Authorization of Representative Fees, 50260-50263 [E8-19674]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
50260
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
1. It may be appropriate to provide a
process for a Federal agency to conduct
a single NMSA consultation on a series
or class of actions similar in type and
effect. Would the public and other
Federal agencies find this useful and, if
so, how might the ONMS best identify
the most appropriate actions that could
be subject to this arrangement?
2. Beyond simply describing the
action and its potential effects on
sanctuary resources, what additional
information, if any, should be included
in the written statement provided to the
ONMS by the Federal action agency to
ensure that the consultation fully
addresses the effects of the activity on
sanctuary resources?
3. The ONNS anticipates there may be
circumstances where a sanctuary
resource statement might need to be
supplemented, such as when the scope
of the proposed action changes prior to
the conclusion of the consultation
process. The ONMS seeks comment on
what other circumstances might require
a supplemental statement and if this
issue should to be addressed through
regulation.
4. The ONNS desires that 304(d)
consultations be integrated as efficiently
as possible with the other statutory
requirements that may apply to a
Federal agency action. Should
regulations address how 304(d)
consultations can be best integrated or
otherwise coordinated with, for
example, actions required by the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), consultations conducted
pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act and section 305(b)(2) of the
Magnuson Stevens Fisheries
Conservation and Management Act
(Essential Fish Habitat provision)? If so,
what considerations should be made by
the ONNS and Federal agencies when
integrating NNSA consultations with
these other requirements?
5. When multiple Federal agencies are
involved with a project, the ONNS
believes it may be helpful to consider
designating a lead agency to conduct
304(d) consultations on behalf of the
other agencies. Do agencies and the
public believe this would be useful and,
if so, how should this designation be
determined and what procedures should
govern this arrangement?
6. The ONNS believes that the ONNS
permit and NNSA consultation
processes should be integrated for
Federal activities that trigger both the
304(d) andNNSA permit requirements.
Would additional information on how
this integration could work be helpful
and, if so, should it be described via
regulation?
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:09 Aug 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
7. Section 304(d) states that if a
Federal agency takes action other than
what was recommended, and a
sanctuary resource is destroyed, lost, or
injured, the agency taking action should
‘‘prevent and mitigate further damage
and restore or replace the sanctuary
resource’’ in a manner approved by
ONNS. Would it be helpful to Federal
agencies and the public to have
regulations to implement this statutory
directive?
8. If the circumstances under which a
consultation was completed change (i.e.,
if new information becomes available,
there are changes to the proposed
action, or the results of monitoring show
injury or loss to sanctuary resources), a
previously completed NNSA
consultation might need to be reopened
in order to protect sanctuary resources
in accordance with the NNSA. Should
regulatory procedures be developed to
govern how and when a consultation
should be re-opened?
9. Are there any other ideas that
should be considered in order to best
facilitate and improve the NNSA
consultation requirements and process?
Comments received will help NOAA
determine its next steps. If NOAA
decides that regulations are appropriate
for the implementation of NNSA section
304(d), they will be promulgated in
compliance with the Administrative
Procedure Act, NEPA and other relevant
statutes and executive orders.
Classification: This Advanced Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking has been
determined to be significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Dated: August 19, 2008.
John H. Dunnigan,
Assistant Administrator for Oceans and
Coastal Zone Management.
[FR Doc. E8–19662 Filed 8–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–M
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Parts 404 and 416
[Docket No. SSA–2008–0030]
RIN 0960–AG82
Authorization of Representative Fees
Social Security Administration.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: We propose to revise our
rules regarding payment of
representative fees to allow
representatives to charge and receive a
fee from third parties without requiring
our authorization in certain instances.
We also propose to eliminate the
requirement that we authorize fees for
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
legal guardians or court-appointed
representatives who provide
representational services in claims
before us if a court has already
authorized their fees. We are proposing
these revisions to reflect changes in
representatives’ business practices, and
in the ways in which claimants obtain
representation, and to make more
efficient the way we process
representative fees.
DATES: To make sure that your
comments are considered, we must
receive them no later than September
25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any one of four methods—Internet,
facsimile, regular mail, or handdelivery. Commenters should not
submit the same comments multiple
times or by more than one method.
Regardless of which of the following
methods you choose, please state that
your comments refer to Docket No.
