Virginia Regulatory Program, 50915-50924 [E8-20175]
Download as PDF
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(1) Department agencies shall issue an
Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM) soliciting public
input on relevant studies and scientific
information, data regarding the
frequency, intensity, duration and other
parameters of worker exposure in the
affected industries, occupations and
activities, key default factors and
assumptions, and other relevant
information related to the development
of a health standard regulating
occupational exposure to a particular
toxic substance or hazardous chemical
prior to issuing a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) or other regulatory
action in that health rulemaking, except
when promulgating an emergency
temporary standard under section 6(c)
of the OSH Act, 29 U.S.C. 655(c) (2000)
or section 101(b)(1) of the Mine Act, 30
U.S.C. 811(b)(1) (2000).
(2) In its risk assessments, the
Department’s agencies shall identify and
discuss key issues including, but not
limited to, the reliability of data,
significant uncertainties, choice of
assumptions and default factors, and
shall address all related comments from
the public and peer reviewers in the
subsequent Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) and Final Rule.
(3) Risk assessments shall utilize the
best available evidence, and the latest
available scientific data in the field,
including industry-by-industry evidence
relating to working life exposures.
(4) Department risk assessments shall
include and identify the following four
components:
(i) Hazard identification. The hazard
identification step examines whether a
substance or chemical is a health
hazard;
(ii) Dose-response assessment. The
dose response assessment step examines
the relationship between exposure to a
hazardous substance and an adverse
health outcome;
(iii) Exposure assessment. The
exposure assessment step estimates
exposure to the hazardous substance in
the workplace;
(iv) Risk characterization. The risk
characterization step provides estimates
of risk to workers from occupational
exposure scenarios of interest. The risk
characterization also summarizes the
key findings and discusses the
limitations of the data, the choice of
assumptions, the inherent uncertainties
associated with the estimates of risk,
limitations of the database, and how
these factors impact the risk assessment.
(5) Information quality and peer
review. Risk assessments shall be
performed in accordance with Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB) and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
the Department’s information quality
and peer review guidelines.
(d) Public access to rulemaking
information.
(1) The Department shall post together
in an easily accessible and well
organized format on https://
www.regulations.gov, all relevant
documents related to any rulemaking
addressing occupational exposure to
toxic substances and hazardous
chemicals no later than fourteen days
after the conclusion of the relevant step
in the rulemaking process, including but
not limited to publication of the
ANPRM, conclusion of the Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Act
(SBREFA) process, publication of the
NPRM, conclusion of any public hearing
and the publication of the Final Rule.
(2) The documents posted shall
include but are not limited to any
underlying scientific studies relied
upon in the rulemaking, to the extent
possible given copyright limitations; all
risk assessment analyses underlying the
NPRM and Final Rule; the text of the
ANPRM; SBREFA process documents;
the text of the NPRM; all public hearing
transcripts and briefs; all public
comments; the final docket of the
rulemaking; and the text of the Final
Rule.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of
August 2008.
Leon R. Sequeira,
Assistant Secretary for Policy.
[FR Doc. E8–20179 Filed 8–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 946
[VA–126–FOR; Docket ID OSM–2008–0012]
Virginia Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of
a proposed amendment to the Virginia
regulatory program under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). The
amendment revises the Virginia Coal
Surface Mining Reclamation
Regulations pertaining to ownership
and control, valid existing rights, selfbonding, and availability of records.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50915
Virginia intends to revise its program to
be consistent with the corresponding
Federal regulations and SMCRA and is
responding, in part, to 30 CFR Part 732
letters.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Virginia program and
this submittal are available for your
inspection, the comment period during
which you may submit written
comments, and the procedures that we
will follow for the public hearing, if one
is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments until 4 p.m., local time,
September 29, 2008. If requested, we
will hold a public hearing on September
23, 2008. We will accept requests to
speak until 4 p.m., e.s.t., on September
15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘VA–126–FOR/OSM–
2008–0012’’ by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: ebandy@osmre.gov.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Earl Bandy,
Knoxville Field Office, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
710 Locust Street, 2nd Floor, Knoxville,
Tennessee 37902, Telephone: (865) 545–
4103.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The proposed rule
has been assigned Docket ID OSM–
2008–0012. If you would like to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and do the
following. Click on the ‘‘Advanced
Docket Search’’ button on the right side
of the screen. Type in the Docket ID
OSM–2008–0012 and click the
‘‘Submit’’ button at the bottom of the
page. The next screen will display the
Docket Search Results for the
rulemaking. If you click on OSM–2008–
0012, you can view the proposed rule
and submit a comment. You can also
view supporting material and any
comments submitted by others.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency docket number
‘‘OSM–2008–0012/VA–126–FOR’’ for
this rulemaking. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Public
Comment Procedures’’ section in this
document. You may also request to
speak at a public hearing by any of the
methods listed above or by contacting
the individual listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the
Virginia program, this submission, a
listing of any scheduled public hearings,
and all written comments received in
response to this document at OSM’s
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
50916
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Knoxville Field Office at the address
listed above during normal business
hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the submission by
contacting OSM’s Knoxville Field
Office. In addition, you may receive a
copy of the submission during regular
business hours at the following location:
Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals,
and Energy, 3405 Mountain Empire
Road, Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219,
Telephone: (276) 523–8100, E-Mail:
lsv@mme.state.va.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Earl
Bandy, Telephone: (865) 545–4103.
Internet: ebandy@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Virginia Program
II. Description of the Submission
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
I. Background on the Virginia Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act* * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Virginia
program on December 15, 1981. You can
find background information on the
Virginia program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval
of the Virginia program in the December
15, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR
61088). You can also find later actions
concerning Virginia’s program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 946.12,
946.13, and 946.15.
II. Description of the Submission
By letter dated June 11, 2008, the
Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals,
and Energy (DMME) sent us an informal
proposed amendment to its program for
a pre-submission review (VA–126–INF).
We reviewed the pre-submission and
responded to DMME, with comments,
via electronic mail on July 2, 2008. By
letter dated July 17, 2008, DMME
formally submitted the proposed
amendments to its program
(Administrative Record No. VA–1089.)
The full text of the program amendment
is available for you to read at the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
location listed above under
‘‘ADDRESSES.’’ DMME proposes the
following changes:
1. 4VAC25–130–700.5. Definitions
The corresponding Federal
regulations for this section are 30 CFR
701.5, 761.5 and 880.5.
DMME proposes to either add, delete
or modify the following definitions:
‘‘Applicant Violator System’’ or
‘‘AVS’’ means an automated information
system of applicant, permittee, operator,
violation and related data the Federal
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement (OSM) maintains and
the division utilizes in the permit
review process.
‘‘Control’’ or ‘‘controller’’, when used
in Parts 4VAC25–130–773, 4VAC25–
130–774, and 4VAC25–130–778 of this
chapter, refers to or means (a) A
permittee of a surface coal mining
operation; (b) An operator of a surface
coal mining operation; or (c) Any person
who has the ability to determine the
manner in which a surface coal mining
operation is conducted.
‘‘Indemnity agreement’’ means an
agreement between two persons in
which one person agrees to pay the
other person for a loss or damage. The
persons involved can be individual
people, or groups of people, or legal
organizations, such as partnerships,
corporations or government agencies, or
any combination of these. The
agreement shall, at a minimum:
(a) Contain the date of execution.
(b) Be payable to the ‘‘Treasurer of
Virginia.’’
(c) Be immediately due and payable
in the event of bond forfeiture of the
permit.
(d) Be payable in a sum certain of
money.
(e) Be signed by the makers.
‘‘Knowing’’ or ‘‘knowingly’’, which
means that a person who authorized,
ordered, or carried out an act or
omission knew or had reason to know
that the act or omission would result in
either a violation or a failure to abate or
correct a violation.
‘‘Own’’, ‘‘owner’’, or ‘‘ownership’’, as
used in Parts 4VAC25–130–773,
4VAC25–130–774, and 4VAC25–130–
778 of this chapter (except when used
in the context of ownership of real
property), means being a sole proprietor
or owning of record in excess of 50
percent of the voting securities or other
instruments of ownership of an entity.
‘‘Self-bond,’’ as provided by Part 801
of this chapter, means:
(a) For an underground mining
operation, an indemnity agreement in a
sum certain payable on demand to the
Treasurer of Virginia, executed by the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
applicant and by each individual and
business organization capable of
influencing or controlling the
investment or financial practices of the
applicant by virtue of this authority as
an officer or ownership of all or a
significant part of the applicant, and
supported by a certification that the
applicant participating in the Pool Bond
Fund has a net worth, total assets minus
total liabilities equivalent to $1 million.
Such certification shall be by an
independent certified public accountant
in the form of an unqualified opinion.
This definition in the Virginia
regulation is being amended to delete
the reference to ‘‘cognovit note’’ and
replace such with ‘‘indemnity
agreement’’, as the approved bonding
instrument under 4VAC25–130–801.13,
as being amended.
The DMME is proposing to delete ‘‘in
ownership or other effective control
over the right to conduct surface coal
mining operations under a permit
issued by the division’’ and add ‘‘of a
permittee’’ after ‘‘change.’’ As proposed,
the definition will read as follows:
‘‘Transfer, assignment, or sale of
permit rights’’ means a change of a
permittee.
The DMME is proposing to add the
following definition of ‘‘Valid Existing
Rights’’ (VER) and delete from
subsection (a) ‘‘for haulroads, that a
person possesses a valid existing right
for an area protected under of the Act
on August 3, 1977, if the application of
any of the prohibitions contained in that
section to the property interest that
existed on that date would effect a
taking of the person’s property which
would entitle the person to
compensation under the Fifth and
Fourteenth Amendments to the United
States Constitution;’’ and add ‘‘§ 45.1–
252 D’’; the DMME is proposing to add
‘‘For haulroads,’’ at the beginning of
subsection c; at subsection (c) (2), ‘‘Was
under a properly’’ is added at the
beginning sentence and ‘‘A’’ is deleted;
‘‘or’’ is added after ‘‘way’’; the DMME is
proposing to add subsection 3 ‘‘Was
used or contained in a valid permit that
existed when the land came under the
protection of § 45.1–252D or § 4 VAC
25–130–761.11.’’ Subsection (c) is
deleted entirely and subsection (e) is
renamed subsection (d). In subsection
(d), ‘‘That an’’ is added to the beginning
of the sentence; ‘‘(s) that are’’ is added
after ‘‘document’’; ‘‘the’’ is deleted after
‘‘establish’’ and ‘‘valid existing’’ is
added before ‘‘rights’’; ‘‘to which the
standard of paragraphs (a) and (d) of this
definition applies’’ is deleted after
‘‘rights’’. As proposed, the definition
will read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
‘‘Valid existing rights’’ means a set of
circumstances under which a person
may, subject to division approval,
conduct surface coal mining operations
on lands where § 45.1–252 D of the Act
and § 4VAC25–130–761.11 of the
regulations would otherwise prohibit
such operations. The possession of valid
existing rights only confers an exception
from the prohibitions of § 45.1–252 D
and § 4VAC25–130–761.11. A person
seeking to exercise valid existing rights
would need:
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(c) of this definition, a demonstration of
the legally binding conveyance, lease,
deed, contract, or other document
which vests the person, or predecessor
in interest, with the right to conduct the
type of surface coal mining operations
intended. The right must exist at the
time the land came under the protection
of § 4VAC25–130–761.11 and § 45.1–
252 D;
(b) A demonstration of compliance
with one of the following—
(1) That all permits and other
authorizations required to conduct
surface coal mining operations had been
obtained, or a good faith attempt to
obtain all necessary permits and
authorizations had been made, before
the land came under the protection of
§ 45.1–252 D or § 4VAC25–130–761.11.
