United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement, 45351-45354 [E8-17968]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Authority for This Rulemaking
§ 39.13
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
I
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
I
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:53 Aug 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
2008–16–13 Boeing: Amendment 39–15631.
Docket No. FAA–2008–0413; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–003–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective September 9, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737–
600, –700, –700C, –800, –900, and –900ER
series airplanes, certificated in any category;
line numbers 1 through 2196 inclusive.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of a rod
end fracture on a rudder power control unit
(PCU) control rod, which is similar to the
ones used for the elevator tab pushrods.
Analysis revealed that the fractured rod end
had an incorrect hardness, which had
probably occurred during the manufacture of
the control rod. We are issuing this AD to
prevent fracture of the elevator tab pushrod
ends, which could result in excessive inflight vibrations of the elevator tab, possible
loss of the elevator tab, and consequent loss
of controllability of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
Pushrod Replacement
(f) At the time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–27–1284, dated
November 28, 2007; except, where the
service bulletin specifies a compliance time
after the date on the service bulletin, this AD
requires compliance within the specified
compliance time after the effective date of
this AD: Replace the pushrods for the left and
right elevator tab control mechanisms with
new, improved pushrods by doing all the
actions in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 737–27–
1284, dated November 28, 2007.
45351
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737–27–1284, dated
November 28, 2007, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information incorporated by reference at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 23,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–17748 Filed 8–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Parts Installation
(g) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a pushrod assembly, part
number 65–45166–24, on any airplane.
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN:
Tamara Anderson, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
917–6421; fax (425) 917–6590; has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested, using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
19 CFR Parts 10, 102, 162, 163, and 178
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[Docket No. USCBP–2007–0056; CBP Dec.
08–29]
RIN 1505–AB76
United States-Morocco Free Trade
Agreement
Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCIES:
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
45352
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
SUMMARY: This document adopts as a
final rule, with some changes, interim
amendments to title 19 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (‘‘CFR’’) which
were published in the Federal Register
on June 29, 2007, as CBP Dec. 07–51 to
implement the preferential tariff
treatment and other customs-related
provisions of the United States-Morocco
Free Trade Agreement signed by the
United States and the Kingdom of
Morocco.
DATES: Final Rule effective September 4,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Textile Operational Aspects: Robert
Abels, Office of International Trade,
(202–863–6503).
Other Operational Aspects: Heather
Sykes, Office of International Trade,
(202–863–6099).
Legal Aspects: Karen Greene, Office of
International Trade, (202–572–8838).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 15, 2004, the United States
and the Kingdom of Morocco (the
‘‘Parties’’) signed the U.S.-Morocco Free
Trade Agreement (‘‘MFTA’’ or
‘‘Agreement’’). The stated objectives of
the MFTA are to: Encourage expansion
and diversification of trade between the
Parties; eliminate barriers to trade in,
and facilitate the cross-border
movement of, goods and services
between the territories of the Parties;
promote conditions of fair competition
in the free trade area; substantially
increase investment opportunities in the
territories of the Parties; provide
adequate and effective protection and
enforcement of intellectual property
rights in each Party’s territory; create
effective procedures for the
implementation and application of the
MFTA, for its joint administration and
for the resolution of disputes; and
establish a framework for further
regional and multilateral cooperation to
expand and enhance the benefits of the
MFTA.
The provisions of the MFTA were
adopted by the United States with the
enactment of the United States-Morocco
Free Trade Agreement Implementation
Act (the ‘‘Act’’), Public Law 108–302,
118 Stat. 1103 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note), on
August 17, 2004. Section 205 of the Act
requires that regulations be prescribed
as necessary to implement these
provisions of the MFTA.
On December 22, 2005, the President
signed Proclamation 7971 to implement
the provisions of the MFTA. The
proclamation, which was published in
the Federal Register on December 27,
2005 (70 FR 76649), modified the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:53 Aug 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) as set forth in
Annexes I and II of Publication 3721 of
the U.S. International Trade
Commission. The modifications to the
HTSUS included the addition of new
General Note 27, incorporating the
relevant MFTA rules of origin as set
forth in the Act, and the insertion
throughout the HTSUS of the
preferential duty rates applicable to
individual products under the MFTA
where the special program indicator
‘‘MA’’ appears in parenthesis in the
‘‘Special’’ rate of duty subcolumn. The
modifications to the HTSUS also
included a new Subchapter XII to
Chapter 99 to provide for temporary
tariff rate quotas and applicable
safeguards implemented by the MFTA.
