Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, Hyde, Tyrrell, and Washington Counties, NC, 45240-45241 [E8-17766]
Download as PDF
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
45240
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Notices
observed or where observer coverage is
low.
Response: The predominant type of
fishing gear that has been known to
interact with sea otters are salmon set
and drift gillnets. Available information
suggests that fisheries using other types
of gear, such as trawl, longline, pot, and
purse seine appear to be less likely to
have interactions with sea otters due to
either the areas where such fisheries
operate, or the specific gear used, or
both. Gillnet fisheries occur throughout
the range of sea otters in Alaska;
however, the nature of their potential
for interaction depends on several
factors including sea otter distribution
and abundance relative to the
distribution and effort expended in
these fisheries. We believe that
application of entanglement rates
derived from small sample sizes in
observed fisheries to unobserved
fisheries in other areas would produce
questionable results.
Comment 10: Stock assessment
reports do not consider other impacts
from oil and gas development besides
oil spills.
Response: We considered disturbance
from oil and gas exploration,
development, and production in the
draft stock assessments; however, we
did not state this point explicitly in the
draft stock assessment reports. We have
revised the final stock assessment
reports accordingly.
Comment 11: Fuel oil spills from ship
traffic should be considered for the
southcentral and southeast Alaska
stocks.
Response: We have included
additional information from the Alaska
Department of Environmental
Conservation spill reporting database
about ship traffic and other sources that
have resulted in discharges of crude and
noncrude oil into the marine
environment for all 3 stock assessment
reports.
Comment 12: The stock assessment
reports should describe the reasons for
and implications of the age/sex
distribution of the subsistence harvest
on the demography and dynamics of sea
otter populations.
Response: We believe the suggested
additional in-depth analysis of the
subsistence harvest is beyond the scope
of these reports as it relates to
determining the status of the stocks.
Comment 13: The impact of other
factors, such as contaminants, should be
evaluated.
Response: Available information is
insufficient to quantitatively estimate
the impacts of these factors.
Comment 14: Additional detail on the
Unusual Mortality Event should be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:50 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
included in the stock assessment
reports.
Response: Studies of sea otter disease,
mortality, and survival are ongoing.
Results are not yet available for
inclusion in this stock assessment
report.
Comment 15: Given the dates of the
various surveys used to estimate the
population size of the southwest Alaska
stock, the current population may be
lower than the estimated value.
Response: We acknowledge that
population estimates for some of the
regions within the southwest Alaska
stock are somewhat dated; however,
they are the best available scientific
information at this time. Population
monitoring for this stock is an important
component of the recovery plan that is
in development. As this stock is listed
as threatened under the ESA, it is
considered strategic under the MMPA
and subject to annual review, regardless
of the actual population size.
Comment 16: Apparent regional
population trends in the southeast
Alaska stock should be discussed in
greater detail.
Response: The U.S. Geological Survey
collected survey information for the
southeast Alaska stock. A summary
report that addresses this issue is in
preparation; however, conclusions are
not available at this time.
Comment 17: Information gathered
from the fishing industry cannot be
relied upon for truthfulness or accuracy
because of their concern for profits.
Response: The Service relied on the
best available scientific information in
the preparation of these stock
assessment reports, and readily
acknowledges the limitations of these
data. Although some of the information
is self-reported, we also rely on fisheries
observer programs when available.
Comment 18: The agency’s system for
observing the catch is incorrect and
untruthful. Cameras on boats and fines
and jail times are needed.
Response: Observer programs are
conducted by the National Marine
Fisheries Service of the Department of
Commerce. We have forwarded these
suggested improvements to them for
consideration.
Comment 19: The words ‘‘optimum
sustainable population’’ are opposed as
the phrase promotes overutilization of
the wildlife.
Response: The term ‘‘Optimal
Sustainable Population’’ is defined in
the Marine Mammal Protection Act (16
U.S.C. 1362).
References Not Cited in the Notice of
Availability of Draft Revised SARs
Manly, B.F.J. 2006. Incidental catch and
interactions of marine mammals and birds
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in the Cook Inlet salmon driftnet and setnet
fisheries. Western EcoSystems Technology
Inc. Report. Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA.
98pp.
Manly, B.F.J. 2007. Incidental take and
interactions of marine mammals and birds
in the Kodiak Island salmon set gillnet
fishery, 2002 and 2005. Western
EcoSystems Technology Inc. Report.
Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA. 221pp.
Authority: The authority for this action is
the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361–1407).
Dated: July 29, 2008.
