Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Mojave Population of the Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii), 45236-45238 [E8-17520]
Download as PDF
45236
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Notices
January through June and July through
December of each year. Section 221(g)(4)
is implemented in the HUD regulations
at 24 CFR 221.255 and 24 CFR 221.790.
The Secretary of the Treasury has
determined that the interest rate to be
borne by debentures issued pursuant to
section 221(g)(4) during the 6-month
period beginning July 1, 2008, is 37⁄8
percent.
The subject matter of this notice falls
within the categorical exemption from
HUD’s environmental clearance
procedures set forth in 24 CFR
50.19(c)(6). For that reason, no
environmental finding has been
prepared for this notice.
or file written statements. Such requests
should be made prior to the meeting to:
Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director, John
H. Chafee, Blackstone River Valley
National Heritage Corridor Commission,
One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI
02895, Tel.: (401) 762–0250.
Further information concerning this
meeting may be obtained from Jan H.
Reitsma, Executive Director of the
Commission at the aforementioned
address.
Jan H. Reitsma,
Executive Director, BRVNHCC.
[FR Doc. E8–17789 Filed 8–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–RK–P
Authority: Sections 211, 221, 224, National
Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. 1715b, 1715l, 1715o;
Section 7(d), Department of HUD Act, 42
U.S.C. 3535(d).
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Dated: July 25, 2008.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E8–17742 Filed 8–1–08; 8:45 am]
Reestablishment of the Lake
Champlain Sea Lamprey Control
Alternatives Workgroup
Office of the Secretary
Blackstone River Valley National
Heritage Corridor Commission
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Notice of Meeting
Notice is hereby given in accordance
with Section 552b of Title 5, United
States Code, that a meeting of the John
H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley
National Heritage Corridor Commission
will be held on Thursday, September
18, 2008.
The Commission was established
pursuant to Pub. L. 99–647. The
purpose of the Commission is to assist
federal, state and local authorities in the
development and implementation of an
integrated resource management plan
for those lands and waters within the
Corridor.
The meeting will convene on
September 18, 2008 at 9 a.m. at
Banneker Industries, located at 582
Great Road, North Smithfield, RI for the
following reasons:
1. Approval of Minutes
2. Chairman’s Report
3. Executive Director’s Report
4. Financial Budget
5. Public Input
It is anticipated that about thirty
people will be able to attend the session
in addition to the Commission
members.
Interested persons may make oral or
written presentations to the Commission
16:50 Aug 01, 2008
Office of the Secretary
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Certification
Jkt 214001
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Notice of Reestablishment.
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
(3) facilitating coordinated research
between Lake Champlain and the Great
Lakes; and (4) development of requests
for proposals, project proposals, and
research efforts affecting the Lake
Champlain Basin.
The Workgroup consists of up to 20
members representing Federal and State
agencies and stakeholders. In addition,
up to five of the members may be
special Government employees, selected
for their scientific expertise. All
members are knowledgeable about Lake
Champlain fishery management issues,
including sea lamprey control.
The Certification for reestablishment
is published below.
SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Interior
(Secretary), after consultation with the
General Services Administration, has
reestablished the Lake Champlain Sea
Lamprey Control Alternatives
Workgroup (Workgroup) for 2 years. The
Workgroup provides an opportunity for
stakeholders to give policy and
technical input on efforts to develop
and implement sea lamprey control
techniques alternative to lampricides in
Lake Champlain.
DATES: The Council’s charter will be
filed under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act August 19, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dave Tilton, Fish and Wildlife Service,
Lake Champlain Fish and Wildlife
Resources Complex, 11 Lincoln Street,
Essex Junction, VT 05452, 802–872–
0629, extension 12.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Workgroup conducts its operations in
accordance with the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. Appendix). It reports to the
Secretary through the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) and Lake Champlain
Fish and Wildlife Management
Cooperative (Cooperative) and functions
solely as an advisory body. The
Workgroup provides recommendations
and advice to the Cooperative. Specific
responsibilities of the Workgroup are to
provide recommendations on: (1)
Feasible and appropriate sea lamprey
management methods alternative to
lampricides; (2) funding priorities for
research and/or demonstration projects;
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I hereby certify that the Lake
Champlain Sea Lamprey Control
Alternatives Workgroup (Workgroup) is
necessary and is in the public interest
in connection with the performance of
duties imposed on the Department of
the Interior through the Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement for a
Long-term Program of Sea Lamprey
Control in Lake Champlain as published
in 2001 (66 FR 46651, September 6,
2001).