Those customs-related MFTA
provisions that require implementation
through regulation include certain tariff
and non-tariff provisions within Chapter
One (Initial Provisions and Definitions),
Chapter Two (National Treatment and
Market Access for Goods), Chapter Four
(Textiles and Apparel), Chapter Five
(Rules of Origin), and Chapter Six
(Customs Administration).
In Chapter One of the MFTA, certain
general definitions in Article 1.3 have
been incorporated into the MFTA
implementing regulations. In MFTA
Chapter Two, Article 2.6 (Goods Reentered after Repair or Alteration)
requires implementation by CBP.
Chapter Four of the MFTA sets forth
the measures relating to trade in textile
and apparel goods between Morocco
and the United States under the MFTA.
The provisions within Chapter Four that
require regulatory action by CBP are
Article 4.3 (Rules of Origin and Related
Matters) and Article 4.5 (Definitions).
Chapter Five of the MFTA sets forth
the rules for determining whether an
imported good qualifies as an
originating good of the United States or
Morocco (MFTA Party) and, as such, is
therefore eligible for preferential tariff
(duty-free or reduced duty) treatment as
specified in the Agreement. Under
Article 5.1, originating goods may be
grouped in three broad categories: (1)
Goods that are wholly the growth,
product, or manufacture of one or both
of the Parties; (2) goods (other than
those covered by the product-specific
rules set forth in Annex 4–A or Annex
5–A) that are new or different articles of
commerce that have been grown,
produced, or manufactured in the
territory of one or both of the Parties,
and that have a minimum value-content,
i.e., at least 35 percent of the good’s
appraised value must be attributed to
the cost or value of materials produced
in one or both of the Parties plus the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
direct costs of processing operations
performed in one or both of the Parties;
and (3) goods that satisfy the productspecific rules set forth in Annex 4–A
(textile or apparel goods) or Annex 5–
A (certain non-textile or non-apparel
goods).
Article 5.2 explains that the term
‘‘new or different article of commerce’’
means a good that has been
substantially transformed from a good or
material that is not wholly the growth,
product, or manufacture of one or both
of the Parties and that has a new name,
character, or use distinct from the good
or material from which it was
transformed. Article 5.3 provides that a
good will not be considered to be a new
or different article of commerce as the
result of undergoing simple combining
or packaging operations, or mere
dilution with water or another
substance that does not materially alter
the characteristics of the good. CBP
notes that, pursuant to letters of
understanding exchanged between the
Parties on June 16, 2004, in determining
whether a good meets the definition of
a ‘‘ new or different article of
commerce’’ in § 10.769(i), the United
States should be guided by the
provisions of part 102 of the CBP
regulations (19 CFR part 102).
Article 5.4 provides for the
accumulation of production in the
territory of one or both of the Parties in
determining whether a good qualifies as
originating under the MFTA. Articles
5.5 and 5.6 set forth the rules for
calculating the value of materials and
the direct costs of processing operations,
respectively, for purposes of
determining whether a good satisfies the
35 percent value-content requirement.
Articles 5.7 through 5.9 consist of
additional sub-rules applicable to
originating goods, involving retail
packaging materials, packing materials
for shipment, indirect materials, and
transit and transshipment. In addition,
Articles 5.10 and 5.11 set forth the
procedural requirements that apply
under the MFTA, in particular with
regard to importer claims for
preferential tariff treatment. Article 5.14
provides definitions of certain of the
terms used in Chapter Five of the
MFTA. The basic rules of origin in
Chapter Five of the MFTA are set forth
in General Note 27, HTSUS, and in part
102 of title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
Chapter Six sets forth the customs
operational provisions related to the
implementation and administration of
the MFTA.
Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) is responsible for administering
the provisions of the MFTA and the Act
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
that relate to the importation of goods
into the United States from Morocco. On
June 29, 2007, CBP published CBP Dec.
07–51 in the Federal Register (72 FR
35647), setting forth interim
amendments to implement the
preferential tariff treatment and
customs-related provisions of the
MFTA. In order to provide transparency
and facilitate their use, the majority of
the MFTA implementing regulations set
forth in CBP Dec. 07–51 were included
within new subpart M in part 10 of title
19 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(19 CFR subpart M, part 10). However,
in those cases in which MFTA
implementation was more appropriate
in the context of an existing regulatory
provision, the MFTA regulatory text was
incorporated in an existing part within
the CBP regulations.
