North Baja Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Motion To Vacate Certificate in Part, 50609 [E8-19814]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 167 / Wednesday, August 27, 2008 / Notices the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 12, 2008. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–19812 Filed 8–26–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket Nos. CP06–61–000; CP01–23–003] North Baja Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Motion To Vacate Certificate in Part sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES August 20, 2008. Take notice that on June 25, 2008, North Baja Pipeline, LLC (North Baja), 1400 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon 94201, filed in Docket Nos. CP06–61–000 and CP01–23–003, a motion to vacate a portion of the certificate authority granted on October 2, 2007, in those dockets, allowing North Baja to modify and expand its existing pipeline system to facilitate the importation of regasified liquefied VerDate Aug<31>2005 18:52 Aug 26, 2008 Jkt 214001 natural gas from Mexico into California and Arizona (Expansion Project). North Baja states that the planned construction of a 45.7-mile, 16-inch diameter lateral pipeline extending from a point north of its Ogilby Meter Station to the Imperial Irrigation District’s El Centro Generating Facility in Imperial County, California (the ‘‘IID Lateral’’ proposed as construction Phase I–A), is no longer necessary due to the Imperial Irrigation District’s decision to terminate its precedent agreement. North Baja seeks to vacate the portion of its certificate that authorizes the IID Lateral facilities, proposed as Phase I–A of the project. The motion is on file with the Commission and open for public inspection. This motion is available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission’s Web site at https:// www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free at (866) 208–3676, or for TTY, contact (202) 502–8659. Any questions regarding the application should be directed to Carl M. Fink, Associate General Counsel, North Baja Pipeline, LLC (North Baja), 1400 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon 94201, (503) 833– 4256. There are two ways to become involved in the Commission’s review of North Baja’s request. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by becoming a party to this proceeding should, on or before the comment date listed below, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of this filing and all subsequent filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy of all filing to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the proceeding. However, other persons do not have to intervene in order to have comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with the PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 50609 Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to North Baja’s request. The Commission will consider these comments in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission’s rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to this project provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly involved in the protest. Persons who wish to comment only in support of or in opposition to North Baja’s request should submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of the Commission. The Commission’s rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests only to the applicant. However, the nonparty commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by the Commission and will not have the right to seek court review of the Commission’s final order. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission’s Web site (https:// www.ferc.gov) under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. Comment Date: September 10, 2008. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–19814 Filed 8–26–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP08–457–000] CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company-Mississippi River Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization August 15, 2008. Take notice that on August 6, 2008, CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company-Mississippi River Transmission Corporation (MRT), 1111 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas, 77002 filed in Docket No. CP08–457–000 a prior notice request pursuant to sections 157.205 and 157.213(b) of the Commission’s regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA), and MRT’s blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82–489–000.1 MRT seeks 1 20 E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM FERC ¶ 62,579 (1982). 27AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19814]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP06-61-000; CP01-23-003]


North Baja Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Motion To Vacate Certificate 
in Part

August 20, 2008.
    Take notice that on June 25, 2008, North Baja Pipeline, LLC (North 
Baja), 1400 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon 94201, filed 
in Docket Nos. CP06-61-000 and CP01-23-003, a motion to vacate a 
portion of the certificate authority granted on October 2, 2007, in 
those dockets, allowing North Baja to modify and expand its existing 
pipeline system to facilitate the importation of regasified liquefied 
natural gas from Mexico into California and Arizona (Expansion 
Project). North Baja states that the planned construction of a 45.7-
mile, 16-inch diameter lateral pipeline extending from a point north of 
its Ogilby Meter Station to the Imperial Irrigation District's El 
Centro Generating Facility in Imperial County, California (the ``IID 
Lateral'' proposed as construction Phase I-A), is no longer necessary 
due to the Imperial Irrigation District's decision to terminate its 
precedent agreement. North Baja seeks to vacate the portion of its 
certificate that authorizes the IID Lateral facilities, proposed as 
Phase I-A of the project.
    The motion is on file with the Commission and open for public 
inspection. This motion is available for review at the Commission in 
the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site 
at https://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket 
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support 
at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free at (866) 208-3676, or for 
TTY, contact (202) 502-8659.
    Any questions regarding the application should be directed to Carl 
M. Fink, Associate General Counsel, North Baja Pipeline, LLC (North 
Baja), 1400 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon 94201, (503) 
833-4256.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of 
North Baja's request. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status 
by becoming a party to this proceeding should, on or before the comment 
date listed below, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in 
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the 
NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on 
the service list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will 
receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other 
parties. A party must submit 14 copies of this filing and all 
subsequent filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy of all 
filing to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. 
Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission 
orders in the proceeding.
    However, other persons do not have to intervene in order to have 
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with 
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and 
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to North Baja's 
request. The Commission will consider these comments in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will 
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's 
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to this 
project provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties 
directly involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only in support of or in opposition to 
North Baja's request should submit an original and two copies of their 
comments to the Secretary of the Commission. The Commission's rules 
require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project 
provide copies of their protests only to the applicant. However, the 
non-party commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by 
other parties or issued by the Commission and will not have the right 
to seek court review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18 
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web 
site (https://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.
    Comment Date: September 10, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19814 Filed 8-26-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.