Fisheries in the Western Pacific; Pelagic Fisheries; Squid Jig Fisheries, 50751-50755 [E8-20004]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 168 / Thursday, August 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
business size standard for this census
category; that size standard is 500 or
fewer employees. According to Census
Bureau data for 2002, there were 1,362
firms in this category that operated for
the entire year. Of these, 1,351 had
employment of 499 or fewer employees,
and six firms had employment of
between 500 and 999. Consequently, we
estimate that the majority of these firms
small entities that may be affected by
our action.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
D. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements for Small Entities
66. Any potential proposals from this
NPRM will not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements that would
be subject to the Paperwork Reduction
Act. Therefore, we have not attempted
here to provide an estimate in terms of
burden hours. Rather, we are asking
commenters to provide the Commission
with reliable information and comments
on any costs and burdens on small
entities.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize the
Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives
Considered
67. The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
(among others) the following four
alternatives: (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.
68. As noted above, the NPRM invites
comment on regulations that the
Commission must implement 90 days
after the 911 NET Act’s enactment,
including regulations that:
(A) Ensure that IP-enabled voice
service providers have the ability to
exercise their rights under subsection
(b);
(B) Take into account any technical,
network security, or information privacy
requirements that are specific to IPenabled voice services; and
(C) Provide, with respect to any
capabilities that are not required to be
made available to a commercial mobile
service provider but that the
Commission determines * * * are
necessary for an IP-enabled voice
service provider to comply with its
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:24 Aug 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
obligations [to provide 911 service and
enhanced 911 service], that such
capabilities shall be available at the
same rates, terms, and conditions as
would apply if such capabilities were
made available to a commercial mobile
service provider.
69. Specifically, we invite comment
regarding how the Commission could
ease any potential burden on small
entities. The Commission seeks
comment on significant alternatives and
recommends that small entities file
comments in response to the NPRM. We
anticipate that the record will be
developed concerning alternative ways
in which the Commission could lessen
the burden on classes of carrier or
entities.
F. Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rules
70. None.
Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 Analysis
71. This document does not contain
proposed information collection(s)
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13. In
addition, therefore, it does not contain
any new or modified ‘‘information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198. See 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Ordering Clauses
72. Accordingly, it is ordered that
pursuant to the authority contained in
sections 1, 4(i)–(j), 201, 202, 222, 251,
252, and 303(r) of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151,
154(i)–(j), 201, 202, 222, 251, 252,
303(r), and section 6 of the Wireless 911
Act, as amended, this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking is adopted.
73. It is further ordered that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
including the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–20135 Filed 8–27–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50751
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 665
[Docket No. 0612242967–7394–01]
RIN 0648–AS71
Fisheries in the Western Pacific;
Pelagic Fisheries; Squid Jig Fisheries
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
include three species of pelagic squid
under Federal management, and
establish permitting and reporting
requirements for squid jig fishing
vessels over 50 ft (15.4 m) in length.
These vessels would also be required to
carry Federal observers if requested by
NMFS. This proposed rule is intended
to improve monitoring and management
of U.S. domestic pelagic squid fisheries
in the western Pacific.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
must be received by October 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
amendment, identified by 0648–AS71,
may be sent to either of the following
addresses:
• Electronic Submission: Federal eRulemaking Portal www.regulations.gov;
or
• Mail: William L. Robinson,
Regional Administrator, NMFS, Pacific
Islands Region (PIR), 1601 Kapiolani
Blvd, Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814–
4700.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (if you wish to
remain anonymous, enter ‘‘NA’’ in the
required name and organization fields).
Attachments to electronic comments
will be accepted in Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file
formats only.
Copies of the Fishery Management
Plan for Pelagic Fisheries of the Western
Pacific Region (Pelagics FMP), and
proposed Amendment 15 including an
environmental assessment (EA), are
E:\FR\FM\28AUP1.SGM
28AUP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
50752
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 168 / Thursday, August 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
available from the Western Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council),
1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400, Honolulu,
HI 96813, tel 808–522–8220, fax 808–
522–8226, or www.wpcouncil.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob
Harman, NMFS PIR, 808–944–2271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
Federal Register document is also
accessible at the Office of the Federal
Register website: www.gpoaccess.gov/fr.
The pelagic fisheries of the U.S.
western Pacific are managed under the
Pelagics FMP, which was developed by
the Council, and approved and
implemented by NMFS. The Council
has submitted Pelagics FMP
Amendment 15 to NMFS for review
under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act). This proposed
rule would implement the management
provisions recommended in
Amendment 15, if approved by the
Secretary of Commerce. Although no
squid resource concerns have arisen to
date, effective monitoring programs and
mechanisms to implement management
measures are both needed. To address
these needs, the Council recommends in
Amendment 15 improving data on U.S.
squid fisheries through new permitting,
monitoring and reporting requirements,
as follows:
• Add three pelagic squid species to
the pelagic management unit (neon
flying squid, Ommastrephes bartramii,
diamondback squid, Thysanoteuthis
rhombus, and purple flying squid,
Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis); and
• Require operators of U.S. vessels
greater than 50 ft (15.4 m) in length
overall that fish for pelagic squid in
waters of the U.S. Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ) of the western Pacific to:
i. obtain Federal permits;
ii. carry Federal observers if requested
by NMFS; and
iii. report any western Pacific pelagic
squid catch and effort either in Federal
squid logbooks or via existing local
reporting systems.
These measures, if implemented,
would provide additional data and a
mechanism for the Council and NMFS
to effectively monitor and manage the
U.S. domestic pelagic squid fisheries.
Pelagic squid are widely dispersed
and short-lived, with relatively high
reproduction rates. Thus, populations
recover quickly following declines and
are difficult to over-harvest with
relatively inefficient fishing methods
such as jigging. For example, stock
abundance of neon flying squid in the
central North Pacific was low in 1993,
probably due to high fishing mortality
from the high seas drift gillnet fishery.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:24 Aug 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
That fishery was banned in 1992, and
the stocks quickly recovered and
abundance was high during 1994–96.
