United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement, 45351-45354 [E8-17968]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations Authority for This Rulemaking § 39.13 Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. I Regulatory Findings This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of compliance in the AD Docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES I PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. VerDate Aug<31>2005 12:53 Aug 04, 2008 Jkt 214001 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD: 2008–16–13 Boeing: Amendment 39–15631. Docket No. FAA–2008–0413; Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–003–AD. Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective September 9, 2008. Affected ADs (b) None. Applicability (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737– 600, –700, –700C, –800, –900, and –900ER series airplanes, certificated in any category; line numbers 1 through 2196 inclusive. Unsafe Condition (d) This AD results from a report of a rod end fracture on a rudder power control unit (PCU) control rod, which is similar to the ones used for the elevator tab pushrods. Analysis revealed that the fractured rod end had an incorrect hardness, which had probably occurred during the manufacture of the control rod. We are issuing this AD to prevent fracture of the elevator tab pushrod ends, which could result in excessive inflight vibrations of the elevator tab, possible loss of the elevator tab, and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane. Compliance (e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. Pushrod Replacement (f) At the time specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–27–1284, dated November 28, 2007; except, where the service bulletin specifies a compliance time after the date on the service bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD: Replace the pushrods for the left and right elevator tab control mechanisms with new, improved pushrods by doing all the actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–27– 1284, dated November 28, 2007. 45351 for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane. Material Incorporated by Reference (i) You must use Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–27–1284, dated November 28, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207. (3) You may review copies of the service information incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal_register/ code_of_federal_regulations/ ibr_locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 23, 2008. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E8–17748 Filed 8–4–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Parts Installation (g) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a pushrod assembly, part number 65–45166–24, on any airplane. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN: Tamara Anderson, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6421; fax (425) 917–6590; has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time 19 CFR Parts 10, 102, 162, 163, and 178 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY [Docket No. USCBP–2007–0056; CBP Dec. 08–29] RIN 1505–AB76 United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Department of the Treasury. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCIES: E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM 05AUR1 45352 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES SUMMARY: This document adopts as a final rule, with some changes, interim amendments to title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (‘‘CFR’’) which were published in the Federal Register on June 29, 2007, as CBP Dec. 07–51 to implement the preferential tariff treatment and other customs-related provisions of the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement signed by the United States and the Kingdom of Morocco. DATES: Final Rule effective September 4, 2008. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Textile Operational Aspects: Robert Abels, Office of International Trade, (202–863–6503). Other Operational Aspects: Heather Sykes, Office of International Trade, (202–863–6099). Legal Aspects: Karen Greene, Office of International Trade, (202–572–8838). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 15, 2004, the United States and the Kingdom of Morocco (the ‘‘Parties’’) signed the U.S.-Morocco Free Trade Agreement (‘‘MFTA’’ or ‘‘Agreement’’). The stated objectives of the MFTA are to: Encourage expansion and diversification of trade between the Parties; eliminate barriers to trade in, and facilitate the cross-border movement of, goods and services between the territories of the Parties; promote conditions of fair competition in the free trade area; substantially increase investment opportunities in the territories of the Parties; provide adequate and effective protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights in each Party’s territory; create effective procedures for the implementation and application of the MFTA, for its joint administration and for the resolution of disputes; and establish a framework for further regional and multilateral cooperation to expand and enhance the benefits of the MFTA. The provisions of the MFTA were adopted by the United States with the enactment of the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (the ‘‘Act’’), Public Law 108–302, 118 Stat. 1103 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note), on August 17, 2004. Section 205 of the Act requires that regulations be prescribed as necessary to implement these provisions of the MFTA. On December 22, 2005, the President signed Proclamation 7971 to implement the provisions of the MFTA. The proclamation, which was published in the Federal Register on December 27, 2005 (70 FR 76649), modified the VerDate Aug<31>2005 12:53 Aug 04, 2008 Jkt 214001 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) as set forth in Annexes I and II of Publication 3721 of the