Fisheries in the Western Pacific; Crustacean Fisheries; Deepwater Shrimp, 49638-49641 [E8-19579]
Download as PDF
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
49638
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 164 / Friday, August 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
there has not been a large-scale directed
fishery for this species in North
Carolina. This prevents the meaningful
quantification of current revenues that
might be foregone as a result of the
proposed action, as well as the
identification and description of fishing
entities that might desire to re-enter the
fishery should the fishery reemerge in
North Carolina in the future.
It should be emphasized that the
proposed action would not directly
affect any current fishing revenues or
fishing practices because the medium
mesh spiny dogfish gillnet fishery in
North Carolina has not operated since
the May 26, 2006, implementation of the
BDTRP, nor in any substantive manner
since 2000. Instead, the proposed
continuation of the nighttime fishing
prohibition would have an effect only if
a directed spiny dogfish fishery
reemerges in North Carolina because of
changes in FMP actions. In that case, the
proposed action would reduce potential
medium mesh gillnet fishing
opportunities by limiting soak times,
and would limit the redevelopment and
prosecution of a fishery that, prior to the
FMPs and BDTRP, contributed a
relatively minor share of fishing
revenues to the fishery participants.
NMFS considered two alternatives for
the proposed action. The first
alternative, the status quo, would
continue current restrictions until May
26, 2009, when the medium mesh
gillnet prohibitions in North Carolina
would expire. This alternative would
allow increased soak times associated
with the directed spiny dogfish fishery
and associated revenues, if FMP actions
allow for the reemergence of a directed
fishery in North Carolina. However, this
alternative would not prevent future
incidental mortality and serious injury
to dolphins from extended soak time of
medium mesh commercial gillnet gear,
and, therefore, would not meet the
objectives of the BDTRP. The second
alternative, the proposed action, would
continue, without modification, current
nighttime medium mesh gillnet
restrictions in North Carolina state
waters during the winter for an
additional three years (until May 26,
2012). This alternative is a consensus
recommendation of the BDTRT and
would achieve the BDTRP’s objectives,
as mandated by the MMPA, by
continuing to reduce serious injuries
and mortalities of dolphins incidental to
commercial gillnet fishing.
References
ASFMC. 2002. Interstate Fishery
Management Plan for Spiny Dogfish.
Fishery Management Report No. 40 of
the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Aug 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
Commission. Prepared by the Spiny
Dogfish Plan Development Team.
ASFMC. 2007a. Review of the
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission’s Interstate Fishery
Management Plan for Spiny Dogfish
(Squalus acanthias) May 2006–April
2007 fishing year. Prepared by the Spiny
Dogfish Plan Review Team, ASMFC.
ASMFC. 2007b. ASMFC Spiny
Dogfish Board Sets 2008/2009 Fishing
Year Quota at 8 Million Pounds.
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission Press Release, October 30,
2007.
Byrd, B.L, A.A. Hohn, F.H. Munden,
G.N. Lovewell, and R.E. LoPiccolo.
2008. Effects of Commercial Fishing
Regulations on Stranding Rates of
Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops
truncatus). Fish. Bull. 106:72–81.
Lovewell, G.N. and B.L. Byrd. 2007.
Bottlenose Dolphins Recovered Inshore
and on Ocean-Side Beaches of North
Carolina from January 2005 to April
2007. Prepared by NMFS-SEFSC for the
BDTRT. BDTRT document number 6–
19–07q.
NCDMF. 2008. Overview of North
Carolina Spiny Dogfish Regulations and
Commercial Landings. North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources, March
2008.
NMFS. Personal Communication.
National Marine Fisheries Service,
Fisheries Statistic Division, Silver
Spring, MD.
NMFS. 2007. U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of
Mexico Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments 2006. U.S. Department of
Commerce. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NMFS-NE–201.
NMFS. 2006. 43rd SAW Assessment
Summary Report. U.S. Department of
Commerce. Northeast Fishery Science
Center Reference Document 06–14.
