Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 49536-49537 [E8-19434]
Download as PDF
49536
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 163 / Thursday, August 21, 2008 / Notices
monitor programs implemented as a
result on the adoption of the NCP,
including the Fly Quiet Program
guidelines and the Noise Monitoring
Program.
The airport sponsor proposed three
changes to flight procedures. One of
these measures, a change to nighttime
flight procedures for jets departing to
the north, will require further safety and
environmental analysis. The other two
programs elements FAA disapproved as
they involve proposed changes to flight
paths that FAA Air Traffic Control
determined would create numerous
adverse impacts to safety and efficiency
of air traffic control operations. These
program elements propose testing 24hour flight tracks between 350 and 010
degree headings and implementing a
170 degree departure heading to 4 DME
or 8,000 MSL (+/¥20 degrees).
FAA disapproved the remaining
program element, the proposed ban of
Stage 2 aircraft under 75,000 lbs. from
operating at Centennial Airport at
nighttime, pending further study. Per
the requirements of 14 CFR Part 16, this
measure requires further study to
determine the impact on the national
airspace system and air commerce.
FAA’s determinations are set forth in
detail in a Record of Approval endorsed
by the Airports Division Manager on
August 12, 2008. The Record of
Approval, as well as other evaluation
materials and the documents
comprising the submittal, are available
for review at the FAA office and Internet
site listed above and at the
administrative offices of the Arapahoe
County Public Airport Authority,
Englewood, CO.
Issued in Renton, Washington on August
12, 2008.
Donna Taylor,
Manager, Airports Division, FAA Northwest
Mountain Region.
[FR Doc. E8–19278 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
with certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:48 Aug 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favor of relief.
Town of Ipswich, Massachusetts
[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA–
2008–0093]
The Town of Ipswich, Massachusetts
(Town) seeks a permanent waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of
FRA’s regulations on the Use of
Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail
Grade Crossings, 49 CFR Part 222. The
Town intends to establish a Pre-Rule
Quiet Zone to formalize existing
restrictions on routine sounding of the
locomotive horn that were previously
continued under the provisions of 49
CFR 222.41(c)(1). The Town is seeking
a waiver to extend the filing date for a
Detailed Plan, as provided in 49 CFR
222.41(c)(2)(i)(B), which indicates that
the Detailed Plan must be filed with
FRA by June 24, 2008. The waiver
petition requests that the Detailed Plan
filed by the Town on July 28, 2008 be
accepted as a valid Detailed Plan even
though it was filed after June 24, 2008.
Initially, the Town of Ipswich
submitted a Detailed Plan dated June 23,
2008, which was not received by FRA
until June 30, 2008. The original
Detailed Plan stated that the Town
intended to reassess the risk index for
the Topsfield Road grade crossing after
March 2009, 5 years after an accident
that occurred at the Topsfield Road
location, to determine if additional
safety improvements at this grade
crossing would be required. FRA
rejected this Detailed Plan because it
was not received by the agency until
June 30, 2008, and it did not include a
detailed explanation of, and timetable
for, the safety improvements that would
be implemented as required by 49 CFR
222.41(c)(2)(i)(B). The Town, after
discussion with representatives of FRA
and the Massachusetts Bay
Transportation Authority (MBTA),
resubmitted the Detailed Plan on July
28, 2008, outlining the intended
supplemental safety measures for the
Topsfield Road grade crossing.
The Town seeks the waiver in order
to continue the restrictions on routine
sounding of locomotive horns at the
grade crossings identified in its Detailed
Plan until June 24, 2010.
The Town of Ipswich, the public
authority, is filing this waiver request
without the support of the MBTA,
which is the railroad providing service
over the five grade crossings identified
in the Detailed Plan. However, the
petition contains an explanation of the
steps that the Town has taken to reach
an agreement with the MBTA, in
accordance with 49 CFR 222.15(b). As
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
stated in the petition, the Town has
made a written request to the MBTA to
support its waiver request and the
Detailed Plan. The Town also conducted
a meeting of its Board of Selectmen on
August 1, 2008, where an MBTA official
in attendance stated that it is the policy
of the MBTA to neither support nor
oppose requests by municipalities to
maintain quiet zones or obtain waivers
from FRA regulations.
The Town has also asserted in its
waiver petition that the joint submission
requirement contained in 49 CFR
222.15(a) would not be likely to
contribute significantly to public safety
in this instance, based on its plans to
install a four-quadrant gate system with
enhanced electronic monitoring at the
Topsfield Road crossing, where an
accident occurred in March 2004.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2008–
0093) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received within 20
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at:
https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 163 / Thursday, August 21, 2008 / Notices
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
Issued in Washington, DC on August 18,
2008.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8–19434 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Safety;
Notice of Application for Special
Permits
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
AGENCY:
List of Applications for Special
Permits.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special
permits from the Department of
Transportation’s Hazardous Material
Regulations (49 CFR Part 107, Subpart
B), notice is hereby given that the Office
of Hazardous Materials Safety has
received the application described
herein. Each mode of transportation for
which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in
the ‘‘Nature of Application’’ portion of
the table below as follows: 1—Motor
vehicle, 2—Rail freight, 3—Cargo vessel,
4—Cargo aircraft only, 5—Passengercarrying aircraft.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 22, 2008.
Address Comments to: Record Center,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Washington, DC 20590.
Comments should refer to the
application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of
49537
comments is desired, include a selfaddressed stamped postcard showing
the special permit number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the applications are available
for inspection in the Records Center,
East Building, PHH–30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue Southeast, Washington
DC or at https://dms.dot.gov.