Stock abundance was again depressed
in 1997 (the most prominent El Nino
year in the last century), but was high
in 1998. There is no evidence of overharvesting of pelagic squid stocks on the
high seas or in EEZ waters around U.S.
islands in the western Pacific.
Pelagic squid are targeted by food and
bait fisheries throughout the Pacific.
They are a major component of the
pelagic ecosystem, with large species
preying on a variety of fish and
invertebrate species, and smaller species
providing important forage components
for species such as swordfish and pilot
whales. This ‘‘keystone’’ role of squid in
the trophic web suggests that squid may
be an important indicator of ecosystem
dynamics. An international, large-scale,
multi-species squid jigging fishery exists
on the Pacific high seas, including
foreign and a few U.S. fishing vessels.
The Japanese jigging fleet was once
dominant in the North Pacific, but is
now rivaled by a growing Chinese fleet.
The fishery is seasonal with most
vessels switching to the Southern
Hemisphere during the southern
summer (October-February). Three U.S.
squid jig vessels fished for squid in the
North Pacific for a month or less in the
summer of 2003, catching red flying
squid on the high seas and offloading in
Japan. Following a disappointing
season, they moved to New Zealand
waters for the 2003 summer/autumn
squid season. To date, these domestic
jigging vessels have fished on the high
seas or in the waters of other nations,
but there is a possibility of moving their
fishing activities to U.S. EEZ waters
around Hawaii in association with a
shift in oceanic conditions. In addition
to this large-vessel fishery, a few smaller
vessels target purple flying squid with
jigs near the Hawaiian Islands. This
smaller fishery provides squid for the
seafood market, and bait for the tuna
handline fishery.
Although U.S. fisheries in the
northern waters of the western Pacific
catch a tiny fraction of the total
international squid production, data
provided by monitoring of these
fisheries are, as yet, the only indicator
available of squid stock status. The first
issue to be addressed in the proposed
rule is the need for improved
information about U.S. squid jig
fisheries. To effectively monitor and
manage these fisheries, there is a need
to ensure that U.S. catches of squid in
the western Pacific are recorded
accurately. For fishing on the high seas,
the HSFCA requires catch reporting, but
to date there has been no specific
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
HSFCA logbook for squid jig fishing.
Commercial landings of squid offloaded
in Hawaii (regardless of where caught)
are required to be reported on Hawaii
state catch reports. Recreational catches
landed in Hawaii are not subject to any
reporting requirements (although
recreational squid harvests are believed
to be small and are not a concern to
resource managers). With the exception
of the Pacific remote island areas
(PRIA), creel surveys are conducted in
the other areas of the U.S. western
Pacific to collect data on both
commercial and recreational fishing
activities. The information collected
from these disparate programs have not
been compiled for efficient analyses by
resource scientists and managers.
U.S. squid jig vessels that fish only on
the high seas in the western Pacific
would be required to report their catch
and effort using the Federal squid
logbooks, pursuant to the reporting and
recordkeeping provision of the High
Seas Fishing Compliance Act (HSFCA).
The reporting requirements of the
HSFCA (50 CFR 300.17(b)(3)) provide
the necessary regulatory authority for
NMFS to require squid jig fishermen to
use Federal logbooks that would be
implemented under this proposed rule
to meet the reporting requirements
under both the HSFCA and the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
In addition to data needs, a second
issue regarding the domestic squid
jigging fishery is that there is no
management mechanism to implement
fishery regulatory controls, should
concerns arise regarding squid stocks or
other aspects of the fishery. Squid
resources are healthy, the domestic
fishery is relatively small, and there
have been no observed or reported
interactions with protected species or
significant levels of bycatch. Thus,
specific management measures (such as
time or area closures, or effort or
landing limits) are not being considered
at this time. However, the establishment
of mechanisms to implement
management measures would allow for
regulatory controls to be put in place if
data collected indicate a future need for
additional management measures.
To be considered, comments must be
received by close of business on October
14, 2008, not postmarked or otherwise
transmitted by that date.
In addition to soliciting public
comments on this proposed rule, NMFS
is soliciting comments on proposed
Amendment 15 through October 10,
2008 as stated in the Notice of
Availability published on August 11,
2008 (73 FR 46580). Public comments
on this proposed rule, if received by
October 10, 2008, will also be
E:\FR\FM\28AUP1.SGM
28AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 168 / Thursday, August 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
considered in the approval/disapproval
decision for Amendment 15. Comments
received after that date will not be
considered in the approval/disapproval
decision for Amendment 15, but will be
considered for this proposed rule.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent
with the Pelagics FMP, other provisions
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable laws, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
Amendment 15 includes an EA that
describes the existing squid fishery
management and environment, and
describes the potential environmental
impacts of implementing the provisions
of the preferred alternative. The EA tiers
off a 2005 Final Environmental Impact
Statement (2005 EIS) (70 FR 24038, May
6, 2005), and incorporates by reference
the previous environmental impact
analysis of the five alternatives
considered in Amendment 15,
specifically Alternative 1, the no-action
alternative, Alternative 2, voluntary
monitoring, Alternative 3, mandatory
monitoring and management under the
Pelagics FMP, Alternative 4, mandatory
monitoring and management through a
new squid FMP, and Alternative 5,
mandatory monitoring and management
through international agreements. All of
the previous alternatives considered in
the April 2005 EIS were coordinated
with interested and affected parties.
New information about future fishery
management policies became available
after the 2005 EIS was completed, and
an additional alternative (Alternative
3a) was added and analyzed in the EA.
Alternative 3a is similar to Alternative
3 in the 2005 EIS, but the revised
alternative now contains provisions for
mandatory Federal permits and
logbooks reporting for vessels greater
than 50 ft (15.4 m) in length that fish for
squid in the U.S. EEZ waters of the
western Pacific, and a requirement to
carry Federal observers when requested
by NMFS.