U.S. International Trade Commission. The modifications to the HTSUS included the addition of new General Note 27, incorporating the relevant MFTA rules of origin as set forth in the Act, and the insertion throughout the HTSUS of the preferential duty rates applicable to individual products under the MFTA where the special program indicator ‘‘MA’’ appears in parenthesis in the ‘‘Special’’ rate of duty subcolumn. The modifications to the HTSUS also included a new Subchapter XII to Chapter 99 to provide for temporary tariff rate quotas and applicable safeguards implemented by the MFTA. Those customs-related MFTA provisions that require implementation through regulation include certain tariff and non-tariff provisions within Chapter One (Initial Provisions and Definitions), Chapter Two (National Treatment and Market Access for Goods), Chapter Four (Textiles and Apparel), Chapter Five (Rules of Origin), and Chapter Six (Customs Administration). In Chapter One of the MFTA, certain general definitions in Article 1.3 have been incorporated into the MFTA implementing regulations. In MFTA Chapter Two, Article 2.6 (Goods Reentered after Repair or Alteration) requires implementation by CBP. Chapter Four of the MFTA sets forth the measures relating to trade in textile and apparel goods between Morocco and the United States under the MFTA. The provisions within Chapter Four that require regulatory action by CBP are Article 4.3 (Rules of Origin and Related Matters) and Article 4.5 (Definitions). Chapter Five of the MFTA sets forth the rules for determining whether an imported good qualifies as an originating good of the United States or Morocco (MFTA Party) and, as such, is therefore eligible for preferential tariff (duty-free or reduced duty) treatment as specified in the Agreement. Under Article 5.1, originating goods may be grouped in three broad categories: (1) Goods that are wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of one or both of the Parties; (2) goods (other than those covered by the product-specific rules set forth in Annex 4–A or Annex 5–A) that are new or different articles of commerce that have been grown, produced, or manufactured in the territory of one or both of the Parties, and that have a minimum value-content, i.e., at least 35 percent of the good’s appraised value must be attributed to the cost or value of materials produced in one or both of the Parties plus the PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 direct costs of processing operations performed in one or both of the Parties; and (3) goods that satisfy the productspecific rules set forth in Annex 4–A (textile or apparel goods) or Annex 5– A (certain non-textile or non-apparel goods). Article 5.2 explains that the term ‘‘new or different article of commerce’’ means a good that has been substantially transformed from a good or material that is not wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of one or both of the Parties and that has a new name, character, or use distinct from the good or material from which it was transformed. Article 5.3 provides that a good will not be considered to be a new or different article of commerce as the result of undergoing simple combining or packaging operations, or mere dilution with water or another substance that does not materially alter the characteristics of the good. CBP notes that, pursuant to letters of understanding exchanged between the Parties on June 16, 2004, in determining whether a good meets the definition of a ‘‘ new or different article of commerce’’ in § 10.769(i), the United States should be guided by the provisions of part 102 of the CBP regulations (19 CFR part 102). Article 5.4 provides for the accumulation of production in the territory of one or both of the Parties in determining whether a good qualifies as originating under the MFTA. Articles 5.5 and 5.6 set forth the rules for calculating the value of materials and the direct costs of processing operations, respectively, for purposes of determining whether a good satisfies the 35 percent value-content requirement. Articles 5.7 through 5.9 consist of additional sub-rules applicable to originating goods, involving retail packaging materials, packing materials for shipment, indirect materials, and transit and transshipment. In addition, Articles 5.10 and 5.11 set forth the procedural requirements that apply under the MFTA, in particular with regard to importer claims for preferential tariff treatment. Article 5.14 provides definitions of certain of the terms used in Chapter Five of the MFTA. The basic rules of origin in Chapter Five of the MFTA are set forth in General Note 27, HTSUS, and in part 102 of title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Chapter Six sets forth the customs operational provisions related to the implementation and administration of the MFTA. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) is responsible for administering the provisions of the MFTA and the Act E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM 05AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations that relate to the importation of goods into the United States from Morocco. On June 29, 2007, CBP published CBP Dec. 07–51 in the Federal Register (72 FR 35647), setting forth interim amendments to implement the preferential tariff treatment and customs-related provisions of the MFTA. In order to provide transparency and facilitate their use, the majority of the MFTA implementing regulations set forth in CBP Dec. 07–51 were included within new subpart M in part 10 of title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR subpart M, part 10). However, in those cases in which MFTA implementation was more appropriate in the context of an existing regulatory provision, the MFTA regulatory text was incorporated in an existing part within the CBP regulations. Although the interim regulatory amendments were promulgated without prior public notice and comment procedures and took effect on June 29, 2007, CBP Dec. 07–51 provided for the submission