston, MA 02116–3969 and Richard Moskowitz, Vice President and Regulatory Affairs Counsel, American Trucking Associations, 950 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22203. You are required to include with your comments a certification that you provided a copy of your comments to MassHighway and ATA. (The following format is suggested: ‘‘I certify copies of this comment were sent to Ms. Conyngham, MassHighway, and Mr. Moskowitz, ATA, at the address specified in the Federal Register.’’) Background Title 49 U.S.C. 5125 includes several preemption provisions. Section 5125(c)(1) allows a State or Indian tribe to establish, maintain, or enforce a highway routing designation over which hazardous material may or may not be transported by motor vehicles, or a limitation or requirement related to highway routing, only if the designation, limitation, or requirement complies with 49 U.S.C. 5112(b). Section 5112(b) requires the Secretary of Transportation (the Secretary), in consultation with the States, to prescribe by regulation standards for the States and Indian tribes to follow when designating specific highway routes for transportation of hazardous materials. The Secretary has delegated to the Administrator of the FMCSA authority and responsibility for highway routing of hazardous materials. See 49 CFR 1.73(d)(2). The standards required by 49 U.S.C. 5112(b) for establishing highway E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1 erowe on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES 51336 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 2, 2008 / Notices routing requirements for nonradioactive hazardous materials are set forth in 49 CFR part 397, subpart C, and apply to any designations established or modified on or after November 14, 1994. See 49 CFR 397.69(a). A State or Indian tribe must follow FMCSA standards when establishing highway routing requirements for hazardous materials. See 49 CFR 397.71 (Federal standards for routing of nonradioactive hazardous materials (NRHM)). Except as provided in §§ 397.75 (dispute resolution) and 397.219 (waiver), a NHRM route designation made in violation of § 397.69(a) is preempted pursuant to section 105(b)(4) of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, as amended, 49 U.S.C. 5125(c), 49 CFR 397.69(b). MassHighway submits that the Boston regulation on routing of hazardous materials has been in place since 1980. Subsequent construction on the Central Artery and Third Harbor Tunnel Project (often referred to as the ‘‘Big Dig’’) impacted the routes used by transporters of hazardous materials in Boston. After September 11, 2001, Boston changed its policy on issuing permits necessary for transportation of hazardous materials through Boston. Boston officials take the position that Boston’s regulation is grandfathered under 49 U.S.C. 5125(c)(2)(A) and (B) and that minor routing changes have not impacted the fact that the regulation is not subject to preemption under 49 CFR 397.69. Boston also argues that its increased enforcement and policy on issuing permits falls squarely within its permitting authority. MassHighway acknowledges that the regulated community argues that the policy changes are a de facto change in routing restrictions and hazmat carriers denied permits must now pass through multiple communities surrounding Boston, increasing and transferring risk to other communities and depriving the public of involvement in the routing process. MassHighway requests that FMCSA review the facts, analysis, and exhibits presented in its application, including the above-described circumstances, prior DOT Inconsistency and Consistency Determinations, and a 1981 Federal District Court decision, to determine whether the Boston regulation and current enforcement scheme remain grandfathered under Federal law. American Trucking Associations, Inc. et al. v. city of Boston et al. (D. Mass. filed April 6, 1981) (Copy of unpublished opinion provided in MassHighway application.) On May 30, 2008, ATA filed an Application for Preemption Determination on the City of Boston’s VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:40 Aug 29, 2008 Jkt 214001 routing and transportation restrictions applicable to certain hazardous materials. Notice of this application and request for comments was published in the Federal Register on August 8, 2008. See 73 FR 46349 (August 8, 2008). The ATA application and Federal Register notice may be found at https:// www.regulations.gov under nonrulemaking docket no. FMCSA–2008– 0204. ATA alleges that Boston, in the course of the construction of the Central Artery Tunnel, changed designated hazardous materials routes through Boston and, in doing so, failed to comply with the requirements of § 397.71. ATA requested that the FMCSA Administrator make a determination on whether the highway routing designations established by Boston are preempted pursuant to § 397.69(b). FMCSA received the MassHighway application on or about July 25, 2008. MassHighway addresses the same central issue as that raised in the ATA application, e.g., whether the Boston hazardous materials routing designations are subject to the preemption provisions of § 397.69. In order to avoid duplication and address the issues raised in these applications in a thorough and complete manner, FMCSA is consolidating the MassHighway application for a preemption determination with that of the ATA. Copies of the MassHighway application for preemption and the ATA application for preemption determination are available for review in the consolidated docket for this notice. You may view or obtain a copy of the applications online by visiting https://www.regulations.gov and going to the docket number for this matter (FMCSA–2008–0204). Public Comments FMCSA seeks comments on (1) whether Boston’s highway routing designations were established or modified prior to November 14, 1994, exempting them from the preemption provisions of 49 CFR 397.69 and/or (2) whether Boston’s highway routing designations are subject to the preemption provisions of 397.69. Comments should specifically address the preemption standard established under 49 CFR 397.69 and 49 U.S.C. 5125(c). Issued on: August 26, 2008. David Hugel, Deputy Administrator. [FR Doc. E8–20222 Filed 8–29–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA–99–6156, FMCSA–00– 7006, FMCSA–00–7165, FMCSA–02–12294] Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of renewal of exemptions; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to renew the exemptions from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for 34 individuals. FMCSA has statutory authority to exempt individuals from the vision requirement if the exemptions granted will not compromise safety. The Agency has concluded that granting these exemption renewals will provide a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety maintained without the exemptions for these commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers. This decision is effective September 21, 2008. Comments must be received on or before October 2, 2008. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Docket ID FMCSA–99– 6156, FMCSA–00–7006, FMCSA–00– 7165, FMCSA–02–12294, using any of the following methods. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001. • Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. • Fax: 1–202–493–2251. Each submission must include the Agency name and the docket number for this Notice. Note that DOT posts all comments received without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act heading below. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments, go to https:// www.regulations.gov at any time or DATES: E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 2, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51335-51336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2008-0204]


