Rules for Home Construction Contracts, 45180-45184 [E8-17830]
Download as PDF
45180
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness
Directives 2007–12–01 and 2007–12–02, both
effective January 24, 2008, and EMBRAER
Service Bulletins 170–24–0041, Revision 01,
dated August 28, 2007; and 190–24–0012,
Revision 01, dated August 21, 2007; for
related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 23,
2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–17777 Filed 8–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–120844–07]
RIN 1545–BG70
Rules for Home Construction
Contracts
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and Notice of Public Hearing.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed regulations amending the
regulations under § 1.460 to provide
guidance to taxpayers in the home
construction industry regarding
accounting for certain long-term
construction contracts that qualify as
home construction contracts under
section 460(e)(6) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code) and to provide guidance to
taxpayers with long-term contracts
under section 460(f) regarding certain
changes in method of accounting for
long-term contracts. This document also
provides a notice of a public hearing on
these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by November 3, 2008. Outlines
of topics to be discussed at the public
hearing scheduled for December 5,
2008, at 10 a.m. must be received by
November 13, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–120844–07), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, POB
7604 Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20224. Submissions may be hand
delivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–120844–07),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC. Alternatively,
taxpayers may submit comments
electronically via the Federal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–120844–
07). The public hearing will be held in
the auditorium, Internal Revenue
Service Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Brendan P. O’Hara, (202) 622–4920;
concerning submission of comments,
the hearing, or to be placed on the
building access list to attend the
hearing, Richard Hurst, (202) 622–7180
(not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Explanation of
Provisions
This document contains a proposed
amendment to the Income Tax
Regulations, 26 CFR part 1, under
section 460 and §§ 1.460–3, 1.460–4,
1.460–5 and 1.460–6 of the Income Tax
Regulations. In general, section 460(a)
requires taxpayers to use the percentage
of completion method (PCM) to account
for taxable income from any long-term
contract. Section 460(e) exempts home
construction contracts from the general
requirement to use the percentage of
completion method of accounting.
Section 460(e)(6) defines a home
construction contract to be any
construction contract if 80 percent or
more of the total estimated contract
costs are reasonably expected to be
attributable to the construction of (i)
dwelling units contained in buildings
containing 4 or fewer dwelling units,
and (ii) improvements to real property
directly related to such dwelling units
and located on the site of such dwelling
units. Section 460(e)(4) defines a
construction contract to be any contract
for the building, construction,
reconstruction, or rehabilitation of, or
the installation of any integral
component to, or improvement of, real
property.
These proposed regulations expand
the types of contracts eligible for the
home construction contract exemption
and amend the rules for how taxpayerinitiated changes in methods of
accounting to comply with the
regulations under section 460 may be
implemented.
Definition of a Home Construction
Contract
Improvements to Real Property
The definition of a construction
contract under section 460(e) includes
many transactions involving land
developers and construction service
providers in the home construction
industry. For example, a construction
contract under section 460(e) includes a
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
contract for the provision of land by the
taxpayer if the estimated total allocable
contract costs attributable to the
taxpayer’s construction activities (not
including the cost of the land provided
to the customer) are 10 percent or more
of the contract’s total contract price.
As noted, section 460(a) requires that
the income from any long-term contract
be recognized using the percentage of
completion method. However, taxpayers
with contracts that meet the definition
of a ‘‘home construction contract’’ are
not required to use the percentage of
completion method for those contracts
and may use an exempt method. Exempt
methods commonly used to account for
home construction contracts include the
completed contract method (CCM) and
the accrual method.
Under section 460, a home
construction contract includes any
construction contract if 80 percent of
the total estimated contract costs are
reasonably expected to be attributable to
the construction of improvements to
real property directly related to
qualifying dwelling units and located on
the site of such dwelling units.
Commentators have suggested that
many contracts entered into by land
developers in the home construction
industry should fall within the
definition of a home construction
contract.
The proposed regulations expand the
scope of the home construction contract
exemption by providing that a contract
for the construction of common
improvements is considered a contract
for the construction of improvements to
real property directly related to the
dwelling unit(s) and located on the site
of such dwelling unit(s), even if the
contract is not for the construction of
any dwelling unit. Therefore, under the
proposed regulations, a land developer
that is selling individual lots (and its
contractors and subcontractors) may
have long-term construction contracts
that qualify for the home construction
contract exemption.
Townhouses, Rowhouses, and
Condominiums
Under section 460, a home
construction contract also includes any
construction contract if 80 percent of
the total contract costs are reasonably
expected to be attributable to the
construction of dwelling units
contained in buildings containing four
or fewer dwelling units. Section
460(e)(6) states that each townhouse or
rowhouse shall be treated as a separate
building, regardless of the number of
townhouses or rowhouses physically
attached to each other. In certain
circumstances, the terms condominium
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
and townhouse are used
interchangeably to describe similar
structures. Individual condominium
units possess many of the characteristics
generally associated with townhouses
and rowhouses such as private
ownership, shared portions of their
structures, residential housing, and the
economics of the underlying purchase
transactions.