SSA–2008–0030 to ensure that we can
associate your comments with the
correct regulation:
1. Federal eRulemaking portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. (This is the
most expedient method for submitting
your comments, and we strongly urge
you to use it.) In the ‘‘Comment or
Submission’’ section of the webpage,
type ‘‘SSA–2008–0030’’, select ‘‘Go’’,
and then click ‘‘Send a Comment or
Submission.’’ The Federal eRulemaking
portal issues you a tracking number
when you submit a comment.
2. Telefax to (410) 966–2830.
3. Letter to the Commissioner of
Social Security, P.O. Box 17703,
Baltimore, MD 21235–7703.
4. Deliver your comments to the
Office of Regulations, Social Security
Administration, 922 Altmeyer Building,
6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21235–6401, between 8 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m. on regular business days.
All comments are posted on the
Federal eRulemaking portal, although
they may not appear for several days
after receipt of the comment. You may
also inspect the comments on regular
business days by making arrangements
with the contact person shown in this
preamble.
Caution: All comments we receive
from members of the public are
available for public viewing on the
Federal eRulemaking portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, you
should be careful to include in your
comments only information that you
wish to make publicly available on the
Internet. We strongly urge you not to
include any personal information, such
as your Social Security number or
medical information, in your comments.
C:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marg Handel, Supervisory Social
Insurance Specialist, Office of Income
Security Programs, Social Security
Administration, 6401 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235–6401,
(410) 965–4639. For information on
eligibility or filing for benefits, call our
national toll-free number, 1–800–772–
1213 or TTY 1–800–325–0778, or visit
our Internet site, Social Security Online,
at https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Version
The electronic file of this document is
available on the date of publication in
the Federal Register at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
Explanation of Changes
Authority
We may issue regulations to
administer the Social Security Act (Act).
42 U.S.C. 405(a), 902(a)(5), and
1383(d)(1). Specifically, we may issue
regulations allowing attorneys and nonattorneys to represent claimants before
us. We also may set the maximum fees
for those services. 42 U.S.C. 406(a)(1)
and 1383(d)(2). Based on this authority,
we are proposing new rules to revise our
current regulations on fees paid to
claimant representatives found in part
404 subpart R and part 416 subpart O.
Current Regulations on Fees Paid by
Third Parties
We require all representatives to
obtain our approval before charging or
receiving a fee for representational
services. 20 CFR 404.1720 and
416.1520. We also prohibit
representatives from charging or
receiving fees that are more than the
amount we approve regardless of
whether the fee is charged to, or
received from, claimants or third
parties. 20 CFR 404.1720(b)(3) and
416.1520(b)(3). However, under our
long-standing interpretation of these
regulations, if certain criteria are met,
we need not approve a fee if a nonprofit
organization pays the fee out of funds
provided by a government entity. Social
Security Ruling (SSR) 85–3.
sroberts on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
Proposed Changes
We propose to revise our current
policy and allow representatives, in
certain cases, to be paid fees for
providing representational services
without requiring our authorization.
The primary reason that we set
maximum fees is to protect claimants
and beneficiaries. Our current
regulations carry out this purpose.
Nevertheless, when a party other than a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:09 Aug 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
claimant or beneficiary incurs the
liability for the cost of the
representative’s services, there is little
risk that the individual may be charged
an unreasonable fee. Often third parties,
such as insurance companies, have
provided claimants representation and
have paid the representatives’ fees
without any liability to the claimants.
We do not believe that we need to
continue approving fee arrangements
between representatives and third
parties when the amount of claimants’
benefits will not be affected.
Similarly, there is no reason to require
legal guardians or court-appointed
representatives to obtain our approval
for fee arrangements if a court has
already authorized their fees. Because
courts, when authorizing guardians’
fees, generally consider the wards’ best
interests and have reviewed and
approved the legal guardian’s
accounting, there is little risk to the
beneficiary that the fee approved is
unreasonable. Thus, under our current
subregulatory instructions, we do not
require legal guardians or courtappointed representatives to obtain our
approval for fee arrangements if a court
has already authorized their fees for
representation before us, regardless of
who bears the liability for paying the
fee.
We propose to define ‘‘legal guardian
or court-appointed representative’’ as ‘‘a
court-appointed person, committee, or
conservator who is lawfully invested
with the power and charged with the
duty of taking care of and managing the
property and rights of an individual
who is considered incapable of
managing his or her own affairs’’ in
§§ 404.1703 and 416.1503.