Although the interim regulatory
amendments were promulgated without
prior public notice and comment
procedures and took effect on June 29,
2007, CBP Dec. 07–51 provided for the
submission of public comments that
would be considered before adopting
the interim regulations as a final rule.
The prescribed public comment period
closed on August 28, 2007. No
comments were received in response to
the solicitation of public comments in
CBP Dec. 07–51.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
Changes to the Regulations
The final rulemaking text set forth
below incorporates certain changes, as
discussed below, which CBP believes
are necessary based on further internal
review of the interim regulatory text.
Definition of ‘‘New or Different Article
of Commerce’’
The words ‘‘new or different article of
commerce’’ are defined in § 10.769(i) of
the interim regulations as a good that
has been substantially transformed from
a good or material that is not wholly the
growth, product, or manufacture of one
or both of the Parties and that has a new
name, character, or use distinct from the
good or material from which it was
transformed. This definition has been
revised in this final rule document to
provide that such an article of
commerce ‘‘exists when the country of
origin of a good which is produced in
a Party from foreign materials is
determined to be that country under the
provisions of §§ 102.1 through 102.21
of’’ the CBP regulations (19 CFR 102.1
through 102.21). CBP believes that this
revised definition is more transparent
and is consistent with letters of
understanding exchanged between the
Parties which provide that, in
determining whether a good meets the
definition of a ‘‘new or different article
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:53 Aug 04, 2008
Jkt 214001
of commerce,’’ the United States and
Morocco should be guided by the
provisions of Part 102 of the CBP
regulations.
CBP also notes that this revised
definition is identical to the definition
of the same term set forth in the interim
regulations implementing the United
States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement
(‘‘BFTA’’) (see § 10.809(i), CBP
regulations (19 CFR 10.809(i)). The rules
of origin set forth in the BFTA
(including letters of understanding
exchanged between the Parties
concerning the interpretation of ‘‘new or
different article of commerce’’) closely
parallel those in the MFTA.
Other Changes
1. In § 10.761, relating to the scope of
Subpart M, the last sentence has been
revised to add Part 102 as one of the
parts in the CBP regulations that include
amendments implementing the MFTA,
consistent with the revision to the
definition of ‘‘new or different article of
commerce’’ in § 10.769(i) discussed
above;
2. In § 10.769, the definition of
‘‘substantially transformed’’ (formerly
paragraph (o)) has been removed as
those words are no longer used in
Subpart M as a result of the revision of
the definition of ‘‘new or different
article of commerce’’ discussed above;
3. In § 10.770, which sets forth the
basic MFTA rules of origin, paragraph
(a)(2) has been revised to add the words
‘‘, as defined in § 10.769(i) of this
subpart,’’ immediately following the
words ‘‘new or different article of
commerce’’ for clarification purposes;
4. Section 10.785, which concerns
verifications conducted in Morocco by
Moroccan authorities (at the request of
CBP) relating to textile and apparel
goods imported into the United States,
has been removed in its entirety. CBP
believes that the provisions of § 10.785
are unnecessary to the proper
implementation of the MFTA as they
relate primarily to actions that the
Government of Morocco and CBP may
take in connection with verifications
performed in Morocco. As such, these
provisions impose no requirements on
U.S. importers of textile or apparel
goods or other members of the trade. In
addition, CBP notes that the removal of
§ 10.785 provides consistency between
the MFTA implementing regulations
and the interim regulations
implementing the BFTA, which include
no provisions regarding verifications in
Bahrain of U.S. imports of textile and
apparel products. The verification
provisions in the MFTA closely parallel
those in the BFTA;
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45353
5. As a result of the removal of
§ 10.785, discussed above, §§ 10.786
through 10.788 of the interim regulatory
text have been re-designated as
§§ 10.785 through 10.787, respectively;
and
6. In § 102.0, relating to the scope of
part 102, the third sentence has been
revised by adding the words ‘‘§ 10.769
of the United States-Morocco Free Trade
Agreement regulations and’’
immediately following the words ‘‘new
or different article of commerce under’’,
consistent with the revision of the
definition of ‘‘new or different article of
commerce’’ discussed above.