The purpose and need for the
proposed action is to establish
appropriate monitoring and
management mechanisms for the
domestic harvest of western Pacific
pelagic squid. Based on the information
in the EA and the 2005 EIS, as
compared to the no-action alternative,
preferred Alternative 3a would have no
adverse impacts to essential fish habitat
or habitat areas of particular concern.
None of the action alternatives would be
expected to change the impacts of U.S.
vessels on squid resources in the short
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:24 Aug 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
term, but impacts on the resource base
could increase with higher future effort,
so increasing fishery managers’
understanding of the status of the stocks
and fishing mortality would be an
important outcome of this action. By
including pelagic squid as management
unit species under the preferred
alternative, the foundation would be
established for implementing control
measures, should they become
necessary. None of the action
alternatives is anticipated to have any
significant adverse impacts on seabird,
sea turtle, or marine mammal
populations because the fishery has a
relatively low level of participation, and
there have been no observed or reported
interactions with protected resources in
either the nearshore Hawaii squid
fishery or the U.S. high seas squid jig
fishery. The preferred alternative would
provide for the sustained participation
of fishing communities by helping to
ensure the long-term availability of
Pacific pelagic squid. The complete
analysis of the alternatives is contained
in the 2005 EIS and in Amendment 15,
and is not repeated here. Copies of these
two environmental analytical
documents are available from the
Council (see ADDRESSES).
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Council for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The analysis follows:
The Western Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) prepared Amendment 15
to the Pelagics FMP. Amendment 15
recommends including three species of
commercially-harvested pelagic squid (neon
flying squid, purple flying squid, and
diamondback squid) as pelagic management
unit species. Amendment 15 would establish
Federal permitting, data reporting, and
observer requirements for squid jigging
vessels over 50 ft (15.4 m) in length that fish
in the U.S. EEZ of the western Pacific, or
land these squid in ports of the region. A
description of the action, why it is being
considered, and the legal basis for this action
are contained in the preamble to this
proposed rule. This rule does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with other Federal rules.
There are no disproportionate economic
impacts from this rule based on homeport,
gear type, or relative vessel size. Pursuant to
section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. § 605(b), NMFS has determined
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities based on the pre-existing status
of pelagic squid fisheries within the U.S. EEZ
of the central and western Pacific. All vessels
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50753
having the potential to participate in this
fishery are considered to be small entities
under the current Small Business
Administration definition of small fishharvesting businesses (gross receipts not in
excess of $ 4.0 million, independently owned
and operated, and not dominant in their
field).
This proposed rule would improve
mandatory monitoring and establish
mechanisms for management by including
these squids in the management unit. This
rule would require U.S. vessels greater than
50 ft (15.4 m) in length overall that fish for
pelagic squid in U.S. Pacific EEZ to obtain
Federal permits, to carry observers if
requested by NMFS, and to report their catch
and effort using either NMFS western Pacific
squid jigging logbooks or existing local
reporting systems. High seas squid harvests
would be reported in the squid jigging
logbooks. The fishery data would be
centralized into a database easily available to
resource scientists and managers.
An international, large-scale squid jigging
fishery (multi-species) exists on the Pacific
high seas. This includes both foreign and,
until recently, a few domestic (U.S. flagged)
fishing vessels. Three U.S. flagged squid
jiggers fished for squid in the North Pacific
in the summer of 2003, catching neon flying
squid before traveling to the Southern
Hemisphere. (The fishery is seasonal with
most vessels switching to the Southern
Hemisphere during the southern summer,
October-February.) The operation consisted
of a mother ship, 47 m long with 38 jigging
machines, and holding up to 453,600 kg of
squid, with a crew of 18. The other three
boats ranged from 32–34 m in length. Each
had 21–38 jigging machines, holding 204,100
to 386,000 kg of squid, with crews of 12.
Blast freezers were installed on board all four
boats. While squid catches as high as 8,000
kg per vessel per night have been reported by
some operations, the recent domestic
operation in the North Pacific caught a
combined total of 20,253 kg of red flying
squid for three vessels fishing over 22 days
in 2003.
In addition, a small nearshore squid jigging
fishery operating out of Kauai and a tuna
handline fishery operating primarily from the
Big Island of Hawaii have been known to
target purple flying squid for food and/or
bait. Although significant in the 1970s and
1980s, current participation in this fishery is
now estimated to consist of only a few
vessels. Nonetheless, due to shifts in both
economic and oceanic conditions, there
exists the potential for domestic squid jigging
effort to shift from the high seas to the U.S.
EEZ around Hawaii.
Economic impacts of the preferred
alternative would have a slightly adverse
economic impact in the requirement to pay
a vessel permit fee of approximately $30.
Using average prices for squid sold in Hawaii
during the summer of 2003 ($1.81/lb), a
permit fee of $30 represents only 0.15% of
the average boat revenue for the known boats
jigging for squid in the North Pacific during
2003. The largest potential impact to affected
participants is the observer requirement for
vessels greater than 50 ft (15.4 m) in length
overall contained in the preliminarily
E:\FR\FM\28AUP1.SGM
28AUP1
50754
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 168 / Thursday, August 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
preferred alternative. Assuming that the costs
of deploying (paying and feeding) observers
would be paid by NMFS (as has been the case
in the western Pacific region to date), vessel
operators will still incur some indirect costs.
Limited bunk or deck space may require
vessel operators to reduce the number of
crew in order to accommodate observers,
resulting in a decrease in the operating
efficiency of the remaining crew. There may
be additional costs if vessel operators choose
to carry additional liability insurance
(beyond that provided by NMFS for its
observers). These costs would vary between
individual vessels depending on the
insurance carriers’ minimum allowed
coverage period, and the coverage approach
that is taken. The number of entities that will
be required to carry observers is unknown as
the appropriate level of observer coverage has
not been determined, however, given that no
vessels of this size have fished for pelagic
squid in Pacific U.S. EEZ waters without
landing them in the U.S.A. to date, this
burden may be minimal. It is possible that a
squid fishery observer program could operate
on an intermittent basis if the low levels of
bycatch and protected species interactions
believed to occur are confirmed. The
remaining aspects of the preferred alternative
consist of the requirement for vessels greater
than 50 ft (15.4 m) in length overall to obtain
Federal permit and to either complete new
Federal logbooks or to participate in local
reporting systems.
