Competitive and Noncompetitive Non-formula Grant Programs-General Grant Administrative Provisions and Program-Specific Administrative Provisions for the Specialty Crop Research Initiative, 44897-44909 [E8-17594]
Download as PDF
44897
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 149
Friday, August 1, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cooperative State Research,
Education, and Extension Service
7 CFR Part 3430
RIN 0524–AA28
Competitive and Noncompetitive Nonformula Grant Programs—General
Grant Administrative Provisions and
Program-Specific Administrative
Provisions for the Specialty Crop
Research Initiative
Cooperative State Research,
Education, and Extension Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim Rule and request for
comments.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Cooperative State
Research, Education, and Extension
Service (CSREES) is publishing one set
of administrative requirements that
contain elements common to all of the
competitive and noncompetitive nonformula grant programs the Agency
administers as an interim rule. Although
this interim rule becomes effective on
the date of publication, CSREES is
requesting comments for a 60-day
period as identified below. In a
relatively short period of time, this will
allow CSREES to apply basic rules to
grant programs that are currently
operating without them, including new
non-formula grant programs created by
the passage of the Food, Conservation,
and Energy Act of 2008 (FCEA) (Pub. L.
110–234) and to efficiently implement
changes to programs with existing
regulations as required by FCEA. The
provisions in subparts A through E will
serve as a single Agency resource
codifying current practices simply and
coherently for almost all CSREES
competitive and noncompetitive nonformula grant programs except the
Small Business Innovation Research
(SBIR) Program. As specific rules are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
developed for each CSREES grant
program, CSREES will propose adding a
subpart for that Federal assistance
program to this regulation. This interim
rule is being published with a first set
of program-specific grant regulations as
subpart F for the Specialty Research
Crop Initiative, authorized under
section 7311 of FCEA.
DATES: This interim rule is effective
August 1, 2008. The Agency must
receive comments on or before
September 30, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 0524–AA28, by any of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: RFP-OEP@reeusda.gov.
Include Regulatory Information Number
(RIN) number 0524–AA28 in the subject
line of the message.
Fax: 202–401–7752.
Mail: Paper, disk or CD–ROM
submissions should be submitted to
Cooperative State Research, Education,
and Extension Service, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, STOP 2299, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–2299.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Cooperative
State Research, Education, and
Extension Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Room 2258, Waterfront
Centre, 800 9th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20024.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and the
RIN for this rulemaking. All comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
Daly, Policy Section Leader, Office of
Extramural Programs, Cooperative State
Research, Education, and Extension
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
STOP 2299, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
2299; Voice: 202–401–3319; Fax: 202–
401–7752; E-mail:
edaly@csrees.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Summary
Authority
This rulemaking is authorized by
section 1470 of the National
Agricultural Research, Extension, and
Teaching Policy Act of 1977
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(NARETPA), as amended, Public Law
95–113 (7 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.). It
furthers the streamlining and
standardization efforts initiated by the
Federal Financial Assistance
Management Improvement Act of 1999,
Public Law 106–107 (31 U.S.C. 6101
note) which sunset in November 2007,
and is in accordance with the efforts of
CSREES and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) to streamline and
simplify the entire grants process while
meeting the ever-increasing
accountability and transparency
standards.
Context
CSREES has published administrative
provisions specific to some of the nonformula grant programs it administers.
These provisions appear in Parts 3400,
Special Research Grants Program; 3401,
Rangeland Research Grants Program;
3402, Food and Agricultural Sciences
National Needs Graduate and
Postgraduate Fellowship Grants
Program; 3405, Higher Education
Challenge Grants Program; 3406, 1890
Institution Capacity Building Grants
Program; 3411, National Research
Initiative Competitive Grants Program;
and 3415, Biotechnology Risk
Assessment Research Grants Program of
7 CFR. This interim rule will not apply
to the Small Business Research
Innovation (SBIR) Program with
implementing regulations codified at 7
CFR 3403. Where the interim
administrative provisions conflict with
existing regulations for CSREES
administered non-formula grant
programs, the existing regulations (i.e.,
7 CFR parts 3400 through 3402, 3405,
3406, 3411, and 3415) for these
programs will supersede until the
regulation is cancelled or the subpart for
that specific program is promulgated
under this part.
Purpose
A primary function of CSREES is the
fair, effective, and efficient
administration of Federal assistance
programs implementing agricultural
research, education, and extension
programs. The Agency’s development
and publication of regulations for its
non-formula grant programs enhance its
accountability and standardize
procedures across the grant programs it
administers while providing
transparency to the public. More than
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
44898
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
thirty grant programs administered by
CSREES are not currently governed by
administrative provisions; and CSREES’
existing administrative provisions fail to
take advantage of basic similarities
between non-formula grant programs
and the Federal government-wide efforts
to standardize and streamline the entire
grant process from pre-award through
closeout and post-award. The
cumulative effect is duplicative,
confusing language, contrary to the
needs and demands of applicants and
grantees for consistent and clear grant
policies and procedures.
This rulemaking attempts to solve the
problem by addressing the elements
common to all of the competitive and
noncompetitive grant programs CSREES
administers. In this way, the Agency can
apply basic rules to grant programs that
are currently operating without them as
well as quickly implement regulations
for any new program. In addition, this
rule will serve as a single resource,
except for the SBIR and formula grant
programs, that codifies current
processes simply and coherently.
This interim rule will allow CSREES
to finally document and codify the grant
policies and business practices it sought
to standardize and streamline in concert
with other Federal grant-making
agencies in response to various laws
(including Pub. L. 106–107),
regulations, and Presidential,
Departmental, and Agency directives
and initiatives. As of fiscal year 2008,
CSREES publishes program solicitations
or Requests For Applications (RFAs) in
an Agency-wide template (incorporating
the Federal government-wide
requirements and standards) on the
Grants.gov web site; accepts all
applications (using the SF–424 form
families) via Grants.gov; requires all
competitive and noncompetitive nonformula programs to submit all progress
and final technical reports via the
Current Research Information System
(CRIS); and as of July 1, 2008,
implemented a more comprehensive
and updated set of award terms and
conditions that are consistent with other
Federal grant-making agencies, yet
address the unique needs of CSREES
programs and USDA and CSREES
business practices. These interim rules
also address various issues related to
audit findings and recommendations
from the USDA Office of Inspector
General (e.g., timely closeout of expired
awards and restriction of grant funds 90
days after the expiration date). In
response to Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) Circular A–123 on
Internal Controls, Improper Payment
Information Act (IPIA), and other
oversight and monitoring requirements,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
CSREES is seeking to clearly establish
and implement monitoring and
oversight procedures and systems to
ensure that Federal assistance funds are
being efficiently and effectively
expended in accordance with program
authorities and Federal assistance laws
and regulations.
Alternatives
CSREES considered publishing
separate rules for each uncovered grant
program. However, this would defeat
the purposes of recent laws, regulations,
and Presidential, Departmental, and
Agency initiatives to standardize and
streamline the entire grant cycle.
Furthermore, it would be a time
consuming practice to draft and publish
a final rule for each uncovered program.
On the other hand, this interim rule
provides clearer, more consistent and
effective grant policies and procedures
for the grantee which will contribute to
more efficient and effective program
delivery and potentially result in less
audit findings and disallowed costs. The
Agency expects this interim rule to
contribute and facilitate more consistent
processes across grant programs within
CSREES and across USDA and the
Federal government. By making better
use of standard administrative
provisions, CSREES also anticipates
being able to publish clearer and more
consistent RFAs within a shorter time
frame and provide applicants, grantees,
staff, and the public with one
comprehensive set of administrative
provisions.
Compliance
Once implemented, applicants who
fail to comply with the new
administrative provisions may not have
their applications considered for
funding by CSREES, may have their
grant suspended or terminated, or may
be billed for disallowed costs. This
penalty provision can be enforced and
is critical to CSREES’ fair, effective, and
efficient administration of grant
programs. It is anticipated that having
one set of administrative provisions
codified in one part will assist
applicants and grantees in
understanding and complying with
Federal assistance laws and regulations,
as well as the intent of the authorizing
regulation.
Organization
CSREES organized the regulation as
follows: Subparts A through E provide
administrative provisions for all
competitive and noncompetitive nonformula grants. Subparts F and
thereafter apply to specific CSREES
programs and are organized in the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
following groups: Research programs
(i.e., programs with a predominantly
research focus), education and
multicultural programs, extension
programs, integrated programs (i.e.,
programs that statutorily require the
integration of two or more
components—research, education, or
extension); and other programs. See
section 3430.2 below for definitions
(e.g., research, extension, and
education).
CSREES is, to the extent practical,
using the following subpart template for
each program authority: (1)
Applicability of regulations, (2)
purpose, (3) eligibility, (4) definitions
(those in addition to or different from
3430.2), (5) project types and priorities,
(6) funding restrictions (including
indirect costs), and (7) matching
requirements. Subparts F and thereafter
contain the above seven components in
this order. Additional sections may be
added for a specific program if there are
additional requirements or a need for
additional rules for the program (e.g.,
additional reporting requirements).
Subpart F—Specialty Crop Research
Initiative
As stated above, this interim
rulemaking includes the programspecific rules as subpart F for the
Specialty Crop Research Initiative
(SRCI) which is authorized under
section 7311 of FCEA.
Through this program-specific
regulation under subpart F, § 3430.202,
CSREES is defining ‘‘integrated’’ and
‘‘specialty crop.’’ Subpart F also
provides that individual applicants
must be U.S. citizens or a national of the
United States and excludes foreign or
international organizations. Section
3430.204 provides that CSREES can
develop and implement new activities
and focus areas not identified in
3430.201 based on input provided by
stakeholders and as determined by
CSREES. Section 3430.205 states the
specific program restrictions and
clarifies the indirect cost policy for the
SCRI Program. Section 3430.206 states
the specific matching requirements for
this program and that these matching
requirements cannot be waived.
Timeline for Implementing Regulations
CSREES is publishing this rule as
interim with a 60-day comment period
and anticipates a final rule by March 1,
2009. However, in the interim, these
regulations apply to all CSREES
competitive and noncompetitive nonformula programs (except for the
programs implemented by 7 CFR Part
3400, Special Research Grants Program;
7 CFR Part 3401, Rangeland Research
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Grants Program; 7 CFR Part 3402, Food
and Agricultural Sciences National
Needs Graduate and Postgraduate
Fellowship Grants Program; 7 CFR Part
3405, Higher Education Challenge
Grants Program; 7 CFR Part 3406, 1890
Institution Capacity Building Grants
Program; 7 CFR Part 3411, National
Research Initiative Competitive Grants
Program; and 7 CFR Part 3415,
Biotechnology Risk Assessment
Research Grants Program) until the
regulations for these programs (i.e., the
individual subparts) are in effect or
superseded by statute). As stated
previously, this regulation will not
apply to 7 CFR Part 3403, Small
Business Innovation Research Grants
Program. Within the next 18 months,
CSREES plans to cancel some of the
existing program-specific regulations
identified in 7 CFR and incorporate
these program-specific regulations as
separate subparts under this part. In
addition, CSREES is currently drafting a
CSREES Grants Policy Manual, which
while incorporating the regulations
under this part, will provide more
specific instructions, detailed
explanations, and background for
potential applicants, grantees, Agency
and Departmental staff, and the public.
II. Administrative Requirements for the
Proposed Rulemaking
Executive Order 12866
This action has been determined not
significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866, and therefore, has not
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget. This interim
rule will not materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs; nor
will it have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; nor
will it adversely affect the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities in
a material way. Furthermore, it does not
raise a novel legal or policy issue arising
out of legal mandates, the President’s
priorities or principles set forth in the
Executive Order.
organizations, and governmental
jurisdictions subject to regulation.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
The Department certifies that this
interim rule has been assessed in
accordance with the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq. (PRA). The Department
concludes that this interim rule does not
impose any new information
requirements; however, the burden
estimates will increase for existing
approved information collections
associated with this rule due to
additional applicants. These estimates
will be provided to OMB. In addition to
the SF–424 form families (i.e., Research
and Related and Mandatory), SF–272,
Federal Cash Transactions Report, and
SF–269, Financial Status Reports;
CSREES has three currently approved
OMB information collections associated
with this rulemaking: OMB Information
Collection No. 0524–0042, CSREES
Current Research Information System
(CRIS); No. 0524–0041, CSREES
Application Review Process; and No.
0524–0026, Assurance of Compliance
with the Department of Agriculture
Regulations Assuring Civil Rights
Compliance and Organizational
Information.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
This interim regulation applies to the
following Federal assistance programs
administered by CSREES including
10.309, Specialty Crop Research
Initiative.
The National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969
The Department certifies this interim
rule has been assessed in accordance
with the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq. (NEPA). The
Department concludes that the NEPA
requirements do not apply to this
rulemaking because this interim rule
includes no provisions impacting the
maintenance, preservation or
enhancement of a healthful
environment.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
Federal Regulations and Policies on
Families
This interim rule has been reviewed
in accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5
U.S.C. 601–612. The Department
concluded that the rule does not involve
regulatory and informational
requirements regarding businesses,
The Department has reviewed this
interim rule in accordance with the
requirements of section 654 of the
Treasury and general Government
Appropriations Act of 1999, 5 U.S.C.
601 note. This interim regulation was
not found to have a potential negative
effect on family well-being as it is
defined thereunder.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44899
Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental and
Safety Risk
The Department certifies that this
interim rule has been assessed regarding
the environmental health risks and
safety risks that may disproportionately
affect children. This interim regulation
was not found to have a negative affect
on the health and safety of children.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
and Executive Order 13132
The Department has reviewed this
interim rule in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order No.
13132, 64 FR 43225 (August 10, 1999)
and the Unfunded Mandates Act of
1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., and has
found no potential or substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. As there
is no Federal mandate contained herein
that could result in increased
expenditures by State, local tribal
governments or by the private sector,
the department has not prepared a
budgetary impact statement.
Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department has reviewed this
interim rule in accordance with
Executive Order 13175, 65 FR 67249
(Nov. 9, 2000), and has determined that
it does not have ‘‘tribal implications.’’
The interim rule does not ‘‘have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.’’
Executive Order 12630: Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
The Department has reviewed this
interim rule in accordance with
Executive Order 12630, 53 FR 8859
(Mar. 15, 1988) and has determined that
it does not contain any ‘‘policies that
have takings implications in regard to
the licensing, permitting, or other
condition requirements or limitations
on private property use, or that require
dedications or exactions from owners of
private property.’’