In both of the situations addressed in
these proposed rules, eliminating the
requirement that we review these fee
arrangements would not adversely affect
the interests of our beneficiaries and
would allow our resources and the
resources of the representatives to be
used to serve claimants and
beneficiaries in other ways. However, to
ensure that the interests of our
beneficiaries are not adversely affected,
we are including criteria in proposed
§§ 404.1720(e) and 416.1520(e) that are
similar to the criteria we currently have
in SSR 85–3. Under these proposed
regulations, our approval would not be
necessary when the fees are paid by a
third party, the claimant is free from any
liability for a fee, and the representative
waives the right to charge and collect a
fee. As we previously noted, our
approval of the fee request would also
not be necessary where a court has
already authorized the fee in cases
where legal guardians or court-
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50261
appointed representatives provide
representational services in claims
before us. Our experience has been that
these criteria adequately ensure that the
cases where our prior approval of a fee
is not needed are limited to ones where
claimants and beneficiaries are already
protected from unreasonable attorney
fees.
We also propose to make minor
conforming changes to paragraph (b)(3)
in §§ 404.1720 and 416.1520.
Please note that in another proposed
rule document that we are publishing
separately, Revisions to Rules on
Representation of Parties, RIN 0960–
AG56, we propose different revisions to
§§ 404.1703, 404.1720, 416.1503, and
416.1520. When we publish any final
rules following the public comment
period, we will coordinate revisions to
these sections.
Lastly, SSR 85–3 explains that we do
not need to authorize a representative’s
fee if the fee is paid by a nonprofit
organization or an agency out of funds
provided or administered by a
government entity and not paid by the
claimant or beneficiary. The proposed
rules would codify this policy. In
accordance with our usual practice, we
will rescind SSR 85–3 as obsolete if and
when we adopt these rules in final.
Clarity of These Rules
Executive Order 12866, as amended,
requires each agency to write all rules
in plain language. In addition to your
substantive comments on these
proposed rules, we invite your
comments on how to make them easier
to understand.
For example:
• Have we organized the material to
suit your needs?
• Are the requirements in the rules
clearly stated?
• Do the rules contain technical
language or jargon that isn’t clear?
• Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the rules easier to
understand?
• Would more (but shorter) sections
be better?
• Could we improve clarity by adding
tables, lists, or diagrams?
• What else could we do to make the
rules easier to understand?
When Will We Start To Use These
Rules?
We will not use these rules until we
evaluate the public comments we
receive on them, determine whether
they should be issued as final rules, and
issue final rules in the Federal Register.
If we publish final rules, we will
explain in the preamble how we will
C:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
50262
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
apply them, and summarize and
respond to the public comments. Until
the effective date of any final rules, we
will continue to use our current rules.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, as Amended
We have consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that these proposed rules
meet the criteria for a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, as amended. Therefore, they
were reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Paperwork Reduction Act
We certify that these proposed rules
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. These proposed rules do not
place significant costs on small entities
because they will relieve some small
entities of the need to obtain SSA
approval of a fee. It is anticipated that
the cost to small entities will either be
minimal, or it will result in cost savings
as a result of increased efficiency.
Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis as provided in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, as amended, is not
required.
We are proposing revisions to our
rules on obtaining approval for charging
a fee for representing claimants. These
proposed rules contain public reporting
requirements that must be approved by
OMB. The chart below lists these
sections, describes their content, and
provides their burden. We previously
accounted for these public reporting
burdens in the Information Collection
Requests for the various forms the
public uses to submit the information to
SSA. Consequently, we are inserting a
1-hour placeholder burden in these
sections.
Number of
respondents
Frequency of
response
Average burden per
response
(minutes)
404.1720; 416.1520 .........................................................................................
The representative submits to us a form we prescribe waiving the right
to charge and collect a fee.
sroberts on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
Regulation sections and description
........................
........................
........................
We have submitted an Information
Collection Request to OMB for
clearance. We are soliciting comments
on the burden estimate; the need for the
information; its practical utility; ways to
enhance its quality, utility and clarity;
and on ways to minimize the burden on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
You can call, e-mail or write to the
addresses/phone numbers listed below
to request a copy of the Information
Collection Request package or to
comment.