(2) That the land needed for and
immediately adjacent to a surface coal
mining operation for which all permits
and other authorizations required to
conduct surface coal mining operations
had been obtained, or a good faith
attempt made to obtain such permits
and authorizations occurred before the
land came under the protection of
§ 45.1–252 D or § 4VAC25–130–761.11.
The person must demonstrate that
prohibiting the expansion of the
operation onto that land would unfairly
impact the viability of the operation as
originally planned before the land came
under the protection of § 45.1–252 D or
§ 4VAC25–130–761.11. Except for
operations in existence before August 3,
1977, or for which a good faith effort to
obtain all necessary permits had been
made before August 3, 1977, this
standard does not apply to lands already
under the protection of § 45.1–252 D or
§ 4VAC25–130–761.11 when the
division approved the permit for the
original operation or when the good
faith effort to obtain all necessary
permits for the original operation was
made. In evaluating whether a person
meets this standard, the division may
consider—
(i) The extent to which coal supply
contracts or other legal and business
commitments that occurred before the
land came under the protection of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
§§ 45.1–252 D or § 4VAC25–130–761.11
depend upon the use of the land for
surface coal mining operations.
(ii) The extent to which plans used to
obtain financing for the operation before
the land came under the protection of
§ 45.1–252 D or § 4VAC25–130–761.11
relied upon use of that land for surface
coal mining operations.
(iii) The extent to which investments
in the operation made before the land
came under the protection of § 45.1–252
D or § 4VAC25–130–761.11 relied upon
the use of that land for surface coal
mining operations.
(iv) Whether the land lies within the
area identified on the life-of-mine map
under § 4VAC25–130–779.24(c) that was
submitted before the land came under
the protection of § 45.1–252 D or
§ 4VAC25–130–761.11.
(c) For haulroads, a person who
claims valid existing rights to use or
construct a road across the surface of
lands protected by § 45.1–252 D or
§ 4VAC25–130–761.11 must
demonstrate that one or more of the
following circumstances exist, the
road—
(1) Existed when the land upon which
it is located came under the protection
of § 45.1–252 D or § 4VAC25–130–
761.11, and the person has the legal
right to use the road for surface coal
mining operations.
(2) Was under a properly recorded
right of way or easement for a road in
that location at the time the land came
under the protection of § 45.1–252 D or
§ 4VAC25–130–761.11, and under the
document creating the right of way or
easement, and under subsequent
conveyances, the person has a legal
right to use or construct a road across
the right of way or easement for surface
coal mining operations.
(3) Was used or contained in a valid
permit that existed when the land came
under the protection of § 45.1–252 D or
§ 4VAC25–130–761.11.
(d) That an interpretation of the terms
of the document(s) that are relied upon
to establish valid existing rights shall be
based either upon applicable Virginia
statutory or case law concerning
interpretation of documents conveying
mineral rights or, where no applicable
state law exists, upon the usage and
custom at the time and place it came
into existence. This amendment would
apply to permit applications submitted
on and after the date the amendment is
approved by the Secretary of Interior
and becomes effective upon
promulgation pursuant to the Federal
and Virginia Administrative Process
Acts.
The DMME is proposing to add the
following definition:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50917
‘‘Violation’’, when used in the context
of the permit application information or
permit eligibility requirements of
§§ 45.1–235 and 45.1–238(C) of the Act
and related regulations, means:
(1) A failure to comply with an
applicable provision of a Virginia,
Federal, or other State law or regulation
pertaining to air or water environmental
protection, as evidenced by a written
notification from a governmental entity
to the responsible person; or
(2) A noncompliance for which the
division has provided one or more of
the following types of notice or OSM or
a State regulatory authority has
provided equivalent notice under
corresponding provisions of a Federal or
State regulatory program—
(i) A notice of violation under
§ 4VAC–25–130–843.12.
(ii) A cessation order under § 4VAC–
25–130–843.11.
(iii) A final order, bill, or demand
letter pertaining to a delinquent civil
penalty assessed under Part 4VAC–25–
130–845 or 4VAC–25–130–846.
(iv) A bill or demand letter pertaining
to delinquent reclamation fees owed
under 30 CFR Part 870.
(v) A notice of bond forfeiture under
§ 4VAC–25–130–800.50 when—
(A) One or more violations upon
which the forfeiture was based have not
been abated or corrected;
(B) The amount forfeited and
collected is insufficient for full
reclamation under § 4VAC–25–130–
800.50 or § 4VAC–25–130–801.19, the
division orders reimbursement for
additional reclamation costs, and the
person has not complied with the
reimbursement order.
The DMME is proposing to add the
following definition:
‘‘Violation, failure or refusal’’, for
purposes of Part 4VAC25–130–846,
means:
(1) A failure to comply with a
condition of an issued permit or the
regulations implementing those
sections; or
(2) A failure or refusal to comply with
any order issued under Part 4VAC25–
130–843, or any order incorporated in a
final decision issued by the Director,
except an order incorporated in a
decision issued under § 45.1–246 of the
Act.
The DMME is proposing to add ‘‘or
regulation’’ after ‘‘law’’ in the definition
of Violation notice. As proposed, it will
read as follows:
‘‘Violation notice’’ means any written
notification from a governmental entity
of a violation of law or regulation,
whether by letter, memorandum, legal
or administrative pleading, or other
written communication.
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
50918
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
The DMME proposes to add the
definition of ‘‘Willful or Willfully.’’ As
proposed, it will read as follows:
‘‘Willful’’ or ‘‘Willfully’’ means that a
person who authorized, ordered or
carried out an act or omission that
resulted in either a violation or the
failure to abate or correct a violation
acted:
(1) Intentionally, voluntarily, or
consciously; and
(2) With intentional disregard or plain
indifference to legal requirements.
The DMME is proposing to delete the
following definitions:
‘‘Cognovit note’’ means an
extraordinary note which authorizes an
attorney to confess judgment against the
person or persons signing it. It is written
authority of a debtor and a direction by
him for entry of a judgment against him
if the obligation set forth in the note is
not paid when due. Such judgment may
be taken by any person holding the note,
which cuts off every defense which
makers of the note may otherwise have
and it likewise cuts off all rights of
appeal from any judgment taken on it.
The note shall, at a minimum:
(a) Contain the date of execution.
(b) Be payable to the ‘‘Treasurer of
Virginia.’’
(c) Be due and payable in the event of
bond forfeiture of the permit.
(d) Be payable in a sum certain of
money.
(e) Be signed by the makers.
This definition in the Virginia
regulations is being deleted, as the
indemnity agreement will be the
bonding instrument utilized under
4VAC25–130–801.13 (as being
amended).
‘‘Owned or controlled’’ and ‘‘owns or
controls’’ mean any one or a
combination of the relationships
specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this definition:
(a)(i) Being a permittee of a surface
coal mining operation; (ii) based on
instrument of ownership or voting
securities, owning of record in excess of
50% of an entity; or (iii) having any
other relationship which gives one
person authority directly or indirectly to
determine the manner in which an
applicant, an operator, or other entity
conducts surface coal mining
operations.
(b) The following relationships are
presumed to constitute ownership or
control unless a person can demonstrate
that the person subject to the
presumption does not in fact have the
authority directly or indirectly to
determine the manner in which the
relevant surface coal mining operation
is conducted:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
(1) Being an officer or director of an
entity;
(2) Being the operator of a surface coal
mining operation;
(3) Having the ability to commit the
financial or real property assets or
working resources of an entity;
(4) Being a general partner in a
partnership;
(5) Based on the instruments of
ownership or the voting securities of a
corporate entity, owning of record 10
through 50% of the entity; or
(6) Owning or controlling coal to be
mined by another person under a lease,
sublease or other contract and having
the right to receive such coal after
mining or having authority to determine
the manner in which that person or
another person conducts a surface coal
mining operation.
2. 4VAC25–130–773.13. Public
Participation in Permit Processing
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 773.6. The
DMME proposes to add ‘‘or the last
publication date of the newspaper
notice required by Paragraph (a) of this
section, whichever is later’’ after
‘‘notification’’. As proposed, it reads as
follows:
(b) Comments and objections on
permit application.
(1) Within 30 days after notification or
the last publication date of the
newspaper notice required by Paragraph
(a) of this section, whichever is later,
written comments or objections on an
application for a permit, significant
revision to a permit under 4VAC25–
130–774.13, or renewal of a permit
under 4VAC25–130–774.15, may be
submitted to the division by public
entities notified under Paragraph (a)(3)
of this section with respect to the effects
of the proposed mining operations on
the environment within their areas of
responsibility.
This change in the Virginia regulation
will allow public entities to have the
same period of time to review and
comment on the application as afforded
the public.
3. 4VAC25–130–773.15. Review of
Permit Applications
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 773.7.
The DMME proposes to delete from
(a)(1) ‘‘, unless a later time is necessary
to provide an opportunity for a hearing
under subdivision (b)(2) of this section.’’
The DMME proposes to add to (a)
subdivisions (3) and (4) which state:
(3) The division shall review the
information submitted under
§§ 4VAC25–130–778.13 and 4VAC25–
130–778.14 regarding the applicant’s
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and/or operator’s permit histories,
business structure, and ownership and
control relationships.
(4) If the applicant or operator does
not have any previous mining
experience, the division may conduct
additional reviews to determine if
someone else with surface coal mining
experience controls or will control the
mining operation.
The DMME proposes to delete from
subdivision (b)(1) ‘‘by any person who
owns or controls the applicant’’ after
‘‘operator’’; proposes to add ‘‘; or if a
surface coal mining and reclamation
operation indirectly owned or
controlled by the applicant or operator
has an unabated or uncorrected
violation and the applicant’s or
operator’s control was established or the
violation was cited after November 2,
1988.’’ after ‘‘subdivision’’; proposes to
delete subsection (b)(4)(i)(C)(1) entirely
and join (2) to the end of the sentence
at (C). This change is to reflect the
deletion of the last sentence of Section
510(e) of the Surface Mining Control
and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C.
1260(e)) per the ‘‘Tax Relief and Health
Care Act of 2006.’’ As proposed, this
section will read as follows:
(a) General.
(1) The division shall review the
application for a permit, revision, or
renewal; written comments and
objections submitted; information from
the AVS; and records of any informal
conference or hearing held on the
application and issue a written decision,
within a reasonable time, either
granting, requiring modification of, or
denying the application. If an informal
conference is held under 4VAC25–130–
773.13(c), the decision shall be made
within 60 days of the close of the
conference.