Conclusion
Accordingly, based on the
considerations discussed above, CBP
believes that the interim regulations
published as CBP Dec. 07–51, should be
adopted as a final rule with certain
changes as discussed above and as set
forth below.
Executive Order 12866
CBP has determined that this
document is not a regulation or rule
subject to the provisions of Executive
Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (58
FR 51735, October 1993), because it
pertains to a foreign affairs function of
the United States and implements an
international agreement and, therefore,
is specifically exempted by section
3(d)(2) of Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
CBP Dec. 07–51 was issued as an
interim rule rather than a notice of
proposed rulemaking because CBP had
determined that the interim regulations
involve a foreign affairs function of the
United States pursuant to § 553(a)(1) of
the Administrative Procedure Act.
Because no notice of proposed
rulemaking was required, the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not
apply. Accordingly, this final rule is not
subject to the regulatory analysis
requirements or other requirements of 5
U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information in this
final rule has previously been reviewed
and approved by the Office of
Management and Budget in accordance
with the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under
control number 1651–0117.
The collections of information in
these regulations are in §§ 10.703 and
10.704. This information is required in
connection with claims for preferential
tariff treatment and for the purpose of
the exercise of other rights under the
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
45354
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 151 / Tuesday, August 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
MFTA and the Act and will be used by
CBP to determine eligibility for a tariff
preference or other rights or benefits
under the MFTA and the Act. The likely
respondents are business organizations
including importers, exporters, and
manufacturers.
The estimated average annual burden
associated with the collection of
information in this final rule is 0.2
hours per respondent or record keeper.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it
displays a valid OMB control number.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in
accordance with § 0.1(a)(1) of the CBP
regulations (19 CFR 0.1(a)(1)) pertaining
to the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury (or his/her delegate) to
approve regulations related to certain
customs revenue functions.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Part 10
Alterations, Bonds, Customs duties
and inspection, Exports, Imports,
Preference programs, Repairs, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Trade
agreements.
19 CFR Part 102
Customs duties and inspections,
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rules of origin, Trade
agreements.
19 CFR Part 162
19 CFR Part 163
Administrative practice and
procedure, Customs duties and
inspection, Export, Import, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Trade
agreements.
19 CFR Part 178
Amendments to the CBP Regulations
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending parts 10, 162, 163, and 178 of
the CBP regulations (19 CFR parts 10,
162, 163, and 178), which was
published at 72 FR 35647 on June 29,
2007, is adopted as a final rule with
certain changes as discussed above and
as set forth below.
I
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States), 1321, 1481, 1484, 1498, 1508,
1623, 1624, 3314;
*
*
*
*
*
Sections 10.761 through 10.787 also issued
under Public Law 108–302, 118 Stat. 1103
(19 U.S.C. 3805 note).
*
*
*
*
*
2. Section 10.761 is amended by
revising the last sentence to read as
follows:
I
§ 10.761
§ 10.769
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) New or different article of
commerce. A ‘‘new or different article of
commerce’’ exists when the country of
origin of a good which is produced in
a Party from foreign materials is
determined to be that country under the
provisions of §§ 102.1 through 102.21 of
this chapter;
*
*
*
*
*
[Amended]
4. Section 10.770 is amended by
adding the words ‘‘, as defined in
§ 10.769(i) of this subpart,’’ immediately
following the words ‘‘new or different
article of commerce’’ in paragraph (a)(2).
I
§ 10.785
I
Jkt 214001
[Removed]
5. Section 10.785 is removed.
§§ 10.786 through 10.788 [Redesignated as
§§ 10.785 through 10.787]
6. Sections 10.786 through 10.788 are
redesignated as §§ 10.785 through
10.787, respectively.
PART 102—RULES OF ORIGIN
7. The authority citation for part 102
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States), 1624, 3314, 3592.
8. Section 102.0 is amended by
revising the third sentence to read as
follows:
I
PO 00000
§ 102.0
Scope.
* * * The rules set forth in §§ 102.1
through 102.21 of this part will also
apply for purposes of determining
whether an imported good is a new or
different article of commerce under
§ 10.769 of the United States-Morocco
Free Trade Agreement regulations and
§ 10.809 of the United States-Bahrain
Free Trade Agreement regulations.* * *
W. Ralph Basham,
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
Approved: July 31, 2008.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. E8–17968 Filed 8–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
Scope.