Application by the Massachusetts Department of Highways for a 
Preemption Determination on the City of Boston's Hazardous Materials 
Routing Designation

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of application for preemption determination, 
consolidation with the American Trucking Associations, Inc. (ATA) 
application for preemption determination, and extension of time to 
submit comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA provides notice and invites interested parties to submit 
comments on an application by the Massachusetts Department of Highways 
(MassHighway) for an administrative determination on whether Federal 
law preempts highway routing designations issued by the City of Boston 
(Boston) regarding the transportation of hazardous materials. 
MassHighway seeks a preemption determination to resolve whether 
Boston's regulatory scheme on hazardous materials transportation in 
Boston remains consistent with Federal law in light of the history of 
the Boston regulation, changes that have occurred since the 
regulation's inception in 1980, and policy changes in issuing permits 
under the regulation. The MassHighway application, filed on July 25, 
2008, encompasses the issues raised by ATA in its application for 
preemption determination filed on May 30, 2008. Accordingly, the 
MassHighway application will be consolidated with the ATA application 
in Docket No. FMCSA-1008-0204 and the time period for submitting 
comments is extended by this notice.

DATES: Comments received by October 17, 2008 and rebuttal comments 
received by December 1, 2008 will be considered before an 
administrative ruling is issued. Rebuttal comments may discuss only 
those issues raised by comments received during the initial comment 
period and may not discuss new issues.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket 
Management System Number FMCSA-2008-0204 by any of the following 
methods:
    Web Site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for 
submitting comments on the Federal electronic docket site.
    Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Mail to: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 
DC 20590.
    Courier or Hand Delivery: Ground Floor, Room W12-140, DOT Building, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. 
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and 
docket number. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and 
additional information, see the Public Participation and Supplementary 
Information headings below. Note that all comments received will be 
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any 
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading 
below.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov at any time or to 
the ground floor, Room W12-140, DOT Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, 
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all 
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual 
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf 
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's 
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on 
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19476) or you may visit https://
www.regulations.gov.
    Public participation: The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is 
generally available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. You can get 
electronic submission and retrieval help and guidelines under the 
``help'' section of the https://www.regulations.gov Web site and also at 
the DOT's https://docketsinfo.dot.gov Web site. If you want confirmation 
of receipt of your comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped 
envelope or postcard or print the acknowledgement page that appears 
after submitting comments online.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James O. Simmons, Chief, Hazardous 
Materials Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or at 
james.simmons@dot.gov (e-mail).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A copy of each comment must be sent to 
Monica E. Conyngham, Chief Counsel, MassHighway, 10 Park Plaza, Boston, 
MA 02116-3969 and Richard Moskowitz, Vice President and Regulatory 
Affairs Counsel, American Trucking Associations, 950 North Glebe Road, 
Arlington, VA 22203. You are required to include with your comments a 
certification that you provided a copy of your comments to MassHighway 
and ATA. (The following format is suggested: ``I certify copies of this 
comment were sent to Ms. Conyngham, MassHighway, and Mr. Moskowitz, 
ATA, at the address specified in the Federal Register.'')