Because there are no fishery-management
controls associated with this measure that
affect the operations of the fishery other than
potentially carrying observers, significant
impacts to the profitability of a substantial
number of small entities are not anticipated
and there will be no disproportionate impact
between gear types, vessels or port of
landing. As a result, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and none
has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains
collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA). These requirements have
been submitted to OMB for approval.
The preferred alternative would require
the owners of all U.S. vessels greater
than 50 ft (15.4 m) in length that
conduct commercial squid jig fishing for
squid in U.S. EEZ waters around the
islands of the western Pacific to obtain
Federal fishing permits, and the vessel
operators would be required to complete
and submit Federal catch reports, or
report via local reporting systems where
such systems exist. Permit eligibility
would not be restricted in any way, and
the permit would be renewable on an
annual basis.
NMFS anticipates that initial permit
applications would require 0.5 hours
per applicant, with renewals requiring
an additional 0.5 hours annually. It is
estimated that NMFS may receive and
process up to 30 permit applications
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:24 Aug 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
each year. Thus, the total collection-ofinformation burden to fishermen for
permit applications is estimated at 15
hours per year. The cost for individual
Federal permits has not been
determined, but would represent only
the administrative cost and is
anticipated to be approximately $30 per
permit.
NMFS anticipates the time
requirement to complete Federal catch
reports to be approximately 10 minutes
per vessel per fishing day. Assuming
that the 30 vessels fish during up to 100
days per year, the total collection-ofinformation burden estimate for fishing
data reporting is estimated at 500 hours
per year.
These estimates include the time for
reviewing instructions, searching and
compiling existing data sources, and
completing and reviewing the collection
information. Public comment is sought
regarding: whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
burden estimates; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Send comments on these or any other
aspects of the collection of information
to William L. Robinson (see ADDRESSES),
and by email to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax
to 202–395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 665
Administrative practice and
procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaii, Hawaiian
Natives, Northern Mariana Islands,
Pacific remote island areas, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 22, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 665 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 665—FISHERIES IN THE
WESTERN PACIFIC
1. The authority citation for part 665
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 665.12, amend the definition
for ‘‘Pacific Pelagic Management Unit
Species,’’ by adding three squid species
to the end of the table, and add a
definition for ‘‘Squid jig fishing’’ in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
§ 665.12
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Pacific Pelagic Management Unit
Species * * *
Common name
*
*
*
Squid:
Diamondback squid
Neon flying squid
Purple flying squid
Scientific name
*
*
Thysanoteuthis
rhombus
Ommastrephes
bartramii
Sthenoteuthis
oualaniensis
*
*
*
*
*
Squid jig fishing means fishing for
squid that are Pelagic management unit
species using a hook or hooks attached
to a line that is raised and lowered in
the water column by manual or
mechanical means.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 665.13, revise paragraphs
(f)(2)(i) through (f)(2)(v), and add a new
paragraph (f)(2)(vi) to read as follows:
§ 665.13
Permits and fees.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Fees. * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Hawaii longline limited access
permit.
(ii) Mau Zone limited access permit.
(iii) Coral reef ecosystem special
permit
(iv) American Samoa longline limited
access permit.
(v) Main Hawaiian Islands noncommercial bottomfish permit.
(vi) Western Pacific squid jig permit.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 665.14, revise paragraph (a)(1)
to read as follows:
§ 665.14
Reporting and recordkeeping.
(a) Fishing record forms. (1)
Applicability. (i) The operator of any
fishing vessel subject to the
requirements of §§ 665.21, 665.41,
665.61(a)(2), 665.61(a)(3), 665.61(a)(4),
665.81, or 665.602 must maintain on
board the vessel an accurate and
complete record of catch, effort, and
E:\FR\FM\28AUP1.SGM
28AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 168 / Thursday, August 28, 2008 / Proposed Rules
other data on paper report forms
provided by the Regional Administrator,
or electronically as specified and
approved by the Regional
Administrator, except as allowed in
paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section.
(ii) All information specified by the
Regional Administrator must be
recorded on paper or electronically
within 24 hours after the completion of
each fishing day. The logbook
information, reported on paper or
electronically, for each day of the
fishing trip must be signed and dated or
otherwise authenticated by the vessel
operator in the manner determined by
the Regional Administrator, and be
submitted or transmitted via an
approved method as specified by the
Regional Administrator, and as required
by this paragraph (a).
(iii) In lieu of the requirements in
paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the
operator of a fishing vessel registered for
use under a Western Pacific squid jig
permit pursuant to the requirements of
§ 665.21(g) may participate in a state
reporting system. If participating in a
state reporting system, all required
information must be recorded and
submitted in the exact manner required
by applicable state law or regulation.
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 665.21, redesignate paragraphs
(g) through (n) as paragraphs (h) through
(o), and add a new paragraph (g) to read
as follows:
§ 665.21
Permits.
*
*
*
*
(g) A vessel of the United States must
be registered for use under a Western
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:24 Aug 27, 2008
Jkt 214001
Pacific squid jig fishing permit, if that
vessel is more than 50 ft (15.4 m) in
length overall and is used to squid jig
fish in EEZ waters around American
Samoa, the CNMI, Guam, the Hawaiian
Archipelago, or the PRIA.
*
*
*
*
*
6. In § 665.22 add new paragraph (zz)
to read as follows:
§ 665.22
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(zz) Use a vessel that is greater than
50 ft (15.4 m) in length overall to squid
jig fish in EEZ waters around American
Samoa, the CNMI, Guam, the Hawaiian
Archipelago, or the PRIA, without a
Western Pacific squid jig fishing permit
registered for use with that vessel, in
violation of § 665.21(g).