Dated: July 24, 2008.
Dirk Kempthorne,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. E8–17737 Filed 8–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2008–N0114; 80221–1113–
0000–C2]
Draft Revised Recovery Plan for
Mojave Population of the Desert
Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii)
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability
for review and comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft revised recovery
plan for the Mojave population of the
desert tortoise for public review and
comment.
We must receive any comments
on the draft recovery plan on or before
November 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The draft recovery plan and
reference materials are available for
inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours at the following
location: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, 1340
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Notices
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Financial Boulevard, Suite 234, Reno,
NV 89502 (telephone: 775–861–6300).
Submitted comments regarding the draft
revised recovery plan will also be
available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours following the public review and
comment period. Requests for copies of
the draft revised recovery plan and
submission of written comments or
materials regarding the plan should be
addressed to the Field Supervisor at the
above address. You may also submit
electronic comments on the recovery
plan to: DTrecovery@fws.gov. An
electronic copy of the draft recovery
plan is available at: https://
endangered.fws.gov/recovery/
index.html#plans.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roy
Averill-Murray, Desert Tortoise
Recovery Coordinator, at the above
address or telephone number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened
animals and plants is a primary goal of
the Endangered Species Act (Act) (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq. ) and our endangered
species program. Recovery means
improvement of the status of listed
species to the point at which listing is
no longer required under the criteria set
out in section 4(a)(1) of the Act.
Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for the
conservation of the species, establish
criteria for downlisting or delisting
listed species, and estimate time and
cost for implementing the measures
needed for recovery. The Recovery Plan
for the Mojave Population of the Desert
Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) was first
published in 1994 wherein the status of
the species, threats, recovery actions
and recovery criteria were presented.
Since that time a great deal of effort has
been dedicated to recovery and
conservation activities, and additional
information has been obtained through
research and observation that allows us
to better focus our recovery strategy.
The revised recovery plan for the
Mojave Population of the desert tortoise
is the focus of this notice.
Section 4(f) of the Act directs the
Secretaries of Interior and Commerce to
develop and implement recovery plans
for species listed as endangered or
threatened, unless such plans will not
promote the conservation of the species.
We and the National Marine Fisheries
Service, as appropriate, have been
delegated responsibility for
administering the Act. Section 4(f) of
the Act requires that public notice, and
an opportunity for public review and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:50 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
comment, be provided during
development of recovery plans. We will
consider all information presented
during the public comment period on
each new or revised recovery plan.
Substantive comments may or may not
result in changes to a recovery plan.
However, any substantive comments
regarding recovery plan implementation
will be forwarded to appropriate Federal
agencies or other interested entities so
that they can take these comments into
account during the implementation of
their respective management programs.
Individual responses to submitted
comments will not be provided.
The desert tortoise is a large,
herbivorous reptile that can reach 20 to
38 centimeters (cm) (8 to 15 inches (in))
in carapace length and 10 to 15 cm (4
to 6 in) in shell height. Hatchlings
emerge from eggs at about 5 cm (2 in)
in length. Adults have a domed
carapace and relatively flat, unhinged
plastrons (lower shells). Their shells are
high-domed and greenish-tan to dark
brown in color with tan scute (horny
plate on the shell) centers. Adult desert
tortoises weigh 3.6 to 6.8 kilograms (8
to 15 pounds). The forelimbs have
heavy, claw-like scales and are flattened
for digging. Hind limbs are more
elephantine.
Throughout most of the Mojave
Desert, the desert tortoise occupies a
variety of habitats: From flats and slopes
dominated by creosote bush (Larrea
tridentata) scrub at lower elevations, to
rocky slopes in the blackbrush
(Coleogyne ramosissima) scrub, and
juniper (Juniperus spp.) woodland
interface at higher elevations. Records of
desert tortoises range from below sea
level to an elevation of 2,225 meters (m)
(7,300 feet (ft)), with the most favorable
habitat at elevations between 305 and
914 m (1,000 and 3,000 ft). Desert
tortoises most commonly occur on
gently sloping terrain with sandy-gravel
soils that are friable for burrowing and
where there is sparse cover of lowgrowing shrubs and a high diversity of
both perennial and annual plants.