(2) The applicant for a permit or
revision of a permit shall have the
burden of establishing that the
application is in compliance with all the
requirements of the regulatory program.
(3) The division shall review the
information submitted under
§§ 4VAC25–130–778.13 and 4VAC25–
130–778.14 regarding the applicant’s
and/or operator’s permit histories,
business structure, and ownership and
control relationships.
(4) If the applicant or operator does
not have any previous mining
experience, the division may conduct
additional reviews to determine if
someone else with surface coal mining
experience controls or will control the
mining operation.
(b) Review of violations.
(1) Based on available information
concerning Federal and state failure-toabate cessation orders, unabated Federal
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
and state imminent harm cessation
orders, delinquent civil penalties issued
pursuant to § 518 of the Federal Act and
§ 45.1–246 of the Code of Virginia, bond
forfeitures where violations upon which
the forfeitures were based have not been
corrected, delinquent abandoned mine
reclamation fees, and unabated
violations of Federal and state laws,
rules, and regulations pertaining to air
or water environmental protection
incurred in connection with any surface
coal mining operation, the division shall
not issue the permit if any surface coal
mining and reclamation operation
directly owned or controlled by either
the applicant or operator is currently in
violation of the Federal Act, this
chapter, or any other law, rule or
regulation referred to in this
subdivision; or if a surface coal mining
and reclamation operation indirectly
owned or controlled by the applicant or
operator has an unabated or uncorrected
violation and the applicant’s or
operator’s control was established or the
violation was cited after November 2,
1988. In the absence of a failure-to-abate
cessation order, the division may
presume that a notice of violation issued
pursuant to 4VAC25–130–843.12 or
under a Federal or state program has
been or is being corrected to the
satisfaction of the agency with
jurisdiction over the violation, except
where evidence to the contrary is set
forth in the permit application or the
AVS; or where the notice of violation is
issued for nonpayment of abandoned
mine reclamation fees or civil penalties.
If a current violation exists, the division
shall require the applicant or operator
before the issuance of the permit, to
either:
(i) Submit to the division proof that
the current violation has been or is in
the process of being corrected to the
satisfaction of the agency that has
jurisdiction over the violation; or
(ii) Establish for the division that the
applicant or operator or any person who
owns or controls the applicant, has filed
and is presently pursuing, in good faith,
a direct administrative or judicial
appeal to contest the validity of the
current violation. If the initial judicial
review authority under 4VAC25–130–
775.13 affirms the violation, then the
applicant shall within 30 days of the
judicial action submit the proof required
under subdivision (b)(1)(i) of this
section.
(2) Any permit that is issued on the
basis of proof submitted under
subdivision (b)(1)(i) of this section that
a violation is in the process of being
corrected, or pending the outcome of an
appeal described in subdivision
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
(b)(1)(ii) of this section, shall be
conditionally issued.
(3) If the division makes a finding that
the applicant or the operator specified
in the application, controls or has
controlled surface coal mining and
reclamation operations with a
demonstrated pattern of willful
violations of the Act of such nature and
duration, and with resulting irreparable
damage to the environment as to
indicate an intent not to comply with
the Act, no permit shall be issued.
Before such a finding becomes final, the
applicant or operator shall be afforded
an opportunity for an adjudicatory
hearing on the determination as
provided for in 4VAC25–130–775.11.
(4)(i) Subsequent to October 24, 1992,
the prohibitions of subsection (b) of this
section regarding the issuance of a new
permit shall not apply to any violation
that:
(A) Occurs after that date;
(B) Is unabated; and
(C) Results from an unanticipated
event or condition that arises from a
surface coal mining and reclamation
operation on lands that are eligible for
remining under a permit held by the
person making application for the new
permit.
4. 4VAC25–130–773.20(c)(3).
Improvidently Issued Permits; General
Procedures
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 773.21.
The DMME proposes to amend
subsection (c)(3) by deleting ‘‘Suspend
the permit until’’ and delete (c)(4)
entirely. As amended, it will read as
follows:
(3) Serve the permittee with a
preliminary finding that shall be based
on evidence sufficient to establish a
prima facie case that the permit was
improvidently issued. The finding shall
inform the permittee that the permit
may be suspended or rescinded under
4VAC25–130–773.21, if the violation is
not abated or the penalty or fee is not
paid.
5. 4VAC25–130–773.21. Improvidently
Issued Permits; Rescission Procedures
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 773.23.
The DMME proposes to add ‘‘service
of the notice of’’ after ‘‘After’’ and ‘‘as
set forth in the notice’’ after ‘‘permit’’ in
subsection (b). A new subsection (c) is
added; subsection (e) is renamed to (d)
and ‘‘or person aggrieved by the
division’s notice or decision’’ is added
after ‘‘permittee’’; ‘‘§ 4 VAC 25–130–
775.11 of this chapter and’’ is added
after ‘‘under’’. As amended, it will read
as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50919
If the division, under 4VAC25–130–
773.20(c)(3 4), elects to suspend or
rescind an improvidently issued permit,
it shall serve on the permittee a notice
of proposed suspension and rescission
which includes the reasons for the
finding of the division under 4VAC25–
130–773.20(b) and states that:
(a) Automatic suspension and
rescission. After a specified period of
time not to exceed 90 days the permit
automatically will become suspended,
and not to exceed 90 days thereafter
rescinded, unless within those periods
the permittee submits proof, and the
division finds, that:
(1) The finding of the division under
4VAC25–130–773.20(b) was erroneous;
(2) The permittee or other person
responsible has abated the violation on
which the finding was based, or paid
the penalty or fee, to the satisfaction of
the responsible agency;
(3) The violation, penalty or fee is the
subject of a good faith appeal, or of an
abatement plan or payment schedule
with which the permittee or other
person responsible is complying to the
satisfaction of the responsible agency; or
(4) Since the finding was made, the
permittee has severed any ownership or
control link with the person responsible
for, and does not continue to be
responsible for, the violation, penalty or
fee.
(b) Cessation of operations. After
service of the notice of permit
suspension or rescission, the permittee
shall cease all surface coal mining and
reclamation operations under the permit
as set forth in the notice, except for
violation abatement and for reclamation
and other environmental protection
measures as required by the division;
and
(c) A person may challenge an
ownership or control listing or finding
by submitting to the division a written
explanation of the basis for the
challenge, along with any evidence or
explanatory materials that substantiates
that the person did not or does not own
or control the entire surface coal mining
operation or relevant portion or aspect
thereof. The person may request that
any information submitted to the
division under this section be held as
confidential, if it is not required to be
made public under the Act. The
division shall review the information
and render a written decision regarding
the person’s ownership or control listing
or link within 60 days from receipt of
the challenge.
(d) Right to appeal. The permittee or
person aggrieved by the division’s
notice or decision may file an appeal for
administrative review of the notice or
decision under subparagraph (c) under
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
50920
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
§ 4VAC25–130–775.11 of this chapter
and § 2.2–4000 et seq. of the Code of
Virginia.
6. 4VAC25–130–774.12. Post-Permit
Issuance Requirements
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 774.11.
The DMME proposes to add this
entire new section to the Virginia
regulations and will read as follows:
Information—
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Within 30 days after—
Permit records .....................................................................................
Unabated or uncorrected violations ....................................................
Unpaid final civil penalties, charges, taxes or fees ............................
Changes in violation status .................................................................
(b) In the event the permittee is issued
enforcement action under § 4VAC25–
130–843.11, and fails to timely comply
with the order’s remedial measures, the
division shall instruct the permittee to
provide or update all the information
required by § 4VAC25–130–778.11.
However, the permittee would not be
required to submit this information if a
court of competent jurisdiction has
granted a stay of the cessation order and
the stay remains in effect.
(c) The permittee shall notify the
division within 60 days of any addition,
departure, or change in position of any
person identified under § 4VAC25–130–
778.13. The permittee shall provide the
date of such addition, departure, or
change of such person(s).
(d) Should the division discover that
the permittee, or a person listed in an
ownership or control relationship with
the permittee, owns or controls an
operation with an unabated or
uncorrected violation, it will determine
whether enforcement action is
appropriate under Parts 4VAC25–130–
843 and 4VAC25–130–846, or other
applicable provisions under the Act.
The division may issue a preliminary
finding of permit ineligibility under
§ 45.1–238(C) of the Act, if it finds that
the person had control relationships and
violations that would have made the
person ineligible for a permit under
§ 4VAC25–130–773.15. The finding
shall be in accordance with 4VAC25–
130–773.20(c)(3).
(e) If a determination of permit
ineligibility is rendered by the division,
the person would have 30 days from
service of the written finding to submit
any information that would tend to
demonstrate the person’s lack of
ownership or control of the surface coal
mining operation. The division would
issue a final determination regarding the
permit eligibility within 30 days of
receiving any information from the
person or from the expiration date that
the person could submit the information
under this subparagraph. A person
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
(a) For purposes of future permit
eligibility determinations and
enforcement actions, the division will
utilize the AVS, retrieving and entering
appropriate data regarding ownership,
control, and violation information. The
division shall enter into the AVS—
The permit is issued or subsequent changes made.
The abatement or correction period for a violation expires.
The required due payment date.
Abatement, correction, or termination of a violation, or a final decision
from an administrative or judicial review proceeding.
aggrieved by the division’s eligibility
finding would have the right to request
review under Part 4VAC25–130–775.
7. 4VAC25–130–774.17(a). Transfer,
Assignment, or Sale of Permit Rights
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 774.17.
As amended, it reads as follows:
(a) General. No transfer, assignment,
or sale of rights granted by a permit
shall be made without the prior written
approval of the division. At its
discretion, the division may allow a
prospective successor in interest to
engage in surface coal mining and
reclamation operations under the permit
during the pendency of an application
for approval of a transfer, assignment, or
sale of permit rights submitted under
paragraph (b) of this section, provided
that the prospective successor in
interest can demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the division that
sufficient bond coverage will remain in
place.
8. 4VAC130–778.13. Identification of
Interests
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 778.11.
An application shall contain the
following information:
(a) A statement as to whether the
applicant and/or the operator, if
different from the applicant, is a
corporation, partnership, single
proprietorship, association, or other
business entity.
(b) The name, address, telephone
number and, as applicable, employer
identification number of the:
(1) Applicant;
(2) Applicant’s resident agent;
(3) Operator, if different from the
applicant; and
(4) Each business entity in the
applicant’s and operator’s
organizational structure, up to and
including the ultimate parent entity of
the applicant and operator; for every
such business entity provide the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
required information for every
president, chief executive officer,
partner, member, and/or director (or
persons in similar positions), a
positions), and every person who owns
of record 10 percent or more of the
entity.
(c) For the applicant and operator, if
different from the applicant,
information required by paragraph (d) of
this section for every:
(1) Officer.
(2) Partner.
(3) Member.
(4) Director.
(5) Person performing a function
similar to a director.
(6) Person who owns, of record, 10
percent or more of the applicant or
operator.