7. In § 665.23, revise paragraph (a),
redesignate paragraphs (b) and (c) as
paragraphs (d) and (e), and add new
paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
§ 665.23
Notifications.
(a) The permit holder, or designated
agent, for any vessel registered for use
under a Hawaii longline limited access
permit, or for any vessel greater than 40
ft (12.2 m) in length overall that is
registered for use under an American
Samoa longline limited access permit,
shall provide a notice to the Regional
Administrator at least 72 hours (not
including weekends and Federal
holidays) before the vessel leaves port
on a fishing trip, any part of which
occurs in the EEZ around the Hawaiian
Archipelago or American Samoa. The
vessel operator will be presumed to be
an agent designated by the permit
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50755
holder unless the Regional
Administrator is otherwise notified by
the permit holder. The permit holder or
designated agent for a vessel registered
for use under Hawaii longline limited
access permits must also provide
notification of the trip type (either deepsetting or shallow-setting).
(b) The permit holder, or designated
agent, for any vessel registered for use
under a Western Pacific squid jig fishing
permit that is greater than 50 ft (15.4 m)
in length overall, shall provide a notice
to the Regional Administrator at least 72
hours (not including weekends and
Federal holidays) before the vessel
leaves port on a fishing trip, any part of
which occurs in Western Pacific waters.
The vessel operator will be presumed to
be an agent designated by the permit
holder unless the Regional
Administrator is otherwise notified by
the permit holder.
(c) For purposes of this section, the
notice must be provided to the office or
telephone number designated by the
Regional Administrator. The notice
must provide the official number of the
vessel, the name of the vessel, the
intended departure date, time, and
location, the name of the operator of the
vessel, and the name and telephone
number of the permit holder or
designated agent to be available between
8 a.m. and 5 p.m. (local time) on
weekdays for NMFS to contact to
arrange observer placement.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–20004 Filed 8–27–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\28AUP1.SGM
28AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 168 (Thursday, August 28, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50751-50755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-20004]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 665
[Docket No. 0612242967-7394-01]
RIN 0648-AS71
Fisheries in the Western Pacific; Pelagic Fisheries; Squid Jig
Fisheries
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would include three species of pelagic
squid under Federal management, and establish permitting and reporting
requirements for squid jig fishing vessels over 50 ft (15.4 m) in
length. These vessels would also be required to carry Federal observers
if requested by NMFS. This proposed rule is intended to improve
monitoring and management of U.S. domestic pelagic squid fisheries in
the western Pacific.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received by October 14,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the amendment, identified by 0648-AS71, may be
sent to either of the following addresses:
Electronic Submission: Federal e-Rulemaking Portal
www.regulations.gov; or
Mail: William L. Robinson, Regional Administrator, NMFS,
Pacific Islands Region (PIR), 1601 Kapiolani Blvd, Suite 1110,
Honolulu, HI 96814-4700.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to www.regulations.gov without change. All
personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (if you wish to remain
anonymous, enter ``NA'' in the required name and organization fields).
Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word
or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of the Fishery Management Plan for Pelagic Fisheries of the
Western Pacific Region (Pelagics FMP), and proposed Amendment 15
including an environmental assessment (EA), are
[[Page 50752]]
available from the Western Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council), 1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813, tel 808-
522-8220, fax 808-522-8226, or www.wpcouncil.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Harman, NMFS PIR, 808-944-2271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Federal Register document is also
accessible at the Office of the Federal Register website:
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr.
The pelagic fisheries of the U.S. western Pacific are managed under
the Pelagics FMP, which was developed by the Council, and approved and
implemented by NMFS. The Council has submitted Pelagics FMP Amendment
15 to NMFS for review under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). This proposed rule would
implement the management provisions recommended in Amendment 15, if
approved by the Secretary of Commerce. Although no squid resource
concerns have arisen to date, effective monitoring programs and
mechanisms to implement management measures are both needed. To address
these needs, the Council recommends in Amendment 15 improving data on
U.S. squid fisheries through new permitting, monitoring and reporting
requirements, as follows:
Add three pelagic squid species to the pelagic management
unit (neon flying squid, Ommastrephes bartramii, diamondback squid,
Thysanoteuthis rhombus, and purple flying squid, Sthenoteuthis
oualaniensis); and
Require operators of U.S. vessels greater than 50 ft (15.4
m) in length overall that fish for pelagic squid in waters of the U.S.
Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of the western Pacific to:
i. obtain Federal permits;
ii. carry Federal observers if requested by NMFS; and
iii. report any western Pacific pelagic squid catch and effort
either in Federal squid logbooks or via existing local reporting
systems.
These measures, if implemented, would provide additional data and a
mechanism for the Council and NMFS to effectively monitor and manage
the U.S. domestic pelagic squid fisheries.
Pelagic squid are widely dispersed and short-lived, with relatively
high reproduction rates. Thus, populations recover quickly following
declines and are difficult to over-harvest with relatively inefficient
fishing methods such as jigging. For example, stock abundance of neon
flying squid in the central North Pacific was low in 1993, probably due
to high fishing mortality from the high seas drift gillnet fishery.
That fishery was banned in 1992, and the stocks quickly recovered and
abundance was high during 1994-96. Stock abundance was again depressed
in 1997 (the most prominent El Nino year in the last century), but was
high in 1998. There is no evidence of over-harvesting of pelagic squid
stocks on the high seas or in EEZ waters around U.S. islands in the
western Pacific.
Pelagic squid are targeted by food and bait fisheries throughout
the Pacific. They are a major component of the pelagic ecosystem, with
large species preying on a variety of fish and invertebrate species,
and smaller species providing important forage components for species
such as swordfish and pilot whales. This ``keystone'' role of squid in
the trophic web suggests that squid may be an important indicator of
ecosystem dynamics. An international, large-scale, multi-species squid
jigging fishery exists on the Pacific high seas, including foreign and
a few U.S. fishing vessels. The Japanese jigging fleet was once
dominant in the North Pacific, but is now rivaled by a growing Chinese
fleet. The fishery is seasonal with most vessels switching to the
Southern Hemisphere during the southern summer (October-February).
