Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program-Petition for Objection to State Operating Permit for Pouch Terminal Plant, 45768 [E8-18141]
Download as PDF
45768
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 6, 2008 / Notices
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[Regional Docket No. II–2005–07; FRL–
8701–3]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program—Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for Pouch
Terminal Plant
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final decision
concerning State operating permit.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces the
EPA Administrator’s decision,
responding to a petition submitted by
the office of James P. Molinaro,
President of the Borough of Staten
Island, New York, requesting that EPA
object to an operating permit issued by
the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)
to the New York Power Authority’s
Pouch Terminal plant. The petition,
requesting an objection to the issuance
of the Pouch Terminal title V permit is
denied.
Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the
Clean Air Act (Act), Petitioner may seek
judicial review of any portions of the
petition which EPA denied, in the
United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit. Any petition for
review shall be filed within 60 days
from the date this notice appears in the
Federal Register, pursuant to section
307 of the Act.
ADDRESSES: You may review copies of
the final order, the petition, and all
relevant information at the EPA Region
2 Office, 290 Broadway, New York, New
York 10007–1866. If you wish to
examine these documents, you should
make an appointment at least 24 hours
before visiting day. Additionally, the
final order for the Pouch Terminal plant
is available electronically at: https://
www.epa.gov/region07/programs/artd/
air/title5/petitiondb/
petitiondb2002.htm.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Riva, Chief, Permitting Section,
Air Programs Branch, Division of
Environmental Planning and Protection,
EPA, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 25th
Floor, New York, New York 10007–
1866, telephone (212) 637–4074.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act
affords EPA a 45-day period to review,
and object to as appropriate, operating
permits proposed by State permitting
authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the Act
authorizes any person to petition the
EPA Administrator within 60 days after
the expiration of this review period to
object to State operating permits if EPA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:46 Aug 05, 2008
Jkt 214001
has not done so. Petitions must be based
only on objections to the permit that
were raised with reasonable specificity
during the public comment period
provided by the State, unless the
petitioner demonstrates that it was
impracticable to raise these issues
during the comment period or the
grounds for the issues arose after this
period.
On October 26, 2005, the EPA
received a petition from the office of
James P. Molinaro, President of the
Borough of Staten Island, New York,
requesting that EPA object to the
issuance of the title V operating permit
for the Pouch Terminal facility based on
the following allegations: (1) NYPA
performed an environmental impact
statement (EIS) for the site only because
a lawsuit was brought against it by the
community, and ignored the Sun
Chemical company in performing the
EIS; (2) statements made by applicant,
regarding the facility’s projected hours
of operation, are conflicting; (3) NOX
and CO emission limits originally
pledged by NYPA are absent in the
permit; (4) the public was not informed
of the facility’s documented air
emission violations until after the
public hearing; (5) amendment of the
title V application to include ‘‘less
restrictive’’ air emissions limitations
was effected without any public
involvement, and enforcement action
against the facility, through two consent
orders, involved no public participation;
(6) DEC ignored the known industry fact
that startups and shutdowns are the
worst case situations; (7)
acknowledgment by DEC of the facility’s
air emissions violations was due to the
fact that this information was about to
be divulged in the newspaper; (8)
eighteen months passed before a DEC
enforcement action was instituted for
the violations to the facility’s operating
air permit; (9) the community living
across the street from the plant should
receive any and all information on
environmental violations occurring at
the facility; (10) in response to the
facility’s 18-month violations, NYPA
provided no explanation why it stated
‘‘No Action is Needed’’; (11) the air
emissions under the proposed draft title
V permit were less stringent than those
under the state facility air permit; (12)
it took a long time, 22 months, following
the public hearing/comment period,
before DEC released its Responsiveness
Summary; and (13) DEC allowed more
than 18 months, too long a time span,
for the ‘‘shakedown’’ period. The
Petitioner has requested that EPA object
to the issuance of the Pouch Terminal
permit, pursuant to CAA section
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 70.8(d), for any or
all of the above reasons.
On June 23, 2008, the Administrator
issued an order denying the petition on
the Pouch Terminal plant. The order
explains EPA’s reasons for denying
petitioner’s claims.
Dated: July 25, 2008.
Alan J. Steinberg,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. E8–18141 Filed 8–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8701–2]
Request for Nominations for 2008
Clean Air Excellence Awards Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Request for nominations for
Clean Air Excellence Awards.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA established the Clean Air
Excellence Awards Program in
February, 2000. This is an annual
awards program to recognize
outstanding and innovative efforts that
support progress in achieving clean air.
