In the Matter of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Entergy Nuclear Palisades, LLC (Big Rock Point); Order Approving Indirect Transfer of Facility Operating License, 45086-45088 [E8-17687]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
45086
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Notices
pendency of a hearing, the staff is
expected to promptly proceed with the
approval or denial of license transfer
requests consistent with the staff’s
findings in its safety evaluation. Notice
of the staff’s action shall be promptly
transmitted to the presiding officer and
parties to the proceeding. Commission
action on the pending hearing request is
being handled independently of this
action.
Also, an intervenor from Oswego,
New York, submitted two letters to the
Commission with public comments
dated January 21, 2008, along with an
electronic transmission containing
public comments dated January 27,
2008. The public comments are
addressed by the NRC’s safety
evaluation dated July 28, 2008.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80(a), no
license, or any right thereunder, shall be
transferred, directly or indirectly,
through transfer of control of the
license, unless the Commission shall
give its consent in writing. Upon review
of the information in the application as
supplemented and other information
before the Commission, and relying
upon the representations and
agreements in the application as
supplemented, the NRC staff concludes
that the proposed indirect transfer of
control of the license held by ENVermont Yankee to Enexus, as described
herein, will not affect the qualifications
of EN-Vermont Yankee as holder of the
Vermont Yankee license. The indirect
transfer of control of the license is
otherwise consistent with applicable
provisions of law, regulations, and
orders issued by the NRC. Furthermore,
the NRC staff concludes that the
proposed corporate restructuring
involving new intermediate and
ultimate parent companies over ENO, as
described herein, will not affect the
qualifications of ENO as holder of the
Vermont Yankee license. The indirect
transfer of control of the license as held
by ENO, to the extent affected by the
proposed restructuring, is otherwise
consistent with applicable provisions of
law, regulations, and orders issued by
the Commission.
The NRC staff concludes that the
conversion of Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. to EquaGen Nuclear
LLC would not constitute a direct
transfer of the licenses to the extent held
by ENO. Therefore, no consent to the
proposed conversion is necessary.
The findings set forth above are
supported by the NRC’s safety
evaluation dated July 28, 2008.
III
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections
161b, 161i, 161o, and 184 of the Atomic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:39 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 2201(b), 2201(i), 2201(o), and
2234; and 10 CFR 50.80, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the application regarding
the indirect license transfer discussed
above related to the proposed corporate
restructuring and establishment of
Enexus is approved, subject to the
following conditions:
1. EN-Vermont Yankee shall enter
into the $700 million Support
Agreement with Enexus Energy
Corporation as described in the
application, no later than the time the
proposed transactions and indirect
license transfer occurs. EN-Vermont
Yankee shall take no action to cause
Enexus Energy Corporation, or its
successors and assigns, to void, cancel,
or modify the Support Agreement or
cause it to fail to perform, or impair its
performance under the Support
Agreement, without prior written
consent of the NRC. The Support
Agreement may not be amended or
modified without 30 days prior written
notice to the Director of the Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation or his
designee. An executed copy of the
Support Agreement shall be submitted
to the NRC no later than 30 days after
the completion of the proposed
transactions and the indirect license
transfer. EN-Vermont Yankee shall
inform the NRC in writing anytime it
draws upon the Support Agreement.
2. The ten separate support guarantees
from various Entergy subsidiaries,
which total $315 million, including the
support guarantee relating to Vermont
Yankee, may be revoked when, and
conditioned upon, implementation of
the new $700 million Support
Agreement at the time the proposed
restructuring and indirect license
transfer are completed.
3. Should the proposed corporate
restructuring and establishment of
Enexus not be completed within one
year from the date of this Order, this
Order shall become null and void,
provided, however, upon written
application and good cause shown, such
date may be extended by Order.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
For further details with respect to this
Order, see the application dated July 30,
2007, as supplemented by letters dated
October 31, and December 5, 2007, and
January 24, March 17, April 22, and
May 2, 2008, and the NRC’s safety
evaluation dated July 28, 2008, which
are available for public inspection at the
Commission’s Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North,
Public File Area 01 F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland and accessible electronically
from the Agencywide Documents
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Access and Management System
(ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading
Room on the Internet at the NRC Web
site, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, should contact the
NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone
at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or
by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 28th day
of July 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Timothy J. McGinty,
Acting Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E8–17678 Filed 7–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–155 and 72–43]
In the Matter of Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc.; Entergy Nuclear
Palisades, LLC (Big Rock Point); Order
Approving Indirect Transfer of Facility
Operating License
I
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(ENO) and Entergy Nuclear Palisades,
LLC (EN-Palisades) are co-holders of the
Facility Operating License, No. DPR–06,
which authorizes the possession, use,
and operation of Big Rock Point. Big
Rock Point is an independent spent fuel
storage installation (ISFSI) that is owned
by EN-Palisades and operated by ENO.
