Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Subsistence Fishing, 45201-45204 [E8-17814]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
§ 594.8 Fee for importing a vehicle
pursuant to a determination by the
Administrator.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) If a determination has been made
pursuant to a petition, the fee for each
vehicle is $198. The direct and indirect
costs that determine the fee are those set
forth in §§ 594.7(b), (c), and (d).
(c) If a determination has been made
on or after October 1, 2008, pursuant to
the Administrator’s initiative, the fee for
each vehicle is $125. * * *
5. Section 594.9 is amended by
revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 594.9 Fee for reimbursement of bond
processing costs.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The bond processing fee for each
vehicle imported on and after October 1,
2008, for which a certificate of
conformity is furnished, is $10.23.
5. Section 594.10 is amended by
revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 594.10 Fee for review and processing of
conformity certificate.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The review and processing fee for
each certificate of conformity submitted
on and after October 1, 2008 is $14.
However, if the vehicle covered by the
certificate has been entered
electronically with the U.S. Department
of Homeland Security through the
Automated Broker Interface and the
registered importer submitting the
certificate has an e-mail address, the fee
for the certificate is $6, provided that
the fee is paid by a credit card issued
to the registered importer. If NHTSA
finds that the information in the entry
or the certificate is incorrect, requiring
further processing, the processing fee
shall be $48.
Issued on: July 25, 2008.
Ronald L. Medford,
Senior Associate Administrator for Vehicle
Safety.
[FR Doc. E8–17516 Filed 8–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
[Docket No. 071203794–8828–01]
RIN 0648–AW36
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Subsistence
Fishing
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations
that amend the subsistence fishery rules
for members of an Alaska Native tribe
eligible to harvest Pacific halibut in
waters in and off Alaska for customary
and traditional use. The proposed
change would correct the location listed
in the regulations for the Village of
Kanatak tribe and the International
Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC)
halibut regulatory area (Area) in which
members may subsistence fish. These
regulations correctly define the
headquarters and Area for the Village of
Kanatak tribe. The action would change
the tribe’s headquarters from Egegik to
Wasilla and the corresponding Area
from 4E to Area 3A. The intent of the
correction is to remove restrictions on
participation of tribal members in
traditional subsistence fisheries for
Pacific halibut by aligning the tribe’s
headquarters with its actual location in
Wasilla.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than September 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue
Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. You may submit
comments, identified by ‘‘RIN 0648–
AW36’’ by any one of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal website at
https://www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802.
• Fax: (907) 586–7557.
• Hand delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Room
420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of
the public record and will be posted to
https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying
Information (e.g., name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments must be in Microsoft Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe portable
document file (pdf) formats to be
accepted.
Copies of the Categorical Exclusion
(CE) and Regulatory Impact Review
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
45201
(RIR) prepared for this action may be
obtained from the NMFS Alaska Region,
P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, Alaska 99802,
Attn: Ellen Sebastian, Records Officer;
in person at NMFS Alaska Region, 709
West 9th Street, Room 420A, Juneau,
Alaska; and via the Internet at the
NMFS Alaska Region website at https://
www.noaa.fakr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peggy Murphy, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Need for Action
The United States and Canada
participate in the International Pacific
Halibut Commission (IPHC) and
promulgate regulations governing the
Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus
stenolepis) fishery under the authority
of the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of
1982 (Halibut Act). Regulations
governing the allocation and catch of
halibut in U.S. convention waters that
are in agreement with the Halibut Act
may be developed by the North Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council).
Regulations recommended by the
Council must be approved by the
Secretary of Commerce before being
implemented through the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The
Council prepared an environmental
assessment/regulatory impact review
(EA/RIR) for subsistence halibut
fisheries, in January 2003, and NMFS
published the final rule to implement
subsistence halibut regulations in April
2003 (68 FR 18145). The Alaska Native
tribe, Village of Kanatak is recognized in
the regulations as an organized tribal
entity with its tribal headquarters
located in Egegik, Alaska within halibut
regulatory area 3A. However, the tribe’s
headquarters are actually located in
Wasilla, Alaska in halibut regulatory
area 4E. The initial assignment of the
tribal headquarters location to Egegik
was incorrect.