Executive Order 13211: Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
The Department has reviewed this
interim regulation and has determined
that the provisions of Executive Order
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
44900
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
13211, 66 FR 28355 (May 18, 2001), are
not applicable as this is not a significant
regulatory action and there are no direct
or implied effects on energy supply,
distribution, or use.
Clarity of This Regulation
Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735
(September 30, 1993), and the
President’s memorandum of June 1,
1998, require each agency to write all
rules in plain language. The Department
invites comments on how to make this
interim rule easier to understand.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 3430
Administrative practice and
procedure, Agricultural research,
Education, Extension, Federal
assistance.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Cooperative State
Research, Education, and Extension
Service is amending chapter XXXIV of
title 7 of the Code of Federal
Regulations to add part 3430 to read as
follows:
I
PART 3430—COMPETITIVE AND
NONCOMPETITIVE NON-FORMULA
GRANT PROGRAMS—GENERAL
GRANT ADMINISTRATION
PROVISIONS
Subpart A—General Information
Sec.
3430.1 Applicability of regulations.
3430.2 Definitions.
3430.3 Deviations.
3430.4 Other applicable statutes and
regulations.
Subpart B—Pre-Award: Solicitation and
Application
3430.11 Competition.
3430.12 Requests for applications.
3430.13 Letter of intent to submit an
application.
3430.14 Types of applications; types of
grants instruments.
3430.15 Stakeholder input.
3430.16 Eligibility requirements.
3430.17 Content of an application.
3430.18 Submission of an application.
3430.19 Resubmission of an application.
3430.20 Acknowledgment of an
application.
3430.21 Confidentiality of applications and
awards.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Subpart C—Pre-Award: Application Review
and Evaluation
3430.31 Guiding principles.
3430.32 Preliminary application review.
3430.33 Selection of reviewers.
3430.34 Evaluation criteria.
3430.35 Review of noncompetitive
applications.
3430.36 Procedures to minimize or
eliminate duplication of effort.
3430.37 Feedback to applicants.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
Subpart D—Award
3430.41 Administration.
Subpart E—Post-Award and Closeout
3430.51 Payment.
3430.52 Cost sharing and matching.
3430.53 Program income.
3430.54 Technical reporting.
3430.55 Financial reporting.
3430.56 Project meetings.
3430.57 Hearings and appeals.
3430.58 Closeout procedures.
Research Programs
Subpart F—Specialty Crop Research
Initiative
3430.200 Applicability of regulations.
3430.201 Purpose.
3430.202 Definitions.
3430.203 Eligibility.
3430.204 Project types and priorities.
3430.205 Funding restrictions.
3430.206 Matching requirements.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 3316; Pub. L. 106–107
(31 U.S.C. 6101 note)
Subpart A—General Information
§ 3430.1
Applicability of regulations.
(a) This part provides agency specific
regulations regarding the application
for, evaluation, award, and post-award
administration of Cooperative State
Research, Education, and Extension
Service (CSREES) awards, and are
supplementary to the uniform assistance
regulations at 7 CFR parts 3016 (State,
local, and tribal governments), 3019
(institutions of higher education,
hospitals, and nonprofits), and 3015 (all
others), as applicable.
(b) Competitive programs. This part
applies to all agricultural research,
education, and extension competitive
and related programs for which the
Cooperative State Research, Education,
and Extension Service (CSREES) has
administrative or other authority, as
well as any other Federal assistance
program delegated to the CSREES
administrator. In cases where
regulations of this part conflict with
existing regulations of CSREES in title 7
(i.e., 7 CFR parts 3400 through 3499) of
the Code of Federal Regulations,
regulations of this part shall supersede.
This part does not apply to the Small
Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
Program.
(c) Noncompetitive programs.
Subparts A, B, D, and E of this part, as
well as § 3430.35, apply to all
noncompetitive agricultural research,
education, and extension programs
administered by CSREES, as well as any
other Federal assistance program
delegated to the CSREES administrator.
(d) Grant programs administered on
behalf of other agencies. Subparts A
through E of this part, as appropriate,
apply to competitive and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
noncompetitive grants administered on
behalf of other agencies of the Federal
government. Requirements specific to
these grant programs will be included in
the program solicitations or RFAs.
(e) Grant programs administered
jointly with other agencies. Subparts A
through E of this part, as appropriate,
apply to competitive and
noncompetitive grants administered
jointly with other agencies of the
Federal government. Requirements
specific to these grant programs will be
included in the appropriate program
solicitations or RFAs published by both
or either agency.
(f) Formula fund grants programs.
This part does not apply to any of the
formula grant programs administered by
CSREES. Formula funds are the research
funds provided to 1862 land-grant
institutions and agricultural experiment
stations under the Hatch Act of 1887 (7
U.S.C. 361a, et seq.); extension funds
provided to 1862 land-grant institutions
under sections 3(b) and 3(c)) of the
Smith-Lever Act (7 U.S.C. 343(b) and
(c)) and section 208(c) of the District of
Columbia Public Postsecondary
Education Reorganization Act, Public
Law 93–471; agricultural extension and
research funds provided to 1890 landgrant institutions under sections 1444
and 1445 of the National Agricultural
Research, Extension, and Teaching
Policy Act of 1977 (NARETPA) (7 U.S.C.
3221 and 3222); expanded food and
nutrition education program funds
authorized under section 3(d) of the
Smith-Lever Act to the 1862 land-grant
institutions and the 1890 land-grant
institutions; extension funds under the
Renewable Resources Extension Act for
the 1862 land-grant institutions and the
1890 land-grant institutions; research
funds provided to forestry schools
under the McIntire-Stennis Cooperative
Forestry Research Act of 1962 (16 U.S.C.
582a, et seq.); and animal health and
disease research funds provided to
veterinary schools and agricultural
experiment stations under section 1433
of NARETPA (7 U.S.C. 3195).
§ 3430.2
Definitions.
As used in this part:
1862 Land-Grant Institution means an
institution eligible to receive funds
under the Act of July 2, 1862, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 301 et seq.). Unless
otherwise stated for a specific program,
this term includes a research foundation
maintained by such an institution.
1890 Land-Grant Institution means
one of those institutions eligible to
receive funds under the Act of August
30, 1890, as amended (7 U.S.C. 321 et
seq.), including Tuskegee University
and West Virginia State University.
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Unless otherwise stated for a specific
program, this term includes a research
foundation maintained by such an
institution.
1994 Land-Grant Institution means
one of those institutions as defined in
section 532 of the Equity in Educational
Land-Grant Status Act of 1994, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 301 note). These
institutions are commonly referred to as
Tribal Colleges or Universities.
Administrator means the
Administrator of the Cooperative State
Research, Education, and Extension
Service (CSREES) and any other officer
or employee of the CSREES to whom the
authority involved is delegated.
Advisory Board means the National
Agricultural Research, Extension,
Education, and Economics Advisory
Board.
Agricultural research means research
in the food and agricultural sciences.
Applied research means research that
includes expansion of the findings of
fundamental research to uncover
practical ways in which new knowledge
can be advanced to benefit individuals
and society.
Authorized Departmental Officer or
ADO means the Secretary or any
employee of the Department with
delegated authority to issue or modify
grant instruments on behalf of the
Secretary.
Authorized Representative or AR
means the President or Chief Executive
Officer of the applicant organization or
the official, designated by the President
or Chief Executive Officer of the
applicant organization, who has the
authority to commit the resources of the
organization to the project.
Budget period means the interval of
time (usually 12 months) into which the
project period is divided for budgetary
and reporting purposes.
Cash contributions means the
recipient’s cash outlay, including the
outlay of money contributed to the
recipient by non-Federal third parties.
Citizen or national of the United
States means a citizen or native resident
of a State; or, a person defined in the
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8
U.S.C. 1101(a)(22), who, though not a
citizen of the United States, owes
permanent allegiance to the United
States. When eligibility is claimed
solely on the basis of permanent
allegiance, documentary evidence from
the Immigration and Naturalization
Service as to such eligibility must be
made available to CSREES upon request.
College or university means, unless
defined in a separate subpart, an
educational institution in any State
which:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
(1) Admits as regular students only
persons having a certificate of
graduation from a school providing
secondary education, or the recognized
equivalent of such a certificate;
(2) Is legally authorized within such
State to provide a program of education
beyond secondary education;
(3) Provides an educational program
for which a bachelor’s degree or any
other higher degree is awarded;
(4) Is a public or other nonprofit
institution; and
(5) Is accredited by a nationally
recognized accrediting agency or
association. Unless otherwise stated for
a specific program, this term includes a
research foundation maintained by such
an institution.
Department means the United States
Department of Agriculture.
Education activity or teaching activity
means formal classroom instruction,
laboratory instruction, and practicum
experience in the food and agricultural
sciences and other related matters such
as faculty development, student
recruitment and services, curriculum
development, instructional materials
and equipment, and innovative teaching
methodologies.
Established and demonstrated
capacity means that an organization has
met the following criteria:
(1) Conducts any systematic study
directed toward new or fuller
knowledge and understanding of the
subject studied; or,
(2) Systematically relates or applies
the findings of research or scientific
experimentation to the application of
new approaches to problem solving,
technologies, or management practices;
and
(3) Has facilities, qualified personnel,
independent funding, and prior projects
and accomplishments in research or
technology transfer.
Extension means informal education
program conducted in the States in
cooperation with the Unites States
Department of Agriculture.
Extension activity means an act or
process that delivers science-based
knowledge and informal educational
programs to people, enabling them to
make practical decisions.
Food and agricultural sciences. The
term ‘‘food and agricultural sciences’’
means basic, applied, and
developmental research, extension, and
teaching activities in food and fiber,
agricultural, renewable natural
resources, forestry, and physical and
social sciences, including activities
relating to the following:
(1) Animal health, production, and
well-being.
(2) Plant health and production.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44901
(3) Animal and plant germ plasm
collection and preservation.
(4) Aquaculture.
(5) Food safety.
(6) Soil and water conservation and
improvement.
(7) Forestry, horticulture, and range
management.
(8) Nutritional sciences and
promotion.
(9) Farm enhancement, including
financial management, input efficiency,
and profitability.
(10) Home economics.
(11) Rural human ecology.
(12) Youth development and
agricultural education, including 4–H
clubs.
(13) Expansion of domestic and
international markets for agricultural
commodities and products, including
agricultural trade barrier identification
and analysis.
(14) Information management and
technology transfer related to
agriculture.
(15) Biotechnology related to
agriculture.
(16) The processing, distributing,
marketing, and utilization of food and
agricultural products.
Fundamental research means research
that increases knowledge or
understanding of the fundamental
aspects of phenomena and has the
potential for broad application, and has
an effect on agriculture, food, nutrition,
or the environment.
Graduate degree means a Master’s or
doctoral degree.
Grant means the award by the
Authorized Departmental Officer of
funds to an eligible grantee to assist in
meeting the costs of conducting for the
benefit of the public, an identified
project which is intended and designed
to accomplish the purpose of the
program as identified in the program
solicitation or RFA.
Grantee means the organization
designated in the grant award document
as the responsible legal entity to which
a grant is awarded.
Insular area means the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam,
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, the
Federated States of Micronesia, the
Republic of the Marshall Islands, the
Republic of Palau, and the Virgin
Islands of the United States.
Integrated means to incorporate two
or three components of the agricultural
knowledge system (research, education,
and extension) around a problem area or
activity.
Land-grant Institutions means the
1862 Land-Grant Institutions, 1890
Land-Grant Institutions, and 1994 LandGrant Institutions.
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
44902
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Matching or cost sharing means that
portion of allowable project or program
costs not borne by the Federal
Government, including the value of inkind contributions.
Merit review means an evaluation of a
proposed project or elements of a
proposed program whereby the
technical quality and relevance to
regional or national goals are assessed.
Merit reviewers means peers and other
individuals with expertise appropriate
to conduct merit review of a proposed
project.
Methodology means the project
approach to be followed.
Mission-linked research means
research on specifically identified
agricultural problems which, through a
continuum of efforts, provides
information and technology that may be
transferred to users and may relate to a
product, practice, or process.
National laboratories include Federal
laboratories that are government-owned
contractor-operated or governmentowned government-operated.
Peer reviewers means experts or
consultants qualified by training and
experience to give expert advice on the
scientific and technical merit of grant
applications or the relevance of those
applications to one or more of the
application evaluation criteria. Peer
reviewers may be adhoc or convened as
a panel.
Prior approval means written
approval by an Authorized
Departmental Officer evidencing prior
consent.
Private research organization means
any non-governmental corporation,
partnership, proprietorship, trust, or
other organization.
Private sector means all non-public
entities, including for-profit and
nonprofit commercial and noncommercial entities, and including
private or independent educational
associations.
Program Officer means a CSREES
individual who is responsible for the
technical oversight of the award on
behalf of USDA.
Project means the particular activity
within the scope of the program
supported by a grant award.
Project Director or PD means the
single individual designated by the
grantee in the grant application and
approved by the Authorized
Departmental Officer who is responsible
for the direction and management of the
project, also known as a Principal
Investigator (PI) for research activities.
Project period means the total length
of time, as stated in the award document
and modifications thereto, if any, during
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
which Federal sponsorship begins and
ends.
Research means any systematic study
directed toward new or fuller
knowledge and understanding of the
subject studied.
Scientific peer review is an evaluation
of the technical quality of a proposed
project and its relevance to regional or
national goals, performed by experts
with the scientific knowledge and
technical skills to conduct the proposed
research work.
Secretary means the Secretary of
Agriculture and any other officer or
employee of the Department to whom
the authority involved is delegated.
State means any one of the fifty
States, the District of Columbia, and the
insular areas.
Third party in-kind contributions
means the value of non-cash
contributions of property or services
provided by non-Federal third parties,
including real property, equipment,
supplies and other expendable property,
directly benefiting and specifically
identifiable to a funded project or
program.
United States means the several
States, the District of Columbia, and the
insular areas.
Units of State government means all
State institutions, including the formal
divisions of State government (i.e., the
official state agencies such as
departments of transportation and
education), local government agencies
(e.g., a county human services office),
and including state educational
institutions (e.g., public colleges and
universities).
§ 3430.3
Deviations.
Any request by the applicant or
grantee for a waiver or deviation from
any provision of this part shall be
submitted to the ADO identified in the
agency specific requirements. CSREES
shall review the request and notify the
applicant/grantee whether the request to
deviate has been approved within 30
calendar days from the date of receipt of
the deviation request. If the deviation
request is still under consideration at
the end of 30 calendar days, CSREES
shall inform the applicant/grantee in
writing of the date when the applicant/
grantee may expect the decision.