The facility is located in Charlevoix
County, Michigan.
II
By application dated July 30, 2007, as
supplemented by letters dated October
31, and December 5, 2007, and January
24, March 17, April 22, and May 2,
2008, ENO, acting on behalf of itself and
EN-Palisades, requested that the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC,
the Commission), pursuant to Section
50.80 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), consent to the
proposed indirect transfer of control of
the Big Rock Point license, including
the general license for the ISFSI.
EN-Palisades is currently a direct
wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy
Nuclear Midwest Investment Company,
LLC which, in turn, is a direct wholly
owned subsidiary of Entergy Nuclear
Holding Company which, in turn, is a
direct wholly owned subsidiary of
Entergy Corporation. Therefore, under
the current corporate structure, Entergy
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Notices
Corporation is the indirect owner of 100
percent of EN-Palisades.
Under the proposed corporate
restructuring, a new holding company,
Enexus Energy Corporation (Enexus),
will be created. Initially, the
shareholders of Entergy Corporation
will separately own the shares of
Enexus and, as such, Enexus will be
owned by the public. Entergy Nuclear
Holding Company will become a direct
wholly owned subsidiary of Enexus.
Accordingly, following the corporate
restructuring, Enexus will acquire
indirect control of 100 percent of ENPalisades.
ENO, the operator of the Big Rock
Point facility, is currently a direct
wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy
Nuclear Holding Company #2 which, in
turn, is a direct wholly owned
subsidiary of Entergy Corporation.
Therefore, Entergy Corporation is
currently the indirect owner of 100
percent of ENO.
Under the proposed corporate
restructuring, Entergy Nuclear Holding
Company #2 will be eliminated and
ENO will become a direct subsidiary of
a new parent company called EquaGen,
LLC. EquaGen, LLC will be owned in
equal shares by two new intermediate
holding companies as follows. Entergy
EquaGen, Inc. is being created as a
direct subsidiary of Entergy Corporation
and will own 50 percent of EquaGen,
LLC. Similarly, Enexus EquaGen, LLC is
being created as a direct subsidiary of
Enexus and will also own 50 percent of
EquaGen, LLC. Accordingly, following
the corporate restructuring, Entergy
Corporation and Enexus will each have
indirect control of 50 percent of ENO.
Finally, ENO will be converted from
a corporation to a limited liability
company and its name will be changed
from Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. to
EquaGen Nuclear, LLC. Under Delaware
law, EquaGen Nuclear, LLC will assume
all of the rights and responsibilities of
ENO, and it will be the same company
(legal entity) both before and after the
conversion and name change. Also, ENPalisades will undergo a name change to
become Enexus Nuclear Palisades, LLC.
The staff understands that ENO will
request an administrative license
amendment to conform the Big Rock
Point license in the near future.
Notice of the request for approval and
an opportunity for a hearing was
published in the Federal Register on
January 16, 2008 (73 FR 2956). By
petition dated February 5, 2008, Locals
369 and 590, Utility Workers Union of
America (UWUA), American Federation
of Labor-Congress of Industrial
Organization, representing plant
workers at the Pilgrim Nuclear Power
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:39 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
Station located in Plymouth,
Massachusetts, responded to the
Federal Register notice and requested a
hearing and leave to intervene as a party
in the Big Rock Point proceeding. On
June 12, 2008, Local 369 filed a notice
of withdrawal of its petition to
intervene. The notice of withdrawal did
not apply to Local 590.
The request for a hearing is currently
pending before the Commission.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.1316, during the
pendency of a hearing, the staff is
expected to promptly proceed with the
approval or denial of license transfer
requests consistent with the staff’s
findings in its safety evaluation. Notice
of the staff’s action shall be promptly
transmitted to the presiding officer and
parties to the proceeding. Commission
action on the pending hearing requests
is being handled independently of this
action.