of public comments that would be considered before adopting the interim regulations as a final rule. The prescribed public comment period closed on August 28, 2007. No comments were received in response to the solicitation of public comments in CBP Dec. 07–51. dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES Changes to the Regulations The final rulemaking text set forth below incorporates certain changes, as discussed below, which CBP believes are necessary based on further internal review of the interim regulatory text. Definition of ‘‘New or Different Article of Commerce’’ The words ‘‘new or different article of commerce’’ are defined in § 10.769(i) of the interim regulations as a good that has been substantially transformed from a good or material that is not wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of one or both of the Parties and that has a new name, character, or use distinct from the good or material from which it was transformed. This definition has been revised in this final rule document to provide that such an article of commerce ‘‘exists when the country of origin of a good which is produced in a Party from foreign materials is determined to be that country under the provisions of §§ 102.1 through 102.21 of’’ the CBP regulations (19 CFR 102.1 through 102.21). CBP believes that this revised definition is more transparent and is consistent with letters of understanding exchanged between the Parties which provide that, in determining whether a good meets the definition of a ‘‘new or different article VerDate Aug<31>2005 12:53 Aug 04, 2008 Jkt 214001 of commerce,’’ the United States and Morocco should be guided by the provisions of Part 102 of the CBP regulations. CBP also notes that this revised definition is identical to the definition of the same term set forth in the interim regulations implementing the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement (‘‘BFTA’’) (see § 10.809(i), CBP regulations (19 CFR 10.809(i)). The rules of origin set forth in the BFTA (including letters of understanding exchanged between the Parties concerning the interpretation of ‘‘new or different article of commerce’’) closely parallel those in the MFTA. Other Changes 1. In § 10.761, relating to the scope of Subpart M, the last sentence has been revised to add Part 102 as one of the parts in the CBP regulations that include amendments implementing the MFTA, consistent with the revision to the definition of ‘‘new or different article of commerce’’ in § 10.769(i) discussed above; 2. In § 10.769, the definition of ‘‘substantially transformed’’ (formerly paragraph (o)) has been removed as those words are no longer used in Subpart M as a result of the revision of the definition of ‘‘new or different article of commerce’’ discussed above; 3. In § 10.770, which sets forth the basic MFTA rules of origin, paragraph (a)(2) has been revised to add the words ‘‘, as defined in § 10.769(i) of this subpart,’’ immediately following the words ‘‘new or different article of commerce’’ for clarification purposes; 4. Section 10.785, which concerns verifications conducted in Morocco by Moroccan authorities (at the request of CBP) relating to textile and apparel goods imported into the United States, has been removed in its entirety. CBP believes that the provisions of § 10.785 are unnecessary to the proper implementation of the MFTA as they relate primarily to actions that the Government of Morocco and CBP may take in connection with verifications performed in Morocco. As such, these provisions impose no requirements on U.S. importers of textile or apparel goods or other members of the trade. In addition, CBP notes that the removal of § 10.785 provides consistency between the MFTA implementing regulations and the interim regulations implementing the BFTA, which include no provisions regarding verifications in Bahrain of U.S. imports of textile and apparel products. The verification provisions in the MFTA closely parallel those in the BFTA; PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 45353 5. As a result of the removal of § 10.785, discussed above, §§ 10.786 through 10.788 of the interim regulatory text have been re-designated as §§ 10.785 through 10.787, respectively; and 6. In § 102.0, relating to the scope of part 102, the third sentence has been revised by adding the words ‘‘§ 10.769 of the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement regulations and’’ immediately following the words ‘‘new or different article of commerce under’’, consistent with the revision of the definition of ‘‘new or different article of commerce’’ discussed above. Conclusion Accordingly, based on the considerations discussed above, CBP believes that the interim regulations published as CBP Dec. 07–51, should be adopted as a final rule with certain changes as discussed above and as set forth below. Executive Order 12866 CBP has determined that this document is not a regulation or rule subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (58 FR 51735, October 1993), because it pertains to a foreign affairs function of the United States and implements an international agreement and, therefore, is specifically exempted by section 3(d)(2) of Executive Order 12866. Regulatory Flexibility Act CBP Dec. 07–51 was issued as an interim rule rather than a notice of proposed rulemaking because CBP had determined that the interim regulations involve a foreign affairs function of the United States pursuant to § 553(a)(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act. Because no notice of proposed rulemaking was required, the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. Accordingly, this final rule is not subject to the regulatory analysis requirements or other requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. Paperwork Reduction Act The collection of information in this final rule has previously been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1651–0117. The collections of information in these regulations are in §§ 10.703 and 10.704. This information is required in connection with claims for preferential tariff treatment and for the purpose of the exercise of other rights under the E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM 05AUR1 45354 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations MFTA and the Act and will be used by CBP to determine eligibility for a tariff preference or other rights or benefits under the MFTA and the Act. The likely respondents are business organizations including importers, exporters, and manufacturers. The estimated average annual burden associated with the collection of information in this final rule is 0.2 hours per respondent or record keeper. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Signing Authority This document is being issued in accordance with § 0.1(a)(1) of the CBP regulations (19 CFR 0.1(a)(1)) pertaining to the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury (or his/her delegate) to approve regulations related to certain customs revenue functions. List of Subjects 19 CFR Part 10 Alterations, Bonds, Customs duties and inspection, Exports, Imports, Preference programs, Repairs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Trade agreements. 19 CFR Part 102 Customs duties and inspections, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rules of origin, Trade agreements. 19 CFR Part 162 19 CFR Part 163 Administrative practice and procedure, Customs duties and inspection, Export, Import, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Trade agreements. 19 CFR Part 178 Amendments to the CBP Regulations Accordingly, the interim rule amending parts 10, 162, 163, and 178 of the CBP regulations (19 CFR parts 10, 162, 163, and 178), which was published at 72 FR 35647 on June 29, 2007, is adopted as a final rule with certain changes as discussed above and as set forth below. I dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1321, 1481, 1484, 1498, 1508, 1623, 1624, 3314; * * * * * Sections 10.761 through 10.787 also issued under Public Law 108–302, 118 Stat. 1103 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note). * * * * * 2. Section 10.761 is amended by revising the last sentence to read as follows: I § 10.761 § 10.769 Definitions. * * * * * (i) New or different article of commerce. A ‘‘new or different article of commerce’’ exists when the country of origin of a good which is produced in a Party from foreign materials is determined to be that country under the provisions of §§ 102.1 through 102.21 of this chapter; * * * * * [Amended] 4. Section 10.770 is amended by adding the words ‘‘, as defined in § 10.769(i) of this subpart,’’ immediately following the words ‘‘new or different article of commerce’’ in paragraph (a)(2). I § 10.785 I Jkt 214001 [Removed] 5. Section 10.785 is removed. §§ 10.786 through 10.788 [Redesignated as §§ 10.785 through 10.787] 6. Sections 10.786 through 10.788 are redesignated as §§ 10.785 through 10.787, respectively. PART 102—RULES OF ORIGIN 7. The authority citation for part 102 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1624, 3314, 3592. 8. Section 102.0 is amended by revising the third sentence to read as follows: I PO 00000 § 102.0 Scope. * * * The rules set forth in §§ 102.1 through 102.21 of this part will also apply for purposes of determining whether an imported good is a new or different article of commerce under § 10.769 of the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement regulations and § 10.809 of the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement regulations.* * * W. Ralph Basham, Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Approved: July 31, 2008. Timothy E. Skud, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. [FR Doc. E8–17968 Filed 8–4–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–14–P Scope. * * * Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the MFTA and the Act are contained in Parts 102, 162, and 163 of this chapter. I 3. Section 10.769 is amended by revising paragraph (i) and removing paragraph (o). Revised paragraph (i) reads as follows: I Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 12:53 Aug 04, 2008 1. The general authority citation for Part 10 and the specific authority for Subpart M continue to read as follows: I § 10.770 Administrative practice and procedure, Customs duties and inspection, Penalties, Trade agreements. VerDate Aug<31>2005 PART 10—ARTICLES CONDITIONALLY FREE, SUBJECT TO A REDUCED RATE, ETC. Frm 00012 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 64 [CG Docket No. 03–123; DA 08–1589] Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Clarifies the Transferability of Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) Provider Certification Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Clarification. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In this document, the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau (Bureau) responds to requests for guidance concerning the transferability of Commission certification of Internet-based TRS providers as eligible for compensation from the Interstate TRS Fund (Fund). The Bureau clarifies that such certification is not transferable. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Hlibok, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office at (800) 311–4381 (voice), (202) 418–0431 (TTY), or e-mail at Gregory.Hlibok@fcc.gov. This is a summary of the Commission’s document DA 08–1589, released July 3, 2008 in CG Docket No. 03–123. The full text of document DA 08–1589 and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. Document DA 08–1589 and copies of subsequently filed documents in this matter also may be purchased from the Commission’s duplicating contractor at SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM 05AUR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 5, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45351-45354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17968]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