Three U.S. squid jig vessels fished for squid in the North Pacific for
a month or less in the summer of 2003, catching red flying squid on the
high seas and offloading in Japan. Following a disappointing season,
they moved to New Zealand waters for the 2003 summer/autumn squid
season. To date, these domestic jigging vessels have fished on the high
seas or in the waters of other nations, but there is a possibility of
moving their fishing activities to U.S. EEZ waters around Hawaii in
association with a shift in oceanic conditions. In addition to this
large-vessel fishery, a few smaller vessels target purple flying squid
with jigs near the Hawaiian Islands. This smaller fishery provides
squid for the seafood market, and bait for the tuna handline fishery.
Although U.S. fisheries in the northern waters of the western
Pacific catch a tiny fraction of the total international squid
production, data provided by monitoring of these fisheries are, as yet,
the only indicator available of squid stock status. The first issue to
be addressed in the proposed rule is the need for improved information
about U.S. squid jig fisheries. To effectively monitor and manage these
fisheries, there is a need to ensure that U.S. catches of squid in the
western Pacific are recorded accurately. For fishing on the high seas,
the HSFCA requires catch reporting, but to date there has been no
specific HSFCA logbook for squid jig fishing. Commercial landings of
squid offloaded in Hawaii (regardless of where caught) are required to
be reported on Hawaii state catch reports. Recreational catches landed
in Hawaii are not subject to any reporting requirements (although
recreational squid harvests are believed to be small and are not a
concern to resource managers). With the exception of the Pacific remote
island areas (PRIA), creel surveys are conducted in the other areas of
the U.S. western Pacific to collect data on both commercial and
recreational fishing activities. The information collected from these
disparate programs have not been compiled for efficient analyses by
resource scientists and managers.
U.S. squid jig vessels that fish only on the high seas in the
western Pacific would be required to report their catch and effort
using the Federal squid logbooks, pursuant to the reporting and
recordkeeping provision of the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act
(HSFCA). The reporting requirements of the HSFCA (50 CFR 300.17(b)(3))
provide the necessary regulatory authority for NMFS to require squid
jig fishermen to use Federal logbooks that would be implemented under
this proposed rule to meet the reporting requirements under both the
HSFCA and the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
In addition to data needs, a second issue regarding the domestic
squid jigging fishery is that there is no management mechanism to
implement fishery regulatory controls, should concerns arise regarding
squid stocks or other aspects of the fishery. Squid resources are
healthy, the domestic fishery is relatively small, and there have been
no observed or reported interactions with protected species or
significant levels of bycatch. Thus, specific management measures (such
as time or area closures, or effort or landing limits) are not being
considered at this time. However, the establishment of mechanisms to
implement management measures would allow for regulatory controls to be
put in place if data collected indicate a future need for additional
management measures.
To be considered, comments must be received by close of business on
October 14, 2008, not postmarked or otherwise transmitted by that date.
In addition to soliciting public comments on this proposed rule,
NMFS is soliciting comments on proposed Amendment 15 through October
10, 2008 as stated in the Notice of Availability published on August
11, 2008 (73 FR 46580). Public comments on this proposed rule, if
received by October 10, 2008, will also be
[[Page 50753]]
considered in the approval/disapproval decision for Amendment 15.
Comments received after that date will not be considered in the
approval/disapproval decision for Amendment 15, but will be considered
for this proposed rule.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the Pelagics FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, and other applicable laws, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
Amendment 15 includes an EA that describes the existing squid
fishery management and environment, and describes the potential
environmental impacts of implementing the provisions of the preferred
alternative. The EA tiers off a 2005 Final Environmental Impact
Statement (2005 EIS) (70 FR 24038, May 6, 2005), and incorporates by
reference the previous environmental impact analysis of the five
alternatives considered in Amendment 15, specifically Alternative 1,
the no-action alternative, Alternative 2, voluntary monitoring,
Alternative 3, mandatory monitoring and management under the Pelagics
FMP, Alternative 4, mandatory monitoring and management through a new
squid FMP, and Alternative 5, mandatory monitoring and management
through international agreements. All of the previous alternatives
considered in the April 2005 EIS were coordinated with interested and
affected parties. New information about future fishery management
policies became available after the 2005 EIS was completed, and an
additional alternative (Alternative 3a) was added and analyzed in the
EA. Alternative 3a is similar to Alternative 3 in the 2005 EIS, but the
revised alternative now contains provisions for mandatory Federal
permits and logbooks reporting for vessels greater than 50 ft (15.4 m)
in length that fish for squid in the U.S. EEZ waters of the western
Pacific, and a requirement to carry Federal observers when requested by
NMFS.
The purpose and need for the proposed action is to establish
appropriate monitoring and management mechanisms for the domestic
harvest of western Pacific pelagic squid. Based on the information in
the EA and the 2005 EIS, as compared to the no-action alternative,
preferred Alternative 3a would have no adverse impacts to essential
fish habitat or habitat areas of particular concern. None of the action
alternatives would be expected to change the impacts of U.S. vessels on
squid resources in the short term, but impacts on the resource base
could increase with higher future effort, so increasing fishery
managers' understanding of the status of the stocks and fishing
mortality would be an important outcome of this action. By including
pelagic squid as management unit species under the preferred
alternative, the foundation would be established for implementing
control measures, should they become necessary. None of the action
alternatives is anticipated to have any significant adverse impacts on
seabird, sea turtle, or marine mammal populations because the fishery
has a relatively low level of participation, and there have been no
observed or reported interactions with protected resources in either
the nearshore Hawaii squid fishery or the U.S. high seas squid jig
fishery. The preferred alternative would provide for the sustained
participation of fishing communities by helping to ensure the long-term
availability of Pacific pelagic squid. The complete analysis of the
alternatives is contained in the 2005 EIS and in Amendment 15, and is
not repeated here. Copies of these two environmental analytical
documents are available from the Council (see ADDRESSES).
