VA Acquisition Regulation: Supporting Veteran-Owned and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses, 49141-49155 [E8-19261]
Download as PDF
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Rule 54 Sulfur Compounds (Adopted 06/
14/94)
Rule 56 Open Burning (Adopted 11/11/03)
Rule 57 Incinerators (Adopted 01/11/05)
Rule 57.1 Particulate Matter Emissions from
Fuel Burning Equipment (Adopted 01/11/
05)
Rule 62.7 Asbestos—Demolition and
Renovation (Adopted 09/01/92)
Rule 63 Separation and Combination of
Emissions (Adopted 11/21/78)
Rule 64 Sulfur Content of Fuels (Adopted
04/13/99)
Rule 67 Vacuum Producing Devices
(Adopted 07/05/83)
Rule 68 Carbon Monoxide (Adopted 04/13/
04)
Rule 71 Crude Oil and Reactive Organic
Compound Liquids (Adopted 12/13/94)
Rule 71.1 Crude Oil Production and
Separation (Adopted 06/16/92)
Rule 71.2 Storage of Reactive Organic
Compound Liquids (Adopted 09/26/89)
Rule 71.3 Transfer of Reactive Organic
Compound Liquids (Adopted 06/16/92)
Rule 71.4 Petroleum Sumps, Pits, Ponds,
and Well Cellars (Adopted 06/08/93)
Rule 71.5 Glycol Dehydrators (Adopted 12/
13/94)
Rule 72 New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) (Adopted 09/13/05)
Rule 73 National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS)
(Adopted 09/13/05)
Rule 74 Specific Source Standards
(Adopted 07/06/76)
Rule 74.1 Abrasive Blasting (Adopted 11/
12/91)
Rule 74.2 Architectural Coatings (Adopted
11/13/01)
Rule 74.6 Surface Cleaning and Degreasing
(Adopted 11/11/03—effective 07/01/04)
Rule 74.6.1 Batch Loaded Vapor Degreasers
(Adopted 11/11/03—effective 07/01/04)
Rule 74.7 Fugitive Emissions of Reactive
Organic Compounds at Petroleum
Refineries and Chemical Plants (Adopted
10/10/95)
Rule 74.8 Refinery Vacuum Producing
Systems, Waste-water Separators and
Process Turnarounds (Adopted 07/05/83)
Rule 74.9 Stationary Internal Combustion
Engines (Adopted 11/08/05)
Rule 74.10 Components at Crude Oil
Production Facilities and Natural Gas
Production and Processing Facilities
(Adopted 03/10/98)
Rule 74.11 Natural Gas-Fired Residential
Water Heaters-Control of NOX (Adopted
04/09/85)
Rule 74.11.1 Large Water Heaters and Small
Boilers (Adopted 09/14/99)
Rule 74.12 Surface Coating of Metal Parts
and Products (Adopted 04/08/08)
Rule 74.15 Boilers, Steam Generators and
Process Heaters (Adopted 11/08/94)
Rule 74.15.1 Boilers, Steam Generators and
Process Heaters (Adopted 06/13/00)
Rule 74.16 Oil Field Drilling Operations
(Adopted 01/08/91)
Rule 74.20 Adhesives and Sealants
(Adopted 01/11/05)
Rule 74.23 Stationary Gas Turbines
(Adopted 1/08/02)
Rule 74.24 Marine Coating Operations
(Adopted 11/11/03)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
Rule 74.24.1 Pleasure Craft Coating and
Commercial Boatyard Operations (Adopted
01/08/02)
Rule 74.26 Crude Oil Storage Tank
Degassing Operations (Adopted 11/08/94)
Rule 74.27 Gasoline and ROC Liquid
Storage Tank Degassing Operations
(Adopted 11/08/94)
Rule 74.28 Asphalt Roofing Operations
(Adopted 05/10/94)
Rule 74.30 Wood Products Coatings
(Adopted 06/27/06)
Rule 75 Circumvention (Adopted 11/27/78)
Rule 101 Sampling and Testing Facilities
(Adopted 05/23/72)
Rule 102 Source Tests (Adopted 04/13/04)
Rule 103 Continuous Monitoring Systems
(Adopted 02/09/99)
Rule 154 Stage 1 Episode Actions (Adopted
09/17/91)
Rule 155 Stage 2 Episode Actions (Adopted
09/17/91)
Rule 156 Stage 3 Episode Actions (Adopted
09/17/91)
Rule 158 Source Abatement Plans (Adopted
09/17/91)
Rule 159 Traffic Abatement Procedures
(Adopted 09/17/91)
Rule 220 General Conformity (Adopted 05/
09/95)
Rule 230 Notice to Comply (Adopted 11/09/
99)
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–19336 Filed 8–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
48 CFR Parts 802, 804, 808, 809, 810,
813, 815, 819, 828, and 852
RIN 2900–AM92
VA Acquisition Regulation: Supporting
Veteran-Owned and Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned Small Businesses
Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
49141
conditions. The proposed rule would
implement these special acquisition
methods as a change to the VA
Acquisition Regulation (VAAR).
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted on or before
October 20, 2008 to be considered in the
formulation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AM92—VA Acquisition Regulation:
Supporting Veteran-Owned and ServiceDisabled Veteran-Owned Small
Businesses.’’ All comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday (except holidays). Please
call (202) 461–4902 for an appointment.
This is not a toll-free number. In
addition, during the comment period,
comments are available online through
the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Derek Underwood, Acquisition Policy
Division (049P1A), Office of Acquisition
and Logistics, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC, 20420, telephone
number (202) 461–6865 (not a toll-free
number) or e-mail
Derek.Underwood@va.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
This proposed rule would
implement portions of the Veterans
Benefits, Health Care, and Information
Technology Act of 2006 and Executive
Order 13360, Providing Opportunities
for Service-Disabled Veteran Businesses
to Increase Their Federal Contracting
and Subcontracting. The Public Law
and Executive Order authorize the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to
establish special methods for
contracting with service-disabled
veteran-owned small businesses
(SDVOSBs) and veteran-owned small
businesses (VOSBs). Under this
proposed rule, a VA contracting officer
could restrict competition in contracting
for SDVOSBs or VOSBs under certain
conditions. Likewise, sole source
contracts with SDVOSBs or VOSBs
would be permitted under certain
VA’s mission is to serve veterans.
Buying from SDVOSBs and VOSBs
directly supports VA’s mission.
Supporting service-disabled veterans
who own businesses contributes
significantly in restoring their quality of
life while enhancing transition from
active duty to civilian life. Such
acquisitions maintain the
socioeconomic well-being of the Nation
and carry out VA’s strategic goals.
Section 1.102–2(d) of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (codified
at 48 CFR chapter 1) provides that the
Federal Acquisition System ‘‘must
support the attainment of public policy
goals adopted by the Congress and the
President.’’ It is public policy, as
expressed in 15 U.S.C. 637 and 644 that
SDVOSBs and VOSBs, among others,
shall have the maximum practicable
opportunity to participate in the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
49142
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
performance of contracts let by any
Federal agency.
Sections 502 and 503 of Public Law
109–461, the Veterans Benefits, Health
Care, and Information Technology Act
of 2006, (codified at 38 U.S.C. 8127 and
8128) contain provisions that authorize
VA to create a unique procurement
program among Federal agencies. This
program would permit VA contracting
officers to conduct acquisition actions
limited to SDVOSBs or VOSBs for the
Department’s requirements. The law
requires the Secretary to give priority to
a small business concern owned and
controlled by veterans.
On October 20, 2004, the President
issued Executive Order 13360,
Providing Opportunities for ServiceDisabled Veteran Businesses to Increase
Their Federal Contracting and
Subcontracting. The Executive Order
directs the heads of agencies to
significantly increase opportunities for
service-disabled veteran businesses in
Federal prime contracting and
subcontracting actions. To achieve that
objective, the Executive Order requires
agencies to more effectively implement
section 15(g) of the Small Business Act
(15 U.S.C. 644(g)) through various
efforts, including the development of a
strategic plan to implement Executive
Order 13360. VA has developed its
strategic plan, which is posted at the
following Internet Web site: https://
www.vetbiz.gov/fpp/fpp.htm.
VA proposes to amend the VAAR to
implement the changes required by 38
U.S.C. 8127 and 8128 and some
rulemaking aspects of VA’s strategic
plan for Executive Order 13360.
Specifically, this proposed rule would
allow VA contracting officers to:
• Under certain conditions, permit
non-competitive sourcing under the
simplified acquisition threshold with
SDVOSBs or VOSBs.
• Require set-asides for SDVOSBs or
VOSBs above the simplified acquisition
threshold when the contracting officer
has a reasonable expectation that two or
more eligible SDVOSBs or VOSBs will
submit offers and that the award can be
made at a fair and reasonable price that
offers the best value to the United
States.
• Under certain conditions, permit
non-competitive sourcing for SDVOSBs
or VOSBs above the simplified
acquisition threshold when the
contracting officer determines that a fair
and reasonable price will be obtained as
a result of negotiations for requirements
not to exceed $5 million.
• Include evaluation factors in
negotiated acquisitions that give
preference to SDVOSBs and VOSBs and
preference to offerors who propose to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
include such businesses as
subcontractors.
• Require offerors who propose to use
SDVOSBs or VOSBs as subcontractors to
utilize eligible businesses.
• Require VOSBs participating in the
Department’s acquisitions to register in
VetBiz.gov’s Vendor Information Pages
(VIP) database and verify that the
business meets eligibility requirements.
´ ´
• Establish a VA Mentor-Protege
Program and give large businesses that
participate in the program a preference
in the award of VA prime contracts.
• Encourage prime contractors and
mentors to assist SDVOSBs and VOSBs
in obtaining bonding when required.
• Revise the eligibility definition for
‘‘service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concerns’’ to include a spouse
who obtains ownership rights upon the
death of a 100 percent service-disabled
veteran or a veteran who died as a direct
result of a service-connected injury for
a period of 10 years unless the spouse
remarries or sells the interest in the
business.
• Recommend debarment of any
business that willfully or deliberately
misrepresents ownership and control of
the business for purposes of registering
in the VetBiz.gov Vendor Information
Pages database or other Federal
databases.
• Under certain conditions, authorize
Contracting Officers to acquire supplies
and services from SDVOSBs and VOSBs
in lieu of Federal Prison Industries (FPI)
and the Government Printing Office
(GPO).
Section 802.101 Definitions
In proposed section 802.101, VA
adopts and incorporates various
statutory definitions. FAR 2.101 defines
‘‘service-disabled veteran-owned small
business (SDVOSB) concern’’ and
‘‘veteran-owned small business (VOSB)
concern.’’ Prime and subcontracting
actions conducted under the authority
of 38 U.S.C. 8127, as implemented in
VAAR subpart 819.70, revise the
definition of ‘‘service-disabled veteranowned small business concern’’ and
require that SDVOSBs and VOSBs must
be registered in the Vendor Information
Pages (VIP) and that the ownership and
control of such businesses has been
verified by VA. In addition, section
8127(h) enables a surviving spouse who
obtains ownership rights to a business
upon the death of a veteran with a
service-connected disability rated at 100
percent, or a veteran who dies as a
direct result of a service-connected
disability, to have VA treat the business
as a ‘‘service-disabled veteran-owned
small business’’ for a 10-year period
after the death of the veteran, unless the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
surviving spouse remarries, sells the
interest in the business or the business
outgrows the small business size
standards. This section also includes a
definition of VIP.
Section 804.1102 Vendor Information
Pages
FAR 4.1102 currently requires all
businesses to be registered in the
Central Contractor Registration (CCR).
Proposed section 804.1102 would
require VOSBs, including SDVOSBs, to
register in the VIP database, available at
https://www.VetBiz.gov, in order to be
eligible to participate in set-asides for
SDVOSBs and VOSBs issued by VA
contracting officers. In completing
registration, businesses would provide
information establishing that the
business is owned and controlled by
eligible parties, according to the criteria
defined in 38 U.S.C. 8127 and FAR
19.1403.
Section 808.603 Purchase Priorities
Under certain conditions, this section
would authorize contracting officers to
purchase supplies and services
produced or provided by FPI from
eligible SDVOSBs and VOSBs, in
accordance with procedures set forth in
proposed VAAR subpart 819.70,
without seeking a waiver from FPI. We
interpret section 8128 and the
legislative history to mean that
SDVOSBs and VOSBs must receive
priority in VA contracting opportunities
without regard to other provisions of
law concerning contracting preferences.
This interpretation conflicts with the
current contracting priorities in law,
and as implemented in the FAR, for
Federal agencies buying from FPI. VA
finds that section 8128, being directly
applicable solely to VA and providing
authority without regard to any other
provision of law, requires VA
contracting officers to have the authority
to override other statutory contracting
preferences to provide priority to
SDVOSBs and VOSBs to meet VA’s
socioeconomic goals for such concerns.
Therefore, proposed section 808.603 is
the only means available to VA to
implement the requirement in section
8128 that veterans’ small businesses
have priority in VA acquisitions that
would normally be awarded under FPI.
Section 808.803 Priority for
Acquisition of Printing and Related
Supplies
This section would authorize
contracting officers to acquire
government printing from eligible
service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses and veteran-owned small
businesses, in accordance with
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
procedures set forth in VAAR subpart
819.70, in lieu of the Government
Printing Office (GPO). We interpret
section 8128 and the relevant legislative
history as authorizing VA to give
priority in contracting to SDVOSBs and
VOSBs without regard to other
provisions of law concerning
contracting preferences. This
interpretation conflicts with the current
contracting priority in law, and as
implemented in the FAR, which
provides that Federal agencies buying
printing services must procure such
services from GPO. VA finds that
section 8128, being directly applicable
solely to VA and providing authority for
priority in VA contracting without
regard to any other provision of law,
requires VA contracting officers to have
the authority to override the statutory
contracting preference for GPO services
and instead provide priority in
contracting to SDVOSBs and VOSBs for
printing services and related supplies.
Therefore, proposed section 808.803 is
the only means available to VA to
implement section 8128.
Section 809.406–2
Debarment
Causes for
FAR 9.406–2 lists several reasons for
which a debarring official may initiate
a debarment action. Proposed VAAR
809.406–2 adds one additional reason:
misrepresentation of status as an
SDVOSB or a VOSB, in accordance with
section 8127(g).
Section 810.001
Policy
Market Research
FAR 10.001 requires agencies to
conduct market research on an ongoing
basis and to effectively identify the
capabilities of small businesses to meet
agency requirements. VAAR section
810.001 would establish that, when
conducting market research, VA
contracting teams shall use the VIP
database, in addition to other sources of
information.
Section 810.002
Procedures
Market Research
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
This section would require
contracting officers to record VIP
queries in the solicitation file.
Section 813.106 Soliciting
Competition, Evaluation of Quotations
or Offers, Award and Documentation
This section would clarify that
contracting officers may use other than
competitive procedures to enter into a
contract with an SDVOSB or VOSB
when the amount is less than the
simplified acquisition threshold not to
exceed $5 million. Contracting officers
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
would give first consideration to
SDVOSBs.
Section 813.202 Purchase Guidelines
FAR 13.202(a)(1) provides that, to the
extent practicable, open market micropurchases shall be distributed equitably
among qualified suppliers. The set-aside
provisions of FAR Part 19 do not apply
to micro-purchases. However, in
accordance with sections 8127 and
8128, VA would make an exception to
this FAR requirement when supplies are
available from SDVOSBs or VOSBs. We
would add section 813.202 to allow
preference for SDVOSB and VOSB
sources when making local open market
micro-purchases using the purchase
card. In such cases, equitable
distribution of open market micropurchases among all qualified suppliers
would not be required. Instead, open
market micro-purchases would be
equitably distributed among all
qualified SDVOSBs or VOSBs,
respectively, to the maximum extent
practicable. We believe that this change
would assist VA in meeting its statutory
goals for award of contracts to SDVOSBs
and VOSBs.
Sections 815.304 and 852.215–70
Evaluation Factors and Significant
Subfactors
To implement sections 8127 and
8128, VA would add sections 815.304
and 852.215–70 to require VA
contracting officers to: (1) Include
provisions in negotiated solicitations
giving preference to offers received from
VOSBs and additional preference to
offers received from SDVOSBs; (2) use
past performance in meeting SDVOSB
subcontracting goals as a non-price
evaluation factor in selecting offers for
award; (3) use the proposed inclusion of
SDVOSBs or VOSBs as subcontractors
as an evaluation factor when
competitively negotiating the award of
contracts or task or delivery orders; and
(4) consider participation in VA’s
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Program as an
evaluation factor when competitively
negotiating the award of contracts or
task or delivery orders. VA is
particularly interested in receiving
comments on the proposed mandatory
inclusion of evaluation preferences for
SDVOSBs and VOSBs in negotiated
acquisitions.