The proposed regulations expand
what is considered a townhouse or
rowhouse, for purposes of the home
construction contract exemption, to
include an individual condominium
unit. This will have the effect of
allowing each condominium unit to be
treated as a separate building for
purposes of determining whether the
underlying contract qualifies as a home
construction contract.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
Completed Contract Method
Under the current regulations under
section 460, the appropriate severing of
a home construction contract requires a
facts and circumstances analysis based
upon certain factors that are neither
specific nor always relevant to home
construction contracts. Likewise, the
date a home construction contract is
considered completed and accepted is
determined using a facts and
circumstances analysis.
The IRS and Treasury Department are
aware of controversies related to the
application of the existing facts and
circumstances analyses for determining
the appropriate severance and final
completion and acceptance of home
construction contracts accounted for
using the completed contract method.
Expanding the definition of a home
construction contract as provided in
these proposed regulations may
heighten the significance of these issues.
As a result, the IRS and Treasury
Department expect to propose specific
severing and completion rules for home
construction contracts accounted for
using the completed contract method.
Taxpayers are encouraged to submit
comments on the types of severing and
completion rules that would result in
the clear reflection of income for home
construction contracts accounted for
using the completed contract method.
Specifically, the IRS and the Treasury
Department request comments on the
circumstances (if any) in which it would
not be appropriate to require severing
and completion of a home construction
contract to be determined on a dwelling
unit by dwelling unit or lot by lot basis
or, when a contract is not for the sale
of a dwelling unit or lot, on the basis of
when the taxpayer receives payment(s)
under the contract.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
Method of Accounting
Currently, the regulations under
section 460 provide that a taxpayer that
uses the percentage-of-completion
method (PCM), the exempt-contract
percentage-of-completion method
(EPCM), or elects the 10-percent method
or special alternative minimum taxable
income (AMTI) method, or that adopts
or elects a cost allocation method of
accounting (or changes to another
method of accounting with the
Commissioner’s consent) must apply the
method(s) consistently for all similarly
classified contracts until the taxpayer
obtains the Commissioner’s consent
under section 446 to change to another
method of accounting. The regulations
further provide that a taxpayer-initiated
change in method of accounting will be
permitted only on a cut-off basis (that is,
for contracts entered into on or after the
year of change), and thus, a section
481(a) adjustment will not be permitted
nor required. The proposed regulations
continue this cut-off method of
implementation but only for taxpayerinitiated changes from a permissible
PCM method to another permissible
PCM method for long-term contracts for
which PCM is required and for
taxpayer-initiated changes from a cost
allocation method of accounting that
complies with the cost allocation rules
of § 1.460–5 to another cost allocation
method of accounting that complies
with the cost allocation rules of § 1.460–
5. Under the proposed regulations all
other taxpayer-initiated changes in
method of accounting under section 460
will be made with a section 481(a)
adjustment.
The proposed regulations provide that
in determining the hypothetical
underpayment or overpayment of tax for
any year as part of the look-back
computation, amounts reported as
section 481(a) adjustments shall
generally be taken into account in the
tax year or years they are reported. For
purposes of determining whether there
is a hypothetical underpayment or
overpayment of tax under the look-back
computation, a taxpayer would use
amounts reported under its old method
for the years the old method was used
and would use amounts reported under
its new method for the years the new
method was used, netted against the
amount of any section 481(a)
adjustments required to be taken into
account. Thus, a look-back computation
would not be required upon contract
completion simply because the taxpayer
has changed its method of accounting.
However, a look-back computation
would be required upon contract
completion if actual costs or the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45181
contract price differ from the estimated
amounts notwithstanding the fact a
change in method of accounting
occurred. For example, if a taxpayer
using PCM changed its method of
accounting for construction costs
incurred in a contract reported under
PCM, the section 460 look-back would
be computed using the costs recognized
prior to the year of change (reported
under the taxpayer’s old method of
accounting) and the costs recognized in
subsequent years using the new method
of accounting, netted against any
applicable section 481(a) adjustment.
Similarly, for changes in methods of
accounting where no costs were
recognized under the old method of
accounting (for example, a change in
method of accounting from CCM to
PCM), look-back would effectively only
apply to years in which the taxpayer’s
new method of accounting was used to
the extent that no costs were recognized
prior to the year of change under the old
method of accounting. This approach to
the look-back computation is consistent
with the underlying purpose of lookback as well as the general accounting
method change procedures. Comments
are specifically requested with respect
to issues that taxpayers may foresee
with respect to the rules provided in
these proposed regulations for taking
into account section 481(a) adjustments
in the year reported for purposes of the
look-back computation.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to
apply to taxable years beginning on or
after the date the final regulations are
published in the Federal Register. The
final regulations will provide rules
applicable to taxpayers that seek to
change a method of accounting to
comply with the rules contained in the
final regulations. Taxpayers may not
change or otherwise use a method of
accounting in reliance upon the rules
contained in these new proposed
regulations until the rules are published
as final regulations in the Federal
Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this
proposed regulation is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
has also been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply,
and because the regulations do not
impose a collection of information on
small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code,
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
45182
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
this notice of proposed rulemaking will
be submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small businesses.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Comments and Public Hearing
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written comments (a signed original
with eight (8) copies) or electronic
comments that are submitted timely to
the IRS. The IRS and Treasury
Department request comments on the
clarity of the proposed regulations and
how they may be made easier to
understand. All comments will be
available for public inspection and
copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for December 5, 2008, beginning at 10
a.m., in the auditorium of the Internal
Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Due to
building security procedures, visitors
must enter at the Constitution Avenue
entrance. In addition, all visitors must
present photo identification to enter the
building. Because of access restrictions,
visitors will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit electronic or written
comments and an outline of the topics
to be discussed and the time to be
devoted to each topic (signed original
and eight (8) copies) by November 13,
2008. A period of 10 minutes will be
allotted to each person for making
comments. An agenda showing the
scheduling of the speakers will be
prepared after the deadline for receiving
outlines has passed. Copies of the
agenda will be available free of charge
at the hearing.