Office of Management and Budget, Attn:
Desk Officer for SSA, Fax Number:
202–395–6974, E-mail address:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Social Security Administration, Attn:
Reports Clearance Officer, 1333
Annex Building, 6401 Security Blvd.,
Baltimore, MD 21235, Fax: 410–965–
6400, E-mail address:
OPLM.RCO@ssa.gov.
You can submit comments on the
paperwork burdens associated with this
rule for up to 60 days after publication
of this notice; however, they will be
most useful if received within 30 days
of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment to
SSA on the proposed regulations. These
information collection requirements
will not become effective until approved
by OMB. When OMB has approved
these information collection
requirements, SSA will publish a notice
in the Federal Register.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 96.001, Social SecurityDisability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:09 Aug 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
Estimated annual burden
(hours)
Retirement Insurance; 96.004, Social
Security-Survivors Insurance; and 96.006,
Supplemental Security Income)
appointed representative’’ in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
List of Subjects
§ 404.1703
1
20 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and
procedure; Blind; Disability benefits;
Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability
Insurance; Penalties; Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements; Social
Security.
20 CFR Part 416
Administrative practice and
procedure; Penalties; Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements;
Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
Dated: May 27, 2008.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE,
SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY
INSURANCE (1950– )
Subpart R—[Amended]
1. The authority citation for subpart R
of part 404 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 205(a), 206, 702(a)(5), and
1127 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
405(a), 406, 902(a)(5), and 1320a–6); sec. 303,
Pub. L. 108–203, 118 Stat. 493.
2. Amend § 404.1703 by adding a
definition for ‘‘legal guardian or court-
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Fee for a representative’s
*
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we propose to amend 20 CFR
parts 404 and 416 as set forth below:
Frm 00015
*
*
*
*
Legal guardian or court-appointed
representative means a court-appointed
person, committee, or conservator who
is lawfully invested with the power and
charged with the duty of taking care of
and managing the property and rights of
an individual who is considered
incapable of managing his or her own
affairs.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 404.1720 by revising
paragraph (b) heading and (b)(3) and by
adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 404.1720
services.
Editorial Note: This document was
received at the Office of the Federal Register
on August 20, 2008.
PO 00000
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Charging and receiving a fee under
the fee petition process. * * *
(3) Subject to paragraph (e) of this
section, a representative must not
charge or receive any fee unless we have
approved it, and a representative must
not charge or receive any fee that is
more than the amount we approve.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) When we need not authorize a fee.
We do not need to authorize a fee when:
(1) A non-profit organization, a
Federal, State, county, or city
government agency, or a third party that
is a business entity independent of your
representative pays from its funds the
representative fees and expenses and
both of the following conditions apply:
(i) You (including any auxiliary
beneficiaries) are free of any liability to
C:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
pay a fee or any expenses, or any part
thereof, directly or indirectly, to the
representative or someone else; and
(ii) The representative submits to us a
form we prescribe waiving the right to
charge and collect a fee and any
expenses from you and the auxiliary
beneficiaries, if any, directly or
indirectly, in whole or in part; or
(2) A court authorizes a fee for your
representative who, in your case, is your
legal guardian or a court-appointed
representative.
PART 416—SUPPLEMENTAL
SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED,
BLIND, AND DISABLED
4. The authority citation for subpart O
of part 416 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1127 and
1631(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
902(a)(5), 1320a–6 and 1383(d)); sec. 303,
Pub. L. 108–203, 118 Stat. 493.
5. Amend § 416.1503 by adding a
definition for ‘‘legal guardian or courtappointed representative’’ in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Legal guardian or court-appointed
representative means a court-appointed
person, committee, or conservator who
is lawfully invested with the power and
charged with the duty of taking care of
and managing the property and rights of
an individual who is considered
incapable of managing his or her own
affairs.
*
*
*
*
*
6. Amend § 416.1520 by revising
paragraph (b) heading and (b)(3) and by
adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 416.1520
services.
Fee for a representative’s
sroberts on PROD1PC76 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Charging and receiving a fee under
the fee petition process. * * *
(3) Subject to paragraph (e) of this
section, a representative must not
charge or receive any fee unless we have
approved it, and a representative must
not charge or receive any fee that is
more than the amount we approve.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) When we need not authorize a fee.