Section 815.304–70 Evaluation Factor
Commitments
In accordance with section 8127(a)(4),
we propose to require prime contractors
who offer to use one or more SDVOSBs
or VOSBs as subcontractors in
accordance with proposed section
852.215–70, Veteran-Owned Small
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49143
Business Evaluation Factors, to actually
use those subcontractors or to replace
any proposed subcontractor who is not
used for the specified subcontract with
another SDVOSB or VOSB
subcontractor. This subsection would be
implemented under proposed new
sections 815.304–70 and 852.215–71.
Further, this subsection would help
ensure that SDVOSBs and VOSBs
receive subcontract awards under VA
prime contracts, as prime contractors
will be required to report only
utilization of companies appearing in
the VIP database as ‘‘verified’’ to be
owned and controlled by eligible
veterans or surviving spouses.
Section 815.304–71 Solicitation
Clauses
This section would prescribe
insertion of certain contract clauses in
acquisitions from SDVOSBs and VOSBs,
including section 852.215–70, ServiceDisabled Veteran-Owned and VeteranOwned Small Business Evaluation
Factors, and section 852.215–71,
Evaluation Factor Commitments, for
applicable solicitations and contracts.
Section 819.201 General Policy
This section would authorize the
Secretary to establish goals for each
fiscal year for participation in
Department contracts by SDVOSBs and
VOSBs. Furthermore, in order to
establish contracting priority for
veteran-owned and -controlled small
businesses in accordance with section
8128, the Secretary may decrease other
status-specific small business goals set
forth by section 15(g)(1) of the Small
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)) upon
consultation with the Administrator of
the U.S. Small Business Administration.
Section 819.307 Protests
FAR 19.307 contains instructions for
processing protests of status as a
SDVOSB concern. Section 8127
contains additional eligibility criteria
for VA’s processing of protests and
authorizes VA to conduct VOSB setasides. Proposed VAAR section 819.307
would address protest procedures and
other information specific to VA’s
unique acquisition program.
Section 819.704 Subcontracting Plan
Requirements
In accordance with section 8127,
proposed section 819.704 would require
contracting officers to include suggested
subcontracting goals in acquisitions that
may require a subcontracting plan. To
receive subcontracting plan
accomplishment credit for
subcontracting with SDVOSBs and
VOSBs, prime contractors would be
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
49144
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Flexibility Act
required to use eligible businesses
identified in the VIP database.
Section 819.705 Appeals of
Contracting Officer Decisions
This section would prescribe
procedures for appeals of VA
contracting officers’ SDVOSB set-aside
decisions, VOSB set-aside decisions,
and prime contractor credits for
subcontracting.
Section 819.709
Contract Clause
This section would require
contracting officers to insert the clause
in section 852.219–9, Small Business
Subcontracting Plan Minimum
Requirements, for solicitations and
contracts that include the FAR clause at
52.219–9, Small Business
Subcontracting Plan.
Subpart 819.70 Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned
Small Business Acquisition Program
This subpart would establish sole
source contracting procedures for
acquisitions under $5 million and create
a new set-aside program for SDVOSBs
and VOSBs.
Subpart 819.71
Program
´ ´
VA Mentor-Protege
In accordance with paragraph (3)(a) of
VA’s Executive Order 13360 strategic
plan, we propose to establish a SDVOSB
´ ´
mentor-protege program within VA
under new subpart 819.71, consisting of
sections 819.7101 through 819.7115,
and at sections 852.219–71 and
852.219–72. We propose to establish
this program to help SDVOSBs receive
developmental support from VA prime
contractors in order to increase the base
of SDVOSBs eligible to perform VA
prime contracts and to participate as
subcontractors on VA prime contracts.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Sections 828.106–71, 828.106–72, and
852.228–72 Assisting Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned
Small Businesses in Obtaining Bonds
In accordance with paragraph (3)(f) of
VA’s Executive Order 13360 strategic
plan, we propose to add new sections
828.106–71, 828.107–72, and 852.228–
72, to encourage prime contractors to
assist SDVOSBs and VOSBs in obtaining
subcontractor performance and payment
bonds and to encourage mentor firms to
´ ´
assist protege SDVOSBs and VOSBs in
obtaining acceptable bid, payment, and
performance bonds as prime
contractors. The ability to obtain
acceptable surety bonds is one of the
major concerns for small businesses in
contracting with the Federal
government for construction.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
This regulation may have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the
law provides that the Secretary shall
give priority to small business concerns
owned and controlled by veterans.
Service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses (SDVOSBs) and veteranowned small businesses (VOSBs) may
benefit from this regulation. Other small
businesses may be indirectly affected if
a greater portion of VA’s small business
contracts are awarded to SDVOSBs and
VOSBs. However, this regulation may
result in an increase in VA contracts
awarded to the overall total of small
businesses.
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) has been prepared and
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 603. Interested parties are invited
to submit comments on VA’s regulatory
flexibility analysis. The analysis is as
follows:
1. Description of the reasons why
action by the agency is being
considered.
These proposed changes to the
Veterans Affairs Acquisition Regulation
(VAAR) implement sections 502 and
503 of Public Law 109–461, the
Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and
Information Technology Act of 2006 (38
U.S.C. 8127 and 8128). The changes will
also implement the rulemaking portions
of VA’s Strategic Plan for Executive
Order 13360, Providing Opportunities
for Service-Disabled Veteran Businesses
to Increase Their Federal Contracting
and Subcontracting (https://
www.vetbiz.gov/fpp/fpp.htm). VA exists
to serve veterans, and buying from
SDVOSBs and VOSBs directly supports
that mission. Such acquisitions support
the socioeconomic well-being of the
Nation and support VA’s Strategic
Goals. The proposed changes to the VA
Acquisition Regulation reflect the intent
of Congress that VA fulfill its special
mission to serve veterans and enable
them to realize the American dream that
they fought to protect, especially those
who became disabled while serving
their country.
2. Succinct statement of the objectives
of, and legal basis for, the proposed rule.
Sections 502 and 503 of Public Law
109–461 require VA to create a unique
acquisition program among Federal
agencies that permits preferences for
SDVOSBs and VOSBs. This proposed
rule would permit VA contracting
officers to conduct acquisition actions
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
with preferences for SDVOSBs or
VOSBs. Specifically, this proposed rule
will allow VA contracting officers to:
a. Under certain conditions, permit
non-competitive sourcing under the
simplified acquisition threshold with
SDVOSBs or VOSBs;
b. Require set-asides for SDVOSBs or
VOSBs above the simplified acquisition
threshold when the contracting officer
has a reasonable expectation that two or
more eligible SDVOSBs or VOSBs will
submit offers and that the award can be
made at a fair and reasonable price that
offers the best value to the United
States;
c. Under certain conditions, permit
non-competitive sourcing for SDVOSBs
or VOSBs above the simplified
acquisition threshold when the
contracting officer determines that a fair
and reasonable price will be obtained as
a result of negotiations for requirements
not to exceed $5 million;
d. Include evaluation factors in
negotiated acquisitions that give
preference to SDVOSBs and VOSBs and
preference to offerors who propose to
include such businesses as
subcontractors;
e. Require offerors who propose to use
SDVOSBs or VOSBs as subcontractors to
utilize eligible businesses;
f. Require VOSBs participating in the
Department’s acquisitions to register in
VetBiz.gov’s Vendor Information Pages
(VIP) database and verify that the
business meets eligibility requirements;
´ ´
g. Establish a VA Mentor-Protege
Program and give large businesses that
participate in the program a preference
in the award of VA prime contracts;
h. Encourage prime contractors and
mentors to assist SDVOSBs and VOSBs
in obtaining bonding when required;
i. Recommend debarment of any
business that willfully or deliberately
misrepresents ownership and control of
the business for purposes of registering
in the VetBiz.gov VIP database or other
federal databases; and
j. Under certain conditions, acquire
supplies and services from SDVOSBs
and VOSBs in lieu of FPI and GPO.
3. Description of, and, where feasible,
estimate of the number of small entities
to which the proposed rule will apply.
VA cannot accurately determine how
many concerns would be participating
in these SDVOSB/VOSB contract
awards because there is insufficient data
on SDVOSBs/VOSBs that are ready and
able to perform under VA requirements
to support a reasonable estimate.
To establish the likely number of
SDVOSBs or VOSBs that may benefit
from VA’s unique procurement
authority there are two principal data
sources, the Central Contractor
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Registration (CCR) database, in which a
business must be listed to receive a
payment from a Federal agency, and
VA’s VetBiz.gov VIP database. A CCR
Dynamic Small Business Search query
conducted on March 13, 2008, returned
40,163 VOSBs, including 11,465
SDVOSBs. A VIP query returned 10,695
VOSBs, including 6,354 SDVOSBs. The
VIP database requires that businesses
answer eligibility questions before they
are permitted to register their business.
The CCR is a self-representation
database.
Under this proposed rule, VA
contracting teams will be required to
give priority consideration to SDVOSBs
and VOSBs when using other
contracting programs, like set-asides for
the Historically Underutilized Business
(HUB) Zone Program or 8(a) Business
Development Program reserved actions
or the Small Business Set-aside
program. A CCR Dynamic Small
Business Search conducted on March
13, 2008, returned 13,848 active
HUBZone firms. Of this population,
2,565, or 19 percent, are also VOSBs. A
search of active 8(a) businesses
identified 9,822 current firms, which
includes 1,285 VOSBs, or 14 percent of
the total population. There are 63,395
woman-owned small businesses
(WOSBs) in the Central Contractor
Registration, of which 4,471 appear to
also be VOSBs. VA notes that the SBA
is in the process of establishing a WOSB
set-aside program, making the
percentage of WOSBs who are also
VOSB eligible of interest to the
Department.
There are some concerns that the
proposed rule will displace business
opportunities for non-veteran-owned
businesses, based on the following
speculations:
• Additional businesses may be
opened by veterans seeking to
participate in the sole source or setaside procurement actions;
• Veteran-owned small businesses
not currently in the Federal market may
be expected to explore selling to VA;
• The VOSB population may increase
as these businesses register in the
VetBiz.gov VIP database;
• Public Law 109–461 procurement
authority also requires that VA’s large
prime contractors use eligible
businesses in order to receive
subcontracting program credit for
VOSBs and SDVOSBs; and
• On June 6, 2008, the Office of
Federal Procurement Policy issued new
guidance regarding Interagency
Agreements. Under this policy, other
Federal agencies with which VA
executes such agreements will be
governed by the procurement rules
contained in this regulation. In FY 2007,
interagency acquisitions were
approximately $15,444,709.39, or 0.13%
of total contract dollars.
The Department of Veterans Affairs
has a strong commitment to supporting
all types of small businesses, as
demonstrated in the procurement chart
below:
FY 2006
($)
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Total Procurement ...........................................................................................
Total Small Business .......................................................................................
Small and Disadvantaged Business ................................................................
8(a) ...................................................................................................................
Woman-Owned Small Business ......................................................................
Veteran-Owned Small Business ......................................................................
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business .........................................
HUBZone .........................................................................................................
The preliminary Total Small Business
procurement for FY2007 was
$3,878,901,724.00 or 32.91%.
Procurement totals for SDVOSBs and
VOSBs were $2,012,552,332.00 or
17.08% and procurement totals for nonveteran-owned businesses were
$1,965,729,663.00 or 16.68%, a mere
.40% difference. Although, SDVOSBs
and VOSBs gained 7.2% of
procurements from FY2006 to FY2007
and non-veteran-owned businesses lost
.44% of procurements, the non-veteranowned businesses still received
increased procurement dollars totaling
$205,666,870.00 from FY2006 to
FY2007. Assuming this trend and/or
this new procurement authority does
increase procurement percentages for
SDVOSBs and VOSBs and the
procurement percentages for nonveteran-owned businesses decrease, as
previously demonstrated from FY2006
to FY2007, the contracting dollars and/
or opportunities for non-veteran-owned
businesses were not adversely impacted
economically. VA also estimates that it
would be unrealistic for SDVOSBs and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
10,282,566,304
3,028,055,461
507,442,123
402,659,565
513,104,216
666,825,417
348,077,159
336,856,889
VOSBs to absorb the entire 16.68% of
procurements that are currently being
awarded to the non-veteran-owned
businesses. The SDVOSBs and VOSBs
are more likely to sub-contract with the
non-veteran-owned businesses with
existing contracts rather than investing
in costly business expansions. Based on
prior procurement trends, VA believes
there would not be an adverse economic
impact on non-veteran-owned
businesses, but requests comment from
the public on other possible impacts
this rule may have on small entities.
This rule also creates a Mentor´ ´
Protege Program for SDVOSBs and
VOSBs. It is the expectation that at such
time as this rule is finalized, those
´ ´
Protege entities would directly benefit
from the forms of Mentoring described
in this proposed rule. VA believes there
would not be an adverse economic
impact on small contractors or
subcontractors, but requests comment
from the public on other possible
impacts this rule may have on small
entities. Comments will be used as a
factual basis upon which VA would
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49145
FY 2007
(%)
....................
29.45
4.93
3.92
4.99
6.49
3.39
3.28
($)
11,784,896,886
3,878,901,724
603,502,602
406,996,187
573,355,381
1,193,853,547
818,698,785
381,875,493
(%)
....................
32.91
5.12
3.45
4.87
10.13
6.95
3.24
certify that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
For the reasons outlined above, given
the relatively small number of
businesses owned and controlled by
veterans in the Federal marketplace and
with the understanding that this rule
would apply only to VA and its large
prime contractors, VA believes this rule
would not have a major impact on small
entities doing business in the Federal
marketplace.
VA welcomes comments concerning
the potential number of small entities
that could become eligible under this
rule. VA also specifically requests
comments concerning the rule’s impact
on small entities that are not VOSBs.
4. Description of projected reporting,
recordkeeping, and other compliance
requirements of the proposed rule,
including an estimate of the classes of
small entities which will be subject to
the requirement and the type of
professional skills necessary for
preparation of the report or record.
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
49146
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
There are two categories of coverage
in this proposed rule that could
potentially require the collection of
information from contractors. VA will
collect information from prime
contractors seeking a preference for
subcontracting with SDVOSBs or
VOSBs. That information would include
identity of the SDVOSBs or VOSBs, the
approximate dollar value of the
proposed subcontracts, and
confirmation that the proposed
subcontractors are eligible SDVOSBs or
VOSBs as verified by the VetBiz.gov VIP
database. VA estimates the cost to an
individual business to be less than
$100.00 for 70–75% of the businesses
seeking verification, and the average
cost to the entire population of veterans
seeking to become verified is less than
$325.00 on average. VA also will collect
information in conjunction with
preferences associated with the VA
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Program. That
information would include the program
agreement, developmental plan, and
reports on the success of the program.
5. Identification, to the extent
practicable, of all relevant Federal rules
which may duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with the proposed rule.
The VAAR (48 CFR chapter 8)
supplements the FAR (48 CFR chapter
1). This proposed rule would affect 48
CFR parts 802, 804, 808, 809, 810, 813,
815, 819, 828, and 852 and
corresponding parts of the FAR.
6. Description of any significant
alternatives to the proposed rule which
would accomplish the stated objectives
of applicable statutes and which would
minimize any significant economic
impact of the proposed rule on small
entities. This proposed rule is designed
to benefit SDVOSBs and VOSBs. There
are no alternatives which would
accomplish the stated objectives of
sections 502 and 503 of Public Law
109–461 to give contracting priority to
SDVOSBs and VOSBs.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Executive Order classifies a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) unless OMB waives such review,
as any regulatory action that is likely to
result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed rule have
been examined, and it has been
determined to be a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866
because it is likely to result in a rule that
may raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or principles set
forth in the Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
developing any rule that may result in
an expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
given year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, or
tribal governments, or the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521),
collections of information are contained
in this proposed rule. These collections
are contained in new sections that were
not previously contained in the VAAR.
This notice is to obtain an OMB control
number for these new sections. As
required under section 3507(d) of the
Act, VA has submitted a copy of this
rulemaking action to OMB for its review
of the collection of information.
OMB assigns control numbers to
collections of information it approves.
VA may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Comments on the collection of
information should be submitted to
OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of Veterans Affairs, Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
Washington, DC 20503, with copies to
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Director, Regulations Management
(00REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20420. Comments
should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AM92.’’
There are categories of coverage in
this proposed rule that could potentially
require the collection of information
from contractors: (1) Section 852.215–
70, Veteran-Owned Small Business
Evaluation Factors; and (2) subpart
´ ´
819.71, VA Mentor-Protege Program,
specifically sections 819.7101 through
819.7115 and the related clauses at
sections 852.219–71 and 852.219–72.
There is no information available upon
which to judge the impact of these PRA
requirements, but since the provisions
are limited to SDVOSBs and VOSBs,
rather than to all small businesses,
collection efforts are estimated to be
minimal.