Rowan W. Gould,
Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E8–17804 Filed 8–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2008–N0147; 40136–1265–
0000–S3]
Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife
Refuge, Hyde, Tyrrell, and Washington
Counties, NC
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Final
comprehensive conservation plan and
finding of no significant impact.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for
Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge.
In the final CCP, we describe how we
will manage this refuge for the next 15
years.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the CCP may be
obtained by writing to: Howard A.
Phillips, Refuge Manager, Pocosin Lakes
National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box 329,
Columbia, NC 27925. The CCP may also
be accessed and downloaded from the
Service’s Internet site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Howard A. Phillips; Telephone: 252/
796–3004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for Pocosin Lakes National
Wildlife Refuge. We started this process
through a notice in the Federal Register
on November 3, 2000 (65 FR 66256). For
more about the process, see that notice.
Congress established the 12,000-acre
Pungo National Wildlife Refuge in 1963
by the authorities of the Migratory Bird
Conservation Act of 1929 and the Fish
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Notices
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
and Wildlife Act of 1956. In 1990, we
established Pocosin Lakes National
Wildlife Refuge, making Pungo Refuge a
unit of Pocosin Lakes Refuge. The refuge
now consists of 110,106 acres. We
named the refuge for the pocosin habitat
that dominates the landscape and for
the lakes that occur within the pocosin.
We announce our decision and the
availability of the final CCP and FONSI
for Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife
Refuge in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40
CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements. We
completed a thorough analysis of
impacts on the human environment,
which we included in the draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment (Draft CCP/
EA). The CCP will guide us in managing
and administering Pocosin Lakes Refuge
for the next 15 years.
The compatibility determinations for
hunting; fishing; wildlife observation
and photography; environmental
education and interpretation; access for
public uses; trapping of selected
furbearers and feral hogs for nuisance
animal management; refuge resource
research studies; cooperative farming
program; commercial photography;
commercial tours and guiding; wood
and reed gathering and cutting; and
meetings of non-service agencies and
organizations are all available in the
CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Improvement Act),
which amended the National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of
1966, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Improvement Act.
Comments
Approximately 130 copies of the Draft
CCP/EA were made available for a 30-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:50 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
45241
day public review period as announced
in the Federal Register on July 12, 2007
(72 FR 38097). Twelve agencies and/or
individuals submitted comments, either
in writing or at public forums. Four
persons spoke at the public forums and
eight presented written comments,
representing state agencies, local
government agencies, non-governmental
organizations, businesses, and local
citizens.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Selected Alternative
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the Bureau of
Indian Affairs has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget a
request for approval and renewal of
information collections, OMB Control
No. 1076–0017, Financial Assistance
and Social Service Program application
form 5–6601.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before September 3,
2008.
We developed four alternatives for
management of the refuge and chose
Alternative 2 as the preferred
alternative. We selected Alternative 2
based on the sound professional
judgment of the staff and after
considering the comments we received
on the draft document. The primary
focus under Alternative 2 will be to
optimize management of the
impoundments very intensively by
controlling water levels and vegetation
to create optimum habitat for migrating
waterfowl. Implementing the CCP will
result in moderate program increases to
address the refuge’s highest priorities.
We will manage pine forests and
marshes with prescribed fire and will
manage the vegetative composition of
habitats in selected areas. Waterfowl
will be surveyed on a routine basis. We
will develop inventory plans for all
species and implement them in selected
habitats. We will develop and
implement a black bear management
plan. The visitor center will be
maintained by volunteers and
cooperating agency personnel
supplementing refuge personnel. The
volunteer program will be expanded by
recruiting volunteers to contribute 4,000
hours of service. We will construct two
pads for recreational vehicles in order to
attract volunteers. There will be 17.5
staff members dedicated to refuge
management and 7.5 staff members
dedicated to fire management. The six
priority public uses will be allowed,
with the refuge staff conducting
environmental education and
interpretation programs to meet local
needs.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Public
Law 105–57.
Dated: June 10, 2008.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E8–17766 Filed 8–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Information Collection Activities,
Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of renewal of a currently
approved information collection.
AGENCY:
Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments
regarding this proposal to the Desk
Officer of the Department of the Interior
by facsimile to (202) 395–6566. You
may also send comments by e-mail to:
OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov.