* * * Additional provisions
implementing certain aspects of the
MFTA and the Act are contained in
Parts 102, 162, and 163 of this chapter.
I 3. Section 10.769 is amended by
revising paragraph (i) and removing
paragraph (o). Revised paragraph (i)
reads as follows:
I
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Imports, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
12:53 Aug 04, 2008
1. The general authority citation for
Part 10 and the specific authority for
Subpart M continue to read as follows:
I
§ 10.770
Administrative practice and
procedure, Customs duties and
inspection, Penalties, Trade agreements.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
PART 10—ARTICLES CONDITIONALLY
FREE, SUBJECT TO A REDUCED
RATE, ETC.
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[CG Docket No. 03–123; DA 08–1589]
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau Clarifies the Transferability of
Telecommunications Relay Service
(TRS) Provider Certification
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Clarification.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau (Bureau) responds to requests
for guidance concerning the
transferability of Commission
certification of Internet-based TRS
providers as eligible for compensation
from the Interstate TRS Fund (Fund).
The Bureau clarifies that such
certification is not transferable.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Hlibok, Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability
Rights Office at (800) 311–4381 (voice),
(202) 418–0431 (TTY), or e-mail at
Gregory.Hlibok@fcc.gov.
This is a
summary of the Commission’s
document DA 08–1589, released July 3,
2008 in CG Docket No. 03–123. The full
text of document DA 08–1589 and
copies of any subsequently filed
documents in this matter will be
available for public inspection and
copying during regular business hours
at the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
Document DA 08–1589 and copies of
subsequently filed documents in this
matter also may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor at
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\05AUR1.SGM
05AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 5, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45351-45354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17968]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19 CFR Parts 10, 102, 162, 163, and 178
[Docket No. USCBP-2007-0056; CBP Dec. 08-29]
RIN 1505-AB76
United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement
AGENCIES: Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 45352]]
SUMMARY: This document adopts as a final rule, with some changes,
interim amendments to title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(``CFR'') which were published in the Federal Register on June 29,
2007, as CBP Dec. 07-51 to implement the preferential tariff treatment
and other customs-related provisions of the United States-Morocco Free
Trade Agreement signed by the United States and the Kingdom of Morocco.
DATES: Final Rule effective September 4, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Textile Operational Aspects: Robert Abels, Office of International
Trade, (202-863-6503).
Other Operational Aspects: Heather Sykes, Office of International
Trade, (202-863-6099).
Legal Aspects: Karen Greene, Office of International Trade, (202-
572-8838).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 15, 2004, the United States and the Kingdom of Morocco (the
``Parties'') signed the U.S.-Morocco Free Trade Agreement (``MFTA'' or
``Agreement''). The stated objectives of the MFTA are to: Encourage
expansion and diversification of trade between the Parties; eliminate
barriers to trade in, and facilitate the cross-border movement of,
goods and services between the territories of the Parties; promote
conditions of fair competition in the free trade area; substantially
increase investment opportunities in the territories of the Parties;
provide adequate and effective protection and enforcement of
intellectual property rights in each Party's territory; create
effective procedures for the implementation and application of the
MFTA, for its joint administration and for the resolution of disputes;
and establish a framework for further regional and multilateral
cooperation to expand and enhance the benefits of the MFTA.
The provisions of the MFTA were adopted by the United States with
the enactment of the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act (the ``Act''), Public Law 108-302, 118 Stat. 1103
(19 U.S.C. 3805 note), on August 17, 2004. Section 205 of the Act
requires that regulations be prescribed as necessary to implement these
provisions of the MFTA.
On December 22, 2005, the President signed Proclamation 7971 to
implement the provisions of the MFTA. The proclamation, which was
published in the Federal Register on December 27, 2005 (70 FR 76649),
modified the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(``HTSUS'') as set forth in Annexes I and II of Publication 3721 of the
U.S. International Trade Commission. The modifications to the HTSUS
included the addition of new General Note 27, incorporating the
relevant MFTA rules of origin as set forth in the Act, and the
insertion throughout the HTSUS of the preferential duty rates
applicable to individual products under the MFTA where the special
program indicator ``MA'' appears in parenthesis in the ``Special'' rate
of duty subcolumn. The modifications to the HTSUS also included a new
Subchapter XII to Chapter 99 to provide for temporary tariff rate
quotas and applicable safeguards implemented by the MFTA.