We do not need to authorize a fee when:
(1) A non-profit organization, a
Federal, State, county, or city
government agency, or a third party that
is a business entity independent of your
representative pays from its funds the
representative fees and expenses and
both of the following conditions apply:
(i) You are free of any liability to pay
a fee or any expenses, or any part
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:09 Aug 25, 2008
Jkt 214001
[FR Doc. E8–19674 Filed 8–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Subpart O—[Amended]
§ 416.1503
thereof, directly or indirectly, to the
representative or someone else; and
(ii) The representative submits to us a
form we prescribe waiving the right to
charge and collect a fee and any
expenses from you if any, directly or
indirectly, in whole or in part; or
(2) A court authorizes a fee for your
representative who, in your case, is your
legal guardian or a court-appointed
representative.
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 924
[SATS No. MS–018–FOR; Docket No. OSM–
2008–0017]
Mississippi Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening and
extension of public comment period on
proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are announcing receipt of
revisions to a previously proposed
amendment to the Mississippi
regulatory program (Mississippi
program) under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). Mississippi
proposes a revision to its regulations
regarding valid existing rights as it
pertains to designation of lands as
unsuitable for surface coal mining
operations. Mississippi intends to revise
its program to be consistent with
SMCRA.
This document gives the times and
locations that the Mississippi program
and proposed amendment to that
program are available for your
inspection and the comment period
during which you may submit written
comments on the revisions to the
amendment.
We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m., c.t., September 10, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following two methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The proposed rule
is listed under the agency name ‘‘OFFICE
DATES:
OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND
ENFORCEMENT’’ and has been assigned
Docket ID: OSM–2008–0017. If you
would like to submit comments through
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50263
the Federal erulemaking Portal, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and do the
following. Click on the ‘‘Advanced
Docket Search’’ button on the right side
of the screen. Type in the Docket ID
OSM–2008–0017 and click the submit
button at the bottom of the page. The
next screen will display the Docket
Search Results for the rulemaking. If
you click on the OSM–2008–0017, you
can view the proposed rule and submit
a comment. You can also view
supporting material and any comments
submitted by others.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Sherry
Wilson, Director, Birmingham Field
Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 135
Gemini Circle, Suite 215, Homewood,
Alabama 35209. Please include the
Docket ID (OSM–2008–0017) with your
comments.
We cannot ensure that comments
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) or sent to an address
other than the two listed above will be
included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
For additional information on the
rulemaking process and the public
availability of comments, see ‘‘III. Public
Comment Procedures’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
You may receive one free copy of the
amendment by contacting OSM’s
Birmingham Field Office. See below FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
You may review a copy of the
amendment during regular business
hours at the following locations:
Sherry Wilson, Director, Birmingham
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 135
Gemini Circle, Suite 215, Homewood,
Alabama 35209, Telephone: (205)
290–7282, swilson@osmre.gov.
Michael B. E. Bograd, Director,
Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality, 2380
Highway 80 West, P.O. Box 20307,
Jackson, Mississippi 39289–1307,
Telephone: (601) 961–5500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sherry Wilson, Director, Birmingham
Field Office. Telephone: (205) 290–
7282. E-mail: swilson@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Mississippi Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Mississippi
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
C:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 26, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50260-50263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19674]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
20 CFR Parts 404 and 416
[Docket No. SSA-2008-0030]
RIN 0960-AG82
Authorization of Representative Fees
AGENCY: Social Security Administration.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to revise our rules regarding payment of
representative fees to allow representatives to charge and receive a
fee from third parties without requiring our authorization in certain
instances. We also propose to eliminate the requirement that we
authorize fees for legal guardians or court-appointed representatives
who provide representational services in claims before us if a court
has already authorized their fees. We are proposing these revisions to
reflect changes in representatives' business practices, and in the ways
in which claimants obtain representation, and to make more efficient
the way we process representative fees.
DATES: To make sure that your comments are considered, we must receive
them no later than September 25, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any one of four methods--
Internet, facsimile, regular mail, or hand-delivery. Commenters should
not submit the same comments multiple times or by more than one method.
Regardless of which of the following methods you choose, please state
that your comments refer to Docket No. SSA-2008-0030 to ensure that we
can associate your comments with the correct regulation:
1. Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov. (This
is the most expedient method for submitting your comments, and we
strongly urge you to use it.) In the ``Comment or Submission'' section
of the webpage, type ``SSA-2008-0030'', select ``Go'', and then click
``Send a Comment or Submission.'' The Federal eRulemaking portal issues
you a tracking number when you submit a comment.