Copies of comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to
Kevin Sanders, Acting Chief, Office of
Indian Services, Bureau of Indian
Affairs, Department of the Interior, 1849
C Street, NW., MS–4513–MIB,
Washington, DC 20240. Telephone (202)
513–7621.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the collection of information
form or requests for additional
information should be directed to Kevin
Sanders, Office of Indian Services,
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of
the Interior, 1849 C Street, NW., MS–
4513, Washington, DC 20240.
Telephone (202) 513–7621.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Abstract
The Bureau of Indian Affairs needs
the information collected. Funding of
these programs is authorized by 25
U.S.C. 13 to make determinations of
eligibility for the BIA’s social service
financial assistance programs: General
Assistance, Child Welfare Assistance,
Miscellaneous Assistance, and services
only (no cash assistance).
A 60-day notice for public comments
was published in the Federal Register
on February 4, 2008 (73 FR 6524). No
comments were received regarding this
form.
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 150 (Monday, August 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45240-45241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17766]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R4-R-2008-N0147; 40136-1265-0000-S3]
Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, Hyde, Tyrrell, and
Washington Counties, NC
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Final comprehensive conservation plan
and finding of no significant impact.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for Pocosin Lakes National
Wildlife Refuge. In the final CCP, we describe how we will manage this
refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the CCP may be obtained by writing to: Howard A.
Phillips, Refuge Manager, Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, P.O.
Box 329, Columbia, NC 27925. The CCP may also be accessed and
downloaded from the Service's Internet site: https://southeast.fws.gov/
planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard A. Phillips; Telephone: 252/
796-3004.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP process for Pocosin Lakes
National Wildlife Refuge. We started this process through a notice in
the Federal Register on November 3, 2000 (65 FR 66256). For more about
the process, see that notice.
Congress established the 12,000-acre Pungo National Wildlife Refuge
in 1963 by the authorities of the Migratory Bird Conservation Act of
1929 and the Fish
[[Page 45241]]
and Wildlife Act of 1956. In 1990, we established Pocosin Lakes
National Wildlife Refuge, making Pungo Refuge a unit of Pocosin Lakes
Refuge. The refuge now consists of 110,106 acres. We named the refuge
for the pocosin habitat that dominates the landscape and for the lakes
that occur within the pocosin.
We announce our decision and the availability of the final CCP and
FONSI for Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40 CFR 1506.6(b))
requirements. We completed a thorough analysis of impacts on the human
environment, which we included in the draft comprehensive conservation
plan and environmental assessment (Draft CCP/EA). The CCP will guide us
in managing and administering Pocosin Lakes Refuge for the next 15
years.
The compatibility determinations for hunting; fishing; wildlife
observation and photography; environmental education and
interpretation; access for public uses; trapping of selected furbearers
and feral hogs for nuisance animal management; refuge resource research
studies; cooperative farming program; commercial photography;
commercial tours and guiding; wood and reed gathering and cutting; and
meetings of non-service agencies and organizations are all available in
the CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Improvement Act), which amended the National
Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, requires us to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of
fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on
conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Improvement Act.
Comments
Approximately 130 copies of the Draft CCP/EA were made available
for a 30-day public review period as announced in the Federal Register
on July 12, 2007 (72 FR 38097). Twelve agencies and/or individuals
submitted comments, either in writing or at public forums. Four persons
spoke at the public forums and eight presented written comments,
representing state agencies, local government agencies, non-
governmental organizations, businesses, and local citizens.
Selected Alternative
We developed four alternatives for management of the refuge and
chose Alternative 2 as the preferred alternative. We selected
Alternative 2 based on the sound professional judgment of the staff and
after considering the comments we received on the draft document. The
primary focus under Alternative 2 will be to optimize management of the
impoundments very intensively by controlling water levels and
vegetation to create optimum habitat for migrating waterfowl.
Implementing the CCP will result in moderate program increases to
address the refuge's highest priorities. We will manage pine forests
and marshes with prescribed fire and will manage the vegetative
composition of habitats in selected areas. Waterfowl will be surveyed
on a routine basis. We will develop inventory plans for all species and
implement them in selected habitats. We will develop and implement a
black bear management plan. The visitor center will be maintained by
volunteers and cooperating agency personnel supplementing refuge
personnel. The volunteer program will be expanded by recruiting
volunteers to contribute 4,000 hours of service. We will construct two
pads for recreational vehicles in order to attract volunteers. There
will be 17.5 staff members dedicated to refuge management and 7.5 staff
members dedicated to fire management. The six priority public uses will
be allowed, with the refuge staff conducting environmental education
and interpretation programs to meet local needs.
Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law
105-57.
Dated: June 10, 2008.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E8-17766 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P