The lists of rural communities and
native tribes recommended by the
Council and approved by the Secretary
for subsistence fishing eligibility were
derived from positive customary and
traditional findings for halibut and
bottomfish made by the Alaska State
Board of Fisheries (BOF) prior to the
Alaska Supreme Court decision,
McDowell v. State, 785 P.2d 1 (Alaska
1989). The Council retains exclusive
authority to recommend changes to the
list of communities § 300.65(g)(1) and
Alaska Native tribes § 300.65(g)(2) with
customary and traditional uses of
Pacific halibut. Residents and tribal
members who believe that their rural or
tribal place was incorrectly left out of
the subsistence eligibility listing for
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
45202
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
communities or Alaska Native tribes, or
who are seeking eligibility for the first
time, are encouraged to seek a
customary and traditional finding from
the BOF before petitioning the Council.
The Proposed Action
In June 2007, the Council received a
request from the Kanatak Tribal Council
to have its fishing area corrected from
Area 4E to Area 3A, because the current,
erroneous, listing has prevented the
same tribal members from participating
in traditional subsistence fisheries. The
Council recognized this difference and
responded by recommending an
amendment to § 300.65(g)(2) to change
the listing for the Village of Kanatak’s
headquarters from Egegik to Wasilla and
update the corresponding halibut
regulatory area from Area 4E to Area 3A.
The intent of the correction is to remove
restrictions on individual participation
by aligning the tribe’s headquarters with
its actual location in Wasilla.
Individual persons are eligible to
harvest subsistence halibut if they are
rural residents of a community or a
member of an Alaska Native tribe with
customary and traditional uses of
halibut. Communities and tribes are
listed in tables by Halibut Regulatory
Areas at § 300.65(g)(1) and (2),
respectively. A person subsistence
fishing for halibut also must hold a
valid Subsistence Halibut Area
Registration Certificate (SHARC) in that
person’s name issued by NMFS. An
individual holding a SHARC that
resides in a rural area may harvest
subsistence halibut in all waters in and
off Alaska except for areas designated as
non-subsistence areas. The four nonsubsistence areas specified in regulation
at § 300.65(h)(3) are the Ketchikan,
Juneau, Anchorage/-Matsu/-Kenai, and
Valdez non-subsistence areas (see
Figures 2 through 5 to subpart E of part
300). Under this action, there would be
no change to rural eligibility criteria to
subsistence fish for halibut in any
halibut regulatory area in waters in and
off the State of Alaska.
A non-rural Alaska resident or a
resident of another state who is a
member of a tribe that is located in a
rural area is limited to subsistence
fishing for halibut only in his or her area
of tribal membership (§ 300.65(h)(4)(i)
and (ii)). The ‘‘area of tribal
membership’’ is defined at
§ 300.65(h)(4)(iii) as ‘‘rural areas of the
[IPHC] regulatory area or of the Bering
Sea closed area in which the Alaska
Native tribal headquarters is located.’’
The area of tribal membership for the
Kanatak tribe is currently Area 4E. The
action would align the Village of
Kanatak’s tribal headquarters with its
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
actual location in Wasilla in Area 3A
and effectively changes area restrictions
on some members of the tribe to
conduct subsistence halibut fishing. The
proposed action is expected to
redistribute some tribal members’
harvesting effort from Area 4E to fishing
areas in Area 3A. Waters in Area 3A
include two non-subsistence areas that
are closed to subsistence fishing: the
Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai non-rural area
and the Valdez non-rural area.
Moving the place of the Kanatak tribal
headquarters to Wasilla is expected to
increase customary and traditional uses
of halibut by individual members of the
tribe in Area 3A. Wasilla is a
community in the Anchorage-MatsuKenai non-rural area within Area 3A
where a majority of Kanatak tribal
members reside. Non-rural and nonresident members of the Kanatak tribe
may increase subsistence halibut use in
Area 3A because they would have
greater access to subsistence fishing
areas through Anchorage, central
Alaska’s main transportation hub that is
connected to road systems throughout
much of Area 3A.
The action would improve accuracy
of current regulations, and the quality of
subsistence halibut information for nonrural tribal members, by correctly
recognizing the location of the tribe’s
headquarters in Wasilla. This correction
improves area specific data collected by
the State of Alaska subsistence halibut
survey and analyzed for reporting
subsistence harvest and effort in Alaska.
Classification
Regulations governing the U.S.
fisheries for Pacific halibut are
developed by the International Pacific
Halibut Commission (IPHC), the Pacific
Fishery Management Council, the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council), and the Secretary of
Commerce. Section 5 of the Northern
Pacific Halibut Act of 1982 (Halibut Act,
16 U.S.C. 773c) allows the Regional
Council having authority for a particular
geographical area to develop regulations
governing the allocation and catch of
halibut in U.S. Convention waters as
long as those regulations do not conflict
with IPHC regulations. The proposed
action is consistent with the Council’s
authority to allocate halibut catches
among fishery participants in the waters
in and off Alaska.