Those customs-related MFTA provisions that require implementation
through regulation include certain tariff and non-tariff provisions
within Chapter One (Initial Provisions and Definitions), Chapter Two
(National Treatment and Market Access for Goods), Chapter Four
(Textiles and Apparel), Chapter Five (Rules of Origin), and Chapter Six
(Customs Administration).
In Chapter One of the MFTA, certain general definitions in Article
1.3 have been incorporated into the MFTA implementing regulations. In
MFTA Chapter Two, Article 2.6 (Goods Re-entered after Repair or
Alteration) requires implementation by CBP.
Chapter Four of the MFTA sets forth the measures relating to trade
in textile and apparel goods between Morocco and the United States
under the MFTA. The provisions within Chapter Four that require
regulatory action by CBP are Article 4.3 (Rules of Origin and Related
Matters) and Article 4.5 (Definitions).
Chapter Five of the MFTA sets forth the rules for determining
whether an imported good qualifies as an originating good of the United
States or Morocco (MFTA Party) and, as such, is therefore eligible for
preferential tariff (duty-free or reduced duty) treatment as specified
in the Agreement. Under Article 5.1, originating goods may be grouped
in three broad categories: (1) Goods that are wholly the growth,
product, or manufacture of one or both of the Parties; (2) goods (other
than those covered by the product-specific rules set forth in Annex 4-A
or Annex 5-A) that are new or different articles of commerce that have
been grown, produced, or manufactured in the territory of one or both
of the Parties, and that have a minimum value-content, i.e., at least
35 percent of the good's appraised value must be attributed to the cost
or value of materials produced in one or both of the Parties plus the
direct costs of processing operations performed in one or both of the
Parties; and (3) goods that satisfy the product-specific rules set
forth in Annex 4-A (textile or apparel goods) or Annex 5-A (certain
non-textile or non-apparel goods).
Article 5.2 explains that the term ``new or different article of
commerce'' means a good that has been substantially transformed from a
good or material that is not wholly the growth, product, or manufacture
of one or both of the Parties and that has a new name, character, or
use distinct from the good or material from which it was transformed.
Article 5.3 provides that a good will not be considered to be a new or
different article of commerce as the result of undergoing simple
combining or packaging operations, or mere dilution with water or
another substance that does not materially alter the characteristics of
the good. CBP notes that, pursuant to letters of understanding
exchanged between the Parties on June 16, 2004, in determining whether
a good meets the definition of a `` new or different article of
commerce'' in Sec. 10.769(i), the United States should be guided by
the provisions of part 102 of the CBP regulations (19 CFR part 102).
Article 5.4 provides for the accumulation of production in the
territory of one or both of the Parties in determining whether a good
qualifies as originating under the MFTA. Articles 5.5 and 5.6 set forth
the rules for calculating the value of materials and the direct costs
of processing operations, respectively, for purposes of determining
whether a good satisfies the 35 percent value-content requirement.
Articles 5.7 through 5.9 consist of additional sub-rules applicable
to originating goods, involving retail packaging materials, packing
materials for shipment, indirect materials, and transit and
transshipment. In addition, Articles 5.10 and 5.11 set forth the
procedural requirements that apply under the MFTA, in particular with
regard to importer claims for preferential tariff treatment. Article
5.14 provides definitions of certain of the terms used in Chapter Five
of the MFTA. The basic rules of origin in Chapter Five of the MFTA are
set forth in General Note 27, HTSUS, and in part 102 of title 19 of the
Code of Federal Regulations.
Chapter Six sets forth the customs operational provisions related
to the implementation and administration of the MFTA.
Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') is responsible for
administering the provisions of the MFTA and the Act
[[Page 45353]]
that relate to the importation of goods into the United States from
Morocco. On June 29, 2007, CBP published CBP Dec. 07-51 in the Federal
Register (72 FR 35647), setting forth interim amendments to implement
the preferential tariff treatment and customs-related provisions of the
MFTA. In order to provide transparency and facilitate their use, the
majority of the MFTA implementing regulations set forth in CBP Dec. 07-
51 were included within new subpart M in part 10 of title 19 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR subpart M, part 10). However, in
those cases in which MFTA implementation was more appropriate in the
context of an existing regulatory provision, the MFTA regulatory text
was incorporated in an existing part within the CBP regulations.