Title and section number: 852.215–70,
Veteran-Owned Small Business
Evaluation Factors.
Summary of collection of information:
VA is proposing to give preference to
prime contractors who offer to
subcontract with SDVOSBs or VOSBs.
VA must collect information from
offerors regarding: (1) Proposed
SDVOSB and VOSB subcontractors; (2)
the approximate dollar value of the
proposed subcontracts; and (3)
eligibility of the proposed
subcontractors as verified in VetBiz.gov
VIP database (https://www.VetBiz.gov).
Description of need for information
and proposed use of information: The
information is submitted on a voluntary
basis by those offerors who wish to
qualify for this evaluation factor. The
information will be used by the
contracting officer to determine whether
or not the offeror qualifies for extra
credit in the selection of the contract
awardee. Those offerors who qualify
will be afforded a preference in the
selection.
Description of likely respondents: Any
offeror, on a negotiated solicitation that
includes the applicable evaluation
factor, who intends to subcontract with
one or more SDVOSBs or VOSBs and
who wishes to obtain a preference in the
award selection.
Estimated number of respondents:
125.
Estimated frequency of responses: 1
response for each solicitation.
Estimated average burden per
collection: 5 minutes.
Estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden: 10 hours.
Title and section number: Subpart
´ ´
819.71, VA Mentor-Protege Program,
subpart 819.71’s related sections
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
819.7101 through 819.7115, and the
related clauses at section 852.219–71,
´ ´
VA Mentor-Protege Program, and
section 852.219–72, Evaluation Factor
for Participation in the VA Mentor´ ´
Protege Program.
Summary of collection of information:
VA is proposing to institute a Mentor´ ´
Protege Program, whereby a large
business agrees to provide
developmental support to a VOSB or
SDVOSB. VA must approve the Mentor´ ´
Protege Agreement entered into by the
two parties, and VA requires both
parties to report on the success of the
program. Mentors can qualify for
additional preference on negotiated
solicitations by furnishing evidence of
participation in the program with their
offer.
Description of need for information
and proposed use of information: The
information is needed for the review
and evaluation of mentor applications
for realism, validity, and accuracy of
provided information and for
conducting a mid-term evaluation at the
´ ´
mid-point interval to measure protege
progress against the developmental plan
contained in the approved agreement.
The information will also be used to
evaluate the status of a business as a
´ ´
participant in VA’s Mentor-Protege
Program for possible credit in negotiated
contracts.
Description of likely respondents:
Large business prime contractors and
SDVOSBs or VOSBs.
Estimated number of respondents: 50.
Estimated frequency of responses:
´ ´
Each protege program participant will
be required to submit 3 sets of data
consisting of the application and the
mid- and end-term reports. Each mentor
program participant will be required to
submit 4 sets of data consisting of the
application, the mid- and end-term
reports, and, when submitting an offer,
information to verify their participation
in the program in order to receive
evaluation credit.
Estimated average burden per
collection: 1 hour weighted average per
data submission.
Estimated total annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden: 200 hours (4 data
submissions @ 1 hour each times 50
program participants).
The Department considers comments
by the public on collections of
information in—
• Evaluating whether the collections
of information are necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
• Evaluating the accuracy of the
Department’s estimate of the burden of
the collections of information, including
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Enhancing the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimizing the burden of the
collections of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
OMB is required to make a final
decision concerning the collection of
information contained in this proposed
rule between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
to OMB is best assured of having its full
effect if OMB receives it within 30 days
of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment on
the proposed rule.
List of Subjects
48 CFR Parts 802, 804, 809, 810, 813,
and 815
Government procurement, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
48 CFR Part 819
Administrative practice and
procedure, Government procurement,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Small business, Veterans.
48 CFR Part 828
Government procurement, Insurance,
Surety bonds.
48 CFR Part 852
Government procurement, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Approved: April 21, 2008.
James B. Peake,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
Editorial Note: This document was
received at the Office of the Federal Register
on August 15, 2008.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 48 CFR
Chapter 8 as follows:
CHAPTER 8—DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Subchapter A—General
PART 802—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS
AND TERMS
1. The authority citation for part 802
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40
U.S.C. 121(c) and (d); and 48 CFR 1.301–
1.304.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49147
2. Section 802.101 is amended by
adding in alphabetical order the
following terms:
802.101
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concern (SDVOSB) has the
same meaning as defined in FAR Part
2.101, except for businesses
participating in set-asides or
subcontracts authorized by VAAR
subpart 819.70. These businesses must
be listed as verified on the Vendor
Information Pages (VIP) at https://
www.vetbiz.gov. In addition, some
businesses may be owned and
controlled by a surviving spouse.
*
*
*
*
*
Surviving Spouse means an
individual who has been listed in the
Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA)
Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA)
database of veterans and family
members. To be eligible for inclusion in
the VetBiz.gov VIP database, the
following conditions must apply:
(1) If the death of the veteran causes
the small business concern to be less
than 51 percent owned by one or more
service-disabled veterans, the surviving
spouse of such veteran who acquires
ownership rights in such small business
shall, for the period described below, be
treated as if the surviving spouse were
that veteran for the purpose of
maintaining the status of the small
business concern as a service-disabled
veteran-owned small business.
(2) The period referred to above is the
period beginning on the date on which
the veteran dies and ending on the
earliest of the following dates:
(i) The date on which the surviving
spouse remarries;
(ii) The date on which the surviving
spouse relinquishes an ownership
interest in the small business concern;
(iii) The date that is 10 years after the
date of the veteran’s death; or
(iv) The date on which the business
concern is no longer small under
Federal small business size standards.
(3) The veteran must have had a 100
percent service-connected disability
rating or the veteran died as a direct
result of a service-connected disability.
*
*
*
*
*
Vendor Information Pages (VIP)
means the VetBiz.gov Vendor
Information Pages at https://
www.vetbiz.gov.
Veteran-owned small business
concern (VOSB) has the same meaning
as defined in FAR Part 2.101, except for
businesses participating in set-asides or
subcontracts authorized by VAAR Part
819.7001. These businesses must be
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
49148
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
listed as verified on the VetBiz.gov VIP
database.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 804—ADMINISTRATIVE
MATTERS
3. The authority citation for part 804
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40
U.S.C. 121(c) and (d); and 48 CFR 1.301–
1.304.
4. Section 804.1102 is added to read
as follows:
804.1102 Vendor Information Pages (VIP)
Database.
In addition to registering in the
Central Contractor Registration (CCR),
all VOSBs, including SDVOSBs, must
register in the VIP database, available at
https://www.VetBiz.gov, to be eligible to
participate in VA’s Veteran-owned
Small Business prime contracting and
subcontracting opportunities programs.
PART 808—REQUIRED SOURCES OF
SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
5. The authority citation for part 808
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40
U.S.C. 121(c) and (d); and 48 CFR 1.301–
1.304.
6. Subpart 808.6 and section 808.603
are added to read as follows:
PART 809—CONTRACTOR
QUALIFICATIONS
8. The authority citation for part 809
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40
U.S.C. 121(c) and (d); and 48 CFR 1.301–
1.304.
9. Section 809.406–2 is added to read
as follows:
809.406–2
Cause for debarment.
Misrepresentations of VOSB or
SDVOSB eligibility may result in action
taken by VA officials to debar the
business concern for a period not to
exceed 5 years from contracting with
VA as a prime contractor or a
subcontractor.
10. Part 810 is added to read as
follows:
PART 810—MARKET RESEARCH
Sec.
810.001
810.002
Market research policy.
Market research procedures.
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40
U.S.C. 121(c) and (d); and 48 CFR 1.301–
1.304.
810.001
Market research policy.
When conducting market research,
VA contracting teams shall use the VIP
database, at https://www.VetBiz.gov, in
addition to other sources of information.
Subpart 808.6—Acquisition From
Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (FPI)
808.603
with 38 U.S.C. 8128, small business
concerns owned and controlled by
veterans: Contracting priority (See FAR
8.802(a)(4)).
Purchase priorities.
Contracting officers may purchase
supplies and services produced or
provided by FPI from eligible servicedisabled veteran-owned small
businesses and veteran-owned small
businesses, in accordance with
procedures set forth in VAAR subpart
819.70, without seeking a waiver from
FPI, in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 8128,
Small business concerns owned and
controlled by veterans: Contracting
priority.
810.002
Market research procedures.
Contracting officers shall record VIP
queries in the solicitation file by
printing the results of the search(es)
along with specific query used to
generate the search(es).
PART 813—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
PROCEDURES
11. The authority citation for part 813
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40
U.S.C. 121(c) and (d); and 48 CFR 1.301–
1.304.
7. Section 808.803 is added to read as
follows:
12. Section 813.106 is revised to read
as follows:
808.803 Priority for acquisition of printing
and related supplies.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Subpart 808.8—Acquisition of Printing
and Related Supplies
813.106 Soliciting competition, evaluation
of quotations or offers, award and
documentation.
Contracting officers may acquire
government printing from eligible
service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses and veteran-owned small
businesses, in accordance with
procedures set forth in VAAR subpart
819.70, in lieu of the Government
Printing Office (GPO), in accordance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
Contracting officers may use other
than competitive procedures to enter
into a contract with an SDVOSB or
VOSB when the amount is less than the
simplified acquisition threshold.
Contracting officers shall give first
consideration to SDVOSBs.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13. Section 813.202 is added to read
as follows:
813.202
Purchase guidelines.
Open market micro-purchases shall be
equitably distributed among all
qualified SDVOSBs or VOSBs,
respectively, to the maximum extent
practicable.
PART 815—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
14. The authority citation for part 815
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40
U.S.C. 121(c); and 48 CFR 1.301–1.304.
15. Section 815.304 is added to read
as follows:
815.304 Evaluation factors and significant
subfactors.
(a) In an effort to assist SDVOSBs and
VOSBs, contracting officers shall
include evaluation factors in
competitively negotiated solicitations
that are not set aside for SDVOSBs or
VOSBs.
(b) Additional consideration shall also
be given to any offeror, regardless of size
status, that proposes to subcontract with
SDVOSBs or VOSBs.
16. Section 815.304–70 is added to
read as follows:
815.304–70 Evaluation factor
commitments.
(a) VA contracting officers shall:
(1) Include provisions in negotiated
solicitations giving preference to offers
received from VOSBs and additional
preference to offers received from
SDVOSBs;
(2) Use past performance in meeting
SDVOSB subcontracting goals as a nonprice evaluation factor in selecting
offers for award;
(3) Use the proposed inclusion of
SDVOSBs or VOSBs as subcontractors
as an evaluation factor when
competitively negotiating the award of
contracts or task or delivery orders; and
(4) Consider participation in VA’s
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Program as an
evaluation factor when competitively
negotiating the award of contracts or
task or delivery orders.
(b) If an offeror proposes to use an
SDVOSB or VOSB subcontractor in
accordance with the clause at 852.215–
70, Service-Disabled Veteran-owned and
Veteran-owned Small Business
Evaluation Factors, the contracting
officer shall ensure that the offeror, if
awarded the contract, actually does use
the proposed subcontractor or another
SDVOSB or VOSB subcontractor for that
subcontract or for work of similar value.
17. Section 815.304–71 is added to
read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
815.304–71
clause.
Solicitation provision and
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40
U.S.C. 121(c) and (d); 48 CFR 1.301–1.304;
and 15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(E).
goal for the total value of planned
subcontracts.
(b) The contracting officer shall
ensure that any subcontracting plans
submitted by offerors include a goal that
is at least commensurate with the
annual VA VOSB prime contracting goal
for the total value of all planned
subcontracts.
(c) VA’s Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization
(OSDBU) shall review all prime
contractors’ subcontracting plan
achievement reports to ensure that, in
the case of a subcontract that is counted
for purposes of meeting a goal in
accordance with subparagraphs (a) and
(b) above, the subcontract was actually
awarded to a business concern that is
eligible to be counted toward meeting
the goal, as provided in VAAR
804.1102.
22. Section 819.705 is added as
follows:
Subpart 819.2—Policies
819.705 Appeal of Contracting Officer
Decisions.
19. Section 819.201 is revised to read
as follows:
(a) Acquisitions not exceeding the
SAT and sections 819.7007 and
819.7008 are excluded from this section.
(b) When an interested party intends
to appeal a contracting officer’s decision
to not use the set-aside authority
contained in VAAR 819.70, the party
shall notify the contracting officer, in
writing, of its intent to challenge the
decision. The contracting officer has 5
working days to reply to the challenge
by either revising the strategy or
indicating the rationale for not settingaside the requirement. Upon receipt of
the decision, the interested party may
appeal to the Head of the Contracting
Activity (HCA). Such appeal shall be
filed within 5 working days of receipt of
the contracting officer’s decision. The
HCA has 5 working days to respond to
the appeal. The contracting officer shall
suspend action on the acquisition
unless the HCA makes a written
determination that urgent circumstances
exist which would significantly affect
the interests of the Government. The
decision of the HCA shall be final.
(c) Prime contractors submitting
businesses declared ineligible for credit
in SDVOSB and/or VOSB
subcontracting plans may appeal to the
Director, Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization
(OSDBU), within 5 working days of
receipt of information declaring their
subcontractor ineligible. The Director,
OSDBU, shall have 5 working days to
respond. The decision of the Director,
OSDBU, may be appealed to the Senior
Procurement Executive (SPE) within 5
working days. The SPE shall have 15
(a) The contracting officer shall insert
the provision at 852.215–70, ServiceDisabled Veteran-owned and Veteranowned Small Business Evaluation
Factors, in competitively negotiated
solicitations that are not set aside for
SDVOSBs or VOSBs.
(b) The contracting officer shall insert
the clause at 852.215–71, Evaluation
Factor Commitments, in solicitations
and contracts that include the clause at
852.215–70, Service-Disabled Veteranowned and Veteran-owned Small
Business Evaluation Factors.
PART 819—SMALL BUSINESS
PROGRAMS
18. The authority citation for part 819
is revised to read as follows:
819.201
General policy.
The Secretary shall establish goals for
each fiscal year for participation in
Department contracts by SDVOSBs and
VOSBs. In order to establish contracting
priority for veteran owned and
controlled small businesses in
accordance with 38 U.S.C. 8128, the
Secretary may decrease other statusspecific small business goals set forth by
section 15(g)(1) of the Small Business
Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)) upon
consultation with the Administrator of
the U.S. Small Business Administration.
20. Section 819.307 is added to read
as follows:
819.307
Protests.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
For acquisitions under the authority
of VAAR part 819.70, regarding
eligibility of SDVOSB and VOSB
concerns, contracting officers shall
forward all protests to the Associate
Administrator for Government
Contracting AA/GC, U.S. Small
Business Administration (ATTN:
Veterans Business Program Protest), 409
3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416,
for disposition.
21. Section 819.704 is added to read
as follows:
819.704. Subcontracting plan
requirements.
(a) The contracting officer shall
ensure that any subcontracting plans
submitted by offerors include a goal that
is at least commensurate with the
annual VA SDVOSB prime contracting
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49149
working days to respond and that
decision shall be final.
23. Section 819.709 is added to read
as follows:
819.709
Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the
clause at 852.219–9, Small Business
Subcontracting Plan Minimum
Requirements, in solicitations and
contracts that include the FAR clause at
52.219–9, Small Business
Subcontracting Plan.
24. Subpart 819.70 is revised to read
as follows:
Subpart 819.70—Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned
Small Business Acquisition Program
819.7001
General.
(a) The Veterans Benefits, Health
Care, and Information Technology Act
of 2006 (38 U.S.C. 8127) created an
acquisition program for small business
concerns owned and controlled by
service-disabled veterans and those
owned and controlled by veterans for
VA.
(b) The purpose of the program is to
provide contracting assistance to
SDVOSBs and VOSBs.
819.7002
Applicability.
This subpart applies to VA
contracting activities and to its prime
contractors.
819.7003
Eligibility.
(a) Eligibility of SDVOSBs and VOSBs
continues to be governed by the Small
Business Administration regulations, 13
CFR subparts 125.8 through 125.13, as
well as the FAR, except where expressly
directed otherwise by the VAAR, and 38
CFR verification regulations for
SDVOSBs and VOSBs.
(b) At the time of submission of offer,
the offeror must represent to the
contracting officer that it is a—
(1) Service-disabled veteran-owned
small business concern or veteranowned small business concern;
(2) Small business concern under the
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code assigned to the
acquisition; and
(3) Verified for eligibility in the
Vendor Information Pages database.
(c) A joint venture may be considered
an SDVOSB or VOSB concern if—
(1) At least one member of the joint
venture is an SDVOSB or VOSB
concern, and makes the representations
in paragraph (b) of this section;
(2) Each other concern is small under
the size standard corresponding to the
NAICS code assigned to the
procurement;
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
49150
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(3) The joint venture meets the
requirements of paragraph 7 of the size
standard explanation of Affiliates in
FAR 19.101; and
(4) The joint venture meets the
requirements of 13 CFR 125.15(b),
modified to include veteran-owned
small businesses where this CFR section
refers to SDVOSB concerns.