Rossman, M. and D. Palka. 2004. A
Review of Coastal Bottlenose Dolphin
Bycatch Mortality Estimates in Relation
to the Potential Effectiveness of the
Proposed BDTRP. Prepared by NMFSNEFSC for the BDTRT. BDTRT
document number 1–13–05f.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 229
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Fisheries, Marine
mammals, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 18, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 229 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 229—AUTHORIZATION FOR
COMMERCIAL FISHERIES UNDER THE
MARINE MAMMAL PROTECTION ACT
OF 1972
1. The authority citation for part 229
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.;
§ 220.32(f) also issued under 16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.
2. In § 229.35 paragraphs (d)(4)(ii) and
(d)(5)(i) are revised to read as follows:
§ 229.35 Bottlenose Dolphin Take
Reduction Plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) Medium mesh gillnets. From
November 1 through April 30 of the
following year, in Northern North
Carolina State waters, no person may
fish with any medium mesh gillnet at
night. This provision expires on May 26,
2012.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(i) Medium Mesh Gillnets. From
November 1 through April 30 of the
following year, in Southern North
Carolina State waters, no person may
fish with any medium mesh gillnet at
night. This provision expires on May 26,
2012.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–19580 Filed 8–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 665
[Docket No. 070719388–81094–02]
RIN 0648–AV29
Fisheries in the Western Pacific;
Crustacean Fisheries; Deepwater
Shrimp
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
designate deepwater shrimp of the
genus Heterocarpus as management unit
species (MUS), and require Federal
permits and data reporting for
deepwater shrimp fishing in Federal
waters of the western Pacific. The
proposed rule is intended to improve
information on deepwater shrimp
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
22AUP1
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 164 / Friday, August 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
fisheries and their ecosystem impacts,
and to provide a basis for future
management of the fisheries, if needed.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received by October 6, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposed
rule, identified by 0648–AV29, may be
sent to either of the following addresses:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal
www.regulations.gov; or
• Mail: William L. Robinson,
Regional Administrator, NMFS, Pacific
Islands Region (PIR), 1601 Kapiolani
Blvd, Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814–
4700.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the commenter may be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘NA’’ in
the required name and organization
fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
Copies of the Fishery Management
Plan for Crustacean Fisheries of the
Western Pacific Region (FMP), and
proposed FMP Amendment 13, which
includes an environmental assessment
(EA), are available from the Western
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council), 1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400,
Honolulu, HI 96813, tel 808–522–8220,
fax 808–522–8226, or
www.wpcouncil.org.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to William L.
Robinson, and by e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or fax to
202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brett Wiedoff, NMFS PIR, 808–944–
2272.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
Federal Register document is accessible
at the Office of the Federal Register
website: www.gpoaccess.gov/fr.
Crustacean fisheries in the western
Pacific are federally-managed within the
waters of the U.S. Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ) around American Samoa,
the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands (CNMI), Guam, Hawaii,
and the Pacific Remote Island Areas
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Aug 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
(PRIA, comprising Palmyra Atoll,
Kingman Reef, Jarvis Island, Baker
Island, Howland Island, Johnston Atoll,
Wake Island, and Midway Atoll). The
EEZ around the CNMI and PRIA extends
from the shoreline seaward to 200
nautical miles (nm), and the EEZ around
the other islands extends from three to
200 nm offshore. Currently, the
crustaceans FMP management unit
species include the spiny lobsters
Panulirus marginatus and P.
penicillatus, slipper lobsters of the
family Scyllaridae, and Kona (spanner)
crab, Ranina ranina.
Eight species of the deepwater shrimp
genus Heterocarpus have been reported
throughout the tropical Pacific,
generally at depths of 200 to 1,200
meters on the outer reef slopes that
surround islands and deepwater banks.
Species distribution tends to be
stratified by depth with some overlap.
The deepwater trap fisheries have
primarily targeted Heterocarpus ensifer
and H. laevigatus.