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Council for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The analysis follows:
The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council)
prepared Amendment 15 to the Pelagics FMP. Amendment 15 recommends
including three species of commercially-harvested pelagic squid
(neon flying squid, purple flying squid, and diamondback squid) as
pelagic management unit species. Amendment 15 would establish
Federal permitting, data reporting, and observer requirements for
squid jigging vessels over 50 ft (15.4 m) in length that fish in the
U.S. EEZ of the western Pacific, or land these squid in ports of the
region. A description of the action, why it is being considered, and
the legal basis for this action are contained in the preamble to
this proposed rule. This rule does not duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with other Federal rules. There are no disproportionate
economic impacts from this rule based on homeport, gear type, or
relative vessel size. Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 605(b), NMFS has determined that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities based on the pre-existing
status of pelagic squid fisheries within the U.S. EEZ of the central
and western Pacific. All vessels having the potential to participate
in this fishery are considered to be small entities under the
current Small Business Administration definition of small fish-
harvesting businesses (gross receipts not in excess of $ 4.0
million, independently owned and operated, and not dominant in their
field).
This proposed rule would improve mandatory monitoring and
establish mechanisms for management by including these squids in the
management unit. This rule would require U.S. vessels greater than
50 ft (15.4 m) in length overall that fish for pelagic squid in U.S.
Pacific EEZ to obtain Federal permits, to carry observers if
requested by NMFS, and to report their catch and effort using either
NMFS western Pacific squid jigging logbooks or existing local
reporting systems. High seas squid harvests would be reported in the
squid jigging logbooks. The fishery data would be centralized into a
database easily available to resource scientists and managers.
An international, large-scale squid jigging fishery (multi-
species) exists on the Pacific high seas. This includes both foreign
and, until recently, a few domestic (U.S. flagged) fishing vessels.
Three U.S. flagged squid jiggers fished for squid in the North
Pacific in the summer of 2003, catching neon flying squid before
traveling to the Southern Hemisphere. (The fishery is seasonal with
most vessels switching to the Southern Hemisphere during the
southern summer, October-February.) The operation consisted of a
mother ship, 47 m long with 38 jigging machines, and holding up to
453,600 kg of squid, with a crew of 18. The other three boats ranged
from 32-34 m in length. Each had 21-38 jigging machines, holding
204,100 to 386,000 kg of squid, with crews of 12. Blast freezers
were installed on board all four boats. While squid catches as high
as 8,000 kg per vessel per night have been reported by some
operations, the recent domestic operation in the North Pacific
caught a combined total of 20,253 kg of red flying squid for three
vessels fishing over 22 days in 2003.
In addition, a small nearshore squid jigging fishery operating
out of Kauai and a tuna handline fishery operating primarily from
the Big Island of Hawaii have been known to target purple flying
squid for food and/or bait. Although significant in the 1970s and
1980s, current participation in this fishery is now estimated to
consist of only a few vessels. Nonetheless, due to shifts in both
economic and oceanic conditions, there exists the potential for
domestic squid jigging effort to shift from the high seas to the
U.S. EEZ around Hawaii.
Economic impacts of the preferred alternative would have a
slightly adverse economic impact in the requirement to pay a vessel
permit fee of approximately $30. Using average prices for squid sold
in Hawaii during the summer of 2003 ($1.81/lb), a permit fee of $30
represents only 0.15% of the average boat revenue for the known
boats jigging for squid in the North Pacific during 2003. The
largest potential impact to affected participants is the observer
requirement for vessels greater than 50 ft (15.4 m) in length
overall contained in the preliminarily
[[Page 50754]]
preferred alternative. Assuming that the costs of deploying (paying
and feeding) observers would be paid by NMFS (as has been the case
in the western Pacific region to date), vessel operators will still
incur some indirect costs. Limited bunk or deck space may require
vessel operators to reduce the number of crew in order to
accommodate observers, resulting in a decrease in the operating
efficiency of the remaining crew. There may be additional costs if
vessel operators choose to carry additional liability insurance
(beyond that provided by NMFS for its observers). These costs would
vary between individual vessels depending on the insurance carriers'
minimum allowed coverage period, and the coverage approach that is
taken. The number of entities that will be required to carry
observers is unknown as the appropriate level of observer coverage
has not been determined, however, given that no vessels of this size
have fished for pelagic squid in Pacific U.S. EEZ waters without
landing them in the U.S.A. to date, this burden may be minimal. It
is possible that a squid fishery observer program could operate on
an intermittent basis if the low levels of bycatch and protected
species interactions believed to occur are confirmed. The remaining
aspects of the preferred alternative consist of the requirement for
vessels greater than 50 ft (15.4 m) in length overall to obtain
Federal permit and to either complete new Federal logbooks or to
participate in local reporting systems.
Because there are no fishery-management controls associated with
this measure that affect the operations of the fishery other than
potentially carrying observers, significant impacts to the
profitability of a substantial number of small entities are not
anticipated and there will be no disproportionate impact between
gear types, vessels or port of landing. As a result, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and none has been
prepared.
This proposed rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). These requirements have
been submitted to OMB for approval. The preferred alternative would
require the owners of all U.S. vessels greater than 50 ft (15.4 m) in
length that conduct commercial squid jig fishing for squid in U.S. EEZ
waters around the islands of the western Pacific to obtain Federal
fishing permits, and the vessel operators would be required to complete
and submit Federal catch reports, or report via local reporting systems
where such systems exist. Permit eligibility would not be restricted in
any way, and the permit would be renewable on an annual basis.
NMFS anticipates that initial permit applications would require 0.5
hours per applicant, with renewals requiring an additional 0.5 hours
annually. It is estimated that NMFS may receive and process up to 30
permit applications each year. Thus, the total collection-of-
information burden to fishermen for permit applications is estimated at
15 hours per year. The cost for individual Federal permits has not been
determined, but would represent only the administrative cost and is
anticipated to be approximately $30 per permit.