19 CFR Parts 10, 102, 162, 163, and 178

[Docket No. USCBP-2007-0056; CBP Dec. 08-29]
RIN 1505-AB76


United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement

AGENCIES: Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security; Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 45352]]

SUMMARY: This document adopts as a final rule, with some changes, 
interim amendments to title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
(``CFR'') which were published in the Federal Register on June 29, 
2007, as CBP Dec. 07-51 to implement the preferential tariff treatment 
and other customs-related provisions of the United States-Morocco Free 
Trade Agreement signed by the United States and the Kingdom of Morocco.

DATES: Final Rule effective September 4, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Textile Operational Aspects: Robert Abels, Office of International 
Trade, (202-863-6503).
    Other Operational Aspects: Heather Sykes, Office of International 
Trade, (202-863-6099).
    Legal Aspects: Karen Greene, Office of International Trade, (202-
572-8838).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 15, 2004, the United States and the Kingdom of Morocco (the 
``Parties'') signed the U.S.-Morocco Free Trade Agreement (``MFTA'' or 
``Agreement''). The stated objectives of the MFTA are to: Encourage 
expansion and diversification of trade between the Parties; eliminate 
barriers to trade in, and facilitate the cross-border movement of, 
goods and services between the territories of the Parties; promote 
conditions of fair competition in the free trade area; substantially 
increase investment opportunities in the territories of the Parties; 
provide adequate and effective protection and enforcement of 
intellectual property rights in each Party's territory; create 
effective procedures for the implementation and application of the 
MFTA, for its joint administration and for the resolution of disputes; 
and establish a framework for further regional and multilateral 
cooperation to expand and enhance the benefits of the MFTA.
    The provisions of the MFTA were adopted by the United States with 
the enactment of the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (the ``Act''), Public Law 108-302, 118 Stat. 1103 
(19 U.S.C. 3805 note), on August 17, 2004. Section 205 of the Act 
requires that regulations be prescribed as necessary to implement these 
provisions of the MFTA.
    On December 22, 2005, the President signed Proclamation 7971 to 
implement the provisions of the MFTA. The proclamation, which was 
published in the Federal Register on December 27, 2005 (70 FR 76649), 
modified the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(``HTSUS'') as set forth in Annexes I and II of Publication 3721 of the 
U.S. International Trade Commission. The modifications to the HTSUS 
included the addition of new General Note 27, incorporating the 
relevant MFTA rules of origin as set forth in the Act, and the 
insertion throughout the HTSUS of the preferential duty rates 
applicable to individual products under the MFTA where the special 
program indicator ``MA'' appears in parenthesis in the ``Special'' rate 
of duty subcolumn. The modifications to the HTSUS also included a new 
Subchapter XII to Chapter 99 to provide for temporary tariff rate 
quotas and applicable safeguards implemented by the MFTA.
    Those customs-related MFTA provisions that require implementation 
through regulation include certain tariff and non-tariff provisions 
within Chapter One (Initial Provisions and Definitions), Chapter Two 
(National Treatment and Market Access for Goods), Chapter Four 
(Textiles and Apparel), Chapter Five (Rules of Origin), and Chapter Six 
(Customs Administration).
    In Chapter One of the MFTA, certain general definitions in Article 
1.3 have been incorporated into the MFTA implementing regulations. In 
MFTA Chapter Two, Article 2.6 (Goods Re-entered after Repair or 
Alteration) requires implementation by CBP.
    Chapter Four of the MFTA sets forth the measures relating to trade 
in textile and apparel goods between Morocco and the United States 
under the MFTA. The provisions within Chapter Four that require 
regulatory action by CBP are Article 4.3 (Rules of Origin and Related 
Matters) and Article 4.5 (Definitions).
    Chapter Five of the MFTA sets forth the rules for determining 
whether an imported good qualifies as an originating good of the United 
States or Morocco (MFTA Party) and, as such, is therefore eligible for 
preferential tariff (duty-free or reduced duty) treatment as specified 
in the Agreement. Under Article 5.1, originating goods may be grouped 