The desert tortoise occurs in the
Mojave and Sonoran deserts in southern
California, southern Nevada, Arizona,
and the southwestern tip of Utah in the
United States, as well as in Sonora and
northern Sinaloa in Mexico. The listed
Mojave population of the desert tortoise
includes those animals living north and
west of the Colorado River in the
Mojave Desert of California, Nevada,
Arizona, and southwestern Utah, and in
the Sonoran (Colorado) Desert in
California. A recovery plan was
published in 1994 and critical habitat
was also designated in all four States
supporting the species.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45237
Three other tortoise species in the
genus Gopherus occur in the United
States, and another occurs in Mexico;
however, all are geographically
separated from the Mojave population.
The Sonoran population of the desert
tortoise is significantly different both
genetically and ecologically, but could
be confused visually with tortoises of
the Mojave population; therefore, we
determined the Sonoran population also
warranted protection as a threatened
species under section 4(e) of the
Endangered Species Act (similarity of
appearance) when located outside of its
natural range.
The vast majority of threats to the
desert tortoise or its habitat are
associated with human land uses. The
threats identified in the 1994 Recovery
Plan, and that formed the basis for
listing the tortoise as a threatened
species, continue to affect the species.
Habitat loss, degradation, and
fragmentation from urbanization, offhighway vehicle use in the desert, linear
features such as roads and utility
corridors, livestock grazing and mining,
and military activities were cited as
some of the primary reasons for the
decline in desert tortoise populations.
Disease and increased incidence of fire
in the Mojave Desert have also been
implicated in desert tortoise declines.
The data amassed between 1979 and
2002 from permanent study plots
throughout the range of the species were
used to explore regional and recoveryunit-level analyses and trends, and to
develop within-population spatial
analyses at various scales on the
landscape and in different management
units. Despite the challenges in
comparing data from year to year, the
apparent downward trend in desert
tortoise populations in the western
portion of the range that was identified
at the time of listing is considered
ongoing. Results from other portions of
the range were inconclusive, but recent
surveys of some populations found too
few tortoises to produce population
estimates, suggesting that declines may
have occurred more broadly.
Collectively, the various analyses that
have been performed do not suggest that
implementation of specific management
actions over time has abated declines of,
or resulted in detectable increases in,
desert tortoise populations across most
of the range. The life history of the
species (i.e., delayed reproductive
maturity, low reproductive rates, and
relatively high mortality early in life) is
such that observing relatively rapid
increases in populations is highly
unlikely, even over the 23-year
monitoring period evaluated.
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
45238
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 150 / Monday, August 4, 2008 / Notices
Despite the clear demonstration that
the threats identified at the time of
listing impact individual tortoises, there
are few data available to evaluate or
quantify the effects of threats on desert
tortoise populations. While current
research results can lead to predictions
about how local tortoise abundance
should be affected by the presence of
threats, quantitative estimates of the
magnitude of these threats, or of their
relative importance, have not yet been
developed.
While precise correlations between
the multitude of threats and desert
tortoise populations have not been
clearly shown, a great deal of effort has
been put forth by research scientists and
land managers to actively conserve the
species. Substantive datasets pertaining
to disease, non-native invasive plant
species, and fire have been assembled
over the years that will be used to
inform decisions relative to desert
tortoise recovery. Conservation actions
such as land acquisitions, installing
protective fencing, retiring grazing
allotments, limiting off-highway vehicle
access, and implementing restoration
projects have been important recovery
and management efforts based on our
current state of knowledge regarding the
threats facing the species.
The revised strategy emphasizes
partnerships to direct and maintain
focus on implementing recovery actions
and a system to track implementation
and effectiveness of those actions. The
strategic elements listed herein are part
of a multi-faceted approach designed to
improve the 1994 Recovery Plan. The
goals of the revised recovery plan are
recovery and delisting of the desert
tortoise. The objectives and recovery
criteria address demography (maintain
self-sustaining populations of desert
tortoises within each recovery unit into
the future); distribution (maintain welldistributed populations of desert
tortoises throughout each recovery unit);
and habitat (ensure that habitat within
each recovery unit is protected and
managed to support long-term viability
of desert tortoise populations. The
strategic elements include the following:
(1) Develop, support, and build
partnerships to facilitate recovery; (2)
protect existing populations and habitat,
instituting habitat restoration where
necessary; (3) augment depleted
populations in a strategic, experimental
manner; (4) monitor progress toward
recovery, includes population trend and
effectiveness monitoring; (5) conduct
applied research and modeling in
support of recovery efforts within a
strategic framework; and (6) implement
a formal adaptive management program
that integrates new information and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:50 Aug 01, 2008
Jkt 214001
utilizes conceptual models that link
management actions to predicted
responses by desert tortoise populations
or their habitat. The success of this
revised recovery strategy will rely
heavily upon the involvement of our
partners and our commitment to
implementing the strategic elements
listed above coupled with a functioning
adaptive management program.