Western Pacific commercial trap
fisheries for deepwater shrimp are
intermittent. There have been sporadic
operations in Hawaii since the 1960s,
small-scale fisheries in Guam during the
1970s, and some activity in the CNMI
during the mid–1990s. The fisheries
have been unregulated, and there has
been no comprehensive collection of
information about the fisheries. Most of
these fishing ventures have been shortlived, probably as a result of sometimesfrequent loss of traps, a shrimp product
with a short shelf life and history of
inconsistent quality, and the rapid
localized depletion of deepwater shrimp
stocks leading to low catch rates.
Despite these hurdles, interest in
deepwater shrimp fisheries continues.
Amendment 13 would designate
deepwater shrimp of the genus
Heterocarpus as management unit
species under the FMP, and would
require Federal permits and reporting
for deepwater shrimp fishing in the U.S.
EEZ. The proposed monitoring program
(permits and logbooks) is intended to
improve understanding of these
fisheries and their impact on marine
ecosystems. Although currently there
are no resource concerns regarding
western Pacific deepwater shrimp, the
proposed designation of these shrimp as
management unit species would provide
a basis for management of the fisheries,
if warranted in the future.
In addition to the proposed rule,
Amendment 13 designates Essential
Fish Habitat (EFH) for Heterocarpus
spp. as required under the MagnusonStevens Act. To reduce the complexity
and the number of EFH identifications
required for each individual species and
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49639
life stages of the genus Heterocarpus in
the western Pacific, EFH has been
designated for the complete assemblage
of adult and juvenile Heterocarpus spp.
as the outer reef slopes between 300 and
700 meters surrounding every island
and submerged banks in the western
Pacific. The species complex
designations includes all eight species
of deepwater shrimp extant in the
western Pacific (Heterocarpus ensifer,
H. laevigatus, H. sibogae, H. gibbosus,
H. Lepidus, H. dorsalis, H. tricarinatus
and H. longirostris).
In addition to adding deepwater
shrimp to the management unit, this
proposed rule would reorganize some
existing regulations relating to the
Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI)
lobster limited access permit program.
These regulations, now in paragraphs
§ 665.41(a)(1), (a)(3), (a)(4), and
665.41(d), would be consolidated into
paragraph § 665.41(d). The regulations
would also clarify that the harvest of
crustacean management unit species
within the NWHI Marine National
Monument is subject to the
requirements of 50 CFR part 404.
To be considered, comments must be
received by close of business on October
6, 2008, not postmarked or otherwise
transmitted by that date.
In addition to soliciting public
comments on this proposed rule, NMFS
is soliciting comments on proposed
FMP Amendment 13 through October
14, 2008 as stated in the Notice of
Availability published on August 14,
2008 (50 CFR Part 665). Public
comments on this proposed rule, if
received by October 14, 2008, will also
be considered in the approval/
disapproval decision for Amendment
13. Comments received after that date
will not be considered in the approval/
disapproval decision for Amendment
13, but will be considered for this
proposed rule.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent
with the Crustaceans FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable laws, subject
to further consideration after public
comment.
Amendment 13 includes an EA that
discusses the impacts on the
environment as a result of this rule. The
purpose and need for the proposed
action is to establish appropriate
monitoring and management
mechanisms for the domestic harvest of
western Pacific deepwater shrimp.
Based on the information in the EA, as
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
22AUP1
49640
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 164 / Friday, August 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
compared to the no-action alternative,
the preferred alternative would have no
adverse impacts to essential fish habitat
or habitat areas of particular concern.
