Documentation of Nonimmigrants Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended: Fingerprinting, 49091-49092 [E8-19316]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
History
On August 28, 2007, the U.S. Army
requested the FAA take action to modify
R–5107A, White Sands Missile Range,
NM, by subdividing the area to reduce
the size of R–5107A and establish
R–5107K. The U.S. Army assessed the
utilization of the existing R–5107A, and
determined their operations are
contained to the west side of War
Highway 11, 70 to 90 percent of the
time. The requested action makes the
unused area available for use by
nonparticipating civil aircraft. The U.S.
Army has also determined that a small
area at the northwest corner of the
existing R–5107A is not needed and
requested a boundary reduction. The
subdivision of R–5107A, into R–5107A
and R–5107K, will allow airspace
managers the opportunity to return
unused airspace east of War Highway 11
for use by nonparticipating civil aircraft
during periods of inactivity.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 73 by
revisingR–5107A, White Sands Missile
Range, NM, by dividing the area into 2
sub areas, R–5107A and R–5104K.
Together, R–5107A and R–5107K will
occupy the same vertical, but slightly
smaller lateral area by eliminating the
northwest corner of the existing R–
5107A. Additionally, R–5107K will only
be active 0700–2000 local time, Monday
through Friday, rather than the current
continuous time of designation. Since
this action permits greater access to
airspace by both Visual Flight Rules and
Instrument Flight Rules aircraft during
periods of activation of R–5107A and R–
5107K, notice and public procedures
under 5 U.S.C. 533(b) are unnecessary.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:02 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
49091
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it amends restricted areas in New
Mexico.
R–5107K White Sands Missile Range, NM
[New]
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 32°19′30″ N.,
long. 106°23′49″ W.; to lat. 32°19′30″ N.,
long. 106°20′38″ W.; to lat. 32°24′48″ N.,
long. 106°09′02″ W.; to lat. 32°23′18″ N.,
long. 106°07′05″ W.; to lat. 32°05′00″ N.,
long. 106°18′22″ W.; to lat. 32°05′00″ N.,
long. 106°29′02″ W.; to lat. 32°06′20″ N.,
long. 106°34′02″ W.; to lat. 32°08′40″ N.,
long. 106°34′02″ W.; to lat. 32°08′51″ N.,
long. 106°30′01″ W.; to lat. 32°12′17″ N.,
long. 106°24′17″ W.; to lat. 32°14′33″ N.,
long. 106°23′46″ W.; to the point of
beginning.
Designated altitudes. Surface to unlimited.
Time of designation. 0700–2000 local time,
Monday–Friday, other times by NOTAM.
Controlling agency. FAA, Albuquerque,
ARTCC.
Using agency. Commanding General, U.S.
Army Air Defense Artillery Center and Fort
Bliss Center, (USAADCENFB) Fort Bliss, TX.
Environmental Review
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 14,
2008.
Edith V. Parish,
Manager, Airspace and Rules Group.
[FR Doc. E8–19271 Filed 8–19–08; 8:45 am]
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with 311d.,
FAA Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures.’’ This
airspace action is not expected to cause
any potentially significant
environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that
warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73
Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted
areas.
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 41
[Public Notice: 6324]
Documentation of Nonimmigrants
Under the Immigration and Nationality
Act, as Amended: Fingerprinting
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
Adoption of the Amendment
ACTION:
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 73 as follows:
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the
Department of State’s regulations
relating to the application for a
nonimmigrant visa, to generally require
all applicants, with certain exceptions,
to provide a set of ten scanned
fingerprints as part of the application
process. The scanning of ten
fingerprints of nonimmigrant visa
applicants has already been
implemented. For the purposes of
verifying and confirming identity,
conducting background checks, and to
ensure that an applicant has not
received a visa or entered into the
United States under a different name,
the Department of State may use the
fingerprints in order to ascertain from
the appropriate authorities whether they
have information pertinent to the
applicant’s eligibility to receive a visa
and for other purposes consistent with
applicable law, regulations, and
Department policy.
DATES: This rule is effective on August
20, 2008.