§ 3430.4 Other applicable statutes and
regulations.
Several Federal statutes and
regulations apply to grant applications
considered for review and to project
grants awarded under CSREES grant
programs. These include, but are not
limited to:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7 CFR Part 1, subpart A—USDA
implementation of the Freedom of
Information Act.
7 CFR Part 3—USDA implementation of
OMB Circular No. A–129, regarding debt
management.
7 CFR Part 15, subpart A—USDA
implementation of Title VI of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended.
7 CFR Part 331 and 9 CFR Part 121—USDA
implementation of the Agricultural
Bioterrorism Protection Act of 2002.
7 CFR Part 3015—USDA Uniform Federal
Assistance Regulations, implementing OMB
directives (i.e., OMB Circular Nos. A–21 and
A–122, now codified at 2 CFR Parts 220) and
incorporating provisions of 31 U.S.C. 6301–
6308 (formerly the Federal Grant and
Cooperative Agreement Act of 1977, Pub. L.
95–224), as well as general policy
requirements applicable to grantees of
Departmental financial assistance.
7 CFR Part 3017—USDA implementation
of Governmentwide Debarment and
Suspension (Nonprocurement) and
Governmentwide Requirements for Drug Free
Workplace (Grants).
7 CFR Part 3018—USDA implementation
of Restrictions on Lobbying. Imposes
prohibitions and requirements for disclosure
and certification related to lobbying on
grantees of Federal contracts, grants,
cooperative agreements, and loans.
7 CFR Part 3019—USDA implementation
of OMB Circular No. A–110, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants and
Other Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and Other Nonprofit
Organizations.
7 CFR Part 3052—USDA implementation
of OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of States,
Local Governments, and Nonprofit
Organizations.
7 CFR Part 3407—CSREES procedures to
implement the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended. 29 U.S.C.
794 (section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973)
and
7 CFR Part 15b (USDA implementation of
statute)—prohibiting discrimination based
upon physical or mental handicap in
Federally assisted programs.
35 U.S.C. 200 et seq.—Bayh-Dole Act,
controlling allocation of rights to inventions
made by employees of small business firms
and domestic nonprofit organizations,
including universities, in Federally assisted
programs (implementing regulations are
contained in 37 CFR Part 401).
Subpart B—Pre-Award: Solicitation
and Application
§ 3430.11
Competition.
(a) Standards for competition. Except
as provided in paragraph (b) of this
section, CSREES will enter into grants
and cooperative agreements, unless
restricted by statute, only after
competition.
(b) The CSREES ADO and the Agency
approving official may make a
determination in writing that
competition is not deemed appropriate
for a particular transaction. Such
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
determination shall be limited to
transactions where it can be adequately
justified that a noncompetitive award is
in the best interest of the Federal
government and necessary to the goals
of the program.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
§ 3430.12
Requests for applications.
(a) For each competitive and
noncompetitive non-formula program,
CSREES will prepare a program
solicitation (also called a request for
applications (RFA); hereafter referred to
as RFA in accordance with the OMB
policy directive, 68 FR 37370–37379
(June 23, 2003), establishing a standard
format for Federal agency
announcements (i.e., program
solicitations or RFAs) of funding
opportunities under programs that
award discretionary grants or
cooperative agreements. This policy
directive requires the content of the
RFA to be organized in a sequential
manner beginning with overview
information followed by the full text of
the announcement and will apply
unless superseded by statute or another
OMB policy directive. The RFA may
include all or a portion of the following
items:
(1) Contact information;
(2) Directions for interested
beneficiaries to submit written
comments in a published program
solicitation or RFA;
(3) CFDA number;
(4) Legislative authority and
background information;
(5) Purpose, priorities, and fund
availability;
(6) Program-specific eligibility
requirements;
(7) Program-specific restrictions on
the use of funds, if applicable;
(8) Matching requirements, if
applicable;
(9) Acceptable types of applications;
(10) Types of projects to be given
priority consideration, including
maximum anticipated awards and
maximum project lengths, if applicable;
(11) Program areas, if applicable;
(12) Funding restrictions, if
applicable;
(13) Directions for obtaining
additional requests for applications and
application forms;
(14) Information about how to obtain
application forms and the instructions
for completing such forms;
(15) Instructions and requirements for
submitting applications, including
submission deadline(s);
(16) Explanation of the application
revaluation process; and
(17) Specific evaluation criteria used
in the review process.
(b) Where program-specific
requirements differ from the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
requirements established in this part,
program solicitations will also address
any such variation(s). Variations may
occur in the following:
(1) Award management guidelines;
(2) Restrictions on the delegation of
fiscal responsibility;
(3) Required approval for changes to
project plans;
(4) Expected program outputs and
reporting requirements, if applicable;
(5) Applicable Federal statutes and
regulations;
(6) Confidential aspects of
applications and awards, if applicable;
(7) Regulatory information; and
(8) Definitions.
§ 3430.13 Letter of intent to submit an
application.
CSREES may request or require that
prospective applicants notify program
staff of their intent to submit an
application identified as ‘‘letter of
intent’’. If applicable, the request or
requirement will be included in the
RFA, along with directions for the
preparation and submission of the letter
of intent and any relevant deadlines.
Entities interested in submitting an
application for a CSREES grant should
complete and submit a ‘‘Letter of Intent
to Submit an Application’’ form by the
due date specified in the RFA. This
form does not obligate the applicant in
any way, but will provide useful
information to CSREES in preparing for
application review. Applicants that do
not submit a letter of intent by the
specified due date are still allowed to
submit a grant application by the
application due date specified in the
RFA, unless otherwise specified in the
RFA.
§ 3430.14 Types of applications; types of
grant instruments.
(a) Types of applications. The type of
application acceptable may vary by
funding opportunity. The RFA will
stipulate the type of application that
may be submitted to CSREES in
response to the funding opportunity.
Applicants may submit the following
types of applications as specified in the
RFA.
(1) New. An application that is being
submitted to CSREES for the first time.
(2) Resubmission. This is a project
application that had been submitted for
consideration under the same program
previously but has not been approved
for an award under the program. For
competitive programs, this type of
application is evaluated, in competition
with other pending applications in the
area to which it is assigned.
Resubmissions are reviewed according
to the same evaluation criteria as new
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44903
applications. In addition, applicants
must respond to previous panel review
summary, unless waived by CSREES.
(3) Renewal. An application
requesting additional funding for a
period subsequent to that provided by a
current award. A renewal application
competes with all other applications
and must be developed as fully as
though the applicant is applying for the
first time. Renewal applicants also must
have filed a progress report via CRIS,
unless waived by CSREES.
(4) Continuation. A noncompeting
application for an additional funding/
budget period within a previously
approved project period.
(5) Revision. An application that
proposes a change in the Federal
Government’s financial obligations or
contingent liability from an existing
obligation; or, any other change in the
terms and conditions of the existing
award.
(6) Resubmitted renewal. This is a
project application that has been
submitted for consideration under the
same program previously. This type of
application has also been submitted for
renewal under the same program but
was not approved. For competitive
programs, this type of application is
evaluated, in competition with other
pending applications in the area to
which it is assigned. Resubmitted
renewal applications are reviewed
according to the same evaluation criteria
as new applications. Applicants must
respond to previous panel review
summary and file a progress report via
CRIS, unless waived by CSREES.
(b) Types of grant instruments. The
following is a list of corresponding
categories of grant instruments issued
by CSREES.
(1) Standard. This is a grant
instrument by which the CSREES agrees
to support a specified level of effort for
a predetermined project period without
the announced intention of providing
additional support at a future date.
(2) Renewal. This is an instrument by
which the CSREES agrees to provide
additional funding under a standard
grant as specified in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section for a project period beyond
that approved in an original or amended
award, provided that the cumulative
period does not exceed any statutory
time limitation of the award.
(3) Continuation. This is a grant
instrument by which the CSREES agrees
to support a specified level of effort for
a predetermined period of time with a
statement of intention to provide
additional support at a future date,
provided that performance has been
satisfactory, appropriations are available
for this purpose, and continued support
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
44904
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
would be in the best interest of the
Federal government and the public.
(4) Supplemental. This is an
instrument by which the CSREES agrees
to provide small amounts of additional
funding under a standard, renewal, or
continuation grant as specified in
paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(3) of
this section and may involve a shortterm (usually six months or less)
extension of the project period beyond
that approved in an original or amended
award, but in no case may the
cumulative period of the project,
including short term extensions, exceed
any statutory time limitation of the
award.
(c) Obligation of the Federal
government. Neither the acceptance of
any application nor the award of any
project grant shall commit or obligate
the United States in any way to make
any renewal, supplemental,
continuation or other award with
respect to any approved application or
portion of an approved application.
§ 3430.15
Stakeholder input.
Section 103 (c)(2) of the Agricultural
Research, Extension, and Education
Reform Act of 1998 (AREERA) (7 U.S.C.
7613(c)(2)) requires the Secretary to
solicit and consider input on each
program RFA from persons who
conduct agricultural research,
education, and extension for use in
formulating future RFAs for competitive
programs. CSREES will provide
instructions for submission of
stakeholder input in the RFA. CSREES
will consider any comments received
within the specified timeframe in the
development of the future RFAs for the
program.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
§ 3430.16
Eligibility requirements.
Program-specific eligibility
requirements appear in the subpart
applicable to each program and in the
RFAs. In addition to program-specific
eligibility requirements, grants will be
awarded only to responsible applicants.
Specific management information
relating to an applicant shall be
submitted on a one-time basis, with
updates on an as-needed basis, as part
of the responsibility determination prior
to award of a grant identified under a
specific CSREES program, if such
information has not been provided
previously under this or another
CSREES program. CSREES will provide
copies of forms recommended for use in
fulfilling these requirements as part of
the preaward process. Although an
applicant may be eligible based on its
status as one of these entities, there are
factors which may exclude an applicant
from receiving Federal financial and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
nonfinancial assistance and benefits
under a CSREES program (e.g.,
debarment or suspension of an
individual involved or a determination
that an applicant is not responsible
based on submitted organizational
management information).
§ 3430.17
Content of an application.
The RFA provides instructions about
how to access a funding opportunity.
The funding opportunity contains the
application package, which includes the
forms necessary for completion of an
application in response to the RFA, as
well as the application instructions. The
application instructions document, ‘‘A
Guide for the Preparation and
Submission of CSREES Applications via
Grants.gov,’’ is intended to assist
applicants in the preparation and
submission of applications to CSREES.
It is also the primary document for use
in the preparation of CSREES
applications via Grants.gov.
§ 3430.18
Submission of an application.
(a) When to submit. The RFA will
provide deadlines for the submission of
letters of intent, if requested and
required, and applications. CSREES may
issue separate RFAs and/or establish
separate deadlines for different types of
applications, different grant
instruments, different topics or phases
of the grant programs. If applications are
not received by applicable deadlines,
they will not be considered for funding.
Exceptions will only be considered
when extenuating circumstances exist
and justification and supporting
documentation are provided to CSREES.
(b) What to submit. The contents of
the applicable application package, as
well as any other information, is to be
submitted by the due date.
(c) Where to submit. The RFA will
provide addresses for submission of
letters of intent, if requested or required.
It will also indicate permissible
methods of submission (i.e., electronic,
e-mail, hand-delivery, U.S. Postal
Service, courier). Conformance with
preparation and submission instructions
is required and will be strictly enforced
unless a deviation had been approved in
advance of application submission.
CSREES may establish additional
requirements. CSREES may return
without review applications that are not
consistent with the RFA instructions.
§ 3430.19
Resubmission of an application.
(a) Previously unfunded applications.
(1) Applications that are resubmitted to
a program, after being previously
submitted but not funded by that
program, must include the following
information:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(i) The CSREES-assigned proposal
number of the previously submitted
application;
(ii) Summary of the previous
reviewers’ comments; and
(iii) Explanation of how the previous
reviewers’ comments or previous panel
summary have been addressed in the
current application.
(2) Resubmitting an application that
has been revised based on previous
reviewers’ critiques does not guarantee
the application will be recommended
for funding.
(b) Previously funded applications. (1)
CSREES competitive programs are
generally not designed to support
multiple grant awards activities that are
essentially repetitive in nature. PDs who
have had their projects funded
previously are discouraged from
resubmitting relatively identical
applications for further funding.
Applications that are sequential
continuations or new stages of
previously funded projects must
compete with first-time applications,
and should thoroughly demonstrate
how the proposed project expands
substantially on previously funded
efforts and promotes innovation and
creativity beyond the scope of the
previously funded project.
(2) An application may be submitted
only once to CSREES. The submission
of duplicative or substantially similar
applications concurrently for review by
more than one program will result in the
exclusion of the redundant applications
from CSREES consideration.
§ 3430.20 Acknowledgment of an
application.
The receipt of all letters of intent and
applications will be acknowledged by
CSREES. Applicants who do not receive
an acknowledgement within a certain
number of days (as established in the
RFA, e.g., 30 and 60 days) of the
submission deadline should contact the
program contact. Once the application
has been assigned a proposal number by
CSREES, that number should be cited
on all future correspondence.
§ 3430.21 Confidentiality of applications
and awards.
(a) Names of submitting institutions
and individuals, as well as application
content and evaluations, will be kept
confidential, except to those involved in
the review process, to the extent
permissible by law.
(b) If an application contains
proprietary information that constitutes
a trade secret, proprietary commercial or
financial information, confidential
personal information, or data affecting
the national security, it will be treated
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
in confidence to the extent permitted by
law, provided the information is clearly
marked by the proposer with the term
‘‘confidential and proprietary
information’’ and provided at the
bottom of the project narrative or any
other attachment included in the
application that contains such
information: ‘‘The following pages
(specify) contain proprietary
information which (name of proposing
organization) requests not to be released
to persons outside the Government,
except for purposes of evaluation.’’
(c) By law, USDA is required to make
the final decisions as to whether the
information is required to be kept in
confidence. Information contained in
unsuccessful applications will remain
the property of the proposer. However,
USDA will retain for three years one file
copy of each application received; extra
copies will be destroyed. Public release
of information from any application
submitted will be subject to existing
legal requirements. Any application that
is funded will be considered an integral
part of the award and normally will be
made available to the public upon
request, except for designated
proprietary information that is
determined by USDA to be proprietary
information.