Also, an intervenor from Oswego,
New York, submitted two letters to the
Commission with public comments
dated January 21, 2008. The public
comments are addressed by the NRC’s
safety evaluation dated July 28, 2008.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80(a), no
license, or any right thereunder, shall be
transferred, directly or indirectly,
through transfer of control of the
license, unless the Commission shall
give its consent in writing. Upon review
of the information in the application as
supplemented and other information
before the Commission, and relying
upon the representations and
agreements in the application as
supplemented, the NRC staff concludes
that the proposed indirect transfer of
control of the license held by ENPalisades to Enexus, as described
herein, will not affect the qualifications
of EN-Palisades as holder of the Big
Rock Point license. The indirect transfer
of control of the license is otherwise
consistent with applicable provisions of
law, regulations, and orders issued by
the NRC. Furthermore, the NRC staff
concludes that the proposed corporate
restructuring involving new
intermediate and ultimate parent
companies over ENO, as described
herein, will not affect the qualifications
of ENO as holder of the Big Rock Point
license. The indirect transfer of control
of the license as held by ENO, to the
extent affected by the proposed
restructuring, is otherwise consistent
with applicable provisions of law,
regulations, and orders issued by the
Commission.
The NRC staff concludes that the
conversion of Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. to EquaGen Nuclear,
LLC would not constitute a direct
transfer of the licenses to the extent held
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45087
by ENO. Therefore, no consent to the
proposed conversion is necessary.
The findings set forth above are
supported by the NRC’s safety
evaluation dated July 28, 2008.
III.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections
161b, 161i, 161o, and 184 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 42
U.S.C. 2201(b), 2201(i), 2201(o), and
2234; and 10 CFR 50.80, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the application regarding
the indirect license transfer discussed
above related to the proposed corporate
restructuring and establishment of
Enexus is approved, subject to the
following conditions:
1. EN-Palisades shall enter into the
$700 million Support Agreement with
Enexus Energy Corporation as described
in the application, no later than the time
the proposed transactions and indirect
license transfer occurs. EN-Palisades
shall take no action to cause Enexus
Energy Corporation, or its successors
and assigns, to void, cancel, or modify
the Support Agreement or cause it to fail
to perform, or impair its performance
under the Support Agreement, without
prior written consent of the NRC. The
Support Agreement may not be
amended or modified without 30 days
prior written notice to the Director of
the Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards or his designee. An
executed copy of the Support
Agreement shall be submitted to the
NRC no later than 30 days after the
completion of the proposed transactions
and the indirect license transfer. ENPalisades shall inform the NRC in
writing anytime it draws upon the
Support Agreement.
2. The ten separate support guarantees
from various Entergy subsidiaries,
which total $315 million, including the
support guarantee relating to Big Rock
Point, may be revoked when, and
conditioned upon, implementation of
the new $700 million Support
Agreement at the time the proposed
restructuring and indirect license
transfer are completed.
3. The Parent Company Guarantee
may be terminated when, and
conditioned upon, replacement with an
alternative financial assurance
mechanism that is acceptable under the
terms of 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1) at the time
the proposed restructuring and indirect
license transfer are completed.
4. Should the proposed corporate
restructuring and establishment of
Enexus not be completed within one
year from the date of this Order, this
Order shall become null and void,
provided, however, upon written
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
45088
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Notices
application and good cause shown, such
date may be extended by Order.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
For further details with respect to this
Order, see the application dated July 30,
2007, as supplemented by letters dated
October 31, and December 5, 2007, and
January 24, March 17, April 22, and
May 2, 2008, and the NRC’s safety
evaluation dated July 28, 2008, which
are available for public inspection at the
Commission’s Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North,
Public File Area 01 F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland, and accessible electronically
from the Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading
Room on the Internet at the NRC Web
site, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. Persons who do not have
access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, should contact the
NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone
at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or
by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day
of July 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
E. William Brach,
Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and
Transportation, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E8–17687 Filed 7–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–333 and 72–12]
In the Matter of Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc.; Entergy Nuclear
Fitzpatrick, LLC (James A. FitzPatrick
Nuclear Power Plant); Order Approving
Indirect Transfer of Facility Operating
License
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
I
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
(ENO) and Entergy Nuclear FitzPatrick,
LLC (EN-FitzPatrick) are co-holders of
the Facility Operating License, No.