This notice announces the competition
for the Year 2008 program.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Awards
Program Notice: Pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
7403(a)(1) and (2) and sections 103(a)(1)
and (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA),
notice is hereby given that the EPA’s
Office of Air and Radiation (OAR)
announces the opening of competition
for the Year 2008 ‘‘Clean Air Excellence
Awards Program’’ (CAEAP). The intent
of the program is to recognize and honor
outstanding, innovative efforts that help
to make progress in achieving cleaner
air. The CAEAP is open to both public
and private entities. Entries are limited
to the United States. There are five
general award categories: (1) Clean Air
Technology; (2) Community Action; (3)
Education/Outreach; (4) Regulatory/
Policy Innovations; (5) Transportation
Efficiency Innovations; and two special
awards categories: (1) Thomas W. Zosel
Outstanding Individual Achievement
Award, and (2) Gregg Cooke Visionary
Program Award. Awards are given on an
annual basis and are for recognition
only.
Entry Requirements: All applicants
are asked to submit their entry on a
CAEAP entry form, contained in the
CAEAP Entry Package, which may be
obtained from the Clean Air Act
Advisory Committee (CAAAC) Web site
at: https://www.epa.gov/oar/caaac by
clicking on Awards Program or by
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18141]
[[Page 45768]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[Regional Docket No. II-2005-07; FRL-8701-3]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program--Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for Pouch Terminal Plant
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final decision concerning State operating permit.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces the EPA Administrator's decision,
responding to a petition submitted by the office of James P. Molinaro,
President of the Borough of Staten Island, New York, requesting that
EPA object to an operating permit issued by the New York State
Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) to the New York Power
Authority's Pouch Terminal plant. The petition, requesting an objection
to the issuance of the Pouch Terminal title V permit is denied.
Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act (Act),
Petitioner may seek judicial review of any portions of the petition
which EPA denied, in the United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit. Any petition for review shall be filed within 60
days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register,
pursuant to section 307 of the Act.
ADDRESSES: You may review copies of the final order, the petition, and
all relevant information at the EPA Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, New
York, New York 10007-1866. If you wish to examine these documents, you
should make an appointment at least 24 hours before visiting day.
Additionally, the final order for the Pouch Terminal plant is available
electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/region07/programs/artd/air/
title5/petitiondb/petitiondb2002.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Riva, Chief, Permitting
Section, Air Programs Branch, Division of Environmental Planning and
Protection, EPA, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York
10007-1866, telephone (212) 637-4074.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act affords EPA a 45-day period to
review, and object to as appropriate, operating permits proposed by
State permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the Act authorizes
any person to petition the EPA Administrator within 60 days after the
expiration of this review period to object to State operating permits
if EPA has not done so. Petitions must be based only on objections to
the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity during the
public comment period provided by the State, unless the petitioner
demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise these issues during the
comment period or the grounds for the issues arose after this period.
On October 26, 2005, the EPA received a petition from the office of
James P. Molinaro, President of the Borough of Staten Island, New York,
requesting that EPA object to the issuance of the title V operating
permit for the Pouch Terminal facility based on the following
allegations: (1) NYPA performed an environmental impact statement (EIS)
for the site only because a lawsuit was brought against it by the
community, and ignored the Sun Chemical company in performing the EIS;
(2) statements made by applicant, regarding the facility's projected
hours of operation, are conflicting; (3) NOX and CO emission
limits originally pledged by NYPA are absent in the permit; (4) the
public was not informed of the facility's documented air emission
violations until after the public hearing; (5) amendment of the title V
application to include ``less restrictive'' air emissions limitations
was effected without any public involvement, and enforcement action
against the facility, through two consent orders, involved no public
participation; (6) DEC ignored the known industry fact that startups
and shutdowns are the worst case situations; (7) acknowledgment by DEC
of the facility's air emissions violations was due to the fact that
this information was about to be divulged in the newspaper; (8)
eighteen months passed before a DEC enforcement action was instituted
for the violations to the facility's operating air permit; (9) the
community living across the street from the plant should receive any
and all information on environmental violations occurring at the
facility; (10) in response to the facility's 18-month violations, NYPA
provided no explanation why it stated ``No Action is Needed''; (11) the
air emissions under the proposed draft title V permit were less
stringent than those under the state facility air permit; (12) it took
a long time, 22 months, following the public hearing/comment period,
before DEC released its Responsiveness Summary; and (13) DEC allowed
more than 18 months, too long a time span, for the ``shakedown''
period. The Petitioner has requested that EPA object to the issuance of
the Pouch Terminal permit, pursuant to CAA section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR
70.8(d), for any or all of the above reasons.
On June 23, 2008, the Administrator issued an order denying the
petition on the Pouch Terminal plant. The order explains EPA's reasons
for denying petitioner's claims.
Dated: July 25, 2008.
Alan J. Steinberg,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. E8-18141 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P