(d) The inclusion of proprietary
information is discouraged unless it is
necessary for the proper evaluation of
the application. If proprietary
information is to be included, it should
be limited, set apart from other text on
a separate page, and keyed to the text by
numbers. It should be confined to a few
critical technical items that, if disclosed,
could jeopardize the obtaining of foreign
or domestic patents. Trade secrets,
salaries, or other information that could
jeopardize commercial competitiveness
should be similarly keyed and presented
on a separate page. Applications or
reports which attempt to restrict
dissemination of large amounts of
information may be found unacceptable
by USDA and constitute grounds for
return of the application without further
consideration. Without assuming any
liability for inadvertent disclosure,
USDA will limit dissemination of such
information to its employees and, where
necessary for the evaluation of the
application, to outside reviewers on a
confidential basis. An application may
be withdrawn at any time prior to the
final action thereon.
Subpart C—Pre-Award: Application
Review and Evaluation
§ 3430.31
Guiding principles.
The guiding principle for grant
application review and evaluation is to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
ensure that each proposal is treated in
a consistent and fair manner regardless
of regional and institutional affiliation.
After the evaluation process by the
review panel, the CSREES through the
program officer ensures that applicants
receive appropriate feedback and
comments on their proposals, and
processes the awards in as timely a
manner as possible.
§ 3430.32
Preliminary application review.
Prior to technical examination, a
preliminary review will be made of all
applications for responsiveness to the
administrative requirements set forth in
the RFA. Applications that do not meet
the administrative requirements may be
eliminated from program competition.
However, USDA retains the right to
conduct discussions with applicants to
resolve technical and/or budget issues,
as deemed necessary by USDA.
§ 3430.33
Selection of reviewers.
(a) Requirement. CSREES is
responsible for performing a review of
applications submitted to CSREES
competitive award programs in
accordance with section 103(a) of the
Agricultural Research, Extension, and
Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C.
7613(a)). Reviews are undertaken to
ensure that projects supported by
CSREES are of high quality and are
consistent with the goals and
requirements of the funding program.
Applications submitted to CSREES
undergo a programmatic evaluation to
determine the worthiness of Federal
support. The evaluations consist of a
peer panel review and also may entail
an assessment by Federal employees
and ad hoc reviewers.
(b) CSREES Peer Review System. The
CSREES Application Review Process is
accomplished through the use of the
CSREES Peer Review System (PRS), a
web-based system which allows
reviewers and potential reviewers to
update personal information and to
complete and submit reviews
electronically to CSREES.
(c) Relevant training and experience.
Reviewers will be selected based upon
training and experience in relevant
scientific, extension, or education fields
taking into account the following
factors:
(1) Level of relevant formal scientific,
technical education, and extension
experience of the individual, as well as
the extent to which an individual is
engaged in relevant research, education,
or extension activities;
(2) Need to include as reviewers
experts from various areas of
specialization within relevant scientific,
education, and extension fields;
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44905
(3) Need to include as reviewers other
experts (e.g., producers, range or forest
managers/operators, and consumers)
who can assess relevance of the
applications to targeted audiences and
to program needs;
(4) Need to include as reviewers
experts from a variety of organizational
types (e.g., colleges, universities,
industry, state and Federal agencies,
private profit and nonprofit
organizations) and geographic locations;
(5) Need to maintain a balanced
composition of reviewers with regard to
minority and female representation and
an equitable age distribution; and
(6) Need to include reviewers who
can judge the effective usefulness to
producers and the general public of
each application.
(d) Confidentiality. The identities of
reviewers will remain confidential to
the maximum extent possible.
Therefore, the names of reviewers will
not be released to applicants. If it is
possible to reveal the names of
reviewers in such a way that they
cannot be identified with the review of
any particular application, this will be
done at the end of the fiscal year or as
requested. Names of submitting
institutions and individuals, as well as
application content and peer
evaluations, will be kept confidential,
except to those involved in the review
process, to the extent permitted by law.
Reviewers are expected to be in
compliance with CSREES
Confidentiality Guidelines. Reviewers
provide this assurance through PRS.
(e) Conflicts of interest. During the
evaluation process, extreme care will be
taken to prevent any actual or perceived
conflicts of interest that may impact
review or evaluation. For the purpose of
determining conflicts of interest, the
academic and administrative autonomy
of an institution shall be determined.
Reviewers are expected to be in
compliance with CSREES Conflict-ofinterest Guidelines. Reviewers provide
this assurance through PRS.
§ 3430.34
Evaluation criteria.
(a) To ensure any project receiving
funds from CSREES is consistent with
the broad goals of the funding program,
the content of each proposal/application
submitted to CSREES will be evaluated
based on a pre-determined set of review
criteria. It is the responsibility of the
Program Officer to develop, adopt,
adapt, or otherwise establish the criteria
by which proposals are to be evaluated.
It may be appropriate for the Program
Officer to involve other scientists or
stakeholders in the development of
criteria, or to extract criteria from
legislative authority or appropriations
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
44906
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
language. The review criteria is
described in the RFA and shall not
include criteria concerning any cost
sharing or matching requirements per
section 7301 of the Food, Conservation,
and Energy Act of 2008.
(b) In order that all potential
applicants for a program have similar
opportunities to compete for funds, all
reviewers will receive from the Program
Officer a description of the review
criteria. Reviewers are instructed to use
those same evaluation criteria, and only
those criteria, to judge the merit of the
proposals they review.
§ 3430.35 Review of noncompetitive
applications.
(a) Some projects are directed by
either authorizing legislation and/or
appropriations to specifically support a
designated institution or set of
institutions for particular research,
education or extension topics of
importance to the nation, a State or a
region. Although these projects may be
awarded noncompetitively, these
projects or activities are subject to the
same application process, award terms
and conditions, Federal assistance laws
and regulations, reporting and
monitoring requirements, and postaward administration and closeout
policies and procedures as competitive
grant programs. The only difference is
these applications are not subject to a
competitive peer review process at the
Agency level.
(b) All noncompetitive applications
recommended for funding are required
to be merit reviewed and the merit
review documented by the CSREES
program official. For awards
recommended for funding at or greater
than $10,000, an independent and unit
merit review are required.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
§ 3430.36 Procedures to minimize or
eliminate duplication of effort.
CSREES may implement appropriate
business processes to minimize or
eliminate the awarding of CSREES
grants that unnecessarily duplicate
activities already being sponsored under
other grant awards, including awards
made by other Federal agencies.
Business processes may include the
review of the Current and Pending
Support Form; documented CRIS
searches prior to award; the conduct of
project director (PD) workshops,
conferences, meetings, and symposia;
and agency participation in Federal
government-wide and other committees,
taskforces, or groups that seek to solve
problems related to agricultural
research, education, and extension and
other activities delegated to the CSREES
administrator.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
§ 3430.37
Feedback to applicants.
Copies of individual reviews and/or
summary reviews, not including the
identity of reviewers, will be sent to the
applicant PDs after the review process
has been completed.
Subpart D—Award
§ 3430.41
Administration.
(a) General. Within the limit of funds
available for such purpose, the CSREES
ADO shall make grants to those
responsible, eligible applicants whose
applications are judged most
meritorious under the procedures set
forth in the RFA. The date specified by
the CSREES ADO as the effective date
of the grant shall be no later than
September 30 of the Federal fiscal year
in which the project is approved for
support and funds are appropriated for
such purpose, unless otherwise
permitted by law. It should be noted
that the project need not be initiated on
the grant effective date, but as soon
thereafter as practical so that project
goals may be attained within the funded
project period. All funds granted by
CSREES shall be expended solely for the
purpose for which the funds are granted
in accordance with the approved
application and budget, the regulations,
the terms and conditions of the award,
the applicable Federal cost principles,
and the Department’s assistance
regulations (7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019).
(b) Organizational management
information. Specific management
information relating to an applicant
shall be submitted on a one-time basis
as part of the responsibility
determination prior to the award of a
grant, if such information has not been
provided previously to CSREES.
CSREES will provide copies of forms
recommended for use in fulfilling these
requirements as part of the preaward
process.
(c) Notice of Award. The notice of
award document (i.e., Form CSREES–
2009, Award Face Sheet) will provide
pertinent instructions and information
including, at a minimum, the following:
(1) Legal name and address of
performing organization or institution to
whom the Administrator has awarded a
grant;
(2) Title of project;
(3) Name(s) and institution(s) of
Project Director(s);
(4) Identifying award number
assigned by CSREES or the Department;
(5) Project period;
(6) Total amount of CSREES financial
assistance approved;
(7) Legal authority(ies) under which
the grant is awarded;
(8) Appropriate CFDA number;
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(9) Approved budget plan or
referenced thereof; and
(10) Other information or provisions
(including the Terms and Conditions)
deemed necessary by CSREES to carry
out its respective granting activities or
to accomplish the purpose of a
particular grant.
(d) Other terms and conditions.
CSREES may, with respect to any grant,
impose additional conditions prior to or
at the time of any award when, in the
CSREES’ judgment, such conditions are
necessary to assure or protect
advancement of the approved project,
the interests of the public, or the
conservation of grant funds.
Subpart E—Post-Award and Closeout
§ 3430.51
Payment.
(a) All payments will be made in
advance unless a deviation is accepted
(see § 3430.3) or as specified in
paragraph (b) of this section. All
payments to the grantee shall be made
via the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services’ Payment Management
System (DHHS–PMS) or another
electronic funds transfer (EFT) method
except for awards to other Federal
agencies. Grantees are expected to
request funds via DHHS–PMS for
reimbursement basis in a timely
manner.
(b) If CSREES has determined that
advance payment is not feasible and
that the grantee does not maintain or
demonstrate the willingness to
maintain: Written procedures that
minimize the time elapsing between the
transfer of funds and disbursement by
the grantee, and financial management
systems that meet the standards for fund
control and accountability as
established in § 3430.61; CSREES shall
use the reimbursement method.
§ 3430.52
Cost sharing and matching.
(a) General. Grantees may be required
to match the Federal funds received
under a CSREES grant. The required
percentage of matching, type of
matching (e.g., cash and/or in-kind
contributions), sources of match (e.g.,
non-Federal), and whether CSREES has
any authority to waive the match will be
specified in the subpart applicable to
the specific grant program, as well as in
the RFA.
(b) Indirect Costs. Grantees’ matching
contribution may also include
unrecoverable indirect costs. Such costs
may be accepted as part of the grantee’s
resource contribution provided the total
amount of indirect cost claimed under
the Federal and non-Federal portions of
the costs, when combined, do not
exceed the applicant’s negotiated
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
indirect cost rate or if applicable, the
statutory cap on indirect costs. Indirect
costs provisions for each specific grant
program are identified in the ‘‘Funding
restrictions’’ section of the subpart for
each individual grant program.
§ 3430.53
Program income.
(a) CSREES shall apply the standards
set forth in this section in requiring
grantee organizations to account for
program income related to projects
financed in whole or in part with
Federal funds.
(b) Unless otherwise provided in the
authorizing statute, program income
earned during the project period shall
be retained by the grantee and, in
accordance with the terms and
conditions of the award, shall be added
to funds committed to the project by
CSREES and grantee and used to further
eligible project or program objectives.
Any specific program deviations will be
identified in the individual subparts.
(c) Unless the program regulations
identified in the individual subpart
provide otherwise, grantees shall follow
the terms and conditions of the award.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
§ 3430.54
Technical reporting.
(a) Requirement. All projects
supported with Federal funds under this
part must be documented in the Current
Research Information System (CRIS).
(b) Initial Documentation in the CRIS
Database. Information collected in the
‘‘Work Unit Description’’ (Form AD–
416) and ‘‘Work Unit Classification’’
(Form AD–417) is required upon project
initiation for all new awards in CRIS
(i.e., prior to award).
(c) Annual CRIS Reports. Unless
stated differently in the grant terms and
conditions, an annual
‘‘Accomplishments Report’’ (Form AD–
421) is due 90 calendar days after the
award’s anniversary date (i.e., one year
following the month and day of which
the project period begins and each year
thereafter up until a final report is
required). An annual report covers a
one-year period. In addition to the Form
AD–421, the following information,
when applicable, must be submitted to
the programmatic contact person
identified in block 4 of the Award Face
Sheet (Form CSREES–2009): A
comparison of actual accomplishments
with the goals established for the
reporting period (where the output of
the project can be expressed readily in
numbers, a computation of the cost per
unit of output should be considered if
the information is considered useful);
the reasons for slippage if established
goals were not met; and additional
pertinent information including, when
appropriate, analysis and explanation of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
cost overruns or unexpectedly high unit
costs. The annual report of ‘‘Funding
and Staff Support’’ (Form AD–419) is
due February 1 of the year subsequent
to the Federal fiscal year being reported.
(d) CRIS Final Report. The CRIS final
report, ‘‘Accomplishments Report’’
(Form AD–421), covers the entire period
of performance of the award. The report
should encompass progress made
during the entire timeframe of the
project instead of covering
accomplishments made only during the
final reporting segment of the project. In
addition to providing the information
required under paragraph (c) of this
section, the final report must include
the following when applicable: A
disclosure of any inventions not
previously reported that were conceived
or first actually reduced to practice
during the performance of the work
under the award; a written statement on
whether or not the awardee elects (or
plans to elect) to obtain patent(s) on any
such invention; and identify equipment
purchased with any Federal funds
under the award and indicate
subsequent use of such equipment.
(e) CRIS Web Site Via Internet. The
CRIS database is available to the public
on the World Wide Web. CRIS project
information is available via the Internet
CRIS Web site at https://
cris.csrees.usda.gov. To submit forms
electronically, the CRIS forms Web site
can be accessed through the CRIS Web
site or accessed directly at https://
csf.uvm.edu/cris.
(f) Grantees may be required to submit
other technical reports or submit the
CRIS reports more frequently than
annual. Additional requirements for a
specific grant program are described in
the applicable subpart after subpart F
and are identified in the RFA. The
Award Face Sheet (Form CSREES–2009)
also will specify these additional
reporting requirements.
§ 3430.55
Financial reporting.
(a) SF–269, Financial Status Report.
Unless stated differently in the grant
terms and conditions, a SF–269,
Financial Status Report, is due 90 days
after the expiration of the grant and
should be submitted to the Awards
Management Branch (AMB) at Awards
Management Branch; Office of
Extramural Programs, CSREES; U.S.
Department of Agriculture; STOP 2271;
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.;
Washington, DC 20250–2271. The
awardee shall report program outlays
and program income on the same
accounting basis (i.e., cash or accrual)
that it uses in its normal accounting
system. When submitting a final SF–
269, Financial Status Report, the total
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44907
matching contribution, if required,
should be shown in item 12., Remarks.