in three broad categories: (1) Goods that are wholly the growth, 
product, or manufacture of one or both of the Parties; (2) goods (other 
than those covered by the product-specific rules set forth in Annex 4-A 
or Annex 5-A) that are new or different articles of commerce that have 
been grown, produced, or manufactured in the territory of one or both 
of the Parties, and that have a minimum value-content, i.e., at least 
35 percent of the good's appraised value must be attributed to the cost 
or value of materials produced in one or both of the Parties plus the 
direct costs of processing operations performed in one or both of the 
Parties; and (3) goods that satisfy the product-specific rules set 
forth in Annex 4-A (textile or apparel goods) or Annex 5-A (certain 
non-textile or non-apparel goods).
    Article 5.2 explains that the term ``new or different article of 
commerce'' means a good that has been substantially transformed from a 
good or material that is not wholly the growth, product, or manufacture 
of one or both of the Parties and that has a new name, character, or 
use distinct from the good or material from which it was transformed. 
Article 5.3 provides that a good will not be considered to be a new or 
different article of commerce as the result of undergoing simple 
combining or packaging operations, or mere dilution with water or 
another substance that does not materially alter the characteristics of 
the good. CBP notes that, pursuant to letters of understanding 
exchanged between the Parties on June 16, 2004, in determining whether 
a good meets the definition of a `` new or different article of 
commerce'' in Sec.  10.769(i), the United States should be guided by 
the provisions of part 102 of the CBP regulations (19 CFR part 102).
    Article 5.4 provides for the accumulation of production in the 
territory of one or both of the Parties in determining whether a good 
qualifies as originating under the MFTA. Articles 5.5 and 5.6 set forth 
the rules for calculating the value of materials and the direct costs 
of processing operations, respectively, for purposes of determining 
whether a good satisfies the 35 percent value-content requirement.
    Articles 5.7 through 5.9 consist of additional sub-rules applicable 
to originating goods, involving retail packaging materials, packing 
materials for shipment, indirect materials, and transit and 
transshipment. In addition, Articles 5.10 and 5.11 set forth the 
procedural requirements that apply under the MFTA, in particular with 
regard to importer claims for preferential tariff treatment. Article 
5.14 provides definitions of certain of the terms used in Chapter Five 
of the MFTA. The basic rules of origin in Chapter Five of the MFTA are 
set forth in General Note 27, HTSUS, and in part 102 of title 19 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations.
    Chapter Six sets forth the customs operational provisions related 
to the implementation and administration of the MFTA.
    Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') is responsible for 
administering the provisions of the MFTA and the Act

[[Page 45353]]

that relate to the importation of goods into the United States from 
Morocco. On June 29, 2007, CBP published CBP Dec. 07-51 in the Federal 
Register (72 FR 35647), setting forth interim amendments to implement 
the preferential tariff treatment and customs-related provisions of the 
MFTA. In order to provide transparency and facilitate their use, the 
majority of the MFTA implementing regulations set forth in CBP Dec. 07-
51 were included within new subpart M in part 10 of title 19 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR subpart M, part 10). However, in 
those cases in which MFTA implementation was more appropriate in the 
context of an existing regulatory provision, the MFTA regulatory text 
was incorporated in an existing part within the CBP regulations.
    Although the interim regulatory amendments were promulgated without 
prior public notice and comment procedures and took effect on June 29, 
2007, CBP Dec. 07-51 provided for the submission of public comments 
that would be considered before adopting the interim regulations as a 
final rule. The prescribed public comment period closed on August 28, 
2007. No comments were received in response to the solicitation of 
public comments in CBP Dec. 07-51.

Changes to the Regulations

    The final rulemaking text set forth below incorporates certain 
changes, as discussed below, which CBP believes are necessary based on 
further internal review of the interim regulatory text.