Background

    Title 49 U.S.C. 5125 includes several preemption provisions. 
Section 5125(c)(1) allows a State or Indian tribe to establish, 
maintain, or enforce a highway routing designation over which hazardous 
material may or may not be transported by motor vehicles, or a 
limitation or requirement related to highway routing, only if the 
designation, limitation, or requirement complies with 49 U.S.C. 
5112(b).
    Section 5112(b) requires the Secretary of Transportation (the 
Secretary), in consultation with the States, to prescribe by regulation 
standards for the States and Indian tribes to follow when designating 
specific highway routes for transportation of hazardous materials. The 
Secretary has delegated to the Administrator of the FMCSA authority and 
responsibility for highway routing of hazardous materials. See 49 CFR 
1.73(d)(2). The standards required by 49 U.S.C. 5112(b) for 
establishing highway

[[Page 51336]]

routing requirements for non-radioactive hazardous materials are set 
forth in 49 CFR part 397, subpart C, and apply to any designations 
established or modified on or after November 14, 1994. See 49 CFR 
397.69(a). A State or Indian tribe must follow FMCSA standards when 
establishing highway routing requirements for hazardous materials. See 
49 CFR 397.71 (Federal standards for routing of nonradioactive 
hazardous materials (NRHM)). Except as provided in Sec. Sec.  397.75 
(dispute resolution) and 397.219 (waiver), a NHRM route designation 
made in violation of Sec.  397.69(a) is preempted pursuant to section 
105(b)(4) of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, as amended, 49 
U.S.C. 5125(c), 49 CFR 397.69(b).
    MassHighway submits that the Boston regulation on routing of 
hazardous materials has been in place since 1980. Subsequent 
construction on the Central Artery and Third Harbor Tunnel Project 
(often referred to as the ``Big Dig'') impacted the routes used by 
transporters of hazardous materials in Boston. After September 11, 
2001, Boston changed its policy on issuing permits necessary for 
transportation of hazardous materials through Boston. Boston officials 
take the position that Boston's regulation is grandfathered under 49 
U.S.C. 5125(c)(2)(A) and (B) and that minor routing changes have not 
impacted the fact that the regulation is not subject to preemption 
under 49 CFR 397.69. Boston also argues that its increased enforcement 
and policy on issuing permits falls squarely within its permitting 
authority. MassHighway acknowledges that the regulated community argues 
that the policy changes are a de facto change in routing restrictions 
and hazmat carriers denied permits must now pass through multiple 
communities surrounding Boston, increasing and transferring risk to 
other communities and depriving the public of involvement in the 
routing process. MassHighway requests that FMCSA review the facts, 
analysis, and exhibits presented in its application, including the 
above-described circumstances, prior DOT Inconsistency and Consistency 
Determinations, and a 1981 Federal District Court decision, to 
determine whether the Boston regulation and current enforcement scheme 
remain grandfathered under Federal law. American Trucking Associations, 
Inc. et al. v. city of Boston et al. (D. Mass. filed April 6, 1981) 
(Copy of unpublished opinion provided in MassHighway application.)
    On May 30, 2008, ATA filed an Application for Preemption 
Determination on the City of Boston's routing and transportation 
restrictions applicable to certain hazardous materials. Notice of this 
application and request for comments was published in the Federal 
Register on August 8, 2008. See 73 FR 46349 (August 8, 2008). The ATA 
application and Federal Register notice may be found at https://
www.regulations.gov under non-rulemaking docket no. FMCSA-2008-0204. 
ATA alleges that Boston, in the course of the construction of the 
Central Artery Tunnel, changed designated hazardous materials routes 
through Boston and, in doing so, failed to comply with the requirements 
of Sec.  397.71. ATA requested that the FMCSA Administrator make a 
determination on whether the highway routing designations established 
by Boston are preempted pursuant to Sec.  397.69(b).
    FMCSA received the MassHighway application on or about July 25, 
2008. MassHighway addresses the same central issue as that raised in 
the ATA application, e.g., whether the Boston hazardous materials 
routing designations are subject to the preemption provisions of Sec.  
397.69. In order to avoid duplication and address the issues raised in 
these applications in a thorough and complete manner, FMCSA is 
consolidating the MassHighway application for a preemption 
determination with that of the ATA. Copies of the MassHighway 
application for preemption and the ATA application for preemption 
determination are available for review in the consolidated docket for 
this notice. You may view or obtain a copy of the applications online 
by visiting https://www.regulations.gov and going to the docket number 
for this matter (FMCSA-2008-0204).

Public Comments

    FMCSA seeks comments on (1) whether Boston's highway routing 
designations were established or modified prior to November 14, 1994, 
exempting them from the preemption provisions of 49 CFR 397.69 and/or 
(2) whether Boston's highway routing designations are subject to the 
preemption provisions of 397.69. Comments should specifically address 
the preemption standard established under 49 CFR 397.69 and 49 U.S.C. 
5125(c).

    Issued on: August 26, 2008.
David Hugel,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8-20222 Filed 8-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.