North Forest Acres Levee/Road Project City of Seward, AK, 49984 [E8-19597]
Download as PDF
49984
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 165 / Monday, August 25, 2008 / Notices
District. Attn: Recreation Fee Program,
57600 McKenzie Hwy, McKenzie
Bridge, OR 97413 or at https://
www.fs.fed.us/r6/willamette/recreation/
rea-feechange/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement
Act (Title VII, Pub. L. 108–447) directed
the Secretary of Agriculture to publish
a six month advance notice in the
Federal Register whenever new
recreation fee areas are established.
Once public involvement is complete,
new fee proposals will he reviewed by
the Pacific Northwest Recreation
Resource Advisory Committee (RRAC).
The RRAC will discuss and forward
their recommendation to the Regional
Forester who makes the final decision
on behalf of the Secretary of
Agriculture. Information about the
Pacific Northwest Recreation Resource
Advisory Committee, RRAC meeting
dates and location can be found on the
Region 6 (Oregon/Washington) Forest
Service Web site at: https://
www.fs.fed.us/r6/passespermits/
rrac.shtml. A tentative meeting is
scheduled for the end of October of
2008.
Date: August 14, 2008.
Dallas Emch,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E8–19458 Filed 8–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
North Forest Acres Levee/Road Project
City of Seward, AK
Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Finding of No Significant
Impact.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969; the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations (40
CFR part 1500); and the regulations of
the Natural Resources Conservation
Service (7 CFR part 650); the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, gives notice
of a Finding of No Significant Impact
based on the Environmental Assessment
and its Supplemental for the North
Forest Acres Road/Levee Project.
DATES: The agency must receive
comments on or before September 26,
2008.
Natural Resources
Conservation Service, 800 West
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:18 Aug 22, 2008
Jkt 214001
Evergreen, Suite 100, Palmer, Alaska
99645–6539.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil
Naegele, 907–761–7758.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A limited
number of copies of the Environmental
Assessment and the Supplemental
Environmental Assessment are available
to fill single copy requests at the above
address. Copies of the environmental
documents are also available for review
at the above address.
Dated: August 15, 2008.
Robert N. Jones,
Alaska State Conservationist, Natural
Resources Conservation Service.
Finding of No Significant Impact
The National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires Federal
agencies to examine the environmental
impacts of all Federal actions affecting
the quality of the human environment.
I have determined, based upon the
evaluation of impacts in the
Environmental Assessment (EA)
prepared in 2003 and the Supplemental
Environmental Assessment (SEA)
prepared in 2007, that there would be
no significant individual or cumulative
impacts on the quality of the human
environment as a result of implementing
the North Forest Acres Levee/Road
Project in Seward, Alaska. The EA and
SEA are attached hereto and made a part
hereof. Based on the documented
findings, I have determined that an
Environmental Impact Statement is not
required.
The city of Seward, Alaska, has
experienced flood damage from the
Resurrection River and Japanese Creek
several times in the past. Damages from
the 1995 flood alone totaled 9.8 million
dollars. A multi-agency task force
recommended five complementary
actions to minimize the risk of future
damage. Three of these actions (a levee
on Japanese Creek, dredging at the
mouth of the Resurrection River and
widening of the highway bridges) have
been completed. The North Forest
Levee/Road Project, along with
widening of the railroad bridges are the
final components of the flood control
strategy. Congress has authorized
funding for this project in the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
budget.
An Environmental Assessment was
completed for this project in 2003.
Based on the findings of the EA a
preferred alternative was selected (West
2b and East 3) as the best viable option
of the eight considered, including the
no-action. This decision was based on
an analysis of the environmental
impacts for each alternative, public
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comment, and State and Federal agency
comments. A Finding of No Significant
Impact (FONSI) was issued based on the
preferred alternative and published in
the Federal Register (69 FR 2110–2111).
The Seward City Council and the
residents of the effected areas raised
objections to the FONSI and the
preferred alternative. The objections
were based primarily on the close
proximity of the dyke and road to the
residential subdivision. A decision was
made to rescind the original FONSI and
prepare a Supplemental Environmental
Analysis to address these concerns.
The SEA assessed the impacts of an
additional alignment further to the
north of the original alternatives
addressed in the EA. This alternative
had the support of the City and the
nearby residents. This alternative also
had greater adverse impacts (than the
original routes) on the floodplain,
wetlands, and Japanese Creek. Based on
comments received from State and
Federal agencies it was clear that the
northerly route would require a more indepth study and in all probability
would create the need for the
preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) with no guarantee of
support for the City’s preferred
alternative. For the purpose of
furthering the project, the Seward City
Council has dropped their objections to
the preferred alternative identified in
the 2003 EA.
