Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 and ERJ 190 Airplanes, 49362-49364 [E8-19366]
Download as PDF
49362
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 163 / Thursday, August 21, 2008 / Proposed Rules
‘‘Warning: Stick Shaker May Not Activate
Prior to Buffet/Roll-Off If Airspeed Is
Reduced Below the Appropriate Minimum
Speed.’’
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
No Maintenance Transaction Report
Required for Cessna Service Letters
14 CFR Part 39
(l) Cessna Alert Service Letters ASL560–
34–34 and ASL560–34–35, both Revision 1,
both dated October 2, 2007, both including
Attachments; and Cessna Alert Service
Letters ASL560–34–34 and ASL560–34–35,
both Revision 3, both dated March 6, 2008,
both including Attachments; specify to
submit a maintenance transaction report to
the manufacturer. This AD does not include
that requirement.
Actions Accomplished According to
Previous Issue of Service Bulletin
(m) Actions accomplished before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
Cessna Alert Service Letter ASL560–34–34 or
ASL560–34–35, both Revision 2, both dated
January 11, 2008, both including
Attachments, are considered acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding action
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(n)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN: Bob
Busto, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and
Propulsion Branch, ACE–116W, FAA,
Wichita ACO, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas
67209; telephone (316) 946–4157; fax (316)
946–4107; has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
12, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–19386 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:27 Aug 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0889; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–092–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 and ERJ
190 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
[E]scape slide system installation [was found
with] * * * tie-down straps which are used
for escape slide packing [having not been
removed]. The non-removal of the tie-down
straps does not allow the aircraft door to
reach the fully open position and the
consequent deployment of the escape slide
system in a * * * emergency evacuation,
affecting the occupying safety.
The unsafe condition is failure of an
evacuation system, which could impede
an emergency evacuation and increase
the chance of injury to passengers and
flightcrew during the evacuation. The
proposed AD would require actions that
are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 22,
2008.
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2848; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0889; Directorate Identifier
2008–NM–092–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
ˆ
The Agencia Nacional de Aviacao
¸˜
Civil (ANAC), which is the aviation
authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directives 2008–01–03
and 2008–01–04, both effective March 3,
2008 (referred to after this as ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
[E]scape slide system installation [was found
with] * * * tie-down straps which are used
for escape slide packing [having not been
removed]. The non-removal of the tie-down
straps does not allow the aircraft door to
reach the fully open position and the
consequent deployment of the escape slide
system in a * * * emergency evacuation,
affecting the occupying safety.
The unsafe condition is failure of an
evacuation system, which could impede
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 163 / Thursday, August 21, 2008 / Proposed Rules
an emergency evacuation and increase
the chance of injury to passengers and
flightcrew during the evacuation. The
corrective action involves inspection of
the forward and rearward doors’
emergency evacuation slide packs for
the presence of tie-down straps, and, if
applicable, removal of the tie-down
straps. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
EMBRAER has issued Service
Bulletins 170–25–0088 and 190–25–
0062, both dated December 21, 2007.
The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$23,040, or $160 per product.
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
Authority for This Rulemaking
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the
proposed AD.
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
Costs of Compliance
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 144 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:27 Aug 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
49363
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA–2008–
0889; Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–
092–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
September 22, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes
specified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of
this AD.
(1) EMBRAER Model ERJ 170–100 LR,
–100 STD, –100 SE, and –100 SU, –200 LR,
–200 STD, and –200 SU airplanes, serial
numbers 17000002, 17000004 thru 17000013,
and 17000015 thru 17000196, certificated in
any category.
(2) EMBRAER Model ERJ 190–100 STD,
–100 LR, –100 IGW, –100 ECJ, –200 STD,
–200 LR, and –200 IGW airplanes, serial
numbers 19000002, 19000004 thru 19000132,
and 19000135, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 25: Equipment/Furnishings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
[E]scape slide system installation [was found
with] * * * tie-down straps which are used
for escape slide packing [having not been
removed]. The non-removal of the tie-down
straps does not allow the aircraft door to
reach the fully open position and the
consequent deployment of the escape slide
system in a * * * emergency evacuation,
affecting the occupying safety.
The unsafe condition is failure of an
evacuation system, which could impede an
emergency evacuation and increase the
chance of injury to passengers and flightcrew
during the evacuation. The corrective action
involves inspection of the forward and
rearward doors’ emergency evacuation slide
packs for the presence of tie-down straps,
and, if applicable, removal of the tie-down
straps.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done: Within 600 flight
hours after the effective date of this AD, carry
out a general visual inspection (GVI) of the
emergency evacuation slide packs installed
on the forward and rearward doors in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of EMBRAER Service Bulletin
170–25–0088, dated December 21, 2007; or
190–25–0062, dated December 21, 2007; as
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
49364
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 163 / Thursday, August 21, 2008 / Proposed Rules
applicable. If tie-down straps are found, they
must be cut and removed from the slide pack
before further flight.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a
general visual inspection (GVI) is: ‘‘A visual
examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious
damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of
inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror
may be necessary to ensure visual access to
all exposed surfaces in the inspection area.