This notice of receipt of applications
for special permit is published in
accordance with Part 107 of the Federal
hazardous materials transportation law
(49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 8,
2008.
Delmer F. Billings,
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials,
Special Permits and Approvals.
NEW SPECIAL PERMITS
Docket No.
14739–N ............
...........................
14740–N ............
Regulation(s) affected
Nature of special permits thereof
Battery Council International (BCI), Chicago, IL.
49 CFR 172.316 .............
...........................
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown,
PA.
49 CFR 173.301(c) and
(f) and 173.40.
14741–N ............
...........................
...........................
Weatherford International, Fort Worth,
TX.
Strong Environmental,
Inc., Norcross, GA.
49 CFR 173.304 .............
14742–N ............
14743–N ............
...........................
TIER DE, Inc., Gap, PA
49 CFR 173.24b and
173.244.
14744–N ............
...........................
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque,
NM.
49 CFR 173.24(b)(1) and
173.302a.
14746–N ............
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Application No.
...........................
Preferred Foam Products, Inc., Clinton, CT.
49 CFR 173.315(a) ........
To authorize the transportation in commerce of
certain Consumer commodities that have been
overpacked and do not have the correct markings on the inner package when transported by
motor vehicle. (mode 1)
To authorize the transportation in commerce of
certain DOT-specification cylinders containing
nitric oxide that do not meet the requirements
for pressure relief devices. (modes 1, 3)
To authorize the transportation in commerce of
sulfur hexafluoride in non-DOT specification cylinders. (modes 1, 3, 4, 5)
To authorize the manufacture, marking, sale and
use of a IJN standard 4G fiberboard box for use
as the outer packaging for lab pack applications
in accordance with § 173.12(b). (mode 1)
To authorize the one-time, one-way transportation
in commerce of a non-DOT specification metal
tank containing approximately 700 lbs. of sodium by motor vehicle. (mode 1)
To authorize the transportation in commerce of
DOT Specification 3AA and ICC 3A cylinders
containing nitrogen, compressed, and a nonDOT specification refrigeration system containing helium that are installed in the Advance
Flight Telescope (AFT) Payload where the cylinders release nitrogen into the satellite telescope during transportation. (modes 1, 4, 5)
To authorize the transportation in commerce of
certain non-DOT specification portable tanks
containing a Division 2.2 compressed gas.
(modes 1, 2)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:48 Aug 20, 2008
Applicant
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00132
49 CFR 173.12(b) ..........
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21AUN1.SGM
21AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 163 (Thursday, August 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49536-49537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19434]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.
Town of Ipswich, Massachusetts
[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-2008-0093]
The Town of Ipswich, Massachusetts (Town) seeks a permanent waiver
of compliance from certain provisions of FRA's regulations on the Use
of Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings, 49 CFR Part 222.
The Town intends to establish a Pre-Rule Quiet Zone to formalize
existing restrictions on routine sounding of the locomotive horn that
were previously continued under the provisions of 49 CFR 222.41(c)(1).
The Town is seeking a waiver to extend the filing date for a Detailed
Plan, as provided in 49 CFR 222.41(c)(2)(i)(B), which indicates that
the Detailed Plan must be filed with FRA by June 24, 2008. The waiver
petition requests that the Detailed Plan filed by the Town on July 28,
2008 be accepted as a valid Detailed Plan even though it was filed
after June 24, 2008.
Initially, the Town of Ipswich submitted a Detailed Plan dated June
23, 2008, which was not received by FRA until June 30, 2008. The
original Detailed Plan stated that the Town intended to reassess the
risk index for the Topsfield Road grade crossing after March 2009, 5
years after an accident that occurred at the Topsfield Road location,
to determine if additional safety improvements at this grade crossing
would be required. FRA rejected this Detailed Plan because it was not
received by the agency until June 30, 2008, and it did not include a
detailed explanation of, and timetable for, the safety improvements
that would be implemented as required by 49 CFR 222.41(c)(2)(i)(B). The
Town, after discussion with representatives of FRA and the
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), resubmitted the
Detailed Plan on July 28, 2008, outlining the intended supplemental
safety measures for the Topsfield Road grade crossing.
The Town seeks the waiver in order to continue the restrictions on
routine sounding of locomotive horns at the grade crossings identified
in its Detailed Plan until June 24, 2010.
The Town of Ipswich, the public authority, is filing this waiver
request without the support of the MBTA, which is the railroad
providing service over the five grade crossings identified in the
Detailed Plan. However, the petition contains an explanation of the
steps that the Town has taken to reach an agreement with the MBTA, in
accordance with 49 CFR 222.15(b). As stated in the petition, the Town
has made a written request to the MBTA to support its waiver request
and the Detailed Plan. The Town also conducted a meeting of its Board
of Selectmen on August 1, 2008, where an MBTA official in attendance
stated that it is the policy of the MBTA to neither support nor oppose
requests by municipalities to maintain quiet zones or obtain waivers
from FRA regulations.
The Town has also asserted in its waiver petition that the joint
submission requirement contained in 49 CFR 222.15(a) would not be
likely to contribute significantly to public safety in this instance,
based on its plans to install a four-quadrant gate system with enhanced
electronic monitoring at the Topsfield Road crossing, where an accident
occurred in March 2004.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2008-0093) and may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received within 20 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web
site at: https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments
[[Page 49537]]
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78).
Issued in Washington, DC on August 18, 2008.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E8-19434 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P