Public Comments Solicited
We solicit written comments on the
draft revised recovery plan described in
this notice. All comments received by
the date specified above will be
considered in development of a final
revised recovery plan for the Mojave
population of the desert tortoise.
Authority: The authority for this action is
section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act,
16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Jim A. Bartel,
Acting Regional Director, Region 8, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E8–17520 Filed 8–1–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R9–FHC–2008–N0185; 71490–1351–
0000–M2]
Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock
Assessment Reports
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of final
revised marine mammal stock
assessment reports for three stocks of
northern sea otters in Alaska; response
to comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), the Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) has incorporated public
comments into revisions of marine
mammal stock assessment reports for
the three stocks of northern sea otters
(Enhydra lutris kenyoni) in Alaska. The
2008 final stock assessment reports are
now complete and available to the
public.
Send requests for printed
copies of the final stock assessment
reports to: Chief, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Marine Mammals Management
Office, 1011 East Tudor Road,
Anchorage, AK 99503; (800) 362–5148.
Copies of the final revised stock
assessment reports are also available on
the Internet in Adobe Acrobat format at
https://alaska.fws.gov/fisheries/mmm/
seaotters/reports.htm.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
One of the
goals of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361–
1407) is to ensure that stocks of marine
mammals occurring in waters under the
jurisdiction of the United States do not
experience a level of human-caused
mortality and serious injury that is
likely to cause the stock to be reduced
below its optimum sustainable
population level (OSP). OSP is defined
as ‘‘ * * * the number of animals which
will result in the maximum productivity
of the population or the species, keeping
in mind the carrying capacity of the
habitat and the health of the ecosystem
of which they form a constituent
element.’’
To help accomplish the goal of
maintaining marine mammal stocks at
their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA
requires the Service and the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to
prepare stock assessment reports for
each marine mammal stock that occurs
in waters under the jurisdiction of the
United States. These stock assessments
are to be based on the best scientific
information available and are, therefore,
prepared in consultation with
established regional scientific review
groups. Each stock assessment must
include:
(1) A description of the stock and its
geographic range; (2) minimum
population estimate, maximum net
productivity rate, and current
population trend; (3) estimate of humancaused mortality and serious injury; (4)
commercial fishery interactions; (5)
status of the stock; and (6) potential
biological removal level (PBR). The PBR
is defined as ‘‘ * * * the maximum
number of animals, not including
natural mortalities, that may be removed
from a marine mammal stock while
allowing that stock to reach or maintain
its OSP.’’ The PBR is the product of the
minimum population estimate of the
stock (Nmin); one-half the maximum
theoretical or estimated net productivity
rate of the stock at a small population
size (Rmax); and a recovery factor (Fr) of
between 0.1 and 1.0, which is intended
to compensate for uncertainty and
unknown estimation errors.
Section 117 of the MMPA also
requires the Service and the NMFS to
review and revise the stock assessment
reports: (a) At least annually for stocks
that are specified as strategic stocks; (b)
at least annually for stocks for which
significant new information is available;
and (c) at least once every 3 years for all
other stocks.
A strategic stock is defined in the
MMPA as a marine mammal stock: (A)
For which the level of direct humancaused mortality exceeds the PBR; (B)
which, based on the best available
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\04AUN1.SGM
04AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 150 (Monday, August 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45236-45238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17520]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2008-N0114; 80221-1113-0000-C2]
Draft Revised Recovery Plan for Mojave Population of the Desert
Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii)
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability for review and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft revised recovery plan for the Mojave population
of the desert tortoise for public review and comment.