(d) For each person listed from
paragraph (c) of this section:
(1) The person’s name, address, and
telephone number.
(2) The person’s position title and
relationship to the applicant or operator,
including percentage of ownership and
location in the organizational structure.
(3) The date the person began
functioning in that position.
(e) A list of all the names under which
the applicant, operator, partners, or
principal shareholders, and the
operator’s partners or principal
shareholders operate or previously
operated a surface coal mining
operation in the United States within a
five-year period preceding the date of
submission of the application, including
the name, address, identifying numbers,
including employer identification
number, Federal or State permit number
and MSHA number, the date of issuance
of the MSHA number, and the
regulatory authority.
(f) For the applicant and operator, if
different from the applicant, a list of any
pending permit applications for surface
coal mining operations filed in the
United States, identifying each
application by its application number,
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
jurisdiction, or by other identifying
information when necessary.
(g) For any surface coal mining
operation the applicant and/or operator
owned or controlled within a five year
period preceding the submission of the
permit application, and for any surface
coal mining operation the applicant
and/or operator controlled on that date,
the:
(1) Permittee’s and operator’s name
and address, tax identification numbers;
(2) Name of the regulatory authority
with jurisdiction over the permit(s) with
the corresponding Federal or State
permit number(s) and MSHA number(s);
and
(3) The permittee’s and operator’s
relationship to the operation, including
the percentage of ownership and
location in the organizational structure.
(h) The name and address of each
legal or equitable owner of record of the
surface and mineral property to be
mined, each holder of record of any
leasehold interest in the property to be
mined, and any purchaser of record
under a real estate contract for the
property to be mined.
(i) The name and address of each
owner of record of all property (surface
and subsurface) contiguous to any part
of the proposed permit area.
(j) The Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) numbers for all
mine-associated structures that require
MSHA approval.
(k) A statement of all lands, interest
in lands, options, or pending bids on
interests held or made by the applicant
for lands contiguous to the area
described in the permit application. If
requested by the applicant, any
information required by this Paragraph
which is not on public file pursuant to
State law shall be held in confidence by
the division, as provided under
4VAC25–130–773.13(d)(3)(ii).
(l) Each application shall contain a
list of all other licenses and permits
needed by the applicant to conduct the
proposed surface mining activities.
This list shall identify each license
and permit by—
(1) Type of permit or license;
(2) Name and address of issuing
authority;
(3) Identification numbers of
applications for those permits or
licenses or, if issued, the identification
numbers of the permits or licenses; and
(4) If a decision has been made, the
date of approval or disapproval by each
issuing authority.
(m) After an applicant is notified that
his application is approved, but before
the permit is issued, the applicant shall,
as applicable, update, correct or indicate
that no change has occurred in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
information previously submitted under
Paragraphs (a) through (d) of this
section.
(n) The applicant shall submit the
information required by this section and
by 4VAC25–130–778.14 in any
prescribed OSM format that is issued.
9. 4VAC25–130–778.14(c). Violation
Information
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 778.14.
As proposed the amendment reads as
follows:
(c) For any violation of a provision of
the Federal Act or this chapter, or of any
law, rule or regulation of the United
States, or of any State law, rule or
regulation enacted pursuant to Federal
law, rule or regulation pertaining to air
or water environmental protection
incurred in connection with any surface
coal mining operation, a list of all
violation notices received by the
applicant during the three year period
preceding the application date, and a
list of all unabated cessation orders and
unabated air and water quality violation
notices received prior to the date of the
application by any surface coal mining
and reclamation operation owned or
controlled by either the applicant or
operator. For each violation notice or
cessation order reported, the lists shall
include the following information, as
applicable:
10. 4VAC25–130–800.52(a) and (a)(2).
Bond Forfeiture Reinstatement
Procedures
There is no direct Federal counterpart
regulation for this section.
As proposed, it reads as follows:
(a) Any person who owns or controls
or has owned or controlled any
operation on which the bond has been
forfeited or the permit revoked pursuant
to this chapter or pursuant to Chapters
15 [repealed], 17 (§ 45.1–198 et seq.) or
23 [repealed] of Title 45.1 of the Code
of Virginia and who has not previously
been reinstated by the Director may
petition the Director for reinstatement.
Reinstatement, if granted, shall be under
such terms and conditions as set forth
by the Director or his designee. The
Director or his designee in determining
the terms and conditions shall consider
the particular facts and circumstances
existing in each individual case.
Reinstatement shall not be available to
applicants for reinstatement where the
division finds that the applicant
controls or has controlled surface coal
mining and reclamation operations with
a demonstrated pattern of willful
violations of the Act of such nature and
duration and with such resulting
irreparable damage to the environment
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50921
as to indicate an intent not to comply
with the Act, in accordance with
4VAC25–130–773.15(b)(3). As a
minimum, the applicant for
reinstatement shall satisfy the following
requirements:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Pay to the Director a reinstatement
fee of $5,000 assessed by the Director on
each site forfeited. These fees shall be
used by the Director to accomplish
reclamation on other forfeited or
abandoned surface coal mining
operations or conduct such other
investigations, research or abatement
actions relating to lands and waters
affected by coal surface mining
activities.
(b) Reinstatement by the Director shall
be a prerequisite to the filing by the
person (applicant for reinstatement) of
any new permit application or renewal
under this chapter or Chapters 15
[repealed], 17 (§ 45.1–198 et seq.), or 23
[repealed] of Title 45.1 of the Code of
Virginia, but shall not affect the person’s
need to comply with all other
requirements of said statutes,
regulations or both promulgated
thereunder.
11. 4VAC25–130–801.12(c) and (d).
Entrance Fee and Bond
There is no direct Federal counterpart
regulation for this section.
As proposed, it reads as follows:
(c) The Director may accept the bond
of an applicant of an underground
mining operation without separate
surety, as provided by 4VAC25–130–
801.13, upon a showing by such
applicant of a net worth, total assets
minus total liabilities (certified by an
independent certified public
accountant), equivalent to $1 million.
Such net worth shall be, during the
existence of the permit, certified
annually by an independent certified
public accountant and the certification
submitted to the division on the
anniversary date of the permit.
(d) The Director may accept the bond
of an applicant of a surface mining
operation or associated facility without
separate surety, upon a showing by the
applicant of those conditions set forth in
4VAC25–130–801.13(b). The financial
solvency of the permittee shall be,
during the existence of the permit,
certified annually by an independent
certified public accountant and the
certification submitted to the division
by June 1st or by such other date that
the division may set.
12. 4VAC25–130–801.13. Self-Bonding
There is no direct Federal counterpart
regulation for this section.
As proposed, it reads as follows:
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
50922
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(a) The division may accept a selfbond from the applicant of a proposed
surface coal mining operation in the
form of an indemnity agreement.
(1) The applicant shall provide the:
(i) Name and address of a suitable
agent to receive service of process in the
Commonwealth.
(ii) Name and address of the certified
public accountant(s) who prepared the
statement required by this section.
(iii) Location of the financial records
used to prepare the C.P.A. statement
required by this section.
(iv) Evidence indicating a history of
satisfactory continuous operation.
(2) For a proposed underground
mining operation, the applicant has a
net worth, certified by an independent
certified public accountant in the form
of an unqualified opinion appended to
the financial statement submitted, of no
less than $1 million after total liabilities
are subtracted from total assets. If the
applicant is a subsidiary corporation,
the applicant’s parent organization’s net
worth need only be certified by the
independent certified public
accountant, if the applicant uses or
includes any assets or liabilities of the
parent organization in computing or
arriving at the applicant’s net worth.
Where the division has a valid reason to
believe that the permittee’s net worth is
less than required by this subsection, it
may require a new certified public
accountant’s statement and certification.
(3) The applicant of a proposed
surface mining operation or associated
facility shall submit evidence
substantiating the applicant’s financial
solvency, with the appropriate financial
documentation required by Paragraph
(a)(4) of this section.(4)(i) An indemnity
agreement must be executed by the
applicant, and said agreement must also
be executed by:
(A) If a corporation, two corporate
officers who are authorized to sign the
agreement by a resolution of the board
of directors, a copy of which shall be
provided;
(B) To the extent that the history or
assets of a parent organization are relied
upon to make the showings of this Part,
the parent organization of which it is a
subsidiary, whether first-tier, secondtier, or further removed, in the form of
(A) above;
(C) If the applicant is a partnership,
all of its general partners and their
parent organization or principal
investors; and
(D) If the applicant is a married
individual, the applicant’s spouse;
(ii) Any person who occupies more
than one of the specified positions shall
indicate each capacity in which he signs
the agreement;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
(iii) The agreement shall be a binding
obligation, jointly and severally, on all
who execute it;
(iv) For the purposes of this
Paragraph, principal investor or parent
organization means anyone with a 10
percent or more beneficial ownership
interest, directly or indirectly, in the
applicant.
(b) Whenever a participant in the Pool
Bond Fund applies for an additional
permit or permits, the C.P.A.
certification required by Paragraph (a)(2)
or (a)(3) of this section shall be updated
reflecting those prior reclamation
obligations and self-bonding liabilities
still in effect.
(c) If at any time the conditions upon
which the self-bond was approved no
longer prevail, the division shall require
the posting of a surety or collateral bond
before coal surface mining operations
may continue. The permittee shall
immediately notify the division of any
change in his total liabilities or total
assets which would jeopardize the
support of the self-bond. If the permittee
fails to have sufficient resources to
support the self-bond, he shall be
deemed to be without bond coverage in
violation of 4VAC25–130–800.11(b).
13. 4VAC25–130–840.14(c)(2).
Availability of Records
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 840.14.
The DMME is proposing to add ‘‘or
electronic transmittal’’ after ‘‘mail’’; add
‘‘the division offices and on its Internet
site’’ after ‘‘at’’; delete ‘‘a Federal, State
or local government office in the county
where the mining is occurring or
proposed to occur’’ after ‘‘at’’; add ‘‘or
electronic transmittal’’ after ‘‘mail’’; and
delete ‘‘A list of government offices
where information may be inspected
can be obtained on request by
contacting the division’s Big Stone Gap
office.’’ As proposed, it reads as follows:
(2) At the division’s option in
accordance with the Virginia Freedom
of Information Act (Chapter 21 (§ 2.1–
340 et seq.) of Title 2.1 of the Code of
Virginia), providing copies of subject
information promptly by mail or
electronic transmittal at the request of
any resident of the area where the
mining is occurring or is proposed to
occur, provided, that the division shall
maintain for public inspection, at the
division offices and on its Internet site,
a description of the information
available for mailing or electronic
transmittal and the procedure for
obtaining such information.
This Virginia regulation is amended
to provide for electronic transmittal of
information and the maintenance of the
description of available information
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
from the division offices and via the
agency Internet site.
The Division has 2 offices located in
the coalfield counties of Southwest
Virginia which are readily available to
the public and an Internet site to serve
industry, other governmental agencies,
and the public.
14. 4VAC25–130–846.2. Definitions
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 701.5.
The following revised definitions are
being moved to § 4VAC25–130–700.5
Definitions.
