Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding, 50971-50972 [E8-20126]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Notices
the Project’s costs.5 You admitted that
the co-conspirators further agreed and
submitted to the Universal Service
Administrative Company ‘‘(USAC’’)
false and misleading documents
indicating that the Academy had
secured access to funding from an
independent foundation and that the coconspirators also misrepresented the
share of the Project’s costs that USAC
would be paying.6
Pursuant to section 54.8(a)(4) of the
Commission’s rules,7 your conviction
requires the Bureau to suspend you
from participating in any activities
associated with or related to the schools
and libraries fund mechanism,
including the receipt of funds or
discounted services through the schools
and libraries fund mechanism, or
consulting with, assisting, or advising
applicants or service providers
regarding the schools and libraries
support mechanism.8 Your suspension
becomes effective upon the earlier of
your receipt of this letter or publication
of notice in the Federal Register.9
Suspension is immediate pending the
Bureau’s final debarment determination.
In accordance with the Commission’s
debarment rules, you may contest this
suspension or the scope of this
suspension by filing arguments in
opposition to the suspension, with any
relevant documentation. Your request
must be received within 30 days after
you receive this letter or after notice is
published in the Federal Register,
whichever comes first.10 Such requests,
however, will not ordinarily be
granted.11 The Bureau may reverse or
limit the scope of suspension only upon
a finding of extraordinary
circumstances.12 Absent extraordinary
circumstances, the Bureau will decide
any request for reversal or modification
of suspension within 90 days of its
receipt of such request.13
II. Initiation of Debarment Proceedings
Your guilty plea and conviction of
criminal conduct in connection with the
E-Rate program, in addition to serving
as a basis for immediate suspension
from the program, also serves as a basis
for the initiation of debarment
5 See
Allan Green Substitute Information at para.
5.
6 See
id.
CFR 54.8(a)(4). See Second Report and Order,
18 FCC Rcd at 9225–9227, paras. 67–74.
8 47 CFR 54.8(a)(1), (d).
9 Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9226,
para. 69; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(1).
10 47 CFR 54.8(e)(4).
11 Id.
12 47 CFR 54.8(e)(5).
13 See Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at
9226, para. 70; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(5), 54.8(f).
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
7 47
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:32 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
proceedings against you. Your
conviction falls within the categories of
causes for debarment defined in section
54.8(c) of the Commission’s rules.14
Therefore, pursuant to section 54.8(a)(4)
of the Commission’s rules, your
conviction requires the Bureau to
commence debarment proceedings
against you.
As with your suspension, you may
contest debarment or the scope of the
proposed debarment by filing arguments
and any relevant documentation within
30 calendar days of the earlier of the
receipt of this letter or of publication in
the Federal Register.15 Absent
extraordinary circumstances, the Bureau
will debar you.16 Within 90 days of
receipt of any opposition to your
suspension and proposed debarment,
the Bureau, in the absence of
extraordinary circumstances, will
provide you with notice of its decision
to debar.17 If the Bureau decides to
debar you, its decision will become
effective upon the earlier of your receipt
of a debarment notice or publication of
the decision in the Federal Register.18
If and when your debarment becomes
effective, you will be prohibited from
participating in activities associated
with or related to the schools and
libraries support mechanism for three
years from the date of debarment.19 The
Bureau may, if necessary to protect the
public interest, extend the debarment
period.20
Please direct any response, if by
messenger or hand delivery, to Marlene
H. Dortch, Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission, 236
14 ‘‘Causes
for suspension and debarment are the
conviction of or civil judgment for attempt or
commission of criminal fraud, theft, embezzlement,
forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of
records, making false statements, receiving stolen
property, making false claims, obstruction of justice
and other fraud or criminal offense arising out of
activities associated with or related to the schools
and libraries support mechanism, the high-cost
support mechanism, the rural healthcare support
mechanism, and the low-income support
mechanism.’’ 47 CFR 54.8(c). Such activities
‘‘include the receipt of funds or discounted services
through [the Federal universal service] support
mechanisms, or consulting with, assisting, or
advising applicants or service providers regarding
[the Federal universal service] support
mechanisms.’’ 47 CFR 54.8(a)(1).