Executive Order 13175 of November
6, 2000 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), the
Executive Memorandum of April 29,
1994 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), and the
American Indian and Alaska Native
Policy of the U.S. Department of
Commerce (March 30, 1995) outline the
responsibilities of NMFS in matters
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
affecting tribal interests. Section 161 of
Public Law (P.L.) 108–199 (188 Stat.
452), as amended by section 518 of P.L.
109–447 (118 Stat. 3267), extends the
consultation requirements of E.O. 13175
to Alaska Native corporations. NMFS
has special obligations to consult and
coordinate with tribal governments and
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act
(ANCSA) corporations on a governmentto-government basis. This rule affects
individual members of the Village of
Kanatak tribe, but not the tribe itself,
and the village of Kanatak is not
recognized as an ANCSA corporation.
NMFS recognizes the importance of
communication and during the process
of developing the proposed action,
NMFS consulted with the Alaska Native
Subsistence Halibut Working Group in
December 2007 and the Kanatak Tribal
Administrator in January 2008.
The proposed rule was determined to
be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
that this action, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Basis and purpose of rule
The United States and Canada participate
in the International Pacific Halibut
Commission (IPHC) and promulgate
regulations governing the Pacific halibut
(Hippoglossus stenolepis) fishery under the
authority of the Northern Pacific Halibut Act
of 1982 (Halibut Act). Regulations governing
the allocation and catch of halibut in U.S.
convention waters that are in agreement with
the Halibut Act may be developed by the
North Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council). The Secretary of Commerce must
approve regulations recommended by the
Council before implementation by the
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).
The Council prepared an environmental
assessment/regulatory impact review (EA/
RIR) for subsistence halibut fisheries, in
January 2003, and NMFS published the final
rule to implement subsistence halibut
regulations in April 2003 (68 FR 18145). The
Alaska Native tribe, Village of Kanatak is
recognized in the regulations as an organized
tribal entity with its tribal headquarters
located in Egegik, Alaska within halibut
regulatory area 3A. However, the tribe’s
headquarters are actually located in Wasilla,
Alaska in halibut regulatory area 4E. The
initial assignment of the tribal headquarters
location to Egegik was incorrect.
In June 2007, the Council received a
request from the Kanatak Tribal Council to
have its fishing area corrected from Area 4E
to Area 3A, because the current, erroneous,
listing has prevented the same tribal
members from participating in traditional
subsistence fisheries. The Council recognized
this difference and responded by
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
45203
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
recommending an amendment to
§ 300.65(g)(2) to change the listing for the
Village of Kanatak’s headquarters from
Egegik to Wasilla and update the
corresponding halibut regulatory area from
Area 4E to Area 3A. The intent of the
correction is to remove restrictions on
individual participation by aligning the
tribe’s headquarters with its actual location
in Wasilla.
Individual persons are eligible to harvest
subsistence halibut if they are rural residents
of a community or a member of an Alaska
Native tribe with customary and traditional
uses of halibut. Communities and tribes are
listed in tables by Halibut Regulatory Areas
at § 300.65(g)(1) and (2), respectively. A
person subsistence fishing for halibut also
must hold a valid Subsistence Halibut Area
Registration Certificate (SHARC) in that
person’s name issued by NMFS. An
individual holding a SHARC that resides in
a rural area may harvest subsistence halibut
in all waters in and off Alaska except for
areas designated as non-subsistence areas.
The four non-subsistence areas specified in
regulation at § 300.65(h)(3) are the Ketchikan,
Juneau, Anchorage/-Matsu/-Kenai, and
Valdez non-subsistence areas (see Figures 2
through 5 to subpart E of part 300). Under
this action, there would be no change to rural
eligibility criteria to subsistence fish for
halibut in any halibut regulatory area in
waters in and off the State of Alaska.
A non-rural Alaska resident or a resident
of another state who is a member of a tribe
that is located in a rural area is limited to
subsistence fishing for halibut only in his or
her area of tribal membership
(§ 300.65(h)(4)(i) and (ii)). The ‘‘area of tribal
membership’’ is defined at § 300.65(h)(4)(iii)
as ‘‘rural areas of the [IPHC] regulatory area
or of the Bering Sea closed area in which the
Alaska Native tribal headquarters is located.’’