DPR–59, which authorizes the
possession, use, and operation of the
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power
Plant (FitzPatrick). FitzPatrick is a
boiling water nuclear reactor that is
owned by EN-FitzPatrick and operated
by ENO. The facility is located in
Scriba, Oswego County, New York.
II
By application dated July 30, 2007, as
supplemented by letters dated October
31, and December 5, 2007, and January
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:39 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
24, March 17, April 22, and May 2,
2008, ENO, acting on behalf of itself and
EN-FitzPatrick, requested that the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC,
the Commission), pursuant to Section
50.80 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), consent to the
proposed indirect transfer of control of
the FitzPatrick license, including the
general license for the independent
spent fuel storage installation.
EN-FitzPatrick is currently a direct
wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy
Nuclear New York Investment Company
1 which, in turn, is a direct wholly
owned subsidiary of Entergy Nuclear
Holding Company #1. Seventy-five
percent of Entergy Nuclear Holding
Company #1 is directly owned by
Entergy Corporation while the
remaining 25 percent is directly owned
by Entergy Global, LLC. Entergy Global,
LLC is a direct wholly owned subsidiary
of Entergy International Holdings LTD
which, in turn, is a direct wholly owned
subsidiary of Entergy Corporation.
Therefore, under the current corporate
structure, Entergy Corporation is the
indirect owner of 100 percent of ENFitzPatrick.
Under the proposed corporate
restructuring, a new holding company,
Enexus Energy Corporation (Enexus),
will be created. Initially, the
shareholders of Entergy Corporation
will separately own the shares of
Enexus and, as such, Enexus will be
owned by the public. Entergy Nuclear
Holding Company #1 will become a
direct wholly owned subsidiary of
Enexus. Entergy Global, LLC, Entergy
International Holdings LTD, and
Entergy Nuclear New York Investment
Company 1 will be eliminated.
Accordingly, following the corporate
restructuring, Enexus will acquire
indirect control of 100 percent of ENFitzPatrick.
ENO, the operator of the FitzPatrick
facility, is currently a direct wholly
owned subsidiary of Entergy Nuclear
Holding Company #2 which, in turn, is
a direct wholly owned subsidiary of
Entergy Corporation. Therefore, Entergy
Corporation is currently the indirect
owner of 100 percent of ENO.
Under the proposed corporate
restructuring, Entergy Nuclear Holding
Company #2 will be eliminated and
ENO will become a direct subsidiary of
a new parent company called EquaGen,
LLC. EquaGen, LLC will be owned in
equal shares by two new intermediate
holding companies as follows. Entergy
EquaGen, Inc. is being created as a
direct subsidiary of Entergy Corporation
and will own 50 percent of EquaGen,
LLC. Similarly, Enexus EquaGen, LLC is
being created as a direct subsidiary of
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Enexus and will also own 50 percent of
EquaGen, LLC. Accordingly, following
the corporate restructuring, Entergy
Corporation and Enexus will each have
indirect control of 50 percent of ENO.
Finally, ENO will be converted from
a corporation to a limited liability
company and its name will be changed
from Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. to
EquaGen Nuclear, LLC. Under Delaware
law, EquaGen Nuclear, LLC will assume
all of the rights and responsibilities of
ENO, and it will be the same company
(legal entity) both before and after the
conversion and name change. Also, ENFitzPatrick will undergo a name change
to become Enexus Nuclear FitzPatrick,
LLC. The staff understands that ENO
will request an administrative license
amendment to conform the FitzPatrick
license in the near future.
Notice of the requests for approval
and an opportunity for a hearing was
published in the Federal Register on
January 16, 2008 (73 FR 2950). By
petition dated February 5, 2008, Locals
369 and 590, Utility Workers Union of
America (UWUA), American Federation
of Labor-Congress of Industrial
Organization, representing plant
workers at the Pilgrim Nuclear Power
Station located in Plymouth,
Massachusetts, responded to the
Federal Register notice and requested a
hearing and leave to intervene as a party
in the FitzPatrick proceeding. On June
12, 2008, Local 369 filed a notice of
withdrawal of its petition to intervene.
The notice of withdrawal did not apply
to Local 590.
