Thifensulfuron Methyl; Pesticide Tolerances, 47072-47075 [E8-18457]
Download as PDF
47072
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 13, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
VII. Congressional Review Act
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: July 29, 2008.
Donald R. Stubbs,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180. 474 is amended by
revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a)(1), by alphabetically
adding the following commodities to the
table in paragraph (a)(1); by removing
the text from paragraph (b) and
reserving the paragraph designation and
heading; and by adding a new paragraph
(c).
I
§ 180.474 Tebuconazole; tolerances for
residues.
(a) General. (1) Tolerances are
established for the residues of the
fungicide, tebuconazole, alpha-[2-(4Chlorophenyl)ethyl]-alpha-(1,1dimethylethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1ethanol in or on the following
commodities:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
*
*
*
*
Apple, wet pomace .......................
Asparagus .....................................
*
*
*
*
Bean, succulent ............................
Bean, dry seed .............................
Beet, garden, roots .......................
Beet, garden, tops ........................
15:55 Aug 12, 2008
Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup
5B ..............................................
Coffee, green bean1 .....................
Coffee, roasted bean1 ..................
Corn, field, grain ...........................
Corn, field, forage .........................
Corn, field, stover .........................
Corn, pop, grain ............................
Corn, pop, stover ..........................
Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with
husks removed ..........................
Corn, sweet, forage ......................
Corn, sweet, stover ......................
Cotton, undelinted seed ...............
Cotton, gin byproducts .................
Fruit, pome, group 11 ...................
Fruit, stone, group 12, except
cherry ........................................
Grain, aspirated fractions .............
*
*
*
*
Hop, dried cones ..........................
Lychee ..........................................
Mango, postharvest ......................
*
*
*
*
Okra ..............................................
Onion, bulb, subgroup 3-07A .......
Onion, green, subgroup 3-07B .....
*
*
*
*
Plum, pre- and post-harvest .........
*
*
*
*
Soybean, forage ...........................
Soybean, hay ................................
Soybean, seed ..............................
Sunflower, seed ............................
Sunflower, meal ............................
Sunflower, refined oil ....................
Vegetable, cucurbit, group 9 ........
*
*
*
*
1There
Jkt 214001
35.0
1.6
0.15
*
1.2
0.2
1.3
*
1.0
*
25
50
0.08
0.05
0.2
0.2
0.09
*
Parts per
million
*
*
16.0
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Section 18 emergency exemptions.
[Reserved]
(c) Tolerances with regional
registrations. Tolerances with regional
registrations for the residues of the
fungicide, tebuconazole, alpha-[2-(4Chlorophenyl)ethyl]-alpha-(1,1dimethylethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1ethanol in or on the following
commodities:
*
*
*
*
0.5
7.0
*
[FR Doc. E8–18625 Filed 8–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
0.1
0.1
0.70
7.0
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0564; FRL–8374–4]
Thifensulfuron Methyl; Pesticide
Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of thifensulfuron
methyl in or on barley, hay; oat, forage;
oat, hay; wheat, forage, and wheat, hay.
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company
requested these tolerances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
1.0 (FFDCA).
*
Turnip, roots .................................
Turnip, tops ...................................
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
0.5
7.0
6.0
2.0
25.0
0.05
are no U.S. registrations as of 7/31/
Commodity
0.1
0.05
2.5
0.15
0.3
0.05
4.0
3.5
0.05
3.5
2008.
Parts per
million
Commodity
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Parts per
million
Commodity
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
This regulation is effective
August 13, 2008. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before October 14, 2008, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2007–0564. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, and search for the
docket ID number. Follow the
instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or
access available documents. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the docket index available in
regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vickie Walters, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 13, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(703) 305–5704; e-mail address:
walters.vickie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to those engaged in the
following activities:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather to provide a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic
copy of this Federal Register document
through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s pilot
e-CFR site at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
ecfr.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, any
person may file an objection to any
aspect of this regulation and may also
request a hearing on those objections.
