Montana Regulatory Program, 50265-50267 [E8-19712]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This determination is based on the fact
that the Mississippi program does not
regulate coal exploration and surface
coal mining and reclamation operations
on Indian lands. Therefore, the
Mississippi program has no effect on
Federally-recognized Indian tribes.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
sroberts on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
18:09 Aug 25, 2008
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the State submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 924
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: July 30, 2008.
Sherry Wilson,
Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent
Region.
[FR Doc. E8–19713 Filed 8–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 926
[SATS No. MT–028–FOR; Docket ID OSM–
2008–0018]
Montana Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50265
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of
a proposed amendment to the Montana
regulatory program (hereinafter, the
‘‘Montana program’’) under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (‘‘SMCRA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’). Montana
proposes to clarify ambiguities.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Montana program and
proposed amendment to that program
are available for your inspection, the
comment period during which you may
submit written comments on the
amendment, and the procedures that we
will follow for the public hearing, if one
is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m., m.d.t. September 25, 2008. If
requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on September 22,
2008. We will accept requests to speak
until 4 p.m., m.d.t. on September 10,
2008.
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. This proposed
rule has been assigned Docket ID: OSM–
2008–0018. If you would like to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, go to
www.regulations.gov and do the
following. Click on the ‘‘Advanced
Docket Search’’ button on the right side
of the screen. Type in the Docket ID
‘‘OSM–2008–0018’’ and click the
‘‘Submit’’ button at the bottom of the
page. The next screen will display the
Docket Search Results for the
rulemaking. If you click on OSM–2008–
0018, you can view the proposed rule
and submit a comment. You can also
view supporting material and any
comments submitted by others.
• E-mail: JFleischman@osmre.gov.
Include the docket number in the
subject line of the message.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Jeffrey
Fleischman, Director, Casper Field
Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement,150 East
B Street, Rm 1018, Casper, Wyoming
82601–1018.
• Fax: 307/261–6552.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and OSM
Docket ID OSM–2008–0018.
For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the ‘‘III. Public Comment
Procedures’’ in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: In addition to viewing the
docket and obtaining copies of
documents at www.regulations.gov, you
may review copies of the Montana
ADDRESSES:
C:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
50266
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
program, this amendment, a listing of
any public hearings, and all written
comments received in response to this
document at the addresses listed below
during normal business hours, Monday
through Friday, excluding holidays. You
may also receive one free copy of the
amendment by contacting OSM’s Casper
Field Office or Montana’s Industrial and
Energy Minerals Bureau.
Jeffrey W. Fleischman, Chief, Casper
Field Office, U.S. Office of Surface
Mining,Federal Building, 150 East B
Street, Room 1018,Casper, Wyoming,
307/261–6550, Internet:
JFleischman@osmre.gov.
Neil Harrington, Chief, Industrial and
Energy Minerals Bureau, Montana
Department of Environmental Quality,
1520 E. Sixth Ave., P.O. Box 200901,
406/444–4973, Internet:
neharrington@mt.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Fleischman, Telephone: 307/
261–6550, Internet:
JFleischman@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Montana Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
sroberts on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
I. Background on the Montana Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its State program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Montana
program on April 1, 1980. You can find
background information on the Montana
program, including the Secretary’s
findings, the disposition of comments,
and conditions of approval of the
Montana program in the April 1, 1980,
Federal Register (45 FR 21560). You can
also find later actions concerning
Montana’s program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 926.15, 926.16,
and 926.30.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated July 7, 2008, Montana
sent us a proposed amendment to its
program (Docket ID No. OSM–2008–
0018) under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:09 Aug 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
seq.). Montana sent the amendment to
include the changes made at its own
initiative. The full text of the program
amendment is available for you to read
at the locations listed above under
ADDRESSES.
Specifically, Montana proposes to: (1)
Make minor revisions to the
Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM)
for style and readability; (2) change the
ARM to require, rather than allow
discretion to the Montana Department of
Environmental Quality to release bonds
when reclamation standards have been
met; and (3) to clarify that written
findings are required when reclamation
has not been accomplished.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the Montana program.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they
should be specific, confined to issues
pertinent to the proposed regulations,
and explain the reason for any
recommended change(s). We appreciate
any and all comments, but those most
useful and likely to influence decisions
on the final regulations will be those
that either involve personal experience
or include citations to and analyses of
SMCRA, its legislative history, its
implementing regulations, case law,
other pertinent Tribal or Federal laws or
regulations, technical literature, or other
relevant publications.
We cannot ensure that comments
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) or sent to an address
other than those listed above (see
ADDRESSES) will be included in the
docket for this rulemaking and
considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available in the
electronic docket for this rulemaking at
www.regulations.gov. While you can ask
us in your comment to withhold your
personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that
we will be able to do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m., m.d.t. on September 10, 2008. If
you are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
the hearing. If only one person
expresses an interest, a public meeting
rather than a hearing may be held, with
the results included in the docket for
this rulemaking.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at a public
hearing provide us with a written copy
of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
because each program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
C:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
50267
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires that
State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federally
recognized Indian Tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian Tribes.
The rule does not involve or affect
Indian Tribes in any way.
sroberts on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:09 Aug 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This determination is based upon the
fact that the State submittal which is the
subject of this rule is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded Mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 926
Dated: August 6, 2008.