NMFS anticipates the time requirement to complete Federal catch
reports to be approximately 10 minutes per vessel per fishing day.
Assuming that the 30 vessels fish during up to 100 days per year, the
total collection-of-information burden estimate for fishing data
reporting is estimated at 500 hours per year.
These estimates include the time for reviewing instructions,
searching and compiling existing data sources, and completing and
reviewing the collection information. Public comment is sought
regarding: whether this proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of
the burden estimates; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Send
comments on these or any other aspects of the collection of information
to William L. Robinson (see ADDRESSES), and by email to David_
Rostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202-395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 665
Administrative practice and procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaii, Hawaiian Natives, Northern Mariana Islands,
Pacific remote island areas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 22, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 665 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 665--FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN PACIFIC
1. The authority citation for part 665 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 665.12, amend the definition for ``Pacific Pelagic
Management Unit Species,'' by adding three squid species to the end of
the table, and add a definition for ``Squid jig fishing'' in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 665.12 Definitions.
* * * * *
Pacific Pelagic Management Unit Species * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common name Scientific name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Squid: ...................
Diamondback squid Thysanoteuthis
rhombus
Neon flying squid Ommastrephes
bartramii
Purple flying squid Sthenoteuthis
oualaniensis
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Squid jig fishing means fishing for squid that are Pelagic
management unit species using a hook or hooks attached to a line that
is raised and lowered in the water column by manual or mechanical
means.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 665.13, revise paragraphs (f)(2)(i) through (f)(2)(v),
and add a new paragraph (f)(2)(vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 665.13 Permits and fees.
* * * * *
(f) Fees. * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Hawaii longline limited access permit.
(ii) Mau Zone limited access permit.
(iii) Coral reef ecosystem special permit
(iv) American Samoa longline limited access permit.
(v) Main Hawaiian Islands non-commercial bottomfish permit.
(vi) Western Pacific squid jig permit.
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 665.14, revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 665.14 Reporting and recordkeeping.
(a) Fishing record forms. (1) Applicability. (i) The operator of
any fishing vessel subject to the requirements of Sec. Sec. 665.21,
665.41, 665.61(a)(2), 665.61(a)(3), 665.61(a)(4), 665.81, or 665.602
must maintain on board the vessel an accurate and complete record of
catch, effort, and
[[Page 50755]]
other data on paper report forms provided by the Regional
Administrator, or electronically as specified and approved by the
Regional Administrator, except as allowed in paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of
this section.
(ii) All information specified by the Regional Administrator must
be recorded on paper or electronically within 24 hours after the
completion of each fishing day. The logbook information, reported on
paper or electronically, for each day of the fishing trip must be
signed and dated or otherwise authenticated by the vessel operator in
the manner determined by the Regional Administrator, and be submitted
or transmitted via an approved method as specified by the Regional
Administrator, and as required by this paragraph (a).
(iii) In lieu of the requirements in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this
section, the operator of a fishing vessel registered for use under a
Western Pacific squid jig permit pursuant to the requirements of Sec.
665.21(g) may participate in a state reporting system. If participating
in a state reporting system, all required information must be recorded
and submitted in the exact manner required by applicable state law or
regulation.
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 665.21, redesignate paragraphs (g) through (n) as
paragraphs (h) through (o), and add a new paragraph (g) to read as
follows:
Sec. 665.21 Permits.
* * * * *
(g) A vessel of the United States must be registered for use under
a Western Pacific squid jig fishing permit, if that vessel is more than
50 ft (15.4 m) in length overall and is used to squid jig fish in EEZ
waters around American Samoa, the CNMI, Guam, the Hawaiian Archipelago,
or the PRIA.
* * * * *
6. In Sec. 665.22 add new paragraph (zz) to read as follows:
Sec. 665.22 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(zz) Use a vessel that is greater than 50 ft (15.4 m) in length
overall to squid jig fish in EEZ waters around American Samoa, the
CNMI, Guam, the Hawaiian Archipelago, or the PRIA, without a Western
Pacific squid jig fishing permit registered for use with that vessel,
in violation of Sec. 665.21(g).
7. In Sec. 665.23, revise paragraph (a), redesignate paragraphs
(b) and (c) as paragraphs (d) and (e), and add new paragraphs (b) and
(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 665.23 Notifications.
(a) The permit holder, or designated agent, for any vessel
registered for use under a Hawaii longline limited access permit, or
for any vessel greater than 40 ft (12.2 m) in length overall that is
registered for use under an American Samoa longline limited access
permit, shall provide a notice to the Regional Administrator at least
72 hours (not including weekends and Federal holidays) before the
vessel leaves port on a fishing trip, any part of which occurs in the
EEZ around the Hawaiian Archipelago or American Samoa. The vessel
operator will be presumed to be an agent designated by the permit
holder unless the Regional Administrator is otherwise notified by the
permit holder. The permit holder or designated agent for a vessel
registered for use under Hawaii longline limited access permits must
also provide notification of the trip type (either deep-setting or
shallow-setting).
(b) The permit holder, or designated agent, for any vessel
registered for use under a Western Pacific squid jig fishing permit
that is greater than 50 ft (15.4 m) in length overall, shall provide a
notice to the Regional Administrator at least 72 hours (not including
weekends and Federal holidays) before the vessel leaves port on a
fishing trip, any part of which occurs in Western Pacific waters. The
vessel operator will be presumed to be an agent designated by the
permit holder unless the Regional Administrator is otherwise notified
by the permit holder.
(c) For purposes of this section, the notice must be provided to
the office or telephone number designated by the Regional
Administrator. The notice must provide the official number of the
vessel, the name of the vessel, the intended departure date, time, and
location, the name of the operator of the vessel, and the name and
telephone number of the permit holder or designated agent to be
available between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. (local time) on weekdays for NMFS
to contact to arrange observer placement.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-20004 Filed 8-27-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S