You must file your objection or request
a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2007–0564 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Aug 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
as required by 40 CFR part 178 on or
before October 14, 2008.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit this copy,
identified by docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OPP–2007–0564, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
II. Petition for Tolerance
In the Federal Register of September
19, 2007 (72 FR 53577) (FRL–8144–3),
EPA issued a notice pursuant to section
408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 7F7219) by E.I.
DuPont de Nemours and Company,
DuPont Crop Protection, P.O. Box
80038, Wilmington, DE 19880-0038. The
petition requested that 40 CFR
180.439(a) be amended by establishing
tolerances for residues of the herbicide,
thifensulfuron methyl, methyl-3-[[[[(4methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2thiophenecarboxylate, in or on barley,
hay at 0.7 part per million (ppm), oat,
forage at 0.2 ppm; oat, hay at 2.0 ppm;
wheat, forage at 1.0 ppm; and wheat,
hay at 0.8 ppm. That notice referenced
a summary of the petition prepared by
E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company,
the registrant, which is available to the
public in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. There were no
comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
Thifensulfuron methyl currently has
tolerances for grain and straw from
barley, oats, and wheat. No tolerances
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47073
have been established for hay and forage
of these commodities because
thifensulfuron methyl’s registration
under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), U.S.C. 136 et seq., restricts the
feeding of hay and forage from treated
barley, oats, and wheat to livestock.
DuPont has applied to EPA to lift the
feeding restriction in its FIFRA
registration and this petition for hay and
forage was filed in conjunction with that
requested change.
Based upon review of the field trial
data supporting the petition, EPA is
revising the tolerance levels for pending
commodities as follows: barley, hay at
0.8 ppm; oat, hay at 0.05 ppm; wheat,
forage at 2.5 ppm; and wheat, hay at 0.7
ppm.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue.’’
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)
of FFDCA, and the factors specified in
section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for the petitioned-for
tolerances for residues of thifensulfuron
methyl, methyl-3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2thiophenecarboxylate, on barley, hay at
0.8 ppm; oat, forage at 0.2 ppm; oat, hay
at 0.05 ppm; wheat, forage at 2.5 ppm
and wheat, hay at 0.7 ppm.
EPA has previously concluded that
aggregate exposure to thifensulfuron
methyl on the grain and straw of barley,
oats, and wheat as well as other
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
47074
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 13, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
commodities is safe. (72FR13179 (March
21, 2007)). Establishment of the
requested thifensulfuron methyl
tolerances on hay and forage of barley,
oats, and hay will not change the
exposure or risk estimates from this
prior tolerance action because:
1. The requested change in FIFRA
registration for thifensulfuron methyl is
only for the lifting of the feeding
restriction on treated barley, oats, and
wheat. There are no requested changes,
such as to application rates that could
affect residue levels on human food
items. No changes in existing tolerances
are necessary.
2. The Agency has determined that
there will not be finite residues of
thifensulfuron methyl in animal
commodities as a result of animals
consuming thifensulfuron methyltreated barley, oats or wheat.
3. Since thifensulfuron methyl is not
being registered on any additional crops
and the application rates to the
registered crops are not increasing, there
is no change in estimated drinking
water estimates.
4. No residential uses are being
proposed.
The toxicological profile, endpoints
and current risk assessments are
discussed in the final rule published in
the Federal Register of March 21, 2007
(72FR13179)(FRL–8117–1) which
established tolerances for residues of
thifensulfuron methyl in rice, grain at
0.05 ppm; rice, straw at 0.05 ppm;
sorghum, grain, forage at 0.05 ppm;
sorghum, grain, grain at 0.05 ppm; and
sorghum, grain, stover at 0.05 ppm.
These previous risk assessments and the
reasons that the current action does not
change that risk assessment are
discussed in the document entitled
‘‘Ingredient: Thifensulfuron Methyl
Title: Label Amendments and Petition
for Tolerances on Wheat Forage and
Hay, Oat Forage and Hay, and Barley,
Hay.’’ This document can be found at
https://www.regulations.gov. in docket
EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0564 and is
identified as document 004. Based on
risk assessments and the findings
presented in the Federal Register notice
above, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population and to
infants and children from aggregate
exposure to thifensulfuron methyl
residues.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology
((liquid chromatography/mass
spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC/
MS/MS)) is available to enforce the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Aug 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
tolerance expression. The method may
be requested from: Chief, Analytical
Chemistry Branch, Environmental
Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft.