(d) Any SDVOSB or VOSB concern
(nonmanufacturer) must meet the
requirements in FAR 19.102(f) to receive
a benefit under this program.
819.7004
Contracting order of priority.
In determining the acquisition
strategy applicable to an acquisition, the
contracting officer shall consider, in the
following order of priority, contracting
preferences that ensure contracts will be
awarded:
(a) To SDVOSBs;
(b) To VOSB, including but not
limited to SDVOSBs;
(c) Pursuant to—
(1) Section 8(a) of the Small Business
Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)); or
(2) The Historically-Underutilized
Business Zone (HUBZone) Program (15
U.S.C. 657a); and
(d) Pursuant to any other small
business contracting preference.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
819.7005 Service-disabled veteran-owned
small business set-aside procedures.
(a) The contracting officer shall
consider SDVOSB set-asides before
considering VOSB set-asides. Except as
authorized by 819.7007 and 819.7008,
the contracting officer shall set-aside an
acquisition for competition restricted to
SDVOSB concerns upon a reasonable
expectation that—
(1) Offers will be received from two or
more eligible SDVOSB concerns; and
(2) Award will be made at a fair and
reasonable price.
(b) When conducting SDVOSB setasides, the contracting officer shall
ensure—
(1) Eligibility is extended to
businesses owned and operated by
surviving spouses; and
(2) Businesses are registered and
verified as eligible in Vendor
Information Pages prior to making an
award.
(c) If the contracting officer receives
only one acceptable offer at a fair and
reasonable price from an eligible
SDVOSB concern in response to a
SDVOSB set-aside, the contracting
officer should make an award to that
concern. If the contracting officer
receives no acceptable offers from
eligible SDVOSB concerns, the set-aside
shall be withdrawn and the
requirement, if still valid, set aside for
VOSB competition, if appropriate.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
819.7006 Veteran-owned small business
set-aside procedures.
819.7008 Sole source awards to veteranowned small business concerns.
(a) The contracting officer shall
consider SDVOSB set-asides before
considering VOSB set-asides. Except as
authorized by 819.7007 and 819.7008,
the contracting officer shall set aside an
acquisition for competition restricted to
VOSB concerns upon a reasonable
expectation that—
(1) Offers will be received from two or
more eligible VOSB concerns; and
(2) Award will be made at a fair and
reasonable price.
(b) If the contracting officer receives
only one acceptable offer at a fair and
reasonable price from an eligible VOSB
concern in response to a VOSB setaside, the contracting officer should
make an award to that concern. If the
contracting officer receives no
acceptable offers from eligible VOSB
concerns, the set-aside shall be
withdrawn and the requirement, if still
valid, set aside for other small business
programs, as appropriate.
(c) When conducting VOSB set-asides,
the contracting officer shall ensure the
business is registered and verified as
eligible in the Vendor Information Pages
prior to making an award.
(a) A contracting officer may award
contracts to VOSB concerns on a sole
source basis provided—
(1) The anticipated award price of the
contract (including options) will not
exceed $5 million;
(2) The requirement is synopsized in
accordance with FAR part 5;
(3) The VOSB concern has been
determined to be a responsible
contractor with respect to performance;
(4) Award can be made at a fair and
reasonable price; and
(5) No responsible SDVOSB concern
has been identified.
(b) The contracting officer’s
determination whether to make a sole
source award is a business decision
wholly within the discretion of the
contracting officer. A determination that
only one veteran-owned small business
concern is available to meet the
requirement is not required. No protest
is authorized in connection with the
issuance or proposed issuance of a
contract under this section, on the basis
that more than one veteran-owned small
business concern is available to meet
the requirement.
(c) When conducting a VOSB sole
source acquisition, the contracting
officer shall ensure businesses are
registered and verified as eligible in the
Vendor Information Pages prior to
making an award.
819.7007. Sole source awards to servicedisabled veteran-owned small business
concerns.
(a) A contracting officer may award
contracts to SDVOSB concerns on a sole
source basis provided—
(1) The anticipated award price of the
contract (including options) will not
exceed $5 million;
(2) The requirement is synopsized in
accordance with FAR part 5;
(3) The SDVOSB concern has been
determined to be a responsible
contractor with respect to performance;
and
(4) Award can be made at a fair and
reasonable price.
(b) The contracting officer’s
determination whether to make a sole
source award is a business decision
wholly within the discretion of the
contracting officer. A determination that
only one service-disabled veteranowned small business concern is
available to meet the requirement is not
required. No protest is authorized in
connection with the issuance or
proposed issuance of a contract under
this section, on the basis that more than
one service-disabled veteran-owned
small business concern is available to
meet the requirement.
(c) When conducting a SDVOSB sole
source acquisition, the contracting
officer shall ensure businesses are
registered and verified as eligible in the
Vendor Information Pages prior to
making an award.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
819.7009
Contract clauses.
The contracting officer shall insert the
clause 852.219–10, Notice of Total
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small
Business Set-Aside or 852.219–11,
Notice of Total Veteran-Owned Small
Business Set-Aside in solicitations and
contracts for acquisitions under this
subpart.
25. Subpart 819.71, consisting of
sections 819.7101 through 819.7115, is
added to read as follows:
´ ´
Subpart 819.71—VA Mentor-Protege
Program
Sec.
819.7101 Purpose.
819.7102 Definitions.
819.7103 Non-affiliation.
819.7104 General policy.
819.7105 Incentives for mentor
participation.
´ ´
819.7106 Eligibility of Mentor and Protege
firms.
´ ´
819.7107 Selection of Protege firms.
819.7108 Application process.
819.7109 VA review of application.
819.7110 Developmental assistance.
819.7111 Obligations under the Mentor´ ´
Protege Program.
819.7112 Internal controls.
819.7113 Reports.
819.7114 Measurement of program success.
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
819.7115 Solicitation provisions.
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501.
819.7104
´ ´
Subpart 819.71—VA Mentor-Protege
Program
819.7101
Purpose.
´ ´
The VA Mentor-Protege Program is
designed to assist service-disabled
veteran-owned small businesses
(SDVOSBs) and veteran-owned small
businesses (VOSBs) in enhancing their
capabilities to perform contracts and
subcontracts for VA. The Mentor´ ´
Protege Program is also designed to
improve the performance of VA
contractors and subcontractors by
providing developmental assistance to
´ ´
Protege entities, fostering the
establishment of long-term business
relationships between SDVOSBs,
VOSBs and prime contractors, and
increasing the overall number of
SDVOSBs and VOSBs that receive VA
contract and subcontract awards. A
´ ´
firm’s status as a Protege under a VA
contract shall not have an effect on the
firm’s eligibility to seek other prime
contracts or subcontracts.
819.7102
Definitions.
(a) A Mentor is a prime contractor that
elects to promote and develop SDVOSB
and/or VOSB subcontractors by
providing developmental assistance
designed to enhance the business
´ ´
success of the Protege. A mentor may be
a large or small business concern.
(b) OSDBU is the Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization.
This is the VA office responsible for
administering, implementing and
coordinating the Department’s small
business programs, including the
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Program.
(c) Program refers to the VA Mentor´ ´
Protege Program as described in this
Chapter.
´ ´
(d) Protege means a service-disabled
veteran-owned small business or
veteran-owned small business, as
defined in VAAR 802.101, which meets
Federal small business size standards in
its primary North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) code and
which is the recipient of developmental
´ ´
assistance pursuant to a Mentor-Protege
agreement.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
819.7103
Non-affiliation.
´ ´
A Protege firm will not be considered
an affiliate of a Mentor firm solely on
´ ´
the basis that the Protege firm is
receiving developmental assistance from
the Mentor firm under VA’s Mentor´ ´
Protege Program. The determination of
affiliation is a function of the Small
Business Administration.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
General policy.
(a) To be eligible, Mentors and
´ ´
Proteges must not be listed on the
Excluded Parties List System, located at
https://www.epls.gov. Mentors will
provide appropriate developmental
assistance to enhance the capabilities of
´ ´
Proteges to perform as prime contractors
and/or subcontractors.
(b) VA reserves the right to limit the
number of participants in the program
in order to ensure its effective
´ ´
management of the Mentor-Protege
Program.
819.7105 Incentives for prime contractor
participation.
(a) Under the Small Business Act, 15
U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(e), VA is authorized to
provide appropriate incentives to
encourage subcontracting opportunities
for small business consistent with the
efficient and economical performance of
the contract. This authority is limited to
negotiated procurements. FAR 19.202–1
provides additional guidance.
(b) Costs incurred by a Mentor to
provide developmental assistance, as
described in 819.7110 to fulfill the
terms of their agreement(s) with a
´ ´
Protege firm(s), are not reimbursable as
a direct cost under a VA contract. If VA
is the Mentor’s responsible audit agency
under FAR 42.703–1, VA will consider
these costs in determining indirect cost
rates. If VA is not the responsible audit
agency, Mentors are encouraged to enter
into an advance agreement with their
responsible audit agency on the
treatment of such costs when
determining indirect cost rates.
(c) In addition to subparagraph (b) of
this section, contracting officers may
give Mentors evaluation credit under
852.219–52, Evaluation Factor for
´ ´
Participation in the VA Mentor-Protege
Program, considerations for
subcontracts awarded pursuant to their
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Agreements and their
subcontracting plans. Therefore:
(1) Contracting officers may evaluate
subcontracting plans containing Mentor´ ´
Protege arrangements more favorably
than subcontracting plans without
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Agreements.
(2) Contracting officers may assess the
prime contractor’s compliance with the
subcontracting plans submitted in
previous contracts as a factor in
evaluating past performance under FAR
15.305(a)(2)(v) and determining
contractor responsibility 19.705–5(a)(1).
(d) OSDBU Mentoring Award. A nonmonetary award will be presented
annually to the Mentoring firm
providing the most effective
´ ´
developmental support of a Protege. The
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Program Manager will
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49151
recommend an award winner to the
OSDBU Director.
´ ´
(e) OSDBU Mentor-Protege Annual
Conference. At the conclusion of each
´ ´
year in the Mentor-Protege Program,
Mentor firms will be invited to brief
contracting officers, program leaders,
office directors and other guests on
Program progress.
819.7106
firms.
´ ´
Eligibility of Mentor and Protege
Eligible business entities approved as
Mentors may enter into agreements
´ ´
(hereafter referred to as ‘‘Mentor-Protege
Agreement’’ or ‘‘Agreement’’ and
explained in 819.7108) with eligible
´ ´
Proteges. Mentors provide appropriate
developmental assistance to enhance
´ ´
the capabilities of Proteges to perform as
contractors and/or subcontractors.
Eligible small business entities capable
of providing developmental assistance
´ ´
may be approved as Mentors. Proteges
may participate in the Program in
pursuit of a prime contract or as
subcontractors under the Mentor’s
prime contract with VA, but are not
required to be a subcontractor to a VA
prime contractor or be a VA prime
contractor.
(a) Eligibility. A Mentor: (1) May be
either a large or small business entity;
(2) Must be able to provide
developmental assistance that will
´ ´
enhance the ability of Proteges to
perform as prime contractors or
subcontractors; and
(3) Will be encouraged to enter into
arrangements with entities with which
it has established business
relationships.
´ ´
(b) Eligibility. A Protege:
(1) Must be a service-disabled veteranowned small business or veteran-owned
small business as defined in VAAR
802.101;
(2) Must meet the size standard
corresponding to the NAICS code that
the Mentor prime contractor believes
best describes the product or service
being acquired by the subcontract; and
´ ´
(c) Proteges may have multiple
´ ´
Mentors. Proteges participating in
´ ´
Mentor-Protege programs in addition to
VA’s Program should maintain a system
for preparing separate reports of
mentoring activity so that results of
VA’s Program can be reported separately
from any other agency program.
´ ´
(d) A Protege firm shall self-represent
to a Mentor firm that it meets the
requirements set forth in paragraph (b)
of this section. Mentors shall confirm
eligibility by documenting the verified
´ ´
status of the protege in the VetBiz.gov
Vendor Information Pages database.
´ ´
Proteges must maintain verified status
throughout the term of the Mentor-
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
49152
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
´ ´
Protege Agreement. Failure to do so
shall result in cancellation of the
Agreement.
819.7107
´ ´
Selection of Protege firms.
(a) Mentor firms will be solely
´ ´
responsible for selecting Protege firms.
Mentors are encouraged to select from a
broad base of service-disabled veteranowned small business or veteran-owned
small business firms whose core
competencies support VA’s mission;
and choose SDVOSB and/or VOSB
´ ´
proteges in addition to firms with whom
they have established business
relationships.
(b) Mentors may have multiple
´ ´
Proteges. However, to preserve the
integrity of the Program and assure the
quality of developmental assistance
´ ´
provided to Proteges, VA reserves the
right to limit the total number of
´ ´
Proteges participating under each
´ ´
Mentor firm for the Mentor-Protege
Program.
´ ´
(c) The selection of Protege firms by
Mentor firms may not be protested,
except that any protest regarding the
size or eligibility status of an entity
selected by a Mentor shall be handled
in accordance with the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the
Small Business Administration
regulations.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
819.7108
Application process.
(a) Firms interested in becoming
´ ´
approved Mentor-Protege participants
must submit a joint written VA Mentor´ ´
Protege Agreement to the VA OSDBU
for review and approval. The proposed
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Agreement will be
evaluated on the extent to which the
Mentor plans to provide developmental
assistance. Evaluations will consider the
nature and extent of technical and
managerial support as well as any
proposed financial assistance in the
form of equity investment, loans, jointventure, and traditional subcontracting
support.
´ ´
(b) The Mentor-Protege Agreement
must contain:
(1) Names, addresses, phone numbers,
and e-mail addresses (if available) of the
´ ´
Mentor and Protege firm(s) and a point
´ ´
of contact for both Mentor and Protege
who will oversee the agreement;
´ ´
(2) A statement from the Protege firm
that the firm is currently eligible as a
SDVOSB or VOSB to participate in VA’s
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Program;
(3) A description of the Mentor’s
ability to provide developmental
´ ´
assistance to the Protege and the type of
developmental assistance that will be
provided, to include a description of the
types and dollar amounts of subcontract
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
work, if any, that may be awarded to the
´ ´
Protege firm;
(4) Duration of the Agreement,
including rights and responsibilities of
´ ´
both parties (Mentor and Protege), with
bi-annual reviews;
(5) Termination procedures, including
procedures for the parties’ voluntary
withdrawal from the Program. The
Agreement shall require the Mentor or
´ ´
the Protege to notify the other firm and
VA OSDBU in writing at least 30 days
in advance of its intent to voluntarily
terminate the Agreement;
(6) A schedule with milestones for
providing assistance;
(7) Criteria for evaluation of the
´ ´
Protege’s developmental success;
(8) A plan addressing how the Mentor
´ ´
will increase the quality of the Protege
firm’s technical capabilities and
contracting and subcontracting
opportunities;
(9) An estimate of the total cost of the
planned mentoring assistance to be
´ ´
provided to the Protege;
(10) An agreement by both parties to
comply with the reporting requirements
of VAAR 819.7113;
(11) A plan for accomplishing
unfinished work should the agreement
be voluntarily cancelled;
(12) Other terms and conditions, as
appropriate; and
(13) Signatures and date(s).
(c) The Agreement defines the
relationship between the Mentor and
´ ´
the Protege firms only. The Agreement
does not create any privity of contract
between the Mentor and VA or the
´ ´
Protege and VA.
819.7109
VA review of application.
(a) VA OSDBU will review the
information to establish the Mentor and
´ ´
Protege eligibility and to ensure that the
information that is in section 819.7108
is included. If the application relates to
a specific contract, then OSDBU will
consult with the responsible contracting
officer on the adequacy of the proposed
Agreement, as appropriate. OSDBU will
complete its review no later than 30
calendar days after receipt of the
application or after consultation with
the contracting officer, whichever is
later. There is no charge to apply for the
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Program.
(b) After OSDBU completes its review
and provides written approval, the
Mentor may execute the Agreement and
implement the developmental
assistance as provided under the
Agreement. OSDBU will provide a copy
´ ´
of the Mentor-Protege Agreement to the
VA contracting officer for any VA
contracts affected by the Agreement.
(c) If the application is disapproved,
the Mentor may provide additional
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
information for reconsideration. OSDBU
will complete review of any
supplemental material no later than 30
days after its receipt. Upon finding
deficiencies that VA considers
correctable, OSDBU will notify the
´ ´
Mentor and Protege and request
correction of deficiencies to be provided
within 15 days.
819.7110
Developmental assistance.
