Sole Source Aquifer Designation of Conanicut Island, Narragansett Bay, RI, 47599-47600 [E8-18836]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 158 / Thursday, August 14, 2008 / Notices
Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR)
for the following: Lead and Copper
Rule; Minor Revisions; promulgated by
EPA January 12, 2000 (65 FR 1950),
Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection
Byproducts (Stage 2 DBPR); Final Rule;
promulgated by EPA January 4, 2006 (71
FR 388), Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface
Water Treatment (LT2); Final Rule;
promulgated by EPA January 5, 2006 (71
FR 654), Correction to the Stage 2
Disinfectants and Disinfection
Byproducts Rule; promulgated by EPA
January 27, 2006 (71 FR 4644) and
Correction to Stage 2; promulgated by
EPA June 29, 2006 (71 FR 37168), and
Correction to the LT2; promulgated by
EPA January 30, 2006 (71 FR 4968) and
Correction to the LT2; promulgated by
EPA February 6, 2006 (71 FR 6136).
The application demonstrates that
Puerto Rico has adopted drinking water
regulations which satisfy the NPDWRs
for the above. The USEPA has
determined that Puerto Rico’s
regulations are no less stringent than the
corresponding Federal Regulations and
that Puerto Rico continues to meet all
requirements for primary enforcement
responsibility as specified in 40 CFR
142.10.
Authority: Section 1413 of the Safe
Drinking Water Act, as amended, 40 U.S.C.
300g–2, and 40 CFR 142.10, 142.12(d) and
142.13.
Dated: July 25, 2008.
Alan J. Steinberg,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. E8–18837 Filed 8–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8704–7]
Sole Source Aquifer Designation of
Conanicut Island, Narragansett Bay, RI
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of determination.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Regional Administrator
of Region I of the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) has
determined, pursuant to section 1424(e)
of the Safe Drinking Water Act, that the
aquifer system that underlies Conanicut
Island, Rhode Island is the sole or
principal source of drinking water for
this area and if the aquifer system were
contaminated would create a significant
hazard to public health. As a result of
Sole Source Aquifer (SSA) designation,
federal financially-assisted projects over
the designated aquifer area will be
subject to EPA review to ensure that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Aug 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
these projects are designed and
constructed so that they do not
contaminate this aquifer so as to create
a significant hazard to public health.
Effective Date: This
determination shall become effective on
August 14, 2008.
DATES:
The data and record upon
which these findings are based are
available to the public and may be
inspected during normal business hours
at the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency—Region I, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, One Congress Street, Suite
1100, Boston, MA 02114–2023.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Douglas Heath, U.S. EPA—Region I at
the address above or at (617) 918–1585,
e-mail: heath.doug@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1424(e) of the Safe Drinking
Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 300h–3(e), states:
‘‘If the Administrator determines, on his
own initiative or petition, that an area
has an aquifer which is the sole or
principal drinking water source for the
area and which, if contaminated, would
create a significant hazard to public
health, he shall publish notice of that
determination in the Federal Register.
After the publication of any such notice,
no commitment for federal financial
assistance (through a grant, contract,
loan guarantee, or otherwise) may be
entered into for any project which the
Administrator determines may
contaminate such aquifer through a
recharge zone so as to create a
significant hazard to public health, but
a commitment for federal financial
assistance may, if authorized under
another provision of law, be entered
into to plan or design the project to
assure that it will not so contaminate
the aquifer.’’
On February 1, 2006, EPA Region I
received a petition from the North End
Concerned Citizens (NECC) requesting
the designation of the aquifer system
underlying Conanicut Island as a SSA.
NECC subsequently submitted a revised
petition. Among other things, the
revised petition removed references to
an original request that EPA review
closure plans for a landfill and the
location of a proposed Town Garage. On
August 17, 2007, EPA completed its
technical review of the completeness
and adequacy of the petition. On
February 13, 2008, EPA held a public
meeting in Jamestown and invited
public comment on the petition. The
public comment period closed on March
19, 2008.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47599
II. Basis for Determination
Among the factors considered by the
Regional Administrator as part of the
review and technical verification
process for designating an area under
section 1424(e) were:
1. The aquifer system underlying
Conanicut Island supplies the service
area population with 50% or more of its
drinking water needs. Approximately
57% of the island’s residents rely solely
on residential supply wells. The
remaining 43% of residents rely on
municipal water provided by the
Jamestown Water District (a portion of
which is also ground water extracted by
bedrock wells) with a peak flow of
400,000 gallons per day.
2. There is no physical, legal and/or
economical alternative drinking water
source or combination of sources to
meet all of the needs of the designated
service area.