I
PART 73—SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 73.51
I
*
[Amended]
2. § 73.51 is amended as follows:
*
*
*
*
R–5107A White Sands Missile Range, NM
[Revised]
Boundaries. Beginning at lat. 32°19′30″ N.,
long. 106°34′02″ W.; to lat. 32°19′30″ N.,
long. 106°23′49″ W.; to lat. 32°14′33″ N.,
long. 106°23′46″ W.; to lat. 32°12′17″ N.,
long. 106°24′17″ W.; to lat. 32°08′51″ N.,
long. 106°30′01″ W.; to lat. 32°08′40″ N.,
long. 106°34′02″ W.; to the point of
beginning.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00007
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
49092
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Robertson, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services,
Department of State, Washington, DC
20520–0106, (202) 663–1202, e-mail
(robertsonce3@state.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Why is the Department promulgating
this rule?
This rule updates the regulations
concerning documents and fingerprints
to be provided in support of
nonimmigrant visa applications. This
amendment is necessary because
regulations currently in place do not
contain information about the general
requirement for nonimmigrant visa
applicants to provide ten fingerprints. In
response to the requirements
established by the Enhanced Border
Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of
2002, the collection of fingerprints from
most nonimmigrant visa applicants was
announced to the public in December
2004 as part of the Biometric Visa
Program. At that time, available
technology allowed for efficient capture
and comparisons of two fingerprints by
means of scanning (fingerscans). Later,
the process was expanded to 10
fingerscans. Notice of the transition to
ten fingerprints was published in the
Federal Register at 72 FR 25351 (4 May
2007).
What effect does this rule change have
on the nonimmigrant visa applicant?
The Biometric Visa Program was
introduced gradually, as technology
allowed, and is now in place at all
posts. Therefore, this rule change will
have no effect on applicants.
Must all applicants be fingerprinted?
As described in the Federal Register
notice, the majority of nonimmigrant
visa applicants are required to be fingerscanned as part of the application
process. There are currently some
exceptions to the fingerprint
requirement, including most applicants
under the age of 14 years or over the age
of 79.
Regulatory Findings
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Administrative Procedure Act
This regulation involves a foreign
affairs function of the United States and,
therefore, in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(1), is not subject to the
rulemaking procedures set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business.
Because this final rule is exempt from
notice and comment rulemaking under
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:02 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
5 U.S.C. 553, it is exempt from the
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements set forth at sections 603
and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604). Nonetheless,
consistent with section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605(b)), the Department certifies that
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This regulates
individual aliens who seek
consideration for nonimmigrant visas
and does not affect any small entities, as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA),
Public Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C.
1532, generally requires agencies to
prepare a statement before proposing
any rule that may result in an annual
expenditure of $100 million or more by
State, local, or tribal governments, or by
the private sector. This rule will not
result in any such expenditure, nor will
it significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of
congressional review of agency
rulemaking under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, Public Law 104–121. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United
States-based companies to compete with
foreign based companies in domestic
and import markets.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Review
The Department of State has reviewed
this rule to ensure its consistency with
the regulatory philosophy and
principles set forth in Executive Order
12866 and has determined that the
benefits of the proposed regulation
justify its costs. The Department does
not consider the rule to be an
economically significant action within
the scope of section 3(f)(1) of the
Executive Order since it is not likely to
have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or to adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or state, local, or tribal
governments or communities.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132:
Federalism
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the rule
have federalism implications warranting
the application of Executive Orders No.
12372 and No. 13132.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
The Department has reviewed the
proposed regulations in light of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No.
12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose information
collection requirements under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 41
Aliens, Foreign officials, Immigration,
Nonimmigrants, Passports and Visas.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
the Department of State amends 22 CFR
part 41 to read as follows:
I
PART 41—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 41
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104; Pub. L. 105–277,
112 Stat. 2681–795 through 2681–801; 8
U.S.C. 1185 note (section 7290 of Pub. L.
108–458, as amended by section 546 of
Public Law 109–295).