The forms of developmental
assistance a Mentor can provide to a
´ ´
Protege include, but are not limited to,
the following:
(a) Guidance relating to—
(1) Financial management;
(2) Organizational management;
(3) Overall business management/
planning;
(4) Business development; and
(5) Technical assistance.
(b) Loans.
(c) Rent-free use of facilities and/or
equipment.
(d) Property.
(e) Temporary assignment of
´ ´
personnel to a Protege for training.
(f) Any other types of permissible,
mutually beneficial assistance.
819.7111 Obligations under the Mentor´ ´
Protege Program.
´ ´
(a) A Mentor or Protege may
voluntarily withdraw from the Program.
However, in no event shall such
withdrawal impact the contractual
requirements under any prime contract.
´ ´
(b) Mentors and proteges shall submit
reports to VA OSDBU in accordance
with 819.7113.
819.7112
Internal controls.
(a) OSDBU will oversee the Program
and will work cooperatively with
relevant contracting officers to achieve
Program objectives. OSDBU will
establish internal controls as checks and
balances applicable to the Program.
These controls will include:
(1) Reviewing and evaluating Mentor
applications for validity of the provided
information;
(2) Reviewing bi-annual progress
reports submitted by Mentors and
´ ´
´ ´
Proteges on Protege development to
´ ´
measure Protege progress against the
plan submitted in the approved
Agreement;
(3) Reviewing and evaluating
financial reports and invoices submitted
by the Mentor to verify that VA is not
charged by the Mentor for providing
´ ´
developmental assistance to the Protege;
and
(4) Limiting the number of
´ ´
participants in the Mentor-Protege
Program within a reporting period, in
order to insure the effective
management of the Program.
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(b) VA may rescind approval of an
´ ´
existing Mentor-Protege Agreement if it
determines that such action is in VA’s
best interest. The rescission shall be in
writing and sent to the Mentor and
´ ´
Protege after approval by the OSDBU
Director. Rescission of an Agreement
does not change the terms of any
subcontract between the Mentor and the
´ ´
Protege.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
819.7113
Reports.
´ ´
(a) Mentor and Protege entities shall
submit to VA’s Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization biannual reports on progress under the
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Agreement. VA will
evaluate reports by considering the
following:
(1) Specific actions taken by the
Mentor during the evaluation period to
increase the participation of their
´ ´
Protege(s) as suppliers to VA, other
government agencies and to commercial
entities;
(2) Specific actions taken by the
Mentor during the evaluation period to
develop technical and administrative
´ ´
expertise of a Protege as defined in the
Agreement;
´ ´
(3) The extent to which the Protege
has met the developmental objectives in
the Agreement;
(4) The extent to which the Mentor’s
´ ´
participation in the Mentor-Protege
´ ´
Program impacted the Protege’(s’) ability
to receive contract(s) and subcontract(s)
from private firms and Federal agencies
other than VA; and, if deemed
necessary;
´ ´
(5) Input from the Protege on the
nature of the developmental assistance
provided by the Mentor.
(b) OSDBU will submit annual reports
to the relevant contracting officer
regarding participating prime
contractor’(s’) performance in the
Program.
(c) In addition to the written progress
report in paragraph (a) of this section, at
the mid-term point in the Mentor´ ´
Protege agreement, the Mentor and the
´ ´
Protege shall formally brief the VA
OSDBU regarding program
accomplishments as pertains to the
approved agreement.
´ ´
(d) Mentor and Protege firms shall
submit an evaluation to OSDBU at the
conclusion of the mutually agreed upon
Program period, the conclusion of the
contract, or the voluntary withdrawal by
either party from the Program,
whichever comes first.
be measured by the extent to which it
results in:
(a) An increase in the quality of the
´ ´
technical capabilities of the protege
firm.
(b) An increase in the number and
dollar value of contract and subcontract
´ ´
awards to protege firms since the time
of their entry into the program
´ ´
attributable to the Mentor-Protege
relationship (under VA contracts,
contracts awarded by other Federal
agencies and under commercial
contracts.)
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 8127, 8128, and
8151–8153; 40 U.S.C. 121(c); and 48 CFR
1.301–1.304.
819.7115
(a) In an effort to achieve socioeconomic
small business goals, depending on the
evaluation factors included in the
solicitation, VA may evaluate offerors based
on their service-disabled veteran-owned or
veteran-owned small business status and
their proposed use of eligible servicedisabled veteran-owned small businesses and
veteran-owned small businesses as
subcontractors.
(b) Eligible service-disabled veteran-owned
offerors will receive full credit, and offerors
qualifying as veteran-owned small businesses
will receive partial credit for the ServiceDisabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned
Small Business Status evaluation factor. To
receive credit, an offeror must be registered
and verified in Vendor Information Pages.
(https://www.VetBiz.gov).
(c) Non-veteran offerors proposing to use
service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses or veteran-owned small
businesses as subcontractors will receive
some consideration under this evaluation
factor. Offerors must state in their proposals
the names of the SDVOSBs and VOSBs with
whom they intend to subcontract and
provide a brief description of the proposed
subcontracts and the approximate dollar
values of the proposed subcontracts. In
addition, the proposed subcontractors must
be registered and verified in the VetBiz.gov
Vendor Information Pages (VIP) (https://
www.vetbiz.gov).
Solicitation provisions.
(a) Insert the provision at 852.219–71,
´ ´
VA Mentor-Protege Program, in
solicitations that include the FAR clause
at 52.219–9, Small Business
Subcontracting Plan.
(b) Insert the provision at 852.219–72,
Evaluation Factor for Participation in
´ ´
the VA Mentor-Protege Program, in
solicitations that include an evaluation
factor for participation in VA’s Mentor´ ´
Protege Program in accordance with
819.7105 and that also include the FAR
clause at 52.219–9, Small Business
Subcontracting Plan.
PART 828—BONDS AND INSURANCE
26. The authority citation for part 828
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 8127, 8128 and
8151–8153; 40 U.S.C. 121(c); and 48 CFR
1.301–1.304.
27. Section 828.106–71 is added to
read as follows:
828.106–71 Assisting service-disabled
veteran-owned and veteran-owned small
businesses in obtaining bonding.
VA prime contractors are encouraged
to assist SDVOSB concerns and VOSB
concerns in obtaining subcontractor
performance and payment bonds.
Mentors are especially encouraged to
´ ´
assist their Proteges in obtaining bid,
payment, and performance bonds as
prime contractors and bonds as
subcontractors when bonds are
required.
28. Section 828.106–72 is added to
read as follows:
828.106–72
Contract provision.
Insert the provision at 852.228–72,
Assisting Service-Disabled VeteranOwned and Veteran-Owned Small
Businesses in Obtaining Bonds, in
solicitations that include the FAR clause
at 52.228–1, Bid Guarantee.
819.7114 Measurement of program
success.
The overall success of the VA Mentor´ ´
Protege Program encompassing all
´ ´
participating mentors and proteges will
PART 852—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
29. The authority citation for part 852
is revised to read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
49153
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30. Section 852.215–70 is added to
read as follows:
852.215–70 Service-Disabled VeteranOwned and Veteran-Owned Small Business
Evaluation Factors.
As prescribed in 815.304–71(a), insert
the following clause:
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned and
Veteran-Owned Small Business
Evaluation Factors (Date)
(End of Clause)
31. Section 852.215–71 is added to
read as follows:
852.215–71 Evaluation Factor
Commitments.
As prescribed in 815.304–71(b), insert
the following clause:
Evaluation Factor Commitments (Date)
The offeror agrees, if awarded a contract,
to use the service-disabled veteran-owned
small businesses or veteran-owned small
businesses proposed as subcontractors in
accordance with clause 852.215–70, ServiceDisabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned
Small Business Evaluation Factors, or to
substitute one or more service-disabled
veteran-owned small businesses or veteranowned small businesses for subcontract work
of the same or similar value.
(End of Clause)
32. Section 852.219–9 is added to
read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
49154
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
852.219–9 VA Small Business
Subcontracting Plan Minimum
Requirements.
As prescribed in 819.9, insert the
following clause:
VA Small Business Subcontracting Plan
Minimum Requirements (Date)
(a) This clause does not apply to small
business concerns.
(b) If the offeror is required to submit an
individual subcontracting plan, the
minimum goals for award of subcontracts to
service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concerns and veteran-owned small
business concerns shall be at least
commensurate with the Department’s annual
service-disabled veteran-owned small
business and veteran-owned small business
prime contracting goals for the total dollars
planned to be subcontracted.
(c) For a commercial plan, the minimum
goals for award of subcontracts to servicedisabled veteran-owned small business
concerns and veteran-owned small
businesses shall be at least commensurate
with the Department’s annual servicedisabled veteran-owned small business and
veteran-owned small business prime
contracting goals for the total value of
projected subcontracts to support the sales
for the commercial plan.
(d) To be credited toward goal
achievements, businesses must be verified as
eligible in the Vendor Information Pages
database. The contractor shall annually
submit a listing of service-disabled veteranowned small businesses and veteran-owned
small businesses for which credit toward goal
achievement is to be applied for the review
of personnel in the Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization.
(e) The contractor may appeal any
businesses determined not eligible for
crediting toward goal achievements by
following the procedures contained in VAAR
subpart 819.407.
(End of Clause)
33. Section 852.219–10 is added to
read as follows:
852.219–10 VA Notice of Total ServiceDisabled Veteran-Owned Small Business
Set-Aside.
As prescribed in 819.7009, insert the
following clause:
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
VA Notice of Total Service-Disabled
Veteran-Owned Small Business SetAside (Date)
(a) Definition. For the Department of
Veterans Affairs, ‘‘Service-disabled veteranowned small business concern’’—
(1) Means a small business concern—
(i) Not less than 51 percent of which is
owned by one or more service-disabled
veterans or, in the case of any publicly
owned business, not less than 51 percent of
the stock of which is owned by one or more
service-disabled veterans (or eligible
surviving spouses);
(ii) The management and daily business
operations of which are controlled by one or
more service-disabled veterans (or eligible
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
surviving spouses) or, in the case of a servicedisabled veteran with permanent and severe
disability, the spouse or permanent caregiver
of such veteran;
(iii) The business meets Federal small
business size standards for the applicable
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code identified in the
solicitation document; and
(iv) The business has been verified for
ownership and control and is so listed in the
Vendor Information Pages, (https://
www.VetBiz.gov).
(2) ‘‘Service-disabled veteran’’ means a
veteran, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(2), with
a disability that is service-connected, as
defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(16).
(b) General.
(1) Offers are solicited only from servicedisabled veteran-owned small business
concerns. Offers received from concerns that
are not service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concerns shall not be considered.
(2) Any award resulting from this
solicitation shall be made to a servicedisabled veteran-owned small business
concern.
(c) Agreement. A service-disabled veteranowned small business concern agrees that in
the performance of the contract, in the case
of a contract for—
(1) Services (except construction), at least
50 percent of the cost of personnel for
contract performance will be spent for
employees of the concern or employees of
other eligible service-disabled veteran-owned
small business concerns;
(2) Supplies (other than acquisition from a
nonmanufacturer of the supplies), at least 50
percent of the cost of manufacturing,
excluding the cost of materials, will be
performed by the concern or other eligible
service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concerns;
(3) General construction, at least 15 percent
of the cost of the contract performance
incurred for personnel will be spent on the
concern’s employees or the employees of
other eligible service-disabled veteran-owned
small business concerns; or
(4) Construction by special trade
contractors, at least 25 percent of the cost of
the contract performance incurred for
personnel will be spent on the concern’s
employees or the employees of other eligible
service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concerns.
(d) A joint venture may be considered a
service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concern if—
(1) At least one member of the joint venture
is a service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concern, and makes the following
representations: That it is a service-disabled
veteran-owned small business concern, and
that it is a small business concern under the
North American Industry Classification
Systems (NAICS) code assigned to the
procurement;
(2) Each other concern is small under the
size standard corresponding to the NAICS
code assigned to the procurement; and
(3) The joint venture meets the
requirements of paragraph 7 of the
explanation of Affiliates in 19.101 of the
Federal Acquisition Regulation.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(4) The joint venture meets the
requirements of 13 CFR 125.15(b).
(e) Any service-disabled veteran-owned
small business concern (nonmanufacturer)
must meet the requirements in 19.102(f) of
the Federal Acquisition Regulation to receive
a benefit under this program.
(End of Clause)
34. Section 852.219–11 is added to
read as follows:
852.219–11 VA Notice of Total VeteranOwned Small Business Set-Aside.
As prescribed in 819.7009, insert the
following clause:
VA Notice of Total Veteran-Owned
Small Business Set-Aside (Date)
(a) Definition. For the Department of
Veterans Affairs, ‘‘Veteran-owned small
business concern’’—
(1) Means a small business concern—
(i) Not less than 51 percent of which is
owned by one or more veterans or, in the
case of any publicly owned business, not less
than 51 percent of the stock of which is
owned by one or more veterans;
(ii) The management and daily business
operations of which are controlled by one or
more veterans;
(iii) The business meets Federal small
business size standards for the applicable
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code identified in the
solicitation document; and
(iv) The business has been verified for
ownership and control and is so listed in the
Vendor Information Pages (https://
www.VetBiz.gov).
(2) ‘‘Veteran’’ is defined in 38 U.S.C.
101(2).
(b) General.
(1) Offers are solicited only from veteranowned small business concerns. All servicedisabled veteran-owned small businesses are
also determined to be veteran-owned small
businesses if they meet the criteria identified
in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Offers
received from concerns that are not veteranowned small business concerns shall not be
considered.
(2) Any award resulting from this
solicitation shall be made to a veteran-owned
small business concern.
(c) Agreement. A veteran-owned small
business concern agrees that in the
performance of the contract, in the case of a
contract for—
(1) Services (except construction), at least
50 percent of the cost of personnel for
contract performance will be spent for
employees of the concern or employees of
other eligible veteran-owned small business
concerns;
(2) Supplies (other than acquisition from a
nonmanufacturer of the supplies), at least 50
percent of the cost of manufacturing,
excluding the cost of materials, will be
performed by the concern or other eligible
veteran-owned small business concerns;
(3) General construction, at least 15 percent
of the cost of the contract performance
incurred for personnel will be spent on the
concern’s employees or the employees of
other eligible veteran-owned small business
concerns; or
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(4) Construction by special trade
contractors, at least 25 percent of the cost of
the contract performance incurred for
personnel will be spent on the concern’s
employees or the employees of other eligible
veteran-owned small business concerns.
(d) A joint venture may be considered a
veteran-owned small business concern if—
(1) At least one member of the joint venture
is a veteran-owned small business concern,
and makes the following representations:
That it is a veteran-owned small business
concern, and that it is a small business
concern under the NAICS code assigned to
the procurement;
(2) Each other concern is small under the
size standard corresponding to the NAICS
code assigned to the procurement;
(3) The joint venture meets the
requirements of paragraph 7 of the
explanation of Affiliates in 19.101 of the
Federal Acquisition Regulation; and
(4) The joint venture meets the
requirements of 13 CFR 125.15(b), except that
the principal company may be a veteranowned small business concern or a servicedisabled veterans-owned small business
concern.
(e) Any veteran-owned small business
concern (nonmanufacturer) must meet the
requirements in 19.102(f) of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation to receive a benefit
under this program.
(End of Clause)
35. Section 852.219–71 is added to
read as follows:
852.219–71
´ ´
VA Mentor-Protege Program.
As prescribed in 819.7115(a), insert
the following clause:
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
´ ´
VA Mentor-Protege Program (Date)
(a) Large businesses are encouraged to
´ ´
participate in the VA Mentor-Protege
Program for the purpose of providing
developmental assistance to eligible servicedisabled veteran-owned small businesses and
veteran-owned small businesses to enhance
the small businesses’ capabilities and
increase their participation as VA prime
contractors and as subcontractors.
(b) The program consists of:
(1) Mentor firms, which are prime
contractors capable of providing
developmental assistance;
´ ´
(2) Protege firms, which are servicedisabled veteran-owned small business
concerns or veteran-owned small business
concerns; and
´ ´
(3) Mentor-Protege Agreements approved
by the VA Office of Small and Disadvantaged
Business Utilization.
(c) Mentor participation in the program
means providing business developmental
´ ´
assistance to aid Proteges in developing the
requisite expertise to effectively compete for
and successfully perform VA prime contracts
and subcontracts.
(d) Large business prime contractors
´ ´
serving as Mentors in the VA Mentor-Protege
Program are eligible for an incentive for
subcontracting plan credit. VA will recognize
the costs incurred by a Mentor firm in
´ ´
providing assistance to a Protege firm and
apply those costs for purposes of determining
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Aug 19, 2008
Jkt 214001
whether the mentor firm attains its
subcontracting plan participation goals under
a VA contract. The amount of credit given to
´ ´
a Mentor firm for these Protege
developmental assistance costs shall be
calculated on a dollar-for-dollar basis and
reported by the large business prime
contractor via the Electronic Subcontracting
Reporting System (eSRS).