None of the action alternatives would be
expected to change the impacts of U.S.
vessels on deepwater shrimp resources
in the short term, but impacts on the
resource base could increase with
higher future effort, so increasing
fishery managers’ understanding of the
status of the stocks and fishing mortality
would be an important outcome of this
action. By including deepwater shrimp
as management unit species, the
foundation would be established for
implementing control measures, should
they become necessary. None of the
action alternatives is anticipated to have
any significant adverse impacts on
seabird, sea turtle, or marine mammal
populations because the fishery has a
relatively low level of participation, and
there have been no observed or reported
interactions with protected resources in
the deepwater shrimp fishery. The
preferred alternative would provide for
the sustained participation of fishing
communities by helping to ensure the
long-term availability of western Pacific
deepwater shrimp. The complete
analysis of the alternatives is contained
in Amendment 13, including an EA, and
is not repeated here. Copies of the
environmental analytical documents is
available from the Council (see
ADDRESSES).
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Council for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
A description of the action, why it is being
considered, and the legal basis for this action
are contained in the preamble to the
proposed rule. This rule does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with other Federal rules.
There are no disproportionate economic
impacts from this rule based on home port,
gear type, or relative vessel size. Pursuant to
section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. § 605(b), the NMFS Pacific
Islands Regional Office has determined that
this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities based on the pre-existing status of
deepwater shrimp fisheries within the U.S.
EEZ of the western Pacific. All vessels having
the potential to participate in this fishery are
considered to be small entities under the
current Small Business Administration
definition of small fish-harvesting businesses
(gross receipts not in excess of $ 4.0 million,
independently owned and operated, and not
dominant in the field). While fishing for
deepwater shrimp has been sporadic over the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Aug 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
last several decades, in 1984, a total of 17
vessels reported catching approximately 159
tons of deepwater shrimp worth an estimated
ex-vessel value of $780,000. More recent
information is not possible because
confidentiality rules restrict the release of
information from the small number of
participants.
Alternative 1 (no action) would preclude
Federal monitoring and management of
known deepwater shrimp fisheries operating
within the western Pacific. Alternative 2
would include deepwater shrimp as
management unit species (MUS) under the
Crustaceans FMP, enabling the Council and
NMFS to develop management measures, as
appropriate, for deepwater shrimp fisheries
in the region. Alternative 3 would add
deepwater shrimp to the MUS, as in
Alternative 2, and would also require Federal
permitting and reporting of harvest for
vessels engaged in the deepwater shrimp
fishery.
Alternatives 1 and 2 would yield no
economic impact to small entities (vessels).
However, Alternative 3 would have a slightly
adverse economic impact resulting in a
requirement to pay a vessel permit fee of
approximately $30. Applied on a 1984 dollar
base, this represents only 0.06 percent of the
average boat revenue for 1984. Alternative 3
represents the most adverse economic impact
of the 3 alternatives. However, the fishery
cannot be monitored and managed under the
requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
particularly National Standards 1 and 2,
without accurate and reliable data on shrimp
effort and production associated with
required permitting, recordkeeping and
reporting from the directed deepwater
shrimp.
As a result, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains a
collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). This requirement has been
submitted to OMB for approval. The
preferred alternative would require the
owners of U.S. vessels that fish for
deepwater shrimp management unit
species in the western Pacific to obtain
Federal fishing permits, and the vessel
operators would be required to complete
and submit Federal catch reports.
Permit eligibility would not be
restricted in any way, and the permit
would be renewable on an annual basis.
NMFS anticipates that initial permit
applications would require 0.5 hours
per applicant, with renewals requiring
an additional 0.5 hours annually. It is
estimated that NMFS may receive and
process up to 10 permit applications
each year. Thus, the total collection-ofinformation burden to fishermen for
permit applications is estimated at five
(5) hours per year. The cost for
individual Federal permits has not been
determined, but would represent only
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the administrative cost and is
anticipated to be approximately $30 per
permit.
NMFS anticipates the time
requirement to complete Federal catch
reports to be approximately 10 minutes
per vessel per fishing day. Assuming
that 10 vessels fish during up to 100
days per year, the total collection-ofinformation burden estimate for fishing
data reporting is estimated at 167 hours
per year.
Public comment is sought regarding:
whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information to William L.