2. In § 41.105 add paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
I
§ 41.105 Supporting documents and
fingerprinting.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Fingerprinting. Every applicant for
a nonimmigrant visa must furnish
fingerprints, as required by the consular
officer.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 6, 2008.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8–19316 Filed 8–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
E:\FR\FM\20AUR1.SGM
20AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 20, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49091-49092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19316]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 41
[Public Notice: 6324]
Documentation of Nonimmigrants Under the Immigration and
Nationality Act, as Amended: Fingerprinting
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the Department of State's regulations
relating to the application for a nonimmigrant visa, to generally
require all applicants, with certain exceptions, to provide a set of
ten scanned fingerprints as part of the application process. The
scanning of ten fingerprints of nonimmigrant visa applicants has
already been implemented. For the purposes of verifying and confirming
identity, conducting background checks, and to ensure that an applicant
has not received a visa or entered into the United States under a
different name, the Department of State may use the fingerprints in
order to ascertain from the appropriate authorities whether they have
information pertinent to the applicant's eligibility to receive a visa
and for other purposes consistent with applicable law, regulations, and
Department policy.
DATES: This rule is effective on August 20, 2008.
[[Page 49092]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Robertson, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services, Department of State, Washington,
DC 20520-0106, (202) 663-1202, e-mail (robertsonce3@state.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Why is the Department promulgating this rule?
This rule updates the regulations concerning documents and
fingerprints to be provided in support of nonimmigrant visa
applications. This amendment is necessary because regulations currently
in place do not contain information about the general requirement for
nonimmigrant visa applicants to provide ten fingerprints. In response
to the requirements established by the Enhanced Border Security and
Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002, the collection of fingerprints from most
nonimmigrant visa applicants was announced to the public in December
2004 as part of the Biometric Visa Program. At that time, available
technology allowed for efficient capture and comparisons of two
fingerprints by means of scanning (fingerscans). Later, the process was
expanded to 10 fingerscans. Notice of the transition to ten
fingerprints was published in the Federal Register at 72 FR 25351 (4
May 2007).
What effect does this rule change have on the nonimmigrant visa
applicant?
The Biometric Visa Program was introduced gradually, as technology
allowed, and is now in place at all posts. Therefore, this rule change
will have no effect on applicants.
Must all applicants be fingerprinted?
As described in the Federal Register notice, the majority of
nonimmigrant visa applicants are required to be finger-scanned as part
of the application process. There are currently some exceptions to the
fingerprint requirement, including most applicants under the age of 14
years or over the age of 79.
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
This regulation involves a foreign affairs function of the United
States and, therefore, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1), is not
subject to the rulemaking procedures set forth at 5 U.S.C. 553.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business.
Because this final rule is exempt from notice and comment
rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553, it is exempt from the regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements set forth at sections 603 and 604 of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604). Nonetheless,
consistent with section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), the Department certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This regulates individual aliens who seek consideration for
nonimmigrant visas and does not affect any small entities, as defined
in 5 U.S.C. 601(6).
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA),
Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires
agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that may
result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State,
local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. This rule will
not result in any such expenditure, nor will it significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for
purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-
121. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United States-based companies to compete
with foreign based companies in domestic and import markets.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Review
The Department of State has reviewed this rule to ensure its
consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in
Executive Order 12866 and has determined that the benefits of the
proposed regulation justify its costs. The Department does not consider
the rule to be an economically significant action within the scope of
section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order since it is not likely to have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or to adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or state,
local, or tribal governments or communities.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Nor will the rule have federalism
implications warranting the application of Executive Orders No. 12372
and No. 13132.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed the proposed regulations in light of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate
ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and
reduce burden.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose information collection requirements under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 41
Aliens, Foreign officials, Immigration, Nonimmigrants, Passports
and Visas.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of State amends
22 CFR part 41 to read as follows:
PART 41--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 41 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104; Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681-795
through 2681-801; 8 U.S.C. 1185 note (section 7290 of Pub. L. 108-
458, as amended by section 546 of Public Law 109-295).
0
2. In Sec. 41.105 add paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 41.105 Supporting documents and fingerprinting.
* * * * *
(b) Fingerprinting. Every applicant for a nonimmigrant visa must
furnish fingerprints, as required by the consular officer.
* * * * *
Dated: August 6, 2008.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-19316 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P