Meade, MD 20755–5350; telephone
number: (410) 305–2905; e-mail address:
residuemethods@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
There are no established or proposed
Codex Maximum residue limits (MRLs)
for residues of thifensulfuron methyl.
Canada and Mexico have established
MRLs for thifensulfuron methyl on
several plant commodities. However, no
Canadian or Mexican MRLs for
thifensulfuron methyl have been
proposed or established for barley, hay;
oat, forage; oat, hay; wheat, forage; or
wheat, hay.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for residues of thifensulfuron methyl,
methyl-3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5triazin-2yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2thiophenecarboxylate, on barley, hay at
0.8 ppm; oat, forage at 0.2 ppm; oat, hay
at 0.05 ppm; wheat, forage at 2.5 ppm
and wheat, hay at 0.7 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes tolerances
under section 408(d) of FFDCA in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this final rule
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Public Law 104–4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 157 / Wednesday, August 13, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 31, 2008.
Donald R. Stubbs,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
requires affected facilities to maintain
their automatic sprinkler systems once
they are installed.
DATES: These regulations are effective
on October 14, 2008. The incorporation
by reference listed in the rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register October 14, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Danielle Shearer, (410) 786–6617; James
Merrill, (410) 786–6998; Marcia
Newton, (410) 786–5265; or Jeannie
Miller, (410) 786–3164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.439 is amended by
alphabetically adding the following
commodities to the table in paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
I
I. Background
§180.439 Thifensulfuron methyl;
tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
Commodity
*
Parts per million
*
*
*
*
Barley, hay
*
*
*
*
0.8
*
Oat, forage
*
*
*
*
0.2
*
Oat, hay
*
*
*
*
0.05
*
Wheat, forage
*
*
*
*
2.5
*
Wheat, hay
*
*
*
*
0.7
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–18457 Filed 8–12–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 483
[CMS–3191–F]
RIN 0938–AN79
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Fire
Safety Requirements for Long Term
Care Facilities, Automatic Sprinkler
Systems
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This final rule requires all
long term care facilities to be equipped
with sprinkler systems by August 13,
2013. Additionally, this final rule
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:55 Aug 12, 2008
Jkt 214001
A. Overview of the Life Safety Code
The Life Safety Code (LSC), published
by the National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA), a private, nonprofit
organization dedicated to reducing loss
of life due to fire, is a compilation of fire
safety requirements. The LSC contains
fire safety requirements for both new
and existing buildings. It is updated
through a consensus process and
generally published every 3 years.
Sections 1819(d)(2)(B) and 1919(d)(2)(B)
of the Social Security Act (the Act)
require that long term care facilities
participating in the Medicare and
Medicaid programs generally meet the
applicable provisions of the edition of
the LSC that is adopted by the Secretary.
Beginning with the adoption of the
1967 edition of the LSC in 1971,
Medicare and Medicaid regulations
have historically incorporated the LSC
requirements by reference for all long
term care facilities as well as other
providers, while providing the
opportunity for a Secretarial waiver of a
requirement under certain
circumstances. The statutory basis for
incorporating NFPA’s LSC for our other
providers is under the Secretary’s
general rulemaking authority at sections
1102 and 1871 of the Act, and under
provider-specific provisions of title
XVIII that permit us to issue regulations
to protect the health and safety of
participants in Medicare and Medicaid.
We adopted the LSC to ensure that
patients and residents are consistently
protected from fire, regardless of the
location in which they receive care.
Since adopting and enforcing the 1967
and subsequent editions of the LSC,
there has been a significant decline in
the number of multiple death fires,
indicating that the LSC has been
effective in improving fire safety in
health care facilities.
On October 26, 2001, we published a
proposed rule (66 FR 54179), and on
January 10, 2003, we published a final
rule in the Federal Register, entitled
‘‘Fire Safety Requirements for Certain
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47075
Health Care Facilities’’ (68 FR 1374). In
that final rule, we adopted the 2000
edition of the LSC provisions as the
standard governing Medicare and
Medicaid health care facilities,
including long term care facilities. The
final rule required all existing long term
care facilities to comply with the 2000
edition of the LSC.