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Brendan P. O’Hara, Office
of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax
and Accounting). However, other
personnel from the IRS and Treasury
Department participated in their
development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.460–3 is amended
by:
1. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii).
2. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(2)(ii),
(b)(2)(iii) and (b)(2)(iv) as paragraphs
(b)(2)(iii), (b)(2)(iv) and (b)(2)(v),
respectively, and revising them.
3. Adding a new paragraph (b)(2)(ii).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 1.460–3 Long-term construction
contracts.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Construction contract, other than
a home construction contract, that a
taxpayer estimates (when entering into
the contract) will be completed within
2 years of the contract commencement
date, provided the taxpayer satisfies the
$10,000,000 gross receipts test described
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(2) * * *
(ii) Land improvements. For purposes
of paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B) of this section,
improvements to real property directly
related to, and located on the site of, the
dwelling units consist of improvements
to land on which dwelling units (as
described in paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of
this section) are constructed, and
common improvements as defined in
paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section. A
long-term construction contract is a
home construction contract if a taxpayer
(including a subcontractor working for a
general contractor) meets the 80% test
in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section as
applied to either paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A)
of this section or paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B)
of this section, or both paragraphs
(b)(2)(i)(A) and (b)(2)(i)(B) of this
section, collectively.
(iii) Townhouses and rowhouses. For
purposes of determining whether a longterm construction contract is a home
construction contract under paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, each townhouse or
rowhouse is a separate building. For this
purpose, the term townhouse and
rowhouse includes an individual
condominium unit.
(iv) Common improvements—(A) In
general. A taxpayer includes in the cost
of a dwelling unit or land its allocable
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
share of the cost that the taxpayer incurs
for any common improvements that
benefit the dwelling unit or land.
(B) Definition. For purposes of this
section, a common improvement is an
improvement that the taxpayer is
contractually obligated, or required by
law, to construct within the tract or
tracts of land containing the dwelling
units (or the land on which dwelling
units are to be constructed) and that
benefits the dwelling units (or the land
on which dwelling units are to be
constructed). In general, a common
improvement does not solely benefit
any particular dwelling unit or any
particular lot on which a dwelling unit
is constructed. However, land clearing
and grading are common improvements,
even when performed on a particular
lot. Other examples of common
improvements are sidewalks, sewers,
roads and clubhouses.
(v) Mixed use costs. If a contract
involves the construction of both
commercial units and dwelling units, a
taxpayer must allocate the costs among
the commercial units and dwelling units
using a reasonable method or
combination of reasonable methods. In
general, the reasonableness of an
allocation method will be based on facts
and circumstances. Examples of
methods that may be reasonable are
specific identification, square footage, or
fair market value.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 3. Section 1.460–4 is amended
by:
1. Revising the third sentence in
paragraph (c)(1).
2. Redesignating paragraph (g) as
paragraph (g)(1) and revising newly
redesignated paragraph (g)(1).
3. Adding a paragraph (g)(2).
4. Revising Example 5. of paragraph
(h).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 1.460–4 Methods of accounting for longterm contracts.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * * Permissible exempt contract
methods are the PCM, the EPCM
described in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, the CCM described in paragraph
(d) of this section, the accrual method,
and any other permissible method.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Method of accounting—(1) In
general. A taxpayer must apply its
method(s) of accounting for long-term
contracts consistently for all similarly
classified long-term contracts until the
taxpayer obtains the Commissioner’s
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
consent under section 446(e) to change
to another method of accounting.
(2) Taxpayer-initiated change in
method of accounting—(i) Change to
PCM for long-term contracts for which
PCM is required. A taxpayer-initiated
change in method of accounting for
long-term contracts (or portion thereof)
for which income must be determined
using the PCM described in paragraph
(b) of this section and the costs
allocation rules described in § 1.460–
5(b) or (c) (required PCM contracts) from
a method of accounting that does not
comply with paragraph (b) of this
section and § 1.460–5(b) or (c) to a
method that complies with paragraph
(b) of this section and § 1.460–5(b) or (c)
must be applied to all required PCM
contracts entered into before the year of
change and not reported as completed
as of the beginning of the year of
change. Accordingly, a section 481(a)
adjustment will be required.
(ii) Change from a permissible PCM
method to another permissible PCM
method for long-term contracts for
which PCM is required. A taxpayer
initiated change in method of
accounting for required PCM contracts,
as defined in paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this
section (or a portion thereof), from a
method of accounting that complies
with paragraph (b) of this section and
§ 1.460–5(b) or (c) to another method of
accounting that complies with
paragraph (b) of this section and
§ 1.460–5(b) or (c) must be made on a
cut-off basis and applied only to
contracts entered into during and after
the year of change. Accordingly, a
section 481(a) adjustment will be
neither permitted nor required.