2. Telefax to (410) 966-2830.
3. Letter to the Commissioner of Social Security, P.O. Box 17703,
Baltimore, MD 21235-7703.
4. Deliver your comments to the Office of Regulations, Social
Security Administration, 922 Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
on regular business days.
All comments are posted on the Federal eRulemaking portal, although
they may not appear for several days after receipt of the comment. You
may also inspect the comments on regular business days by making
arrangements with the contact person shown in this preamble.
Caution: All comments we receive from members of the public are
available for public viewing on the Federal eRulemaking portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, you should be careful to include
in your comments only information that you wish to make publicly
available on the Internet. We strongly urge you not to include any
personal information, such as your Social Security number or medical
information, in your comments.
[[Page 50261]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marg Handel, Supervisory Social
Insurance Specialist, Office of Income Security Programs, Social
Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-
6401, (410) 965-4639. For information on eligibility or filing for
benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1-800-772-1213 or TTY 1-
800-325-0778, or visit our Internet site, Social Security Online, at
https://www.socialsecurity.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Version
The electronic file of this document is available on the date of
publication in the Federal Register at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/
index.html.
Explanation of Changes
Authority
We may issue regulations to administer the Social Security Act
(Act). 42 U.S.C. 405(a), 902(a)(5), and 1383(d)(1). Specifically, we
may issue regulations allowing attorneys and non-attorneys to represent
claimants before us. We also may set the maximum fees for those
services. 42 U.S.C. 406(a)(1) and 1383(d)(2). Based on this authority,
we are proposing new rules to revise our current regulations on fees
paid to claimant representatives found in part 404 subpart R and part
416 subpart O.
Current Regulations on Fees Paid by Third Parties
We require all representatives to obtain our approval before
charging or receiving a fee for representational services. 20 CFR
404.1720 and 416.1520. We also prohibit representatives from charging
or receiving fees that are more than the amount we approve regardless
of whether the fee is charged to, or received from, claimants or third
parties. 20 CFR 404.1720(b)(3) and 416.1520(b)(3). However, under our
long-standing interpretation of these regulations, if certain criteria
are met, we need not approve a fee if a nonprofit organization pays the
fee out of funds provided by a government entity. Social Security
Ruling (SSR) 85-3.
Proposed Changes
We propose to revise our current policy and allow representatives,
in certain cases, to be paid fees for providing representational
services without requiring our authorization. The primary reason that
we set maximum fees is to protect claimants and beneficiaries. Our
current regulations carry out this purpose. Nevertheless, when a party
other than a claimant or beneficiary incurs the liability for the cost
of the representative's services, there is little risk that the
individual may be charged an unreasonable fee. Often third parties,
such as insurance companies, have provided claimants representation and
have paid the representatives' fees without any liability to the
claimants. We do not believe that we need to continue approving fee
arrangements between representatives and third parties when the amount
of claimants' benefits will not be affected.
Similarly, there is no reason to require legal guardians or court-
appointed representatives to obtain our approval for fee arrangements
if a court has already authorized their fees. Because courts, when
authorizing guardians' fees, generally consider the wards' best
interests and have reviewed and approved the legal guardian's
accounting, there is little risk to the beneficiary that the fee
approved is unreasonable. Thus, under our current subregulatory
instructions, we do not require legal guardians or court-appointed
representatives to obtain our approval for fee arrangements if a court
has already authorized their fees for representation before us,
regardless of who bears the liability for paying the fee.
We propose to define ``legal guardian or court-appointed
representative'' as ``a court-appointed person, committee, or
conservator who is lawfully invested with the power and charged with
the duty of taking care of and managing the property and rights of an
individual who is considered incapable of managing his or her own
affairs'' in Sec. Sec. 404.1703 and 416.1503.
In both of the situations addressed in these proposed rules,
eliminating the requirement that we review these fee arrangements would
not adversely affect the interests of our beneficiaries and would allow
our resources and the resources of the representatives to be used to
serve claimants and beneficiaries in other ways. However, to ensure
that the interests of our beneficiaries are not adversely affected, we
are including criteria in proposed Sec. Sec. 404.1720(e) and
416.1520(e) that are similar to the criteria we currently have in SSR
85-3. Under these proposed regulations, our approval would not be
necessary when the fees are paid by a third party, the claimant is free
from any liability for a fee, and the representative waives the right
to charge and collect a fee. As we previously noted, our approval of
the fee request would also not be necessary where a court has already
authorized the fee in cases where legal guardians or court-appointed
representatives provide representational services in claims before us.