(e) Contractors interested in participating
in the program are encouraged to contact the
VA Office of Small and Disadvantaged
Business Utilization for more information.
(End of Clause)
36. Section 852.219–72 is added to
read as follows:
852.219–72 Evaluation Factor for
´ ´
Participation in the VA Mentor-Protege
Program.
As prescribed in 819.7115(b), insert
the following clause:
Evaluation Factor for Participation in
´ ´
the VA Mentor-Protege Program (Date)
This solicitation contains an evaluation
factor or sub-factor regarding participation in
´ ´
the VA Mentor-Protege Program. In order to
receive credit under the evaluation factor or
sub-factor, the offeror must provide with its
proposal a copy of a signed letter issued by
the VA Office of Small and Disadvantaged
Business Utilization approving the offeror’s
´ ´
Mentor-Protege Agreement.
(End of Clause)
37. Section 852.228–72 is added to
read as follows:
852.228–72 Assisting Service-Disabled
Veteran-owned and Veteran-owned Small
Businesses in Obtaining Bonds.
As prescribed in 828.106–71, insert
the following clause:
Assisting Service-Disabled VeteranOwned Small Businesses and VeteranOwned Small Businesses in Obtaining
Bonds (Date)
Prime contractors are encouraged to assist
service-disabled veteran-owned and veteranowned small business potential
subcontractors in obtaining bonding, when
required. Mentor firms are encouraged to
´ ´
assist Protege firms under VA’s Mentor´ ´
Protege Program in obtaining acceptable bid,
payment, and performance bonds, when
required, as a prime contractor under a
solicitation or contract and in obtaining any
required bonds under subcontracts.
(End of Provision)
[FR Doc. E8–19261 Filed 8–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
49155
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY BOARD
49 CFR Part 830
Notification and Reporting of Aircraft
Accidents or Incidents and Overdue
Aircraft, and Preservation of Aircraft
Wreckage, Mail, Cargo, and Records
National Transportation Safety
Board (NTSB).
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On March 31, 2008, the NTSB
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to amend its regulations
concerning notification and reporting
requirements with regard to unmanned
aircraft accidents, found at 49 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 830,
‘‘Notification and Reporting of Aircraft
Accidents or Incidents and Overdue
Aircraft, and Preservation of Aircraft
Wreckage, Mail, Cargo, and Records.’’
This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is
available at 73 FR 16826 (Mar. 31,
2008). The NTSB is publishing this
notice to inform the public that it is
extending the comment period for the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
September 30, 2008.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
September 30, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send written
comments using any of the following
methods:
1. Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
2. Mail: Mail comments concerning
this proposed rule to Dana Schuize, AS–
b, National Transportation Safety Board,
490 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington,
DC 20594–2000.
3. Fax: (202) 314–6319, Attention:
Dana Schuize.
4. Hand Delivery: 6th Floor, 490
L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Dana Schuize, Office of Aviation Safety,
(202) 314–6323.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: After
issuing the March 31, 2008, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking concerning
unmanned aircraft accidents, the NTSB
discovered that a problem existed with
the Web site, available at https://
www.regulations.gov, that the NTSB
listed in the Notice as one mechanism
by which it would receive public
comments. In particular, the NTSB
subsequently determined that
commenters were unable to submit
comments through that Web site. The
E:\FR\FM\20AUP1.SGM
20AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 20, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49141-49155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19261]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
48 CFR Parts 802, 804, 808, 809, 810, 813, 815, 819, 828, and 852
RIN 2900-AM92
VA Acquisition Regulation: Supporting Veteran-Owned and Service-
Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement portions of the Veterans
Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 and
Executive Order 13360, Providing Opportunities for Service-Disabled
Veteran Businesses to Increase Their Federal Contracting and
Subcontracting. The Public Law and Executive Order authorize the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to establish special methods for
contracting with service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses
(SDVOSBs) and veteran-owned small businesses (VOSBs). Under this
proposed rule, a VA contracting officer could restrict competition in
contracting for SDVOSBs or VOSBs under certain conditions. Likewise,
sole source contracts with SDVOSBs or VOSBs would be permitted under
certain conditions. The proposed rule would implement these special
acquisition methods as a change to the VA Acquisition Regulation
(VAAR).
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted on or before
October 20, 2008 to be considered in the formulation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273-9026.
Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to ``RIN
2900-AM92--VA Acquisition Regulation: Supporting Veteran-Owned and
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses.'' All comments
received will be available for public inspection in the Office of
Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1063B, between the hours of 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please
call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment. This is not a toll-free number.
In addition, during the comment period, comments are available online
through the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at
www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Derek Underwood, Acquisition Policy
Division (049P1A), Office of Acquisition and Logistics, Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC, 20420,
telephone number (202) 461-6865 (not a toll-free number) or e-mail
Derek.Underwood@va.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
VA's mission is to serve veterans. Buying from SDVOSBs and VOSBs
directly supports VA's mission. Supporting service-disabled veterans
who own businesses contributes significantly in restoring their quality
of life while enhancing transition from active duty to civilian life.
Such acquisitions maintain the socioeconomic well-being of the Nation
and carry out VA's strategic goals. Section 1.102-2(d) of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (codified at 48 CFR chapter 1) provides
that the Federal Acquisition System ``must support the attainment of
public policy goals adopted by the Congress and the President.'' It is
public policy, as expressed in 15 U.S.C. 637 and 644 that SDVOSBs and
VOSBs, among others, shall have the maximum practicable opportunity to
participate in the
[[Page 49142]]
performance of contracts let by any Federal agency.
Sections 502 and 503 of Public Law 109-461, the Veterans Benefits,
Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006, (codified at 38
U.S.C. 8127 and 8128) contain provisions that authorize VA to create a
unique procurement program among Federal agencies. This program would
permit VA contracting officers to conduct acquisition actions limited
to SDVOSBs or VOSBs for the Department's requirements. The law requires
the Secretary to give priority to a small business concern owned and
controlled by veterans.
On October 20, 2004, the President issued Executive Order 13360,
Providing Opportunities for Service-Disabled Veteran Businesses to
Increase Their Federal Contracting and Subcontracting. The Executive
Order directs the heads of agencies to significantly increase
opportunities for service-disabled veteran businesses in Federal prime
contracting and subcontracting actions. To achieve that objective, the
Executive Order requires agencies to more effectively implement section
15(g) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)) through various
efforts, including the development of a strategic plan to implement
Executive Order 13360. VA has developed its strategic plan, which is
posted at the following Internet Web site: https://www.vetbiz.gov/fpp/
fpp.htm.
VA proposes to amend the VAAR to implement the changes required by
38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128 and some rulemaking aspects of VA's strategic
plan for Executive Order 13360. Specifically, this proposed rule would
allow VA contracting officers to:
Under certain conditions, permit non-competitive sourcing
under the simplified acquisition threshold with SDVOSBs or VOSBs.
Require set-asides for SDVOSBs or VOSBs above the
simplified acquisition threshold when the contracting officer has a
reasonable expectation that two or more eligible SDVOSBs or VOSBs will
submit offers and that the award can be made at a fair and reasonable
price that offers the best value to the United States.
Under certain conditions, permit non-competitive sourcing
for SDVOSBs or VOSBs above the simplified acquisition threshold when
the contracting officer determines that a fair and reasonable price
will be obtained as a result of negotiations for requirements not to
exceed $5 million.
Include evaluation factors in negotiated acquisitions that
give preference to SDVOSBs and VOSBs and preference to offerors who
propose to include such businesses as subcontractors.
Require offerors who propose to use SDVOSBs or VOSBs as
subcontractors to utilize eligible businesses.
Require VOSBs participating in the Department's
acquisitions to register in VetBiz.gov's Vendor Information Pages (VIP)
database and verify that the business meets eligibility requirements.
Establish a VA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program and
give large businesses that participate in the program a preference in
the award of VA prime contracts.
Encourage prime contractors and mentors to assist SDVOSBs
and VOSBs in obtaining bonding when required.
Revise the eligibility definition for ``service-disabled
veteran-owned small business concerns'' to include a spouse who obtains
ownership rights upon the death of a 100 percent service-disabled
veteran or a veteran who died as a direct result of a service-connected
injury for a period of 10 years unless the spouse remarries or sells
the interest in the business.
Recommend debarment of any business that willfully or
deliberately misrepresents ownership and control of the business for
purposes of registering in the VetBiz.gov Vendor Information Pages
database or other Federal databases.
Under certain conditions, authorize Contracting Officers
to acquire supplies and services from SDVOSBs and VOSBs in lieu of
Federal Prison Industries (FPI) and the Government Printing Office
(GPO).
Section 802.101 Definitions
In proposed section 802.101, VA adopts and incorporates various
statutory definitions. FAR 2.101 defines ``service-disabled veteran-
owned small business (SDVOSB) concern'' and ``veteran-owned small
business (VOSB) concern.'' Prime and subcontracting actions conducted
under the authority of 38 U.S.C. 8127, as implemented in VAAR subpart
819.70, revise the definition of ``service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concern'' and require that SDVOSBs and VOSBs must be
registered in the Vendor Information Pages (VIP) and that the ownership
and control of such businesses has been verified by VA. In addition,
section 8127(h) enables a surviving spouse who obtains ownership rights
to a business upon the death of a veteran with a service-connected
disability rated at 100 percent, or a veteran who dies as a direct
result of a service-connected disability, to have VA treat the business
as a ``service-disabled veteran-owned small business'' for a 10-year
period after the death of the veteran, unless the surviving spouse
remarries, sells the interest in the business or the business outgrows
the small business size standards. This section also includes a
definition of VIP.
Section 804.1102 Vendor Information Pages
FAR 4.1102 currently requires all businesses to be registered in
the Central Contractor Registration (CCR). Proposed section 804.1102
would require VOSBs, including SDVOSBs, to register in the VIP
database, available at https://www.VetBiz.gov, in order to be eligible
to participate in set-asides for SDVOSBs and VOSBs issued by VA
contracting officers. In completing registration, businesses would
provide information establishing that the business is owned and
controlled by eligible parties, according to the criteria defined in 38
U.S.C. 8127 and FAR 19.1403.
Section 808.603 Purchase Priorities
Under certain conditions, this section would authorize contracting
officers to purchase supplies and services produced or provided by FPI
from eligible SDVOSBs and VOSBs, in accordance with procedures set
forth in proposed VAAR subpart 819.70, without seeking a waiver from
FPI. We interpret section 8128 and the legislative history to mean that
SDVOSBs and VOSBs must receive priority in VA contracting opportunities
without regard to other provisions of law concerning contracting
preferences. This interpretation conflicts with the current contracting
priorities in law, and as implemented in the FAR, for Federal agencies
buying from FPI. VA finds that section 8128, being directly applicable
solely to VA and providing authority without regard to any other
provision of law, requires VA contracting officers to have the
authority to override other statutory contracting preferences to
provide priority to SDVOSBs and VOSBs to meet VA's socioeconomic goals
for such concerns. Therefore, proposed section 808.603 is the only
means available to VA to implement the requirement in section 8128 that
veterans' small businesses have priority in VA acquisitions that would
normally be awarded under FPI.
Section 808.803 Priority for Acquisition of Printing and Related
Supplies
This section would authorize contracting officers to acquire
government printing from eligible service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses and veteran-owned small businesses, in accordance with
[[Page 49143]]
procedures set forth in VAAR subpart 819.70, in lieu of the Government
Printing Office (GPO). We interpret section 8128 and the relevant
legislative history as authorizing VA to give priority in contracting
to SDVOSBs and VOSBs without regard to other provisions of law
concerning contracting preferences. This interpretation conflicts with
the current contracting priority in law, and as implemented in the FAR,
which provides that Federal agencies buying printing services must
procure such services from GPO. VA finds that section 8128, being
directly applicable solely to VA and providing authority for priority
in VA contracting without regard to any other provision of law,
requires VA contracting officers to have the authority to override the
statutory contracting preference for GPO services and instead provide
priority in contracting to SDVOSBs and VOSBs for printing services and
related supplies. Therefore, proposed section 808.803 is the only means
available to VA to implement section 8128.
Section 809.406-2 Causes for Debarment
FAR 9.406-2 lists several reasons for which a debarring official
may initiate a debarment action. Proposed VAAR 809.406-2 adds one
additional reason: misrepresentation of status as an SDVOSB or a VOSB,
in accordance with section 8127(g).
Section 810.001 Market Research Policy
FAR 10.001 requires agencies to conduct market research on an
ongoing basis and to effectively identify the capabilities of small
businesses to meet agency requirements. VAAR section 810.001 would
establish that, when conducting market research, VA contracting teams
shall use the VIP database, in addition to other sources of
information.
Section 810.002 Market Research Procedures
This section would require contracting officers to record VIP
queries in the solicitation file.
Section 813.106 Soliciting Competition, Evaluation of Quotations or
Offers, Award and Documentation
This section would clarify that contracting officers may use other
than competitive procedures to enter into a contract with an SDVOSB or
VOSB when the amount is less than the simplified acquisition threshold
not to exceed $5 million. Contracting officers would give first
consideration to SDVOSBs.
Section 813.202 Purchase Guidelines
FAR 13.202(a)(1) provides that, to the extent practicable, open
market micro-purchases shall be distributed equitably among qualified
suppliers. The set-aside provisions of FAR Part 19 do not apply to
micro-purchases. However, in accordance with sections 8127 and 8128, VA
would make an exception to this FAR requirement when supplies are
available from SDVOSBs or VOSBs. We would add section 813.202 to allow
preference for SDVOSB and VOSB sources when making local open market
micro-purchases using the purchase card. In such cases, equitable
distribution of open market micro-purchases among all qualified
suppliers would not be required. Instead, open market micro-purchases
would be equitably distributed among all qualified SDVOSBs or VOSBs,
respectively, to the maximum extent practicable. We believe that this
change would assist VA in meeting its statutory goals for award of
contracts to SDVOSBs and VOSBs.
Sections 815.304 and 852.215-70 Evaluation Factors and Significant
Subfactors
To implement sections 8127 and 8128, VA would add sections 815.304
and 852.215-70 to require VA contracting officers to: (1) Include
provisions in negotiated solicitations giving preference to offers
received from VOSBs and additional preference to offers received from
SDVOSBs; (2) use past performance in meeting SDVOSB subcontracting
goals as a non-price evaluation factor in selecting offers for award;
(3) use the proposed inclusion of SDVOSBs or VOSBs as subcontractors as
an evaluation factor when competitively negotiating the award of
contracts or task or delivery orders; and (4) consider participation in
VA's Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program as an evaluation factor when
competitively negotiating the award of contracts or task or delivery
orders. VA is particularly interested in receiving comments on the
proposed mandatory inclusion of evaluation preferences for SDVOSBs and
VOSBs in negotiated acquisitions.
Section 815.304-70 Evaluation Factor Commitments
In accordance with section 8127(a)(4), we propose to require prime
contractors who offer to use one or more SDVOSBs or VOSBs as
subcontractors in accordance with proposed section 852.215-70, Veteran-
Owned Small Business Evaluation Factors, to actually use those
subcontractors or to replace any proposed subcontractor who is not used
for the specified subcontract with another SDVOSB or VOSB
subcontractor. This subsection would be implemented under proposed new
sections 815.304-70 and 852.215-71. Further, this subsection would help
ensure that SDVOSBs and VOSBs receive subcontract awards under VA prime
contracts, as prime contractors will be required to report only
utilization of companies appearing in the VIP database as ``verified''
to be owned and controlled by eligible veterans or surviving spouses.
Section 815.304-71 Solicitation Clauses
This section would prescribe insertion of certain contract clauses
in acquisitions from SDVOSBs and VOSBs, including section 852.215-70,
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned Small Business
Evaluation Factors, and section 852.215-71, Evaluation Factor
Commitments, for applicable solicitations and contracts.
Section 819.201 General Policy
This section would authorize the Secretary to establish goals for
each fiscal year for participation in Department contracts by SDVOSBs
and VOSBs. Furthermore, in order to establish contracting priority for
veteran-owned and -controlled small businesses in accordance with
section 8128, the Secretary may decrease other status-specific small
business goals set forth by section 15(g)(1) of the Small Business Act
(15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)) upon consultation with the Administrator of the
U.S. Small Business Administration.
Section 819.307 Protests
FAR 19.307 contains instructions for processing protests of status
as a SDVOSB concern. Section 8127 contains additional eligibility
criteria for VA's processing of protests and authorizes VA to conduct
VOSB set-asides. Proposed VAAR section 819.307 would address protest
procedures and other information specific to VA's unique acquisition
program.
Section 819.704 Subcontracting Plan Requirements
In accordance with section 8127, proposed section 819.704 would
require contracting officers to include suggested subcontracting goals
in acquisitions that may require a subcontracting plan. To receive
subcontracting plan accomplishment credit for subcontracting with
SDVOSBs and VOSBs, prime contractors would be
[[Page 49144]]
required to use eligible businesses identified in the VIP database.