Robinson (see ADDRESSES), and by email to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov or
fax to 202–395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 665
Administrative practice and
procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaii, Hawaiian
Natives, Northern Mariana Islands,
Pacific remote island areas, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 18, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 665 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 665—FISHERIES IN THE
WESTERN PACIFIC
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 665 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 665.12, revise the definition of
‘‘Crustaceans management unit species’’
to read as follows:
§ 665.12
*
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
*
Definitions.
*
22AUP1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 164 / Friday, August 22, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Crustaceans management unit species
means the following crustaceans:
Common Name
Scientific Name
Spiny lobsters
Panulirus
marginatus
P. penicillatus
family Scyllaridae
Ranina ranina
Heterocarpus spp.
Slipper lobsters
Kona crab
Deepwater shrimp
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 665.13, revise paragraphs
(f)(2)(i) through (f)(2)(v), and add a new
paragraph (f)(2)(vi) to read as follows:
§ 665.13
Permits and fees.
*
*
*
*
(f) Fees. * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Hawaii longline limited access
permit.
(ii) Mau Zone limited access permit.
(iii) Coral reef ecosystem special
permit.
(iv) American Samoa longline limited
access permit.
(v) Main Hawaiian Islands noncommercial bottomfish permit.
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with PROPOSALS
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Aug 21, 2008
Jkt 214001
(vi) Crustaceans permit.
*
*
*
*
4. In § 665.41, revise paragraphs (a)
and (d) to read as follows:
*
§ 665.41
Permits.
(a) Applicability. (1) The owner of any
vessel used to fish for lobster in
Crustaceans Permit Area 1 must have a
lobster limited access permit issued for
such vessel.
(2) The owner of any vessel used to
fish for lobster in Crustaceans Permit
Areas 2, 3, or 4 must have a permit
issued for that vessel.
(3) The owner of any vessel used to
fish for deepwater shrimp in
Crustaceans Permit Areas 1, 2, 3, or 4
must have a permit issued for that
vessel.
(4) Harvest of crustacean management
unit species within the Northwestern
Hawaiian Islands Marine National
Monument is subject to the
requirements of 50 CFR part 404.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Lobster Limited Access Permit
Requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49641
(1) A lobster limited access permit is
valid for fishing only in Crustaceans
Permit Area 1.
(2) Only one permit will be assigned
to any vessel.
(3) No vessel owner will have permits
for a single vessel to harvest lobsters in
Permit Areas 1 and 2 at the same time.
(4) A maximum of 15 limited access
permits can be valid at any time.
*
*
*
*
*
5. In § 665.42, add a new paragraph
(c) to read as follows.
§ 665.42
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) In any Crustaceans Permit Area, it
is unlawful for any person to:
(1) Fish for, take, or retain deepwater
shrimp without a permit issued under
§ 665.41.
(2) Falsify or fail to make, keep,
maintain, or submit Federal reports and
records of harvests of deepwater shrimp
as required under § 665.14.
[FR Doc. E8–19579 Filed 8–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\22AUP1.SGM
22AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 164 (Friday, August 22, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49638-49641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19579]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 665
[Docket No. 070719388-81094-02]
RIN 0648-AV29
Fisheries in the Western Pacific; Crustacean Fisheries; Deepwater
Shrimp
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would designate deepwater shrimp of the
genus Heterocarpus as management unit species (MUS), and require
Federal permits and data reporting for deepwater shrimp fishing in
Federal waters of the western Pacific. The proposed rule is intended to
improve information on deepwater shrimp
[[Page 49639]]
fisheries and their ecosystem impacts, and to provide a basis for
future management of the fisheries, if needed.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received by October 6,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposed rule, identified by 0648-AV29, may
be sent to either of the following addresses:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal www.regulations.gov; or
Mail: William L. Robinson, Regional Administrator, NMFS,
Pacific Islands Region (PIR), 1601 Kapiolani Blvd, Suite 1110,
Honolulu, HI 96814-4700.