‘‘Knowingly’’ means that an
individual knew or had reason to know
in authorizing, ordering, or carrying out
an act or omission on the part of a
corporate permittee that such act or
omission constituted a violation, failure,
or refusal.
‘‘Violation, failure or refusal’’ means:
(1) A violation of a condition of the
permit issued pursuant to the Act and
the regulations promulgated thereunder;
or, (2) A failure or refusal to comply
with any order issued under § 45.1–245
of the Act, or any order incorporated in
a decision issued by the Director under
the Act, except an order incorporated in
a decision issued under § 45.1–246(B) of
the Act.
‘‘Willfully’’ means that an individual
acted (1) either intentionally,
voluntarily, or consciously, and (2) with
intentional disregard or plain
indifference to legal requirements in
authorizing, ordering, or carrying out a
corporate permittee’s action or omission
that constituted a violation, failure, or
refusal.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the submission
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the Virginia program.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they
should be specific, confined to issues
pertinent to the proposed regulations,
and explain the reason for any
recommended change(s). We appreciate
any and all comments, but those most
useful and likely to influence decisions
on the final regulations will be those
that either involve personal experience
or include citations to and analyses of
SMCRA, its legislative history, its
implementing regulations, case law,
other pertinent Tribal or Federal laws or
regulations, technical literature, or other
relevant publications. We cannot ensure
that comments received after the close
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
IV. Procedural Determinations
of the comment period (see DATES) or
sent to an address other than those
listed above (see ADDRESSES) will be
included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m., local time, on September 15, 2008.
If you are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at a public
hearing provide us with a written copy
of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Public Meeting
If there is limited interest in
participation in a public hearing, we
may hold a public meeting rather than
a public hearing. If you wish to meet
with us to discuss the submission,
please request a meeting by contacting
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible,
we will post notices of meetings at the
locations listed under ADDRESSES. We
will make a written summary of each
meeting a part of the administrative
record.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that, to the extent
allowable by law, this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
since each such program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires that
State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50923
effects of this rule on Federally
recognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
The basis for this determination is that
our decision is on a State regulatory
program and does not involve a Federal
program involving Indian Tribes.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute a
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal
that is the subject of this rule is based
on counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
50924
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, geographic
regions, or Federal, State or local
governmental agencies; and (c) Does not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:27 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S. based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based on the analysis
performed under various laws and
executive orders for the counterpart
Federal regulations.
year. This determination is based on the
analysis performed under various laws
and executive orders for the counterpart
Federal regulations.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
Dated: July 24, 2008.
Michael K. Robinson,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E8–20175 Filed 8–28–08; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 946
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
E:\FR\FM\29AUP1.SGM
29AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 169 (Friday, August 29, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50915-50924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20175]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 946
[VA-126-FOR; Docket ID OSM-2008-0012]
Virginia Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the
Virginia regulatory program under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). The amendment revises the
Virginia Coal Surface Mining Reclamation Regulations pertaining to
ownership and control, valid existing rights, self-bonding, and
availability of records. Virginia intends to revise its program to be
consistent with the corresponding Federal regulations and SMCRA and is
responding, in part, to 30 CFR Part 732 letters.
This document gives the times and locations that the Virginia
program and this submittal are available for your inspection, the
comment period during which you may submit written comments, and the
procedures that we will follow for the public hearing, if one is
requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments until 4 p.m., local time,
September 29, 2008. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on
September 23, 2008. We will accept requests to speak until 4 p.m.,
e.s.t., on September 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``VA-126-FOR/OSM-
2008-0012'' by any of the following methods:
E-mail: ebandy@osmre.gov.
Mail/Hand Delivery: Earl Bandy, Knoxville Field Office,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 710 Locust
Street, 2nd Floor, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902, Telephone: (865) 545-
4103.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
The proposed rule has been assigned Docket ID OSM-2008-0012. If you
would like to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal,
go to https://www.regulations.gov and do the following. Click on the
``Advanced Docket Search'' button on the right side of the screen. Type
in the Docket ID OSM-2008-0012 and click the ``Submit'' button at the
bottom of the page. The next screen will display the Docket Search
Results for the rulemaking. If you click on OSM-2008-0012, you can view
the proposed rule and submit a comment. You can also view supporting
material and any comments submitted by others.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
docket number ``OSM-2008-0012/VA-126-FOR'' for this rulemaking. For
detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures''
section in this document. You may also request to speak at a public
hearing by any of the methods listed above or by contacting the
individual listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the Virginia program, this
submission, a listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written
comments received in response to this document at OSM's
[[Page 50916]]
Knoxville Field Office at the address listed above during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may
receive one free copy of the submission by contacting OSM's Knoxville
Field Office. In addition, you may receive a copy of the submission
during regular business hours at the following location: Virginia
Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy, 3405 Mountain Empire Road,
Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219, Telephone: (276) 523-8100, E-Mail:
lsv@mme.state.va.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Earl Bandy, Telephone: (865) 545-4103.
Internet: ebandy@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Virginia Program
II. Description of the Submission
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Virginia Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``a State law which provides
for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of this Act* * *; and rules and
regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Virginia program on December 15, 1981. You can find background
information on the Virginia program, including the Secretary's
findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of
the Virginia program in the December 15, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR
61088). You can also find later actions concerning Virginia's program
and program amendments at 30 CFR 946.12, 946.13, and 946.15.
II. Description of the Submission
By letter dated June 11, 2008, the Virginia Department of Mines,
Minerals, and Energy (DMME) sent us an informal proposed amendment to
its program for a pre-submission review (VA-126-INF). We reviewed the
pre-submission and responded to DMME, with comments, via electronic
mail on July 2, 2008. By letter dated July 17, 2008, DMME formally
submitted the proposed amendments to its program (Administrative Record
No. VA-1089.) The full text of the program amendment is available for
you to read at the location listed above under ``ADDRESSES.'' DMME
proposes the following changes:
1. 4VAC25-130-700.5. Definitions
The corresponding Federal regulations for this section are 30 CFR
701.5, 761.5 and 880.5.
DMME proposes to either add, delete or modify the following
definitions:
``Applicant Violator System'' or ``AVS'' means an automated
information system of applicant, permittee, operator, violation and
related data the Federal Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement (OSM) maintains and the division utilizes in the permit
review process.
``Control'' or ``controller'', when used in Parts 4VAC25-130-773,
4VAC25-130-774, and 4VAC25-130-778 of this chapter, refers to or means
(a) A permittee of a surface coal mining operation; (b) An operator of
a surface coal mining operation; or (c) Any person who has the ability
to determine the manner in which a surface coal mining operation is
conducted.
``Indemnity agreement'' means an agreement between two persons in
which one person agrees to pay the other person for a loss or damage.
The persons involved can be individual people, or groups of people, or
legal organizations, such as partnerships, corporations or government
agencies, or any combination of these. The agreement shall, at a
minimum:
(a) Contain the date of execution.
(b) Be payable to the ``Treasurer of Virginia.''
(c) Be immediately due and payable in the event of bond forfeiture
of the permit.
(d) Be payable in a sum certain of money.
(e) Be signed by the makers.
``Knowing'' or ``knowingly'', which means that a person who
authorized, ordered, or carried out an act or omission knew or had
reason to know that the act or omission would result in either a
violation or a failure to abate or correct a violation.
``Own'', ``owner'', or ``ownership'', as used in Parts 4VAC25-130-
773, 4VAC25-130-774, and 4VAC25-130-778 of this chapter (except when
used in the context of ownership of real property), means being a sole
proprietor or owning of record in excess of 50 percent of the voting
securities or other instruments of ownership of an entity.
``Self-bond,'' as provided by Part 801 of this chapter, means:
(a) For an underground mining operation, an indemnity agreement in
a sum certain payable on demand to the Treasurer of Virginia, executed
by the applicant and by each individual and business organization
capable of influencing or controlling the investment or financial
practices of the applicant by virtue of this authority as an officer or
ownership of all or a significant part of the applicant, and supported
by a certification that the applicant participating in the Pool Bond
Fund has a net worth, total assets minus total liabilities equivalent
to $1 million. Such certification shall be by an independent certified
public accountant in the form of an unqualified opinion.
This definition in the Virginia regulation is being amended to
delete the reference to ``cognovit note'' and replace such with
``indemnity agreement'', as the approved bonding instrument under
4VAC25-130-801.13, as being amended.
The DMME is proposing to delete ``in ownership or other effective
control over the right to conduct surface coal mining operations under
a permit issued by the division'' and add ``of a permittee'' after
``change.'' As proposed, the definition will read as follows:
``Transfer, assignment, or sale of permit rights'' means a change
of a permittee.
The DMME is proposing to add the following definition of ``Valid
Existing Rights'' (VER) and delete from subsection (a) ``for haulroads,
that a person possesses a valid existing right for an area protected
under of the Act on August 3, 1977, if the application of any of the
prohibitions contained in that section to the property interest that
existed on that date would effect a taking of the person's property
which would entitle the person to compensation under the Fifth and
Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution;'' and add
``Sec. 45.1-252 D''; the DMME is proposing to add ``For haulroads,''
at the beginning of subsection c; at subsection (c) (2), ``Was under a
properly'' is added at the beginning sentence and ``A'' is deleted;
``or'' is added after ``way''; the DMME is proposing to add subsection
3 ``Was used or contained in a valid permit that existed when the land
came under the protection of Sec. 45.1-252D or Sec. 4 VAC 25-130-
761.11.'' Subsection (c) is deleted entirely and subsection (e) is
renamed subsection (d). In subsection (d), ``That an'' is added to the
beginning of the sentence; ``(s) that are'' is added after
``document''; ``the'' is deleted after ``establish'' and ``valid
existing'' is added before ``rights''; ``to which the standard of
paragraphs (a) and (d) of this definition applies'' is deleted after
``rights''. As proposed, the definition will read as follows:
[[Page 50917]]
``Valid existing rights'' means a set of circumstances under which
a person may, subject to division approval, conduct surface coal mining
operations on lands where Sec. 45.1-252 D of the Act and Sec. 4VAC25-
130-761.11 of the regulations would otherwise prohibit such operations.
The possession of valid existing rights only confers an exception from
the prohibitions of Sec. 45.1-252 D and Sec. 4VAC25-130-761.11. A
person seeking to exercise valid existing rights would need:
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this definition, a
demonstration of the legally binding conveyance, lease, deed, contract,
or other document which vests the person, or predecessor in interest,
with the right to conduct the type of surface coal mining operations
intended. The right must exist at the time the land came under the
protection of Sec. 4VAC25-130-761.11 and Sec. 45.1-252 D;
(b) A demonstration of compliance with one of the following--
(1) That all permits and other authorizations required to conduct
surface coal mining operations had been obtained, or a good faith
attempt to obtain all necessary permits and authorizations had been
made, before the land came under the protection of Sec. 45.1-252 D or
Sec. 4VAC25-130-761.11.