The area of tribal membership for the
Kanatak tribe is currently Area 4E. The action
would align the Village of Kanatak’s tribal
headquarters with its actual location in
Wasilla in Area 3A and effectively changes
area restrictions on some members of the
tribe to conduct subsistence halibut fishing.
The proposed action is expected to
redistribute some tribal members’ harvesting
effort from Area 4E to fishing areas in Area
3A. Waters in Area 3A include two nonsubsistence areas that are closed to
subsistence fishing: the Anchorage-MatsuKenai non-rural area and the Valdez nonrural area.
Moving the place of the Kanatak tribal
headquarters to Wasilla is expected to
increase customary and traditional uses of
halibut by individual members of the tribe in
Area 3A. Wasilla is a community in the
Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai non-rural area
within Area 3A where a majority of Kanatak
tribal members reside. Non-rural and nonresident members of the Kanatak tribe may
increase subsistence halibut use in Area 3A
because they would have greater access to
subsistence fishing areas through Anchorage,
central Alaska’s main transportation hub that
is connected to road systems throughout
much of Area 3A.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
Factual Basis for the Certification
Description and estimate of the number of
small entities to which the rule applies
The action would not directly regulate any
small entities. Small entities have the same
definition as small business, small
organizations, and small government
jurisdictions in Section 601(3)-(5) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980.
Instead, the action would directly regulate
individual persons who are not considered
small entities within the meaning of the RFA.
An individual member of the Village of
Kanatak tribe would be directly regulated by
the action if he or she is: (a) a non-rural
resident of Alaska or a resident of a state
other than Alaska; and (b) subsistence fishing
for halibut (§ 300.65(h)(4)(i)-(iii)). Even
though there are typically a number of
individuals in a tribe they are regulated as
individual persons and not collectively as
evidenced by the distinction of residency.
The Village of Kanatak would be the only
Alaska Native tribe whose non-rural and nonresident members would be directly
regulated by the proposed rule.
All of the persons that would be directly
regulated by the action are natural persons.
The subsistence halibut regulation at
§ 300.65(g)(2) specifies that ‘‘A person is
eligible to harvest subsistence halibut if he or
she is a member of an Alaska Native tribe
with customary and traditional uses of
halibut listed [in the table in this
paragraph].’’ The Village of Kanatak is listed
in the table and individual members of the
tribe are recognized as natural persons
eligible to harvest subsistence halibut.
Moreover, all of the members of the Kanatak
Tribe are natural persons as direct
descendents of individuals counted in a
census carried out in Kanatak in 1924
(Olivier, pers. comm.). The regulations
further specify at § 300.61 that halibut caught
for subsistence purposes are defined as
halibut caught by a rural resident or a
member of an Alaska Native tribe for direct
personal or family consumption as food,
sharing for personal or family consumption
as food, or customary trade. While there is no
clear requirement in the regulations that a
‘‘rural resident’’ or a ‘‘member of an Alaska
Native tribe’’ be a natural person, the
regulations clearly anticipate that they will
be.
The definition of small entity, distinction
of individual tribal members, and declaration
of natural persons combined provide the
factual basis for asserting no small entities
are directly regulated by the action.
Description and estimate of economic impact
on small entities by entity size and industry
No small entities are directly regulated by
the proposed rule. Therefore, there are no
economic impacts on directly regulated small
entities.
Criteria used to evaluate whether the rule
would impose impacts on ‘‘a substantial
number of small entities’’
The criteria used to determine whether or
not small entities are directly regulated by
this action are the definitions of a small
business, small organization, small
governmental jurisdiction, and small entity
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in 601(3), (4), (5), and (6) of the RFA, and the
definition of a business concern at 13 CFR
121.105.
Criteria used to evaluate whether the rule
would impose ‘‘significant economic
impacts’’
Because this action will not directly
regulate any small entities, no criteria were
necessary to make a determination of
whether or not the action would have
significant economic impacts on directly
regulated entities.
Description of and basis for assumptions
used
The finding that no small entities would be
directly regulated by this action is based on
the definition of small entities in the RFA
and implementing regulations, a
determination that only individual members
of the Kanatak Tribe would be directly
regulated, and a determination that all
individual tribal members are natural
persons, and not entities, as contemplated by
the statute and regulations. As a result, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
Because there will not be a substantial
impact on a significant number of small
entities, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required and none has
been prepared.