The 2000 edition of the LSC required
all newly constructed buildings
containing health care facilities to have
an automatic sprinkler system installed
throughout the building. However, like
all previous editions, the LSC did not
require existing buildings to install
automatic sprinkler systems throughout
if they met certain construction
standards, ranging from the size of the
buildings to the types of material used
in their construction.
In accordance with the 2000 edition
of the LSC, an existing building that
meets the above-mentioned construction
standards must install sprinklers if it
undergoes a major renovation. However,
in such cases, it is required to install
sprinklers only in the renovated
section(s). Therefore, a building may
have sprinklers only on one floor or in
one wing. We did not receive any timely
public comments in response to the
October 2001 proposed rule that
addressed the issue of installing
automatic sprinkler systems in
buildings not undergoing major
renovations. That is to say, no public
comments supported, questioned or
challenged our proposal to incorporate
this LSC provision by reference.
In the 2006 edition of the LSC, the
NFPA decided to include an automatic
sprinkler system requirement for all
long term care facilities. We support the
NFPA in its decision. We decided to
proceed with this rule, without
proposing adoption of the NFPA 2006
edition of the LSC, because we want to
avoid further delay in requiring an
automatic sprinkler system in long term
care facilities. As stated in the October
27, 2006 proposed rule (71 FR 62957,
62960), given the large scope of the LSC,
we would not be able to adopt and
enforce compliance with the 2006
edition of the LSC until 2009 or 2010.
Therefore, we decided at this time to
proceed with rulemaking that does not
include adoption of the NFPA 2006
LSC.
We will continue to work with the
NFPA to revise and refine each edition
of the LSC. We are currently working
with the NFPA through its consensus
process to revise and refine the 2009
edition of the LSC. Once the 2009
edition is issued, we will review the
code in its entirety and explore the
possibility of adopting it for all
E:\FR\FM\13AUR1.SGM
13AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47072-47075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18457]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0564; FRL-8374-4]
Thifensulfuron Methyl; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
thifensulfuron methyl in or on barley, hay; oat, forage; oat, hay;
wheat, forage, and wheat, hay. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company
requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective August 13, 2008. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before October 14, 2008,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0564. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, and search for the
docket ID number. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or access available documents. All
documents in the docket are listed in the docket index available in
regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is not
publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available in the electronic
docket at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vickie Walters, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:
[[Page 47073]]
(703) 305-5704; e-mail address: walters.vickie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to those
engaged in the following activities:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather to
provide a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by
this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in
determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you
have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a
frequently updated electronic version of EPA's tolerance regulations at
40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR
site at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, any person may file an objection to
any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this
regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0564 in the subject line on the first page of
your submission. All requests must be in writing, and must be mailed or
delivered to the Hearing Clerk as required by 40 CFR part 178 on or
before October 14, 2008.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit this copy, identified by docket ID number
EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0564, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Petition for Tolerance
In the Federal Register of September 19, 2007 (72 FR 53577) (FRL-
8144-3), EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
7F7219) by E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, DuPont Crop Protection,
P.O. Box 80038, Wilmington, DE 19880-0038. The petition requested that
40 CFR 180.439(a) be amended by establishing tolerances for residues of
the herbicide, thifensulfuron methyl, methyl-3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-
1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-
thiophenecarboxylate, in or on barley, hay at 0.7 part per million
(ppm), oat, forage at 0.2 ppm; oat, hay at 2.0 ppm; wheat, forage at
1.0 ppm; and wheat, hay at 0.8 ppm. That notice referenced a summary of
the petition prepared by E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, the
registrant, which is available to the public in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
Thifensulfuron methyl currently has tolerances for grain and straw
from barley, oats, and wheat. No tolerances have been established for
hay and forage of these commodities because thifensulfuron methyl's
registration under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA), U.S.C. 136 et seq., restricts the feeding of hay and
forage from treated barley, oats, and wheat to livestock. DuPont has
applied to EPA to lift the feeding restriction in its FIFRA
registration and this petition for hay and forage was filed in
conjunction with that requested change.