3. The EPA finds that the petition
appropriately delineates the boundaries
of the aquifer project review and service
area. For purposes of this designation,
EPA finds the Conanicut Island Aquifer
System boundary is based on the mean
high tide line since this marks the
freshwater-saltwater boundary.
4. While the quality of the area’s
ground water is considered to be good,
it is vulnerable to contamination due to
the relatively thin soil cover and rapid
movement of ground water in fractured
rock, coupled with increasing
development and other land uses.
Recharge of the water supply is by
infiltration of precipitation over the
entire island. The designated area is
underlain primarily by a fractured
bedrock aquifer system. The aquifer
system is overlain by areas of glacial till
and soil deposits. Freshwater in bedrock
fractures under the island forms a lensshaped body that floats on saltwater as
its density is less than that of saltwater.
According to a 1997 study by the
University of Rhode Island, the
thickness of the freshwater lens is
estimated to range from a few tens of
feet near the shoreline to more than
500 feet in the central part of the island
under non-pumping conditions.
III. Description of the Conanicut Island
Aquifer System That Underlies
Conanicut Island
The Conanicut Island Aquifer System
is a nine-square-mile island located in
Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. The
island is divided into three land masses:
North Island, Central Island, and
Beavertail Peninsula. North Island rises
to an elevation of about 140 feet above
sea level and is characterized by parallel
ridges running north-south which create
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
47600
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 158 / Thursday, August 14, 2008 / Notices
the Jamestown Brook Watershed. To the
south, separated by Great Creek and
extensive wetlands, is the Central Town
area. The Central Island area is
comprised of gently rolling hills up to
100 feet elevation with bedrock
outcrops in the Dumplings and Fort
Wetherill area. To the southwest is the
Beavertail Peninsula rising to an
elevation of 125 feet. The peninsula is
connected to the rest of the island by a
sandy isthmus called Mackerel Cove
Beach.
The average annual precipitation is
approximately 43 inches. The island’s
climate is moderated by the waters of
Narragansett Bay and the Atlantic
Ocean.
Conanicut Island’s bedrock is
terrestrial metasedimentary rock of
Pennsylvanian age (approximately
300 million years old) in the north and
the Cambrian-age Conanicut group in
the center of the island and on
Beavertail. Originally deposited as
sediments ranging from coarse-grained
gravel to fine-grained silt, these
materials hardened over time into
metamorphic rocks. Fort Wetherill on
the southeastern portion of the island is
underlain by Proterozoic Newport
Formation granites. These are overlain
by poorly-sorted glacial till ranging from
0 to about 45 feet in thickness. Because
the rock and till transmit water very
slowly, seasonally-high water table
conditions occur throughout much of
the island.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
IV. Information Utilized in
Determination
The information utilized in this
determination includes: The petition
and supporting documents submitted by
the NECC, letters received before and
during the public comment period, and
public comments received during the
public hearing. In addition, much of the
information has been derived from
published literature on the
hydrogeology and water resources of the
region. This information is available to
the public and may be inspected at the
EPA Region I office in Boston,
Massachusetts (address listed above).
The petition and support document and
EPA’s response summary to public
comment are also available at the
Jamestown Public Library in Jamestown,
Rhode Island.
V. Summary and Discussion of Public
Comments
Most comments received were in
favor of the designation. Written
comments in support were received
from the Honorable Lincoln Chaffee,
U.S. Senate; Senate Majority Leader M.
Teresa Paiva Weed and House Deputy
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 Aug 13, 2008
Jkt 214001
Minority Whip Bruce J. Long of the
Rhode Island General Assembly; the
Rhode Island Department of Health; the
Rhode Island Department of
Environmental Management; and 36
residents/households of Jamestown. On
March 11, 2008, a majority of the
Jamestown Conservation Commission
voted to support the petition. On March
17, 2008, a majority of the Town
Council approved a motion to support
SSA designation. EPA received five
written comments expressing
opposition to the designation. Among
these were letters from two members of
the Town Council.
EPA has addressed the written
comments received in a Responsiveness
Summary, which is part of the record of
this decision. The Responsiveness
Summary is available at the EPA Region
I offices and at the Jamestown Public
Library.
VI. Project Review
After the effective date of this
designation, EPA will evaluate projects
within the designation area that include
federal financial assistance to determine
whether the project may contaminate
the aquifer so as to create a significant
hazard to public health. Where
practicable, EPA will offer comments as
to how the project may be designed to
protect the aquifer. EPA anticipates that
few future projects will trigger SSA
review. Where review is required, EPA
will coordinate with state and local
agencies and the project’s developers.