List of Subjects for 50 CFR Part 300
Alaska, Alaska Natives, Fisheries,
Fishing, Pacific halibut fisheries, Tribes.
Dated: July 29, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 300 as follows:
PART 300—INTERNATIONAL
FISHERIES REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 300, subpart E, continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773–773k.
2. In § 300.65, in paragraph (g)(2):
A. In the table for Halibut Regulatory
Area 3A, add in alphabetical order an
entry for ‘‘Wasilla’’.
B. In the table for Halibut Regulatory
Area 4E, revise the entry for ‘‘Egegik’’.
The addition and revision read as
follows.
§ 300.65 Catch sharing plan and domestic
management measures in waters in and off
Alaska.
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
*
*
45204
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Halibut Regulatory Area 4E
Halibut Regulatory Area 3A
Place with Tribal
Headquarters
Organized Tribal Entity
*******
Village of Kanatak
*******
*
Organized Tribal Entity
*******
Wasilla
*
Place with Tribal
Headquarters
Egegik
Egegik Village
*******
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–17814 Filed 8–1–08; 8:45 am]
ebenthall on PRODPC60 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:20 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\04AUP1.SGM
04AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 150 (Monday, August 4, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45201-45204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17814]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 071203794-8828-01]
RIN 0648-AW36
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Subsistence Fishing
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations that amend the subsistence fishery
rules for members of an Alaska Native tribe eligible to harvest Pacific
halibut in waters in and off Alaska for customary and traditional use.
The proposed change would correct the location listed in the
regulations for the Village of Kanatak tribe and the International
Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) halibut regulatory area (Area) in
which members may subsistence fish. These regulations correctly define
the headquarters and Area for the Village of Kanatak tribe. The action
would change the tribe's headquarters from Egegik to Wasilla and the
corresponding Area from 4E to Area 3A. The intent of the correction is
to remove restrictions on participation of tribal members in
traditional subsistence fisheries for Pacific halibut by aligning the
tribe's headquarters with its actual location in Wasilla.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than September 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region, NMFS,
Attn: Ellen Sebastian. You may submit comments, identified by ``RIN
0648-AW36'' by any one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal website at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Mail: P. O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Fax: (907) 586-7557.
Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th
Street, Room 420A, Juneau, AK.
All comments received are a part of the public record and will be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal
Identifying Information (e.g., name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required
fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments must be in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
portable document file (pdf) formats to be accepted.
Copies of the Categorical Exclusion (CE) and Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR) prepared for this action may be obtained from the NMFS
Alaska Region, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, Alaska 99802, Attn: Ellen
Sebastian, Records Officer; in person at NMFS Alaska Region, 709 West
9\th\ Street, Room 420A, Juneau, Alaska; and via the Internet at the
NMFS Alaska Region website at https://www.noaa.fakr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Murphy, 907-586-7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Need for Action
The United States and Canada participate in the International
Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) and promulgate regulations governing
the Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) fishery under the
authority of the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982 (Halibut Act).
Regulations governing the allocation and catch of halibut in U.S.
convention waters that are in agreement with the Halibut Act may be
developed by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council).
Regulations recommended by the Council must be approved by the
Secretary of Commerce before being implemented through the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The Council prepared an environmental
assessment/regulatory impact review (EA/RIR) for subsistence halibut
fisheries, in January 2003, and NMFS published the final rule to
implement subsistence halibut regulations in April 2003 (68 FR 18145).
The Alaska Native tribe, Village of Kanatak is recognized in the
regulations as an organized tribal entity with its tribal headquarters
located in Egegik, Alaska within halibut regulatory area 3A. However,
the tribe's headquarters are actually located in Wasilla, Alaska in
halibut regulatory area 4E. The initial assignment of the tribal
headquarters location to Egegik was incorrect.
The lists of rural communities and native tribes recommended by the
Council and approved by the Secretary for subsistence fishing
eligibility were derived from positive customary and traditional
findings for halibut and bottomfish made by the Alaska State Board of
Fisheries (BOF) prior to the Alaska Supreme Court decision, McDowell v.
State, 785 P.2d 1 (Alaska 1989). The Council retains exclusive
authority to recommend changes to the list of communities Sec.
300.65(g)(1) and Alaska Native tribes Sec. 300.65(g)(2) with customary
and traditional uses of Pacific halibut. Residents and tribal members
who believe that their rural or tribal place was incorrectly left out
of the subsistence eligibility listing for
[[Page 45202]]
communities or Alaska Native tribes, or who are seeking eligibility for
the first time, are encouraged to seek a customary and traditional
finding from the BOF before petitioning the Council.