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to www.regulations.gov without change. All
personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``NA'' in the
required name and organization fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word
or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of the Fishery Management Plan for Crustacean Fisheries of
the Western Pacific Region (FMP), and proposed FMP Amendment 13, which
includes an environmental assessment (EA), are available from the
Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council), 1164 Bishop St.,
Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813, tel 808-522-8220, fax 808-522-8226, or
www.wpcouncil.org.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to William L. Robinson, and by e-mail to
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov or fax to 202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brett Wiedoff, NMFS PIR, 808-944-2272.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Federal Register document is accessible
at the Office of the Federal Register website: www.gpoaccess.gov/fr.
Crustacean fisheries in the western Pacific are federally-managed
within the waters of the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) around
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
(CNMI), Guam, Hawaii, and the Pacific Remote Island Areas (PRIA,
comprising Palmyra Atoll, Kingman Reef, Jarvis Island, Baker Island,
Howland Island, Johnston Atoll, Wake Island, and Midway Atoll). The EEZ
around the CNMI and PRIA extends from the shoreline seaward to 200
nautical miles (nm), and the EEZ around the other islands extends from
three to 200 nm offshore. Currently, the crustaceans FMP management
unit species include the spiny lobsters Panulirus marginatus and P.
penicillatus, slipper lobsters of the family Scyllaridae, and Kona
(spanner) crab, Ranina ranina.
Eight species of the deepwater shrimp genus Heterocarpus have been
reported throughout the tropical Pacific, generally at depths of 200 to
1,200 meters on the outer reef slopes that surround islands and
deepwater banks. Species distribution tends to be stratified by depth
with some overlap. The deepwater trap fisheries have primarily targeted
Heterocarpus ensifer and H. laevigatus.
Western Pacific commercial trap fisheries for deepwater shrimp are
intermittent. There have been sporadic operations in Hawaii since the
1960s, small-scale fisheries in Guam during the 1970s, and some
activity in the CNMI during the mid-1990s. The fisheries have been
unregulated, and there has been no comprehensive collection of
information about the fisheries. Most of these fishing ventures have
been short-lived, probably as a result of sometimes-frequent loss of
traps, a shrimp product with a short shelf life and history of
inconsistent quality, and the rapid localized depletion of deepwater
shrimp stocks leading to low catch rates. Despite these hurdles,
interest in deepwater shrimp fisheries continues.
Amendment 13 would designate deepwater shrimp of the genus
Heterocarpus as management unit species under the FMP, and would
require Federal permits and reporting for deepwater shrimp fishing in
the U.S. EEZ. The proposed monitoring program (permits and logbooks) is
intended to improve understanding of these fisheries and their impact
on marine ecosystems. Although currently there are no resource concerns
regarding western Pacific deepwater shrimp, the proposed designation of
these shrimp as management unit species would provide a basis for
management of the fisheries, if warranted in the future.
In addition to the proposed rule, Amendment 13 designates Essential
Fish Habitat (EFH) for Heterocarpus spp. as required under the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. To reduce the complexity and the number of EFH
identifications required for each individual species and life stages of
the genus Heterocarpus in the western Pacific, EFH has been designated
for the complete assemblage of adult and juvenile Heterocarpus spp. as
the outer reef slopes between 300 and 700 meters surrounding every
island and submerged banks in the western Pacific. The species complex
designations includes all eight species of deepwater shrimp extant in
the western Pacific (Heterocarpus ensifer, H. laevigatus, H. sibogae,
H. gibbosus, H. Lepidus, H. dorsalis, H. tricarinatus and H.
longirostris).
In addition to adding deepwater shrimp to the management unit, this
proposed rule would reorganize some existing regulations relating to
the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI) lobster limited access permit
program. These regulations, now in paragraphs Sec. 665.41(a)(1),
(a)(3), (a)(4), and 665.41(d), would be consolidated into paragraph
Sec. 665.41(d). The regulations would also clarify that the harvest of
crustacean management unit species within the NWHI Marine National
Monument is subject to the requirements of 50 CFR part 404.