EPA will give their comments full
consideration. Through its review, EPA
will attempt to complement and support
state and local ground water protection
measures. Although the project review
process cannot be delegated, EPA will
rely to the maximum extent possible on
any existing or future state and/or local
control measures to protect the quality
of ground water in the review area. EPA
also will work to integrate any review
with related reviews required pursuant
to other federal laws, such as the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) as amended 42 U.S.C. 4321, et
seq., to avoid delay or duplication of
effort.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of section 1427 of the Safe Drinking
Water Act as amended 42 U.S.C. 300h–3(e).
Dated: July 30, 2008.
Ira Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, USEPA
Region I.
[FR Doc. E8–18836 Filed 8–13–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Submitted for
Review to the Office of Management
and Budget, Comments Requested
August 6, 2008.
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burden and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520), the Federal Communications
Commission invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to comment
on the following information
collection(s). Comments are requested
concerning (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Commission, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act that does not
display a valid OMB control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should
be submitted on or before September 15,
2008. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the FCC contact listed below as
soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget (e-mail
address: nfraser@omb.eop.gov), and to
the Federal Communications
Commission’s PRA mailbox (e-mail
address: PRA@fcc.gov). Include in the
e-mails the OMB control number of the
collection as shown in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below or, if there is no OMB control
number, the Title as shown in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. If
you are unable to submit your
comments by email contact the person
listed below to make alternate
arrangements.
For
additional information contact Leslie F.
Smith via email at PRA@fcc.gov or at
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 158 (Thursday, August 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47599-47600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18836]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8704-7]
Sole Source Aquifer Designation of Conanicut Island, Narragansett
Bay, RI
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Regional Administrator of Region I of the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) has determined, pursuant to section 1424(e) of
the Safe Drinking Water Act, that the aquifer system that underlies
Conanicut Island, Rhode Island is the sole or principal source of
drinking water for this area and if the aquifer system were
contaminated would create a significant hazard to public health. As a
result of Sole Source Aquifer (SSA) designation, federal financially-
assisted projects over the designated aquifer area will be subject to
EPA review to ensure that these projects are designed and constructed
so that they do not contaminate this aquifer so as to create a
significant hazard to public health.
DATES: Effective Date: This determination shall become effective on
August 14, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The data and record upon which these findings are based are
available to the public and may be inspected during normal business
hours at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency--Region I, Office of
Ecosystem Protection, One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA
02114-2023.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Heath, U.S. EPA--Region I at
the address above or at (617) 918-1585, e-mail: heath.doug@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 1424(e) of the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 300h-
3(e), states: ``If the Administrator determines, on his own initiative
or petition, that an area has an aquifer which is the sole or principal
drinking water source for the area and which, if contaminated, would
create a significant hazard to public health, he shall publish notice
of that determination in the Federal Register. After the publication of
any such notice, no commitment for federal financial assistance
(through a grant, contract, loan guarantee, or otherwise) may be
entered into for any project which the Administrator determines may
contaminate such aquifer through a recharge zone so as to create a
significant hazard to public health, but a commitment for federal
financial assistance may, if authorized under another provision of law,
be entered into to plan or design the project to assure that it will
not so contaminate the aquifer.''
On February 1, 2006, EPA Region I received a petition from the
North End Concerned Citizens (NECC) requesting the designation of the
aquifer system underlying Conanicut Island as a SSA. NECC subsequently
submitted a revised petition. Among other things, the revised petition
removed references to an original request that EPA review closure plans
for a landfill and the location of a proposed Town Garage. On August
17, 2007, EPA completed its technical review of the completeness and
adequacy of the petition. On February 13, 2008, EPA held a public
meeting in Jamestown and invited public comment on the petition. The
public comment period closed on March 19, 2008.
II. Basis for Determination
Among the factors considered by the Regional Administrator as part
of the review and technical verification process for designating an
area under section 1424(e) were:
1. The aquifer system underlying Conanicut Island supplies the
service area population with 50% or more of its drinking water needs.
Approximately 57% of the island's residents rely solely on residential
supply wells. The remaining 43% of residents rely on municipal water
provided by the Jamestown Water District (a portion of which is also
ground water extracted by bedrock wells) with a peak flow of 400,000
gallons per day.
2. There is no physical, legal and/or economical alternative
drinking water source or combination of sources to meet all of the
needs of the designated service area.
3. The EPA finds that the petition appropriately delineates the
boundaries of the aquifer project review and service area. For purposes
of this designation, EPA finds the Conanicut Island Aquifer System
boundary is based on the mean high tide line since this marks the
freshwater-saltwater boundary.