The Proposed Action
In June 2007, the Council received a request from the Kanatak
Tribal Council to have its fishing area corrected from Area 4E to Area
3A, because the current, erroneous, listing has prevented the same
tribal members from participating in traditional subsistence fisheries.
The Council recognized this difference and responded by recommending an
amendment to Sec. 300.65(g)(2) to change the listing for the Village
of Kanatak's headquarters from Egegik to Wasilla and update the
corresponding halibut regulatory area from Area 4E to Area 3A. The
intent of the correction is to remove restrictions on individual
participation by aligning the tribe's headquarters with its actual
location in Wasilla.
Individual persons are eligible to harvest subsistence halibut if
they are rural residents of a community or a member of an Alaska Native
tribe with customary and traditional uses of halibut. Communities and
tribes are listed in tables by Halibut Regulatory Areas at Sec.
300.65(g)(1) and (2), respectively. A person subsistence fishing for
halibut also must hold a valid Subsistence Halibut Area Registration
Certificate (SHARC) in that person's name issued by NMFS. An individual
holding a SHARC that resides in a rural area may harvest subsistence
halibut in all waters in and off Alaska except for areas designated as
non-subsistence areas. The four non-subsistence areas specified in
regulation at Sec. 300.65(h)(3) are the Ketchikan, Juneau, Anchorage/-
Matsu/-Kenai, and Valdez non-subsistence areas (see Figures 2 through 5
to subpart E of part 300). Under this action, there would be no change
to rural eligibility criteria to subsistence fish for halibut in any
halibut regulatory area in waters in and off the State of Alaska.
A non-rural Alaska resident or a resident of another state who is a
member of a tribe that is located in a rural area is limited to
subsistence fishing for halibut only in his or her area of tribal
membership (Sec. 300.65(h)(4)(i) and (ii)). The ``area of tribal
membership'' is defined at Sec. 300.65(h)(4)(iii) as ``rural areas of
the [IPHC] regulatory area or of the Bering Sea closed area in which
the Alaska Native tribal headquarters is located.'' The area of tribal
membership for the Kanatak tribe is currently Area 4E. The action would
align the Village of Kanatak's tribal headquarters with its actual
location in Wasilla in Area 3A and effectively changes area
restrictions on some members of the tribe to conduct subsistence
halibut fishing. The proposed action is expected to redistribute some
tribal members' harvesting effort from Area 4E to fishing areas in Area
3A. Waters in Area 3A include two non-subsistence areas that are closed
to subsistence fishing: the Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai non-rural area and
the Valdez non-rural area.
Moving the place of the Kanatak tribal headquarters to Wasilla is
expected to increase customary and traditional uses of halibut by
individual members of the tribe in Area 3A. Wasilla is a community in
the Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai non-rural area within Area 3A where a
majority of Kanatak tribal members reside. Non-rural and non-resident
members of the Kanatak tribe may increase subsistence halibut use in
Area 3A because they would have greater access to subsistence fishing
areas through Anchorage, central Alaska's main transportation hub that
is connected to road systems throughout much of Area 3A.
The action would improve accuracy of current regulations, and the
quality of subsistence halibut information for non-rural tribal
members, by correctly recognizing the location of the tribe's
headquarters in Wasilla. This correction improves area specific data
collected by the State of Alaska subsistence halibut survey and
analyzed for reporting subsistence harvest and effort in Alaska.
Classification
Regulations governing the U.S. fisheries for Pacific halibut are
developed by the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC), the
Pacific Fishery Management Council, the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council), and the Secretary of Commerce. Section 5
of the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982 (Halibut Act, 16 U.S.C.
773c) allows the Regional Council having authority for a particular
geographical area to develop regulations governing the allocation and
catch of halibut in U.S. Convention waters as long as those regulations
do not conflict with IPHC regulations. The proposed action is
consistent with the Council's authority to allocate halibut catches
among fishery participants in the waters in and off Alaska.
Executive Order 13175 of November 6, 2000 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), the
Executive Memorandum of April 29, 1994 (25 U.S.C. 450 note), and the
American Indian and Alaska Native Policy of the U.S. Department of
Commerce (March 30, 1995) outline the responsibilities of NMFS in
matters affecting tribal interests. Section 161 of Public Law (P.L.)