To be considered, comments must be received by close of business on
October 6, 2008, not postmarked or otherwise transmitted by that date.
In addition to soliciting public comments on this proposed rule,
NMFS is soliciting comments on proposed FMP Amendment 13 through
October 14, 2008 as stated in the Notice of Availability published on
August 14, 2008 (50 CFR Part 665). Public comments on this proposed
rule, if received by October 14, 2008, will also be considered in the
approval/disapproval decision for Amendment 13. Comments received after
that date will not be considered in the approval/disapproval decision
for Amendment 13, but will be considered for this proposed rule.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the Crustaceans FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, and other applicable laws, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
Amendment 13 includes an EA that discusses the impacts on the
environment as a result of this rule. The purpose and need for the
proposed action is to establish appropriate monitoring and management
mechanisms for the domestic harvest of western Pacific deepwater
shrimp. Based on the information in the EA, as
[[Page 49640]]
compared to the no-action alternative, the preferred alternative would
have no adverse impacts to essential fish habitat or habitat areas of
particular concern. None of the action alternatives would be expected
to change the impacts of U.S. vessels on deepwater shrimp resources in
the short term, but impacts on the resource base could increase with
higher future effort, so increasing fishery managers' understanding of
the status of the stocks and fishing mortality would be an important
outcome of this action. By including deepwater shrimp as management
unit species, the foundation would be established for implementing
control measures, should they become necessary. None of the action
alternatives is anticipated to have any significant adverse impacts on
seabird, sea turtle, or marine mammal populations because the fishery
has a relatively low level of participation, and there have been no
observed or reported interactions with protected resources in the
deepwater shrimp fishery. The preferred alternative would provide for
the sustained participation of fishing communities by helping to ensure
the long-term availability of western Pacific deepwater shrimp. The
complete analysis of the alternatives is contained in Amendment 13,
including an EA, and is not repeated here. Copies of the environmental
analytical documents is available from the Council (see ADDRESSES).
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Council for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
A description of the action, why it is being considered, and the
legal basis for this action are contained in the preamble to the
proposed rule. This rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with other Federal rules. There are no disproportionate economic
impacts from this rule based on home port, gear type, or relative
vessel size. Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 605(b), the NMFS Pacific Islands
Regional Office has determined that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities based on the pre-existing status of deepwater shrimp
fisheries within the U.S. EEZ of the western Pacific. All vessels
having the potential to participate in this fishery are considered
to be small entities under the current Small Business Administration
definition of small fish-harvesting businesses (gross receipts not
in excess of $ 4.0 million, independently owned and operated, and
not dominant in the field). While fishing for deepwater shrimp has
been sporadic over the last several decades, in 1984, a total of 17
vessels reported catching approximately 159 tons of deepwater shrimp
worth an estimated ex-vessel value of $780,000. More recent
information is not possible because confidentiality rules restrict
the release of information from the small number of participants.
Alternative 1 (no action) would preclude Federal monitoring and
management of known deepwater shrimp fisheries operating within the
western Pacific. Alternative 2 would include deepwater shrimp as
management unit species (MUS) under the Crustaceans FMP, enabling
the Council and NMFS to develop management measures, as appropriate,
for deepwater shrimp fisheries in the region. Alternative 3 would
add deepwater shrimp to the MUS, as in Alternative 2, and would also
require Federal permitting and reporting of harvest for vessels
engaged in the deepwater shrimp fishery.
Alternatives 1 and 2 would yield no economic impact to small
entities (vessels). However, Alternative 3 would have a slightly
adverse economic impact resulting in a requirement to pay a vessel
permit fee of approximately $30. Applied on a 1984 dollar base, this
represents only 0.06 percent of the average boat revenue for 1984.
Alternative 3 represents the most adverse economic impact of the 3
alternatives. However, the fishery cannot be monitored and managed
under the requirements of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, particularly
National Standards 1 and 2, without accurate and reliable data on
shrimp effort and production associated with required permitting,
recordkeeping and reporting from the directed deepwater shrimp.