Based upon review of the field trial data supporting the petition,
EPA is revising the tolerance levels for pending commodities as
follows: barley, hay at 0.8 ppm; oat, hay at 0.05 ppm; wheat, forage at
2.5 ppm; and wheat, hay at 0.7 ppm.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue.''
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, and the factors
specified in section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to
make a determination on aggregate exposure for the petitioned-for
tolerances for residues of thifensulfuron methyl, methyl-3-[[[[(4-
methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-
thiophenecarboxylate, on barley, hay at 0.8 ppm; oat, forage at 0.2
ppm; oat, hay at 0.05 ppm; wheat, forage at 2.5 ppm and wheat, hay at
0.7 ppm.
EPA has previously concluded that aggregate exposure to
thifensulfuron methyl on the grain and straw of barley, oats, and wheat
as well as other
[[Page 47074]]
commodities is safe. (72FR13179 (March 21, 2007)). Establishment of the
requested thifensulfuron methyl tolerances on hay and forage of barley,
oats, and hay will not change the exposure or risk estimates from this
prior tolerance action because:
1. The requested change in FIFRA registration for thifensulfuron
methyl is only for the lifting of the feeding restriction on treated
barley, oats, and wheat. There are no requested changes, such as to
application rates that could affect residue levels on human food items.
No changes in existing tolerances are necessary.
2. The Agency has determined that there will not be finite residues
of thifensulfuron methyl in animal commodities as a result of animals
consuming thifensulfuron methyl-treated barley, oats or wheat.
3. Since thifensulfuron methyl is not being registered on any
additional crops and the application rates to the registered crops are
not increasing, there is no change in estimated drinking water
estimates.
4. No residential uses are being proposed.
The toxicological profile, endpoints and current risk assessments
are discussed in the final rule published in the Federal Register of
March 21, 2007 (72FR13179)(FRL-8117-1) which established tolerances for
residues of thifensulfuron methyl in rice, grain at 0.05 ppm; rice,
straw at 0.05 ppm; sorghum, grain, forage at 0.05 ppm; sorghum, grain,
grain at 0.05 ppm; and sorghum, grain, stover at 0.05 ppm. These
previous risk assessments and the reasons that the current action does
not change that risk assessment are discussed in the document entitled
``Ingredient: Thifensulfuron Methyl Title: Label Amendments and
Petition for Tolerances on Wheat Forage and Hay, Oat Forage and Hay,
and Barley, Hay.'' This document can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov. in docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0564 and is identified
as document 004. Based on risk assessments and the findings presented
in the Federal Register notice above, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population
and to infants and children from aggregate exposure to thifensulfuron
methyl residues.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology ((liquid chromatography/mass
spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS)) is available to enforce the
tolerance expression. The method may be requested from: Chief,
Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes
Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; e-mail
address: residuemethods@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
There are no established or proposed Codex Maximum residue limits
(MRLs) for residues of thifensulfuron methyl. Canada and Mexico have
established MRLs for thifensulfuron methyl on several plant
commodities. However, no Canadian or Mexican MRLs for thifensulfuron
methyl have been proposed or established for barley, hay; oat, forage;
oat, hay; wheat, forage; or wheat, hay.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of
thifensulfuron methyl, methyl-3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-
2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylate, on barley,
hay at 0.8 ppm; oat, forage at 0.2 ppm; oat, hay at 0.05 ppm; wheat,
forage at 2.5 ppm and wheat, hay at 0.7 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes tolerances under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition,
this final rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 47075]]
Dated: July 31, 2008.
Donald R. Stubbs,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Section 180.439 is amended by alphabetically adding the following
commodities to the table in paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.439 Thifensulfuron methyl; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commodity Parts per million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Barley, hay 0.8
* * * * *
Oat, forage 0.2
* * * * *
Oat, hay 0.05
* * * * *
Wheat, forage 2.5
* * * * *
Wheat, hay 0.7
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-18457 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S