(iii) Change to an exempt contract
method for home construction
contracts. A taxpayer-initiated change
in method of accounting for home
construction contracts, as defined in
§ 1.460–3(b)(2), to a permissible exempt
contract method, as described in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, must be
applied to all home construction
contracts entered into before the year of
change and not reported as completed
as of the beginning of the year of
change. Accordingly, a section 481(a)
adjustment will be required.
(iv) Change to an exempt contract
method for exempt contracts other than
home construction contracts. A
taxpayer-initiated change in method of
accounting for long-term contracts (or
portion thereof) not described in
paragraphs (g)(2)(i), (ii) and (iii) of this
section to a permissible exempt contract
method as described in paragraph (c)(1)
of this section must be applied to all
contracts that are eligible to use the
exempt contract method entered into
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
before the year of change and not
reported as completed as of the
beginning of the year of change.
Accordingly, a section 481(a)
adjustment will be required.
(h) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Example 5. PCM—contract terminated. C,
whose taxable year ends December 31,
determines the income from long-term
contracts using the PCM. During 2001, C
buys land and begins constructing a building
that will contain 50 apartment units on that
land. C enters into a contract to sell the
building to B for $2,400,000. B gives C a
$50,000 deposit toward the purchase price.
By the end of 2001, C has incurred $500,000
of allocable contract costs on the building
and estimates that the total allocable contract
costs on the building will be $1,500,000.
Thus, for 2001, C reports gross receipts of
$800,000 ($500,000/$1,500,000 ×
$2,400,000), current-year costs of $500,000,
and gross income of $300,000
($800,000¥$500,000). In 2002, after C has
incurred an additional $250,000 of allocable
contract costs on the building, B files for
bankruptcy protection and defaults on the
contract with C, who is permitted to keep B’s
$50,000 deposit as liquidated damages. In
2002, C reverses the transaction with B under
paragraph (b)(7) of this section and reports a
loss of $300,000 ($500,000¥$800,000). In
addition, C obtains an adjusted basis in the
building sold to B of $700,000 ($500,000
(current-year costs deducted in
2001)¥$50,000 (B’s forfeited deposit) +
$250,000 (current-year costs incurred in
2002). C may not apply the look-back method
to this contract in 2002.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 4. Section 1.460–5 is amended
by:
1. Adding a new sentence to the end
of paragraph (c)(2).
2. Revising paragraph (g).
The revision and addition read as
follows:
§ 1.460–5
Cost allocation rules.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * * Further, this election is not
available if a taxpayer is changing from
a cost allocation method other than as
prescribed in paragraph (b) of this
section, in which case the taxpayer must
follow the procedures under § 1.446–
1(e) for obtaining the Commissioner’s
consent for the change in method of
accounting.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Method of accounting. A taxpayer
that adopts, elects, or otherwise changes
to a cost allocation method of
accounting (or changes to another cost
allocation method of accounting with
the Commissioner’s consent) must apply
that method consistently for all
similarly classified contracts, until the
taxpayer obtains the Commissioner’s
consent under section 446 to change to
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45183
another cost allocation method. A
taxpayer-initiated change in cost
allocation method from a method that
does not comply with the cost allocation
rules of this section to a method that
complies with the cost allocation rules
of this section must be applied to all
long-term contracts to which the rules of
this section apply, including contracts
entered into before the year of change
and not reported as completed as of the
beginning of the year of change.
Accordingly, a section 481(a)
adjustment is required. Any other
taxpayer-initiated change in cost
allocation method to a method
permitted under the rules of this section
must be made on a cut-off basis and
applied only to contracts entered into
during and after the year of change, in
which case a section 481(a) adjustment
will be neither permitted nor required.
Par. 5. Section 1.460–6 is amended
by:
1. Adding paragraph (c)(3)(vii).
2. Redesignating paragraph (d)(2)(iv)
as paragraph (d)(2)(v).
3. Adding a new paragraph (d)(2)(iv).
The additions and revision read as
follows:
§ 1.460–6
Look-back method.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(vii) Section 481(a) adjustments. For
purposes of determining the
hypothetical underpayment or
overpayment of tax for any year,
amounts reported as section 481(a)
adjustments shall be taken into account
in the tax year or years they are
reported. However, any portion of a
section 481(a) adjustment not yet
reported as of the tax year in which the
contract is completed shall be taken into
account in the tax year the contract is
completed for purposes of determining
the hypothetical underpayment or
overpayment of tax.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Section 481(a) adjustments. For
purposes of determining the
hypothetical underpayment or
overpayment of tax for any year under
the simplified marginal impact method,
amounts reported as section 481(a)
adjustments shall be taken into account
in the tax year or years they are
reported. However, any portion of a
section 481(a) adjustment not yet
reported as of the tax year in which the
contract is completed shall be taken into
account in the tax year the contract is
completed for purposes of determining
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
45184
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
the hypothetical underpayment or
overpayment of tax.
*
*
*
*
*
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E8–17830 Filed 8–1–08; 8:45 am]
Matt
Rau, Environmental Engineer, Criteria
Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,
(312) 886–6524, rau.matthew@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the
Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State’s
SIP submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this rule, no
further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all
public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that, if EPA receives adverse
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment. For additional information,
see the direct final rule which is located
in the Rules section of this Federal
Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2006–0003; FRL–8696–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a revision to the Illinois State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone.