Our experience has been that these criteria adequately ensure that the
cases where our prior approval of a fee is not needed are limited to
ones where claimants and beneficiaries are already protected from
unreasonable attorney fees.
We also propose to make minor conforming changes to paragraph
(b)(3) in Sec. Sec. 404.1720 and 416.1520.
Please note that in another proposed rule document that we are
publishing separately, Revisions to Rules on Representation of Parties,
RIN 0960-AG56, we propose different revisions to Sec. Sec. 404.1703,
404.1720, 416.1503, and 416.1520. When we publish any final rules
following the public comment period, we will coordinate revisions to
these sections.
Lastly, SSR 85-3 explains that we do not need to authorize a
representative's fee if the fee is paid by a nonprofit organization or
an agency out of funds provided or administered by a government entity
and not paid by the claimant or beneficiary. The proposed rules would
codify this policy. In accordance with our usual practice, we will
rescind SSR 85-3 as obsolete if and when we adopt these rules in final.
Clarity of These Rules
Executive Order 12866, as amended, requires each agency to write
all rules in plain language. In addition to your substantive comments
on these proposed rules, we invite your comments on how to make them
easier to understand.
For example:
Have we organized the material to suit your needs?
Are the requirements in the rules clearly stated?
Do the rules contain technical language or jargon that
isn't clear?
Would a different format (grouping and order of sections,
use of headings, paragraphing) make the rules easier to understand?
Would more (but shorter) sections be better?
Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or
diagrams?
What else could we do to make the rules easier to
understand?
When Will We Start To Use These Rules?
We will not use these rules until we evaluate the public comments
we receive on them, determine whether they should be issued as final
rules, and issue final rules in the Federal Register. If we publish
final rules, we will explain in the preamble how we will
[[Page 50262]]
apply them, and summarize and respond to the public comments. Until the
effective date of any final rules, we will continue to use our current
rules.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, as Amended
We have consulted with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
and determined that these proposed rules meet the criteria for a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, as amended.
Therefore, they were reviewed by OMB.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these proposed rules will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. These
proposed rules do not place significant costs on small entities because
they will relieve some small entities of the need to obtain SSA
approval of a fee. It is anticipated that the cost to small entities
will either be minimal, or it will result in cost savings as a result
of increased efficiency. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis
as provided in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, is not
required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
We are proposing revisions to our rules on obtaining approval for
charging a fee for representing claimants. These proposed rules contain
public reporting requirements that must be approved by OMB. The chart
below lists these sections, describes their content, and provides their
burden. We previously accounted for these public reporting burdens in
the Information Collection Requests for the various forms the public
uses to submit the information to SSA. Consequently, we are inserting a
1-hour placeholder burden in these sections.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average burden Estimated
Regulation sections and description Number of Frequency of per response annual burden
respondents response (minutes) (hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
404.1720; 416.1520.............................. .............. .............. .............. 1
The representative submits to us a form we
prescribe waiving the right to charge and
collect a fee..............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have submitted an Information Collection Request to OMB for
clearance. We are soliciting comments on the burden estimate; the need
for the information; its practical utility; ways to enhance its
quality, utility and clarity; and on ways to minimize the burden on
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology. You can call, e-mail or write to
the addresses/phone numbers listed below to request a copy of the
Information Collection Request package or to comment.
Office of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA, Fax
Number: 202-395-6974, E-mail address: OIRA--Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Social Security Administration, Attn: Reports Clearance Officer, 1333
Annex Building, 6401 Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235, Fax: 410-965-
6400, E-mail address: OPLM.RCO@ssa.gov.
You can submit comments on the paperwork burdens associated with
this rule for up to 60 days after publication of this notice; however,
they will be most useful if received within 30 days of publication.