(2) That the land needed for and immediately adjacent to a surface
coal mining operation for which all permits and other authorizations
required to conduct surface coal mining operations had been obtained,
or a good faith attempt made to obtain such permits and authorizations
occurred before the land came under the protection of Sec. 45.1-252 D
or Sec. 4VAC25-130-761.11. The person must demonstrate that
prohibiting the expansion of the operation onto that land would
unfairly impact the viability of the operation as originally planned
before the land came under the protection of Sec. 45.1-252 D or Sec.
4VAC25-130-761.11. Except for operations in existence before August 3,
1977, or for which a good faith effort to obtain all necessary permits
had been made before August 3, 1977, this standard does not apply to
lands already under the protection of Sec. 45.1-252 D or Sec. 4VAC25-
130-761.11 when the division approved the permit for the original
operation or when the good faith effort to obtain all necessary permits
for the original operation was made. In evaluating whether a person
meets this standard, the division may consider--
(i) The extent to which coal supply contracts or other legal and
business commitments that occurred before the land came under the
protection of Sec. Sec. 45.1-252 D or Sec. 4VAC25-130-761.11 depend
upon the use of the land for surface coal mining operations.
(ii) The extent to which plans used to obtain financing for the
operation before the land came under the protection of Sec. 45.1-252 D
or Sec. 4VAC25-130-761.11 relied upon use of that land for surface
coal mining operations.
(iii) The extent to which investments in the operation made before
the land came under the protection of Sec. 45.1-252 D or Sec. 4VAC25-
130-761.11 relied upon the use of that land for surface coal mining
operations.
(iv) Whether the land lies within the area identified on the life-
of-mine map under Sec. 4VAC25-130-779.24(c) that was submitted before
the land came under the protection of Sec. 45.1-252 D or Sec. 4VAC25-
130-761.11.
(c) For haulroads, a person who claims valid existing rights to use
or construct a road across the surface of lands protected by Sec.
45.1-252 D or Sec. 4VAC25-130-761.11 must demonstrate that one or more
of the following circumstances exist, the road--
(1) Existed when the land upon which it is located came under the
protection of Sec. 45.1-252 D or Sec. 4VAC25-130-761.11, and the
person has the legal right to use the road for surface coal mining
operations.
(2) Was under a properly recorded right of way or easement for a
road in that location at the time the land came under the protection of
Sec. 45.1-252 D or Sec. 4VAC25-130-761.11, and under the document
creating the right of way or easement, and under subsequent
conveyances, the person has a legal right to use or construct a road
across the right of way or easement for surface coal mining operations.
(3) Was used or contained in a valid permit that existed when the
land came under the protection of Sec. 45.1-252 D or Sec. 4VAC25-130-
761.11.
(d) That an interpretation of the terms of the document(s) that are
relied upon to establish valid existing rights shall be based either
upon applicable Virginia statutory or case law concerning
interpretation of documents conveying mineral rights or, where no
applicable state law exists, upon the usage and custom at the time and
place it came into existence. This amendment would apply to permit
applications submitted on and after the date the amendment is approved
by the Secretary of Interior and becomes effective upon promulgation
pursuant to the Federal and Virginia Administrative Process Acts.
The DMME is proposing to add the following definition:
``Violation'', when used in the context of the permit application
information or permit eligibility requirements of Sec. Sec. 45.1-235
and 45.1-238(C) of the Act and related regulations, means:
(1) A failure to comply with an applicable provision of a Virginia,
Federal, or other State law or regulation pertaining to air or water
environmental protection, as evidenced by a written notification from a
governmental entity to the responsible person; or
(2) A noncompliance for which the division has provided one or more
of the following types of notice or OSM or a State regulatory authority
has provided equivalent notice under corresponding provisions of a
Federal or State regulatory program--
(i) A notice of violation under Sec. 4VAC-25-130-843.12.
(ii) A cessation order under Sec. 4VAC-25-130-843.11.
(iii) A final order, bill, or demand letter pertaining to a
delinquent civil penalty assessed under Part 4VAC-25-130-845 or 4VAC-
25-130-846.
(iv) A bill or demand letter pertaining to delinquent reclamation
fees owed under 30 CFR Part 870.
(v) A notice of bond forfeiture under Sec. 4VAC-25-130-800.50
when--
(A) One or more violations upon which the forfeiture was based have
not been abated or corrected;
(B) The amount forfeited and collected is insufficient for full
reclamation under Sec. 4VAC-25-130-800.50 or Sec. 4VAC-25-130-801.19,
the division orders reimbursement for additional reclamation costs, and
the person has not complied with the reimbursement order.
The DMME is proposing to add the following definition:
``Violation, failure or refusal'', for purposes of Part 4VAC25-130-
846, means:
(1) A failure to comply with a condition of an issued permit or the
regulations implementing those sections; or
(2) A failure or refusal to comply with any order issued under Part
4VAC25-130-843, or any order incorporated in a final decision issued by
the Director, except an order incorporated in a decision issued under
Sec. 45.1-246 of the Act.
The DMME is proposing to add ``or regulation'' after ``law'' in the
definition of Violation notice. As proposed, it will read as follows:
``Violation notice'' means any written notification from a
governmental entity of a violation of law or regulation, whether by
letter, memorandum, legal or administrative pleading, or other written
communication.
[[Page 50918]]
The DMME proposes to add the definition of ``Willful or
Willfully.'' As proposed, it will read as follows:
``Willful'' or ``Willfully'' means that a person who authorized,
ordered or carried out an act or omission that resulted in either a
violation or the failure to abate or correct a violation acted:
(1) Intentionally, voluntarily, or consciously; and
(2) With intentional disregard or plain indifference to legal
requirements.
The DMME is proposing to delete the following definitions:
``Cognovit note'' means an extraordinary note which authorizes an
attorney to confess judgment against the person or persons signing it.
It is written authority of a debtor and a direction by him for entry of
a judgment against him if the obligation set forth in the note is not
paid when due. Such judgment may be taken by any person holding the
note, which cuts off every defense which makers of the note may
otherwise have and it likewise cuts off all rights of appeal from any
judgment taken on it. The note shall, at a minimum:
(a) Contain the date of execution.
(b) Be payable to the ``Treasurer of Virginia.''
(c) Be due and payable in the event of bond forfeiture of the
permit.
(d) Be payable in a sum certain of money.
(e) Be signed by the makers.
This definition in the Virginia regulations is being deleted, as
the indemnity agreement will be the bonding instrument utilized under
4VAC25-130-801.13 (as being amended).
``Owned or controlled'' and ``owns or controls'' mean any one or a
combination of the relationships specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this definition:
(a)(i) Being a permittee of a surface coal mining operation; (ii)
based on instrument of ownership or voting securities, owning of record
in excess of 50% of an entity; or (iii) having any other relationship
which gives one person authority directly or indirectly to determine
the manner in which an applicant, an operator, or other entity conducts
surface coal mining operations.
(b) The following relationships are presumed to constitute
ownership or control unless a person can demonstrate that the person
subject to the presumption does not in fact have the authority directly
or indirectly to determine the manner in which the relevant surface
coal mining operation is conducted:
(1) Being an officer or director of an entity;
(2) Being the operator of a surface coal mining operation;
(3) Having the ability to commit the financial or real property
assets or working resources of an entity;
(4) Being a general partner in a partnership;
(5) Based on the instruments of ownership or the voting securities
of a corporate entity, owning of record 10 through 50% of the entity;
or
(6) Owning or controlling coal to be mined by another person under
a lease, sublease or other contract and having the right to receive
such coal after mining or having authority to determine the manner in
which that person or another person conducts a surface coal mining
operation.
2. 4VAC25-130-773.13. Public Participation in Permit Processing
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
773.6. The DMME proposes to add ``or the last publication date of the
newspaper notice required by Paragraph (a) of this section, whichever
is later'' after ``notification''. As proposed, it reads as follows:
(b) Comments and objections on permit application.
(1) Within 30 days after notification or the last publication date
of the newspaper notice required by Paragraph (a) of this section,
whichever is later, written comments or objections on an application
for a permit, significant revision to a permit under 4VAC25-130-774.13,
or renewal of a permit under 4VAC25-130-774.15, may be submitted to the
division by public entities notified under Paragraph (a)(3) of this
section with respect to the effects of the proposed mining operations
on the environment within their areas of responsibility.
This change in the Virginia regulation will allow public entities
to have the same period of time to review and comment on the
application as afforded the public.
3. 4VAC25-130-773.15. Review of Permit Applications
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
773.7.
The DMME proposes to delete from (a)(1) ``, unless a later time is
necessary to provide an opportunity for a hearing under subdivision
(b)(2) of this section.''
The DMME proposes to add to (a) subdivisions (3) and (4) which
state:
(3) The division shall review the information submitted under
Sec. Sec. 4VAC25-130-778.13 and 4VAC25-130-778.14 regarding the
applicant's and/or operator's permit histories, business structure, and
ownership and control relationships.
(4) If the applicant or operator does not have any previous mining
experience, the division may conduct additional reviews to determine if
someone else with surface coal mining experience controls or will
control the mining operation.
The DMME proposes to delete from subdivision (b)(1) ``by any person
who owns or controls the applicant'' after ``operator''; proposes to
add ``; or if a surface coal mining and reclamation operation
indirectly owned or controlled by the applicant or operator has an
unabated or uncorrected violation and the applicant's or operator's
control was established or the violation was cited after November 2,
1988.'' after ``subdivision''; proposes to delete subsection
(b)(4)(i)(C)(1) entirely and join (2) to the end of the sentence at
(C). This change is to reflect the deletion of the last sentence of
Section 510(e) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (30 U.S.C. 1260(e)) per the ``Tax Relief and Health Care Act of
2006.'' As proposed, this section will read as follows:
(a) General.
(1) The division shall review the application for a permit,
revision, or renewal; written comments and objections submitted;
information from the AVS; and records of any informal conference or
hearing held on the application and issue a written decision, within a
reasonable time, either granting, requiring modification of, or denying
the application. If an informal conference is held under 4VAC25-130-
773.13(c), the decision shall be made within 60 days of the close of
the conference.
(2) The applicant for a permit or revision of a permit shall have
the burden of establishing that the application is in compliance with
all the requirements of the regulatory program.
(3) The division shall review the information submitted under
Sec. Sec. 4VAC25-130-778.13 and 4VAC25-130-778.14 regarding the
applicant's and/or operator's permit histories, business structure, and
ownership and control relationships.
(4) If the applicant or operator does not have any previous mining
experience, the division may conduct additional reviews to determine if
someone else with surface coal mining experience controls or will
control the mining operation.
(b) Review of violations.