The final SF–269 must not show any
unliquidated obligations. If the awardee
still has valid obligations that remain
unpaid when the report is due, it shall
submit a provisional report (showing
the unliquidated obligations) by the due
date and a final report when all
obligations have been liquidated. When
submitting a provisional report, the
awardee shall inform AMB when it
expects a final report. If AMB waives
the requirement for provisional reports,
the grantee will be so notified. SF–269,
Financial Status Reports, must be
submitted by all grantees, including
Federal agencies and national
laboratories.
(b) Grants with Required Matching.
For grants requiring a matching
contribution, an annual SF–269,
Financial Status Report, is required and
this requirement will be indicated on
the Award Face Sheet, Form CSREES–
2009, in which case it must be
submitted no later than 90 days
following the end of the Federal fiscal
year, September 30th.
(c) Overdue SF–269, Financial Status
Reports. Grantees with overdue SF–269,
Financial Status Reports, or other
required financial report (as identified
in the grant terms and conditions), will
have their applicable balances at
DHHS–PMS restricted or placed on
‘‘manual review,’’ which restricts the
grantee’s ability to draw funds thus
requiring prior approval from CSREES.
If any remaining available balances are
needed by the grantee, the grantee will
be required to contact AMB to request
permission to draw any additional
funds and may be required to provide
documentation to support the draw.
(d) SF–272, Federal Cash
Transactions Report. Grantees
(receiving electronic payments through
DHHS–PMS) are required to submit
their SF–272, Federal Cash Transactions
Report, via the DHHS–PMS by the
specified dates. Failure to submit this
quarterly report by the due date may
result in funds being restricted by
DHHS–PMS. Grantees (not receiving
payments through DHHS–PMS) may be
exempt from this reporting requirement.
(e) Additional reporting requirements.
CSREES may require additional
financial reporting requirements as
follows: CSREES may require forecasts
of Federal cash requirements in the
‘‘Remarks’’ section of the report; and
when practical and deemed necessary,
CSREES may require grantees to report
in the ‘‘Remarks’’ section the amount of
cash advances received in excess of
three days (i.e., short narrative with
explanations of actions taken to reduce
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
44908
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
the excess balances). When CSREES
needs additional information or more
frequent reports, the following will be
observed: When additional information
is needed to comply with legislative
requirements, CSREES will issue
instructions to require grantees to
submit such information under the
‘‘Remarks’’ section of the reports; and
CSREES determines that a grantee’s
accounting system is inadequate,
additional pertinent information to
further monitor awards may be obtained
upon written notice to the grantee until
such time as the system is brought up
to standard. CSREES, in obtaining this
information, shall comply with the PRA
clearance requirements and the
implementing regulations codified at 5
CFR part 1320.
§ 3430.56
Project meetings.
In addition to reviewing (and
monitoring the status of) progress and
final technical reports and financial
reports, CSREES program officers may
use regular and periodic conference
calls to monitor the grantee’s
performance as well as PD conferences,
workshops, meetings, and symposia to
not only monitor the grants, but to
facilitate communication and the
sharing of project results. These
opportunities also serve to eliminate or
minimize CSREES funding unneeded
duplicative project activities. Required
attendance at these conference calls,
conferences, workshops, meetings, and
symposia will be identified in the RFA
and the grantee should develop a
proposal accordingly.
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
§ 3430.57
Hearings and appeals.
(a) Scope of the post-award disputes
covered. The disputes covered by this
section include: Cost disallowances
pursuant to the ADO’s decision (e.g.,
specific disallowances under an
individual grant or as the result of an
audit report); termination orders; and
the final settlement amount under a
termination.
(b) Procedures. The grantee should
submit a letter to the ADO from the
applicant’s AR, via mail, e-mail, or fax,
noting the grantee’s dispute and
identifying the Grants Officer’s decision
in question, giving reasons for a request
to review and providing any other
material pertinent to the request. The
letter to the ADO must be dated no later
than 60 days after the date of the letter
notifying the grantee of the decision in
question. CSREES retains the right to
consider requests for review after the
60-day period in extenuating
circumstances. The ADO will review or
designate an individual to review the
request. A report will be prepared with
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
a recommendation within 60 days and
forwarded to the Deputy Administrator,
Office of Extramural Programs for
disposition.
§ 3430.58
Closeout.
Most CSREES awards are supported
with annual appropriations. On
September 30th of the 5th fiscal year
after the period of availability for
obligation, the funds for these
appropriations accounts expire per 31
U.S.C. 1552 and the account is closed.
Funds that have not been drawn
through DHHS–PMS by the grantee or
disbursed through any other system or
method by August 31st (of the fifth year
appropriation) are subject to be returned
to the U.S. Department of Treasury after
that date. Please note that the August
31st requirement also applies to awards
with a 90-day period concluding on a
date after September 30th of that
following fifth year. Please note expired
appropriations cannot be restored after
this date. More specific instructions are
provided in the CSREES award terms
and conditions.
Research Programs
Subpart F—Specialty Crop Research
Initiative
§ 3430.200
Applicability of regulations.
The regulations in this subpart apply
to the program authorized under section
412 of the Agricultural Research,
Extension, and Education Reform Act of
1998 (7 U.S.C. 7621 et seq.).
§ 3430.201
Purpose.
The purpose of this program is to
address the critical needs of the
specialty crop industry by developing
and disseminating science-based tools
to address needs of specific crops and
their regions, including: Research in
plant breeding, genetics, and genomics
to improve crop characteristics, such as
product, taste, quality, and appearance;
environmental responses and
tolerances; nutrient management,
including plant nutrient uptake
efficiency; pest and disease
management, including resistance to
pests and diseases resulting in reduced
application management strategies; and
enhanced phytonutrient content; efforts
to identify and address threats from
pests and diseases, including threats to
specialty crop pollinators; efforts to
improve production efficiency,
productivity, and profitability over the
long term (including specialty crop
policy and marketing); new innovations
and technology, including improved
mechanization and technologies that
delay or inhibit ripening; and methods
to prevent, detect, monitor, control, and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
respond to potential food safety hazards
in the production and processing of
specialty crops, including fresh
produce. CSREES will award research
and extension, including integrated
grants to eligible institutions listed in
§ 3430.203. In addition to the focus
areas defined in this section, CSREES
may include additional activities or
focus areas that will further address the
critical needs of the specialty crop
industry. Some of these activities or
focus areas may be identified by
stakeholder groups or by USDA in
response to emerging critical needs of
the specialty crop industry.
§ 3430.202
Definitions.
The definitions applicable to the
program under this subpart include:
Integrated means for the purposes of
this program to incorporate the research
and extension components of the
agricultural knowledge system around a
problem area or activity.
Specialty crop means fruits and
vegetables, tree nuts, dried fruits, and
horticulture and nursery crops
(including floriculture).
§ 3430.203
Eligibility.
Eligible applicants for the grant
program implemented under this
subpart include: Federal agencies;
national laboratories; colleges and
universities; research institutions and
organizations; private organizations or
corporations; State agricultural
experiment stations; individuals; and
groups consisting of 2 or more entities
identified in this sentence. To be
eligible under this part, individuals
must be a citizen or national of the
United States as defined in § 3430.2 of
this part. Eligible institutions do not
include foreign and international
organizations, unless otherwise
provided in the RFA.
§ 3430.204
Project types and priorities.
For each RFA, CSREES may develop
and include the appropriate project
types and focus areas (in addition to the
five activities or focus areas identified
in 3430.201) based on the critical needs
of the specialty crop industry as
identified through stakeholder input
and deemed appropriate by CSREES. Of
the funds made available each fiscal
year, not less than 10 percent of these
funds shall be allocated for each activity
or focus area identified in § 3430.201. In
making awards for this program, USDA
will give higher priority to projects that
are multistate, multi-institutional, and
multidisciplinary; and include explicit
mechanisms to communicate the results
to producers and the public.
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
§ 3430.205
Funding restrictions.
Funds made available under this
subpart shall not be used for the
construction of a new building or
facility or the acquisition, expansion,
remodeling, or alteration of an existing
facility (including site grading and
improvement, and architect fees).
Indirect costs are subject to NARETPA
section 1462(a) limiting indirect costs to
22 percent of the total Federal funds
provided under each award unless
superseded by another authority. The
maximum allowed indirect cost of 22
percent may be claimed under the
Federal portion of the award budget, or
the maximum allowed indirect cost of
22 percent may be claimed as a
matching contribution (if no indirect
costs are requested on the Federal
portion of the budget). However, the
maximum allowed indirect cost of 22
percent may not be claimed on both the
Federal portion of the budget for the
award and as a matching contribution;
but a grantee may, for example, request
11 percent of indirect costs on both the
Federal portion of the budget for the
award and as a matching contribution.
Or, a grantee may request any other,
similar percentage combination that,
when combined, does not exceed a
maximum indirect cost rate of 22
percent.
§ 3430.206
Matching requirements.
Grantees are required to provide
funds or in-kind support from nonFederal sources in an amount that is at
least equal to the amount provided by
the Federal government. The matching
contribution must be provided from
non-Federal sources except when
authorized by statute. The matching
requirements under this subpart cannot
be waived.
Signed at Washington, DC, on July 28,
2008.
Colien Hefferan,
Administrator, Cooperative State Research,
Education, and Extension Service.
[FR Doc. E8–17594 Filed 7–31–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 97
rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES
[Docket No. 30621; Amdt. No. 3281]
Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures;
Miscellaneous Amendments
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:09 Jul 31, 2008
Jkt 214001
SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends,
suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures
(SIAPs) and associated Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle Departure
Procedures for operations at certain
airports. These regulatory actions are
needed because of the adoption of new
or revised criteria, or because of changes
occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of
new navigational facilities, adding new
obstacles, or changing air traffic
requirements. These changes are
designed to provide safe and efficient
use of the navigable airspace and to
promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected
airports.
DATES: This rule is effective August 1,
2008. The compliance date for each
SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums,
and ODP is specified in the amendatory
provisions.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of August 1,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Availability of matter
incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
For Examination—
1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA
Headquarters Building, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591;
2. The FAA Regional Office of the
region in which the affected airport is
located;
3. The National Flight Procedures
Office, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd.,
Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
4. The National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
Information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Availability—All SIAPs are available
online free of charge. Visit nfdc.faa.gov
to register. Additionally, individual
SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from:
1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA–
200), FAA Headquarters Building, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; or
2. The FAA Regional Office of the
region in which the affected airport is
located.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS–420) Flight
Technologies and Programs Division,
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44909
Flight Standards Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500
South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City,
OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box
25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone: (405) 954–4164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by
amending the referenced SIAPs. The
complete regulatory description of each
SIAP is listed on the appropriate FAA
Form 8260, as modified by the National
Flight Data Center (FDC)/Permanent
Notice to Airmen (P–NOTAM), and is
incorporated by reference in the
amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1
CFR part 51, and § 97.20 of Title 14 of
the Code of Federal Regulations.
The large number of SIAPs, their
complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim
publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further,
airmen do not use the regulatory text of
the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic
depiction on charts printed by
publishers of aeronautical materials.
Thus, the advantages of incorporation
by reference are realized and
publication of the complete description
of each SIAP contained in FAA form
documents is unnecessary. This
amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAP
and the corresponding effective dates.
This amendment also identifies the
airport and its location, the procedure
and the amendment number.
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is
effective upon publication of each
separate SIAP as amended in the
transmittal. For safety and timeliness of
change considerations, this amendment
incorporates only specific changes
contained for each SIAP as modified by
FDC/P–NOTAMs.
The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P–
NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria
contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures
(TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied
only to specific conditions existing at
the affected airports. All SIAP
amendments in this rule have been
previously issued by the FAA in a FDC
NOTAM as an emergency action of
immediate flight safety relating directly
to published aeronautical charts. The
circumstances which created the need
for all these SIAP amendments requires
making them effective in less than 30
days.
E:\FR\FM\01AUR1.SGM
01AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 149 (Friday, August 1, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44897-44909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17594]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 44897]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service
7 CFR Part 3430
RIN 0524-AA28
Competitive and Noncompetitive Non-formula Grant Programs--
General Grant Administrative Provisions and Program-Specific
Administrative Provisions for the Specialty Crop Research Initiative
AGENCY: Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim Rule and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension
Service (CSREES) is publishing one set of administrative requirements
that contain elements common to all of the competitive and
noncompetitive non-formula grant programs the Agency administers as an
interim rule. Although this interim rule becomes effective on the date
of publication, CSREES is requesting comments for a 60-day period as
identified below. In a relatively short period of time, this will allow
CSREES to apply basic rules to grant programs that are currently
operating without them, including new non-formula grant programs
created by the passage of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of
2008 (FCEA) (Pub. L. 110-234) and to efficiently implement changes to
programs with existing regulations as required by FCEA. The provisions
in subparts A through E will serve as a single Agency resource
codifying current practices simply and coherently for almost all CSREES
competitive and noncompetitive non-formula grant programs except the
Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program. As specific rules
are developed for each CSREES grant program, CSREES will propose adding
a subpart for that Federal assistance program to this regulation. This
interim rule is being published with a first set of program-specific
grant regulations as subpart F for the Specialty Research Crop
Initiative, authorized under section 7311 of FCEA.
DATES: This interim rule is effective August 1, 2008. The Agency must
receive comments on or before September 30, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 0524-AA28, by any
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: RFP-OEP@reeusda.gov. Include Regulatory Information Number
(RIN) number 0524-AA28 in the subject line of the message.
Fax: 202-401-7752.
Mail: Paper, disk or CD-ROM submissions should be submitted to
Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, STOP 2299, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-2299.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Cooperative State Research, Education, and
Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Room 2258,
Waterfront Centre, 800 9th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20024.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and the RIN for this rulemaking. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Daly, Policy Section Leader,
Office of Extramural Programs, Cooperative State Research, Education,
and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, STOP 2299, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-2299; Voice: 202-401-
3319; Fax: 202-401-7752; E-mail: edaly@csrees.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Summary
Authority
This rulemaking is authorized by section 1470 of the National
Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977
(NARETPA), as amended, Public Law 95-113 (7 U.S.C. 3101 et seq.). It
furthers the streamlining and standardization efforts initiated by the
Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement Act of 1999, Public
Law 106-107 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note) which sunset in November 2007, and is
in accordance with the efforts of CSREES and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) to streamline and simplify the entire grants process
while meeting the ever-increasing accountability and transparency
standards.