The state is incorporating revisions EPA
made to its definition of volatile organic
compound (VOC). This SIP revision
adds one compound to the list of
compounds that are exempt from being
considered a VOC. This is because it
was determined that the listed
compound does not contribute to ozone
formation.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2006–0003, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 886–5824.
4. Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief,
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney,
Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal
holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules section of this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
Dated: July 14, 2008.
Walter W. Kovalick Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E8–17698 Filed 8–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2008–0501; FRL–8698–8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a request submitted by the Indiana
Department of Environmental
Management on May 22, 2008, to revise
the Indiana State Implementation Plan
(SIP). The submission revises the
Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) by
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
amending and updating the definition of
‘‘References to Code of Federal
Regulations,’’ to refer to the 2007
edition.
In the final rules section of this
Federal Register, EPA is approving the
SIP revision as a direct final rule
without prior proposal, because EPA
views this as a noncontroversial
revision and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If we do not receive any adverse
comments in response to these direct
final and proposed rules, we do not
contemplate taking any further action in
relation to this proposed rule. If EPA
receives adverse comments, we will
withdraw the direct final rule and will
respond to all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2008–0501 by one of the following
methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
• Fax: (312) 886–5824.
• Mail: John Mooney, Chief, Criteria
Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
• Hand Delivery: John Mooney, Chief,
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding
Federal holidays.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031,
hatten.charles@epa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 150 (Monday, August 4, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45180-45184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17830]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-120844-07]
RIN 1545-BG70
Rules for Home Construction Contracts
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and Notice of Public Hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations amending the
regulations under Sec. 1.460 to provide guidance to taxpayers in the
home construction industry regarding accounting for certain long-term
construction contracts that qualify as home construction contracts
under section 460(e)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and to
provide guidance to taxpayers with long-term contracts under section
460(f) regarding certain changes in method of accounting for long-term
contracts. This document also provides a notice of a public hearing on
these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be received by November 3, 2008. Outlines
of topics to be discussed at the public hearing scheduled for December
5, 2008, at 10 a.m. must be received by November 13, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-120844-07), room 5203,
Internal Revenue Service, POB 7604 Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC
20224. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through Friday between
the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-120844-07),
Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC. Alternatively, taxpayers may submit comments
electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-120844-07). The public hearing will be
held in the auditorium, Internal Revenue Service Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Brendan P. O'Hara, (202) 622-4920; concerning submission of comments,
the hearing, or to be placed on the building access list to attend the
hearing, Richard Hurst, (202) 622-7180 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Explanation of Provisions
This document contains a proposed amendment to the Income Tax
Regulations, 26 CFR part 1, under section 460 and Sec. Sec. 1.460-3,
1.460-4, 1.460-5 and 1.460-6 of the Income Tax Regulations. In general,
section 460(a) requires taxpayers to use the percentage of completion
method (PCM) to account for taxable income from any long-term contract.
Section 460(e) exempts home construction contracts from the general
requirement to use the percentage of completion method of accounting.
Section 460(e)(6) defines a home construction contract to be any
construction contract if 80 percent or more of the total estimated
contract costs are reasonably expected to be attributable to the
construction of (i) dwelling units contained in buildings containing 4
or fewer dwelling units, and (ii) improvements to real property
directly related to such dwelling units and located on the site of such
dwelling units. Section 460(e)(4) defines a construction contract to be
any contract for the building, construction, reconstruction, or
rehabilitation of, or the installation of any integral component to, or
improvement of, real property.
These proposed regulations expand the types of contracts eligible
for the home construction contract exemption and amend the rules for
how taxpayer-initiated changes in methods of accounting to comply with
the regulations under section 460 may be implemented.
Definition of a Home Construction Contract
Improvements to Real Property
The definition of a construction contract under section 460(e)
includes many transactions involving land developers and construction
service providers in the home construction industry. For example, a
construction contract under section 460(e) includes a contract for the
provision of land by the taxpayer if the estimated total allocable
contract costs attributable to the taxpayer's construction activities
(not including the cost of the land provided to the customer) are 10
percent or more of the contract's total contract price.
As noted, section 460(a) requires that the income from any long-
term contract be recognized using the percentage of completion method.
However, taxpayers with contracts that meet the definition of a ``home
construction contract'' are not required to use the percentage of
completion method for those contracts and may use an exempt method.
Exempt methods commonly used to account for home construction contracts
include the completed contract method (CCM) and the accrual method.
Under section 460, a home construction contract includes any
construction contract if 80 percent of the total estimated contract
costs are reasonably expected to be attributable to the construction of
improvements to real property directly related to qualifying dwelling
units and located on the site of such dwelling units. Commentators have
suggested that many contracts entered into by land developers in the
home construction industry should fall within the definition of a home
construction contract.
The proposed regulations expand the scope of the home construction
contract exemption by providing that a contract for the construction of
common improvements is considered a contract for the construction of
improvements to real property directly related to the dwelling unit(s)
and located on the site of such dwelling unit(s), even if the contract
is not for the construction of any dwelling unit. Therefore, under the
proposed regulations, a land developer that is selling individual lots
(and its contractors and subcontractors) may have long-term
construction contracts that qualify for the home construction contract
exemption.
Townhouses, Rowhouses, and Condominiums
Under section 460, a home construction contract also includes any
construction contract if 80 percent of the total contract costs are
reasonably expected to be attributable to the construction of dwelling
units contained in buildings containing four or fewer dwelling units.