Richard Holbrook,
Acting Regional Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. E8–19712 Filed 8–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0379; FRL–8708–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania;
Reasonably Available Control
Technology Requirements for Volatile
Organic Compounds and Nitrogen
Oxides
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to remove
the limited status of its approval of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision that
requires all major sources of volatile
organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen
oxides (NOX) to implement reasonably
available control technology (RACT).
EPA is proposing to convert its limited
approval of Pennsylvania’s VOC and
NOX RACT regulations to full approval
because EPA has approved all of the
case-by-case RACT determinations that
had been submitted by Pennsylvania
such that there are no longer any such
submissions pending before EPA. In
prior final rules, EPA has fully approved
Pennsylvania’s VOC and NOX RACT
regulations for the Pennsylvania portion
of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton
area, and for the Pittsburgh-Beaver
Valley area. EPA previously proposed to
convert its limited approval of
Pennsylvania’s VOC and NOX RACT
regulations as they apply in the
remainder of the Commonwealth to full
approval. EPA is withdrawing that
proposal and is now reproposing
approval. This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the
Act).
Written comments must be
received on or before September 25,
2008.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
ADDRESSES:
C:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 26, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50265-50267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19712]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 926
[SATS No. MT-028-FOR; Docket ID OSM-2008-0018]
Montana Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the
Montana regulatory program (hereinafter, the ``Montana program'') under
the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (``SMCRA'' or
``the Act''). Montana proposes to clarify ambiguities.
This document gives the times and locations that the Montana
program and proposed amendment to that program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for
the public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.,
m.d.t. September 25, 2008. If requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on September 22, 2008. We will accept requests to
speak until 4 p.m., m.d.t. on September 10, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. This
proposed rule has been assigned Docket ID: OSM-2008-0018. If you would
like to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, go to
www.regulations.gov and do the following. Click on the ``Advanced
Docket Search'' button on the right side of the screen. Type in the
Docket ID ``OSM-2008-0018'' and click the ``Submit'' button at the
bottom of the page. The next screen will display the Docket Search
Results for the rulemaking. If you click on OSM-2008-0018, you can view
the proposed rule and submit a comment. You can also view supporting
material and any comments submitted by others.
E-mail: JFleischman@osmre.gov. Include the docket number
in the subject line of the message.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Jeffrey Fleischman, Director,
Casper Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement,150 East B Street, Rm 1018, Casper, Wyoming 82601-1018.
Fax: 307/261-6552.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and OSM Docket ID OSM-2008-0018.
For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the ``III. Public Comment
Procedures'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: In addition to viewing the docket and obtaining copies of
documents at www.regulations.gov, you may review copies of the Montana
[[Page 50266]]
program, this amendment, a listing of any public hearings, and all
written comments received in response to this document at the addresses
listed below during normal business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may also receive one free copy of the amendment
by contacting OSM's Casper Field Office or Montana's Industrial and
Energy Minerals Bureau.
Jeffrey W. Fleischman, Chief, Casper Field Office, U.S. Office of
Surface Mining,Federal Building, 150 East B Street, Room 1018,Casper,
Wyoming, 307/261-6550, Internet: JFleischman@osmre.gov.
Neil Harrington, Chief, Industrial and Energy Minerals Bureau,
Montana Department of Environmental Quality, 1520 E. Sixth Ave., P.O.
Box 200901, 406/444-4973, Internet: neharrington@mt.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Fleischman, Telephone: 307/
261-6550, Internet: JFleischman@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Montana Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Montana Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its State program includes, among other things, ``a State law which
provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On
the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Montana program on April 1, 1980. You can
find background information on the Montana program, including the
Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of
approval of the Montana program in the April 1, 1980, Federal Register
(45 FR 21560). You can also find later actions concerning Montana's
program and program amendments at 30 CFR 926.15, 926.16, and 926.30.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated July 7, 2008, Montana sent us a proposed amendment
to its program (Docket ID No. OSM-2008-0018) under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1201 et seq.). Montana sent the amendment to include the changes made
at its own initiative. The full text of the program amendment is
available for you to read at the locations listed above under
ADDRESSES.
Specifically, Montana proposes to: (1) Make minor revisions to the
Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM) for style and readability; (2)
change the ARM to require, rather than allow discretion to the Montana
Department of Environmental Quality to release bonds when reclamation
standards have been met; and (3) to clarify that written findings are
required when reclamation has not been accomplished.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the Montana program.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they should be specific, confined
to issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason
for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but
those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or
include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history,
its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent Tribal or
Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant
publications.
We cannot ensure that comments received after the close of the
comment period (see DATES) or sent to an address other than those
listed above (see ADDRESSES) will be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available in the electronic docket
for this rulemaking at www.regulations.gov. While you can ask us in
your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m., m.d.t. on
September 10, 2008. If you are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and
time of the hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no
one requests an opportunity to speak, we will not hold the hearing. If
only one person expresses an interest, a public meeting rather than a
hearing may be held, with the results included in the docket for this
rulemaking.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at a public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations
[[Page 50267]]
and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR parts 730, 731, and 732
have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent with''
regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally recognized Indian Tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian Tribes.
The rule does not involve or affect Indian Tribes in any way.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This determination is based upon the fact that the State submittal
which is the subject of this rule is based upon counterpart Federal
regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a determination made
that the Federal regulation was not considered a major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded Mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 926
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: August 6, 2008.
Richard Holbrook,
Acting Regional Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. E8-19712 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P