Context
CSREES has published administrative provisions specific to some of
the non-formula grant programs it administers. These provisions appear
in Parts 3400, Special Research Grants Program; 3401, Rangeland
Research Grants Program; 3402, Food and Agricultural Sciences National
Needs Graduate and Postgraduate Fellowship Grants Program; 3405, Higher
Education Challenge Grants Program; 3406, 1890 Institution Capacity
Building Grants Program; 3411, National Research Initiative Competitive
Grants Program; and 3415, Biotechnology Risk Assessment Research Grants
Program of 7 CFR. This interim rule will not apply to the Small
Business Research Innovation (SBIR) Program with implementing
regulations codified at 7 CFR 3403. Where the interim administrative
provisions conflict with existing regulations for CSREES administered
non-formula grant programs, the existing regulations (i.e., 7 CFR parts
3400 through 3402, 3405, 3406, 3411, and 3415) for these programs will
supersede until the regulation is cancelled or the subpart for that
specific program is promulgated under this part.
Purpose
A primary function of CSREES is the fair, effective, and efficient
administration of Federal assistance programs implementing agricultural
research, education, and extension programs. The Agency's development
and publication of regulations for its non-formula grant programs
enhance its accountability and standardize procedures across the grant
programs it administers while providing transparency to the public.
More than
[[Page 44898]]
thirty grant programs administered by CSREES are not currently governed
by administrative provisions; and CSREES' existing administrative
provisions fail to take advantage of basic similarities between non-
formula grant programs and the Federal government-wide efforts to
standardize and streamline the entire grant process from pre-award
through closeout and post-award. The cumulative effect is duplicative,
confusing language, contrary to the needs and demands of applicants and
grantees for consistent and clear grant policies and procedures.
This rulemaking attempts to solve the problem by addressing the
elements common to all of the competitive and noncompetitive grant
programs CSREES administers. In this way, the Agency can apply basic
rules to grant programs that are currently operating without them as
well as quickly implement regulations for any new program. In addition,
this rule will serve as a single resource, except for the SBIR and
formula grant programs, that codifies current processes simply and
coherently.
This interim rule will allow CSREES to finally document and codify
the grant policies and business practices it sought to standardize and
streamline in concert with other Federal grant-making agencies in
response to various laws (including Pub. L. 106-107), regulations, and
Presidential, Departmental, and Agency directives and initiatives. As
of fiscal year 2008, CSREES publishes program solicitations or Requests
For Applications (RFAs) in an Agency-wide template (incorporating the
Federal government-wide requirements and standards) on the Grants.gov
web site; accepts all applications (using the SF-424 form families) via
Grants.gov; requires all competitive and noncompetitive non-formula
programs to submit all progress and final technical reports via the
Current Research Information System (CRIS); and as of July 1, 2008,
implemented a more comprehensive and updated set of award terms and
conditions that are consistent with other Federal grant-making
agencies, yet address the unique needs of CSREES programs and USDA and
CSREES business practices. These interim rules also address various
issues related to audit findings and recommendations from the USDA
Office of Inspector General (e.g., timely closeout of expired awards
and restriction of grant funds 90 days after the expiration date). In
response to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123 on
Internal Controls, Improper Payment Information Act (IPIA), and other
oversight and monitoring requirements, CSREES is seeking to clearly
establish and implement monitoring and oversight procedures and systems
to ensure that Federal assistance funds are being efficiently and
effectively expended in accordance with program authorities and Federal
assistance laws and regulations.
Alternatives
CSREES considered publishing separate rules for each uncovered
grant program. However, this would defeat the purposes of recent laws,
regulations, and Presidential, Departmental, and Agency initiatives to
standardize and streamline the entire grant cycle. Furthermore, it
would be a time consuming practice to draft and publish a final rule
for each uncovered program. On the other hand, this interim rule
provides clearer, more consistent and effective grant policies and
procedures for the grantee which will contribute to more efficient and
effective program delivery and potentially result in less audit
findings and disallowed costs. The Agency expects this interim rule to
contribute and facilitate more consistent processes across grant
programs within CSREES and across USDA and the Federal government. By
making better use of standard administrative provisions, CSREES also
anticipates being able to publish clearer and more consistent RFAs
within a shorter time frame and provide applicants, grantees, staff,
and the public with one comprehensive set of administrative provisions.
Compliance
Once implemented, applicants who fail to comply with the new
administrative provisions may not have their applications considered
for funding by CSREES, may have their grant suspended or terminated, or
may be billed for disallowed costs. This penalty provision can be
enforced and is critical to CSREES' fair, effective, and efficient
administration of grant programs. It is anticipated that having one set
of administrative provisions codified in one part will assist
applicants and grantees in understanding and complying with Federal
assistance laws and regulations, as well as the intent of the
authorizing regulation.
Organization
CSREES organized the regulation as follows: Subparts A through E
provide administrative provisions for all competitive and
noncompetitive non-formula grants. Subparts F and thereafter apply to
specific CSREES programs and are organized in the following groups:
Research programs (i.e., programs with a predominantly research focus),
education and multicultural programs, extension programs, integrated
programs (i.e., programs that statutorily require the integration of
two or more components--research, education, or extension); and other
programs. See section 3430.2 below for definitions (e.g., research,
extension, and education).
CSREES is, to the extent practical, using the following subpart
template for each program authority: (1) Applicability of regulations,
(2) purpose, (3) eligibility, (4) definitions (those in addition to or
different from 3430.2), (5) project types and priorities, (6) funding
restrictions (including indirect costs), and (7) matching requirements.
Subparts F and thereafter contain the above seven components in this
order. Additional sections may be added for a specific program if there
are additional requirements or a need for additional rules for the
program (e.g., additional reporting requirements).
Subpart F--Specialty Crop Research Initiative
As stated above, this interim rulemaking includes the program-
specific rules as subpart F for the Specialty Crop Research Initiative
(SRCI) which is authorized under section 7311 of FCEA.
Through this program-specific regulation under subpart F, Sec.
3430.202, CSREES is defining ``integrated'' and ``specialty crop.''
Subpart F also provides that individual applicants must be U.S.
citizens or a national of the United States and excludes foreign or
international organizations. Section 3430.204 provides that CSREES can
develop and implement new activities and focus areas not identified in
3430.201 based on input provided by stakeholders and as determined by
CSREES. Section 3430.205 states the specific program restrictions and
clarifies the indirect cost policy for the SCRI Program. Section
3430.206 states the specific matching requirements for this program and
that these matching requirements cannot be waived.
Timeline for Implementing Regulations
CSREES is publishing this rule as interim with a 60-day comment
period and anticipates a final rule by March 1, 2009. However, in the
interim, these regulations apply to all CSREES competitive and
noncompetitive non-formula programs (except for the programs
implemented by 7 CFR Part 3400, Special Research Grants Program; 7 CFR
Part 3401, Rangeland Research
[[Page 44899]]
Grants Program; 7 CFR Part 3402, Food and Agricultural Sciences
National Needs Graduate and Postgraduate Fellowship Grants Program; 7
CFR Part 3405, Higher Education Challenge Grants Program; 7 CFR Part
3406, 1890 Institution Capacity Building Grants Program; 7 CFR Part
3411, National Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program; and 7
CFR Part 3415, Biotechnology Risk Assessment Research Grants Program)
until the regulations for these programs (i.e., the individual
subparts) are in effect or superseded by statute). As stated
previously, this regulation will not apply to 7 CFR Part 3403, Small
Business Innovation Research Grants Program. Within the next 18 months,
CSREES plans to cancel some of the existing program-specific
regulations identified in 7 CFR and incorporate these program-specific
regulations as separate subparts under this part. In addition, CSREES
is currently drafting a CSREES Grants Policy Manual, which while
incorporating the regulations under this part, will provide more
specific instructions, detailed explanations, and background for
potential applicants, grantees, Agency and Departmental staff, and the
public.
II. Administrative Requirements for the Proposed Rulemaking
Executive Order 12866
This action has been determined not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866, and therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget. This interim rule will not materially
alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs; nor will it have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; nor will it adversely affect the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities
in a material way. Furthermore, it does not raise a novel legal or
policy issue arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities
or principles set forth in the Executive Order.
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
This interim rule has been reviewed in accordance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 601-612. The
Department concluded that the rule does not involve regulatory and
informational requirements regarding businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions subject to regulation.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
The Department certifies that this interim rule has been assessed
in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq. (PRA). The Department concludes that this interim
rule does not impose any new information requirements; however, the
burden estimates will increase for existing approved information
collections associated with this rule due to additional applicants.
These estimates will be provided to OMB. In addition to the SF-424 form
families (i.e., Research and Related and Mandatory), SF-272, Federal
Cash Transactions Report, and SF-269, Financial Status Reports; CSREES
has three currently approved OMB information collections associated
with this rulemaking: OMB Information Collection No. 0524-0042, CSREES
Current Research Information System (CRIS); No. 0524-0041, CSREES
Application Review Process; and No. 0524-0026, Assurance of Compliance
with the Department of Agriculture Regulations Assuring Civil Rights
Compliance and Organizational Information.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
This interim regulation applies to the following Federal assistance
programs administered by CSREES including 10.309, Specialty Crop
Research Initiative.
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
The Department certifies this interim rule has been assessed in
accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. (NEPA). The Department concludes
that the NEPA requirements do not apply to this rulemaking because this
interim rule includes no provisions impacting the maintenance,
preservation or enhancement of a healthful environment.
Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
The Department has reviewed this interim rule in accordance with
the requirements of section 654 of the Treasury and general Government
Appropriations Act of 1999, 5 U.S.C. 601 note. This interim regulation
was not found to have a potential negative effect on family well-being
as it is defined thereunder.
Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental and
Safety Risk
The Department certifies that this interim rule has been assessed
regarding the environmental health risks and safety risks that may
disproportionately affect children. This interim regulation was not
found to have a negative affect on the health and safety of children.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 and Executive Order 13132
The Department has reviewed this interim rule in accordance with
the requirements of Executive Order No. 13132, 64 FR 43225 (August 10,
1999) and the Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., and
has found no potential or substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. As there is no Federal mandate contained herein that
could result in increased expenditures by State, local tribal
governments or by the private sector, the department has not prepared a
budgetary impact statement.
Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department has reviewed this interim rule in accordance with
Executive Order 13175, 65 FR 67249 (Nov. 9, 2000), and has determined
that it does not have ``tribal implications.'' The interim rule does
not ``have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal government and Indian Tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes.''
Executive Order 12630: Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
The Department has reviewed this interim rule in accordance with
Executive Order 12630, 53 FR 8859 (Mar. 15, 1988) and has determined
that it does not contain any ``policies that have takings implications
in regard to the licensing, permitting, or other condition requirements
or limitations on private property use, or that require dedications or
exactions from owners of private property.''
Executive Order 13211: Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
The Department has reviewed this interim regulation and has
determined that the provisions of Executive Order
[[Page 44900]]
13211, 66 FR 28355 (May 18, 2001), are not applicable as this is not a
significant regulatory action and there are no direct or implied
effects on energy supply, distribution, or use.
Clarity of This Regulation
Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735 (September 30, 1993), and the
President's memorandum of June 1, 1998, require each agency to write
all rules in plain language. The Department invites comments on how to
make this interim rule easier to understand.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 3430
Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural research,
Education, Extension, Federal assistance.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Cooperative State
Research, Education, and Extension Service is amending chapter XXXIV of
title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations to add part 3430 to read as
follows:
PART 3430--COMPETITIVE AND NONCOMPETITIVE NON-FORMULA GRANT
PROGRAMS--GENERAL GRANT ADMINISTRATION PROVISIONS
Subpart A--General Information
Sec.
3430.1 Applicability of regulations.
3430.2 Definitions.
3430.3 Deviations.
3430.4 Other applicable statutes and regulations.
Subpart B--Pre-Award: Solicitation and Application
3430.11 Competition.
3430.12 Requests for applications.
3430.13 Letter of intent to submit an application.
3430.14 Types of applications; types of grants instruments.
3430.15 Stakeholder input.
3430.16 Eligibility requirements.
3430.17 Content of an application.
3430.18 Submission of an application.
3430.19 Resubmission of an application.
3430.20 Acknowledgment of an application.
3430.21 Confidentiality of applications and awards.
Subpart C--Pre-Award: Application Review and Evaluation
3430.31 Guiding principles.
3430.32 Preliminary application review.
3430.33 Selection of reviewers.
3430.34 Evaluation criteria.
3430.35 Review of noncompetitive applications.
3430.36 Procedures to minimize or eliminate duplication of effort.
3430.37 Feedback to applicants.
Subpart D--Award
3430.41 Administration.
Subpart E--Post-Award and Closeout
3430.51 Payment.
3430.52 Cost sharing and matching.
3430.53 Program income.
3430.54 Technical reporting.
3430.55 Financial reporting.
3430.56 Project meetings.
3430.57 Hearings and appeals.
3430.58 Closeout procedures.
Research Programs
Subpart F--Specialty Crop Research Initiative
3430.200 Applicability of regulations.
3430.201 Purpose.
3430.202 Definitions.
3430.203 Eligibility.
3430.204 Project types and priorities.
3430.205 Funding restrictions.
3430.206 Matching requirements.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 3316; Pub. L. 106-107 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note)
Subpart A--General Information
Sec. 3430.1 Applicability of regulations.
(a) This part provides agency specific regulations regarding the
application for, evaluation, award, and post-award administration of
Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES)
awards, and are supplementary to the uniform assistance regulations at
7 CFR parts 3016 (State, local, and tribal governments), 3019
(institutions of higher education, hospitals, and nonprofits), and 3015
(all others), as applicable.
(b) Competitive programs. This part applies to all agricultural
research, education, and extension competitive and related programs for
which the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service
(CSREES) has administrative or other authority, as well as any other
Federal assistance program delegated to the CSREES administrator. In
cases where regulations of this part conflict with existing regulations
of CSREES in title 7 (i.e., 7 CFR parts 3400 through 3499) of the Code
of Federal Regulations, regulations of this part shall supersede. This
part does not apply to the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
Program.
(c) Noncompetitive programs. Subparts A, B, D, and E of this part,
as well as Sec. 3430.35, apply to all noncompetitive agricultural
research, education, and extension programs administered by CSREES, as
well as any other Federal assistance program delegated to the CSREES
administrator.
(d) Grant programs administered on behalf of other agencies.
Subparts A through E of this part, as appropriate, apply to competitive
and noncompetitive grants administered on behalf of other agencies of
the Federal government. Requirements specific to these grant programs
will be included in the program solicitations or RFAs.
(e) Grant programs administered jointly with other agencies.
Subparts A through E of this part, as appropriate, apply to competitive
and noncompetitive grants administered jointly with other agencies of
the Federal government. Requirements specific to these grant programs
will be included in the appropriate program solicitations or RFAs
published by both or either agency.