As a result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains a collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). This requirement has been submitted to OMB for approval. The
preferred alternative would require the owners of U.S. vessels that
fish for deepwater shrimp management unit species in the western
Pacific to obtain Federal fishing permits, and the vessel operators
would be required to complete and submit Federal catch reports. Permit
eligibility would not be restricted in any way, and the permit would be
renewable on an annual basis.
NMFS anticipates that initial permit applications would require 0.5
hours per applicant, with renewals requiring an additional 0.5 hours
annually. It is estimated that NMFS may receive and process up to 10
permit applications each year. Thus, the total collection-of-
information burden to fishermen for permit applications is estimated at
five (5) hours per year. The cost for individual Federal permits has
not been determined, but would represent only the administrative cost
and is anticipated to be approximately $30 per permit.
NMFS anticipates the time requirement to complete Federal catch
reports to be approximately 10 minutes per vessel per fishing day.
Assuming that 10 vessels fish during up to 100 days per year, the total
collection-of-information burden estimate for fishing data reporting is
estimated at 167 hours per year.
Public comment is sought regarding: whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on
these or any other aspects of the collection of information to William
L. Robinson (see ADDRESSES), and by e-mail to David_
Rostker@omb.eop.gov or fax to 202-395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 665
Administrative practice and procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaii, Hawaiian Natives, Northern Mariana Islands,
Pacific remote island areas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 18, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 665 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 665--FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN PACIFIC
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 665 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 665.12, revise the definition of ``Crustaceans
management unit species'' to read as follows:
Sec. 665.12 Definitions.
* * * * *
[[Page 49641]]
Crustaceans management unit species means the following
crustaceans:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Name Scientific Name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Spiny lobsters Panulirus marginatus
P. penicillatus
Slipper lobsters family Scyllaridae
Kona crab Ranina ranina
Deepwater shrimp Heterocarpus spp.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 665.13, revise paragraphs (f)(2)(i) through (f)(2)(v),
and add a new paragraph (f)(2)(vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 665.13 Permits and fees.
* * * * *
(f) Fees. * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Hawaii longline limited access permit.
(ii) Mau Zone limited access permit.
(iii) Coral reef ecosystem special permit.
(iv) American Samoa longline limited access permit.
(v) Main Hawaiian Islands non-commercial bottomfish permit.
(vi) Crustaceans permit.
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 665.41, revise paragraphs (a) and (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 665.41 Permits.
(a) Applicability. (1) The owner of any vessel used to fish for
lobster in Crustaceans Permit Area 1 must have a lobster limited access
permit issued for such vessel.
(2) The owner of any vessel used to fish for lobster in Crustaceans
Permit Areas 2, 3, or 4 must have a permit issued for that vessel.
(3) The owner of any vessel used to fish for deepwater shrimp in
Crustaceans Permit Areas 1, 2, 3, or 4 must have a permit issued for
that vessel.
(4) Harvest of crustacean management unit species within the
Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Marine National Monument is subject to
the requirements of 50 CFR part 404.
* * * * *
(d) Lobster Limited Access Permit Requirements.
(1) A lobster limited access permit is valid for fishing only in
Crustaceans Permit Area 1.
(2) Only one permit will be assigned to any vessel.
(3) No vessel owner will have permits for a single vessel to
harvest lobsters in Permit Areas 1 and 2 at the same time.
(4) A maximum of 15 limited access permits can be valid at any
time.
* * * * *
5. In Sec. 665.42, add a new paragraph (c) to read as follows.
Sec. 665.42 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(c) In any Crustaceans Permit Area, it is unlawful for any person
to:
(1) Fish for, take, or retain deepwater shrimp without a permit
issued under Sec. 665.41.
(2) Falsify or fail to make, keep, maintain, or submit Federal
reports and records of harvests of deepwater shrimp as required under
Sec. 665.14.
[FR Doc. E8-19579 Filed 8-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S