DATES: We must receive any comments on the draft recovery plan on or
before November 3, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The draft recovery plan and reference materials are
available for inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours
at the following location: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Nevada Fish
and Wildlife Office, 1340
[[Page 45237]]
Financial Boulevard, Suite 234, Reno, NV 89502 (telephone: 775-861-
6300). Submitted comments regarding the draft revised recovery plan
will also be available for public inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours following the public review and comment period.
Requests for copies of the draft revised recovery plan and submission
of written comments or materials regarding the plan should be addressed
to the Field Supervisor at the above address. You may also submit
electronic comments on the recovery plan to: DTrecovery@fws.gov. An
electronic copy of the draft recovery plan is available at: https://
endangered.fws.gov/recovery/#plans.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roy Averill-Murray, Desert Tortoise
Recovery Coordinator, at the above address or telephone number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened animals and plants is a
primary goal of the Endangered Species Act (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq. ) and our endangered species program. Recovery means improvement
of the status of listed species to the point at which listing is no
longer required under the criteria set out in section 4(a)(1) of the
Act. Recovery plans describe actions considered necessary for the
conservation of the species, establish criteria for downlisting or
delisting listed species, and estimate time and cost for implementing
the measures needed for recovery. The Recovery Plan for the Mojave
Population of the Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) was first
published in 1994 wherein the status of the species, threats, recovery
actions and recovery criteria were presented. Since that time a great
deal of effort has been dedicated to recovery and conservation
activities, and additional information has been obtained through
research and observation that allows us to better focus our recovery
strategy. The revised recovery plan for the Mojave Population of the
desert tortoise is the focus of this notice.
Section 4(f) of the Act directs the Secretaries of Interior and
Commerce to develop and implement recovery plans for species listed as
endangered or threatened, unless such plans will not promote the
conservation of the species. We and the National Marine Fisheries
Service, as appropriate, have been delegated responsibility for
administering the Act. Section 4(f) of the Act requires that public
notice, and an opportunity for public review and comment, be provided
during development of recovery plans. We will consider all information
presented during the public comment period on each new or revised
recovery plan. Substantive comments may or may not result in changes to
a recovery plan. However, any substantive comments regarding recovery
plan implementation will be forwarded to appropriate Federal agencies
or other interested entities so that they can take these comments into
account during the implementation of their respective management
programs. Individual responses to submitted comments will not be
provided.
The desert tortoise is a large, herbivorous reptile that can reach
20 to 38 centimeters (cm) (8 to 15 inches (in)) in carapace length and
10 to 15 cm (4 to 6 in) in shell height. Hatchlings emerge from eggs at
about 5 cm (2 in) in length. Adults have a domed carapace and
relatively flat, unhinged plastrons (lower shells). Their shells are
high-domed and greenish-tan to dark brown in color with tan scute
(horny plate on the shell) centers. Adult desert tortoises weigh 3.6 to
6.8 kilograms (8 to 15 pounds). The forelimbs have heavy, claw-like
scales and are flattened for digging. Hind limbs are more elephantine.
Throughout most of the Mojave Desert, the desert tortoise occupies
a variety of habitats: From flats and slopes dominated by creosote bush
(Larrea tridentata) scrub at lower elevations, to rocky slopes in the
blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima) scrub, and juniper (Juniperus spp.)
woodland interface at higher elevations. Records of desert tortoises
range from below sea level to an elevation of 2,225 meters (m) (7,300
feet (ft)), with the most favorable habitat at elevations between 305
and 914 m (1,000 and 3,000 ft). Desert tortoises most commonly occur on
gently sloping terrain with sandy-gravel soils that are friable for
burrowing and where there is sparse cover of low-growing shrubs and a
high diversity of both perennial and annual plants.
The desert tortoise occurs in the Mojave and Sonoran deserts in
southern California, southern Nevada, Arizona, and the southwestern tip
of Utah in the United States, as well as in Sonora and northern Sinaloa
in Mexico. The listed Mojave population of the desert tortoise includes
those animals living north and west of the Colorado River in the Mojave
Desert of California, Nevada, Arizona, and southwestern Utah, and in
the Sonoran (Colorado) Desert in California. A recovery plan was
published in 1994 and critical habitat was also designated in all four
States supporting the species.