Definition of ``New or Different Article of Commerce''

    The words ``new or different article of commerce'' are defined in 
Sec.  10.769(i) of the interim regulations as a good that has been 
substantially transformed from a good or material that is not wholly 
the growth, product, or manufacture of one or both of the Parties and 
that has a new name, character, or use distinct from the good or 
material from which it was transformed. This definition has been 
revised in this final rule document to provide that such an article of 
commerce ``exists when the country of origin of a good which is 
produced in a Party from foreign materials is determined to be that 
country under the provisions of Sec. Sec.  102.1 through 102.21 of'' 
the CBP regulations (19 CFR 102.1 through 102.21). CBP believes that 
this revised definition is more transparent and is consistent with 
letters of understanding exchanged between the Parties which provide 
that, in determining whether a good meets the definition of a ``new or 
different article of commerce,'' the United States and Morocco should 
be guided by the provisions of Part 102 of the CBP regulations.
    CBP also notes that this revised definition is identical to the 
definition of the same term set forth in the interim regulations 
implementing the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement (``BFTA'') 
(see Sec.  10.809(i), CBP regulations (19 CFR 10.809(i)). The rules of 
origin set forth in the BFTA (including letters of understanding 
exchanged between the Parties concerning the interpretation of ``new or 
different article of commerce'') closely parallel those in the MFTA.

Other Changes

    1. In Sec.  10.761, relating to the scope of Subpart M, the last 
sentence has been revised to add Part 102 as one of the parts in the 
CBP regulations that include amendments implementing the MFTA, 
consistent with the revision to the definition of ``new or different 
article of commerce'' in Sec.  10.769(i) discussed above;
    2. In Sec.  10.769, the definition of ``substantially transformed'' 
(formerly paragraph (o)) has been removed as those words are no longer 
used in Subpart M as a result of the revision of the definition of 
``new or different article of commerce'' discussed above;
    3. In Sec.  10.770, which sets forth the basic MFTA rules of 
origin, paragraph (a)(2) has been revised to add the words ``, as 
defined in Sec.  10.769(i) of this subpart,'' immediately following the 
words ``new or different article of commerce'' for clarification 
purposes;
    4. Section 10.785, which concerns verifications conducted in 
Morocco by Moroccan authorities (at the request of CBP) relating to 
textile and apparel goods imported into the United States, has been 
removed in its entirety. CBP believes that the provisions of Sec.  
10.785 are unnecessary to the proper implementation of the MFTA as they 
relate primarily to actions that the Government of Morocco and CBP may 
take in connection with verifications performed in Morocco. As such, 
these provisions impose no requirements on U.S. importers of textile or 
apparel goods or other members of the trade. In addition, CBP notes 
that the removal of Sec.  10.785 provides consistency between the MFTA 
implementing regulations and the interim regulations implementing the 
BFTA, which include no provisions regarding verifications in Bahrain of 
U.S. imports of textile and apparel products. The verification 
provisions in the MFTA closely parallel those in the BFTA;
    5. As a result of the removal of Sec.  10.785, discussed above, 
Sec. Sec.  10.786 through 10.788 of the interim regulatory text have 
been re-designated as Sec. Sec.  10.785 through 10.787, respectively; 
and
    6. In Sec.  102.0, relating to the scope of part 102, the third 
sentence has been revised by adding the words ``Sec.  10.769 of the 
United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement regulations and'' 
immediately following the words ``new or different article of commerce 
under'', consistent with the revision of the definition of ``new or 
different article of commerce'' discussed above.

Conclusion

    Accordingly, based on the considerations discussed above, CBP 
believes that the interim regulations published as CBP Dec. 07-51, 
should be adopted as a final rule with certain changes as discussed 
above and as set forth below.