This level of inspection is made under
normally available lighting conditions such
as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or
opening of access panels or doors. Stands,
ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.’’
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August
6, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–19366 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0887; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–336–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Airworthiness Directives; BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Model
BAE 146 and Avro 146–RJ Airplanes
AGENCY:
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Kenny Kaulia,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2848; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness
Directives 2008–01–03 and 2008–01–04, both
effective March 3, 2008; and EMBRAER
Service Bulletins 170–25–0088 and 190–25–
0062, both dated December 21, 2007; for
related information.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:27 Aug 20, 2008
Jkt 214001
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
During inspection of undercarriage main
beam sidestays, bolts attaching the
undercarriage main beam sidestay to frame
29 were found with the heads of the bolts
sheared off. Loose bolt assemblies were also
found.
If sheared or loose bolts are not detected
and replaced, a possible consequence is the
collapse of the main landing gear.
*
*
*
*
*
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 22,
2008.
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1175; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0887; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–336–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2007–0277,
dated November 5, 2007 (referred to
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
During inspection of undercarriage main
beam sidestays, bolts attaching the
undercarriage main beam sidestay to frame
29 were found with the heads of the bolts
sheared off. Loose bolt assemblies were also
found.
E:\FR\FM\21AUP1.SGM
21AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 163 (Thursday, August 21, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49362-49364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19366]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0889; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-092-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 and ERJ 190 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
[E]scape slide system installation [was found with] * * * tie-down
straps which are used for escape slide packing [having not been
removed]. The non-removal of the tie-down straps does not allow the
aircraft door to reach the fully open position and the consequent
deployment of the escape slide system in a * * * emergency
evacuation, affecting the occupying safety.
The unsafe condition is failure of an evacuation system, which could
impede an emergency evacuation and increase the chance of injury to
passengers and flightcrew during the evacuation. The proposed AD would
require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 22,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2848; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0889;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-092-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC),
which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directives 2008-01-03 and 2008-01-04, both effective
March 3, 2008 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
[E]scape slide system installation [was found with] * * * tie-down
straps which are used for escape slide packing [having not been
removed]. The non-removal of the tie-down straps does not allow the
aircraft door to reach the fully open position and the consequent
deployment of the escape slide system in a * * * emergency
evacuation, affecting the occupying safety.
The unsafe condition is failure of an evacuation system, which could
impede
[[Page 49363]]
an emergency evacuation and increase the chance of injury to passengers
and flightcrew during the evacuation. The corrective action involves
inspection of the forward and rearward doors' emergency evacuation
slide packs for the presence of tie-down straps, and, if applicable,
removal of the tie-down straps. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
EMBRAER has issued Service Bulletins 170-25-0088 and 190-25-0062,
both dated December 21, 2007. The actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in
the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 144 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 2 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $23,040, or $160 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-
2008-0889; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-092-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by September 22, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to the airplanes specified in paragraphs
(c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
(1) EMBRAER Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD, -100 SE, and -100
SU, -200 LR, -200 STD, and -200 SU airplanes, serial numbers
17000002, 17000004 thru 17000013, and 17000015 thru 17000196,
certificated in any category.
(2) EMBRAER Model ERJ 190-100 STD, -100 LR, -100 IGW, -100 ECJ,
-200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW airplanes, serial numbers 19000002,
19000004 thru 19000132, and 19000135, certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25:
Equipment/Furnishings.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
[E]scape slide system installation [was found with] * * * tie-down
straps which are used for escape slide packing [having not been
removed]. The non-removal of the tie-down straps does not allow the
aircraft door to reach the fully open position and the consequent
deployment of the escape slide system in a * * * emergency
evacuation, affecting the occupying safety.
The unsafe condition is failure of an evacuation system, which could
impede an emergency evacuation and increase the chance of injury to
passengers and flightcrew during the evacuation. The corrective
action involves inspection of the forward and rearward doors'
emergency evacuation slide packs for the presence of tie-down
straps, and, if applicable, removal of the tie-down straps.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done: Within 600 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, carry out a general visual inspection
(GVI) of the emergency evacuation slide packs installed on the
forward and rearward doors in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of EMBRAER Service Bulletin 170-25-0088, dated December
21, 2007; or 190-25-0062, dated December 21, 2007; as
[[Page 49364]]
applicable. If tie-down straps are found, they must be cut and
removed from the slide pack before further flight.
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection
(GVI) is: ``A visual examination of an interior or exterior area,
installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or
irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching
distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to
ensure visual access to all exposed surfaces in the inspection area.
This level of inspection is made under normally available lighting
conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or
droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or
doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked.''
FAA AD Differences
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-2848; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness Directives 2008-01-03
and 2008-01-04, both effective March 3, 2008; and EMBRAER Service
Bulletins 170-25-0088 and 190-25-0062, both dated December 21, 2007;
for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 6, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-19366 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P