Although the interim regulatory amendments were promulgated without
prior public notice and comment procedures and took effect on June 29,
2007, CBP Dec. 07-51 provided for the submission of public comments
that would be considered before adopting the interim regulations as a
final rule. The prescribed public comment period closed on August 28,
2007. No comments were received in response to the solicitation of
public comments in CBP Dec. 07-51.
Changes to the Regulations
The final rulemaking text set forth below incorporates certain
changes, as discussed below, which CBP believes are necessary based on
further internal review of the interim regulatory text.
Definition of ``New or Different Article of Commerce''
The words ``new or different article of commerce'' are defined in
Sec. 10.769(i) of the interim regulations as a good that has been
substantially transformed from a good or material that is not wholly
the growth, product, or manufacture of one or both of the Parties and
that has a new name, character, or use distinct from the good or
material from which it was transformed. This definition has been
revised in this final rule document to provide that such an article of
commerce ``exists when the country of origin of a good which is
produced in a Party from foreign materials is determined to be that
country under the provisions of Sec. Sec. 102.1 through 102.21 of''
the CBP regulations (19 CFR 102.1 through 102.21). CBP believes that
this revised definition is more transparent and is consistent with
letters of understanding exchanged between the Parties which provide
that, in determining whether a good meets the definition of a ``new or
different article of commerce,'' the United States and Morocco should
be guided by the provisions of Part 102 of the CBP regulations.
CBP also notes that this revised definition is identical to the
definition of the same term set forth in the interim regulations
implementing the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement (``BFTA'')
(see Sec. 10.809(i), CBP regulations (19 CFR 10.809(i)). The rules of
origin set forth in the BFTA (including letters of understanding
exchanged between the Parties concerning the interpretation of ``new or
different article of commerce'') closely parallel those in the MFTA.
Other Changes
1. In Sec. 10.761, relating to the scope of Subpart M, the last
sentence has been revised to add Part 102 as one of the parts in the
CBP regulations that include amendments implementing the MFTA,
consistent with the revision to the definition of ``new or different
article of commerce'' in Sec. 10.769(i) discussed above;
2. In Sec. 10.769, the definition of ``substantially transformed''
(formerly paragraph (o)) has been removed as those words are no longer
used in Subpart M as a result of the revision of the definition of
``new or different article of commerce'' discussed above;
3. In Sec. 10.770, which sets forth the basic MFTA rules of
origin, paragraph (a)(2) has been revised to add the words ``, as
defined in Sec. 10.769(i) of this subpart,'' immediately following the
words ``new or different article of commerce'' for clarification
purposes;
4. Section 10.785, which concerns verifications conducted in
Morocco by Moroccan authorities (at the request of CBP) relating to
textile and apparel goods imported into the United States, has been
removed in its entirety. CBP believes that the provisions of Sec.
10.785 are unnecessary to the proper implementation of the MFTA as they
relate primarily to actions that the Government of Morocco and CBP may
take in connection with verifications performed in Morocco. As such,
these provisions impose no requirements on U.S. importers of textile or
apparel goods or other members of the trade. In addition, CBP notes
that the removal of Sec. 10.785 provides consistency between the MFTA
implementing regulations and the interim regulations implementing the
BFTA, which include no provisions regarding verifications in Bahrain of
U.S. imports of textile and apparel products. The verification
provisions in the MFTA closely parallel those in the BFTA;
5. As a result of the removal of Sec. 10.785, discussed above,
Sec. Sec. 10.786 through 10.788 of the interim regulatory text have
been re-designated as Sec. Sec. 10.785 through 10.787, respectively;
and
6. In Sec. 102.0, relating to the scope of part 102, the third
sentence has been revised by adding the words ``Sec. 10.769 of the
United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement regulations and''
immediately following the words ``new or different article of commerce
under'', consistent with the revision of the definition of ``new or
different article of commerce'' discussed above.
Conclusion
Accordingly, based on the considerations discussed above, CBP
believes that the interim regulations published as CBP Dec. 07-51,
should be adopted as a final rule with certain changes as discussed
above and as set forth below.