Section 819.705 Appeals of Contracting Officer Decisions
This section would prescribe procedures for appeals of VA
contracting officers' SDVOSB set-aside decisions, VOSB set-aside
decisions, and prime contractor credits for subcontracting.
Section 819.709 Contract Clause
This section would require contracting officers to insert the
clause in section 852.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan Minimum
Requirements, for solicitations and contracts that include the FAR
clause at 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.
Subpart 819.70 Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned Small
Business Acquisition Program
This subpart would establish sole source contracting procedures for
acquisitions under $5 million and create a new set-aside program for
SDVOSBs and VOSBs.
Subpart 819.71 VA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program
In accordance with paragraph (3)(a) of VA's Executive Order 13360
strategic plan, we propose to establish a SDVOSB mentor-
prot[eacute]g[eacute] program within VA under new subpart 819.71,
consisting of sections 819.7101 through 819.7115, and at sections
852.219-71 and 852.219-72. We propose to establish this program to help
SDVOSBs receive developmental support from VA prime contractors in
order to increase the base of SDVOSBs eligible to perform VA prime
contracts and to participate as subcontractors on VA prime contracts.
Sections 828.106-71, 828.106-72, and 852.228-72 Assisting Service-
Disabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned Small Businesses in Obtaining
Bonds
In accordance with paragraph (3)(f) of VA's Executive Order 13360
strategic plan, we propose to add new sections 828.106-71, 828.107-72,
and 852.228-72, to encourage prime contractors to assist SDVOSBs and
VOSBs in obtaining subcontractor performance and payment bonds and to
encourage mentor firms to assist prot[eacute]g[eacute] SDVOSBs and
VOSBs in obtaining acceptable bid, payment, and performance bonds as
prime contractors. The ability to obtain acceptable surety bonds is one
of the major concerns for small businesses in contracting with the
Federal government for construction.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This regulation may have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the law
provides that the Secretary shall give priority to small business
concerns owned and controlled by veterans. Service-disabled veteran-
owned small businesses (SDVOSBs) and veteran-owned small businesses
(VOSBs) may benefit from this regulation. Other small businesses may be
indirectly affected if a greater portion of VA's small business
contracts are awarded to SDVOSBs and VOSBs. However, this regulation
may result in an increase in VA contracts awarded to the overall total
of small businesses.
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) has been prepared
and submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603. Interested parties are
invited to submit comments on VA's regulatory flexibility analysis. The
analysis is as follows:
1. Description of the reasons why action by the agency is being
considered.
These proposed changes to the Veterans Affairs Acquisition
Regulation (VAAR) implement sections 502 and 503 of Public Law 109-461,
the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of
2006 (38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128). The changes will also implement the
rulemaking portions of VA's Strategic Plan for Executive Order 13360,
Providing Opportunities for Service-Disabled Veteran Businesses to
Increase Their Federal Contracting and Subcontracting (https://
www.vetbiz.gov/fpp/fpp.htm). VA exists to serve veterans, and buying
from SDVOSBs and VOSBs directly supports that mission. Such
acquisitions support the socioeconomic well-being of the Nation and
support VA's Strategic Goals. The proposed changes to the VA
Acquisition Regulation reflect the intent of Congress that VA fulfill
its special mission to serve veterans and enable them to realize the
American dream that they fought to protect, especially those who became
disabled while serving their country.
2. Succinct statement of the objectives of, and legal basis for,
the proposed rule.
Sections 502 and 503 of Public Law 109-461 require VA to create a
unique acquisition program among Federal agencies that permits
preferences for SDVOSBs and VOSBs. This proposed rule would permit VA
contracting officers to conduct acquisition actions with preferences
for SDVOSBs or VOSBs. Specifically, this proposed rule will allow VA
contracting officers to:
a. Under certain conditions, permit non-competitive sourcing under
the simplified acquisition threshold with SDVOSBs or VOSBs;
b. Require set-asides for SDVOSBs or VOSBs above the simplified
acquisition threshold when the contracting officer has a reasonable
expectation that two or more eligible SDVOSBs or VOSBs will submit
offers and that the award can be made at a fair and reasonable price
that offers the best value to the United States;
c. Under certain conditions, permit non-competitive sourcing for
SDVOSBs or VOSBs above the simplified acquisition threshold when the
contracting officer determines that a fair and reasonable price will be
obtained as a result of negotiations for requirements not to exceed $5
million;
d. Include evaluation factors in negotiated acquisitions that give
preference to SDVOSBs and VOSBs and preference to offerors who propose
to include such businesses as subcontractors;
e. Require offerors who propose to use SDVOSBs or VOSBs as
subcontractors to utilize eligible businesses;
f. Require VOSBs participating in the Department's acquisitions to
register in VetBiz.gov's Vendor Information Pages (VIP) database and
verify that the business meets eligibility requirements;
g. Establish a VA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program and give
large businesses that participate in the program a preference in the
award of VA prime contracts;
h. Encourage prime contractors and mentors to assist SDVOSBs and
VOSBs in obtaining bonding when required;
i. Recommend debarment of any business that willfully or
deliberately misrepresents ownership and control of the business for
purposes of registering in the VetBiz.gov VIP database or other federal
databases; and
j. Under certain conditions, acquire supplies and services from
SDVOSBs and VOSBs in lieu of FPI and GPO.
3. Description of, and, where feasible, estimate of the number of
small entities to which the proposed rule will apply.
VA cannot accurately determine how many concerns would be
participating in these SDVOSB/VOSB contract awards because there is
insufficient data on SDVOSBs/VOSBs that are ready and able to perform
under VA requirements to support a reasonable estimate.
To establish the likely number of SDVOSBs or VOSBs that may benefit
from VA's unique procurement authority there are two principal data
sources, the Central Contractor
[[Page 49145]]
Registration (CCR) database, in which a business must be listed to
receive a payment from a Federal agency, and VA's VetBiz.gov VIP
database. A CCR Dynamic Small Business Search query conducted on March
13, 2008, returned 40,163 VOSBs, including 11,465 SDVOSBs. A VIP query
returned 10,695 VOSBs, including 6,354 SDVOSBs. The VIP database
requires that businesses answer eligibility questions before they are
permitted to register their business. The CCR is a self-representation
database.
Under this proposed rule, VA contracting teams will be required to
give priority consideration to SDVOSBs and VOSBs when using other
contracting programs, like set-asides for the Historically
Underutilized Business (HUB) Zone Program or 8(a) Business Development
Program reserved actions or the Small Business Set-aside program. A CCR
Dynamic Small Business Search conducted on March 13, 2008, returned
13,848 active HUBZone firms. Of this population, 2,565, or 19 percent,
are also VOSBs. A search of active 8(a) businesses identified 9,822
current firms, which includes 1,285 VOSBs, or 14 percent of the total
population. There are 63,395 woman-owned small businesses (WOSBs) in
the Central Contractor Registration, of which 4,471 appear to also be
VOSBs. VA notes that the SBA is in the process of establishing a WOSB
set-aside program, making the percentage of WOSBs who are also VOSB
eligible of interest to the Department.
There are some concerns that the proposed rule will displace
business opportunities for non-veteran-owned businesses, based on the
following speculations:
Additional businesses may be opened by veterans seeking to
participate in the sole source or set-aside procurement actions;
Veteran-owned small businesses not currently in the
Federal market may be expected to explore selling to VA;
The VOSB population may increase as these businesses
register in the VetBiz.gov VIP database;
Public Law 109-461 procurement authority also requires
that VA's large prime contractors use eligible businesses in order to
receive subcontracting program credit for VOSBs and SDVOSBs; and
On June 6, 2008, the Office of Federal Procurement Policy
issued new guidance regarding Interagency Agreements. Under this
policy, other Federal agencies with which VA executes such agreements
will be governed by the procurement rules contained in this regulation.
In FY 2007, interagency acquisitions were approximately $15,444,709.39,
or 0.13% of total contract dollars.
The Department of Veterans Affairs has a strong commitment to
supporting all types of small businesses, as demonstrated in the
procurement chart below:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2006 FY 2007
-------------------------------------------------------------
($) (%) ($) (%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Procurement................................. 10,282,566,304 ........... 11,784,896,886 ...........
Total Small Business.............................. 3,028,055,461 29.45 3,878,901,724 32.91
Small and Disadvantaged Business.................. 507,442,123 4.93 603,502,602 5.12
8(a).............................................. 402,659,565 3.92 406,996,187 3.45
Woman-Owned Small Business........................ 513,104,216 4.99 573,355,381 4.87
Veteran-Owned Small Business...................... 666,825,417 6.49 1,193,853,547 10.13
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business..... 348,077,159 3.39 818,698,785 6.95
HUBZone........................................... 336,856,889 3.28 381,875,493 3.24
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The preliminary Total Small Business procurement for FY2007 was
$3,878,901,724.00 or 32.91%. Procurement totals for SDVOSBs and VOSBs
were $2,012,552,332.00 or 17.08% and procurement totals for non-
veteran-owned businesses were $1,965,729,663.00 or 16.68%, a mere .40%
difference. Although, SDVOSBs and VOSBs gained 7.2% of procurements
from FY2006 to FY2007 and non-veteran-owned businesses lost .44% of
procurements, the non-veteran-owned businesses still received increased
procurement dollars totaling $205,666,870.00 from FY2006 to FY2007.
Assuming this trend and/or this new procurement authority does increase
procurement percentages for SDVOSBs and VOSBs and the procurement
percentages for non-veteran-owned businesses decrease, as previously
demonstrated from FY2006 to FY2007, the contracting dollars and/or
opportunities for non-veteran-owned businesses were not adversely
impacted economically. VA also estimates that it would be unrealistic
for SDVOSBs and VOSBs to absorb the entire 16.68% of procurements that
are currently being awarded to the non-veteran-owned businesses. The
SDVOSBs and VOSBs are more likely to sub-contract with the non-veteran-
owned businesses with existing contracts rather than investing in
costly business expansions. Based on prior procurement trends, VA
believes there would not be an adverse economic impact on non-veteran-
owned businesses, but requests comment from the public on other
possible impacts this rule may have on small entities.
This rule also creates a Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program for
SDVOSBs and VOSBs. It is the expectation that at such time as this rule
is finalized, those Prot[eacute]g[eacute] entities would directly
benefit from the forms of Mentoring described in this proposed rule. VA
believes there would not be an adverse economic impact on small
contractors or subcontractors, but requests comment from the public on
other possible impacts this rule may have on small entities. Comments
will be used as a factual basis upon which VA would certify that this
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
For the reasons outlined above, given the relatively small number
of businesses owned and controlled by veterans in the Federal
marketplace and with the understanding that this rule would apply only
to VA and its large prime contractors, VA believes this rule would not
have a major impact on small entities doing business in the Federal
marketplace.
VA welcomes comments concerning the potential number of small
entities that could become eligible under this rule. VA also
specifically requests comments concerning the rule's impact on small
entities that are not VOSBs.
4. Description of projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of the proposed rule, including an estimate of
the classes of small entities which will be subject to the requirement
and the type of professional skills necessary for preparation of the
report or record.
[[Page 49146]]
There are two categories of coverage in this proposed rule that
could potentially require the collection of information from
contractors. VA will collect information from prime contractors seeking
a preference for subcontracting with SDVOSBs or VOSBs. That information
would include identity of the SDVOSBs or VOSBs, the approximate dollar
value of the proposed subcontracts, and confirmation that the proposed
subcontractors are eligible SDVOSBs or VOSBs as verified by the
VetBiz.gov VIP database. VA estimates the cost to an individual
business to be less than $100.00 for 70-75% of the businesses seeking
verification, and the average cost to the entire population of veterans
seeking to become verified is less than $325.00 on average. VA also
will collect information in conjunction with preferences associated
with the VA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program. That information
would include the program agreement, developmental plan, and reports on
the success of the program.
5. Identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant
Federal rules which may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
proposed rule.
The VAAR (48 CFR chapter 8) supplements the FAR (48 CFR chapter 1).
This proposed rule would affect 48 CFR parts 802, 804, 808, 809, 810,
813, 815, 819, 828, and 852 and corresponding parts of the FAR.
6. Description of any significant alternatives to the proposed rule
which would accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and
which would minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed
rule on small entities. This proposed rule is designed to benefit
SDVOSBs and VOSBs. There are no alternatives which would accomplish the
stated objectives of sections 502 and 503 of Public Law 109-461 to give
contracting priority to SDVOSBs and VOSBs.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive
Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) unless OMB waives such
review, as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule
that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter
the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed rule have been examined, and it has been
determined to be a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 because it is likely to result in a rule that may raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or principles set forth in the Executive Order.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before developing any rule that may result in an expenditure
by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any given year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, or tribal governments, or the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521), collections of information are contained in this proposed rule.
These collections are contained in new sections that were not
previously contained in the VAAR. This notice is to obtain an OMB
control number for these new sections. As required under section
3507(d) of the Act, VA has submitted a copy of this rulemaking action
to OMB for its review of the collection of information.
OMB assigns control numbers to collections of information it
approves. VA may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Comments on the collection of information should be submitted to
OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for the Department of Veterans Affairs,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503, with copies to the Director, Regulations
Management (00REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20420. Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AM92.''
There are categories of coverage in this proposed rule that could
potentially require the collection of information from contractors: (1)
Section 852.215-70, Veteran-Owned Small Business Evaluation Factors;
and (2) subpart 819.71, VA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program,
specifically sections 819.7101 through 819.7115 and the related clauses
at sections 852.219-71 and 852.219-72. There is no information
available upon which to judge the impact of these PRA requirements, but
since the provisions are limited to SDVOSBs and VOSBs, rather than to
all small businesses, collection efforts are estimated to be minimal.
Title and section number: 852.215-70, Veteran-Owned Small Business
Evaluation Factors.
Summary of collection of information: VA is proposing to give
preference to prime contractors who offer to subcontract with SDVOSBs
or VOSBs. VA must collect information from offerors regarding: (1)
Proposed SDVOSB and VOSB subcontractors; (2) the approximate dollar
value of the proposed subcontracts; and (3) eligibility of the proposed
subcontractors as verified in VetBiz.gov VIP database (https://
www.VetBiz.gov).
Description of need for information and proposed use of
information: The information is submitted on a voluntary basis by those
offerors who wish to qualify for this evaluation factor. The
information will be used by the contracting officer to determine
whether or not the offeror qualifies for extra credit in the selection
of the contract awardee. Those offerors who qualify will be afforded a
preference in the selection.
Description of likely respondents: Any offeror, on a negotiated
solicitation that includes the applicable evaluation factor, who
intends to subcontract with one or more SDVOSBs or VOSBs and who wishes
to obtain a preference in the award selection.
Estimated number of respondents: 125.
Estimated frequency of responses: 1 response for each solicitation.
Estimated average burden per collection: 5 minutes.
Estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden: 10
hours.
Title and section number: Subpart 819.71, VA Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program, subpart 819.71's related sections
[[Page 49147]]
819.7101 through 819.7115, and the related clauses at section 852.219-
71, VA Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program, and section 852.219-72,
Evaluation Factor for Participation in the VA Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program.
Summary of collection of information: VA is proposing to institute
a Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program, whereby a large business agrees
to provide developmental support to a VOSB or SDVOSB. VA must approve
the Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Agreement entered into by the two
parties, and VA requires both parties to report on the success of the
program. Mentors can qualify for additional preference on negotiated
solicitations by furnishing evidence of participation in the program
with their offer.
Description of need for information and proposed use of
information: The information is needed for the review and evaluation of
mentor applications for realism, validity, and accuracy of provided
information and for conducting a mid-term evaluation at the mid-point
interval to measure prot[eacute]g[eacute] progress against the
developmental plan contained in the approved agreement. The information
will also be used to evaluate the status of a business as a participant
in VA's Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program for possible credit in
negotiated contracts.
Description of likely respondents: Large business prime contractors
and SDVOSBs or VOSBs.
Estimated number of respondents: 50.
Estimated frequency of responses: Each prot[eacute]g[eacute]
program participant will be required to submit 3 sets of data
consisting of the application and the mid- and end-term reports. Each
mentor program participant will be required to submit 4 sets of data
consisting of the application, the mid- and end-term reports, and, when
submitting an offer, information to verify their participation in the
program in order to receive evaluation credit.
Estimated average burden per collection: 1 hour weighted average
per data submission.
Estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden: 200
hours (4 data submissions @ 1 hour each times 50 program participants).
The Department considers comments by the public on collections of
information in--
Evaluating whether the collections of information are
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility;
Evaluating the accuracy of the Department's estimate of
the burden of the collections of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimizing the burden of the collections of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
OMB is required to make a final decision concerning the collection
of information contained in this proposed rule between 30 and 60 days
after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore,
a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB
receives it within 30 days of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment on the proposed rule.