The request for a hearing is currently
pending before the Commission.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.1316, during the
pendency of a hearing, the staff is
expected to promptly proceed with the
approval or denial of license transfer
requests consistent with the staff’s
findings in its safety evaluation. Notice
of the staff’s action shall be promptly
transmitted to the presiding officer and
parties to the proceeding. Commission
action on the pending hearing requests
is being handled independently of this
action.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80(a), no
license, or any right thereunder, shall be
transferred, directly or indirectly,
through transfer of control of the
license, unless the Commission gives its
consent in writing. Upon review of the
information in the application as
supplemented and other information
before the Commission, and relying
upon the representations and
agreements in the application as
supplemented, the NRC staff concludes
that the proposed indirect transfer of
control of the license held by ENFitzPatrick to Enexus, as described
E:\FR\FM\01AUN1.SGM
01AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 149 (Friday, August 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45086-45088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17687]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-155 and 72-43]
In the Matter of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Entergy
Nuclear Palisades, LLC (Big Rock Point); Order Approving Indirect
Transfer of Facility Operating License
I
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO) and Entergy Nuclear
Palisades, LLC (EN-Palisades) are co-holders of the Facility Operating
License, No. DPR-06, which authorizes the possession, use, and
operation of Big Rock Point. Big Rock Point is an independent spent
fuel storage installation (ISFSI) that is owned by EN-Palisades and
operated by ENO. The facility is located in Charlevoix County,
Michigan.
II
By application dated July 30, 2007, as supplemented by letters
dated October 31, and December 5, 2007, and January 24, March 17, April
22, and May 2, 2008, ENO, acting on behalf of itself and EN-Palisades,
requested that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the
Commission), pursuant to Section 50.80 of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), consent to the proposed indirect transfer
of control of the Big Rock Point license, including the general license
for the ISFSI.
EN-Palisades is currently a direct wholly owned subsidiary of
Entergy Nuclear Midwest Investment Company, LLC which, in turn, is a
direct wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy Nuclear Holding Company
which, in turn, is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy
Corporation. Therefore, under the current corporate structure, Entergy
[[Page 45087]]
Corporation is the indirect owner of 100 percent of EN-Palisades.
Under the proposed corporate restructuring, a new holding company,
Enexus Energy Corporation (Enexus), will be created. Initially, the
shareholders of Entergy Corporation will separately own the shares of
Enexus and, as such, Enexus will be owned by the public. Entergy
Nuclear Holding Company will become a direct wholly owned subsidiary of
Enexus. Accordingly, following the corporate restructuring, Enexus will
acquire indirect control of 100 percent of EN-Palisades.
ENO, the operator of the Big Rock Point facility, is currently a
direct wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy Nuclear Holding Company
2 which, in turn, is a direct wholly owned subsidiary of
Entergy Corporation. Therefore, Entergy Corporation is currently the
indirect owner of 100 percent of ENO.
Under the proposed corporate restructuring, Entergy Nuclear Holding
Company 2 will be eliminated and ENO will become a direct
subsidiary of a new parent company called EquaGen, LLC. EquaGen, LLC
will be owned in equal shares by two new intermediate holding companies
as follows. Entergy EquaGen, Inc. is being created as a direct
subsidiary of Entergy Corporation and will own 50 percent of EquaGen,
LLC. Similarly, Enexus EquaGen, LLC is being created as a direct
subsidiary of Enexus and will also own 50 percent of EquaGen, LLC.
Accordingly, following the corporate restructuring, Entergy Corporation
and Enexus will each have indirect control of 50 percent of ENO.
Finally, ENO will be converted from a corporation to a limited
liability company and its name will be changed from Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. to EquaGen Nuclear, LLC. Under Delaware law, EquaGen
Nuclear, LLC will assume all of the rights and responsibilities of ENO,
and it will be the same company (legal entity) both before and after
the conversion and name change. Also, EN-Palisades will undergo a name
change to become Enexus Nuclear Palisades, LLC. The staff understands
that ENO will request an administrative license amendment to conform
the Big Rock Point license in the near future.
Notice of the request for approval and an opportunity for a hearing
was published in the Federal Register on January 16, 2008 (73 FR 2956).