Section 460(e)(6) states that each townhouse or rowhouse shall be
treated as a separate building, regardless of the number of townhouses
or rowhouses physically attached to each other. In certain
circumstances, the terms condominium
[[Page 45181]]
and townhouse are used interchangeably to describe similar structures.
Individual condominium units possess many of the characteristics
generally associated with townhouses and rowhouses such as private
ownership, shared portions of their structures, residential housing,
and the economics of the underlying purchase transactions.
The proposed regulations expand what is considered a townhouse or
rowhouse, for purposes of the home construction contract exemption, to
include an individual condominium unit. This will have the effect of
allowing each condominium unit to be treated as a separate building for
purposes of determining whether the underlying contract qualifies as a
home construction contract.
Completed Contract Method
Under the current regulations under section 460, the appropriate
severing of a home construction contract requires a facts and
circumstances analysis based upon certain factors that are neither
specific nor always relevant to home construction contracts. Likewise,
the date a home construction contract is considered completed and
accepted is determined using a facts and circumstances analysis.
The IRS and Treasury Department are aware of controversies related
to the application of the existing facts and circumstances analyses for
determining the appropriate severance and final completion and
acceptance of home construction contracts accounted for using the
completed contract method. Expanding the definition of a home
construction contract as provided in these proposed regulations may
heighten the significance of these issues. As a result, the IRS and
Treasury Department expect to propose specific severing and completion
rules for home construction contracts accounted for using the completed
contract method. Taxpayers are encouraged to submit comments on the
types of severing and completion rules that would result in the clear
reflection of income for home construction contracts accounted for
using the completed contract method. Specifically, the IRS and the
Treasury Department request comments on the circumstances (if any) in
which it would not be appropriate to require severing and completion of
a home construction contract to be determined on a dwelling unit by
dwelling unit or lot by lot basis or, when a contract is not for the
sale of a dwelling unit or lot, on the basis of when the taxpayer
receives payment(s) under the contract.
Method of Accounting
Currently, the regulations under section 460 provide that a
taxpayer that uses the percentage-of-completion method (PCM), the
exempt-contract percentage-of-completion method (EPCM), or elects the
10-percent method or special alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI)
method, or that adopts or elects a cost allocation method of accounting
(or changes to another method of accounting with the Commissioner's
consent) must apply the method(s) consistently for all similarly
classified contracts until the taxpayer obtains the Commissioner's
consent under section 446 to change to another method of accounting.
The regulations further provide that a taxpayer-initiated change in
method of accounting will be permitted only on a cut-off basis (that
is, for contracts entered into on or after the year of change), and
thus, a section 481(a) adjustment will not be permitted nor required.
The proposed regulations continue this cut-off method of implementation
but only for taxpayer-initiated changes from a permissible PCM method
to another permissible PCM method for long-term contracts for which PCM
is required and for taxpayer-initiated changes from a cost allocation
method of accounting that complies with the cost allocation rules of
Sec. 1.460-5 to another cost allocation method of accounting that
complies with the cost allocation rules of Sec. 1.460-5. Under the
proposed regulations all other taxpayer-initiated changes in method of
accounting under section 460 will be made with a section 481(a)
adjustment.
The proposed regulations provide that in determining the
hypothetical underpayment or overpayment of tax for any year as part of
the look-back computation, amounts reported as section 481(a)
adjustments shall generally be taken into account in the tax year or
years they are reported. For purposes of determining whether there is a
hypothetical underpayment or overpayment of tax under the look-back
computation, a taxpayer would use amounts reported under its old method
for the years the old method was used and would use amounts reported
under its new method for the years the new method was used, netted
against the amount of any section 481(a) adjustments required to be
taken into account. Thus, a look-back computation would not be required
upon contract completion simply because the taxpayer has changed its
method of accounting. However, a look-back computation would be
required upon contract completion if actual costs or the contract price
differ from the estimated amounts notwithstanding the fact a change in
method of accounting occurred. For example, if a taxpayer using PCM
changed its method of accounting for construction costs incurred in a
contract reported under PCM, the section 460 look-back would be
computed using the costs recognized prior to the year of change
(reported under the taxpayer's old method of accounting) and the costs
recognized in subsequent years using the new method of accounting,
netted against any applicable section 481(a) adjustment. Similarly, for
changes in methods of accounting where no costs were recognized under
the old method of accounting (for example, a change in method of
accounting from CCM to PCM), look-back would effectively only apply to
years in which the taxpayer's new method of accounting was used to the
extent that no costs were recognized prior to the year of change under
the old method of accounting. This approach to the look-back
computation is consistent with the underlying purpose of look-back as
well as the general accounting method change procedures. Comments are
specifically requested with respect to issues that taxpayers may
foresee with respect to the rules provided in these proposed
regulations for taking into account section 481(a) adjustments in the
year reported for purposes of the look-back computation.
Proposed Effective/Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to apply to taxable years beginning
on or after the date the final regulations are published in the Federal
Register. The final regulations will provide rules applicable to
taxpayers that seek to change a method of accounting to comply with the
rules contained in the final regulations. Taxpayers may not change or
otherwise use a method of accounting in reliance upon the rules
contained in these new proposed regulations until the rules are
published as final regulations in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this proposed regulation is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866.
Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It has also been
determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply, and because the regulations do not
impose a collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code,
[[Page 45182]]
this notice of proposed rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small businesses.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written comments (a signed original
with eight (8) copies) or electronic comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS. The IRS and Treasury Department request comments on the
clarity of the proposed regulations and how they may be made easier to
understand. All comments will be available for public inspection and
copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled for December 5, 2008, beginning
at 10 a.m., in the auditorium of the Internal Revenue Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must enter at the Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo identification to enter the
building. Because of access restrictions, visitors will not be admitted
beyond the immediate entrance area more than 30 minutes before the
hearing starts. For information about having your name placed on the
building access list to attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing. Persons who
wish to present oral comments at the hearing must submit electronic or
written comments and an outline of the topics to be discussed and the
time to be devoted to each topic (signed original and eight (8) copies)
by November 13, 2008. A period of 10 minutes will be allotted to each
person for making comments. An agenda showing the scheduling of the
speakers will be prepared after the deadline for receiving outlines has
passed. Copies of the agenda will be available free of charge at the
hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Brendan P. O'Hara,
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting). However,
other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in
their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.460-3 is amended by:
1. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(ii).
2. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(2)(ii), (b)(2)(iii) and (b)(2)(iv)
as paragraphs (b)(2)(iii), (b)(2)(iv) and (b)(2)(v), respectively, and
revising them.
3. Adding a new paragraph (b)(2)(ii).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1.460-3 Long-term construction contracts.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Construction contract, other than a home construction
contract, that a taxpayer estimates (when entering into the contract)
will be completed within 2 years of the contract commencement date,
provided the taxpayer satisfies the $10,000,000 gross receipts test
described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(2) * * *
(ii) Land improvements. For purposes of paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B) of
this section, improvements to real property directly related to, and
located on the site of, the dwelling units consist of improvements to
land on which dwelling units (as described in paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of
this section) are constructed, and common improvements as defined in
paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section. A long-term construction contract
is a home construction contract if a taxpayer (including a
subcontractor working for a general contractor) meets the 80% test in
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section as applied to either paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(A) of this section or paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B) of this section,
or both paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(A) and (b)(2)(i)(B) of this section,
collectively.
(iii) Townhouses and rowhouses. For purposes of determining whether
a long-term construction contract is a home construction contract under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, each townhouse or rowhouse is a
separate building. For this purpose, the term townhouse and rowhouse
includes an individual condominium unit.
(iv) Common improvements--(A) In general. A taxpayer includes in
the cost of a dwelling unit or land its allocable share of the cost
that the taxpayer incurs for any common improvements that benefit the
dwelling unit or land.
(B) Definition. For purposes of this section, a common improvement
is an improvement that the taxpayer is contractually obligated, or
required by law, to construct within the tract or tracts of land
containing the dwelling units (or the land on which dwelling units are
to be constructed) and that benefits the dwelling units (or the land on
which dwelling units are to be constructed). In general, a common
improvement does not solely benefit any particular dwelling unit or any
particular lot on which a dwelling unit is constructed. However, land
clearing and grading are common improvements, even when performed on a
particular lot. Other examples of common improvements are sidewalks,
sewers, roads and clubhouses.
(v) Mixed use costs. If a contract involves the construction of
both commercial units and dwelling units, a taxpayer must allocate the
costs among the commercial units and dwelling units using a reasonable
method or combination of reasonable methods. In general, the
reasonableness of an allocation method will be based on facts and
circumstances. Examples of methods that may be reasonable are specific
identification, square footage, or fair market value.
* * * * *
Par. 3. Section 1.460-4 is amended by:
1. Revising the third sentence in paragraph (c)(1).
2. Redesignating paragraph (g) as paragraph (g)(1) and revising
newly redesignated paragraph (g)(1).
3. Adding a paragraph (g)(2).
4. Revising Example 5. of paragraph (h).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.460-4 Methods of accounting for long-term contracts.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * * Permissible exempt contract methods are the PCM, the EPCM
described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the CCM described in
paragraph (d) of this section, the accrual method, and any other
permissible method. * * *
* * * * *
(g) Method of accounting--(1) In general. A taxpayer must apply its
method(s) of accounting for long-term contracts consistently for all
similarly classified long-term contracts until the taxpayer obtains the
Commissioner's
[[Page 45183]]
consent under section 446(e) to change to another method of accounting.
(2) Taxpayer-initiated change in method of accounting--(i) Change
to PCM for long-term contracts for which PCM is required. A taxpayer-
initiated change in method of accounting for long-term contracts (or
portion thereof) for which income must be determined using the PCM
described in paragraph (b) of this section and the costs allocation
rules described in Sec. 1.460-5(b) or (c) (required PCM contracts)
from a method of accounting that does not comply with paragraph (b) of
this section and Sec. 1.460-5(b) or (c) to a method that complies with
paragraph (b) of this section and Sec. 1.460-5(b) or (c) must be
applied to all required PCM contracts entered into before the year of
change and not reported as completed as of the beginning of the year of
change. Accordingly, a section 481(a) adjustment will be required.