Executive Order 12866
CBP has determined that this document is not a regulation or rule
subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993 (58 FR 51735, October 1993), because it pertains to a foreign
affairs function of the United States and implements an international
agreement and, therefore, is specifically exempted by section 3(d)(2)
of Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
CBP Dec. 07-51 was issued as an interim rule rather than a notice
of proposed rulemaking because CBP had determined that the interim
regulations involve a foreign affairs function of the United States
pursuant to Sec. 553(a)(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act.
Because no notice of proposed rulemaking was required, the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),
do not apply. Accordingly, this final rule is not subject to the
regulatory analysis requirements or other requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information in this final rule has previously
been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1651-0117.
The collections of information in these regulations are in
Sec. Sec. 10.703 and 10.704. This information is required in
connection with claims for preferential tariff treatment and for the
purpose of the exercise of other rights under the
[[Page 45354]]
MFTA and the Act and will be used by CBP to determine eligibility for a
tariff preference or other rights or benefits under the MFTA and the
Act. The likely respondents are business organizations including
importers, exporters, and manufacturers.
The estimated average annual burden associated with the collection
of information in this final rule is 0.2 hours per respondent or record
keeper. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in accordance with Sec. 0.1(a)(1) of
the CBP regulations (19 CFR 0.1(a)(1)) pertaining to the authority of
the Secretary of the Treasury (or his/her delegate) to approve
regulations related to certain customs revenue functions.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Part 10
Alterations, Bonds, Customs duties and inspection, Exports,
Imports, Preference programs, Repairs, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Trade agreements.
19 CFR Part 102
Customs duties and inspections, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rules of origin, Trade agreements.
19 CFR Part 162
Administrative practice and procedure, Customs duties and
inspection, Penalties, Trade agreements.
19 CFR Part 163
Administrative practice and procedure, Customs duties and
inspection, Export, Import, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Trade agreements.
19 CFR Part 178
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Imports, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the CBP Regulations
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending parts 10, 162, 163, and 178 of
the CBP regulations (19 CFR parts 10, 162, 163, and 178), which was
published at 72 FR 35647 on June 29, 2007, is adopted as a final rule
with certain changes as discussed above and as set forth below.
PART 10--ARTICLES CONDITIONALLY FREE, SUBJECT TO A REDUCED RATE,
ETC.
0
1. The general authority citation for Part 10 and the specific
authority for Subpart M continue to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1321, 1481, 1484, 1498, 1508,
1623, 1624, 3314;
* * * * *
Sections 10.761 through 10.787 also issued under Public Law 108-
302, 118 Stat. 1103 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note).
* * * * *
0
2. Section 10.761 is amended by revising the last sentence to read as
follows:
Sec. 10.761 Scope.
* * * Additional provisions implementing certain aspects of the
MFTA and the Act are contained in Parts 102, 162, and 163 of this
chapter.
0
3. Section 10.769 is amended by revising paragraph (i) and removing
paragraph (o). Revised paragraph (i) reads as follows:
Sec. 10.769 Definitions.
* * * * *
(i) New or different article of commerce. A ``new or different
article of commerce'' exists when the country of origin of a good which
is produced in a Party from foreign materials is determined to be that
country under the provisions of Sec. Sec. 102.1 through 102.21 of this
chapter;
* * * * *
Sec. 10.770 [Amended]
0
4. Section 10.770 is amended by adding the words ``, as defined in
Sec. 10.769(i) of this subpart,'' immediately following the words
``new or different article of commerce'' in paragraph (a)(2).
Sec. 10.785 [Removed]
0
5. Section 10.785 is removed.
Sec. Sec. 10.786 through 10.788 [Redesignated as Sec. Sec. 10.785
through 10.787]
0
6. Sections 10.786 through 10.788 are redesignated as Sec. Sec. 10.785
through 10.787, respectively.
PART 102--RULES OF ORIGIN
0
7. The authority citation for part 102 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1624, 3314, 3592.
0
8. Section 102.0 is amended by revising the third sentence to read as
follows:
Sec. 102.0 Scope.
* * * The rules set forth in Sec. Sec. 102.1 through 102.21 of
this part will also apply for purposes of determining whether an
imported good is a new or different article of commerce under Sec.
10.769 of the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement regulations
and Sec. 10.809 of the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement
regulations.* * *
W. Ralph Basham,
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
Approved: July 31, 2008.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. E8-17968 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P