(f) Formula fund grants programs. This part does not apply to any
of the formula grant programs administered by CSREES. Formula funds are
the research funds provided to 1862 land-grant institutions and
agricultural experiment stations under the Hatch Act of 1887 (7 U.S.C.
361a, et seq.); extension funds provided to 1862 land-grant
institutions under sections 3(b) and 3(c)) of the Smith-Lever Act (7
U.S.C. 343(b) and (c)) and section 208(c) of the District of Columbia
Public Postsecondary Education Reorganization Act, Public Law 93-471;
agricultural extension and research funds provided to 1890 land-grant
institutions under sections 1444 and 1445 of the National Agricultural
Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (NARETPA) (7
U.S.C. 3221 and 3222); expanded food and nutrition education program
funds authorized under section 3(d) of the Smith-Lever Act to the 1862
land-grant institutions and the 1890 land-grant institutions; extension
funds under the Renewable Resources Extension Act for the 1862 land-
grant institutions and the 1890 land-grant institutions; research funds
provided to forestry schools under the McIntire-Stennis Cooperative
Forestry Research Act of 1962 (16 U.S.C. 582a, et seq.); and animal
health and disease research funds provided to veterinary schools and
agricultural experiment stations under section 1433 of NARETPA (7
U.S.C. 3195).
Sec. 3430.2 Definitions.
As used in this part:
1862 Land-Grant Institution means an institution eligible to
receive funds under the Act of July 2, 1862, as amended (7 U.S.C. 301
et seq.). Unless otherwise stated for a specific program, this term
includes a research foundation maintained by such an institution.
1890 Land-Grant Institution means one of those institutions
eligible to receive funds under the Act of August 30, 1890, as amended
(7 U.S.C. 321 et seq.), including Tuskegee University and West Virginia
State University.
[[Page 44901]]
Unless otherwise stated for a specific program, this term includes a
research foundation maintained by such an institution.
1994 Land-Grant Institution means one of those institutions as
defined in section 532 of the Equity in Educational Land-Grant Status
Act of 1994, as amended (7 U.S.C. 301 note). These institutions are
commonly referred to as Tribal Colleges or Universities.
Administrator means the Administrator of the Cooperative State
Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES) and any other
officer or employee of the CSREES to whom the authority involved is
delegated.
Advisory Board means the National Agricultural Research, Extension,
Education, and Economics Advisory Board.
Agricultural research means research in the food and agricultural
sciences.
Applied research means research that includes expansion of the
findings of fundamental research to uncover practical ways in which new
knowledge can be advanced to benefit individuals and society.
Authorized Departmental Officer or ADO means the Secretary or any
employee of the Department with delegated authority to issue or modify
grant instruments on behalf of the Secretary.
Authorized Representative or AR means the President or Chief
Executive Officer of the applicant organization or the official,
designated by the President or Chief Executive Officer of the applicant
organization, who has the authority to commit the resources of the
organization to the project.
Budget period means the interval of time (usually 12 months) into
which the project period is divided for budgetary and reporting
purposes.
Cash contributions means the recipient's cash outlay, including the
outlay of money contributed to the recipient by non-Federal third
parties.
Citizen or national of the United States means a citizen or native
resident of a State; or, a person defined in the Immigration and
Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22), who, though not a citizen of the
United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. When
eligibility is claimed solely on the basis of permanent allegiance,
documentary evidence from the Immigration and Naturalization Service as
to such eligibility must be made available to CSREES upon request.
College or university means, unless defined in a separate subpart,
an educational institution in any State which:
(1) Admits as regular students only persons having a certificate of
graduation from a school providing secondary education, or the
recognized equivalent of such a certificate;
(2) Is legally authorized within such State to provide a program of
education beyond secondary education;
(3) Provides an educational program for which a bachelor's degree
or any other higher degree is awarded;
(4) Is a public or other nonprofit institution; and
(5) Is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or
association. Unless otherwise stated for a specific program, this term
includes a research foundation maintained by such an institution.
Department means the United States Department of Agriculture.
Education activity or teaching activity means formal classroom
instruction, laboratory instruction, and practicum experience in the
food and agricultural sciences and other related matters such as
faculty development, student recruitment and services, curriculum
development, instructional materials and equipment, and innovative
teaching methodologies.
Established and demonstrated capacity means that an organization
has met the following criteria:
(1) Conducts any systematic study directed toward new or fuller
knowledge and understanding of the subject studied; or,
(2) Systematically relates or applies the findings of research or
scientific experimentation to the application of new approaches to
problem solving, technologies, or management practices; and
(3) Has facilities, qualified personnel, independent funding, and
prior projects and accomplishments in research or technology transfer.
Extension means informal education program conducted in the States
in cooperation with the Unites States Department of Agriculture.
Extension activity means an act or process that delivers science-
based knowledge and informal educational programs to people, enabling
them to make practical decisions.
Food and agricultural sciences. The term ``food and agricultural
sciences'' means basic, applied, and developmental research, extension,
and teaching activities in food and fiber, agricultural, renewable
natural resources, forestry, and physical and social sciences,
including activities relating to the following:
(1) Animal health, production, and well-being.
(2) Plant health and production.
(3) Animal and plant germ plasm collection and preservation.
(4) Aquaculture.
(5) Food safety.
(6) Soil and water conservation and improvement.
(7) Forestry, horticulture, and range management.
(8) Nutritional sciences and promotion.
(9) Farm enhancement, including financial management, input
efficiency, and profitability.
(10) Home economics.
(11) Rural human ecology.
(12) Youth development and agricultural education, including 4-H
clubs.
(13) Expansion of domestic and international markets for
agricultural commodities and products, including agricultural trade
barrier identification and analysis.
(14) Information management and technology transfer related to
agriculture.
(15) Biotechnology related to agriculture.
(16) The processing, distributing, marketing, and utilization of
food and agricultural products.
Fundamental research means research that increases knowledge or
understanding of the fundamental aspects of phenomena and has the
potential for broad application, and has an effect on agriculture,
food, nutrition, or the environment.
Graduate degree means a Master's or doctoral degree.
Grant means the award by the Authorized Departmental Officer of
funds to an eligible grantee to assist in meeting the costs of
conducting for the benefit of the public, an identified project which
is intended and designed to accomplish the purpose of the program as
identified in the program solicitation or RFA.
Grantee means the organization designated in the grant award
document as the responsible legal entity to which a grant is awarded.
Insular area means the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, American
Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Federated
States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the
Republic of Palau, and the Virgin Islands of the United States.
Integrated means to incorporate two or three components of the
agricultural knowledge system (research, education, and extension)
around a problem area or activity.
Land-grant Institutions means the 1862 Land-Grant Institutions,
1890 Land-Grant Institutions, and 1994 Land-Grant Institutions.
[[Page 44902]]
Matching or cost sharing means that portion of allowable project or
program costs not borne by the Federal Government, including the value
of in-kind contributions.
Merit review means an evaluation of a proposed project or elements
of a proposed program whereby the technical quality and relevance to
regional or national goals are assessed.
Merit reviewers means peers and other individuals with expertise
appropriate to conduct merit review of a proposed project.
Methodology means the project approach to be followed.
Mission-linked research means research on specifically identified
agricultural problems which, through a continuum of efforts, provides
information and technology that may be transferred to users and may
relate to a product, practice, or process.
National laboratories include Federal laboratories that are
government-owned contractor-operated or government-owned government-
operated.
Peer reviewers means experts or consultants qualified by training
and experience to give expert advice on the scientific and technical
merit of grant applications or the relevance of those applications to
one or more of the application evaluation criteria. Peer reviewers may
be adhoc or convened as a panel.
Prior approval means written approval by an Authorized Departmental
Officer evidencing prior consent.
Private research organization means any non-governmental
corporation, partnership, proprietorship, trust, or other organization.
Private sector means all non-public entities, including for-profit
and nonprofit commercial and non-commercial entities, and including
private or independent educational associations.
Program Officer means a CSREES individual who is responsible for
the technical oversight of the award on behalf of USDA.
Project means the particular activity within the scope of the
program supported by a grant award.
Project Director or PD means the single individual designated by
the grantee in the grant application and approved by the Authorized
Departmental Officer who is responsible for the direction and
management of the project, also known as a Principal Investigator (PI)
for research activities.
Project period means the total length of time, as stated in the
award document and modifications thereto, if any, during which Federal
sponsorship begins and ends.
Research means any systematic study directed toward new or fuller
knowledge and understanding of the subject studied.
Scientific peer review is an evaluation of the technical quality of
a proposed project and its relevance to regional or national goals,
performed by experts with the scientific knowledge and technical skills
to conduct the proposed research work.
Secretary means the Secretary of Agriculture and any other officer
or employee of the Department to whom the authority involved is
delegated.
State means any one of the fifty States, the District of Columbia,
and the insular areas.
Third party in-kind contributions means the value of non-cash
contributions of property or services provided by non-Federal third
parties, including real property, equipment, supplies and other
expendable property, directly benefiting and specifically identifiable
to a funded project or program.
United States means the several States, the District of Columbia,
and the insular areas.
Units of State government means all State institutions, including
the formal divisions of State government (i.e., the official state
agencies such as departments of transportation and education), local
government agencies (e.g., a county human services office), and
including state educational institutions (e.g., public colleges and
universities).
Sec. 3430.3 Deviations.
Any request by the applicant or grantee for a waiver or deviation
from any provision of this part shall be submitted to the ADO
identified in the agency specific requirements. CSREES shall review the
request and notify the applicant/grantee whether the request to deviate
has been approved within 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of
the deviation request. If the deviation request is still under
consideration at the end of 30 calendar days, CSREES shall inform the
applicant/grantee in writing of the date when the applicant/grantee may
expect the decision.
Sec. 3430.4 Other applicable statutes and regulations.
Several Federal statutes and regulations apply to grant
applications considered for review and to project grants awarded under
CSREES grant programs. These include, but are not limited to:
7 CFR Part 1, subpart A--USDA implementation of the Freedom of
Information Act.
7 CFR Part 3--USDA implementation of OMB Circular No. A-129,
regarding debt management.
7 CFR Part 15, subpart A--USDA implementation of Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
7 CFR Part 331 and 9 CFR Part 121--USDA implementation of the
Agricultural Bioterrorism Protection Act of 2002.
7 CFR Part 3015--USDA Uniform Federal Assistance Regulations,
implementing OMB directives (i.e., OMB Circular Nos. A-21 and A-122,
now codified at 2 CFR Parts 220) and incorporating provisions of 31
U.S.C. 6301-6308 (formerly the Federal Grant and Cooperative
Agreement Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95-224), as well as general policy
requirements applicable to grantees of Departmental financial
assistance.
7 CFR Part 3017--USDA implementation of Governmentwide Debarment
and Suspension (Nonprocurement) and Governmentwide Requirements for
Drug Free Workplace (Grants).
7 CFR Part 3018--USDA implementation of Restrictions on
Lobbying. Imposes prohibitions and requirements for disclosure and
certification related to lobbying on grantees of Federal contracts,
grants, cooperative agreements, and loans.
7 CFR Part 3019--USDA implementation of OMB Circular No. A-110,
Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Other Agreements
with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other
Nonprofit Organizations.
7 CFR Part 3052--USDA implementation of OMB Circular No. A-133,
Audits of States, Local Governments, and Nonprofit Organizations.
7 CFR Part 3407--CSREES procedures to implement the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended. 29 U.S.C. 794 (section
504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973) and
7 CFR Part 15b (USDA implementation of statute)--prohibiting
discrimination based upon physical or mental handicap in Federally
assisted programs.
35 U.S.C. 200 et seq.--Bayh-Dole Act, controlling allocation of
rights to inventions made by employees of small business firms and
domestic nonprofit organizations, including universities, in
Federally assisted programs (implementing regulations are contained
in 37 CFR Part 401).
Subpart B--Pre-Award: Solicitation and Application
Sec. 3430.11 Competition.
(a) Standards for competition. Except as provided in paragraph (b)
of this section, CSREES will enter into grants and cooperative
agreements, unless restricted by statute, only after competition.
(b) The CSREES ADO and the Agency approving official may make a
determination in writing that competition is not deemed appropriate for
a particular transaction. Such
[[Page 44903]]
determination shall be limited to transactions where it can be
adequately justified that a noncompetitive award is in the best
interest of the Federal government and necessary to the goals of the
program.
Sec. 3430.12 Requests for applications.
(a) For each competitive and noncompetitive non-formula program,
CSREES will prepare a program solicitation (also called a request for
applications (RFA); hereafter referred to as RFA in accordance with the
OMB policy directive, 68 FR 37370-37379 (June 23, 2003), establishing a
standard format for Federal agency announcements (i.e., program
solicitations or RFAs) of funding opportunities under programs that
award discretionary grants or cooperative agreements. This policy
directive requires the content of the RFA to be organized in a
sequential manner beginning with overview information followed by the
full text of the announcement and will apply unless superseded by
statute or another OMB policy directive. The RFA may include all or a
portion of the following items:
(1) Contact information;
(2) Directions for interested beneficiaries to submit written
comments in a published program solicitation or RFA;
(3) CFDA number;
(4) Legislative authority and background information;
(5) Purpose, priorities, and fund availability;
(6) Program-specific eligibility requirements;
(7) Program-specific restrictions on the use of funds, if
applicable;
(8) Matching requirements, if applicable;
(9) Acceptable types of applications;
(10) Types of projects to be given priority consideration,
including maximum anticipated awards and maximum project lengths, if
applicable;
(11) Program areas, if applicable;
(12) Funding restrictions, if applicable;
(13) Directions for obtaining additional requests for applications
and application forms;
(14) Information about how to obtain application forms and the
instructions for completing such forms;
(15) Instructions and requirements for submitting applications,
including submission deadline(s);
(16) Explanation of the application revaluation process; and
(17) Specific evaluation criteria used in the review process.
(b) Where program-specific requirements differ from the
requirements established in this part, program solicitations will also
address any such variation(s). Variations may occur in the following:
(1) Award management guidelines;
(2) Restrictions on the delegation of fiscal responsibility;
(3) Required approval for changes to project plans;
(4) Expected program outputs and reporting requirements, if
applicable;
(5) Applicable Federal statutes and regulations;
(6) Confidential aspects of applications and awards, if applicable;
(7) Regulatory information; and
(8) Definitions.
Sec. 3430.13 Letter of intent to submit an application.