(ii) Change from a permissible PCM method to another permissible
PCM method for long-term contracts for which PCM is required. A
taxpayer initiated change in method of accounting for required PCM
contracts, as defined in paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this section (or a
portion thereof), from a method of accounting that complies with
paragraph (b) of this section and Sec. 1.460-5(b) or (c) to another
method of accounting that complies with paragraph (b) of this section
and Sec. 1.460-5(b) or (c) must be made on a cut-off basis and applied
only to contracts entered into during and after the year of change.
Accordingly, a section 481(a) adjustment will be neither permitted nor
required.
(iii) Change to an exempt contract method for home construction
contracts. A taxpayer-initiated change in method of accounting for home
construction contracts, as defined in Sec. 1.460-3(b)(2), to a
permissible exempt contract method, as described in paragraph (c)(1) of
this section, must be applied to all home construction contracts
entered into before the year of change and not reported as completed as
of the beginning of the year of change. Accordingly, a section 481(a)
adjustment will be required.
(iv) Change to an exempt contract method for exempt contracts other
than home construction contracts. A taxpayer-initiated change in method
of accounting for long-term contracts (or portion thereof) not
described in paragraphs (g)(2)(i), (ii) and (iii) of this section to a
permissible exempt contract method as described in paragraph (c)(1) of
this section must be applied to all contracts that are eligible to use
the exempt contract method entered into before the year of change and
not reported as completed as of the beginning of the year of change.
Accordingly, a section 481(a) adjustment will be required.
(h) * * *
* * * * *
Example 5. PCM--contract terminated. C, whose taxable year ends
December 31, determines the income from long-term contracts using
the PCM. During 2001, C buys land and begins constructing a building
that will contain 50 apartment units on that land. C enters into a
contract to sell the building to B for $2,400,000. B gives C a
$50,000 deposit toward the purchase price. By the end of 2001, C has
incurred $500,000 of allocable contract costs on the building and
estimates that the total allocable contract costs on the building
will be $1,500,000. Thus, for 2001, C reports gross receipts of
$800,000 ($500,000/$1,500,000 x $2,400,000), current-year costs of
$500,000, and gross income of $300,000 ($800,000-$500,000). In 2002,
after C has incurred an additional $250,000 of allocable contract
costs on the building, B files for bankruptcy protection and
defaults on the contract with C, who is permitted to keep B's
$50,000 deposit as liquidated damages. In 2002, C reverses the
transaction with B under paragraph (b)(7) of this section and
reports a loss of $300,000 ($500,000-$800,000). In addition, C
obtains an adjusted basis in the building sold to B of $700,000
($500,000 (current-year costs deducted in 2001)-$50,000 (B's
forfeited deposit) + $250,000 (current-year costs incurred in 2002).
C may not apply the look-back method to this contract in 2002.
* * * * *
Par. 4. Section 1.460-5 is amended by:
1. Adding a new sentence to the end of paragraph (c)(2).
2. Revising paragraph (g).
The revision and addition read as follows:
Sec. 1.460-5 Cost allocation rules.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * * Further, this election is not available if a taxpayer is
changing from a cost allocation method other than as prescribed in
paragraph (b) of this section, in which case the taxpayer must follow
the procedures under Sec. 1.446-1(e) for obtaining the Commissioner's
consent for the change in method of accounting.
* * * * *
(g) Method of accounting. A taxpayer that adopts, elects, or
otherwise changes to a cost allocation method of accounting (or changes
to another cost allocation method of accounting with the Commissioner's
consent) must apply that method consistently for all similarly
classified contracts, until the taxpayer obtains the Commissioner's
consent under section 446 to change to another cost allocation method.
A taxpayer-initiated change in cost allocation method from a method
that does not comply with the cost allocation rules of this section to
a method that complies with the cost allocation rules of this section
must be applied to all long-term contracts to which the rules of this
section apply, including contracts entered into before the year of
change and not reported as completed as of the beginning of the year of
change. Accordingly, a section 481(a) adjustment is required. Any other
taxpayer-initiated change in cost allocation method to a method
permitted under the rules of this section must be made on a cut-off
basis and applied only to contracts entered into during and after the
year of change, in which case a section 481(a) adjustment will be
neither permitted nor required.
Par. 5. Section 1.460-6 is amended by:
1. Adding paragraph (c)(3)(vii).
2. Redesignating paragraph (d)(2)(iv) as paragraph (d)(2)(v).
3. Adding a new paragraph (d)(2)(iv).
The additions and revision read as follows:
Sec. 1.460-6 Look-back method.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(vii) Section 481(a) adjustments. For purposes of determining the
hypothetical underpayment or overpayment of tax for any year, amounts
reported as section 481(a) adjustments shall be taken into account in
the tax year or years they are reported. However, any portion of a
section 481(a) adjustment not yet reported as of the tax year in which
the contract is completed shall be taken into account in the tax year
the contract is completed for purposes of determining the hypothetical
underpayment or overpayment of tax.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Section 481(a) adjustments. For purposes of determining the
hypothetical underpayment or overpayment of tax for any year under the
simplified marginal impact method, amounts reported as section 481(a)
adjustments shall be taken into account in the tax year or years they
are reported. However, any portion of a section 481(a) adjustment not
yet reported as of the tax year in which the contract is completed
shall be taken into account in the tax year the contract is completed
for purposes of determining
[[Page 45184]]
the hypothetical underpayment or overpayment of tax.
* * * * *
Linda E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E8-17830 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P