By petition dated February 5, 2008, Locals 369 and 590, Utility Workers
Union of America (UWUA), American Federation of Labor-Congress of
Industrial Organization, representing plant workers at the Pilgrim
Nuclear Power Station located in Plymouth, Massachusetts, responded to
the Federal Register notice and requested a hearing and leave to
intervene as a party in the Big Rock Point proceeding. On June 12,
2008, Local 369 filed a notice of withdrawal of its petition to
intervene. The notice of withdrawal did not apply to Local 590.
The request for a hearing is currently pending before the
Commission. Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.1316, during the pendency of a
hearing, the staff is expected to promptly proceed with the approval or
denial of license transfer requests consistent with the staff's
findings in its safety evaluation. Notice of the staff's action shall
be promptly transmitted to the presiding officer and parties to the
proceeding. Commission action on the pending hearing requests is being
handled independently of this action.
Also, an intervenor from Oswego, New York, submitted two letters to
the Commission with public comments dated January 21, 2008. The public
comments are addressed by the NRC's safety evaluation dated July 28,
2008.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80(a), no license, or any right thereunder,
shall be transferred, directly or indirectly, through transfer of
control of the license, unless the Commission shall give its consent in
writing. Upon review of the information in the application as
supplemented and other information before the Commission, and relying
upon the representations and agreements in the application as
supplemented, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed indirect
transfer of control of the license held by EN-Palisades to Enexus, as
described herein, will not affect the qualifications of EN-Palisades as
holder of the Big Rock Point license. The indirect transfer of control
of the license is otherwise consistent with applicable provisions of
law, regulations, and orders issued by the NRC. Furthermore, the NRC
staff concludes that the proposed corporate restructuring involving new
intermediate and ultimate parent companies over ENO, as described
herein, will not affect the qualifications of ENO as holder of the Big
Rock Point license. The indirect transfer of control of the license as
held by ENO, to the extent affected by the proposed restructuring, is
otherwise consistent with applicable provisions of law, regulations,
and orders issued by the Commission.
The NRC staff concludes that the conversion of Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. to EquaGen Nuclear, LLC would not constitute a direct
transfer of the licenses to the extent held by ENO. Therefore, no
consent to the proposed conversion is necessary.
The findings set forth above are supported by the NRC's safety
evaluation dated July 28, 2008.
III.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 161b, 161i, 161o, and 184 of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2201(b), 2201(i),
2201(o), and 2234; and 10 CFR 50.80, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
application regarding the indirect license transfer discussed above
related to the proposed corporate restructuring and establishment of
Enexus is approved, subject to the following conditions:
1. EN-Palisades shall enter into the $700 million Support Agreement
with Enexus Energy Corporation as described in the application, no
later than the time the proposed transactions and indirect license
transfer occurs. EN-Palisades shall take no action to cause Enexus
Energy Corporation, or its successors and assigns, to void, cancel, or
modify the Support Agreement or cause it to fail to perform, or impair
its performance under the Support Agreement, without prior written
consent of the NRC. The Support Agreement may not be amended or
modified without 30 days prior written notice to the Director of the
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards or his designee. An
executed copy of the Support Agreement shall be submitted to the NRC no
later than 30 days after the completion of the proposed transactions
and the indirect license transfer. EN-Palisades shall inform the NRC in
writing anytime it draws upon the Support Agreement.
2. The ten separate support guarantees from various Entergy
subsidiaries, which total $315 million, including the support guarantee
relating to Big Rock Point, may be revoked when, and conditioned upon,
implementation of the new $700 million Support Agreement at the time
the proposed restructuring and indirect license transfer are completed.
3. The Parent Company Guarantee may be terminated when, and
conditioned upon, replacement with an alternative financial assurance
mechanism that is acceptable under the terms of 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1) at
the time the proposed restructuring and indirect license transfer are
completed.
4. Should the proposed corporate restructuring and establishment of
Enexus not be completed within one year from the date of this Order,
this Order shall become null and void, provided, however, upon written
[[Page 45088]]
application and good cause shown, such date may be extended by Order.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
For further details with respect to this Order, see the application
dated July 30, 2007, as supplemented by letters dated October 31, and
December 5, 2007, and January 24, March 17, April 22, and May 2, 2008,
and the NRC's safety evaluation dated July 28, 2008, which are
available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document
Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, Public File Area 01 F21,
11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and accessible
electronically from the Agencywide Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at the
NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do
not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff
by telephone at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to
pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of July 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
E. William Brach,
Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E8-17687 Filed 7-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P