(1) Based on available information concerning Federal and state
failure-to-abate cessation orders, unabated Federal
[[Page 50919]]
and state imminent harm cessation orders, delinquent civil penalties
issued pursuant to Sec. 518 of the Federal Act and Sec. 45.1-246 of
the Code of Virginia, bond forfeitures where violations upon which the
forfeitures were based have not been corrected, delinquent abandoned
mine reclamation fees, and unabated violations of Federal and state
laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to air or water environmental
protection incurred in connection with any surface coal mining
operation, the division shall not issue the permit if any surface coal
mining and reclamation operation directly owned or controlled by either
the applicant or operator is currently in violation of the Federal Act,
this chapter, or any other law, rule or regulation referred to in this
subdivision; or if a surface coal mining and reclamation operation
indirectly owned or controlled by the applicant or operator has an
unabated or uncorrected violation and the applicant's or operator's
control was established or the violation was cited after November 2,
1988. In the absence of a failure-to-abate cessation order, the
division may presume that a notice of violation issued pursuant to
4VAC25-130-843.12 or under a Federal or state program has been or is
being corrected to the satisfaction of the agency with jurisdiction
over the violation, except where evidence to the contrary is set forth
in the permit application or the AVS; or where the notice of violation
is issued for nonpayment of abandoned mine reclamation fees or civil
penalties. If a current violation exists, the division shall require
the applicant or operator before the issuance of the permit, to either:
(i) Submit to the division proof that the current violation has
been or is in the process of being corrected to the satisfaction of the
agency that has jurisdiction over the violation; or
(ii) Establish for the division that the applicant or operator or
any person who owns or controls the applicant, has filed and is
presently pursuing, in good faith, a direct administrative or judicial
appeal to contest the validity of the current violation. If the initial
judicial review authority under 4VAC25-130-775.13 affirms the
violation, then the applicant shall within 30 days of the judicial
action submit the proof required under subdivision (b)(1)(i) of this
section.
(2) Any permit that is issued on the basis of proof submitted under
subdivision (b)(1)(i) of this section that a violation is in the
process of being corrected, or pending the outcome of an appeal
described in subdivision (b)(1)(ii) of this section, shall be
conditionally issued.
(3) If the division makes a finding that the applicant or the
operator specified in the application, controls or has controlled
surface coal mining and reclamation operations with a demonstrated
pattern of willful violations of the Act of such nature and duration,
and with resulting irreparable damage to the environment as to indicate
an intent not to comply with the Act, no permit shall be issued. Before
such a finding becomes final, the applicant or operator shall be
afforded an opportunity for an adjudicatory hearing on the
determination as provided for in 4VAC25-130-775.11.
(4)(i) Subsequent to October 24, 1992, the prohibitions of
subsection (b) of this section regarding the issuance of a new permit
shall not apply to any violation that:
(A) Occurs after that date;
(B) Is unabated; and
(C) Results from an unanticipated event or condition that arises
from a surface coal mining and reclamation operation on lands that are
eligible for remining under a permit held by the person making
application for the new permit.
4. 4VAC25-130-773.20(c)(3). Improvidently Issued Permits; General
Procedures
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
773.21.
The DMME proposes to amend subsection (c)(3) by deleting ``Suspend
the permit until'' and delete (c)(4) entirely. As amended, it will read
as follows:
(3) Serve the permittee with a preliminary finding that shall be
based on evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case that the
permit was improvidently issued. The finding shall inform the permittee
that the permit may be suspended or rescinded under 4VAC25-130-773.21,
if the violation is not abated or the penalty or fee is not paid.
5. 4VAC25-130-773.21. Improvidently Issued Permits; Rescission
Procedures
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
773.23.
The DMME proposes to add ``service of the notice of'' after
``After'' and ``as set forth in the notice'' after ``permit'' in
subsection (b). A new subsection (c) is added; subsection (e) is
renamed to (d) and ``or person aggrieved by the division's notice or
decision'' is added after ``permittee''; ``Sec. 4 VAC 25-130-775.11 of
this chapter and'' is added after ``under''. As amended, it will read
as follows:
If the division, under 4VAC25-130-773.20(c)(3 4), elects to suspend
or rescind an improvidently issued permit, it shall serve on the
permittee a notice of proposed suspension and rescission which includes
the reasons for the finding of the division under 4VAC25-130-773.20(b)
and states that:
(a) Automatic suspension and rescission. After a specified period
of time not to exceed 90 days the permit automatically will become
suspended, and not to exceed 90 days thereafter rescinded, unless
within those periods the permittee submits proof, and the division
finds, that:
(1) The finding of the division under 4VAC25-130-773.20(b) was
erroneous;
(2) The permittee or other person responsible has abated the
violation on which the finding was based, or paid the penalty or fee,
to the satisfaction of the responsible agency;
(3) The violation, penalty or fee is the subject of a good faith
appeal, or of an abatement plan or payment schedule with which the
permittee or other person responsible is complying to the satisfaction
of the responsible agency; or
(4) Since the finding was made, the permittee has severed any
ownership or control link with the person responsible for, and does not
continue to be responsible for, the violation, penalty or fee.
(b) Cessation of operations. After service of the notice of permit
suspension or rescission, the permittee shall cease all surface coal
mining and reclamation operations under the permit as set forth in the
notice, except for violation abatement and for reclamation and other
environmental protection measures as required by the division; and
(c) A person may challenge an ownership or control listing or
finding by submitting to the division a written explanation of the
basis for the challenge, along with any evidence or explanatory
materials that substantiates that the person did not or does not own or
control the entire surface coal mining operation or relevant portion or
aspect thereof. The person may request that any information submitted
to the division under this section be held as confidential, if it is
not required to be made public under the Act. The division shall review
the information and render a written decision regarding the person's
ownership or control listing or link within 60 days from receipt of the
challenge.
(d) Right to appeal. The permittee or person aggrieved by the
division's notice or decision may file an appeal for administrative
review of the notice or decision under subparagraph (c) under
[[Page 50920]]
Sec. 4VAC25-130-775.11 of this chapter and Sec. 2.2-4000 et seq. of
the Code of Virginia.
6. 4VAC25-130-774.12. Post-Permit Issuance Requirements
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
774.11.
The DMME proposes to add this entire new section to the Virginia
regulations and will read as follows:
(a) For purposes of future permit eligibility determinations and
enforcement actions, the division will utilize the AVS, retrieving and
entering appropriate data regarding ownership, control, and violation
information. The division shall enter into the AVS--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information-- Within 30 days after--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Permit records..................... The permit is issued or
subsequent changes made.
(2) Unabated or uncorrected violations. The abatement or correction
period for a violation
expires.
(3) Unpaid final civil penalties, The required due payment date.
charges, taxes or fees.
(4) Changes in violation status........ Abatement, correction, or
termination of a violation, or
a final decision from an
administrative or judicial
review proceeding.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) In the event the permittee is issued enforcement action under
Sec. 4VAC25-130-843.11, and fails to timely comply with the order's
remedial measures, the division shall instruct the permittee to provide
or update all the information required by Sec. 4VAC25-130-778.11.
However, the permittee would not be required to submit this information
if a court of competent jurisdiction has granted a stay of the
cessation order and the stay remains in effect.
(c) The permittee shall notify the division within 60 days of any
addition, departure, or change in position of any person identified
under Sec. 4VAC25-130-778.13. The permittee shall provide the date of
such addition, departure, or change of such person(s).
(d) Should the division discover that the permittee, or a person
listed in an ownership or control relationship with the permittee, owns
or controls an operation with an unabated or uncorrected violation, it
will determine whether enforcement action is appropriate under Parts
4VAC25-130-843 and 4VAC25-130-846, or other applicable provisions under
the Act. The division may issue a preliminary finding of permit
ineligibility under Sec. 45.1-238(C) of the Act, if it finds that the
person had control relationships and violations that would have made
the person ineligible for a permit under Sec. 4VAC25-130-773.15. The
finding shall be in accordance with 4VAC25-130-773.20(c)(3).
(e) If a determination of permit ineligibility is rendered by the
division, the person would have 30 days from service of the written
finding to submit any information that would tend to demonstrate the
person's lack of ownership or control of the surface coal mining
operation. The division would issue a final determination regarding the
permit eligibility within 30 days of receiving any information from the
person or from the expiration date that the person could submit the
information under this subparagraph. A person aggrieved by the
division's eligibility finding would have the right to request review
under Part 4VAC25-130-775.
7. 4VAC25-130-774.17(a). Transfer, Assignment, or Sale of Permit Rights
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
774.17.
As amended, it reads as follows:
(a) General. No transfer, assignment, or sale of rights granted by
a permit shall be made without the prior written approval of the
division. At its discretion, the division may allow a prospective
successor in interest to engage in surface coal mining and reclamation
operations under the permit during the pendency of an application for
approval of a transfer, assignment, or sale of permit rights submitted
under paragraph (b) of this section, provided that the prospective
successor in interest can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
division that sufficient bond coverage will remain in place.
8. 4VAC130-778.13. Identification of Interests
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
778.11.
An application shall contain the following information:
(a) A statement as to whether the applicant and/or the operator, if
different from the applicant, is a corporation, partnership, single
proprietorship, association, or other business entity.
(b) The name, address, telephone number and, as applicable,
employer identification number of the:
(1) Applicant;
(2) Applicant's resident agent;
(3) Operator, if different from the applicant; and
(4) Each business entity in the applicant's and operator's
organizational structure, up to and including the ultimate parent
entity of the applicant and operator; for every such business entity
provide the required information for every president, chief executive
officer, partner, member, and/or director (or persons in similar
positions), a positions), and every person who owns of record 10
percent or more of the entity.
(c) For the applicant and operator, if different from the
applicant, information required by paragraph (d) of this section for
every:
(1) Officer.
(2) Partner.
(3) Member.
(4) Director.
(5) Person performing a function similar to a director.
(6) Person who owns, of record, 10 percent or more of the applicant
or operator.
(d) For each person listed from paragraph (c) of this section:
(1) The person's name, address, and telephone number.
(2) The person's position title and relationship to the applicant
or operator, including percentage of ownership and location in the
organizational structure.
(3) The date the person began functioning in that position.
(e) A list of all the names under which the applicant, operator,
partners, or principal shareholders, and the operator's partners or
principal shareholders operate or previously operated a surface coal
mining operation in the United States within a five-year period
preceding the date of submission of the application, including the
name, address, identifying numbers, including employer identification
number, Federal or State permit number and MSHA number, the date of
issuance of the MSHA number, and the regulatory authority.
(f) For the applicant and operator, if different from the
applicant, a list of any pending permit applications for surface coal
mining operations filed in the United States, identifying each
application by its application number,
[[Page 50921]]
jurisdiction, or by other identifying information when necessary.
(g) For any surface coal mining operation the applicant and/or
operator owned or controlled within a five year period preceding the
submission of the permit application, and for any surface coal mining
operation the applicant and/or operator controlled on that date, the:
(1) Permittee's and operator's name and address, tax identification
numbers;
(2) Name of the regulatory authority with jurisdiction over the
permit(s) with the corresponding Federal or State permit number(s) and
MSHA number(s); and
(3) The permittee's and operator's relationship to the operation,
including the percentage of ownership and location in the
organizational structure.
(h) The name and address of each legal or equitable owner of record
of the surface and mineral property to be mined, each holder of record
of any leasehold interest in the property to be mined, and any
purchaser of record under a real estate contract for the property to be
mined.
(i) The name and address of each owner of record of all property
(surface and subsurface) contiguous to any part of the proposed permit
area.