This does not affect the deadline for the public to comment to SSA on
the proposed regulations. These information collection requirements
will not become effective until approved by OMB. When OMB has approved
these information collection requirements, SSA will publish a notice in
the Federal Register.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 96.001, Social
Security-Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social Security-Retirement
Insurance; 96.004, Social Security-Survivors Insurance; and 96.006,
Supplemental Security Income)
List of Subjects
20 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and procedure; Blind; Disability benefits;
Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance; Penalties; Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements; Social Security.
20 CFR Part 416
Administrative practice and procedure; Penalties; Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements; Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
Dated: May 27, 2008.
Michael J. Astrue,
Commissioner of Social Security.
Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the
Federal Register on August 20, 2008.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, we propose to amend 20 CFR
parts 404 and 416 as set forth below:
PART 404--FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY INSURANCE
(1950- )
Subpart R--[Amended]
1. The authority citation for subpart R of part 404 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 205(a), 206, 702(a)(5), and 1127 of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(a), 406, 902(a)(5), and 1320a-6); sec.
303, Pub. L. 108-203, 118 Stat. 493.
2. Amend Sec. 404.1703 by adding a definition for ``legal guardian
or court-appointed representative'' in alphabetical order to read as
follows:
Sec. 404.1703 Definitions.
* * * * *
Legal guardian or court-appointed representative means a court-
appointed person, committee, or conservator who is lawfully invested
with the power and charged with the duty of taking care of and managing
the property and rights of an individual who is considered incapable of
managing his or her own affairs.
* * * * *
3. Amend Sec. 404.1720 by revising paragraph (b) heading and
(b)(3) and by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 404.1720 Fee for a representative's services.
* * * * *
(b) Charging and receiving a fee under the fee petition process. *
* *
(3) Subject to paragraph (e) of this section, a representative must
not charge or receive any fee unless we have approved it, and a
representative must not charge or receive any fee that is more than the
amount we approve.
* * * * *
(e) When we need not authorize a fee. We do not need to authorize a
fee when:
(1) A non-profit organization, a Federal, State, county, or city
government agency, or a third party that is a business entity
independent of your representative pays from its funds the
representative fees and expenses and both of the following conditions
apply:
(i) You (including any auxiliary beneficiaries) are free of any
liability to
[[Page 50263]]
pay a fee or any expenses, or any part thereof, directly or indirectly,
to the representative or someone else; and
(ii) The representative submits to us a form we prescribe waiving
the right to charge and collect a fee and any expenses from you and the
auxiliary beneficiaries, if any, directly or indirectly, in whole or in
part; or
(2) A court authorizes a fee for your representative who, in your
case, is your legal guardian or a court-appointed representative.
PART 416--SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME FOR THE AGED, BLIND, AND
DISABLED
Subpart O--[Amended]
4. The authority citation for subpart O of part 416 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 702(a)(5), 1127 and 1631(d) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 902(a)(5), 1320a-6 and 1383(d)); sec. 303,
Pub. L. 108-203, 118 Stat. 493.
5. Amend Sec. 416.1503 by adding a definition for ``legal guardian
or court-appointed representative'' in alphabetical order to read as
follows:
Sec. 416.1503 Definitions.
* * * * *
Legal guardian or court-appointed representative means a court-
appointed person, committee, or conservator who is lawfully invested
with the power and charged with the duty of taking care of and managing
the property and rights of an individual who is considered incapable of
managing his or her own affairs.
* * * * *
6. Amend Sec. 416.1520 by revising paragraph (b) heading and
(b)(3) and by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 416.1520 Fee for a representative's services.
* * * * *
(b) Charging and receiving a fee under the fee petition process. *
* *
(3) Subject to paragraph (e) of this section, a representative must
not charge or receive any fee unless we have approved it, and a
representative must not charge or receive any fee that is more than the
amount we approve.
* * * * *
(e) When we need not authorize a fee. We do not need to authorize a
fee when:
(1) A non-profit organization, a Federal, State, county, or city
government agency, or a third party that is a business entity
independent of your representative pays from its funds the
representative fees and expenses and both of the following conditions
apply:
(i) You are free of any liability to pay a fee or any expenses, or
any part thereof, directly or indirectly, to the representative or
someone else; and
(ii) The representative submits to us a form we prescribe waiving
the right to charge and collect a fee and any expenses from you if any,
directly or indirectly, in whole or in part; or
(2) A court authorizes a fee for your representative who, in your
case, is your legal guardian or a court-appointed representative.
[FR Doc. E8-19674 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P