4. While the quality of the area's ground water is considered to be
good, it is vulnerable to contamination due to the relatively thin soil
cover and rapid movement of ground water in fractured rock, coupled
with increasing development and other land uses. Recharge of the water
supply is by infiltration of precipitation over the entire island. The
designated area is underlain primarily by a fractured bedrock aquifer
system. The aquifer system is overlain by areas of glacial till and
soil deposits. Freshwater in bedrock fractures under the island forms a
lens-shaped body that floats on saltwater as its density is less than
that of saltwater. According to a 1997 study by the University of Rhode
Island, the thickness of the freshwater lens is estimated to range from
a few tens of feet near the shoreline to more than 500 feet in the
central part of the island under non-pumping conditions.
III. Description of the Conanicut Island Aquifer System That Underlies
Conanicut Island
The Conanicut Island Aquifer System is a nine-square-mile island
located in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. The island is divided into
three land masses: North Island, Central Island, and Beavertail
Peninsula. North Island rises to an elevation of about 140 feet above
sea level and is characterized by parallel ridges running north-south
which create
[[Page 47600]]
the Jamestown Brook Watershed. To the south, separated by Great Creek
and extensive wetlands, is the Central Town area. The Central Island
area is comprised of gently rolling hills up to 100 feet elevation with
bedrock outcrops in the Dumplings and Fort Wetherill area. To the
southwest is the Beavertail Peninsula rising to an elevation of 125
feet. The peninsula is connected to the rest of the island by a sandy
isthmus called Mackerel Cove Beach.
The average annual precipitation is approximately 43 inches. The
island's climate is moderated by the waters of Narragansett Bay and the
Atlantic Ocean.
Conanicut Island's bedrock is terrestrial metasedimentary rock of
Pennsylvanian age (approximately 300 million years old) in the north
and the Cambrian-age Conanicut group in the center of the island and on
Beavertail. Originally deposited as sediments ranging from coarse-
grained gravel to fine-grained silt, these materials hardened over time
into metamorphic rocks. Fort Wetherill on the southeastern portion of
the island is underlain by Proterozoic Newport Formation granites.
These are overlain by poorly-sorted glacial till ranging from 0 to
about 45 feet in thickness. Because the rock and till transmit water
very slowly, seasonally-high water table conditions occur throughout
much of the island.
IV. Information Utilized in Determination
The information utilized in this determination includes: The
petition and supporting documents submitted by the NECC, letters
received before and during the public comment period, and public
comments received during the public hearing. In addition, much of the
information has been derived from published literature on the
hydrogeology and water resources of the region. This information is
available to the public and may be inspected at the EPA Region I office
in Boston, Massachusetts (address listed above). The petition and
support document and EPA's response summary to public comment are also
available at the Jamestown Public Library in Jamestown, Rhode Island.
V. Summary and Discussion of Public Comments
Most comments received were in favor of the designation. Written
comments in support were received from the Honorable Lincoln Chaffee,
U.S. Senate; Senate Majority Leader M. Teresa Paiva Weed and House
Deputy Minority Whip Bruce J. Long of the Rhode Island General
Assembly; the Rhode Island Department of Health; the Rhode Island
Department of Environmental Management; and 36 residents/households of
Jamestown. On March 11, 2008, a majority of the Jamestown Conservation
Commission voted to support the petition. On March 17, 2008, a majority
of the Town Council approved a motion to support SSA designation. EPA
received five written comments expressing opposition to the
designation. Among these were letters from two members of the Town
Council.
EPA has addressed the written comments received in a Responsiveness
Summary, which is part of the record of this decision. The
Responsiveness Summary is available at the EPA Region I offices and at
the Jamestown Public Library.
VI. Project Review
After the effective date of this designation, EPA will evaluate
projects within the designation area that include federal financial
assistance to determine whether the project may contaminate the aquifer
so as to create a significant hazard to public health. Where
practicable, EPA will offer comments as to how the project may be
designed to protect the aquifer. EPA anticipates that few future
projects will trigger SSA review. Where review is required, EPA will
coordinate with state and local agencies and the project's developers.
EPA will give their comments full consideration. Through its review,
EPA will attempt to complement and support state and local ground water
protection measures. Although the project review process cannot be
delegated, EPA will rely to the maximum extent possible on any existing
or future state and/or local control measures to protect the quality of
ground water in the review area. EPA also will work to integrate any
review with related reviews required pursuant to other federal laws,
such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as amended 42
U.S.C. 4321, et seq., to avoid delay or duplication of effort.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of section
1427 of the Safe Drinking Water Act as amended 42 U.S.C. 300h-3(e).
Dated: July 30, 2008.
Ira Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, USEPA Region I.
[FR Doc. E8-18836 Filed 8-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P