(j) The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) numbers for
all mine-associated structures that require MSHA approval.
(k) A statement of all lands, interest in lands, options, or
pending bids on interests held or made by the applicant for lands
contiguous to the area described in the permit application. If
requested by the applicant, any information required by this Paragraph
which is not on public file pursuant to State law shall be held in
confidence by the division, as provided under 4VAC25-130-
773.13(d)(3)(ii).
(l) Each application shall contain a list of all other licenses and
permits needed by the applicant to conduct the proposed surface mining
activities.
This list shall identify each license and permit by--
(1) Type of permit or license;
(2) Name and address of issuing authority;
(3) Identification numbers of applications for those permits or
licenses or, if issued, the identification numbers of the permits or
licenses; and
(4) If a decision has been made, the date of approval or
disapproval by each issuing authority.
(m) After an applicant is notified that his application is
approved, but before the permit is issued, the applicant shall, as
applicable, update, correct or indicate that no change has occurred in
the information previously submitted under Paragraphs (a) through (d)
of this section.
(n) The applicant shall submit the information required by this
section and by 4VAC25-130-778.14 in any prescribed OSM format that is
issued.
9. 4VAC25-130-778.14(c). Violation Information
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
778.14.
As proposed the amendment reads as follows:
(c) For any violation of a provision of the Federal Act or this
chapter, or of any law, rule or regulation of the United States, or of
any State law, rule or regulation enacted pursuant to Federal law, rule
or regulation pertaining to air or water environmental protection
incurred in connection with any surface coal mining operation, a list
of all violation notices received by the applicant during the three
year period preceding the application date, and a list of all unabated
cessation orders and unabated air and water quality violation notices
received prior to the date of the application by any surface coal
mining and reclamation operation owned or controlled by either the
applicant or operator. For each violation notice or cessation order
reported, the lists shall include the following information, as
applicable:
10. 4VAC25-130-800.52(a) and (a)(2). Bond Forfeiture Reinstatement
Procedures
There is no direct Federal counterpart regulation for this section.
As proposed, it reads as follows:
(a) Any person who owns or controls or has owned or controlled any
operation on which the bond has been forfeited or the permit revoked
pursuant to this chapter or pursuant to Chapters 15 [repealed], 17
(Sec. 45.1-198 et seq.) or 23 [repealed] of Title 45.1 of the Code of
Virginia and who has not previously been reinstated by the Director may
petition the Director for reinstatement. Reinstatement, if granted,
shall be under such terms and conditions as set forth by the Director
or his designee. The Director or his designee in determining the terms
and conditions shall consider the particular facts and circumstances
existing in each individual case. Reinstatement shall not be available
to applicants for reinstatement where the division finds that the
applicant controls or has controlled surface coal mining and
reclamation operations with a demonstrated pattern of willful
violations of the Act of such nature and duration and with such
resulting irreparable damage to the environment as to indicate an
intent not to comply with the Act, in accordance with 4VAC25-130-
773.15(b)(3). As a minimum, the applicant for reinstatement shall
satisfy the following requirements:
* * * * *
(5) Pay to the Director a reinstatement fee of $5,000 assessed by
the Director on each site forfeited. These fees shall be used by the
Director to accomplish reclamation on other forfeited or abandoned
surface coal mining operations or conduct such other investigations,
research or abatement actions relating to lands and waters affected by
coal surface mining activities.
(b) Reinstatement by the Director shall be a prerequisite to the
filing by the person (applicant for reinstatement) of any new permit
application or renewal under this chapter or Chapters 15 [repealed], 17
(Sec. 45.1-198 et seq.), or 23 [repealed] of Title 45.1 of the Code of
Virginia, but shall not affect the person's need to comply with all
other requirements of said statutes, regulations or both promulgated
thereunder.
11. 4VAC25-130-801.12(c) and (d). Entrance Fee and Bond
There is no direct Federal counterpart regulation for this section.
As proposed, it reads as follows:
(c) The Director may accept the bond of an applicant of an
underground mining operation without separate surety, as provided by
4VAC25-130-801.13, upon a showing by such applicant of a net worth,
total assets minus total liabilities (certified by an independent
certified public accountant), equivalent to $1 million. Such net worth
shall be, during the existence of the permit, certified annually by an
independent certified public accountant and the certification submitted
to the division on the anniversary date of the permit.
(d) The Director may accept the bond of an applicant of a surface
mining operation or associated facility without separate surety, upon a
showing by the applicant of those conditions set forth in 4VAC25-130-
801.13(b). The financial solvency of the permittee shall be, during the
existence of the permit, certified annually by an independent certified
public accountant and the certification submitted to the division by
June 1st or by such other date that the division may set.
12. 4VAC25-130-801.13. Self-Bonding
There is no direct Federal counterpart regulation for this section.
As proposed, it reads as follows:
[[Page 50922]]
(a) The division may accept a self-bond from the applicant of a
proposed surface coal mining operation in the form of an indemnity
agreement.
(1) The applicant shall provide the:
(i) Name and address of a suitable agent to receive service of
process in the Commonwealth.
(ii) Name and address of the certified public accountant(s) who
prepared the statement required by this section.
(iii) Location of the financial records used to prepare the C.P.A.
statement required by this section.
(iv) Evidence indicating a history of satisfactory continuous
operation.
(2) For a proposed underground mining operation, the applicant has
a net worth, certified by an independent certified public accountant in
the form of an unqualified opinion appended to the financial statement
submitted, of no less than $1 million after total liabilities are
subtracted from total assets. If the applicant is a subsidiary
corporation, the applicant's parent organization's net worth need only
be certified by the independent certified public accountant, if the
applicant uses or includes any assets or liabilities of the parent
organization in computing or arriving at the applicant's net worth.
Where the division has a valid reason to believe that the permittee's
net worth is less than required by this subsection, it may require a
new certified public accountant's statement and certification.
(3) The applicant of a proposed surface mining operation or
associated facility shall submit evidence substantiating the
applicant's financial solvency, with the appropriate financial
documentation required by Paragraph (a)(4) of this section.(4)(i) An
indemnity agreement must be executed by the applicant, and said
agreement must also be executed by:
(A) If a corporation, two corporate officers who are authorized to
sign the agreement by a resolution of the board of directors, a copy of
which shall be provided;
(B) To the extent that the history or assets of a parent
organization are relied upon to make the showings of this Part, the
parent organization of which it is a subsidiary, whether first-tier,
second-tier, or further removed, in the form of (A) above;
(C) If the applicant is a partnership, all of its general partners
and their parent organization or principal investors; and
(D) If the applicant is a married individual, the applicant's
spouse;
(ii) Any person who occupies more than one of the specified
positions shall indicate each capacity in which he signs the agreement;
(iii) The agreement shall be a binding obligation, jointly and
severally, on all who execute it;
(iv) For the purposes of this Paragraph, principal investor or
parent organization means anyone with a 10 percent or more beneficial
ownership interest, directly or indirectly, in the applicant.
(b) Whenever a participant in the Pool Bond Fund applies for an
additional permit or permits, the C.P.A. certification required by
Paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section shall be updated reflecting
those prior reclamation obligations and self-bonding liabilities still
in effect.
(c) If at any time the conditions upon which the self-bond was
approved no longer prevail, the division shall require the posting of a
surety or collateral bond before coal surface mining operations may
continue. The permittee shall immediately notify the division of any
change in his total liabilities or total assets which would jeopardize
the support of the self-bond. If the permittee fails to have sufficient
resources to support the self-bond, he shall be deemed to be without
bond coverage in violation of 4VAC25-130-800.11(b).
13. 4VAC25-130-840.14(c)(2). Availability of Records
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
840.14.
The DMME is proposing to add ``or electronic transmittal'' after
``mail''; add ``the division offices and on its Internet site'' after
``at''; delete ``a Federal, State or local government office in the
county where the mining is occurring or proposed to occur'' after
``at''; add ``or electronic transmittal'' after ``mail''; and delete
``A list of government offices where information may be inspected can
be obtained on request by contacting the division's Big Stone Gap
office.'' As proposed, it reads as follows:
(2) At the division's option in accordance with the Virginia
Freedom of Information Act (Chapter 21 (Sec. 2.1-340 et seq.) of Title
2.1 of the Code of Virginia), providing copies of subject information
promptly by mail or electronic transmittal at the request of any
resident of the area where the mining is occurring or is proposed to
occur, provided, that the division shall maintain for public
inspection, at the division offices and on its Internet site, a
description of the information available for mailing or electronic
transmittal and the procedure for obtaining such information.
This Virginia regulation is amended to provide for electronic
transmittal of information and the maintenance of the description of
available information from the division offices and via the agency
Internet site.
The Division has 2 offices located in the coalfield counties of
Southwest Virginia which are readily available to the public and an
Internet site to serve industry, other governmental agencies, and the
public.
14. 4VAC25-130-846.2. Definitions
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
701.5.
The following revised definitions are being moved to Sec. 4VAC25-
130-700.5 Definitions.
``Knowingly'' means that an individual knew or had reason to know
in authorizing, ordering, or carrying out an act or omission on the
part of a corporate permittee that such act or omission constituted a
violation, failure, or refusal.
``Violation, failure or refusal'' means:
(1) A violation of a condition of the permit issued pursuant to the
Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder; or, (2) A failure or
refusal to comply with any order issued under Sec. 45.1-245 of the
Act, or any order incorporated in a decision issued by the Director
under the Act, except an order incorporated in a decision issued under
Sec. 45.1-246(B) of the Act.
``Willfully'' means that an individual acted (1) either
intentionally, voluntarily, or consciously, and (2) with intentional
disregard or plain indifference to legal requirements in authorizing,
ordering, or carrying out a corporate permittee's action or omission
that constituted a violation, failure, or refusal.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the submission satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the Virginia program.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they should be specific, confined
to issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason
for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but
those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or
include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history,
its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent Tribal or
Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant
publications. We cannot ensure that comments received after the close
[[Page 50923]]
of the comment period (see DATES) or sent to an address other than
those listed above (see ADDRESSES) will be included in the docket for
this rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you may
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., local time, on
September 15, 2008. If you are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and
time of the hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no
one requests an opportunity to speak, we will not hold the hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at a public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If there is limited interest in participation in a public hearing,
we may hold a public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish
to meet with us to discuss the submission, please request a meeting by
contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All
such meetings are open to the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will
make a written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative
record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that, to the
extent allowable by law, this rule meets the applicable standards of
subsections (a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are
not applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and
program amendments since each such program is drafted and promulgated
by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11,
732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the submittal is consistent with
SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and whether the other
requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent with''
regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
The basis for this determination is that our decision is on a State
regulatory program and does not involve a Federal program involving
Indian Tribes.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute a major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal that is the subject of this rule is based on
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied
[[Page 50924]]
upon the data and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, geographic regions, or Federal, State or local governmental
agencies; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based on the analysis performed
under various laws and executive orders for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based on the analysis performed under
various laws and executive orders for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 946
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: July 24, 2008.
Michael K. Robinson,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E8-20175 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P