The current preferred alternative is
the same as the preferred alternative
identified in the 2003 EA with a slight
modification. The eastern half of the
alignment has been moved slightly
further south so as to further reduce any
impacts to those wetlands. The western
half of the route remains as identified in
the 2003 preferred alternative. This
alternative minimizes impact to the
wetlands, minimizes encroachment on
the floodplain, and results in no
significant rise of floodwaters in
Resurrection River. There are no stream
crossings of Japanese Creek and no
culverts or flood gates to operate and
maintain.
Based on the information presented in
the attached North Forest Levee/Road
Project EA and SEA, I find that the
proposed action is not a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment. Therefore,
an EIS is not required.
Dated: August 15, 2008.
Robert Jones,
Alaska State Conservationist, Natural
Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. E8–19597 Filed 8–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 165 (Monday, August 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19597]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
North Forest Acres Levee/Road Project City of Seward, AK
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality regulations
(40 CFR part 1500); and the regulations of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (7 CFR part 650); the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, gives notice of a
Finding of No Significant Impact based on the Environmental Assessment
and its Supplemental for the North Forest Acres Road/Levee Project.
DATES: The agency must receive comments on or before September 26,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Natural Resources Conservation Service, 800 West Evergreen,
Suite 100, Palmer, Alaska 99645-6539.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil Naegele, 907-761-7758.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A limited number of copies of the
Environmental Assessment and the Supplemental Environmental Assessment
are available to fill single copy requests at the above address. Copies
of the environmental documents are also available for review at the
above address.
Dated: August 15, 2008.
Robert N. Jones,
Alaska State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Finding of No Significant Impact
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires
Federal agencies to examine the environmental impacts of all Federal
actions affecting the quality of the human environment. I have
determined, based upon the evaluation of impacts in the Environmental
Assessment (EA) prepared in 2003 and the Supplemental Environmental
Assessment (SEA) prepared in 2007, that there would be no significant
individual or cumulative impacts on the quality of the human
environment as a result of implementing the North Forest Acres Levee/
Road Project in Seward, Alaska. The EA and SEA are attached hereto and
made a part hereof. Based on the documented findings, I have determined
that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
The city of Seward, Alaska, has experienced flood damage from the
Resurrection River and Japanese Creek several times in the past.
Damages from the 1995 flood alone totaled 9.8 million dollars. A multi-
agency task force recommended five complementary actions to minimize
the risk of future damage. Three of these actions (a levee on Japanese
Creek, dredging at the mouth of the Resurrection River and widening of
the highway bridges) have been completed. The North Forest Levee/Road
Project, along with widening of the railroad bridges are the final
components of the flood control strategy. Congress has authorized
funding for this project in the Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) budget.
An Environmental Assessment was completed for this project in 2003.
Based on the findings of the EA a preferred alternative was selected
(West 2b and East 3) as the best viable option of the eight considered,
including the no-action. This decision was based on an analysis of the
environmental impacts for each alternative, public comment, and State
and Federal agency comments. A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
was issued based on the preferred alternative and published in the
Federal Register (69 FR 2110-2111). The Seward City Council and the
residents of the effected areas raised objections to the FONSI and the
preferred alternative. The objections were based primarily on the close
proximity of the dyke and road to the residential subdivision. A
decision was made to rescind the original FONSI and prepare a
Supplemental Environmental Analysis to address these concerns.
The SEA assessed the impacts of an additional alignment further to
the north of the original alternatives addressed in the EA. This
alternative had the support of the City and the nearby residents. This
alternative also had greater adverse impacts (than the original routes)
on the floodplain, wetlands, and Japanese Creek. Based on comments
received from State and Federal agencies it was clear that the
northerly route would require a more in-depth study and in all
probability would create the need for the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) with no guarantee of support for
the City's preferred alternative. For the purpose of furthering the
project, the Seward City Council has dropped their objections to the
preferred alternative identified in the 2003 EA.
The current preferred alternative is the same as the preferred
alternative identified in the 2003 EA with a slight modification. The
eastern half of the alignment has been moved slightly further south so
as to further reduce any impacts to those wetlands. The western half of
the route remains as identified in the 2003 preferred alternative. This
alternative minimizes impact to the wetlands, minimizes encroachment on
the floodplain, and results in no significant rise of floodwaters in
Resurrection River. There are no stream crossings of Japanese Creek and
no culverts or flood gates to operate and maintain.
Based on the information presented in the attached North Forest
Levee/Road Project EA and SEA, I find that the proposed action is not a
major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment. Therefore, an EIS is not required.
Dated: August 15, 2008.
Robert Jones,
Alaska State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. E8-19597 Filed 8-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P