Three other tortoise species in the genus Gopherus occur in the
United States, and another occurs in Mexico; however, all are
geographically separated from the Mojave population. The Sonoran
population of the desert tortoise is significantly different both
genetically and ecologically, but could be confused visually with
tortoises of the Mojave population; therefore, we determined the
Sonoran population also warranted protection as a threatened species
under section 4(e) of the Endangered Species Act (similarity of
appearance) when located outside of its natural range.
The vast majority of threats to the desert tortoise or its habitat
are associated with human land uses. The threats identified in the 1994
Recovery Plan, and that formed the basis for listing the tortoise as a
threatened species, continue to affect the species. Habitat loss,
degradation, and fragmentation from urbanization, off-highway vehicle
use in the desert, linear features such as roads and utility corridors,
livestock grazing and mining, and military activities were cited as
some of the primary reasons for the decline in desert tortoise
populations. Disease and increased incidence of fire in the Mojave
Desert have also been implicated in desert tortoise declines.
The data amassed between 1979 and 2002 from permanent study plots
throughout the range of the species were used to explore regional and
recovery-unit-level analyses and trends, and to develop within-
population spatial analyses at various scales on the landscape and in
different management units. Despite the challenges in comparing data
from year to year, the apparent downward trend in desert tortoise
populations in the western portion of the range that was identified at
the time of listing is considered ongoing. Results from other portions
of the range were inconclusive, but recent surveys of some populations
found too few tortoises to produce population estimates, suggesting
that declines may have occurred more broadly.
Collectively, the various analyses that have been performed do not
suggest that implementation of specific management actions over time
has abated declines of, or resulted in detectable increases in, desert
tortoise populations across most of the range. The life history of the
species (i.e., delayed reproductive maturity, low reproductive rates,
and relatively high mortality early in life) is such that observing
relatively rapid increases in populations is highly unlikely, even over
the 23-year monitoring period evaluated.
[[Page 45238]]
Despite the clear demonstration that the threats identified at the
time of listing impact individual tortoises, there are few data
available to evaluate or quantify the effects of threats on desert
tortoise populations. While current research results can lead to
predictions about how local tortoise abundance should be affected by
the presence of threats, quantitative estimates of the magnitude of
these threats, or of their relative importance, have not yet been
developed.
While precise correlations between the multitude of threats and
desert tortoise populations have not been clearly shown, a great deal
of effort has been put forth by research scientists and land managers
to actively conserve the species. Substantive datasets pertaining to
disease, non-native invasive plant species, and fire have been
assembled over the years that will be used to inform decisions relative
to desert tortoise recovery. Conservation actions such as land
acquisitions, installing protective fencing, retiring grazing
allotments, limiting off-highway vehicle access, and implementing
restoration projects have been important recovery and management
efforts based on our current state of knowledge regarding the threats
facing the species.
The revised strategy emphasizes partnerships to direct and maintain
focus on implementing recovery actions and a system to track
implementation and effectiveness of those actions. The strategic
elements listed herein are part of a multi-faceted approach designed to
improve the 1994 Recovery Plan. The goals of the revised recovery plan
are recovery and delisting of the desert tortoise. The objectives and
recovery criteria address demography (maintain self-sustaining
populations of desert tortoises within each recovery unit into the
future); distribution (maintain well-distributed populations of desert
tortoises throughout each recovery unit); and habitat (ensure that
habitat within each recovery unit is protected and managed to support
long-term viability of desert tortoise populations. The strategic
elements include the following: (1) Develop, support, and build
partnerships to facilitate recovery; (2) protect existing populations
and habitat, instituting habitat restoration where necessary; (3)
augment depleted populations in a strategic, experimental manner; (4)
monitor progress toward recovery, includes population trend and
effectiveness monitoring; (5) conduct applied research and modeling in
support of recovery efforts within a strategic framework; and (6)
implement a formal adaptive management program that integrates new
information and utilizes conceptual models that link management actions
to predicted responses by desert tortoise populations or their habitat.
The success of this revised recovery strategy will rely heavily upon
the involvement of our partners and our commitment to implementing the
strategic elements listed above coupled with a functioning adaptive
management program.
Public Comments Solicited
We solicit written comments on the draft revised recovery plan
described in this notice. All comments received by the date specified
above will be considered in development of a final revised recovery
plan for the Mojave population of the desert tortoise.
Authority: The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the
Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Jim A. Bartel,
Acting Regional Director, Region 8, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E8-17520 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P