15 See Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at
9226, para. 70; 47 CFR 54.8(e)(3).
16 Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9227,
para. 74.
17 See id., 18 FCC Rcd at 9226, para. 70; 47 CFR
54.8(e)(5).
18 Id. The Commission may reverse a debarment,
or may limit the scope or period of debarment upon
a finding of extraordinary circumstances, following
the filing of a petition by you or an interested party
or upon motion by the Commission. 47 CFR 54.8(f).
19 Second Report and Order, 18 FCC Rcd at 9225,
paras. 67; 47 CFR 54.8(d), 54.8(g).
20 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50971
Massachusetts Avenue, NE., Suite 110,
Washington, DC 20002, to the attention
of Diana Lee, Attorney Advisor,
Investigations and Hearings Division,
Enforcement Bureau, Room 4–C330,
with a copy to Vickie Robinson,
Assistant Chief, Investigations and
Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau,
Room 4–C330, Federal Communications
Commission. If sent by commercial
overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal
Service Express Mail and Priority Mail),
the response should be sent to the
Federal Communications Commission,
9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol
Heights, Maryland 20743. If sent by
first-class, Express, or Priority mail, the
response should be sent to Diana Lee,
Attorney Advisor, Investigations and
Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission,
445 12th Street, SW., Room 4–C330,
Washington, DC 20554, with a copy to
Vickie Robinson, Assistant Chief,
Investigations and Hearings Division,
Enforcement Bureau, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room 4–C330, Washington,
DC 20554. You shall also transmit a
copy of the response via e-mail to
diana.lee@fcc.gov and to
vickie.robinson@fcc.gov.
If you have any questions, please
contact Ms. Lee via mail, by telephone
at (202) 418–1420 or by e-mail at
diana.lee@fcc.gov. If Ms. Lee is
unavailable, you may contact Ms. Vickie
Robinson, Assistant Chief,
Investigations and Hearings Division, by
telephone at (202) 418–1420 and by email at vickie.robinson@fcc.gov.
Sincerely yours,
Hillary S. DeNigro,
Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division,
Enforcement Bureau.
cc:
Kristy Carroll, Esq., Universal
Service Administrative Company
(via e-mail). Michael Wood,
Antitrust Division, United States
Department of Justice (via mail).
[FR Doc. E8–20145 Filed 8–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[Report No. 2872]
Petitions for Reconsideration and
Clarification of Action in Rulemaking
Proceeding
August 20, 2008.
Petitions for Reconsideration have
been filed in the Commission’s
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this
Public Notice and published pursuant to
47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
50972
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 169 / Friday, August 29, 2008 / Notices
these documents is available for viewing
and copying in Room CY–B402, 445
12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or
may be purchased from the
Commission’s copy contractor, Best
Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1)–800–
378–3160). Oppositions to these
petitions must be filed by September 15,
2008. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the
Commission’s rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)).
Replies to oppositions must be filed
within 10 days after the time for filing
oppositions have expired.
Subject: In the Matter of
Telecommunications Relay Services and
Speech-to-Speech Services for
Individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities (CG Docket No. 03–123).
E911 Requirements for IP-Enabled
Service Providers (WC Docket No. 05–
196).
Number of Petitions Filed: 2.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–20126 Filed 8–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[DA 08–1913; WT Docket No. 08–165]
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
Seeks Comment on Petition for
Declaratory Ruling by CTIA—The
Wireless Association To Clarify
Provisions of Section 332(c)(7)(B) To
Ensure Timely Siting Review and To
Preempt Under Section 253 State and
Local Ordinances That Classify All
Wireless Siting Proposals as Requiring
a Variance
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this document, comment is
sought on a July 11, 2008 petition for
Declaratory Ruling (Petition) filed by
CTIA—The Wireless Association
(Petitioner). The Petitioner asks the
Federal Communications Commission
to clarify the provisions of section
332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications
Act, as amended, that Petitioner
contends are ambiguous and that have
been unreasonably interpreted.
Petitioner further requests that the
Commission preempt local ordinances
and state laws that Petitioner believes
violate section 253(a) of the
Communications Act, as amended.