List of Subjects
48 CFR Parts 802, 804, 809, 810, 813, and 815
Government procurement, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
48 CFR Part 819
Administrative practice and procedure, Government procurement,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Small business, Veterans.
48 CFR Part 828
Government procurement, Insurance, Surety bonds.
48 CFR Part 852
Government procurement, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Approved: April 21, 2008.
James B. Peake,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the
Federal Register on August 15, 2008.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 48 CFR Chapter 8 as follows:
CHAPTER 8--DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Subchapter A--General
PART 802--DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
1. The authority citation for part 802 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and (d);
and 48 CFR 1.301-1.304.
2. Section 802.101 is amended by adding in alphabetical order the
following terms:
802.101 Definitions.
* * * * *
Service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern (SDVOSB) has
the same meaning as defined in FAR Part 2.101, except for businesses
participating in set-asides or subcontracts authorized by VAAR subpart
819.70. These businesses must be listed as verified on the Vendor
Information Pages (VIP) at https://www.vetbiz.gov. In addition, some
businesses may be owned and controlled by a surviving spouse.
* * * * *
Surviving Spouse means an individual who has been listed in the
Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) Veterans Benefits Administration
(VBA) database of veterans and family members. To be eligible for
inclusion in the VetBiz.gov VIP database, the following conditions must
apply:
(1) If the death of the veteran causes the small business concern
to be less than 51 percent owned by one or more service-disabled
veterans, the surviving spouse of such veteran who acquires ownership
rights in such small business shall, for the period described below, be
treated as if the surviving spouse were that veteran for the purpose of
maintaining the status of the small business concern as a service-
disabled veteran-owned small business.
(2) The period referred to above is the period beginning on the
date on which the veteran dies and ending on the earliest of the
following dates:
(i) The date on which the surviving spouse remarries;
(ii) The date on which the surviving spouse relinquishes an
ownership interest in the small business concern;
(iii) The date that is 10 years after the date of the veteran's
death; or
(iv) The date on which the business concern is no longer small
under Federal small business size standards.
(3) The veteran must have had a 100 percent service-connected
disability rating or the veteran died as a direct result of a service-
connected disability.
* * * * *
Vendor Information Pages (VIP) means the VetBiz.gov Vendor
Information Pages at https://www.vetbiz.gov.
Veteran-owned small business concern (VOSB) has the same meaning as
defined in FAR Part 2.101, except for businesses participating in set-
asides or subcontracts authorized by VAAR Part 819.7001. These
businesses must be
[[Page 49148]]
listed as verified on the VetBiz.gov VIP database.
* * * * *
PART 804--ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
3. The authority citation for part 804 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and (d);
and 48 CFR 1.301-1.304.
4. Section 804.1102 is added to read as follows:
804.1102 Vendor Information Pages (VIP) Database.
In addition to registering in the Central Contractor Registration
(CCR), all VOSBs, including SDVOSBs, must register in the VIP database,
available at https://www.VetBiz.gov, to be eligible to participate in
VA's Veteran-owned Small Business prime contracting and subcontracting
opportunities programs.
PART 808--REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
5. The authority citation for part 808 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and (d);
and 48 CFR 1.301-1.304.
6. Subpart 808.6 and section 808.603 are added to read as follows:
Subpart 808.6--Acquisition From Federal Prison Industries, Inc.
(FPI)
808.603 Purchase priorities.
Contracting officers may purchase supplies and services produced or
provided by FPI from eligible service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses and veteran-owned small businesses, in accordance with
procedures set forth in VAAR subpart 819.70, without seeking a waiver
from FPI, in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 8128, Small business concerns
owned and controlled by veterans: Contracting priority.
Subpart 808.8--Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies
7. Section 808.803 is added to read as follows:
808.803 Priority for acquisition of printing and related supplies.
Contracting officers may acquire government printing from eligible
service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses and veteran-owned small
businesses, in accordance with procedures set forth in VAAR subpart
819.70, in lieu of the Government Printing Office (GPO), in accordance
with 38 U.S.C. 8128, small business concerns owned and controlled by
veterans: Contracting priority (See FAR 8.802(a)(4)).
PART 809--CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS
8. The authority citation for part 809 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and (d);
and 48 CFR 1.301-1.304.
9. Section 809.406-2 is added to read as follows:
809.406-2 Cause for debarment.
Misrepresentations of VOSB or SDVOSB eligibility may result in
action taken by VA officials to debar the business concern for a period
not to exceed 5 years from contracting with VA as a prime contractor or
a subcontractor.
10. Part 810 is added to read as follows:
PART 810--MARKET RESEARCH
Sec.
810.001 Market research policy.
810.002 Market research procedures.
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and (d);
and 48 CFR 1.301-1.304.
810.001 Market research policy.
When conducting market research, VA contracting teams shall use the
VIP database, at https://www.VetBiz.gov, in addition to other sources of
information.
810.002 Market research procedures.
Contracting officers shall record VIP queries in the solicitation
file by printing the results of the search(es) along with specific
query used to generate the search(es).
PART 813--SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
11. The authority citation for part 813 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and (d);
and 48 CFR 1.301-1.304.
12. Section 813.106 is revised to read as follows:
813.106 Soliciting competition, evaluation of quotations or offers,
award and documentation.
Contracting officers may use other than competitive procedures to
enter into a contract with an SDVOSB or VOSB when the amount is less
than the simplified acquisition threshold. Contracting officers shall
give first consideration to SDVOSBs.
13. Section 813.202 is added to read as follows:
813.202 Purchase guidelines.
Open market micro-purchases shall be equitably distributed among
all qualified SDVOSBs or VOSBs, respectively, to the maximum extent
practicable.
PART 815--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
14. The authority citation for part 815 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40 U.S.C. 121(c); and 48 CFR
1.301-1.304.
15. Section 815.304 is added to read as follows:
815.304 Evaluation factors and significant subfactors.
(a) In an effort to assist SDVOSBs and VOSBs, contracting officers
shall include evaluation factors in competitively negotiated
solicitations that are not set aside for SDVOSBs or VOSBs.
(b) Additional consideration shall also be given to any offeror,
regardless of size status, that proposes to subcontract with SDVOSBs or
VOSBs.
16. Section 815.304-70 is added to read as follows:
815.304-70 Evaluation factor commitments.
(a) VA contracting officers shall:
(1) Include provisions in negotiated solicitations giving
preference to offers received from VOSBs and additional preference to
offers received from SDVOSBs;
(2) Use past performance in meeting SDVOSB subcontracting goals as
a non-price evaluation factor in selecting offers for award;
(3) Use the proposed inclusion of SDVOSBs or VOSBs as
subcontractors as an evaluation factor when competitively negotiating
the award of contracts or task or delivery orders; and
(4) Consider participation in VA's Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute]
Program as an evaluation factor when competitively negotiating the
award of contracts or task or delivery orders.
(b) If an offeror proposes to use an SDVOSB or VOSB subcontractor
in accordance with the clause at 852.215-70, Service-Disabled Veteran-
owned and Veteran-owned Small Business Evaluation Factors, the
contracting officer shall ensure that the offeror, if awarded the
contract, actually does use the proposed subcontractor or another
SDVOSB or VOSB subcontractor for that subcontract or for work of
similar value.
17. Section 815.304-71 is added to read as follows:
[[Page 49149]]
815.304-71 Solicitation provision and clause.
(a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 852.215-
70, Service-Disabled Veteran-owned and Veteran-owned Small Business
Evaluation Factors, in competitively negotiated solicitations that are
not set aside for SDVOSBs or VOSBs.
(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.215-71,
Evaluation Factor Commitments, in solicitations and contracts that
include the clause at 852.215-70, Service-Disabled Veteran-owned and
Veteran-owned Small Business Evaluation Factors.
PART 819--SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
18. The authority citation for part 819 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128; 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and (d); 48
CFR 1.301-1.304; and 15 U.S.C. 637(d)(4)(E).
Subpart 819.2--Policies
19. Section 819.201 is revised to read as follows:
819.201 General policy.
The Secretary shall establish goals for each fiscal year for
participation in Department contracts by SDVOSBs and VOSBs. In order to
establish contracting priority for veteran owned and controlled small
businesses in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 8128, the Secretary may
decrease other status-specific small business goals set forth by
section 15(g)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)) upon
consultation with the Administrator of the U.S. Small Business
Administration.
20. Section 819.307 is added to read as follows:
819.307 Protests.
For acquisitions under the authority of VAAR part 819.70, regarding
eligibility of SDVOSB and VOSB concerns, contracting officers shall
forward all protests to the Associate Administrator for Government
Contracting AA/GC, U.S. Small Business Administration (ATTN: Veterans
Business Program Protest), 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416,
for disposition.
21. Section 819.704 is added to read as follows:
819.704. Subcontracting plan requirements.
(a) The contracting officer shall ensure that any subcontracting
plans submitted by offerors include a goal that is at least
commensurate with the annual VA SDVOSB prime contracting goal for the
total value of planned subcontracts.
(b) The contracting officer shall ensure that any subcontracting
plans submitted by offerors include a goal that is at least
commensurate with the annual VA VOSB prime contracting goal for the
total value of all planned subcontracts.
(c) VA's Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization
(OSDBU) shall review all prime contractors' subcontracting plan
achievement reports to ensure that, in the case of a subcontract that
is counted for purposes of meeting a goal in accordance with
subparagraphs (a) and (b) above, the subcontract was actually awarded
to a business concern that is eligible to be counted toward meeting the
goal, as provided in VAAR 804.1102.
22. Section 819.705 is added as follows:
819.705 Appeal of Contracting Officer Decisions.
(a) Acquisitions not exceeding the SAT and sections 819.7007 and
819.7008 are excluded from this section.
(b) When an interested party intends to appeal a contracting
officer's decision to not use the set-aside authority contained in VAAR
819.70, the party shall notify the contracting officer, in writing, of
its intent to challenge the decision. The contracting officer has 5
working days to reply to the challenge by either revising the strategy
or indicating the rationale for not setting-aside the requirement. Upon
receipt of the decision, the interested party may appeal to the Head of
the Contracting Activity (HCA). Such appeal shall be filed within 5
working days of receipt of the contracting officer's decision. The HCA
has 5 working days to respond to the appeal. The contracting officer
shall suspend action on the acquisition unless the HCA makes a written
determination that urgent circumstances exist which would significantly
affect the interests of the Government. The decision of the HCA shall
be final.
(c) Prime contractors submitting businesses declared ineligible for
credit in SDVOSB and/or VOSB subcontracting plans may appeal to the
Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization
(OSDBU), within 5 working days of receipt of information declaring
their subcontractor ineligible. The Director, OSDBU, shall have 5
working days to respond. The decision of the Director, OSDBU, may be
appealed to the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) within 5 working
days. The SPE shall have 15 working days to respond and that decision
shall be final.
23. Section 819.709 is added to read as follows:
819.709 Contract clause.
The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.219-9, Small
Business Subcontracting Plan Minimum Requirements, in solicitations and
contracts that include the FAR clause at 52.219-9, Small Business
Subcontracting Plan.
24. Subpart 819.70 is revised to read as follows:
Subpart 819.70--Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned
Small Business Acquisition Program
819.7001 General.
(a) The Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology
Act of 2006 (38 U.S.C. 8127) created an acquisition program for small
business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans and
those owned and controlled by veterans for VA.
(b) The purpose of the program is to provide contracting assistance
to SDVOSBs and VOSBs.
819.7002 Applicability.
This subpart applies to VA contracting activities and to its prime
contractors.
819.7003 Eligibility.
(a) Eligibility of SDVOSBs and VOSBs continues to be governed by
the Small Business Administration regulations, 13 CFR subparts 125.8
through 125.13, as well as the FAR, except where expressly directed
otherwise by the VAAR, and 38 CFR verification regulations for SDVOSBs
and VOSBs.
(b) At the time of submission of offer, the offeror must represent
to the contracting officer that it is a--
(1) Service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern or
veteran-owned small business concern;
(2) Small business concern under the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code assigned to the acquisition; and
(3) Verified for eligibility in the Vendor Information Pages
database.
(c) A joint venture may be considered an SDVOSB or VOSB concern
if--
(1) At least one member of the joint venture is an SDVOSB or VOSB
concern, and makes the representations in paragraph (b) of this
section;
(2) Each other concern is small under the size standard
corresponding to the NAICS code assigned to the procurement;
[[Page 49150]]
(3) The joint venture meets the requirements of paragraph 7 of the
size standard explanation of Affiliates in FAR 19.101; and
(4) The joint venture meets the requirements of 13 CFR 125.15(b),
modified to include veteran-owned small businesses where this CFR
section refers to SDVOSB concerns.
(d) Any SDVOSB or VOSB concern (nonmanufacturer) must meet the
requirements in FAR 19.102(f) to receive a benefit under this program.
819.7004 Contracting order of priority.
In determining the acquisition strategy applicable to an
acquisition, the contracting officer shall consider, in the following
order of priority, contracting preferences that ensure contracts will
be awarded:
(a) To SDVOSBs;
(b) To VOSB, including but not limited to SDVOSBs;
(c) Pursuant to--
(1) Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(a)); or
(2) The Historically-Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) Program
(15 U.S.C. 657a); and
(d) Pursuant to any other small business contracting preference.
819.7005 Service-disabled veteran-owned small business set-aside
procedures.
(a) The contracting officer shall consider SDVOSB set-asides before
considering VOSB set-asides. Except as authorized by 819.7007 and
819.7008, the contracting officer shall set-aside an acquisition for
competition restricted to SDVOSB concerns upon a reasonable expectation
that--
(1) Offers will be received from two or more eligible SDVOSB
concerns; and
(2) Award will be made at a fair and reasonable price.
(b) When conducting SDVOSB set-asides, the contracting officer
shall ensure--
(1) Eligibility is extended to businesses owned and operated by
surviving spouses; and
(2) Businesses are registered and verified as eligible in Vendor
Information Pages prior to making an award.
(c) If the contracting officer receives only one acceptable offer
at a fair and reasonable price from an eligible SDVOSB concern in
response to a SDVOSB set-aside, the contracting officer should make an
award to that concern. If the contracting officer receives no
acceptable offers from eligible SDVOSB concerns, the set-aside shall be
withdrawn and the requirement, if still valid, set aside for VOSB
competition, if appropriate.
819.7006 Veteran-owned small business set-aside procedures.
(a) The contracting officer shall consider SDVOSB set-asides before
considering VOSB set-asides. Except as authorized by 819.7007 and
819.7008, the contracting officer shall set aside an acquisition for
competition restricted to VOSB concerns upon a reasonable expectation
that--
(1) Offers will be received from two or more eligible VOSB
concerns; and
(2) Award will be made at a fair and reasonable price.
(b) If the contracting officer receives only one acceptable offer
at a fair and reasonable price from an eligible VOSB concern in
response to a VOSB set-aside, the contracting officer should make an
award to that concern. If the contracting officer receives no
acceptable offers from eligible VOSB concerns, the set-aside shall be
withdrawn and the requirement, if still valid, set aside for other
small business programs, as appropriate.
(c) When conducting VOSB set-asides, the contracting officer shall
ensure the business is registered and verified as eligible in the
Vendor Information Pages prior to making an award.
819.7007. Sole source awards to service-disabled veteran-owned small
business concerns.
(a) A contracting officer may award contracts to SDVOSB concerns on
a sole source basis provided--
(1) The anticipated award price of the contract (including options)
will not exceed $5 million;
(2) The requirement is synopsized in accordance with FAR part 5;
(3) The SDVOSB concern has been determined to be a responsible
contractor with respect to performance; and
(4) Award can be made at a fair and reasonable price.
(b) The contracting officer's determination whether to make a sole
source award is a business decision wholly within the discretion of the
contracting officer. A determination that only one service-disabled
veteran-owned small business concern is available to meet the
requirement is not required. No protest is authorized in connection
with the issuance or proposed issuance of a contract under this
section, on the basis that more than one service-disabled veteran-owned
small business concern is available to meet the requirement.
(c) When conducting a SDVOSB sole source acquisition, the
contracting officer shall ensure businesses are registered and verified
as eligible in the Vendor Information Pages prior to making an award.
819.7008 Sole source awards to veteran-owned small business concerns.
(a) A contracting officer may award contracts to VOSB concerns on a
sole source basis provided--
(1) The anticipated award price of the contract (including options)
will not exceed $5 million;
(2) The requirement is synopsized in accordance with FAR part 5;
(3) The VOSB concern has been determined to be a responsible
contractor with respect to performance;
(4) Award can be made at a fair and reasonable price; and
(5) No responsible SDVOSB concern has been identified.
(b) The contracting officer's determination whether to make a sole
source award is a business decision wholly within the