CSREES may request or require that prospective applicants notify
program staff of their intent to submit an application identified as
``letter of intent''. If applicable, the request or requirement will be
included in the RFA, along with directions for the preparation and
submission of the letter of intent and any relevant deadlines. Entities
interested in submitting an application for a CSREES grant should
complete and submit a ``Letter of Intent to Submit an Application''
form by the due date specified in the RFA. This form does not obligate
the applicant in any way, but will provide useful information to CSREES
in preparing for application review. Applicants that do not submit a
letter of intent by the specified due date are still allowed to submit
a grant application by the application due date specified in the RFA,
unless otherwise specified in the RFA.
Sec. 3430.14 Types of applications; types of grant instruments.
(a) Types of applications. The type of application acceptable may
vary by funding opportunity. The RFA will stipulate the type of
application that may be submitted to CSREES in response to the funding
opportunity. Applicants may submit the following types of applications
as specified in the RFA.
(1) New. An application that is being submitted to CSREES for the
first time.
(2) Resubmission. This is a project application that had been
submitted for consideration under the same program previously but has
not been approved for an award under the program. For competitive
programs, this type of application is evaluated, in competition with
other pending applications in the area to which it is assigned.
Resubmissions are reviewed according to the same evaluation criteria as
new applications. In addition, applicants must respond to previous
panel review summary, unless waived by CSREES.
(3) Renewal. An application requesting additional funding for a
period subsequent to that provided by a current award. A renewal
application competes with all other applications and must be developed
as fully as though the applicant is applying for the first time.
Renewal applicants also must have filed a progress report via CRIS,
unless waived by CSREES.
(4) Continuation. A noncompeting application for an additional
funding/budget period within a previously approved project period.
(5) Revision. An application that proposes a change in the Federal
Government's financial obligations or contingent liability from an
existing obligation; or, any other change in the terms and conditions
of the existing award.
(6) Resubmitted renewal. This is a project application that has
been submitted for consideration under the same program previously.
This type of application has also been submitted for renewal under the
same program but was not approved. For competitive programs, this type
of application is evaluated, in competition with other pending
applications in the area to which it is assigned. Resubmitted renewal
applications are reviewed according to the same evaluation criteria as
new applications. Applicants must respond to previous panel review
summary and file a progress report via CRIS, unless waived by CSREES.
(b) Types of grant instruments. The following is a list of
corresponding categories of grant instruments issued by CSREES.
(1) Standard. This is a grant instrument by which the CSREES agrees
to support a specified level of effort for a predetermined project
period without the announced intention of providing additional support
at a future date.
(2) Renewal. This is an instrument by which the CSREES agrees to
provide additional funding under a standard grant as specified in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section for a project period beyond that
approved in an original or amended award, provided that the cumulative
period does not exceed any statutory time limitation of the award.
(3) Continuation. This is a grant instrument by which the CSREES
agrees to support a specified level of effort for a predetermined
period of time with a statement of intention to provide additional
support at a future date, provided that performance has been
satisfactory, appropriations are available for this purpose, and
continued support
[[Page 44904]]
would be in the best interest of the Federal government and the public.
(4) Supplemental. This is an instrument by which the CSREES agrees
to provide small amounts of additional funding under a standard,
renewal, or continuation grant as specified in paragraphs (b)(1),
(b)(2), and (b)(3) of this section and may involve a short-term
(usually six months or less) extension of the project period beyond
that approved in an original or amended award, but in no case may the
cumulative period of the project, including short term extensions,
exceed any statutory time limitation of the award.
(c) Obligation of the Federal government. Neither the acceptance of
any application nor the award of any project grant shall commit or
obligate the United States in any way to make any renewal,
supplemental, continuation or other award with respect to any approved
application or portion of an approved application.
Sec. 3430.15 Stakeholder input.
Section 103 (c)(2) of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and
Education Reform Act of 1998 (AREERA) (7 U.S.C. 7613(c)(2)) requires
the Secretary to solicit and consider input on each program RFA from
persons who conduct agricultural research, education, and extension for
use in formulating future RFAs for competitive programs. CSREES will
provide instructions for submission of stakeholder input in the RFA.
CSREES will consider any comments received within the specified
timeframe in the development of the future RFAs for the program.
Sec. 3430.16 Eligibility requirements.
Program-specific eligibility requirements appear in the subpart
applicable to each program and in the RFAs. In addition to program-
specific eligibility requirements, grants will be awarded only to
responsible applicants. Specific management information relating to an
applicant shall be submitted on a one-time basis, with updates on an
as-needed basis, as part of the responsibility determination prior to
award of a grant identified under a specific CSREES program, if such
information has not been provided previously under this or another
CSREES program. CSREES will provide copies of forms recommended for use
in fulfilling these requirements as part of the preaward process.
Although an applicant may be eligible based on its status as one of
these entities, there are factors which may exclude an applicant from
receiving Federal financial and nonfinancial assistance and benefits
under a CSREES program (e.g., debarment or suspension of an individual
involved or a determination that an applicant is not responsible based
on submitted organizational management information).
Sec. 3430.17 Content of an application.
The RFA provides instructions about how to access a funding
opportunity. The funding opportunity contains the application package,
which includes the forms necessary for completion of an application in
response to the RFA, as well as the application instructions. The
application instructions document, ``A Guide for the Preparation and
Submission of CSREES Applications via Grants.gov,'' is intended to
assist applicants in the preparation and submission of applications to
CSREES. It is also the primary document for use in the preparation of
CSREES applications via Grants.gov.
Sec. 3430.18 Submission of an application.
(a) When to submit. The RFA will provide deadlines for the
submission of letters of intent, if requested and required, and
applications. CSREES may issue separate RFAs and/or establish separate
deadlines for different types of applications, different grant
instruments, different topics or phases of the grant programs. If
applications are not received by applicable deadlines, they will not be
considered for funding. Exceptions will only be considered when
extenuating circumstances exist and justification and supporting
documentation are provided to CSREES.
(b) What to submit. The contents of the applicable application
package, as well as any other information, is to be submitted by the
due date.
(c) Where to submit. The RFA will provide addresses for submission
of letters of intent, if requested or required. It will also indicate
permissible methods of submission (i.e., electronic, e-mail, hand-
delivery, U.S. Postal Service, courier). Conformance with preparation
and submission instructions is required and will be strictly enforced
unless a deviation had been approved in advance of application
submission. CSREES may establish additional requirements. CSREES may
return without review applications that are not consistent with the RFA
instructions.
Sec. 3430.19 Resubmission of an application.
(a) Previously unfunded applications. (1) Applications that are
resubmitted to a program, after being previously submitted but not
funded by that program, must include the following information:
(i) The CSREES-assigned proposal number of the previously submitted
application;
(ii) Summary of the previous reviewers' comments; and
(iii) Explanation of how the previous reviewers' comments or
previous panel summary have been addressed in the current application.
(2) Resubmitting an application that has been revised based on
previous reviewers' critiques does not guarantee the application will
be recommended for funding.
(b) Previously funded applications. (1) CSREES competitive programs
are generally not designed to support multiple grant awards activities
that are essentially repetitive in nature. PDs who have had their
projects funded previously are discouraged from resubmitting relatively
identical applications for further funding. Applications that are
sequential continuations or new stages of previously funded projects
must compete with first-time applications, and should thoroughly
demonstrate how the proposed project expands substantially on
previously funded efforts and promotes innovation and creativity beyond
the scope of the previously funded project.
(2) An application may be submitted only once to CSREES. The
submission of duplicative or substantially similar applications
concurrently for review by more than one program will result in the
exclusion of the redundant applications from CSREES consideration.
Sec. 3430.20 Acknowledgment of an application.
The receipt of all letters of intent and applications will be
acknowledged by CSREES. Applicants who do not receive an
acknowledgement within a certain number of days (as established in the
RFA, e.g., 30 and 60 days) of the submission deadline should contact
the program contact. Once the application has been assigned a proposal
number by CSREES, that number should be cited on all future
correspondence.
Sec. 3430.21 Confidentiality of applications and awards.
(a) Names of submitting institutions and individuals, as well as
application content and evaluations, will be kept confidential, except
to those involved in the review process, to the extent permissible by
law.
(b) If an application contains proprietary information that
constitutes a trade secret, proprietary commercial or financial
information, confidential personal information, or data affecting the
national security, it will be treated
[[Page 44905]]
in confidence to the extent permitted by law, provided the information
is clearly marked by the proposer with the term ``confidential and
proprietary information'' and provided at the bottom of the project
narrative or any other attachment included in the application that
contains such information: ``The following pages (specify) contain
proprietary information which (name of proposing organization) requests
not to be released to persons outside the Government, except for
purposes of evaluation.''
(c) By law, USDA is required to make the final decisions as to
whether the information is required to be kept in confidence.
Information contained in unsuccessful applications will remain the
property of the proposer. However, USDA will retain for three years one
file copy of each application received; extra copies will be destroyed.
Public release of information from any application submitted will be
subject to existing legal requirements. Any application that is funded
will be considered an integral part of the award and normally will be
made available to the public upon request, except for designated
proprietary information that is determined by USDA to be proprietary
information.
(d) The inclusion of proprietary information is discouraged unless
it is necessary for the proper evaluation of the application. If
proprietary information is to be included, it should be limited, set
apart from other text on a separate page, and keyed to the text by
numbers. It should be confined to a few critical technical items that,
if disclosed, could jeopardize the obtaining of foreign or domestic
patents. Trade secrets, salaries, or other information that could
jeopardize commercial competitiveness should be similarly keyed and
presented on a separate page. Applications or reports which attempt to
restrict dissemination of large amounts of information may be found
unacceptable by USDA and constitute grounds for return of the
application without further consideration. Without assuming any
liability for inadvertent disclosure, USDA will limit dissemination of
such information to its employees and, where necessary for the
evaluation of the application, to outside reviewers on a confidential
basis. An application may be withdrawn at any time prior to the final
action thereon.
Subpart C--Pre-Award: Application Review and Evaluation
Sec. 3430.31 Guiding principles.
The guiding principle for grant application review and evaluation
is to ensure that each proposal is treated in a consistent and fair
manner regardless of regional and institutional affiliation. After the
evaluation process by the review panel, the CSREES through the program
officer ensures that applicants receive appropriate feedback and
comments on their proposals, and processes the awards in as timely a
manner as possible.
Sec. 3430.32 Preliminary application review.
Prior to technical examination, a preliminary review will be made
of all applications for responsiveness to the administrative
requirements set forth in the RFA. Applications that do not meet the
administrative requirements may be eliminated from program competition.
However, USDA retains the right to conduct discussions with applicants
to resolve technical and/or budget issues, as deemed necessary by USDA.
Sec. 3430.33 Selection of reviewers.
(a) Requirement. CSREES is responsible for performing a review of
applications submitted to CSREES competitive award programs in
accordance with section 103(a) of the Agricultural Research, Extension,
and Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C. 7613(a)). Reviews are
undertaken to ensure that projects supported by CSREES are of high
quality and are consistent with the goals and requirements of the
funding program. Applications submitted to CSREES undergo a
programmatic evaluation to determine the worthiness of Federal support.
The evaluations consist of a peer panel review and also may entail an
assessment by Federal employees and ad hoc reviewers.
(b) CSREES Peer Review System. The CSREES Application Review
Process is accomplished through the use of the CSREES Peer Review
System (PRS), a web-based system which allows reviewers and potential
reviewers to update personal information and to complete and submit
reviews electronically to CSREES.
(c) Relevant training and experience. Reviewers will be selected
based upon training and experience in relevant scientific, extension,
or education fields taking into account the following factors:
(1) Level of relevant formal scientific, technical education, and
extension experience of the individual, as well as the extent to which
an individual is engaged in relevant research, education, or extension
activities;
(2) Need to include as reviewers experts from various areas of
specialization within relevant scientific, education, and extension
fields;
(3) Need to include as reviewers other experts (e.g., producers,
range or forest managers/operators, and consumers) who can assess
relevance of the applications to targeted audiences and to program
needs;
(4) Need to include as reviewers experts from a variety of
organizational types (e.g., colleges, universities, industry, state and
Federal agencies, private profit and nonprofit organizations) and
geographic locations;
(5) Need to maintain a balanced composition of reviewers with
regard to minority and female representation and an equitable age
distribution; and
(6) Need to include reviewers who can judge the effective
usefulness to producers and the general public of each application.
(d) Confidentiality. The identities of reviewers will remain
confidential to the maximum extent possible. Therefore, the names of
reviewers will not be released to applicants. If it is possible to
reveal the names of reviewers in such a way that they cannot be
identified with the review of any particular application, this will be
done at the end of the fiscal year or as requested. Names of submitting
institutions and individuals, as well as application content and peer
evaluations, will be kept confidential, except to those involved in the
review process, to the extent permitted by law. Reviewers are expected
to be in compliance with CSREES Confidentiality Guidelines. Reviewers
provide this assurance through PRS.
(e) Conflicts of interest. During the evaluation process, extreme
care will be taken to prevent any actual or perceived conflicts of
interest that may impact review or evaluation. For the purpose of
determining conflicts of interest, the academic and administrative
autonomy of an institution shall be determined. Reviewers are expected
to be in compliance with CSREES Conflict-of-interest Guidelines.
Reviewers provide this assurance through PRS.
Sec. 3430.34 Evaluation criteria.
(a) To ensure any project receiving funds from CSREES is consistent
with the broad goals of the funding program, the content of each
proposal/application submitted to CSREES will be evaluated based on a
pre-determined set of review criteria. It is the responsibility of the
Program Officer to develop, adopt, adapt, or otherwise establish the
criteria by which proposals are to be evaluated. It may be appropriate
for the Program Officer to involve other scientists or stakeholders in
the development of criteria, or to extract criteria from legislative
authority or appropriations
[[Page 44906]]
language. The review criteria is described in the RFA and shall not
include criteria concerning any cost sharing or matching requirements
per section 7301 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008.
(b) In order that all potential applicants for a program have
similar opportunities to compete for funds, all reviewers will receive
from the Program Officer a description of the review criteria.
Reviewers are instructed to use those same evaluation criteria, and
only those criteria, to judge the merit of the proposals they review.
Sec. 3430.35 Review of noncompetitive applications.
(a) Some projects are directed by either authorizing legislation
and/or appropriations to specifically support a designated institution
or set of institutions for particular research, education or extension
topics of importance to the nation, a State or a region. Although these
projects may be awarded noncompetitively, these projects or activities
are subject to the same application process, award terms and
conditions, Federal assistance laws and regulations, reporting and
monitoring requirements, and post-award administration and closeout
policies and procedures as competitive grant programs. The only
difference is these applications are not subject to a com