DATES: Interested parties may file
comments on or before September 15,
2008, and reply comments on or before
September 30, 2008.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:32 Aug 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
You may submit comments,
identified by WT Docket No. 08–165, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web site: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail
(although we continue to experience
delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service
mail). All filings must be addressed to
the Commission’s Secretary, Office of
the Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Rowan, Spectrum and
Competition Policy Division, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau at (202)
418–1883 or Michael.Rowan@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s public
notice released on August 14, 2008. The
full text of the public notice is available
for public inspection and copying
during business hours in the FCC
Reference Information Center, Portals II,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. It also may be
purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor at Portals II, 445
12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554; the contractor’s
Web site, https://www.bcpiweb.com; or
by calling (800) 378–3160, facsimile
(202) 488–5563, or e-mail
FCC@BCPIWEB.com. Copies of the
public notice also may be obtained via
the Commission’s Electronic Comment
Filing System (ECFS) by entering the
docket number, WT Docket No. 08–165.
Additionally, the complete item is
available on the Federal
Communications Commission’s Web
site at https://www.fcc.gov.
On July 11, 2008, CTIA—The Wireless
Association (CTIA) filed a petition
requesting that the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) issue a Declaratory Ruling
clarifying provisions of the
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (Communications Act)
regarding state and local review of
wireless facility siting applications.1
CTIA seeks clarification of provisions in
section 332(c)(7) of the Communications
Act that it contends are ambiguous and
that it claims have been interpreted in
a manner that has allowed certain
zoning authorities to impose
unreasonable impediments to wireless
facility siting and the provision of
wireless services. CTIA also requests
that the Commission preempt local
ordinances and state laws that it states
subject wireless facility siting
applications to unique, burdensome
requirements, in violation of section
253(a) of the Communications Act,
which bars state and local laws that
‘‘prohibit or have the effect of
prohibiting the ability of any entity to
provide any interstate or intrastate
telecommunications service.’’ 2
Specifically, in its petition, CTIA asks
the Commission to take four actions
relating to the time frames in which
zoning authorities must act on siting
requests, their power to restrict
competitive entry by multiple providers
in a given area, and their ability to
impose certain procedural requirements
on wireless service providers. First, to
eliminate an ambiguity that CTIA
contends currently exists in section
332(c)(7)(B)(v) of the Communications
Act, CTIA asks the Commission to
clarify the time period in which a state
or local zoning authority will be deemed
to have failed to act on a wireless
facility siting application. CTIA states
that ‘‘the Commission should issue a
declaratory ruling explaining that (1) a
failure to act on a wireless facility siting
application only involving collocation
occurs if there is no final action within
45 days from submission of the request
to the local zoning authority; and (2) a
failure to act on any other wireless
siting facility application occurs if there
is no final action within 75 days from
submission of the request to the local
zoning authority.’’ 3 Second, citing the
requirement in section 332(c)(7)(B)(ii) of
the Communications Act that state and
local governments act on wireless
facility siting applications within a
reasonable time, CTIA asks the
Commission to implement procedural
steps whereby, if a zoning authority fails
1 In the Matter of Petition for Declaratory Ruling
to Clarify Provisions of section 332(c)(7)(B) to
Ensure Timely Siting Review and to Preempt under
section 253 State and Local Ordinances that
Classify All Wireless Siting Proposals as Requiring
a Variance, Petition for Declaratory Ruling, WT
Docket No. 08–165, filed July 11, 2008 (Petition).
2 47 U.S.C. 253(a).
3 Petition at iii.
E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM
29AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 169 (Friday, August 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50971-50972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20126]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[Report No. 2872]
Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in
Rulemaking Proceeding
August 20, 2008.
Petitions for Reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published
pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of
[[Page 50972]]
these documents is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402,
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the
Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1)-
800-378-3160). Oppositions to these petitions must be filed by
September 15, 2008. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47
CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to oppositions must be filed within 10 days
after the time for filing oppositions have expired.
Subject: In the Matter of Telecommunications Relay Services and
Speech-to-Speech Services for Individuals with Hearing and Speech
Disabilities (CG Docket No. 03-123).
E911 Requirements for IP-Enabled Service Providers (WC Docket No.
05-196).
Number of Petitions Filed: 2.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-20126 Filed 8-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P