Executive Order 12866

    CBP has determined that this document is not a regulation or rule 
subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 
1993 (58 FR 51735, October 1993), because it pertains to a foreign 
affairs function of the United States and implements an international 
agreement and, therefore, is specifically exempted by section 3(d)(2) 
of Executive Order 12866.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    CBP Dec. 07-51 was issued as an interim rule rather than a notice 
of proposed rulemaking because CBP had determined that the interim 
regulations involve a foreign affairs function of the United States 
pursuant to Sec.  553(a)(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act. 
Because no notice of proposed rulemaking was required, the provisions 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), 
do not apply. Accordingly, this final rule is not subject to the 
regulatory analysis requirements or other requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 
and 604.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    The collection of information in this final rule has previously 
been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in 
accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1651-0117.
    The collections of information in these regulations are in 
Sec. Sec.  10.703 and 10.704. This information is required in 
connection with claims for preferential tariff treatment and for the 
purpose of the exercise of other rights under the

[[Page 45354]]

MFTA and the Act and will be used by CBP to determine eligibility for a 
tariff preference or other rights or benefits under the MFTA and the 
Act. The likely respondents are business organizations including 
importers, exporters, and manufacturers.
    The estimated average annual burden associated with the collection 
of information in this final rule is 0.2 hours per respondent or record 
keeper. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 
information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.

Signing Authority

    This document is being issued in accordance with Sec.  0.1(a)(1) of 
the CBP regulations (19 CFR 0.1(a)(1)) pertaining to the authority of 
the Secretary of the Treasury (or his/her delegate) to approve 
regulations related to certain customs revenue functions.

List of Subjects

19 CFR Part 10

    Alterations, Bonds, Customs duties and inspection, Exports, 
Imports, Preference programs, Repairs, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Trade agreements.

19 CFR Part 102

    Customs duties and inspections, Imports, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Rules of origin, Trade agreements.

19 CFR Part 162

    Administrative practice and procedure, Customs duties and 
inspection, Penalties, Trade agreements.

19 CFR Part 163

    Administrative practice and procedure, Customs duties and 
inspection, Export, Import, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Trade agreements.

19 CFR Part 178

    Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Imports, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements.

Amendments to the CBP Regulations

0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending parts 10, 162, 163, and 178 of 
the CBP regulations (19 CFR parts 10, 162, 163, and 178), which was 
published at 72 FR 35647 on June 29, 2007, is adopted as a final rule 
with certain changes as discussed above and as set forth below.

PART 10--ARTICLES CONDITIONALLY FREE, SUBJECT TO A REDUCED RATE, 
ETC.

0
1. The general authority citation for Part 10 and the specific 
authority for Subpart M continue to read as follows:

    Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1321, 1481, 1484, 1498, 1508, 
1623, 1624, 3314;
* * * * *
    Sections 10.761 through 10.787 also issued under Public Law 108-
302, 118 Stat. 1103 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note).
* * * * *

0
2. Section 10.761 is amended by revising the last sentence to read as 
follows:


Sec.  10.761  Scope.

    * * * Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the 
MFTA and the Act are contained in Parts 102, 162, and 163 of this 
chapter.

0
3. Section 10.769 is amended by revising paragraph (i) and removing 
paragraph (o). Revised paragraph (i) reads as follows:


Sec.  10.769  Definitions.

* * * * *
    (i) New or different article of commerce. A ``new or different 
article of commerce'' exists when the country of origin of a good which 
is produced in a Party from foreign materials is determined to be that 
country under the provisions of Sec. Sec.  102.1 through 102.21 of this 
chapter;
* * * * *


Sec.  10.770  [Amended]

0
4. Section 10.770 is amended by adding the words ``, as defined in 
Sec.  10.769(i) of this subpart,'' immediately following the words 
``new or different article of commerce'' in paragraph (a)(2).


Sec.  10.785  [Removed]

0
5. Section 10.785 is removed.


Sec. Sec.  10.786 through 10.788  [Redesignated as Sec. Sec.  10.785 
through 10.787]

0
6. Sections 10.786 through 10.788 are redesignated as Sec. Sec.  10.785 
through 10.787, respectively.

PART 102--RULES OF ORIGIN

0
7. The authority citation for part 102 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1624, 3314, 3592.


0
8. Section 102.0 is amended by revising the third sentence to read as 
follows:


Sec.  102.0  Scope.

    * * * The rules set forth in Sec. Sec.  102.1 through 102.21 of 
this part will also apply for purposes of determining whether an 
imported good is a new or different article of commerce under Sec.  
10.769 of the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement regulations 
and Sec.  10.809 of the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement 
regulations.* * *

W. Ralph Basham,
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
    Approved: July 31, 2008.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. E8-17968 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.