108-199 (188 Stat. 452), as amended by section 518 of P.L. 109-447 (118
Stat. 3267), extends the consultation requirements of E.O. 13175 to
Alaska Native corporations. NMFS has special obligations to consult and
coordinate with tribal governments and Alaska Native Claims Settlement
Act (ANCSA) corporations on a government-to-government basis. This rule
affects individual members of the Village of Kanatak tribe, but not the
tribe itself, and the village of Kanatak is not recognized as an ANCSA
corporation. NMFS recognizes the importance of communication and during
the process of developing the proposed action, NMFS consulted with the
Alaska Native Subsistence Halibut Working Group in December 2007 and
the Kanatak Tribal Administrator in January 2008.
The proposed rule was determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this action, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Basis and purpose of rule
The United States and Canada participate in the International
Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) and promulgate regulations
governing the Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) fishery
under the authority of the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982
(Halibut Act). Regulations governing the allocation and catch of
halibut in U.S. convention waters that are in agreement with the
Halibut Act may be developed by the North Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council). The Secretary of Commerce must approve
regulations recommended by the Council before implementation by the
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The Council prepared an
environmental assessment/regulatory impact review (EA/RIR) for
subsistence halibut fisheries, in January 2003, and NMFS published
the final rule to implement subsistence halibut regulations in April
2003 (68 FR 18145). The Alaska Native tribe, Village of Kanatak is
recognized in the regulations as an organized tribal entity with its
tribal headquarters located in Egegik, Alaska within halibut
regulatory area 3A. However, the tribe's headquarters are actually
located in Wasilla, Alaska in halibut regulatory area 4E. The
initial assignment of the tribal headquarters location to Egegik was
incorrect.
In June 2007, the Council received a request from the Kanatak
Tribal Council to have its fishing area corrected from Area 4E to
Area 3A, because the current, erroneous, listing has prevented the
same tribal members from participating in traditional subsistence
fisheries. The Council recognized this difference and responded by
[[Page 45203]]
recommending an amendment to Sec. 300.65(g)(2) to change the
listing for the Village of Kanatak's headquarters from Egegik to
Wasilla and update the corresponding halibut regulatory area from
Area 4E to Area 3A. The intent of the correction is to remove
restrictions on individual participation by aligning the tribe's
headquarters with its actual location in Wasilla.
Individual persons are eligible to harvest subsistence halibut
if they are rural residents of a community or a member of an Alaska
Native tribe with customary and traditional uses of halibut.
Communities and tribes are listed in tables by Halibut Regulatory
Areas at Sec. 300.65(g)(1) and (2), respectively. A person
subsistence fishing for halibut also must hold a valid Subsistence
Halibut Area Registration Certificate (SHARC) in that person's name
issued by NMFS. An individual holding a SHARC that resides in a
rural area may harvest subsistence halibut in all waters in and off
Alaska except for areas designated as non-subsistence areas. The
four non-subsistence areas specified in regulation at Sec.
300.65(h)(3) are the Ketchikan, Juneau, Anchorage/-Matsu/-Kenai, and
Valdez non-subsistence areas (see Figures 2 through 5 to subpart E
of part 300). Under this action, there would be no change to rural
eligibility criteria to subsistence fish for halibut in any halibut
regulatory area in waters in and off the State of Alaska.
A non-rural Alaska resident or a resident of another state who
is a member of a tribe that is located in a rural area is limited to
subsistence fishing for halibut only in his or her area of tribal
membership (Sec. 300.65(h)(4)(i) and (ii)). The ``area of tribal
membership'' is defined at Sec. 300.65(h)(4)(iii) as ``rural areas
of the [IPHC] regulatory area or of the Bering Sea closed area in
which the Alaska Native tribal headquarters is located.'' The area
of tribal membership for the Kanatak tribe is currently Area 4E. The
action would align the Village of Kanatak's tribal headquarters with
its actual location in Wasilla in Area 3A and effectively changes
area restrictions on some members of the tribe to conduct
subsistence halibut fishing. The proposed action is expected to
redistribute some tribal members' harvesting effort from Area 4E to
fishing areas in Area 3A. Waters in Area 3A include two non-
subsistence areas that are closed to subsistence fishing: the
Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai non-rural area and the Valdez non-rural area.
Moving the place of the Kanatak tribal headquarters to Wasilla
is expected to increase customary and traditional uses of halibut by
individual members of the tribe in Area 3A. Wasilla is a community
in the Anchorage-Matsu-Kenai non-rural area within Area 3A where a
majority of Kanatak tribal members reside. Non-rural and non-
resident members of the Kanatak tribe may increase subsistence
halibut use in Area 3A because they would have greater access to
subsistence fishing areas through Anchorage, central Alaska's main
transportation hub that is connected to road systems throughout much
of Area 3A.
Factual Basis for the Certification
Description and estimate of the number of small entities to which
the rule applies
The action would not directly regulate any small entities. Small
entities have the same definition as small business, small
organizations, and small government jurisdictions in Section 601(3)-
(5) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) of 1980. Instead, the
action would directly regulate individual persons who are not
considered small entities within the meaning of the RFA.
An individual member of the Village of Kanatak tribe would be
directly regulated by the action if he or she is: (a) a non-rural
resident of Alaska or a resident of a state other than Alaska; and
(b) subsistence fishing for halibut (Sec. 300.65(h)(4)(i)-(iii)).
Even though there are typically a number of individuals in a tribe
they are regulated as individual persons and not collectively as
evidenced by the distinction of residency. The Village of Kanatak
would be the only Alaska Native tribe whose non-rural and non-
resident members would be directly regulated by the proposed rule.
All of the persons that would be directly regulated by the
action are natural persons. The subsistence halibut regulation at
Sec. 300.65(g)(2) specifies that ``A person is eligible to harvest
subsistence halibut if he or she is a member of an Alaska Native
tribe with customary and traditional uses of halibut listed [in the
table in this paragraph].'' The Village of Kanatak is listed in the
table and individual members of the tribe are recognized as natural
persons eligible to harvest subsistence halibut. Moreover, all of
the members of the Kanatak Tribe are natural persons as direct
descendents of individuals counted in a census carried out in
Kanatak in 1924 (Olivier, pers. comm.). The regulations further
specify at Sec. 300.61 that halibut caught for subsistence purposes
are defined as halibut caught by a rural resident or a member of an
Alaska Native tribe for direct personal or family consumption as
food, sharing for personal or family consumption as food, or
customary trade. While there is no clear requirement in the
regulations that a ``rural resident'' or a ``member of an Alaska
Native tribe'' be a natural person, the regulations clearly
anticipate that they will be.
The definition of small entity, distinction of individual tribal
members, and declaration of natural persons combined provide the
factual basis for asserting no small entities are directly regulated
by the action.
Description and estimate of economic impact on small entities by
entity size and industry
No small entities are directly regulated by the proposed rule.
Therefore, there are no economic impacts on directly regulated small
entities.
Criteria used to evaluate whether the rule would impose impacts on
``a substantial number of small entities''
The criteria used to determine whether or not small entities are
directly regulated by this action are the definitions of a small
business, small organization, small governmental jurisdiction, and
small entity in 601(3), (4), (5), and (6) of the RFA, and the
definition of a business concern at 13 CFR 121.105.
Criteria used to evaluate whether the rule would impose
``significant economic impacts''
Because this action will not directly regulate any small
entities, no criteria were necessary to make a determination of
whether or not the action would have significant economic impacts on
directly regulated entities.
Description of and basis for assumptions used
The finding that no small entities would be directly regulated
by this action is based on the definition of small entities in the
RFA and implementing regulations, a determination that only
individual members of the Kanatak Tribe would be directly regulated,
and a determination that all individual tribal members are natural
persons, and not entities, as contemplated by the statute and
regulations. As a result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
is not required and none has been prepared.
Because there will not be a substantial impact on a significant
number of small entities, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required and none has been prepared.
List of Subjects for 50 CFR Part 300
Alaska, Alaska Natives, Fisheries, Fishing, Pacific halibut
fisheries, Tribes.
Dated: July 29, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 300 as follows:
PART 300--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 300, subpart E, continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773-773k.
2. In Sec. 300.65, in paragraph (g)(2):
A. In the table for Halibut Regulatory Area 3A, add in alphabetical
order an entry for ``Wasilla''.
B. In the table for Halibut Regulatory Area 4E, revise the entry
for ``Egegik''.
The addition and revision read as follows.
Sec. 300.65 Catch sharing plan and domestic management measures in
waters in and off Alaska.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) * * *
[[Page 45204]]
Halibut Regulatory Area 3A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Place with Tribal Headquarters Organized Tribal Entity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * * ...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wasilla Village of Kanatak
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * * ...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Halibut Regulatory Area 4E
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Place with Tribal Headquarters Organized Tribal Entity
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * * ...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Egegik Egegik Village
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * * ...................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-17814 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S